The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20020906 01/23/2001 15:17 CITY O, DAC0N0 4 19703046498 N0.281 P01 i (7r-wmoirtic; . City of Dacono,. Colorado 49,V)Pvc * • FAX DATE: / /23 /O/ TO: RD &4O �LS� FAX NUMBER: 170 + 3 o'-1- (/" / Cl U FROM: V i ` (adt07/1 - (4A 1C SUBJECT: ? o(t' 60(d, ( Rjv K [Ve6s-f NUMBER OF PAQES TO FOLLOW: COMMENT'S: • CITY OF DACONO PHONE: 303-833-2317 P.O. BOX 186 FAX: 303-833-5528 DACONO,CO 80514 2002-0906 01/23/2001 15: 17 CITY OF DACONO a 19703046498 ..a... NO.281 D02 ir:".. 0: itw, ' - Weld County Referral JIIJIc__ _______________[RFiEweD December 28, 2000 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: I Applicant Rolinda Colorado Co Ltd & Case Number SPR-340 Firebaugh Precast, Inc. Please Reply 8y Januar/18, 2001 Planner Robert Anderson 1 Project Site Plan Review for the Fabrication of Precast Concrete Products in the (1-3) Industrial Zone District. f Legal Lots 6-12/01k 1 and Lot 7/i91k 2 Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision, being part of the N2 of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location South of and adjacent to WCR 12 and 1/4 mile east of WCR 11. For a more 1 precise location, see legal. . Parcel Number 1467 12 201003 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. O We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan Q We have reviewed'the request and find no conflicts with our interests. )4See attached letter. Comments: Signature /(23/O/ Agency `.1-141 Date .&Weld County Planning Dept_ 31555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 ^x(970)353-8100 ext.3540 t(970)304-6498 fax ,-. p..' STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER yield County plannfn of coy Division of Water Resources g Dept, Department of Natural Resources I�� 08 yew 1313 Sherman Street,Room 818 �.1AN 2001 • • ` Denver,Colorado 80203 trine Phone:(303)866-3581 FAX:(303)866-3589 C E I V E Rr Bill Owens Governor http://water.state.co.us/default.htm Greg E.Watcher January 5, 2001 Executive Director Mr. Robert Anderson Hal D.Simpson,P.E. State Engineer Weld County Planning Dept. 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case Number SPR-340 Firebaugh Precast, Inc. Section 12, T1N, R68W, 6th PM Water Division 1, Water District 5 Dear Mr. Anderson: Pursuant to the State Engineer's August 7, 1995 memorandum to county planning directors this office is no longer providing comments on land use actions that do not involve a subdivision as defined in Section 30-28-101(10)(a), C.R.S. This referral does not appear to qualify as a "subdivision." Returned herewith are the materials submitted to this office in the above referenced matter. If you have any questions in this matter, please contact this office at 303/866-3581 . Sincerely, fjk, (40\-la. William C. McIntyre Water Resource Engineer Enclosures cc: Richard Stenzel, Division Engineer ("atii;), le Weld County Referral IID December 28, 2000 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Rolinda Colorado Co Ltd & Case-Number SPR-340 l 1 Firebaugh Precast, Inc. I Please Reply By January 18, 2001 Planner Robed Anderson . Project Site Plan Review for the Fabrication of Precast Concrete Products in the (1-3) Industrial Zone District. Legal Lots 6-12 /Blk 1 and Lot 7/ Blk 2 Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision, being part of the N2 of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. • Location South of and adjacent to WCR 12 and 1/4 mile east of WCR 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1467 12 201003 • _ - i The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. ❑ WW have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: A. i -) /,-JUI Atif rl cInnd- 43.11AAA <t>- Alp A wlV ,e /1-0A IL-CS/IF `-•" • 't !± cna x)..12 nn YA S XIn n �,� �f.�n� OnnaY> A v 90n 0>� d�•� �n l- 2. A x &A _ 1 / ,/7 A-Lion;l�.l rla, CL--- /1 QA 1-�..Q IWJ l / n J� n �J -f' 1 lS�u 1k0 p fMt .. /� n. U/l.p c Uf'.m f.pr` - Signature !! r Q� 0pp��y,/J / - 57- 0 / Agency ADA,Ati, Date +weld County Planning Dept. :•1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 :•(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax Weld Coun Plunning Dept. zoo; WeWcT& M eferral Inge December 28, 2000 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Rolinda Colorado Co-Ltd & Case Number SPR-340 Firebaugh Precast, Inc. Please Reply By January 18, 2001 Planner Robert Anderson Project Site Plan Review for the Fabrication of Precast Concrete Products in the (1-3) Industrial Zone District. Legal Lots 6-12/ Blk 1 and Lot 7/ Blk 2 Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision, being part of the N2 of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld - County, Colorado. Location South of and adjacent to WCR 12 and 1/4 mile east of WCR 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1467 12 201003 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: Signature 9/ / CAI Agency /f-) VAOre Date di" ❖Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 :•(970)353-6100 ext.3540 x(970)304-6498 f Jan 07 01 04: 21p Dip".sion of Wildlife 3q.a7 77G-6663 p. 2 res cfie 6H-******* Weld County Referral NigDecember 28, 2000 • COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: • Applicant Rolinda Colorado Co Ltd & Case Number SPR-340 • • Firebaugh Precast, Inc. f Please Reply By January 18, 2001 Planner Robert Anderson Project Site Plan Review for the Fabrication of Precast Concrete Products in the (I-3) Industrial Zone District. Legal Lots 6-12/ Blk 1 and Lot 7/Blk 2 Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision, being pad of the N2 of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld • County, Colorado. ' Location South of and adjacent to WCR 12 and 1/4 mile east of WCR 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1467 12 201003 • The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: Signature m4/ 17// C25 �"74,v diva/ Agency C ace"• /Jir/ wig deJrt' Date IfA ty +Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 •?(970)353-6100 ext.3540 •:•(970)304-6498 fax Anne Johnson - Site Plan Referral -Reply ^oly Page 1 From: BRUCE Barker To: LMORRISON Date: 1/25/01 2:27PM Subject: Site Plan Referral -Reply-Reply This was a question from Anne about a development where she said the name, but of course I was not smart enough to write it down. I think you're right about the annexation issue. Bruce. >>> LEE Morrison 01/25/01 02:20pm >>> I concur and ordinarily a site plan is the last zoning step I would like to know=why the issue ? I assume it is the annexation issue >>> BRUCE Barker 01/25/01 01:57pm >>> You asked in your voice-mail message whether a site plan is considered to be"development" in accordance with Section 2.1 of Ord. 195 (Tri-Town IGA). Section 2.1 of Ord. 195 (Code section 19-2-40)says that"development" is "any land use requiring regulatory approval by the elected governing body . . ." I understand that the site plan is not"approved by the elected governing body." So, technically, I think its not development as that term is defined in the agreement. It seems to me, however, that if the site plan is the first step of a process that will evenually include consideration by the "elected governing body,"that we should treat the site plan application like development and subject to the terms of the agreement. What do Monica and Lee think? Bruce. CC: NORTHDOMAIN.NORTHPOST.AJOHNSON, NORTHDOMAIN.NORTHPOST.MMIKA REFERRAL LIST NAME: Rolinda Colorado Co Ltd &Firebaugh Precast, Inc. CASE NUMBER: SPR-340 REFERRALS SENT: December 28,2000 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY:January 18, 2001 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES _Attorney Ault _X Health Department ✓ Brighton Extension Service Broomfield Emergency Management Office _X_Dacono ✓ _X Sheriff's Office ' Eaton _X Public Works ' Erie Housing Authority Evans Airport Authority Firestone _X Building Inspection ✓ Fort Lupton _X Code Enforcement r _X Frederick C7 STATE Garden City _X Division of Water Resources / Gilcrest Geological Survey Greeley Department of Health Grover Department of Transportation Hudson Historical Society _Johnstown Water Conservation Board Keenesburg Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Kersey Division of Wildlife: LaSalle _X Loveland V Lochbuie Greeley Longmont Division of Minerals/Geology Mead FIRE DISTRICTS Milliken Ault F-1 New Raymer Berthoud F-2 Northglenn Briggsdale F-24 Nunn Brighton F-3 Pierce Eaton F-4 Platteville Fort Lupton F-5 Severance Galeton F-6 Thornton Hudson F-7 Windsor Johnstown F-8 La Salle F-9 _X Mountain View F-10 ✓ COUNTIES Milliken F-11 Adams Nunn F-12 Boulder Pawnee F-22 Larimer Platteville F-13 Platte Valley F-14 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Poudre Valley F-15 US Army Corps of Engineers Raymer F-2 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Aviation Administration Windsor/Severance F-17 Federal Communication Commission Wiggins F-18 Union Colony F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Brighton OTHER Fort Collins School District Greeley Ditch Company _X Longmont West Adams titse rs Weld County Referral WIlDC December 28, 2000 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Rolinda Colorado Co Ltd & Case Number SPR-340 Firebaugh Precast, Inc. Please Reply By January 18, 2001 Planner Robert Anderson Project Site Plan Review for the Fabrication of Precast Concrete Products in the (1-3) Industrial Zone District. Legal Lots 6-12/Blk 1 and Lot 7/ Blk 2 Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision, being part of the N2 of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location South of and adjacent to WCR 12 and 1/4 mile east of WCR 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1467 12 201003 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: Signature Agency Date +Weld County Planning Dept. ❖1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES ' PHONE (970)353-6100, EXT 3540 70) 304-6498 C. 1555TH AVENUE GREELEY, OLORADO 8 631 COLORADO December 28, 2000 Linn Leeburg 707 Hawthorne Ave Boulder, CO 80304 Subject: SPR-340 -Site Plan Review for the Fabrication of Precast Concrete Products located in the 1-3 Zone District on a parcel of land described as Lots 6-12 / Blk 1 and Lot 7/ Blk 2 Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision, being part of the N2 of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Leeburg: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at this time. Our Department will be processing the Site Plan within 45 to 60 days upon receipt of the application. You will be notified by this office at the end of the review period regarding the site plan. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Dacono and Frederick Planning Commissions for their review and comments. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Dacono and Frederick Planning Commission meetings to answer any questions the Commission members may have with respect to your application. Please call the City of Dacono at 303-833-2317 and the Town of Frederick at 303-833-2388, for further details regarding the date, time, and place of these meetings. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call or visit our office. Sincerely, Robert Anderson Planner inn C FIELD CHECK ✓ COLORADO APPLICANT: CASE #: LEGAL: LOCATION: ZONING LAND USE N N E E S S W W COMMENTS: PLANNER: INSPECTION DATE: t • S sy R { }.^e�444t�{ '( a7 a� f �vz g i" � Name: MVC-006S.JPG Size: 32345 bytes Dimensions: 640 x 480 pixels I-'i; L.,-e el, ' rC g -t• d'tre "• '•v �� a �?' � l.. N� ₹ .ht i aq E r � t x r.. lleigliel,l4Le4 1 . t 'v9G}I , ( j fiatP• 11' Name: MVC-007S.JPG Size: 27797 bytes Dimensions: 640 x 480 pixels p7l 7-'44 t �G, n 3 ! t , p 0,„ t 6iwv "••WFa'4 utwa 11Wi � is , e Ad;a x'�„ ys ,3y s41.r'r4114‘.4w- �,d` .34#44k ",-�tk •.e. '� zs N f J -0 ` Y�{4P S .av, 4 Va , Re 3Nk!` • � tm y f � � ' ' ,r y,"��a jv §�[ t It's u • • et ,y 4 k Name: MVC-01OS.JPG Size: 31863 bytes Dimensions: 640 x 480 pixels n oak.cm �� .a" yt'Xtl 4Ftt x�t FSn�t E?" t aY41 it u r xp a "t a ✓�Atk NF}'�i' �' Yrs de hfh 1 d� k R N' e . ..'4,1a,y ( F fief" '41/42'''' yx tfr . Jr. 1 • • Name: MVC-012S.JPG Size: 33912 bytes Dimensions: 640 x 480 pixels n r1 I / CS w.z Icar 4 i a a`110;'C eau 3c.f.f dF z B p F iit t:'1v'txA • 'c. r.�,• .„yw-3 +a a t - i ry ry f` . �-5 k. i4t yy{�".'',A,,, .'�'4k. ,}y,y( .A.9, •• %->F +,.''.0.J' A;-. .�! .t +"# � �°"l. TM � � `�ti'�� „lV � O4rFY hA. 'dy {.t . :+a p 1I .' _ _..� _•_ b" T ^ , _ r • =. Name: MVC-013S.JPG Size: 29045 bytes Dimensions: 640 x 480 pixels • 7� A.45� to • Name: MVC-022S.JPG Size: 33050 bytes Dimensions: 640 x 480 pixels teal 4 at S vg e m"' Yo � .,-5 ,,r mot , � " '� m ---„ � ,-,� ) i All 1 Irli �A b raw ) t . _ Name: MVC-021S.JPG Size: 32584 bytes Dimensions: 640 x 480 pixels [41±Sl'a7C tit: 54r7T7',, area! i t 55 a' i s - a 1:1114-411-117T1/4W -=.-i �" � y y, �' ,.ak ice' tt.+ kitS YS 1aT`j�� a a° mt x"i 5 '<fit t= i A Pao ' • Name: MVC-027S.JPG Size: 28277 bytes Dimensions: 640 x 480 pixels a t `tL lb ' i oY ry '` 4 �u 3 ^ice r ''';C-St. e $TM1YA \�Y `'. wI C t. •fra4 4'- `R5,.3.5+`,to�1 "nf .� (�C. x,"� 15 �hrr 4' i d Uxa 38 "r . r;(4�, itt I Name: MVC-029S.JPG Size: 28311 bytes Dimensions: 640 x 480 pixels - c./ i , 1, r._ -1 6Alir 7e n k 1� lin kilt:ego ) a I i Name: MVC-030S.JPG Size: 27638 bytes Dimensions: 640 x 480 pixels c e,/ _:1[ • I a••Ir t r nv.npi.CUM•• •• tinIS Iiu MOO.'w )115711. t. PANORAM INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION PART OF N 1/2, SEC. 12, TOWNSHIP I NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST, COUNTY OF WELD. STATE OF COLORADO —NM CM Of SEC.12 • TIM.21111• ••x1,4:1 -- -- COUNTY ROAD 12 __ �-a art r I[G IS __ V-rVft'I° .....=UMW••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••I. ' S .if a • •ila•i. if 91115 ET a9•• 1.99.0.+ 9 Sam/I..rY.•r...Y--s..Yay4.4teem.rr•I4.r1.1••••••.4—r•Y.le*Id rA.w-.0.10w Yr IRU2 ROa---"' `le 4 mart w•.M •-• I 71.•1..w/0.wtal are.I1.tr••4•N.lbw•••1•w••••Iwll•I0.r ImIn 4.04 M•/bk..•••••••••••.•taw.y•Mir I.srr W••WI•.I•wtlM IWa Wlutlyll/.4wy aw,4•MI'War 1.00 Al limbo,Y•Y••••......ha•••••.m.Y./.. ^.- •wf— )maf� )••• ,:rr �"reT •••fr Mlo1 y+ .1..0171 W•/Af a u... an.IW•ry.••w«//w4 Mlwli•.rr.4 wan..Vow I Illar 111••1X..an S �••'«4r•. M..« O' ,J( 1W r.••.• .M« I..rw1•e...".....•y•a•.•..•...•••mme me•mama..4e•4'rm.a mow rarea•er wa.w..i ••1% I 415..U.••••...rX••I•ty Y 0.••••.•.....•a 0.w..wr•.r t MO.. Ur.•....I are ...••w•rY.1 — ; m I IS • 21 S.M.•,A ••�a4Y•arlia.w••1.../Is•ant•rnutwirl..lya>Yu••11.4.•.W•r 1►•I`r l W.a.yl lwwl�Merr Ones • 1 •..r.•YI lam.•r•y/W.M..I••wW r maw.*a•.r.M••.1.4•W•••.Y••l•s•111•r per.•./.w r N•M..••W.•/ }' ma 1«I.••0.1w•.M/Yu...we.r we.it••owe.r 0•Y•4 Y ant•.•/Y.ti+r•••r,. .t••Y/MW.*�•/r••r• 'a •1V ly M.r y yY 1W I►MI/..N.I•ay•nyl;.....4•Y.•a.Y 15151011 r 0.yO 1 r 1515101{a waft.. alm. PNp /Y•r r«w a•.r I4.r 1••I•••.•.i r w.My 17.••.rl�r•R7l••••M.W wlO wl/w Il.•M yly4 1..•0.M ly/Y yYr 1 • g>' = u DO Hem a.•• /w4•r4U•.y14 rr••.Iwl.a•r..•w.Y y•y1r11171'7ev•NM/Y•Y yiIW•I•yw r.�.l•••\Y•�1MI�1► 3 ; { OA . .W.l.P.#w Or r 04 w up.w l..«yY Yw••••I...ON.•►•W/w1 W r ••.•Y••••.•.•,.ww 1W M/.I••• .2i 0.�.•.4uff•rwl rlw•I.415.Ha.•�.•wY+0..•1115 Y.rrr6.r.•4r.�Y.{�•r«+•.Y r•...rwya IIYSY./M• --^^�•)C . ...gm.sr*r y1..u.r••nw••w.Y••M 11X■ 1•.•ea1.4 old.1.iy Y•w•r.W4w....rrea.Y.1.Y�w.. ,Wrn IS _ IE : •••.•.•7,M1w.....NI 0.aa•0.....4 r wY•.p • a pp ,.......2.2...._............. /� /- 3 1 A i Il S ` Y 1.7.7: •-•+tli4 a� �N/J•�'_^� I 11 YN { rem IMlOe ist •5Oy4/•Y 1 `t Mlrw YY�F••.•I.rT^23 p wg 8 �� II•.r•1.r1 *A ' - 1 !f • •qt 3 $ II •.Y.w•/rl.r..M.•..e..tl•�.A 3.0.�1Y•a r•fl.1 i .)1C. S W� ; �1I O ).)« fa 1ae•M 4.�lt=lL. Yw•rya•. Yg..LIa•p�f• S , Me / ' ', a., I.ae0 i )rave 2• j: Y•1t•a4 a / l L R•mr mums ;� f^ /1 .11110 =a a la -1721 s ..1111••1+..�N• •y.Iwl l�Mwr 4 W YY r 415•.w 1•w wXlh Y•0.•••r.Ys.•1 Y.rM,r .•�4•W•.y 8I L 9 II • a )Mm yr sp. 4.it�um y.�1� f 1,,.r.•rrw.an.•n j i 2 i a.o•f s 4w..r......WwY 4+r ti1w am...V.ll.r• ...... /...,..,a.aff• J •v�• t {1 r 1. _: ear l _.. rr_ _r_._ I I •� rnwRrw.RXY:rrr«•Ir _f 9L'L _- 1 w 1•� f/ N.11' MOW M Ita n 0 •M•r Y.••.••r rr.awrw•.r.r er art . //�} / _r. _ 'T • \ .•z...,. _ 9 . •tl4 Oaf 1.10.6.....144-1•2... .I1. / ", Q • • .,� ' E : • w�`\N.\\ • tl i 21 . Z atbur • 44742—l7 <iX1_. b.�Frar.••r. •`••V- 4v•« l'........-. \ tl•i •110•11 41./r.f•1Yr non istye•lw/w•.•.IY.•-You.0 Sr,Oar•_�lww_••.4 1.111_.••._/ .• I •'S Oa Hart lat •�` • 2 ter•C.••e eva 4 eu.r • d \ r.. 20 • • i I.bro.,wY r w r.. a.•✓• ale.• •I•a.••Y Y•• Ir- ♦ C rR •••....or.•.•e.••rlr awe......r•.•.r. 11 t ' L r..••• w . I. 4.•I..mom 0.11 a.•,r I. .�.•Y••M.aiwa�•r.•wl.i..r•.•• f 1 •0.wr4•w.••..arrleraYR••a.r..• a.b' •9 1 al 14.•�••••••••ya/.wr M11..•.•w .�..r.••r•�w•r•i Y.•ria•a 11.11. • •rl. \ r -a a R.•al••rea II..W w�/.we••IN•ra awl...wM •stye,.•.•a ll►yate asses fa• /11514. M+ IW Y•II.lulu Y•r. •• a wM.Iw�Yr•II.IM•al.••7•r0.•tiXf,y. .•kY 1••.wM4� tl0.Y14w r4 W.M a./ar•M.7r •M..t4••••r•a1 r.r 11.11••••••• c «• • b2/.11. \ 19 3{ a.YO.•rfrOO.P .•.r.•Iw...y•...., bra.r•r.r la aa�/Y In*.11.1111•rY , 1.111 aN `.• •••11,11 grew.am r/tW rY••.IarW.wr✓•..•4•.r•rer E•.•�Y/4Mr....•4r,Y./w•..•.••r• S �� .11•••••••••••••1•18 w•.•y•••r•�rw mad•.r 0..••lM4 r Ywl0.lai•.0.. •3•2 Ir°•. • I \ III r0.ti. I.•..r......•....w....11•.•..... SO WI .�,,. V I• a •••••••••••• `•./1.•11 Y 1.44 Y•Y•r•4••.•a .N.YI11•Y.r.rr4•••••r 1111.leer4w � 111411111 mill ^1/111.•r•rwrrw.r.•artir ` / l t� YYy ss/..+.w.•�.Y w4r.•r Y.aIW•0.MrIM .Y rlr 4•.•Ywy.l/salt•Y•a••.Yy►dm.. . 1 -- If • p..•n•.••r 0.1••1.1•aw.wel.•./.••a.r.•.•ll•.Wyl Mlw ' I f 111 l.•1' • \ \ 1W 0.r.•e moms.a•M••0.•r a)raw rr 4llRl.r...... .I.,art• ! %' N �tf la 3.1•so'40.5 .10.113• .R.•r t.ul...LW uW um moll. Mo..el....rrM r 0.l8 r near•Y•.�7.• Y Sr IT'1i 1 7 • a 4. _ `` 11.="4=11•••••••....... •wl 1•.M UM 1.4 Pre..a•HO.* ! aM.N' Iw«...me •s' * •«f« \ i `w.«...«• J14r•I a••r �YM•.M1n a.�a.y aa.i4 yr ,+••y r4aw..0.wr Lf--' ••. ..Par_•YW0...w YW1/ 1ao' .n•.i co. \ wt.lr va la r ceanT.ru w I I 0.0 t i i ,. '', 4,a • \• _ fi a•oro2u• "— '"- /t w�, a Tai•ieaJr w .{1I. v . SO*Sr. ^ {CY 11Ri.ROTNTlf2 Ma �.�/ 1_ a • \ •a' Y)ROMY 1150113.1 �\ WDOVr10a T 441::). i . II 12 13 M IS • 111 Pb 1, ..-- .'s �\ 7 j t' a 1 _ ...... t\ `.� QY12R114 EIMM2 Dam . / yam e • • ... I , ..........,..L___Itali• 1•vT••1111 bcRe If 'R )mw « 143 of .CLLa.'••00- I «.. «.•««.r.•«•.•..«nr•. t «•.•.•«a \' �_ .) lo..ef lea0e YlI a / �„ r1 a Ie• • . �� 1 I- t•.eD mead 7-.eem—rmm'.—y2'-�- - .a).. ^.�f N R 113..2"OW E. 1929.ai • . Ii w•^t e.f. Or .t•,•-Oa'tart 1st yMer7i�eX •I C1 6.r•••f., ae ROBINSON SURVEYING a ENGINEERING CO. 3001 SOUTH JAMAICA COURT, AURORA, COLO 80014 (303) 752-4823 I PANORAM INDUSTRIAL PARK PART OF N z, SEC. /2, TOWNSHIP l NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO $-a,zn4 {y /49504 i trrn AI_e t-r fi r- -"- ---c...-±,'-.--- ^^ 1 5':21: I SEC :vov I! 1- •o- °YS_ I EVC<<6i _EC.2, 1 V 6 I �& 2 {III ^� t• r .... . N.REEK j '�' .2._I , rs[v xos�z'(u.aea.avp � ' ni Ala , I, $I' I� �,e, r I � i y ZON�B<-lN 657R1A(. �q i3 t312,B.LO C K Z va'4 y SCALE /'•/OO' v ,,� Iltq I�' ell I' I . a�\ /it-. . .�i ... � I� 1 ✓ !\:4... , 'fl III'F I, I I I � t -C uu ��_ —Z '�-- •fig. r' III ,1y _ 11•Q .. _ \'; e-I-'Y- / $i ! i '0' 7 .... / ,'.� A_ / o �..' ,) I, iA \, AY \ 7' //7e a I Ii k ...., ....a ... ..urt. ..a ,.. .,�. a..,., a. •� ice_ ' �/ � �A�r. , i ,.....a o..� .-'l� � / I / ""'�. I � �i. re-aSB95O 4O'W 49883,� �� . .�.. �I P�/ I , Bd4 FsCK Imil �/ �A �� ,..4.7,;..,,,,::,,, u,. .v. 3 ,."� .� 1... T"" i -'� �It 1 � •it .,.<. . ....rr. 'Q 31 l 7; V /- P 4 �10� -1� Jp I� � I v � �,1 r -- �NB9SE 1494 B / t . - "`^'"x°"""`" Pi-.Naned by Roh/Henn Su.vevino S Fnoin..n/no Co - 7QFr7 5 Fnr St Ann/.wood (b/a..do 80/10 .. 1 } I PA NORA M /NDUSTR/A L PARK - PART OF N%, SEC /2, TOWNSHIP / NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO I �ewe...r r ,,.;:re.A.rAr /49 re.. �— j y 2•ziePc •,R.c. r �. , ..rlw:.. — _._ — -_ _, tea;.....,-.._ T _ ----. - CORM 892724 W F wr F>r so r_ — • ( .ca -L.-,--..,---...„...___ _I_ __ it TRUE P.0.8.�� .______21 ,12,__ �..�\+ ! �—2p'ro ea.oamNt�c oA. ...__—_, , I; .>_+ae�,.�_oa w:6e tamp...! t-`I —3Ro. T,o o..,., clr.t.nla.r.,,. 1 111— �.•ea s I ,craw' ,w mwr-iJ,l.1 o d..o.w f 7T s ...._—ass.i 1 ..L'''-..: 4•7,7—.. ,.!.49,. 1.w as Z7 (�. I I I: ✓ CORNER ` �'* I I SEC. /2, 1.0 Acre \ . I I . 8 11 /3:\ y° 1.0 Aar r.p4� T,B.N.•SPIKE IN FENCE HxST N,R66W /.o Icm aoAae I-� 1 I I / . d € _ I I 1• E!E✓.•5O?I./J CU.S.6.5.o4TUM) t, c x .I.1 gil� s �+ + II• w I ;oAue .! :i J u: I, I r / 1 dt.e• I III �ioAae 1oAae; ,0, -0 I lit / : / II` I I i s � I 11 I a \ �+�-'2 ZOn% ' INDUSTRIAL ;'i •/ ,04.:. . 1 r':� y� - mil / I I,d acre h. a f, „ e i I i� •1 s 1.d Acre .d tow �; _ i I . ... III �� i � BOCK 2 <, ;i LI SCALE /"•/00' 24 i ',., ill Pte\ I Pepe l.o a<.r 1 / ` e ?, .�..,, (,+., y� ) L,-/ � `� •I/ : / -_i ;I' n A _40-. -. " -;'• , lo 4 '41 ,..-- ; + /6.Aare ... • 1\i' 1. . /" �lr l � 7 / Ii co u•. rea.. 1 _ _ I /.O 4en j . �i it; }�, "` 6 S ACR€Sd 111 . • � • �"�_ I ; f % rI' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C.i.,,i -.-••••--• ...Z-; 't I" � `1 x I �3 r 9 D . • 9 / b i Ile k....4. ..1 3 «�-•-.,, '. l in.-.4.�•ie.....z~• l.Zs Eq' 1.0 wr.e / ,.oArret ZL ' jt a p North, P.ange Cf asst of O.:1,6th Principal Meridian, 1 1�— II �L� / �I II -% That part of the North �of Section 12. Townth. .. t ( L �•;•,,)' 'l 1 _~ • `II /ran`, / ..._ ,/ �.•►}.r{ fw • County of weld. Slate of Colorado, being rorr particular!,describM as foilars: i!RI a l ��: ^„ _ r+.•• �.�sie«.! _4.e, +' ^+'•J'+•'�`'"" a _� `l/ �� ,- / 'II O ''; - o the assured basis all bearing is the ad herein tine of tee Northwest 5 01 said Srcti en 12 as baerin9r• : a; }—yT_-. _ r I 1` `�;1� � +:'—._- S C II'!S' E and 2;t.h alt beerin9s rental nod c.te reiatili ta said Section it a fiatavr+raest cocrnar .I` -'S"'- • �\ '�""'- j" r.gwPn� �I El the North Tins of said]ectien 17. a distance of 1138.11 1„ 1 I \\ E + Lo ae.r' + o of said Section t2,' !bores N 89°27'^R" E, eon,:t • \ + 0 I / I 1 I ' �.`.{.J '.j feet: thence 5 0oll't5'E. parallel with the test line of the Northwest it of sate Section 12, a distance s N •-•;.;.;./' - r.l,ar�'sE I 1 •r4 r I ''li:r- -f•'� .�'1 ,' !I of:A.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF DOMING; thence continuing S Goll'IS' E. Parallel with the!rest rine : L Yr -- ' �I p ,x'51/e� ,,(, \Ft „r. I •{�; r of the Northwest t of said Section i2. a distance of 1818.13 feet to the nest Southerly line o/the parcel 1 r -. I 1 deser iba0n Book 821, Reception No. I7s9T60 of the geld Scanty rrco•u: thorn:* N a9°I 5'00" G along said rryy ..11dd / f of said Section I2: thence •�J J ,: wrd sw:a;rt,( I I \s 6 ` , } • Souther) line. a distance of 1991.J8 feet to the East line of the Northwest Old I �I--+ri�, \ 4 I • /.7•`"`e , i R / I I ₹ N Oo04'55'W. along the East tine of the Northwest of said Section 12, a distance of lNI5.7V feet to a ti /y -; -�f y ��— Ir _ , 1r'f •, r0 tae .' ��. !I Point, which point le 30.00 test Southerly free the Northeast corner of the Northwest t of said Section 12: I `� �`.f�-- \ / / !V thefts S 89027'29• N, parallel with said North line, a distance of 1495.00 feet to the TRUE POINT Of PEGIN- ff�t I 0, 1 62.29 acres Pore or less. 7' •.. _iy' (' I_• /.4 Ao''es� '� '1- \ '. �'• frT • �! 1 f 44 I ( ssea'.. i L+C4hJb'` i / I w I • a a V ', ...::.... I ; 1 / i NINN.V / '. . i, . I -r } :•'"" '�) I Alk1 : I1 I I l OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT '-.` a t.!Aarra 1 ,•.. - '}• _ fI !8- I NW CAR.O><9�pF Nt "�t. ...el - •- 1 I, ,vorarlr Uue or s�f NrI This ra to certify that Dale Harrington has been aetharized by A,P. Stonebreaker, Na dwrar of tha `` —~• II ► -� II r.eAw/ *9,t p� /) hereon described rear property, to subdivide said property Al an induttriai park under the mane and /! ' �` • n• ----- `iiiYYY - ' 1 /\t Ire j 589'50'40"W- 498;Wr / style of PAN N INDUSTRIAL PARS. • rawim• -,..... ' \ „. -----.., f -..,,,,. • / ..� )/ii. i / < -�I i' �' - I( ./ A.P. 9tenebrakar, (inner / 11 $ � �: .rt I- I :{,t- _ �. /. .; - 1 1 �p G (�a ,v/ 1J state of Colorado {S9 - ..�:_. I .I, l:r•,C.-,�,^ —,�if...='� • t�L' •J .H i_-£'1 4!r( 1 CW tf of Arerohoe 1 •,•'-'-'_ --�•— / r'+/l{ -'-r5 .H Pl, ;YF' .+� Pt;'•.Q;f n r • ,;NI r t)'It+ Thenforequfrrn Owner's Aff idevit ram acknowledged before Pe this_2gth day of Apr.! _. 19OO— A.6.. ..___.._. —_—, _—s ..—.__.._. —, I I • ?c:Q' ;..t.? II. a, 'I A.F'. SFn..rb.eka. as owner of the above descri bed pry III 1 t BC+SG/t • / ( ) ! 2 °� I; :lye Perri. (-- • I / "fig + . —• /� 1 ! • I t % f, •I 1 0rr�'!• Witness Py bard and official seal. .?''eia�;,;.II / It1 ;r . r?.. •.I II !x i I I !3 /1 li I I � 1g ' r Vf�1 my comissivn expires Qes,9. ems _ :t ri. . toAw. I. f.o s 1 Ave* r3tea yAvea ' dlfr ^ ` t • 1(if:./44- . / / I 1 Ai i R .. r r , 1 iii t '''I i• I ,..., i i / saws.ed<..t,nf 1. e..Prrt, {Y.•+r o,^a'e.� __ -. �;' —_ _ -.___... __ -._._ r / ti, ay..-.J_ kiN •�`i I z9s� _ roe' �� .�•ee•.— s•—,4�'yt———-- —'- — sCr— }-,� _ .. .�-_''_-_- — N 89'f5 /494.381 Ali 'y' r �� MOST 1r%v LIAIR OP .._-... . -, . .1,. :(. ,_, L11"..==+?.. PARlXL 1N DOOK 62a .•�..•-.- reeaivrlorr No.1709160 Pre.toarerI by Robinson Survevino 6` F_neineerino r,, - POgil S Fn Jr 5t F»n/rwt»d ire/made 801/0 Robert R. Anderson -SPR-340 Page 1 From: TREVOR Jiricek To: Anderson, Robert R. Date: 2/5/02 4:20PM Subject: SPR-340 Robert- As we discussed today, February 5, 2002, we have reviewed the February 5, 2002, letter from LeeBurg & Associates concerning SPR-340. I also spoke with Linn LeeBurg on the telephone. We have no objections to delaying the installation of the septic system so long as the system has been upgraded or replaced prior to the CO being issued for the expanded portion of the facility. We do have objection to delaying the filing of the air emissions permit and the NPDES permit as well as the filing of a dust abatement plan. These are items that should be already filed by the existing operation. I have informed Mr. LeeBurg that these items must be completed prior to recording of the plat. If you have any questions. please call me at 2214 Trevor Jiricek Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment tjiricek@co.weld.co.us 970-304-6415 Extension 2214 CC: i:vleeburg@attbi.com FROM : LEEBURG 8, ASSOCIATES PHONE HO. : 4422428 Feb. 05 2002 08:05AM P1 FAX TRANSMISSION LEEBURG&ASSOCIATES LINN T.LEEBURG 707 Hawthorn Avenue Boulder, CO 80304 (303)442-2428 Fax: (303) 444-8325 . . ✓i. rklerk -92a".3oy-69" To: T . � Date: L-s-o '.de r f,4h,/eesop '91o.-)a i i19Q Fax#: Pages: including this cover sheet. From: Linn T. Leeburg Subject: COMMENTS: ft FROM : LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES PHONE NO. : 4422428 Feb. 05 2002 08:05AM P2 LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 Hawthorn Avenue 0 Suite 207 0 Boulder, CO 80304 0(303) 442-2428 February 5, 2002 Mr. Mark Wallace / n.r,.0o r 'c P� — Y' Filly -no -3.0 Y-c Iii Weld County Public Health&Environment Mr. Robert Anderson,Planner -4/1.4 a- 3a y- 6 Y98 Weld County Planning Services 1555 North 17"`Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: SPR-340;Rolinda Colorado Co, Ltd, dba Firebaugh Precast, Inc_ Dear Messrs. Wallace and Anderson: The Administrative Review for the subject Site Plan Review stipulates in the conditional approval of February 22, 2001 certain conditions mandated by Nanning Services based on a referral memorandum from Shelbe McConnellogue dated January 18, 2001 (copies enclosed). Of concern to the Applicant are those actions within the purview of the Department of Public Health& Environment that are to be completed"Prior to Recording the Plat,"notably: 2.13 - Existing Septic System The Applicant has had the existing septic system evaluated by a professional engineer. The system has been found to be in need of revision and appropriate enhancements are being evaluated. The Applicant fully intends to bring the system into compliance with current regulations. Nonetheless, given that occupancy of planned new facilities on the subject site which are a part of this SPR cannot occur without a building permit and a certificate of occupancy; it is respectfully requested of the Department of Public Health& Environment that this stipulation not be a condition of recording the Plat, but a condition that must be satisfied prior to occupancy of the new facilities. FROM : LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES �. PHONE 'N0. : 4422428 Feb. 05 2002 08:06AM P3 Mr. Mark Wallace Mr. Robert Anderson,Planner February 5, 2002 Page 2 2.D., E.,&F- Air Pollution Emission Notice/Permit, NPDES Permit&Dust Abatement Plan Similarly, the Applicant fully intents to comply with the stipulations outlined,but in that planned on site equipment has not yet been specified, we respectfully request these three items be delayed and satisfied as a precedent to occupancy of the new facilities. Serving as an agent for the Applicant,I am advised by Mr. Anderson on February 4,2002, that since the foregoing stipulations were initiated by the Department of Health&Environment, in order to delay them until time of building permitting, a letter recommending same must be tendered to the Planning Director, Ms. Monica Daniels-Mika, from Health&Environment. Please consider this a formal request for same. Thank you for your consideration and response. If questions arise,I may be reached at 303-947-0791. Sincerely, Linn T. Leebur cc: Mr. Randy Lindsay-Brisbin-Firebaugh Precast, Inc. Mr. Ken Rollin, PE-Rollin Consulting FROM : LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES PHONE NO. : 4422428 Feb. 05 2002 08:06AM P4 RC ROLLLN CONSULTING 970-454-0404 L ,e6y, July-5-,-.2001 Mr. Linn Leeburg Leeburg& Associates 707 Hawthorn Avenue Suite 207 Boulder, CO 80304 Dear Mr. Leeburg, On July 3, 2001 I visited the Firebaugh Precast Inc. site near Dacono, Colorado, While on site I observed the attempts to find the existing leach bed for the ISDS that exists. It appears that the bed is under the asphalt lot and the trenches that were exposed have no gravel in them. The existing tank appears to be usable. An ISDS is not allowed to be covered with asphalt so the existing system does not meet Weld County Regulations. I recommend that a new system be designed and constructed to provide sanitary service for the site. If the system is designed for 16 employees, one shift per day, the bed will be approximately 500 to 800 square feet depending on the percolation test. This type of bed can be constructed for about $3.00 per square foot. The percolation-test and design will cost approximately $800.00 to $1,000. This estimate is conditioned on getting perc rates between 20 and 45 minutes per inch. If the rates are higher the square footage and cost will go up. If you have question or comments please contact me. Respectfully, Rollin Consulting Ken Rollin P.E. 01.708-001 Rd150 840 EAGLE DRIVE, EATON, COLORADO 80615 FROM : LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES ' PHONE NO. : 4422428 .-. Feb. 05 2002 08:06RM P5 Y . ' • • 11) The facility shall utilize the existing public water system. (Department of Public Health and Environment, Central Weld County Water District) 12) All pesticides,fertilizers,and other potentially hazardous chemicals must be stored and handled in a safe manner. Reference 25-8-205,5 Colorado Water Quality Control Act and Rules and Regulations thereof. (Department of Public Health and Environment) 13) Landscaping materials as indicated in the approved Landscape Plan shall be maintained at all times. Dead or diseased plant materials shall be replaced with materials of similar quantity and quality at the earliest possible time, (Department of Planning Services) . 14) The applicant shall submit detailed plans describing any proposed structures or signs and all structures, including signs, shall obtain the appropriate building permits, Proposed signs shall adhere to Chapter 23, Article IV, Division 2 of the Weld County Code. Existing Buildings may require a review and building permits if their use is changed. (Departments of Planning Services, and Building Inspection) 15) The site shall maintain compliance with Chapter 23,Article IV, Division 4-of the Weld County Code, at all times. (Department of Planning Services) D. The applicant shall attempt to address the requirements/concerns of the City of Dacono, as stated in the referral response received January 23, 2001. Evidence of such shall be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) E. The applicant shall attempt to address the requirements/concerns of the Mountain View Fire Protection District,as stated in the referral response received January 16, 2001. Evidence of such shall be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) 2. Prior to Recording the Plat: A. The applicant shall submit a Landscape/Screening Plan to the Department of Planning Services for review and approval. Upon approval the Landscape/ Screening Plan shall be placed on the plat. (Department of Planning Services) B. The existing septic system shall be reviewed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. The review shall consist of observation of the system and a technical review describing the systems ability to handle the proposed hydraulic load. The review shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment. In the event-the-system is found to b ine_ adequately stor constructed the system shall be brought into compliance with current regulations. (Department of Public Health and Environment) 5 FROM LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES PHONE ,NO. : •4422428 Feb. 85 2002 08:07RM PS C. The applicant shall enter into an Improvements Agreement according to policy regarding collateral for improvements and post adequate collateral for parking and landscaping requirements. The agreement and form of collateral shall be reviewed by County Staff and accepted by the Board of County Commissioners prior to recording the plat. (Department of Planning Services, Public Works) D. An Air Pollution Emission Notice (A.P.E.N.)and Emissions Permit application must be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health and nviron ent for emissions of criteria, hazardous or odorous pollutants. Sources of such emissions include but are not limited to the following: sandblasting operations, mining, spray paint booths, dry cleaners, haul road traffic, composting, boilers and incinerators. Evidence of such shall tted t the Weld County Departments of Public Health an nvironmentand Planning Services. (Department of Public Health and Environment) E. A NPDES Permit shall be_gptained from the Water Quality Control Division of the Calorad`otepartm`enf of Health f6 any proposed discharge into State Waterways. Evidence of such shall be submitted to the Weld County Departments of Public / Health and Environment and Planning Services, (Department of Public Health and Environment) F. A dust abatement plan shall besubmitted to Environmental-l �ervices, Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment, for approval prior to recording the plat.The facility shall have sufficient equipment available to implement dust control as required by Weld County Environmental Health Services. (Department of Public Health and Environment) G. The drainage report submitted for review by the Department of Public Works for the storm water retention shall be stamped by a licensed engineer from the State of Colorado. (Department of Public Works) 3. Prior to the release of Building Permits: A. Upon approval by the Department of Planning Services, a Site Plan Review Plat shall be prepared per Chapter 23, Article i!, Division 3, Section 23-2-160, Paragraphs V & W of the Weld County Code and submitted to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded. (Department of Planning Services) B. The applicant shall submit two complete sets of blueprints to the Weld County Building Inspection Department and the Mountain View Fire Protection District. (Departments of Building Inspection, Planning Services and Mountain View Fire Protection District) 4. Prior to the release of the Certificate of Occupancy: A. The applicant shall submit evidence to the Department of Planning Services that final inspection/approval has been received from the Mountain View Fire Protection District. (Department of Planning Services) 6 FROM : LEEBURG & ASS0C I RTES PHONE -NO. : -4422428 i . Feb.C05 2002 08:(d8RM P7 1/eid OUnty i�(:;nrpjgp Or,ht Memoranr € D TO: Robert Anderson DATE: January 18, 2001 ' Weld County Planning CFROM: Sheble McConnellogure,Environmental Health Services COLORADO CASE: SPR-340 NAME: Rolinda Colorado Co Ltd Environmental Health Services has reviewed this proposal for the fabrication of precast concrete products. Our Department recommends approval. Prior to recording the plat: 1. An Air Pollution Emission Notice(A.P.E.N.)and Emissions Permit application must be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health and Environment for emissions of criteria, hazardous or odorous air pollutants. Sources of such emissions include but are not limited to the following: sandblasting operations,mining, spray paint booths, dry cleaners, haul road traffic, composting, boilers and incinerators. Evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Health& the Environment and the Department of Planning Services. 2. A NPDES Permit shall be obtained from the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of '." Health for any proposed discharge into State Waterways. Evidence shall be submitted to the Department of Health & the Environment and the Department of Planning Services_ 3. A dust abatement plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Services, Weld County Department of v Public Health&Environment, for approval prior to operation. The facility shall have sufficient equipment available to implement the dust control as required by the Environmental Health Services. The following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. All liquid and solid wastes (as defined in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S.,as amended) shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 2. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 3. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. J 4. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 5. This facility shall adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the Industrial Zone as delineated in 25-12-103:C.R.S., as amended. FROM : LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES PHONE NO. : 4422428 Feb. 05 2002 OB:td8RM P8 Rolinda/Firebaugh 34$ ad34.' ±1:166w^Rao■± a SPR-340 Page 2 6. Adequate toilet facilities shall be provided for the employees. 7. The existing septic system shall be reviewed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. The review shall consist of observation of the system and a technical review describing the systems ability to handle the proposed hydraulic load. The review shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Services Division of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment In the event the system is found to be inadequately sized or constructed the system shall be brought into compliance with current Regulations. 8. The facility shall utilize the municipal sewage treatment system as soon as it is becomes available to the site. 9. The applicant shall remove,handle, and stockpile overburden, soil, sand and gravel from the facility area in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. 10. The facility shall utilize the existing public water supply.( CWCWD) sm/spr340 FROM : LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES PHONE NO. : 4422428 Feb. 04 2002 09:24AM P1 FAX TRANSMISSION LEEBURG&ASSOCIATES LINN T.LEEBURG 707 Hawthorn Avenue Boulder, CO 80304 (303)442-2428 Fax: (303)444-8325 Date: - a Fax#:! 7fd _3 o y_6 yrs Pages: ?- , including this cover sheet. From: Linn T. Leeburg Subject: ,s, , e ✓�, COMMENTS: _ are/ e i c® .^f` set,7;cr✓syrn-I, ✓ e a i:11 fit '',-r /e-r err ''740,/ rev. ,Q /S .Z' /n rl'�Jrc�/ d7 /` I��.y.tea/ 2 �/, SPC Aloe) C7 . 01 .s/rrro , 'C. / 6. 3_ L mll‘ T L "-74,y $, 1 clv0JQ /To s-c/7 s as f fr"oricerLe d/mil , (,(Jai✓ Ql r✓ //44 S P •-•e* /1"'{ cat 7/ 7elsAst sr cc) /1 — 3e" 3 --95/9 -c9 Lr r 6e ✓rq /0:30q,, 2- Y-oa 4 FROM LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES PHONE NO. : 4422428 Feb. 04 2002 09:24AM P2 6.3.1 The sum of all commercial building identification signs on a given wall shall not exceed 8% of that wall. 6.3.1.1 For example, if a building wall is 100 feet long and 15 feet high, for a total of 1500 sq. ft., the total square footage of wall signs cannot exceed 8% of 1500 sq. ft. or 120 sq. ft. .3.2 ne sign per development complex is permitted. The sign can be either a free- standing sign that is a maximum of 25' in height or a ground mounted monument sign that does not exceed 150 square feet in area. A development complex is a group of free-standing buildings or buildings constructed in such a way as to give an appearance of being inter-related due to architectural similarity, interconnected drives, parking areas and/or platting of the development. A development complex includes uses which provide a combined sense of place such as office or business parks, retail centers, industrial parks, apartment complexes and hotels. 6.3.3 One sign per tenant in the development complex is ailowed and each development complex should strive to utilize consistent placement, size, and style of sign. For example, all tenant signs in a development complex should be flush-mounted signs on buildings or projecting signs (signs that project perpendicular from a building) not a combination of the two. 6.3.4 Ground mounted monument signs may be located along arterials at the primary entries to residential, commercial and industrial subdivisions to provide the overall project identity. They should be no greater than 150 square feet in a The monument sign''shall only a of the su appropriately landscaped. 111III 11111111111111111 III 111111111111 111 1111111 11 1111 2681989 03/23/1999 04:34P Weld County CO 22 of 32 R 161.00 0 0.00 JR Suki taukamoto 11111` 2637539 09/02/1998 11:120 Weld County CO 22 of 28 R 0.00 0 0.00 JR Suki Tsukamo?o UNIFORM BASELINE DESIGN STANDARDS SIGNS 20 / i..,. gwesreRn srares 12753 S. Parker Road Suite SURlInG� Inc. Parker,Ye. CO 80134 (303) 841-7436 �� } //�► [ /\> LETTER OFF TRANSMITTAL FAX (303) 841-7439 TO: Itie l d (, hw f17/A f IQ� rR ces DATE: 1/(/2 /I5SS or I4 n4-e, uQ. JOB#: 2Cc( -CO8 (i/lte ti, CO 8a3/ CLIENT#: PHONE#: FAX#: PROJECT: SiSIe %Pr TetiIet.) RE: rift k rec4c4 We are sending herewith. ❑ separately via Delivery Service: ❑ I Hr. ❑ 2 Hr. H 3 Hr. Via: H. S. Mail 11 Express Mail H Fedex ❑ Hand Carry LI Pickup I.1 Fax LI Modem #: ❑ Internet Address: The following materials: II Bluelines L9 Mvlars I I Translucent Bond Ll Color Bond I 1 Disk 11 CD-ROM Ii Report LI Exhibit I I Legal Description H Field Notes ❑ Calculations f 1 Other: For Your: L•I Usc I I Rcvicw 11 Approval H ATE COPIES PAGES SIZE DESCRIPTION lilt / . / 24-X34 µyla_r hr r:hri COMMENTS: COPY OF TRANSMITTAL SENT TO VIA WITH ENCLOSURES • This I I complctcsoes not complete deliver) of all material for this project. Respect fulls submittt'd. (/D By rill/ �� l/ T� ` ROLINDA COLORADO CO., LTD 6090 AKRON AVE. CANAL FULTON, OH 44614 Weld Ccunty Planning Dept. F. RECEIVE ® January 10, 2002 This letter authorizes Randy Lindsay-Brisbin to sign documents on behalf of our Limited Liability Company, approved by its members' signatures below: Roland C. Lindsay, Member c-4 Linda L. Lindsay, Member • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES Ii`PC 55 15 NORTH AVENUE GREELEY,, COLORADO 80631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us COLORADO E-MAIL: rranders @co.weld.co.us PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT. 3540 FAX (970)304-6498 Date: August 27, 2001 Case#: SPR-340 Parcel #: 1467 12 201 003 Applicant: Rolinda Colorado Company, Ltd. and Planner: R. Anderson Firebaugh Precast, Inc. 3090 E. Las Vegas Colorado Springs, CO 80931 Legal Lots 6-12/ Blk 1 & Lot 7/Blk 2 , Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision, being part of Description: the North Half of Section 12, Township 1 North, Range 68 West of the 6T" P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Zoning: 1-3 (Industrial) Zone District Proposed Site Plan Review for the Fabrication of Precast Concrete Products in the 1-3 Zone Use: District Attached are the applicant's responses to the requirements and conditions of Site Plan Review 340. Please evaluate the appropriate sections of this response as they pertain to your individual areas. At your earliest convenience please forward a recommendation of either acceptance or denial (based on your individual areas of expertise and concern) of the Site Plan amendments or any additional conditions, concerns or requirements to the Department of Planning Services. A copy of your referral response and the Department of Planning Services' staff review has been attached for your convenience. Your assistance in this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Robert Anderson 4• Planner LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 Hawthorn Avenue 0 Suite 207 0 Boulder, CO 80304 0(303) 442-2428 August 22, 2001 Mr. Robert Anderson Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County, Colorado 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case No: SPR-340 Dear Mr. Anderson: This correspondence serves to respond to the County's Site Plan Review Administrative Review dated February 22, 2001 for the foregoing Case Number. The undersigned is serving as Agent on behalf of the Applicant, Rolinda Colorado Company Ltd./Firebaugh Precast, Inc. Specifically in response to the Administrative Review: ► 1.A: The Site Plan Review Plat will be submitted shortly and will delineate per: — 1.A.1: Parking spaces compliant with the American Disability Act (ADA). — 1.A.2: Thirty-three parking stalls adhering to Weld County's requirements. — 1.A.6: Parking area curb stops per Weld County Code. — 1.A.3: The Applicant does not plan to pave the parking areas. — 1.A.4: Vehicle parking and office areas do comply with off street parking and loading requirements. — 1.A.5: Enclosed are internal access roadway designs for the Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision as prepared by Drexel, Barrel!& Company. These designs reflect ultimately paving Panoram Circle in its entirety, doing so in a phased manner. The Applicant is willing to collateralize said future Mr. Robert Anderson,Planner Department of Planning Services August 22, 2001 Page 2 phases and paving via an Improvements Agreement. A draft of such an Agreement is hereby requested from Weld County for review and execution by the Applicant. Final Drawings will be submitted upon receipt of County and Referral Agency comments and prior to SPR Plat recording. — 1.A.7& 8: The Applicant will comply with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code regarding lighting requirements and trash receptacle screening. — 1.A.9& 1.B.1-4: An extensive Landscape Plan(copy enclosed)has been developed in concert with the City of Dacono Staff and is consistent with Ordinance No. 201, Uniform Baseline Standards. This is a phased plan which allows the eventual widening of Weld County Road 12, owned by the City of Dacono. The Applicant is willing to collateralize landscaping phases via an Improvements Agreement. A draft of such an Agreement is hereby requested of Weld County and/or the City of Dacono for review and execution by the Applicant. The Landscape Plan will be recorded concurrent with recording the Site Plan Review Plat. • 1.C.1-15: The final Site Plan Review Plat will include notes outlined in Items 1.C.1- 15. • 1.D: The City of Dacono is a referral agency to this SPR Proceeding. Procedurally this SPR Application has represented a confusing, cumbersome process before the County and the City. Weld County Road 12 is a City roadway and the Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision,while within the County, is adjacent to areas previously annexed to Dacono. In that this site may very well be annexed to the City of Dacono in the future the City desires various issues be addressed now consistent with Dacono's Standards. These include landscaping, roadway, utilities, fire flow, drainage and encroachment items. Numerous meetings have been held with Dacono officials by the Applicant and their agents and representatives, and preliminary designs were submitted to Dacono and Weld County for comment on August 1°'. No written response has been received at this date. The Applicant respects and is sensitive the City's issues. Nonetheless, this SPR Proceeding is currently within the County's jurisdiction and within a county approved subdivision. The Applicant has diligently addressed and pursued resolution of those items following. Should conflicts arise,the Applicant strongly encourages Mr. Robert Anderson,Planner Department of Planning Services August 22, 2001 Page 3 County authority to proceed with approval, recognizing future annexation and/or SPR's trigger opportunity for City input and control. — Landscaping: See enclosed Landscape Plan, as prepared by Peaceful Valley Studios. — Roadways: See Panoram Circle Plan&Profile, Sheets 1 & 2 prepared by Drexel, Barrels& Company. — Weld County Road 12 Right-of-Way: The City of Dacono is desirous of widening Weld County Road 12 at some future date. Given the existence of major utilities along the right-of-way and of oil and gas production facilities near the right-of-way,the City appears to be constrained to a total new Weld County Road 12 width of 100 feet. The City is desirous of securing an additional 20 feet of right-of-way from the Applicant and the Applicant is willing to make same available to the City. The Panoram Circle roadway designs reflect those eventualities. — Traffic: The Weld County Department of Public Works and the City of Dacono have requested a Traffic Impact Study in and about the Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision and said Study was submitted to both entities on July 5t. Written response and/or acceptance was specifically requested by the undersigned. At this date, no written acknowledgment has been received. Mr. Bruce Roscoe, the City's contract engineer did advise the undersigned via telephone conversation that the Traffic submittals were okay. (See enclosed Traffic Impact Study prepared by W. L. Contractors dated May, 2001 and associated correspondence.) This SPR Application generates minimal incremental traffic volumes and future traffic counts are difficult to project or anticipate. Nonetheless, the Applicant has striven to make realistic future projections and expects such traffic will not exceed five(5)times the volumes within this SPR Application. All roadway designs including corner radii and road surfacing cross sections have factored-in these ultimate traffic projections. — Annexation: The City of Dacono has requested the Applicant annex to the City at its future request. The Applicant is willing to do so, and respectfully requests Weld County approve this Site Plan Review in order to allow the Applicant the ability to develop a functional, operational facility as soon as possible under the Mr. Robert Anderson, Planner Department of Planning Services August 22, 2001 Page 4 prevailing and applicable Weld County Site Plan Review processes. Please note in any future annexation proceeding, the City still has the opportunity to address then pertinent issues and concerns under their jurisdiction. — Water Supply/Fire Protection: The Applicant realizes the existing Central Weld County Water District's(CWCWD)infrastructure is inadequate to provide sufficient fire flow capacity for the construction planned under this SPR. The Applicant has,therefore, contracted with CWCWD for extension of new 12" and 24" lines from Highway 52 to service the site(see attached contract and correspondence). That extension is slated for installation very shortly. Drexel,Barrell& Company have designed an ultimate water distribution system within the Subdivision. Appropriate site specific hydrants and distribution have also been designed. All designs have been preliminarily reviewed by CWCWD,by Mountain View Fire Protection District and by the City of Dacono's engineering firm. The water system design is a phased plan and the Applicant is willing to collateralize future phases via an Improvements Agreement. A draft of said Agreement is hereby requested of Weld County for review and execution by the Applicant. — Drainage: A extensive Drainage Report was prepared by Kenneth N. Armfield, P.E. on December 8, 2000 and included in the original SPR Submittals. That report has been reviewed and enhanced by Drexel, Barrell& Company, and a new drainageway designed paralleling the south right-of-way line of Weld County Road 12. This drainageway, associated culverts and on-site detention ponds and easements insure storm water runoff will not exceed historic flows from the undeveloped site and are designed to release retained water at a rate not to exceed applicable standards. Nonetheless,the City of Dacono's engineer has expressed concerns regarding downstream storm water runoff, both immediately west of the site and along Weld County Road 12, downstream and west/northwest of the site. The Applicant has initiated good faith efforts and contacts with the property owner(St. Vrain Block/Dan Ryan) regarding same. St. Vrain Block does not perceive a current or future problem and is,therefore, reluctant to address the issue at this time. The Applicant has neither the power nor authority to address basin-wide or downstream issues and is in compliance with applicable runoff, detention and Mr. Robert Anderson, Planner Department of Planning Services August 22, 2001 Page 5 release criteria. Further, the involved governmental jurisdictions have a future opportunity to address broad drainage concerns at such time as other property owners might initiate annexation, zoning, subdivision or Site Plan Review proceedings affecting the involved downstream(and upstream) lands. — Railroad Spur Easement: The Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision(Reception No. 01879792)indicates a 40'R.R. Spur Easement on and across Lots 7 and 8 , Block 1 and Lot 7,Block 2 within this SPR. The City of Dacono's referral letter of January 25, 2001 requests the Applicant secure written confirmation and acceptance to allow encroachment into the easement. The Applicant has researched the genesis and history of the easement and has contacted and requested of Union Pacific a relinquishment of any rights they may possess. Union Pacific feels they have no land rights regarding the easement and are reluctant to execute any documents regarding the easement (see attached correspondence). The Applicant believes this issue has been vigorously pursued and that no problems exist regarding the easement that may affect this SPR. — Sewer: No public sewer system exists within 400 feet of the site. The Applicant agrees to connect to such a system when any portion of the site is within 400 feet of a sewer line that has capacity to serve the property. ► 1.E: Mountain View Fire Protection District's referral letter of January 11, 2001 has been addressed. Drexel, Barrell& Company have designed water lines and hydrants and the Applicant has secured an adequate supply source from CWCWD to meet or exceed requirements of the 1997 Uniform Fire Code for Type II-N construction. The undersigned and Mr. Cliff Brockman with Drexel, Barrel(& Company met with Mountain View on August 1"and have revised designs according to their recommendations. ► 2.A: See enclosed Landscape Plan and 1.A.9 and 1.B.1-4 foregoing. ► 2.B: The existing septic system has been reviewed by Ken Rollin, P.E. (see enclosed correspondence of July 5, 2001). In that portions of the existing system do not , meet Weld County regulations, an appropriately engineered/re-engineered system will be designed, permitted and constructed. The Applicant respectfully requests the septic system be addressed in concert with the Building Permit Application and not be a preface to recording the Site Plan Review Plat. Mr. Robert Anderson, Planner Department of Planning Services August 22, 2001 Page 6 ► 2.C: Applicable Improvements Agreements are hereby requested for review and execution by the Applicant. ► 2.D: An Air Pollution Emission Notice(A.P.E.N.) and Emissions Permit application will be tendered to the Weld County Departments of Public Health& Environment and Planning Services. The Applicant respectfully requests the A.P.E.N. and Emissions Permit be submitted in concert with the Building Permit Application, prior to Occupancy and not be a preface to recording the Site Plan Review Plat. ► 2.E: An NPDES Permit has been requested by the Weld County Department of Public Health&Environment. In Colorado this process is referred to as the Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS), not NPDES. It is also referred to as the Colorado Stormwater Program. The Applicant's precast concrete fabrication facilities fall within SIC Code No. 3273, Light Industrial. Light Industrial& Construction Colorado Storm Water General Permits are applicable. The Construction General Permit and associated Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP)will be the responsibility of the Applicant's selected contractor(s) and an Application submitted to the Colorado Department of Public Health& Environment Water Quality Control Division at least ten(10)days prior to the anticipated start of construction. The Light Industry General Permit is the responsibility of the Applicant and the Application will be submitted to the Colorado Department of Public Health& Environment Water Quality Control Division at least thirty(30) days prior to the anticipated date of any discharge. In other words, prior to Occupancy. The Applicant respectfully requests this provision not be a preface to recording the Site Plan Review Plat. ► 2.F: The Applicant respectfully requests the Dust Abatement Plan be submitted to the Weld County Department of Public Health&Environment in concert with the Building Permit Application and not be a preface to recording the Site Plan Review Plat. ► 2.G: The Drainage Report submitted with the Site Plan Review Application as prepared by Kenneth N. Armfield, P.E.,Number 32527, dated December 8, 2000,was in fact stamped on page 5 of 5 of the Report. Subsequent review of drainage issues Mr. Robert Anderson, Planner Department of Planning Services August 22, 2001 Page 7 and designs for a drainageway along Weld County Road 12 and associated culverts have been stamped and signed by Clifford Brockman, P.E., with Drexel, Barrell& Company. ► 3.A: The Applicant agrees to prepare and submit to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, a Site Plan Review Plat for recording and to submit same prior to release of Building Permits. ► 3.B: The Applicant will provide two sets of blueprints to the Weld County Building Inspection Department and Mountain View Fire Protection District prior to release of Building Permits. ► 4.A: The Applicant will submit evidence of Final Inspection/Approval from Mountain View Fire Protection District prior to release of the Certification of Occupancy. ► 4.B: The Applicant agrees to have in place all paving, parking and utilities consistent with planned roadway,utility and landscape phasing, as outlined in the SPR Submittals and as collateralized by Improvements Agreements prior to release of the Certificate of Occupancy. I believe the foregoing statements and the enclosed materials respond to the conditions outlined in the Site Plan Review correspondence of February 22, 2001 and respectfully request affirmation of approval and authorization to submit the Site Plan Review Plat and a Building Permit Application. Thank you for your prompt review and response. If questions arise, kindly contact me at 303- 947-0791. Sincerely, Linn T. Leeburg Enclosure cc: Mr. Randy Lindsay-Brisbin,Firebaugh Precast, Inc. LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 Hawthorn Avenue 0 Suite 207 0 Boulder, CO 80304 0(303)442-2428 August 1, 2001 Distribution List: Mr. Robert Anderson, Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Ms. Diane M. Houghtaling,P.E. Traffic Engineer Weld County Department of Public Works 1111 H Street Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632-0758 Mr. Bruce A. Roscoe, P.E. r g consulting engineers, inc. 1331 - 17th Street, Suite 710 Denver, CO 80202 Ms. Sherry Albertson-Clark, MCP 5313 Fairway Six Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: SPR-340 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed herewith are preliminary road, water line, and drainage design drawings for SPR-340 (Rolinda Colorado Company Ltd and Firebaugh Precast, Inc.), as prepared by Drexel, Harrell & Company dated July 13, 2001. Also enclosed is a Geotechnical Engineering Report for Pavement Thickness Design as prepared by Terracon dated July 24, 2001. Your review and comments are appreciated prior to finalizing these designs and submittals of the Site Plan Review Plat. Said drawings are also being reviewed by Mountain View Fire Protection District and Central Weld County Water District(CWCWD). r—, �. Distribution List SPR-340 August 1, 2001 Page 2 The designs assume: • A 100 ft. wide right-of-way width for Weld County Road 12 which is within the City of Dacono's jurisdiction. • Phased road and waterline construction which can be collateralized by appropriate Improvement Agreements to be executed between Rolinda/Firebaugh, Weld County, and the City of Dacono. Note: Please provide said Improvements Agreements for consideration and execution by Rolinda/Firebaugh. • A water line in Panoram Circle tying-in to a planned 24" CWCWD line running along Weld County Road 12, which will be installed Summer, 2001 and has already been paid for by Rolinda/Firebaugh • Fire flow capability in excess of 3,500 gallons per minute. • Ultimate traffic levels assumed at five(5)times the levels projected within this Site Plan Review(SPR-340) (i.e., 5 x 48 trips/day=240 trips/day). • Roadway design to achieve R-values of not less than 20. Note: The preliminary designs of July 13, 2001, "Typical Panoram Circle Section"will be revised accordingly to reflect the Recommended Payment Section(s) outlined by Terracon in their July 24, 2001 report. • A 35 ft. wide drainage way along the south side of Weld County Road 12 with 3:1 side slopes. Your prompt response is appreciated. Should questions arise, I may be reached at 303-947-0791. Sincerely, Linn T.7 eeburg cc: Randy Lindsay-Brisbin,Firebaugh Precast Cliff Brockman, Drexel, Barrell & Company Peaceful Valley Studios Landscape Architecture and Planning City of Dacona Sherry Albertson-Clark, AICP Contract Planner: City of Dacona August 13,2001 Dear.Sherry, I appreciated the opportunity to meet with you on 6/5/01 regarding the Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision landscape development project. I have delayed submittal on the attached landscape plans based on the confirmation of the agreed upon site plan review criteria..Revised plans identifying Weld County Road street width, utility and drainage easement, etc. Prepared by Drexel, Barrel &Co. dated 7/13/01 have been followed. Pertaining to the conversation we had on 6/5/01: all Uniform Baseline Standards that have been laid out by the City of Dacona and Weld County have been met. The Baseline Standards established per Ordinance No. 201, Document XIII. Landscaping(23.2.1.13.1- 5), and the Site Plan Review comments prepared by Robert Anderson, comply with the enclosed landscape plan(Sheet#1 &2) and Landscape Specifications prepared by Peaceful Valley Studios dated 8/8//01. We had discussed,that I compose a letter verifying any possible variance in the plan development that deviated from the Baseline Standards or Review Comments prepared by Robert Anderson. As you can view from the plans dated 8/8//01: all Baseline Standards have been met along with compliance with Site Plan review comments laid out by Robert Anderson. There exists one minor exception and for practically we agreed on the following: In the northwest corner of the site along Weld County Road#12, we terminated the street tree planting in this sector of the site due to the existing oil and gas storage tanks.Obviously the access and maintenance of these tanks would not allow.a feasible space for living vegetation. As we had discussed in an effort to offset or initially delay extensive"out of pocket expenses" for the client: Firebaugh Precast Inc. we(Peaceful Valley Studios)have implemented a phase#2 construction element The phase#2 construction elements 1 are expected to be implemented after the annexation of this property to.the City of Dacona. At this point in time, this site is simply a township in Weld County. We would appreciate, if upon your review, all items meet your specifications that the Client (Firebaugh Precast Inc.)provides the Phase#2 landscape improvements concurrent with future annexation. Phase#2: installation items are as follows: See attached plans 1.) All street trees along Weld County Road #12 2) Entry and Egress Plantings: see detail "A" 3.) The Plant materials proposed for the Phase#2 completion of Panoram Circle. 155 Peaceful Valley Rd. 303-747-0503 Lyons, CO 80540 FAX::747-0563 r-. Peaceful Valley Studios Landscape Architecture and Planning Secondly we had discussed providing a chart indicating the following: Site Statistics and Square footage Lots#6-12, Block#1 & Lot#7 Block#2 = 16.71 acres/ 727,888 square feet (total site review area). Formula: 727,888 x 20 %= 145,578 square feet/3.34 acres of Landscape area (Composed of shrub planting beds around the office building, seed areas around the building,seeding at Block#1 : Out lot#1, seeding at Block#2 Out lot#1 & 13, seeding at Block#1:Out lot#27 balance of parking area beyond the 10%minimum, entrance signage areas 145,578 square feet Parking Lot areas proposed and existing 14,000 square feet Formala: 14,000 x10%requirement x.1400 square feet of Landscape area: Total Landscape Area Per Requirements..............146,978 square feet or 3.37 acres Please contact me at your earliest convenience should you require further information and data. However based on the Baseline Standards, requirements have been met. Sincerely yours,, J i—a► •- Hidelly Kchitect Peaceful Valley Studios 155 Peaceful Valley Rd. 303-747.0503 Lyons, CO 80540 FAX:747--0563 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND ASSOCIATED WORK Panoram Industrial Park: Lots 6-12 Block#1 Lot#7 Block #2 Owners: Rolinda Colorado Company LTD & Firebaugh Precast Inc Colorado Springs, Co. 80931 Landscape Architect:Peaceful Valley Studios 155 Peaceful Valley Road Lyons, Colorado 80540 Phone: 303-747-0503 Fax: 303-747-0563 Date: August 12, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS & GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.00-1.11 DEMOLITION, PRESERVATION AND EARTHWORK GRADING 2.00-2.03 SOIL PREPARATION 3.00-3.07 SEEDING 4.00-4.02 PLANTING 5.00-5.04 FINISHES (LANDSCAPE EDGER, MULCHES ETC.) 6.00-6.03 APPENDIX A: DETAILS AND SECTIONS 7.00-7.03 FUTURE MAINTENANCE 8.00-8.08 Section 1.00 : INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS AND GENERAL CONDITIONS 1.01 Examination of Site: Contractor is required to visit site prior to bid submittal. Failure to visit site will in no way relieve any contractor of the necessity of furnishing materials or performing work that may be required to complete work in accordance with professional standards and or contract documents. 1.02 : Review of Equipment and Materials: Where items of equipment, materials are specifically identified by a manufacturer's name, model or catalog number, the following shall apply for all such items furnished under this contract. Also regarding plant and other perishable materials, substitutions shall not be made without the signed consent of the Owner and or Landscape Architect. Only such specified items may be used in the base bid, unless such substituted items are submitted to the Owner or Landscape Architect in writing for "approved substitute" prior to submission of bid. A list of"approved substitutes" will be forwarded to the known bidders prior to receipt of bids in Addendum. Whenever a single product is specified in the Contract Documents by a reference to the name, trade name, make or catalog number of any manufacturer or supplier, the intent is not to limit competition, but to establish a standard of quality which the Landscape Architect has determined is necessary for the project. Substitutions are acceptable as long the quality of the product is deemed comparable. 1.03: Qualifications of Contractor: Contractors are asked to have available if requested, references and documentation showing proven experience in special construction and similar projects of equal or greater capacities of this nature and complexity. Failure to provide such information if requested , will be basis for rejection of proposal. 1.04: Subcontractors: All bidders are advised that any person, firm or other party to whom is proposed to award a subcontract under this Contract must be acceptable to the Owner , Owner Representative and or Landscape Architect. The Owner Representative reserves the right to reject any Subcontractor prior to final award of contract. 1.05: Work Covered by Contract Documents Work under this contract includes all materials, equipment, and labor, necessary to complete the work indicated on the drawings, described in the Specifications or reasonably inferred. Please note : Phase #1 and Phase #2 aspects of improvements are required to be bid separately. 1.06: Time of Completion: Bidders must commence work within 10 days from date of award of contract and complete the work within timeframe deemed necessary by Owner Representative. 1.07: Cleaning: The Contractor shall keep the premises free from all surplus materials, waste materials, rubbish caused by his employees or work and at the completion of his work he shall remove such surplus materials, waste materials, dirt and rubbish, as well as all his tools, trailers, and equipment and shall leave his work clean and spotless, unless more exact requirements are specified. In the case of a dispute, the Owner Representative or General Contractor shall remove all such items and charge the cost of such removal to the contractor. 1.08: Warranties: The Contractor and each subcontractor shall remedy any defects due to faulty materials or workmanship and pay for any damage to other work resulting therefrom, which shall appear in his work within a period of one year from the date of Acceptance by Owner or Owner Representative. The Owner Representative or Owner shall give notice of observed defects with reasonable promptness. The contractor shall respond to warranty issue within a reasonable timeframe, not exceeding 30 days beyond notice of warranty issue. 1.09: Bid Phase #1 separate from Phase #2 Due to the development of the infrastucture on County Road #12, this bid includes provisions for phasing. Bidders are responsible for reviewing Drawings and Specifications for each phase, see attached contract plan documents. After the development, enlargement and paving operations of County Road #12, installation of Phase #2 may commence. 1.10: Project Record Documents: Maintain at job site, one copy of : Contract Drawings, Specifications, addenda, Change Orders, Other Modifications to Contract, As built drawings. Maintain documents in a clean, dry legible condition and do not use record documents for construction purposes. Make documents available at all times for inspection by Owner, Owner Representative and or Landscape Architect. Label each document "Project Record". Record drawing information in colored pencils with different colors for various systems and defined by a color legend. Submit all record drawings to Owner or Landscape Architect at the completion of the project. 1.11 Coordination: The Contractor shall be responsible for coordinating all the work specified under "Landscape Contract". The Contractor shall coordinate the efforts of their subcontractors and the deliveries of suppliers so that the work progresses in an orderly fashion without delays towards timely completion of a complete project in accordance with the drawings and specifications. SECTION 2.00: Demolition, Preservation, Earthwork & Grading 2.01: Demolition: A.) The landscape Contractor is required to physically remove all weeds and native vegetation in the planting areas and beds prior to the construction of the berms and areas deemed for new vegetation . Native vegetation and weeds shall be removed by tilling to a depth of 8-12" and physically removing all weed roots and grass stock in accordance with Industry standards. B.) Preservation: It is requested that all existing tree and shrub stock to remain per plan, be protected with plastic contruction fencing: 2" diameter mesh by 4' height. This construction fencing shall be placed around the drip lines of all trees and shrubs, staked in place, to prevent equipment and traffic from compacting root system and affecting the overall health of the vegetation. Upon completion of heavy construction and equipment use, fencing may be removed, trees and shrubs shall be pruned of all damaged or injured branches. 2.02: Earthwork & Grading A.) The existing grade is within about 4" of final grade not including construction of landscape berm areas. Contractor is required to shape berm areas in an aesthetically pleasing manner. It is requested that berm surfaces not exceed a 3 to 1 slope. 2.03: Cleaning: Maintain continuous cleaning operations throughout the duration of Work. Dispose of, off site at no additional cost to the Owner, all trash and debris generated by installation of the landscape and demolition of any plant materials proposed for removal or any debris left from pruning operations. SECTION 3.00: SOIL PREPARATION 3.01: Description: 1.) Provide soil preparation for the following areas: A.) Tree and shub planting areas. B.)Over seeded areas affected by construction staging and mobilization c.) Installation of new low grow seed bed areas. 3.02: Delivery, storage and Handling: 1.) Take adequate measures to control offensive odors caused by delivery, storage, stockpiling and spreading of soil amendment. Stockpile material at "on site" location. Avoid stockpiling soil amendments for more than seven consecutive days prior to spreading. Incorporate material into ground as soon as possible. 3.03: Materials 1.) Soil amendments (plant mix) shall be composed of 50% Premium 3 and 50% screened topsoil. Upon receipt of CSU soils test results, additional soil supplements may be necessary based on mineral content. This information will be issued through an addendum if necessary. The organic material shall have 90% or greater organic content. This mixture shall be free from clay subsoil, stones, lumps, clogs, plants and their roots, sticks, weed stolen and seeds, high salt content and other materials harmful to plant life. Recommended supplier of this product is A-1 Organics, Eaton Facility : Phone # 800-776-1644. Other materials and supplier are acceptable however organic content must equal at least 90%. 2.) The Contractor shall supply to Owner Representative the following information: If alternate soil amendment product is utilized: soil test results showing mixture composition an analysis. 3.) Provide Owner Representative with delivery tickets on materials to verify quantities delivered to site. 3.04: Fertilizers: A.) Tree and Shrub planting pits: provide 50% premium 3 compost well mixed with 50% of the excavated backfill. Slow release agriform tablets are required B.)Low Grow Seed Areas: Provide Azo-kote amendment at a rate of 1 pound per 100 pounds of seed mix. Integrate fertilizer starter (18-46-0) at a rate of 1 pound per 2000 square feet. Local supplier is Arkansas Valley Seed at 303- 320-7500. 3.05: Planting Tree and shrub stock:see attached details A.) Finish grading and preparation of the planting areas shall be achieved by fine grading until the surface is smooth, friable and of a uniform fine texture and compaction having no lumps or stones over (2) inch in diameter. No planting shall be installed on any area which has not been rough graded. Obtain the Owner's or Landscape Architect's acceptance of prepared areas prior to proceeding. B.) Prepare planting holes with 50% excavated backfill and 50% Premium 3 compost C.) Fertilizer: Slow release Agriform tablets (20-10-5) Apply at a rate of 4/tree, 2/shrub and 1/1 gallon container. 3.06: Planting Low Grow Dry land Seed area A.) Spread organic matter : soil prep. material at a rate of (1.25) cubic yards per 1000 square feet. B.) Mix seed with Azo-kote and ferilizer mixture C.) Evenly apply and immediately incorporate materials into the grade by means of a harrow or other approved method to a depth of(3-4") inches. D.) Drill seed as specified below and topdress with topsoil at a rate of .66 cubic yard of topsoil per 1000 square feet. Finish grading until the surface is generally smooth, having no lumps or stones over (3) inch in diameter. 3.07: Guarantee: Upon completion of soil preparation work, the Contractor shall guarantee against settlement for one full year after final acceptance. Any correction required to meet this specification, including repair/replacement of seed, sod or plant material shall be at Contractor expense. SECTION 4.00 SEEDING & HYDROMULCHING 4.01: Materials & Execution Seed: All seed shall be furnished in bags or containers clearly labeled to show the name and address of supplier, the seed name, the lot number, the percent of weed seed content and the guaranteed percentage of purity and germination. The seed shall have a minimum germination and a minimum purity of (85) percent. Seed shall not exceed 1% weed content by weight. Seed shall be drilled in areas damaged due to construction. Soil tilth is critical in areas of compaction prior to drilling of seed. 1.) Low Grow Dryland Mixture: shall be composed of 30% Crested Wheat grass, 20% SR3200 Blue Fescue, 25% Dwarf Perennial Rye grass, 15% Canada Bluegrass & 10% Chewing Fescue. Seeding rate shall be 1.50 pounds per 2000 square feet. Seed Mixture is known as "Low Grow Mix" and is available through Arkansas Valley Seed Company, phone #: (303-320-7500). 2.) All seed beds shall be hydromulched. Mulch shall be wood cellulose fiber for hydraulic mulching. Aspen fiber mulch shall not be allowed. Mulch shall be died an appropriate color to allow visual metering of its application. The mulch material shall be supplied in packages having a gross weight not in excess of 100 pounds and shall be marked by the manufacturer to showthe air dry weight content. Ten percent (10%) of the wood cellulose fiber mulch shall be applied with the seed. The remaining (90%) percent shall be applied with the tackifier no later than 24 hours after completion of the seeding. The mulch shall be applied by hydraulic method at the rate of (2000) lbs/acre. 3.) Tackifier : shall be "M Binder", R-2400 organic tackifier or acceptable equal. Tackifier shall be applied at a rate of (100lbs) per acre. Local supplier is Bowman Construction: (303-696-8960) 4.) Erosion Control Netting or Soil Guard: Drainage Easement: Within the confines of the 35' drainage easement, along the East boundary of the property, where slopes equal to or exceed a 3 to 1 ratio, Soil Guard Hydromulching product or Excelsior Erosion Control netting is required on these specified slopes. Either product is available through Bowman Construction Products (303-696-8960) and is intended to hold the bank while the seed establishes. 4.02 : Warranty: For a period of 1 year after final acceptance of seeding at no additional cost to the Owner, the Contractor is to reseed any dead, diseased seed in an unhealthy condition. Inadequate or improper maintenance by the Owner shall not be cause for replacement, provided that the Contractor has submitted a bimonthly report of inadequate or improper maintenance. SECTION 5.00: PLANTING 5.01: Work Included , Quality Assurance and Plant Qualifications A.) Furnish all plant material, backfill material, trees, shrubs, ground cover, mulch, labor, equipment, and non plant materials required to complete installation of planting as indicated on the drawings. B.) Plant materials shall be inspected by Owner and or Landscape Architect at the growing site and tagged or otherwise approved for delivery. C.) Plant material shall have a habit of growth that is normal for the species and shall be of sound health, vigorous growth and free from insect pests, diseases, and injuries. All plants shall equal or exceed the measurements specified in the Plant Lists, which are minimum acceptable sizes. Requirements for the measurement, branching, grading, balling, and burlap ping of plants shall equal or exceed the code of standards currently recommended by the American Association of Nurserymen. Collected stock is not permitted. D.) Substitutions will not be permitted without the written approval of Owner or Landscape Architect. E.) Protection after delivery: The balls of burlapped plants which cannot be planted immediately on delivery shall be covered with moist soil or mulch. Shade and protect plants in outside storage areas from wind and direct sunlight. All plants shall be watered as necessary until planted. Plants remain the property of the Contractor until final acceptance by Owner. F.) Planting operations shall be conducted under favorable weather conditions. No planting shall take place after November 15 without written permission of Landscape Architect or Owner Representative 5.02: Prepared Plant Backfill & Staking , Guying and Wrapping: see detail. A.) Prepared plant backfill shall consist of excavated soil and premium 3 compost in the following proportions : 50% Premium 3 Compost well mixed with 50% excavated backfill. B.) Staking , Guying and Wrapping, Mulching: For installation of up to 3" caliper deciduous trees and 8-9' height evergreen trees, See attached detail. For trees in excess of this caliper size: Duck bill #66 with turn buckle shall be utilized. # 66 may also be utilized for evergreen trees in excess of 9' height. 1.) Wire guys #10412 gauge 2.) Grommeted Green nylon straps 1 1/2" wide. 3.) Treated Lodge pole Post : minimum of 6' in height. 4.) Tree wrapping materials shall be first quality 4" wide, bituminous impregnated tape, crepe paper, brown in color, specifically manufactured for tree wrapping and having qualities to resist insect infestation. 5.) Guy wire signals shall be either surveyor flagging or 1/2" diameter white PVC, length 8" /guy wire. 6.) Trees shall be supported immediately after planting. All trees shall be guyed and wrapped as detailed. 5.03: Setting Trees and Shrubs: See detail 1.) Unless otherwise specified, all plants shall be planted in pits to such a depth that the finished grade of the plant after settlement is at least 2-3" above the grade of the surrounding planting area. 2.) Trees and Shrubs shall be planted upright and faced to give the best appearance or relationship to adjacent areas. 3.) Excavation of planting pit shall be done in accordance with Tree, Evergreen and Shrub Planting details. Please refer to the insert for planting hole depth and width and other specifications. A.) For container grown stock: Remove the container to prevent damage to plant or root system. Cut root ball vertically in two to three places with a sharp knife before planting. B.) Balled and Burlap Stock: Backfill with prepared soil mixture amendment to approximately half the depth of the ball and then tamp material. Carefully remove excess burlap and upper 2/3 of wire basket and all of the twine. Tamp and complete backfill, place mulch and water. 4.) Compact the backfill planting soil by puddling with water to eliminate air pockets as necessary and allow it to soak away. After the ground settles, additional soil shall be filled in to the level of the finished grade. 6.) Mulch shall be placed evenly in tree wells as noted on the drawings to a minimum depth of 3". 5.04: Warranty Period and Replacements: 1.) The warranty period for nursery grown shrub, container and tree stock will be for (1) one calendar year from Acceptance of planting installation by Owner and or Landscape Architect. 2.) At no additional cost to the Owner, the Contractor shall replace any trees or plant stock that is dead or in the opinion of the Owner or Landscape Architect is in unhealthy or unsightly condition. Inadequate or improper maintenance by the Owner shall not be cause for replacement, provided the Contractor has submitted throughout the warranty period a bimonthly letter of report to the Owner on improper or inadequate maintenance practices. 3.) All replacement planting is to be executed within 30 days of notice to replace. 4.) Replacement of planting is to be in accordance with the original specifications and its cost included in the bid price. All areas damaged by tree or shrub planting or replacement operations are to be restored to original condition. SECTION 6.00: FINISHES 1.) Work included in this section entails landscape edger, installation of organic cedar mulch, weed barrier and stone mulch. 6.01 : Landscape Edger 1.) Edging : Uniformly edge beds of individual planting areas per drawing. Provide a clear cut division line between planted area and adjacent seed or mulch. Form bed shapes as indicated. Utilize Green Pro, Ryerson, or approved equal of edger which is painted steel. Staking of edger shall occur 3 stakes/ 10' of edger. 6.02: Mulching: Organic 1.) Provide a minimum of 3" of cedar mulch in all tree well in seed and rock mulch areas and other areas indicated on plan. Keep mulch off of sidewalks, driveways and parking areas. 6.03: Mulch: Stone & Weed Barrier Provide a minimum of 2.5" of 3/4-1.5" washed stone mulch in all areas as specified on plan. Mulch shall be placed over Mirifi 140 sn fabric weed barrier. Weed Barrier shall be staked with sod staples at joints and joint overlap shall be a minimum of 3" Keep mulch free of sidewalks, driveways and parking areas. ‘ a ' M bLL �� LAP4 �Er, 0o 01 d/6a 44-1 rt -- .-\ Pos�S / 1A y . r IV.WItlO ' U 0 U 0 ien,„ \____4,.„..._ /� /N-V,WIRE' II ST:Ne4 WI e&-Clt47 He ✓ a JJ , 6 0 V ; Zk-4M>:(LGIAt- TRH V./1W° r f �� H"004 ell W//Rof-1F1 f° N tio-►izjAI-v. 1uYMIC. - Law. y-MV. To At-tow I 2'S'/A.`Y Gam-( fru_ I rI rIT So THAT c-faaNIA f3 - I 4'' Aeoie SU1atouWCll.tedsr. L RJsD€ retilarat Tot' 313 Or WItze 1 ALLcr 11 /11- -YUWJ P tc'Ik or PURL-the 1 . 2"kbl U -V MUiL1-l- -TAM2P clmwwt oI > --T1-F .o.-f• 'i7otti ) rip K++6%::, GIgAt, ` \� ::. .' ;\ ��%�yy�� ; �, ...; 11 °�► ,'�.:�lJl//�. . � il_� gt1G FzIF M - g A SIN, G\+2�DE �I�I�i •. !f�i:�' ruP. D ° ' Y Nt G A IVe. IL totNlfi imp� f tilhi�li:� P)taleCILL HIx ror cat,1rIGAjloNs 3 Clili�l111=v�==11,� °fARIt=Y 9UvPAc o� �'fT I:, � la to"MII`1 'lboneiup AIL \ IR2voT f .1..L asp' ca-t I'l' MIU 2xtz00T Pa&LL- PIA. .,, UNPIs(u?-P. .O 'WI i.thilL f l -ri5 rL A.H-f"INc, 190 TAIL I L x Post 4LPe Wince NKt.W ClAr— \ 11411-11f. / \J tm 5TAl A - WHY1an STpA' w/L1voMMeTs(3 RL-4 a) 410-1t 4 a V. Gs( wipe - 3 tzeg'D. !� G up 1# - use, ebsis fcx iNk o,itlA_--(foss,Anai7Pe put ki .-Th lb pua►i I Ara s tt 1 t` - 4 I` Tr`-b ►.acrii f t `fi arc �„ +u. tr.' p►T �Grznu►� Ih r �I *WS 3.TCP'/Z of Caue 4 �� - ris 'TDi ,RYsgA7G 6L �DtJ�{ZAM 3 A �N -t teM G • N l r Ilthm lIZ H A- 111=�� . ; ��O�Il��la`er- to r _ is . \` ; \� IiO� �' u► teru> 9o5-tau., "' .'.�_1`11;�•�. ��. - 1111 :.�a,.r�. ___ ... . �' aii��lll 7i�11!! Illl�lllE�� c ` _ 1E '= I I ' ' I 111 Mill illle I Al u I Mlu. Voc1 e41-4, pEerS ►-411-t.r�Dh�iz; P hots. 1'Z" i Ow U 2 x=Or PM4w DI is- eVF r — •1 t Ffl NT.. istionamina - ger liat.ILLI 3 P2 -Tl77Thv44 -- 4"- E W4-11-:4A-Avg-_ n -- � .ice cwt - 3 _�1t I�Rt1Pe -AWN_ - -�nu1Skl{RdD __..____- - : ' ` I ) TUREO.:t-a-n'rSaczo 4 - 11 N iN --�Po 11u-- t2set > a•1 \ I2'' N1N 2X et&U.-L 0�. ,4 UE4tin BOIL 0 SkRUia I TI _. I L NTs• Section 8.00: MAINTENANCE 8.01: General Scope of Work: Through the use of qualified, trained personnel and by using the practices and methods recognized and accepted as standards by the landscape industry, the appointed Maintenance Supervisor will provide plant care, chemical pest control, manual irrigation to all plant materials, monitoring and any other maintenance specified herein . Due to the available labor force with Firebaugh Precast and the downtime which is sometimes incurred with this business, Firebaugh may utilize some of their labor force in maintaining the grounds. Labor activities will be directly supervised by an industry trained professional that acts as a Supervisor for Firebaugh. The maintenance shall be on -going and replacement of plant stock which is not thriving will be executed. 8.02: Mowing; Due to the specified "Low Grow seed mix", seeded areas will not exceed 12" in height. Should annual weed growth be prevalent in the first seeded season, mowing can occur on an "as requested" basis. Monitoring of areas shall be overseen by the Maintenance Supervisor. 8.03: Trash, Debris: All landscape areas will be policed and checked in conjunction with other maintenance operations for loose trash and debris. Trash pick up will occur on a weekly basis. 8.04: Weed Control: All native seed areas will be monitored and sprayed for noxious weeds such as Canadian Thistle and Bind weed. This task shall be provided for on a monthly basis Broadleaf sprays shall be handled on a curative basis rather than a preventative basis. Pre-emergent weed control is also acceptable when needed for specifically early spring weeds. 8.05: Bed Care: All bed areas will be checked on a regular basis for mulch coverage. If additional mulch is needed: this is to brought to the attention of the Owner Representative and final consent given prior to proceeding. Every effort shall be made to control grasses and bind weed growing directly in shrub beds and tree wells. After the second season following the installation of the plant materials, it is recommended that vegetation be put on a fertilization schedule. 8.06: Tree and Shrub Care: Maintenance Supervisor will monitor on a regular basis, the health of all plant material and make necessary recommendations to the Owner or Owner Representative with respect to such items as : Fertilization, insect and disease control, etc.. Maintenance Supervisor shall be responsible for pruning of all trees and shrubs on the open space of the subdivision property. Plants shall be pruned in accordance with regularly accepted industry standards for Pruning. Pruning is done to promote healthy growth, prevent weak or abnormal limb structure, control unwanted leggy growth, and maintain the natural growth habit of the plant. A grass free area (mulch ring 3' in diameter) shall be maintained around the circumference of all trees planted in native seed areas. When necessary: tree rings shall be remulched in an effort to maintain moisture in the plant and prevent the introduction of native weed and thistle. Due to the variables and unpredictable nature of insects and disease problems, trees and shrubs shall be sprayed on an " as needed" basis. Most sprays shall be done on a curative basis , however Supervisor may elect to treat potential problems on a preventative basis. 8.07: Watering and Plant irrigation: The existing 2" water meter located on Block #1, lot#1 shall be utilized for hand watering of vegetation along County Road #12. This meter is located just due east of the seconary fire access road or what is now Firebaugh's temporary access. Hand watering of vegetation in close proximity to the office building shall utilize hose bibs off of the office building A.) The newly seeded areas shall be irrigated on a bi weekly basis until seed beds are established. Once established: this drought tolerant low grow seed will not exceed a 12: height, unless irrigated on a regular basis, which is not the desire. B.) Tree and Shrub bed shall be irrigated with a deep root needle on a weekly basis depending on cultivars of vegetation. Gallon age requirements and seasonal demand shall be provided as a guideline for the manual hand water activity. 8.08: Winter Service: All landscape areas shall be policed for trash and debris on a weekly basis. The Supervisor shall monitor the site for trash and debris and shall inspect all landscape and plant materials. Winter watering shall be the responsibility of the Landscape Supervisor and is expected to be performed at a minimum on a monthly basis during drought periods. Maintenance Supervisor shall also be responsible for the collection and removal of fall leaf drop. Leaf Removal in heavy concentrations is strongly suggested in the native seed areas. Pruning and Tree Wrapping are also considered the responsibility of the maintenance Supervisor. Should Maintenance Supervisor inspect any other services necessary for the health and welfare of the plant environment, it is requested that this information be brought forth to the owner or owner representative. l LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 Hawthorn Avenue 0 Suite 207 0 Boulder, CO 80304 0(303) 442-2428 July 5, 2001 Mr. Bruce A. Roscoe,P.E. City of Dacono do r g consulting engineers, inc. 1331 - 17th Street Suite 710 Denver, CO 80202 Dear Bruce: Enclosed herewith is a response to Transportation Initiatives, Inc.'s letter of June 20, 2001 regarding Firebaugh Precast's Traffic Impact Study in and about Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision. I trust this response satisfies the City of Dacono's requirements and respectfully request written acceptance of the Traffic Impact Study by the City. Thank you for your consideration and response. Sincerely, Linn eeurg cc: Mr. Randy Lindsay-Brisbin, Firebaugh Precast, Inc. Ms. Sherry Albertson-Clark, City of Dacono Mr. Robert Anderson, Weld County Planning Ms. Dianne Houghtaling,Weld County Department of Public Works Mr. Joseph Koehler, Transportation Initiatives, Inc. NIT - TOR rumor 503 412 tonc. wv W Itr.nuwltum Fax 303-1 ?-3016 WI.Contractors Inc. 6435 W.55th Ave. Arvada, co 80002 July 5,2001 Linn Leeburg Leeburg&Associates 707 Hawthorn Ave Boulder,CO 80304 RE: Response to Comments on Firebough Traffic Study Dear Mr. Limburg: The :lowing is a response to the review comments on the Traffic Study, 1. Does the seventeen acres complete the development of the industrial park? If additional lots remain to be developed then trips from those lots should be included in the access volumes? The additional lots are not included in this development and at this time the land is planned to remain vacant. Thus no additional trips will be added to the projected traffic. 2. The traffic impact seta&should include analysis of projected 2020 traffic conditions with and without site trat97c for intersection and for roadway level of service. The projected traffic for this development repmsents only 12%of the traffic on the adjacent roadway. As additional land develops and the background traffic increases, the percentage of traffic on the roadways from this development decreases. This development will not cause an impact on the existing roadway system and will be an even smaller percentage of the roadway traffic in the future. The Level of Service is determined by analyzing peak hours. The development is projected to generate 7 trips in the AM peak hour and 6 trips in the PM peak hour. The analysis showed that these trips will not degrade the level of service on Weld County Road 12 when the site is constructed. Seven trips in the AM peak period and 6 trips in the PM peak hour will also not affect the Level of Service in any future year. The above information shows that a 2020 analysis is not needed and should not be required. , Page 2 July 5,2001 Firebaugh Precast Response to Traffic Study Review Comments 3. Describe access sight distance conditions and distances to adjacent intersections and access locations. There an no restrictions to site distance at the proposed access. The north side of Weld County Road 12 is undeveloped in the area, The driveways on the south side of Weld County Road 12 are widely spaced and typical of rural gravel roadways. There will be no conflicts with adjacent driveways. The site is between Weld County Road 11 and Weld County Road 13. Them is sufficient distance between the access and the intersections that the access will not impact either intersection. 4. Trip generation projections seem adequate for 13 employees. Are 15 employees the maximum number ofemployees required with full development of the site. Firebaugh Precast estimates 15 employees at the site. S. Describe the number of gravel trucks required on a daily basis to supply the concrete plant for the precast operation. The number of gravel trucks per day plus precast loads per day plus employee trips will be used to determine pavement design for WCR12. Gravel trucks were included in the 9 hauls per day used in the traffic study. R y Submitted, Fred Lantz, P.E. Traffic Engineer 13336 W. 72' Cir. Arvada, CO 00006Fax(303)423714 3- LANTZ ASSOCIATES Pa( law Linn l eabutl Pew Fred Lantz dompens Limburg&Associates mine 07/06/01 P a 303-4444325 ►ees 3 'as 3O3442.2428 aw Flebaugh Traffic Comments ties Eric Boutin G Urea* O Palle/in O ware Comm at O Mao Reply O Mara Rscyea o e.emw Linn, Hera Is the response to the comments on the Traffic Report. As you will see, I don't plan on making any changes to the Traffic Study. I believe that most d the comments are not appropriate for a development as small as this one. I will be glad to tells to the City if they have any questions, or need additional Information. The original is in the mail to you, so that you can have it for your file. Fred TR. SPORT.41'IO II.ITLATI ES, INC 1'?0 Robb St. X11-103 Lakewood,Colorado 80215 Phone 303-239-6313 Fax 303-239-8592 June 20, 2001 RG Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1331 17th Street, Suite 710 Deriver, Colorado 80202 Attn:Bruce Roscoe,P.E. Re:Review of Firebaugh Precast Traffic Impact Su.xdy, Panoram Indust_nal Park 5434 WCRl2 in Dacono, Colorado Comments. 1. Does the seventeen acres complete the development of the industrial park' if additional lots remain to be developed then trips from those lots should be included in the access volumes. 2. The traffic impact study should include analysis of projected 2020 trat c conditions with and without site tratfic for intersection and fbr roadway level of service. 3. Describe access sight distance conditions and distances to adjacent intersections and access locations. 4, Trip generation projections seem adequate for 15 employees. Are 15 omplovees the maximum number of employees required with full development of the site? 5. Describe the number of gravel trucks required on a daily basis to supply the concrete plant for the precast operation. The number of gavel trucks per day plus precast loads per day plus employee trips will be used to determine pavement design fbr WCR12. • n. Sincerely, to Koehler P.E. Pr at I Traffic Impact Study Firebaugh Precast ' Panoram Industrial Park 5434 Weld County Road 12 I I I I I I I Prepared by: WL Contractors I 6435 W. 55th Ave Arvada, CO 80002 I 303-422-7985 303-422-3965 fax I May 2001 I I 1 Firebaugh Precast ' Traffic Impact Study Certification ' I certify that this Traffic Impact Study was prepared consistent with the ' guidelines prepared by the Institute of Transportation Eng ineers. 111 a 234}0 r Fred Lantz P.E. Traffic Engineer 1 1 1 1 I ra.... nnn1 I • Firebaugh Precast Traffic Impact Study Introduction Firebaugh Precast is proposing a precast concrete facility on the south side of Weld County Road 12 in a portion of the Panoram Industrial Park ISubdivision. The facility will product precast concrete products such as manholes, storm drainage structures, electric vaults and septic tanks. The site is approximately 17 acres. The site will contain the precast Ifacility, a concrete batch plant, and outside storage. Access to the site is from Weld County Road 12. I This Traffic Impact Study will examine the traffic that the site will generate and the impact of this traffic on the County Road. Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the approximate location of the site. Figure 2 is the site plan. I I I I I I I May 2001 WL Contractors 3 I I . Vicinity Map I ' \Cany Pad 16 CO Hwy,B l 1 1 ; ' �. 1 1, Y i a 55%tttII } ₹ 61 e \ (I 1 '£ , 1 1 I 1 I i Ii 1 52 ax ` i In i 7111 el ' f $ ( 1----- SR 1 I i i I i // 1 ge--) - i i I A /I j I ({3p Coif i Cosily POM 12 i _-_•, t i 1 I!j I il SITE 71I I- i I Jel11 �H.2,o i , , I COPYRIGHTS Yn ETAKNC. I I ©1998 by Rand McNally& Company.All rights reserved. I _ I — — .— ltD COUNT! ROAD N0. 18 /a??OCNO _J Ifl ua°ie Srfi , ——— —— I it r �..�. 1 1 I I 1 I . 13 27 f { �� 12 t I •. 4' 1l' 'Tr Jr I • I I� , "'an. J � ,. 11 "'�,...� ��. fb I " ��.I zeI !�r..,"re�. t 2 I1 12 { x'� I I 1 13I ; l «... I PANONAM,NOu3NIAL I I 25 M ' 1 r' / tlt 1 PINK suen7vwoN I lI .i1�. PAR NO. 18797D2 I 11 4. 5 3 I 1 +'w d..r MARX It 5 1 w e.. ...r' ' 2 ' —w Nor. ...-• 1 •L0CKtiR '1 a= a s I ❖� <. 9 +1 I I9 r .w.NI 1 r d... 1 � 2 o.• ' J�lb ANY ♦ — 1 ' ` �' .1. 8 ::4;! • t': j! I ;. . _ �llEl <I 9 l mist le I b w. I .a Z3 j l9 T .a n'• l 1 ''�> m'`. r)e" l B \ .--• 1 -17. / 04..." L / `s 87Rf98GON CORPORATION .��" 1078 19-17 a~u:r.r • .. �1y.� ' p 11 12 8 iJ fI 13 16 �.. a I 1 3 I I Site Plan Firebough Precast May 2001 Figure 2 g WL Contractors I5 Firebaugh Precast Traffic Impact Study Existing Traffic ' Weld County Road 12 is located adjacent to the site. The site will take access from the road. In order to document the traffic on Weld County Road 12,traffic counts were taken by WL Contractors on March 6, 2001. ' Weld County Road 12 is a two lane gravel roadway in the area of the development. ' The traffic count indicated that there were approximately 350 vehicles per Iday on Weld County Road 12. The traffic is evenly split with 180 vehicles eastbound and 172 vehicles westbound. Site Generated Traffic Access to the site is along what is Panoram Circle in the Panoram IIndustrial Park Subdivision. A secondary access will be provided for emergency access only. Thus all traffic to and from the site will enter and Iexit onto Weld County Road 12. ' Firebaugh Precast also operates similar facilities in Colorado Springs. From their experience at their other facilities, they estimate 15 employees Iand 9 hauls per day. This would equate to approximately 48 trips per day. IThe Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation—6th Edition is I used to predict the number of trips that a development would generate. A General Light Industrial use (Land Use#110) in the Trip Generation I manual is predicted to generate 3.02 trips per employee. That equates to 45 trips per day. Thus the Owners estimate and the Trip Generation manual I May 2001 WL Contractors 6 Firebaugh Precast Traffic Impact Study are in agreement on the number of trips that the proposed use will generate. The following table shows the number of trips that will be expected on a daily basis and during the AM and PM peak hours. Site Generated Trips (15 employees) 1 ' Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour (3.02 trips/emp) (0.44 trips/emp) (0.42 trips/emp) In Out In Out In Out Land Use (50%) (50%) (83%) (17%) (21%) (79%) General Light Industrial 23 23 6 1 1 5 1 Directional Distribution ' The trips generated by the development are then distributed to the roadway system. The majority of the trips will come and go west and use Weld ' County Road 11 to reach I-25. Thus the trips generated by the proposed development will be assigned 80%to and from the west and 20%to and from the east. I I May 2001 WL Contractors 7 I I . I IWeld County Road 12 `- 17/ 11 172 —� 180 _I,' co 8 IExisting Traffic Volumes I IWeld County Road 12 c 1 /0 5/ 1 —t, 11 y vE a I Site Generated I Traffic I Weld County Road 12 17/ 11 s— 1 /0 181 I 216 10/ 17 1 5/ 1 r —, I en y „ cg —a .) a I LEGEND Existing + Site Generated I 345= Daily Traffic 5/ 1 =AM /PM I Figure 3 Traffic Volumes Firebough Precast May 2001 WL Contractors 8 I. Firebaugh Precast Traffic Impact Study ii Level of Service (LOS) I1 A method of determining the impact of a point is to calculate the Level of service(Los)of the ac P after development. LOS ranges from LOS A to LOS F. LOS A is a free flowing condition with no delay to ' any vehicle at an intersection. LOS F is complete congestion with stop and go traffic. LOS C is the level that intersections outside a major ' metropolitan area are designed for. LOS C indicates short, acceptable delays to vehicles at an intersection. ' The LOS at the access to the development on Weld Co ' shown below. County Road 12 is Table 1 —Access LOS Direction ©Ifia Westbound Left MOMNorthbound Right&Left As the above table indicates the access will operate at LOS A in both the AM and PM peak hours. This means that there will be no delay to vehicles ' entering or exiting the site. I May 2001 9 WL Contractors ' Firebaugh Precast ' Traffic Impact Study Appendix 1 1 I I I May 2001 WL Contractors 11 • I W.L. Contractors, Inc. 6435 W.55th Ave. 303-422-7985 kitlel : CR 12 W ofCR 13 Site: 1 itle2 Date: 03/06/01 Itle3 Direction: EB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 gain Cars& 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 MI 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 MI Time Total Bikes TIrs Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi 'I2:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I04:00 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 10 0 7 I 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 7 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I08:00 9 0 3 0 0 0 I 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 09:00 11 0 2 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 10:00 II 0 3 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 11:00 15 I 4 5 I 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 ' 12:PM 12 0 4 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 01:00 II 0 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 02:00 9 0 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 03:00 19 0 7 5 0 2 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 I04:00 16 0 10 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 17 0 7 2 0 2 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 06:00 12 0 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 07:00 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I08:00 2 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'milv 180 1 80 35 1 II 18 0 2 32 0 0 0 0 otels N Percent 0.6 44.4 19.4 0.6 6.1 10.0 0.0 1.1 17.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 •Total I I I I I I I W.L. Contractors,Inc. 6435 W. 55th Ave. 303-422-7985 title' : CR 12 W of CR 13 Site: 1 itle2 Date: 03/06/01 itle3 Drecttan: WB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 If — —9 10 11 "12----13— Can& 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle e4 MI <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 MI 6 Axle >6 Axl rme Total Bikes Tin Long Buses 6 Tire Sing1 Singl Double Double Doubl Multi Mul- Multi .. 0 0 —_.0_..._ —__�___ 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 I03:00 1 I 0 0 0 04:00 6 I 0 0 5 05.00 3 I 1 I 0 06:00 17 11 4 0 I07:00 15 10 3 0 08:00 9 2 0 7 09:00 14 3 3 I 6 10:00 5 2 0 0 3 ' 11:00 - 14 5 3 0 1 3 12:PM 16 5 2 1 1 1 3 01:00 8 4 2 0 1 1 02:00 6 1 4 0 1 0 I03:00 18 6 4 1 4 0 04:00 11 5 3 3 0 05:00 6 4 1 0 1 06:00 10 1 7 1 1 07:00 12 9 3 I08:00 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 10:00 1 1 0 11:00 0 0 0 !Lilly la ___.._..IS 34 I I [ owls Percent 2.3 45.3 19.8 1.7 5.2 8.1 0.0 0.6 16.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 'Total I I I I I I I ' HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g FBWCRA.HCO Page 1 I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall I Gainesville , FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets : (N-S) Firebough Precast (E-W) WCR 12 I Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst Fred I Date of Analysis 5/12/1 Other Information AM Peak Hour Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ' No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 1 0 1 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 10 5 1 17 1 0 I PHF 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%) I SU/RV' s (%) CV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 1 . 10 1 . 10 I IAdjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up I Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 I Through Traffic Minor Road 6. 00 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 6 . 50 3 .40 I I I I I I I HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2. 1g FBWCRA.HCO Page 2 I Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 14 ' Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1362 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1362 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1 . 00 IStep 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB I Conflicting Flows: (vph) 16 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1684 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1684 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1 . 00 ' TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Iof Queue-Free State: 1 . 00 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB ' Conflicting Flows : (vph) 32 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1015 Major LT, Minor TH IImpedance Factor: 1 . 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor I due to Impeding Movements 1 . 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1014 IIntersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% I Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) INB L 1 1014 > 1014 3 . 6 0 . 0 A 3 . 6 NB R 0 1362 > IWB L 1 1684 2 . 1 0 . 0 A 0 . 1 IIntersection Delay = 0 . 2 sec/veh I I I IHCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2. 1g FBWCRP.HC0 Page 1 I Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Firebough Precast (E-W) WCR 12 I Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst Fred I Date of Analysis 5/12/1 Other Information PM Peak Hour Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection I Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- I No. Lanes 0 1 < 0 0 > 1 0 1 > 0 < 0 0 0 0 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 17 1 0 11 4 1 I PHF . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 . 95 Grade 0 0 0 MC' s (%) SU/RV' s (%) ICV' s (%) PCE' s 1 . 10 1. 10 1 . 10 I IAdjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ILeft Turn Major Road 5 . 00 2. 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 00 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 6. 50 3 . 40 HCS : Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 . 1g FBWCRP.HCO Page 2 I Worksheet for TWSC Intersection IStep 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 18 I Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1356 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1356 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1 . 00 IStep 2: LT from Major Street WB EB I Conflicting Flows : (vph) 19 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1679 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1679 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1 . 00 I TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. Iof Queue-Free State: 1. 00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB I Conflicting Flows : (vph) 30 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1017 Major LT, Minor TH I Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 1 . 00 Capacity Adjustment Factor I due to Impeding Movements 1 . 00 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1017 IIntersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% I Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) I NB L 4 1017 > 1071 3 .4 0 . 0 A 3 .4 NB R 1 1356 > WB L 0 1679 2 . 1 0 . 0 A 0 . 0 IIntersection Delay = 0 . 5 sec/veh I I I LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 Hawthorn Avenue 0 Suite 207 0 Boulder, CO 80304 0(303)442-2428 April 1, 2001 Ms. Sherry Albertson-Clark Albertson Clark Associates 5313 Fairway Six Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 Via Fax: (970)223-7144 Original sent via U.S. Mail Dear Sherry: On behalf of Rolina Colorado Company, Ltd. and Firebaugh Precast, Inc., a Site Plan Review (SPR-340) was submitted to Weld County's Department of Planning Services in December, 2000. The foregoing SPR was subsequently reviewed by various referral agencies including the City of Dacono and the County Department of Public Works(see attached correspondence from Diane M. Houghtaling dated January 5, 2001). Regarding traffic issues surrounding the SPR,Ms. Houghtaling in a meeting with the undersigned on February 14, 2001,recommended a traffic engineer be retained by the Applicant to analyze said traffic impacts. Subsequently, J. W. Engineering was hired to commence the traffic analysis. On March 6, 2001, J. W. Engineering performed a volume and classification count on WCR 12 between WCR 11 and 13, some 100±feet east of the existing Firebaugh driveway. These counts suggest WCR 12,which is within the City of Dacono,is currently at 180 daily vehicles eastbound and 172 vehicles westbound. Apparently total counts of over 200 vehicles per day represent a "threshold." Firebaugh projected impacts total less than 50 trips per day. On March 27,2001,1 again met with Ms. Houghtaling advising her of the results of the survey. In that meeting she advised that since WCR 12 was within Dacono that Dacono would have jurisdiction regarding traffic impacts of the Firebaugh Site Plan Review. As a result, enclosed herewith are Traffic Counts as surveyed by J. W. Engineering. It is respectfully requested the City of Dacono advise as to appropriate next steps in order to expedite final approval and resolution of traffic impacts attendant with this Site Plan Review. Ms. Sherry Albertson-Clark Albertson Clark Associates April 1, 2001 Page 2 Thank you for your attention and response. Sincerely, Linn T. Leeburg Enclosure cc: Randy Lindsay-Brisbin - Firebaugh Precast, Inc. Dianne Houghtaling- Weld County Department of Public Works • .. _. . . . . AUG. 14. 2001 (TJF: _4:59 FIR Y. 71999.20066 EBAUC .. PACE 1 CUSTOMER NAME: Rolinda. o . T ` _ ire a rec t WATER MAIN EXTENSION CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into this 3© day of . M A'? 20/1, by and bet n the CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER:DISTRICT,hereinafter called the DISTRICT,and RolindaColorado Co. Ltd...an Ohio Limited Liability Comnanv . hereinafter called O (N]'R, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS. DISTRICT has been organited as a legal body and is known as the Central Weld !aunty Water Water District, and I I WHEREAS, OWNERS are taxpaying electors within said DISTRICT, or have petitioned to jo said DISTRICT,and WHEREAS OWNER owns the following described real I property within the service area the DISTRICT: (Said property is hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property.) Lots Ito 12„Inclusive and Lots 18 to 27 lnolpsive, Block 1 and Lots 1 to 13, Block 2;Panoram Industrial Park, WeldCounty, Colorado and, WHEREAS, DISTRICT water facilities are not presently iodated to service adequately the lbject Property,and WHEREAS OWNER wishes to have the DISTRICT construct Water mains to service the Subject Pr perry, and, I WHEREAS DISTRICT wishes to construct said water mains On the terms and conditions`hereina Ir;set forth and WHEREAS, OWNERS are requesting water service by separate tap fee agreements and will acqui r water tap(s) with meter size.'of_ inches,from the said DISTRICT, and, I WHEREAS DISTRICT reserves :the right. and has the authbrity.to consider each extension to tract individually, and administer as detemiined;appropriate based on varying conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the terms of this agreement, it is m ly agreed es follows: 1. Prior to any expenditure .of construction by DISTRICIII. OWNER agrees to pay, in advanc the amount of $285;120,00 based on the estimated costs 4'or all material, labor, installation, fee and I other costs directly applicable to extension. 1 Page 1 of 2 411 AUG. 14: 2001 (TAE),_,15 .00 F]REBA' '193920066 PAGE. 2 Watez Main Extension Contract i 2. DISTRICT agrees to provide credits to OWNER in the total amount of$ 00 ' for tap(s)purchased. 3. DISTRICT agrees to begin construction upon receipt of materials and appropriate e mcnts, estimated,to be within sixty (60)days of the date of this Agreement. 4. OWNER agrees to execute any and all easements needed by DISTRICT at no expense to DISTRICT, across OWNER'S property for the purpose of installing any pipelines construct by DISTRICT.:DISTRICT shall,be responsible for restoring surface area back to reasonabl condition at DISTRICT cost 5. OWNER agrees to abide by rates established and the rules and regulations of the DISTRIC. 6 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Stat.i f Colorado. 7. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the ex ion of the water.mains herein described,and supersedes all prior arrangements or understanding with respect thereto.; 8. This Agreement may only be modified,in writing,by.the Board of Directors of the DISTRI 9. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto: a d their successors,heirs,and:assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto and hereunder set their signatures the day d year first hereinabove.written. :. i OWNERS SIGNATURE CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRI (Property.Owner) ! Rolinda Colorado C ,.LTD 33 ,1�e j,/ i ,k- 0.`4 � IiY: ', ' ATTESTT Autho s five J Address: j I Phone: • I . f . .Page 2:of2 LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 Hawthorn Avenue 0 Suite 207 0 Boulder, CO 80304 0(303) 442-2428 August 5, 2001 7) -1 ' �\ ��, Mr. Randy Lindsay-Brisbin7 3 Vice President/General Manager -4 ` i Firebaugh Precast, Inc. / 1 L 3090 East Las Vegas P. O. Box 5440 Colorado Springs, CO 80931 Dear Randy: fire Protection: On August 21"I, Cliff Brockman with Drexel, Barrell& Company and I met with LuAnn Penfold,Fire Marshall, Mountain View Fire Protection District to review the hydrant and waterline designs for Firebaugh. Ms. Penfold was concerned about water and roadway phasing, hydrant spacing, flow capacity, and design details. After a lengthy discussion, I believe a reasonable and appropriate resolution was achieved: — Since the subdivision will not be fully built-out on all lots and since Site Plan Review is required for all construction, it will not be necessary to install hydrants in Panoram Circle at 300' intervals at this time. — 3000 gpm fire flow will be required to serve Firebaugh's Phase I building(s), assuming Type II N construction with no sprinkler systems. — Dead end feed within Panoram Circle is okay, as long as flow velocities do not exceed 10 ft./second. Cliff will recheck the flow calculations and possibly a 10" line will be required instead of an 8". — Three on-site hydrants will be required initially with a site interior loop necessary. Two of the hydrants will be relocated to the Panoram Circle right-of-way, and the fourth hydrant is required only at ultimate Firebaugh build-out. — All hydrants must be within 600 ft. of the buildings,but cannot be closer than 50 feet. Mr. Randy Lindsay-Brisbin Vice President/General Manager August 5, 2001 Page 2 — The new potable water line can be smaller than 6" which was originally shown on the drawings. — Cliff will revise the drawings according to the foregoing. — Mountain View will need a key if the secondary fire access drive(the existing driveway)will be gated or chained off. — LuAnn wants a sketch showing traffic ways and circulation within the site,which I can provide to her. All in all, it was a cordial and productive meeting. Terracon/Road Section: • I asked Cliff/Drexel to review the Terracon Report and provide an opinion regarding same and to specifically address whether a gravel only road section can be used, at least for an interim period both technically and from an economic perspective. Drainage: • I asked Cliff/Drexel to call Bruce Roscoe regarding drainage concerns. Cliff's thoughts are that Firebaugh doesn't have the power or authority to address basin-wide or downstream issues and any problems with the Block Plant are really the City of Dacono's to address. Also, I advised Cliff that the triangle in the southwest corner of Weld County Road 12 and 13 intersection does not drain westward and is, therefore, not an issue regarding drainage along Weld County Road 12. Cliff mentioned looking at the site in the field and reviewing his and Dan Burroughs' calculations. If additional work is required, Drexel will need a change order. Facpment: I ask Cliff to describe the cul-de-sac on Panoram Circle to provide to Weld County for an easement from Rolinda. presentation Status: • I advised Cliff to wait until Weld County,Dacono, CWCWD, et al. comment on the drawings before finalizing same. We'll shoot for the week of August 6th . UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY Real Estate Department R.D.Uhrich • J.L.Hawkins Assistant Vice President UNION Director-Operations Support J.A.Anthony PACIFIC M.E.Heenan Director-Contracts Director-Administration&Budgets D.D.Brown D.H.Lightwine Director-Real Estate Director-Real Estate M.W.Casey T.K.Love 7600 Farnam Street General Director-Special Properties Director-Real Estate J.P.Gade Omaha,Nebraska 68102 Director-Facility Management Fax:(402)997-3601 April 24,2001 Folder: None LINN T.LEEBURG LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 HAWTHORN AVENUE, SUITE 207 BOULDER, CO 80304 Dear Linn: RE: 40' RR Spur Easement in Panorama Industrial Park near Dacono, Colorado Reference is made to your letter dated April 4, 2001, and our numerous phone conversations regarding the above referenced Railroad easement. Please be advised that Union Pacific has no specific conveyance document in its property records granting it any interest in the subject easement. And the information you have furnished me fails to prove that Union Pacific has ever been granted a property interest in the subject easement. In fact the Subdivision Plat for the park specifically dedicates the Railroad Easement to"the public",not to Union Pacific Therefore,Union Pacific is reluctant to issue a Quit Claim Deed to property it has never held a specific property interest in. Yours truly, • J ck L.Nelson anager Real Estate LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 Hawthorn Avenue 0 Suite 207 0 Boulder, CO 80304 0(303) 442-2428 April 4, 2001 Mr. Jack Nelson Office of Contracts&Real Estate Union Pacific Railroad Company 1416 Dodge Street Omaha,NE 68179 Dear Mr. Nelson: On January 15th you were kind enough to respond to my telephone inquiry regarding possible land rights the Union Pacific Railroad Company might have within the Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision in Weld County, Colorado, (NW 1/4, Section 12, TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M.). At that time you advised that you had no record of any railway rights the Union Pacific may have within the Subdivision, and as a result, felt the Railroad had no interest and would be reluctant to execute a quit claim deed. In a Site Plan Review proceeding pending before Weld County and the adjacent City of Dacono, I subsequently so advised both parties (see attached Leeburg& Associates' letter of January 21, 2001) hoping to allay any concerns about the "40'RR Spur Easement" shown on the subdivision plat. Unfortunately, my arguments were to no avail (see attached letter from Sherry Albertson- Clark, City of Dacono Planner, dated January 23, 2001,No. 4). Serving as agent for the Site Plan Review Applicant, Rolinda Colorado Company, Ltd., who is the owner of a major portion of the subdivision, I am in a dilemma as to how to comply with Dacono's stipulations; i.e., "written confirmation of the Union Pacific Railroad's acceptance to allow an encroachment into the existing railroad spur easement be obtained." I have, therefore, taken the liberty of preparing a quit claim deed for the aforesaid"40'RR Spur Easement"with the Union Pacific Railroad Company as grantor and respectfully request execution of same by an appropriate officer. Anything you might be able to do in this regard would be most appreciated. Thank you for your consideration and response. Should you have questions, I may be reached at 303-442-2428 or 303-947-0791 (cellular). Sincerely, Linn��f�Cee�et�" Enclosure cc: Mr. Randy Lindsay-Brisbin-Rolinda Colorado Company,Ltd. • LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 Hawthorn Avenue 0 Suite 207 0 Boulder, CO 80304 0(303) 442-2428 January 21, 2001 Mr. Robert Anderson Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County, Colorado 1555 North 17d'Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 SUBJECT: Rail Spur Easement, SPR-340 Dear Mr. Anderson: As a follow up to the subject issue,the following information is provided for your review: The Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision Plat (Reception No. 01879792) indicates a"40'RR Spur Easement" on and across the Subdivision, including a portion thereof on and across the Subject Site(Lots 7& 6, Block 1 and Lot 7, Block 2). Title investigations and conversations with the Union Pacific Railroad do not indicate any documented land rights to this easement. It appears to have simply been designated on the plat as an easement for a potential, future railroad spur connecting with the Union Pacific Railroad mainline that existed east of the Subdivision at the time of platting in 1981. Since that time the easement has been built over by Stresscon,by the Applicant's predecessors, and by utilities, the Union Pacific has removed all mainline trackage near the Subdivision and the Union Pacific has sold its right-of-way to others (William Stonebraker, the Town of Firestone and City of Dacono). Further the Block Plant located to the west of the Subject Site has constructed a building immediately west of and over the westerly extension, projected, of the platted Spur Easement. It appears the Spur Easement was simply designated on the plat in accommodation of any potential future USER desirous of railroad service in the Subdivision. Conversations in January 2000 with a Union Pacific land representative (Jack Nelson - Omaha District) indicate Union Pacific has no record of conveyance by the plat to Union Pacific nor any record of a specific grant by the original owner to the Union Pacific. In other words, Union Mr. Robert Anderson Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County, Colorado January 21, 2001 Page 2 Pacific, the only railroad even in the area,whose trackage is now at least 1-1/2±miles from the Subdivision, has no rights or interest in the spur. Recent contact on January 15, 2001, with the Union Pacific Railroad again affirms that the Union Pacific feels they have no surface land rights relative to the subject easement. The Union Pacific is, therefore, reluctant to even address the issue and not receptive of executing a quit claim deed. It is highly unlikely a future USER would desire rail service or even could reasonably get rail service any place near the Subdivision. Again, no title search indicate any rail rights within the Subdivision. The Applicant, therefore, proposes building over the easement. The original Union Pacific rail line served, among other entities, the Graden Mine in Section 12, T1N, R68W. That mine was abandoned in 1955. The rail line continue northward past the west side of Dacono,Frederick, and Firestone and onward to Greeley. Over the years, trackage has been removed and much of the right-of-way purchased in fee from the Union Pacific Railroad by others, including adjacent property owners and by the Towns. The trackage terminates some 12+ miles north of the Panoram Site near the Fort Saint Vrain Power Plant. Union Pacific's closest current ownership terminates near the south line of Section 13, TIN, R68W, some 1-1/2±miles south of Panoram. Further, the St. Vrain Valley Open Lands and Trails Project under the auspices of Weld County and in concert with Colorado Open Lands, Tri-Towns, Great Outdoors Colorado, Boulder County,Longmont, Erie, and the CSU Cooperative Extension have targeted the old Union Pacific right-of-way as a portion of a regional trail system, come 30 miles in length. (See enclosed Farmer& Miner article dated August 23, 2000.) It, therefore, appears highly unlikely any resumption of rail service adjacent to the Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision can or will occur in the future. I have been in conversation with Mr. Lee Morrison, Assistant Weld County Attorney, regarding possible means to address resolution of the spur easement shown on the Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision Plat. His suggestion is to document within the Site Plan Review file the circumstances surrounding the situation and the logic behind allowing the easement to remain on the Plat. Mr. Robert Anderson Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County, Colorado January 21, 2001 Page 3 In summary, it is respectfully requested for the foregoing reasons that Weld County and the City of Dacono allow the platted "40'RR Spur Easement"to remain on the Plat as a part of this Site Plan Review proceeding. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Linn T. Leeburg Leeburg&Associates Agent for the Applicant, Rolinda Colorado Company,Ltd. and its affiliate,Firebaugh Precast, Inc. cc: Mr. Lee Morrison, Weld County Attorney's Office Ms. Sherry Albertson-Clark, City of Dacono Mr. Randy Lindsay-Brisbin, Firebaugh Precast, Inc. RC ROLLIN CONSULTING 970-454-0404 G (17 CV 1/04% Julys,2001 Mr. Linn Leeburg Leeburg& Associates 707 Hawthorn Avenue Suite 207 Boulder, CO 80304 Dear Mr. Leeburg, On July 3, 2001 I visited the Firebaugh Precast Inc. site near Dacono, Colorado. While on site I observed the attempts to find the existing leach bed for the ISDS that exists. It appears that the bed is under the asphalt lot and the trenches that were exposed have no gavel in them. The existing tank appears to be usable. An ISDS is not allowed to be covered with asphalt so the existing system does not meet Weld County Regulations. I recommend that a new system be designed and constructed to provide sanitary service for the site. N If the system is designed for 16 employees, one shift per day, the bed will be approximately 500 to 800 square feet depending on the percolation test. This type of bed can be constructed for about $3.00 per square foot. The percolation-test and design will cost approximately $800.00 to $1,000. This estimate is conditioned on getting perc rates between 20 and 45 minutes per inch. If the rates are higher the square footage and cost will go up. If you have question or comments please contact me. Respectfully, Rollin Consulting Ken Rollin P.E. 01.708-001 RC#30 840 EAGLE DRIVE, EATON, COLORADO 80615 JAN. 14. 2002 (MON) 07: 28 PAGE_1_ r Fbau h Precast • Inc. P.O. SOX 5440 • 3090 EAST LAS VEGAS • COLORADO SPRINGS, Co 80931 (719) 392 • 9036 • FAX (719) 392 • 0066 • TOLL FREE 888 • 685 • 7595 FAX COVER SHEET FRo:P.Ppivcrf L1 NosA BP-4 %/ki/ u�-� Date:J— I 1 -0 Z To: C�.�13n1 R5.0/V COMPANY:\AAA a' LO -. l&,v4-4\ dThud PAX# Phone# ,—_ Page of Comments: ^. -- / rbL Alt Sip P1 °ter& o. ,, Ate �..S� cos 1A4S4ery 514424-, Signed JAN. 14. _2002 (MON) 0728 PACE. 2 i s in+oryL,i,I_ryLML I t 4 917193920066 N0.946 p02 ROLINDA COLORADO CO., LTD. 6090 AKRON AVE. CANAL FULTON, OH 44614 %tun le, 2002 This latter authorizes Randy Lindsay-Brisbin.to sign documents on behalf o f nur Limited Liability Company, approved by itsmembers' signature. below: AA li Roland C.Lindsay, member Linda L. Lindsay, Member • Temporary Easement Agreement The undersigned grantor,Rolinda Colorado Company,Ltd.,whose address is 6090 Akron Avenue, Canal Fulton, Ohio 44614,for and in consideration of Ten Dollars($10)and other good and valuable consideration,do hereby grant and convey to Weld County,Colorado and/or the City of Dacono, Colorado a temporary roadway easement for purposes of public use and emergency vehicle access and turn-around. Said easement shall be adjacent to platted Panoram Circle,within the Panoram Industrial Park Subdivision,Reception No. 1879792 of the records of Weld County,Colorado and is more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. See attached Exhibit A,Page 1 and 2. Grantor shall construct and pave a temporary turn-around within said easement consistent with that Improvements Agreement executed by the grantor and the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County(Reception No. ). Grantee shall have the use and enjoyment of the easement area for roadway and public access until such time as platted Panoram Circle is completed in its entirety,available for public use,and accepted by Weld County and/or the City of Dacono. Said easement shall become null and void coincident with that acceptance event. The rights,conditions and provisions of this easement shall insure to the benefit and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators,successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. Any claim,controversy or dispute arising out of this Agreement shall be sealed by arbitration in accordance with the applicable rules of the American Arbitration Association,and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The arbitration shall be conducted in the county where the property is located. Date this $'~ day of 3 P l in:Met ,2002 Rolinda lorado Company,Ltd. BY/ �� e ui�w` Its pesa - - i- [SEAL] Attest Secretary of Corporation (Corporate Acknowledgement) STATE OF COLORADO �/� /� ) COUNTY OF /Re( )as fore oin ent a•ow ed before me this day of 4 20 C—by a'( r- corporation,on behalf of the corporation. [SEAL] Notary Public rie9l% i C` (.74e/11 My commission expires: %�/f/D.1 A . r, Drexel Barrell& co. EXHIBIT A Engineers/Surveyors Page 1 of 2 Boulder, October 26 , 2001 Colorado Springs, Greeley 4640PearIEastCircle A description of a temporary turn-around easement Suiiell4 located in Lot 7 , Block 2 , PANORAM, INDUSTRIAL PARK Boulder,Colorado80301.2475 SUBDIVISION, for Leeburg & Associates . 303 442 4338 303 442 4373 Fax Irma* npgCRIPTToN A strip of land located in Lot 7, Block 2 , PANORAM INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION, a Subdivision recorded at Reception No. 1879792 of the records of Weld County, Colorado, described as follows : Commencing at the most Easterly Corner of said Lot 7 , thence S34°04 ' 27"W, 95 . 32 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 7 to a point of curve to the right; thence Southwesterly. 108 . 61 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 7 and along the arc of said curve to the TRT1F POTNT OF BFGTNNTNG, said arc having a radius of 170 . 00 feet, a central angle of 36°36 ' 23" and being subtended by a chord that bears S52°22 ' 39"W, 106 . 78 feet; Thence Northwesterly, 16 . 96 feet along the arc of a curve concave to the Northeast to a point of reverse curve, said arc having a radius of 14 . 00 feet, a central angle of 69°23 ' 55" and being subtended by a chord that bears N44°51 ' 18"W, 15 . 94 feet ; Thence Westerly, 173 . 65 feet along the arc of said reverse curve to a point tangent, said arc having a radius of 66 . 00 feet, a central angle of 150045 ' 09° and being subtended by a chord that bears N85°31 ' 55"W, 127 . 72 feet ; Thence S19°05 ' 31"W, 11 . 55 feet to the Southerly line of said Lot 7; (K. Albers - EN-1165 - 5407L. KSA) • EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 2 Legal Description (cont . ) October 26, 2001 Pace 2 Thence S70°54 '29°E, 32 . 29 feet along the southerly line of said Lot 7 to a point of curve to the left ; Thence Easterly, 113 . 73 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 7 and along the arc of said curve to the TRUE POINT OF BFGTN'NJNG, said arc having a radius of 170 . 00 feet , a central angle of 38°24 ' 41 ° and being subtended by a chord that bears N89°53 ' 11°E, 111 .85 feet . Legal Description Prepared Ey: Kent S . Albers Drexel , Harrell & Co . 4840 Pearl Last Circle, Suite 114 Boulder, CO 80301-2475 (303) 442-4338 (K. Albers - EW-1165 - 5407L.KSA) itMEMORANDUM I TO: Robert Anderson DATE: December 10, 2001 Long Range Planner C FROM: Donald Carroll, Engineering Administrator • COLORADO SUBJECT: SPR-340; Firebaugh Precast, Inc., Phase A The applicant has submitted an Improvements Agreement According to Policy Regarding Collateral for Improvements. (Public road maintenance.) Utilizing the plat drawing, verifying quantities, and unit costs, the Weld County Public Works Department recommends acceptance the Exhibit A portion of the transportation section of the Improvements Agreement. Also submitted was an easement for a temporary turnaround and an easement for the drainage and improvements of the retention pond that was required by the Town of Dacono. Both Agreements need to be executed with signatures and recorded. The Weld County Public Works Department recommends approval of the Improvements Agreement (Phase A) and the two easement documents associated with the case. pc: SPR-340 M:\WPFILES\DON-C\plan-spr3.wpd LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 Hawthorn Avenue 0 Suite 207 0 Boulder, CO 80304 0(303)442-2428 November 26, 2001 Mr. Robert Anderson, Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County, Colorado 1555 North 17'"Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case No: SPR-340 Dear Mr. Anderson: Enclosed herewith is an Improvements Agreement for roadway, drainage, and utility work associated with SPR No. 340; Rolinda Colorado Company, Ltd., dba Firebaugh Precast, Inc. This Agreement is founded upon detailed roadway, drainage, and waterline construction drawings and designs as performed by Drexel Barrell& Company dated October 19, 2001, and the Landscape Plan completed by Peaceful Valley Studios, dated September 21, 2001. The aforesaid have been reviewed and approved by Weld County Public Works, the City of Dacono, and Mountain View Fire Protection District. The Improvements Agreement assumes: Collateralizing the Improvements via a Surety Bond. Collateralizing Phase A-Roadway and Phase I- Water via this Improvements Agreement (Phase B -Roadways and Phase 2 -Water would be collateralized at a future date triggered by subsequent, if applicable, Site Plan Review Proceeding(s)and/or Annexation proceedings before the City of Dacono. Paving the Phase A-Roadway. FROM : LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES PHONE NO. : 4422428 Nov. 14 2001 09:47RM P1 FAX TRANSMISSION LEEBURG&ASSOCIATES LINN T.LEEBURG 707 Hawthorn Avenue Boulder, CO 80304 (303)442-2428 Fax (303)444-8325 To:4 On/71/11104—S0/1 Date://—/y Fax#: Pages: a including this cover sheet. From: Linn T. Leeburg Subject: /_gyp -3°r—oor, COMMENTS: _<?9,p 3 yo /4--/ 1 Mr. Robert Anderson, Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County, Colorado November 26, 2001 Page 2 Review and execution by the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado is respectfully requested. Also enclosed is a Temporary Easement Agreement dedicating to the Public, Weld County and/or the City of Dacono a roadway and emergency access turn-around associated with Phase A of the Panoram Circle roadway. Should questions arise, kindly give me a call at 303-947-0791. Thank you for your response. Sincerely, Linn T. L Enclosure cc: Mr. Drew Scheltinga-Weld County Public Works Mr. Lee Morrison -Assistant County Attorney, Weld County Mr. Randy Lindsay-Brisbin -Firebaugh Precast. Inc. FROM : LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES PHONE NO. : 4422428 Nov. 14 2001 09:48RM P2 0OUNTgrN MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT s Administrative Office: i � =, s 9119 County Line Road*Longmont, CO 80501 e 1% e (303)772-0710•FAX (303)651-7702 GG' ,'' November 2,2001 ck0 \ 14)1 Mr.LinnLeebur 1. ' I ' ' 9I/ 8 r/ I'I IfI I Cp Leebtt 8t Associates 1 �fv ^ r 707 Hawthorn Avenue,Suite 207 G Q (1 n` / Boulder,CO 80304 t �( A Dear Mr. Leeburg: • I r' 1 I have reviewed the plans dated October 19, 2001 showing the on-site fire hydrants for the Firebaugh Precast project, located 5294 Weld County Road 12 in the Panoram Industrial Subdivision. The location of the proposed fire hydrants arc satisfactory as shown on the plans. With regard to the fire hydrant installation, I have the following comments: • The type of fire hydrant and the installation of the fire hydrant, waterlines, thrust blocks and valves, etc. shall be in accordance with requirements of the Central Weld Water District. • Fire hydrants shall be installed such that the hydrant connections arc at least 18 inches above grade and no more than 36 inches above grade • If ground cover and shrubbery is desired around fire hydrants for aesthetic purposes, the ground cover and shrubbery may not exceed 4 inches height. • If the fire hydrant is not set back at least three feet from a curb that is at least six inches high, then the hydrant must be protected by bollards. Bollards should be at least Schedule 40 steel pipes, at least 3 inches in diameter,set three feet in concrete and filled with concrete. Bollards should be located so as not to obstruct hydrant outlets. Should any changes be made to approved plans, additional comment and review by the Fire District will be necessary. Should you have any questions or need additional information or assistance, please contact me at(303)772.0710. Sincerely, Ca�`/ LuAnn?enfold Fire Marshal LMP/lp cc: project file file 10 1,02.01 Raton 1 Station 2 Mallon 9 Station 4 Stations Ration 6 Station 7 9119 cry Lne Rd. 10971 Wee 13 P.O.Box Sr5 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Sc,866 P.O.Box 40 Longmont CO Lo arrant.CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwol Road Lafayette.CO 800B8008 Folest St. 80501 50504 Mead.0080542 NMd 80025 F' ,CO 80544d895 tamn0.CO0e.co 80518 Damn'',00 cost1 a Robert R. Anderson - SPR-340 Page 1 From: Char Davis To: Anderson, Robert R. Date: 10/18/01 1:31 PM Subject: SPR-340 Robert, I know that we already discussed this but I was going thru my stuff and thought I should send you a response in writing. Response from the applicant representative pertaining to conditions to 2B, 2D, 2E, and 2F are not acceptable. Regards, Char Charlotte Davis, MPH Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Work (970) 304-6415 ext 2208 FAX (970) 304-6411 cdavis@co.weld.co.us FROM : LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES /"4‘ PHONE NO. : 4422428 Sep. 11 2001 12:04PM P1 FAX TRANSMISSION LEEBURG&ASSOCIATES LINr4 T.LEEBURG 707 Hawthorn Avenue Boulder, CO 80304 (303)442-2428 Fax: (303)444-8325 To: fah f��o� Date: 7 '�//r B/ Fax#: f 170 -304/ -4 yQ® Pages: j including this cover sheet. From: Linn T. Leeburg Subject: COMMENTS: /�f/lr✓P /�� yD✓ ro �'P< ''/// S�l'.. .1IS re-4,0#% /n /G 74' rD�/// /9��P S j<4,,,, �o- � d iie�r @ / :' 60A-, Li . FROM : LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES r PHONE NO. : 4422428 Sep. 11 2001 12:04PM P2 az-r @nrin(c®T do denver ' durango • grand junction • trinidad August 30, 2001I )1\ 4,Sp. ,yl .so• lMs. Karen Cumbo 6k/ City of Dacono P.O. Box 186 Dacono, CO 80514 • RE: Panaram Business Center Preliminary Site Plan and Drainage Study Applicant: Engineer. Drexel Barrell/Kenneth Armfield RGCE Job No. 34.0054 Dear Ms. Cumbo: We have received a submittal on the above-referenced project consisting of the following items: • Preliminary Construction Drawings, not dated The above items were reviewed for engineering issues using applicable sections of the current City of Dacono codes and criteria. We have the following comments: General 1. The proposed dead-end water lines should be looped. 2. Mt. View Fire Protection District will need to approve these plans. 3. City of Dacono criteria requires three (3) valves at all water line tees, and four (4) valves at crosses. It would appear that, if the 354 L.F. section of water line in front of the Phase I building went out of service, all water to buildings would be lost. In general, the rule is to locate valves so that only one hydrant will go out of service at a time in the event of a line break. 4. The three 42-inch culverts are'shown too low in the profile on page 4 of 6. The invert out of 36.00 could not daylight until somewhere north of the oil storage tanks according to the existing contours. 5. The recommendations given in the Geotechnical Report by Terracon for overexcavation for the roadways need to be shown on the civil drawings. 1331 17th street• suite 710• denver, colorado 80202 • (303) 293-8107 fax (303) 293-8106 FROM : LE`EBURG & ASSOCIATES PHONE NO. : 4422428 Sep. 11 2001 12:05PM P3 Ms. Karen Cumbo August 30,2001 Page 2 Panaram Drainage Study 1. The report is adequate. It should be noted that county criteria allows releasing at historic rates from the detention ponds, while City of Dacono criteria requires that the rates be based on soil types as per UD&FCD. We have allowed this procedure in the past. 2. While it does not meet City of Dacono criteria, the report does comply with generally accepted engineering practice. Recommendation • We recommend that the submittal be revised and resubmitted. This review is for general conformance with City of Dacono criteria, and does not relieve the applicant of complying with any specific regulation as may be required by a representative of the City. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us at this office. Sincerely, RG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Bruce A. Roscoe, P.E. Civil Engineering Manager BAR/mw cc: Kathleen Harrington, Griffiths, Tanoue, Light, Harrington & Dawes Sherry Albertson-Clark, Albertson Clark Associates Linn Leeburg, Leeburg and Assoc. Rick Gonsalves, P.E., RG Consulting Engineers • W2GCE\aoRIVE\0034\0054\WinWord\Review.ltr 140 LEEBURG & ASSOCIATES 707 Hawthorn Avenue 0 Suite 207 0 Boulder, CO 80304 0(303) 442-2428 August 1, 2001 Distribution List: csoe9k Mr. Robert Anderson, Planner Q\a v,-Weld County Department of Planning Services e`aO0�pty 6� 1555 North 17th Avenue w UG 4 Greeley, CO 80631 p L9 Ms. Diane M. Houghtaling, P.E. q'� �Ct` Traffic Engineer !� Weld County Department of Public Works 1111 H Street Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632-0758 Mr. Bruce A. Roscoe,P.E. r g consulting engineers, inc. 1331 - 17th Street, Suite 710 Denver, CO 80202 Ms. Sherry Albertson-Clark, AICP 5313 Fairway Six Drive Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: SPR-340 Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed herewith are preliminary road, water line, and drainage design drawings for SPR-340 (Rolinda Colorado Company Ltd and Firebaugh Precast, Inc.), as prepared by Drexel, Barren& Company dated July 13, 2001. Also enclosed is a Geotechnical Engineering Report for Pavement Thickness Design as prepared by Terracon dated July 24, 2001. Your review and comments are appreciated prior to finalizing these designs and submittals of the Site Plan Review Plat. Said drawings are also being reviewed by Mountain View Fire Protection District and Central Weld County Water District (CWCWD). Distribution List SPR-340 August 1, 2001 Page 2 The designs assume: ► A 100 ft. wide right-of-way width for Weld County Road 12 which is within the City of Dacono's jurisdiction. ► Phased road and waterline construction which can be collateralized by appropriate Improvement Agreements to be executed between Rolinda/Firebaugh, Weld County, and the City of Dacono. Note: Please provide said Improvements Agreements for consideration and execution by Rolinda/Firebaugh. ► A water line in Panoram Circle tying-in to a planned 24" CWCWD line running along Weld County Road 12, which will be installed Summer, 2001 and has already been paid for by Rolinda/Firebaugh ► Fire flow capability in excess of 3,500 gallons per minute. ► Ultimate traffic levels assumed at five (5) times the levels projected within this Site Plan Review(SPR-340) (i.e., 5 x 48 trips/day=240 trips/day). ► Roadway design to achieve R-values of not less than 20. Note: The preliminary designs of July 13, 2001, "Typical Panoram Circle Section"will be revised accordingly to reflect the Recommended Payment Section(s) outlined by Terracon in their July 24, 2001 report. ► A 35 ft. wide drainage way along the south side of Weld County Road 12 with 3:1 side slopes. Your prompt response is appreciated. Should questions arise, I may be reached at 303-947-0791. Sincerely, Linn T. Lee urg cc: Randy Lindsay-Brisbin, Firebaugh Precast Cliff Brockman, Drexel, Barrell& Company ... .__ lC l ri"" asseas 1'1)( h, 30 i -1.'? [(JUt. www ( i'nn ads 303 127-307_6 WL Contractors Inc. 635 W. S5dt Ave. Arvada, CO 80002 July 5,2001 Linn Leeburg Leeburg& Associates 707 Hawthorn Ave Boulder, Co 80304 RE: Response to Comments on Firebough Traffic Study Dear Mr. Leeburg: The following is a response to the review comments on the Traffic Study. 1. Does the seventeen acres complete the development of the industrial park? If additional lots remain to be developed then trips from those lots should be included in the access volumes? The additional lots are not included in this development and at this time the land is planned to remain vacant. Thus no additional trips will be added to the projected traffic. 2. The traffic impact study should include analysts of projected 2020 traffic conditions with and without site traffic for intersection and for roadway level of service. The projected traffic for this development represents only 12%of the traffic on the adjacent roadway. As additional land develops and the background traffic increases, the percentage of traffic on the roadways from this development decreases. This development will not cause an impact on the existing roadway system and will be an even smaller percentage of the roadway traffic in the future. The Level of Service is determined by analyzing peak hours. The development is projected to generate 7 trips in the AM peak hour and 6 trips in the PM peak hour. The analysis showed that these trips will not degrade the level of service on Weld County Road 12 when the site is constructed. Seven trips in the AM peak period and 6 trips in the PM peak hour will also not affect the Level of Service in any future year. The above information shows that a 2020 analysis is not needed and should not be required. Page 2 July 5,2001 Firebaugh st Response to Duffle Study Review mm 3. Describe access sight distance conditions and distances to adjacent intersections and access locations. There are no restrictions to site distance at the proposed access. The north side of Weld County Road 12 is undeveloped in the area. The driveways on the south side of Weld County Road 12 are widely spaced and typical of rural gravel roadways. There will be no conflicts with adjacent driveways. The site is between Weld County Road 11 and Weld County Road 13. Them is sufficient distance between the access and the intersections that the access will not impact either intersection. 4. Trip generation projections seem adequate for 13 employees. Are 15 employees S maximum number of employees required with full development of the site. Firebaugh Precast estimates 15 employees at the site. 5. Describe the number of gravel trucks required on a daily basis to supply the concrete plant for the precast operation. The number ofgravel trucks per day plus precast loads per day plus employee trips will be used to determine pavement design for WCRl2. Gravel trucks were included in the 9 hauls per day used in the traffic study. Resp7,e) ly Submitted, Fred Lantz, P.E. Traffic Engineer 13336 W. 72"°CU Arvada, CO 80006 (303)887-3714 Fax(303)423.4946 LANTZ ASSOCIATES Fax tIM Unn Leeburg Priem Fred Lent comemayr Leeburg&Associates as D7/05/01 rime 303.444.8325 ramp 3 Pia 303.442.2428 Firebauph Traffic Comments cc: Eric Boivin O Urgent C Per Review Danes COmnname CPIs Ropy O Res Recycle •temraantes ... Linn, Here is the response to the comments on the Traffic Report. As you will see, I don't plan on making any changes to the Traffic Study. I believe that most S the comments are not appropriate for a development as small as thie one. Iva be glad to talk to the City if they have any questions, or need additional Waterston, The original Is in the man to you, so that you can have It for your Re. Fred ISM Eh St.P.O.Box 400,Fades,CO, TR I=TOW N PHONE:393.033-23311 • Sop Farmer & iner Volume 74 Number 34 'Your hometown newspaper since 1930 W dnesday,Aug.PB 2000 Trail & open space - plan unveiled here ty Michael Mellon A repema! read+r,tt,of nenriv 311 miler in length has hi- dniwidned e1:d p1.1p,.ed tbmugh the efforts of sever. Ai mnnue:pal.-can't rind private so:Mr offkiels—e pr.'s..r hriMeli.,la„d?with oma space preservation. Weld reenti lung image planner Ann Ent Johnson us.Fa.L. 'fitt'I'..w t L,ei wink te unveil the trail and open ^V4, %n• X111 rib.,N1 Vrem Valley Open Laneia and Trails Pr•c., i ,,h.4,, I'll wvu,1. and the public. Jonathan Moore n,l rbeame Lariev at 1lderrrdo Open Lands(heedyuer• weed u1 ladrw,.1.d were ni.,,prevent toexplain the aspects See proposed tat map'on P(p F "'1 nl o 94,11•,, L• 1u 04.0,that e.ouch an integral part of the 11.,,all Imm--+ , b,r,1,1„l Ipen Lands is presently pro• wont�1,u —Iu u,r. , al land. flan.Nerd to Road 28.the trail cm.- 1111.4. utilitie:: of Erie, Dacron, Frederick, .. .. ad Ile' t ' ,pine,with probable trail links join. rnp Ir....1,rmn1•nn.tl.ulder,and other communities to the eeaufl' \lent env developers ere including proposed inter. „1 Page 2 Farmer&Miner Wed.,August 23,2000 .”' "Trails, » Ir_y--- ; Continued from Page 1 % ? G N i' , n nal trail systems that will link their `fir �, %� developments with the major trail system. Johnson noted that in all : 1 �,. 0 = I s` - 1J these communities, "growth is hap- I / , ii- —I cc f _ J pening at a swift and coordinated o �.b- •"'t / • _Sipace,"and the creation of recreational LONGM DNT „tyj a j trails and preservation of open space x+ t< are desired before all the scraps of �x.r.ns 1 • _ b*' '.Tit-,, 1099.119 land are developed and covered with — 'r y n homes and businesses and roads. s,v, ")> ` o p :'� ? - / i "The trail serves as a magnet for `°h' t ` : n / 1 [".. �. preserving open space and agricul- 'v t� - coral areas,"Johnson said.She noted i I that Great Outdoors Colorado , 1,) (LOCO) has already played a key //� � .r, } 1nrole in the project with grant fundsh_k- . )for planning and preliminary stud- f ies.A final master plan and budgetr;for the project were submitted toI- S ,,,,, GOCO several weeks ago,and there ..0 _..-- has been"no negative response"from '_ Ft"STONE that agency,Johnson said. ��\ i Such a far reaching project is V " " 5 n� q(�^ not created overnight,and timelines r ) ._-- are closely tied to project funding, 7 — '— /� Johnson said, including a determt- Hwy.53 '� e I -\ % / nation of what open spaces will be - gr� donated and what must be purchased. � e , ' _, r �5[r _,�Axr.32 "We don't know a realistic timeline until we know realistic funding," dc, -1 _ ?L., I ,..1 Johnson said. She said her "most ` I / r optimistic look" sees total project 1i1 r r b i ,--" I completion in about ten years. ` f �J Moore said he and his staff have / �� ...,,,lll %r `• met with landowners along the pro- _ ��- i I posed trail routefromBarbourPonds �' at Del Camino, southwest toiS,;i, c�as� l/`__ ,•,---r't' Ice-w.�\ f.ongmont's Sandstone Ranch, and - ld �- ./'� I,. further south along Boulder Creek. '7 - About 14 landowners have been con- ! `, J - ,,,,.--�� < tatted and told of the plan for a lei- Is , , _ ! r -41,4 if—. ` ° pure trail system and open space pres- = or ervution.Since negotiations are still o ` c Jr. - . ill progress, Moore could not name r�T�t�. v _ rf names or point to specific pieces of .,v..on. '—` .---r— iv' properly,but he expressed optimism /when he said that at least a half -� �" ` dozen discussions are "moving for- — I ,.--,• - l Una s`t""''�" '^' uaoa+me yagwra, ward" Moore explained that if desired LEGEND :orridor land is not donated,censer- • TRAIL MAP .e - -- - -- - —. • -scion easements are being sought, `„ = whereby the property owner retains SCALE: w.... "'°"'""" ownership rights and usually sur- —PCrr--'n /-`�, t«"-''a. ' .,. • ,e..,.,..,, renders only the right of further de- 0SALM 2Ma•ES +mta.ES RraffiTh ' PAGE: 28 velopment. There can also be"corn — pensation for development value," Moore added. The trail and open space project on any portion of the trail (except ley Open Lands and Trails Project. lie stressed that if a property is"very much private-property-rights perhaps maintenance vehicles). Town of Frederick trustee Dar owner wants nothing to do with the driven,"Moore said, If a landowner Weld County, Boulder County, Williams was one of several loca project and wants none of his land wants to be a part of the project, he Erie, Frederick, Decono, Firestone, officials attending last week's pre involved, the property owner is not may,for instance,make any and all and Longmont have worked on the sentation of the proposed project.Als, pressured. "That's okay, we'll go decisions about who(if anyone) will project—and most have made finan- an avid bicyclist and mountain hiker aroundyou and not bother your land," be allowed on his piece of project cial commitments. State parks and climber, Williams listened to th, the reluctant property owner is told. property for hunting or fishing. Colorado Open Lands have made con- project presentation and nodded hi: Johnson reaffirmed that flexible at- The trail system will be mainly siderable in-kind contributions.Con- approval. "I'd like to be one of th, titude when site said,"Weld County for hiking or biking, with some at- sultant Tim Raters and the CSU first to do the whole loop,either hik does not believe in the condemnation tached portions for equestrian use. Cooperative Extension have also been ing or biking,"he said, of lands." No motorized vehicles will be allowed strong eart.ncre in rha St.Vrain Val. Hello