The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20010651 12/07/00 T11L 15:44 FAX 303 708 0400 S1AN11ARI) CONSLLTING 4,001 lL ,{ , m JT T , T T COLORADO 1 V IlLL]�ll\VI 11 11 LL��lI��ILJ, Littleton CONSULTING 8232 . PC Meadows Drive E Littleton,CO 80124 DTI 303 708 0500 1}'-" Fax:303 708.0400 Email: infottmanhard.com ILLINOIS i_ Vernon Hills 847.634.5550 Downers Grove 630 515 8500 FAX TRANSMISSION COVER PAGE TO: /VIOLA/G41 DATE: /2/7/00 RE: /vtt/✓O CH I FAX: '77C7 - 30471- 4`5, FROM: TOOO ordinThvi)lGffr PROJ: C4vi rn-CCd NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover page) 9 ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW VIA U.S. MAIL Yes X No WE ARE FAXING TO YOU THE ITEMS BELOW RELATIVE TO SUBJECT PROJECT: DESCRIPTION 670 lam eEteicCirf 9 7 > - T 5ec,t"4-rcnv— REMARKS: �/Y> Y Engineers Surveyors Planners If you have any problem receiving this fax or you did not receive all pages, please contact us at 303- 708-0500. [ g EXHIBIT 2001-0651 S #ssy 12. 07. 00 nil 15:45 FAX 303 708 0400 D1:AS1L RI) CU SLL'flVG �i V_ N NOV.20.20L�0 9:43PM UNITED INC NO.636 P.Z/2 5/4' f'TUa POWER g46' - NOTES 1 . TRACTS A-K AND M ARE DESIGNATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. 2. EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ARE A DEVIATION FROM WELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE SECTION 10.6. BY APPROVING THIS PLAN UTILITY PROVIDERS ACKNOWLEDGE THIS AND AGREE THAT THE EASEMENTS ARE SUITABLE FOR USE. UNITED POWER SERVICE is AVAILALt; Z 0 APPROVED THISc`.0.4 DAY OF fr.-10 ',/ 2000. 0 0 �f 0 WI UNITED POWERI AG nzuli[cvt 5,e ,Q,pa 5i''Er(qu5T 0 en —+ a KN ENERGY m 0 < SERVICE IS AVAILABLE 0 V E APPROVED THIS .__ DAY OF 2000, u) .. } I— I— w z -J KN ENERGY W LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT CC O P. SERVICE IS AVAILABLE U V APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. 0 O 1 Z Q W N. LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT Q ~ J Is SAINT VRAIN SANITARY DISTRICT y SERVICE IS AVAILABLE S APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2OOO. V SAINT VRAIN SANITARY DISTRICT 14. GALAXY CABLE h SERVICE IS AVAILABLE O APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. PROD. END,. T.A.C E DRAWN BY, D.L,L V GALAXY CABLE CHECKED DY, H.J.W DOTE, 10-16-00, 0 QWEST _ a SERVICE IS AVAILABLE sc AUE, 1'.=100' APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. SHEET Q gWEST 1 OF 1 z Q KBCWCC C116 L2/0Z.'00 1111 15:45 PAX 303 708 04U0 1IAAIIAHU CUASALT!AU LI'UUL 574717A-To12G Pg4'6 NOTES 1 . TRACTS A-K AND M ARE DESIGNATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. 2. EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ARE A DEVIATION FROM WELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE SECTION 10.6. BY APPROVING THIS PLAN UTILITY PROVIDERS ACKNOWLEDGE THIS AND AGREE THAT THE EASEMENTS ARE SUITABLE FOR USE. UNITED POWER SERVICE IS AVAILABLE 2 0 APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF 2000. 0 O ) CC UNITED POWER > 0 O -IIKN ENERGY CO O n.. a SERVICE IS AVAILABLE D V APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. (1) Y >- LLI KN ENERGY W Z J LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT � 0 SERVICE IS AVAILABLE V APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. 0 a w LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT O J SAINT VRAIN SANITARY DISTRICT k. SERVICE IS AVAILABLE APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. O SAINT VRAIN SANITARY DISTRICT GALAXY CABLE SERVICE IS AVAILABLE APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. PHOJ. ENO.. T.A.C DRAWN BY. D.L.L. _ GALAXY CABLE CHECKED BY. H J W QWEST DATE. D- I6-0o SERVICE IS AVAILABLE SCAlE, 1"=100 APPROVE() THIS ___ DAY OF 2000. SHEET Q OWEST 1 OF 1 KBCWCC 0116 24 1?, U7/ 00 Tilt 13:45 FAX 303 708 0400 )IAAAIIAR11 CUYSLLTLAG .C 00- NOV. 29. 2000 9: 07AM NO. 0079 P. 1 5/4-A/4-Tuft Pace. NOTES' 1 . TRACTS A-K AND M ARE DESIGNATED AS 173 7o1,1> DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS, GHQ«�i6�� 2. EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ARE A DEVIATION FROM WELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE SECTION 1O.6. BY APPROVING THIS PLAN UTILITY PROVIDERS ACKNOWLEDGE THIS AND AGREE THAT THE EASEMENTS ARE SUITABLE FOR USE. UNITED POWER SERVICE IS AVAILABI.,i: Z 0 APPROVED THIS ____, DAY OF 2000. O 0 co— 4 UNI TED POWER - "' > 0 m KN ENERGY -I a Q SERVICE IS AVAILABLE = 0 M APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. CO `y. } KN ENERGY W Z J LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT CC O E- SERVICE IS AVAILABLE A V lbs APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. ' _ ili 4 w o LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT O SAINT VRAIN SANITARY DISTRICT Q SERVICE IS AVAILABLE APPgar 6/0 ( 4j APPROVED THIS 22`__ DAY OF A i,E.Aare 2000. Q V Le CC SAI VRAIN SANITARY DISTRICT Q Pk GALAXY CABLE I.. SERVICE IS AVAILABLE O APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2OOO, PROJ. fNa., Y.A.C 11 DRAWN B ` Y. DJ- L. GALAXY CABLE C4ECKfD 9T, H J Yo ._ i OWEST UAIY, O-Ia-oo OQ SLATY. 1--1Do SERVICE IS AVAILABLE n APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2OOO, SHEET Q ()WEST1 OF 1 Q KBCWCC C116 12/07/00 1'HL 15:46 FAX 303 708 0400 MANHARU CUNSLLTISi. 005 11/16/00 THLT 14:20 FAX 3035305252 LEWD 1002 5/C'4/A-Tu&G Pig 4g NOTES; 1 . TRACTS A-K AND M ARE DESIGNATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. 2. EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ARE A DEVIATION FROM WELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE SECTION 10.6. BY APPROVING THIS PLAN UTILITY PROVIDERS ACKNOWLEDGE THIS AND AGREE THAT THE EASEMENTS ARE SUITABLE FOR USE. UNITED POWER SERVICE IS AVAILARI.i 2 O APPROVED THIS ____, DAY OF _ 2000. O 0 7, a UNITED POWER > a KN ENERGY 0 -I C. 0 < SERVICE IS AVAILABLE = U APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. Cl) } } le KN ENERGY W l— F— w z LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT CC O f"" SERVICE IS AVAILABLE V U APPROVED THIS a__ DAY OF AkIllf_loy(ituramo. o z Z a w hL VI q WATER DISTRICT O J SAINT VRAIN SANITARY DISTRICT r. SERVICE IS AVAILABLE 1/2 APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000, O V SAINT VRAIN SANITARY DISTRICT O GALAXY CABLE k SERVICE IS AVAILABLE 0 O. APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 200 - C PRO). INCL. _ T.AC DRAWN BY. -_D.L.I_.. . .._ V GALAXY CABLE CHECKED ay. H.J.W. Q QWEST DnrE, 10-16 -91:1_ SS SERVICE IS AVAILABLE SCALE. t"=100' APPROVED THIS -___ DAY OF 2OOO. SHEET Q ()WEST 1 of KBCWCC Ci16 12,07100 THE 15:46 FAX 303 708 0400 ?LU11Altll C01SLLl'IV„ NOV-17-00 12: 54 FROM:OWEST FIELD ENG ID: 3034511755 PAGE 1/ 1 -_> !40w —/ / (./Yc / ' 1' -t c., �-. W)II.� 1 . TRACTS A—K AND M ARE DESIGNATED AS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. 2. EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ARE A DEVIATION FROM WELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE SECTION 10.6. BY APPROVING THIS PLAN UTILITY PROVIDERS ACKNOWLEDGE THIS AND AGREE THAT THE EASEMENTS ARE SUITABLE FOR USE, UNITED POWER SERllGE IS AVAILABLE 2 O APPROVED THIS -_ DAY OF _______ ..__ 2000. O 0 U) Q - UNITED POWER - Q KN ENERGY m 0 Ca < SERVICE IS AVAILABLE 0 O APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. CO a RN ENERGY W ~2 ~ W _J LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT CC O 1- SERVICE IS AVAILABLE V U APPROVED THIS ____ DAY Of __ 2000. LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT O W SAINT WAIN SANITARY DISTRICT Q SERvICE IS AVAILABLE y APPROVED THIS _-__ DAY OF 2000 O VII SAINT VRAIN SANITARY DISTRICT SI GALAXY CABLE ic SERVICE IS AVAILABLE Q APPROVED THIS ____ DAY OF 2000. 2 RRo, ENG.. T.A.(' 1 __._-- DRAWN BY, DLL. __ V GALAXY CABLE CHECKED ay,_H LW. Q �1 WEST DATE. Io-is-Go �C��iCI SERVICE is AVAILABLE SCALE. 1"=I00' A PPROVED THIS -f�_ DAY OF %/__ _ 2000. SHEET ..1/44. -- 1 ° 1 IC KBCWCC C11,6 MONICA Mika - S566.MEM Page 1 Memo To: Kim Ogle,Planning Department From: Rick Dill Subject: S-566 Idaho Creek Subdivision Date: December 4, 2000 On Wednesday,November 29,2000,I met with Ryan Carlson to discuss the prior Sheriff s Office comments from Les Cogswell regarding this development. There were five specific issues discussed. Mr Carlson could not describe the slope of the bank surrounding the water bodies west of the development. I indicated our primary concern was not creating an attractive hazard condition where young children from the subdivision would be attracted to water they could not easily get in and out of. If the banks of the water bodies have no barriers for young children trying to get out of the water,we would not require fencing. Mr Carlson was going to get that information and suggested he would take photographs for our review. We discussed street names. Mr Carlson appeared open to renaming streets but requested a listing of what street names were already in use. I am attempting to get that information now. I've found, however, information in that format is not readily available from the geo-files in the dispatch center. I am able to check a specific name and where the street is but cannot assemble of list of what is in the data base at this time. It makes sense to be able to provide a list of names in use. This is not a mobile home park entity but a development of individual lots much like Hill 'n Park which makes the use of a site manager impractical. However,we did discuss the importance of having a viable home owners association with the fiscal resources to actively enforce covenants. Mr Carlson indicated there was a plan to assess home owners fees to fund a home owners association. He was going to provide me more information about the fees and the covenants. It would be possible for a community resource officer to aggressively work with a viable home owners association to address our concerns. Our experience has been HOA's are not effective over time unless there is some on-going fiscal basis to insure compliance through the court. I emphasized the importance of having a centralized school bus shelter collection point and centralized mailboxes. At the time, we discussed placing both in the open space central to the subdivision. However, I later left a message for Mr Carlson indicating something integrated into Road 7.5 at the west entrance or north entrance would probably be more practical as negotiating a large a bus inside the park would be difficult. We discussed"traffic calming"measures of speed bumps and dips. Mr Carlson left a plan for me to mark up with where such features should be located which I initially agreed to do. Subsequent to the meeting,I have become concerned that such recommendations better be made by a traffic engineer as I am unfamiliar with best practices or applicable regulations. cc: Sheriff Jordan Les Cogswell EXHIBIT[1 LS #may ;// STATE OF COLORADO Colorado Water Conservation Board Jepartment of Natural Resources a 1313 Sherman Street,Room 721 Denver,Colorado 80203 I Phone:(303)866-3441 FAX:(303)866-4474 www.cwcb.state.co.us Bill Owens Governor Greg E.Walcher Mr. John Folsom Executive Director 7050 Loma Linda Court Dan McAuliffe Longmont, CO 80504 Acting Director Dear Mr. Folsom: Governor Owens has asked that the Colorado Water Conservation Board respond to your e-mailed message to the Governor, dated October 30,2000. As the Chief of the Flood Protection Section of the Water Conservation Board, I am responsible for directing many of the state's activities regarding flood risk mapping and flood hazard reduction. In your message you made reference to construction in floodprone areas in portions of unincorporated Weld County. Specifically you spoke of lands in the vicinity of St. Vrain Creek, sometimes referred to as the "Del Camino area". You noted that the FEMA FIRM maps for that area contain only approximate floodplain lformation,providing no Base Flood Elevations(BFEs)or other detailed information. The Del Camino area has been a concern to our agency for some time, with respect to the need for detailed and up-to-date floodplain mapping. In 1979 the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Omaha District) prepared preliminary detailed floodplain mapping for the area. Unfortunately, no funding was available, either at the federal, state or county level, to finalize the mapping and publish it. The mapping was never made compliant with federal and state technical standards, so it could not be officially designated and approved by the Colorado Water Conservation Board (as provided for in statutes). That mapping has been available for Weld County to use in making land use decisions, and my understanding is that the county has made some use of the mapping. Our agency does not have a funded program for floodplain mapping. As a result, the preparation of detailed floodplain mapping for areas such as the Del Camino area requires partnerships of local, state and federal agencies, sometimes with private entities as well, to secure funding to prepare the mapping. We are in the midst of trying to arrange just such a partnership for the Del Camino area,but we will not know right away whether the funding will be available. I agree with you that obtaining such funding, no matter where, is a critical need for the Del Camino area. I hope our present effort will be successful. The other need you discussed was the need for procedures to guide new land development so flood hazards are minimized. As you may be aware,Colorado has no state permitting requirements regarding development activities in floodprone areas by a state agency . The permitting of such activities is entirely a local government matter. FEMA requires local governments to adopt and enforce compliant floodplain regulations in order to remain in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). The State of Colorado provides technical assistance to FEMA and to _the local governments. My staff has provided such technical assistance to Weld County in the past. We remain eady to provide more assistance in the future, should Weld County desire. EXHIBIT x s #ssy sere is a specific requirement in FEMA's model regulations that may be of interest to you. Local governments participating in the NFIP must require the preparation of detailed floodplain studies in areas designated as -'proximate floodplains(Zone A)in the event of a subdivision larger than a minimum standard. That standard is a ..✓o-part standard: the property is 5 acres or more, or the subdivision proposes 50 lots or more,whichever is less. I do not know whether that requirement is applicable to any of the development activities your message alluded to. The Colorado Water Conservation Board will continue to pursue funding for the preparation of current floodplain mapping for St. Vrain Creek in Weld County. Should the funding become available, we will be directly involved in the preparation of the floodplain mapping. My staff is available to provide technical assistance to Weld County if the county wishes. I trust that I have addressed your concerns. If you have any further questions or if you would like to discuss other steps that the Water Conservation Board could take,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Y Larry F. Lang,Chief Flood Protection Secti Cc: Governor Bill Owens Greg Walcher, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Natural Resources Monica Mica-Daniels, Weld County Planning Director t/WCTRANS/SECA/larry/St-Vrain citizen letter I I-2000.doc 7050 Loma Linda Ct. Longmont CO 80504 303 833 2992 October 30, 2000 To: Governor Bill Owens Sir: In the newsletter article released for the Governor's Flood and Drought Preparedness Conference,you stated your concerns for the incredible damage and suffering caused by floods last spring. I would like to relate to you how future exposure of life and property to damage by flooding is being permitted by a lack of accurate information as to the extent of floodplains and their characteristics in many areas of Colorado, and specifically in the area in which I reside. New construction is continuously being permitted in flood prone areas with no accurate information as to the potential boundaries of flooding or its depth. The FEMA FIRM maps [080266 0850 C and 0855 C, 1982] for my area have never been completed to establish base flood elevations [zone A]. Since they were published there have and continue to be major changes permitted in the flood prone areas. FEMA and CWCB are not responsive to referrals made relating to these new developments. County flood hazard area permits are inadequate, as they are issued base on inaccurate information and inadequate protective measures being required. There are in place regulations requiring this situation to be addressed. CFR Title44 section 65 has specific requirements as to studies and mitigations for alterations in flood prone areas. 2 CCR 408 — 1 specifies rules and regulations for designation and approval of floodplains. This conference would be an excellent venue for gathering and dispensing information and expressing concern for this problem. Permitting construction in flood-prone areas without knowledge of their flooding characteristics will inevitably result in negative consequences for the health, safety and welfare of the people of Colorado. If study funding is the problem, we are being penny-wise and pound-foolish. I hope the problem is not a lack of determination on the part of government agencies.. Thank you John Folsom October 30, 2000 Barbara Kirkmeyer, Chair Weld Board of County Commissioners I understand that you will be speaking at the Governor's Hood and Drought Preparedness Conference,your topic being a"Rural Case Study of Flood Impacts& Recovery Activities". If you are not already, I would like to make you aware of a situation, specifically, in the drainages of the St. Vrain and Boulder Creeks in Weld County. This condition may exist in other drainages as well. It may, in the future, have grave negative impacts on the health and welfare of present and future Weld residents, and on public funds. The FEMA FIRM maps[080266 0850 C and 0855 C]for the area were never completed in 1982 to classify and establish flood base flood elevations[zone A]along the courses of these steams. In the years since the study, local governments have permitted, or are or will be in the process of permitting, major changes for development in these drainages in the subject area and upstream. Some of these, locally, are Idaho Creek, Lighthouse Cove, RiverDance, at Hamm Pit, Paragon Lake Estates, Blue Heron, MeadowVale phaseII, Sherwood-Hanover, Continental View Ponds, Reflection Bay, Raintree, Brooks Farm and Del Camino East. Incidentally, some of these projects have been referred to the CWCB and FEMA for comment, some have not. In no case, have I found a response from these agencies. CFR Title 44, section 65 does require information being provided and certain studies and other steps being taken relating to intrusions that would alter lands in a flood plain. 2 CCR 408 — 1 specifies rules and regulations for designation and approval of floodplains. Earlier this year I understand there was discussion of the need for more accurate flood plain and floodway information, locally,between County staff and Larry Lang of CWCB but no measures have been taken as a result of the meeting. If you are in agreement with the allegations and concerns of this letter, I would appreciate any efforts that could be made to inform those that are involved with or otherwise have an interest in the need for accuracy of floodplain studies, for the health, safety and welfare of Colorado residents, locally, and at other locations in the state. If I may be of any assistance, please so advise me. Thank you, John Folsom 1. EXHIBIT L. 5.4653-9 November 15, 2000 To: Monica Daniels-Mika Subject: Projected WCR 9-1/2 [Del Camino Parkway] Monica: It would appear that the reason for this future road is not going to be achieved based on the way its alignment seems to be working out. On the south end Firestone has diverted it through Del Camino Junction Business Park as is indicated on MUD map 2.1 toward the west so that it ends up at the east I-25 service road. On the north, it is now planned to veer it again to the west to join the same service road. Unfortunately, CDOT has under-designed the improvements to the service road. Where reconstructed near Del Camino and at the St. Vrain Creek crossing the road has only two lanes. Assuming that the basic rationale for the road is to take some of the traffic from the now under-designed service road, we end up with two new intersections with the service road and a two lane bottleneck over the Creek. To make 9-1/2 effective, the bullet has to be bitten and the Creek bridged so that traffic can flow independent of the service road. Now that we've solved this problem, we can attack the resistance of Mr.Tagliente to extend 9-1/2 through Frederick developments to its proposed junction with Hwy. 52 which is defeating thetth�e°purpose of the road in that area. I would suggest this latter matter is e of ate con�m [HB1041] and be turned over to the County attorney. #RQ .se as n,rw o Fols m fierJy 6r f tic 9%fz_ Z7 y i a +n • o a Ee wc,Q2G ,/ �.94re"4N,Qre, ,"rjrr✓r4$ nun 7% t (z L Awes) ,,e,2 i se,7-7:4'wee e K` x y wy�iy �. rzsl I 14 ,8[ o KEz+ �E E. iCK P ,s,X,y J 2 12/0/700 THU 15:46 FAA 303 /08 0400 MANSARD CONSULTING f�007 BULK STUDY IDA- 0 CEEC S I�ISIO\ N WELD CC \TY, COLOA: O -- LOC < c , LCT 12 40' TYPICAL —I0' REAR SETBACK 5' SIDE 5' SIDE SETBACK SETBACK + CONC. STOOP— 28.00' TYPICAL HOME 0 (CHALET 228,0951) d d r N N 10.00' F] 61 18.00' PCRCN DRIVE- WAY R.O.W. 1$ GARAGE SETBACK B 0.w. R ACTUAL R1 MIN LOT SIZE 2498 SF 6000 SF AVG LOT SIZE 3106 SF ' MIN SETBACK 5 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK GARAGE 18 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK FRONT 10 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK REAR 10 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK SIDE 5 FT 20 FT MIN OFFSET 10 FT 6 FT MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 30 FT 30 FT MAX LOT COVERAGE 41% 50% 12/07/00 THL 15:47 FAA 303 708 0400 _MAN7NAR') GUASCJLT1NG BULK STUDY IDAHO CREEK S . BDIVISION 7 WELD COU \TY, COLORADO BLOCK 1 , LOT 58 A,7/ Pe / \ 9p SF R 9C 5 C. / 47 /5� CY R / \ / / 5 SIDE SETBACK 5 SIDE SETBACK r / \ 30.00' / TYPICAL HOME I ^(NANTUCKETT 230.1524) ' N \ N 10.00' o N PORCH I cd M / co I _ 20.00' I DRIVE- 18' GARAGE SETBACK --_I WAY I L_ e 0.kV ACTUAL R1 MIN LOT SIZE 2498 SF 6000 SF AVG LOT SIZE 3106 SF MIN SETBACK 5 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK GARAGE 18 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK FRONT 10 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK REAR 10 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK SIDE 5 FT 20 FT MIN OFFSET 10 FT 6 FT MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 30 FT 30 FT MAX LOT COVERAGE 41% 50% GRAPHIC SCALE DATE REVISIONS BY 20 0 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. �I IDAHO CREEK SUBDIVISION n1 Y l�L NHARD CONSULTINGLTD. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO jiLfl'' - • ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS BULK STUDY —--' 'I 8232 E. Park Meadows Dr. Littleton, Colorado 00124 tel: 303/708-0500 fax: 303/708-0400 http://wmr.MANHARD.com DRAWN ew S.E.S. NI, El ( /29/00 SCALE. I '- 2O'IeooE,KBCWCC PROJECT.C116 1Z/U170U '1'HU 15:47 FAX 303 708 0400 1lN\'Hi1Rll CONSULTING 11009 BULK STUDY IDA CREEK S VIS O\ mELTh CC � NTY, COLNADO BLOCK 1 , LOT 47 10' REAR SETBACK 5' SIDE 5' SIDE c SETBACK SETBACK si000ec.P 48.00' TYPICAL HOME .(CHALET 228.1074) s IN N To.00 M 1&01 PORCH h— DRIVE— GARAGE SETBACK WAY / R.O.W. /,,,■,, 8.0.w ACTUAL R1 MIN LOT SIZE 2498 SF 6000 SF AVG LOT SIZE 3106 SF MIN SETBACK 5 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK GARAGE 18 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK FRONT 10 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK REAR 10 FT 20 FT MIN SETBACK SIDE 5 FT 20 FT MIN OFFSET 10 FT 6 FT MAX BUILDING HEIGHT 30 FT 30 FT MAX LOT COVERAGE 41% 50% Hello