The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20031096.tiff INVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant LifeBridge Christian Church Case Number PZ-1004 Submitted or Prepared Prior to At Hearing Hearing 1 Staff Comments X Department of Planning Services Field Check Form X Commissioner Folsom Field Check Form Letter to Applicant X 2 Affidavit of Sign Posting (EXHIBITS O, P, Q, FILED UNDER BOCC EXHIBITS) X 3 Legal Notifications X 4 Application dated 12-12-2002 X 4a Adjacent Property Owners and Mineral Rights Affidavit(FILED UNDER SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS) 4b Specific Development Guide 4c Tax Certificate 4d Property Deed (FILED UNDER DEED) 4e Mineral Owners Agreement 4f Agreement with Oligarchy Ditch Company 4g Service Provider Letters and Draft Agreements 4h Draft Improvements Agreement 4i Wetlands and Wildlife Information 4j Geotechnical Reports(FILED UNDER SOIL SURVEY- INCLUDES STORMWATER DRAINAGE OVERSIZE MAP) 5 Maps X 5a Project LifeBridge Phase One Plan Area, no date, submitted with 12-12-2002 materials 5b Change of Zone Application Maps dated 12-11-2002(DUPLICATE OVERSIZED MAPS IN BACK OF FILE) 5c Conceptual Site Plan at Full Build-out Image, no date, submitted with 12.12-2002 materials 5d Conceptual Model Photograph dated 12-9-2002, submitted with 12-12-2002 materials (FILED UNDER APPLICATION) Se Project LifeBridge Bikepaths and Sidewalks, submitted with 12-12-2002 materials (FILED UNDER APPLICATION) 5f Project LifeBridge Trails System, submitted with 12-12-2002 materials (FILED UNDER APPLICATION) j as acb3-/O , 5g Change of Zone- Drainage Plan Map dated 9-23-2002 (OVERSIZED MAP LOCATED IN BACK OF FILE) 5h Amended Change of Zone Application Maps dated 2-18-2002(DUPLICATE OVERSIZED MAPS IN BACK OF FILE) 5i 2'Amended Change of Zone Application Maps dated 2-26-2003 5j Phasing Diagram, Filing I, Phase 1 and Phase 2 dated 2-18-2003 (OVERSIZED MAPS LOCATED IN BACK OF FILE) 5k View Studies, Detailed Site Plans& Phasing Chart 51 Amended View Studies dated 3-10-2003 (View A revised)(FILED UNDER APPLICATION) 6 Referral list/Referrals with Comments Weld County Code Compliance referral received 12-30-2003,2-12-2003 X Opinion from L. Morrison, County Attorney's Office concerning Weld County X Home Rule Charter, Section 3-13, re: Board of County Commissioners, dated 12-31-2002 Weld County Sheriff's Office referral received 1-8-2003 and 03-05-2003 X Mountain View Fire Protection District referral received 1-13-2003 X State of Colorado, Office of State Engineer, referral received 05-21-2002 and X 01-15-2003 St.Vrain Valley School District, RE-1J referral received 1-15-2003 X St.Vrain Sanitation District referral received 1-16-2003 X Longmont Soil Conservation District referral received 1-17-2003 X Weld County Department of Building Inspection referral received 1-21-2003 X Weld County Department of Public Health& Environment referral received X 1-27-2003 City of Longmont referral received 2-6-2003, 3-12-2003 X State of Colorado, Division of Wildlife referral received 2-8-2003 X State of Colorado, Geological Survey referral received 2-11-2003 X Weld County Zoning Compliance referral received 12-30-2003,2-12-2003 X Weld County Department of Public Works referral received 02-25-2003 X State of Colorado Department of Transportation referrals dated 3-3-2003, 3-6-203, X and 3-7-2003 (Hydraulics) PC Exhibits 7 Rob and Kayla Smith, Letter of Concern dated 12-2-2002 X 8 Brandon Fuller, Letter of Concern received 12-16-2002 X 9 Wendy Wahlin, Letter of Opposition received 12-19-2002 X 10 Robert and Sara Ward, Letter of Concern received 12-18-2002 X 11 Carol Zuber, Letter of Concern received 12-26-2002 X 12 Mescal Poole, Letter of Opposition received 12-26-2002 X 13 Raymond and Donna Hall, Letter of Concern received 12-26-2002 X 14 Commissioner Vaad, Letter recusing himself from consideration of Land Use X Case PZ-1004, LifeBridge Christian Church PUD, received 1-6-2003 15 Pat Hains, Letter of Concern received 1-7-2003 X 16 Bridget Lambert, Letter of Opposition received 1-16-2003 X 17 Dale and Natalie Tenny, Letter of Opposition received 1-17-2003 X 18 Peter Gries, Letter of Concern received 1-24-2003 X 19 Cheryl Winter, Letter of Concern received 2-3-2003 X 20 William and Jane Ewer, Letter of Opposition received 2-4-2003 X 21 Rob and Kayla Smith, Letter of Concern received 2-4-2003 X 22 Greeley Tribune Article, dated 2-11-2003 (OVERSIZED NEWS ARTICLE IN ORIGINAL FILE) 23 John and Sarah Fenton, Letter of Opposition received 2-11-2003 X 24 Michael Donohoo, E-mail of Concern received 2-12-2003 X 25 Gregg Koldenhoven, Letter of Concern received 2-20-2003 X 26 Rich Archer, E-mail of Concern-no date X 27 Surrounding Neighborhoods Petition of Denial-256 signatures, 14 pages X (See also#237) 28 William and Jane Ewer, Letter of Opposition received 2-21-2003 X 29 Frank and Renee Svejda, Letter of Support received 2-21-2003 X 30 Daniel and Amy Rice, Letter of Concern received 2-21-2003 X 31 Penny Rehn, Letter of Concern received 2-25-2003 X 32 Christine Hains, Letter of Opposition received 2-25-2003 X 33 Paul King, Letter of Opposition received 2-26-2003 X 34 Carol Zuber, E-mail of Opposition received 2-26-2003 X 35 Bobbie Evert, Letter of Concern received 2-26-2003 X 36 Kathleen Trubell, Letter of Concern received 2-27-2003 X 37 Anda Brenholt, Letter of Opposition received 2-27-2003 X 38 Barb Poquette, Letter of Concern received 2-27-2003 X 39 Robert and Diane Harrison, Letter of Concern received 2-27-2003 X 40 Daniel and Amy Rice, Letter of Concern received 2-28-2003 X 41 Michelle Floriolli, Letter of Opposition received 2-28-2003 X 42 Mark and Jennifer Hargrove, Letter of Concern received 2-27-2003 X 43 Gene Merrill, E-mail of Concern received 3-1-2003 X 44 Dale and Natalie Tenny, Letter received 3-5-2003 X 45 Roger Olsen, Letter of Opposition received 3-6-2003 X 46 Tony and Linda Mollohan, Letter of Opposition received 3-6-2003 X 47 Sheri O'Neal, Letter of Opposition received 3-6-2003 X 48 Terry-Lee Braun, Letter of Opposition received 3-6-2003 X 49 Tom and Audra Geldmacher, 2 Letters of Concern received 3-6-2003 X 50 Denton Farnsworth, Letter of Concern received 3-6-2003 X 51 William and Jean White, Letter of Concern received 3-6-2003 X 52 Duane Leise, Letter of Concern received 3-6-2003; E-mail received 3-13-2003; X and Response from County Attorney received 3-12-2003 53 Vicki and Duane Braunagel, Letter of Opposition received 3-6-2003 X 54 L. C. O'Neal, Letter of Opposition received 3-7-2003 X 55 Rob and Jane Sanders, Letters of Concern received 3-7-2003 X 56 Applicant, Petition of Support, 1179 signatures, 93 pages (see also Ex #231) X 57 Longmont Police Department, Letter of Support dated 3-10-2003, received 4-11- X 2003 58 Longmont High School,2 Letters of Support received 3-10-2003 X 59 Darrell Hammond, 2 Letters of Support received 3-10-2003 X 60 Applicant, Letter re: Community Use of Facility received 3-10-2003 X 61 Outreach United Resource Center, Inc., Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 62 Boulder County Sheriff's Office, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 63 Joe and Stephanie Pelle, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 64 Janis and Mike Wisman, E-mail to Bruce Ginnell received 3-10-2003 X 65 Ahlberg Funeral Chapel and Crematory, Letter of Support received 3-10- X 2003 66 Alternatives for Youth, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 67 St. Vrain Valley School District, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 68 Boulder County Health Department, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 69 Boulder County Parks and Open Space Department, Letter of Support X received 3-10-2003 70 Sidney Poppe, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 71 Jackie Merrill, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 72 Stephanie King, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 73 Valerie Lopez, 2 Letters of Support received 3-10-2003 X 74 Martin Scholes, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 75 Parris Cardenas, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 76 Lisa Rue, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 77 Longmont Cobras Baseball Team, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 78 Phil West, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 79 Kendra Wilson, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 80 T. Williamson, K&C RV, Inc., Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 81 Mike Bloise, Longmont Lightning, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 82 Jim Coleman, Abundant Life Church, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 83 Mark Pimper, D.D.S., Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 84 Kay Ramachandran, Longmont Coalition, Letter of Support received 3-10- X 2003 85 Nick and Emily Stratton, Letter of Support and corresponding news article X received 3-10-2003 and 4-21-2003 86 John and Ann Boettcher Family, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 87 Monica Burkhardt, Bonfils Blood Center, Letter of Support received 3-10- X 2003 88 Karen Cody Carlson, Dental Aid, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 89 Gerald Granlich and Karla Hale, Longmont Meals on Wheels, Inc., X 2 Letters of Support received 3-10-2003 90 Glenda Faus, St. Vrain Valley Parenting Center, Letter of Support received X 3-10-2003 91 Lori Canova, I Have a Dream Foundation, Letter of Support received 3-10- X 2003 92 Ann Jennings, St. Vrain Community Council, Letter of Support received 3- X 10-2003 93 James Baldwin, Community Food Share, Letter of Support received 3-10- X 2003 94 Tina Bedard, Life Line Screening, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 95 Steve Welsh, Seven Oaks Academy, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 96 Jor-El Godsey, Life Choices Pregnancy Center, Letter of Support received X 3-10-2003 97 Ilene Ripan, Atlerra Sterling House, Letter of Support received 3-10-2003 X 98 Vicky Braunagel, Letter of Concern and Petition of Opposition X received 3-10-2003 (See also#238) 99 Peter Gries, Letter received 3-10-2003; and Letter and Diary Notes from X Elsie Bredehoft dated 4-29-1999 to 5-1-2000 100 Lisa Morgenthal, Letter of Opposition received 3-10-2003 X 101 Roberta Evert, Letter of Concern received 3-10-2003 X 102 Randall Branham, Letter of Opposition received 3-10-2003 X 103 Tom and Catharine Middlen, Letter of Concern received 3-10-2003 X 104 Duane Liese, Letter of Opposition received 3-10-2003 X 105 Jan and Russ Howard, Letter of Opposition received 3-10-2003, and X response from County Attorney's Office, dated 3-10-2003 106 Larry Trubell, Letter of Opposition received 3-10-2003 X 107 John Mark Schroeder, Letter of Concern received 3-10-2003 X 108 Michael and Lisa Donohoo, 2 Letters of Concern received 3-10-2003 and X 3-12-2003 109 Linda Clayburn, Girl Scouts Mountain Prairie Council, Letter of Support X and Pictures dated 3-10-2003 ( PICTURES IN ORIGINAL FILE, INDIVIDUAL PICTURES NOT NUMBERED) 110 Peter and Monica Gries, Letter of Opposition and news articles X received 3-11-2003 111 Michael Donohoo, Letter of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 112 Fred Collins, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 113 Lori Miller, Letter of Concern and Correction E-mail received 3-12-2003 X 114 Louise Leise, Letter of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 115 Thomas and Mary Cairy, Letter of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 116 David Duvall, 2 Letters of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 117 Scott Pratt, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 118 Mervi Tuominen-Collins, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 119 Bernard and Donna Messineo, 6 Letters of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 120 Charles and Teresa Hellmer, 2 Letters of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 121 Lois O'Neal, Letter of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 122 Tami Wogny, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 123 Greg and Kim Kittilson, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 124 Virginia Guderjahn, Letter of Support received 3-12-2003 X 125 Gretchen Pratt, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 126 Becky Auer, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 127 Ee Wah Koh, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 128 Janet Russell and Richard Salm, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 129 Erik Wahlin, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 130 Rod Schmidt, E-mail of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 131 Daily Times-Call, News Article dated 2-19-2003 X 132 Steve and LeiAnne Koch, Letter of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 133 The Vazzano Family, Letter of Opposition received 3-12-203 X 134 William and Joyce Norris, 2 Letters of Concern dated 3-12-2003 X 135 John and Carrie Shellenberger, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 136 Viran Meza, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 137 Barb and Michael Stember, 2 Letters of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 138 Ellen Eiler-Golliher, E-mail and Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 139 Wesley Sullivan, E-mail and Letter of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 140 Ron and Judy Franco, E-mail of Support received 3-12-2003 X 141 Marisa Burt and Mark Flood, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 142 M. J. Sullivan, E-mail and Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 143 Randall McKie, E-mail of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 144 Richard and Susan Jetley, E-mail of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 145 David Duvall, E-mail of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 146 Robert and Vicki Schnepp, Letter of Concern received 3-12-2003 X 147 Corey and Amy Johnson, Letter of Concern received 3-13-2003 X 148 Janis Whisman, E-mail of Concern received 3-13-2003 X 149 Marlene Tibbitts, Letter of Concern received 3-13-2003 X 150 Ken Auer, Letter of Concern received 3-13-2003 X 151 Franklin and Suezan Johnson, Letter of Opposition received 3-12-2003 X 152 Planning Staff, Memo requesting Continuance of PC Hearing, X dated 3-13-2003 153 David Rice, Letter of Concern received 3-20-2003 X 154 Matthew Olson, Policy Studies, Inc., Letter of Concern received 03-31- X 2003 155 Lisa Donohoo, Letter of Concern received 4-3-2003 X 156 Mikaela Evans, Letter of Support received 4-7-2003 X 157 Bob and Linda Fredericksen, Letter of Support received 4-7-2003 X 158 Mariann De Stefano, Letter of Support received 4-7-2003 X 159 Al and Shirlee Larson, Letter of Support received 4-8-2003 X 160 Brad Evans, Letter of Support received 4-8-2003 X 161 Connie Sorensen, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 162 Kim Wikre, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 163 Lee and Helen Swenson, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 164 Jerry and Judy Bakanec, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 165 Business Owner, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 166 Frank and Jana Pierce, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 167 Doyle and Tammy Bloss, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 168 Debbie Powers, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 169 Douglas Powers, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 170 Erik and Jan Knudson, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 171 Richard and Paula Fagre, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 172 Kim Nelson, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 173 Scott Owen, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 174 News Article, The Arizona Republic, dated March 27, 2003, received 4-10- X 2003 175 Rachel Maxwell, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 176 Jennifer Jones, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 177 Jim and Susan Davis, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 178 Echo Owen, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 179 Don Owen, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 180 Scott McKenna, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 181 Laurie McKenna, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 182 Larry and Donna Schroeder, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 183 LaRayne Randall, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 184 Daniel and Harriet Mattox, Letter of Support received 4-10-2003 X 185 Applicant, Faxed Petition of Support, 3 pages, received 4-10-2003 X (Duplicate of#202 - Originals) 186 Keith Goshia, E-mail of Support received 4-11-2003 X 187 Melissa Seipelt, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 188 Joby Roberts, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 189 Cindy York, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 190 Larry and Susan Wisecup, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 191 Lisa King, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 192 Jeff and Steph Gold, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 193 Chris Bass, Two Letters of Support received 4-11-2003 X 194 Dana and Malissa Gelles, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 195 Ken and Connie Williamson, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 196 Carl Randall, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 197 Dawn and David Orr, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 198 Douglas and Sandra Boruff, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 199 Gerald Roberts, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 200 Robert Gardner, Letter of Support received 4-11-2003 X 201 Town of Mead, Referral response received 4-18-2003 X 202 Applicant, Petition of Support, 3 pages received 4-14-2003 X 203 YMCA Longmont, Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 204 Longmont High School, Jay Darien, Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 205 Unsigned Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 206 Stephanie Spetter, Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 207 Boulder County Housing Authority, Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 208 Shari Wittkorn, Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 209 Mike Stratton, Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 210 Nadine Zaragoza, Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 211 Monique Green, Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 212 Hank and Raeanne Simonous, Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 213 Barbara Desch, Letter of Support received 4-14-2003 X 214 Dale and Natalie Tenny, E-mail of Opposition received 4-17-2003 X 215 Steve Weathers and Colleen Shibao, E-mail of Concern received 4-18- X 2003 216 Paul and Susan Entzel, Letter of Support received 4-18-2003 X 217 Claudio and Becca Battaglini, Letter of Support received 4-18-2003 X 218 Jeff and Janet Still, Letter of Support received 4-18-2003 X 219 Herman and LeVon Hallenbeck, Letter of Support received 4-18-2003 X 220 Dennis Nevins, Letter of Support received 4-18-2003 X 221 Rod Schmidt, Letter of Support received 4-21-2003 X 222 Patina Oil and Gas Corporation, Letter of Concern received 4-23-2003 X 223 SVYSA, Nick Pocalyko, Letter of Support received 4-21-2003 X 224 Applicant, Final Plat and Floor Plans related to Belle Creek Filing I, X received 4-21-2003 (Filed under Application) (OVERSIZED MAP LOCATED IN BACK OF FILE) 225 Town of Firestone, referral response X 226 Town of Frederick, referral response X 227 Sign posting affidavit X 228 John Folsom, field check X 229 Tetra Tech letter to Kim Ogle, dated April 14, 2003,with fax cover (original X substituted for fax) 230 St. Vrain School Mitigation Agreement (mentioned in above fax cover) X 231 Matthew Delich, Addition to Petition for Support (see also#56, #185, and X #202), and 232 Lee Morrison, Property Tax Law X 233 Peter Gries, Fact sheet from East Longmont group X 234 Peter Gries, photograph of fruit-watermelon, 2 limes, grapefruit, and X lemon (not taken into possession, photographed) 235 Printouts of Posters on CD X 236 Richard Sohn, Packet of violations in Boulder County X 237 159 signatures petition opposed (See also#27) X 238 145 signatures petition opposed (See also#98 for duplicate copy of the X letter submitted to the Planners and Commissioners of Weld County) 239 View A, Phase 1 X 240 Views, Ft. Collins High School (2 pages) X 241 Large board --View C, Phase 1 (Returned to applicant, reduced version X provided) 242 Large board—left hand panel 3D site sections (Returned to applicant, X reduced version submitted as slide 11 of BOCC Exhibit R) 243 Large board -- right hand panel 3D site sections (Returned to applicant, X reduced version submitted as slide 11 of BOCC Exhibit R) 244 Barbara Brunk, Letter re: Bulk Standards, dated 04-21-2003 X I hereby certify that the 244 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commission hearing. I further certify that these items were forwarded to the Clerk to the Board's office. 'r i1�� Kim O e ❖ Planner III 46ti MEMORANDUM WCTO: Planning Commission COLORADO DATE: March 4, 2003 FROM: Kim Ogle, Planner III YO. SUBJECT: LifeBridge Christian Church PUD PZ-1004, applicant Bruce Grinnell c/o Barbara Brunk, Tetra Tech Rocky Mountain Consultants Attached to this memorandum are additional application materials that were received prior to the March 4, 2003, Planning Commissioners hearing. The materials included are: ❑ The signed Oligarchy Ditch Agreement, received via facsimile March 3, 2003. Please note the Ditch Agreement has not been reviewed by Attorney Morrison. Mr. Morrison will review the document and provide comment, if any, prior to March 11, 2003. ❑ The referral letter from the Colorado Department of Transportation, received via facsimile March 3, 2003. ❑ Four letters from surrounding property owners. The information enclosed was current through March 4, 2003. A second mailing of information will be sent under separate cover via USMail on or about March 11, 2003, unless other arrangements are made through this office. Should you have any questions or need further information, I may be reached at the Greeley office, 970 353 6100 x 3540 or via e-mail at kogle@co.weld.co.us pc: Barb Brunk TTRMC, Longmont end memorandum a DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Phone: (970) 353-6100, Ext. 3540 Fax: (970) 304-6498 I COLORADO December 23, 2002 LifeBridge Christian Church c/o Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. 1900 South Sunset Street, Suite 1-F Longmont, CO 80501 Subject: PZ-1004 - Request for a PUD Change of Zone from (A) Agricultural to PUD with (E) Estate; (R-1) Low Density Residential; (R-2) Duplex Residential; (R-3) Medium Density Residential; (R-4) High Density Residential; (C-1) Neighborhood Commercial and (C-2) General fa, Commercial To Whom It May Concern: Your application and related materials for the request described are being processed at the present time. Our department will be processing the Sketch Plan in accordance with Chapter 27, Article III of the Weld County Code. You will be notified by this office at the end of the review period regarding the Sketch Plan. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Longmont Planning Commission for their review and comments. Please call Longmont at 303-651-8330, for information regarding the date, time and place of the meeting and the review process. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call or visit. Sincerely, Ki O Planner r LAND USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE h iDe COLORADO CASE HEARING DATE: March 18, 2003 NUMBER: PZ-1004 Continued to April 1, 2003 Continued to April 22, 2003 PLANNER: Kim Ogle APPLICANT: LifeBridge Christian Church : c/o Tetra Tech Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc., 1900 South Sunset Street, Suite 1-F; Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: Request for a PUD Change of Zone from (A)Agricultural to PUD with (E) Estate; (R-1) Low Density Residential; (R-2) Duplex Residential; (R-3) Medium Density Residential; (R- 4) High Density Residential; (C-1) Neighborhood Commercial and (C-2) General Commercial and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses in the Mixed Use Development Overlay District LEGAL: Lot B of Recorded Exemption 1389 and Part of Section 5, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of&adjacent to Weld County Road 26; north of& adjacent to Hwy 119; west of and adjacent to Fairview Street ACRES: 313 +/- t PARCEL#: 1313 05 000054; 1313 05 000060; 1313 05 000062 and 1313 05 000066 POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS The criteria for review of this Change of Zone application is listed in Section 27.6.120 of the Weld County Code as follows The Department of Planning Services' staff has received responses from the following agencies: • Weld County Code Compliance referral received 12-30-2003, 2-12-2003 • Weld County Attorney's Office referral received 12-31-2003 • Weld County Sheriffs Office referral received 1-8-2003 • Mountain View Fire Protection District referral received 1-9-2003 • Longmont Soil Conservation District referral received 1-14-2003 • St. Vrain Valley School District, RE-1J referral received 1-15-2003 • State of Colorado, Division of Water Resources referral received 1-15-2003 • St. Vrain Sanitation District referral received 1-16-2003 • Weld County Department of Building Inspection referral received 1-21-2003 • Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment referral received 1-27-2003 • City of Longmont referral received 2-6-2003, 3-12-2003 • State of Colorado, Division of Wildlife referral received 2-8-2003 • State of Colorado, Geological Survey referral received 2-11-2003 • Weld County Department of Public Works referral received 2-21-2003 • Oligarchy Ditch Company Agreement received 3-3-2003 • State of Colorado Department of Transportation, Traffic referral received 3-3-2003 & 3-6-2003 • State of Colorado Department of Transportation, Hydraulics referral received 3-7-2003 Town of Mead, referral received 4-11-2003 LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 1 The Department of Planning Services' staff has not received responses from the following agencies: • Left Hand Water District • Boulder County Department of Planning & Engineering Great Western Railroad • Long's Peak Water District LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 2 OF CHANGE ECOMNE � I ADMINISTRATIVE RECOMMENDATION WUDe COLORADO CASE HEARING DATE: March 18, 2003 NUMBER: PZ-1004 Continued to April 1, 2003 Continued to April 22, 2003 PLANNER: Kim Ogle APPLICANT: LifeBridge Christian Church : c/o Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc., 1900 South Sunset Street, Suite 1-F; Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: Request for a PUD Change of Zone from (A)Agricultural to PUD with (E) Estate; (R-1) Low Density Residential; (R-2)Duplex Residential;(R-3)Medium Density Residential;(R-4)High Density Residential; (C-1) Neighborhood Commercial and (C-2) General Commercial and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses in the Mixed Use Development Overlay District LEGAL: Lot B of Recorded Exemption 1389 and Pad of Section 5, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of& adjacent to Weld County Road 26; north of& adjacent to Hwy 119; west of and adjacent to Fairview Street ACRES: 313+/- PARCEL#: 1313 05 000054; 1313 05 000060; 1313 05 000062 and 1313 05 000066 THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES' STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 27-5-30 of the Weld County Code. 2. The submitted materials are in compliance with Section 27-6-120 of the Weld County Code as follows: A. Section 27-6-120.8.6.a The proposal is consistent with any intergovernmental agreement in effect influencing the PUD and Chapters 19 (Coordinated Planning Agreements), Chapter 22 (Comprehensive Plan), Chapter 23 (Zoning), Chapter 24 (Subdivision) and Chapter 26 (Mixed Use Development) of this Code. The proposed site is presently influenced by an Inter-Governmental Agreement with the City of Longmont. The proposal is consistent with the aforementioned documents as follows: 1) Section 22-2-110.6 (UGB.Goal 2) states, "Concentrate urban development in or adjacent to existing municipalities or the 1-25 Mixed Use Development area and maintain urban growth boundary areas that provide an official designation between future urban and non-urban uses." The proposed subdivision is located within the Mixed Use Development (MUD) area, and is within the boundaries of (Ordinance 2002-7,Article XIV,Chapter 19)the Inter-governmental Agreement(IGA)boundary with the City of Longmont and within the Municipal Referral Area with the Town of Mead. 2) Section 22-2-230.A (MUD.Goal 1) states "To plan and to manage growth and to provide for ease of inclusion in the 1-25 Mixed Use Development area and urban development nodes so as to balance relevant fiscal, environmental, aesthetic and LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 3 economic components of the area." The proposal assures that new development occurs in such a manner as to maintain an attractive working and living environment. Further,all applicable standards and regulations, unless otherwise modified herein, of Chapter 26,Chapter 27 and Chapter 23,along with Chapter 22 shall be integrated in the design of the Final Plan and will be addressed through the Site Plan Review process. 3) Ordinance 2002-7,Article XIV,Chapter 19,the Inter-governmental Agreement(IGA) boundary with the City of Longmont presently influences this site. The Department of Planning Services and the County Attorney's office determined that when the application was submitted and under review there was not an IGA in place between Weld County and the City of Longmont, therefore, it was determined by the Weld County Attorney's office that this application would not be subject to Ordinance 2002- 7, Article XIV, Chapter 19 , given that Ordinance 2002-7, Article XIV, Chapter 19 was not adopted prior to the submittal of the Sketch Plan, PK-1004, application. 4) Goal MUD.C. Goal 1 in Chapter 26, Article 1 Section 26-1-50.B.1.a of the Weld County Code states, "Establish a sense of community identity within the Mixed Use Development area by planning and managing residential, commercial, industrial, environmental, aesthetic and economic components of the area." The land uses shown on the change of zone plat reflect the uses shown on the MUD Structural Land Use Map. (Map Number 2.1, dated June 20, 2002) MUD.C. Goal 3 in Chapter 26, Article 1 Section 26-1-50.B.3.a of the Weld County Code states, "Community form and identity shall be encouraged through the enhancement and preservation of natural resources and features." Where feasible, drainage ways shall be maintained in their natural state to ensure optimal re-charge (MUD.C. Policy 3.2, Section 26-1-50.B.3.c). Impacts to air quality will be minimized (MUD.C. Policy 3.3, Section 26-1-50.6.3.d). Disturbed areas will be re-vegetated immediately following construction. In order to minimize wind and soil erosion, temporary stabilization measures will be established until permanent cover is in place. (MUD.C. Policy 3.5, Section 26-1-50.B.3.f). Native species have been selected for some of the re-vegetation. (MUD.C. Policy 3.6, Section 26-1-50.B.3.g). 5) Section 22-3-140.6 TGoal 2.states"A Countywide trail system should be considered to service transportation and recreation purposes." Several pedestrian and open space connections are provided to connect the three components of the development and the surrounding area, including adjacent subdivisions and the Longmont Open Space area associated with Union Reservoir. 6) Section 22-3-140.A.T.Goal 1. states"Provide a unified and coordinated countywide street and highway system which moves people and goods in a safe, economical, and efficient manner. The proposed development will comply with Sections 22-3-60 through 22-3-140 of the Weld County Code. Access to the development will preserve the existing and future function of roads and highways affected by this proposed development. All development circulation systems shall be designed so that they do not disrupt highway travel. Traffic generated by the proposed development will conform to the recommendations and requirements of the Department of Public Works and the Colorado Department of Transportation (T. Policy 1.1, Section 22-3-140.A.1). 7) Section 26-1-50.6.4.c MUD.C.Policy 4.2 of the Weld County Code states, "All proposals for commercial, industrial and residential development within the 1-25 Mixed Use Development area and urban development node overlay district should use the Planned Unit Development application process and regulations." The Planned Unit Development process will allow developers flexibility and variety needed to offer a range of products,services and uses. It will also give the developer an opportunity to explain the development plans to surrounding land owners and the County so that important information about land use compatibility and services, facilities or utilities needed to serve the proposal are determined to be adequate. LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD.PZ-1004,page 4 Section 26-1-70.C.3.a, MUD.T. Goal 3 of the Weld County Code states, "New development within the MUD area shall provide a mechanism for balancing relevant fiscal and economic components of transportation systems." An overall traffic impact analysis has been prepared for this development. Cumulative development impacts, created by this project and appropriate improvements are identified in the traffic report. (MUD.T. Policy 3.1, Section 26-1-70.3.b). Section 26-1-70.C.4, MUD.T. Goal 4 of the Weld County Code states, "As development occurs, the feasibility of a public transit system shall be examined in the MUD area." The site also has the potential to become a public transportation hub complete with a Park-N-Ride Facility. The proposal states that the development's design integrates a transportation network, including a public transit system into the project. B. Section 27-6-120.B.6.6-The uses which would be allowed in the proposed PUD will conform with the Performance Standards of the PUD Zone District contained in Article II, Chapter 27 of this Code. Section 27-2-20 Access Standards Access to this PUD will be off of State Highway 119, Weld County Road 3.5, and Weld County Road 26. State Highway 119 is immediately south of and adjacent to this proposed development,Weld County Road 26 is immediately north of and adjacent to the property and Weld County Road 3.5 aligns itself in a north-south direction and divides the Single Family Residential Component from the Neighborhood Center, Residential, Senior Housing, Mixed Use Office/Commercial and Church campus site. Further,the internal roads as proposed shall meet all the requirements of Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code. The application is within the Weld County Road Impact Fee Area #3, Ordinance 2002-11, Section 20-1-10 of the Weld County Code and shall require the payment of road impact fees at the time a building permit is applied for as addressed through Section 20-1-200, Section 27-2-30 Buffering and Screening All proposed uses,except single family residential development within the site will go through a Site Plan Review application process, and all on-site screening and buffering will be addressed during the Site Plan Review phase of site development. The site shall maintain compliance with the Mixed Use Development standards regarding screening and buffering of the property, per Section 26-2-70, Landscape Regulations of the Weld County Code. Section 27-2-40. Bulk Requirements LifeBridge Christian Church has proposed a deviation of the bulk requirements as set out in the Weld County Code, Table 23.4 for the residential component, and Section 23-3-250 Performance Standards for the Commercial Zone District. Refer to the Bulk Standards Summary Table on page 7 of this document. LifeBridge Christian Church is proposing a maximum building height of sixty feet for the entire church campus, with an additional sixty feet of height for approximately thirty percent of the building for the fly space area associated with the theater. Additionally, LifeBridge Christian Church proposes a maximum building height of thirty-five (35) feet for the residential component; a maximum building height of forty-five (45) feet for the assisted living village; and a maximum building height of fifty-five feet for the mixed use office/ retail area, commercial center and neighborhood center. It should be noted that all R-2, R-3, R-4 and Commercial development in a PUD shall undergo a site plan review process, as defined in Chapter 23,Article II, Division 3 of the Weld County Code. Section 27-2-50. Circulation Development within a PUD Zone District shall be designed and constructed to include adequate, safe and convenient arrangements for pedestrian and vehicular circulation, off- street parking and loading space. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation shall relate to the LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004,page 5 circulation system external to a PUD Zone District. All streets within the PUD Zone District, whether private or public shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Weld County Public Works Department, Chapter 24 (Subdivision) and Chapter 26 (MUD), of the Weld County Code and the Colorado Department of Transportation, if applicable, unless otherwise modified herein. LifeBridge Christian Church will be responsible for designing the cross sections according to Section 24-7-20 and Appendix 24-E of the Weld County Code. Section 27-2-60. Common Open Space As proposed, the site does meet the open space requirements of Chapter 27 and Chapter 26 (MUD). LifeBridge Christian Church shall adhere to Section 26-2-70.D regarding landscape requirements adjacent to Roadway Corridors, specifically State Highway 119. A trail, adjacent to the Oligarchy ditch,will traverse the site connecting areas to the east and west of the development. Section 27-2-70. Compatibility The proposed site is north of and adjacent to State Highway 119, east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3.5, south of and adjacent to the realigned Weld County Road 26. Vista Commercial Business Park is directly south of this property across State Highway 119. The Elms at Meadow Vale PUD and Meadow Vale Farms PUD are adjacent to the east, and Longview PUD is adjacent to the West, across Weld County Road 3.5. The site location is identified as Neighborhood Center on the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan, Map 2.1 Structural Land Use Map date June 20, 2002. Section 26-2- 30 in Chapter 26 of the Weld County Code describes the Neighborhood Center and Residential Component. Two diagrams follow and address: Bulk Standards Summary: Lifebridge Pud V. Weld County Code Bulk Standards Massing Diagram for Church Campus Bulk Standards Graphic Massing Diagram for Church Campus r LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004,page 6 Neighborhood Centers. Neighborhood centers are established to provide convenience goods and services primarily for the residents of a specific neighborhood. These centers should be accessible via sidewalks, trails or green ways, creating identity for individual neighborhoods. Neighborhood centers characteristically have few environmental impacts and rely more upon service-related provisions such as law enforcement and fire protection. New development within these centers shall therefore mitigate the impacts associated with its use. Neighborhood centers include, but are not limited to, the following activities and services: 1. Small Parks 2. Civic uses, such as places of worship, libraries, and community centers 3. Public facilities, such as schools 4. Service businesses, such as smaller offices 5. Residential mix Residential. Residential districts within the MUD area are encouraged to be cohesive,identifiable and diverse, while retaining the current agrarian lifestyle of residents in the area. The County encourages comprehensive and coordinated neighborhood design efforts in developments,especially with regard to circulation provisions,conservation of natural features and relationship to established neighborhood centers. The County also encourages diversity of housing types, including owner-occupied and rental housing,which serve all economic segments of the population and match local incomes and age groups. Higher residential densities shall be situated within close proximity to the designated neighborhood centers. Each neighborhood shall have an interconnected network of local streets that provide direct connections to local destinations. The successful design and development of residential neighborhoods within the MUD area is essential for it to function efficiently and provide a sense of place and community identity. Developments are encouraged to incorporate design features which enhance the quality of the neighborhood and promote safety for its residents. LifeBridge Christian Church states "The Project LifeBridge plan maximizes the relationship between compatible uses. The various uses front local roads, using the street and its associated streetscape as a buffer. A progression of building scale and level of use from State Highway 119 north into the site reduces the need for screening and buffering between uses. A neighborhood center, located in the most visible section of the property, is associated with the assisted living facility, community center, and neighborhood retail and office facilities. These community scale uses buffer the neighborhood center from the senior housing portion of the site. Generous landscaped areas and setbacks help to buffer the surrounding single family lots from the larger scaled buildings of the church/community facilities. As a result, the uses within the PUD are compatible." Additionally, LifeBridge Christian Church states that the proposal is compatible to the surrounding area as "The uses allowed in the PUD are compatible with land uses surrounding the PUD Zone District."Proposed residential scale uses and appropriate setbacks and landscaping are included around the perimeter of the PUD. Neighborhood retail and commercial uses, sited along State Highway 119 and primary arterial streets within the PUD Zone District, minimize conflicting uses with adjacent uses by setbacks,perimeter landscape buffers and a proposed landscaped parkway. Church/community facilities are sited central to the development with open space and recreational fields surrounding the buildings. The required parking will be landscaped and screened appropriately from adjacent neighborhoods. The Department of Planning Services notes that the site will maintain compliance with Chapter 26 regarding screening and buffering of the property. The proposed LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 7 PUD shall demonstrate compatibility with the surrounding residential properties specific to a Conceptual Lighting Plan, a Conceptual Landscape Plan with topographical features delineated, a Conceptual Sign Plan, a Conceptual Phasing Plan with incremental intervals identified, a Conceptual Phased Parking Plan, and a Conceptual Master Drainage Plan, at a minimum. LifeBridge Christian Church shall be compatible with the surrounding residential communities, including any requirements as determined by the Colorado Department of Transportation and the Weld County Department of Public Works. Additional justification provided by LifeBridge Christian Church for the location of the proposed structures in relation to the surrounding properties follows. The application materials state"Lower intensity land uses have been designed for the northernmost portions of the PUD, north of the Great Western Rail Track, in the area adjacent to City of Longmont open space and recreation facilities. Appropriate setbacks and buffers will be provided between future residences and adjacent streets that carry significant amounts of traffic. As in other City of Longmont developments located adjacent to high volume traffic areas,the residential portion of the PUD adjacent to Weld County Road 26 will face internally and have limited access to Weld County Road 26." Consistent with Weld County's Right to Farm Policy, notes regarding agricultural activities on adjacent properties will be added to all appropriate documents related to the PUD so that new residents will be aware of the adjacent land uses. Section 27-2-80. Design Standards and Improvement Agreements Weld County entered into an Off-Site Improvement Reimbursement Agreement with Longview Community, LLC on February 6th, 2002, with the intent that Longview be reimbursed a portion of the cost of constructing the traffic signal at State Highway 119 and Weld County Road 3.5. Reimbursement agreements such as these are common for public improvements that are shared as development occurs in a rapidly growing area. The LifeBridge PUD should be required to reimburse a proportionate share of the signal cost to Longview within the spirit of the February 6th, 2002 agreement. Final Plat recording shall not occur until the required On-Site(Private) and Off-Site (Public) Improvement Agreements through Weld County Government have been approved and collateral tendered. This will include any infrastructure requirements determined to be completed by the Colorado Department of Transportation. A final drainage report(s) must be stamped, signed and dated by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado and submitted at final plat for each development phase. Final drainage construction plans, conforming to the drainage report,shall be submitted with the appropriate phase. LifeBridge Christian Church must document and reference development phase drainage reports with respect to an overall drainage plan/report. Should drainage criteria change in the future,final drainage design must meet standards that are in effect at that time. Further, final construction drawings for all roads within the proposed PUD and all adjacent roads as applicable shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Section 27-2-90. Filing LifeBridge Christian Church has indicated that the development will occur in multiple filings and phases. Section 27-2-100. Landscaping Standards This proposal shall adhere to Section 24-9-10, Section 26-2-70, and Section 27-2-100 of the Weld County Code. A detailed landscape, berm and screening plan along with a maintenance and planting schedule shall be submitted with the Final Plan application. r LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004,page 8 Additionally LifeBridge Christian Church shall provide a detailed sign plan for the entire development. All signs in the development shall be required to adhere to Section 23-4-80 and Section 26-2-90 of the Weld County Code. Section 27-2-120. Mixed Use Development Area (MUD) This proposal is located within the MUD area and adheres to Chapter 26 of the Weld County Code when the attached conditions are met. Section 27-2-130. Monuments Permanent reference monuments shall be set on the Planned Unit Development according to Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code and Section 30-51-101, et seq., Colorado Revised Statues. Section 27-2-150. Parking Requirements All parking and loading areas shall meet the requirements of Chapter 23,Article IV, Division I of the Weld County Code. Adequate parking spaces and internal pedestrian circulation shall be designed to meet requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and shall be illustrated on the Change of Zone plat. Site specific parking requirements will be addressed during the Site Plan Review application process through Chapter 23-2-160 and Appendix 23-A and Appendix 23-B for each of the lots within the proposed PUD. Section 27-2-160. Phasing A Final Plan may develop in phases within a PUD. LifeBridge Christian Church has indicated that the development will occur in multiple filings and phases. Each Filing shall adhere to the requirements of the Change of Zone. Section 27-2-170. Public Water Provisions Application materials indicate that domestic water service is to be provided by Left Hand and Long's Peak Water Districts. The Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment reviewed this case in accordance with this consideration in place. The Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment states"...water will be provided by Left Hand Water District and Longs Peak Water District The minimum proposed lot size has yet to be determined. Letters of intent and ability to serve from all three utility districts were included in the application materials." Section 27-2-190. Urban Scale Development For the purpose of review, this application is considered urban scale and shall adhere to the requirements of urban type developments. Section 27-2-200. Uses LifeBridge Christian Church shall provide a conceptual time frame for the completion of the project, including future amenities and landscape treatment of adjacent streets and properties prior to recording the Change of Zone Plat. The Plat shall be amended to reflect this time frame. The Final Plat application will be heard by the Board of County Commissioners for final approval and action. Section 27-2-210 Water and Sewer Provisions The application materials state "Long's Peak Water District can and will serve everything within their service territory. LifeBridge Christian Church has discussed Weld County's comment on the Sketch Plan requiring a commitment agreement approved by the Weld County Attorney's Office. A draft agreement regarding this requirement and a letter from the District indicating their confirmation to provide service has been reviewed and approved as to form by Lee Morrison." Additionally, the application materials state"Left Hand Water District's consulting engineer is working on a report regarding service availability in this area. Preliminary information indicates that there will only be about 20, 5/8"taps available(or the equivalent of 400 to 600 gallons per minute of"purchase-able" water service) before a pump station must be built. LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004,page 9 Taps (5/8") may be reserved through a type of subdivision agreement with the District by paying 40% of the plan investment fee, or about$2,040. Kathy Peterson (with the District) indicated that Left Hand Water would probably participate in the cost of the facility. A draft agreement regarding this requirement and a letter from the District indicating their confirmation to provide service has been reviewed and approved as to form by Lee Morrison." The referral dated January 8, 2003 from the Office of the State Engineer, Division of Water Resources,states"three water service agreements have been provided with this application. Two agreements are for the Longs Peak Water District and one agreement is used if the development uses ditch water to irrigate the landscaping, and the other agreement is used if ditch water is not used. Please be advised that if ditch water is used to irrigate the landscape within the development, this letter is not offering an opinion on the ditch water rights of the proposal to use this water to irrigate the landscape." "Information from the above agreements indicates that each District plans to supply treated water to the development, charging fees for the water supply on a per tap basis payable prior to the activation of the tap. As mentioned in the May 15, 2002 letter, each of the Districts requires that new developments provide sufficient amount of raw water to satisfy the needs for residential and commercial use." "Since formal commitments for service between Districts and the developer have not been made yet and since the developer is still working on finding the best solution to provide water service to the site, the comments from the May 15, 2002 letter still apply." The May 15, 2002 letter states "Pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(ll), C.R.S., the State Engineer's office offers the opinion that the proposed water supply will not cause material injury to existing water rights, and the supply is adequate with Left Hand Water District and Long's Peak Water District serving this subdivision. However, please note, this opinion is based on the fact that the District's and the developer will finalize the service agreements." Formal commitments reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's office demonstrating that all components of Filing I, Phases 1 and 2 will be serviced by either the Left Hand Water District and the Long's Peak Water District or both, will be required, prior to submitting the Final Plat application. C. Section 27-6-120.6.c- That the uses which would be permitted shall be compatible with the existing or future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing Zoning, and with the future development as projected by Chapter 22 of this Code or master plans of affected municipalities. The City of Longmont,in a letter received February 6,2003,acknowledged that the proposed development is within Weld County's I-25 Mixed Use Development Area, is also located in the St. Vrain Valley Planning area of the Longmont Area Comprehensive Plan (LACP) and is within the cooperative planning agreement area of the recently adopted Inter-governmental Area (IGA) between the City and the County. As previously noted the application was in process prior to the adoption of the Longmont IGA and it was determined by the Weld County Attorney's office that this application would not be subject to Ordinance 2002-7, Article XIV, Chapter 19 of the Weld County Code, as the Ordinance was not adopted prior to the submittal of the Sketch Plan application. The Town of Mead, in their referral dated April 7, 2003 deems this proposal to be an incompatible land use with the Town of Mead and with the surrounding area. The Town's position is that the County is considering and/or permitting suburban/ urban scale development in unincorporated areas that should instead be developed in municipalities. The proposed PUD does meet the intent and is in compliance with the Weld County MUD Structural 2.1 Land Use Map. Vista Commercial Business Park is directly south of this property across State Highway 119. Longview PUD is immediately adjacent to the west of the Weld County Road 3.5. The Elms at MeadowVale and MeadowVale Farms are adjacent to the west,with the Union Reservoir, Longmont open space and agricultural lands adjacent LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 10 to the north across Weld County Road 26. D. Section 27-6-120.6.d- That the PUD Zone District shall be serviced by an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system in compliance with the Performance Standards in Article II of this Code. Water will be provided by Left Hand Water District and Longs Peak Water District and sewer service will be provided by St.Vrain Sanitation District. All service providers have indicated their ability and willingness to service this application. Formal commitments for service between Districts and the developer have not been made yet since the developer is still working on finding the best solution to provide water service to the site. St.Vrain Sanitation District has determined that they have the ability to serve the project. However, there is a capacity issue at the pump station downstream of the site,and with the force main(currently 6")and the line running along State Highway 119. The pump station needs to be upgraded, which is not a huge expense but the District needs to know when to start the upgrade. Additionally, upgrading the line along State Highway 119 is not a typical line extension, in this case. It is the District's responsibility to apply a fair contribution from the developers using the line, to upgrade the line (currently 12"). St. Vrain Sanitation District indicated they are now finalizing the specific infrastructure requirements for the site and will ensure that the District does not hinder the development's schedule. A draft agreement regarding this requirement and a letter from the District indicating their confirmation to provide service was included in the application materials. The agreement is based on the Districts standard agreement and has been reviewed and approved as to form by Lee Morrison. E. Section 27-6-120.6.e- That street or highway facilities providing access to the property are adequate in functional classification, width, and structural capacity to meet the traffic requirements of the uses of the proposed PUD Zone District. The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal and has determined the internal streets meet the requirements of Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code. Roadway plans will be required at final plat. All internal road rights-of-way should be dedicated to the public,and the roads designed and constructed to County standards. At the final plat stage for each development phase, road construction plans, improvement agreements and collateral will be required in accordance with County policies. Extensive improvements to the existing roadway system will be required to provide adequate access to the LifeBridge PUD. The offsite road improvements should be identified with each final plat application. This process is expected to take place over a long period of time. However, it is important to understand the extent and phasing of the roadway improvements as we review a change of zone application. Because the Department of Public Works does not know when a future final plat application will take place or the extent of the proposed development, future roadway improvements must be identified based on traffic thresholds. LifeBridge Christian Church's traffic engineer shall identify the necessary future roadway improvements such as realignment,widening, and turn lanes based on traffic thresholds at all impacted locations, at time of Final Plat and at the time of each Site Plan Review application. Weld County Code Section 22-2-220,of the Comprehensive Plan,addresses interconnection of community. Connectivity of roadway systems between neighborhoods is critical. It reduces trip lengths between neighborhoods and helps to reduce traffic congestion. New development should be configured as neighborhoods, not isolated enclaves. The location of neighborhood centers are intended to provide community services for the residents within the MUD area. Pearl I lowlett Road in the Clms at Meadow Vale and Blue Mountain Road in Meadow Vale Farms should be connected to the internal road systems of the LifeBridge PUD. LifcDridge Christian Church's traffic enginccr should estimate the impact on Pearl I lowlett and Blue Mountain Roads and provide the basis from which his conclusions are drawn- Alternative means of transportation and opportunities for those who seek to walk or LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 11 ride their bicycles should be provided to connect community facilities and employment centers. The trail systems of Meadowvale and the Elms at Meadowvale should be interconnected with the LifeBridge PUD. n The internal road in Block 3, adjacent to and south of the Great Western Railway,will serve the Church Worship and Learning Facilities and be connected to both internal and external road systems. Significant traffic on this road is anticipated. It's intersection with WCR 3 % is shown adjacent to the railroad crossing. Sufficient separation should be provided between the internal road and the railroad track for a vehicle to turn right and have sight distance down the track to the east. This internal road will also form a four-way intersection at WCR 26 and WCR 5. The intersection cannot be constructed within the LifeBridge site without creating an offset intersection, which is not acceptable. Acquiring right-of-way from property to the east or realigning a portion of WCR 5 will be required. Both of these intersection issues can be addressed in the final design at the final plat application. Weld County and the City of Longmont propose to realign WCR 26 adjacent to LifeBridge PUD. Design speeds and road curvatures must be addressed with respect to this realignment. LifeBridge Christian Church shall coordinate the final roadway design with Weld County and the City of Longmont at the final plat application. F. Section 27-6-120.6.f - An off-site road improvements agreement and an on-site improvements agreement proposal is in compliance with Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code as amended and a road improvements agreement is complete and has been submitted, if applicable. Development Standards and Conditions of Approval ensure compliance with Chapter 24, Article VII, and Sections 24-9-10 and 24-9-20 of this Code. The Weld County Public Works Department and Department of Planning Services and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) shall require an Off-Site(Private) and On- Site(Public) Improvements Agreement in accordance with Section 27-6-120.6.f of the Weld County Code at the time of Final Plat application. G. Section 27-6-120.6.g - That there has been compliance with the applicable requirements contained in Chapter 23 regarding overlay districts, commercial mineral deposits, and soil conditions on the subject site. The Colorado Geological Survey, in their referral letter dated February 11, 2003, identified several areas of concern for the site, including the potential for shallow groundwater, and collapsible soils and expansive claystone. Their referral states "Geologic and Preliminary Geo-technical Investigation Reports" prepared by CTL/Thompson (August 11, 1998; November 17, 1998; and September 6, 2002). CTL/Thompson's reports characterize the site's geology and geologic hazards, and contain appropriate preliminary recommendations regarding subsurface drainage, grading and surface drainage, and foundation and floor system design. The proposed land uses vary for each of the parcels for which separate reports were prepared, but geological conditions and constraints on development are similar for all three areas. The main problems that will need to be addressed during design and construction are: Shallow Groundwater. Groundwater levels in several areas of the site are too shallow for basement construction. This condition was addressed in all three of CTL's reports, and will need to be addressed for all of the project's planned structures with basements, not just the single-family homes on the northwest parcel. Collapsible Soils and Expansive Claystone. This site is underlain by eolian sandy clays and silts and Pierre Shale containing inter-bedded sandstone and claystone. The thickness, lithology and engineering properties of these units vary over short distances, so detailed site specific investigations will be needed, once building locations have been finalized and grading is complete, to determine engineering parameters such as maximum bearing LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004,page 12 pressures, type of subsurface soil or rock individual foundations will terminate on and whether minimum dead loads will be needed, and to design individual foundations, floor systems and individual perimeter foundations drains." ^ The Weld County Department of Public Works in their referral dated February 21, 2003, stated that The Change of Zone Stormwater Report for Project LifeBridge P.U.D. Weld County, Colorado, September 2002, by Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. is acceptable for the change of zone request. A final drainage plan for each final plat (development phase) application shall be submitted. Each final drainage plan must address existing LifeBridge development with respect to the proposed development and downstream mitigation requirements. Early development phases may require improvements and construction of downstream mitigation infrastructure external to the phase. In addition, drainage coordination may be necessary between Weld County, City of Longmont, CDOT, ditch companies, and/or the railroad. A Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), Hydraulics Engineer, preformed a site inspection visit on Thursday March 6, 2003. Based on field conditions and observations, Samer Alhaj, Hydraulics Engineer, states "Presently, this development is proposing to release stormwater runoff to the borrow ditch along State Highway 119. This is consistent with historic runoff patterns from the property. CDOT does not object to this proposed concept, subject to the following conditions: The Church may need to make improvements to the borrow ditch not only along its frontage, but may need to continue east, possibly as far as County 5-1/2,or to the St.Vrain River. This work may consist of reasonable functional improvements to the borrow ditch for improved long term performance and resistance to erosion. Specifically, prior to final plat approval, CDOT will require the Church to analyze the existing capacity of the borrow ditch. If the capacity analysis indicates the ditch is undersized, then the Church may likely need to re- grade the borrow ditch to provide the required capacity. Other work could include installing drop structures in the borrow ditch. CDOT will continue to work closely with the Church to determine the extent, if any, of the required improvements by the time of final plat. CDOT reserves the right to approve any construction plans that show (1) stormwater drainage being released to the borrow ditch, and/or(2) any other modifications to the borrow ditch." The September 2002 report states, "Control of the surface water will influence the performance of foundations, slab-on-grade floors and pavements." LifeBridge Christian Church shall prepare a final plat(s) construction detail for typical lot grading with respect to drainage. Front, rear and side slopes around building envelopes must be addressed. In addition, drainage for rear and side lot line swales shall be considered. Building envelopes must be planned to avoid storm water flows, while taking into account adjacent drainage mitigation. A final drainage report(s) must be stamped, signed and dated by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado and submitted at final plat for each development phase. Final drainage construction plans,conforming to the drainage report,shall be submitted with the appropriate phase. LifeBridge Christian Church must document and reference development phase drainage reports with respect to an overall drainage plan/report. Should drainage criteria change in the future,final drainage design must meet standards that are in effect at that time. LifeBridge Christian Church will be required to address probable erosion areas at each final plat stage for each development phase where storm runoff is released and/or there is an abrupt change of direction with stormwater channels. LifeBridge Christian Church shall provide evidence of off-site drainage contributions to this development with the final drainage report(s). The area(s) to the north and northeast of WCR 26 must be addressed with respect to the 100-year storm. Existing runoff to the Meadow Vale development, adjacent to LifeBridge, must be addressed. The submitted drainage plan, although adequate,would require the resolving of some minor issues and the LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 13 submission of additional documentation as outlined in the memorandum dated February 21, 2003 at time of Final Plat application. The Department of Public Works Public Works in their referral dated February 21, 2003 provides comment on the three investigations comprising the Geotechnical Reports submitted by LifeBridge Christian Church. Since this is one development,the comments will be attributed to the entire property. The Geologic and Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Portion of Whitham Property (North Half) Southeast of County Road 26 and County Road No. 3 % Weld County Colorado, dated November 17, 1998. The Geologic and Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Lifebridge Planned Unit Development Southwest of County Road 26 and County Road No. 3 % Weld County Colorado, dated September 6, 2002. The Geologic and Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Portion of Whitham Property Northeast of County Highway 119 and County Road No. 3'/:Weld County, Colorado, dated November 17, 1998. Groundwater is shallow across most of the proposed development site. The reports state, "The ground water depth is above typical residence basement depth(measured from existing grade)over nearly the entire parcel." Full basements may not be feasible, unless extensive mitigation measures are taken. Mitigation measures shall be addressed by LifeBridge Christian Church at the time of final plat application. The report indicates that full-depth and/or increases in pavement thickness will be required as a result of weak subgrade soils (natural clays). Pavement designs in future final plat applications shall take these soil conditions into consideration.also provides comment on the Geo-technical Reports submitted by LifeBridge Christian Church. In the referral response dated January 21, 2003, the Weld County Building Inspection Department states "Each building will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnical report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer." H. Section 27-6-120.6.h- Consistency exists between the proposed zone district(s), uses, the specific or conceptual development guide. The proposal shall be consistent with the PUD with(E)Estate;(R-1)Low Density Residential; (R-2)Duplex Residential; (R-3)Medium Density Residential; (R-4) High Density Residential; (C-1) Neighborhood Commercial and(C-2)General Commercial and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses in the Mixed Use Development Overlay District. Given the several outstanding issues regarding the site, specific to water and sewage removal not being specifically addressed in the Change of Zone application, the Department of Planning Services' shall recommend that LifeBridge Christian Church have the Board of County Commissioners hear the Final Plan for this proposed development. 3. The submitted materials are in compliance with Section 27-6-30 of the Weld County Code,as follows: Section 27-6-40 Environmental Impacts: Noise and Dust-The application materials state"The proposed development will not contribute to problems with excessive noise and vibration after construction is complete. All uses within the PUD will comply with the appropriate State and County noise requirements at the property line." Smoke, Dust and Odors - The application materials state "The proposed development will not contribute to problems with smoke, dust and odors when construction is complete. The PUD will comply with all state and local regulations regarding smoke, dust and odors during each phase of construction. If required, Air Pollution Emission Notices (APEN) will be filed with the Colorado Department of Health and the Environment. We do not anticipate that the uses within the PUD will LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004,page 14 generate smoke, dust and odors. Single family residential, church campus and office related activities, senior residential and neighborhood center activities do not typically generate smoke, dust and odors beyond what is typically found in the adjacent residential and agricultural land uses." Heat, Light and Glare-The application materials state"the uses within the PUD will not generate off site heat, light and glare. All lighting will be designed to prevent light pollution on adjacent properties. Appropriate setbacks and landscaping will limit off site glare from windows on structures within the PUD." Visual/Aesthetic Impacts-The application materials state"Covenants will outline design guidelines within the development to ensure architecture is uniform and aesthetically pleasing. Buildings will be designed to fit into the context of the PUD and surrounding land use." The architectural character of the PUD is described by LifeBridge Christian Church and a discussion follows: CHURCH CAMPUS The intertwining of buildings and landscapes is the essence of accomplished campus architecture. The Church campus will include a collection of buildings organized around carefully composed outdoor spaces. The design goal to break down the scale of the campus through a series of appropriately scaled structures and carefully orchestrated people-oriented outdoor spaces. These outdoor spaces will be the organizing element for the campus. The buildings will vary in function,size and configuration. The application materials state that the goal is to create a memorable and lasting place. A strong pedestrian experience will be created along the edges of the buildings. This will be accomplished by providing covered walkways, trellises, canopies, and deep overhangs. In addition, pedestrian circulation between the buildings will be made into amenities on the campus. Buildings that house large functions, such as assembly and performing arts spaces, may be tempered with appropriately scaled foreground elements.These smaller scaled elements will help break down the massing of the dimensionally large structures. LifeBridge Christian Church proposes to amend the original application to include a 1500 seat outdoor amphitheater in the northwest corner of the church campus subject to a Site Plan Review in a future phase. LBCC anticipates that this amphitheater will be used for things like outdoor weddings, community theater, lecture classes and children's events. LifeBridge Christian Church is on record that all reference to any other amphitheater has been removed from the plans and is hereby removed from the application. SENIOR HOUSING Multi-story assisted living,one and two story duplex and four-plex housing units will comprise the majority of types of housing for this portion of the development. The housing will focus around a public park. This large open space will provide a strong identity and create a center for the neighborhood. Strong build-to lines will make the buildings part of larger ensembles defining the public realm. The streets created will support a safe neighborhood by having housing facades with large windows. Front yards will be defined with low planting's and porches. The housing facades will be in scale with the width of the street to create a room- like quality that will enhance the sense of community and a place of shared use. Pedestrian activities will be encouraged with generous sidewalks and reduced traffic speeds.Adequate parking for the housing will be provided, in order to avoid large asphalt lots of cars or parking garages. Parking is typically located off of the service alley with parking of vehicles in carports or garages. SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING Larger custom single-family houses will comprise this portion of the development.Variety in both the size and massing of the houses will create a unique neighborhood and avoid a tract housing product. LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 15 MIXED-USE RETAIL The commercial development will be comprised of low scale business,retail and professional office uses. Commercial streets will be lined with glass-windowed storefronts promoting friendly streets. Generally, parking will be provided on the street, with secondary parking adjacent to the buildings, in well-landscaped lots. The mixed-use retail will be the anchor of the large park to the south,with the housing flanking the park to the east and west. A type of town-square and main street will be created within this retail zone. The scale of the mixed-use retail will vary depending on the type of business. For example, offices could occur above ground floor retail. A community center at the apex of the park will provide a central feature for the retail zone, as well as,a gathering place for the residents of the senior housing." That being stated, LifeBridge Christian Church states"The Neighborhood Center and Mixed Use Office/Retail portions of the PUD have not been designed. It is LifeBridge Christian Church's intention to set the bulk requirements with this Change of Zone application. LifeBridge Christian Church will provide specific information regarding architecture, site design and character with the Final PUD Plan and Site Plan review as per the requirements stated in the Weld County Code." For this Change of Zone application, LifeBridge Christian Church proposes to provide definition to their intent for the character of the Neighborhood Center and Mixed Use Office/Retail portions of the PUD by addressing the floor area ratio(FAR). Floor Area Ratio is defined as the area of the building footprint relative to the lot that it is located on (i.e.a.25 FAR means that the footprint of the building will cover 25% of the lot). The floor area ratios, maximum building heights and gross square footage for each block are designed to act as maximum limitations.The PUD will limit allowable density, lot coverage and gross buildable square feet within each block. Buildings may be a combination of one,two and three stories. Any combination of building height, floor area ratio and gross square footage will be limited to the bulk requirements listed in the PUD. For example; a taller building will be within the designated height restriction, have a smaller floor area ratio and will be within the allowable gross square feet for the block; a one story building will be within the allowable floor area ratio, shorter than the allowable height and within the allowable gross square feet for the block. Market demand will determine phasing within the Neighborhood Center and Mixed Use Office/ Retail portion of the PUD. A Final PUD Plan and Site Plan review will be submitted for review and approval for all development within this portion of the PUD. LifeBridge Christian Church has provided the following discussion for the Phasing of Filing I, Phase 1 and 2 for the LifeBridge Christian Church PUD: The Phase 1 church campus will include three buildings. LifeBridge Christian Church (LBCC) estimates that the combined area of the buildings will be approximately 268,000 square feet. The largest will contain a chapel and fellowship hall,the western most building will contain adult education classrooms, offices and worship space for young adults, and the third building will be the children's learning center and will include classrooms and children's worship space. LBCC anticipates that Phase 1 of the church campus will include 800 parking spaces. The church campus will be constructed with the Filing I of Phase 1 and remain unchanged until Phase 2 of the PUD. Filing I, Phase 1 will include approximately 1/2 of the large lot single family residential (Block 1 -88 units), a portion of the attached residential units in the senior community(Blocks 5 and 6 -43 units), a portion of the assisted living village(Blocks 10& 11 -43 units), and 43 additional single family units within the senior village (Blocks 8 and 9). Filing I, Phase 2 will add the remainder of the large lot single family residential (Block 1 —88 units), and additional single family and attached units in the senior village (Block 12—63 units). The area designated as agricultural within Filing I will continue to be managed as irrigated farmland with a crop rotation of beets, barley, sunflowers, corn and alfalfa. LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 16 The area designated un-programmed open space within the Church campus will be seeded to dryland pasture and irrigated to establish the grass. eas The 125'wide drainage area adjacent to the eastern boundary of the PUD will include a 4'to 6' tall, landscaped berm that will act to buffer parking, noise and streets within the PUD from the adjacent residential development. It will also keep drainage from the property from entering the adjacent property. Per section 26-2-70.8.4 of the Weld County Code, the landscaped berm will form an opaque planted screen between the two properties. The screen will moderate the impact of noise, light, aesthetic concerns and traffic. Parking for the residents within the senior housing community will meet Weld County standards for on street and off street parking and allow for visitor parking. Parking within the assisted living village will occur within the parcel boundaries specified for that use. Parking will meet or exceed requirements of the Weld County Code for the specified uses as follows: Parking will be provided in on site surface lots and include appropriate parking for residents, employees,visitors and service parking. Specific details regarding parking for each type of unit will be provided with the Final PUD Plan and will be reviewed at all Site Plan Review applications. Pocket parks, trail connections and other details regarding the open space will be provided with the Final PUD Plat per the Weld County Code. LBCC will proceed with construction of the Filing I, Phase 1 as soon as the Final Plat and Site Plan Review applications are approved. The Filing I, Phase 2 will follow when there is a demand for more lots. LBCC anticipates that the residential portion of Filing I will be completed in 3 to 5 years, depending on market demand for the units." Electrical Interference-The application materials state"to the best of LifeBridge Christian Church's knowledge, the proposed development will not produce electrical interference." Water Pollution-The application materials state"LifeBridge Christian Church does not anticipate that uses within the PUD will pollute surface or ground water. During each phase of construction, surface water quality will be managed through an appropriate storm water management plan that addresses erosion and runoff. LifeBridge Christian Church shall comply with the Proposed Storm Water Management Plan for Weld County dated March 10,2003. All uses within the PUD will comply with local, state and federal water quality regulations." Wastewater Disposal -The application materials state 'The development site is included in the St. Vrain Sanitation District's Master Plan." Air Pollution - The application materials state "All development within the PUD will comply with Colorado Department of Health and Environment(CDPHE) regulations regarding air quality." Solid Waste-The application materials state"No solid waste will be disposed of within the PUD. A waste management contractor will be hired to serve the needs of the development." Radiation/radioactive material-The application materials state"The proposed site does not contain any known radiation or radioactive material." Potable Drinking Water Source-The application materials state"Longs Peak and Left Hand Water Districts are proposed to provide service to the development. The proposed uses for all portions of the site should have no impacts on any drinking water sources." The referral response dated January 27,2003 from the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment indicates that the application materials have adequately addressed all of the potential impacts described in Chapter 27 of the County Code. Traffic Impacts -The application materials state "All streets within the PUD will be paved." Wildlife Impacts-A referral dated February 8, 2003 from the Colorado Division of Wildlife stated that LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 17 the property provides a known habitat for native predators and that the riparian corridor associated with the Oligarchy Ditch does provide a certain amount of shelter and cover for movement of wildlife species. Retention of the existing deciduous and non-deciduous vegetation is highly recommended. The application materials provided an additional assessment of the project site. On February 18, 2002 Rocky Mountain Consultants performed a routine delineation of potentially jurisdictional wetlands on the site.A site walk to determine the availability of habitat for threatened and endangered species was also completed. Aerial photographs, the Weld County Soil Survey (Southern Part), USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle map of Longmont and the National Wetlands Inventory map compiled by the US Fish and Wildlife Service were all consulted prior to and during the field visit. The National Wetlands Inventory mapping does not depict habitats typically inhabited by Preble's Jumping Mouse, Ute Ladies'Tresses or the Colorado Butterfly Plant. There could be raptor use of nearby cottonwood trees although none were observed during the brief site visit or mentioned by long time residents. At this time TTRMC have field delineated the wetlands and determined that although the Oligarchy Ditch appears to be a jurisdictional water feature, there has been a limit to wetland creation to approximately 0.25 acres on the westernmost corner of the subject parcel. This minor wetland site is isolated and densely covered with grasses, which are not preferred by the above-mentioned species. The project proposal plans to preserve a portion of the corridor along the Oligarchy ditch and maintain those large cottonwood trees, a licensed arborist deems salvageable and safe, as part of the buffer and open space requirements. TTRMC requested that the US Army Corps of Engineers and US Fish and Wildlife Service review the field information. Letters from the Army Corps of Engineers and US Fish and Wildlife Service, concurred with the TTRMC evaluation. The Department of Public Health and Environment in their referral dated January 27, 2003 states "The initial impact plan submitted in the application materials appears to address all the environmental impacts of Section 27-6-40." Based on the previously discussed criteria and Conditions of Approval,the applicant has met the standards associated with this Section. Section 27-6-50 Service Provision Impacts: Schools - The application materials state "... residential units within the development will be predominately used for senior housing. LifeBridge Christian Church does not anticipate a large enough impact to create the need for a public school on the site. LifeBridge Christian Church has met with the St. Vrain Valley School District regarding this development. The developer of the single- family residential component, 110 Residential Parcels, will be responsible for the required school impact fees. However, LifeBridge Christian Church proposes to operate a preschool learning center on the site as a part of their Church campus. This may include a private school for grades K-12 and post secondary education. In a referral response from St.Vrain Valley School District dated January 13, 2003, the District is opposed to the approval of the residential portion of the application due to their impact on already overcrowded school facilities. The referral continues on to state, should the County decide to recommend approval of this development proposal,the School District's cash-in-lieu would still need to be satisfied. For Single Family Residential structures the cash-in-lieu fee is $645.00 dollars per residence and $492.00 dollars per Duplex/Triplex residence. It should be noted that LifeBridge Christian Church states that they are committed to working with the St Vrain Valley School District to mitigate any impacts to the District related to LifeBridge PUD. The District has adopted a voluntary mitigation plan that includes a fee structure for residential development within the system. If the schools that will serve the future residents of the PUD exceed 125% of capacity at the time of Final Plat, LBCC has agreed to pay the appropriate mitigation fee. Any residential development that is not age restricted will be required to participate in the mitigation plan. A significant portion of the PUD contains a senior village. LBCC will provide appropriate documentation for the senior village at the time of final plat. The restriction will clearly demonstrate that the lots are age restricted for seniors and that there will not be school age children within those portions of the PUD. LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 18 Law Enforcement - The application materials state " Weld County Sheriffs Office will provide Law Enforcement for the site. Their local office is located approximately 4 miles east of the site at the Weld County Annex. LifeBridge Christian Church will go through Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design(CPTED)training with the local Community Resource Officer. In addition,the church has organized a safety and security team, which will meet with the Community Resource Officer to review the security practices and develop emergency plans for the Church Campus. In a referral response dated January 6, 2003,the Weld County Sheriffs office"lacks the ability to absorb any additional service demand without the resources recommended in the multi-year plan provided to the Board of County Commissioners or as indicated by growth not considered at the time the plan was developed." Fire Protection - The application materials state "It is anticipated that the Mountain View Fire Protection District (MVFPD) will have adequate resources to successfully serve the development. LifeBridge Christian Church is committed to meeting all of the requirements as outlined by the District. The Fire District will require review of final designs for the development and structures within the PUD. LifeBridge Christian Church met with and reviewed the current street configuration and street cross sections with the District and have added a note to the plat regarding compliance with all District rules and regulations. A letter regarding compliance with all applicable regulations and standards will be provided with each Final Plat/Site Plan application as the PUD moves to each Filing. The fire flows required to serve this site will be dependent on the building size, whether it is sprinkled or not, and the type of construction. For the larger buildings on site(125,000 square feet and above) a combination of fire walls and sprinklers will be required. All of the larger buildings will be sprinkled. Mountain View Fire Protection District,hereafter identified as Mountain View,states there shall be two points of ingress and egress to the site, no matter which portion of the development Mountain View is trying to serve. In order to have two accesses to the single family residential portion of the development, the Fairview Extension must be completed and/or the re-aligned Weld County Road 26 north of the project site must remain in existence. In the event the Fairview Extension is not built, Weld County Road 26 will need to continue west to County Line Road. The District supports multiple connections and inter-connectivity of the street systems. LifeBridge Christian Church is working with Mountain View Fire Protection District for the design of a one-way emergency access for the pedestrian mall area on the Church Campus. Mountain View will review the final design of the campus and pedestrian malls at the time of final site design for each phase of the development. If required,the emergency access will meet the standards of the District. Trees will be trimmed to allow the trucks to travel unimpeded. Roads for the fire trucks will provide a thirty-five(35)foot inside radius and forty-eight(48)foot outer radius. In general, Mountain View does not like the idea of gates or medians. If there is an electric gate, it will be designed so the fail position is open. The District prefers knock key switches, which only Mountain View would have, as opposed to a box with a key. Additionally, Mountain View needs twenty(20)foot wide lanes on both sides of the median to negotiate turns and set up equipment(ie. outriggers which need hard,flat surface). Large trees in the median will have required clearance from the ground. Hydrants will be placed at regular intervals along all of the arterial and collector streets. As the pad sites are developed, individual buildings will likely require additional on-site hydrants. Hydrants will be used to serve multiple buildings if they are located appropriately. It will take a minimum of three hydrants to supply the required 2,500 gallons per minute (gpm) fire flow for large buildings. Ambulance-The PUD will be serviced by Mountain View Fire Protection District. LifeBridge Christian Church will continue to work with Mountain View to ensure that all development within the PUD will be accessible and meet all requirements of Mountain View as discussed under the heading of fire Protection. Transportation - The application materials state "The site layout will provide a network of local, collector and arterial streets,all developed according to County standards. A greenway/trail system is designed to connect the various components of the development for pedestrian and bicycle traffic as well as provide recreational opportunities. Typical cross sections of the streets within the PUD will be designed and constructed to the MUD Standards. LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 19 Traffic Impact Analysis The Department of Public Works in their referral dated February 21,2003 states"Because we do not know when a future final plat application will take place or the extent of the proposed development, future roadway improvements must be identified based on traffic thresholds. LifeBridge Christian Church's traffic engineer should identify the necessary future roadway improvements such as realignment, widening, and turn lanes based on traffic thresholds at all impacted locations." The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) submitted a referral dated March 3, 2003 and March 6, 2003 for the application under review. CDOT states in the March 3, 2003 referral "I've reviewed the traffic impact study dated June, 2002, and the memorandum dated February, 2003 for the LifeBridge Project. Filings 1 and 2 will require that the developer make improvements to State Highway 119 necessary to bring it into conformance with the State Highway Access Code and based upon the traffic volumes projected. It is possible that the lanes have already been constructed adequately. The storage requirement for the eastbound to northbound left turn lane may have to be improved. Gloria Hice-Idler of CDOT submitted a second referral providing an explanation to the March 3,2003 referral. It is the Colorado Department of Transportation's position that CDOT would prefer to NOT have an interchange. It would be the worst case and we[CDOT]would welcome alternatives. The March 6, 2003 referral states"I [Hice-Idler]would encourage all agencies[and the applicant]to meet and discuss the scenarios. Depending on the necessary improvements, it would be advantageous to look a possible right-of-way footprints to enable the developer to better plan his property." Storm Drainage The Change of Zone Stormwater Report for Project LifeBridge P.U.D. Weld County, Colorado, September 2002, by Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. is acceptable for the change of zone request. A final drainage plan for each final plat (development phase) application shall be submitted. Each final drainage plan must address existing LifeBridge development with respect to the proposed development and downstream mitigation requirements. Early development phases may require improvements and construction of downstream mitigation infrastructure external to the phase. In addition, drainage coordination may be necessary between Weld County, City of Longmont, CDOT, ditch companies, and/or the railroad. LifeBridge Christian Church states that this property has historically drained across the Colorado Department of Transportation right-of-way into the roadside borrow ditch and east to the St. Vrain River. Per Weld County requirements, the developed 100-year runoff will be detained and released at the 5-year historic rate. The post development condition will release a much smaller amount of water into the right-of-way than has historically occurred. LifeBridge Christian Church shall adhere to the requirements of the Proposed Storm Water Management Plan for Weld County dated March 10, 2003 developed by Weld County and the City of Longmont, Colorado for the purposes of addressing the requirements of the new Phase 2, NPDES regulation for urbanized land in Weld County. Utility Provisions-United Power, Inc.will provide electrical services, Excel Energy will provide natural gas services and Qwest will provide telecommunications services to the development. Representatives of LifeBridge Christian Church have met with the service providers and information provided is as follows: United Power-The application materials state"There is ample electrical capacity in the area to serve the project. As build out occurs, United Power will insure there is adequate service in the area. There is a heavy underground line on the south side of State Highway 119 to Fairview. On Weld County Road 3.5 there is an overhead tie line that was rebuilt three years ago to upgrade it to a three-phase line. United Power indicated they would not need a substation location on this site. United Power owns all of the electrical infrastructure up to and including the meters. This includes the wires,transmission lines,and transformers. Beyond the meter is either the Church's responsibility LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 20 or whoever owns, resides on, or uses the property to be served. United Power may need to upgrade further north over a period of time as required. United Power charges a Plant Investment fee and a meter fee. The plant investment fee covers existing infrastructure that United Power installed with previous developments and some of the new offsite infrastructure required to be installed. The plant investment fee is computed based on the anticipated amps to be served. United Power's standard easement is fifteen feet wide. United Power will install the tap boxes first, which are eight feet square boxes. All of the United Power lines in residential and commercial developments are placed underground." Qwest Communications-The application materials state"There is adequate capacity in the area for the residential components of the project. Qwest will analyze line costs and all the additional costs Qwest would incur to serve the campus portion of the project to determine whether or not it is economically feasible or desirable for Qwest to serve the campus portion of the project with technologically advanced telecommunications. Currently there are fiber optic lines along State Highway 119. There is conduit in place from Weld County Road 3.5 to Weld County Road 5.5. Conduit is scheduled for installation this spring from WCR 3.5 to County Line Road. From there,there is conduit all the way to the central office at 6th and Coffman. A representative from Qwest stated that a 244-fiber cable is to be run along State Highway 119 as part of Qwest's plan for the area. Excel Energy-The application materials state"Excel Energy stated that the project site is within their service area and that Excel Energy will be able to serve the uses within the PUD." Water Service-The application materials state"water will be provided by Long's Peak and Left Hand Water Districts. St. Vrain Sanitation District will handle the effluent flow." Based on the previously discussed criteria and Conditions of Approval,the applicant has met the standards associated with this Section. Section 27-6-60 Landscaping Elements: LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a revised Comprehensive Landscape Plan in accordance with this Section of the Weld County Code. LifeBridge Christian Church shall amend the Change of Zone plat to conform to the criteria of Section 24-9-10, Section 27-2-100, and conceptually Section 26-2-70. A detailed landscape, berm and screening plan along with a maintenance and planting schedule shall be submitted with the Final Plan application. The application materials state "The landscaping on this site will be designed to enhance the appearance and character of the PUD area. All landscaping will conform to County Landscaping Regulations set forth in the MUD. Landscaping will incorporate xeriscaping techniques, drought tolerant and native species and drought-tolerant turf to the maximum extent possible. The application materials state "The intent of the landscape design for Project LifeBridge is to complement the variety of proposed land uses and tie the entire site together into one unified neighborhood. By enhancing the landscape throughout the site, the community will become an enjoyable and enriching place to live and work. A series of outdoor rooms or spaces will be created to designate areas for the recreational activities incorporated into the neighborhood. Areas for playing fields, walking/running trails, bike paths, a possible swimming pool, tennis courts, and passive recreation activities will all be incorporated into the design. Providing these amenities close to home or work affords a greater number of people the opportunity to use and enjoy them. A trail, parallel to the Great Western Rail Tracks,will run through the site connecting areas to the east and west of the development. The trail will provide opportunities for activities such as walking, cycling, and running for both residents of Project LifeBridge as well as neighboring communities. LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 21 Connections to Union Reservoir as well as a documented regional recreation trail system along the Oligarchy Ditch are planned for within this development. To tie the site together and create a cohesive neighborhood, tree-lined streets with sidewalks will connect the different areas of the site. As the street trees mature, the canopies will provide shade along the street corridors, creating a more comfortable experience for pedestrians as well as providing cooling benefits for the adjacent buildings in the summer months. A diverse assortment of tree species will be used throughout the entire site to prevent the loss of a significant number of trees in the event that a disease affects one single species. The variety of tree species used will be arranged to help define the different land uses within the neighborhood. As with the street trees, unique planting beds will be incorporated into areas of the neighborhood to help define land-uses and reinforce a distinction between public and private spaces. Plantings will be used to enhance signage and various building facades. Other streetscape elements, such as benches, streetlights, and trash receptacles will also be designed as to unify the neighborhood and enhance the experience along the streets. The Project LifeBridge will exhibit a well-cared for and maintained appearance that will generate a sense of pride and ownership for members of the community." The application materials state"A homeowners association and/or metro district will be established, responsible for liability insurance, taxes, maintenance of open space, street(s), private utilities and other facilities. Open Spaces will be platted with each Phase of the PUD." An aggregate Twenty(20) percent of open space associated with this PUD will be maintained at all times. The application materials state"LifeBridge Christian Church owns shares in several irrigation ditches and a pumping right from Union Reservoir. It is the intention to utilize these water rights to irrigate the common open space within the PUD. Specific details of the raw water supply system will be provided at the time of final plat/site plan review for each phase within the PUD. Evidence of adequate water resources to sustain and maintain the proposed landscaping will be submitted to the Planning Department with final site plans." Given the complexities, scale and the level of design required for this development, this change of zone application prevents a detailed Landscape Plan for the 315 more or less acres. Appropriate plant materials and numbers of specific plant materials will be included in future site plan review application submittals. A Conceptual Landscape Plan and a Conceptual Site Masterplan submitted with both the sketch plan and change of zone application illustrates the intent of landscape improvements within the PUD and will be required for recording with the Change of Zone Plats. This development will be required to adhere to the guidelines for intersection sight distance triangles. Buffering and Screening - The application materials state "that there will be strategically placed, limited screening between uses.Generally,streetscapes and open space provide transitions between types of uses on site. Where individual properties require additional screening of service or alley uses, provisions will be made to provide appropriate levels by means of structures landscape. Transition to adjacent property land uses will be similar to the standards set by the existing developments. Parkways and park-like edge treatments, using landscape and topographical land forms, create a friendly perimeter to the development." LifeBridge Christian Church has delineated the appropriate setbacks for existing and proposed oil and gas facilities on the plans. LifeBridge Christian Church states that they are continuing to work through the appeal process regarding the District Court ruling on future development of oil and gas facilities on this site with a copy of the findings of fact for the court proceeding. Should the appeals court rule in favor of LifeBridge Christian Church, future drilling and tank battery locations will be removed from the plans. If the court rules against LifeBridge Christian Church, LifeBridge Christian Church shall provide evidence of an agreement with the mineral owners or other mitigation as outlined in the Weld County Code. LifeBridge Christian Church states that the"appropriate reservations and setbacks for existing and future oil and gas production facilities have been delineated. LifeBridge Christian Church continues to pursue a resolution that will eliminate future drilling within the PUD and cap and abandon the existing facilities. However, LifeBridge Christian Church has provided locations within the Colorado LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 22 Oil and Gas Conservation Commission designated locations for future facilities. The sites designated do not require directional drilling. All buildings within Phase I of the Church Campus fall outside of the 350' setback from the existing well. LifeBridge Christian Church has confirmed that the Uniform Fire Code requires a 300'setback from the wellhead to places of assembly. LifeBridge Christian Church used the more conservative Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission setback of 350' to avoid future conflicts. No development within the PUD will occur within the reserved drill sites or required setback from the existing facilities unless LifeBridge Christian Church reaches an agreement with the oil and gas companies. Section 27-6-70. Site Design: The proposal takes into consideration the sites advantages and limitations,as well as the compatibility of the development with adjacent sites.The application materials note"in developing the master plan for Project LifeBridge, existing site features and limitations greatly influenced the design and layout. The site topography is generally a gentle slope with the highest point on the north edge of the site. The Oligarchy ditch currently bisects the site from east to west and the railway spur crosses the site to the north. Views west of the Front Range to Longs Peak and northwest over Union Reservoir are retained and accentuated. The framework and design intent is to create program uses such as the senior community, church/education campus, and neighborhood center as an environment of distinct identity and character. Although some of the proposed land uses within the planned unit development are somewhat unique to the immediate area, they are sensitive to the bordering property uses. Appropriate setbacks and landscaping have been incorporated into the plan as a transition to the surrounding land uses. Scale, density, street design and open space, were considered in the planning. Building location in relation to other buildings and streets are dependant on building use and street type. Code restrictions determine distances between buildings. Setbacks for this PUD Zone district are dictated by street classification and land use. A series of street classifications within the development help define both the vehicular and pedestrian circulation. All streets incorporate sidewalks, trees and street furniture. On street parking, tree lawns and minimized building setbacks create familiar and functional neighborhood roads. Off-street parking will be landscaped and screened within County standards at a minimum. Open space and circulation provide the framework for land uses. A range of open space types and scales relate to the various residential or community scale uses in the development. Parks offer green connections from within the development to Union Reservoir and other recreational opportunities. Recreational fields,gardens and naturalistic parks compliment the church/community campus. A large central park creates a signature open space for the project, easily accessible from all areas of the development." Compatibility of Uses Within the PUD-The various program uses front local roads, using the street and its associated street scape as a buffer. A progression of building scale and level of use from State Highway 119 north into the site reduces the need for screening and buffering between uses. A neighborhood center, located in the most visible section of the property, is associated with the assisted living facility,community center,and neighborhood retail and office. These community scale uses buffer the neighborhood center from the senior housing portion of the site. Generous landscaped areas and setbacks help to buffer the surrounding single family lots from the larger scaled buildings of the church/community facilities.The program uses and scale of building types within the development are compatible as proposed. In a referral response dated January 27, 2003 the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment states"The commercial and industrial uses in the development will be subject to the Site Plan Review process once they are identified. The Department will conduct additional reviews of those uses at that time. However, a preliminary review of the regulatory needs of the development (based on the brochure provided in the application materials, with a 50-year vision of the project), indicate there are several areas that will be governed. They are addressed here for future reference only: LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 23 1. Licenses and/or regulations will govern the following listed activities: assisted living, classrooms, day care centers, commercial kitchen, theater, restaurants, food services, maintenance garage, swimming pool, and potentially some types of shops (grocery, dry cleaner, etcetera); 2. Zoning should accommodate the cemetery area of the development; 3. Special permits may be required for public gatherings at the events area and the outdoor amphitheater. The specific regulatory requirements are expected to change over the course of the 50-year build-out. Each commercial development must comply with all applicable Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Colorado Department of Human Services, EPA and/or Oil and Gas regulations. This list of regulatory authorities is not meant to be all-inclusive; LifeBridge Christian Church/developer must contact the appropriate agency for more information regarding the site-specific requirements of each development." Compatibility of Uses to Areas Surrounding the PUD-The application materials state"the program uses allowed in the PUD are compatible with land uses surrounding the project site. Proposed residential scale uses and appropriate setbacks and landscaping are included around the perimeter of the PUD. Neighborhood retail and commercial uses, sited along State Highway119 and primary arterial streets within the PUD Zone District,minimize conflicting uses with adjacent uses by setbacks, perimeter landscape buffers and a proposed landscaped parkway. Church/community facilities are sited central to the development with open space and recreational fields surrounding the buildings. The required parking will be landscaped and screened appropriately from adjacent neighborhoods." Although the Church/community facilities are sited central to the development with open space and recreational fields surrounding the buildings,the massing and scale of the development's components may not be entirely in character with the residential neighborhoods to the west and east. The scale of the proposed structures is not in character with the area and would significantly alter the scenic quality of the Longmont entry corridor and that of the front range. In the referral received from the City of Longmont, dated February 5, 2003, it is noted that the application states "innovative sitting and design techniques used ... to preserve the prime visual features", when actually the proposed one hundred twenty(120)foot tall fly space associated with the auditorium facility would also significantly alter the visual quality and view corridor to the front range. Adverse visual impacts caused by building scale, disturbed vegetation,and other activities will be mitigated with buffering, screening and height restrictions (MUD.C. Policy 2.10, Section 26-1-50.B.2.k). Solid fencing will not be used adjacent to streets throughout the development(MUD.C. Policy 2.12, Section 26-1-50.B.2.m). It is strongly suggested that LifeBridge Christian Church investigate alternative siting for the auditorium structure. One option may be to lower the overall height or to lower the interior finish floor elevation of the auditorium structure substantially below the finished landscaped grade. To be compatible with the surrounding residential and open space properties, the maximum height of any structure shall be limited to sixty feet for all structures associated with the Church Campus south the of Great Western Railroad track. One caveat to this bulk requirement: The overall height within the center of the church campus will be restricted to sixty (60) feet with up to 20% of the envelope in the center portion of the campus may extend up to ninety (90) feet. Land north of the track shall be limited to an overall height of forty-five feet with all setbacks adhered to per the Weld County Code. Additionally, all appurtenances, including ornamentation associated with all buildings in the Church Campus area, north and south of the Great Western railroad shall not exceed an overall height of sixty feet. The site design appears to fully integrate the residential, neighborhood commercial, environmental, aesthetic and economic components into a cohesive unit that is attractive and compatible with surrounding land uses (MUD.C. Policies 1.1 and 1.2, Section 26-1-50.B.1.b and c). To facilitate the integration of these components, the maximum height as determined by the Uniform Building code (UBC) and administered by the Department of Building Inspection for structures shall be thirty-five LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 24 (35) feet for the single family residential component and forty-five (45) feet for the commercial component. LifeBridge Christian Church has attempted to address the compatibility with the Farms at MeadowVale PUD immediately adjacent to the east of the proposed senior village housing component. LifeBridge has stated that the height of the first row of residences along the east side of the Senior Village shall be a maximum on one-story. Further, LifeBridge has committed to include detached single family homes in the first row of homes along the eastern boundary of the residential portion of the senior village instead of attached units. It is anticipated that this action will reduce the overall density of the development at this location. Section 26-1-50.2.a, MUD.C. Goal 2 of the Weld County Code states,"New development shall occur in a manner that assures an attractive working and living environment." Innovative siting and design techniques are not fully implemented or used within Project LifeBridge PUD to cultivate an attractive visual appearance and preserve prime visual features (MUD.C. Policy 2.1, Section 26-1-50.B.2.b). Various pedestrian trails will connect the three components of the PUD and the surrounding area (MUD.C. Policy 2.4, Section 26-1-50.B.2.e). Open Space will be integrated into the design of each component within the PUD.The architecture of the buildings will be sympathetic with each other and all will contribute to a strong sense of place. The scale, massing and materials are sensitive to the location. The configuration of the buildings appears to not respond to opportunities for views, solar orientation and open space features of the surrounding properties. (MUD.C. Policies 2.6 and 2.7, Section 26-1-50.6.2.g and h). All structures south of the Great Western Railroad track shall conform to the following three dimensional building envelope. From the east property line there is a 125 foot landscape buffer; from this point west 275 feet the building envelope has a height of forty-five feet; from this point west 100 feet the building envelope has a height of fifty-five feet;from this point west 200 feet,the building envelope has a height of sixty feet; depending on location there is a building envelope with a height of ninety feet. Within the building envelope area,twenty percent of the total area of the building envelope may exceed the sixty foot height and shall be less than ninety feet in height. From the west property line there is a 125 foot landscape buffer; from this point east 275 feet the building envelope has a height of forty-five feet; from this point west 100 feet the building envelope has a height of fifty-five feet; from this point east the building envelope has a height of sixty feet; depending on location there is a building envelope with a height of ninety feet. Within the building envelope area, twenty percent of the total area of the building envelope may exceed the sixty foot height and shall be less than ninety feet in height. From the south property line of the church campus there is a 125 foot landscape buffer; from this point north 175 feet the building envelope has a height of forty-five feet;from this point north 100 feet the building envelope has a height of fifty-five feet; from this point north 400 feet, the building envelope has a height of sixty feet; depending on location there is a building envelope with a height of ninety feet. Within the building envelope area, twenty percent of the total area of the building envelope may exceed the sixty foot height and shall be less than ninety feet in height. From the north property line of the church campus,there is a 125 foot landscape buffer;from this point south275 feet the building envelope has a height of forty-five feet; from this point south three hundred feet the building envelope has a height of fifty-five feet; from this point south six hundred feet the building envelope has a height of sixty feet;depending on location there is a building envelope with a height of ninety feet. Within the building envelope area, twenty percent of the total area of the building envelope may exceed the sixty foot height and shall be less than ninety feet in height. All structures including elements considered to be ornamentation north of the Great Western Railroad track shall be limited to a height of forty-five(45)feet, and shall be limited to a building envelope that is one hundred twenty-five (125) feet from the north, west and east property lines and one hundred twenty-five (125) feet north of the Great Western Railroad track. LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 25 LifeBridge Christian Church states that "all lighting within the PUD will be directional lighting to minimize off-site glare. In order to meet minimum foot-candles for parking areas LifeBridge Christian Church will use pole mounted, direct cut-off fixtures as the primary parking lot lighting, and where necessary additional glare guards will be added. Bollard lighting will be the preferred alternative for pedestrian walkways through the parking lot and internal to the campus." The outdoor sports facilities and fields will not be lighted for evening athletic events or other uses. Section 26-1-50.B.4.a, MUD.C. Goal 4 of the Weld County Code states, "The coordination of municipal, county, regional and state growth policies and programs which includes the MUD area shall be evaluated in order to minimize discrepancies, promote a better understanding of growth dynamics in the area, avoid duplication of services and provide economies of scale." The Project LifeBridge PUD application as proposed does not demonstrate that the PUD is compatible with existing surrounding land use in terms of general use, building height, scale,density,traffic, dust and noise (MUD.C. Policy 4.1). Project LifeBridge PUD is using the PUD application process and regulations as required by MUD.C. Policy 4.2, Section 26-1-50.B.4.b. The PUD process will allow flexibility and variety needed to offer a range of products services and uses. The Conditions of Approval for this proposed PUD will ensure compatibility. To further facilitate compatibility with the residential neighborhoods to the east, at a minimum there shall be a one hundred twenty-five foot landscaped buffer with a minimum height naturally formed berm of four to six feet at a slope not to exceed 2.5:1 in an undulating form planted with a variety of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubbery; and groundcover plant materials. The form of this landscape buffer shall be reminiscent of a hedgerow. This buffer shall be installed in each Filing and Phase of development for the entire property. Hazard Districts - The proposed PUD Zone District is not located within a Flood Hazard, Geologic Hazard or Airport Overlay District. Section 27-6-80. Common Open Space Usage: The application states that 93 acres of open space or 30% of the site is common open space. As proposed, the site does meet the open space requirements of Chapter 26 and Chapter 27. Each parcel of the PUD shall adhere to the standards of Chapter 23-2-160(Site Plan Review). Further, all R-2, R-3, R-4 and commercial development in a PUD shall undergo a site plan review process, as defined in Chapter 23, Article II, Division 3 of the Weld County Code. The application materials further describe the intent of the common open space, and is states as follows: "The provision of varied, quality and accessible open space remains a priority of Project LifeBridge. These open spaces are accessible to the pedestrian by sidewalks, provided on every street type within the PUD Zone District, and by linkages to adjacent green way networks. On-street and off-street parking bordering the open spaces provide opportunity for visitors arriving by vehicle. A wide variety of open space types create a series of recreational prospects for users. Naturalistic landscape and trails within large open areas, smaller intimate gardens, and a large central park help to organize the site development. The amount of open space required by the County Code as part of the uses will be met at a minimum. Areas of open space amount to roughly 30% of the total project area." LifeBridge Christian Church shall provide a lineal landscaped buffer of one hundred twenty-five (125) feet minimum adjacent to the eastern property line of the proposed development. In the referral response from the City of Longmont dated February 5, 2003 "the City strongly encourages LifeBridge Christian Church to provide a trail on both the west and south side of the single family residential area. These trails, in addition to the trail proposed along the Great Western Rail Track, could connect to the City's trial system in the future and provide for much needed community connections to regional trails." It should be noted that the primary greenway that the LACP has identified is north of State Highway 119 and east of Weld County Road 1 along Spring Gulch Creek. The City further notes that if there is to be a connection between the LifeBridge PUD trails and the City's trail system,Weld County Government will need to ensure such a trail connection happens as adjacent property remains under Weld County's land use control. Weld County Code Sec.22-2-220, Comprehensive Plan, addresses interconnection of community. Alternative means of transportation and opportunities for those who seek to walk or ride their bicycles should be provided to connect community facilities and employment centers. The trail systems of the City of Longmont, Meadowvale and the Elms at Meadowvale should be interconnected with the LifeBridge PUD. LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, PZ-1004, page 26 In a referral response dated January 27, 2003 the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment states "The PUD will create a multi-use neighborhood, which will provide worship, residential, commercial, recreational, and event areas within the 315-acre site. Residential areas expect to include assisted living, senior housing, multi-family housing, and residential areas. Active and passive recreational opportunities will include such things as sports fields, fitness/recreation center,swimming pool,events area,outdoor amphitheater,trails,bike paths,playgrounds,etc. These varied recreational opportunities must address the sanitation requirements of any area where people work, live,or congregate. The Department is recommending permanent restroom and handwashing facilities be provided in close proximity to those public gathering areas." Section 27-6-90. Proposed Signs: LifeBridge Christian Church shall be required to submit proposed Sign Plan to the Department of Planning Services for approval prior to the Final plat being recorded. Approved signs shall be placed on the Final Plat. In addition to the Development sign, the issue of sign location will be reviewed for each commercial lot during the Site Plan Review application process as defined in Chapter 23, Article II, Division 3 of the Weld County Code. Section 27-6-100. MUD Impacts: The proposed change of zone does lie within the Mixed Use Development area, and requires adherence to all criteria outlined in Chapter 26 of the Weld County Code, or as modified in the application materials. Section 27-6-110. Intergovernmental Agreement Impacts: The proposed Change of Zone is within Ordinance 2002-7, Article XIV, Chapter 19 , the Intergovernmental Agreement)area for the City of Longmont. However,the Weld County Attorney's office has determined this project will not be bound to adhere to Ordinance 2002-7, Article XIV, Chapter 19 . See previous comments under Section 27-6-120.6.c, page 6. Based on the previously discussed criteria and Conditions of Approval,the applicant has met the standards associated with this Section. This Approval recommendation is based upon compliance with Chapter 27 requirements. The Change of Zone from(A)Agricultural to PUD with (E) Estate; (R-1) Low Density Residential; (R-2) Duplex Residential; (R-3)Medium Density Residential;(R-4)High Density Residential;(C-1)Neighborhood Commercial and(C-2) General Commercial uses and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses in the Mixed Use Development Overlay District is conditional upon the following: 1. Prior to recording the Change of Zone plat: A. All proposed street names shall be submitted to the Mountain View Fire Protection District, the Weld County Sheriff's Office,the Weld County Ambulance Services Department and the Longmont Post Office for review. (Department of Planning Services) B. The Change of Zone plat shall meet all requirements of Section 27-9-20 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) C. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a proposed estimate for time of construction of the PUD, including a conceptual Phasing Plan for the site. (Department of Planning Services) D. LifeBridge Christian Church shall address the concerns of the Mountain View Fire Protection District, as stated in a memo dated January 9, 2003 and incorporate remedies for these concerns. Written evidence of a solution shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. (Mountain View Fire Protection District) E. LifeBridge Christian Church shall address the concerns of the Weld County Sheriffs office, as stated in a memo dated January 6, 2003 and incorporate remedies for these concerns. Written evidence of a solution shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. (Sheriff) LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD, P7-1004, page 27 F. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit in writing a request for the vacation of the Change of Zone case number COZ-430 for the Bayshore PUD, on the grounds that the application was abandoned. The change of zone was not completed and there was no evidence of the PUD in the title work. (Department of Planning Services) 2. The plat shall be amended to include the following: A. The proposed locations of the oil and gas drilling envelopes and the existing oil and gas facilities on site, including all easements associated with these facilities. (Department of Planning Services) B. Weld County's Right to Farm note as delineated in Appendix 22-E of the Weld County Code (Department of Planning Services) C. A connection shall be shown between the internal roadway system and Pearl I lowlett Road in the Elms at MeadowVale and Blue Mountain Road in MeadowVale Farms. (Department of Public Works) D. The Bulk Area Line Diagram for the Church Campus, including the Bulk Standards Table located on page 7 of this document. (Department of Planning Services) E. The Change of Zone plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services' for recording within Sixty(60)days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners.With the Change of Zone plat map, LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a digital file of all drawings associated with the Change of Zone application. Acceptable CAD formats are .dwg, .dxf, and .dgn(Microstation); acceptable GIS formats are .shp(Shape Files), Arclnfo Coverages and Arclnfo Export files format type is .e00. The preferred format for Images is .tif(Group 4) ... (Group 6 is not acceptable). (Department of Planning Services) 3. The Change of Zone is conditional upon the following and that each shall be placed on the Change of Zone plat as notes prior to recording: A. The site specific development plan is for a PUD change of zone from (A)Agricultural to PUD with (E) Estate; (R-1) Low Density Residential; (R-2) Duplex Residential; (R-3) Medium Density Residential;(R-4)High Density Residential;(C-1)Neighborhood Commercial and(C- 2) General Commercial and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses in the Mixed Use Development Overlay District as indicated in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject and governed by the Conditions of Approval stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Conditions of Approval may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. B. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Article VIII,Section 23-8- 50 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) C. LifeBridge Christian Church shall obtain water from Long's Peak Water District and/or Left Hand Water District. (Department of Public Health and Environment) D. LifeBridge Christian Church shall obtain sewer service from St. Vrain Sanitation District. (Department of Public Health and Environment) E. If required, LifeBridge Christian Church shall obtain a storm water discharge permit from the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, if required. Silt fences shall be maintained on the down gradient portion of the site during all parts of the construction phase of the project. (Department of Public Health and Environment) F. If land development creates more than a 25 acre contiguous disturbance, or exceeds six(6) months in duration,the responsible party shall prepare a fugitive dust control plan,submit an Air Pollution Emissions Notice (A.P.E.N.), and apply for a permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. (Department of Public Health and Environment) LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 28 G. During the development of the site, all land disturbance shall be conducted so that nuisance conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions, at the request of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment,a Fugitive Dust Control Plan must be submitted. (Department of Public Health and Environment) H. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, any development that disturbs more than five acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods which are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. (Department of Public Health and Environment) Building permits shall be obtained prior to any construction. A separate permit will be required for each structure. Permits are required for structures such as bus shelters or entrance gates. (Department of Building Inspection) J. A plan review will be required for each building. Two complete sets of plans are required when applying for the permit. (Department of Building Inspection) K. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the codes adopted by Weld County at the time of permit application. Current adopted codes include the 1997 Uniform Building Code; 1998 International Mechanical Code; 1997 International Plumbing Code; 2002 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Building Inspection) L. Each building will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnical report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. (Department of Building Inspection) M. Building height shall be limited to the maximum height allowed per UBC Table 5-B. Wall and opening protection and limitations shall be in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. Separation of buildings of mixed occupancy classifications shall be in accordance with UBC Table 3-B and Chapter 3. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code, unless modified per the Bulk Standards Table on page 7 of this document. (Department of Building Inspection) N. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code for the purpose of determining the maximum building size and height for various uses and types of construction and to determine compliance with the Bulk Requirements from Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code. Building height shall be measured in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code in order to determine compliance with offset and setback requirements. Offset and setbacks are measured from the farthest projection from the building. An ILC(Improvement Lot Certificate)will be required for each building showing the building height as measured according to Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code as well as the offset and setback distances to property lines. The ILC, bearing the stamp of a Colorado registered engineer or the certification of a Colorado registered surveyor, will be required prior to the frame inspection. (Department of Building Inspection) O. Building Heights shall be restricted, including the heights of all building ornamentation, including stand alone elements. The Single Family Residential component shall be limited to a height of thirty-five (35) feet. The Church Campus area north of the Great Western railroad shall be limited to a height of forty-five(45)feet. The Church Campus area south of the Great Western railroad shall be limited to a height of sixty (60) feet or less with twenty percent of the interior site area is limited to a height of ninety (90) feet. See the bulk standard diagram as delineated on page 8: Bulk Standards Summary: LifeBridge PUD v. Weld County Code and page 9: Bulk Standards Massing Diagram for Church Campus of this document. The graphic on page 10 delineates the spatial building envelope. The Senior Village component shall be limited to a height of thirty-five (35) feet P... excluding the units directly adjacent to the east property line where these structures are limited to a single story and the mixed use office, retail and neighborhood center shall be limited to a height of forty-five(45)feet including ornamentation. All heights are determined utilizing the Uniform Building Code. (Department of Planning Services) LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 29 P. All signs including entrance signs shall require building permits. Signs shall adhere to Section 26-2-90 and Section 23-4-100 of the Weld County Code. These requirements shall apply to all temporary and permanent signs. With each Filing, LifeBridge Christian Church shall follow the approved Sign Plan. (Department of Building Inspection, Department of Planning Services) Q. All structures shall conform to the Section 29-2-20 of the Weld County Code,Article II(1997 Uniform Building Code), Section 29-2-30 of the Weld County Code, Article II (1998 International Mechanical Code), Section 29-2-40 of the Weld County Code, Article II (2002 Electrical Code), 29-2-50 of the Weld County Code, Article II (1997 International Plumbing Code) and Section 29-2-10 of the Weld County Code, Article II, Chapter 29. (Department of Building Inspection) R. All buildings or structures shall maintain distances from the property lines and adjacent structures as outlined in Section 29-3-160 of the Weld County Code or as stated in the Bulk Standards Table delineated on the Change of Zone plat. (Department of Building Inspection) S. At the time a lot is proposed for development, except for the Single Family Residential component, a Site Plan Review application meeting the criteria of Section 23-2-160 shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services for review and approval prior to any on-site construction commencing. (Department of Planning Services) T. At the time an application is accepted for a building permit, a plan review will be done. A complete review of the building or structure by the Weld County Building Inspection Department or the Mountain View Fire Protection District may reveal other building issues or areas needing attention. (Department of Building Inspection) U. Effective January 1, 2003, Building Permits issued on the proposed lots will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the Weld County Road Impact Program Area 3. (Ordinance 2002-11) (Department of Planning Services) V. Installation of utilities shall comply with Section 24-9-10 of the Weld County Code.(Department of Planning Services) W. The property owner shall be responsible for complying with the Performance Standards of Chapter 27, Article II, of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) Y. The property owner shall be responsible for complying with Chapter 27, Article VIII, of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) Z. The property owner shall be responsible for complying with the criteria of Chapter 26 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) AA. Personnel from the Weld County Government shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. (Department of Planning Services) AB. The property owner shall be responsible for maintaining compliance with Section 26-2-100 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) AC. No development activity shall commence on the property, nor shall any building permits be issued on the property until the final plan as been approved and recorded. (Department of Planning Services) AD. The property owner shall be responsible for maintaining compliance with Section 26-2-90 of the Weld County Code. These requirements shall apply to all temporary and permanent signs. (Department of Planning Services) AE. LifeBridge Christian Church shall comply with Section 27-8-50 Weld County Code,as follows: Failure to submit a Planned Unit Development Final Plan- If a PUD Final Plan application is not submitted within two (2) years of the date of the approval of the PUD Zone District, the LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 30 Board of County Commissioners shall require the landowner to appear before it and present evidence substantiating that the PUD project has not been abandoned and that LifeBridge Christian Church possesses the willingness and ability to continue with the submittal of the PUD Final Plan. The Board may extend the date for the submittal of the PUD Final Plan application and shall annually require LifeBridge Christian Church to demonstrate that the PUD has not been abandoned. If the Board determines that conditions or statements made supporting the original approval of the PUD Zone District have changed or that the landowner cannot implement the PUD Final Plan,the Board of County Commissioners may, at a public hearing revoke the PUD Zone District and order the recorded PUD Zone District reverted to the original Zone District. (Department of Planning Services) 4. At the time of Final Plan submittal: A. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit an agreement with Long's Peak Water District and/or Left Hand Water District for the potable water requirements for Filing 1, Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the development, including for fire suppression and irrigation of the PUD open space areas, if applicable. Evidence of approval by the County Attorney's office shall be submited to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services, Department of Public Health & Environment) B. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit an agreement with Saint Vrain Sanitation District for the sewer water requirements for the Filing 1, Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the development. Evidence of approval by the County Attorney's office shall be submited to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services, Department of Public Health & Environment) C. Weld County entered into an Off-Site Improvement Reimbursement Agreement with Longview Community, LLC on February 6th, 2002, with the intent that Longview be reimbursed a portion of the cost of constructing the traffic signal at State Highway 119 and Weld County Road 3.5. Reimbursement agreements such as these are common for public improvements that are shared as development occurs in a rapidly growing area. The LifeBridge PUD should be required to reimburse a proportionate share of the signal cost to Longview within the spirit of the February 6th, 2002 agreement. (Department of Public Works) D. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a drainage report, signed by a Colorado licensed engineer,to the Department of Public Works for approval. LifeBridge Christian Church shall supply the Department of Planning Services with written approval from the Department of Public Works at the time of Final Plat application. (Dept.of Planning Services,Dept.of Public Works) E. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit Final design drawings for Phases 1 and 2 and preliminary road design in sufficient detail to determine future right-of-way requirements at full buildout. (Department of Public Works) F. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a plan delineating all fire hydrant locations, the specific size of the water mains, and the projected flow rate for each Filing. (Mountain View Fire Protection District) G. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit Final Roadway Plans for review for all roads within the proposed PUD. (Department of Public Works) H. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit an on-site (Private) and off-site (Public) Improvements Agreement that addresses all improvements associated with this development, per compliance with Section 24-9-10 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit evidence to the Department of Planning Services that approval was received from the Department of Public Works of an Improvements Agreement Regarding Collateral for the Transportation and Non-Transportation portion of the PUD. (Departments of Public Works, Planning Services) LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 31 J. A final drainage report(s) must be stamped, signed and dated by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado and submitted at final plat for each development phase. Final drainage construction plans,conforming to the drainage report, shall be submitted with the appropriate phase. LifeBridge Christian Church must document and reference development phase drainage reports with respect to an overall drainage plan/report. Should drainage criteria change in the future, final drainage design must meet standards that are in effect at that time. LifeBridge Christian Church shall supply the Department of Planning Services with written approval from the Department of Public Works. (Departments of Public Works, Planning Services) K. LifeBridge Christian Church will be required to address probable erosion areas at each final plat stage for each development phase where storm runoff is released and/or there is an abrupt change of direction with stormwater channels, and as determined in the Proposed Storm Water Management Plan for Weld County dated March 10, 2003 (Department of Public Works) L. LifeBridge Christian Church shall provide evidence of off-site drainage contributions to this development with the final drainage report(s). The area(s)to the north and northeast of Weld County Road 26 must be addressed with respect to the 100-year storm. Existing runoff to the Meadow Vale development, adjacent to LifeBridge, must be addressed. (Department of Public Works) M. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a revised road layout for review and approval for the four-way intersection at Weld County Road 26 and Weld County Road 5. Sufficient separation should be provided between the internal road and the railroad track for a vehicle to turn right and have sight distance down the track to the east. This internal road will also form an intersection at Weld County Road 26 and Weld County Road 5. Acquiring right-of- way from property to the east or realigning a portion of Weld County Road 5 will be required. (Department of Public Works) N. Weld County and the City of Longmont propose to realign Weld County Road 26 adjacent to LifeBridge PUD. Design speeds and road curvatures must be addressed with respect to this realignment. LifeBridge Christian Church shall coordinate the final roadway design with Weld County at the final plat application. (Department of Public Works) O. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit pavement designs in the final plat application. Further, the pavement design shall take the on site soil conditions into consideration. (Department of Public Works) P. Service Provision Impacts for ambulance shall be addressed as required by Section 27-6- 50.B.4 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) Q. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a Conceptual Landscape Plan with topographical features delineated in accordance with Section 27-2-100(PUD),and Section 26-2-60(MUD) of the Weld County Code, for each Filing. (Department of Planning Services) R. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a Conceptual Sign Plan in accordance with Section 23-4-70 (Zoning) and Section 26-2-90 (MUD) of the Weld County Code, for each Filing. (Department of Planning Services) S. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a Conceptual Phasing Plan with incremental intervals identified in accordance with Section 27-2-160(PUD)of the Weld County Code,for each Filing. (Department of Planning Services) T. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a Conceptual Lighting Plan in accordance with Section 23-3-100(Zoning); Section 27-6-90(PUD), and Section 26-2-90(MUD)of the Weld County Code, for each Filing. (Department of Planning Services) U. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a Conceptual Phased Parking Plan in accordance with Appendix 26-H, 26-I, and 26-J (MUD) of the Weld County Code, for each Filing. (Department of Planning Services) LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004.page 32 V. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit the final alignment of the connection of the recreational trail to planned regional trails in the area shall be completed and all land dedications completed within the PUD. (Department of Planning Services) W. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit the final agreement with the St.Vrain School District for the proposed development. (Department of Public Works, Department of Planning Services) X. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit an agreement with Great Western Railroad for the pedestrian crossing between the north and south sides of the Church Campus area. Written evidence of a signed agreement approved by the County Attorney's office shall be submited to the Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) Y. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit three Draft copies of the Homeowners Association (HOA) and Commercial Association (COA) for review and approval by Weld County Government. (Department of Planning Services) Z. The PUD Final Plan shall comply with all regulations and requirements of Section 27 of the Weld County Code, or as modified in the application materials. (Department of Planning Services) AA. LifeBridge Christian Church shall submit a digital file of all drawings associated with the Final plat application. Acceptable CAD formats are.dwg, .dxf,and.dgn(Microstation); acceptable GIS formats are .shp(Shape Files),Arclnfo Coverages and Arclnfo Export files format type is .e00. The preferred format for Images is .tif (Group 4) ... (Group 6 is not acceptable). (Department of Planning Services) 6. Prior to the release of any building permits: A. LifeBridge Christian Church shall supply designated street signs and stop signs, as required by Weld County Public Works, at the appropriate locations. (Department of Public Works) B. Complete drawings shall be submitted for review by the Mountain View Fire Protection District. (Department of Building Inspection) C. Effective January 1, 2003, Building Permits issued on the proposed lots will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the Weld County Road Impact Program. (Ordinance 2002-11) (Department of Planning Services) LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 33 BULK STANDARDS SUMMARY: LIF_ RIDGE PUD v. WELD COUNTY CODE LIFEBRIDGE PUD CHURCH SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY& ASSISTED MIXED USE COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD WELD COUNTY CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED LIVING OFFICE/RETAIL CENTER CENTER RESIDENTIAL VILLAGE Minimum LOT Size N/A 7500 3500 N/A N/A N/A N/A (SF) 6000 6000 6000 Minimum LOT area N/A 7500 2500 N/A N/A N/A N/A per Residential 6000 4500 4600 Structure(SF) Minimum LOT area N/A 7500 1500 N/A N/A N/A N/A per Unit(SF) 6000 3000 3000 Minimum 25 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 15 FEET 0 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET SETBACK(feet) 26 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 25 FEET 26 FEET 25 FEET Minimum OFFSET 25 FEET MIN 5 FEET Side Yards, 5 FEET OR 0 FEET 15 FEET 0 FEET MIN 15 FEET MIN 15 FEET MINIMUM (feet)Fences are Setback From 15 Feet Corner With Minimum 10 Feet Minimum Setback From Setback From Setback From not required to Property Line Setback;20 Feet For Between Structures, 15 Setback From Property Line Property Line Property Line comply with the Rear Yards;3 Feet Feet Corner Setback; Property Line minimum OFFSET 26 FEET MIN For Accessory 20 Feet For Accessory and may be Setback Structures(I.e., Structures(I.e., 6 FEET or 1 10 FEET MIN 10 FEET MIN 10 FEET MIN located on the From Garages or Sheds at Garages or Sheds at FEET Setback From Setback From Setback From Property Line Property Rear Lot Line) Rear Lot Line) for every Property Line Property Line Property Line Line 5 FEET or 1 FEET 5 FEET or 1 FEET 3 FEET Bldg for every for every Height 3 FEET Bldg Height 3 FEET Bldg Height Maximum SEE 30 FEET 45 FEET 45 FEET 45-55 FEET 45-55 FEET 55 FEET BUILDING MASSING Portions of the Portions of the HEIGHT(feet) TABLE FOR Structures such Structures such BULK as parapet walls, as parapet walls, STANDARDS clock towers or clock towers or IN THIS other architectural other architectural AREA. features up to 55 features up to 55 FEET FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 36 FEET 45 FEET 45 FEET 46 FEET Maximum LOT 85% 50% 60% 75% 85% 85% 85 Coverage(%) 85% 50% 60% 60% 85% 85% 85% Maximum number NOT NOT PERMITTED NOT PERMITTED NOT NOT PERMITTED NOT PERMITTED NOT PERMITTED of ANIMAL UNITS PERMITTED R-1: TWO(2)PER PERMITTED permitted per LOT w/o Special LOT NOT NOT PERMITTED Permit on TWO(2)PER LOT R-2: NOT PERMITTED PERMITTED NOT PERMITTED NOT PERMITTED Church Campus Table 1,Bulk Standards,page 8 Ait it_a; MEMORANDUM WI O TO: Michael Miller, Planning Commission Chair Planning Commissioners COLORADO DATE: April 22, 2003 FROM: Kim Ogle, Planner Ill SUBJECT: LifeBridge Christian Church PUD Revisions to Staff Comments of April 15, 2003 The Department of Planning Services has modified staff comments as noted: Page 6 Remove underline at paragraph 1. Page 8 Bulk Standards Summary: LifeBridge PUD v. Weld County Code Heading - Church Campus, Row - Maximum Building Height Text Deleted and replaced with "See Massing Table for Bulk Standards in this Area" Page 9 Bulk Standards Massing Diagram for Church Campus Third Row- Quarter Section Line on Section 5, Third Column - Maximum Building Height Text Deleted and replaced with "55 feet" Paragraph at foot of page Second line, Text Deleted and replaced with "The overall height within the center of the church campus will be restricted to sixty (60) feet with up to 20% of the envelope in the center portion of the campus may extend up to ninety (90) feet." Page 10 Bulk Standards Graphic Massing Diagram for Church Campus - Height Graphic was incorrect, did not correspond to text. Revised Graphic Page 11 New Page is inserted. Additional graphic added to document Bulk Standards Graphic Massing Diagram for Church Campus - Distance Page 12 Text begins with "Neighborhood Centers" and renumber Page 32, formerly page 31, due to inserting new page 11 Deleted the following text: "The church campus componcnt will be restricted to an ovcrall height for the amphitheater of ninety feet for ten (10) percent of the building footprint to accommodate the flyspace associated with this structure. Aa previously stated, all proposed structures and additions to the proposed structures shall not exceed sixty(60)feet in height as determined through building height by the Department of Building Inspection. The location of the church campus components shall be limited to a building envelope that is one hundred twenty five (125)feet from the west and east property lines, twenty-five hundred (2500)feet from the south property line oriented north and one hundred twenty five(125)feet south of the Great Western Railroad track." Page 32, formerly page 31, delete text and replace with: shall limit the overall flyspace to ten percent of the buildings footprint, not to exceed 12,000 square feet. The overall height within the center of the church campus will be restricted to sixty(60) feet with up to 20% of the envelope in the center portion of the campus may extend up to ninety(90) feet. Page 33, formerly page 32, new text added From the south property line of the church campus there is a 125 foot landscape buffer; from this point north 175 feet the building envelope has a height of forty-five feet; from this point north 100 feet the building envelope has a height of fifty-five feet; from this point north 400 feet, the building envelope has a height of sixty feet; depending on location there is a building envelope with a height of ninety feet. Within the building envelope area, twenty percent of the total area of the building envelope may exceed the sixty foot height and shall be less than ninety feet in height. "From the north property line of the church campus,there is a 125 foot landscape buffer; from this point south 275 feet the building envelope has a height of forty-five feet; from this point south three hundred feet the building envelope has a height of fifty-five feet; from this point south six hundred feet the building envelope has a height of sixty feet; depending on location there is a building envelope with a height of ninety feet. Within the building envelope area,twenty percent of the total area of the building envelope may exceed the sixty foot height and shall be less than ninety feet in height" Page 38, formerly page 37, Item O. Building Heights shall be restricted, including the heights of all building ornamentation, including stand alone elements. The Single Family Residential component shall be limited to a height of thirty-five (35) feet. The Church Campus area north of the Great Western railroad shall be limited to a height of forty-five (45) feet. The Church Campus area south of the Great Western railroad shall be limited to a height of sixty(60) feet or less with twenty percent of the interior site area is limited to a height of ninety (90) feet. See the bulk standard diagram as delineated on page 8: Bulk Standards Summary: LifeBridge PUD v.Weld County Code and page 9: Bulk Standards Massing Diagram for Church Campus of this document. The graphic on page 10 delineates the spatial building envelope. The Senior Village component shall be limited to a height of thirty-five (35) feet excluding the units directly adjacent to the east property line where these structures are limited to a single story and the mixed use office, retail and neighborhood center shall be limited to a height of forty-five (45) feet including ornamentation. All heights are determined utilizing the Uniform Building Code. (Department of Planning Services) Staff is in receipt of additional drawings submitted by the applicant to address the Single Family& Attached Residential component and the Minimum Lot Size for the Assisted Living Village. Building Plan and Elevation are of structures constructed for Belle Creek in Henderson, CO and Forest City at Stapleton (Denver, CO). Website address: www.bellecreek.com/welcome/homes 4.htm ; www.bellecreek.com/welcome/homes 3.htm ; www.bellecreek.com/welcome/homes_2.htm ; and www.stapletondenver.com/builders/builder_list.asp?buildMisclD=4. Plans of the Belle Creek development on large format drawings have also been submitted. Additional Letters from interested parties and surrounding property owners continue to arrive at the Clerk to the Board and the Department of Planning Services office's. These letter will be provided at the hearing. r O5 , 42 33 O� ., UNION /, 'aN ,; - RESERVOIR W „I County Road 26 O ; ELMS AT MEADOWVALE N / ling lli`� LL _ r is 7 I �I �tik Illi z I ` LONGVIEW PUD o MEADO / - ' Rte' 1�� O Ih State High 119 -t i - _ w VISTA I(OMMERCIAL G r 1 a ej git E- Ce m • 9 l - a • l �. , �A S LEGEND SITE LOCATION MAP ) I i LIFEBRIDGE PROPERTY NORTH FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY,GRAPHIC IS NOT TO SCALE g[p[p b kr tr. i _ 2 } r# r» - ST. i • • .. E 3 Z • ,..a +fit ,�.. •• ,4 .;",;•,,,..,:•.*::;t t .:t'ct ;;,- .] . �t el y v t. ti ' i ♦ vi t _ i.a I 1c ! 2; 1 ::::::::,:i41.::::. a °}• •, R �{ .,:"....f::,.i.::::,7,' 12'#' lyy..Y,.-y"iRy�., " .y3Gt_� "o .�' flit �.yj}jj� .)jj. t'.•j �b �A-.+ e :_.....,.. :1.:.a.... E�ad.L .l'.€r•: r „� 1I,✓ ..,f. r' :4 3i X74'. t. Sr..` } f '� ,! 1� • x' „ . rCY X' }ice •y' y „fiat .r'R- •.r•�x##'{ ': ' ,r •r +•y�"y€t}1t.- r. # �"T - p.i '�!IY�7ti • 3 ar 4.* r . •'a^E^+"R ..y � +,r ,.1 ..- 4 . aw7 4: ..:' i d Y: I $ t L`}ti ffr v"'ww1Y yY :•f •r+} i.€ p } 41 «•.ono z YI Alt ill • ifia :t:.[4't "1 y v •t^ 5 m s kf:;a jr3fr' f`` a `• t ... • s � ;:*.". i .: • a,. t f 04 97AS � and;.`d�")If a .ir'•.a.. .. 3#S 2K i .ae.... rtY4NL$}t4.3S{.i.kr•J!..r.. - Y=.}.t �}.. xtl..- h.M.t.":� .... .... _ ., a -.•,.v 4, ,./:,* !Ili: 1N: F x 7, III I x i i I �t ; 1 J .'c 1 I I , i , 1 1 1 ., , Ii ii iiii,: 0BU0Da0� � � 1r 1f i 1 ,E ici13 Pik Alilt P 4I Cu. HERE III ....*..n de 4„... 4 44 „,..04.,. ," ' li AIT I 1 i dtF ig '14 ort i k Y I4.4 frii A,.4'..: �.s. 7i J 1yfiV� 9 Ysy vits ,y. sw: Y�' ,•�•"• _�Wi�4iiifY5f""�iiZ'f"iCGi"f1Yii „„1»mna 'mta'ft s a•h4 'a ea' ^'n °# , * 5, c 1 .. no # " e '" - o- i • g � , `'i. ff Y'...(3, • ";A4 "_ hYAr-22,Li ," 5" "VA' t"PAII ..�. .v4e-kt'WM'lf ks�a'" :"tii .S. }_ ..j . 4i.., G'-'J r. . Y „ „ i o : :4 F .., ti [ i. --1 7 -,\ (iTii \ . ri �`- C!..:,.4:;,,,,.,,.„ _ 1‘;'4'. mull uusuu ) "`, s. • tilt ul lllIu11�MO i I I �, rf r `� ili III�1�111��i�lll „,„ , ,.+ r =1u91 IIItil.iim- iiii ; ,. (cc:" 1 : a ii r iPi a6m' I lilt s° � e a H. 3 EA I 9 , ' O u cx C a O SO a ; ; I ii ,---.. ''',q,,'",.<6' x T ,*' } i14 • - t� W.m r. ...�.rurx..n2Ab' >sh. a + ..-�. .t. .- • _� •x .'e}�{'. •'ix"�5 - •:J4:x' t fe£=K3't�< 9ie'A^'4"^3 't ��' '.�t'• it x" ' 1 L,..:,,,,....: A.,.....,,,,,!,,,,11,,.:5,,,-:: r ,....,5,,,,I..,1•.,,,....9 ` - 7. i;±�1: fr g.P,','� t ,.je Wi ¥ S' +y"qr 4 M Wks Yk t a '�, }V % • • ••=Y2�•��d 'k: a. 'Yf s,t L .� j t 4, )1 -: , .,-,,t.itillil: ..-or111:# ',...... � SS �F 1" lJO ��' ( Iii m �1i1! ,I ; 1 I.: 1 t\ I.. r i _ illitiar , .,..,, • , --- ---. : .. !!: '. - ci t 1.:17.1 :4F,- . : ":''kr I 7:1AT r i Tr" IIIL-1 . 5 ,y 1 T— i sikoiliill ignilliil ,,, : %\ g i Illimmii r---- - _-_--- ---- -- , r __ � t•rt:: ,.,,... 1 14r • cn %� \.f LL ��' � o L a - 4• .-hr :4,4" t y � :'.�L r *� #�4'y toy a ':i 4 :�`'::•^ ::•-1 1 tE rt. am r � ;a"'' R�•rsl t -:i sf''.:�'°' w :I.,...' '' 6 .� : y i : . .�•�k' 5.....�:- - ,y„^ • fyn' Y-ra. Lam•.. 'li S , -4 -L=f�" , A r i iii .. ti i lit i Nil! itoo fill 1" - s • i 4 I2 iii a,..... 11111 1 Ii 14.10.fa I y I 'i iirli 'ill tb II �II �S �ef�� tiii` hil 7 �0 i s 11 ,t ,is 1 ia : is , it 11a go! III I .} ii alita ittr '..`4. * .411/4 He I , II , i 1 • �! di.. / j►� • flip ' . * •. ..�. tic -......,/�' ;� cla r' t _ "_k IL 111 r } \ I • t1I •tI .1 3 e 1It -IL { LI Ea-- mac_— — rR 4y"t •. �` 1:J J i P a� Y �s� , - ie.\\ 4 R r Via ! f,ta.i Y A. 4v 51 5 ,,re* pp i.ra+w+r.-- ;�., .r •.,,r>"� ,..."7,17,17,77,7177,77 paT a s r•' ` + .111 '15 £ i.`" i �, t '6Fj :ilrti< r r'j7•� i5 j ,d '"X •+{r' i, k r�nl • ,,.!1 • • f 1.k 4"gt•,2-w . . ,x�`• c.. . +•"_:" ! i• 7 4 1 cy �"' a: Vii, 4 9 ,•, • 1 .fi .• :.,•:...,, ... r'�.+,. .,i.. .. .:.... ....,,• •r;..'. •i:.�' ,•, y y:i' �K.i�i�`''�.::C•:`E�`ern:"•.4p��:'ir,;` _ II . .•.. .. ... .;•,;"i'. , ..� ..:� i s,{^J� ‘,+� irr....?r fir'. •'1' t ) ?11 •M�l. Iris!" _.`{,�• ...t' r .. . :>v.[wJ�pti��::+. __w{.art..s�•�Ym;5c�u- _ :.. .k�as«L"��AF.,S,. •§ ''-u.1-'-%' • • r1 r-- •y. 1 MJLra.'61 I^,re).u.~+tPro I i•..•:I•r1 r •x L --. � ••� •• /4 s•i ~•L` CI N•td+ft:d111:tltlil+l<SiR WWI • •� _ _ I „'k11.-Icltl,ds::41>,1rr.s4zin ' .•••.. '• 11Jf:'"1.11 l..1•.41:'1'l1. t•Y4:MY1 it • ` ) Y,\ ••4� h. a J , 4+ C le Li, 's.i \ + v4 •a \64 E 1..is,s - :::. 14;% 1 , id, ',I':Or-- gr.. t "" s: i ' - n�•r- ►.. 114 i ' n w li �.. .t t`r},,4 +1,' i! .aR i C .. i • r 4-' t 4l 1 7 '� S h. r. i4 % 1r y h. . ‘ w 4, 11a1..irc..1-iifeesi'rzr:n'in'm I. 's ' ,' 4 ,�, L �_ i1 (,:ii p :iiituenAtt1'1.1�7':re,-n L • if'WM Ar.70tH i-11 1.1.•:::h•:'I• I!•-, 4 a•...h.a<.1iii ,. ••--' - — 704 m .d' i46�`: • 4�it.l.K, .[YJ J t• { .1 ��'1 � F,�?a r .l. S • A `3 ;",:.!1:.::.:.:...,,`t` :i'Ia'.•.�• '. Je•: ,jp.• ..k ..f,}. .:6• • 4i,..s..,. ,•{.4� EF m,-.1.,,,,.-.).,'..,,,ii-c .- 4" •`-. r • • , T-<t .•-.y( •,, .s } "r .A A r '?!.IT, ,.:r. ' w`'tt. tr•+i3 'N.,,,taa•::.r s •...,:...,-.:.,:;:,,,,,,,,i,..--...,:, ^' • .fir•'. �� .{y#r ,�f •faSl ,4ir,y' 4 rt ,.: tr •a'.•' _ '•' •,1:,• ! '�. + • r _V '�} >"•%.l� f) • • • it :'�•,tfy)1{.e+ s' i. $ f •• .�•��y{ • • • � t.:. -♦.w u..I'.:„r*,t`,d li':'-:..:Y!::..:.. ..�:.•.....'..:.�.;y.��i: .. .: '::.:.: ....'.9'� .':Zw w,�✓ -ray 9. 5.7 a7 'rr yM d restr-pAr. x , per ` �11� } XY j (k t 4 ,x13? `` ^°3. rx„.r _ }A $ sirt 1 t 4r � I I 1 " 4 ag 5 B. t $ II JulI . ! ILI 1 + 1 ! I I c ' ; it S 2 T ! sl E I- S1 . 1 1 '1 $ *4 4 is i I i III 4 Al r jail II ` III"f Ill , 4k $ .� t Ai. 2c, . .• i 141 31i 31 i. HUh III 18 11 1 i 1 r+w s•... r 00 t Sr. .,.„:,.. G "igo', ,r.,;;,,ih iABe:S' ,.;&+.v r,;in,,,,, v r= - S 'ajt 'tt � r` k.{. -‘174's. 'G S � /,�►' fi t'� 1i �.` �M, ,air. .�. .rr�. �.. < .. . �"ti�.- -aao� � . � :,.�> .LM► 'r,r��•vt Building Height Key 45' Max. 55' Max. 60' Max. I 90' Max. Property lint Property Line _x. .:.. E 1 �. 0 250 500. 1000 Maximum Allowable Building Heights Diagram - North/South Section p5 � ..:€w₹gp5, r, x,!'t x I7/1„,r="77:77 -_.m i 7x '"x247 A +' a y `Pr ,ak �• � 3 axe a „n $ Y 7 Ty X� "�L±,� " S YY 1 4.¢$ x +}y;} k $Yk `5S 4} ,„:4;,'''''' y„ , f. d C it‘iikip W 1,77,1 s,:{ 6 it 4— •- 133f t?7M fit, r i \\\u 1131 au. S s 7. LL r. re 61I— Ai It ri t' w Z 0I 1L LI u ,a 0 A ,, 111i!Art }3 9 13345..1 17'77 S••"a I 't......---- I m ca .2x v..rvx�kkk : � *3' }4{, �''"". Yx,.: Ft 6� e. }ciggiqI. ' 'i r5��vkx 'S k gm t`y' nr#lai�.4a nv k"` S...� "?ay'N.x.•s4 s,: • • _ r _ .y..,✓.r i{d.<e FW�:A w.,..•. .,......�..._ _ .. Y,3.Si�uvti�",E�'#S�b�5',t�'73�a:...:..' . . . ;`x ii"1�: .,...... i ) ) ) etlLx sT Ali DAR[ supai.1f1A'e: urristaME litiDii ViELD .NT,' CODE titinpmarm RRr Ctd.ti'Ci1 TTl.Qr 1 I POW.• Via a P IIIPLP i IMP I t' wit_ .rC X - -. irl1?!f1'trilkrir.z ah of r.rt uc•r trk it rse irte:+i.Td4, In id r eCt i r.'.'a•1 =.Tia71 11.171.41. .U14 t 11,1 SUIT!1 Palitini . 4+r ; • rinsLra LL"r lar WI Rf{Sj 1_CC. 4■ •�.t. rat. Lial IP:I -Kiti• iiYa; Lied mss._ moron"itAr. ma I . TbX. Mr} hi h it %A aii r!I�tiihiil aa:. 4anr aum A ea tws a ra i Cr mai lib 11132 We PA t. 4i s.L Via ur VW rig I Mob -ter Lag .try FITT .1.: rem .ic,.f1ar. °iParr P 5 •u+ •IhIi$I i.I( 1 aa•rszyhcyam• ,r1rA'.• r It I . 1S Iist t P4 AY' i-r *rig'' .1!fit kI -tomatmemesamtrit .. .. !iit arr CUP R` si kill 1P►1 rr I lE.t" ,.ii i t., 44 ' t74 iiffr 6 PP F' Ilk i L R11 UM II Mel IPPIM klalt .•f...Ig i r-:.fa 1riLm•ier 11:row Lae 'PA Fallimma 13 Psi iiiien.+ 1I.rti r Ilr+ a,r..s r gal tatealle Perm ner.-swig T• t ayi^Li4 -' -i,,, 'Y;$ur r.ti. a riv.Sir •el smarm t rfr ' IirIPtAa La. Praarir Law ia5oiat•41.Ai> {71•,31,law as lem a. 1 rar u.!:woo iaiaa.II Ptirtrhl Linn iii>tias Csa 111• .n t'I'w di :eIr i ea.:4:4r r:a•r,a iraliar i M NNW oa immot1 114kat.i l orreLrin II s. liereAi*fa.I a Moro>a 4'sir• •:: i y r":f t!t'sa n •■t t VI Uri : lb rim ins f i+.Pert PsiI i L.A., IL., ice --=or t!-- a ..i ,it.zra a 1aa. can OWI Ihrlirira r 7 113,.11 .1y' . �p -'•a• a►, r.'f Irr Pim I.4 Lr-Q Lre i J.h rw"i rrligravf Ilia W sawn tali PI tallI4t ..:rem Limn aa • PirI 1I“: .it iu -ri I II:3- lrr., ss i}tRdT r T.- .- i .�5L`.! 1111_.._ I"•T F1 Mewl -aura. I I r 1 taaa ter. LI.r..1 P4.1 3G rerl Lt!IFi 11 te' 4%• 14111.11 ir• }6r{tT lP.�? li�� Y� Prra•rsa ad din r4rirs r t a r{ai, .L— ila+I1"},rr.as i pa.ior emu Ida Amie '� Lam 4..-i ii r• I t.1 rt.&4 i ii a m arsatttaraina visa aairtataa !.111,a-,i 17.4 4fi•'4 *r•• Parr 11127 -r.i -I % .•.t t . .i1rvrF1 41 'air 41i1,'" al ..- ilmid"Yti•Li t1 4r; •- {i i.. 4.5 i. rL t i1-'.. yr. 111'I ^+aaa '..t 444 •• s PIN I4i'4 ;r,%. at `ti l7'v. ii.r-s:a!maim 1401 cry Otani fib 'oil WWI I I t 15)1 r,1i'' PO itin@n ti i•I=oneor-T= IC PiPar141f.g P raaat a r•a'11i IFIWITTflt P .- row t:I P4P L71 rtmartia tarftihn ar LL*' . ',5tr v a1 It r rill POlila.!I I'f'a .vat '...'. 131.141',1:. tea so -'i.e td-PM P 4177 . we' t t t- rt et-3 ti-) ita{ti'I•s kit "'11,.% a I.1.rt I Y .n-_._.._ mod r.," ; S , l♦t�i ::'v i , .S =" 4 4 ea . .ae • : O• -(`x .j 4 r t N V•^M-.•.«. t• .♦, 4F ,`wy, x O A'`�ryry''V . � " ' 4 .".;4•4,....4••:• • .A .p•.. ».' - - ».. - • a- ` )4' ,••*:.'t ',( it 1":4. - �" .. "• ♦ ''h pis f k Sri q'��, Y , • t. • • Ty ---„,,, ::4 ,....„0,. , ';; 'j'Ybgy Jt. • � M1 sd-IF W; • t zYte ,�..r"�'r�' R L w h R • ItI o t eA ., . . . .Fj" st}sSspot,. ].•i„ .""^ • t xi4 i �"�rt. /y'y�,,.,' .I.I._J C .tom R e: T 644•• •«'!' ppT' • • j 4 ,. - }}M ((1 •t�,,{, fri •/e'�.� a ��'.i. .at .*. cry, • ..• toi .-iJ },i•t : :A§ ', '. t t ! ' tes r `1 !`L t�'iLki; .•y•, f 2 t t y' ' In '•y .r..1-fit.•'s,f 1YFMVM.•iY t • f. 1 �4 r". ;.• [jP i y;^{''�Y }Si,} '` "•: . c ,. It....1111% " , 41it�Y "•it,••I • M,,, ?S• 3.�^l 11 ;'kN{ „y "�`}KL'.,{ • fr'i�i�, I .,'Ij, r'+,�}t '•S f,i / t:'i,s } ,Y ��•` :� T}' i� s Y�'• # 'h. .tY ti H?Tjj"ttjj��..yq`i :t . 41 .1 4 r Y „ . Zs 0*kY - .• Y 24. gt,L:�C - •• t..lS.y y .„,„„4„:t.lima1"' i 43"•@ y• iyA./�, r • IV'G to x* Y r,. ? 11 •Y F A W' -'4. - •NIW � ey s, • $ •0 •,:r•-'•.•-•.. 0 , L i� rl A,wu •.l,.t.. t-1 x 0 en /I [2:441' } ft' 4i.° is 0 0 Y 0 e . . • ,,, a ,..„T"". • °i#a t F +,. r .S ,• Y L •‘ V pYI.). ,lY••Y•• i{ 7 1 mat» „.'ilyr• r f... • � . Y • �yt {Y Ti "s ,ttt`.krii qq d' r Q. X tµuI 4 3 M1'� ia.'4i°S. t {i _tir 4 : .. PY t. - N ' t.5 E f .s- - x �; z .. 4 � . '•. ii 0 Az aQ •Y. 4 4-4 " C/] V!J n Px a ,, O 4• ••iti*.,i fit. : ` v i ..,. :' .. - i �.;py�yb r.i. yt"ti••• • F JY ti R^7 ii.x. .• •'y .A.�•,3, xrk • : 4 t .r. • • i ter Y '• r 43 3. # • Ott O f c ,.•y;: h'.`. • CL) • ri₹vp �P"+f,L 4y�A"'k ..' E < 4!#tZ+ttk s_ µa4 _ _.y ' . s ., Y t, f • of ?Y ; ' • i ' c ry ;S a .H • a ., ..r a-, •a. • ''. t4. a a , , . ..... pt + 1 1' x ! t St. W I Ar. Y'n s` Y r1 . e 4 .er up r ,,Qy�� yfi rvT'de. A} ,.y M t _ka ,ngt _ . . , *Cut .4. , } '1' , .• t • . • ax14J .:. NN • • 4.;.1, • ? x.b . . . {: - ‘4•`—`0,k s iY M y jai J . • tall "- y $ O' fi y( 41 r :• ` S • • • • P/, . Q� 'y tJl ') 1444 • .: 4 '-' cn Z� Y;. • ., , O �1 �'•F xn'k' ;).t.ni:1"t . t�l • if, Y "' M• %v++ x • ±,' -* - y,' i t. r _ . ^C y _ ,. may, • • • • r� l• r .. *.Ti . .4. t a a z 1. ;. Q r It ' � \/U1 QS -' # ..rs . . z .Ni,k 1 fAy •. r�'X'X i ' . . £. , x . .• '. P, ra. '4;1••.A?„. .,1,4,...,i,-,44.k, teyn+�,� q �.° r�laGi Ax `Gi vra RI S' .>.,:. ;vt' } f J'_`. ,. Yi'M` r raw +# Y' . fi '''}}} 2 c '• G At Y" r*-:.� f j. Y an. F S ,... J'. 4 Ih 5J ''SS S ' ':vf —4 - .-.t� :r.v •:'d,?, . ,n ''. a h. •x,., ...:r Tg a x :Y£Z >. r ,t,t}; ,> Flte iF M t. t'F 54 . . � 1 l . a t Sit M1_�4. 1 WW iit t° • ,r. t;H {. ' 4 i _ O 14* fm /'�� riy Yr Zt l^/ f - v j it. . :iif • • kr � f a b 0 Il f la,`,. 4 R,:,. d"...:*..54:-.4 } �t. . • ri P f M1 .k... O sk Fco aty f R;1*..; kiosks •WVit p'./.:ifesi;•.:44•,"•.2,• ? T;;;',-, . - ir,.,. . .. ..„ . 4: ,.. .„4„,. .,,...„,: , ,,...„..,..:,,,... ., ,,. ....., ... , „, '44 44.4,- '4' 44 .ii...4.' t.',Oo `t lit,'., a ww. f f_. r ' ,t '"" y'� '!p • ,V [' prr . `4 Yt v. r •�,.tt. •t /,"...dill': r r. a. r wt„,.,.,,,..;r.:.* t ,Yn ! Y. 14. ¢ y ,}: ,&& By ��.. tfeic tit?.# P'r. y"" ' ter._Ik t`..Y+n ,{rV S•Y„, >..yn+ •^ +:'' r_ , k; , ₹₹TTy,• r.-:.",''Is.". C# �g ` ,. f '-•? Y a 11 .sh jet i . el ' : i''" :c4tyelYe ,x'4"t •.f. •.n C' .. h • iLil" i.w. '+"• • • 1/4 w K.. 4 4. x X ' ' r._+t /Y, 4414,4 }-: ' 'j �.i .,+' *``',`s. ..;91 }f t 'tS y' '.1. . e' i`4„`Y' i{•• rywn , a-.-fra L. "fi j( } , a. ₹ { Y /{. 4 "Jr : . {t e• _ '";:::.t.';'*.:'"k: : 4 A''1 »I ,".3Rr ',f,Y,I f'�' a�} ' - r ., µ:,Vi:h wry . , , "4- AR'- Ei "w'A.; µ ' r ,4 `, Di) .,+ y• e x * r. {lr . , { 4 _ .r;pt' wb�, , Mil A, •�y 'Y . • • •k "��yy4 si•'. , a ,4 it• • {k Sx'Y.I' •.h : .M Jtl Y' Y .. •.+.:`ter ' ,,y � • r` PF ! vL.. '« i M i y , �ry/11.' }y •,- ,, •,f ' Y • •:.,r,t ,c,:'• ..'ti'•..il. .,,-* i ,A yY.. � , P,q Y ii' ...• t , .Y.' t r Y "` . . • ,l'} „1/4. •- •,:'`~' - 1? •.,,,a:Y`:..'. . t%' ' yr •`,, t '''',11-; , } rF r 1. M. . • 1 .•1:4;i:.. ;,IAF t rt. K• 041 j}y' • yrt.,' r �{I' ,�} .{} fi,'G fIS.�• r'r+. �''• Y,'•iR} ••• � $, g:i a : r. .S .'., S.4 ♦ •.� s".J i • k 1 •R I. FZ •r }:" Y { Y J r+F x 1 F .:.F. i ,YyA,f�2}15. ( ,, 1 ,- ry. L.. 1O.. ky +• t ai;: ,y,{ xa.• .tt k C t 'Sit �xh+�wy,�'� r .t , *its f ; -11s*".;.'M:4 } i. "*..., fir :?5r x ` -4 3• ;+, '44-641:::F.' �� y. 'k. .,,r +�}� u■;p.,�y„�4 r .f ak! ,r. ti ,j,; : r w `h VS: f,.�Y.. i.^ :�. '4 }. rY*rpp,.+• } t 111C}�}t..yy..��",,�Y ',.• • 1 k }. 41;4 is "w+i TT j • i Y §V �t ytR `rr"' r. i #'*P"r i '4. i'M,i r .k,xt� k pw > r �1kT' j� r ^rrC " . •!S F .f' r., t 4: . 5 li1:4.4 • t t 3 r •^"R' lc: yn t of -1 4 •3/4,v �' �S5'{ ri .i...11, fi �' 4,' r1 , i Ai e.1yil�µetE X Ikl t y. t - ;.1 Y'I`:I '4" �• „s A7vi},•.t+i�A f+ `'• #' . a wY;•''‘,' iA" •• �`# "Y,' 4144 ' .✓ Rek • 1,. S :I y,4 , • • '..5r4 1} f" ._ 't :,. 4,.. 1.• 't.'•:::..v.. „tits •% ; PE 6:1•I: r 'h .,. tT`?,K' }t,w... # •+,,.}y , 4 '.^ A(',stir.c:'?" t .rr a W .1„ 4!4, pit, {1i"�, , • h ,.. , .-4.....t _ C - A�''' .Ii..! :41•;::4?'_h' . r - r w.,, n '.-.gsk"�: •�.t,„t Y rt .. "1.--t"i••••••.; Y • '.•1.4.4,......f../..v 1. j#X .._/..v .nt. • ',i yr �1.. wR gay ,'Jr k ++itw,;a r`'i`.'Y.x' : it 44:::N:4i:4:4 cr ,s r a< '4:4.�� + 7.:7'741M .:47,. ..,. • s .7.77, . 'ex•':... •17:1-7,7,-.777.777, 1', y A f Tfiw'. a ,•re ^i °'pns�R?F1, ' I��i y? v. :twae (4 1� 1 t y+ t .I i t: f .,f 1.. •'qty T. ... `.4d' ', M:.. '''''''';.0.;•:",.'''•••:••',..,.^:::•,A;•...4.0.,,• rt t;-L. .•VZ S.t}ga••;,..,...;,1.a•.:,.'-',';•:,- 1 F 1'f tr,.gaip 1 et. e.t t d t ,t [ �. 1�li I i,d i.,. ,rn III ; Ii a i .. ; rI rTh �+ (1c It'll I r,1x I IEII 111111 y J II . I I • �' 6iE`��1 111i�11! sr ``f iIl . .� �♦ ' i•r4 � ;, � 11 �: --- 7 A -0, �u. 4. v, 6 ,I ' , r,\t_i_.„. )'` '� II i {J x : Q oo I et,' [ __ _ . . . I r1.•'.'S` "'>> . 't•^f a.:.7.;.i '1 r; 3 7 . '...,777:177:7•:,7 .+TINOWIN T.l'..6.' xT C .t 'T"'.'7- Z'5,7-gtt'.11,3':41-VN R � rvR .tr' ..• a a•^f: 1,--.---,,-..r r-r-yr: •r•.M n i •:?1t s w3:o r a. .. . • .4 `!. `7 � . {;2 3 bxt ; t ti _.. • s. :a •; ••+,,y. r.4.4:rt• N r!1i- t -e ,.+3 r" 4-a �~ . ., z w::<bY.. , .. C.. ..:;''''.... ru.. :a�.^;i..ne4�'ti. ..:.. ��r4�S� .-. a:.1�.�t..w�i.:. .... ...�.ei'" ..... _. , • r -....., I 3 I �_: ra _ I I +{ . • ::,...1.....:0 . ,,.:y,• . ,, <'^'• 1j1I - _-_ it I S'.",.......,',.41. N 1---10 Ell 1 1 i ,:tr.77N., i G ,s'111111111. I it .. . . ... .1 • — . '.-. ,:,..,..... 1\i,I:*. ):-:..-'.': .- . ,,. ,,...,...,......... (.• . ) ' SJlM1 I Ifll it , I ` /J - UI ill i • il i L u • I I \ \.- J r H {'I ' ko Ei II • = V 1f • ' o C. f� 3 -O •—r u_ NS N, 'Cr i.1` w \J\ l I 1I • y• k •O j v, E 'I • i i I \ ti (C \ I • ,� �-�'.`';` ' 'Vii.�'e�' �, • r..; •a,:' t s7 „rryt -`r�'-t' 't '`'7•- •i.•1'. .`,..,....,•,..7•••,...'•••:" •4yx�', 44:' - S' I• to r �V��`-�i .,•,: +x4n a •.�:'�x t' S r,� _ " ' +o ••. � t�. :3;,- +w' . .„,....,..,,:..4...,:, t , :::it.; 11 • : .. .'a da- `. L.{#,tF, i••�..... .... .. a ..... 5, ..3ay F. • '7 P , •g k ., M1 • :!.1.1....../....-:!.....7w-::•.--.;.. ',. , ..i r - ,i: . ... .>. � ;�t;6!''.:��" • y',.r.r4.1i::fAiFr�N k'�';l3ldtii ... ,rr_- .� SL[JO144 31[ ' flJj ] uOU1JJPsOU •a i ` ',.•y r rF ?sq.a a ;�7w1 .k o t' 2....;:',:.--,‘ ,11,. ^,, ;: r Ytt '4✓ yam• '5,S Y' • ... '` t 4t!,;"."-"";`' {.ry ,x .. 3 J,;••:. ..a . N,y ••••:7',..4" .`: ' 'Y,�p.4'' 44..r1 y'�} t •.'1a� )-•-•/•'.','•.-Sa., 4` '.,i¢t'�. f • j' •" ai t .4' 2:' j }+` 7.,1; .f.. .'+`..•- • •'� "1 a;i.!' �' ly: '}.•^_ tle t %1' ^ r.V :�A.F -,4' • 1 r$ 1.;',45.,--;'..:-;•, tc : tr !'+ 'r•6:,.. 'e ; :-t.+ .} x. -,:;.,Y.° a�_ " •c -:•, ....=i, ,, .2 q,rKFa b', w 'rt .. ? ..i '.'ICY. �vJ.Tt��, i.AnU Y '..r•k t, r+e'� 4 ..:iv x :. S; '4' a 2a•. .: ,,,;- -i...2„.. +>,-•a.i ,•v--,N--,-..,s r ..r, • _"A'4 '. .'"Zxr•� w+. T! ar- I.z .i.,'••1,,...,,* �h�, •l ,...�,' r 4:� •.... ; as ! x• ..I• tM-' ,•'�,••} a� r.>i> . . -$.,,,........".`"";:j.,. ., ..:�y r+,��>_,3it, R68W CHANGE OF RESERVOIRZONE PLAN FOR 32 33 LEGAL° N.`.. �....1 ...R,r r .. ,•1r, Ip.r.,r r:;r.,a:��.M...�w.,. PROJECT UFEBRIDGE PUD amaa•na.t-a,we WI.a mat we,m.ra t. A TRACT Of WO STATED II SaCOON S.104106' au M ,�.TV=rtl.nf°a::rum was-a...r 2 NORM WIC 0 CT 6 M 6TH Fl411WK e I ', la n 1,4w...a v rco t m...,R.Mo.•u•.m roux*.WMTY or RID.mot 6 OQAR1OO. 1 PROPERTY OWNERS CERTIFICATE: I .. =... WO M411•,••)•I' f..N K r.a••.03„fa.e n 4r NO....K. 1 ao.ar,,.a ra1:•1v.MIT YN ..r..aw.wI a.•rr.arrar R•.w.1. ,.ea.w.../Ian maes. Yss ' .'N ri.4 le WI ar.n r rl•nr w..[.',..If..Y..S.fa .Y•YdM. •ryat.r..a'M M ,Neva 1N 4i w r M. VYI,s••Mr.'a>a.11,e••a/0,4 WO.,.0,al a.u. Y NJ Ma.Km ra.•/:Vod•.,Irly alaY.R.,*3,4 NI f I a.ny MAtlV.t0.r1.6 sCye woof.•,a�f4l.U•, l f .1'ul o r..,.a a..•a 1..r.:.rr. W J w �a.Ivi°a:r M ool M:O.1,1-0-1-0 rM wYtw:ra•aiW.n •\ .0 K.Y..',FY•IV..,l,.68,0,......1 K•,r..y. WIW I l ` �' - �6RW..ar•fa.I..Ya.1.. Yef.r- w..>.3: / +�'•,„, l ..VNY a.' 45 rn,no Wr V Alit fa YM1 I.M taw nr •1,40.tlora4 MS r6w1.01r MN.�K ./ / / , M?l�9.1a.HM Y�YI tl 11111•01.0"0,3,4“1:1 a�W 9,41•••,99.9 V..r revsec.ay.Ira 4w Vs 00 U. • 1 S r=:R""TYTr 5,i••••e,Lr..l6 ir.Y/.A.Vra m - ..•f W•2,,.,i.09 I.awVsw l.rV ...... ,�, .YMf•a..P rsR1Y.V.K K,a.am...bN 0,,,,,,,p ... -___- 1 • T.N v..V•r;or,i awT.CYv�. tfaaYa-al. - Nam us 1•>.T. •••M•„•nc. •wm 41.1 _ •t.Yr It wrV lrF 111 R1,ar,6 a,..Nfat.p.J00!-„V .,ro W11a an...00,Y1lYW M..lf•..T. 'PPOECT l .f.sa r V ss..0..l r WIMP 1.,00 OK 1101 ta.., q 'YII'�CERTIFICATE +!nr rlasatKcr rae�.ib 0w v Y+�Ynrt a.0r,1 Pc,Iw67a0 y.. T: 5, Tz� 06.0...wpm,o.�"..z",..�.cr°.'>,o.o�i%im s N•....... .....awID.`.w... ... ... :4 .ars r w o....a...I rx+�e u v rat%ra„rs.Affua • wwylriwl.. ,m,:.w .r.•.e..<..zwarw'a[r ..ae'" ;. MI v1.ao..o s vnu>a••v.n.I a u,w.m r n ..ma,v.uww a,eiaaow,.o' ar.Jj+`� .ws a 009,.....01,-rer CO•.'s+.1 wen raII 11 RI r, �. vwa,Km� r�ru..vvi�c.o.a°�..na, • m�. • r..►.,.s us•af••••ar.at�.c Y•zn<.•••,:•• T -- IL.I..1ax.r,r aP••••••,.,.r1 =WI a-n.ark soot le,rronr ov elzf� WI I ^ply..Ir en+4 or...V.,."00.w.a r:e t Y,e a.,w•r 1rm �a Y 00.0,.r 9.1•.03.Kai I r ...w'....a,.r 1tla=....a..1.a_.n..>411 THE ..... . --, it O Th ?4 OF APPROVAL� PIANNIINGS : �' IT FI CCRA 1KdWTIOlt paw w f .0-.P"—to ar"c-,.."— 1�,•raLPr. w.,t��..;;. .w wss......1.:101.0.1 L.r of a z, �a!O NI X,10 MM4 r n 11.04 P0i1.•'C , SOBS Rl�o INTER sMa.s n..r aCf.--. 111 l .wa.sR a 4,..a.u•. 0.00CW is t e 14.0••tra r,1 li.•�• -_ — aY a'Wi+)si,16+wa WO l...a1.s>I ft. I I • •.`o',..,Tar.m SP,not•,,,k fo.10 �T— • warr.r ea l 1..01.,.r.t .IO...a.1a 15 1..I.Tao CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY • 03a..e °wa y I..x 93.1. 111E COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: i 8 9 .o..w la,e•.16r.xs r1...,0..mRr.o r...1.,PI.,1 e'MOW 1015, ar- 5 IR.1.,I,.........'..' ,::W,K. -Yao.�c9'i.Pu.v— • SHEET met ��. .a.y n C. • SHEET 1 VICINITYMAP ` n:.caw II IC NM —MMI— 16e1w VICMITY WP SHEET 2 ALL AN msuc.Wn.rm•....ea....r,. SHEET CHANGE G OF ZONE PLAN -A ........ 1 •••••••••,••••••••1 . &EET� CHANGE OF ZONE PLAN iiii .u,.I..5 w a.ow, •K WA GU.1a CO. l 7Y•w.:IM.w ....l.w. SHEET STREET SECTIONS iV.a::.t•:Pu*1tM1wnwNse ...um= "•r 14i.m.nr elil ...v,ra SHEET IANDBUIPEPLAN �• .It a1a.wr1 ,pRrLL>V'.,. _ +-0��. [�.1INSIEDESIGN `— Inc a .'r R ir ,�l 001 YYw WY a.R _Mu.wi—� � y wa.v•.ra... w M r. •.= .��.•.=,r .."... IM�Y . 011,11111= lit":".'''''* •�q,r �� yyF :•.•,..., • �' t49; 1 •.. '•, • Cz r .✓; � i'-'.6.:..1“. x r • y,* Sl,�• ,u, 1 ',/,'r. 1,4;`+ Fii I.5 •,.m. ^`'. .; 'S.,r., .., .. `.." d}: .. t riv a,t r-. `A•••Ay.., ..w i:. .•I,. .:5 f 1 „,... ` y 1 ....,...it...e,.......,..„,..:„.........,„,ebrld e PU e r , .4 e r «,.� 'k- 1 i hiagra �..F__: r� F"• �'. 2� .ae' Ja '4--„f, '•< I . CHANGE OF ZONE PLAN FOR t i i I PROJECT LIFEBRIDGE PUD I I• i ,' 1 I S A m.c OF IMO SCRMIEL M SfCI 1 5.COMB ,�� y _:'i':• 1,i �' 2 IpRIC MCC EE.6f OF 11(QR.GI..CYK . .. /'. . 1' _ I rYrr� �•� ' •Jti~ L4ilONM.COIM[I1'6 R0,SUIE OF CQON�00. l: .,-z,r.. ' .-. . �- / OVERAII MAP ,. . / , . • . ••;'... wary 7Ac9u IIY. I ...f>tl. �� [� <—c.- ,.,y r•.•-u .--1—aw..�.na!ACM re y t f 0 ^.;r Tom.:C...�O..wc• w�:>.a.•(/.r-.a:) 1 / s.1.. vv. trst �e..t L n 1 // r _ t / w�aL�[x ualooE PLO oo.cen NL r /r - � / LMoutE aorta �- -- .we.,.• •'1,..---'' .� 1 I t y ' x ! ;.,...t...,,,..... l '.A•. .a. • � _- + wrr \ Y f i V ....rs•r ' L.' .... '. /,- sHEE . • ,.. . . , , • .,, . ., /. ......,,..... 4. �.= - ,-. . ..�' .---...o- .� .,�...r.: ...:W,.. f ✓.... // v .... .• Nom.. --/ : lido,\ ‘. .:,' „.-.-• -—"• -•••Y f [1,, '-;*Gt... „...._........"-- VW; i 1 \ ;/iT —; ' ---,ems „ SHEETA `- ~ .�w .. ,r If . • .' r:. .....Mti • II 1 .. 1 _... �.. , „.� a ,.' ••••...ova �. _. ...... .-/- ; r -- ' -.*. ------_---- . �' _- .,I i �. e° b� Inc Aga -- aoonwd..,Moa.,u,wm�c. $fir-..�.... " 2R• s F - wr .:''.'.->......; .::.. ,.....-.) _:. ,zi' s: at e'.'•'..... ,17,2t'''- .., _ ...x . ` .. ,-. _ .. -ty.... -a..,:',,k` .r i°_ ,:. # t e - 1 • A ) •t s e-X" t F• •td..1 ' as '.'� .....r -i ", *� Y 't' h -t ,ate+ sv r .. d i .{ �'4 ti. (�yx C_t . pa+ .�, .'N ; ••••,..!le, ". { : t: outh Detail A . 4F �� _ t MATCHl1NE-SEE SHEET 3 • aR 16 --11''. r _ LI I • '• I E 4 , x s 4tr..%1 . il ,,,., ,.T , ,),/, . 9 i • I \ t7 f01�� Il Y E''''\1.—-•Al / �I' L.ua.K V hC'�. � i o g .3 • li 4SY.ib tMYG l , is r V`NXL l n V f ` jl M ' r i 11 t it all • / " ! u I 1' • It KOHRGW come uLC.I4 42 am. \.,.. A 13. K v ant.06 Ij • r■■ .n rr _ 'ti.. Ei 'r NIoe0lgiele�WAM t :'... • , .•.-N'r.:.>. _ .. ':'' rte x r" Kra Ram .+ �`� TT ^ --.7::.---7-----,,.-__---- �_ \.7ars-.•sT1Y'W-0� SIPE MOW tN I'm iI. +-- _-_ v..to CHANGE OF ZONE PLAN FOR - -—— NE MOl p° 'S°"• 'a PROJECT UFEBRIDGE PUD ,' • , trt S.11101Ed f._-1 o.a Dm.DaP.1aa+Nrb eoni▪r.n.,..S.a?r.a`r°°`"vv« war>.a. 1 PORN aYQ KM 0)A watt OF WO sawn')DI M WAN PRN�µ yy uvfd b Hb 3 t7; � Isar t IXIIMY Cr RID.51.11 If 0Q0P/DO. iliil c_.-13 ............« `�"' ti �`° . ~ CHANGE OF ZONE PLAN dlinl is. .:-,1.z• ; ('-7 G'rn.M Cod rrwutW6.M.r p Odd.daru6 �1 n�w�ul... yn _(�1 i kt t Q �t= ' `W.-c--.f ▪ 4''^'/r- .nww.w..o...u+ucl :�•.-•y:PkwttR.xnwHn 6 ——. idea*. ..p ._IWwl�r! .--.-`.».ttawatant . ` .. w i @ .• .ea..x ars. n -fiu1M f..... �tMM1�.�.0....VI..W Fentress INSITEDESIGN�., .av:.ntaostanua .FOUldfOll CAI MI .44Waddaddd"v.'os'isx+nd...r.w.t-.r.w..x.<e..m<...w - I•'.'" �..,�,�. 'Bredbt1>•n S a (1/4.... / a.ttaaw� c .rt.w a„cn. :".,""+.0"°,...,--r.-.41--,-.,-- ,.. ,�_.;—'�.',,; • atta..wu.+acweuwfv� ,, a ms.. xw tC� ...III=P.,.:J" asa s...0 -{ ziII:8i7.tYr� �� .0rf F •s+;r4 =>.....",...'''''''+'-7 _ .._ v •r `.v, ,Y E : ' r i. a, '� x k SF$ ✓, -5, , i" „ 4/w aK w € 7"4- kkkkt ._ s sly' -.a "^ i" k. x e �P orb F , '*s . .: iu, I's _ ,...-. �- . / T _� T r / 11 l , I y u o°iir / I TARS Kraut poo. mini Mtn up 44Y I er vamp mrcu i `'t a r it '' Hasa - to ry . : t.to .` N ';� '(w /,' gfr'. ...rx' S'IA Ali �I! - y w�/j� n4`. {� _____-------71._,- i �f c " .. nom - laKuo Kano. i eve Pc 00 i�c o rt..: �'q 1 _ MATCHJNESEE SHEET 4 CHANGE OF ZONE PLAN FOR Weer R r*4 se.se 1 PROJECT LIFEBRIDGE PUD `` ligL_I C•Y.OafMO *O. r/o Wan 2 KA KMCP W LAND Ri�6 t /3b ( 9 3 a. r fe3...s. lank mum a RID.Sul a mmwm. r p..unn.m. CHANGE OF ZONE PLAN i _.4.',.....n.,.`, 1'=200 .e.+.puvns� ... SHEET, a...� WOW <. �.e.w €41.81 .. .. . ....,,. ! © .. .._.seep... �' - !. �,owo�o�iun .o,.,se,se7 T .AL BLOCK , telEMGNFentmae pwc( g�C Q �� orwuw TYPICAL RESIDENfIAI EASEMENTS Pt= BBmnMdd w..i.s�.c I LOT EASEMENTS ` r.„-=.— .a= ZeC.L=_' Lt= 4,, ha t r ,,t Ills g hilliL !N!! !LuIi1Ii1 :; ,::,;:,, i it fjjj. HI 12 1Trii if71 ' I U {{ 4 rig I gilalloollut iitri lilt iliiiii i1]1Y1I1191'TII' iiiinitiIJ li a<< it -- 4 1 I ki. '4 ‘ r" iK4'T 'N\ ti, il ,,, I'16 y�:.,f mac_ Ii'i �. '^r",� ,` ; s ,,, ,, , \ , .., _a. 7"________. . _ , , ,,, ,, \:\s, )t,,,.., „;mcali 1 c I:I \\ l� n ry\\: kl, it 4., 4 kih..\\„.„,„„ {. ,-.., 5 f fr, ics rit—at 11 .4 Y„„,,, „a;a�”1°. , '?'F. s , 1�rc7gwan^r.«„.,.x• .,r• r•,7 gr,T M1 yt f �- 1. «1v1. `' wa. ':•r.�,. •w.,Yae;•+x. °, -, q ''''''''.1'' .ai. • • .,.......-....,4'.:17'.'4'.0.,-,41'.41!;.' :2::...'....:rte+ .. •.t`=Tt irwar.. + ,.t:r:• .9. •{ ! F[:`. r L ;' r +, -...'.44,4,I3'''.'':-.......'.. y„:. F• .„}�y,oU Fri' K � •V ,'�" r'1`::.. .s I,, �,C y y "s c ,.—1x...,a yq ,,';1+r. ,'t .WV:LI a .;c _ ,tryF.=�:. ...• t' . , ..r .,cai+ . ' +14'•: �irY.r. .'AvI'8:oafi•-9S:. . 1 j I (� I ! ' G' ~ Y • r t 7, .. tr�r-z 11� �"/f 4{7 l A ,1' Jr. 11,(1,\,,._ 1rl�~ K Q /- Ilrl *` Ili�l I , i r.I ! Ilil •x\\ 1 : 4 1. „ filll■1111.._„. ._ . .IT . . ��+,. j III1111111 I`... II:II i i . . ,,. 1 , i ! l(-] -- , ,.. . ,. ,.,,Ii . . "" . . ,:....f:,..,. . . . (----, .1 . . . " . i , . �. , los . . �, .,....t(-:- 21:11, Iiiii.li.sul 1!!I 11111l II .,. �•_. I , I • ti / €11111111 tilllllll I i II ` 31IA 11111 _ 111I11111��r9111111i61� I� ' .,.d iI(a .....‘Q 7,4*. I I r v t`i/) S 1 It 1 II r.M LF•'' LL , k,f W�.. .� III mss::'. J x d• E , I s..' v c C • am io. ob. I .• „T11r;��ta; 4 o- • i • • ,n w r++. xrvny ry:- 744.. V. - r F rc e.,.'^C'F'•'ti '1"IPIII,.V„C '2.py. s r 't`i'',"l yy ''a '1q,,rr..• .,, :rr A ,..,• ,';'''11 ( r ins '� 't ��f `� a'�'k• f" • •i}a,e �, e'irr'��• qy1 ,: ,� �.o:ivr. ' i 74. •y'L _ rrs• ry - : "'�}.:•.:::.:..'Sr 'L;i0il.Whv tiK44,;: -.. t7�fN Y ,&.0•..>.a_3`v::.i6st wit..'-.7 �en7r s 1r €a.c c,T1't'. t > " q A d '"+'? :19,M' f+S."Ig=Y'f 7,.. a.t .R 4 ..,<,C-l�fi`f r ''4 rF N r"' <�w:' • > ai`�'`t..,r., -- K• '^"` • rrk T`t --r'., :t. e r.. .taaj.._y;.wi�,:bi,'• r, • .,`,.�n i.', •kp a,��.`�.t�.`• 7y:.,�� .,�.o::•.r.': .'i'rSy.'. `�'$ :A�'Cv 4' yl. 'Ir ( {r" x 1 a ^tT[ 1 i [ err! g E 1 II SS II II f 1 E II jj`` {p lid Ii,. '!...,,...L--:•••;\ ti) all IIIIIIIIIP -• NN, `.41' - IIIIIIIIIII ,( \ V _ 1 f 11[I tl ,%40/ ) ... . .. li \ \lig ,10,,,,,., �� t t,af , ,,,) i'i+ ` ' 1Y. lillitalillI IIIIIIIIIII iii II - - - :.. -� Mllt(111lf1flllTlllltiii I - v �'' : t►' s ih1 eo a4 g o ui �•..� � / §-0 .3 y= III � L 1 �--,. G CO I o 1I I ii II0 44 \ V u u E V I '\��+� �� 0- • • r s II l t f 77: sM gc...4Sa^ ,,. rr-L4P,,.'1 ,� .,4•., rt:£vt, c 5`---. _, y li- iyir w4.. Nf..i. f: £fir 444044 r=ilida n:::J“-,,e• i.h ',r,'.1`,7e .., ..t1'•4,t.t . - :.:1;:. :.i.:... ..., z•;7: ''•'.".,....c.,.:: �.J. 2St . .1t, di re uk.r. .'-', ieiwdi,;ii,W t • i:$ —'..,.::"• .".: ,, 4.,x .: ..... `-•,.,J-.;::•i';;;.'..;.• . • ,� . .•Y.` • S:r+, "r< �t 1'5i:a'1/:1'.t,Y P"' -"':ikf.`:•';'• � � ,. : .' ' ��!J;�.Y:�:..,ti r.• ,'gam'.' eta ' I ` • ` 4 ��F �S'e .S•r'3u .l r �1]�� .Ft ,}' r ...)11.1:,.. .:•`......... •r N - { y •1•i:: :lr",flK. - "r ' •/•,......•'.1%.:: .1^ ::i'r ':i .Fi.'• �04i ��p urn' •a : 5 ` .T1 T.÷... .1!, i 11 11. IZ ll 'f Ill ill I. It. .,..t. li ,,.: 1 I Il ti tit1c1itl1i ! l� ii.1 I . It 1 , Willi, I It ill 1 I • ItfK 111111 lli Iit ;Alt I!1 . ev, • i . • i # raw ._ • `' - —.or-.- li 1 "% I . ilwiliii. i . ,'. li -.I 1.-V11--.: Il i 1 "lift!! 1 III 131 � 1i� �, , �', t1l + it'! li • — • :r x .p .,1'. .Ma's•'. • ,„:'.41#04tt. '•:•'' ,.::s:�-,�.:.,,::..:::>.: I e!: .. ...:..•:.. • • • :T t:i ... .,.F of. .. .....4;•,:'..'4".1:44..:•'. :, ,kt,..�; 7. ,�,T '.: •��..: • • • .�.4:,.,_• y ;ix.::' ''?.:M!a;4 i' •,..,::::::::;,,,,:f:::,-...!' ..4',•- ` ��.... ..< Y _. .Y. .. ,� c I' ' 'h ;41.... ..y+ • • .x ♦ • i '^ r. i' r ��. Yk'x` SY f � -a v: #,.-,... ......c...„:,,..-,44...:;;,73..)..1/4.• • •ar t>V` y 7C ..,z L��¢.pp. crvII 'fi x; H '*. 0. .4£`* 4 # a xF tt^ s , > ::n 4"�3,- Y .h.�¢ y �+� { - .,kk a°< n - ,`x. is 4kv< C .�,. F r ,.. ::•'- M..r r 'l. C.• DII_.. 1E] ��• 7_ BUILDING HEIGHT O4 a Highest point �t �‘ on grade within ..---,..; 5 ft. of house H GRADE, 100 ft. GRADE. 92 ft. 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE SECTION 209 T • >.ry ,3'klf w�j 'T y y1Czxy♦tTS • .•x, '*' •5�•, ^C 'S • F i u. t �a •••• .•-,.i•••: 7-.•:.,,, ,:-.,.F?•;•••:.•••v.,. M1l ?Wr• y •..Y • f 3 • r ._"ir FIELD CHECK inspection date: March 2, 2003 CASE NUMBER: PZ-1004 APPLICANT: LifeBridge Christian Church : c/o Tetra Tech Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc., 1900 South Sunset Street, Suite 1-F; Longmont, CO 80501 LEGAL: Lot B of Recorded Exemption 1389 and Part of Section 5, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of& adjacent to Weld County Road 26; north of&adjacent to Hwy 119; west of and adjacent to Fairview Street Zonina I and Use N A(Agricultural) N Agricultural/Residential E A(Agricultural) E Meadow Vale Farms and the Elms at Meadow Vale PUDs S A(Agricultural) S Vista Commercial Business Park, State Highway 119 W A(Agricultural) W Longview PUD, Agricultural Lands, Residential Properties COMMENTS: Site is located in the MUD area of the County. State Highway 119 a divided highway with limited access points is located to the South, County Road 3 '%traverses between the two parcels and County Road 26 is to the north. All roads in the immediate vicinity are graveled. CR 3.5 is a signalized intersection. Numerous oil and gas appurtenances are on site and there are also irrigation laterals present. A rail line single track traverses the property northeast to southwest. The alignment of the tracks cuts a swath into the existing slope on site. The tracks are south of the area identified as single family residential on the applicants development plans, west of CR 3.5. Public services appear to be available upon visual inspection of surrounding area. The property slopes to the south with the highest ground located near County Road 26. The property appears to have a higher elevation on lands identified as Single Family Residential, west of County Road 3 '/z, Property is vacant however, appearances indicate that it has been in agricultural production. There is a limited amount of vegetation on site, predominately near the fence lines. Portions of the property are fenced with a three strand barb or farm wire fence material. Ki •.le, ' anner 1240 Hello