HomeMy WebLinkAbout20032913.tiff RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
OCTOBER 20, 2003
TAPE #2003-29
The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity
with the laws of the State of Colorado at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial Center,
Greeley, Colorado, October 20, 2003, at the hour of 9:00 a.m.
ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chair and on roll call the following members were
present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof:
Commissioner David E. Long, Chair
Commissioner Robert D. Masden, Pro-Tern
Commissioner M. J. Geile
Commissioner William H. Jerke - EXCUSED
Commissioner Glenn Vaad
Also present:
County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker
Acting Clerk to the Board, Carol A. Harding
Director of Finance and Administration, Donald D. Warden
MINUTES: Commissioner Vaad moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners
meeting of October 15, 2003, as printed. Commissioner Geile seconded the motion, and it carried
unanimously.
CERTIFICATION OF HEARINGS: Commissioner Vaad moved to approve the Certification of Hearings
conducted on October 14,2003,as follows: 1)Violation Hearings;and a hearing conducted on October 15,
2003: 1)Use by Special Review,USR#1429-David and Annita Alvarez,dba Bethel Family Praise Center.
Commissioner Geile seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: There were no amendments to the agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Geile moved to approve the consent agenda as printed.
Commissioner Masden seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.
PUBLIC INPUT: There was no public input.
2003-2913
BC0016
WARRANTS: Donald Warden, Director of Finance and Administration, presented the following warrants
for approval by the Board:
All Funds $497,889.87
Electronic Transfers - All Funds $1,167.55
Commissioner Masden moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr.Warden. Commissioner Geile
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
CONSIDER HEARING CONCERNING THE RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR A HOTEL AND RESTAURANT
LIQUOR LICENSE FROM SIMON CORP,DBASIMON'S BAR AND GRILL: Bruce Barker,County Attorney,
stated this renewal application was considered in July,at which time several outstanding Building Permits
and a Site Plan on the property had not been completed. During the renewal hearing last year,the Board
discussed these items with the applicant,and approved the renewa with the understanding that these items
would be taken care of prior to the next renewal date. Since it had not been done, this hearing was
scheduled. Mr. Barker stated there are one or two Building Permits for interior work, which have been
finalized; a Building Permit for an apartment, which is outstanding; and a Site Plan, which has been
conditionally approved by the Department of Planning Services,although there are conditions which need
to be met before the process is complete. Jeff Reif, Department of Building Inspection,stated he has only
inspected and finalized one permit for Simon's Bar and Grill. He further stated he does not have a record
for the one discussed for the apartment. Kim Ogle, Department of Planning Services,stated staff provided
additional comments for the Site Plan Review,and a meeting is scheduled with the owner of the Travelodge
to review. Commissioner Geile stated he has serious concerns about safety issues for patrons in the
building, and all Building Permit and Planning issues need to be resolved. He stated there are still a lot of
open questions. Mr. Barker stated Simon Ryu,owner of Simon's Bar and Grill,was asked by the Board of
Commissioners to apply for one Building Permit. He got the permit immediately and the inspection has
been completed and the permit finalized. Mr. Barkerfurther stated Mr. Ryu has done everything the Board
has asked him to do and he has been working with the property owners on the Site Plan issues; however,
Mr. Ryu has no control over that portion of the property,and the Site Plan process has been moving slowly,
although progress has been made. Responding to Commissioner Geile,Mr. Barker stated there is a lease
between Mr. Ryu and the owner of the property. Commissioner Geile stated the applicant certainly would
have protection in the form of a termination clause included in the lease,and the Building Permit and Site
Plan issues all tie together on the total property;therefore,he has a hard time separating the two and feels
all issues must be resolved prior to approval of the renewal. Responding to Commissioner Vaad, Mr.
Barker stated the property could go into a violation status if the Site Plan meeting is not successful,in which
case, Commissioner Vaad stated, the interest of the County will have been met. Commissioner Vaad
further stated Mr. Ryu has provided everything asked of him and, if the owner of the property does not come
through,all business on the property will cease. Therefore,Commissioner Vaad stated he is in support of
the license. Commissioner Geile stated he does not want the issues separated since there is too much
commonality in facilities, parking, staff, and maintenance; and all issues need to be completed before
proceeding with the license. Commissioner Geile stated he is not in support of the renewal.
Mr. Ryu stated he has done everything he can,and he does not feel his liquor license should be jeopardized
because of someone else's failure to complete a process. He said it has nothing to do with his business
and,although he has had his lease for many years, he is only the tenant and he cannot tell his landlord what
to do. Responding to Commissioner Masden,Mr. Barker stated this matter may be continued to a later date
until the outcome of the Site Plan meeting is known. However,Mr. Ogle stated staff approval was given on
October 3,2003,and the applicant has 30 days to meet the conditions,therefore, November 3,2003,is the
date a response from the property owner is required. Commissioner Masden moved to continue this matter
Minutes, October 20, 2003 2003-2913
Page 2 BC0016
to November 5, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Vaad, carried
unanimously. Mr. Barker asked the Clerk to make the State Division of Liquor aware of the continuance.
CONSIDER TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF WCR 11 BETWEEN WCRS 2 AND 6 AND WCR 3.25
BETWEEN STATE HIGHWAY 52AND WCR 16.5: Dale Elliott, Department of Public Works,stated Weld
County Road 11 will be closed between Weld County Roads 2 and 6 on October 27, 2003, for a culvert
installation. He further stated Weld County Road 3.25 will be closed between State Highway 53 and Weld
County Road 16.5 for a bridge replacement and road construction, effective November 10, 2003.
Responding to Commissioner Masden, Mr. Elliott stated the gravel companies hauling on Weld County
Road 3.75 have been contacted, and they have made other arrangements during construction.
Commissioner Vaad moved to approve said closure. The motion,which was seconded by Commissioner
Geile, carried unanimously.
CONSIDER NONEXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR UPGRADE AND MAINTENANCE OF A
PORTION OF WCR 147 RIGHT-OF-WAY AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN -CLINTON TAPPY: Don
Carroll, Department of Public Works, stated this agreement is a Condition of Approval for Subdivision
Exemption#967,which required an access agreement to be completed. Mr. Carroll stated the access is
on the right-of-way known as Weld County Road 147,from Weld County Road 112,and is 60 feet wide,with
30 feet right-of-way on both sides of the center line. He stated all adjacent landowners were notified of this
meeting. Commissioner Masden moved to approve said agreement and authorize the Chair to sign.
Seconded by Commissioner Geile, the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDER PARKING LOT RELOCATION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO
SIGN-CHARLES AND ALICE GREENMAN: Mr. Carroll stated this is a followup agreement for Change of
Zone#1026,which was fora Planned Unit Development adjacent to Union Reservoir. He stated an antique
shop in the development installed a parking lot in front of the shop with a sign; and the agreement reflects
that, upon expansion of Weld County Road 1, they will relocate the parking lot to the rear of the property.
Mr.Carroll stated this agreement allows the applicant to meet Condition of Approval#2.G. Commissioner
Vaad moved to approve said agreement and authorize the Chair to sign. Seconded by Commissioner
Geile, the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDER MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING ACCESS TO FOOD BANK
PROPERTY AND ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO
SIGN: Mr. Barker stated this is a three-way agreement between the Weld Food Bank,City of Greeley,and
Weld County,and it outlines access to the facility across property owned by Weld County, as well as how
the County will issue Building Permits and inspections. Commissioner Geile moved to approve said
agreement and authorize the Chair to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Vaad, the motion carried
unanimously.
CONSIDER CHANGE ORDER#1 FOR CHAMBERS SUBDIVISION AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN-
LEVI CONTRACTORS, INC.: Mr. Warden stated this Change Order is necessary to close out the
Chambers Subdivision Project,and it reflects the additional costs of the lift station,which was not included
in the original contract. He explained State funds of $38,000 were included in the project; however,
approximately $8,000 more was necessary to meet all the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment and City of Brighton requirements. Mr. Warden stated the project is complete and this will
close out the paperwork. Responding to Commissioner Geile, Mr.Warden explained an additional 420 feet
of lift was required, and it is at the end of the line; however, the big issue was operation in the event of a
power failure. Commissioner Masden moved to approve said change order and authorize the Chair to sign.
Seconded by Commissioner Vaad,the motion carried unanimously. Responding to Commissioner Wad,
Mr. Warden stated the source of funds for the overage is General Fund reserves.
Minutes, October 20, 2003 2003-2913
Page 3 BC0016
CONSIDER RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF RAY PETERSON TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FOR THE WELD COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT:Commissioner Vaad moved to ratify the appointment of
Ray Peterson to the Board of Trustees for the Weld County Library District. Commissioner Masden
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
PLANNING:
CONSIDER RECORDED EXEMPTION #3648 - RONALD WARNER: Sheri Lockman, Department of
Planning Services,stated this item and the next four items,Subdivision Exemptions#1000 thru#1003 for
lot line adjustments, should be heard concurrently. She explained the current layout of the four
Subdivisions, which is extremely linear, and stated the proposal is to widen and shorten each lot. Ms.
Lockman provided aerial photos with current and proposed lot layouts depicted, with Recorded
Exemption#3648 replacing Subdivision Exemption#1001. Ms. Lockman stated the lots are located along
an abandoned Union Pacific railroad spur, and stated the City of Dacono has major concerns due to a
Conceptual Site Plan they are reviewing for Dacono Estates,which would traverse the southern portion of
these lots. Ms. Lockman stated a response was also received from Bob Swenson, Managing Partner for
Dacono Estates, LLC, stating concerns; and the U. S. Department of the Interior and Reclamation has
deemed the abandoned railroad spur to be historically significant, recommending it for inclusion on the
National Register of Historic Sites. Responding to Commissioner Geile regarding the lots on the east side
of the properties, Ms. Lockman stated she does not know the dates for approval of nearby Recorded
Exemptions; however,all of them were under separate ownership. Ms. Lockman stated access would be
from Weld County Road 8 for all of the lots,and Dacono has anenxed all the roads in the area and,therefor,
has total jurisdiction and could require the applicant to access the parcels from the north. Responding to
Commissioner Masden and Chair Long, Ms. Lockman stated the parcels together are a mile long, and,
although there are some setbacks for oil and gas facilities, there are no wells on these lots. Responding
to Commissioner Geile, Ms. Lockman stated the railroad is still in place even though it does not cross Weld
County Road 8. She said it was an old spur,for which the right-of-way was sold to the applicant by Union
Pacific. Prior to that a nearby landowner did a study to get the property declared historical, and it was
designated as having historical significance. Responding further to Commissioner Geile, Ms. Lockman
stated Dacono surrounds the parcels, it is near the Dacono trail system,and Dacono has jurisdiction over
the roads. Commissioner Vaad commented all previously approved Recorded Exemptions have been
required to have access determined prior to approval. Ms. Lockman stated the County has allowed the
applicant to submit access agreements as a Condition of Approval.
Ronald Warner, applicant, referred to an E-mail from Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, to the
Department of Planning Services, stating these are four separate legal parcels. Mr. Warner stated for
Subdivision Exemption #1003 and#1002, he has to remove the tracks by the end of November, per his
agreement with the railroad, and those parcels have always been deeded to Union Pacific. The parcel
proposed as Recorded Exemption #3648 was at one time deeded to a subsidiary of Union Pacific, and
consists of more than the railroad right-of-way. He said that parcel, along with Subdivision Exemption
#1000, have been leased for agricultural purposes for years and have not had railroad tracks since 1909
or 1910. Mr.Warner submitted a letter from the Central Weld Water District,marked Exhibit B,concerning
the installation of an 18-inch by 8-inch tee into the property, along with the installation of 20 feet of piping
being stubbed out to the north fora future tie in. He also stated he talked to Mr.Carroll,who agreed he owns
the north half of Weld County Road 8,and there has never has been right-of-way going through there. He
stated the railroad owns the right-of-way on the south part of the road. Mr. Warner stated access from
Weld County Road 8 is grandfathered in,since it has always been there and is a legal access,although he
has no problem with showing a 30-foot easement from Weld County Road 8 running along the east side
of the parcels. Mr. Warner stated all parcels drain naturally back to Little Dry Creek, and Bull Canal also
runs through his property. Mr.Warner stated the regulations regarding historically significant properties are
different when applied to an independent landowner instead of a developer. Therefore, since he will be
using the parcels only as legal building parcels, he does not have to meet the historical impact
Minutes, October 20, 2003 2003-2913
Page 4 BC0016
requirements. Mr.Warner stated the City of Dacono is concerned about the size of the parcels;however,
the smallest parcel is 105 feet wide, which is adequate, even if a 30-foot right-of-way easement were
granted. He stated the City should not stop him from using his property as he sees fit and he would like to
keep it agricultural. Mr.Warner said the City had a contract on this property a few years before he bought
it; however,they let the contract lapse,and when the owner called them,the City said they were no longer
interested in the property.Therefore,the property was available for him to purchase. He said the railroad
has worked with the two trail committees, although he disagrees his parcels are a critical link to the trail
systems, since there are two natural gas lines running through the property underground. Mr. Warner
stated getting electrical or other utilities to the site does not create any problems.
Ken Dell, Tetra Tech RMC, represented the City of Dacono, and displayed an area map showing the
properties to be within the Urban Growth Boundary area of the City. (Changed to Tape #2003-40.)
Responding to Commissioner Masden, Mr.Dell stated the property is eligible for annexation at this time and
the area to the south of these parcels is currently in the process of being annexed. That process should
be completed within 30 or45 days. Mr. Dell stated water and sewer are being extended into the area;the
Dacono Comprehensive Plan designates this area to be medium density residential,with three to seven
dwelling units per acre;and the area is also designated as part of the regional trail system, in cooperation
with other entities in the area. He stated the railroad right-of-way, with its historical significance, is an
important part of the regional trail system. Mr. Dell discussed the tremendous growth pressures in the
area,and he stated numerous sections of the Weld County Code and Intergovernmental Agreement form
a sound basis for denial of this application. Mr. Dell stated Urban Growth Policy 3.1 allows approval if all
three conditions are met;however,not even one condition is met by this application,since the municipality
is willing to annex the property and the property is eligible for annexation. He stated the proposed use and
service impacts are consistent with urban type uses. He discussed the importance of continuity of streets
through this section, stating Dacono has been spacing streets at one-quarter or one-half mile distances,
which is necessary to handle traffic flow and emergency vehicle access. Mr.Dell argued that this proposal
will eliminate the internal grid systems for interior development of the section. He also stated the proposal
is not compatible with the Comprehensive Plan for the area, and it will be disruptive to genuine urban
development. Responding to Commissioner Geile, Mr. Barker stated the definition of the term
"development"in the Intergovernmental Agreement does not include Subdivision Exemptions;therefore,the
agreement does not cover them. Mr. Barker further stated annexation is mentioned for Recorded
Exemptions; however, the Board of County Commissioners can approve them without considering
annexation. He stated where there is no minimum size requirement it is okay to approve them in the Urban
Growth Area as long as it does not conflict with urban services. Responding to Commissioner Geile, Ms.
Lockman stated this is not part of the Legacy Trail Project.
Responding to Chair Long, Mr.Warner stated he will continue the hearing with only four Commissioners
present.
Karen Cumbo,City Administrator of Dacono,stated in 1999,the City did have correspondence with Union
Pacific regarding the purchase of this property;however,funds were not available to do so. She submitted
a letter regarding the property,dated August 27,2002,marked Exhibit C,stating the City would have been
"willing to pursue any available legal options to acquire"the property. Regarding the trail,Ms.Cumbo stated
all the regional plans include the trail traveling south on the railroad right-of-way to the ditch, then going
southwest, and she has been working with the committee to continue along the railroad to either Weld
County Road 6 or 8. Ms. Cumbo stated this area has an urban development requiring urban services;
therefore, the water line was installed as part of the development. She stated the developers paid $3.9
million over the last several years on this project. Ms. Cumbo stated when she met with Mr.Warner, she
was given a plan including eight lots, not four, therefore, the City's assumption is the property will again
divide. Ms. Cumbo stated the spirit of the Intergovernmental Agreement encourages the City and County
to work together in the area. Responding to Commissioner Vaad, Ms. Cumbo stated the City would have
Minutes, October 20, 2003 2003-2913
Page 5 BC0016
been willing to use eminent domain to secure the property. Responding to Commissioner Geile, Mr. Barker
stated,since the Subdivision Exemptions are only doing lot line adjustments with this proposal,they would
be eligible for further division in the future. Responding to Commissioner Geile,Ms.Gumbo stated the trail
running through Subdivision Exemption #1000 is on the plan and is part of the Legacy project.
Mr. Warner submitted a map of the regional trail, marked Exhibit D, showing the northern part of the trail
does not pass through his property, since it is to the west on the railroad bed. Responding to
Commissioner Geile, Mr.Carroll stated there is currently one access from Weld County Road 8. He further
stated the road has been annexed by Dacono,therefore,the applicant would have to go through whatever
permit process the City has in place, and will be required to designate a 30-foot easement through all the
parcels. Responding to Commissioner Geile, Mr. Barker stated Dacono is required to give reasonable
access to property; however, it can require terms regarding that access.
Commissioner Geile expressed concern that these proposals could have significant development issues,
since they are being structured as changes to the lot line. He stated, in looking at the Urban Growth area
of Dacono, including recent and pending annexations, there is significant conflict with Dacono's plans.
Commissioner Geile stated another concern whether access off Weld County Road 8 will occur.
Therefore, he would recommend the applicant take his proposal to the City of Dacono and pursue
annexation, since there are too many issues pending. Commissioner Masden concurred, and stated he
feels these proposals would hinder urban growth and development. He further stated there are too many
Comprehensive Plan and annexation issues;therefore,he is not in support of the requests. Commissioner
Vaad stated he is very sympathetic to any property owner and their rights to develop their property;however,
he is also concerned with Dacono's desire and ability to develop a major property and its goals for the trail,
whether or not the trail is on this property. He stated it is a matter of record that the City would have been
willing to use all legal options,including eminent domain,to obtain this property. He stated this decision will
impact the fair market value of the property; however, that cannot be the concern of the County.
Commissioner Vaad stated the access to the properties is going to have to be worked out, and it appears
the City of Dacono is the proper authority for that. He also stated the property is in a growth area and the
value of those properties are increasing. Commissioner Vaad stated he cannot make a decision in favor
of the proposals without understanding the impacts of access, and future subdivision which could legally
be done,therefore, he is not in support. Commissioner Geile moved to deny the request of Ronald Warner
for Recorded Exemption #3648. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Masden, carried
unanimously.
CONSIDER SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION#1000-RONALD WARNER: Commissioner Geile moved to deny
Subdivision #1000. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Masden, carried unanimously.
CONSIDER SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION#1001 -RONALD WARNER: Commissioner Geile moved to deny
Subdivision Exemption #1001. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Masden, carried
unanimously.
CONSIDER SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION#1002-RONALD WARNER: Commissioner Geile moved to deny
Subdivision Exemption #1002. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Masden, carried
unanimously.
CONSIDER SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION#1003-RONALD WARNER: Commissioner Geile moved to deny
Subdivision Exemption #1003. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Masden, carried
unanimously.
(Chair Long called a short recess.)
Minutes, October 20, 2003 2003-2913
Page 6 BC0016
CONSIDER REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF ROAD IMPACT FEES-ACTION PURSUIT PAINTBALL, LLC:
Monica Mika, Department of Planning Services, stated this is the first appeal to the Board of County
Commissioners of road impact fees. She reviewed the chronology for the appeal outlined in her
memorandum to the Board dated October 14, 2003. Chris Gathman, Department of Planning Services,
briefly reviewed the history of Use by Special Review Permit#1413,which was approved by the Board on
April 23,2003. Ms. Mika stated the fee requested byAnthony Navarro,via his consultant,Diane Houghtaling,
is$4,665.67. Responding to Commissioner Vaad regarding the entry dated September 24,2003,that the
transportation study was complete, Ms. Mika explained when an application is submitted,the applicant has
ten days to complete the required information. In this case,an incomplete application was submitted,staff
requested additional information, which was subsequently submitted by the applicant, making
September 24,2003,the date the complete application was submitted. Using that information,Peter Schei,
Department of Public Works, provided an alternative fee calculation for the proposed fee of$11,415.54.
Responding to Commissioner Vaad,Mr.Schei stated there was a misinterpretation of the variables that are
supposed to be used in the formula resulting in a discrepancy in the values that were calculated.
Diane Houghtaling,applicant's representative,stated she originally submitted the Impact Fee Independent
Study using three similar land uses,including an amusement park,community recreation center,and golf
course. Mr. Schei used the golf course and three employees, and she now agrees with the golf course
comparison,which would generate 44.16 trips. However,she stated there are really two full-time equivalent
employees,since the applicant has one full-time employee and two part-time employees whose hours do
not exceed 40. Ms. Houghtaling stated she also disagrees with the new percent,which is included in the
formula. She explained that when a new facility is built, normally the old facility is used by someone else;
however, in this case,the flood plain is the existing facility,therefore, no one will be moving in to generate
more trips. She is requesting those old trips be deducted since they existed prior to the impact study,which
gives a total of$4,087.10. Ms. Houghtaling stated it is a new facility with no additional employees,and no
additional trips added, since it is currently using another location. Responding to Chair Long, Ms.
Houghtaling explained the site is vacant land,and they generate 19 trips per day at a different location. She
further explained they will simply move from the other facility, not replace the other facility, although the
same roadway system is used for both.
Chris Fasching of Fellsburg, Holt, and Ullevig, acting as the County's contracted transportation expert,
discussed the issue of whether an applicant can take trips from one location to another. He stated there
are no rules established for the question,and this decision will set a precedent for uses of this nature. He
said if the applicant is expanding a use and remaining in the same location there is good rationale forgiving
credit for current trips; however,there is no application process established for this type of situation. He
stated they are moving across the street and across the river. However, Mr. Fasching stated, using the
lowest cost use,which is a mini warehouse,in the Traffic Impact Fee Study Table and applying the number
of trips generated, the fee would be approximately$14,000. He stated Public Works has already used
some discretion in the fee and is recommending $11,415.54. Mr. Fasching stated the Board needs to
determine the policy on credits given when a facility moves. Responding to Commissioner Masden, Mr.
Gathman stated the applicant did not pay impact fees at the original location, since they were approved
during the time this application was being processed. Mr. Gathman stated both facilities will be in operation;
they are not going to close the existing facility. Responding to Commissioner Geile, Ms. Mika stated
previously access was considered in relationship to assessment;however,under the current amendment,
seven roadways were identified and staff no longer considers access. Ms. Houghtaling stated the applicant
will operate in both locations, although not at same time. She stated if one facility is open, the other is
closed. Ms. Mika stated both sites are in the floodplain, and the new site is also in the floodway.
Commissioner Vaad stated the transportation impact fees were not intended to have fees pay for the
neglect up to that point, and he finds the argument about moving from one facility to another compelling.
However, in looking at the figures if the lowest possible is $14,000, then a 30 percent difference was
included by staff in assessing the fee. Commissioner Vaad stated he supports staff's recommendation of
Minutes, October 20, 2003 2003-2913
Page 7 BC0016
$11,415.54 and,therefore,moved to deny the request of Action Pursuit Paintball, LLC,for road impact fees,
and to accept the methodology for staff's fee. The motion,which was seconded by Commissioner Geile,
carried unanimously.Chair Long stated that although this facility is moving,the applicant is also developing
what could be two sites in the future.
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the
consent agenda. No Ordinances were approved.
Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted by
the Acting Clerk to the Board.
There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 11:30 a.m.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD UNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST: aide/,� � ��'� E
&a D id E. on Char
Weld County Clerk to . ` >
pvq
1861 (' �•
%1O-'�.I Robert D. s en, Pro-Tem
BY: !`/L _ &o - �. •
Deputy Clerk to the' i j
NI M. eil
EXCUSED
William H. Jerke rk
Glenn a Vacf —
Minutes, October 20, 2003 2003-2913
Page 8 BC0016
Hello