HomeMy WebLinkAbout20030182 •
Weld County Planning Department
GREELEY OFFICE
DEC 2 6 7002
2r;z ECv P► 2: 37 RECEIVED
,EC_
December 24, 2002
Mr. Kim Ogle, Planner II
Department of Planning Services
Weld County Colorado
1555 N. 17th Ave
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Case Number: MZ-614
Applicant: Timothy and Lisa Brough
Request: Minor Subdivision Change of
Zone from (A) Agriculture to (E)
Estate for nine (9) residential lots
Dear Mr. Ogle
Please file the enclosed letter with the above mentioned case.
Regards,
('Ae 4, "
Cleon V. Kimberling
6615 Weld County Road 84
Fort Collins, CO 80524
EXHIBIT
2003-0182 I c≥ #&i9
December 7, 2002
Board of County Commissioners
Re: Case Number: MZ-614
Applicant: Timothy and Lisa Brough
Request: Minor Subdivision Change of
Zone from (A) Agriculture to (E)
Estate for nine (9) residential lots
Dear Board of Commissioners
I have some concerns about the change to the Agriculture zoning of the mentioned
property (Lot B or RE, being pail of the SW4 Section 6, T7N,R67W of the 6th P.M.,
Weld County, Colorado):
1. The lack of organized planning for development in an Agriculture
Community.
Over the years the Planning Commission and County Commissioners have
approved a commercial cabinet manufacturing operation on the NE4 7/7/67 and
an Estate of 4 lots on the same quarter section. Immediately across the
intersection on the SW4 5/7/67 the planning commission and commissioners
approved a special use permit for a 4,000 cow dairy. On section 8/7/67,
immediately across the road south from the 4,000 cow dairy permit a number of
Estate plots have been approved and developed. Immediately across the road to
the west of the proposed Estates is an operational dairy milking 1,500 or more
cows. From this pattern of development it appears there is no planning.
Is this extreme diversity really compatible to the future of an agriculturally zoned
community?
2. The Future of Food Supply.
Weld County once boasted being the number one producer of food and produce in
the country. Between 1992 and 1997 Agriculture land conversion in Colorado
exceeded 270,000 acres annually with Weld County being in the top 4 counties in
the state for land conversion. During the past 5 years this trend has accelerated.
Currently we have no shortage of food as we import from Mexico, Central and
South America, Europe, Asia, China and all over the globe. We have no
assurance that these relationships will continue. Plus, we have no control over
Food Safety and Quality Assurance as we do here in the US. Many farmers in the
Imperial Valley of California have moved their operations into Mexico where
there are no restrictions on herbicides or pesticides and no EPA regulations to
protect the environment. Under our Free Trade Agreement these products come
into the US with no control over Food Safety and Quality assurance that is
imposed on US Agriculture producers.
Is this conversion of our prime producing land wise or has our greed blinded
us to worthy stewardship for future generations?
3. Water Resources.
The conversion of agriculture water to domestic water has an enormous
impact on agriculture. As this conversion continues there are fewer numbers
of farms that must carry the burden of expense to deliver the water to
agriculture land. The cost of delivery remains constant or increases and is
divided among fewer agriculture users increasing the cost to the individual
farmer. As a personal example, we irrigate from the North Poudre irrigation
system. At one point this past summer we didn't have water as there are now
too few agriculture users on our particular system to warrant running the
ditch. In the near future with more agriculture land being converted to Estates
the North Poudre system may not be able to justify maintaining a ditch forcing
agriculture completely out of the community.
The future of agriculture in Weld County and the impact this has on the future of
our food source is your responsibility. Are you doing what is best for future generations
by destroying highly productive food producing land? You are the ones making the calls.
Regards,
env/V-
-t
Cleon V. Kimberling
6615 Weld County Road 84
Fort Collins, CO 80524
L9c elite consulting, inc.
p.o. box 94 greeley, co 80631 13 J ?: 2
970-381-8878, fax 970-378-0867
January 13, 2003
Esther Gesick
Clerk to the Board Office
915 10th ST.
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Approval of mineral owners for Pheasant Crest Estates
ECI#MM-001
Dear Ms Gesick:
Mr. Kim Ogle, Weld County Planning, asked that I forward these letters to you about the
Pheasant Crest Estates subdivisions. The letters are signed by the mineral owners of the
ground, which Pheasant Crest Estates is being proposed. The mineral owners have no
objections to rezoning or re-platting this property.
It is my understanding that these are the only items that you need to schedule the
rezoning of Pheasant Crest Estates for a Board of County Commissioners meeting. The
case number is CZ-614. If you need anything else, please do not hesitate in contacting
me. Thank you for your help and cooperation.
God Bless America
Tony ans, P.E.
Elite Consulting, Inc.
CC: Kim Ogle, Weld County Planning
EXHIBIT
CD? #4,151
I, the undersigned,have a mineral interest in the following property:
Approximately 75 acres at the Northeast corner of Weld County Roads 13
and 84 in the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 7 North, Range
67 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado.
have no objections to rezoning or platting of this property.
Signed:CP4 t Aio:)44 A) z 3/4 z_
Print N e Da2.4111 r/5
Sign ame Df
I, the undersigned, have a mineral interest in the following property:
Approximately 75 acres at the Northeast corner of Weld County Roads 13
and 84 in the Southwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 7 North, Range
67 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado.
have no objections to rezoning or platting of this property.
Signed:
'?Evet 1N li/opinou -
Print Name Date
/ �- D3
Sign ame Date
r--
k 0 19v wCR # I3
Ft . 0o ( !it<isCd yexaq
U,/anuar9 ao03
l<; ` l le, pick v1 vier !( {
Weld you hle,�h�„� maces �
( 55 5 N . I, tc
C� rtC1Ltj , Co 704,3 ( J
Deer YVkr . O51e, -•'
�ln i s Ie &&e F is ; 1,-, r24ctrcA
--ELL Propose cQ P/uctsaat leves-F Es.{‘/e p;
TTw, 13voccq in %as 3r..eizA te ol�s '9na,�r.
builds frig efroelopes ov, (ol-s l -0- w a ttire
�Uoa(C( kit n (f build " js out of our
View . Vile_ Cua,ut" - k-c Picts) i ktc ari ic7`
G,,t,cd +&t Soave o4 Con,ni:sst'o ers
acuare or t&ts a9ree vox, tct, bc-r, et~_.
+(n e to o txq k s tt _e( to s,
ICUs a3rce tux cct sadisf,'es a-kiy
6 ect ti s we lnatic to *leis Prop°Se41
(At cklo /rvuc/v# .
�l ta,2t 1 L y CIA
i hcer€elt� i
5La ker e tic tt fttl
EXHIBIT
ep-*coy
Feb 02 03 10: 57a Fred Walker (9701686-6154 p. 2
WATER SUPPLY AND STORAGE COMPANY -
P.O. Box 1584 rn
Ft Collins, Colorado 80522
January 29, 2003 T
Re: Pheasant Crest Estates
Dear Kim,
I will not be able to attend this week's Commissioners Hearing because of more urgent
water matters associated with our company. Below are the conditions that our company
would ask to be incorporated into this change of zone, if approved.
Fencing
Starting at the secondary fire access road on the west side of the property,the
applicant should construct a 5 foot or greater woven wire fence no closer than 30 feet
from the edge of the ditch. It should continue North to no closer than 30 feet from the
edge of our main canal. Along this north side,this fence should not be placed on our
property or within 30 feet of the edge, which ever is greater. There may be points along
this northern property line in which WSSC does not own 30 feet from the edge,
especially at the northwest corner. We would ask that the applicant grant and record an
easement to WSSC that would give us no less than 30 feet in these cases where WSSC
does not own 30 feet. At the Northeast corner of the subdivision, the fence should turn
south and extend far enough to deter the residents from gaining access to our canal and
roadway. There should be no gates in this fence.
All posts used to support the fence should be metal, because they are permanent
and not subject to fire damage.
Painted metal"No Trespassing"signs should be securely fastened on the interior
side of the fence so the residents can clearly read the signs. These signs should be
replaced every five years.
Irrigation Pipe across Canal
This pipe clearly has not been used in along time. If the applicant does not state
in the application that they intend to use irrigation water from this structure for the
subdivision it should be removed. It is very old and in need of repair. It should not
become the ditch company's problem to remove later on when it starts to fall into the
canal. Tt may already be subject to abandonment.
Fred Walker
President
EXHIBIT
I-3
Cam #411/
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING
CERTIFICATE
THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS JANUARY 27, 2003 THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED
ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE IS NOT
ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT
OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON
THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY
(ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
I, KIM OGLE, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS
POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS HEARING FOR MZ-614, A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR A NINE LOT MINOR
SUBDIVISION IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT.
KIM OGLE
Name of Person Posting Sign
r
'CIAMJ---
SinaiLitt of Person Hosting bign
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss.
COUNTY OF WELD )
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me this!, day of TCI0U Or , 2003.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
k d_ o
,aci k
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: _LyT
4. EXHIBIT
Icot 46N
I
KSI a1LMiCN cows or SMIRK f,.TiN.. 1.17x. :.:x.la
IW O JC ALUINNIM
POW a GINIKNCFY 44 D
:t ç .,
wTisaiLD ?bNE ro aE
O/V A-or 01
LSD fit no a7 671x:21 or .
"
I. dui-Des-we\ - 025-Dr r wipg
1 11c ,,
Rill \ •
t DuD EXFMrooN NO.
t -3-RE-2992.STEWART
F Rill"
I 1 X.IA FES
till II 1
1
��� it ,h- 4011.01CA .g 1
—III LOT2 \ "k \
i1' IyA1 \.1
Ct \; � `I �> 548'55'00"E
it r it t� /. /• /. ^\ 293.99'
•fr L \\I/.`/1/�//�� \ 556'06'23"E
1.
o I II I ` _' V/ .......-
t. / \ \ 155.49'
:�
10 m. sec ` /\ 49' '13"
p \• <` BBOE to•tw. Reds./ ) 166.93' WARN SUPPLY Mill
ill .I I I I LOT_I \L \\\ LOT) Il MO^ ` STOWAGE
MOtaAIMr, BOG 250.
\ 51:11 \
I31m •\\ \ /\ - \�
• r 1
bII I LL- - - ,-__ �' \\ %-5,- LUTJ \ j.� S77'4t e,E�gC�r�73� Si 400.34 E
av 50'NAIr Bow \. %e" / ..�:m ./...... .N: t .4.. .V.7t
��yI LUTE C '� /rows
I II xo' AaanG.l Nor r -1- I \\ T'4����<J, x5' M. \ LOTS � -
OI I` 1 _1_ K _• \I1 \��e . Btnb 5F 18.11 \ Lar;q — \
N I _ _ _ _ _ V. / \ iCCSONigO.t( �I 'N
}''� �� \ \FULL-OCPM BASOENIS I C
'F,JI\ al I B ICOF GS Lilt CA&SCNT
Z II I - - - - - LOT. No MILD IOC TO 9NaAIn PIPE lilt CO. \
TM I 01511.4 HMSO NO 0!r II 11 SITONY MNWARN \\ \ BOON 1447. ►AR 24 f r,
lrl Ja PIMP NOW KW&KOKNOS OW O I It s' *J( AT&T(AVIAN. /1 C
l 1 to* UIUM1 AC YPIICS NNYOSLO F I -1- I — BOON 10/5.PAR 25$. LOCATION\ \ 4
11 t li `Aru�(A5(r[ r `LI -I- 1— C wsl 0C MID *MAO. \ T�— — ;
4-1 4.wlt�ww" �I
I 9:PTIC ■S"CPnC ` I \ NO BUIo to 1
I µ.a ran F I LOTS Nld 1.. WARN
' Iv$' $86'27'12"W L I 1. o-:.W B SNOW MAKrAR .T.. 1
I 1 .AO�!ELn o/ 300.00' 4 II h ItS Loot MAT NOI
e I I �] JO.1f0• Srt °Sri" f ' F1r.L-OEPIN SASEKNIS / O
V - - - 1NIAN4LF5 LANOSCAPINf
' -12-1/.1 LESS MM '6, II Or 0711.1 SEPTC«And / u
I
J-//x' r Kldr AT 1 1 MSOIPnd M.O. EACH I T 1.
.
1 /1 ' • ;YANn1il' 1 ii MsalPnd MO .No LOT MILL 04 Rama( ITS GIN \ I/
CBM p ram°NO.. BC BM TRUNK MSdP11d FF O
ASIC In I • I N/KLLOw PlASTIC I II 9IC moo LOCAnd rinl ITS ��w �r O
F[SL, �1 N 8 1 LM, lS 13112 Il I -' 1 OWN NOTAOIIAL KNOW,NON 40 �, w �� --0".'n1".4312 «d o n \i�''�� TESL, «�_-r- YYY ���..
� _z - - _ -
113 - GCJl:�'7�' C.4 A� 586'27'12"W 2124.99' (R=2424.97') Lam• � rtC-a-ny
OMA'ROAD
1110111-a-.Ar
BOG l32. PAGE II?
4. EXHIBIT
Hello