HomeMy WebLinkAbout20011751.tiff 1` !
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION-
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS r,, n. r
Moved by Arlan Marrs that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning,
Commission along with the addition of the amendment 2.A. Be it resolved by the Weld County.Planning)
Commission that the application for:
PLANNER: Sheri Lockman
CASE NUMBER: S-588
APPLICANT: Denver/Canadian c/o Dan Ochsner
ADDRESS: 18905 WCR 394, LaSalle, CO 80645
REQUEST: Final Plat for a 5-lot Minor Subdivision - Ivy Crest
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of AMRE-2151. Being part of the E2 of Section 21, Township 3
North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: West of and adjacent to Weld County Road 19, 1/4 mile north of State Highway 66
•
The Planning Commission recommends that this request be approved for the followig reasons:
1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24-3-50 of
the Weld County Code.
2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' Staff that the application has shown
compliance with Section 24-3-60.1 of the Weld County Code as follows:
a. Section 24-3-60.1.1 --Compliance with Chapters 23 and 24 of the Weld County Code,the
zone district in which the proposed use is located, and any adopted intergovernmental
agreements or master plans of affected municipalities. The applicant has shown
compliance with the Weld County Code throughout the Final Plat application process.The
overall design of the proposed development adheres to Minor Subdivision and the Estate
Zone District requirements. The Town of Platteville Comprehensive Plan has designated
this area as an agricultural buffer.Further,the Town of Mead referral response dated March
19, 2001 indicated their disapproval of the proposal. Consideration was given to the
responses from the Towns of Mead and Platteville during the Change of Zone application
process and deemed to be inadequate for a denial.
b. Section 24-3-60.1.2--That provisions have been made to preserve prime agricultural land.
The site is designated as irrigated land (not prime) by the United States Department of
Agriculture.
c. Section 24-3-60.1.3 — That provisions have been made for a public water supply that is
sufficient in terms of quantity, dependability and quality to provide water for the minor
subdivision, including fire protection.A Condition of Approval ensures that the Water Main
Extension Contract is finalized, a tap agreement will be in place and tap fees and the
$44,100 for improvements or collateral to satisfy those fees is in place prior to recording the
Final Plat. Further, a Condition of Approval ensures that the well proposed to provide fire
protection is properly permitted through the Office of the State Engineer, Division of Water
-Resources.
4. EXHIBIT
2001-1751
SASS$
RESOLUTION S-588
Denver/Canadian
Page 2
d. Section 24-3-60.1.4--That, if a public sewage disposal system is proposed, provision has
been made for the system and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed,
evidence that such systems will comply with state and local laws and regulations which are
in effect at the time of submission of the minor subdivision. Individual Sewage Disposal
Systems (I.S.D.S.) are proposed for each lot and will be installed according the Weld
County Department of Public Health and Environment I.S.D.S. regulations.
e. Section 24-3-60.1.5 -- That all areas of the minor subdivision which may involve soil or
topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions have been
identified by the subdivider and that the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with
such conditions.The Colorado Geologic Survey indicated during the Sketch Plan phase that
no geology related problems appear to be associated with this proposal.
f. Section 24-3-60.1.6--That streets within the minor subdivision are adequate in functional
classification, width and structural capacity to meet the traffic requirements of the minor
subdivision. Weld County Department of Public Works have approved the proposed
roadway plans for the subdivision.
g. Section 24-3-60.1.7 -- That off-site street or highway facilities providing access to the
proposed minor subdivision are adequate in functional classification, width and structural
capacity to meet the traffic requirements of the minor subdivision.
h. Section 24-3-60.1.8--That the construction,maintenance,snow removal and other matters
pertaining to or affecting the road and rights-of-way for the minor subdivision are the sole
responsibility of the landowners within the minor subdivision.The Homeowners Association
will be required to maintain the road.
Section 24-3-60.1.9--This minor subdivision is not part of or contiguous with a previously
recorded subdivision or unincorporated townsite.
j. Section 24-3-60.1.10 --That there will be no on-street parking permitted within the minor
subdivision. On-street parking will not be permitted within Ivy Crest Subdivision as stated
in the Conditions of Approval.
k. Section 24-3-60.1.11 --That no additional access to a county, state or federal highway will
be created. The access to Weld County Road 19 was pre-existing.
I. Section 24-3-60.1.12—That the ingress and egress to all lots within the minor subdivision
will be to an internal road circulation system. All lots access onto Larkspur Road.
m. Section 24-3-60.1.13—That facilities providing drainage and stormwater management are
adequate.A Storm Water Drainage Report was approved by the Weld County Department
of Public Works at the Change of Zone phase.
n. Section 24-3-60.1.14—That the maximum number of lots within the minor subdivision will
not exceed five (5)lots. The proposal is for five (5)lots.
RESOLUTION S-588
Denver/Canadian
Page 3
o. Section 24-3-60.1.15—That the minor subdivision will not cause an unreasonable burden
on the ability of local governments or districts to provide fire and police protection or other
services. The Weld County Department of Planning Services has not received any referral
responses from local governments or primary service providers which reflect an inability to
provide the necessary services.
P. Section 24-3-60.1.16—That the subdivision will not have an undue adverse effect on wildlife
and its habitat, the preservation of agricultural land and historical sites. The Colorado
Division of Wildlife indicated in a referral response dated March 28,2001,that the proposal
has no conflicts with their interests.
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the
applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral agencies.
The Planning Commissions recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following:
1. Prior to scheduling a Board of County Commissioners hearing:
A. The applicant shall complete the access to the Lot directly north of the subdivision and
vacate the original access crossing Lot 5.
B. The applicant shall submit evidence that oil and gas facilities accessed by the road being
removed have an adequate easement across an alternative access that the companies are
in agreement with.
2. Prior to Recording the Minor Subdivision Final Plat:
A. The Board of County Commissioners shall review and approve the Improvements
Agreement According to Policy Regarding Collateral for Improvements including the form
of collateral. The Improvements Agreement shall address a plan for allotment and
distribution of irrigation water. The applicant shall submit a signed and dated copy of this
document prior to Board approval. The security for the agreement shall be tendered and
accepted by the Board of County Commissioners.
B. The Restrictive Covenants for Ivy Crest shall be approved by the Weld County Attorney's
Office and be ready for recording in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder.
C. A bus pull off / mail area shall be indicated on the plat. Evidence of Weld County
Department of Public Works approval shall be submitted to the Weld County Department
of Planning Services.
D. The applicant shall submit evidence that the Water Main Extension Contract has been
finalized.
E. The applicant shall submit documentation which indicates that a tap agreement has been
reached and tap fees and the $44,100 for improvements have been paid for or collateral
to satisfy those fees is in place.
F. The applicant shall submit evidence that the well proposed to provide fire protection has
been properly permitted through the Office of the State Engineer, Division of Water
Resources.
�-. RESOLUTION S-588
Denver/Canadian
Page 4
G. The applicant shall submit a specific plan to the Weld County Department of Planning
Services for review and approval of the landscaping and screening indicated in application
materials for Outlot B.
H. The Plat shall be amended to include:
1) The most recent version of Weld County's Right to Farm as listed in Section 22,
Appendix 22-F of the Weld County Code.
2) The location of the well to be utilized for fire protection and a minimum twenty(20)
foot access easement from Larkspur Road to reach the well.
3) A continuous twenty (20) foot utility and drainage easement adjacent to the
Larkspur Road and the cul-de-sac.
5) The twenty(20)foot utility and drainage easement between lots with ten (10)feet
being on either side of the lot line.
6) Legal descriptions on the plat shall include LotA of Amended Recorded Exemption
2151.
7) The approved Landscape and Screening plan.
3. The Final Plat is conditional upon the following and that each be placed on the Final Plat as notes
prior to recording:
A. The Final Plat allows for Estate uses and shall comply with the Estate Zone District
requirements as set forth in Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. The Minor Subdivision
shall consist of five (5) lots.
B. Water service shall be provided by Central Weld County Water District. Individual Sewage
Disposal Systems are required for the proposed residential lots and shall be installed
according to the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment I.S.D.S.
Regulations.
C. The site shall maintain compliance at all times with the requirements of the Weld County
Departments of Public Health and Environment, Planning Services and Public Works.
D. Installation of utilities shall comply with Section 24-9-10 of the Weld County Code.
E. Outdoor storage shall be screened from public rights of way, and adjacent properties
F. Weld County's Right To Farm ,as stated in Section 22,Appendix 22-F of the Weld County
Code, shall be recognized at all times
G. The site shall be developed in accordance with the recommendations contained in the
geotechnical report prepared by CDS Engineering Corporation.
H. No on street parking shall be allowed.
RESOLUTION S-588
Denver/Canadian
Page 5
Potential purchasers are hereby notified that an onion processing operation is located
directly east of Ivy Crest Minor Subdivision. Further,a poultry facility is located to the north
and a dairy to the east. Off-site impacts that may be encountered include noise from trucks,
tractors,and equipment,dust from animal pens and odors from animal confinement,silage,
onions and manure.
4. The Final Plat shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services for recording within 30
days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners.
Motion seconded by Bryant Gimlin
VOTE:
For Passage Against Passage Absent
Cathy Clamp Cristie Nicklas Fred Walker
Bryant Gimlin Stephen Mokray Jack Epple
Arlan Marrs Michael Miller
John Folsom
The Chair declared the resolution failed to pass and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file
of this case to the Board of County Commissioner's for further proceedings.
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I,Vicki Hamilton,Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission,do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing resolution,is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County,
Colorado, adopted on, May 1, 2001.
Dated the 1st of M y, 2i��
e_c_
Vicki Hamilton
Secretary
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Page 2
2. CASE NUMBER: S-588 (Continued from April 17, 2001)
PLANNER: Sheri Lockman
APPLICANT: Denver/Canadian do Dan Ochsner
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of AMRE-2151. Being part of the E2 of Section 21,
Township 3 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld
County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Final Plat for a 5-lot Minor Subdivision - Ivy Crest
LOCATION: West of and adjacent to Weld County Road 19, 1/4 mile north of State
Highway 66
Sheri Lockman, Planner presented Case Number S-588 and read the Department of Planning Services
comments and recommendations of approval into the record. Ms. Lockman stated one of the largest
concerns dealt with compatibility with the Agricultural Service Establishment located east of the site. Ms.
Lockman also stated that the applicant was required to submit a copy of a landscaping and berming plan
with the final application.
Cathy Clamp asked Ms. Lockman if a street light might be required at the intersection of Weld County Road
119 and State Highway 66, as indicated in a letter dated February 21, 2001 from the United Power. Ms.
Lockman replied that the light was not required.
Michael Miller,asked Ms.Lockman about the ownership of mineral rites beneath this property and if that has
been addressed. Ms. Lockman confirmed the lot is too small to be economically feasible to mine.
John Folsom, confirmed there was reference to nonurban development of any land within 3 miles urban
growth boundaries of Platteville. Ms. Lockman stated the IGA does not address this.
Dan Ochsner, applicant stated his name and address for the record.
Mr.Miller asked Mr.Ochsner if he owned the mineral rights to the property. Mr.Ochsner stated that his land
and cattle company owns the mineral rights. Mr.Miller stated that state maps indicate that the bench below
the road has a fifty foot layer of gravel on it. Mr. Miller stated the state requires that gravel reserves not be
compromised. Mr. Ochsner stated that engineering report on the property indicated it was actually sand
and not gravel, therefore, wasn't economically feasible to mine.
Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, stated that the language in the title commitment"reservation of
veins"are talking about hard minerals in the 1872 mining act and not sand and gravel which are surface
minerals.
Mr. Miller indicated that the fire hydrants would be served by an irrigation well and domestic water from
Central Weld Water. Mr. Ochsner stated it wouldn't be feasible to bring an eight (8) inch line two miles
down to the five lots. The fire department agreed with the well providing water to the hydrants.
Stephen Mokray asked the applicant who will maintain the well. Mr. Ochsner stated the homeowner's
association and the property owner of where the well is located (the north lot).
Cristie Nicklas asked for public comment.
Lila Mayer stated her name and address for the record. Ms. Mayer wanted assurance that the most recent
Right to Farm Covenant was on the change of zone plat,and that future residents know the meaning of that
covenant. She also asked that the berming plan is doubled in height to provide a wider division between
this subdivision and her business across the road. Ms. Mayer's concerns also include soil erosion and
setbacks for the residences as far back on the lots as possible. Ms. Mayer wants to know what guarantees
she has that these will be carried out.
i EXHIBIT
Itegg
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Page 3
Mr. Folsom stated that Ms. Mayer grows onions and potatoes on the property. Mr. Folsom also stated that
this can be very odoriferous. Ms. Mayer said the business is run 24 hours a day and there are also lights
on at night. Mr. Folsom stated that potential buyers might not know the agricultural aspect of living across
the road from a onion processing plant. Ms. Mayer stated that they just want to protect their livelihood and
not have to continue to defend their agricultural business.
Kenneth Mayer,stated his name and address for the record. Mr.Mayer illustrated where his packaging shed
is located and said that there may be several semi-trucks either on the road waiting to load. Mr. Mayer
stated each of the proposed lots are two and one half acres and Central Weld Water is providing domestic
water, but there won't be water for irrigation to keep the lots from eroding.
Mr. Folsom, asked Mr. Mayer if recording the Right to Farm Advisement on the plat will be adequate for
future buyers. Mr. Mayer stated he did not think it would be. I don't think people will realize what they are
getting into.
Bryant Gimlin asked if the semi-trucks back in off the county road. Mr. Mayer said sometimes they are
staged on the county road. Mr. Mayer stated his business runs twenty-four hours a day and many times at
night the semis are waiting to be loaded. Mr.Mayer also stated there are noise and lights at all times during
the day and night. Mr. Gimlin asked if there is room on the road for two way traffic when the trucks are
staged waiting to be loaded. Mr. Mayer stated that the trucks try to move to the side as far as possible and
that there is room for two-way traffic.
Ms. Clamp asked Ms. Lockman if a requirement for water to irrigate should be added since Central Weld
Water will only provide for domestic use.
Ms. Nicklas asked Ms. Lockman what seeding was on the land at this time. Ms. Lockman stated a mixture
of grass and weeds were located there. Ms. Lockman asked to refer to the Change of Zone to establish
the irrigation requirements.
Ms. Lockman responded to Ms. Mayers concerns stating that the Right to Farm will be on the Plat and in
the covenants. The six foot berm will probably not be feasible because of the sloping and seeding
difficulties, however, it could be made higher than the three foot stated. Ms. Lockman stated that
enforcement will come through the improvements agreements for the roads, landscaping. Ms. Lockman
stated that there are building envelopes on the plat,however,the setbacks are limited because of the slope
of the property.
Diane Houghtaling, Department of Public Works defined the new access for the proposed site. The new
driveway is on the south side of the development.
Mr. Miller, confirmed that there are two accesses.
Mr. Miller stated that initially the Planning Commission denied the Change of Zone and the Board of County
Commissioners approved it. Mr. Miller asked Mr. Morrison what would happen to this application if the
Planning Commission denied it. Mr. Morrison stated it would still go to the Board of County Commissioners
but if they denied it the application could not move forward, however the applicant could reapply for a
substantial change of plans. Mr.Morrison suggested the Planning Commission needs to base their decision
on the criteria of the preliminary plan.
Ms.Nicklas asked Mr.Ochsner if he was in agreement with the Development Standards and the Conditions
of Approval. He stated he was in agreement.
Ms. Clamp asked Mr. Ochsner to address the irrigation issue for the five lots. Mr. Ochsner stated that the
homeowner's association will receive five(5)per cent or 1000 gallons from the well. Ms. Clamp confirmed
with Mr. Ochsner that taps from the well could be run to each lot for irrigation to help mitigate erosion.
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Page 4
Mr. Mokray asked how the water could be distributed to the property. Mr. Ochsner stated it could be
distributed by a ditch or by underground water. Mr.Ochsner also stated he will meet with the homeowners,
once the lots are purchased and develop a plan with them. Mr.Ochsner stated the monitoring of the water
will be through the homeowner's association. An example by Mr. Ochsner was to allot one day a week and
allocate the water so all the homeowners would be watering on the same day. Mr. Ochsner stated the
homeowner's association would be responsible for maintenance of five percent of the well and he, would
be responsible for the remaining ninety-five percent.
Ms.Clamp stated that she understood the concern of the Mayers and their onion operation situated across
from the proposed lots,and suggested to Ms.Lockman that stronger language other than the Right to Farm
Covenant, needs to appear not only on the plat but some notification that would let potential buyers know
of the noise and odor problems.
Ms.Lockman stated that a note could be added to the plat stating,"Potential purchasers are hereby notified
that a onion processing operation is directly east of the site. Outside impacts may be encountered including
noise,trucks,tractors,equipment, and odors. With this statement, it would make the buyer aware that the
operation has been in production and the USR number will be defined.
Cathy Clamp moved that such language be added as a Condition of Approval. Bryant Gimlin seconded the
motion.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision.
Arlan Marrs, voted yes with the additional language that all the surrounding feedlots, poultry and dairy
information be made available to the potential buyer. Ms. Lockman agreed. Bryant Gimlin seconded the
„•—• amendment.
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision
John Folsom,yes; Arlan Marrs,yes; Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller,yes;Jack Epple, absent; Bryant
Gimlin, yes; Cathy Clamp, yes; Cristie Nicklas, yes; Fred Walker, absent. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Folsom stated that he wished this statement also be put in the covenants.
Mr. Miller stated that the building envelope of Lot 2 has a fifty (50) foot water easement for Northern
Colorado Water Conservancy District running through the middle of it. Ms. Lockman stated the lot was
moved over so there would be enough room the house and a septic system. Mr. Miller stated that no
improvements could be put on the easement.
Ms.Smith stated that there is a twenty-five(25)foot setback between a water line and a leach field or septic
tank. Ms. Smith stated the Department of Public Health and Environment would not recommend a leach
field on the easement, however if the septic tank was on one side of the easement and the leach field on
the other, the approval from the owner of the easement would have to be guaranteed.
Mr. Morrison suggested that an irrigation plan be put in place by the developer of the subdivision and that
could be included in the Improvements Agreement.
Ms. Nicklas agreed and asked Ms. Lockman for language for that measure. Ms. Lockman stated that 2.A
requires an improvements agreement in the form of collateral to be approved by the Board of County
Commissioners. Mr. Morrison said to specifically add the irrigation language to the Improvements
Agreement.
Mr. Marrs moved to send Case Number S-588 be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along
with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the addition of the amendment 2.A
regarding construction of the irrigation system along with the Planning Commission's recommendation for
approval. Mr. Gimlin seconded the motion.
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Page 5
The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision
Michael Miller,voted no with comment stating that the development does not address the potential problems
that will occur with the construction of homes across from this type of processing facility.
John Folsom, voted no for the same reason as Mr. Miller.
Stephen Mokray, voted no with comment stating he was not comfortable with the proposal
Cristie Nicklas, voted no, stating the compatibility issue was a factor.
John Folsom, no; Arlan Marrs, yes; Stephan Mokray, no; Michael Miller, no; Jack Epple, absent; Bryant
Gimlin,yes;Cathy Clamp,yes; Cristie Nicklas,no; Fred Walker,absent. Motion fails,with four to three vote.
3. CASE NUMBER: Z-556
PLANNER: Kim Ogle
APPLICANT: H. Leroy& Phyllis Johnson Go Todd Hodges Design, LLC
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of RE-2308 being part of the N2 Section 25,
Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M.,Weld
County Colorado
REQUEST: Change of Zone from A(Agricultural)to PUD with Estate uses
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 54;0.5 mile east of WCR 47
Kim Ogle,Planner presented Case NumberZ-556 and read the Department of Planning Services comments
and recommendations of approval into the record. Kim Ogle also stated that the Department of Services
staff had revisions of staff recommendations with deletions noted as strikeouts and additions are noted in
bold face type. On page 1, the addition of the referral date for the Department of Public Health and
Environment, page 8, item 4.P was added and page 10 item 5.H was added.
Commissioner John Folsom asked Kim Ogle, how the potential purchasers are notified of the information
if that information is only recorded on the plat. Kim Ogle suggested the information could be included in the
covenants.
Commissioner Cathy Clamp stated that in the letter from the City of Greeley, dated April 10, 2001,the city
requested a fifty foot right-of-way from the center line of Weld County Road 54 for future improvements.
Mr. Ogle stated that he would review staff comments to verify that this issue has been addressed.
Commissioner Michael Miller, stated, according to Church and Associates that construction should begin
when groundwater is at its lowest level. The Terracon report indicates the report was done in October which
is probably the approaching the lowest groundwater and groundwater was at one(1)foot to a foot and a half
then. Michael Miller stated his concern was the difficulty to build or grade on this site. Pam Smith,
Department of Public Health and Environment stated that the septic systems are going to have to be
unconventional septic systems due to the high ground water. Ms. Smith also stated there are systems that
can be installed that will not contribute to groundwater contamination through nitrates.
Mr. Miller asked Ms. Smith if standing groundwater on the surface would be a health issue. Ms. Smith
commented that there is always the potential for mosquito breeding habitats with standing water especially
with grasses in the water. Ms. Smith also stipulated that the maintenance and care of the property would
have bearing on this situation.
Commissioner Cristie Nickles suggested that the applicant could answer how they were dealing with the
standing groundwater and construction.
SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday,April 17, 2001
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held Tuesday 2001, in the Weld County
Public Health/Planning Building, (Room 210), 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was
called to order by Chair, Cristie Nicklas, at 1:33 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Cristie Nicklas Present
Fred Walker Present
John Folsom Present EXHIBIT
Jack Epple Absent
Michael Miller Present
Stephan Mokray Present
Arlan Marrs Present
Bryant Gimlin Absent
Cathy Clamp Ptesent
Also Present: Sheri Lockman, Chris Gathman, Robert Anderson, Julie Chester, Lauren Light, Bethany
Salzman, Department of Planning Services; Don Carroll, Department of Public Works; Trevor Jiricek, Char
Davis, Department of Environmental Health; Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney.
The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission held on, April 3, 2001,
was approved as read.
1. CASE NUMBER: S-588
APPLICANT: Denver/Canadian c/o Dan Ochsner
PLANNER: Sheri Lockman
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of AMRE-2151.Being part of the E2 of Section 21, Township
3 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado.
REQUEST: Final Plat for a 5-lot Minor Subdivision - Ivy Crest
LOCATION: West of and adjacent to Weld County Road 19, 1/4 mile north of State Highway 66
Sheri Lockman, Planner requested a continuance along with the Department of Public Works and Planning
Services Staff for Case Number S-588 to be continued until May 1,2001. The applicant is working with the
Department of Public Works to build a road on the adjacent property. The applicant would like to do this
prior to the Planning Commission Hearing.
Cristie Nicklas asked if there were any questions for staff from the Planning Commission.No questions were
asked. Cristie Nicklas asked if the applicant was available. The applicant was not present. No public
comment was presented. Stephen Mokray moved that Case Number S-588 be continued until May 1,2001.
Michael Miller seconded. Motion carried for continuance.
2. CASE NUMBER: USR-1318 (continued from March 20, 2001)
APPLICANT: Jose Aguirre
'PLANNER: Chris Gathman
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of NW1/4 Section 35, Township 5 North, Range 66 West of
the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado (Lot 14, Indian Hills
Subdivision)
REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a Home
Business (flatwork/concrete contractor's business) in the (A) Agricultural Zone
District
LOCATION: Approximately 250 feet South of Weld County Road 52 and west of and adjacent
to 44'"Avenue.
Chris Gathman, Planner. with Department of Planning Staffs understanding, informed the Planning
Commission that the applicant is withdrawing his application for Case Number USR-1318 for a Special Use
Hello