The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20012401.tiff LAFARGE September 12, 2001 Ms. Esther Gesick Board of County Commissioners 915 10`h Street, First Floor Greeley, CO 80632 RE- Docket No. 2001-62 Dear Ms. Esther Gesick: Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc., a subsidiary of Lafarge Corporation, has received your notice for the Board of County Commissioner's hearing scheduled for September 19, 2001. We are requesting to have our case postponed until Wednesday, October 17, 2001. Our traffic consultant will not be able to complete the traffic study until October 8 and the Public Works Department requested some time to review and approve the information. Should you have any additional questions, please contact me at (303) 657-4331. Sincerely, bAie/Goettemoeller Senior Land Manager Cc: Diane Houghtaling, Public Works ;2O61-, (7/3 sl EXHIBIT WESTERN MOBILE INC.,a subsidiary of Lafarge Corporation TECHNICAL SERVICES ,/,` , 1590 W.12th Ave.,Denver,Colorado 80204-3410 �—a'C• Office:(303)657-4000 Fax:(303)657-4339 LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 1889 York Street Denver, CO 80206 (303)333-1105 FAX (303)333-1107 E-mail: lsc@iscden.com Web Site: http://www.lscden.com TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. October 8, 2001 Weld County Planning Dept. Mr. Julie Goettemoeller OCT 1 G 2001 Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc. 1800 N. Taft Hill Road RECEIVE Fort Collins, CO 80522 D Re: Cottonwood Gravel Pit Weld County, Colorado (LSC # 011240) Dear Ms. Goettemoeller: We are pleased to submit our report of the traffic impacts of the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit located in Weld County, Colorado. This study first provides a summary of existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the proposed site. It then provides estimates of the amount and directional distribution of traffic that will be generated by the proposed operation as well as estimates of existing plus project-generated traffic volumes on the surrounding road system. In light of the 20-year life of the operation, estimates of Year 2021 background and total traffic are also provided. Finally, the impacts of the project's generated traffic are evaluated and recommendations are made regarding roadway improvements. This site is within the juris- diction of Weld County, Colorado and this report has been prepared in accordance with its requirements. The remainder of this report presents our findings concerning the traffic impacts of the proposed development. Background The proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit will replace the existing Hamm Gravel Pit. The existing ` Hamm Gravel Pit is located in the northwest corner of the intersecdon of St.. c Highway (SH) 119 and Weld County Road 7. Most of the gravel has been removed from this site and it will be closing down shortly. The proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit already is in operation but on a limited basis. Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc. expects to transfer the existing Hamm business to the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit. Figure 1 depicts the location of the existing Hamm Gravel Pit as well as the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit with respect to the major roadways in and around both gravel pits. Figure 2 depicts the major roadways impacted by the proposed gravel pit. The site is located directly above the western portion of the Town of Frederick and about six 11 miles southeast of the City of Longmont. It is bounded by Weld County Road 20.5 on the ti north County Road 7 on the east, the Town of Frederick on-the south, and a ditch on k the west. The propo ned to have a single access point onto Weld County y° EXHIBIT 2nd h»USCf48g Ms. Julie Geottemoeller Page 2 October 8, 2001 Road 20.5. This access already exists and is currently serving the limited operation at the Cottonwood Gravel Pit. This access is approximately one mile west of Weld County Road 7. The proposed use for the site is gravel mining. Existing Roadway Characteristics A total of five intersections plus the existing access onto Weld County Road 20.5 are felt to be the ones most impacted by the proposed gravel pit. These intersections are -- Weld County Road 1/Weld County Road 20.5, Weld County 7/Weld County Road 20.5, Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 20, Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 18, and Weld County Road 7/SH 52. Figure 3 illustrates the existing lane geometry and traffic control at these six intersections. SH 52 is currently a two-lane roadway with east/west continuity through Weld County. It begins at SH 119 in Boulder County and ends in Wiggins in Morgan County. This roadway provides access to 1-25, US 85, and I-76 to the east. According to the State Highway Access Code, SH 52 is classified as either a Rural Arterial (RA) or a Non-Rural Arterial (NRA) depending on the surrounding area. Near the proposed gravel pit, SH 52 is an RA west of Weld County Road 7 and an NRA east of Weld County Road 7. Weld County Road 7is a paved, two-lane, north/south county road with continuity between SH 119 on the north to SH 7 on the south, a distance of about 11 miles. Weld County Road 7 between SH 119 and SH 52 (approximately five miles) is a heavily used truck route. All the access points with this roadway are Stop controlled with the Stop control on the east/west roadways. At SH 119 and SH 52, this roadway is Stop controlled. Weld County Road 20.5 is a two-lane paved and unpaved, east/west county road. It begins on the west at Weld County Road 1 (Weld/Boulder County Line) and continues east where it ends at the I-25 frontage road. East of Weld County Road 7, this roadway is unpaved. Existing Traffic Figure 3 illustrates existing peak-hour intersection turning movement traffic volumes in the vicinity of the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit at the five existing intersections. These volumes are based on counts conducted by CounterMeasures,Inc. in September 2001. Heavy vehicles were also surveyed during the counts and the resulting truck percentages for each movement were used in the capacity analyses. Printouts of all count data are attached to this report. Year 2021 Background Traffic Since the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit will replace the existing Hamm Gravel Pit, it is assumed that there will be no start up time before the proposed gravel pit will be in full production. Therefore, no short-term planning year is necessary. The North Front Range Transportation and Air Quality Planning Council has developed a travel forecasting model for the north front range area which includes the location of the proposed Ms. Julie Geottemoeller Page 3 October 8, 2001 gravel pit. This model does not include either Weld County Road 7 or 20.5, but does include SH 119 and SH 52. SH 119 is forecasted to grow at an annual rate of about 4.5 percent while SH 52 is forecasted to grow at an annual rate of 1.5 to 2.2 percent. The growth rate for SH 119 and SH 52 was averaged to arrive at an annual growth rate for Weld County Road 7 and 20.5. This method resulted in an annual growth rate of 3.0 percent. Therefore, for 2021, a growth factor of 1.80 was applied to the 2001 existing traffic counts to arrive at an estimate for 2021. The resulting Year 2021 background traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 4. Heavy vehicle volumes are also shown in Figure 4. These background traffic volumes represent the future traffic volumes on the area roadways without the expected traffic generated by the proposed gravel pit and therefore form the basis for evaluating the impacts that traffic generated by the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit will have on the surrounding roadway system. Estimated Traffic Generation and Distribution The applicant provided actual vehicle information for the existing Hamm facility for one week in January 2001 and July 2001. This information consisted of the departure time for each truck, the gross and tare weight, and destination. Based on information, the following daily and peak-hour traffic generation activities resulted: Daily Traffic Generation Rates • Haul/End Dump Trucks 145 one-way trips leaving the site • Light Vehicles: 10 one-way trips leaving the site Morning Peak-Hour Traffic Generation Rates • Haul/End Dump Trucks 18 one-way trips leaving the site • Light Vehicles 1 one-way trips leaving the site Evening Peak-Hour Traffic Generation Rates • Haul/End Dump Trucks 3 one-way trips leaving the site • Light Vehicles 0 one-way trips leaving the site. The only trucks using the proposed gravel pit are going to hauling raw material. Therefore, Weld County is suggesting that a dwell time of ten minutes be used. The applicant does not own any of the trucks visiting the site; as such, no trucks are stored at the site. Therefore, there will be an equal number of empty trucks entering the site during the morning and evening peak-hours and throughout the entire day. The applicant also provided an estimate of the directional distribution for the proposed gravel pit. This estimate indicates that 60 percent of the vehicles visiting the site will be to and from the east and the other 40 percent will be accessing the site to and from the west. The applicant also provided the route the traffic will use in accessing the proposed gravel pit. For traffic coming from the east, vehicles will use Weld County Road 20.5 to Weld County Road 7 and then south on Weld County Road 7 until they reach SH 52. For traffic coming from the west,vehicles will use Weld County Road 20.5 until they reach Weld County Road 1 and north on Weld County Road 1 until they reach SH 119. Ms. Julie Geottemoeller Page 4 October 8, 2001 As indicated above, the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit is projected to generate a total of 320 vehicle-trips, or 145 vehicles entering and 155 vehicles exiting the site during a typical 24- hour week day. Of these, 18 vehicles would enter and exit in the morning peak-hour, while seven vehicles would enter and exit in the evening peak-hour. Of the morning peak-hour, all but one of the vehicles are considered to be a haul or end dump truck. For the evening peak- hour, all the vehicles are either a haul or end dump truck. It should be noted that all of the trucks entering the site will be empty. Figure 5 depicts the site-generated traffic at the five intersections plus the one site access point. These estimates are based on the morning and evening peak-hour traffic generation estimates and directional distribution of site-generated traffic discussed above. Finally, Figures 6 and 7 illustrate Year 2001 and 2021 total traffic volumes which are the combination of background (Figures 3 and 4) and site-generated (Figure 5) traffic. Again, heavy vehicle volumes are indicated for affected movements. Capacity Analyses In order to assess the impacts of the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit, related capacity analyses have been performed which compare existing and future background traffic operating conditions (Figures 3 and 4) with those reflecting the addition of site-generated traffic (Figures 6 and 7). The methodology used is that presented in the 2000 edition of the nationally accepted Highway Capacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. The concept of Level of Service (LOS) is used as a basis for computing combinations of roadway operating conditions. By definition, six different Levels of Service are used (A, B, C, D, E, and F) with"A" being a relatively free-flow condition and"E" representing the "capacity" of a given intersection or traffic movement. Table 2 summarizes the results of our Level of Service (LOS) analyses. Computer printouts containing output from the Synchro 5.0 software are enclosed. Weld County Road 1/Weld County Road 20.5: The unsignalized intersection currently has east/west Stop control. In 2001, all of the traffic movements at this intersection are expected to operate at a very good Level of Service (LOS "B" or better) in the morning and evening peak- hours either with or without the traffic from the proposed gravel pit. In 2021, the westbound approach at this unsignalized intersection are expected to operate at a poor Level of Service (LOS"V or worse) in the morning peak-hour. This condition exists either with or without the traffic from the proposed gravel pit. Changes in lane geometry were evaluated at this intersection to eliminate the poor performance. Separate left- and right-turn lanes were assumed, however, the westbound approach continued to operate at a poor Level of Service. When a traffic signal is assumed, this intersection is expected to operate at a very good Level of Service (LOS 'B") in the morning and evening peak-hours. There is a slight increase in average vehicle delay when the traffic from the proposed gravel pit is added to the future year background traffic volumes. By the Year 2021,it appears this intersection will meet the peak-hour traffic signal warrants from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Ms. Julie Geottemoeller Page 5 October 8, 2001 Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 20.5: The unsignalized intersection currently has east/west Stop control. All of the traffic movements at this unsignalized intersection are expected to operate at a good Level of Service (LOS "C" or better) in the morning and evening peak-hours. This applies to both 2001 and 2021. Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 20: The unsignalized intersection currently has east/west Stop control. All of the traffic movements at this unsignalized intersection are expected to operate at a very good Level of Service (LOS "B" or better) in the morning and evening peak-hours. This applies to both 2001 and 2021. Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 18: The unsignalized intersection currently has east/west Stop control. All of the traffic movements at this unsignalized intersection are expected to operate at a very good Level of Service (LOS "B" or better) in the morning and evening peak-hours. This applies to both 2001 and 2021. Weld County Road/SH 52: This unsignalized intersection currently has north/south Stop control. In 2001, the northbound and southbound approaches operate at an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS "F") in the morning and evening peak-hours either with or without the traffic from the proposed development. In 2021, only the westbound approach is not expected to experience any problems. Changes in lane geometry was evaluated but problems still existed. One additional through lane on SH 52 was also evaluated,but the problem persisted. A traffic signal will need to be installed at this intersection for it to operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS "D" or better) in the morning and evening peak-hours. This intersection appears to meet MUTCD peak-hour traffic signal warrants in the morning peak-hour. Average Daily Traffic Impacts Figure 8 shows the average daily impacts due to the site-generated traffic including the daily number of heavy vehicles generated by the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit. The average daily impacts are minimal, indicating that by Year 2021, it is estimated that site-generated traffic will be accountable for less than 15 percent of the daily traffic on Weld County Road 7 and 20.5. Site-generated traffic on SH 52 will account for about one percent of the total traffic by the Year 2021. Truck Impacts on Pavement Condition The destructive effect of repeated wheel loads is the major factor which contributes to the deterioration of roadway pavements. Since both the magnitude of the load and the number of repetitions are important, provision is made in pavement design procedures to allow for the effects of the number and weight of all axle loads expected during the design period. CDOT uses pavement design procedures which convert traffic data to 18 Kip equivalent single-axle load applications (18K ESAL). Eighteen Kip or 18,000 lbs is the maximum legal load allowed on a single axle. CDOT uses the following load equivalency factors for flexible pavement design: 1. passenger vehicle: 0.003 2. single-unit trucks: 0.249 3. combination trucks: 1.087 Ms. Julie Geottemoeller Page 6 October 8, 2001 The latter category includes the tractor trailer combinations that would be hauling materials from the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit. Eighteen Kip ESAL's have been calculated for the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit on Weld County Road 7 and 20.5 using the CDOT load equivalency factors and assumptions regarding the breakdown of traffic into the various vehicle classifications. Based on these assumptions, the Cottonwood Gravel Pit will generate about 116,875 ESALs on an annual basis or about 2,337,500 ESALs over the next 20 years. On Weld County Road 20.5 east of the site access, the total number of ESALs will be about 70,125 on an annual basis or about 1,402,500 over the next 20 years.. In 2001, the ESALs generated by the proposed gravel pit will result in an increase of about 60 percent of the back- ground levels. As background traffic volumes increase, the site-generated traffics' share decreases to about 33 percent. On Weld County Road 20.5 west of the site access, the total number of ESALs is estimated to be about 46,750 on an annual basis or about 935,000 over the next 20 years. In 2001, the ESALs generated by the proposed gravel pit will result in an increase of about 32 percent of the background levels. This share decreases to about 17 percent as a result of the growth in background traffic. On Weld County Road 7 north of Weld County Road 18, the total number of ESALs is estimated to be about 70,125 on an annual basis or about 1,402,500 over the next 20 years. In 2001, the ESALs generated by the proposed gravel pit will result in an increase of about 105 percent of the background levels. This share decreases to about 58 percent as a result of the growth in background traffic. Intersection Improvements An analysis was performed on three intersections, Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 20.5, Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 1, and Weld County 7/ SH 52, to determine how well each of these intersections performs in handling large trucks. Figures 9 through 14 depict the results of this analysis. Weld County 7/Weld County Road 20.5: Two movements were analyzed. Eastbound Weld County Road 20.5 to southbound Weld County Road 7 (see Figure 9) and northbound Weld County Road 7 to westbound Weld County Road 20.5 (see Figure 10). As can be seen in Figure 9, in order for trucks to avoid going into the northbound lane of Weld County Road 7, large trucks will have to travel on the dirt portion of the right-of-way. Additional asphalt mat will need to be added to the southwest corner of this intersection. There appears to be enough right-of-way to accomplish this. This determination is based on where the fence is located and not a detailed investigation of the Assessor records. It appears that there is enough existing asphalt mat for northbound trucks on Weld County Road 7 desiring to turn left onto Weld County Road 20.7 (see Figure 10). Ms. Julie Geottemoeller Page 7 October 8, 2001 Weld County Road 7/SH 52:Two movements were analyzed, southbound Weld County Road 7 to eastbound SH 52 (see Figure 11) and westbound SH 52 to northbound Weld County Road 7 (see Figure 12). As can be seen in Figures 11 and 12, there is enough existing asphalt mat to permit large trucks to make the desired turning movements. Weld County Road 20.5/Weld County Road 1:Two movements were analyzed,westbound Weld County Road 20.5 to northbound Weld County Road 1 (see Figure 13) and southbound Weld County Road 1 to eastbound Weld County Road 20.5 (see Figure 14). As can be seen in Figure 13, in order for trucks to avoid going into the southbound lane of Weld County Road 1, large trucks will have to travel on the dirt portion of the right-of-way. Additional asphalt mat will need to be added to the northeast corner of this intersection. There appears to be enough right-of-way to accomplish this. However, there is an irrigation ditch located near the road- way. This determination is based on where the plowed field ends and not a detailed investigation of the Assessor records. It appears that there is enough existing asphalt mat for southbound trucks on Weld County Road 1 desiring to turn left onto Weld County Road 20.7 (see Figure 14). Recommendations In order to mitigate the impacts from the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit, the following inter- section improvements are needed: 1. The southwest corner of the intersection of Weld County Road 7 and Weld County Road 20.5 will need to have additional asphalt added. Figure 15 depicts where the additional material needs to be added. 2. The northeast corner of the intersection of Weld County Road 1 and Weld County Road 20.5 will need to have additional asphalt added. Figure 16 depicts where the additional material needs to be added. No other roadway improvements are needed to mitigate the impacts from the proposed gravel pit. However, in order for the intersections analyzed in this report to operate at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS"D"or better), some intersection improvements are needed. They consist of: 1. The intersection of Weld County Road 1 and Weld County Road 20.5 will need to have a traffic signal installed. The exact date at which this signal will be needed is not known, however, it appears that the need for the signal will occur between 2016 and 2021. Weld County should monitor this intersection and once it meets MUTCD traffic signal warrants, the signal should be installed. The existing lane geometry does not need to be changed. 2. The intersection of Weld County Road 7 and SH 52 will need to have a traffic signal installed. The exact date at which this signal will be needed is not known, however, it appears that the need for the signal will occur between 2016 and 2021. Weld County should monitor this intersection and once it meets MUTCD traffic signal warrants, the signal should be installed. Additional through lanes need to be added Ms. Julie Geottemoeller Page 8 October 8, 2001 to SH 52 as well as a separate left-turn lanes in both directions. The northbound and southbound approaches also need separate left-turn lanes. Conclusions Based upon the foregoing analyses, the following conclusions can be made concerning the traffic impacts of the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit: 1. The proposed gravel pit is expected to generate a total of 290 heavy vehicle-trips and 20 passenger vehicle/pickup trips on an average work day. During the morning peak-hour, about 18 vehicles are expected to enter and exit the site. All but two of these vehicles will be heavy vehicles. In the evening peak-hour, a total of three vehicles is expected to enter and exit the site. All of these vehicles will be heavy vehicles. 2. About 60 percent of the traffic generated by the Cottonwood Gravel Pit would be oriented to and from the east on Weld County Road 20.5 while the remaining 40 percent would be oriented to and from the west on Weld County Road 20.5. 3. Of the six intersections analyzed in this report,four are expected to operate at a good Level of Service (LOS "C" or better), Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 20.5, Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 20, Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 18, and the site access with Weld County Road 20.5. The other two inter- sections, Weld County Road 1/Weld County Road 20.5 and Weld County Road 7/ SH 52, are expected to have problems over the next 20 years. 4. Two intersections will need minor widening to accommodate the large trucks. These intersections are Weld County Road 7/Weld County Road 20.5 and Weld County Road 1/Weld County Road 20.5. 5. Over the next 20 years, the traffic generated by the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit will account for approximately 30 percent of the total number of ESALs on Weld County Road 20.5 west of Weld County Road 7 and 18 percent on Weld County Road 20.5 east of Weld County Road 1. On Weld County Road 7 north of Weld County Road 18, site-generated traffic will account for about 43 percent of the ESALs. 6. The traffic impacts of the Cottonwood Gravel Pit can be accommodated by the existing roadway system with the improvements recommended herein. Ms. Julie Geottemoeller Page 9 October 8, 2001 We trust that this information will assist you with further planning for the proposed develop- ment of the proposed Cottonwood Gravel Pit. Please call if we can be of further assistance. Respectfully submitted, LSC�'Trransportation Consultants, Inc. �— e O RUH' ..e.By. Dave L. Rule '., P.E. :`�;Q�O` 9 �9d .O 9. DLR/wc t 13428 J Enclosures: Tables 1 Figures 1-16 Traffic Counts Capacity Analyses \\Server\d\LSC\Projects\2001\011240\Report\F-COG P.wpd Table 1 I Intersection Level of Service Cottonwood Gravel Pit Development Weld County,Colorado Year2001 Year 2021 Yea 2001 Background plus Year 2021 Background plus Background Traffic Site-Generated Traffic Background Traffic Site-Generated Traffic Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Traffic Service Service Service Service Service Service Service Service Control Intersection Location AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Unsignalized WCR 1&VCR 20.5 Two-Way Stop a)Eastbound Approach B B B B D C D C b)Westbound Approach B B B B F B F B c)Northbound Left-Tum A A A A A A A A d)Southbound Left-Turn A A A A A A A A Unsignalized WCR 7&WCR 20.5 Two-Way Stop a)Eastbound Approach B A B A B B B B b)Westbound Approach B B B B C B C B c)Northbound Left-Tum A A A A A A A A d)Southbound Left-Tum A A A A A A A A Unsignalized WCR 7&WCR 20 Two-Way Stop a)Eastbound Approach B B B B B B B B b)Westbound Approach A A A A B B B B c)Northbound Left-Tum — A — A A A A A d)Southbound Left-Tum A A A A A A A A _ Unsignalized VVCR 7&WCR 16 Two-Way Stop a)Eastbound Approach B A B A B B B B b)Westbound Approach A A A A B B B B c)Northbound Left-Tum A A A A A A A A d)Southbound Left-Tum A A A A A A A A Unsignalized WCR 7&SH 52 Two-Way Stop a)Eastbound Approach A A A A A F A F b)Westbound Approach A A A A A A A A c)Northbound Approach F F F F F F F F d)Southbound Approach F F F F F F F F Unsignalized WCR 7&Access Road Two-Way Stop a)Westbound Left—Turn NA NA A A NA NA A A b)Northbound Approach NA NA B B NA NA B B Mitigation Measures Unsignalized WCR 7&SH 52(1) Two-Way Stop a)Eastbound Left-Turn B A B A — — — — b)Westbound Left-Tum A B A B — — — — c)Northbound Approach C C C C — — — — d)Southbound Approach C C C C — — — — Signalized WCR 1&WCR 20.5 a)Entire Intersection — — — — B B A A b)Intersection Delay(seciveh.) — — — — 13.1 17.0 9.6 9.6 Signalized WCR 7&SH 52 a)Entire Intersection — — — — B B B B b)Intersection Delay(seciveh.) — — — — 13.9 10.9 14.4 11.0 r- (1)-Lane Geometry Changes 9 'Y;','",0:-/ -.4.__,.,, R a+','-'m is " .-. „t, ," -?.,.;:;,„4-145:- Awziw .r.-„• ., * -r Y Y ''' . ry��°"�� `r`. 1 �* ,.�'' _ '� $t�v.wgkr sk q*'".TMfi� 93 �p �.�' � ..a4 �`'- � .7;.,.,,,,,,.4.-'•-•-•.-N sr 1 +M Y xf i } is x } .n ,kk<�Cy a� " Ct Ti 44,40174r1'+" Y") .� t '�-.Y$' . »' k ..,k, sn�1'r 7 �. $ :W � dl '�u,rr .ayK,., a.` �r r'� t „ . tts -ax'IIx .y ;:ii s: a j;✓ _ F3 s`'S'.fr. 4 ',x x fit a -- 1 -Ay '^iy, ,Tre ddcr `"� �k � Y "n �f •'Pr? � :.^ •-••;,1,4,•,;O4...J.� � .{ "x c'��, `,. .�t"S. a k{4y : 'a Y ilaty z -,-:- : ?-p ,,,...,,,,...,..,,44,,,,_,.37,::,,...7. Y 5 't t 'Tw �'`'^ . ry re ei:-- f i ) ° 'i&r £ n y '.ky to Y % � .k ' ¢ ""f`��4 �`U' ' -,•' ?.- 4:'2. b r v a *",u d9p -.1,1"...-'4 z§!. #'e ¢* w--?1,w,":k.;,. ....„.„,,,,,,,[1,../•-..4.it.k.,:ifv„.-:...,it,... : t t. .. a x. xp '^ s S, r z>r S'' } ',.',/ ' W ' g w4 !,!la--- .?'1°'" ?y i'•3 ^,.' it - Y y -? ✓ ;. �. W f y 4itt ix _33.;;;,%; ;;;,% '{ X K: JAW/at.sz, ti 's Acs : _t✓,' Yx . 'A ✓ 'ski 1C� „.n 32 n�" '° } t ` d " x�� C'F y fr ; "'yg Y `i * s Ie z2'4 l F {7 t , , .. 4 'r '�':� s .: ",s,"..,,,.- - ' � yi�y Y-- E. fi- vf, - s• +i:.:. ,,a ,,,,,at,-Z-1,-1,-.-'' ,i 3 t * �u, ^"` re r '"' s +uzi4 � +n""tsA '. ;aq n`.✓ �' a'Y�eC�Y Y Y _.2,_[_::„,",:,,,,,„:::,,,,:,„,,..,., t� C • Y s Fa °SS R 4 d „r s# ,r kuNW,', + �+? '"!7' fix � `>p 5 -' x ' � " t gsy,, i a " tiro `f " VC..'-',"!,lln$$a, k 4'd; #4a x r,-y aE w*y � ,�+. ,!h *'•' x«� .s „ Y z� r ` �fl ° c v,. �„v<, f .,te #��+ s t r .P • t '11,... T & y ra^ ,..,q°4�-0 •.:-.: '4ky ` rr`�&R y €,� `eye' , 4•++<'c'.= ••:•/.--.-44:LA.�� ,yi,x,'., 1. - Figure 1 Vicinit/ny' GMoMa00 k Cottonwood Gravel Pit(I-Si #011240) TAMS,INC Existing Hamm / Approximate Scale Facility. Scale:I"-4,500 Hwy 119 CR201(2 �Cottonwood SITE CR 20 CO CR 18 V CR 161/2 K V Hwy 52 \) Figure 2 Site Location October,2001 -- -' Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) arc 1) N le Existing A Hamm ///// Approximate Scale Facility Scale I.=SOW ///////// Hwy 119 910 Istar)) l ) 33� �`�� 1)}/12)10 I��(1)1� ' a(' co 4 \` r, ,o,s / 920 4853x+:1)) i CR 201R 1gn---„9{) Co SITE � J 2,a0) ) nE% I CR20 13° 1� ��T°6 3) 1°z r /�-!>s �) )°,) o-ill26) �\- 590 ��io) Kt,, 211°) g 15 I L43aU - 3z °) J 1 ,� n� 1 r \ �' a�ir� R, U �' ))9 f 212 9) 55 ) /// ] l(5) CR 161R I �� 11) 1-D4(5`_3-) --{1+� 1 lit 3 L° 1 e 3 ) / U U • Hwy 52 spy '2)a 1'^) )1T�� (4----- 2ilt �112i4) 1 MlS 17) »-, f L1�,4 7) \ / 1,115 11)3-I 1 15 491)-fiLEGEND: KmTtl2 T3 ii) Fippure3 3 O f = Stop Sign Existing Traffic ,1113) _ AM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) 23(16)- PM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) Conditions October,2001 590 = Average Weekday Traffic Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) 7 INC Feeling Hamm / / Approximate Scak Facility Scale:l"=5,009 Hwy 119 \\\ r.,,,)„...,.\)65,0) 205l) 5 �1CT �2 2) CO 5 100�1i 16)10 1251805�32)1 1 5 \ 85 9)51.‘10 +e)0 5 s) CR2012 1,9*67) 0(45 19) Cottonwood 1-"" �) % CR 20 5J 4 to) 2Q,) _ 12g20)65 3y) 5-1 flM)O 2) 1a 6�c'+)) �' 57t KI+�T)15 y�2 i 133p0((13513) u in — 5 25 ee 22033) rs 5 10 J C80 5 U 59W'2) 5 C " C155L 25CR18 —1 l�sL)u 10�.5 441)15 X16) t00(1>) 65(9) X1,4 0 15) 15 2,i J I C_ Sr) CR1612 / 11) t511� I 10 la(?) 21) 15-1 f201T) -)11- 1z) 1- 5 86 ,2)i) 10(6) U u Hwy 52 10W 1 1)+5 20 351) .1 (.2_ 502]) 6Z0(25)45�� L-9.76:45 65) 1,5440T31)5� 1-256) �5 T) ?no 30 Ty 16 2) 3o Figure 4 30 Year 2020 LEGEND: Background Traffic 413) _ AM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) October,2001 23(16)— PM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) 6.C t Ezuling Hamm ///// Approximate Scale Facility \ Scale:C=5,000' `\\\\-I wy 119 i CN\ 40% i 22)---i 11 2/ 1 I, to) 2) fi „ o� 11 22 22„�0)I 40% 60% 12 z w CR 201/2 r M Cottonwood II e SITE% CR 20 1 ] L Go) 60%U CR18 tg ) /CR 161/2Iit 22 ' ) Y Hwy 52 V 11 i 60% L2+t�) L2 Figure 5 \"----, Assignment and LEGEND: ._ Percent Directional Directional Distribon of 60% - Distribution Site-Generated Traffic ♦11,j) _ AM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) October,2001 - 23(16)— PM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) me fExistIng Hamm ///// Approximate Scak Facility Seale:l'=5,000 Hwy 119 \\\ I 4g10)) 3) 2 5 3(P) 13(11.# 1101 10 7211 i1�1 1_ /�_0 2 11 J�1 pie(2) ) 531 J1n(R��8)ItI' 0g) . 1(1) 7 5b) 2 3077°) CR 2012 A O 3°0{9) � Cott.nw..� ' 3'1 L_J)��) SITF• /} CR 20 ° °,.42`34 ,13) 41 13 8 '�_ I-- 1�(16(1) )) 81�28) 2—$ IT4�3) 4 33(94 88) 3 u 5, 1 X43 U 3270) 31�-) C? ' K1711;4)2 CR 18 )U 69(3_13) 19) 57(9) 39(7) 1747 14) 8 CR161/2 i 20(1.2MOV! G_(?) 7(5)-) L 8 1 �0° � �11 115) 2 �1C12 t]) 1511) / \ 18 9) ) Q5) Y u Hwy52 2)82113) 28(4) It3) 25(9�) ≥ L II433$$2��4) 448(18)3207)" l- lA4J 37) 1,115(17)3- 1540 7) \\N„........_-3J�1flip12 717 ,9 Figure 6 7 Year T2001 LEGEND: Total 1 ra c October,2001 a1(ta) _ AM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) 2a(16)— PM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) fExisting Hamm ///// Approximate Scale Facility Scale. l'=5,,0047 —Iwy 119 I / 60 5)) 80 5) I 29 6540) _ 20541) 3021)20_1 t.5-2) 52 5 Z 2LB 11 161-14_2O 111 1(1);,+;_p ]��J�] I�1 10J 20) B) 5� 55((pp— 5 J 1 ienri6 h} rZf5!(�15)6)10 1(1) 11]16142)1I�L41- I 5 ! 87V115,153 945) CR 2012 * » SH(156�) 103) 52(28)) SIiE� �� CR20 5 5JI �5J213) 25 11)5 j L 1145(20) 101 42) 65 5 1 1i c I251)02) 105]185'011) 5 ft 5 a4) //`/_id2/J L 145 13) 'a 5 25 , =� 1 -�- � 10, Cl_m V H \\\`59012) 2 5 � �15 5 5 i 25 CR18 U 5118 5])15 51 26) 102 IS) ]0 It)a�wI1)�15 3p11)l J 1I5 CR1612 5( 1 1�) 1�1� �10 5 a - 1T) 5��'' 5001 '110 z 16 zo�e z) y ]t 22) J2 6) U V Hwy 52 " ti) 21)1531 4)) 35 13) J 1 61 32) 6M(25)�, 43 )625((65) 1,519(31)5 r15 765 6) -TO lie f ro 2 / Figure 7 39 Year 2020 LEGEND: Background Traffic 413) _ AM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) October,2001 _ = 23(16)— PM Peak—Hour Traffic(Heavy Vehicles) Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) T MC 7gt mApcale le 0ty Scale Scale P=S,p,Y/ Hwy 119 185/1,840/2,000/10% 1 .950/2.000/6% CR 201R Cottonwood %TE G CR 20 _ 185/1.245/2.000/15% X p CR18 3 CR 161/2 UU Hwy 52 1 LEGEND: Site- Figure 8 Site— Generated Total Roadway 185/1,245/2,000/15% = Generated Traffic Capacity Traffic Average Daily Traffic Percent of -- Total Traffic Traffic Impacts October,2001 Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) 6... m,INC t I I rI 4t- R.O.W. Jde WCR 20 1/2 Seale l=sa �■�_� -- Ditch \�\ Gravel \\ r Ai . N. II,'! lm Li Figure 9 Autoturn WCR 7 & WCR 20 1/2 Southbound October,2001 Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) I C it_ I I R.O.W. 9 Approximate Scak WCR 20 1/2 — - - - - - - . Ditch Gravel n I b ! �I j I Figure 10 Autoturn WCR 7 & WCR 20 1/2 Westbound October,2001 Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) 1 Pr ce III Approximate Scale Scale-/'=50 I I I Hwy 52 Figure 11 Autoturn WCR7 & Hwy 52 Northbound October,2001 Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) . 9 fl c U Approximate Scale Scale:I"—50' _____......_l ______----.... .N.\ ///7 Hwy 52 Figure 12 Autoturn WCR 7 & Hwy 52 Eastbound October,2001 Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) i I III Approximate Scale Scale.I"- Ditch WCR 20 1/2 Figure 13 Autoturn WCR 1 & WCR 20 1/2 Northbound October,2001 Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) i I ■ n III App e.l-e Scale Scale. ["'=50' \ \ Ditch 1 � WCR 20 1/2 Figure 14 Autoturn WCR 1 & WCR 20 1/2 Eastbound October,2001 Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) F� R.O.W. _. . _ .._.._.. _.._.._ . ._ .. _..� Approximate Scale WCR 20 1/2 Scale r -5° Ditch / Gravel 1 / ce of WCR p Figure 15 YV LEGEND: CR 7 & WCR 20 1/2 = Location of Additional Asphalt Intersection improvements October,2001 Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) Approximate Scale Scale. U Ditch WCR 20 1/2 Figure 16 LEGEND: WCR 1 & WCR 20 1/2 //j = Location of Additional Asphalt Intersection improvements October,2001 Cottonwood Gravel Pit(LSC#011240) Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-1 FILE: 1205HVTR — E/W STREET: CR-20.5 Movements by: LG TRUCKS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:15 AM 0.83 1 9 10 20 5 45 50 East 1:15 AM 0.72 9 11 3 23 39 48 13 South 7:15 AM 0.67 6 18 0 24 25 75 0 West 7:15 AM 0.75 0 6 0 6 0 x100 0 Entire Intersection North 7:15 AM 0.83 1 9 10 20 5 45 50 East 0.72 9 11 3 23 39 48 13 South 0.67 6 18 0 24 25 75 0 West 0.75 0 6 0 6 0 x100 0 .::::.: CR-1 N W— I il 1 9 I 10 I 20 9 . ... 1:2 ,._ : r :,:,::::::::,..„:,:•:::::•:,:::::::.:::„:,:::::::::;:::::.......................................... .............„..„..:::„..........„....:.........:.:.„.......::::::::::::::.::.:,.:....,....„.......,.....,..:::::.:, :•:•:•:•:„...„:••.:::::::.:.:.:.:..........„....::.............................................••••• „...... ...............::::::: :'. CR-20 .5 23 11 •_. L • 0 3 16 6 CR-20 .5 :?22: .. 0 24 ---� ..... ;<: .. 0 II 18 6 I CR-1 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-1 FILE: 1205HVTR - E/W STREET: CR-20.5 • • Movements by: LG TRUCKS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 5:00 PM 0.38 0 4 2 6 0 67 33 East 5:00 PM 0.88 6 1 0 7 86 14 0 South 5:00 PM 0.75 0 6 0 6 0 X100 0 West 5:00 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entire Intersection North 5:00 PM 0.38 0 4 2 6 0 67 33 East 0.88 6 1 0 7 86 14 0 South 0.75 0 6 0 6 0 %100 0 West 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CR-1 N W-1--E I I S I. i „: ,,„,„„,„„,: ...., ,,„,„„„„,„,„,„„:„„, .„.„.„.„.„:„.„:„::::::.„.„.:„...:„:„.„...„...:.„.„:„.„, „, CR-20 .5 7 1 0 0 1 „,„,: 0 0 CR-20 .5 0 6 ----1 CR-1 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N-S Street: CR-1 FILE: 1205T0TL -'-W Street: CR-20.5 : Movements by: TOIL VEHS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AN - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AM 0.81 3 310 22 335 1 93 7 East 7:15 AM 0.91 37 69 14 120 31 58 12 South 1:15 AM 0.82 10 122 3 135 7 90 2 West 7:30 AM 0.79 2 17 0 19 11 89 0 Entire Intersection North 7:15 AM 0.80 4 300 24 328 1 91 7 East 0.91 37 69 14 120 31 58 12 South 0.82 10 122 3 135 7 90 2 West 0.63 2 13 0 15 13 87 0 CR-1 N w C s 69 4 300 24 L 328 37 ... r .............,..„...,....„.:.,....„.„..........,.............:.::.:.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:::::::.::.:.:.:. :::::::::::::::::,.::::::::::::,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:.:::.:.:.:.: ,:•:::.:::,:„,,,:,: ,„,„ CR-20 .5 120 69 p 14 113 15 CR-20 .5 2 --i135 . .F,3..6 3 122 10 I CR-1 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N-S Street: CR-1 FILE: 1205TOTL -_"-W Street: CR-20.5 . Movements by: TOIL YENS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:45 PM 0.84 0 131 21 152 0 86 14 East 5:00 PM 0.87 43 16 7 66 65 24 11 South 5:00 PM 0.83 14 327 3 344 4 95 1 West 4:00 PM 0.73 1 45 1 47 2 96 2 Entire Intersection North 5:00 PM 0.17 0 116 23 139 0 83 17 East 0.87 43 16 7 66 65 24 11 South 0.83 14 327 3 344 4 95 1 West 0.51 1 35 1 37 3 95 3 CR-1 N W I C S :::37:1:.. 0 ! 116 23 :1:9 .. 139 43 r „.:::::::::::::::::::::,:::::::::::::::::::::::....„..:.:::::.: ....::::::::::::::::::„.„....:.......:::::::::::::::::..........:.:.:.:.:.:.:.......:::::::::::::....:::..:.:.:.:. .....::::::::::. CR--20 .5 66 16 1 1 L 7 35 37 CR-20 .5 • 1 j 344 .................................... ::::1.2 4:::::: 3 327 14 CR-1 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N-S Street: CR-7 FILE: 7205HVTR --c-14Street: CR-20.5 DATE: 9/25/01 Movements by: LG TRUCKS PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 6:30 AM 0.47 6 9 2 17 35 53 12 East 7:30 AM 0.75 2 0 10 12 17 0 83 South 7:15 AM 0.53 9 12 17 38 24 32 45 West 7:00 AM 0.69 9 1 12 22 41 5 55 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.47 5 10 2 17 29 59 12 East 0.63 1 0 9 10 10 0 90 South 0.49 7 10 18 35 20 29 51 West 0.69 9 1 12 22 41 5 55 CR-7 NI W—f—£ 5 23 5 'I 10 2 L___ 17 1 1 ::23 ... .„............ E. .::..::.:,...::.....:_::.,::.::::,:.:..:.::..::.:..::..:.::.:.::..::•:.:..::..:,.:.::.:.,:::...:.::....::.:.:::::::::.:.:..,..::::::....„::.......:.:,...... .......:.,..... .......„......., CR-20 .5 10 0 L 12 --- 9 1 22 CR-20 .5 9 _i 35 ( '...:::•-•-::::::::.:::::::,:::::::::::::::::::........,.........: ::•.....,..-....-.....-...,--....-..:-: :.. 18 1 10 7 28 1 CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-7 FILE: 7205HVTR --E/W STREET: CR-20.5 Movements by: LG TRUCKS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:30 PM 0.50 0 3 1 4 0 75 25 East 4:30 PM 0.25 0 0 1 1 0 0 x100 South 4:30 PM 1.00 0 3 5 8 0 38 62 West 4:30 PM 0.75 5 0 1 6 83 0 17 Entire Intersection North 4:30 PM 0.50 0 3 1 4 0 75 25 East 0.25 0 0 1 1 0 0 %100 South 1.00 0 3 5 8 0 38 62 West 0.75 5 0 1 6 83 0 17 CR-7 N W---1---E I S 0 II 3 ` 1 ................ ................ 4 _____ 0 ....... 5.:... CR-20 .5 1 0 L 1 1 . . . ,:::,..:::.........::::: 0 6 C R-20 .5 :'4 __5 5 8 -1 r i :::....i.:-.. ....:-.-::::::::.:::::.....:.:.:::::::::.:.::.::::::.........„:„......................::::., ::9: I) 1 CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N-S Street: CR-7 FILE: 7205TOTL —'-W Street: CR-20.5 DATE: 9/25/01 Movements by: TOTAL VEHS PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AM 0.61 12 46 3 61 20 15 5 East 7:30 AM 0.85 4 1 12 17 24 6 71 South 6:45 AM 0.96 10 38 101 149 7 26 68 West 7:00 AM 0.72 28 1 17 46 61 2 37 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.61 12 46 3 61 20 75 5 East 0.65 1 2 10 13 8 15 77 South 0.92 10 30 100 140 7 21 71 West 0.72 28 1 17 46 61 2 37 CR-7 N W j 5 :4s. 12 46 3 . ... . . 1� 61 1. ::1:1:4:... r .:,:::::„.....„.....,...„......::::::::::.:.,.:.:,....„:„...:„....„.::.....:::,......:.:,.:...::::.: :„..........:.....:::::::::::„.„.„.......:.:.:.:.„....„.„..................„................................... ......... CR-20 .5 13 2• L 17 i 10 :::::::::::::„, ::::::,..;:::,:::„... 1 46 CR-20 .5 28 .....i 140 ... ... 100 30 10 84 i CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N-S Street: CR-7 FILE: 72051011 -W Street: CR-20.5 : Movements by: TOTAL VEHS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:45 PM 0.68 7 38 1 46 15 83 2 East 4:00 PM 0.69 0 4 7 11 0 36 64 South 4:45 PM 0.85 3 48 51 102 3 47 50 West 4:30 PM 0.74 68 5 13 86 79 6 15 Entire Intersection North 4:30 PM 0.66 10 33 2 45 22 73 4 East 0.38 0 4 2 6 0 67 33 South 0.83 2 50 48 100 2 50 48 West 0.74 68 5 13 86 79 6 15 CR-7 N W J1 S 4 10 I 33 I ......::::::..::.......L .......... 1 :62; .. :-.:E-..::.::::'•:.:•:::::::::-..::',•::::i::::::i:-;:i:-:: :•::•::i. 62 :::::: r 450 CR-20 .5 6 4 • 13 1 2 5 86 CR-20 .5 68 100 ::: « 48 50 I 2 103 CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-7 FILE: 720HVTR - /W STREET: CR-20 DATE: 9/25/01 Movements by: LG TRUCKS PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AM 0.55 0 18 6 24 0 75 25 East 7:00 AM 0.58 7 0 0 7 t100 0 0 South 7:00 AM 0.61 1 26 0 27 4 96 0 West 7:00 AM 0.50 1 0 1 2 50 0 50 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.55 0 18 6 24 0 75 25 East 0.58 7 0 0 7 1100 0 0 South 0.61 1 26 0 27 4 96 0 West 0.50 1 0 1 2 50 0 50 CR-7 N w--f--E I S . I I 34 ... I I 0 I 18 I 6 I 0: 24 _—. 7 :•::::: :::.:::;:::::,::::.:::::::::„....,.........::::„.x,.:,:,................:,....„.:.:.::....,......,.: r ,,,.........„„,„„,„„,v,„...___ I ............. ::,:,:„.,:,:,.....::: ::< CR-20 7 0 i 1 L . :,::,.:....:::.::: .:.......:::.:::.: 0 2 CR-20 1 27 I 0 l 26 I 1 19:.. I I k I I CR -7 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-7 FILE: 720HVTR --C/W STREET: CR-20 • Movements by: LG TRUCKS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:30 PM 0.75 0 7 2 9 0 78 22 East 4:30 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South 4:30 PM 0.88 0 7 0 7 0 %100 0 West 4:30 PM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entire Intersection North 4:30 PM 0.75 0 7 2 9 0 78 22 East 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South 0.88 0 7 0 7 0 t100 0 West 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CR-7 W C I S { { 0 CR-20 0 0 t : 10 .........:::.....:::.: CR-20 0 J r- 7 ---) 0 I 7 \ 0 7 II I ilCR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N-S Street: CR-7 FILE: 720TOTAL —El Street: CR-20 Movements by: TOTAL VEHS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AM 0.79 4 50 34 88 5 57 39 East 6:45 AM 0.93 78 1 10 89 88 1 11 South 6:45 AM 0.83 8 64 1 73 11 88 1 West 7:30 AM 0.50 1 2 3 6 17 33 50 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.79 4 50 34 88 5 57 39 East 0.91 80 0 7 87 92 0 8 South 0.93 9 58 0 67 13 87 0 West 0.63 1 1 3 5 20 20 60 CR-7i. N 14 3 r ! S I I II II :14:1:;... 4 I 50 I 34 ........ ........................... 88 1 80 ::::': : :.'........:::::::::.:::ERF: :.........'...4....-„„„ r .....„.:....x....:..........:.:.:.,.....:........„..:.:........„..:....::....,:.:....:.:.:.:::...„..s: .::::::„,:,::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,:.:::.:::.:::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::.::: ... ............................. :.::::::::::::::: ,:::::::::::::::: ? : CR-20 87 0 L 3 1 7 1 5 CR-20 :4 44:... 1 I--- 67 1 .. ::: : • 0 58 I 9 I I CR-7 Counter Measures PAGE: 1 Site Code : FILE: 720TOTAL N-S Street: CR-1 - F-W Street: CR-20 DATE: 1/25/01 Movements by: TOTAL VEHS PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:30 PM 0.87 0 31 73 104 0 30 70 East 4:45 PM 0.85 46 1 14 61 75 2 23 South 4:30 PM 0.77 9 55 1 65 14 85 2 West 4:00 PM 0.63 1 3 6 10 10 30 60 Entire Intersection North 4:30 PM 0.87 0 31 73 104 0 30 70 East 0.81 43 1 14 58 74 2 24 South 0.77 9 55 1 65 14 85 2 West 0.56 1 3 5 9 11 33 56 CR-7 N W--}--E S 0I 31 73 104 43 -:•:::::*•-."•:::•:::•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:-:•.,•,... 2 :„.:. .....::::::„:::::::::::,...c.:::!:,:.....:.............,:.:.:.:.:.......:::::....„.:.,:::::::::,..::,:: ...........:.:.:....:„.........................:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:....,...,....„.„,::::::::::::.:.:,:.:....,.:. ,,,:,:,:::::::.:,:, : : CR-20 58 1 5 14 13 9 CR-2O :85:... 1 r-- bS „.......••....•.••..•••••••.................................. ...............,.................. r.... .... ..._..._ - 1 I 55 9 46 l CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : 00000018 PAGE: 1 8-S Street: Weld CR-7 FILE: cr7cr18 E-W Street: Weld CR-18 DATE: 9/26/01 Movements by: Bay Treks PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS .,. FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AM 0.72 14 9 0 23 61 39 0 East 7:00 AM 0.50 2 0 0 2 %100 0 0 South 7:00 AM 0.71 0 7 13 20 0 35 65 West 7:00 AM 0.58 8 1 12 21 38 5 57 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AN 0.72 14 9 0 23 61 39 0 East 0.50 2 0 0 2 %100 0 0 South 0.71 0 7 13 20 0 35 65 West 0.58 8 1 12 21 38 5 57 Weld CR-7 N W-1.--E S :; :2:1::•»: 14 9 0 .................................... Z3 __ 2 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,:,:,:,:,„:„,:,....,:,:,„ r ...... Weld CR-18 2 0 12 i L 0 1 21 Weld CR-18 ............................................................................i?":i..!....i.:t. 8 ---1 •••••.••••.....•••••••••-••••-•...•••• • 20 13 7 0 Weld CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : 00000018 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Weld CR-7 FILE: CR1CR18 E-W Street: Weld CR-18 DATE: 9(26(01 Movenents by: Hvy Treks PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .,.. PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:00 PM 0.63 2 5 3 10 20 50 30 East 4:00 PM 0.50 0 3 1 4 0 75 25 South 4:00 PM 0.47 1 3 11 15 7 20 73 West 4:00 PM 0.43 2 10 5 17 12 59 29 Entire Intersection North 4:00 PM 0.63 2 5 3 10 20 50 30 East 0.50 0 3 1 4 0 75 25 South 0.47 1 3 11 15 7 20 13 West 0.43 2 10 5 17 12 59 29 Weld CR-7 f.fOU N W--h-E S 2 5 13 _ .................................. 10 0 ::::-MEMBE:.ii3.:;Xf::r....""rts...". r Weld CR-18 4 3 5 L 1 1UZa 10 17 Weld CR-18 14 2 1 5 11 3 1 M. Weld CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : 00000018 PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: Weld CR-7 FILE: cr7cr18 E/W STREET: Weld CR-18 Su® of the Vehicles and Hay Trcks DATE: 9/26/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:30 AM - 8:30 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 6:30 AM 0.75 14 26 11 51 27 51 22 East 7:15 AM 0.72 7 2 14 23 30 9 61 South 7:30 AM 0.80 5 39 20 64 8 61 31 West 7:00 AM 0.75 8 5 20 33 24 15 61 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.69 17 22 8 47 36 47 17 East 0.56 6 1 11 18 33 6 61 South 0.82 11 34 14 59 19 58 24 West 0.75 8 5 20 33 24 15 61 Weld CR-7 N W--{—E S 17 22 8 :................................... 47 I 6 -::::::;::':::.:'::3K:i..]::...i:':::.:3:if:::..::::.:K:if:•.i: 32 :::::: r `:'i: Weld CR-18 18 1 ....... 20 L11 1RE 5 33 Weld CR-18 J g 59 : a: 14 34 11 41 Weld CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : 00000018 PAGE: 1 N-S Street: Weld CR-1 FILE: CR7CR18 1-W Street: Weld CR-18 Sun of the Vehicles and Hvy Treks DATE: 9/26/01 PEAR PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAR HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:00 PM 0.70 7 37 9 53 13 70 17 East 4:15 PM 0.79 9 5 5 19 47 26 26 South 4:00 PM 0.72 15 39 12 66 23 59 18 West 4:00 PM 0.63 5 13 7 25 20 52 28 Entire Intersection North 4:00 PM 0.70 7 37 9 53 13 70 17 East 0.90 6 7 5 18 33 39 28 South 0.72 15 39 12 66 23 59 18 West 0.63 5 13 7 25 20 52 28 Weld CR-7 fggN W--j--E S 52 <•: L7 37 9 53 I 6 26 is3 Weld CR-18 18 7 L_ 5 13 25 Weld CR-18 5 66 12 39 15 ffffg Weld CR-7 Counter Measures PAGE: 1 Site Code : FILE: 752HVTR N/S STREET: CR-7 E/W STREET: SH-52 DATE: 9/25/01 Movements by: LG TRUCKS PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AM 0.57 12 1 3 16 75 6 19 East 7:00 AM 0.71 14 37 0 51 27 0 73 South 7:00 AM 0.25 1 0 0 1 %100 0 West 7:00 AM 0.78 0 16 9 25 0 64 36 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.57 12 1 3 16 75 6 19 East 0.71 14 37 0 51 27 73 0 South 0.25 1 0 0 1 t100 0 0 West 0.78 0 16 9 25 0 64 36 CR-7 W--t—E S 12 I 1 ( 3 ........:..... .............._______] 16 _�` 14 ::;:;::.:.:::::.:::::::::::::::"::•.::: :':':::::::1::::::::::::.::.::,.::::::%::::: ::::::::: r _ .....:::::.::::::,:„,„:::,:„.,:::::::,:....::::..::::.::.:. ...... : „„, SH-52 51 37 • L 0 9 16 25 SH--52:....,:„.„.....::::.:::::.....::::, „.„...„,,,.,,,, 1 0 0 1 :,::::::...:.:.:....:.::....::::::::::.:.:::::::.::.:::::::: .: ......... .... ... CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-7 FILE: 752HVTR E/W STREET: SH-52 ^- Movements by: LG TRUCKS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:45 PM 0.63 4 0 1 5 80 0 20 East 4:45 PM 0.58 0 7 0 7 0 x100 0 South 4:45 PM 0.25 0 0 1 1 0 0 3100 West 4:45 PM 0.60 0 17 7 24 0 71 29 Entire Intersection North 4:45 PM 0.63 4 0 1 5 80 0 20 East 0.58 0 7 0 7 0 %100 0 South 0.25 0 0 1 1 0 0 3100 West 0.60 0 17 7 24 0 71 29 I� CR-7 N W # C S �i 4 O 1 1 L5 0 :.•,-.i-.••••.",:i:•:::•:::.::•:•::: ::::::::.:::::::::::.....,:.:::: 12 :::::: r .:,:,..,.....,:,.......„...:,.......:::,:,...............,:,..,:,::::,:::::::::::::,:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::,:::„ :.:::::::::::::.:,::::::::::::::::::::::::....:.:.:.s.:.:.:....:.:.:.:.:.:....:....:.:.:.:.:.:.:....:.:.:.:.:.:.: .....:„.,::::::::::: ..::::.:.:.,.::: :.: SH--52 7 7 • H ----- 0 17 24 SH-'-52 • 1:8:.. 0 r 1 1 I ...................,...................:,....:,...........,....................:.::.:.::::.::.,.:.::.:...:....... ::::::::::::::::::::::„.......„.:::::::::::::.:....:.:.:.„.:.:.:.:....:.:....„.:.:.:.:.:.:::....:.:.:.: ..._..... ....::.:,:,::::•:::.::.::.::.,.:„.„:.::.:::,::::.::::::,::.::.:,,:,,:,..,:,,,,:.:,:, 1 O 0 ;0: iiii ill CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-7 FILE: 752T0TL E/14 STREET: SH-52 : Movements by: TOIL VEHS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 7:00 AM 0.76 40 5 10 55 73 9 18 East 7:00 AM 0.98 32 1047 15 1094 3 96 1 South 7:00 AM 0.94 5 3 7 15 33 20 47 West 7:00 AM 0.83 3 448 25 476 1 94 5 Entire Intersection North 7:00 AM 0.76 40 5 10 55 73 9 18 East 0.98 32 1047 15 1094 3 96 1 South 0.94 5 3 7 15 33 20 47 West 0.83 3 448 25 476 1 94 5 CR-7 N =......J W -CS 40 I 5 ! 10 1 55 32 1094 .....:....:::...........:::::..::: :::...::.::::.:.::::::.::::::::::.......:.:::::...::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::....,...::,....... ......................................................::::.................................. :::::::::::::::::, ::::::::.....:::::::: ::`: SH-52 1094 1047 L 25 15 1448 476 SH-52 S::: :`. 463 >:: 3 15 -1 ::::: ... 7 3 ! 5 23 CR-7 Counter Measures Site Code : PAGE: 1 N/S STREET: CR-7 FILE: 7521011 - E/W STREET: SH-52 .• Movements by: TOIL VEHS DATE: 9/25/01 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left North 4:45 PM 0.56 29 8 10 47 62 17 21 East 4:45 PM 0.93 12 494 12 518 2 95 2 South 4:45 PM 0.54 18 17 6 41 44 41 15 West 4:45 PM 0.95 13 1115 32 1160 1 96 3 Entire Intersection North 4:45 PM 0.56 29 8 10 47 62 17 21 East 0.93 12 494 12 518 2 95 2 South 0.54 18 17 6 41 44 41 15 West 0.95 13 1115 32 1160 1 96 3 CR-7 NI W 1 { I S I f 29 8 I 10 ....... . ... .......... .........: L _ I 47 12 ::::::::::::::::„::::.:::::,:,:„:„:„.::::.::.:,:::,::::: 529r 1 SH-52 518 494 • L 32 12 11115 1160 SH-52 :::' 1143' 13 41 --1 6 17 18 33 li CR-7 COUNTER MEASURES 19 001 Volume by Type by Lane Report - D0924001.PRN 11:38 Pg 1 ita: 092460000000 Id: 092460000000 • CId: 01 Fit: 210 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. ;tart: Mon - Sep 24, 2001 at 12:00 End: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 24:00 :i1Y/Town: County: WELD vocation: CR-7 N/0 CR-18 File: 00924001.PRN ;n1-North Ion - Sep 24, 2001 Fype Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total 13:00 Lane 1 0 15 6 0 2 4 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 35 2-1 0 14 4 0 3 3 0 0 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 33 Lane 1-1 0 29 10 0 5 7 0 0 14 1 1 0 1 0 0 68 Hourly Totals 0 29 10 0 5 7 0 0 14 1 1 0 1 0 0 68 14:00 Lane 1 0 11 4 0 0 12 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 40 2-1 0 6 15 0 3 12 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Lane 1-1 0 17 19 0 3 24 0 1 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 90 Ho, Totals 0 17 19 0 3 24 0 1 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 90 15:00 Lane 1 0 15 1 1 0 4 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 2-1 2 10 12 1 3 7 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 Lane 1-1 2 25 19 2 3 11 0 2 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 Hourly Totals 2 25 19 2 3 11 0 2 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 16:00 Lane 1 0 9 10 0 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 2-1 0 14 13 0 4 4 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Lane 1-1 0 23 23 0 5 4 0 3 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 Hourly Totals 0 23 23 0 5 4 0 3 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 11:00 Lane 1 0 22 17 0 2 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 2-1 0 22 6 0 4 3 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 Lane 1-1 0 44 23 0 6 8 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 Hourly Totals 0 44 23 0 6 8 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 COUNTER MEASURES )9 001 Volute by Type by Lane Report - D0924001.PRN 11:38 Pg 2 Ion - Sep 24, 2001 Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total 18:00 Lane 1 0 29 10 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 2-1 1 16 7 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Lane 1-1 1 45 17 0 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 Hourly Totals 1 45 17 0 5 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 19:00 Lane 1 0 13 6 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 2-1 0 15 8 0 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Lane 1-1 0 28 14 0 4 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Hourly Totals 0 28 14 0 4 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 20:00 Lane 1 0 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2-1 0 8 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 La_ 1-1 0 19 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Hourly Totals 0 19 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 21:00 Lane 1 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 2-1 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Lane 1-1 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Hourly Totals 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 22:00 Lane 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2-1 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 Lane 1-1 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 12 Hourly Totals 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 12 23:00 Lane 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lame 1-1 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Hourly Totals 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 COUNTER MEASURES 0' 2001 Volune by Type by Lane Report - D0924001.PRN 11:38 Pg 3 Mon - Sep 24, 2001 Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SO 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 1A-MT None Other Total 24:00 Lane 2-1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Lane 1-1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Hourly Totals 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Daily Percentages s 591 0.51 43.15 23,52 0.34 5.58 10.15 0.0 1.35 14.38 0.34 0.17 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 COUNTER MEASURES )9 '001 Volume by Type by Lane Report - 00924001.PRN 11:38 Pg 4 ita: 092460000000 Id: 092460000000 CId: 01 Fat: 210 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. itart: Mon - Sep 24, 2001 at 12:00 End: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 24:00 :ity/Town: County: WELD location: CR-7 8/0 CR-18 File: D0924001.PRN Al-North Station Data Summary Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-NT None Other Total Grand Totals 3 255 139 2 33 60 0 8 85 2 1 0 3 0 0 591 Percentages 0.51 43.15 23.52 0.34 5.58 10.15 0.00 1.35 14.38 0.34 0.17 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 Lane 1 >1 Total Grand Totals 287 304 591 Percentages 48.56 51.44 Am/Pm Peak Hour Totals Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-NT None Other Total Am Hour None Pm Hour 13-14 0 17 19 0 3 24 0 1 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 90 Percentages 0.00 6.67 13.67 0.00 9.09 40.00 0.00 12.50 29.41 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.23 COUNTER MEASURES 19 '001 Volute by Type by Lane Report - 00925002.PRN 09:33 Pg 1 ;ta: 092465000000 Id: 092465000000 CId: 01 Fit: 210 - Iiperial Int: 60 Min. ;tart: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 00:00 End: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 14:51 :ity/Town: County: WELD vocation: CR-20.5 W/0 CR-7 File: D0925002.PRN :n1-East rue - Sep 25, 2001 type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST SA-MT 6A-MT 1A-MT None Other Total 11:00 Lane 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2-1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Lane 1-1 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Rourly totals 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 02:00 Lane 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane 1-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ho Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 Lane 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane 1-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 Lane 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane 1-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hourly Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 Lane 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lane 1-1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hourly Totals 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 COUNTER MEASURES lr Y001 Volute by Type by Lane Report - D0925002.PRN 09:33 Pg 2 tue - Sep 25, 2001 type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST SA-MT 6A-NT 7A-MT None Other Total 06:00 Lane 1 0 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 2-1 0 5 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Lane 1-1 0 14 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Hourly Totals 0 14 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 07:00 Lane 1 0 38 23 0 0 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 2-1 0 12 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Lane 1-1 0 50 28 0 1 5 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 Hourly Totals 0 50 28 0 1 5 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 08:00 Lane 1 0 60 28 3 1 13 0 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 115 2-1 0 11 8 0 5 5 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 43 1-1 0 71 36 3 6 18 0 1 21 1 0 0 0 1 0 158 Hourly Totals 0 71 36 3 6 18 0 1 21 1 0 0 0 1 0 158 09:00 Lane 1 1 37 17 0 7 9 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 2-1 0 20 12 1 4 7 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 Lane 1-1 1 57 29 1 11 16 0 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 Hourly Totals 1 57 29 1 11 16 0 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 131 10:00 Lane 1 0 24 12 0 3 10 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 2-1 0 11 5 1 10 9 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Lane 1-1 0 35 17 1 13 19 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 Hourly Totals 0 35 17 1 13 19 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 11:00 Lane 1 0 13 15 1 3 15 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 2-1 0 11 13 0 3 13 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 LLne 1-1 0 24 28 1 6 28 0 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 Hourly Totals 0 24 28 1 6 28 0 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 COUNTER MEASURES )9 '001 Volume by Type by Lane Report - D0925002.PRN 09:33 Pg 3 rue - Sep 25, 2001 rype Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total 12:00 Lane 1 0 28 10 0 1 13 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 2-1 0 11 9 0 2 14 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Lane 1-1 0 39 19 0 3 27 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 Hourly Totals 0 39 19 0 3 27 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 13:00 Lane 1 0 23 20 0 1 11 0 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 2-1 0 17 7 0 2 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 Lane 1-1 0 40 27 0 3 20 0 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 Hourly Totals 0 40 27 0 3 20 0 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 14:00 Lane 1 0 15 10 0 0 5 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 39 2-1 0 19 1 0 4 6 0 1 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 42 r L. 1-1 0 34 11 0 4 11 0 2 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 81 Hourly Totals 0 34 11 0 4 11 0 2 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 81 Daily Totals 1 370 209 6 50 144 0 10 127 3 0 0 0 1 0 921 Percentages 0.11 40.17 22.69 0.65 5.43 15.64 0.00 1.09 13.79 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 COUNTER MEASURES 09 1001 Volute by Type by Lane Report - D0925002.PRN 09:33 Pg 4 Sta: 092465000000 Id: 092465000000 CId: 01 Fit: 210 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 00:00 End: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 14:51 City/Town: County: WELD Location: CR-20.5 W/0 CR-1 File: D0925002.PRN Lill-East Station Data Summary Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total Grand Totals 1 370 209 6 50 144 0 10 127 3 0 0 0 1 0 921 Percentages 0.11 40.17 22.69 0.65 5.43 15.64 0.00 1.09 13.79 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 Lane 1 )1 Total Grand Totals 562 359 921 Percentages 61.02 38.98 Am/Pm Peak Hour Totals Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SD 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total At Hour 7-8 0 71 36 3 6 18 0 1 21 1 0 0 0 1 0 158 Percentages 0.00 19.19 17.22 50.00 12.00 12.50 0.00 10.00 16.54 33.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 17.16 Pt Hour 12-13 0 40 27 0 3 20 0 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 Percentages 0.00 10.81 12.92 0.00 6.00 13.89 0.00 30.00 15.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.27 COUNTER MEASURES 05 2001 Volume by Type by Lane Report - D0925003.PRN 09:33 Pg 1 Sta: 092469000000 Id: 092469000000 CId: 01 Fat: 210 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 00:00 End: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 14:40 City/Town: County: WELD Location: CR-20.5 E/0 CR-1 File: D0925003.PRN Lni-East Tue - Sep 25, 2001 Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST SA-MT 6A-NT TA-MT None Other Total 01:00 Lane 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2-1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Lane 1-1 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Hourly Totals 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 02:00 Lane 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lane 1-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hc, , Totals 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:00 Lane 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lane 1-1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hourly Totals 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:00 Lane 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lane 1-1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Hourly Totals 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:00 Lane 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2-1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Lane 1-1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hourly Totals 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 COUNTER MEASURES )f 2001 Value by Type by Lane Report - D0925003.PRN 09:33 Pg 2 tue - Sep 25, 2001 type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-NT 6A-NT 7A-MT None Other Total 06:00 Lane 1 1 6 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 2-1 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Lane 1-1 1 13 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Hourly Totals 1 13 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 07:00 Lane 1 0 16 9 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 30 2-1 0 35 20 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 Lane 1-1 0 51 29 0 3 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 87 Hourly Totals 0 51 29 0 3 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 87 08:00 Lane 1 0 13 7 1 1 10 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 2-1 0 58 32 3 2 11 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 L. . 1-1 0 71 39 4 3 21 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 Hourly Totals 0 71 39 4 3 21 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 09:00 Lane 1 1 20 11 0 3 11 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 2-1 1 42 13 1 10 17 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 Lane 1-1 2 62 24 1 13 28 0 3 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 Hourly Totals 2 62 24 1 13 28 0 3 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 10:00 Lane 1 0 15 9 0 5 10 0 1 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 49 2-1 0 23 13 0 3 14 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 Lane 1-1 0 38 22 0 8 24 0 1 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 110 Hourly Totals 0 38 22 0 8 24 0 1 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 110 11:00 Lane 1 0 12 10 0 2 14 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 2-1 0 15 14 0 2 11 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 Laze 1-1 0 27 24 0 4 25 1 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 Hourly Totals 0 27 24 0 4 25 1 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 102 COUNTER MEASURES 0, 2001 Voluee by Type by Lane Report - D0925003.PRN 09:34 Pg 3 Tue - Sep 25, 2001 Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-NT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total 12:00 Lane 1 0 11 4 1 2 22 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 2-1 0 25 11 0 4 18 0 1 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 72 Lane 1-1 0 36 15 1 6 40 0 1 20 0 0 0 0 1 0 120 Hourly Totals 0 36 15 1 6 40 0 1 20 0 0 0 0 1 0 120 13:00 Lane 1 0 19 9 0 1 13 0 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 2-1 0 28 17 0 1 19 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 Lane 1-1 0 47 26 0 2 32 0 3 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 Hourly Totals 0 47 26 0 2 32 0 3 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 14:00 Lane 1 0 21 5 0 2 18 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 2-1 0 15 11 0 3 13 0 3 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 L. . 1-1 0 36 16 0 5 31 0 4 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 Hourly Totals 0 36 16 0 5 31 0 4 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 Daily Totals 3 392 209 6 45 202 1 12 141 2 0 0 0 1 0 1014 Percentages 0.30 38.66 20.61 0.59 4.44 19.92 0.10 1.18 13.91 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 COUNTER MEASURES I '.001 Volute by Type by Lane Report - D092S003.PRN 09:34 Pg 4 CId: 01 Fut: 210 - Inperial Int: 60 Min. {ta: 09246900000 Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 00:00 Id: 092469000000 End: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 14:40 hart: Sep County: WELD .ocatiorn: File: D0925003.PRM ,ocation: CR-20.5 E/0 CR-1 ,n1-East Station Data Sunoary type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total ?ercentages 0.30 38.66 20.61 0.59 4.44 19.92 0.10 1.18 13.91 1014 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 Lane 1 )1 Total Grand Totals 408 606 1014 Percentages 40.24 59.76 Am/Pm Peak Hour Totals Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total Aa Hour 7-8 0 71 39 4 3 21 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 Percentages 0.00 18.11 18.66 66.67 6.67 10.40 0.00 0.00 9.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.99 Pm Hour 12-13 0 47 26 0 2 32 0 3 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 137 Percentages 0.00 11.99 12.44 0.00 4.44 15.84 0.00 25.00 19.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.51 COUNTER MEASURES OS 2001 Volume by Type by Lane Report - 00925004.PRN 09:34 Pg 1 Sta: 092462000000 Id: 092462000000 CId: 01 Fit: 210 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Start: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 00:00 End: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 15:01 City/Town: County: WELD Location: CR-7 5/0 SR-119 File: D0925004.PRN Ln1-North Tue - Sep 25, 2001 Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SO 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-NT 7A-MT None Other Total 01:00 Lane 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lane 1-1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Hourly Totals 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 02:00 Lane 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lane 1-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Ho. _i Totals 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:00 Lane 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 Lane 1-1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 Hourly Totals 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 04:00 Lane 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lane 1-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hourly Totals 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:00 Lane 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Lane 1-1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Roily Totals 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 COUNTER MEASURES 19 001 Volume by Type by Lane Report - D0925004.PRN 09:34 Pg 2 'ue - Sep 25, 2001 'ype Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total 16:00 Lane 1 0 3 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2-1 0 12 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Lane 1-1 0 15 11 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Hourly Totals 0 15 11 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 07:00 Lane 1 0 8 4 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 2-1 0 19 15 2 5 4 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 54 Lane 1-1 0 27 19 2 7 4 0 3 7 2 0 0 0 1 0 72 Hourly Totals 0 27 19 2 7 4 0 3 7 2 0 0 0 1 0 72 08:00 Lane 1 0 9 8 1 1 2 1 0 10 5 0 0 1 2 0 40 2-1 0 19 20 0 7 1 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 L. 1-1 0 28 28 1 8 3 1 1 18 5 0 0 1 2 0 96 Hourly Totals 0 28 28 1 8 3 1 1 18 5 0 0 1 2 0 96 09:00 Lane 1 0 18 12 1 5 1 1 1 6 1 0 0 0 2 0 48 2-1 1 17 23 0 2 11 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 Lane 1-1 1 35 35 1 7 12 1 2 17 1 0 0 0 2 0 114 Hourly Totals 1 35 35 1 7 12 1 2 17 1 0 0 0 2 0 114 10:00 Lane 1 0 5 9 3 2 7 0 0 4 9 0 0 2 2 0 43 2-1 0 13 12 1 9 7 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 49 Lane 1-1 0 18 21 4 11 14 0 1 9 9 0 0 3 2 0 92 Hourly Totals 0 18 21 4 11 14 0 1 9 9 0 0 3 2 0 92 11:00 Lane 1 0 6 14 3 3 7 3 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 0 41 2-1 0 8 13 0 9 8 0 3 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 53 Lane 1-1 0 14 27 3 12 15 3 3 12 4 0 0 1 0 0 94 Hourly Totals 0 14 27 3 12 15 3 3 12 4 0 0 1 0 0 94 COUNTER MEASURES I9- 701 Volute by Type by Lane Report - D0925004.PRN 09:34 Pg 3 :ue - Sep 25, 2001 +ype Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SO 3A-SO 4A-SO 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-NT 6A-MT 7A-MT None Other Total 12:00 Lane 1 0 17 21 0 5 4 0 2 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 56 2-1 0 7 19 0 3 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 39 Lane 1-1 0 24 40 0 8 8 0 2 6 4 0 0 2 1 0 95 sourly Totals 0 24 40 0 8 8 0 2 6 4 0 0 2 1 0 95 13:00 0 3 1 0 0 1 1 0 45 Lane 1 0 16 9 2 8 3 1 2-1 0 25 16 1 10 4 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 Lane 1-1 0 41 25 3 18 7 1 1 16 1 0 0 1 1 0 115 Hourly Totals 0 41 25 3 18 7 1 1 16 1 0 0 1 1 0 115 14:00 0 0 49 Lane 1 0 13 14 0 5 6 1 1 6 1 0 0 2 2-1 0 18 17 0 1 1 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 La- 1-1 0 31 31 0 6 7 1 2 14 1 0 0 2 0 0 95 Hourly Totals 0 31 31 0 6 7 1 2 14 1 0 0 2 0 0 95 15:00 3 0 1 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 49 Lane 1 0 20 14 0 7 3 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-1 0 12 11 0 42 Lane 1-1 0 32 25 0 10 3 1 1 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 91 Hourly Totals 0 32 25 0 10 3 1 1 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 91 Daily 1 275 264 15 90 74 8 16 113 32 0 0 11 9 0 percentagess 0.11 30.29 29.07 1.65 9.91 908 8.15 0.88 1.76 12.44 3.52 0.00 0.00 1.21 0.99 0.00 COUNTER MEASURES )9 1001 Volume by Type by Lane Report - 00925004.PRN 09:34 Pg 4 CId: 01 Fmt: 210 - Imperial Int: 60 Min. Star 09246200000 Sep Id: 092462000000 End: Tue - Sep 25, 2001 at 15:01 Start: Tue Sep 25, 2001 at 00:00 County: VELD Locatiorn: File: D0925004.PRN Location: CR-7 S/0 SR-119 Ln1-North Station Data Summary Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-MT 6A-MT 7A-NT None Other Total Grand 1 275 264 15 90 74 8 16 113 32 0 0 11 9 0 percentages 908 0.11 30.29 29.07 1.65 9.91 8.15 0.88 1.16 12.44 3.52 0.00 0.00 1.21 0.99 0.0 Lane 1 >1 Total Grand Totals 401 501 908 Percentages 44.16 55.84 At/Pm Peak Hour Totals Type Cycle Cars 2A-4T Buses 2A-SU 3A-SU 4A-SU 4A-ST 5A-ST 6A-ST 5A-NT 6A-MT 7A-NT None Other Total Am Hour 8-9 1 35 35 1 7 12 1 2 17 1 0 0 0 2 0 lit Percentages 100.00 12.73 13.26 6.67 7.78 16.22 12.50 12.50 15.04 3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.22 0.00 12.56 Pa Hour 13 Percentages 0.00 14.91 9.47 20.00 20.00 9.46 12.50 6.25 14.16 3.13 0.00 0.00 9.09 11.11 0.00 12.67 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Base 10/7/2001 -) .i C -- k t , '. 41 Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4., 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 0 13 2 14 69 37 3 122 10 24 300 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 0 14 2 15 75 40 3 133 11 26 `326 4 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage .` Right turn flare(veh) Medianatype,, None N Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 603 530 328 534 527 138 330 143 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 7.1 7.0 6.2 7.3 6.7 6.4 4.1 4.5 tC, 2 stage(s) tF (s) 3.5 4.4 3.3 3.7 4.1 3.5 2.2 2.6 p0 queue free% = 100 96 100 96 82 95 100 98 cM capacity(veh/h) 335 388 718 408 427 855 1240 1227 Volume Total 16 " ,130; 147 357 Volume Left 0 15 3 26 Volume Right 2 40 11 : 4 cSH 414 501 1240 1227 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.26` 0.00 0.02 Queue Length (ft) 3 26 0 2 Control Delay(s) 14.1 14.7 0.2 - 0.8 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 14.1 "14.7 0.2 0.8 Approach LOS B B 4,.3�y.v .,%'.+LiJ.37»3. a �• � � .y u 1 vi.v,�s 5₹'�Sa�'t., ��, c,.. .F w u+5r- :If�c,��, Average Delay 3.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.3% ICU Level of Service A 3: WCR 20.5&WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Base 10/7/2001 -J -• � r t- 4 ti t `► 4 4/ -7S-7Sr trgati Lane Configurations 4, 4. 4. 4, Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 17 1 28 10 2 1 100 30 10 3 46 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 18 1 30 11 2 1 109 33 11 3 50 13 Pedestrians Lane Width(ftj Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent;Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median,.type ,: None None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 321 324 57 349 325 38 63 43 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 7.8 7.5 6.5 8.0 6.5 7.2 4.3 4.8 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 4.1 4.9 3.6 4.3 4.0 4.2 2.4 2.8 p0 queue free% 96 100 97 97 100 100 92 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 486 427 931 427 550 812 1444 1233 Volume-Total ' 50 14 152 66 Volume Left 18 11 109 3 Volume Right 30 1 11 13 cSH 682 460 1444 1233 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.03" 0.08 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 6 2 6 0 Control Delay(s) 10.7 13.1 5.7 0.4 Lane LOS B B A A Approach Delay(s) 10.7 13.1 5.7 0.4 Approach LOS B B •2 r">^S. .:w.. N ��N �,`. .. Fr. @ 'f"tu�„�4 .C . .... ('... 1 ..rv.. r'Fk4C41, Average Delay 5.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 25.1% ICU Level of Service A 6: WCR 20.5&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Base 10/7/2001 -� -► 1 F 4— k q t P " d carlBli - Lane Configurations 4. 4, 4, 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Free free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 3 1 7 0 80 ' 0 58 9' 34 50 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 5 3 ; 1 8 0 87 0 63 10 37 54 4 Pedestrians Lane Width(R) . Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage'' : , Right turn flare (veh) Median type. . None ? None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 285 203 57 201 201 68 59 73 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 7.4 6.5 7.2 7.1 6.5 6.3 4.1 4.3 tC,2 stage(s)tF (s) 3.8 4.0 4.2 3.5 4.0 3.4 2.2 2.4 p0 queue free% 99 100 100 99 100 91 100 97 cM capacity(veh/h) 544 679 791 743 681 976 1558 1431 Volume Total 10 `; 95 73 96 Volume Left 5 8 0 37 Volume Right, 1 87 10 4 cSH 605 952 1558 1431 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.10 0.00 0.03 Queue Length(ft) 1 8 0 2 Control Delay(s) 11.0 9.2 0.0 3.1 Lane LOS B A A Approach Delay(s) 11.0 9.2 0.0 al Approach LOS B A ,arlitwatifiVite qq Average Delay 4.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.0% ICU Level of Service A 9: WCR 20&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Base 10/7/2001 -• �► r ~ 4". -\ t t '► 1 mots '27,Vre0C0013r41 7.; (INORT*Natilll'.)W8A10044,i4EttirPatcri4SSBR Lane Configurations 4, 4. 4, 4. Sign Control Stop ;, Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 20 5 8 11 1 6 14 34 11 8 22 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 22 5 9 12 1 7 15 37 12 9 24 18 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median typ c- None 4 None Median storage veh) vC,Conflicting volume 131 130 33 135 133 43 42 49 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 cord vol tC, single(s) 7.7 6.7 7.2 7.1 6.5 6.5 5.0 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 4.0 4.2 4.2 3.5 4.0 3.6 3.0 2.2 p0 queue free% 97 99 f . 99 99 100 99 99 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 708 715 818 815 747 946 1137 1571 > _ e , a Volumerofai . °- 36 20:, 64 51 Volume Left 22 12 15 9 Volume Right 9 7 r 12 18 cSH 733 850 1137 1571 Volume to Capacity 0.05 . 0.02 ? 0.01 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 4 2 1 0 Control Delay(s) 10.2 9.3- 2.0 1.3 Lane LOS B A A A Approach Delay(s) 10.2 9.3 2.0 1.3 Approach LOS B A Average Delay 4.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.6% ICU Level of Service A 12: WCR 18&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Iscinc s2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Base 10/7/2001 ,, -p r ♦- 4- 4\ t P `► 1 ;-4tak- I E WORi' ;t om ratrti`. S Lane Configurations (t 4+ 4. 4 • Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 25 448 3 15 1047 32 7 3 5 10 ' 5 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 27 487 3 16 1138 35 8 3 5 11 + 5 43 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent!Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median ype NoOe None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 1173 490 1777 1748 489 1738 1733 1155 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 cord'vol tC, single(s) 4.5 4.1 7.2 6.5 6.2 7.4 6.7 6.5 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.5 2.2 3.6 4.0 3.3 3.8 4.2 3.6 p0 queue free% 94 98 82 96 99 79 93 79 cM capacity(veh/h) 489 y 1p0�84 42 81; 583 53 74 210 tik.Volume Total 517 1189 16 60 Volume Left 27 16 8 11 Volume Right 3 35 5 43 cSH ` 489 1084 71 123 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.02 0.23 0.49 Queue Length(ft) 4 1' 20 55 Control Delay(s) 1.6 0.5 70.0 59.1 Lane LOS A A F F Approach Delay(s) 1.6 0.5 70.0 59.1 Approach LOS F F e;•. ,F &':r4&$`, �aatit,Y4admvicteFtiNittga§,¢;,p Average Delay ' ' " 3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.4% ICU Level of Service E 15: SH 52 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 5 Iscincro-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Base 10/7/2001 -. r 4 - 4\ / Lane Configurations it 4 V Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 46 0 0 114 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 50 0 0 124 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 50 174 50 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 5.1 7.4 7.2 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 3.1 4.4 4.2 po queue free% '' 100 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1105 635 798 Volume Total 50 124 0 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1105 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.00 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS '; A Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.9% ICU Level of Service A 18:WCR 20.5&Access Rd Synchro 5 Report Page 6 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Total 10/7/2001 Maialintr ilk * 1 „ e 4 ti 4il ,raeLbt4S x Lane Configurations 4p 4. 4. 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume;(vett/h) 0 13 ' 2 14 69 44 3 122 10 31 '300 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veti/h), 0 14 `- 2 15 75 48 3 133 11 34 326 4 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type.° '; None None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 626 546`; 328 549 542 138 330 143 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 cord vol tC, single(s) 7.1 7.0 6.2 7.3 6.7 6.4 4.1 4.5 tC, 2 stage(s) tF (s) 3.5 4.4 3.3 3.7 4.1 3.5 2.2 2.6 p0 queue tree% 100 96 100 96 82 94 100 97 .; cM capacity(veh/h) 318 378 718 396 415 855 1240 1227 Volume Total '' 16 138 147 364 Volume Left 0 15 3 34 Volume Right 2 48 11 4 cSH 403 502 1240 1227 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.27 : 0.00 0.03 Queue Length (ft) 3 28 0 2 Control Delay(s) 14.3 14.9 0.2 `: 1.0 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 14.3 14.9 0.2 1.0 Approach LOS B B b'A weir 4t . t$*. ,e. i- r get^ Average Delay 4.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.3% - ICU Level of Service A 3: WCR 20.5&WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Total 10/7/2001 C ~ t 1 t t `► j J _„ a _AveitiftqAsit,,t4rv," 'SNOR',YriSBIeSitiCifigSliR Lane Configurations 4' Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(vehlh) 17 1 >> 39 10 2 1 111 30 10`- 3 ' 46 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(vehlh) 18 1 42 11 2 1 121 33 11 3 50 13 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft},, ' Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type ' f, None None Median storage veh) vC,tent'conflicting volume 345 348 57 385 349 38 63 43 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 7.8 7.5 6.5 8.0 6.5 7.2 4.3 4.8 tC, 2 stage(s) tF (s) 4.1 4.9 3.6 4.3 4.0 4.2 2.4 2.8 p0 queue free% '! 96 . 100 95 97 100 100 92 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 464 408 931 394 529 812 1444 1233 F 1 Volume 62 14 164 ,66 Volume Left 18 11 121 3 Volume,Right 42 1 11 . . 13 cSH 704 428 1444 1233 Volume!to Capacity 0.09 0.03 0.08 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 7 3 7 0 Control Delay(s) ; ' 10.6 13.7 5.9 0.4 Lane LOS B B A A Approach Delay(s) 10.6 13.7 5.9 0.4 Approach LOS B B Average Delay 6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.3% ICU Level of Service A 6: WCR 20.5&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Total 10/7/2001 f -• C 4- t -, t P `► 1 -' mss'r,.`t +' L' B "I r ( ^ 0L i Lane Configurations 4. Sign Control Stop Stop Free - Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) ! 5 3 1 7 0 80 0 69 9 34 ' 61 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flown rate(veh/h) 5 3 < 1 8 0 87 0 75 10 37 66 4 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type r" None None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 309 227 68 225 224 80 71 85 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf tC, single(s) 7.4 6.5 7.2 7.1 6.5 6.3 4.1 4.3 tC,2 stage(s)" °? tF (s) 3.8 4.0 4.2 3.5 4.0 3.4 2.2 2.4 p0 queue free% 99 100 100 99 100 91 100 97 cM capacity(veh/h) 523 658 778 716 660 961 1543 1417 fix, Volume Total 10 "95 85 1O8 Volume Left 5 8 0 37 Volume Right 1 87 ! 10 4 cSH 584 936 1543 1417 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.10 0.00 0.03 Queue Length (ft) 1 8 0 2 Control Delay(s) 11.3 9.3 0.0 2.7 Lane LOS B A A Approach Delay(s) 11.3 9.3 0.0 2.7 Approach LOS B A Average Delay 4.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.6% ICU Level of Service A 9: WCR 20&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 Iscinrrc?_st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Total 10/7/2001 + Lane Configurations .7F, e 4, 4+ Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(vehlh) 20 5 8 11 1 6 14 45 11 8 33 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 22 5 . 9 12 1 7 15 49 12 9 36 18 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage'! Right turn flare(veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 155 154 45 159 157 55 54 61 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 cant vol tC, single(s) 7.7 6.7 7.2 7.1 6.5 6.5 5.0 4.1 C, 2 stage(s) tF (s) 4.0 4.2 4.2 3.5 4.0 3.6 3.0 2.2 p0 queue free% 97 99 99 98 100 99 99 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 681 693 804 786 725 931 1124 1555 tY Volume Total 36 20 76'` 63 Volume Left 22 12 15 9 Volume Right 9 7 12 " 18 cSH 709 825 1124 1555 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 4 2 1 0 Control Delay(s) 10.3 9.5 1.7 1.0 Lane LOS B A A A Approach Delay,(s) 10.3 9.5 1.7 1.0 Approach LOS B A �g�,gg* �.„,T W. *G f"�n �-«s "��'�- ,T` m: �«r %s,�irit v.'5.`ie≥ 4: ..;, * ..,,c., .,..fq M-'• Average Delay 3.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.4% ICU Level of Service A 12: WCR 18&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 10/8/20012001 AM Peak Total —r• 7 j '— '11/4- `1 I /1. " l J ,,. � `. , . ,. . ?« . `14$t ast ';rSSST "SBE Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4, 4+ Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(vehlh) r 25 448 3 15 1047 43 `: 7 3 5 21 5 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(venal) 27 487 ' 3 16 1138 47 8 3 5 23 5 43 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage` Right turn flare(veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 1185 490 1783 1760 489 1744 1739 1161 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 cord vol tC, single(s) 4.5 4.1 7.2 6.5 6.2 7.4 6.7 6.5 tC, 2 stage.(s) . tF (s) 2.5 2.2 3.6 4.0 3.3 3.8 4.2 3.6 p0 queue free% 94 98 82 96 99 56 93 79 cM capacity (veh/h) 484 1084 42 79 583 52 73 209 .. s `. tt'e te`. ‘' .T 4.i ._ a ' I i 14tif T'9. ?. Volume Total 517 1201 16 72 Volume Left^ 27 16 8 23 Volume Right 3 47 5 43 cSH 484 1084 70 100 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.02 0.23 0.72 Queue Length(ft) " 4 1 20 93 Control Delay(s) 1.6 0.5 71.1 102.9 Lane LOS A A F F Approach Delay Delay(s) 1.6 0.5 71.1 102.9 LOS FF �' x�p'3E»e�itc�s{C�ni �� f.Ki; �''• kJ��$r. ��'. 2 "3+�fi Average Delay 5.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.6% ICU Level of Service E 15: SH 52&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Total 10/7/2001 1r ~ IN P gift tk.'"ettrii Lane Configurations T. 4 V Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 46 7 11 114 7 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 50 8 12 124 8 12 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type ",,,v . ` None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 58 202 54 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 5.1 7.4 7.1 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 3.1 4.4 4.1 p0 queue free%- 99 99 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 1097 603 810 . .a.Yv, xs#� a Fq li x. 4L°c' 2 ' 4,',5' ;',.4.74' 2j"1 _ �...$..,.w'..�,��.Sx._i1..u�+Y�'Mx.a � � `Y:i,� �' tl.�c�F'+ '�,C� L sF".^,{ Volume Total 58 136 20 Volume Left ; 0 12 8 Volume Right 8 0 12 c$H 1700 1097 715 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.01 0.03 Queue Length(ft) 0 1 2 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.8 10.2 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.8 10.2 Approach LOS B Average Delay ', 1.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.1% ICU Level of Service A 18: WCR 20.5&Acres Rd Synchro 5 Report Page 6 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Base 10/7/2001 ,: ',Af re .,NB ,: Wv ..;$BT Lane Configurations 4. 4s 4. 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/ft) 1 35 1 7 16 43 3 327 14 23 116 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/ii) 1 38 1 8 17 47 3 355 15 25 126 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(fUs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 601 553= 126 566 546 363 126 371 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 cent vol tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.6 6.3 4.1 4.2 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.1 3.4 2.2 2.3 PO queue free% 100 91 r 100 98 96 93 100 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 367 433 930 401 429 656 1473 1150 — Volume total 40 72 i 374 151 Volume Left 1 8 3 25 Volume Right 1 47 15 0 cSH 437 549 1473 1150 Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.13 0.00 -0.02 Queue Length (ft) 8 11 0 2 Control Delay(s) 14.1 12.5 0.1 1.5 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 14.1 12.5 0.1 1.5 Approach LOS B B .1;`1:,„1 ... .,.. ..Average Delay 2.7 intersection Capacity Utilization 31.8% ICU Level of Service A 3: WCR 20.5 &WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Base 10/7/2001 R . ; v' YYiei,, 14a Lane Configurations 4. . 4, Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) : 13 5 68 2 4 0 48 50 2 2 33 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 hourly Row rate(veh/ti) 14 5 74 2 4 0 52 54 2 2 36 11 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 208 207 41 282 211 55 47 57 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 7.2 6.5 6.3 8.1 6.5 6.2 4.2 4.6 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.6 4.0 3.4 4.4 4.0 3.3 2.3 2.7 p0 queue free% 98 99 93 100 99 100 97 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 713 669 1016 459 665 1017 1511 1290 k S l t l,Ufte# — Volume Total 93 7 109 49 Volume Left 14 2 52 2 Volume Right 74 0 2 11 cSH 928 579 1511 1290 Volume to Capacity 0,10 0.01 0.03 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 8 1 3 0 Control Delay(s) 9.3 11.3 3.7 0.4 Lane LOS A B A A Approach Delay(s) 9.3 11.3 3.7 0.4 Approach LOS A B Average Delay 5.3 intersection Capacity Utilization 25.6% ICU Level of Service A 6: WCR 20.5 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Base 10/7/2001 stlf Lane Configurations '+ ,�'+ 4+ Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free 0% 0% 0% Grade 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 3 1 14 1 43 1 55 9 73 31 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 5 3 1 15 1 47 1 60 10 79 34 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None . None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 307 264 34 262 259 65 34 70 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p4 queue free% 99 99 1 95 cPM8 capacity (vehh//h) 594 611 104500 66498 614100 100595 1591100 1525 7 s -- Volume Total 10 63 71 113 Volume Left 5 15 1 79 Volume Right 1 41 10 0 cSH 630 885 1591 1525 Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.07'r 0.00 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 1 6 0 4 Control Delay(s) 10.8 9.4!' 0.1 5.4 Lane LOS B A A A Approach Delay(s) 10.8 9.4 0.1 5.4 Approach LOS B A Average Delay 5.1 intersection Capacity Utilization 23.5% ICU Level of Service A 9: WCR 20 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Base 10/7/2001 # WBR NB t SSl�1T..:'..St3R Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 4+ 4' Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 10 2 1 3 0 11 3 1 3 5 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 5 11 2 1 3 0 12 3 1 3 5 2 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 42 41 7 48 42 4 8 4 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 7.8 7.3 6.6 7.3 6.9 6.2 5.0 4.4 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 4.1 4.7 3.7 3.7 4.4 3.3 3.0 2.5 p0 queue free% 99 98 100 100 100 100 : 99 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 803 716 975 888 767 1086 1180 1436 - Volume Total 18 4 16 11 Volume Left 5 1 12 3 Volume Right 2 0 1 2 cSH 764 794 1180 1436 Volume to Capacity 0,02 0.01 0.01 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 2 0 1 0 Control Delay(s) 9.8 9.6 5.9 2.3 Lane LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s) 9.8 9.6 5.9 2.3 Approach LOS A A n ,.. Average Delay 6.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A 12: WCR 18 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Base 10/7/2001 -D-- { 4 k -, t P ti 1 -' WSW' tNtat ,NB$T NEtfR SSL:; 'SST.:.SBRR Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4, 4, Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 32 1115 13 12 494 12 6 17 18 10 '' 8 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Houdyflow rate(veh/h) 35 1212 14 13 537 13 7 18 20 11 9 32 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 550 1226 1894 1865 1219 1887 1865 543 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.3 4.1 7.3 6.5 6.2 7.2 6.5 6.3 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.4 2.2 3.7 4.0 3.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 p0 queue free% 96 98 83 73 91 69 87 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 927 575 39 69 222 35 69 517 Volume Total 1261 563 45 51 — Volume Left 35 13 7 11 Volume Right 14 13 20 32 cSH 927 575 86 103 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.02 0.52 0.49 Queue Length(ft) 3 2 57 ' 55 Control Delay (s) 1.4 0.6 85.9 69.8 Lane LOS A A F F Approach Delay (s) 1.4 0.6 85.9 69.8 Approach LOSq'`�.y F F ftt cl S m LR r. 1 Average Delay 5.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.7% ICU Level of Service F 15: SH 52 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 5 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Base 10/7/2001 Lane Configurations T. 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) '' 86 0 0 62 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 93 0 0 67 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 93 161 93 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 5.1 7.4 7.2 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.1 4.4 4.2 130 queue free% 100 ' 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1059 647 750 Volume Total 93 67 0 — Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1059 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.00 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A Average Delay i 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 8.3% ICU Level of Service A 18:WCR 20.5&Access Rd Synchro 5 Report Page 6 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Total 10/7/2001 Lane Configurations 4. 4, 4) 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 1 35 1 7 16 44 3 327 14 24 `: 116 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 1 38 1 8 17 48 3 355 15 26 126 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 604 555 126 568 548 363 ' 126 371 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 con!vol tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.6 6.3 4.1 4.2 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.1 3.4 2.2 2.3 P0 queue free% 100 91 100 98 96 93 100 98 cM capacity(veh/h) 364 431 930 399 428 656 1473 1150 '..N � :'1SB 1, .,<+�c S-.r .'rx t;; w.,: f s? '` , , Volume Total 40 73 374 152 Volume Left 1 8 3 26 Volume Right 1 48 15 0 cSH 436 549 1473 1150 Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.13 0.00 0.02 Queue Length (ft) 8 11 0 2 Control Delay(s) 14.1 12.6 0.1 1.6 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 14.1 12.6 0.1 1.6 Approach LOS B B Intersection, a as . k, .., . . . , Average Delay 2.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.8% ICU Level of Service A 3: WCR 20.5 &WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Total 10/7/2001 y -1y �yy r '— yg ke -, t `► 1 -1 tfrt ., ro EB ati y�}R t s B -- WB4"t, Ntak-. :N t`,-,f`tflEiftt,zzi S F ; R Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4 4, Sign Control Stop , Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 13 5 70 2 4 0 ' 50 50 2 2 r 33 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 14 5 76 2 4 0 ; 54 54 2 2 36 11 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage- Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 212 211 41 269 215 55 - 47 57 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 cenfval tC, single (s) 7.2 6.5 6.3 8.1 6.5 6.2 4.2 4.6 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.6 4.0 3.4 4.4 4.0 3.3 2.3 2.7 po queue free% 98 99 93 100 99 100 96 100 cM capacity (veh/h) �p708 664 1016 453 660 1017 1511 1290 - Volume Total 96 7 111 49 Volume Left 14 2 54 2 Volume Right 76 0 2 11 cSH 928 573 1511 1290 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.01 0.04 0.00 Queue Length(ft) 9 1 3 0 Control Delay(s) 9.3 11.4 3.8 0.4 Lane LOS A B A A Approach Delay (s) 9.3 11.4 3.8 0.4 Approach LOS A B Average Delay 5.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 25,9% ICU Level of Service A 6: WCR 20.5 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Total 10/7/2001 de—e.t. Lane Configurations 4. 4. 4+ 4+ Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 3 1 14 1 43 1 57 9 73 ? 33 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 5 3 1 15 1 47 1 62 10 79 36 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None ` None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 31.1 268 36 266 264 67 36 72 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vat tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 99 100 98 100 95 100 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 590 607 1043 659 611 1002 1588 1522 Volume Total 10 63 73 115 Volume Left 5 15 1 79 Volume Right 1 47` 10 0 cSH 626 882 1588 1522 Volume to Capacity 0.02 1/47 0,00 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 1 6 0 4 Control Delay(s) 10.8 9.4 f 0.1 5.3 Lane LOS B A A A Approach Delay (s) 10.8 9.4 0.1 5.3 Approach LOS B A lntelse 1tio 1 tart many .. _e. e Lk ,Average Delay 5.0 intersection Capacity Utilization 23.6% ICU Level of Service A 9: WCR 20 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Total 10/7/2001 Lane Configurations 4+ 4) 4) 4. Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 5 10 2 1 3 0 11 5 1 3 7 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 5 11 2 1 3 0 `. 12 5 1 3 8 2 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 47 46 9 53 46 6 10 7 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 Genf vol tC, single (s) 7.8 7.3 6.6 7.3 6.9 6.2 5.0 4.4 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 4.1 4.7 3.7 3.7 4.4 3.3 3.0 2.5 p0 queue free% 99 98 100 100 100 100 99 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 797 712 972 882 763 1083 1178 1433 Volume Total 18 4 18 13 Volume Left 5 1 12 3 Volume Right 2 0 1 : 2 cSH 760 789 1178 1433 Volume to Capacity 0,02 0.01 0.01 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 2 0 1 0 Contra,Delay(s) 9.9 9.6 5.3 1.9 Lane LOS A A A A Approach Delay (s) 9.9 9.6 5.3 1.9 Approach LOS A A Average Delay 6.4 intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A 12: WCR 18 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 10/7/2001 2001 PM Peak Total Lane Configurations 4 4+ 4' Stop Sign Control Free Free Stop p Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 32 1115 13 12 494 14 6 17 18 12 8 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 35 1212 14 13 537 15 7 18 20 13 9 32 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 552 1226 1895 1867 1219 1888 1866 545 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2.stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.3 4.1 7.3 6.5 6.2 7.2 6.5 6.3 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.4 2.2 3.7 4.0 3.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 p0 queue free% 96 98 83 73 91 63 87 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 925 575 39 69 222 35 69 516 Volume Total 1261 565 45 53 Volume Left 35 13 7 13 Volume Right 14 15 20 32 cSH 925 575 85 96 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.02 0.52 0.56 Queue Length (ft) 3 2 57 64 Control Delay (s) 1.4 0.6 86.3 82.0 Lane LOS A A F F Approach Delay (s) 1.4 0.6 86.3 82.0 Approach LOS F F h1" np-Oti d06 Average Delay 5.4 .� . Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.8% ICU Level of Service F 15: SH 52&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 5 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Total 10/7/2001 -� l ~ 4 P t:.. A ;Nib Lane Configurations 'Ts 4 V Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/11) 86 1 2 62 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 93 1 2 67 1 2 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 95 466 94 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 5.1 7.4 7.2 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.1 4.4 4.2 p0 queue free % : 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1058 642 750 Ovtf l e,Lanite#'`i M'7'.. .�' n �,,s z,:: `$ } X;. i m. , • >,� a ., a . . , i _ _ ... Volume Total 95 70 3 Volume Left 0 2 1 Volume Right 1 0 2 cSH 1700 1058 710 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.00 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 10.1 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 10.1 Approach LOS B Intersection SPrtItt x Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.0% ICU Level of Service A 18: WCR 20.5 &Access Rd Synchro 5 Report Page 6 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 110/7/2001 2021 AM Peak Base '' —. l 1f 4— t t /A. 4 ♦ -' Lane Configurations 4, stop Free 0% 4, 4 Sign Control S 0% p ° Free Stop Grade 0% 0% Volume {veh/h) 5 25 65 5 220 20 45 540 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.9225 0.925 0.92 0.92 0.92 5 27 136125 71 0.925 2390.92 220.92 0.92 49 i 5870.92 0.9121 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 5 27 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) 261 vC, conflicting volume 1090 962 592 970 957 250 598 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 cacti vol tC, single (s) 7.1 7.0 6.2 7.3 6.7 6.4 4.1 4.5 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 3.5 4.4 3.3 3.7 4.1 3.5 2.2 296 .6 9 87 99 88 41 90 99 ia0 queue dui capacty(v eh/h) 91 206 510 184 232 738 989 1103 Volume Totalv1.4 38 234 266 647 Volume Left 5 27 5 49 Volume Right 5 71 22 11 cSH 188 282 989 1103 Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.83 0.01 0.04 Queue Length (ft) 18 171 0 3 Control Delay(s) 29.0 58.3 0.2 1.2 Lane LOS D F A A Approach Delay(s) 29.0 58.3 0.2 1.2 Approach LOS D F Average Delay 13.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.1% ICU Level of Service C Synchro 5 Report 3: WCR 20.5 &WCR 1 Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Base 10/7/2001 '- (�t� / " 1 moment ,�<z H v a ' L sEBT -' R `.W '' WB 5'1`WBR . :SNNB2'\:1. t. : Sea .-., ';� n�3". Lane Configurations 4. 4) 4) 4) Sign Control Stop; Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 5 5 15 5 145 ! - 5 105 15 60 90 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vrehfh) 5 5 5 16 5 158 5 114 16 65 98 11 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 527 375 103 375 372 122 109 130 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf;vol tC, single (s) 7.4 6.5 7.2 7.1 6.5 6.3 4.1 4.3 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.8 4.0 4.2 3.5 4.0 3.4 2.2 2.4 p0 queue free % 98 99 99 97 99 83 100 95 cM capacity(veh/h) 328 530 740 554 532 910 1494 1362 Volume Total 16 179 136 174 Volume Left 5 16 5 65 Volume Right 5 158 16 11 cSH 477 843 1494 1362 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.21 0.00 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 3 20 0 4 Control Delay(s) 12.8 10.4 0.3 3.2 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay (s) 12.8 10.4 i 0.3 3,2 Approach LOS B B .1,..` ';;;:1;t";;;;;;:',;:,..;;:'" . . , . , '" Average Delay 5.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40,5% ICU Level of Service A 9: WCR 20 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Base 10/7/2001 f �--tr7pp 1 4— k. '\ t t �► �`�y Lane Configurations 4. 4, 4, 4' Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume,(veh/h) 35 10 = 15 20 5 10 25 60 20 15 40 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly.flov+rate (veh/ti) 38 11 16 22 5 11 ' 27 65 22 16 43 33 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 236 234 60 245 239 76 76 87 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vot tC, single (s) 7.7 6.7 7.2 7.1 6.5 6.5 5.0 4.1 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 4.0 4.2 4.2 3.5 4.0 3.6 3.0 2.2 p0 queue free % 93 98 98 97 99 99 98 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 585 614 787 671 642 905 1100 1522 tiYtE�ia��5�nN.�'�S` z .:3.,.i�`4i ��'. eo�� r'°��9..'tF ,. y .g xxY + .i. _ •y,•• — Volume Total 65 38 + 114 92 Volume Left 38 22 27 16 Volume Right 16 11 22 33 cSH 630 719 1100 1522 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.05 0.02 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 9 4 2 1 Control Delay(s) 11.4 10.3 2.2 1.4 Lane LOS B B A A Approach Delay(s) 11.4 10.3 r 2.2 1.4 Approach LOS B B y Average Delay 4.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.7% ICU Level of Service A 12: WCR 18 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Base 10/7/2001 Lane Configurations a'+ 4+ 4, 4' Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 35 620 5 25 1625 50 15 5 10 20 10 70 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 38 674 5 27 1766 54 16 5 11 22 11 76 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 1821 679 2682 2628 677 2614 '2603 1793 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.5 4.1 7.2 6.5 6.2 7.4 6.7 6.5 tG,2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.5 2.2 3.6 4.0 3.3 3.8 4.2 3.6 po queue free% 86 97 0 73 98 0 39 10 cM capacity(veh/h) 265 922 1 20 457 9 18 85 ��{' ;1;t:21;'," D l La <r eJS 3 S . la. Volume Total 717 1848 33 109 Volume Left 38 27 16 22 Volume Right 5 54 11 76 cSt{ 265 922 1 27 Volume to Capacity 0.14 0.03 27.28 3.99 Queue Length (ft) 12 2 Err Err Control Delay (s) 5.8 -3.6 Err Err Lane LOS A A F F Approach Delay (s) 5.8 -3.6 Err 9999.0 Approach LOS F F .. Ititettit- 13,71:7" Average Delay '` 521.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 153.9% ICU Level of Service H 15: SH 52 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 5 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Base 10/7/2001 7 r-- 4\ / Movement EBI ERR 1 L. BT a_ NBR Lane Configurations it) 4 V Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 'r 85 0 0 205 ;0 0 ' Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 92 0 0 223 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 92 315 92 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 5.1 7.4 7.2 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.1 4.4 4.2 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 1060 516 752 Dir Lane# � . 1. .. . . . . ... ... Volume Total 92 223 0 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1060 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.00 0.00 Queue Length(ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 0M 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A IntersectionSu f+ ' Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.1% ICU Level of Service A 18: WCR 20.5 &Access Rd Synchro 5 Report Page 6 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Total 10/7/2001 i C4- k- t p " 1 di �- e . . . . : I :I ` t R SBL£h PSBR Lane Configurations Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 25 5 25 125 72 5 220 20 52 540 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 5, 27 5 27 136; 78 5 239 22' 57 587 11 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) . Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent lockage ! Right turn flare(veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 1112 977 592 985 972 250 598 261 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 cent vol tC, single(s) 7.1 7.0 6.2 7.3 6.7 6.4 4.1 4.5 tC,2 stages) tF(s) 3.5 4.4 3.3 3.7 4.1 3.5 2.2 2.6 p0 queue free% cM capacity(veh/h) 84 200 510 178 226 738 989 1103 __. -sn ? r •ar'5yr °, 4 a i . .T:;.,.+ �, , r w s w t•.,n s 0if.t `417.' `", 1 '", Volume Total 38 241 266, .654 Volume Left 5 27 5 57 Volume Right 5 78 ! 22 11 cSH 180 280 989 1103 Volume to Capacity 0.21 ' 0.86 0.01. 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 19 185 0 4 Control Delay(s) 30.3 63.7 0.2 1.3 Lane LOS D F A A Approach Delay(s) 30.3 63.7 0.2 1.3 Approach LOS D F p `,t'1'x:Vikrk', ..; G,..„f Average Delay 14.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.0% ICU Level of Service C 3: WCR 20.5&WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 10/7/20012021 AM Peak Total l --. 1 4— t 1 t I' 4 Lane Configurations 4. 4' Free Free Sign Control Stop Stop pee 0% Grade Volunte(vehth) 30 5 61 20 5 5 191 55 20 5 85 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 33 5 66 ":22 5 5 208 60 22 5 92 22 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 608 611 103 669 611 71 ' 114 82 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol 4.8 tC, single(s) 7.8 7.5 6.5 8.0 6.5 7.2 4.3 tC,2 stage(s} tF (s) 4.1 4.9 3.6 4.3 4.0 4.2 2.4 2.8 pd queue free% 88 98 92 ' 90 98 99 85 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 280 256 876 220 348 775 1381 1190 Volume Total ,., 104 .'"33"'.'289' `,120 Volume Left 33 22 208 5 Volume Right 66 5 22 22 cSH 489 269 1381 1190 Volume to Capacity, 0.21 ' 0.12 0.15 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 20 10 13 0 Control Delay(s) 14.4 " 20.2 6.2 0.4 Lane LOS BC A A Approach Delay(s) 14.4 20.2 6.2 0.4 Approach LOS B C f!II: . ;al* t--;; Average Delay 7.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.9% ICU Level of Service A 6: WCR 20.5&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Total 10/7/2001 744:4 t i,:.. t k.NB S1 L'' SBT SBR Lane Configurations 44, 4. 40 4' Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 5 5 15 5 145 5 116 15 60 101 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 5 5 5 16 5 158 5 126 16 65 110 11 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent;Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median;type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 551 399 115 399 396 134 121 142 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 7.4 6.5 7.2 7.1 6.5 6.3 4.1 4.3 tC,2 stage(s), tF (s) 3.8 4.0 4.2 3.5 4.0 3.4 2.2 2.4 p0 queue free% ` 98 99 99 97 99 82 ` 100 95 cM capacity(veh/h) 315 514 728 534 516 896 1480 1348 Volume Total 16 179 , 148 186 Volume Left 5 16 5 65 Volume Right 5 158 16 11 cSH 462 827 1480 1348 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.22 0.00 0.05 Queue Length (ft) 3 21 0 4 Control Delay(s) 13.1 10.6 0.3 3.0 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 13.1 10.6 0.3 3.0 Approach LOS B B Average Delay 5.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.8% ICU Level of Service A 9: WCR 20&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 10/7/20012021 AM Peak Total M( .0 , lfli L. ° . .$ BR o B osB= T wSBR Lane Configurations 4. `. 4. Free Sign Control Stop Stop Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 35 10 15 20 5 10 25 71 20 15 51 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 38 11 16 22 5 11 27 77 22 16 55 33 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Medan type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 260 ' 258 72 268 263 88 88 99 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,,stage 2 cdnfvol tC, single(s) 7.7 6.7 7.2 7.1 6.5 6.5 5.0 4.1 tC.2 stage(s) .22 tF(s) 4.0 4.2 4.2 3.5 4.0 3.6 3.0 . po queue free% : 93 98 98 97 99 99 98 99 cM capacity(veh/h) 562 595 774 646 623 891 1088 1507 Volume Total 65 38 126 104 Volume Left 38 22 27 16 Volume Right 16 11 22 33 cSH 609 697 1088 1507 Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.05 0.02 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 9 4 2 1 Control Delay(s) 11.6 10.5 2.0 1.2 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 11.6 10.5 2.0 1.2 Approach LOS B B--‘=" c M- 4.. ,. 4„ . tS "iVWCeM' 1 'tF 1 '`,`µ.``#��.w Average Delay 4.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.8% ICU Level of Service A 12: WCR 18&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Total 10/7/2001 Lane Configurations 4 4. 4 4. Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 35 620 ': 5 25 1625 61 15 5 10 31 10 70 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 38 674 ` 5 27 1766 66 `, 16 5 11 34 11 76 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 1833 679 2688 2640 677 2620 2609 1799 vC1, stage 1 conf vol v02, stage 2 cent vol tC, single(s) 4.5 4.1 7.2 6.5 6.2 7.4 6.7 6.5 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.5 2.2 3.6 4.0 3.3 3.8 4.2 3.6 p0 queue free% ': 85 97 0 72 98 0 39 9 cM capacity(veh/h) 262 922 1 20 457 9 18 84 Volume Total 717 1860 33 121 Volume Left 38 27 16 34 Volume Right 5 66 11 76 0SH 262 922 1 22 Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.03 30.21 5.43 Queue Length(ft); 13 2 Err ';Err Control Delay(s) 6.0 -3.2 Err Err Lane LOS A A F F Approach Delay(s) 6.0 -3.2 Err Err Approach LOS F F tir :' f,„Te*_' ` 07-1044401V,"'`-`,71: Rv� Aver .Delay_ 560.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 158.4% ICU Level of Service H 15: SH 52&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 5 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 10/7/20012021 AM Peak Total ` 4-- 4\/ *+/r M sF �'3 dk sk.� , Tyy<.,s BL 4[ Fj. �a, $ a `,r ,"". r h �y 'd 1'"^'' C,j �41� M2Yk�pd.M.nF��,�+h� "f 3. _�'{, �`��"��' "Yy gf�l k`' .�'}. K°!a, ,'hr h fib., Lane Configurations t► 4 Stop Sign Control Free Free 0% Grade Volume(veh/h) 85 7 11 - 205 7 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 92 8 12 t 223 8 12 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) None Median type Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 100 343 96 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 5.0 7.4 7.1 tC, 2 stage(s) tF (s) 3.0 4.4 4.1 p0 queue free% :' 99 98 98 cM capacity(veh/h) 1082 489 763 e tWit„ tr"`; Volume Total 100 235 20 Volume Left 0 12 8 Volume Right 8 0 12 cSH 1700 1082 627 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.01 0.03 Queue Length(ft) 0 1 ' 2 Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.5 10.9 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.5 10.9 Approach LOS B , ,;,{-. any t sr n4L s x ° sib,ei,d i,r `m �+j,5^ sc ,{ m. .�tN a rr,a.�- „. t�t}6!$F�wAs�sl�'�� S�(^7�a�.9S}7,�',y �"Y"x{x. sde... tn,,� yet +.� a 'Y Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.6% ICU Level of Service A 18: WCR 20.5&Access Rd Synchro 5 Report Page 6 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Base 10/8/2001 r '`— l \ t P b 1 d t tt m ax° s'rd d " r c t T WBR " N- SOIMsErGterSEIR Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Frree Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 65 ! 5 15 30 75 5 220 25 40 210 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 5 71 5 16 33 82 5 239 27 43 /`228 5 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed(fUs) Percent'Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Mediantype None. :None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 679 595 231 622 584 253 > 234 266 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf yol tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.6 6.3 4.1 4.2 tC,2 stage(s) tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.1 3.4 2.2 2.3 0 queue free% 98 83 99. 95 92 89" : 100 97 cM capacity(veh/h) 299 404 813 336 402 758 1346 $ 1258 ..irN At' +7S111�,4' ::. Volume Total 82 130" 272 ""277 Volume Left 5 16 5 43 Volume Right 5 82 27 5 cSH 408 550 1346 1258 Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.24 ; 0.00 0.03 Queue Length (ft) 18 23 0 3 Control,Delay(s) 16.0 13.6 0.2 "1.5 Lane LOS CB A A Approach Delay(s) 16.0 13.6 0.2 1.5 Approach LOS C B as Average Delay 4.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.5% (CU Level of Service A 3: WCR 20.5&WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Base 10/7/2001 .) -. 4- t 4\ t ► 1` 4/ Lane Configurations 4. 4) 4.) 4' Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 25 10 125 5 10 0 " 85 90 5 5 60 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 27 11 136 5 11 0 92 98 5 5 '' 65 22 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 378 375 76 ;514 383 101 87 103 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 7.2 6.5 6.3 8.1 6.5 6.2 4.2 4.6 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.6 4.0 3.4 4.4 4.0 3.3 2.3 2.7 p0 queue free%; 95 98 86 98 98 100 94 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 531 521 971 279 516 960 1460 1236 - Volume Total 174 16 196 92 Volume Left 27 5 92 5 Volume Right 136 0 5 . 22 cSH 821 402 1460 1236 Volume to Capacity 0.21 0.04 0.06 0.00 Queue Length (ft) 20 3 5 0 Control Delay(s) 10.6 14.3 3.9 0.5 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 10.6 14.3 3.9 0.5 Approach yLOS B B In xmary .T � .... Y l ._ Y'. .. , , t> f.,c xEV r .�x1..�. . Average Delay 6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.3% ICU Levet of Service A 6: WCR 20.5 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 2 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Base 10/7/2001 -• � C k 4\ t t " j 4' Lane Configurations 4' Sto Free 4 Free Sign Control 0 Grade S0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 15 25 10 10 10 10 20 70 25 15 65 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/ti) 16 27 11 11 11 11 22 76 27 16 71 16 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (f/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None`, None Median storage veh) 103 vC, conflicting volume 261 258 79 269 253 90 87 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 7.8 7.3 6.6 7.3 6.9 6.2 5.0 4.4 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 4.1 4.7 3.7 3.7 4.4 3.3 3.0 2.5 p0 queue free% 97 95 99 98 98 99 98 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 543 519 886 600 567 974 1092 1316 w.r -- Volume Total 54 33 125 : 103 Volume Left 16 11 22 16 Volume Right 11 11 27 16 cSH 574 673 1092 1316 Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.01 Queue Length(ft) 8 4 2 1 Control Delay(s) 11.9 10.6 1.6 1.3 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 11.9 10.8 1.6 1.3 Approach LOS B B !r v! ,.. .,r. c.. 1V Average Delay 4.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 18.9°!0 ICU Level of Service A 12: WCR 18 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Base 10/7/2001 t -• r ti -, t ► J Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4, 4, Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 45 1540 20 20 765 20 10 30 30 20 ' 15 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 49 1674 22 22 832 22 11 33 33 22 16 54 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 853 1696 2731 2679 1685 2717 2679 842 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.3 4.1 7.3 6.5 6.2 7.2 6.5 6.3 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.4 2.2 3.7 4.0 3.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 p0 queue free% 93 94 0 0 72 0 17 84 cM capacity (veh/h) 707 3@@81 3 20 118 0 20 347 Volume Total 1745 875 76 92 — _ Volume Left 49 22 11 22 Volume Right 22 22 33 54 cSH 707 381' 13 0 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.06 5.85 Err Queue Length (ft) 6 5 Err Err Control Delay (s) 275.6 2.1 Err Err Lane LOS F A F F Approach Delay (s) 275.6 2.1 Err Err Approach LOS F F Average Delay Err Intersection Capacity Utilization 155.0% ICU Level of Service H 15: SH 52 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 5 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Base 10/7/2001 #404 m: sF7F RT,Yn`T i.i. r a' q�a4 �T .`.T.'. a.. Lane Configurations t, 4 V Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) ; 160 0 0 115 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 174 0 0 125 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 174 299 174 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf roof tC, single (s) 5.1 7.4 7.2 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.1 4.4 4.2 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 977 528 669 La ; .,s 4 ≥ - Volume Total 174 125 0 — Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 cSH 1700 977 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.00 0.00 Queue Length (ft); 0 0 ` 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A In ion der s Average Delay 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 12.5% ICU Level of Service A 18: WCR 20.5 &Access Rd Synchro 5 Report Page 6 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Total 10/8/2001 1 ' '''ittiNera.44181;**SeklimE,1-4-nSlitiR Lane Configurations 4 4 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 5 65 5 15 30 76 5 220 25 41 210 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow refs(veh/ti) 5 71 5 16 33 83 5 239 27 45 ; 228 5 Pedestrians Lane,Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent,Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type ,` None None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 683 597 '; 231 624 586 253 234 266 .: vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.6 6.3 4.1 4.2 tC,2 stage(s) tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 15 4.1 3.4 2.2 2.3 p0 queue free% 98 82 99 95 92 89 100 96 cM capacity(veh/h) 297 402 813 334 400 758 1346 1258 Volume Total . 82 132 272 278 Volume Left 5 16 5 45 Volume Right 5 83 `' 27 5 cSH 406 550 1346 1258 Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.24 0.00 `0.04 Queue Length (ft) 18 23 0 3 Control Delay(s) 16.1 13.6 0.2 1.8 Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay(s) 16.1 13.6 0.2 1.6 Approach LOS C B Peg., -,1172414,1C` k " ^W a y d t �i ..: . �` Average Delay 4.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.7% ICU Level of Service A 3: WCR 20.5&WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 10/7/20012021 PM Peak Total —. ■ ~ `\ t �I' j �4/ .rSivtS lit',- .. ,#�s;, =4.4" WB M.:,a ..' ;"staft-k:?,581 i"k ` ` Sallj. t Lane Configurations 4+ Stop Free Free Sign Control Stop 0% Grade 0% 0% 0°/ Volume(veh/h) 25 10 127 5 10 0 87 94 5 5 60 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 27 11 138 5 11 0 95 98 5 5 65 22 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage! Right turn flare (veh) None Median type None Median storage veh) 103 vC,conflicting volume 382 379 76 520 388 101 87 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vet 4.6 tC, single (s) 7.2 6.5 6.3 8.1 6.5 6.2 4.2 tC,2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.6 4.0 3.4 4.4 4.0 3.3 2.3 .7 p0 queue free% 00 12.7 95 98- 86 98 98 100 94 1236 cM capacity (veh/h) 527 518 971 274 512 960 1460 Volume Total 176 16 198 ! 92 Volume Left 27 5 95 5 Volume Right 138 0 5 22 cSH 820 397 1460 1236 Volume to Capacity 0,21 0;04 0.06 0.00 Queue Length(ft) 20 3 5 0 Control Delay(s) 10.6 14.4 3.9 ? 0.5 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 10.6 14.4 3.9 0.5 Approach LOS B B Average Delay 6.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.7% ICU Level of Service A Synchro 5 Report 6: WCR 20.5 &WCR 7 Page 2 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 10/7/2001 2021 PM Peak Total Lane Configurations 4'+ 4i Free Free F Sign Control Stop ' Stopree ree Grade 0% Volume(veh/t1) 10 5 5 25 5 80 5 102 15 130 57 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 11 5 5 27 5 87 ! 5 111 16 141 62 5 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage' Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) 127 vC,Conflicting volume 567 485 65 485 480 119 67 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol 4.1 tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 tC,2 stage (s) 2.2 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free% 97 99 99 94 99 91 100 90 1453 cM capacity (veh/h) 363 436 1005 451 439 938 1547 7 Volume Total 22 120 133 209 Volume Left 11 27 5 141 Volume Right 5 87 16 5 cSH 455 723 1547 1453 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.17 0.00 0.10 Queue Length (ft) 4 15 0 8 Control Delay(s) 13.3 11.0 0.3 5.5 Lane LOS BB A A Approach Delay(s) 13.3 11.0 0.3 5.5 Approach LOS B B 1yy�. p�j� yjy� ! ntei etit . t C �.. .� ra�w� a. d ?. ... .,_ Average Delay 5.8 intersection Capacity Utilization 38.9%' ICU Level of Service A 9: WCR 20 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 3 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Total 10/7/2001 -►� l C ~ k y`�\} g�yt may/" �\• j p r ..� .,` F. 4 R.-. }`� M1rr 's zWBT �'*h�'45,.:: %.T,f1 L .�•.lB NBR PS..L�Ft .R�5S�[F f.'< Lane Configurations 4t 4. 4. 4. Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 15 25 10 10 10 10 20 72 25 15 67 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 16 27 11 i 1 11 11 22 78 27 16 73 16 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC,conflicting volume 265 262 81 273 257 92 89 105 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 7.8 7.3 6.6 7.3 6.9 6.2 5.0 4.4 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 4.1 4.7 3.7 3.7 4.4 3.3 3.0 2.5 p0 queue free% 97 95 99 98 98 99 98 99 cM capacity(veh/h) X539 516 883 596 564 971 1090 1313 Volume Total 54 33 127 105 Volume Left 16 11 22 16 Volume Right 11 11 27 16 cSH 571 669 1090 1313 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.05 0.02 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 8 4 2 1 Control Delay(s) 12.0 10.7 0 1.6 1.3 Lane LOS B B A A Approach Delay(s) 12.0 10.7 1.6 1.3 Approach LOS y B B Average Delay 4.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.1% ICU Level of Service A 12: WCR 18 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 4 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Total 10/7/2001 Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4, 4. Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 45 1540 20 20 765 22 10 30 30 22 15 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 49 1674 22 22 832 24 11 33 33 24 16 54 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) vC, conflicting volume 855 1696 2732 2682 1685 2718 2680 843 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, Stage 2 conf vol tC, single (s) 4.3 4.1 7.3 6.5 6.2 7.2 6.5 6.3 tC,2 stage(s) tF (s) 2.4 2.2 3.7 4.0 3.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 130 queue free% ' 93 94 0 0 72 0 '[ 17 84 cM capacity (veh/h) 706 381 3 20 118 0 20 346 p Volume Total 1745 877 76 95 — Volume Left 49 22 11 24 Volume Right 22 24 33 54 cSH 706 381 13 0 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.06 5.88 Err Queue Length (ft) 6 5 Err Err Control Delay (s) 276.5 2.1 Err Err Lane LOS F A ` F F Approach Delay (s) 276.5 2.1 Err Err Approach tOS F F intergin-^Idlt Average Delay Err Intersection Capacity Utilization 155.5% ICU Level of Service H 15: SH 52 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report Page 5 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Total 10/7/2001 — 7 { ~ 4\ /I. Lane Configurations '' 4 tfr Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 180 1 2 115 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 174 1 2 125 1 2 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) vet conflicting volume 175 304 174 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,stage 2 conf vol IC, single (s) 5.1 7.4 7.2 tC,2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.1 4.4 4.2 p0 queue free% 100 100 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 976 523 668 Volume Total 175 127 3 - Volume Left 0 2 1 Volume Right 1 0 2 cSH 1700 976 612 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.00 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 10.9 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.2 10.9 Approach.LOS B Average.Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 19.2% ICU Level of Service A 18: WCR 20.5 &Access Rd Synchro 5 Report Page 6 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 10/8/2001 2001 AM Peak Base — — , . 4,: .. -12 tOnAtitlat-4):3SarAgall Lane Configurations 1 Ti, 'j 4F. 'i t> '1 t+ Sign Control Free Free Slop Stop 0% Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 25 448 3 15 1047 32 7 3 5 10 5 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 27 487 3 16 1138 35 ; 8 3 5 11 5 43 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Raised Median type , Raised1 1 Median storage veh) 1191 1748 - ` 1493 1733 586 543 543 vC, conflicting volume 245 1173 490 1188 17 38 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 648 1205 305 545 vC2,stage 2 conf:vcl tC, single(s) 4.8 4.1 7.8 6.5 6.9 8.1 6.9 7.5 tC,2 stage(s) 6.8 5.5 7.1 5.9 tF (s) 2.6 2.2 3.6 4.0 3.3 3.8 4.2 3.6 p0 queue free% 94 98 96 98 99 92 97 89 cM capacity(veh/h) 431 1084 212 172 761 129 160 390 . < 'r g .. v.1. .,: Bey f .. Volume Total 27 325 166 16 759 414 8 9 11 Y 49 Volume Left ! 27 0 0 16 0 0 8 0 11 0 Volume Right 0 0 3 0 0 35 0 5 0 43 cSH 431 1700 1700 1084 1700 1700 212 334 129 336 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.19 0.10 0.02 0.45 0.24 0.04 0.03 0.08 0.15 Queue Length(ft) . 5 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 7 13 Control Delay (s) 13.9 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 22.6 16.1.1 35.5 E 17.5 Lane LOS B A C Approach Delay(s) 0.7 0.1 19.1 20.8 Approach LOS C C +�' :n �. `4�'�' �`�al� ''fis"� i.ii ia� +� o �'�b��' .tr. , '� `tt-��- Average Delay ( 1.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.6% ICU Level of Service A 15: SH 52&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 AM Peak Total 10/8/2001 4- `\ t /' " l d Lane Configurations lit, In> 'Ft Sign Control Free - Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volumer(Veh/h) . 25 . 448 3 15 1047 43 7 3 5 21 5 40 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(vetVh) 27 487 t 3 16 1138 47 8 3 5 23 5 43 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median type '.: . ,' Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 vC, conflicting volume 1185 490 1191 1760 245 1499 1739 592 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 543 543 1194 1194 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 648 1217 305 545 tC, single (s) 4.8 4.1 7.8 6.5 6.9 8.1 6.9 7.5 tC, 2 stage(s) 6.8 5.5 7.1 5.9 tF (s) 2.6 2.2 3.6 4.0 3.3 3.8 4.2 3.6 p0 queue free% 94 98 96 98 99 82 97 89 cM capacity (veh/h) 426 1084 212 170 761 128 159 386 Volume Total 27 325 166 16 759 426 8 9 23 49 Volume Left 27 ' 0 0 16 0 0 8 0 23 0 Volume Right 0 0 3 0 0 47 0 5 0 43 cSH 426 1700 1700 1084 1700 1700 212 331 128 333 Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.19 0.10 0.02 0.45 0.25 0.04 0.03 0.18 0.15 Queue Length(ft); 5 0 i 0 1 0 0 3 2 16 13 Control Delay(s) 14.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 22.6 16.2 39.2 17.7 Lane LOS °B A CC EC Approach Delay(s) 0.7 0.1 19.2 24.5 Approach LOS C C Average Delay . 1 A Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.9% ICU Level of Service A 15: SH 52&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 10/8/2001 2001 PM Peak Base f —1, 7 c 4I t 1 t t \* 4. d >rit rt . . ` .` ` EBB ...- . ,StI ; E ' L. N nS0 MOM BR Lane Configurations 1 it'G► 1 Ti' 1 t, li 14 Stop Sign Control Free Fr0ee Stop oopjo 0% Grade Volume'(vehlh) 32 1115 13 12 494 12 6 17 18 10 8 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(vehih) 35 1212 14 13 537 13 7 18 20 11 9 32 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Raised Median type Raised 1 Median storage veh) )226, 1619 1885 613 1274 1865 275 1 vC, conflicting volume 5501289 570 570 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 330 1289 289 704 1296 vC2,stage 2 conf;vol tC, single(s) 4.5 4.1 7.8 6.5 6.9 7.7 6.5 7.2 tC,2 stage(s) 6.8 5.5 6.7 5.5 tF (s) 2.4 2.2 3.7 4.0 3.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 p0 Queue free% 96 98 95 89 96 95 95 95 cM capacity(veh/h) 889 575 119 166 440 207 161 688 Volume Total 35 808 418 13 358 192 7 38 11 40 Volume Left . 35 0 0 13 0 0 7 0 11 0 Volume Right 0 0 14 0 0 13 0 20 0 32 cSH 889 1700 1700 575 1700 1700 119 244 207 403 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.48 0.25 0.02 0.21 0.11 0.05 0.16 0.05 0.10 Queue Length(ft) 3 0 0 2 0 0 4 14 " 4 8 Control Delay(s) 9.2 0.0 0.0 11.4 0.0 0.0 36.9 22.5.5 23.4 14.99 Lane LOS A B E Approach Delay(s) 0.3 0.3 24.6 16.7 Approach LOS C ` Cn ' f t i �. .'" °' aar .nom w a *' Average Delay 1.3" Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.0% ICU Level of Service A Synchro 5 Report 15: SH 52&WCR 7 page 1 With Mitigation Measures Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2001 PM Peak Total 10/8/2001 i N / 4- k- 4\ t t `► 1 r ,� , �.. ., Lane Configurations fl 4A ' ft> 11 A '1 Ts Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Valurne(vehfh) 32 1115 13 12 494 14 6 17 18 12 8 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 35 1212 14 13 537 15 7 18 20 13 9 32 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft} Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Mediae type ;:.!. . Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 vC,conflicting volume 552 1226 1619 1867 613 1275 1866 276 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1289 1289 571 571 vC2,stage 2 conf'vol 330 578 704 1296 tC, single(s) 4.5 4.1 7.8 6.5 6.9 7.7 6.5 7.2 tF(s) 2.4 2.2 3.7 4.0 3.3 3.6 4.0 3.4 p0 queue free% 96 98 95 89 96 94 95 95 cM capacity(veh/h) 888 575 119 166 440 207 161 686 Volume Total 35 808 418 13 358 194 7 38 13 40 Volume Left 35 0 0 13 0 0 7 0 13 0 Volume Right 0 0 14 0 0 15 0 20 0 32 cSH r 888 1700 1700 575 1700 1700 119 244 207 402 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.48 0.25 0.02 0.21 0.11 0.05 0.16 0.06 0.10 Queue length(ft) 3 0 0 2 0 0 4 14 5 8 Control Delay(s) 9.2 0.0 0.0 11.4 0.0 0.0 36.9 22.5 23.6 14.9 Lane CQS A B F C G B Approach Delay(s) 0.3 0.3 24.6 17.1 Approach LOS C G Average Delay t3'. Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.0% ICU Level of Service A 15: SH 52 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Base 10/8/2001 -1 c '- 4\ t P v 1 J . , . ''' ANttifif isitifti.,SEIMfilittraiRSSII Lane Configurations 44 4) 4, 4, Ideal Flow(vphpl)„ " 1900 1900 1900 1900 "1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util Factor. + 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.98 0.96 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1387 1522 1585 1776 Fit Permitted 0.96 0.97, 0.99 0.96 Satd. Flow(perm) 1345 1485 1573 1716 Volume(vph)" ," 5 25 ' 5 25 125 65 5 `220 20 45 ` 540 10 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ady.Flow(vph); 5 27 5 27, 136 .`71 5 . 239 22 49 587 11 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 37 0 0 234 0 0 266 0 0 647 0 Heavy Vehicles(%)" 0% 46% 0% 21% 16% 24% '0% 15% 60% 42% 3% 25% Turn Type Perm Perm Perri Perm Protected Phase's' 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G(s) 17.0 1 17.0 35.0 35.0 Effective Green, g(s) 17.0 17.0 35.0 35.0 Actuated VC Ratio 0.28` 0.28 0.58 0.58 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 381 421 918 1001 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perris'; 0.03 c0.16 0.17 c0.38 ' v/c Ratio 0.10 0.56 0.29 0.65 Uniform Delay,dl 15.8 18.3 ` 6.3 8.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5' 5.2 0.8 3.2 Delay(s) 16.4 23.5 7.1 11.6 Level of Service B C AB Approach Delay(s) 16.4 23.5 7.1 11.6 Approach LOS B C A B . .;yo- m" dr.`s n r P ,Y a.,: HCM.Average.Control Delay 13.1 HCM Level of Service" B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle:Length(s) ?" 60.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.1% ICU Level of Service C c Critical Lane Group 3: WCR 20.5&WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Base 10/8/2001 ., `zN NBR 1sT BR Lane Configurations 14. ri tet► 1 1i 'i to Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Utile Factor 1,00 0.95 1.00 0.95` 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.87 Fit Protected , , 0.95 ' 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1327 3468 1805 3417 1583 1704 1388 1282 Flt Permitted.:" 0.'11.. . 1.00 0:37 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.75 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 155 3468 707 3417 1168 1704 1092 1282 Volume(vph) ' 35 620 5 25 1625 50 15 5 10 20 10 70 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flou((vph) 38 674.; 5 .;,. 27 1766 '., 54,` 16 • 5 11 22 .. 11 76 Lane Group Flow(vph) 38 679 0 27 1820 0 16 16 0 22 87 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) 36% 4% 0% 0% 4% 44% '14% 0% 0% 30% 20% 30% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases' 4 :. 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated'Green,G(s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 "16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated WC Ratio 0.60 0.60 ' 0.60 . 0.60 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 93 .2081 424' "2050 > 311 454. 291 342 v/s Ratio Prot 0.20 c0.53 0.01 c0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 0.04 0.01 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.33 0.06 0.89 0.05 0.04 0.08 0.25 Uniform Delay, d1; 6.4 6.0. 5.0" , 10.3 16.4 . 16.3 16.5 '`17.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental-Delay.d2 12.8 OA 0.3 6.2 0.3 0.1 0.5 ;. 1.8 Delay(s) 19.1 6.4 5.3 16.5 16.7 16.4 17.0 19.1 Level of Service B A A B B B B B Approach Delay(s) 7.1 16.3 16.6 18.7 Approach LOS A ` B B B HCM Average.Control Delay 13.9 . HCM Level of Service . B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 60.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.5% ICU Level of Service B c Critical Lane Group 15: SH 52&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Total 10/8/2001 — ,t ", ' 5'- ,etl, - _ ', r .s - a "1SBas: ^ ,T` $SBA! Lane Configurations 4 4 4 4 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 ' 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane UtiL Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.98 0.96 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1387 1516 1585 1768 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.97 0.99 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 1344 1480 1573 1695 Volume(vph). 5 25 5 25 125 72 5 220 20 52 540 10 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) .'` 5 27 .5 27 136` 78 5 239 22 .57 '` 587 11 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 37 0 0 241 0 0 266 0 0 655 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) ' 0% 46% ` 0% 21% 16% 24% ' 0% 15% 60% 42% ' 3% 25% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases'' 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 17.0 17.0 35.0 35.0 Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 17.0 35.0 35.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.58 0.58 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) ' ' 381 418 918 989 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perri 0.03 c0,16 0.17 c0.39 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.58 0.29 0.66 Uniform Delay,dl 15.8 18.4 6.3 8.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 0.5 5.6 0.8 3.5 Delay(s) 16.4 24.1 7.1 12.0 Level of Service < B: C AB Approach Delay(s) 16.4 24.1 7.1 12.0 Approach LOS B` . C A B HCM Average Control Delay 13.5. HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 60.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.0% ICU Level of Service C c Critical Lane Group 3: WCR 20.5&WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 AM Peak Total 10/8/2001 s --w -N I `- t 4\ t `► 1 d Lane Configurations II tt 'I tt. I T' 1 Ti Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane 0tii. Factor 1.00. 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.87 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 ` 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 ',1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1327 3468 1805 3405 1583 1704 1388 1282 Fit Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.75 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 155 3468 707 3405 1168 1704 1092 1282 Volume(vph) 35 620 5 25 1625 61 15 5 10 31 10 70 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ad}. Flow(vph) 38; , 674 5 27 ` 1766 66 16 5 - 11 34 11 76 Lane Group Flow(vph) 38 679 0 27 1832 0 16 16 0 34 87 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) 36% 4% 0% 0% 4% 44% r 14% 0% 0% 30% 20% 30% Turn Type Perm Perm Pemi Penn Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 36.0 '36.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 ; 16.0 Effective Green, g(s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/G Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.27 0.27 . 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 93 2081 424 2043 311 454 291 342 v/s Ratio Prot 0.20 c0.54 0.01 c0.07 v/s Ratio Penn ' 0.24 0.04 0.01 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.33 0.06 0.90 0.05 0.04 0.12 0.25 Uniform Delay,d1 6.4 6.0 5.0 10.4 16.4 16.3 16/ 17.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 12.8 0.4 0.3 6.7 0.3 0.1 0.8 ` 1.8 Delay(s) 19.1 6.4 5.3 17.1 16.7 16.4 17.5 19.1 Level of Service BA AB BB B' , B Approach Delay(s) 7.1 16.9 16.6 18.6 Approach LOS A B B y B -.y ale w r i .194),"), 0 P F fY '.. R`!, .airs' ' •• -44.t-414i--'31?-' '"y rF " ,� #� 4 , E b' HCM Average Central Delay' 14.4 4CM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 60.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service B c Critical Lane Group 15: SH 52 &WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Base 10/8/2001 -I --i, s- `— i 1 t P '► 1 -' Meciiiiiiititir mart zta) pe rt t+ f`mliewtS Sart Lane Configurations 4. 4) 4. 4 . Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 ` 1900 1900 1900 1900'1900 1900 1900; 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 4:00 1.00 Frt 0.99 0.92 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected , 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow(prot) 1878 1568 1840 1810 Flt Permitted< 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.93 Satd. Flow(perm) 1857 1526 1834 1697 Volume;(vph) .. 5 65 . 5 15 30 75 5 220 25 40 210 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ad1-Flaw.(0) ,. ; 5 71 5 16 - 33 82 5 239 27 43 228 5 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 81 0 0 131 0 0 271 0 0 276 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% ">0% 6% 14% 0% 2% 0% 9% " 3% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 16.0 16.0 36.0 36.0 Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 16.0 36.0 36.0 Actuated g/C.Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.60 0.60 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) , 495''! 407 1100 1018 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perot 0.04 co.09 0.15 c0.16 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.32 0.25 0.27 Uniform Delay,dl 16.9 =- 17.6 5.6 5.7 Progression Factor 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 incremental Delay,d2 0.7 2.1 0.5 0.7 Delay(s) 17.6 18.5 6.2 6.4 Level of Service B ' B A A - Approach Delay(s) 17,6 18.5 6.2 6.4 Approach LOS ' B B A A HCM Average Control Delay ' . .. 9.6 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.29 Actuated Cycle Length(s) i' 60.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.5% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group 3: WCR 20.5 &WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Total 10/8/2001 -I "N i t 4\ t r `► 1 d `i t . T Bf= t t7`rlt ' Ra " SBT cSBR Lane Configurations 4> 4, it, 4, Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util.Factor 1.00 ` 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.99 0.92 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow(prof) 1878 1567 1840 1809 Flt Permitted 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.93 , Satd. Flow(perm) 1857 1526 1834 1690 Volume(vph) 5 65 5 15 30 76 5 220 25 41 210 5 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adjz Row`(vph) 5 . ;71 5 16 ;.33 83 ! 5 ,239 27. 45 : 228 5 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 81 0 0 132 0 0 271 0 0 278 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 14% 0% 2% 0% 9% 3% 0% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green,G(s), 16 0 16'.0 " 36.0 36.0 Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 16.0 36.0 36.0 Actuated gIG Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.60 0.60 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 495 407 1100 1014 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Peen ; 0.04 ", c0.09 0.15 c0.16 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.32 0.25 0.27 Uniform:Delay.d1 16.9 17.7 5.6 5.7 Progression Factor 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 0.7 (` 2.1 0.5 0.7 Delay(s) 17.6 18.4 6.2 6.4 Level of Service B B A A Approach Delay(s) 17.6 18.4 6.2 6.4 Approach LOS B B A A HCM Average Control Delay",., 9.6 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.29 Actuated Cycle Length(s)' 60.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.7% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group 3: WCR 20.5&WCR 1 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 2021 PM Peak Base 10/8/2001 is 1 s `- t 1 t f "• j 4r Lane Configurations R 4t► R t't> 1 t) II A Ideal Flow(vphpl) ' 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.88 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 ; 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1480 3533 1805 3561 1543 1758 1641 1516 Flt Permitted 0.29 1.00 ' 0.11 1,00 0.71 1.00 0.71 _1,00 Satd. Flow(perm) 459 3533 211 3561 1155 1758 1233 1516 Volume(vph) ' 45 _1540 20 20 765 20 10 30 30 20 15 50 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow(vph),' 49 1674 >` 22 22 . 832 22 `. 11 33 33-' 22 16 54 Lane Group Flow(vph) 49 1696 0 22 854 0 11 66 0 22 70 0 Heavy Vehicles(%)' 22% 2% 0% 0% 1% 0% 17% 0% 0% 10% 0% 14% Tum Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green,G(s) 36,0 36.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g(s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated WC Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph).. 275 2120 127 2137 308 469 329 404 v/s Ratio Prot c0.48 0.24 0.04 c0.05 v/s Ratio Perm '., : 0.11 0.10 0.01 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.80 0.17 0.40 0.04 0.14 0.07 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 5.4 9.2 '. 5.4 6.3 16,3 16.8 16.4 16.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.4 3.3 2.9 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.9 Delay(s) 6.8 12.5 8.3 6.9 16.5 17.4 16.8 17.8 Level of Service AB AA BB B B Approach Delay(s) 12.3 6.9 17.3 17.6 Approach LOS B` A B B 14CM Average Control Delay 10.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Actuated Cyde Length(s) 60.0 Sum of lost time(s) 6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group 15: SH 52&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 Cottonwood Gravel Pit 10/8120012021 PM Peak Total I ~ -\ ��yty , �`S J 1p /� . 4 .. , „„r {. ...„ � .;ws. .. NSTfi, "'1 R ' SBL SB -.PSBR Lane Configurations 1900 1900 1900: 1900 '1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 - Ideal Flow(vphpl), ' Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Uhl.Factor '' 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.88 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(prot) 1480 3533 1805 3560 1543 1758 1641 1516 Fit Permitted " 0.29 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.71 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 457 3533 211 3560 1155 1758 1233 1516 Volume(vph) 45 1540 20 20 765 22 10 30 30 22 15 50 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj.Flow(vph) ::,.,;a, "= "40;'1674 .;, 22 .r 22 832 - 24 11 33 33 24 16 54 Lane Group Flow(vph) 49 1696 0 22 856 0 11 66 0 24 70 0 Heavy Vehicles(%) 22% ' 2% ` 0% 0% 1% 0% 17% 0% 0% 10% 0% 14% Turn Type Perm Penn Penn Penn Protected.Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, (3(s), 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated WC Ratio 0.60:. 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap(vpti) ' 274 2120 127 2136 308 469 329 404 v/s Ratio Prot c0.48 0.24 0.04 c0.05 via Ratio Perm 0.11 0.10 0.01 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.80 0.17 0.40 0.04 0.14 0.07 0.17 Uniform Delay,d1 5.4 9.2 5.4 6.3 16,3 16.8 16.5 16.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay,d2 1.4 3.3 2.9 . 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.9 Delay(s) 6.8 12.5 8.3 6.9 16.5 17.4 16.9 17.8 Level of Service A B A A B B B B Approach Delay(s) 12.3 6.9 17.3 17.6 Approach LOS B A B B HCM Average Control Delay 11.0 HCM level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Actuated Cycle Length(s) 60.0 Sum of lost time(s) 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.8% ICU Level of Service A c Critical Lane Group 15: SH 52&WCR 7 Synchro 5 Report With Mitigation Measures Page 1 Iscinccs2-st51 13( PRESENCE / ABSENCE SURVEY FOR PREBLE'S MEADOW JUMPING MOUSE BOULDER CREEK AT THE COTTONWOOD PIT WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared for: Hart Environmental 2255 Meadow Avenue PO Box 1303 Boulder, CO 80306 Prepared by: Ronald Beane DA TI MBI Environmental Weld County Planning Dept. 181 Plum Creek Place Littleton, CO 80126 0CT 1 C 2001 RECEIVED 1 EXHIBIT September 18, 2001 7 Ltd Mae#1/48 Cottonwood Creek Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.0 STUDY AREA AND METHODS 4.0 PREBLE'S MEADOW JUMPING MOUSE SURVEY RESULTS 5.0 CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 6.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF SURVEYORS 7.0 SITE INFORMATION 8.0 REFERENCES CITED Appendix A - Summary of PMJM Trapping Appendix B— Survey Field Data Compilation Form prebbles mouse 09/18/01 8:17 PM 1 /'oth,,iwood "_ 7 rcThiL 9 Mc lilt?1?% Jumping Mouse Survey 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Preble's meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) (PMJM) is currently listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The distribution and habitat requirements of this mouse are poorly understood. However, a review of current literature provides some indication of habitat associations for the PMJM. Typically, this mouse occurs in low undergrowth consisting of grasses and forbs, in open wet meadows, riparian corridors near forests, or where tall shrubs and low frees provide adequate cover(USFWS 1998, Meaney and Clippinger 1995). The mouse occurs below 7,800 feet in elevation, generally in lowlands with medium to high moisture (USFWS 1998, Natural Heritage Program 1996) along permanent or intermittent streams (Ryon 1996). Under existing regulations, either a habitat assessment or a full Presence/Absence survey for PMJM is required for any habitat disturbing activity within areas regulated under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act or other areas determined to be potential PMJM habitat. Standard protocol for a presence/absence survey requires a minimum 750 to 1000 trapnight live-trapping effort over a period of 3 or more consecutive nights. Presence/Absence surveys can only be conducted between June 1 and September 15. Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc., a subsidiary of Lafarge Corporation (Mobile Premix), an aggregate mining company, is currently developing a permitted aggregate mine near Boulder Creek in western Weld County(Figure 1). Mining near the creek in this area was initiated prior to the listing of the PMJM; however, recent permit revisions require the re-evaluation of mine compliance with the Threatened and Endangered Species Act (ESA). Mining has complied with Weld County permit requirements maintaining a minimum of 100 feet setback from the upper bank of Boulder Creek. Objectives The objectives of this survey were to: • Determine the suitability of habitat within the project site to support PMJM. • Conduct live-trapping surveys to determine the presence or absence of PMJM within all potential habitat located on or adjacent to the project site. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc., plans to reclaim all disturbed areas near Boulder Creek according to existing mine reclamation permit requirements. Some of the current and future mining is within the 100-year floodplain of Boulder Creek. Some mining will occur along Idaho Creek, a managed irrigation canal. No potential habitat for PMJM exists long or near Idaho Ditch (see Section 4). prebbles mouse 09/18/01 8:17 PM 2 I I / , .t. t ii �� c. / 6 ' u mi ri �� «. ' 1 I I--_. t. `� r $r v.. 111 n "1 4r*r ek I1B��IM� 1 i ti I / f li (5 fff C- / I /7/ Approximate i i - Thj�� 1. Survey Area i ��IRinn I • ,1 16 • . 4874 Net li it c II II ; � I r — �� BM �� / - 4882,/'. .__ 4882 ,, c. • ./ a Survey TransecLs f r' 211 I ti fi E r/ ._ / / 21 I Panted from TOPO!®1998 Wfdflower Production(www.topo.cora) I Figure I. Prepared by: I Site Map of Cottonwood Pit DA TI MBI Environmental 1 N Weld County, Colorado 181 Plum c Place \ "�J Longmont Colorado Quadrangle Littleton,co. 80126 DA TI MBI (303)470-7598 ENVIRONMENTAL I endow Jumpliue Mt)(1:,z ;•ain,ry 3.0 STUDY AREA AND METHODS Ecological Condition/Management History The project site is located between Highways 119 and 52,just west of the small town of Rinn in Weld County, Colorado (Figure 1). This site has historically been used for agriculture, including livestock grazing and agricultural crops. Boulder Creek has been greatly altered by channelization, water diversion and bank stabilization (riprap banks). Native vegetation in the area has been largely replaced by introduced grasses such reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), smooth brome (Bromopsis inermis) and cheat grass (Bromus tectorum) (Photographs 1 and 2). Patches of sandbar willow (Salix exigua) with scattered plains cottonwoods (Populus deltoides) comprise the overstory vegetation (Photographs 3 and 4). Water is often completely diverted out of Boulder Creek at this location and the creek was completely dry except for a few remnant puddles on the day of the habitat assessment. Methods The project site was surveyed on foot in July 2001 following USFWS guidelines (1999) to determine the suitability of the area to support PMJM. Surveys for the presence or absence of PMJM were conducted from 31 July through 04 August 2001 in potential PMJM habitats within the Boulder Creek floodplain adjacent to the project site. Survey protocol followed guidelines provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS, 1999), and consisted of live-trapping techniques using Sherman (H.B Sherman Traps, Inc., Tallahassee, FL.) live-traps (3 x 3 x 10 and 3 x 3.5 x 9 in.) baited with omolene (Oats and cracked corn coated with molasses). Trapping involved parallel lines of trap stations positioned within the best available habitat. Traps were spaced at approximately 10-meter(m) intervals within willow riparian on both sides of the creek. Approximately 175 traps were set for four consecutive nights. An additional night of trapping was added to compensate for numerous traps disturbed by raccoons. Total survey efforts exceeded the minimum required (750 trapnights) by the USFWS and consisted of 850 trapnights over a period of five consecutive nights. A total of 70 traps were sprung or disturbed by raccoons. 4.0 PREBLE'S MEADOW JUMPING MOUSE SURVEY RESULTS Habitat Assessment No high quality PMJM habitat exists on the proposed project site. A few scattered willow riparian patches occur along Boulder Creek adjacent to the project site that potentially provide the necessary habitat components to support PMJM. Idaho Creek is completely outside of the Boulder Creek floodplain and contains no shrub riparian vegetation typically associated with the presence of PMJM. Presence/Absence Survey No PMJM were captured during a total of 850 trapnights over five consecutive nights. Capture success was relatively low on this stretch of Boulder Creek. A total of 75 prebbles mouse 09/18/01 8:17 PM 3 ; ' • , ♦.� Yom• • 1 • • F • N ' �y„W.t.r 'IC• •�..•ti ). •.`7".t �.. 4trI •I Ir,I I ". 1/4.4E , iµ.y II • `40 'c 5 ..,.a '.y... AYf b •� Y'T IPhotograph I (Top). Boulder Creek West of the Cottonwood Pit Project Site IPhotograph 2 (Bottom). Small Patch of Willow on Boulder Creek at Cottonwood PitIt)__ Cottonwood Pit DA TI MBI Weld County,Colorado ENVIRONMENTALI I 0)A 441/41 r 40 ,gyp i 'R IA f • y.,a A t eerli Photograph 3 (Top). Patch of Willow Riparian Habitat Along Boulder Creek Photograph 4 (Bottom). Patch of Willow Riparian Habitat Along Boulder Creek Cottonwood Pit DA TI MBI Weld County, Colorado BMROIaMEHru t.otto.•i of d Pit PCehic's !vlc%Klow Jumping Mouse Surv'Cv captures were recorded with deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) dominating captures (56 captures or 75%). Other small mammals captured included house mouse (Mus musculus, 14 captures or 18.6%), meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus, 3 captures or 4 %), and western harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys megalotis) (2 captures or 2.6 %). Seventy of 850 traps (8 %) were sprung without a capture of an animal. Total open available traps were 780 traps or 92 percent. Other animal or animal sign observed included raccoon (Procyon lotor), white-tailed deer (O. virginiensis), great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), coyote (Canis latrans) and red-tailed hawk (Buteojamaicensis). Soils and Hydrology Soils within the project site are classified as Loup-boel within the Boulder Creek floodplain. (SCS 1980). These soils are deep, nearly level soils that are poorly drained and formed in alluvium. Hydrology of the site consists of the perennial Boulder Creek. Human Development/Disturbance in Survey Area The area has been impacted by human activity including historical farming, livestock grazing, water diversion for irrigation, farmsteads, and highway and railroad construction. 5.0 CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION A Habitat Assessment was conducted in July 2001 at a permitted aggregate mine adjacent to Boulder Creek in Weld County Colorado. Most of the project site contains no habitat typically associated with the presence of PMJM; however, the adjacent floodplain and riparian zone along Boulder Creek contains potential PMJM habitat that required clearance surveys. A Presence/Absence survey for PMJM was conducted from 31 July 2001 through 04 August 2001 in the best available potential PMJM habitat. No PMJM were captured • during a total of 850 trapnights over five consecutive nights. Based on this trapping effort it appears highly unlikely that PMJM presently exists on or near the project site because of the following: • No captures of PMJM. • Limited shrub habitat and lack of lush dense understory preferred by the PMJM. • Previous disturbance (grazing, channelization) and severe weed infestations. • Several unsuccessful presence/absence studies performed on nearby portions of Boulder Creek • Numerous predators including raccoons. 6.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF SURVEYOR Mr. Beane is a certified ecologist and a Zoology Research Associate with the Denver Museum of Natural History. He has performed small mammal investigations for more prebbles mouse 09/18/01 8:17 PM 4 Cottonwood Pit Plco]e's Meadow Jumping Mouse Survey than 14 years throughout the Western US. He is certified to conduct PMJM surveys by the US Fish and Wildlife Service and has completed more than 50 Habitat Assessments and 40 Presence/ Absence Surveys for PMJM over the last four years. 7.0 SITE INFORMATION Location: Portions of Sections 16 and 20, T2N, R68W, Longmont, Colorado UTM's: 13 S 4441500 to 4442150 N/498100 to 498400 E Elevation: 4,875 to 4,900 feet Soils: The NRCS (formally US SCS) has defined the soils at this location as Loup-Boel within the Boulder Creek floodplain. Site Hydrology: Ephemeral River(due to water diversions on Boulder Creek) Proposed Construction: Aggregate Mine 8.0 REFERENCES CITED Meaney, C.A. and N.W. Clippinger. 1995. A survey of Preble's meadow jumping mouse(Zapus hudsonius preblei) in Colorado. Prepared for Judy Sheppard, Colorado Division of Wildlife. Meaney, C.A.,N.W. Clippinger,A.Deans,and M. O'Shea-Stone. 1996. Second Year Survey for Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse(Zapus hudsonius preblei)in Colorado. 15 November. Prepared for Colorado Division of Wildlife. Natural Heritage Program. 1996. Vertebrate characterization abstract(State) Zapus hudsonius preblei. Ryon,T.R. 1996. Evaluation of historical capture sites of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse in Colorado. Final Report. MSES Thesis University of Colorado at Denver. May 1. United States Soil Conservation Service(US SCS). 1980. Soil Survey of the Weld County, Colorado. U.S.Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS). 1999. Survey Guidelines for Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse. USFWS,Colorado Field Office. prebbles mouse 09/18/01 8:17 PM 5 Cottonwood Ph. P e!)le s Meadow jumping Mouse Survey Appendix A - Summary of PMJM Trapping prebbles mouse 09/18/01 8:17 PM 6 i i i Summary of PMJM Trapping 2001 COTTONWOOD PIT ANNUAL REPORT OF SCIENTIFIC COLLECTION OF MAMMALS,BIRDS,AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES 2001 STATE PURPOSE FOR COLLECTION: Presence/absence surveys for Zap us hudsonius preblei Species Number Taken Collection Location Traps Scientific Name Code Date Adult Young Total Sprung/total Male Female Unk Male Female Unk Male Female Unk County T/R/Sect. UTM-N UTM-E Peromyscus maniculatus PEMA 7/31/01 6 6 1 6 6 1 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100-400 3 Musmusculus MUMU 7/31/01 1 1 I 2 I 0 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100-400 Peromyscusmaniculatus PEMA 8/1/01 5 3 I 6 3 0 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100-400 8 Reithrodontomys megalotis REME 8/1/01 I 0 1 0 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100-400 Musmusculus MUMU 8/1/01 2 2 2 2 0 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100400 Peromyscusmaniculatus PEMA 8/2/01 8 4 1 I 1 9 5 I Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100-400 19 Musmusculus MUMU 8/2/01 2 0 0 2 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100-400 Peromyscusmaniculatus PEMA 8/3/01 3 4 2 5 4 0 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100400 23 Microtuspennsylvanicus MIPE 8/3/01 I 1 0 0 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100400 Mus musculus MUMU 8/3/01 I 2 1 2 0 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100400 Peromyscusmaniculatus PEMA 8/4/01 4 4 1 1 4 5 I Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100-400 17 Microtuspennsylvanicus MIPE 8/4/01 2 2 0 0 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100-400 Musmusculus MUMU 8/4/01 I 1 1 I 0 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100-400 Reithrodontomys megalotis REME 8/4/01 1 0 1 0 Weld 2N/68W/S20 4441500-2150 498100-400 Cottonwood Pia. Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse Survey Appendix B —Survey Field Data Compilation Form prebbles mouse 09/18/01 8:17 PM 7 'opus hudsonius preblei, Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse ield Survey Data Compilation form Z. h. preblei found? Yes No X Dates of Survey 7/31/01 to 8/04/01 Surveyor: R. Beane Organization/Company Da Ti Mbi Environmental Full Name(s) Ronald D. Beane Location: Descriptive Site Name (creek, road intersection, etc.) Boulder Creek, west of Rinn, Weld County U.S.G.S. Quad Name Longmont County: Weld Elevation 4,875 —4,900 '/4 A Section(s) NE 'A,. Section 20 Township T2S Range(s) R68W UTM Coordinates, Zone 13 Northing: 4441500 to 4442150 N Fasting: 498100 to 498400 E Directions to Location Between Highways 119 and 52, southwest of the town of Rinn Land Ownership: Private Habitat: General Habitat Description: This site has historically been used for agriculture, including estock grazing and agricultural crops. Boulder Creek has been greatly altered by ...iannelization, water diversion and bank stabilization(riprap banks). Native vegetation in the area has been largely replaced by introduced grasses.. Dominant Plant Community Reed canarvgrass (Phalaris arundinacea), smooth brome (Bromopsis inermis) and as cheat grass (Bromus tectorum). Patches of sandbar willow(Sal ix exigua) with scattered plains cottonwoods (Populus deltoides). Drainage Type: Perennial Stream Ephemeral Stream X Pond/Lake Ditch Other Trapping Information: Type of Traps Sherman 11x3.5x4 Bait Omalene % Available (unsprung) 87 Number of Nights Trapped 5 Total Trapnights 850 Weather Conditions during survey: clear, hot, occasional afternoon thunderstorms. Associated animal Species (especially urban predators, Rattus, Mus) Raccoons, Mus LAFARGE Weld County Planning Dept, October 9, 2001 G 1 0 2G01 Ms. Charlotte Davis RECEIVED Weld County Dept of Public Health and Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 RE: USR-488 Dear Ms. Davis: This letter is being sent to you in regards to several conditions that are being placed on the above referenced resolution that need to be resolved prior to recording of the plat. Item B Please find enclosed the Waste Handling Plan Item C Please find enclosed the Dust Abatement Plan Item D The conditions specified in the existing Emission Permit still apply. We do not anticipate making any changes to this plan. Item E The conditions specified in the existing Emission Permit still apply. We do not anticipate making any changes to this plan. Item F The septic system referenced in this item is no longer in use and we do not anticipate ever using it. We have applied for and been approved for a septic system in the NW corner of the property. A copy of this approval is enclosed. The resolution requires that evidence of approval needs to be submitted to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. If this information is not acceptable for you to provide the Planning Department with approval on these items, please contact me at (970) 407-3669 or on my cell at (970) 227-4041. EXHIBIT MOBILE PREMIX CONCRETE,INC. ry a subsidiary of Lafarge Corporation oZld-- [Atn US'—"---�j)`y� NORTHERN COLORADO DIVISION 1800 North Taft Hill Rd., Post Office Box 2187, Fort Collins, Colorado 80522 Office: (970)407-3600 Fax: (970)407-3900 0.mhd on Recv,ed Paper Ms. Charlotte Davis October 8, 2001 Page 2 My office has been relocated to our Fort Collins divisional office and that address is Lafarge, P.O. Box 2187, Fort Collins, CO 80522. Please forward any correspondence to this address. Sincerely, //,, RI-ie GAettemoeller Land Manager WASTE HANDLING PLAN for Cottonwood Pit USR-488 Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc. a subsidiary of Lafarge North America, Inc. October 2001 WASTE HANDLING PLAN COTTONWOOD PIT This plan is for our Cottonwood Pit located in Sections 16 and 21, T2N, R68W, Weld County at 2002 Weld County Road 20 '/z. WASTE OIL We anticipate generating 1000 gallons of waste oil annual from the loaders. It will be stored in a 250 gallon, secondary contained drum and will be hauled off 4 times a year by Thermofluids, 303-944-7551. SCRAP METAL Scrap metal generated on site from repairs to the plant and screens will be stored on site in a 20 yard dumpster which will removed approximately 3 times per year by Iron & Metals, 303-292-5555. TRASH A 2 yard trash dumpster will be picked up weekly by Western Disposal, 303-444-2037 CHEMICALS No chemicals will be stored on site. DUST ABATEMENT PLAN for Cottonwood Pit USR-488 Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc. a subsidiary of Lafarge North America, Inc. October 2001 DUST ABATEMENT PLAN COTTONWOOD PIT This plan is for our Cottonwood Pit located in Sections 16 and 21, T2N, R68W, Weld County at 2002 Weld County Road 20 '/. 1. Adequate soil moisture will be maintained in topsoil and overburden to control emissions during removal. Watering shall be implemented if necessary. 2. Topsoil and overburden stockpiles shall be compacted and revegetated within one year. 3. Emissions from material handling (i.e. removal, loading, and hauling) shall be controlled by watering at all times unless natural moisture is sufficient to control emissions. 4. Vehicle speed on unpaved roads and disturbed areas shall not exceed a maximum of 30 m.p.h. Speed limit signs shall be posted. 5. Unpaved haul roads shall be watered and/or Magnesium Chloride applied as often as needed to control fugitive particulate emissions. 6. Reclamation works and sequential extraction of material shall be initiated to keep the total disturbed areas at any one time to a minimum. 7. Material stockpiles shall be watered as necessary to control fugitive particulate emissions. Aggregate materials shall be sprayed with water during material loading into the storage bins or stockpiles if necessary. 8. The main office parking lot and access road will be surfaced with asphalt, concrete or equivalent. • WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT 1555 NORTH 17TH AVENUE, GREELEY, CO 80631 PHONE: (970) 304-6415 FAX: (970) 304-6411 Copy Reprinted on 04-13-2001 at 11:30:20 APPLICATION / RECEIPT Initials: SKE Permit Number: SP-0100168 Receipt Number: HAP-01168 04-13-2001 Amount: $315.00 Payment Method: Check Notation: 499005125 Owner Name: MOBILE PREMIX CONCRETE INC Applicant Name: JORDAN DAVID Parcel Number: 1313-16-0-00-006 Site Address: Location: 2002 CR 20 1/2 16 02 68 Total Fees: $315.00 Total All Payments: 315.00 This Payment: $315.00 Balance: $0.00 Account Code Description Amount 256041400-4221400 New Septic Permit $315.00 256041400-4221-400 Repair Septic Permit $0.00 256041400-4221-400 Vault Permit $0.00 256041400-4730-400 Potable Water $0.00 Description: 2 MODULAR OFFICES - Commercial: (YIN) Y "" Residential: (Y/N) N Acres: 400 Number of Persons: 10 Basement Plumbing: (Y/N) N Number of Bedrooms: 0 Bathrooms: Full - 0 3/4: 1 1/2: 2 Water Public: (Y/N) Y Water Source: LEFT HAND Water Private: (Y/N) N Cistern: (Y/N) N Well: (Y/N) N Well Permit Number: NOTICE Applicant acknowledges receipt of the individual sewage disposal system guide and that the completeness of this application is conditional upon further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment for purposes of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary tc insure compliance with rules and regulations adopted under article 10, title 25, CRS as amended. The applicant certifies theat the proposed system will not be located within 400 feet of a community sewage system. The undersigned hereby certifies that all statements made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are, or will be, represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are designed to be relied on by the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said applicaion and in legal action of perjury,I provided by law. This application expires oneyear from the signature date X Q /3/0I Own r/Applicant ate Form RT_HAPP F Cwt c, 1 U{ S � .� yrSCOTT, COX & ASSOCIATES, INC. consulting engineers • surveyors M. Edward Glassgow, IV, P.E. • William H. Mitzelfeld, P.E. September 14, 2001 Weld County Health Department 151716th Avenue Court Greeley, Colorado 80631 Ref: Project 00876 Individual Sewage Disposal System Proposed Scale House and Employee Building LaFarge-Cottonwood Operations 2002 Weld County Road 20-i Ladies and Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to verify the compliance inspection that we completed in conjunction with the construction of the new individual sewage disposal system for the scale house and employee building at the Cottonwood Operations located at 2002 Weld County Road 20-liz in Weld County,Colorado We conducted the required construction phase inspection on September 11, 2001, which included the inspection of the field construction including the new septic tank, D-box, distribution pipes, bed materials (gravel) and associated items. Please note that only one of the two proposed building have been constructed. It is planned that the other building will be constructed in the future and an additional septic tank installed, which will be teed into the existing line between the existing (new) septic tank and the existing (new) septic field. Based on our inspection, it is our opinion that this individual sewage disposal system was constructed in substantial conformance with our plans and specifications subject to... 1. Final backfilling and grading to provide adequate drainage away from, around and/or across the bed. 2. Placement of topsoil and planting of native grasses (as specified in the design report). 1530 55th Street • Boulder, Colorado 80303 • (303) 444-3051 • Fax: (303) 444-3387 Serving Colorado with offices in • Boulder•Longmont•Loveland ro'ect 0057 6 Page 2 It should be noted that we consider these items to be of prime importance to assure the proper performance of the system. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. vo Sincerely, X00 �� S�� SCOTT, COX AND ASSOCIA 1'LS, INC. II a 7:61 1830 •2 • -PoSS/iff\�"�0�`` ` By � '�" M. Edward ssgow,PE cc: LaFarge 1400 W. 64th Ave. P.O. Box 215001 Denver,Colorado 80221 Attn: Mr. Dave MordeN . f July 22, 2001 Mr. Peter Plage USFWS Colorado Field Office P. O. Box 25486, DFC Denver,Colorado 80225 Dear Mr. Plage: I have prepared this letter to address the status of Ute Ladies Tresses Orchid (Spiranthes diluvialis) at the LaFarge Cottonwood aggregate mine site in Weld County,Colorado. In July and August of 2000,I conducted a wetland delineation study at this site. As part of the wetland delineation field work, observations were made on all species occurring within the wetland areas. The field work for this project was conducted at a time when Ute Ladies Tresses Orchid would have been in flower. Ute Ladies Tresses Orchid Survey. No orchids were found within the wetlands on the site. Suitable habitat for Ute Ladies Tresses Orchid consists of moist to saturated soils in floodplain meadows usually in vegetation that is not overly tall or dense (USDI. 1992. Interim survey requirements for Spiranthes diluvialis. USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, Colorado State Office,Golden. 9 pp. + attachments). While moist floodplain habitats occur on the Cottonwood Site,no orchids and none of the species commonly associated with Ute Ladies Tresses Orchid were observed at the Cottonwood site. If you have any questions about the results of this survey,please feel free to contact me. Best regards, /dv/ fe a _ Weld County Planning Dept. Warren/a�rren R. Keammerer, Ph.D. OCT 1 0 2071 Senior Plant Ecologist cc: Julie Goettemoeller ./ RECEIVED 4. EXHIBIT id AnTUS4 #92/1 Keammerer Ecological Consultants, Inc. Phone (303) 530-1783 5858 Woodbourne Hollow Rd. Fax (303) 581 -9219 Boulder, Colorado 80301 warren_keammerer©msn. corn n .it (7°- MEMORANDUM TO: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director of Planning DATE: 10-16-01 s,\\ FROM:.Drew Scheltinga, Engineering Division manage TO: SUBJECT: 2°°AMUSR 488,Mobile Premix Concrete,Inc COLORADO On October 9, 2001,'I received a traffic study for the site'prepared?by LSC Transportation Consultants,Inc.,dated October 8,2001. I have reviewed the study and agree with the conclusions. Because there are significant impacts on WCR s 7 and 20.5 as well as two intersections, l will forward the:traffic study to Felsburg Holt&Ullevig;for review. LSC's study indicates the intersection at WCR 20.5 and WCR I and the intersection at WCR 20.5 and WCR 7:will not accommodate turning movements by large'trucks. Although the details of the improvements are not known,pavement widening or enlarging turning radii are required. LSC's study also indicates that traf is signals are presently warranted at SII 52 and WCR 7 and that a traffic signal will be warranted during the life of the pit at WCR 20.5 and WCR • d1 LSO's study did not address the'need to improve the`access to the site from WCR 2.0.5. I think the pit traffic will warrant turn lanes on WCR 20.5 and I will ask Fill)to analyze this location. We have long term maintenance agreements in place for the haul routes: These agreements have worked welt over tbe'past years.Because Mobil Premix is relocating facilities from other locations in the area to this site, an, updated long term maintenance agreement will be necessary and haul routes will have to be reefined I`recommend approval of the application providing the applicant is required to complete an updated long term maintenance agreement and an off site improvements agreement with the Board of County Commissioners,prior to recording the plat,that addresses the following items: 1. - The intersection at WCR 20.5 and WCR 1 and:the intersection at WCR 20.5 and WCR 7 will be improved at the expense of the applicant to accommodate combination truck turning movements that allow.trucks to stay within their lanes. 'Plans of the improvements detaling the construction shhall be provided by the applicant and approved by the Department of Public Works.. m� 2. The applicant shall share in the cost a€traffic signals at the intersects ... ro0 of WCR 20.5 and WCR lot the time their installation is completed b �+. t1r Page 1 I�` yea . EXHIBIT ae iO �+d /IAUS,Q BB 'ti) ZOO 9NINNV'Id (111M 8669 60£ 0L6 TVA TZ 9T TO/9T/OT 2"d AMUSR-488 October 16,2001 The cost share shall be proportional to the traffic;generatedtby the site to the background traffic at the time the signals are completed. 3. The applicant shall share in the cost of traffic signals and fora lanes being used by the applicant at the intersection of SH 52 and WCR 7 at the tune their installation is completed. The costa.-hare shall be proportional to the traffic generated by the site tq e background traffic at the time'the lanes and sign is are completed. 4. The applicant,at their expense,shall improve the access to their site, which;will include turninglanes and radii to accommodate truck traffic. The lane requirements will be determined by the State Highway Access Code criteria. Plans of the improvements detailing the construction shall be provided by the applicant and approved by the Department of Public Works. 5. The applicant shall enter into an updated long term maintenance agreement with the Board of County Commissioners similar to existing agreements. m.\WPFILES\DREW\PlatuS nB ur+'488.wpd - - Page 2 coo IIIJ 9NINNV'Id O'IIM - 8669 60£ 0L6 Xdd 5Z 9T TO/9T/OT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS: 5'-�- 1 ,20() I . THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AN VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FORA SPECIAL REVIEW OR CHANGE OF ZONE IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. I HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THT THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR CASEd( iktrri Ypp L. THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: 433 theft Lcc fr n NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN SIGNA URE FOR PERSON POS G SIGN STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THIS 1 1 DAY OF 06(ter , '-0O I bA NOTARY PUBLIC ' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: t'If,k THIS FORM SHALL BE PLACED IN THE APPROPRIATE FILE FOR THE ABOVE CASE. = EXHIBIT Hello