The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About810500.tiff ORIGINAL FILE AT MISSILE SITE . ARCHIVE BOX MISSING AS OF 12/ 19/2017 RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 70 : 81: 3 FOR WINDSOR ASSEMBLY OF GOD LOCATED ON PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 17 , TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, held a public meeting on the 23rd day of September, 1981 at the hour of 9 : 00 o' clock a.m. for the purpose of hearing the application of Windsor Assembly of God for a Condition Use Permit for a parsonage and sanctuary on the following described real estate, to-wit: Part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17 , Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. WHEREAS, representatives from the Windsor Assembly of God church were present, and WHEREAS , evidence was presented in support of approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a parsonage and santuary, and WHEREAS, Section 24 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance authorizes such a use in an Agricultural District upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Board of County Commissioners, and WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, has studied the request of the petitioner and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter, and having been fully informed, is satisfied that the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a parsonage and sanctuary on the hereinabove described real estate complies with all of the conditions as set out in Section 24 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, and 310500 PLO 9G? Page 2 CUP Windsor Assembly of God WHEREAS, the Board has reviewed the Planning Commission' s recommended conditions for the proposal and determined that #5 is not applicable, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners that the application of Windsor Assembly of God for a Conditional Use Permit for a parsonage and sanctuary on the hereinabove described tract of land be and hereby is, granted subject to the conditions as stated in the attached Exhibit "A" . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners that the reasons for approval contained in the Planning Commis- sion' s recommendations dated September 17, 1981 be, and hereby are, adopted as the findings of fact of the Board of County Commissioners in this matter. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 23rd day of September, A.D. , 1981. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ABSENT Chuck Carlson, Chairman 66.44.4.-„, .44.1 — (Aye) Norman Carlson, Pro Tem • /,/{}. 7/ (Aye) C. W. Kirby //l . (Aye) J hn T. Martin d ' (A e) /) _1 e K. Ste ' ark ATTEST: , -..s , Weld County Clerk and Recerd6r and Clerk to the Board . BY: ,% ( le Ctiw�t. �' \ // e�C,, ) ,15eputy County Crk APPRogED AS TO FORM: =x /74- c ( County Attorney DATE PRESENTED: September 30 , 1981 EXHIBIT "A" 1. The attached Standards for Use by Special Review be adopted; 2. The plat for the use permit be placed of record by the Department of Planning Service' s staff prior to any building permits being issued on the site; 3. Prior to building permits being applied for, a subsurface water table and soils check be made to determine special needs (if any) regarding septic system and building foundation design. (See Soil Conservation Service letter dated September 2, 1981, Weld County Health Department referral dated August 20, 1981, and Colorado Geological Survey letter dated August 26, 1981) ; 4. The map be amended to reflect necessary additional footage to the north side of Colorado State Highway 392 for future right-of-way reservation for a total of seventy-five (75) feet north of the center line . WINDSOR ASSEMBLY OF GOD CUP-70:81:3 STANDARDS FOR USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW 1. The use is for a sanctuary and parsonage as shown hereon. Additional uses such as fellowship meetings, day-care and christian education (K-12) may be allowed. 2. Design Standards for uses by Special Review, Section 24.5 et. seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with. 3. Operations Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24.6 et. seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with. 4. The Use by Special Review shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Standards stated above and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Standards, as shown, or stated above, shall require the approval of an amendment to the permit by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 5. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. _r0 __ THE WELD CCL9d Y, : C: ,n r-o- _.�_� .10^; OF RECOMMENDATION Ti . .- _ ..- _- ._ , ., C J_ _.. 70:81:3 September 15, 1981 Case No. C,. - Date APPLICATION OF Windsor Assembly of God ADDRESS c/o Reverand James R. Dunn, P.O. Box 367, Windsor, Colorado 80550 by Bob Ehrlich that the fol_ '_ ar:ina resolution be ;' e .lc Cc ..\ 'e_ ' Fe it Peeclved by the Weld ,ount\' i nr' c c Ch ss that the application for Windsor Assembly ot� Goa - covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to-wit: part of the SW1, Section 17, T6n, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado be recommended (favorably) (HKIMPSl )5! ) to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons : 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. licant 2. It is the opinion of the Weld County Planning Commission that the app has shown compliance with Section 24.3.1.1 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: Windsor has recommened no objection to the request so long as water is provided by the city of Windsor; the proposal is adjacent to the city of Windsor; and is located within the Comprehensive Plan boundaries of the city. The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District in that the proposed use does not constitute an interference of agricultural activities; Motion seconded by Bette Kountz Vote: Don Billings For Passage Jerry Keifer Against Passage Wilber Wafel Betty Kountz Bob Ehrlich Fred Otis The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioner=- for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION CF COPY Bobbie Good , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing r'es : ictior is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of v:eid County , Colorado , adopted on september 15 , 1981 _ and re -, corded in Book No . vii of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission . Dated the 17th day of September 1981 ctLo L-Z++a+ oa . Secretary - The proposed activities will be compatible with existing adjacent agricultural uses and with future urban use as contemplated by the City's Comprehensive Plan; - No Overlay Districts affect the site; - The proposed site is located in the corner of the property to minimize effect on agricultural land uses and will in the future be an urbanized area; and Use by Special Review Operations and Design Standards provided adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. The following conditions are recommended for the proposal: 1. The attached Standards for Use by Special Review be adopted; 2. The plat for the use permit be placed of record by the Department of Planning Service' s staff prior to any building permits being issued on the site; 3. Prior to building permits being applied for, a subsurface water table and soils check be made to determine special needs (if any) regarding septic system and building foundation design. (See Soil Conservation Service letter dated September 2, 1981, Weld County Health Department referral dated August 20, 1981, and Colorado Geological Survey letter dated August 26, 1981) ; 4. The map be amended to reflect necessary additional footage to the north side of Colorado State Highway 392 for future right-of-way reservation for a total of seventy-five (75) feet north of the center line; and 5. The applicants show proof of a city of Windsor water tap prior to a building permit being issued on the site. .,... on nnc, WINDSOR ASSEMBLY OF GOD CUP-70:81:3 STANDARDS FOR USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW 1. The use is for a sanctuary and parsonage as shown hereon. Additional uses such as fellowship meetings, day-care and christian education (K-12) may be allowed. 2. Design Standards for uses by Special Review, Section 24.5 et. seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with. 3. Operations Standards for Uses by Special Review, Section 24.6 et. seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance shall be complied with. 4. The Use by Special Review shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Standards stated above and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Standards, as shown, or stated above, shall require the approval of an amendment to the permit by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 5. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. TEH:rjg 9/10/81 Date: . jtember 15, 1981 CASE NUMBER: CUP-70:81:3 NAME: Windsor Assembly of God REQUEST: Parsonage and Sanctuary LEGAL DESCRIPTION: part of the SW1, Section 17, T6N, R67W LOCATION: 12 mile west of Windsor THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Service's staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3.1.1 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: - Windsor has recommended no objection to the request so long as water is provided by the city of Windsor; the proposal is adjacent to the city of Windsor and is located within the Comprehensive Plan boundaries of the city. - The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District in that the proposed use does not constitute an interference of agricultural activities; - The proposed activities will be compatible with existing adjacent agricultural uses and with future urban use as contemplated by the City's Comprehensive Plan; - No Overlay Districts affect the site; - The proposed site is located in the corner of the property to minimize effect on agricultural land uses and will in the future be an urbanized area; and - Use by Special Review Operations and Design Standards provided adequate protection of the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood and County. The following conditions are recommended for the proposal: 1. The attached Standards for Use by Special Review be adopted; 2. The plat for the use permit be placed of record/he Department of Planning Service's staff prior to any building permits being issued on the site; 3. Prior to building permits being applied for, a subsurface water table and soils check be made to determine special needs (if any) regarding septic system and building foundation design. (See Soil Conservation Service letter dated September 2 , 1981, Weld County Health Department referral dated August 20, 1981, and Colorado Geological Survey letter dated August 26, 1981) ; 804-80-042 Windsor Assembly of Goad CUP-70:81:3 Page 2 4. The map be amended to reflect necessary additional footage to the north side of Colorado State Highway 392 for future right-of-way reservation for a total of seventy-five (75) feet north of the center line; and 5. The applicants show proof of a city of Windsor water tap prior to a building permit being issued on the site. TEH;rjg B-20 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 15, 1981 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held on September 15, 1981 at 1:30 p.m. in the Commissioners' Hearing Room, 915 10th Street, Centennial Building, Greeley, Colorado. The meeting was called to order by the chairman, Fred Otis. Tape 69 - Side 2 Roll Call: Jack Holman Excused absence Jerry Kiefer Present Wilbur Wafel Present Bob Halleran Excused absence Fred Otis Present Bette Kountz Present Don Billings Present Bob Ehrlich Present Bill Diehl Excused absence Also present: Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator, Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney and Bobbie Good, Secretary. A quorum was present. The summary of the last regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commis- sion held on September 1, 1981 was approved as distributed. CASE NUMBER - SUP-472:81:18 APPLICANT - Erie Water and Sanitation District SUBJECT - Wastewater Treatment Plant - Continued from August 18, 1981 LEGAL DESCRIPTION - NW1 , Section 6, T1N, R68W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION - 12 miles north of Erie APPEARANCE: Richard Lyons, Attorney for the District, reported the district wishes a new sewer system for the town. The current sewer system has received complaints from the State that they are not in compliance with the state standards. They are either going to upgrade the present sewer system, or put in a new sewer system. If upgraded it would only allow for approximately twenty-five new sewer taps, which the town feels is inadequate. There has been new growth and development in the town of Erie, and the old system is no longer adequate. They have not arranged for funding of any kind at this time, understanding that a special use permit is the first step to be taken in the process of putting in a new sewer. Keith Bell, Engineer for the Erie Water and Sanitation District appeared before the Planning Commission. Tape 70 - Side 1 Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 1981 Page 2 Mr. Bell explained the various locations investigated for locating this site, the soils composition of each site and the location of each site. He explained the process of treatment, purification of liquid effluents and disposal of waste solids planned for the plant. Discussion from the members of the Weld County Planning Commission was directed to Mr. Bell and Mr. Lyons. Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator read the recommendations of the Department of Planning Service's staff and the Development Standards. The chairman, Fred Otis asked Mr. Lyons and Mr. Bell if they were aware of the recommenda- tions and if they felt they could live with these standards; to which they replied they had copies of these documents and felt they were reasonable. Discussion from the Audience: Bennie Bruntz, Westview Estates expressed the views of himself and other residents of this subdivision. He felt there were surely other areas a sewer could be located except right next to a subdivision. The residents are concerned that: 1. their water table would be lowered because of the dewatering process; 2. most of the properties have shallow wells for domestic use; 3. who would be responsible for odor control; and 4. who would be responsible for weed control, etc. While it has been stated a full-time employee would be provided to take care of the plant, the town of Erie sewer site is a "sad mess" now with weeds overgrowing the property. If they cannot afford to maintain this site properly, how can they afford to maintain the new site according to specifications? Many residents of Westview Subdivision are too low to be able to hook onto the sewer, therefore, they will not benefit from it. Also, this subdivision is extremely swampy and there is concern that the wells will be contaminated, or if it rains the sewer may overflow. Roelof Elting, a farmer, who lives on County Line Road stated County Line road was built up three or four feet and, therefore, acts as a dyke to hold any overflow of water from Coal Creek where it crosses County Line Road rather than letting it drain into Boulder Creek and run-off as a natural course of events. Because of this Coal Creek floods the area, including the Westview Subdivision. If the sewer were to drain into Coal Creek and flood this area, what would the consequences be? Tape 70 - Side 2 John Heffner of Westview Estates expressed his concern about the location of the sewer next to Westview Subdivision. He also wondered why other areas with a gravel base could not have be used for the sewer site. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 1981 Page 3 Ron Stow, Weld County Health Department reported he had spoken to Mr. Sam Cooper of the State Health Department, but did not receive a comment. Therefore, the Weld County Health Department is withholding their recommenda- tions pending the recommendations of the State Health Department and the State Board of Health. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney explained the process this applica- tion would have to go through and be approved by, following the Weld County Planning Commission recommendation. Even if the Planning Commission were to recommend denial, the State takes final action on this and could override their decision. The Planning Commission inquired about another expert opinion from some source, perhaps the Weld County Engineering Department, as to whether this is the best site in regard to soils tests, etc. Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator stated the Department of Planning Service's staff does not have expertise in all areas, therefore, they rely on areas with that expertise to give them an opinion when referrals are made up on a particular case. In instances such as this, the staff relies on the Weld County Health Department and the State Health Department for expertise in their areas. Tape 71 - Side 1 George Montano appeared from the audience. He stated he had lived in the town of Erie all his life and has been watching it go backwards. Erie water is bad. A few years ago when a new water system was installed they were assured this would solve most of their problems, then it was discovered it was installed improperly. It was his feeling the Engineer, Mr. Bell, was much like a new car salesman. His primary interest is to sell the town of Erie this project. MOTION: Jerry Keifer moved that the Weld County Planning Commission continue the Erie Wastewater and Sanitation District application for a Special Use Permit until the next regular meeting, Tuesday, October 6, 1981, at 1:30 p.m. The motion was seconded by Bette Kountz. Discussion was called for from the members of the Planning Commission. Don Billings felt a decision should be made today and not postponed until the next meeting. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members for their decision. Jerry Keifer - yes; Wilber Wafel - no; Betty Kountz - yes; Don Billings - no; Bob Ehrlich - yes; Fred Otis - yes. Motion carried with four voting for continuance and two voting against. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 1981 Page 4 A recess was called by the Chairman. CASE NUMBER - CUP-70:81:3 APPLICANT - Windsor Assembly of God SUBJECT - Sanctuary and Parsonage LEGAL DESCRIPTION - Part of the SW', Section 17, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado APPEARANCE - The Reverend James Dunn, Pastor of the Windsor of God Church reported the church had made an application for a Conditional Use Permit to build a sanctuary and parsonage for the church. At a later date they also hope to build a church school, but these plans are not imminent. The town of Windsor has no objection to this request, except they have requested they be connected to the town of Windsor water supply. They would prefer using North Weld water, as it would be much more economical for them. Both water services are available to them. Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator, read the recommendations of the Department of Planning Service's staff and reviewed the Development Standards. He wished to call to the Planning Commission's attention that three entities have requested soils reports and subsurface water tables be checked to determine special needs (if any) prior to any building foundation design being done. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. MOTION: Bob Ehrlich moved CUP-70:81:13 be recommended for approval to the Board of County Commissioners along with all conditions and standards as outlined by the Department of Planning Service's staff. Motion was seconded by Betty Kountz. Discussion by the Planning Commission. Jerry Keifer informed the applicant the Planning Commission tries to go along with the town's recommendation when an application for use is within their comprehensive plan, which this obviously is. Therefore, the recommenda- tion regarding use of Windsor water has not been changed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the member for a vote. Jerry Keifer - yes; Wilbur Wafel - yes; Bette Kountz - yes; Don Billings - no; Bob Ehrlich - yes; Fred Otis - yes. Motion carried by majority vote with five voting for the motionand one against. CASE NUMBER - SUP-476:81:22 APPLICANT - Douglas Howard SUBJECT - Agri-Business (livestock trailers) LEGAL DESCRIPTION - Part of the SE', Section 17, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 1981 Page 5 APPEARANCE - Douglas Howard appeared in his own behalf. He explained he and his wife can run this business from their home if their application for a Special Use Permit is accepted. There would probably never be more than ten or fifteen trailers on the lot at any one time. Much of their business is wholesale and done by telephone sales. They have a large lot, with adequate lighting already installed. There would be little increase in traffic. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. Tom Honn, Zoning Administrator reviewed the recommendation of the Department of Planning Service's staff, along with the Development Standards and Comments. He asked the Planning Commission to be aware of #3 of the staff's recommenda- tions concerning the recommendation of the city of Greeley regarding additional right-of-way. The Chairman asked Mr. Howard if he was aware of the contents of the recommendations and development standards. He stated he was. MOTION: Jerry Keifer moved the Planning Commission accept the recommendations and Development Standards for use by Special Review made by the Department of Planning Service's staff and that they be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with recommendation for approval. Motion seconded by Bette Kountz. The Chairman called for discussion from the Planning Commission. There was none. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members for their vote. Jerry Keifer - yes; Wilbur Wafel - yes; Betty Kountz - yes; Don Billings - yes; Bob Ehrlich - yes; Fred Otis - yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER - SUP-475:81:21 APPLICANT - Colhalar Company, Inc. LEGAL DESCRIPTION - SEA, Section 13, T3N, R66W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. SUBJECT - Alcohol Production Facility APPEARANCE - Ken Colgan who stated they want to build a small alcohol production plant to use in conjunction with their cattle feeding business. They are now in the process of obtaining the necessary permit for their water. This will be quite a small plant and will only produce about 500 gallons of alcohol a day. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. There was none. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting September 15, 1981 Page 6 Tom Bonn, Zoning Administrator reviewed the recommendations of the Depart- ment of Planning Service's staff along with the Development Standards. He asked the Planning Commission to be aware of #3 of the recommendations regarding soils tests and foundation investigation prior to a building permit being applied for. The Chairman asked the applicant if he was aware of the contents of these documents. He stated he was. MOTION: Bob Ehrlich moved SUP-475:81:21 along with the Department of Planning Service's staff recommendations and Development Standards be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the recommendation for approval. The Chairman called for discussion by the Planning Commission. There was none. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members for their vote. Jerry Keifer - yes; Wilber Wafel - yes; Betty Kountz - yes; Don Billings yes; Bob Ehrlich - yes; Fred Otis - yes. Motion carried by unanimous decision. There was no further business. The meeting was adjourned at 4:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Bobbie Good Secretary rjg/ • • o COLORADO STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS r DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Weld County 182 * SH 392 September 8, 1981 Windsor Assembly of God C.U.P. NE Corner of Co. Rd. 15 & 392 Mr. Thomas E. Honn „ DOH FILE 45100 Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 Tenth Street `/ Greeley, Colorado 80631 S?j'" Dear Mr. Honn: We have reviewed the application from the Windsor Assembly of God Church for a Conditional Use Permit, and we ask for your consideration of the following comments. 1 . Projected traffic on State Highway 392 indicates the need for a total of 150 feet of right of way, 75 feet each side of the centerline. The existing right- of-way width north of the highway centerline is approximately 40 feet. An additional 35 feet should be protected as necessary by reservation or, preferably, dedication as permitted by local regulations. 2. We note that a runoff holding pond is located in the southwestern portion of this site. If water from this pond is released and flows toward S.H. 392, we ask that the rate of release not exceed the historical runoff rate for the entire site. Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. Very truly yours, DWIGHT M. BOWER DISTRICT ENGINEER /Doug as Rames District Preconstruction Engineer DDR:da cc: D. M. Bower D. N. Fraser (2) File: Crier-Jacobson w/encl . x P.O. BOX 850 GREELEY, CO 80632 (303) 353-1232 United States Soil P �? Department of Conservation Agriculture Service 4302 W. 9th St. Road, Greeley, CO. 80634 September 2, 1981 Milton BaumgartAer, President West Greeley Soil. Conservation District P. 0. Box 86 _ Greeley, Colorado 80632 I have reviewed the request from Weld County Department of Planning Services for a Conditional Use Permit for a church and parsonage, Windsor Assembly of God Church, to be located on lot B, five acres in the SW4 of Section 17, T6N, R67W, 1/2 mile west of Windsor. This conditional use permit relates directly to the recorded exemption filing by Eaton Development Corporation. The church and parsonage are to be located in the southwest corner of the five acres on the corner of county road 15 and state highway 392. The entire site is made up of the soil type Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slope. This soil type is very compatible for the planned activities, however, north of the acreage is an area which in years past has exhibited surface drainage problems. The entire region west of Windsor on either side of highway 392 has exhibited some subsurface drainage problems. This is not to say that the acreage in question has subsurface water problems, but it would be wise to drill some deep holes to check for a subsurface water table which may affect the construction activities planned. Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slope is considered to be prime farmland when irrigated. Granting of this request may go against the established Weld County position to preserve prime farmland. / ' Sincerely, Ronald D. Miller District Conservationist Greeley Field Office xc: Weld County Department of Planning Services(7 RDM:jb O x • tits. 7614 (If'Wllld Or Ark 0 1r , er� P.O. BOX 621 WINDSOR, COLORADO 80550 ft— September 8 , 1981 Mr. Thomas E. Honn Weld County Colorado Department of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re : Weld County Referrals , August 13 , 1981 Dear Mr. Honn: The proposed church site is included on Windsor' s Comprehensive Land Use Map as a single family resi- dential area, and is therefore compatible with future land use plans. Windsor has a 12" water main along the south boundary of the proposed site and it is stated in the Comprehensive Plan that future develop- ment along existing water mains be served by the Windsor Water Department . Therefore , the Windsor Planning Commission, at their regular meeting September 3 , 1981 made the following recommendation to the Weld County Planning Commission by a unanimous vote : The recorded exemption and conditional use permit requests for the property located 1/2 mile west of Windsor are recommended for approval contingent upon the applicant utilizing Windsor water service now existing near the property. In the event the applicant does not wish to become part of the Windsor water system, the Windsor Planning Commission would recommend denial of the applications. Thank you for bringing this matter to our atten- tion. Sincerely, TOWN OFFWWINDID SEr _ Donald E . Sandoval RE ECEIVb� +. Town Administrator -- ° WeIA COMM DS/j 1 Ilann t CalneissiBI �wr J\l A e - Er : cup 70 : 8( : 3 r te : 9— i�—SI E)k 6o& el),6 Sze of Parcel : Staff !1ezber to Contact : 5,0o c. s t —r,,_ 110,E Legal Description : L fk. 3 12-6 5I y Sep, .ow I� Tb ti 2 (O7 v.9 Location : ^ 2 rni e v..)esk o lOw�sov- NCc.o�rnw 01 SN 9z- ' ' c ,5_ Existing Zonilig: Request : ��S�tZ @ove rbrD vvat. - Samc ka i a Possible Issues Summarized from Application' '_Fa'teYials:- 1 . 'C�'bi oka.se r Cowtprrkevts 0e `Ple 2. Tz i c. t ? ; X CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATIUN Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 - 10th Street Greeley , Colorado 80631 PHONE : 356-4000 Ext. 404 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY : � Permit Fee : /4(, Case Number : c th#2 769 • ar� ' 3 Recording Fee : /p App . Checked by : _ _49 Receipt No . : //$!Z TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURAL GUIDE REQUIRE- MENTS : Print or type only , except for necessary signatures . I , (we) the undersigned , hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning a proposed Conditional Use Permit for the following described unincorporated area of Weld County : LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Conditional Use Permit is proposed : ?feel 8 04 T'.&coraed eS, /30. 0807— /7— 3 - 2 C 5/3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AREA: same as above- Z STREET LOCATION : /UE cps' lS l ZONE : it PROPOSED USE : #' % 0M y'SDNC�e REASON : / - FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR CONDITIONAL USE : NAME : (0. kir I 0 ADDRESS : *-R113197 TEL : NAME : owd rl ADDRESS : � ROSS-0 TEL : NAME : / site ADDRESS : TEL : I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all state- ments , proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge . COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) c } Ca /,/ Signal e : Owner of Au orized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,� day of �� .f(471, 19__V - i n S E) A L„ Notary Public _ My commission expires : 44...e—el J, 25— /57 / / Windsor Assembly of God Fifth and Oak Streets Box 367 Windsor, Colorado S0550 Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado To the Commissioners: The intended use of Parcel B of Recorded Exemption No. 0807-17-3-RE513, a portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. Weld County, Colorado, will be to develope both a parsonage and church facility with sanctuary and Christian education facilities for the use of the Windsor Assembly of God, its congregation and friends. The initial seating capacity of the church will not be less than 200 with the design of the building to provide for easy expansion of seating capacity. Thank you, Rev. James R. Dunn Pastor - Windsor Assembly of God l.. Windsor Assembly of God Fifth and Oak Streets Box 367 Windsor, Colorado 80550 Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado To the Commissioners: Summary of activity for Conditional Use Permit: Activities: The immediate planned activities for using the church facilities will include worship services for the whole congregation both Sunday morning and Sunday evenings plus Mid—week Bible studies on Wednesday evenings. The church facilities will be available all other hours for individual group use such as Royal Rangers (church related Boy Scouts) on Tuesday evenings, youth fellowship meetings on week—ends, women's fellowship meetings, men's prayer breakfast on Saturadays. These individual group activities will be of a small group nature and most likely will not exceed 30 - 40 in attendance. Also scheduled on a regular basis will be revival type meetings for the whole of the congregation and these usually are scheduled for 3 - 6 days during the evening hours. Future plans include a Day Care Center plus Christian schooling (K - 12) such as is now being provided by Trinity Lutheran Day School or DaySpring Christian shool in Greeley. The parsonage will not be utilized for any activity other than those which accompanies a pastor's home. Building Type: Current building plans call for a circular type structure which utilizes space and energy the most efficiently. Under consideration is both the conventional type construction for circular buildings and the "dome" method of construction which utilizes the impacted concrete technique of construction. The reason for considering the "dome"type building is that cost of construction is 40 - 50% less than conventional methods, plus the dome/impacted concrete method has a minimum R-56 insulation factor and readily lends itself to solar applications. The type of building chosen will be architecturally designed and landscaped to be aesthetically pleasing. Parsonage structure will be of the conventional type. Access to the parsonage and church facility will from the County Rd. 15. The greatest amount of traffic to and from the church will not be during hours that are considered to be heavy traffic hours during the daytime. Thank You, dv.71)amesa!unn Pastor- Windsor Assembly of God 4 14 4. �� y .'�.✓ 044 I �a 1`_44 ' {� f ' " w. '.v" ate ,..-.. lIII ...2, e`tc Or I / /` ' -..�.1_ "' .+x r4' 3" �`,� •5i..i1- a .ai .. %f 'SSA F " Y + PYTTirTT yam, ,�.y / V »' . ter' E _ x >1 "3 _ i a 4‘ r ry ' 3 _ ' l.?' kY 'j rC v.•B El f $ ,, .4 s sap,. 4.“a 1 ( � 'v£ .4.--T, S! Y l „l.: , ,�+Y 1' 555 y �. _ �1'`ytC �, a ter_.' t, F',.. ` t Jer E a'5-.. `.„ c^.,- ,t >kl rr ‘ ; srx k 'W- �/ to .k\ ) yt J J' X� r. . 'c J /{ a�K - ' , . ' ;'r.-' a w / x c, K p. .^fir^, ". {, t a sv+ .1.j N�'.. tt:' -r.�.v� 0._y E, 1 N ,.ti_vy.�.T,r>' -m y� - Y^Y - mi.,Y} . .9 -. \ �i --.s a? _.%}r34.r�tu„ _:1 (C� 1 "aY a, K -Ph4'T.�s'�' �TM _". F I( � t r .+s g F-�Y6 NV-^ n ,, A -:.ate V. "1 rocia 1 .,A;hr w '+.4 ;ilea I t.„ .lam+fj Et t ... ,•/4 \Y- ' ....5. T,y.�.-t/`r, :ti :'4 N_ "-.s._�� •. ,-. I. N. 2 N j 'ka.: •Yj F. Q } vt ki t3:i'-zaKLLL�nJ T YR a- .. 4 4 a s4 1 r o SOIL SURVEY are Rocky Mountain jun• er, eastern redcedar, onderosa ble years to 1.S00 pounds in unfavorable years. As rang, nine_ Siberian elm, ' ssian-olive. and hac erry. The condition deteriorates, the sand bluestemn, sand reedgrass shrubs best suited ar skunkbush sumac. lii• , and Siberi- and switchgrass decrease and blue grama, sand dropseec an neashrub. and sand sage increase. Annual weeds and grasses invad, Wildlife is an i portant secondary us of this soil. The the site as range condition becomes poorer. cropland areas rovide favorable habi t for ring-necked Management of vegetation on this soil should be base oheasant and ourning dove. Many ngame species can on taking half and leaving half of the total annual produ,- be attracted y establishing areas f r nesting and escape tion. Seeding is desirable if the range is in poor condition. cover. For heasants, undisturbed esting cover is esse Sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, switchgrass_ sideoat> tial and ould be included in p ns for habitat level p- grama. blue grama, and pubescent wheatgrass are suita- ment, e pecially in areas of inte sive agriculture. ble for seeding. The grass selected should meet th, Ra d expansion of Greeley and the surrounds area seasonal requirements of livestock. It can be seeded int, has esulted in urbanizatio of much of this O es soil. a clean, firm sorghum stubble, or it can be drilled into z T •. soil has good potent I for urban and r creational firm prepared seedbed. Seeding early in spring ha" d velopment. The only li iting feature is the moderately proven most successful. apid permeability in e substratum, w eh causes a Windbreaks and environmental plantings are generally hazard of ground w ter contamination from sewage suited to this soil. Soil blowing, the principal hazard ii lagoons. Lawns. shru s, and trees grow well. Capability establishing trees and shrubs, can be controlled by cu;- ch -s I irrigated. tivating only in the tree row and by leaving a strip 01 4i Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. vegetation between the rows. Supplemental irrigation. This is a deep, well drained soil on plains at elevations of may be needed at the time of planting and during dry 4,600 to 5,200 feet. It formed in mixed outwash deposits. periods. Trees that are best suited and have good survival Included in mapping are small areas of soils that have a are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern redcedar, ponderosa dark surface layer. Some small leveled areas are also in- pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and hackberry. The eluded. shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, and Siberi- Typically the surface layer of this Olney soil is grayish an peashrub. brown fine sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil Wildlife is an important secondary use of this soil. The is yellowish brown and very pale brown sandy clay loam cropland areas provide favorable habitat for ring-necked about 14 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 pheasant and mourning dove. Many nongame species can inches is very pale brown, calcareous fine sandy loam. be attracted by establishing areas for nesting and escap, Permeability and available water capacity are cover. For pheasants, undisturbed nesting cover is essen- moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or tial and should be included in plans for habitat develop- more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is ment, especially in areas of intensive agriculture. Range- low. land wildlife, for example, the pronghorn antelope, can be In irrigated areas this soil is suited to all crops com- attracted by developing livestock watering facilities, monly grown in the area, including corn, sugar beets, managing livestock grazing, and reseeding where needed. beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, and onions. An exam- Rapid expansion of Greeley and the surrounding area ple of a suitable cropping system is 3 to 4 years of alfalfa has resulted in urbanization of much of the Olney soil. followed by corn, corn for silage, sugar beets, small grain, This soil has good potential for urban and recreational or beans. Land leveling, ditch lining, and installing development. The only limiting feature is the moderately pipelines may be needed for proper water application. All rapid permeability in the substratum, which causes a methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow irrigation is hazard of ground water contamination from sewage the most common. Barnyard manure and commercial fer- lagoons. Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability tilizer are needed for top yields. subclass Ile irrigated, IVe nonirrigated; Sandy Plains In nonirrigated areas this soil is suited to winter wheat, range site. barley, and sorghum. Most of the acreage is planted to Olney fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes. winter wheat. The predicted average yield is 28 bushels Th' is a deep, well rained soil on plains at ele ations of per acre. The soil is summer fallowed in alternate years 4 00 to 5,2O0 feet. t formed in mixed outwa deposits. to allow moisture accumulation. Generally precipitation is ncluded in map ' g are small areas of soils hat have a too low for beneficial use of fertilizer. dark surface I er and small areas of s s that have Stubble mulch farming, striperopping, and minimum til- sandstone and .hale within a depth of 60 i hes. lage are needed to control soil blowing and water erosion. Typically t e surface layer of this Oln soil is grayish Terracing also may be needed to control water erosion. brown fine andy clay loam about 8 inc s thick. The sub- The potential native vegetation on this range site is soil is yel wish brown and very pal brown fine sandy dominated by sand bluestem, sand reedgrass, and blue loam abo t 12 inches thick. The subs atum to a depth o1 grama. Needleandthread, switchgrass, sideoats grama, 60 inch is very pale brown, calcare us fine sandy loam. and western wheatgrass are also prominent. Potential Permeability and available Eater capacity are production ranges from 2,200 pounds per acre in favora- moderate. The effective rooting epth is 60 inches or X REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: Windsor Assembly of God Church CASE NUMBER: CUP-70:81:3 SENT REFERRALS OUT: August 10, 1981 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY September 9, 1981 v; U) z v 0 H o z Z H C H L' < L < o v. z c: z 0 c� z o L c C 0 i L E `c 0 w 0 L 0 F-. L 0 Z (Ll] a 2 z n C z County Attorney (plat only) Town of Windsor c/o Don Sandoval, Administrator Weld County Health Department P.O. Box 627 XX Windsor, Colorado 80550 Engineering Department XX Bob Holleran County Extension Agent Planning Commission Member 2 Daisy Court / Colorado Geological Survey Windsor, Colorado 80550 N/ xx 1313 Sherman Street Room 703 Denver, Colorado 80203 Colorado Water Conservation Board Centennial Building 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 State Engineer Division of Water Resources Room 818 Denver, Colorado 80203 State Highway Department XX 1420 2nd Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Colorado Department of Health Water Quality Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 West Greeley Soil Conservation 4302 West 9th Street Road Greeley, Colorado 80631 X eireentiettati r' 0r.c o .%.;,:14a0 AsatNtr i90 RICHARD D. LAMM * yY * JOHN W. ROLD GOVERNOR ,ply * Director * 1840 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE (303D86Hl6S0 866-2611 August 26, 1981 Mr. Thomas Honn Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, Colo. 80631 Dear Mr. Honn: RE: CUP 70:81:3, WINDSOR ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH We have reviewed the plat and attendant information for the proposed Church. This site is underlain by sand and gravel . This material should provide good foundation material but on-lot septic systems may need engineering due to fast percolation rates. We recommend that building foundations be designed by qualified personnel . The two septic systems should also be designed by a qualified engineer. Additionally, we are concerned with groundwater quality in this area. Livestock concentrations have caused TDS and sulfate levels above recommended limits for domestic use. If a well (s) is used for this project, water quality should be checked; treatment may be necessary. If these recommendations are followed, we have no objection to approval of this permit. Sincerely, emu, Th Julia E. Turney Engineering Geologist lt ��n11181 �;' cc: LUC ..( .xa _ O c i= 3 s ti'B < VJ C Flf J� G�4 GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE >yyt, r1 _ _ _. - - _ _ _ - r _ 7 rAugust 10, 19E1 d fEj ] '` _ CUP-70:81: 3 J C.--5 COLORADO - P,r._ trur<fi • TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN : Enclosed is an application from Windsor Assembly of God Church for a Condition Use Permit for a church and parsonage - The parcel of land is described as Lot B RE 513 located in the SVI-,' Section 17, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is 15 mile west of Windsor - This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions . Any comments or recouuiendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 14 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by September 9, 1981 so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter. 1 We have reviewed the/proposal and find no conflicts with our /� interests . c „`ywJ _3Zj,h,, .,,ua10k..deli:nial 67 -Gn1Nw+ d-r""".15//37 /""`' 2 A formal re ommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to s:.' - 3 , Please refer to the enclosed letter . :;L( ' r // r aU , ,31 Signed._-.� amr- /L 9zO14-O1.4 Agency 0kg/S } t!— rate ty�' -17 aa.4 Aa" ria. Zoning Administrator in ) MAILING LIST Windsor Assembly of God Church CUP-70:81:3 Eaton Development Corporation P.O. Box 427 Eaton, Colorado 80615 First Sheridan Corporation 200 South Sheridan Denver, Colorado 80226 J. H. Jr. , Pauline S. and Norman E. Jacoby 33327 Weld County Road 15 Windsor, Colorado 80550 Bertha Streeb 7232 Highway 392 Windsor, Colorado 80550 K C C PETITION SUPPORTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Board of County Commissioners of Weld County , Colorado Weld County Centennial Center 915 10th Street Greeley , Colorado 80631 Dear Commissioners : We , the undersigned owners of property located within 500 feet of the property described in the application submited by Windsor Assembly of God Church , hereby petition you to grant this request for Church and House use . Si nature Mailing Address Description of Property X 9a 11 (- */ ttt-2 c,6 lore] 7.2 ? - wh4.-1 49 2- 30$ .Sy S 1( et F 8t \1):_ /I1 ) '--°�y1n�1`rr`y�yyy� #�rfir w` ill V��.r 1. a 3.4=JA;I�'p�'�T1 L M o t ' iii ;0L- 00f...._. � JyV a is s e n "" a u g '66 V y _ 3 R 2 b c is i a, gaa if, s� d` �s2 •PI t --- I E3:LIE A a3.„ , ~ • / c7 8 .e ..-4. si sa a aE V / 9.2 ;� t® :_( 1_ " a s�,aay a i'aL. 1 a d11 0 7. e I :Tg 114.ill !2 s 3 B € a1, or a `risk 2 C s . a & ,.li! Pa W W = ; t grs;9a a e a O J1 e� " 3 .11):...t‘:1ee a S .l` V 2g i e' '.4.: .1:,i! .38 g y J. Et �� .� 8y L8 3^gd3 ° N d tly a m , IZI4: z "fi g M g �� m Pa BE M" ' g s .8 2 Q g�41� a'x� ne8®'g5 do 3 "" ' Ctgg8 I ^a ae = a.aa- !; :o 3 Vim p z r it to 9& sg, g11 .oam _ � 3 b a s 1.... ?a 5 d o tea: - e '$ ,.,g gEgg°go csg3 ;I "A @0 B- 6 oNa. H�a GC 9 oya„41°. degg aao 4: 0 Yi 61111A=Q ` O Q ,6L Z.91, f „OO,S/ .O S V CO . 0 A I ci k CO 1� O U / p O O O `k V O- IA O • Q 8 4v �' w k j y h44 ct o yo o icj M h O N. w a A Q ym J nu Wlu Hoye 3 Q y� Q , _r\ ,0^ 024 r /q/ Im 3 Z o �� $d„"''y �� y� 1 y U ft. P IO ' -- y I k ,66S ? .1 y e W (r) 'Z' r -----o 4 e li k ' ~ C U \ q , p P Cp y y o ,n t„ W I w \ N y 4 aV S G��11 m i, o Q P ttr� 1 d 1; 2, o° yJ 1y-r3 Pct. Lets ri% i� fi b67 y0 370Y,7 390Nd3731 03/BOB a 09 B3MOd NB340 +.0-,0,-+ [ yI- ,SB d/6 �+ �.r 3„00,Sl.0N ^ I kb, k .0-,09 I.O-,Ob 1 .0-,0, J/army ALt,v •�.po �y IOn 22 3,00,�S'l.0 N O U~ IU 1/ NO/1039 1817 1.93Mh h O >- O Q PHONE (303)356-0000 EXT 434 9151O- STREET GREELE\',COLORADO 8063' August 10, 1981 (c) • COLORADO Reverand James R. Dunn, Pastor Windsor Assembly of God Church P.O. Box 367 Windsor, Colorado 80550 Re : Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a parsonage and church on a parcal of land described as Lot B, RE 513 located in part of the SW1, Section 17, T6N, R67W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Dear Reverand Dunn: Your application and related materials for the request described above are complete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Commission for Tuesday, September 15 , 1981, at 1:30 p.m.' ' This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission members might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any town or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the comprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Windsor Planning Commission for their review and comments. Please contact Don Sandoval, Administrator for the town of Windsor for further details regarding the date, time and place of this meeting. According to our records the Windsor Planning Commission will meet on September 10, 1981. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Windsor Planning Commission to answer any questions the members may have may have with respect to to your application. Please be aware that the Department of Planning Services staff will make a recommendation concerning this application to the Weld County Planning Commission. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact the Department of Planning Services office a few days before the date of the Planning Commission hearing to obtain that recommendation. Reverand James R. Dunn, Pastor August 1C, 1981 Page 2 If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call me. Respectfully, • Thomas E. Honn Zoning Administrator TEH:rjg cc: Town of Windsor, c/O Don Sandoval, Adm nistrator, P.C. Box 627, Windsor, Colorado 80550 Ron Kruger, Wheeler Realty, 1051 Main Street, Windsor, Colorado 80550 t A vii ®SENDER: Ccmplet,itegts 1,2,a..,]3 oT A2.1 ye. c 9res m the &L;ilRN TO"s:ace on g Trverse. � T _w 1. Th following,serv.se is ret tested(ell eck one.) �� H= ,, �r I �� z" XR1 Shaw to whom and date d Baer-3 _� �� ®� �' �� y O Show to whom,date a:d address of delivery-- �[ ®�� O P.E5:PICTED DELIVERY ep NO INSURANCE VE-RA;E L MAIL ED- Show to whom and date delivazed NOT FOR I{Je Rev rse) L C7AIL (See Reverse) O RE.rsTr.YCiEDDELIVEI?Y. sENTro Show to whom,date,and address of dal very.$_ James R. Dunn, Pastor STREET AND NC :As FOR FEES) Windsor Assemb_ly of God 2. ARTICLE teDDRESSEDTal: PO,STATEANDZIPCODE m James R. Dunn, Pastor Windsor Colo. 80550 El Windsor Assembly of God Church --osra- - AWindsor, Colorado 80550 C) CERTIFIEDFEE E n 3. ftRTlCltc GEoLRIPTEO:d I-d SPECIAL DELIVERY RF '.STEP: J rm. Gt r�T t i%ED NO EtiD11l ED NO, I ca RESTRICTED DELIVERY: : -- - 1:0�26 0274191 0 -- - - 37 • w w w SHOW TO WHOM AND r- c1 c' DATE DELIVERED ¢ C) looawcvs ot:r,.n s.p 5tura cf addressee or anent) I-1 I ha-.o recc...eJ(La article described ab-re. L.,) ; y SNDADDHOW T-0 WHOM DATE rn a AfaDADDRESSGF 33 SIGNATURE ❑Addressee ❑ orizcd agent w DELIVERY ¢ t7 2 SHOW TO WHOM AyD DATE --- J i—'— y o DELIVERED WITH RESTRICTED r -^ t ‘1‘..- ' �'. n � DELIVERY ¢ L L;aaT 0PDELIVEeRY -411.1;k----...., \ i RDDRESS DD-L1 DATE WIT — /qp vn a� ADDRESS VD O_E IVERY WITH G . r�s!'S_ y� RESTRICTED DELIVERY ¢ ��5. A—Dr -:rctec.:7 if rogue c` �" , ` TOTALPOSTAOEAIVDFEES g N �)� fa' POSTl7ARK OR DATE l ci c. F I 6. I.EV.xu_C TO C_LIVE:a C_a-,AL`sr. W.•!I{CS C Ie11TEALS n ;\ w° 8-11-81 rcn a / *GPO.1979-3o0d59 - - ------- --- -- -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 4 FLOW SHEET in APPLICANT: LOUV.G, �V..l�fl'/114 ( rjaki CASE # 0070:si :3 REQUEST: &MA 042 - LEGAL: ft S11'4 h ` lo-(O to Q,63i3 LOCATION: 2 0,61Q, ()A- ®I .rJ D \ DATE BY J g - Application Received b q Application Fee - Receipt # 4 25cl 2 E- -2 ,, Recording Fee �j 1 / 0� /( li Application Complete P.C. Hearing Date: 4171, 15 to // I/ d/ Letter to Applicant Drafted / // Referrals Listed ' Field Check by D.P.S . Staff - • - ( Li 1/ _ File Assembled a-i0 - 8 1 .)....1ol Referrals Mailed B- i4- $% .}.-St1 Chaindexed B - ‘6 - S\ o Notification of Applicant M- to - el %1 Surrounding Property Owners Researched j" . - 4\14-- , Airphoto/Vicinity Map Prepared g-V Property Owners Notified by: 3 ,, _ , , Agendas Mailed by: - . 8 ‘.-Cee Legal Approved by County Attorney Referrals - Complete 1 n ' 10 2 Preliminary D.P:S. Staff Comments q — t n Staff Conference D.P.S. Comments ` /0 �4/(7 P.C. Hearing Action: q- ) S -81 `'` e\ P.C. Resolution °1 - ►-1 • 5% .xksC:1 Case Sent to Clerk to Board °4- tg- 't1 ...x.4,,,qt C.C. Hearing q.- 2� _Is j Action 1 ` 7 " �� 7 V" C.C. Resolution Received History Card Complete . � C.C. Resolution Sent to Drafting Drafted on Mylar tIc1G2`'=- cam-`k W Document Sent to Clerk and Recorder 11 t 1%- 1O/9Nt i & CA\-C-. P.C. Minutes r , . `) I5t- 81 ,k.cck Vt*:rjd (C4E-14 V oico:, ‘%-teas4 `eiv Cif ci 0 . a . T .° �J vt- Q.... \', ,) s „ v., 0 1- I Ur( w a v, J U V o d Cr q o ; ::: ' ,i,..sL---.-t.., O ceI lL Q i _. --7---77:1---7. E - •1 1,:a...,•: 3 r o ,, o o c J � 01.. e J c a•a al cc V , . . • ,08 ,a� ( ,Q8 <9 r c! Crtops \ z/ 11,./roD Z a ..0 ` I I's.: W Ilb 4116 O EXHIBIT "A" To Contract Dated May 13,1981 . between Windsor Assembly Church and Eaton Development Corp. . 8 I. - O tl , Q v ' CO 11 j• 1, O V S.88•16'56"W.-499.98' — N 88°16'55"E —4999B' Se/ No 5/x 5O" M Coppedrebor O1\\I" Cupped m re,/ 'r NO 1682 in W O r • O V1 i) C o O Z.O , CD. V I N N W C 4O a z Goode/1 rrOr1 Soo' 649 RN /67//47 9 896 Acres w v4,rc vr. __ -- — 0 t -,fix W, -47 4 .+,, ,i •x.- Q "'�, •"*. SUBJECT PROPERTY '" A '„ -- Approximately (5) Acres 4. 4 ,, :1;:Z";,',If''''"..... ..... '- ',.. '., F" no' ro p 7—..�'Qpie ` _I at NJ 041::761. 1 �`, 30'R reiMit,COO re'bar%Yb- Z - Se/No 54ex 30" s°J - . - r -__ _` -.�," Found Nwy R/Nrmr, , Copped'char r v ,+ -_ r.-y �_.•-.. -49.1 74' -.•Book /54/Page 97 5eR , w"-i6ie.9r RN/d/,�Ofe -- -- -g d3 49�Jyr 11 7 fir- - - ,- - - - - -� -,-,-:1.-:. . -. .- - -.- • . t !'+�. . .•. . ---,_ 525 e'R 2O '°°'°' of Beginning Found I"Sq Steel SW Cor Sec /7 T 6N, R 67W, 6PM• Weld Co, Coto ' K .. Reception Number: L Date: May 22, 1981 Owners: The Eaton Development Corporation Ir s c 3ti�y� Ne-fix/6 461.q11 s-60, '°s- SCAL E a ? O.4°I f Z�J s4r. /"= 300' 8i ,.r ‘ > ° o0 t. %,›*• ,j ' 6 , o , v l PARCEL A N . '� 56.96 AC Ni.111;v I. h. ' N a Ei9$7- 414 7 Z/' �$ NI 41,6 PARCEL �. o % y� 5.004C o0 6 ii `�'S 4;r6E'rioA) A;Nilfi✓E7✓T ill_r_l__ S 5°�b'0t"Nl \' 3!' g o 1'' h /r 494' • g,�." el / ' //P'ac . Z/3•b4 �4t31sar it/`/3 Si' /F+/3"Gas- /4cZG•ot," - yw cae S1TP°I7 'Zia " W ,5 E NlsNwi4Y /29y 2"7j 5. 17 SOvrN L/NE 541'4 5tcr /7 v�• . • •., 0 , • F ., ic' /‘ !La q E-1 •• k woo 4k0o4. "s 9 i ( ' ` .e.• ` 1. ' V/C/N/T�` MAP �I � /" =2000' 1-}1Hvi..A. S4- <-'e .6 qr �&C 0 Li - , 2 c' �0 3 33 7 bg6 — oo ,4 Sheet 1 of 2 133-7-1 f � Reco .ded Exemption No. : Date: May 22, 1981 Owners: LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land situate in the Southwest Quarter of Section 17, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Considering the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section to bear North 00°15'00" East with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Section; thence North 00°15'00" East 1590.83 feet along the West line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section to the centerline of The New Cache LaPoudre Irrigation Company No. 2 Ditch; thence along the centerline of said No. 2 Ditch the following six courses: North 74°00'35" East 277.62 feet; thence North 87°26'50" East 451.91 feet; thence South 69°45'22" East 506.81 feet; thence South 61°06'44" East 461.51 feet; thence South 80°13'54" East 116.52 feet; thence North 64°07'30" East 209.67 feet, thence South 00°26'10" West 1304.24 feet to a point on the South line of the South- west Quarter of said Section; thence South 88°17'28" West 1899.27 feet along the South line, of the Southwest Quarter of said Section to the point of beginning. Except all that part of the above described land lying within the right of way of the No. 2 Canal and also except therefrom two parcels conveyed to the Dept. of Highway State of Colorado, by deeds recorded September 21, 1959 in Book 1541 at Page 94 and recorded May 27, 1966 in Book 568 as Reception No. 1489980. Containing 61.86 net acres more or less. We, The Eaton Development Corporation, being the sole owners in fee of the above described property do hereby subdivide the same as shown on the attached map. Georg Goodell, President d Luttrell, etary The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /1O day of , 1981. My Commission expires: " 1 Ik irk Sept. 21, 19 Witness my Hand and Seal Notar P lie b SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this plat was prepared under my supervision; and further certify that the same is correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Pe rsto, irrpsmoo Edward L. Berl er, Registered Land Surveyor, 10855 10855 • , The accompanying plat is approved and accepted for filing. N�•;y� ;•O.2,cso-11444;7 COu Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: County Clerk BY: DATE: ' Sheet 2 of 2 133-7-1 • WNEEc f'R REAM'' PAO fib 1331 - 8TM AVENUE-P. O. Box 519 - 358-1331 GREELEY• COLORADO 80831 SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE CONTR -/ZT (FARM AND RANCH) Windsor _ , Coloi ado -_ _May 13 , 1981 RFCE Et) FROM _—_Windsor Assembly of God Church Purchaser (a Joint tenants), the sum of $ 1,000.00 , in the fort? of Check to be held by .Tnhn R-P_ JAheeler -__, broker, in his escrow or trustee ?ccount, as earnest money and pall payment for the ful'lo%%ing described real estate situate in the Said County of Weld _, Colorado, to wit Approximately 5 + or - Acres Located in the southwest corner of Sec. 17, T6N , R67W County of Weld. See Attached Exhibit "A" Property dimensions approximately 466' by 466' 1. Soil test of said land to be at Purchasers Expense. 2. This contract contingent on p.irchaser receiving permission from planning board to build church and'. 1.ause on said property. 3. Purbl-aser agrees to allow Seller the right to approve plans of building to be constructed on said 5 Acres. with all easements and rights of way appurtenant thereto, all improvements thereon and all fixtures of a permanent nature currently on the premises, except as hereinafter provided, in their present condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, known as North of Highway 392 and East _of WCR #15 which property purchaser agrees to buy upon the following terms and conditions, for the purchase price of $ 45,0n0-nn , payable as follows $1,000.00 hereby receipted for, $ Balance in cash at time of signing of deed, or under ti.a conditions that follow: 1. Seller agrees to buy Purchasers home at 305 Oak St. Windsor, Co. legal is Lot 4 Block 11, Town of Windsor, for a buy out figure of $36,000.00 if house is not sold by November 15, 1981. 2. If purchasers sell there house before buv out , then the sell price of said land would be $42,500.00 instead of $45,000.00, and then purchasers would close with cash. 1 If a note and trust deed or mortgage is to be assumed, the purchaser agrees to pay a loan transfer fee not to exceed $ N/A and it is a condition of this contract that the purchaser may assume such encum- brance without change in its terms or conditions except None 2. Price to Include the following personal property: None to be conveyed by bill of sale at time of closing in their present condition, free ai.d clew-of all personal property tares, bens and encumbrances, except: Those of Record and except any personal property liens in any encumbrances specified in paragraph 4. The following fixtures of a permanent nature are excluded from this sale• I'.one 3 An abstract of title to said property, certified to date, or a current commitment for title insurance policy in an amoun equal to the purchase price, at seller's option and expense, shall, be furnished the purchaser on or before November 15 , 1981- If seller elects to furnish said title insurance commitment, seller will deliver the title insurance policy to purchaser after closing and pay the premium thereon. NO. SC 25-7-71 Specific Performance Contract {Farm and Rand)) 4 Title shall be inert h.• in the seller. Subject to pain, tit ui tend alio%e pi of ided and compliance with the other term', and condition, heieunder b) put(h.i'c r. In' •-c II' I -hall I 'ecutt' and deliier a good and sufficient General µarrant) deed to said purchaser on ___ November 15 - 1:1 81 or. by mutual agree- ment, at an earlier date, conveying said prupet t) tree an d c lea' ul all is xe, except the general taxes for 19 81 , payable January 1, 19_x_ _, and except ---__ None - - - --- -- --- _-- _--- _ , e stud i I. ,u ui all liens and encumbrances except• and except the folloting easements ______ Those Of Record_ _ and subject to building and zoning regulations and the follutiuii lean ictne ('oNenants Recorded exemption being applied for. — - Any encumbrances required may be paid fium the proceeds o1 this ti ansaction. None 5. General taxes for 19 $1_, personal property taxes, prepaid rents, \Later rents and assessments, and in- terest on encumbrances, if any, and —ShQse of Record___ --_ shall be apportioned to date of delivery of deed except that __- None With respect to the growing crops the seller and pui i baser apt ee as follows•_ Purchaser agrees tQ __allow Seller all crops__fox growing season, 1981_ 6 The hour and place of closing shall be as designated by Wheeler Realty Company Date of Closing 7 Possession of premises shall be deli\(red to purchaser on subject to the following leases or tenancies ___ Those of_Record_ 8 The risk of loss Iiom any damage to the improvements by Inc or other casualty prior to date of closing shall be on the seller, provided howevei that it the seller shall maintain insurance on said improvements which will compensate for the full replacement Value theteot, the seller may at his option assign the proceeds of said in- surance to purchaser, in which case the purchase' shall c oniplete the transaction as herein provided The risk of loss for any damage to growing crops, by fire or othei cas natty shall be borne by the party entitled to said crops as provided in paragraph 5 and such party shall be entitled to the insurance proceeds. N/A Vacant land 9 Time is the essence hereof, and if any payment of other condition hereof is not made, tendered, or per- formed by either the seller or purchaser as herein provided, then this contract, at the option of the party who is not in default. may be terminated by such party, in which case the non-defaulting party may recover such damages as may be proper. In the event of such default by the seller, and the purchaser elects to treat the contract as ter- minated, then all payments made hereon shall be returned to the purchaser In the event of such default by the pur- chaser, and the seller elects to treat the contract as terminated, then all payments made hereunder shall be for- feited and retained on behalt of the seller. In the event, however, the non-defaulting party elects to treat this con- tract as being in full force and effect, then nothing herein shall he construed to prevent its specific performance 10 In the event the seller fails to approve this instrument in writing on or before May 18. 1981 19_ , or it title is not merchantable and written notice of defects is given to the seller or agent within the time herein provided for delivery of deed and shall not be rendered merchantable within 180 days after such writ- ten notice, then this contract, at purchaser's option, shall be void and of no effect and each party hereto shall be re- leased from all obligations hereunder and the payments made hereunder shall be returned forthwith to purchaser upon return of the abstract, if any, to seller, provided, however, that in lieu of correcting such defects, seller may, within said 180 days, obtain a commitment for Owner's Title Insurance Policy in the amount of the purchase price showing the title to be free from such defects and seller shall pay fulb p'emium for such Title Insurance Policy. 11. Additional Provisions: Cl) This contract contingent upon seller nhta i n tng a recorded exemption on said land from the County C'o missinnerii, All expenses to be paid by Seller. (2) Purchasers home to be listed with Wheeler Fealty Co. after this contract is signed. 12 Upon approval hereof by the seller, this agreement shall become a contract between seller and purchaser ande shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors and assigns of said parties. '413 /!�= !_� Agent John R P Wh P 1 Pr, RrnjLpr 5urr‘ci:" / Date -�" -- .1' g( By. — ru([Z.• Date Ron Kruger Sel approies the abo%e contract this day of , 19 and agrees to pay a commission of 7 _c of the giva, sales price for seri ices in this transaction, and agrees that, in the event of torfeiture of payments made by purch,isei, such payments shall be di\ided between the seller's broker and the sellei, one halt thereof to said biokei tit t exc ed the commission, and the balance to the seller. Eaton Development Corp. eorge Goodell, President Setiei Put chaser's Address Phone 686-2701 __ _ _ __— -- - - - Seller's Address Office 454-3344_-- Home 4.54-2006 —_ No. SC 25-7-71 \rte (& c C c �. c), ct--T , �'��1�� 4 \e:3 \��~-cam Lu--1 \-L ��r c� Interg iernmental agrE ments will eventually provide city-type ser- by Nona Thayer • vices. Larimer County • Logical ways to phase development Commissioner need to be determined within this designated service area. The following article by Nona Thayer, • Urbanization should be orderly and Larimer County Commissioner, is m- the provision of services coordinated printed from the August 1981 issue of with development in a timely fashion Colorado Front Range Project News- to reduce costs and minimize potential letter. negative effects. • The county must not accept develop- As the Front Range becomes more majority of taxpayers. ment applications which are eligible urbanized, the idea of intergovernmental • Without intergovernmental coopers for annexation. cooperation takes on a new meaning and tion the mode is frequently competi • There must be mutual agreements relevance. There are some good examples tive. Too often the scenario is a devel on development standards and allow- of cooperative agreements between goy- oper playing a municipality against able densities within the service area, ernments along the Front Range, but the county. "If you (city) do not • Local governments should develop there are also long-standing problems and approve this development as I have compatible comprehensive plans. stumbling blocks which must be over- conceived it, I will develop in the • Use of intergovernmental cooperative come. county." Agreements are made that agreements will result in better and • As municipalities expand their boun- distort comprehensive plans and allow more effective working relationships - daries, they annex areas that have concessions that may be costly to the among local governments. The agree- developed in the unincorporated part taxpayers. Many local governments ments will help to improve the quality of the county where development are mandating that development must and reduce the costs of development standards for streets, drainage, and pay a higher percentage of the costs of that occurs in both the incorporated utility systems may be inferior to the growth. There needs to be uniformity and unincorporated areas. ■ standards established for the urban in front-end fee structures and in pattern of the municipality. development requirements and stan- • It is more costly on a per capita basis dards, or else development will be to provide urban services at very low biased toward the county's lower fees densities. Development in the path of and non-urban standards, resulting in annexation is frequently at a density sprawling patterns of development. that is much lower than the prevailing • The municipality may be thrust into density in the municipality. These unwanted expansion of its boundaries areas will be more expensive to serve to gain control of what is happening and maintain. there. If county development is per- • Cities have broader authority to provide ceived as a threat to the city's future city-type services and more latitude in or implementation of its comprehen- funding these services (particularly in sive plan, uneconomic defensive an- home rule municipalities)than counties. nexations may result. Special districts may be organized to • Citizens in the unincorporated peri- to provide services that counties have phery of a municipality may feel traditionally not provided. However, abandoned and unrepresented by their low visibility to the voter and low County commissioners. voter participation rates lead to a • Special districts are fearful of how lack of political accountability in agreements will affect their ability special district decision-making. to pay for facilities. Paying off bond • The citizens of municipalities are also issues frequently depends on realizing citizens of a county and pay the same projections for growth. level of county taxes as people living Recommendations for Preparing Inter- in the unincorporated areas. County governmental Agreements: commissioners have a responsibility • Cities and counties must be encouraged to all the citizens to minimize the pub- to develop intergovernmental agree- lic costs of providing urban services, ments. Developing the agreements will ' If this can be done cooperatively with require give and take on both sides. the municipalities and special districts, Together, the governments should long-term savings should accrue to the define an area where the municipality 5 FILE CONTAINS OVERSIZED MAP PLEASE SEE ORIGINAL FILE Hello