The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About840067.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION - TED AND ROBERT RADEMACHER WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioner held a public hearing on the 28th day of November, 1984 , at the hour of 2 : 00 o' clock p.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of considering the Final Planned Unit Development Plan for a Commercial and Industrial Subdivision submitted by Ted and Robert Rademacher, 13774 1-25 Access Road, Longmont, Colordo 80501 , and WHEREAS , said Final Plan concerns the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the N2, Section 23 , Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter, and having been fully informed, finds that this Final Plan shall be approved for the following reasons : 1 . The applicant has complied with the application requirements listed in Section 28 .5 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2 . The request is in conformance with Section 28 .3 . 2 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Board of County Commissioners approved the request for a Change of Zone to Planned Unit Development District on February 29 , 1984 . b. The proposed Industrial and Commercial Planned Unit Development Plan conforms to the Industrial and Commercial Planned Unit Development District and is located within that district. 7 84006 7 c. The uses, buildings , and structures permitted shall be compatible with the existing and future development of the surrounding area to the south as permitted by the existing zoning. The subject site adjoins a ten acre, more or less , Commercial Three District parcel and Inter-State 25 to the west, and a one hundred fourteen acre, more or less , Commercial and Industrial Planned Unit Development District parcel to the south. Agricultural Zone Districts adjoin the property to the north and east. The location of the subject parcel does not affect a municipality comprehensive plan. d. The request does conform with the performance standards outlined in Section 35 . 3 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance subject to conditions of approval as listed below. e. No overlay districts affect the subject site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Final Planned Unit Development Plan for a Commercial and Industrial Subdivision on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, approved subject to the following notes being placed on the Final Planned Unit Development Plan Plat prior to recording in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 1 . Prior to grading and any construction, a geotechnical report shall be completed. The report shall include a subsurface investigation; foundation design recommen- dation, fill and grading recommendations and erosion control requirements. 2 . Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Planned Unit Development District shall be serviced by an adequate water system. The water system shall comply with Section 8-10 , Water Supply, as set forth in the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. The Water Supply system shall comply with Sections 10 . 301 and 10 . 302 of the Uniform Fire Code Manual, 1982 Edition. 3 . Prior to the issuance of building permits plans , profiles, and typical cross section drawings of streets shall be submitted to and approved by the Weld County Engineering Department. The streets shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Official Weld County Construction Standards and Weld County Subdivision Regulations . Pavement design computations shall be site specific. 4 . Plans for right turn deceleration lanes at each access onto the 1-25 frontage road shall be submitted to and approved by the Division of Highways. The deceleration lanes shall be installed prior to the issuance of building permits. 5 . A Subdivision Improvements Agreement shall be submitted and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 6 . A site plan review is required. The applicant for a building permit in the Planned Unit Development District shall certify and state that the performance standards and district requirements that are applicable to the development and use of the property, either industrial or commercial , have been complied with according to the intent of Section 23 , Site Plan Review, as set forth in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7 . No structures shall be permitted on the gas pipeline easement as shown on the Final Planned Unit Development Plan Plat. 8 . The applicant shall submit to and have approved by the Department of Planning Services staff, a planting list to be considered as a standard for landscaping in the site plan review process. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 28th day of November, A.D. , 1984 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: "{'4ya(q�,-," WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING - AYE and Clerk to the Board Norman Carlson, Chairman "4'1> YNUNbs Mt�ivo•-- BY: ,tt_;tai J c dine nson, Pro-Tem De uty County C erk engiint APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gene R. Bran EXCUSED Chuck Carlson County Attorney zt )27e7,4715,7_/- J n T. Martin HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 84-73 RE: FINAL P.U.D. PLAN FOR A COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION - TED AND ROBERT RADEMACHER A public hearing was conducted on November 28, 1984, at 2:00 P.M. , with the following present: Commissioner Norman Carlson, Chairman Commissioner Jacqueline Johnson, Pro-Tem Commissioner Gene Brantner Commissioner Chuck Carlson, Excused Commissioner John Martin Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Mary Reiff Assistant County Attorney, Lee D. Morrison Planning Department representative, Rod Allison The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated October 22, 1984, and duly published October 25, and November 15, 1984, in the La Salle Leader, a public hearing was conducted to consider the Final P.U.D. Plan for a Commercial and Industrial Subdivision submitted by Ted and Robert Rademacher. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, read this matter into the record. Rod Allison, representing the Planning Department, read the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record. Before the applicant began his presentation, Commissioner Johnson asked about the availability of water, asking that the applicant address this issue in the presentation. Commissioner Johnson also asked about the Subdivision Improvements Agreement mentioned in one of the proposed conditions. John Zimmerman, of McCarty Engineering, came forward to represent the applicant. He gave the background of this application and explained the various reviews which have been conducted. (Following receipt of a message, Commissioner Martin asked to be excused from the hearing for a short time.) Considerable discussion was held concerning the site plan review which would be conducted upon application for a building permit and the landscaping requirements. (Commissioner Martin returned during this discussion.) Mr. Zimmerman stated that, since the consistency of the landscaping seemed to be a problem, their landscape architect could work with the Planning Department to develop a consistent design. Following discussion, Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the Final P.U.D. Plan submitted by Ted and Robert Rademacher, conditional upon development of a list of types of plantings to be used to maintain landscaping consistency. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brantner. After further discussion, Commissioner Brantner withdrew his motion. Commissioner Johnson, after further discussion, amended her motion, moving to amend the conditions associated with the application by adding, as Condition #8 to be placed on the plat, "The applicant shall submit and have approved by the Department of Planning Services staff, a planting list to be considered as a standard for landscaping in the site plan review process." Commissioner Brantner seconded the amendment to the previous motion and it carried unanimously. Commissioner Brantner then moved to approve the Final P.U.D. Plan, as amended by the addition of Condition No. 8, for Ted and Robert Rademacher. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Martin and carried with Chairman N. Carlson and Commissioners Brantner and Martin voting aye and Commissioner Johnson voting nay. APPROVED: !J BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: . +— WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder _/ e...4-44-0-- and Clerk to the Board_ Norman Carlson, Chairman By: ,c-i� -' ( �yy1+ <l«� • � De uty County Clerk uel e Joh so , Pro-Tem Gene R. Brantner EXCUSED Chuck Carlson 2—i�/ - 7 Jam„ J n T. Martin TAPE #84-128 DOCKET #84-73 LHR 134 ATTENDANCE RECORD _DATE: November 28 , 1984 - TODAY' S HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS: Docket #84-73 , Final P.U.D. Plan, Ted & Robert Rademacher Docket #84-75 , USR-Accessory stucture greater than 1 ,500 square feet-Peterson Docket #84-77 , USR-Amendment to USR Mining Permit - Weld County Corporation Docket #84-72 , USR Development Standards - Colorado Jockey Club PLEASE write or print legibly your name, address and the DOCKET # (as listed above) or the applicant' s name of the hearing you are attending. NAM)E ADDRESS HEARING ATTENDING l,-e.26, /r' ute - 10L SCI vyn...1Fr porch., ,�o,,,,t4 , , tir es gat, ua h. Doti � (T,c1e� ��4 , % -- — p'c teve c-(1'. c� t trh-, -P(), teptg e Y4- - y2— f ` '7307 I ) 54. &&iL' /e / / LC? -- ,,_(2 � l/ /- <- N O 'P I C E Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance , a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All Persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners , located in the Weld County Centennial C-enter, 915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, Colorado. • APPLICANT DOCKET NO. 84-73 Ted and Robert -Rademacher 13774 I-25 Access Road Longmont, CO _80501 DATE : November 28 , 1984 TIME : 2 : 00 P.M. REQUEST: A Final P.U.D. plan _for a commercial and industrial subdivision LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the Nz, erection 23 , Township 3 North, Range 68 -West of the 6th Q .M. , Weld County, Colorado BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE-RS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Mary Reiff, Deputy DATED: October 22 , 1984 PUBLISHED: October 25 , 1984 and November 15, 1984, in the La Salle Leader LHR 134 DATE: Octobe 22, 1984 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 28th day of November, 1984, at 2 : 00 P.M. Docket No. 84-73 - Ted and Robert Rademacher, Final P.U.D. plan for commercial and industrial subdivision OFFICE OF THE CLERK -TO THE BOARD BY: //c -'y Y Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing -time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO �. Affidavit -of Publication SATE OF COLORADO. as. County of Weld.ALJ 3 of said County of Weld. being-duly sworn, soy that LEGAL NOTICE I am„publisher of -_ Pommeelb the Moe awed State �.- �2 I of Colorado mai'N kith County Zan. hearing all be held In the Choate that Iho some is-a weekly newspaper of general County Commoeee of Wel Board f W circilation —d printed and published in the Colorado, Weht Tawny Centennial d/-�-J Enter. 915 1Y0y rSeet. Fist Floor, town of B/G��`OC-e_- Greelap.Colors.0th'lime specified. in saidxounty and state: that the notice-or adver. M0 person'In aeyeta mew Inerenm_tn the the SSt�eetyf..Review es es. tisement.-of -which the _annexed is a true copy. quested to aneadaatmay be heard has been published to said -weekly newspaper /,' eE it ALSO MOWN that the text and for tpns2ennis ma s w tenths KY'the Weld Ca* RannigTomminnon etc be esamlaed weeksr that the notice was published in the in theoace a theeel110 the Board of regular and entire issue of every number of aid County C°'n°'4ivare• located to the ask' Canty Ceatrnial Center. 915 newspaper during the penod and time cf publi• 10th Street,Thal Sac,Gate*,Col- cotton ci said r.ottce and in the newspaper °redo. proper and not in a supplement thereof: that the DOCKET NO.84,73 first_publication et said notice was contained in APPUCANT the/issue of 5014��w/sp.s�p�ar teorina date.dth e d� ( y 0 q Ted etti$yben Rademacher tea,.c0 Awes day al n.."i.. 19 Road Lonwaeet:Calorada-50501 and the last publication thereat, in /thgJasue of DATE:November,9g"191N ain ,nawepaes p bearing date, they 1.+�.� day Of "YiysLCll"'r. yfi TIME:2:00 P.M. :' 192:; that the said -REQUEST:A Final f.U,D.plan for a Ct �" ?^ wmnseelal and M/pkial sabdluyiw L�G+ I�i( LEGAL DESCRIPTION: has been published continuously and unimerrupt. Part of the N1/2,Selo s9 T edfy during the period cf at least fifty-two can. North. oetaP.M., secutive weeks next-prior to the first issue thereat Weld Comity.Co nth° 'P.M., xonteininq said notice or advertisement _above slaw OP COUNTY referred to: and that said-newspaper was_at the time of-each of the publications of said notice, WE1Z)C ,COLClAApO duly-qualified for that purpose within the mean- RS:MARYAr1R FEUERSTEIN intro( an act, entitled. "An Act=oneemmg Legal COUfA/tDLL�IfMTHE BOMD t'fl'CLEJ&A ,RECORDER Notices. Advertisements and Publications, and the Fees of Printers and-Publishers thereof. end EYrMy Rely:Deputy to Repeal all Acts_and Parts al Acts in Conflict DATED:October 22,RIM with the Provisions of this Act." approved April. PubWhed la tlt#, Selle Leader 1921. and cli amendments thereof, and perticu. on T eaeea. yssa►er 35• sod lady as-amended by an act approved. March 30. Ne.aatM le,ins.• 1923. and an act mppr:v May 18. 1931. Publisher Subscribed cn sworn tobefore-me this dc,y of -lie / A.D.. 19 L c , ;glad-4(Z/ My commission -15-- Notary sitn expires ,. --- Notary Public EL LABET H MASSE Y 2,20? MV CAD, 54 GREELEY, CC) 80631 r AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION LONGMONT DAILY TIMES-CALL State of Colorado County of Boulder I, Roger L . Morris _do solemnly swear that the LONGM0NT DAILY TIMES-CALL is a daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in OCE the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, Pursuant to me zoning laws of the State of Colora- and which -has general circulation therein and in parts of -Boulder do and the Weld County Zoning Ordinance,•p,mnc hearing will be held In the Chambers of the-Board and Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously of County Commissioners of Weld Colora- do. County,and uninterruptedly published for a Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th p y period of more than six months Street.First Floor.Greeley,Colorado,at the time nextprior to the first legalspecified.Alt persons In any manner Interested in publication of the annexed notice the following proposed Change of zone are re- quested to attend end may be heard. of advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so cer- United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions tified by ye County Planning CommitNw+eeay be -examined in the office of the Clerk to the-Board of of the Act of March 3, 1879, or an amendments thereof, and County Commissioners,Idcatedin the Weld Coun- y ty Centennial center.915 10th Street,Third Floor, that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for publishing Tirado. DOCKET No1Ow4T3.: - legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws APPLICANT Ted and Robert Rademacher of the State of Colorado; that copies of each number of said 137141-25Access Road Long most,CO 80501 -newspaper, in which said notice or advertisement was published, DATE:November 28,1984 TIME:2:00 P.M. were transmitted -by mail or carrier to each of the subscribers f REQUEST'A;final P.U.D. plan for a commercial and indusgtdaubdivision of said newspaper, according to the accustomed mode of business ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: in this office. Part of the NH, Section.23,Township 3 North, Range 88 West of the 6th P.M:,Weld County,Colo- redo That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY,COLORADO BY:MARY-ANN FEUERSTEIN in the regular and entire editions of said daily newspaper CAM(eli el COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY:Mary Relit,Deputy DATED:October 22,1984 micaxoxixtkoc-xlxix)lxyc xfxosaft week for the period of 1 Published In tbeDelly Times-Call,Longmont,Colt Nov.15,1964 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice I� was in the issue of said newspaper dated Nov-ember 15 19 84 , and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated ,.. . .Q.v.e.m.}b.e .1.5, 19 84. / ssistant Business Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15th day of N4vtmber 19 84 Notary Pu FEE $ 13 . 78 • 1-1300-02 L. • SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 16, 1984 A regular meeting of the Weld Lbunty Planning Commission was held on October 16, 1984, at 1:30 p.m. in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Bob Ehrlich. Tape 175 - Side 2 ROLL CALL Lydia Dunbar Absent - Called in Doug Graff • Present Paulette Weaver Present Stephen Hamilton Absent - Called in Sharon Linhart Present Bill McMurray Present Jack Holman Present Louis Rademacher Present Bob Ehrlich Present Also present: Rod Allison, Current Planner II, Bruce Barker, Assistant County Attorney, and Bobbie Good, Secretary A quorum was -present. The summary of the last regular meeting tf the Weld County Planning Commis- sion held -on October 2, 1984, was approved as distributed. CASE NUMBER: USR-651:84:47 (Continued from October 2, 1984) • APPLICANT: Seymour (Brad) and Joan A. Pet-erson REQUEST: A Use by Special Review Permit for an Accessory Structure greater than 1,500 square feet in the "R-1" (Residential One) Zone District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 1, Knaus Subdivision; located in part of the N1 NE1, Section 8, T5N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of the Greeley City' Limits; •north of 11th Street and west of 73rd Avenue APPEARANCE: The Chairman called for representation. There was none. Therefore, this . will ha moved to -a later item on the agenda. CASE NUMBER: S-241:84:12 APPLICANT: Ted and Robert Rademacher REQUEST: A final "P.U.D." (Planned Unit Development) Plan for a Commercial and Industrial Subdivision LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the N1, Section 23, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately two (2) miles southeast of Mead; -east of 1-23 Frontage Road and south of Weld County Road 32 Summary of the Weld _County Planning Commission Meeting October 16, 1984 Rage 2 APPEARANCE: John McCarty, McCarty Engineering Consultants, stated this property was rezoned from Agricultural to Planned Unit _Development last spring. The -plat shows the lots and future plans for development of the property. The Weld County Utilities Coordinating Committee has met and recommends approval -of the final plan. The developers do not expect any restricted uses for this property, but they do expect the property owners to police themselves. This land is currently in crops, therefore, the subsurface soils study will be done after the crops are harvested. At the current time they do not know how much of the lots will be taken up by buildings, parking spaces, etc., and they expect each los owner to provide their DL,; erosion control plan. This will also be reviewed by =ire s._-_ when the owner applies for a Site _Plan Review. Ihey are currently working witn the fire -prevention and the water districts on lire ire fighting protocol. The Chairman asked Rod Allison to read the recommendations, conditions, and comments into the record. The Planning Commission _discussed the staff's recommendation regarding depositing cash into a County escrow fund for parks and recreation in lieu of open-space. Tape 176 - Side 1 Rod Allison reviewed the history of this case stating the -Planning Commis- sion did deny this request for a change of zone, but she Board of County Commissioners approved it. Therefore, a zone district for commercial and industrial use for this area exists. The staff has tried to come • up with as good a plan as possible. Any decision reached by the Planning Commission should be based on the review and approval procedures as outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. The Chairman calledfor discussion from the audience. Robert Rademacher, property owner and applicant, and Ella Rademacher (Mrs. Ted) , property owner and applicant, reported they are vary interested in seeing that the development of this property is asthetic and attractively landscaped. MOTION: Paulette Weaver moved the developers make payment to the County to be deposited in the escrow account for parks and recreation at a sate of 8.5% in lieu of open-space in the development. Motion seconded by Sharon Linhart. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Disucasion followed. Summary of the Wel-d County Planning Commission Meeting October 16, 1984 Page 3 The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the -Planning Commission for their decision. Bill McMurray - no; Paulette Weaver - yes; Doug Graff - No, because he feels -a business park development with little or no impact on a residential area could be penalized unduly by this proposal. If ;parks and -open-space are considered they should be considered with residential developments, but certainly not with business parks. _Louis Rademacher - Abstain; Tack Holman - no; Sharon Linhart - yes; Bob Ehrlich - no. Motion is denied with four voting against the -motion, two voting for the motion, and one abstaining. MOTION: Jack Holman moved that the open-space requirement be waived according to the Planning staff's recommendation. There is the requirement that an area equivalent to 15% of the total lot size be landscaped and the balance of the open-area-space be waived. Motion seconded by Doug Graff. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the _Planning Commission for their decision. Bill McMurray - yes; Paulette Weaver - No, because this -proposal is going to allow the potential for very intense use of this land and the employees do have an impact on park and recreation needs in the County. Doug Graff - yes; Louis Rademacher - Abstain; Jack Holman - yes; Sharon Linhart - no; Bob Ehrlich - yes. Motion carried with four voting for the motion, two voting against the motion, and one abstaining. Tape 176 - Side 2 Doug Graff moved Lase Number S-241:84:12 for Ted and Robert Rademacher for a _Pinal Planned Unit Development Plan for a Commercial and Industrial Subdivision be forwarded to the Board -0f County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval based upon the recom- mendations and conditions as Mutlined by the Department of Planning Services staff and the testimony heard by the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Bill McMurray. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the _Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Bill McMurray - yes; Paulette Weaver - No, because she still feels a dedication of land or payment in lieu of land would make this more acceptable to the County and more in line with the general good of the residents of the County. Doug Graff - yes; Louis Rademacher — Abstain; Jack Holman - yes; Sharon Linhart - No, because although the applicants have technically complied with the Comprehensive Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting October 16, 1984 Page 4 Plan and the Change of Zone, and they are to be commended for their thoroughness, this is taking away prime agricultural land and green space from our County along an interstate highway that is soon going to be a strip of very intensive commercial and industrial uses. The only way to mitigate that kind of development is to provide for some green space whether it is greenbelts, parks, or other kinds of areas that help to detract from these uses. Bob Ehrlich - yes. Motion carried with four voting for the motion, two voting against the motion, and one abstaining. CASE NUMBER: USR-652:84:48 \r7LICA";T: Scuta Greeley Gas Processing REQUEST: A Use by Special Review Permit for a Natural Gas Processing Plant LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NW SW1i Section 35, T4N, R66W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 1.75 miles southeast of £ilcrest; south of Weld County Road 40 and east of Weld County Road 33 APPEARANCE: Don Milton, South Greeley Gas Processing, _represented the applicant. The proposed project would be very small, a two million cubic foot per day natural gas processing plant with two thirty thousand gallon storage tanks. They have met with the residents from this area and explained the safety features of this plant. They have also suggested to the residents that they visit the plant similar to this one, only larger, in the Windsor area. All the gas processing components will be enclosed in a steel building. The tanks and building will be painted earth tones and the property will be fenced, bermed, and attractively landscaped. Their compressor and refrigeration units remove other gases from the natural gas which will be sold to Western Slope Gas Company. The gases stored in the tanks will require two trucks per week. This plant is designed to comply with the Oil -Insurance-Commission requirements. There are no plans for expansion of the plant. Tom Herrick, Operator, South Greeley Gas Processing, explained the safety features and quietness of operation of this plant. The Chairman asked Rod Allison to read the recommendations, conditions, and operation standards as outlined by the Department of Planning Services staff into the record. Tape 177 - Side 1 Rick Miller, surrounding property owner, spoke in opposition to this request. He stated this would make the third gas plant in a one and one-half mile area. He also elaborated on problems the neighborhood is having with the two existing gas plants. BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Jack Holman that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: �Irrr, r Case Number: S-141:84: 12 Q! � P Name: Ted and Robert Rademacher - - ,r34 Address: 13774 I-25 Access Road, Longmont, CO 805 Request: A final Planned Unit Development plan for a commercial and industrial subdivision. Legal: Part of the NZ of Section 23, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado Location: Approximately two (2) miles southeast of Mead; east of I-25 frontage and south of Weld County Road 32. be recommended favorably to the _Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: The Weld County Planning Commission recommends approval of this request for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has complied with the application requirements listed in Section 28.5 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The request is in conformance with Section 28.3.2 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Board of Commissioners approved the request for a change of zone to planned unit development district on February 29, 1984; - The proposed industrial and commercial Planned Unit Development plan conforms to the industrial and commercial Planned Unit Development district and is located within that district; - The uses, buildings, and structures permitted shall be compatible with the existing and future development of the surrounding area to the south as permitted by the existing zoning. The subject site adjoins a ten (10) acre, more or less, commercial three (3) district parcel and Inter-State 25 to the west, and a one hundred fourteen (114) acre, more or less , commercial and Industrial Planned _Unit Development District parcel to the south. Agricultural Zone Districts adjoin the property to the north and east. The location of the subject parcel does not affect a municipality comprehensive plan; - The request does conform with the performance standards outlined in Section 35.3 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance subject to conditions of approval as listed below; and S-241:84:12 Ted and Robert Rademacher A final Planned Unit Development plan for a commercial and industrial subdivision Part of the N1 of Section 23, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado October 16, 1984 Page 2 No overlay districts affect the subject site. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the information submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding this request and responses of referral entities who have reviewed this request. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following notes being placed on the Final Planned Unit Development Plan Plat prior to recording in the Office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 1. Prior to grading and any construction, a geotechnical report shall be completed. The report shall include a subsurface investigation; foundation design recommendations, fill and grading recommendations and erosion control requirements. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Planned Unit Development _District shall be serviced by an adequate water system. The water system shall comply with Section $-10, Water Supply, as set forth in the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. The Water Supply system shall comply with Section 10.301 and 10.302 of the Uniform Fire Code Manual, 1982 Edition. An underground distribution system shall be installed with fire hydrants attached. Fire hydrant spacing shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits plans, profiles, and typical cross section drawings of streets shall be submitted to and approved by the Weld County Engineering Department. She streets shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Official. Weld County Construction Standards and Weld County Subdivision Regulations. Pavement design computations shall be site specific. 4. Plans for right turn deceleration lanes at each access on to the I-25 frontage road shall be submitted to and approved by the Division of Highways. The deceleration lanes shall be installed prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A Subdivision Improvements Agreement shall be submitted and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 6. A site plan review is required. The applicant for a building permit in the Planned Unit Development District shall certify and state that the performance standards and district requirements that are applicable S-241:84:12 Ted and Robert Rademacher A final Planned Unit Development plan for a commercial and industrial subdivision Part of the N1 of Section 23, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County Colorado October 16, 1984 Page 3 to the development and use of the property, either industrial or commercial, have been complied with according to the intent of Section 23, Site Plan Review as set forth in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. In addition, a temporary and permanent erosion control plan shall be submitted as part of the Site Plan review _process. 7. No structures shall be permitted on the gas pipeline easement as shown on the Final Planned Unit Development Plan Plat. Motion seconded by: Doug Graff Vote: For Passage Abstain Against Passage Bill McMurray Louis Rademacher Paulette Weaver Doug Graff Sharon Linhart Jack Holman Bob Ehrlich The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning -Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on October 16, 1984 and recorded in Book No. IX of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 17th day of October, 1984. �et..t a. CDood Secretary ` Additional Comments S-241:84: 12 Ted and Robert Rademacher 1. The Utility Coordinating Review Committee approved the Final Planned Unit Development Plan utilities and utility easements in a meeting on October 11, 1984. 2. Section 8-15 in the Weld County Subdivision Regulations addresses the public site and open-space requirements for Planned Unit Developments and states in part that". . .the Planning Commission and the Board, upon consideration of vehicular traffic and facilities and the -particular type of development proposed in the subdivision, may require the dedication; development, and/or reservation of areas or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for public use for parks, greenbelts, or other necessary purposes, . . ." The Planning Commission recommends that the applicants do not dedicate land within the final Planned Unit Development Plan for a public site or open space. The proposed Planned Unit Development is for industrial and commercial uses. The Planning Commission does not feel a public site would be compatible with the development proposed. There are no residential developments within the immediate vicinity. In addition, each lot developed in the Planned Unit Development District is required to reserve fifteen percent (15%) of the lot for landscaped areas to comply with performance standards set forth in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Date: October 16, 1984 Case Number: S-241:84: 12 Name: Ted and Robert Rademacher Request: A final PUD plan for a commercial and industrial subdivision. Legal: Pt. N% of Section 23, T3N, R68W Location: Approximately 2 miles southeast of Mead; east of I-25 frontage and south of WCR 32. The Department of Planning Services Staff recommends approval of this request for the following reasons: 1. The applicant has complied with the application requirements listed in Section 28.5 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. The request is in conformance with Section 28.3.2 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - The proposal is consistent with the Weld _County Comprehensive Plan. The Board of Commissioners approved the request for a change of zone to planned unit development district on February 29, 1984; - The proposed industrial and commercial PUD plan conforms to the industrial and commercial PUD district and is located within that district; - The uses, buildings, and structures permitted shall be compatible with the existing and future development of the surrounding area to the south as permitted by the existing zoning. The subject site adjoins a 10 ± acre commercial 3 district parcel and Inner- State 25 to the west, and a 114± acre commercial and Industrial PUD District parcel to the south. Agricultural Zone Districts adjoin the property to the north and east. The location of the subject parcel does not affect a municipality comprehensive plan; - The request -does conform with the performance standards outlined in Section 35.3 et seq. , of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance subject to conditions of approval as listed below; and - No overlay districts affect the subject site. These determinations are based, in part,- upon a review of the information submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding this request and responses of referral entities who have reviewed this request. The Department of Planning Services staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following notes being placed on the Final PUD Plan Plat prior to recording in the Office of the Weld -County Clerk and Recorder. 1. Prior to grading and any construction, a geotechnical report shall be completed. The report shall include a subsurface investigation; foundation design recommendations, fill and grading recommendations and erosion control requirements. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the PUD District shall be serviced by an adequate water system. The water system shall comply with Section 8-10, Water Supply, as set forth in the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. The Water Supply system shall comply with Section 10. 301 and 10.302 of the Uniform Fire Code Manual, 1982 Edition. An underground distribution system shall be installed with fire hydrants attached. Fire hydrant spacing shall not exceed 600 feet. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits plans, profiles, and typical cross section drawincs of streets shall he submitted too and annrn'red __ -;ei County ngineeriag designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Official Weld County Construction Standards and Weld County Subdivision Regulations. Pavement design computations shall be site specific. 4. Plans for right turn deceleration lanes at each access on to I-25 frontage road shall be submitted to and approved by the Division of Highways. The deceleration lanes shall to installed prior to the issuance of Building permits. 5. A Subdivision Improvements Agreement shall be submitted and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 6. A site plan review is required. The -applicant for a building permit in the PUD District shall certify and state that the performance standards and district requirements that are applicable to the development and use of the property, either industrial or commercial, have been complied with according to the intent of Section 23, Site Plan Review es set forth in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. . In addition, a temporary and permanent erosion control plan shall be submitted as part of the Site Plan review process. 7. No structures shall be permitted on the gas pipeline easement as shown on the Final PITD Plan Plat. Additional Comments S-241:84: 12 Ted and Robert Rademacher 1. The Utility Coordinating Review Committee approved the Final PUD Plan utilities and utility easements in a meeting on October 11, 1984. 2. _Section 8-15 in the Weld County Subdivision Regulations addresses the public site and open space requirements for PUD's and states in part that; "the Planning Commission and the Board, upon consideration of vehicular traffic and facilities and the particular type of development proposed in the subdivision, may require the _dedication; development, and/or reservation of areas or sites of a character, extent and locati-on suitable for public use for parks, greenbelts, or other necessary purposes,". . . The Planning Staff recommends that the applicants do not dedicate land within the final PUD Plan for a public site or open space. The proposed PUD is for industrial and commercial uses. The staff does not feel a public site would be compatible with the development proposed. There are no residential developments within the immediate vicinity. In addition. each lot developed in the PUD IDistrict As required to reserve 15 percent of the lot for laudscaped areas to comply with performance standards set forth in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The _Planning Commission options are: (1) Waive the open space requirement; ((2) Require open space in accordance with -Section 8-15 B (2) ; or 6) Require payment in lieu of land in accordance with Section 8-15 A (3). aj otiAtaxkka, o, WE-84-012 .., - OI RICHARD D. LAMM 't * JOHN W. ROLD GOVERNOR # i DIRECTOR s X876 COLORADO GEOLOGICALSURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE-CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMANISTREET DENVER.COLORADO 80203THONE(303)866-2611 • Mr. -Rod Allison Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10the Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 • Dear Mr. Allison: RE. r,,;C.E•1ACHER i51iSINESS PPAR& We have reviewed the plat, Ar-ainage report and geotechnical report for -an adjacent property. This area is underlain by the upper sandstone unit of the Pierre Shale; this material is overlain by a layer of windblown sand and silt. These materials can compact when loaded and are subject to erosion. To adequately design foundations, A tilities and septic systems, we recommend that a geotechnical report he completed for this site prior to grading and construction. This report should include a subsurface investigation, foundation design recommendations, fill and grading recommendations and erosion control requirements. This should be noted on the plat. The subdivision information notes percolation rates of 120 minutes per inch to 20-40 minutes per inch. The former rate indicates subsurface conditions that are not suitable for standard on-lot septic systems; slow percolation rates, locally shallow bedrock and shallow groundwater levels require engineered septic systems. We recommend that this be noted on the plat. If the recommendations -are followed, we have no objection to conditional approval of this application. (Sincerely, }fueca_ cr, Julie E. Turney 1C.; `�•i1J1i (17r Engineering _Geologist { T 1 :3 19_84� ca JET-134-107 Weld Co. Planning Commission GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST. ..KEY TO THE FUTURE \ LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ii I II 9j K,..io C'/ ,/i 91 119 County Line1Rd.,langmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-0710 °TecnoMi September 17, 1984 Mr. Jon Zimmerman McCarty Engineering Consultants, Inc. 703 Third Avenue Longmont, Colorado, 80501 Dear Mr. Zimmerman: The -Longmont Fire Protection_District conditionally approves the Rademacher Business Park PUD at I-25 East -Frontage Road and WCR#32 as follows: 1. An -adequate water supply is iprovided and maintain-ed for fire protection — to be determined by I.S.O. or equivalent -engineering studies. 2. An underground distribution system installed with fire hydrants attached. -Hydrant spacing not to exceed ODD feet. 3. Water pressure within the distribution system shall be maintained at a-mini,mum residual pressure tit 20 to 30 -psi. 4. Other requirements for a water supply as called for in Weld County Subdivision Regulations —Section 8 -Design Standards; Lara 8-10 Water-Supply and_Section 10.301 & 10.302 of the Uniform -Fire Code 11982 Edition. W� Rti 98CErifarrson Captain/Fire Marsh-al -WRE/wrs CC: Board of_Directors (5) Board Secretary/Attorney (1) Chief (1) File (3) STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF-HIGHWAYS F.O. Box 850 e,,,,,*1 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (303)353-1232 October 4, 1984 Weld Co. - 1-25 II b U i 0 `l 1984 j Rademacher P.U.D. _ 7 miles N. -of S.H. • Mr. Rod Allison `L— . 66 on E. Service Rd. Department of Planning Services Vftld Co. Planning Commission Weld County DOH File 45100 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Allison: :'.ave revl_ewEd The a -n.- Ciler Co er_1c:. _^.-",•^- -i la_ 2.1:. L. have the following comments. The two access points to the Interstate 25 East frontage road are acceptable and consistent with our previous discussions with the project consultant. These accesses will serve the three lots in this P.13.11. adjacent to the frontage road, so -no additional access should be necessary. The "Traffic Study" submitted with this P.U.D. application has been coordinated with this office and our Denver staff. We are in general agree- ment with the conclusion of this study that the Rademacher P.U.D. will not -have a significant traffic impact -on the area highway system. The study does indicate a fairly high left-turn movement potential at the I-25/State Highway 66 interchange. However, it would be difficult to mitigate this impact, and with the relatively low existing traffic volume, we do not anti— cipate unreasonable turning conflicts. Based on the projected turning movements at the access approaches to the frontage road and the volume of traffic on the frontage road itself, it appears that right turn deceleration lanes will be warranted at each access. The construction of these lanes would be required in conjunction with the construction of the accesses. An Access _Permit is required to construct -an access to a state highway. Application for this permit is made to this office at the above address. Thank you for the opportunity to review this P.U.D. Very truly yours, ALBERT CHOTVACS DISTRICT ENGINEER / if- L- =// -C` '2't 7 _,A% il, ilam F. Reisbeck 7Ipistrict Pre-Construction -Engineer WFR:jlb cc: A. Chotvacs D. Yost Area Foreman Filn• Crier—,Tnnnhsnn C PANHANDL-E E-ASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY P. O. BOX 127 BRIGHTON, COLORADO 80601 September 27, 1984 Mr. Rod Allison Department of -Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Rod Allison: This letter is for information regarding case 45-241:84:12. -As per your maps showing our pipelines, Panhandle Eastern does maintain an easement 50 feet in width, being 25 feet on each side of the pipeline. No structures will be allowed on Right-of—Way; however, we do not have any problems with roadways, utility crossings, or fences crossing -the pipeline to near right angles. -Roadways maybe parallel, no closer than 10 feet. We do request that if any digging or excavating is planned, please call us at least 48 hours in advance and a fieldman will locate our facilities. If you have any questions -concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at 659-5922. • Sincerely, 77-97 Ken J. Neff. Right-of-Way Representative KJN/gw xc: File a Longmont Soil Conservation District 9595 Nelson Road, Box D - Longmont, Colorado130501 September 25, 1984 Mr. Rod Allison, Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services -915 10th Street reeiey, ,,., 8063 Re: Case n 5-2-41 :84: 12 - Theodore and Robert R-ademacher Dear Rod: Approxi-mately $D% -of this RID is located 'on soils considered to be prime farmland. The soil located along the boundaries of L-ots 2 and 3 of Block 1 , and Lots 2 and 3 of Block 2, has a seasonably high water table at 1/2 to 1-1/2 ft. depth. Potential frost action is high and its suitability for roads and streets is poor. Temporary and permanent erosion control is necessary and an Erosion Control Plan should the implemented. It is _urged that the development of final -storm water management plans by each lot is enforced and that runoff into the Bough Lateral is of no greater quantity or Lesser quality than historical . Sincerely, • Alva M. Dodd, Jr. President CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT (3) Trailer parks, -mobil-e homes and similar uses shall not le permitted in any designated floodway. (4) Any contemplated flood plain -encroachment or channelling shall be thoroughly -analyzed and its effect un stream flow determined before it is undertaken. Any construction, dumping, and -filling operations in a designated floodway constitutes an encroachment. (5) P'loodlands. No lot one (1) acre or less in area shall include floodlands. All lots more than one (1) acre shall contain not less than forty thousand (40,000) square feet of land which is at an elevation of the one hundred (100) year recurrence interval flood or, where such data is not available, five (5) feet above the elevation of the maximum flood of record. -12 Irrigation Ditches Existing irrigation ditches shall be incorporated within the subdivision plan in a -manner such that their function is not impaired. The ditches shall be protected from encroachment and may be _fenced in a manner acceptable to the -ditch company. 8-13 Abandoned Mines Building construction that occurs in areas of abandoned mines shall be approved by a professional engineer. 8-14 Subdividing or Planning All -ofParcel Where an entire parcel is not subdivided, the subdivider must indicate his intended plans for disposition of the remainder of the parcel. 8-15 -Public Sites and Open Spaces A. The _Planning Commission and the Board, upon consideration of vehicular traffic and facilities and the Particular type of development proposed in the subdivision, -may_ require the dedication, development, and/-or: reservation of areas or sites of a character, extent and location suitable for public use for parks, greenbelts, or other necessary public purposes, other than subdivision streets and utility easements designated in accordance with one of the following alternatives or es specified in the PUD plan: (1) The required acreage as may bE determined according to Section 8-15-B of the subdivision regulations shall be dedicated to a public agency for one or more -essential public purposes. Any area so dedicated shall be approved by the proper public agency and shall be maintained by the public agency. 52 (2) The required acreage as determined according to Section 8-15-B of the subdivision regulations may be reserved through deed restrictions as open area, the maintenance of which shall be -ensured by specific obligations in the deed of each lot within the subdivision. (3) In lieu of land there -may be required a payment to the County in an amount equal to the market value at the time of 1( final Plat submission of the required acreage as determined ��® / according to Section 8-15-B. Such value shall be determined ly a competent land appraiser chosen jointly by the Board / and the subdivider. The case collected shall be -deposit , in an escrow account to le expended for parks at a later_ Aate. ./% Required Acreage r� '\ % The am required-amount of land that may be ren d for public dedication, re ,er do , ^r . _ sl r = tO be 3 -dedication or reservation, shall be determined as follows: (1) For residential subdivisions: Required -Acreage = expected population x 10.5 1000 Expected population will be determined by the Planner as follows: Expected population shall be determined by multiplying the total number of units proposed for the subdivision by the average number of inhabitants per unit in -existing subdivisions of a similar character. • (2) For commercial or industrial subdivisions or portions of subdivisions: Required Acreage - Not less than five -percent (5%) nor more than twelve percent (12%) of the acreage of the -commercial or industrial portion of the subdivision. 8-16 Underground Utilities A. All electric and communication utility lines and services, and all street lighting circuits shall be installed underground, -except for the following: (1) Transformers, switching boxes, terminal boxes, meter cabinets, pedestals, ducts and other facilities necessarily appurtenant to such underground and street lighting facilities; (2) -All facilities reasonably necessary to connect underground facilities to existing or permitted overhead or above—ground facilities; 53 LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET October 9, 1984 CASE NUMBER: S-241:84:12 NAME: Ted and Robert Rademacher ADDRESS: 13774 I-25 Access Road, Longmont, Colorado REQUEST: A Final Planned Unit Development Plan on part of the N1 of Section 23, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately two miles southeast of Mead; east of the 1-25 Frontage Road and south of Weld County Road 32 SIZE OF PARCEL: 148 acres, more or less POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The duties of the Planning Commission are set forth in Section 28.3.2 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. A copy of this Section is attached to the Case Summary Sheet. The zone district was changed So Planned Unit _Development on February 29, 1984. The Final Planned Unit Development plan application allows the applicant to plat the Planned Unit Development District into lots, establish vehicular circulation, utilities, easements, -etc. The Utility Review Board is scheduled to review the application on October 71, 1984. 1'fie _Department of Planning Services has not received any objections to this proposal. RA:rg • 2g 3. PUD Plan 20-58 ij 28.3.2. 1 The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider a -PUD Tlan application. The Planning -Commission may review a PUD Plan -concurrently with applications for a change of zone to a PUD District; for any Overlay District Permit; or for a Supplemental District Regulation. If a PUD Plan is applied for concurrently with a 11 3UD District application in which the PUD Plan is to be located, the Planning Commission shall review the PUD District application prior to the I; PUD Plan application. The Planning Commission shall provide recommendations to the Board of pi County Commissioners concerning the disposition of the requested PUD Plan. Such recommendations shall be made within sixty (60) days of the initial hearing date. The Planning Commission -shall recommend approval of the request for the ?Wan url _. , -, It finds tliat - t ht ;. .. not met one or more of the appiicaole requirements or conditions of Sections 28.3.2. 1, 28.3 and 28.6. The applicant has the burden of proof to show that the standards and conditions of Sections 28.3.2, 28.5 and 28.6 are met. The applicant shall demonstrate: 28.3.2. 1. 1 That the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 28.3.2. 1.2 That the proposed PUD Plan conforms to the PUD District in which it is proposed to be located. 28.3.2. 1.3 That the USES, BUILDINGS, and STRUCTURES which would be permitted shall be compatible with the existing or future DEVELOPMENT of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning, and with the future DEVELOPMENT as projected by the COMPREHENSIVE PLAN or MASTER PLANS of affected municipalities. 28.3.2. 1.4 That there_ has been conformance with the Performance Standards outlined in Section 35.3. 28.3.2. 1.5 That there has been compliance with the -Weld County Zoning Ordinance, Section 50, Overlay Districts if the proposal is located within any Overlay District Area identified by maps • officially adopted by Weld County. 28.3.2. 1.6 That there has been compliance with the submittal requirements of the TUD Plan, and that the PUD Plat and the Supporting Documents satisfy the 1-egitimate concerns of the Planning Commission. 20-59 I' 28.3.2.2 The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall -forward the official recommendation of the Planning Commission and the information contained in the official record, which includes the Department of Planning Services case file, to the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) days after said recommendation has been made. 28.3.2.3 If the Planning Commission recommendation is conditional upon the applicant completing certain specified items prior to the publication of the notice for the hearing by the Board of County Commissioners, then the ten (10) day period shall 'commence upon submission of the items by the applicant to the Department of Planning Services. 28.4 Duties of the Office of the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners shall hold a public hearing to 'consider an application for a change of tone to a PUD District or -an application for a PUD Plan. The Board shall not approve any PUD application without written consent of the landowners whose properties are included within the proposed PUD District. 28.4.1 Change of Zone to a PUD District 28.4. 1.1 Upon receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation, the Office of the Board of County Commissioners shall institute the procedures contained in Section 21.-6. 1 of this Ordinance. 28.4. 1.2 The -Board of County Commissioners shall hold a public hearing to consider the application and to take final action thereon. The Board shall make a -decision on the application within sixty (60) days of the initial hearing date. In making a decision on the proposed change of zone, the Board shall consider the recommendation of the Planning Commission,- and from the facts presented at the public ; hearing and the information contained in the official record, which includes the Department of Planning Services case file, the Board of County Commissioners shall approve the request for the change of zone to a PUD District unless it -finds that the applicant has not met one or more -of the applicable requirements or conditions of Sections 28.4. 1. 2, 28.5 and 28.6. The applicant has the burden of proof to show that the standards and conditions of Sections 28.4. 1.2, 28.5 and 28.6 are met. The applicant shall demonstrate: 28.4. 1.2. 1 That the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. .Y 20-60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3. , � . J1 � nT. :[• .4 a i 20 5 � I• - - r it \•l• - GFE•i�j ;' I x r 11 • •¢fir• • L .. • • ,11 j; . : :Hs • rl-• •' qj . oE•AD . •.!1 ..L 4. il'3, 11 G -\Th I LeAlt '4 ')CL j ' 8▪ .. • 1 ' la. • Jek • 0 .4 . '5 li! -742:11\i44-2.4';Ic :.i F4 It..4 I' I. P r IS . .... . . . r ? ,\p, . is ...,c C :� I flj444gj2 • �1� 1 '{`In: .�°°°°1111j L• • /. EJ` ti • I - k 4.0 r.., 0, • • _ ��• / �•4•••x f•1 / •wi0•>!1(J/' V fA }q ( / •� 4� I 30 D D �o =• I =• x• E° • :sr „—xq i_• . x• T r o C x. x 7 2, I 143.9/00/I0., • lx » 1• • ) • iJ •> >• ,. •n0 C l s • I R4 l I g ,e .h- - `N /II �?.•I \ ." [_- "—` -,L ,I� ` ,,r, ` •• I . m�- ▪ ,_/ OeC i [ � . j , 4:2i,4 i • n E• 0' .ic ./ q x. l• zo x, �u i• x•�•, •r -• F :vi 1 f• of I 8•• !• jC ' z • _ ( t- G •� ^ z� F • • •-;1. I.', L N� ONE _-- '--la----a. ' '„�.'-'r."`.-"—� . ' 7.., 1 - y • .y i � P° °'ox• • ° xx �� •1 , 2 • Y (�i-{E O C' EVANSTON •a x• Y 1 (\/p 1 x z• �_1r kr• i•• x `•• • •. ,1 >•J v •• . . •• • • L I� A. puJ I702• •:4,1• r ? s •Vn •�.• r 21 z..• Nv•poA`oi8/ 1 L • •❑x s 3•p •i'-i �-1 • a si { DPAW':T. _•�s j.. / • • gNryx ( r Lg 1./ W4W X ,L �• 11 r~J , •z iJ �- $C ES 0• . • N•'� �� / 1 •� • /� ] 5. • 1� Tie: �• Pi - LfL± E± ru • •r � (/ •9••r^•4 + •• - j — • ••' I n °�� x 1j 2. ,7%'_,t • Ox� • 1 1 �r�•� • ,)• • + 1 • •, r' Orr°E` j xo / o s z•uu w =o x J z= *urrn i•••x • o x x• x == I � .."z r Iz• • •1 o,rr ••�• it 3•r. rENeE•6� 1• : ' I 7 •x• ' v n x 1. •�•• >o kfl' » 1ti : is• •• yo r Q lI• •1 O r] a l J �d., 'lY� 1• Iw `'f)1 •• I- r.E • . ,fl rx, �� a5E t , I ti . .i;,••• ,,I b•1 r . I i 1 v /� 'In .. - •• An• •ra N 1 /R 68�A! q L1 i/ ` d ^1 N "'N --'-( 1 N in \ I I c . ` 2.67 W R.66W L.Ny A A M S . i +°for o° •.,, '. . .•r• • I : • . l 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 11 21 23 25 27 29 31 3: SI t . ei r. - ' _. -..,..t..,.:., •.,mom.: q i { ,'. a 4- t 5 .. , , . rt 9lS Imo' w 7MS� • 5 Ifs . � ,- • *' + , a - w 3 iFF{ 4i Py m K{ { 3ta ., M i �� k Y' 4a p ., sµ x r k t t 1 'G� ', 2• 2 x. p 0ai cx x q ' 5 r•ry n 2 S C `'�`'�esye�aC• 4/ .. safe! r• y,, yY J • Y v ..+. ., •1.42 am S..sta. .-. 7X t + yv } .J� '414? yy#y t ` T �' _ r '9 ,\ +3 YFi Y M ' L , T �� '4 4 t"*'ti 2 t ,;ate ,, ,. . \:._.... , ' ,\ ) } //,yam/ R> •E--..,;:c..- ... � v tiff ; Pr°' '�} t v 5�'';: ' ' YS' '�•4x v+ { -t..*-o, ter _. i v • &. ,a y, it s • °''..'4‘..1*.,::::.'-;.;--:.--.....".�Jgyn., t' i d ��r" L - wk� 4b3 k.,' 4y Mt f x't Y5 l � 0 keI (ar________\:, y �� ° i. !0 �� o� /�� • 49/8 • �5�J\,� � � A \I soo M 4 �� ceao Lake 13 A ` 4879 ------/ ��/ Thomas �� --J1 m ono0 �� ,' �� _ /- �. 11 y • o . 4--.- -c�•-�:—.4 �, ,Pearl Howlett I �J O I I Mulligan ' 4-- ...-,i,_,,,./ v,, \ 41 - _ - Reservoir 22 t� 3 aso5� a /i ''I \ I to , \ ' \-( 'L-4--/ / -se erS4 ° 0, I o 7::::*::....: t� Sso B \ � X76 '� ' 'J! ° 1 a pi 271 � •:• J• w ? IIII• 1 < ' 26 �� "Ditch I Foster n \ � �� 1t rn q Reservoir / I ) II �r . - —5'..-- _ _ _ -----_—. r—— #fir C FIELD CHECK TILING NUMBER: Z-397:83:12 DATE OF INSPECTION: December 22, 1983 NAME: Robert and Theodore Rademacher REQUEST: Change of Zone from "A" Commercial/ (Agricultural) to "PUD" (Planned Unit Development: • ) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: part of the Northwest 1/4, see 21. PIN RARW Of gr17 P M wi d County 1-AND USE: NWCR 32, 2 farm residences, 1 residence, pasture, cropland, 8 residences to NE . WCR 9-1/2, irrigated cropland, Baugh lateral ditch, tank battery, farm E _residence, farm residence to SE. Sekich Business Park (cropland, vacant lots, 4 businesses) , tank battery, S Highway 66, Sekich Equipment Co. . 7 residences, cropland . S-25 frontage road (paved) , I-25, tank battery, 4 residences, mobile home, Wfargresidence" Mulligan Reservoir ZONING: N Agricultural LOCATION: Approximately 2 miles southeast of E Agricultural Mead; south of WCR 32 and east of I-25 S PUD, C-3, Agricultural W Agricultural COMMENTS: Subject site slopes toward the northeast and is irrigated cropland. -Improvements on the 148 acre parcel include a residence, two garages, two box cars for a shelter, silo, corrals and an outbuilding. Access is to either WCR 9-14 and WCR 32, (both gravel) or to the I-25 Frontage Road (paved) . At least ninety percent (90%) of the site is classified prime farmland by the Soil Conservatior Service. -The Sekich Business Park which is immediately south of this proposal has been platted for a maximum of twenty-two (22) lots. Four businesses currently exist in the Sekich Business Park; Essex Crane Rental Corporation, American Fertilizer and Chemical Company, Prancon and Arkansas Valley Seed, Inc. BY: a Michael S. Mullen, Current Planner MSM:dg PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION • Department of Planning Services, 915 — 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado PHONE: 356-4000 Ext. 4400 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NO. APPL. FEE ZONING DISTRICT PUO _ DATE G, RECORDING FEE_ RECEIPT NO. APPL. CHECKED BY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures) : I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning proposed subdivision of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County. -LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N 1V2 zrc TON 23 TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH , a rite Se) WEST of 7R 6071-/ PM.) WEL.° CooNTY CoLORA-Po (If additional space is required, attach -an additional sheet of this same size. ) NAME OF _PROPOSED P.U.D. SUBDIVISION �w EXISTING _ZONING p�t� T Av1�I ,Si..� I e! __twit /r^ TOTAL AREA (ACRES) (L�.B NO. OF PROPOSED LOTS v LOT SIZE: AVERAGE LJ. rj MINIMUM �g UTILITIES: WATER: NAME LI7'i1..E TY1oMPSdN WATER otergiCT SEWER: NAME I`t/A GAS: NAME R444 EAGTEg PLFEUM,E W . _PHONE: NAME HaiN,-yI-t� DISTRICTS: SCHOOL: NAME TIRE: NAME L.0N cIyr• FIRE fiesninTLoN DISneCr DESIGNERS' NAME Se.e 5446IN GSR ADDRESS PHONE ENGINEERS' NAME MG(A4L2TM e,Nameg NC3 Cp/ t,4gA.�.I7g NFL ADDRESS 1O -3gQ eive. PHONE-]12- 77 w5 FEE OWNER OF AREA PROPOSED FOR P.U.D. SUBDIVISION NAME Rbeeler R4ce M -ER AC# ADDRESS t311 r}. ..r-251 ACCESS RD. PHONE ',3C , 44IC� NAME ThEDDo(Ze f?4OEMAck 9R ADDRESS Yes M THE- _A es ROAD PHONE NAMErJ 3r7'' 4� I q ADDRESS PHONE I hereby depose and state under the penalties of -perjury that all statements, proposals' and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the -best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO ) S' nature: Dwne f Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to _before me this j4 nay of Sgf ILMgg , 19c 4. SEAL � ��. C\ N ARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Myrommi.sder, ._,. 1 Feb 1$ wale 8.04-79-D26 WCDPS-78-1 i 0 // ,- ::.'a 11 y{� 4,.. 7. ,� DEPAIP T.•AENTOF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE 1303) 3564000 Ext-4400 = ;�. e 91510TH STREET :7,11, GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 x 't COLORADO NOTICE OF -PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public tearing on October 16, 1984 at 1:30 P.M. to review a request for approval of a Final Plan for a Commercial and Industrial Planned Unit Development (P.U.D. ) from Theodore and Robert Rademacher on a parcel. of land described as part of the N';, Section 23, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado containing 148 acres, more or less. This public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the consideration of the above ref-erenced request will be conducted in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or obj-ections related to the above request should -be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 10th • Street, Thom 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on October 16, 1984 Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado (33611000, Extension 4400) . Bob Ehrlich, Chairman - Weld County Planning Commission To be published in the: La Salle Leader -Po be published one (1) time by: October 4, 1-984 Receive Date: j�- — � r REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: Theodore and Robert Rademacher CASE NUMBER: S-241:84:72 SENT REFERRALS OUT: September 20, 1984, REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY October 4 1984 01 m z z CO o rn 0 z H z H o H W o H W H -_: Cn H ¢ vC CI U o z O U U Q 0 W H W P W H W G ti W A. CC H W U w H -'. W M H <. M 0 0 0 r= o c 9 x W U W SJ z f z z ' 0 m z z I County Attorney (plat only) 1 Town of Mead . r Attn: Diane Hod2es X q ( RX ! I i Mead, Colorado 80542 Ip ; Engineering Department 6 XX ? Soil Conservation Service �'— '{ county Extension Agent / 3 ( 9595 Nelson -Road IV , i2.O. Box D I' —? Longmont, Colorado 80501 ! Office of Emergency Managements ( Longmont Fire District , A/ � c/o Fire Chief Biewieler i 1f9119 County Line Road ;�� Colorado Geological Survey I-Longmont, Colorado 80501 ` I Attn: Julia Turney i ' 1313 Merman Street ! Panhandle Eastern Pipe -Line Co. Room 703 ^ Attn. Owen Jones Denver, Colorado 80203 635 North 7th Avenue P.O. Box 127 State Engineer Brighton, Colorado 80601 :Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman St. , -Room 818 Stephen Hamilton Denver, Colorado -80203 . Planning Commission Member 4020 Weld County Road 5 State Highway Department Erie, Colorado 80516 / XX 1420 2nd Street (-Case is a conflict of interes' Greeley, Colorado 80631 for Louis Rademacher) Colorado Department or. Health Baugh Lateral Ditch and Reservoi. Water Quality Control Division A' Company 4210 East 11th Avenue /I Attn: Zarry Sieckman Denver, Colorado 80220 P.O. Box 209 Longmont, Colorado 80501 XX Little Thompson Water District Attn: John M. Gruner 307 Welch Avenue Berthoud, Colorado 80313 LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT DIRECTORS September 26, 1984 Carey) Salomonson Telephone 532-2096 President307 Welch Avenue Charles Allen []rawer G Leo©axel -Berthoud.Colorado 80513 Par Dorsey Davie McGee E.Thomas Ficord Dean Anderson MANAGER John M Owner Mr. Rod Allison Current Planner II Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado, 80631 Dear rir. Allison: This letter is in response to the Referral on the Final Plan for a Commercial and Industrial -UD in the case of Theodore and Robert Rademacher. The Little Thompson Water District has no objection to the application, subject to the Developers agreeing to: 1) Abiding by all rules and regulations of the District. 2) Providing any and all main line extensions deemed necessary by the District to provide adequater water service for the project. Should you require any additional information relative to this request, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Sincerely yours, -1----4$14‘41N JO M. GRUNER, Manager c-m n ��'JJJJ/' CD jr dim j '-- ,— Ii( l_\iii 22, _- �:) i�8't IJ I kid Co. Planning ✓J� Commission • � LONGMONT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT -4, % -9119 Countyline Rd., Longmont, CO B0501 (303) 772-0710 9p°rec,urn-, September 17, 1984 Mr. Jon Zimmerman McCarty Engineering Consultants, Inc. 703 Third Avenue Longmont, Colorado, 80501 Dear Mr. Zimmerman: The L-ongmont Fire Protection District conditionally approves the :ade:tackler —Business Park DUI) at 1-25 East Frontage Rca;: ana WCRi*32 as follows: 1. An -adequate water supply is -provided -and maintained for fire protection — to be determined by I.S.O. or equivalent engineering -studies. 2. An underground distribution system installed with fire hydrants attached. tIydrant spacing not to exceed 6w feet. 3. Water pressure within the distribution system shall be maintained at a minimum residual pressure of 20 to 30 psi. 4. Other requirements for a water supply as called for in Weld County Subdivisi-on Regulaticns — Section 8 _Design Standards; Para 8-10 Water Supply and Section 10.301 & 10.302 of the Uniform Fire Code 1982 Edition. wa t arson Captain/Fire Marshal WRE/wre CC: Board of Directors ( 5) Board Secretary/Attorney ( 1) Chief (1) Filz (3) ' r a Longmont Soil Conservation District 9595 Nelson Road, Box D - Longmont, Colorado 80501 September 25, 1984 Mr. Rod Allison, Planner Weld County -Department of -Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case $ S-241 :84: 12 - Theodore and Robert Rademacher Dear Rod: Approximately 80% of this PUD is Located on soils considered to be prime farmland. The soil Located along the boundaries of Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1 , and Lots 2 and 3 of Block 2, has a Seasonably high water table at 1/2 to 1-1/2 ft. depth. Potential frost action is high and its suitability for roads and streets is poor. Temporary and permanent -erosion control is necessary and an Erosion Control Plan should be implemented. It k urged that -the development of final storm water management plans by each tat is enforced and that runoff into the Bough Lateral is of no greater quantity or lesser quality than historical . Sincerely, . ,21YL, 922. tie/. , Alva M. Dodd, Jr. President CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY P. 0. BOX 127 BRIGHTON, COLOR-ADO -80601 September 27, 1984 Mr. Rod Allison Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 20631 Dear Mr. -Rod Allison: This letter is for information ronardino case ft5-241:84:12. maintain an easement 50 f-eet in width, being 23 i-eet on taco sine of the pipeline. No structures will be allowed on Right-of-Way; however, we do not have -any problems with roadways, utility crossings, or fences crossing the pipeline to near right angles. Roadways maybe parallel, no closer than 10 feet. We do request that if any digging or excavating is planned, please call us -at least 48 hours in advance and a fieldman will locate our facilities. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to -call me at 659-5922. • Sincerely, Pr Ken 17. Neff Right-of-Way -Representative KJN/gw xc: File NZMcCARTY ENGINCEERING . CONSULTANTS, IN . 1RADEMACHER BUSINESS PART. SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS a. Due to the non-residential nature of this development, no lands will be set aside for public dedication. The interior road system is intended to be dedicated to the -county, upone compliance with all applicable design and construction standards and acceptance. b. Not applicable. c. See enclosed Certificate from County Treasurer. d. See engineer' s seal on Utility Plan. e. See enclosed deed. f. There are no restrict ions. All uses allowed under the category Industrial/Commercial P. U. D. are applicable. q. The Improvements Agreement will be provided prior to recording the Final Plat. h. The architectural style of the buildings on each lot will be determined by the owners of each lot. The buildings in the Rademacher Business Park should be expected to be similar in -character t!o those of comparable business parks. Designs will range from custom architectural projects to standardized prefab metal buildings. i. The uses made of the individual lots will be described with each recorded plat as each lot is sold. J. Screening, buffering, and landscaping will be provided on a lot by lot basis. Individual lots will comply with -the applicable requirements for each site plan. k. No common open space will be provided. 1. -Easements and rights-of-way are as shown: on the Final Plat. m. Not applicable. 703 THIRD AVENUE • LONGMONT,CO•772-7755/449-4373 n. It is expected that construct ion will commence in the Spring afi 1985. Development is planned over a three year period, with 3 buildings in the first year, 9 buildings in the second year, and 12 buildings in the third year. o. Project financing will take place through a line of credit established with the Rademacher _Brother' s lending institution. Construction cost estimates will be provided upon cr'rnpletic.n and analysis rif soil. tests. -Analysis of these tests will determine irhe roadway sections required to conform with established engineering pract ic-es. p. Required approvals will be as per the Utility Sign-off Sheet. q. See -the utility plan as part of the Construct ion Documents. r. See enclosed geologic information. s. _See enclosed am eernent. t. Eee rrcl'_ised drainage report and construction _document . u. See :construction do-cuments. Pavement design computations will be provided irpon analysis of soil test -data. v. Highway access permits will be provided after completion of soil tests and pavement calculations. w. The proposed development consists of twenty-four lots, comprizing a -total of 134. 431 acres, with an average lot size of ;. S acres. Specific information regarding individual building type, size, parking, and additional information wild be provided on a l+'t by lot basis, as lots are sold and developed. x. See enclosed list of property owners. y. See enclosed list of mineral owners and lessees. z. See enclosed traffic study. sou Recorded a o'clock_ / M s�af� JUN 17 1977 Sd30 Reception No 17e,n2•i•; / Amy ANN Ha. EIN -Recorder. i � A. DEED, Made this 17th day of June , 1977 , I ;i LOUIS J. RADEMACHER AND FRANCIS J. RADEMACHER between (Husband and Wife), and EDWARD C. RADEMACHER AND MAGDALEN RADEMACHER (Husband and Wife) - of the 'Y—c yy CLc /''e c E �r:r f..;...:t r2a.. _ County of I'Jel d and state of Colorado,of the first part,and ROBERT M. -RADEMACHER-AND JANICE M. c;-� RADEMACHER (Husband and Wife) and THEODORE A. RADAMACHER. r� wilY5Mfl/'MPPN*fPA1 a single person c_ of the County of Weld and state of Colorado,of the second part, n W ITNESSETH,That the said part j es of the first part,for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION DOLLARS, H to the said part i es of the first part in hand paid by the said part i es of the second part, the receipt whereof 'O is hereby confessed and acmnwledged, ha Ie remised, rclursed, 'old, conveyed and QUIT CLAIMED, and by N I these presents do remise, release, sell, convey and QUIT CLAIM unto the said part ieS of the second-part, their heirs,successors and assigns,forever,all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said part 1e5 of the first part ha ye in and to the following described lot or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the County of Weld andState of Colorado, to wit: The N!z of Section 23, Township 3 North, Range-68 West of the 6th P.M. , WELD -COUNTY, COLORADO, 7.1 .1 See attached_Exhibit A. II it I�I it also known as street and number To DAVE AND TO IIOLD the same,together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging or in anywise thereunto appertaining,and all the estate,right,title,interest and claim whatsoever, of the said part 1eS of the first part, either in law or equity, to the only proper use,benefit and behoof of the said I part ley of the second part, their heirs and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WFIEREOF,The said pmt ies of the first part have hereunto set thei rhands and seal 5 the day and year first above written. ri c,.:. d ��h.r�=r- r - [SEAL] Signed,Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of Louis J. Rademacher,, Husband j ...rrvl rr t.. Cj.•. !r_fl. %.�..' [SEAL) Francis J. ('ademacher, Wife C, G'1- s.-'- ;' •`.�4 P..L..2Tv< C.'c' [SEAL) Edward C. Rademacher, Husband [SEAL] • Magdalen R.;...'. Magdalen Rademacher, Wife STATE OF COLORADO, County of }99 the foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of June 19 // _by' Louis J. Rademacher and Francis J. Rademacher, as Husband and !'life, and Edward C. Rademacher and Magdalen Rademacher, as Husband and Wife. My commission expires , 19 .Witness my hand and official seal. My Con•mie:ion Expires 12-15 a0 / - QyYcoaN • t Notary Public. = n' 4 1 _1 ( No.933.QUIT CLAIM DEED.—arsdrord PublifMeehnp'iazt-16 Stout Street.Denver.Colorado—1-77 SOILS ANALYSIS Rademacher Business Park, Weld County, Color-ado Located in the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, T3N, R68W of the 6th -P .M. , Weld County, Colorado, the -Rademacher property consists primarily of Wiley Colby Complex and 3Cim Loam soil types . The general soil types ar-e of Eolian deposit . There are seven basic soil types listed in order of a relative percent average of this property: 65% Wiley Colby Complex 13% Kim Loam 9% Kim Loam 6% Kim Loam 5% Aquolls & Aquepts 1% Nunn Clay Loam 1% Nunn Clay Loam -The Wiley Colby Complex soils are nearly level , loamy plains and range site types , consisting of 60% Wiley soil , 30% Colby soil, and 10% Heldt Clay & Weld -Loam. The soil is generally deep and well—drained with moderate permeability, medium surface runoff and moderat-e -erosion characteristics . The soil is generally well suit-ed for landscaping and environmental planting. Bedrock is at a depth of approximately feet . Moderate to low shrink/swell soil characteristics exist throughout the site . The Wiley Colby Complex and other soil types present provide a moderate to good potential for urban and recreational development . Sanitary Facilities Good to moderate perc rates can be found throughout the site as calculations indicate ranges from 40 mpi to 20 mpi . There ar-e no plans for utililization of -a County or Municipal sewer system. The developers of each commercial lot on this property will be responsible for having an engineered Individual Sewage Disposal System on their property. It is expected that anticipat-ed business-use sewage flow requirements can be accommodat-ed . This , however , will be determined as geotechnical investigations are conducted for each lot and individual needs can be assessed . SKETCH PLAN DFSIGN NARRATIVE The Rademacher Business Park is conceived as a facility _for light commercial and industrial firms ccrvici-ng the Denver to Fort Collins front range area . It is the intent of the developer to ultimately sell out his entire interest in the property. The ability to attract potential buyers and plan individual sites is first a matter of obtaining the required change _from existing -agricultural zoning to commercial - industrial PUD. Although no individual lots may yet be offered, it was deemed necessary to show potential lot and block configurations to illustrate how development could take place . It would be best to be able to develop the parcel with the largest possible lots . This would diminish overall service requirements and reduce the number of individual transactions . Nevertheless , the plan must be designed to allow for the possible -necessity for a maximum number of lots . Two schemes have been presented . One scheme shows three major block areas, while the other breaks the three blocks into separate lots . These lot configurations are presented as a possible outcome , not as a request for individual platting . It is requested, then, that a certain flexibility in lot design be permitted to allow the developer to pursue the layout most suitable to meet market conditions, while responding to issues raised by a maximum lot situation . The Lot scheme as shown includes 22 lots with an average lot size of 6 . 439 acres and -a maximum/minimum spread from 12 . 75 acres to 4 .4 acres . At a maximum 25 lot configuration, the average lot size would be 5 .67 acres . Roads and Foundations Although the site provides conditions of general suitability, there may be localized characteristics of shrink/swell conditions and reduced soil bearing capacities . Grade beams with caissons to bedrock can be engineered to meet foundation requirements , and cross sectional road base configurations tan be designed to meet each condition . Analysis of leotechnical investigations will provide the data for proper design and engineering . Storm Water Management Since the predominant soils experience moderate to high seepage rates , detention or retention facilities will not be bermed up, but dug below existing grade . Erosion should not be a problem with relatively stable soil conditions . Grass swales would be an acceptable means of transporting storm water . August 31 , 1984 Mr. Rod Allison, Planner Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Rademacher Business Park Traffic Study Dear Rod : The following information addresses the requirement for submitt-al of a traffic study as a condition of the zoning change process. The proposed development consists of twenty-four lots, comprising a total of 134. 431 acres, with an average lot size of 5. 6 acres. All access to the development is by way of an internal circulation loop abutting the frontage road at two points. There is no direct access to either Weld County Roads 32 or 9-1/2. This development is approximately 1/2 mile North of the State Highway 66 and 1-25 interchange. South of -the Rademacher property and contiguous to it 1 ies the Sekich Business Park, wh''se South property line abuts Highway 66. South crf Highway 66 are additional Sekich properties which include a restaurant and farm equipment store. Future development in this area may include the Colorado jockey Club project, approximately a mile to the South. Traffic impact studies, submitted by the Jockey Club' s engineer, are being studied now by the State Highway Department. Impact studies regarding the Sekich property have been in the possession of the Weld County Planning Department for, some time. Traffic impact study assumptions„ concerning the Rademacher Business Park, have been discussed and reached jointly with myself and Transportation Specialists Charles D. Petersen and Robert Tenney of the State Highway Department, Division of Transport a_ i_,n Planning, Denver, Colorado. These assumptions involve the use of trio generation criteria of 5. 6 and 1. 3 trips per acre for peak afternoon hour flows for exit and entry respectively. These factors were selected as minimums, due to the fact that this area was considered relatively remote from highly developed industrial areas. It was then decided that, of the total number of trips generated, 80% of the traffic exiting Rademach-er Business Park would turn South on the frontage road, toward Highway 6-6. This traffic was then apportioned according to percentages of circulation turning East, South, and West. The westerly traffic was then _diviaied into circulat ion exiting South or North tin 1-25, or continuing West on Highway 66 toward Longmont. The impact of the Rademacher Business -Park has been shown to Jpe minimal, particularly in regard to existing flow rates at the ramps from Highway 66 to 1—€5. The flow rate is approximately 1100 cars per hour which is an existing, not maximum, ramp capacity. What becomes clear is that tyre sigrlificarlt impactor of this interchange would be the project proposed ±ly the Jockey Club. . Their traffic engineering study -suggested the improvement of the bridge -acres 1-25 tom' a four large road between the North and _South exits onto 1-25 from Highway -66. If this were to take place, traffic impacts from the Rademacher Business Park would be insigna.ficant. We have -been in conference with the Colorado State Highway Department offices in Greeley and Denver, as well as your own, and feel that we have -satisfied both the ].matter acrd the spirit of the traffic study requirements imposed during the ::onirng change process. The enclosed traffic impact diagram, generated with the help of Chuck Petersen and Bob Tenney will give you a more detailed analysis -of traffic flow. Please feel free tom' contact me with any comments or questions. Sincerely, McCarty Engineering Consultants, In-c. Jon Zimmerman Project Manager JZ/srn Encl. cc: Wally Jacobsen Robert Tenney Robert Rademacher File #1447-1 3o I15o 1t 7s( tet 375 t r% 2 m1 kit.' 375 RAC7EHAGHEI ? , _ P U51 NE PARK 3)o 134,4 1-0-(41, 1_1\ 743; • 1.Or ACRES N ASSUMPTIONS ill lit AF? RHmH PEAK 11O1-1 Rd.)/ Flaw 1 2. fM EXIT= 6.(4,TRiP5/AG, 3. PM E N?EIZ= 1.3 " " V 6co 11L 114O KIGt4) \50. i;54)7, X170 2 (It) F-�-lr5� rlI6NIWAY Co& N0RTH 5o 5;V/, ° to (SEKIGH) y 215 -171 25 PR0PDe-E'0 JOGKE`f Gt.U2� 4, RADEMACFIER BUSINESS PARK TRAFFIC IMP-ACT IV/1R/IcCARTY ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. 703 3RD AVENUE LONDMONT, COLORADO 00501 770-7766 METRO 4494373 JOB NO r,Cf(. 'DATE 2.Z -Y' SHEET OF NAB', F OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITN•IN` BEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS , TOWN/CITY , ASSESSOR' S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE • IDENTIFICATION # Robert M. & Dorthy I. Burch 4525 Weld Co Rd. 32 6212071 +000009 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Joesph W. & Patricia A. Harper 4519 Weld Co Rd. 32 62120714000013 Longmont, Colorado 8_0501 Wyco Pipe Line Company State Assessed 62120714000021 Donald C. Hilgers 436 West Main 62120722000021 Barrington, Ill 6001U Donald D. McIntyre & Dorthy R. Route 1 Box 168D 62120714000023 Longmont, Colorado 60501 Glen S. Douthi-t c/o Greeley P.O. Box 1098 62106135000001 National Sank 1"rustee Greeley, Colorado 806if Mary Emily Benson & Frances P.O. Box 133 62120723000011 Woods Loveland, Loiorado 80537 Public Service Company of State Assessed 26120713000076 • Culuradu Valley 66 32 W. Randolph St Suite 1818 62120727000013 Chicago I11 60601 Robert J. Camenisch 4513 Weld Co Rd. 32 62120714000017 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Mountain States Telephone & P.O. Box 960 62120722000020 lelegraph company Denver, Colorado 80201 Fredrick M. , Donna S. ,Nucgikas P.O. Box 508 62120726000026 J. , and Karen S. 3eklcfi Longmont, Colorado 805-01 Phillip J. & Sally K. Seitz 7814 Elmwood Place 62120714000022 Denver, Colorado 80221 Robert M. , Janice M. , and 14599 Weld County Rd. 9 1/2 62170773.00.0001— theodore N. Rademacher Longmont, Colorado 80501 Nf 1f OWNERS OF PROPERTY WililI :ELT Phase print or type NAME ADDRESS , TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR' S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP £ODE IDENTIFICATION if Sekich Farms 6500 Weld Co -Rd. 32 62120723000039 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Jim H. & Lynda McKinstry 3750 Weld Co Rd. 32 621207220000_022 Longmont, Colorado 80501 Albert D. Kurtz 13634 Rd 17 62120723000032 Platteville, Culuiadu 130651 Mary R. Peters & Daughters 832 Lincoln 62120715000029 Lougmuut, Colorado 130501 Edward & Magoalen Rademacher 13322 Weld Co Rd. 1 62120723000006 an e er eew • Mineral Owners MAILING LIST Z-397 Robert & Theodore Rademacher St. Vrain Land Company 666 Omaha National Bank Building Omaha, Nebraska 68102 T.S. Pace 318 Patterson Building Denver, CO 80202 Morris and Marion Nichols 5180 N. Wishon, Apt. 303 Fresno, CA 93704 RADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK t a ONSULTANTS, INC ING TABLE OF CONTENTS Agenda Region Map Vicinity Map Landowners Map Letters from Landowners Letters from Potential Buyers Responses from Reviewing Agencies EE N -CONSUL AN S, INC. RADEMACHER AGENDA Weld County Board of Commissioners 2 :00 P.-M. , Wednesday, February 29, 1984 I. Weld County Planning Staff: Presentation to Commissioners II. Jon Zimmerman, McCarty Engineering: Introductory presentation A. Background issues 1. Comprehensive Plan 2. Agricultural Land 3. The Market 4. Traffic B. Patterns of development C. Sekich precedent D. K & C Motors E. Race Track F. Changing conditions III . Tom Hellerich, Hellerich and Lazar, Attorneys A. Conformance with Weld County Comprehensive Plan B. Compatibility with surrounding land uses. IV. Rademacher' s Presentation A. Non-profitability of farming/changing conditions B. Right to use land/right to make decisions/risks C. Presentation of letters from landowners/neighbors D. Introduction of potential buyers V. Ken Williamson - existing and potential buyer VI. Don Morgan - potential buyer VII. Wally Armstead - marketing for Rademachers 7O3 nem~MU. ummotvionrr,no•77R••77156/446-4373 VIII. John McCarty, McCarty Engineering Consultants - summation and conclusion . A. Comprehensive plan - flexibility, changing conditions, and County Commissioners comments B. Agricultural land - farmland not profitable C. The market D. Traffic - problem doss not exist E . Consequence of disapproval 1 . Lost taxes 2 . Hardship to Rademachers 3 . Re-application 4 . Existing precedents 5 . Continuing problem F . Closing statement IX. Distribute Information Packets to Board X. Questions . .. ed I-earner Lakes The Forks! ( • V V t Log Cabigetrel e I. over'r . .r` CRADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK . - id•ewiId tic re REGION MAP '°- - \\ '.2_1--..Z,2.--•-.•.*•.7R-- Lf�l - - rrr .. yT„r• McCiellands ! "o or r -a ' - _ Me• noven en a Winc �� • W' -sonvidle i'- Deerki•,e . ! 'erne I t t G.?i uu ! r Estes .k iroke a `. ♦r 263 4"I .. t,ar,c `— it.. Gorden Ci•- 3: Gt -raise' 1 ;c- Campion a�� ' Evans ,- R°se cif� �� PcrL. 7 Firewood ' 1_ � . i?,, 1. 5ell� 7 S61 Joan to* Bed t-..uuc . L �• et nom inC C e iJ • 'Meeker Pcr:- I E I +*ilc. 5! - J �, Lyons ( C • _ _ of ,Y,e +r Ali- spark rr Rev r •;! iovevill ry side 7 n•J t 4 Hy` 1 Proceiul J. estown f Volley 7i`�], • r t v limc�! loge . r • _ • ''Y -��1 !• II• _ n..�1o� jne5burc; J Word 4�� ran e;en� f n3-flint (1 7C0 l p( I` ; Dccono // For: L ,tor. sl, _ • e . Sur - . =cL. .t �" r.R$ _.. lOSt. Vra• t ` r ascr. ~'r ... ibou l v:a.•r. • L 1 Wo• -nbe'6 •Tung -or. r �- cl?oro Pin di'.di'. _ He �• / BR HTO } -Moro Superior ' eo` ae cc I — 5[ y e• —SP M .1"1- +D. 4.� i .• rri-a r rG �dero rj •Hendry' ti • iDRh'C!U e-•A: .e Block •- CII/ETC-MINISTER 'We\b - �' E •s `,owk - ISTER c uerby ! vet: . / N SIT �-.•1 Ada .5 {�'{� y F { t rkins a . •▪C-r ,r _, • Spring_ • ec - '�.�)' 2i.• .-.. S ^ �� [- tSouas . . -rcan!}r�^: Meta. ..__ /U the Lor, Broow re .. ri-_� - R A -� C ' EE dEM . r En �EWO I flint w,u:hen LITTLETO ° Tiny I ewp ' I r :line%r::c.cK) -. •i — r-----.w.-- • RADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK VICINITY MAP a 'I - �- ��... �• --L_-_ CO. RD. X 2 in �j i of . �isAri IR 22 �� li W / I- 6- • \N• 23 `� o- i i STATE HIGHWAY Cab - LANDOWNERS ADJACENT TO z-ti = RADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK �e Mead, G -:l I S P 1 9u - J. -TL•�,.� •_ ___•______„_ _ ____ y,'SO 0, , •-_ 916 \ la — �.__-. 1 \ ; - -! tt. - O'—� _ O' j - 1 Lake 10, Thomas 3 l '" ✓ ] ,,...--• 1 'A 16 "52' T �j t' Pear al• .5�-i _ _ :'�a �' (091]i 4. . - ' -„..., _ Z. P 14 - i Mulligan St x(17. Reserroir 2 o i lb I 0 8 • •' 2 i LI:I"-.' 5009 C � ` • " \ /b �8 - I ��ve• \ LMv' z 1. McIntyre ,. _ I o\, /12 11 2- Hilgers' 3 . Peters 4 . McKinstry 27 5 . Stevenson O1. C 26 - '7 6 . Korey Foster . Camenisch I 8 . Sekich / -- 9. Benson I o«" Reservoir 10 . Burch �a9 �;. r 11. Rademat 12 . Rademacher 13 . K s C _ 14943 '_f- - _ _ - - _ ' — •069714 . • ReYnoids_ . _ `f a` ' ' -`-- • - -15:� Edminston 0z 'a \ I 16. Makings bZ ~ 17. Rademacher :o d v n' - JJ \ n � - � _ Rademacher Brothers 14599 Weld County Rd. 9ii Longmont, CO 80501 Mr. and Mrs. McIntyre : We are in the process of trying to zone 148 acres from "A" (Agricultui-al) to "PUD" (Planned Unit Development) ; (Commercial/Industrial) Pt. Nk, Section 23, T3N , R68W , of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado. This area is located approximately two miles southeast of lead; south of 'geld County Road 32 and east of I-25. It would be helpful to us as our neighbor if you are not opposed to the proposed rezoning of this area, to sign where indicated below and return in the enclosed envelope as soon as possible. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours , 15o-e'An - Bob Rademacher ( Ted Rademacher �� l-i-c��.2` f n Jr L. 9 - 26,,L.:-,al.,- /` , ) ,.l -'moty ,,X.. 'ignature '' ,1(2/1 -CL wJ , Xi / "T Date il Rademacher Brothers 14599 Veld County Rd. 91 Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mr. Hilgers : We are in the process -of trying to zone 148 acres from "A" (Agricultu:-al) to "PUD" (Planned Unit Development) : (Commercial/Industrial) Pt. NW*, Section 23, T3N, R68W, of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. This area is located approximately two miles southeast of Mead= south of Weld County Road 32 and east of I-23. It would be helpful to us as our neighbor if you are not opposed to the proposed rezoning of this area, to sign where indicated below and return in the enclosed envelope as soon as possible . Thank you for your prompt attention to -this matter. Very truly yours, 3 /9 47 61-64- Bob Rademacher Ted Rademacher te/deY77 /»sue eo Signaty' Rademacher Brothers 14599 Weld County Rd. 9z Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mrs. Peters: We are in the process of trying to zone 148 acres from "A" (Agricultural) to "PUD" (Planned Unit Development) : (Commercial/Industrial) Pt. NW*, Section 23, T3N , R68W, of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. This area is located approximately two miles southeast of ICeadt south of Weld County Road 32 and east of I-25. It would be helpful to us as our neighbor if you are not opposed to the proposed rezoning of this area, to sign where indicated below and return in the enclosed envelope as soon as possible. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours , C Bob Rademacher Ted Rademacher I cv A Signature ;L `9 Date Rademacher Brothers 14599 Weld County Rd. 9z Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mr. & Mrs. McKinstry: We are in the process of trying to zone 148 acres from "A" (Agrirultu_-al) to "PUD" (Planned Unit Development) : (Commercial/Industrial) Pt. NW*, Section 23, T3N, R68W, of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado. This area is located approximately two miles southeast of ICead; south of Weld County Road 32 and east of I-25. It would te helpful to us as our neighbor if you are not opposed to the proposed rezoning of this area, to sign where indicated below and return in the enclosed envelope as soon as possible. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours, B -6 ✓I GtG`f1-=yr.-C ..._ Bob Rademacher Ted Rademacher t %- e Signature Date Ni I /; yt Rademacher Brothers 14599 Weld County Rd. 9i Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mr. Douthit: We are in the process of trying to zone 148 acres from "A" (Agricultural) to "PUD" (Planned Unit Development) : (Commercial/Industrial) Pt. NW*, Section 23, T3N, R68W, of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado. This area is located approximately two miles southeast of Lead; south of Weld County Road 32 and east of I-25. It would to helpful to us as our neighbor if you are not opposed to the proposed rezoning of this area, to sign where indicated below and return in the enclosed envelope as soon as possible. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours, v —Le-rw: 1ii Bob Rademacher Ted Rademacher Signature a-' l- 30 -Pv Date Rademacher Brothers 14599 1:eld County Rd. 9i Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Eddie, Maggy & Pete : We are in the process of trying to zone 148 acres from "A" (Agricultural) to "PL'D" ( Planned Unit Development) : (Commercial/Industrial) Pt. NWi, Section 23, T3N, R68W, of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado. This area is located approximately two miles south-east of Mead; south of Weld County Road 32 and east of I-25. It would be helpful to us as our neighbor if you are not opposed to the proposed rezoning of this area, to sign where indicated below and return in the enclosed envelope as soon as possible. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yours, PrIef / Y'.'LLZC/ -✓ate c . Bob Rademacher Ted Rademacher S gnature Date i:enneth A. & Connie S. Williamson D:3A K 3c Development Co. 2250 V. main St . Longmont, Co. 80501 2/6/84 Theodore A. Rademacher Janice G. Rademacher Robert M. Rademacher 13774 I-25 Access Road Longmont, Co. 80501 Please consider this letter as a request for a six month option on the following real estates Approximately 7.2 acres north of present ten acres with frontage on I-25 frontage road, price - :250, 000 Approximately 9 acres east of present ten acres, price - .135 , 000 This option would have the following contingencies : a) That the land named above be zoned C3 b) That financing is available to the purchaser Please advise within ten days . If these conditions are acceptable, please issue us a receipt and option contract. jin rely, • Kenneth A. Williamson ce- LL` (72 -7 onnie S. :Jilliamson L BEAR SEAR un S ALINEMENT, INC. STUART(STU) LOSEY 510 2nd Avenue CV UNREIN President Longmont, Colorado 80501 service manager 776- 1014 December 14, 1983 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I am presently the owner of a wheel alignment business operating under the name S 8 F BEAR ALINEMENT, INC. in Longmont, Colorado. I have met with the Rademachers and have reviewed their plans and ideas for a Commercial PUD along the East side of 1-25. Please accept this letter in support of their proposal for such a development and that after change in zone and de- velopment, I am interested in relocating my business to their commercial development. Sincerely, /744 r..., Stuart W. Losey, President S 8 F BEAR ALINEMENT, INC. 510 Second Ave. Longmont, Co. 80501 McCARTY ENGINEERING U CONSULTANTS, PROJECT Rademacher PROJECT NUMBER 1447-1 CONFERENCE RECORDTIME 3 : 10 P.M . LOCATION Telephone DATE 2/27/84 REPORTED By Jon Zimmerman S U BJ-E C T: Potential Traffic Congestion at I-25 and Highway 66 DISCUSSION: With Mr. Doug Rames , Assistant District Engineer, State of Colorado Division of Highways , P.O. Box 850 , Greeley, CO 80632 1 . The following is a synopsis of the State Highway Department correspondence to Weld County regarding Rademacher Business Park . a. August, 1982 : Access to property from the Frontage Road will require an access permit . b. April , 1983 : No conflicts c . September , 1983 : No objection to sketch plan and single access to Frontage Road . 550 ' required from access to intersection and access permit required . d . December , 1983 : Re-zoning change - refer to previous correspondence . 2 . Direct quote from Mr. Rames : "If the State Highway Department had any concerns about the capacity of the I-25/Highway 66 interchange to handle the increase in traffic from the Rademacher Business Park , any concerns or objections would already have been stated . " NOTE : This conference record was mailed by J. Zimmerman _of McCarty Engineering Consultants, Inc, on 2/28/84 . Its con- tents should be carefully reviewed by the recipient, who should immediately report inaccuracies or mis-statements, if any, to the person who prepared this conference record. 703 THIAO AVENUE • LONCMONT.CO.77Q-7766ngq11-4 3 LITTLE ) HOMPSON WATER ) .STRICT IaR.I n C. Awou EOM• TELEPHONE 002-200• >A,IOENT 30> WELCH AVENUE RL[E ALLEN DRAWER D BERTHOUD, COLORADO •0.12 DOREET ID M[at2 MOMAE RICORD .T J. EALOMOMEON ERt LO M. EADAM August 1, 1983 Robert Rademacher c/o McCarty Engineering 703 Third Ave. Longmont, Co. 80501 Gentlemen: The Little Thompson Water District will provide adequate water service to the proposed Rademacher business park located in Section 23, Twp 3N, Range 68 West upon compliance with the rules and regul- ations of the District. Very truly yours LITTLE THOMPSON WATER DISTRICT Lovilo H. Fagan, Manager IHF:lm1 cc: .w . 1\ Nick Sekich 1-.0. Lox 508 loncmont, Co. 80501 flovember 23, 1983 Rod Allison Department of Planning Services 915 10th St. Greeley, Co. 80631 Dear rnr. Allison: As president of the Baugh Laderal Ditch Co. , I have reviewed the sketch plan application and have no objection to the zoning of the Rademacher Business Park. Sincerely, 71(4Iti4 rick Sekich jr • t . Mountain Bell 1855 South Flatiron Court Boulder, Colorado 80306 June 20, 1983 Mr. Jon Zimmerman McCarty Engineering Consultants, Inc. 703 - 3rd Avenue Longmont, Colorado 80501 Re: Rademacher Business Park Dear Mr. Zimmerman: I have reviewed the sketch plans of the Rademacher Project. It appears that the easements described in the typical lot detail will be adequate for place- ment of our distribution cable. At the present time, Mountain Bell does not have adequate feeder cable from the Mead Central Office to serve any business development in this area. In order to provide additional facilities Mountain Bell will require a development agree— ment. The specific details of this agreement concerning costs and_ developers obligations can be obtained at your request. Please be aware that Mountain Bell will require 1 year lead time from the time a contract is signed to provide service to this area. If you need further assistance, please call me on 441-7161. Sincerely, • • ✓to+' c.!'• .�'✓+ 044-4- Greg Kissler Assistant Manager \j2 'ka. Win .T ! {e,2- M a.i• l Engineering e DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF COLORADO P.O. Box 850 r rr Greeley, Colorado 80632-0850 (303)353-1232 s, June 28, 1983 Weld County I-25 Rademacher Bus Park .7 Mi . N. of Mr. Jon Zimmerman SH 66 on E. McCarty Engineering Consultants, Inc. Service Road 703 Third Avenue iongmont, Colorado 80501 DOH FILE 45100 Dear Mr. Zimmerman: Thank you for providing us with advance copies of the Rademacher Business Park Sketch Plan. We have no objection to the single access to the I-25 east service road, but it must be separated from any existing driveways by a distance at least equal to the minimum stopping sight distance require- ments in the State Highway Access Code. This distance is a function of the posted speed limit. We anticipate that we will receive a referral from Weld County on this proposed development when it is submitted to them for review. We will make any additional comments on this development at that time. Very truly yours, ALBERT CH0TVACS ACTING DISTRICT ENGINEER oug as Rames District reconstruction Engineer DDR:da cc: A. Chotvacs D. Yost Area Foreman s 0 rg83 File: Crier-Jacobson w/encl . Rod Allison/Weld County r0 if � ti N . UNION RURAL ELECT-RIC ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 P.D. Box 359 (303) 659-0551 e fr is Brighton. Colorado 80601 ENTERPRISE 222 July 7, 1983 Mr. Jon Zimmerman McCarty Engineering Consultants, Inc. 703 Third Avenue Longmont, CO -80501 Dear Mr. Zimmerman: The tilat for the Industrial Park which you mailed to me is within the service territory 9f JJnion Rural Electric Association, Inc. I have discussed the plat with Don farmer and -he agrees that we will j.2, • need an easement on the opposite side of the road from the Panhandle Eastern Line. The typical lot easements appear okay for -easements. We will provide the electrical facilities in accordance with our line extension policies and Rules and Regulations on file with the Public Utilities Commission. The design is not available since we -would need a -plat showing the lots before that could be accomplished. Three 'phase power is available on Highway 66. If you have any -questions, _please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, UNION RURAL ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. Dorthy Ruggles Contract Administrator DR:jrs . d 4b "A Consumer-Owned Utility Serving Five Front Rangexoloredo Counties" LONGMONT FIRE . A ;ECTION DISTRICT 9119 COUNTY LINE ROAD LONGMONT, COLORADO 80501 772- 0710 24 June , 1983 _t- , ti • Mr. Jon Zimmerman GUI � 1sa3 McCarty Engineering Consultants , Inc. • Camalss'Qn 703 Third Avenue we'd to. ?WontLongmont , CO 80501 RE: Rademacher -Business -Park Dear Mr . Zimmermap, I have listed below requirements and recommendations of the Longmont Fire Protection District -as shall apply to a _Planned Business Park. 1 . Subdivision shell conform to all codes , standards , and regulations of the Longmont Fire Protection District . 2 . Property owner(s)/occupant(s) shall sub- mit to the fire district a complete set of written plans and detailed drawings of all proposed structures including all measurements , square and cubic footage, intended occupancy , contents and in- dustrial processes. 3 . Prior to start of construction of any structure all roads shall be finished to a rough grade to permit all weather access for fire apparatus , and other emergency equipment. . The water distribution system shall have been completed with fire hydrants attached -and a water supply in operation to provide firefighting capabilities to all areas of the development. 4� All proposed structures shall be protected with an automatic fire extinguishing sprinkler system and/or other fire extinguishing systems as may be required to protect special hazards. Exceptions to the above may be granted for occupancy group, square footage and height of structure being considered. 5 . All facilities shall have a fire deteaiOn and alarm system, communicating with annotify approved central dispatchin4 _agency t the Fire Department of a fire . 6 . Fite Hydrants shall be installed at 500 ' intervals . Hydrants should be located as close to a street intersection as possible with intermediate hydrants along the road- way to meet requirements . Additional fire hydrants may be required within individual properties to meet special hazard requirements . Fire hydrants shall have triple outlets (2- 2�" discharge outlets and 1 -O " all with National Fire Hose Thread) . Fire hydrants shall be served by -a minimum 6" pipe from larger mains . 7 . Fire Protection Water Distribution mains shall be not less than 6 ." ID and the system shall be looped. 8 . Adequate access to all fire hydrants , fire department standpipe and iprinkler ystem connections shall he p the owner/ developer and individual property occupant . X111 parking areas and -dead end road ways -shall have turning rround of fire apparatus. le enough to allow easy 9 . Portable fire extinguishers shall be installed throughout all _facilities as re- quired by code for the individual occupancy. 10 . All structure shall comply with ti►e require- ments set forth in the Uniform Building Lode. and N.F.P.A. codes and standards as may apply. If you have any questions please contact this office (303) • 772 0710 or 666-4404 . Sincerely . Wm. -t. Emerson-Captain Longmont Fire Protection District WRE/Akw cc : Board of Directors (5) r: , ., ( 11 ) ) PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY P. O. BOX 12? BRIGHTON, COLORADO 80601 June 14, 1983 Mr. Jon Zimmerman McCarty Engineering Consultants, Inc. 703 Third Avenue Longmont, CO 80501 Dear Mr. Zimmerman: In regard to the -Rademacher Business Park, Job No. 144701 , Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company will allow the encroachment of the 60-foot roadway upon Panhandle Eastern's 50 foot easement for -the area between the Baugh Lateral and Reservoir Company ditch and Weld County Road 32, in the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 3 North, Range 68 West. In the designated area, Panhandle Eastern will allow the east edge of the roadway to be no closer than 15 feet parallel to its 4.5" 0. D. buried natural gas pipeline. Panhandle Eastern requires that the cover over all of the pipelines in the business park be no less than 30 inches, which is required by the -Department of Transportation. Roads and utilities should cross the pipelines at or near right angles, with utilities crossing under the pipelines. No buildings should be placed within 25 feet of the pipelines. If you should have any ques- tions concerning any other features on or near the easement, please contact me at (303) 659-5922. Sincerely, PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY 9/ft24 f L. -Hogner Right-of-Way Representative JLH/ms JOB #1447-1 AUGUST 22 , 1984 PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR RADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK ,•I CONSULTANTS,McCARTY ENGINEERING NC� RADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK VICINITY MAP •irrs • e c a. RP. 32 TsN 22 W 23 t w � � L O sTi,TE HIGHWAY (ob PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT FOR RADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK GENERAL This preliminary drainage report has been prepared for the proposed Rademacher Business Park located in Weld County, Colorado. This property lies in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 23, T 3 N , R 6-8 W of the 6th P.M . It is bounded on the North side by County Road 32, the East side by County Road 9 1/2 and on the West side by the Interstate 25 frontage road (see vicinity map) . The property has been rezoned from agricultural use to industrial use. The owner proposes to develop 24 lots on this property with a looped access road from the I-25 frontage road . This report outlines the procedure to be used for development of these lots. A comparison of historic runoff to proposed development is made and release rates calculated. As future development occurs on these lots, this report should be used as a guideline for drainage control from these lots. The property has historically been farmland that drains from the south in a north to northeasterly direction. There are two distinct historic drainage basins identified in this study (see Plats I) . The basin boundary almost splits the property into two halves. There is an irrigation ditch that runs from west to east across the property, but for historic runoff calculations this ditch was not considered . Calculations for the historic runoff can be found in Table 1 . The proposed Layout of Rademacher Business Park is shown on Plate I . There are 24 lot-s laid out around a looped access road as -previously stated. Calculations for developed runoff from these lots may also be found in Table 1 . DRAINAGE CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY The drainage criteria and methodology used to calculate runoff and establish release rates for this report were taken from the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual developed by Wright McLaughlin Engineers for the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Tfie May 4, 1984 revision to this report was used for selecting runoff coefficients for both historic and developed conditions. The following summary outlines the major guidelines used to develop this report: 1 . The Rational Method was used to calculate runoff for both historic and developed conditions. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * .. 5 -' ,.-+ IN- N01cX3m * (G Li) 10 1N (94' toOJ * UI * .- 0 > r) 01 lil 01 01 ,-, 01 5 -* N Co 01 t1) $ .- a0 tU lf) * 4- 5 '-' Y1 * U & ak se " * • * 4- ti -- - IN- Ill 01LI) D * n 1U . . * £ Cl >- 0101 '') 4) -1 ,-Ir1J (') * =t 01 1)J 01 1') '-. 01 01 r-1 * fr IS . * --1 * TJ * al * .i.' u] (1 in '''J N 4' 3- Ti * rt -- 5 lf) 01 N -1 Lit 4- Ln . * r. ID • • or * ' 13 al —' .t -• tri ,r) ID .-+ l0 * U > ,-4 ,-1 .-4 .-4 -1 r•. * --. * r6 In * U * * In in N 4 r--4 0 Ti 'Si 'W -* S- m N t0 •r1 c0 Q' t0 "U +1 -* 'G C o * G W0� 10) 1') t0 .-a N) (9 01 -.-' •--1 * > N M* 70 .-i .-1 • * 0.1 SI IG a U a * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * S- r. o Ill ., U al U •.. Ell D ('1 (') u7 y N 1A Si IS, u7 •0 0 > cG C '-4 — -. 01 Ti 4- Ul Ifl t).1 (71 N Ti al •.+ s. 1r rG - O ••+ J_ al U 4i 4 10 Co l0 01 r-' If) If) 01 - C % N S- 'G u] 07 -' 1') 4- 0.1 .• S CO •-' S- w 4) CC " v1 ,-a ..i 4- 0 SI C Ut N -I. at 4) 'G .-• '-1 4- 01 f') (910N ('15 (') U C •.. 0 . 01 o) C'1Nt0u) Co03 C 0 . •-' 3 N Y 0 U nTJ4- C S- WC '?Jul Co (9C) N5ry OEWW n 'ti E n m N. ri 4. ')J pJ U1 •.. 'G 4) U N 11 •I+ U U 0 C I- ;- 'D =I W r-' rnn N 0 a S- }- •,. N 4- .) I.' tG ,-1 •,, .I-) U! >, 01 59y 555 U IJI ❑. 0 -+ 'U C .P -- y) U) w in (') 1') (') 01 C al C Ol N .-4 -.+ •., N . 3 n- O r- U ' WW N 0 0. S' 9 .4 .--' '-. .-1 r1 r-1 0 X U a •.. J C U 0 4- .C Ill > CO •.. .-1 iii .-. N (U .-1 •.1 a Ol III 0f N S_ .-1 •D I-- C U ;- J in .4-1 'G 'G C w w C U C •-' W r 10 () f'J (90) -. Nr C1 Ul in in >. au U UI ''UN 4' u] Ill u) bU] -4 .-4 .p - .p tG 'G n. .. c0 5 4) 4 N N ill U) •u 4- r I_ 0 ..- C C •i 1 \ . • • tG w UJ Ili S. 0 •.. 01 .-1 v ri f1J f1j 1•)J r-1 .•4 -1 ,-1 '4 4- - 4-- (...) N S- U U) '' GI 3 (1 S- 0 M U N > C' of F Q 4- rt .4 lC 0 ❑1 'G C' S_ Ui 'G 03 Ill (9 Li) I(7 If) If) In U --' 0 .C C. . .+1 .. 4) •-1 > 4- Nill N5f') If) N (') Ul •-' .H 'G 0) 4- In u) lJ 1') —1 u] f'1 N ❑1•U S- -. •.1 r f- >, TJ .fl CII A rG 0 (ti al N .r U 3 C]. 3 ` C' i1 C 0 Li r .-•1 .C 05tS' ' 95S+ 5 S5 -ri al C' al •• u) t0 -P in IN- 01hl5 f. 0 ;- > 3 A .. -I-'T. .•1 •.-4 (Ti ftI N N (1] ill 0 al �1 I— ++ •r• (O (') 0 .-I T1 -1 .-. .• .-1 S. -0 J" _I 4- 13 C U1 UI N (0 ,- $. n •N > -N Ul C1 U O 01 4- - n C) Z .0 tG M 4> 'a U (U C. •r. O ••.1 • S. 0 1 1 N 0 ill 1-. 1-1 ,-4 1-1 1-. H :> > 1-1 '(1 Z JJ F-1 UI 1-1 1-. 1-1 > Ili N > •-1 UI 2 A Rademacher Drainage Report August 21, 1984 Page 2 2. The return period of the design storms used were 2 year, 5 year, 10 year, and 100 year . 3. The maximum allowable release rate for any developed lot could be no more than the 05 historic release rate during a 100 year storm. This release rate is calculated in Table 1 for each of the basins under -developed conditions. 4. Climatological data was taken from the NOAA Atlas 2, Volume III, for Colorado. This data was used to estimate the rainfall intensities for the design storms. 5. The Frequency-Duration curves, used for developing rainfall intensities, was taken from data used by Water Resources Consultants in preparation of the new Boulder County Storm Drainage Criteria Manual . Although this was done for Boulder County, the set of curves used was for the eastern part of Boulder County which abuts the proposed business park . It was determined that the derivation of these curves would also be applicable to this particular area. A copy of this curve is included in this report (see Figure 1) and should be used for preparation of final drainage reports as lots are developed. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Calculations used to determine historic and developed flow rates may be found in Table 1 . These values should be used in the preparation of final drainage reports for each lot that is developed. This preliminary drainage report should be used as a general guideline. The following summarizes major points that need to be addressed in these final drainage reports: 1 . There' are 24 lots that are being platted for this business park. However, there is the possibility of more than one lot being developed in one project. Any single or multiple lot development will be limited to discharging no more than the 5 year historic rate in a 100 year storm event. This amount will be determined in proportion to the total area of the business park . 2. The proposed business park has the Bough Lateral Irrigation Ditch running through it from west to east . Any lots draining to this ditch will be limited to discharging a volume no greater than the historic amount at a rate no greater than the historic rate. All final drainage reports will be subject to review and acceptance by the ditch company in charge of the Bough Lateral . 3. The water quality of any storm water entering the Bough Lateral Irrigation Ditch must be equal to or greater than the quality of historic drainage to the ditch . FIGURE I 100 TIME-INTENSITY-FREQUENCY . CURVES FOR WELD COUNTY COLORADO CO UNTY,_ NEAR RADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK . CURVES PREPARED BY• WATER RESOURCES CONSULTANTS, INC. 60 • 70 6: 0 x C w a 60 U • w ; . x U Z N 50 ) I-- N . . .. Z , w I- ? 40 , J 2 a CC 30 100 YR. 50 YR. 20 . 10 YR. 5 YR. Io '2 YR._ . 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 TIME OF CONCENTRATION, Tc (MINUTES) I Rademacher Drainage Report August 21, 1984 Page 3 4. The USDCM has a table of runoff coefficients for light industrial development that are recommended for use with the Rational Method for calculating peak discharges. This table may be found in the May 4, 1983 revision to this manual . These coefficients shall be used in final drainage reports where the Rational Method is used. If a lot that is being developed will have a large area that is not paved and remains pervious to rainfall, these runoff coefficients can he modified to reflect this condition. 5. There will be three culverts needed within the business park itself and two culverts to release from the business park across County -Road 32 to the north . Since the release rate from anywhere within the park will be limited to the 5 year historic release rate during a 100 year storm, the following table summarizes the flows and sizes for each of these culverts: TABLE 2 CULVERT SIZES IN -RADEMACHER BUSINESS PARK Culvert Basin Q5 Culvert Size No. No. (cfs) (Inches) A I 20 30 B II 20 30 C III 5.2 24 D V 12 24 E VI 20 30 These sizes are based on estimated runoff for the five year historic storm. There will be some storm runoff that will be allowed to enter the Bough Lateral Ditch, but only the volume that historically would have occurred. Culvert locations are shown along lot lines where it is assumed that grassed swales will be constructed. Any deviation from the locations of the culverts shown could change the downstream .conditions that would affect other culverts. If it is necessary to relocate these culverts, this possibility should be investigated. The grassed swales have not been sized in this report. As lots are developed, this should be done in final drainage reports. This sizing will be dependent upon the type of development that is done on each lot. Design of thy looped access road should consider swale sizing. Preliminary calculations indicate that a 2 foot deep channel with three-to-one side slopes will have adequate capacity for 20 cfs of runoff. Rademacher Drainage Report August 21, 1984 Page 4 The coefficients used for calculating the runoff under developed conditions were derived for undeveloped property other than the construction of the looped access road . Final drainage reports shall contain coefficients modified to reflect the total amount of development to be done on each lot . Areas for the building envelope, parking lots and storage yards, etc. shall all be considered in the derivation of these coefficients. All final drainage reports should be prepared under the direct supervision of a licensed Professional Engineer. They should contain a map showing a site plan for the proposed development and accompanying calculations. Any plans needing approval by the ditch company should have a letter indicating that approval and should be attached to the drainage report. Hello