HomeMy WebLinkAbout20011912.tiff Jun 12 01 12: 28p MTN VIE FIRE 303651 - '02
p. l
• RECEIVED
rtts\--6;,Tss..\\:, Weld County Referral
May 30, 2001
11111 C
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: FF
Applicant St. Vrain Sanitation Case Number Amended St.Vrain Sanitation
District/c/o Mark Peterson District Service Plan and
Boundary Change
Please Reply By June 11, 2001 Planner Monica Daniels-Mika
Project Modification of Service and Boundary Change.
Legal See Attached.
Location See Attached.
•
Parcel Number Various parcels •
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation
you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that
we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date
may be deemed to he a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further
questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) June 19, 2001
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
X We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature Date (o- k
Agency `VZ \ 7 art c.j • • N;Sri C_k
oWelU County Planning Pent. 4,1555 N.17th Ave,Greeley,CO.80631 ..(970)353-6100 eXt.3540 •*(970)304-6498 fax
kg
EXHIBIT
2001-1912 17
t �o� LQly��r
4/4 �.
December 31, 1999 t¢` -W4'
j U ' r t-3
Mr. Mark Peterson,Manager 47 `42�
St. Vrain Sanitation District A�y�f� "ry:�
P.O. Box 908 •
' ' O
436 Coffman Street Suite 200 �OZ O R
Longmont,Colorado 80502-0908
Re: St. Vrain Sanitation District Treatment Plant Expansion
Dear Mark:
Thank you for your letter dated November 2, 1999 concerning the planned expansions of the District's
treatment facilities. I understand that the District has determined the need to increase the treatment plant
capacity from its current capacity of 0.50 million gallons per day(MGD)to a capacity of 4.5 million
gallons per day by the end of 2004.
City staff presented this issue to the Longmont City Council at their November 23, 1999 meeting. At that
time staff outlined the scope of the proposed expansion plans along with an evaluation of the basis for the
planed expansions and potential impacts to Longmont. We also discussed areas for potential cooperation
and mutual benefit with the District. Following our review of the planning data, together with our
conversations with staff members from Weld County and the Tri-Cities, City staff could not recommend
approval of the expansion of the District's facilities to the 4.5 MGD level. We did concur with the
immediate need to pursue and complete an expansion to 0.99 MGD in 2000.
At the December 2, 1999 meeting of the Northern Front Range Water Quality Planning Association
(NFRWQPA) two items were considered concerning the St. Vrain Sanitation District's plans for
expansion of their wastewater treatment plant. These items were an amendment to the regional water
quality plan and a site application for expansion of the District's wastewater plant to 4.5 MGD. The
NFRWQPA approved the modification of the water quality plan and ruled that the site application was in
conformance with the plan. As we stated at the meeting, the City of Longmont has several concerns
about the amendment and site application, and subsequently voted to not approve the plan amendment or
site application as presented.
We have reviewed the site application, relevant portions of the District's engineering report provided by
your consultant, and data from Weld County and other municipalities. This information does not appear
to support the proposed rapid expansion of the District's plant. The population and flow projections in
the engineering report are not consistent and are not in agreement with Weld County's growth
projections. The availability of water service for the projected population is also questionable as noted in
the report. We do not agree that the District's engineering report provides adequate documentation of the
need for a 4.5-MGD facility by 2004. As we noted at the December 2 meeting, we feel that the District
should stage its requests for water quality plan amendments and site applications to allow a better
evaluation of actual growth rates.
We have additional concerns about the potential impacts of the District's plans on other dischargers in the
Boulder Creek/St. Vrain Creek basin. At 4.5 MGD, the District's plant would be the third largest in the
basin. As you are aware, a Total Maximum Daily Load(TMDL) study is currently being performed in
this basin by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment(CDPHE), To date, the size of
the District's facilities has essentially kept it out of the TMDL assessment. Until this study is completed,
it is not known how, or even it, the District's permit would affect the permit limits for dischar .,.
Water/Wastewater Department II EXHIBIT
1 100 South Sherman Street• Longmont, Colorado 80501 ?/_
(303) 651-8376 • Fax (303) 651-8812 • www.ci.longmont.co.us ! �"
possible that the design of the District's plant and the expansion
plant expansions. It is p s of the'IMDL. issue discussed
basin's ans f proposed e Thisis in issue is ent not other
report, which assumes that the District's discharge— plans for other facihtneering the basin will depend on the findings
other
in the District's engineering expanding
facilities. require
or obstruct te Apreviously noted, the City understands that the District has immediate needs that
the
we p lagoons to 0.99 MGD. Please understand that it is not our intent to impede
Di wastewater if any,the
District's obligations to provide service within their service area. However,the State and all potentially
D the State to take shed what impacts,
sw not feel, that affDistrictted's
s pans may in the Boulder/St.e will beraskig basin need S to understand s State may
District's plans may
have on them. application. the State
have listed in
h to warrant these concerns. If that is the case,
this letter into consideration when they review the District's site a
the proposed s expansions are eignificant enough
provide all dischargers in the basin with written assurances that their permit limits will not be
needs to
affected by the District's plans. needs,and would hope to continue
to appreciate
rsue fu to your c s willingness e eopenlyaother hers the District's mutual
planning give a call
o you would like to discuss these issues further.
to pursue further discussion of these and issues of mutual concern. Please feel free to
at 303.651.8355 if
Sincerely,
City of Longmont
. icy
Dale F. Rademacher
Director,Water/Wastewater Utilities
Gordon Pedrow, City Manager Development
CC: Director of Community
Phil Youngberg,
Quality Director
Cal Youngberg,Water Q tT
Dave DuBois, NFRWQPA
Tom Bennett, CDPHE
Susan Nachtrieb, CDPHE
Russ Clayshulte,DRCOG
Weld County Health Department
City of Boulder
City of Lafayette
City of Louisville
Town of Erie
Niwot SD
Rock Creek Metro SD Weld CountyTri-Area SD
•
1
► ..
St. Vrain
SANITATION
DISTRICT
June 15,2001
Mr. Glenn Vaad Mr. Mike Geile
Mr. Rob Madsen Mr. David Long
Mr. Bill Jerke
915 10th Street
P.O. Box 758
Greeley, CO 80632
Re: Stormwater Management
Dear Commissioners:
The Saint Vrain Sanitation District, pursuant to its charter and Colorado law, hereby
assumes the functions of a Stormwater Management (Drainage) District through its
participation in a group of public entities which have assumed the responsibility of
addressing and mitigating the hazards to life, property, and water quality presented by
stormwater in an area roughly approximated by the delineation on the attached map.
Sincerely,
Saint Vrain Sanitation District
�1orr
rk Peterson
eneral Manager
436 Coffman Street Suites 203&204 P.O. Box 908 Longmont,CO 80502-0908
TOTAL DRAINAGE 2
„ ‘, .
,, , ,,, J,'•_ , _, . , , _- „,, ,, ,,,, . .___ : i . :L ±: .;,A,,H 1,;.. H-
�. �
kw f
'� 1. - )t
K ,.C 5' ,
H
‘jr‘'
7,r
'
KM
� 1
i I
4 0 4 8 Miles
T
0 SERVICE AREA
208 BOUNDRY N
STREAMS
w Creek W \A f E
,' Ditch r
misc s
Hello