HomeMy WebLinkAbout20033263.tiff DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631
Phone (970)353-6100, Ext. 3540 Fax (970)304-6498
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW(MINING OPERATION) APPLICATION
FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES USE ONLY
Application Fee Receipt Number Case Number
Recording Fee Receipt Number Zoning District
Application Checked By: Planner Assigned to Case
To be completed by APPLICANT is accordance with procedural guide requirements:
1. I (we), the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission
concerning a proposed gravel (gravel, coal, borrow pit, etc.) mining operation for the
following described unincorporated area of Weld County:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
S 1/2 of NE 1/4 and NE 1/4 of NE 1/4, T 1N, R 66W, 6th P.M.
PARCEL NUMBER: 147119000034 (12 digit number-found on Tax I.D. Information or
obtained at the Assessor's Office).
2. Surface owner(s)of area of land described
19668 WCR 74 (970) 454-1286
Name: James Adams Address: Eaton, CO 8061'hone:
Name: Gerald Adams Address: 5026 Howes Ln. Phone: (408) 363-6967
San Jose, CA 85118
3. Owner(s)of mineral rights or substance to be mined
19668 wCR 74 (970) 454-1286
Name: James Adams Address: Eaton, CO 80615 Phone:
Name: Gerald Adams Address: 5026 Howes Ln. Phone: (408) 363-6967
San Jose, CA
4. Source of applicant's legal right to enter and to mine on th%9an8 described:
Contract to Buv and Sell Real Estate
(Include certified copy of any document(s) noted
5. Applicant's address:Russ Otterstein, Premeir Paving. Phone: (303) 940-3668
Address: 5085 Harlan Street, Denver, CO 80212 Phone:
6. Identify any prior permits for mining held by applicant or affiliated person:
None
7. Description of Operation
A. Types and number of.,operating erati and processing equipment to be used
nce the numbers otneachh type ot equipment can vary according to demand, exact
numbers cannot be given.
1
B. Maximum number of employees: 25 , and number of shifts:
C. Num o of stages be w rked: and periods of time each is to be worked
of I= b yrs, Phase 2 = ! yrs and Phase 3 = 7 yr
14 EXHIBIT
2003-3263
D. Thickness of mineral deposit: Approx. 46 ft feet, and thickness of the overburden: Annrnx. 3 ft
E. This will be a wet/dry pit operation. dry
F. Site entrance/exit points and County roads and bridges to be utilized between site and delivery
point(s)(must be coordinated with County Engineer) WCR 8 and WCR 27 will be access points
8. Description of reclamation
A. Proposed reclamation land use(s): Lined water storage reservoirs
B. Source of technical advise for reclamation: National Conservation Resource Center
C. Explanation of Reclamation Process: See application package.
I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted
with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
�L
Sign udt re: Owner/Authorized Agent
Rev: 1-27-97
15
APPLICATION FOR A
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (MINING)
For the
ADAMS SAND AND GRAVEL MINE
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Prepared for:
Premier Paving, Inc.
5085 Harlan St.
Denver, CO 80212
(303) 940-3668
Prepared by:
Banks and Gesso, LLC
720 Kipling St., Suite 117
Lakewood, CO 80215
(303) 274-4277
February 2003
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
INTRODUCTION 1
APPLICATION FORM 2
1.0 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS 3
1.1 Legal Description of the Property
1.2 Fee Owners of the Surface Area to be Mined
1.3 Fee Owners of the Substance to be Mined
1.4 Source of Applicant's Legal Right-to-Enter
1.5 Local Address of Applicant
1.6 Other Permits for Open-Cut Mining
2.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF METHOD OF OPERATION 4
2.1 Types and Numbers of Operation and Processing Equipment
2.2 Number of Shifts to be Worked and Maximum Number of Employees
2.3 Wet or Dry Pit
2.4 County Roads and Bridges Utilized
2.5 Size of Area and Stages to be Worked at Any One Time
2.6 Timetable for Various Stages of Operation
2.7 Depth and Thickness of Materials to be Removed
2.8 Proposed Reclaimed Use and Explanation of Reclamation Process
2.9 Source of Technical Advice
2.10 Copy of Agreement with Mineral Owners
2.11 Operation Policies
3.0 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 8
3.1 Copies of Mining and Reclamation Plans Submitted to State of Colorado Mined
Land Reclamation Board
3.2 Plans for Obtaining Water Supply and Water Analysis for Mining Operation
3.3 Cross-Sections of Drainage Structures
3.4 Profile and Typical Cross-Section of Haul Road
4.0 OTHER REQUIREMENTS 11
4.1 Statement of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
4.2 Statement of Consistency with Intent of District
4.3 Statement of Adequate Provisions to Protect the Health, Safety and
Welfare
4.4 Statement of Compatibility with Existing Uses
4.5 Statement of Compatibility with Future Uses
4.6 Statement Concerning Flood Plain, Geologic Hazards and the Airport Overlay
District
5.0 DRAWING REQUIREMENTS 13
Figure 5.1 —Vicinity Map
Figure 5.2 — Extraction Plan Map
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A— Mining Plan 14
Attachment B — Reclamation Plan 24
Attachment C — Special Review Use Questionnaire 30
Attachment D — Original Weld County Road Access Information Sheet 31
Attachment E — Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate 32
Attachment F — Certificate of Conveyances 33
Attachment G — Documentation of Adequate Method of Sewage Disposal 34
Attachment H — Soils Report 35
Attachment I —Affidavit and Certified List of Names and Addresses of
Surface Owners within 500 ft 37
Attachment J —Affidavit and Certified List of Names and Addresses of
Mineral Owners and Lessees 38
Attachment K—Traffic Impact Analysis 39
II
Banks and Gesso, LLC
INTRODUCTION
This Use By Special Review (Mining) application (USR) is being submitted to allow for
development of the site as an open, dry-pit mining operation. The Applicant also wishes
to operate ancillary and compatible concrete and asphalt plants on the site. This
application has been prepared and submitted under the provisions of the Weld County
Zoning Ordinance.
The subject property consists of approximately 112 acres that will be covered under this
USR. The entire 112-acre parcel is legally described as follows:
Approximately 112 acres lying in the South 1/2 of the NE and the NE 'A of the NE 1A of
S19, T1 N, R66W of the 6'h P.M., Parcel #147119000034, Weld County, Colorado. The
property address is 2631 Weld County Road 27, Ft. Lupton, CO 80621.
The Vicinity Map (Figure 5.1) depicts the general location of the parcel. The site is
located immediately south of Weld County Road 8, between U.S. Hwy 85 and Weld
County Road 27. Weld County Road 27 marks the eastern boundary of the property and
U.S. Hwy 85 marks the western boundary. Existing zoning of the subject property and
surrounding properties is predominantly agricultural.
The property currently supports a private residence. The remaining acreage of the
property is a cornfield.
The remainder of this application package discusses the proposal in detail and
addresses each of the requirements of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
1
Banks and Gesso, LLC
APPLICATION FORM
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
2
Banks and Gesso, LLC
1.0 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
1.1— Legal Description of the Property
Please refer to the Boundary Survey of the property following this page.
1.2 — Fee Owners of the Surface Area to be Mined
The fee owners of the surface to be mined are Gerald A. Adams, James L. Adams and
Shirley A. Gray
1.3 — Fee Owners of the Substance to be Mined
The fee owners of the substance to be mined are Gerald A. Adams, James L. Adams
and Shirley A. Gray.
1.4 — Source of Applicant's Legal Right-to-Enter
Premier Paving, Inc. has been granted the right to enter the subject property for mining
through a Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate. The contract has been attached as
Attachment E.
1.5 — Local Address of Applicant
Russ Otterstein
Premier Paving, Inc.
5085 Harlan St.
Denver, CO 80212
1.6 — Other Permits for Open-Cut Mining
The Applicant does not hold any other permits for open-cut mining.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving, Inc. February 2003
3
Banks and Gesso, LLC
2.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED OPERATION
A copy of the Mining Plan that has been submitted to the State of Colorado Mined Land
Reclamation Board has been included as Attachment A.
2.1 —Types and Numbers of Operation and Processing Equipment
Operation and processing equipment will include loaders, scrapers, haul trucks,
conveyors, sorters, screens, crushers, and concrete and asphalt plants. Since the
numbers of each type of equipment can vary according to product demand, exact
numbers cannot be given at this time.
2.2 — Number of Shifts to be Worked and Maximum Number of Employees
A maximum of 25 employees are expected to be present on the property at any given
time. Throughout the use of the property, only one shift per day is expected, although we
do not preclude the possibility of occasional double shifts.
2.3—Wet or Dry Pit
The site will be dry-mined in three phases. Dewatering will occur in each phase after a
slurry wall has been installed around the perimeter of each respective mine phase area.
2.4—County Roads and Bridges Utilized
Vehicles will access directly onto Weld County Road 8 and County Road 27. County
Road 6 will also be used, but will not be directly accessed from the site. Approximately
75 haul trucks per day are expected to enter the site. All haul trucks will enter the site
utilizing Weld County Road 8 via US Highway 85. Approximately 15 of those trucks will
exit the site using the same access point and travel west on WCR 8 and then north on
US 85. Approximately 60 of the entering trucks will exit the site directly onto WCR 27 via
the driveway currently used by the existing residence on the property. These trucks will
head south on WCR 27 to WCR 6 where they will head west to US 85 and then south
towards Denver. No county bridges will be utilized in the proposed haul route.
2.5— Size of Area and Stages to be Worked at Any One Time
The Applicant proposes to dry mine the property in three phases. Phase One,
consisting of approximately 31 acres, is located in the northern part of the property.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
4
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Phase Two, consisting of approximately 30 acres, is located in the southwestern part of
the property. Phase Three, consisting of approximately 28 acres, is located in the
southeastern area of the property. In each phase, a slurry wall will be installed around
the phase perimeter prior to disturbance of the groundwater table. This will help
eliminate any impacts to surrounding groundwater wells. Once the slurry wall is
installed, each phase will be dewatered using a system of pumps. It is important to note
that the need to dewater within each phase will cease once all groundwater within the
sealed mine area is pumped out. Also, mining and reclamation will occur concurrently.
See Figure 5.2— Extraction Plan Map and Attachment A— Mine Plan for further details.
2.6—Timetable for Various Stages of Operation
Phase Duration Phase to be Area to be Mined Phase(s) to be
(years) Mined (acres) Reclaimed
1 7 1 31 1
2 7 2 30 1 & 2
3 7 3 28 2 & 3
2.7 — Depth and Thickness of Materials to be Removed
The mineral deposit to be mined ranges in depth from 35 to 50 ft. Overburden to be
removed ranges in depth from 2 to 4 ft.
2.8— Proposed Reclaimed Use and Explanation of Reclamation Process
The proposed use of reclaimed lands is lined water storage. See Reclamation Plan and
map provided in Attachment B.
2.9—Source of Technical Advice for Reclamation
National Resources Conservation Service.
2.10—Copy of Agreement with Mineral Owners
James L. Adams, Gerald A. Adams, and Shirley A. Gray are the current owners of the
surface and subsurface mineral rights. Through the attached Contract to Purchase, they
have acknowledged the Applicant's intent to apply for this permit and mine the property.
Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain Corporation has a lease interest in the oil and gas beneath
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
5
Banks and Gesso, LLC
the property. The Applicant is currently working with Kerr-McGee to reach a Surface
Use Agreement for the property.
2.11 — Operation Policies
In addition to the minimum operation standards as outlined in Sections 23-4-290 and 23-
4-300 of the County Code, the Applicant will comply with the additional operation
standards described below.
1. Operating hours will be as follows, Monday thru Saturday:
5:30 am to 8:30 pm for mining
6 am to 2 pm for maintenance and repairs
6 am to 5 pm for hauling, asphalt and concrete production
2. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site.
3. Waste materials shall be handled, stored and disposed of in a manner that
controls fugitive dust, blowing debris and other potential nuisance conditions.
4. The Applicant shall remove, handle and stockpile overburden, soil, and sand
and gravel from the facility in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions.
5. Prior to placement of any processing equipment and scale house/office on
the property, an ISDS permit will be obtained and septic system installed for
employee use.
6. The facility shall at all times operate in accordance with a dust abatement
plan approved by the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment.
7. The site shall be maintained in compliance with the local fire protection
district, the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
and the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology.
8. "No Trespassing" signs shall be posted and maintained on the perimeter to
clearly identify site boundaries.
9. The facility shall, at all times, operate in accordance with a Stormwater
Management Plan approved by the Colorado Department of Public Health
and Environment.
10. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the Weld County
Building Code Ordinance.
11. Lighting provided for security and emergency night operation on the site shall
be designed so that the lighting will not adversely affect surrounding property
owners.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
6
Banks and Gesso, LLC
12. The sand and gravel operation will comply with operation policies identified in
Section 23 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as articulated above.
13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the
Operating Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance,
as amended.
14. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County
Planning Department shall be granted access to the property at any
reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property
comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable
Weld County regulations.
15. The scope of the Use by Special Review permit applied for hereunder shall
be limited to the plans shown herein and governed by the foregoing
standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Substantial changes
from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require
the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning
Commission before such changes to the plans or Development Standards
are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the
Department of Planning Services.
16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of
the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the
foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit
by the Board of County Commissioners.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
7
Banks and Gesso, LLC
3.0 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
3.1 — Copies of Mining and Reclamation Plans Submitted to State of Colorado Mined
Land Reclamation Board
See Attachments A and B, respectively.
3.2— Plans for Obtaining Water Supply and Water Analysis for Mining Operation
1. Analysis of Replacement Water Requirements
a. Mining Prior to Buildout
Each of the three mine phases will be dry mined downward until the groundwater
table is approached. Once the mines depth is within approximately three feet of
the groundwater table, the entire phase area will be slurry walled to prevent
groundwater from entering or leaving the cell. After the area is slurry walled, the
area will be dewatered, with the dewatering returned to the South Platte River,
and dry mining will continue until all of the aggregate is mined from the phase
area.
The water required for replacement to the South Platte River from the mining
itself will consist of evaporation loss from exposed water surfaces in each phase
area and other areas and the water contained in the aggregate which will be
hauled away from the mine.
During the period prior to the time when mining in each phase area is completed
(i.e. prior to build-out), the total exposed water surface area in the cell and
elsewhere will be limited to 6.5 acres. Evaporation losses will thereby be limited
to 17.46 acre-feet per year, based on a net evaporation loss of 32.19 inches per
year.
Based on aggregate production rates of 500,000 tons per year, distributed evenly
on a monthly basis, the replacement water required for aggregate production will
be 14.76 acre-feet per year, based on a 4% water content by weight in the
aggregate that will be hauled from the mine.
The mine will also use three existing wells on the property to supply its needs for
domestic use for its employees, for batch concrete production, and for dust
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
8
Banks and Gesso, LLC
suppression. According to the State Engineer's Office, a change in use or new
well permit for these wells will not be required because the wells are close
enough to the mining operation to be included in the overall consumptive use
analysis for the entire property, thereby not requiring additional augmentation
analysis.
As many as 25 employees will need water for drinking and sanitary uses.
Domestic use for the employees will be equal to 0.288 acre-feet per year, based
on a per employee use of 15 gallons per day for 250 working days per year. A
septic tank-leach field system will be used to treat the wastewater resulting from
domestic use, with 90% of the domestic use returning to the groundwater
system. Thus, the operation will need replacement water for the consumptive
domestic use of water in the amount of 0.03 acre-feet per year.
The mine will produce 150,000 cubic yards of concrete per year in its batching
operations. This production will require 16.08 acre-feet of water per year of
replacement water, based on 35 gallons required per cubic yard of concrete.
Dust suppression will require 15.36 acre-feet of water per year, based on
industry experience.
Prior to completion of mining of each cell, total replacement water from
evaporation from exposed water surfaces, water lost in aggregate hauled away
from the mine, water consumptively used for employees' domestic use, water
used in the production of concrete, and water used for dust suppression will be
63.39 acre-feet per year.
b. After Buildout
After the entire property has been completely mined, no replacement water will
be needed. The only use of groundwater on the property which may continue
after buildout would be for domestic use at the currently existing residence on the
property. The domestic use, if any, may be provided by an exempt household
use only well permit, or by an exempt 35-acre domestic use well permit.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
9
Banks and Gesso, LLC
2. Water Replacement
Upon approval of all mining permits, Premier Paving Inc. will purchase 30 shares
in the Fulton Ditch which were historically used on the property by the current
owner to irrigate 114.5 acres of crops. These 30 shares represent an average
diversion of 108 acre-feet per year from the South Platte River. After accounting
for ditch losses, farm losses (tail water and deep percolation to the groundwater
table), these ditch shares will provide 64 acre-feet per year of replacement water.
During the irrigation season, Premier Paving will continue to receive its Fulton
Ditch water at the mine property, but will deliver most of its ditch water to the
South Platte River as replacement water for its depletions to the river. Because
Premier Paving's mine and concrete operation will also deplete the South Platte
River in the non-irrigation season, Premier Paving will construct a small recharge
pond on the property and deliver a part of its Fulton Ditch water in it during the
irrigation season to provide for recharge replacement to the river during the non-
irrigation season.
Prior to buildout it will be necessary to limit the total exposed water surface
outside of the sealed and dewatered mine areas to no more than 6.5 acres to
ensure that there is sufficient replacement water to cover the operation's water
uses. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the evaporative losses and operational losses
per year, respectively (see following pages).
3.3—Cross-Sections for Drainage Structures
On-site drainage structures (if any) will be temporary and will change location over the
life of the operation. No off-site drainage structures are planned. If off-site drainage
structures are used, the design elements can be supplied to the County upon request.
3.4 — Profile and Typical Cross-Section of Haul Road
On-site haul roads will be temporary dirt roads. Off-site roads will be paved County
roads. Design elements for the internal haul roads can be supplied to the County upon
request.
r
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
10
06/02/2003 YON 16:50 FAX 3035262624 Martin & wood water 8002/003
TABLE 1
ADAMS SAND 4.GRAVEL MINE
EVAPORATIVE LOSSES FOR YEAR 1
m m _ PI *4) a (40 (7)
NET
PERCENT OF EVAPORATION
ANNUAL NORMAL EFFECTIVE fOR
GROSS GROSS PRECIPITATION PRECIPITATION NET NET 0,50
MONTH EVAPORATION EVAPORATION (FORT LUPTON) (1170%) EVAPORATION EVAPORATION ACRES
ON WIDNES) ONCNES) ONCHES) (INCHES) (FEET) (ACRE-FEET)
JAN 9.0 123 0.49 0.34 0.69 0.07 0.40
FEB' 15 1.44 0.40 0.34 1.10 0.00 030
MAR 33 220 0.70 0.49 1.77 0.18 0.00
APR OD 3.59 1.71 1.20 2.49 0.21 1.37 -
MAY 120 422 2.05 125 3.07 0.26 1.40
JUN 14.5 0.05 1,12 109 426 0.41 217
JUL 15.0 6.15 1.25 050 527 0.44 2.50
AUG 13.5 5.54 1.25 010 4.55 130 2.54
SEP 10.0 4.10 1.02 0.71 0.30 025 1.82
OCT 7.0 2.87 0.84 0. 0 2]0 110 1,21
NOV 4.0 1.64 O18 0.32 1.32 0.11 0.72
DEC 3.0 1.23 0.35 0.24 029 0.06 0.32
_
TOTAL 100.0 41.02 12.52 653 3110 208 17.40 1
NOTES: (1)FROM SEO 05/11/99 FOR ELEVATIONS UNDER 5,700 FEET
IA PERCENT OF ANNUAL GROSS EVAPORATION MULTIPLIED BY 4100 INCHES
r••
3'nsaasna=_
inn:0 00180000000011"
8000800000008
Jig IEEE 2
ii 1111100100811
n .
ig
0000000800000 R
0888081801800 MI
9
0600000000000 HD
:ZEE
1110801101111O
I 0000000000000114
8080000000000 n
M6aa;;;;s'si 111I14
Micoo2 aaleA pool 71 QT2aeR easasascoc YVd os:9T NON £00g/g0/90
Banks and Gesso, LLC
4.0 OTHER REQUIREMENTS
4.1 -Statement of Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
The Applicant has compared this proposed use and has prepared this application
package to conform to all Mineral Resource Goals and Policies contained in the Weld
County Comprehensive Plan. The details of the proposal contained in this application
conform with the Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
4.2—Statement of Consistency with Intent of District
The Adams Property is located within the 'A' (Agricultural) Zoning District. The intent of
this district is to "provide areas for the conduct of agricultural activities and activities
related to agriculture and agricultural production without the interference of other,
incompatible land uses...(T)he 'A' District is also intended to provide areas for the
conduct of Uses by Special Review which have been determined to be more intense or
to have a potentially greater impact than Uses Allowed by Right." Mineral resource
development is one of the Uses by Special Review in the 'A' (Agricultural) District. This
application has been designed to meet the intent of the Zone District and the
^ requirements of the Use by Special Review.
4.3— Statement of Adequate Provisions to Protect the Health, Safety and
Welfare
This application contains adequate provisions to protect the health, safety and welfare of
surrounding landowners and the County residents. The plan contained in this
application package addresses all cf the major areas of potential pollution and nuisance
factors related to these issues such as noise, dust, water pollution, drainage, truck
traffic, etc.
4.4 — Statement of Compatibility with Existing Uses
Existing land uses immediately surrounding the property include industrial, agricultural
and transportation. The agricultural areas are located north and south of the site, while
the properties to the east of the site are generally industrial in nature. The proposed
mining operation is considered a Use by Special Review according to the zoning
ordinance. The mining and reclamation plans have been designed to be compatible with
the surrounding land uses and contain provisions to ensure this.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
11
Banks and Gesso, LLC
4.5— Statement of Compatibility with Future Uses
The development of the property upon reclamation will have little impact on the
surrounding uses and is consistent with the future anticipated uses of surrounding
properties, whatever they may be, because the site will be reclaimed as ponds.
4.6—Statement Concerning Floodplain, Geologic Hazards and the Airport Overlay
District
No part of the subject property falls within a floodplain, geologic hazard or airport overlay
district.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
12
Banks and Gesso, LLC
5.0 DRAWING REQUIREMENTS
Figure 5.1 —Vicinity Map
See map insert.
Figure 5.2 — Extraction Plan Map
See map insert.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
13
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Attachment A— Mining Plan
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
14
Banks and Gesso, LLC
EXHIBIT D — MINING PLAN
Overview
The Applicant proposes to excavate approximately 6.6 million cubic yards (9.6 million
tons) of sand and gravel from the Adams property. The excavation operation will start in
2003 and will last for approximately 19 years. Approximately 500,000 tons of sand and
gravel will be mined each year. The actual length of the operation is highly dependant
on market conditions. Additionally, it should be noted that no part of the property exists
within the 100-year FEMA floodplain and no wetlands are present in the areas to be
mined.
The Applicant proposes to develop the site as a sand and gravel mining and processing
operation. The ancillary and compatible uses of concrete and asphalt production are
proposed to occur on-site. Facilities and hazardous material management are
discussed in the "Hazardous Materials Management" section below. Approximately 89
acres of the total permit area of 112 acres is proposed for excavation (see Exhibit C-3:
Mining Plan Map). Reserves will be dry-mined. The processing facilities will be located
as shown on Exhibit C-3.
The post-mining land use of the property will be lined water storage.
Mining Methods
The Applicant proposes to dry mine the property in three phases. Phase One,
consisting of approximately 31 acres, is located in the northern part of the property.
Phase Two, consisting of approximately 30 acres, is located in the southwestern part of
the property. Phase Three, consisting of approximately 28 acres, is located in the
southeastern part of the property. In each phase, mining and reclamation will occur
concurrently. Additionally, de-watering will only occur after slurry wall installation and
last until there is no water left within each sealed phase area. Refer to Exhibit C-3 for
further details.
Initial operations will occur in the Phase Three area and will include stripping of topsoil
and overburden and construction of the sediment pond and sump area, which will allow
for construction of the processing facilities. Next, topsoil will be stripped from the Phase
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
15
Banks and Gesso, LLC
One area and stockpiled around the perimeter of the site for later use in reclamation.
Overburden stripped will be stockpiled separately from the topsoil as shown on Exhibit
C-3. Raw materials will then be excavated utilizing trackhoes and front-end loaders.
Excavated materials may be loaded on a field conveyor and transported back to the
processing plant. Some excavated materials may be excavated with scrapers or loaded
into off-road haul trucks for transport to the plant site. Excavated materials may also be
pushed up with a bulldozer for subsequent handling by front-end loaders.
Haul Roads
There is one internal haul road on-site, which will be used for trucks entering and exiting
the plant area. This semi-permanent haul road located on the west side of Phase One
will be approximately 20-ft wide and constructed of compacted dirt. Approximately 300 ft
of the haul road, as measured from WCR 8 and WCR 27, will be paved per Weld County
standards. During the life of the mine, the operation will utilize direct access points onto
Weld County Road 8 and Weld County Road 27. Weld County Road 6 will also be used
by trucks hauling material south on US Highway 85. We are working closely with the
" County to obtain the necessary agreements for access onto their roads. These
agreements will be obtained during the course of local land-use permitting process with
the County.
Earthmovinq Operations
Earthmoving operations will begin with the grubbing of existing vegetation. Stripped
topsoil will be stockpiled for later use in reclamation. Topsoil berms will be constructed
and strategically located around the perimeter of the site and seeded with the temporary
mixes identified on Table E-2. During subsequent stripping operations, overburden from
one area may be placed directly, to near final grade, in other areas being concurrently
reclaimed.
An average depth of approximately 0.5 ft of topsoil and 2.5 ft of overburden exists over
the entire site area. An approximate average depth of 46 ft of sand and gravel underlies
this. The maximum total depth of excavation throughout the property will be
approximately 49 ft. Refer to Exhibit C-3 for topsoil berm and overburden stockpile
.-- locations.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
16
Banks and Gesso, LLC
'^ Water Diversions and Impoundments
The entire site will be graded to direct stormwater runoff towards ditches and de-
watering systems. In each phase, de-watering ditches approximately 4-ft wide by 4-ft
deep will be generally located as shown on Exhibit C-3. Due to unpredictable site
conditions, the locations of the de-watering ditches are subject to change. A CDPS
permit will be obtained from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
for the temporary de-watering operations.
Aggregate processing water will be separate from the de-watering and stormwater
systems. With evaporation and product moisture losses, there should be no need to
discharge processing water. During mining operations the sediment pond will be located
near the processing plant in Phase Three. The sediment pond will be approximately 25-
ft deep, cover an area of approximately 4.5 acres and be maintained below existing
grades as to retain any precipitation. Sediment pond capacity is approximately one-third
of the total waste fines to be produced (approximately 220,000 yd3). These waste fines
will be dredged out from the sediment pond as frequently as needed and used in,
reclamation activities.
In each phase, as mining approaches groundwater levels, slurry wall construction will
take place. Following slurry wall installation in each phase, construction of the de-
watering ditches and sump area will begin and the mine area will be de-watered using
electric pumps. Initially, de-watering quantities will be high but will continue to decrease
as all water is pumped from the mine area. At this point, the de-watering ditches and
sump area will be mined through and made part of the final grade.
The Applicant will obtain 30 shares of water from the Fulton Irrigating Ditch Company,
which will provide approximately 64 acre-ft/yr of water for use in augmentation. These
rights will account for losses in the aggregate processing operations. A Temporary
Substitute Supply Plan (TSSP) and Gravel Well Permit will be obtained prior to any
exposure of groundwater.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
17
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Operations Timetable
A timetable detailing the approximate size of the areas to be worked at one time and the
timeframe for mining and reclamation activities are summarized in the following table
(see Exhibit C-3 for further details):
Phase Duration Phase to be Area to be Phase(s) to be
(years) Mined Mined (acres) Reclaimed
1 7 1 31 1
2 6 2 30 1 & 2
3 6 3 28 2 & 3
Phase One
Phase One will begin with stripping of topsoil (approximately 6,227 yd3) and overburden
(approximately 31,137 yd3) from under the plant area, which will be located in the
northeastern portion of the Phase Three area as shown on Exhibit C-3. The Applicant
will then locate the aggregate processing plant, concrete batch plant, asphalt batch
plant, maintenance building, and scale office in this stripped area. The aggregate plant
will be moved on site once all appropriate permits are obtained. As the plant is being
erected on the site, approximately 26,993 yd3 of topsoil and 123,047 yd3 of overburden
will be stripped from Phase One mine areas and placed strategically along the perimeter
of the property to serve as screening berms.
Mining will begin in the southeastern portion of Phase One and proceed from west to
east, initially remaining a minimum of 3 ft above groundwater levels. As all of the
material above groundwater is being mined out, a slurry wall will be installed around the
perimeter of the phase area and the de-watering ditches and sump area constructed.
After slurry wall installation, the mine area will be de-watered using electric pumps. This
will allow for continued dry-mining of the deposit with minimal impact to surrounding
wells. When mining nears a distance of approximately 100 ft from the toe of the topsoil
berms, berms will be removed and used to backfill the previously mined-out area. Since
no mining will occur within 100 ft of berms, slope stability should not be a concern. De-
watering ditches and a sump area will be necessary until all water has been pumped out
of the pit. At this point, the de-watering ditches and sump area will be mined through.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
18
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Please note that mining will not occur below groundwater levels until the slurry wall has
been installed. The slurry wall may be installed before mining begins.
Throughout the course of mining operations, sand and gravel extraction will occur at
0.5:1 slopes. Excavated materials will be transported to the processing facility via off-
road haul trucks or conveyors. Underground powerlines will be constructed to provide
power for the electric de-watering pumps and plant equipment. As soon as the mining
limits have been reached, reclamation of the pit edges will begin. This will allow for
concurrent backfilling of the pit perimeter with overburden being stripped from other mine
areas. Approximately 2.3 million yd3 (3.4 million tons) of sand and gravel will be
extracted during Phase One operations. Phase One is expected to last approximately 7
years.
Phase Two
As mining in Phase One nears its limits, stripping of Phase Two will begin. Stripped
overburden and topsoil from Phase Two areas will be concurrently used in reclamation
of Phase One areas. However, mining in this phase area will not commence until all of
Phase One has been mined out and reclamation has begun in that area. Portions of the
stripped topsoil (approximately 27,880 yd3) and overburden (approximately 117,320 yd3)
will be used in Phase One reclamation, while the rest will be stockpiled.
Mining in Phase Two areas will begin in the eastern portion and proceed towards the
west. As in Phase One, mining will initially remain a minimum of 3 ft above groundwater
levels. When mining nears a distance of approximately 100 ft from the toe of the topsoil
berms, berms will be removed and used to backfill the previously mined-out area. Since
no mining will occur within 100 ft of berms, slope stability should not be a concern. As
the mining of above groundwater materials nears its end, a slurry wall will be installed
around the perimeter of the phase area and the de-watering ditches and sump area
constructed. This will allow for continued dry-mining of the deposit with minimal impact
to surrounding wells. De-watering ditches and a sump area will be necessary until all
water has been pumped out of the pit. At this point, the de-watering ditches and sump
area will be mined through. Please note that mining will not occur below groundwater
levels until the slurry wall has been installed. The slurry wall may be installed before
mining begins in this phase.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
19
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Throughout the course of mining operations, sand and gravel extraction will occur at
0.5:1 slopes. Excavated materials will be transported to the processing area via off-road
haul trucks or conveyors. As soon as the mining limits have been reached, reclamation
of the pit edges will begin. This will allow for concurrent backfilling of the pit perimeter
with overburden being stripped from other mine areas. Approximately 2.2 million yd3
(3.3 million tons) of sand and gravel will be extracted from Phase Two. Phase Two is
expected to last an additional 6 years.
Phase Three
As mining of Phase Two nears its limits, the remaining areas in Phase Three will be
stripped of overburden and topsoil. The stripped material will be placed directly in Phase
Two areas undergoing reclamation. However, mining in this phase area will not
commence until all of Phase Two has been mined out and reclamation has started in
that area. An additional 16,927 yd3 of topsoil and 81,229 yd3 of overburden will be
stripped from Phase Three and used in Phase Two reclamation.
Mining in Phase Three areas will begin in the western portion and proceed towards the
east. As soon as an area on the pit floor large enough to accommodate the processing
plants is created, the plants will be relocated to the pit floor to allow for mining of the
material previously beneath that area. Like previous phases, mining will initially remain
a minimum of 3 ft above groundwater levels. When mining nears a distance of
approximately 100 ft from the toe of the overburden stockpiles, stockpiles will be
concurrently backfilled into the previously mined-out Phase Two and Phase Three areas.
Since no mining will occur within 100 ft of stockpiles, slope stability should not be a
concern. As the mining of above groundwater materials nears its end and approaches
the plant area, a slurry wall will be installed around the perimeter of the phase area and
the de-watering ditches and sump area constructed. This will allow for continued dry-
mining of the deposit with minimal impact to surrounding wells. De-watering ditches and
a sump area will be necessary until all water has been pumped out of the pit. At this
point, the de-watering ditches and sump area will be mined through. Please note that
mining will not occur below groundwater levels until the slurry wall has been installed.
Similar to Phases One and Two, the slurry wall may be installed before mining begins.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
20
Banks and Gesso, LLC
As in previous phases, sand and gravel extraction will occur at 0.5:1 slopes. Excavated
materials will be transported to the processing facility via off-road haul trucks or
conveyors. As soon as the mining limits have been reached, reclamation of the pit
edges will begin. This will allow for concurrent backfilling of the pit perimeter with
overburden and topsoil previously stockpiled during Phase One stripping operations.
Approximately 2.1 million yd3 (3.0 million tons) of sand and gravel will be extracted from
Phase Three. Phase Three is expected to last an additional 6 years.
Description of Overburden, Deposit and Underlying Stratum
According to the subsurface exploration and laboratory testing performed by Ground
Engineering Consultants, the thickness of topsoil and overburden ranges from 2 to 4 ft.
Based on the number of vegetable and other agricultural crops grown in surrounding
areas, the soils are believed to be suitable for reclamation efforts.
Based on the exploratory boreholes, the subsurface conditions consist of 2 to 4 ft of
clayey sand overlying 35 to 50 ft of sand and gravel. Topsoil averages approximately
0.5 ft in depth, overburden averages approximately 2.5 ft in depth, and sand and gravel
averages approximately 46 ft in depth.
Primary and Secondary Commodities
The primary commodity to be extracted is alluvial sand and gravel. It will be processed
and used as construction aggregate. Most, if not all, sand and gravel will be used in on-
site concrete and asphalt batching operations. Any topsoil and overburden materials in
excess of what is required for reclamation may be sold as a secondary commodity,
though this is not expected to occur.
Incidental Products
It is not anticipated that there will be any incidental products as a result of this proposed
mining operation.
Hazardous Materials Management
As required by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's Water
Quality Control Division (CDPHE-WQCD), the Adams site is subject to a Stormwater
Mangement Plan (SWMP) as part of the NPDES permitting process. The SWMP
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
21
Banks and Gesso, LLC
addresses the hazardous materials stored on site and the measures taken to prevent
potential impacts to groundwater and surface water in the event of a major storm or spill.
Additionally, the SWMP sets up the notification process to be followed in the event of a
hazardous materials spill. It also establishes the specific Best Management Practices
(BMPs) to be implemented on site. Employee training/education in the routine
maintenance and inspection of BMPs is also discussed. As a general prevention
practice, the site will be graded to contain all surface flows on-site in the event of a major
storm. In the event of a hazardous materials spill, the emergency coordinator will follow
the procedure outlined in the "Emergency Spill Response Procedure" section below.
Hazardous Materials Stored On-Site
Hazardous materials to be stored on-site include diesel fuel, AC10 oil, lubricants,
coolants and motor oil. Diesel fuel will be stored in 10,000-gallon, double-walled, above-
ground storage tanks. AC10 oil will be stored in 5, 000- to 10,000-gallon, double-walled,
above-ground storage tanks. Lubricants, coolants and motor oil will be stored in 55-
gallon, double-walled drums. Since all above-ground storage tanks are double-walled
and UL142 or greater, secondary containment measures such as berms are not
necessary. Essentially, if the inner wall fails, the outer wall will contain the materials
within the tank.
Facility Operations Description
Daily operations with regard to hazardous materials includes the following:
• Diesel fuel, motor oil and coolants used in equipment maintenance;
• AC10 oil used in asphalt production; and
• Lubricants used to keep equipment running smoothly.
•
Emergency Spill Response Procedure
In the case of a hazardous materials spill on-site, the emergency coordinator
(coordinator) will be responsible for following the emergency-response procedure. The
coordinator will activate facility alarms, notify personnel and evacuate staff to a
designated location. Whenever there is a spill, the coordinator will identify the source,
amount and extent of the hazardous material. At the same time, the coordinator will
assess possible hazards to human health and the environment (by observation). If the
coordinator determines that there is risk to human health or the environment, all
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
22
Banks and Gesso, LLC
applicable agencies will be notified. The emergency coordinator maintains an
Emergency Notification List, which contains the names and phone numbers of the
designated personnel within the company in addition to local and national emergency
response agencies, a local clean-up contractor and remediation equipment supplier.
The coordinator will also notify all property owners downstream of the spill. Within 15
days following the incident, a report containing all pertinent information will be submitted
to the appropriate agency.
•
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
23
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Attachment B — Reclamation Plan
r
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
24
Banks and Gesso, LLC
EXHIBIT E — RECLAMATION PLAN
The primary post-mining land use for the Adams property will be lined water storage.
Water storage facilities will consist of 3 separate lined ponds. Revegetation will be
accomplished using native seed mixes. The Reclamation Plan assumes the cost for
restoration of the mining area as lined water storage. In each phase, reclamation will
ideally be completed 1-2 years following completion of mining each phase. Refer to
Exhibit F— Reclamation Plan Map for further details.
Reclamation Process
Land disturbance on the permit area will begin with grubbing of vegetation and stripping
and stockpiling of topsoil prior to mining (approximately 78,027 yd3). Grubbed woody
vegetation will not be used as backfill. Using a 10-percent waste factor, approximately
660,499 yd3 of settling fines will also be available for use in reclamation. Waste fines will
be dredged out of the sediment pond as often as is necessary and used in reclamation
activities. The sediment pond, de-watering ditches and sump areas will be mined
through and included in the general reclamation process. The total affected areas are
shown on Exhibit F.
Topsoil Segregation, Preservation and Replacement
Temporary topsoil berms will provide visual screening over the life of the mine and will
be strategically located for easy access during reclamation. If topsoil stockpiles remain
longer than one growing season, they will be revegetated. Watering of stockpiles will
occur as needed for dust control.
Final Grades
Pit edges will be backfilled at a 3:1/2:1 slope. The slopes will be 3:1 from the top of cut
to a point approximately 3 ft below expected water levels once the pit is allowed to refill
with water. From this point to the pit floor, slopes will be at a 2:1 ratio. Water levels are
expected to be approximately 3-5 ft below existing grade on the site. Approximately 12
inches of topsoil will be re-spread over all disturbed areas above water levels.
To totally reclaim the site, approximately 1,004,638 yd3 will be required to backfill the pit
edges to the proposed slopes. The Applicant will have approximately 1,091,259 yd3 of
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
25
Banks and Gesso, LLC
material available for reclamation purposes. From the 1,091,259 yd3 of material
available, approximately 1,013,232 yd3 of overburden and waste fines will be used to
create the proposed slopes. Backfilled overburden and waste fines will be placed in 3-
to 4-ft lifts and compacted by loaders and excavators in approximately 3 to 4 passes.
There should be no need to import material to complete reclamation.
Topsoil Replacement
After overburden and waste fine replacement, approximately 12 inches of topsoil will be
re-spread over disturbed areas above water levels to provide a proper medium for
revegetation. Topsoil will not be re-spread when the ground is frozen, excessively wet
or in any way unsuitable. Contour furrows will be established on shoreline slopes to
reduce erosion and encourage stable plant growth. Soils that are excessively
compacted will be chiseled or disced to break up compaction, then harrowed down.
Revegetation
All surface areas above water levels (approximately 5.2 acres) and disturbed by mining
activities will be topsoiled and drill-seeded for final reclamation with the seed mixes
shown in Table E-1. If use of a grass drill is not possible, seed broadcasting will occur at
double the seeding rate. Per DMG request, reseeding will occur at a rate of
approximately 40-80 seeds/ft2. The timing of the reseeding rate and mulch per acre
applied will be determined based on NRCS input. The seed mix specified in Table E-2 is
for use on topsoil storage berms and other areas requiring a rapidly growing seed mix.
Maintenance
Mowing will be performed for at least two years following seeding to help establish
regenerating stands of grasses and to control weed infestation. Seeded areas will be
mulched with straw or hay mulch. Fertilizer will be applied to areas of the site where
poor nutrient availability is indicated by a failure of seed to become established.
Weed Control Plan
Based on information obtained from the Weld County Code regarding noxious weed
management, this Weed Control Plan has been prepared. Weed control methods will be
carried out as described below.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
26
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Present Weed Species
The following noxious weed species may be, but are not necessarily, present in the
general vicinity of the subject property in limited numbers: Canada thistle, field
bindweed, leafy spurge, musk thistle, scotch thistle and Russian knapweed (part of the 9
noxious species designated for management). These weed species cover the most
acreage in Weld County,
Identify Prevention Methods
The following methods will be implemented in order to help prevent weed
infestation after reclamation is complete:
• Prior to stripping, stockpiling or re-spreading of topsoil, the topsoil will be
inspected for weeds. If weeds are present, they will be removed.
• Equipment will be cleaned when moved from weedy to non-weedy areas, in
order to eliminate potential spreading of weed seeds.
• Vegetation will be established as soon as possible upon completion of
reclamation grading to help reduce the length of time the site is exposed to
possible weed infestation.
Post-Mining Monitoring
Once post-mining grades have been achieved and the site seeded for
revegetation, the site will be monitored for future infestations of noxious weeds.
Monitoring will occur twice per year.
Weed Elimination Methods
Chapter 15, Article I of the Weld County Code contains several sections on integrated
weed management techniques, which detail various methods for controlling noxious
weed species native to the County. If any of these weeds are identified during
subsequent monitoring activities, their respective management strategies will be
employed. For each strategy, the mechanical method will be used initially. If the
mechanical method proves to be ineffective, either the biological or chemical method will
be used. In each case, the strategy used will be decided in coordination with the Weld
County Weed Control Department. Refer to the attached pages for detailed information
on the management strategies to be used.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving, Inc. February 2003
27
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Continued Monitoring
Weed monitoring at the site will continue until noxious weeds are sufficiently controlled.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
28
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Table E-1: Reclamation Seed Mix for Disturbed Areas
Species Variety I PLS2 Percent
(lbs/acre) of Mix(%)3
Buffalo Grass 3.5 30
(Buchloe Dactyloides)
Sideoats Grama 2 15
(Bouteloua Curtipendula)
Blue Grama 3.5 30
(Bouteloua Gracilis)
Little Bluestem 3 25
(Schizachyrium Scoparium)
NOTES:
Availability may dictate the need for substitution or omission.
2 Pure Live Seed pounds per acre;rates shown are for drill seeding. Double rates for broadcast seeding.
3 Percent of mix calculated on a seeds-per-square-foot basis.
4All substitutions shall be approved by the land planner(Banks and Gesso, LLC;303-274-4277).
Table E-2: Temporary Cover
Common Name Seeding
Grasses Variety Rate in PLSZ
(lbs/acre)
Thickspike Wheatgrass Critana 3.0
Streambank Wheatgrass Sodar 3.0
Western Wheatgrass Arriba 3.0
Slender Wheatgrass Premier, San Luis 3.0
Creeping Red Fescue Dawson 1.0
Variety unnamed native unless specified.
2 Pure Live Seed pounds per acre.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
29
Banks and Gesso, LLC
A- ..
Attachment C—Special Review Use Questionnaire
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
30
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE
The following questions are to be answered and submitted as part of the USR application. If a question
does not pertain to your use, please respond with"not applicable",with an explanation as to why the
question is not applicable.
1. Explain, in detail,the proposed use of the property.
Sand and gravel mining operation with concrete and asphalt batching
2. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan.
Refer to Section 4.1.
3. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and
the zone district in which it is located.
4. What Refer Josurround the site? Explain how the proposed use is consistent and compatible
with surrounding land uses.
Refer to Sections 4.4 and 4.5.
5. Describe, in detail,the following:
a. How many people will use this site?
b. AWor r�l�rTyl gA f fOroposed to be employed at this site?
Approx. 25
c. What are the hours of operation?
5:30 am to 8:30 pm for mining, 6am to 5pm for hauling and processing, Mon. thru Saturday
d. What type and how many structures will be erected (built)on this site?
Temporary processing facilities, concrete batch plant, asphalt batch plant, equipment
e. What type and how many animals, if any, will be on this site?
None.
f. What kind (type, size,weight)of vehicles will access this site and how often?
Light vehicles for employees. Gravel, concrete, and asphalt trucks -almost daily
g. Who will provide fire protection to the site?
Mountain View Fire Protection District
h. What is the water source on the property? (Both domestic and irrigation).
Wells and Fulton Ditch shares
I. What is the sewage disposal system on the property? (Existing and proposed).
Existing -septic and leach field proposed -
j. If storage or warehousing is proposed, what type of items will be stored?
Equipment, tools, fuel, processing chemicals
6. Explain the proposed landscaping for the site. The landscaping shall be separately submitted as a
landscape plan map as part of the application submittal.
See Reclamation Plan Map included as Attachment
7. Explain any proposed reclamation procedures when termination of the Use by Special Review
activitysiccufs.
See Reclamation Plan included as Attachment A.
8. Explain how the storm water drainage will be handled on the site.
A Stormwater Management Plan will be prepared and
9. Explain how long it will take to construct this site and when construction and landscaping is
scheduled to begin,
See narative in USR application package
10. Explain where storage and/or stockpile of wastes will occur on this site.
None expected.
10
1
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Attachment D — Original Weld County Road Access Information Sheet
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
31
n0.•00, k.,..n f.-tae with eht,Innt ni nren,c.nn inctn,mantc end of ninht itl„mmOtp with a rMI hit p
APPENDIX B
WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS INFORMATION SHEET
Weld County Public Works Department Date:
1 111 H Street,P.O.Box 758, Greeley,CO 80632
Phone: (970)356-4000,Ext.3750 Fax: (970)304-6497
I. Applicant Name PrpmiPr Paving_ Inr Phone (3Oa) 94O-1868
Address 5OR5 Harlan St City Denver State_Comp 8f1212
2. Address or location of access 26'31 Weld County Rd 97
Section 19 Township 1 N Range 66 W
Subdivision Block _ _Lot —
Weld County Road it 8 Side of Road south Distance from nearest intersection 25 ft
3. Is there an existing access to the property'' Yes X No N of accesses 2 - 3
4. Proposed Use:
❑ Permanent ❑ Residential/Agricultural IX Industrial
O Temporary ] Subdivision ❑ Commercial ❑ Other
5. Site Sketch
Legend for Access I L_ (
Description: _f ♦5"-
AG= Agricultural
W{{DC
RES = Residential (f
O8G= Oil Gas
Ditch
D.R. = Road
Mi
Fes
•
OFFICE USE ONLY:
Road ADT Date Accidents___ Date
Road ADT Date Accidents Date
Drainage Requirement Culvert Size I ength
Special Conditions
Cl Installation authorized O Information Insufficient
Reviewed By: Title:
9
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Attachment G — Documentation of Adequate Method of Sewage Disposal
A septic system currently exists and is in use at the main residence on the property.
This home will be used as the site office once operations begin. The Applicant will have
the current septic system inspected for adequacy to support the proposed use. If the
existing septic system is deemed inadequate, the Applicant will design, permit, and
construct a new system to Colorado and Weld County Department of Health and
Environment standards.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving.Inc. February 2003
34
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Attachment K—Traffic Impact Analysis
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine 02045
Premier Paving,Inc. February 2003
39
LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS,INC.
1889 York Street
Denver,CO 80206
(303)333-1105
FAX(303)333-1107
E-mail: Isc@Iscdenver.com
Web Site: http://www.lsedenver.com
TRANSPORTATION
CONSULTANTS, INC.
November 25, 2002
Mr. Paul Banks
Banks and Gesso, LW
720 Kipling Street, Suite 117
Lakewood, CO 80215
Re: Adams Property
Sand and Gravel Mine
Weld County, Colorado
(LSC #021010)
Dear Mr. Banks:
We have completed a review of the traffic impacts of the proposed Adams Property Sand and
Gravel Mine project located on the southeast corner of the intersection of State Highway 85
(US 85) and Weld County Road 8 (WCR 8) in Weld County, Colorado. The project area is
bounded by WCR 8 on the north, US 85 on the west, and vacant land on the east and south.
The 100-acre site is proposed to contain a sand and gravel mine operation facility. Access to
the site is proposed from WCR 8 with a full movement access intersection. The remainder of
this report presents our findings concerning the traffic impacts of the proposed project.
Existing Roadways
The vicinity map of the Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine site is shown in Figure 1,
enclosed. As indicated, the site is located near the southeast corner of the intersection of
WCR 8 and US 85 in Weld County, Colorado. The main roadway system serving the site will
be US 85, WCR 8, WCR 6, and WCR 27. Major roadways in the vicinity of the site are
described below:
• US 85 is a four-lane expressway, running north-south with a posted speed limit of
65 mph in the vicinity of the site. It connects with the City of Denver on the south
and continues through the metropolitan area, and on the north it connects with
SH 52. US 85 is classified as an expressway by CDOT in the vicinity of the site.
• WCR 8 is a two-lane local roadway, running east-west with a posted speed limit of
40 mph in the vicinity of the site.
• WCR 6 is a two-lane local roadway, running east-west with a posted speed limit of
30 mph in the vicinity of the site.
r
Mr. Paul Banks.
Page 2 November 25, 2002
• WCR 27 (Old Brighton Road) is a two-lane arterial roadway, running north-south
with a posted speed limit of 40 mph in the vicinity of the site.
Existing Traffic and Year 2020 Background Traffic
Peak-hour turning movement counts (including separate truck counts) were conducted by
Counter Measures, Inc. at the US 85/WCR 8, US 85/WCR 6, WCR 8/WCR 27, and WCR 6/
CR 27 intersections in November, 2002, the results of which are shown in Figure 2. The
counts were conducted from 6:30 to 8:30 AM and from 4:00 to 6:00 PM, with the actual AM
and PM peak-hours generally occurring from 7:30 to 8:30 AM and 4:45 to 5:45 PM,
respectively. Actual turning movement data is attached to this report. Figure 2 also shows
the number of trucks at these intersections.
Projections of 2020 peak-hour traffic volumes have been made for the roadway system
adjacent to the site in order to have a basis for determining future traffic impacts. 2020 was
chosen as the long range horizon for the project. Future 2020 traffic projections, shown in
Figure 3,were made assuming a 2.25 percent annual growth on through traffic on US 85 and
WCR 27. This growth rate was obtained by comparing Year 2020 traffic forecasts on US 85
from the US 85 Access Control Plan, 1-76 to WCR 80 report by Felsburg Holt 8s Ullevig,
December 1999,with existing traffic volume on US 85. Note that existing turning volumes at
these intersections were rounded to the nearest five (upper rounding) while calculating Year
2020 background traffic.
Estimated Traffic Generation
The Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine project will contain a sand and gravel mine
operation facility. The amount of traffic that will be generated was taken based on information
provided by the developer of the proposed site.
L It is expected that on an average weekday the proposed project will generate approximately
170 external daily vehicle-trips, with about 85 entering and 85 leaving the site. Of these,
approximately 20 vehicle-trips will occur during the AM peak-hour,with ten vehicles entering
and ten vehicles exiting the site. During the PM peak-hour,approximately 20 vehicle-trips will
occur, with ten vehicles entering and ten vehicles exiting the site.
Estimated Traffic Distribution and Assignment
A key element in the determination of the proposed project's traffic impact is the directional
distribution of its traffic onto the surrounding roadway system. The relative location of the
site, the type of land use, and specific characteristics of the roadway and access system will
dictate what this distribution will be. Note that in this particular case, the distribution was
based on the information provided by the developer of the proposed site. Figure 4 illustrates
,,..the distribution expected to be applicable to the Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine
( roject. As this figure shows, 100 percent of the traffic will use WCR 8 west of the site to enter
the site. Of this, 80 percent of the traffic will come from the south on US 85 and 20 percent
Mr. Paul Banks.
Page 5 November 25, 2002
Recommended Turn-Lanes on US 85
As previously stated, US 85 is classified as an Expressway and the posted speed limit is
65 mph in the vicinity of the site. We are not recommending any improvements (except for a
traffic signal) to the WCR 6/US 85 intersection because the site is only expected to contribute
westbound left-turning traffic. Based on the CDOT State Highway Access Code, the following
turn-lanes are required at the WCR 8/US 85 intersection:
• A southbound left-turn deceleration lane of 1,120 feet including a 300-foot taper.
Currently, a left-turn deceleration lane of approximately 800 feet including 235 feet
taper exists on southbound US 85. Space is available for increasing the length of the
left-turn lane by re-striping, to meet the State Highway Access Code requirements.
• A right-turn deceleration lane of 1,100 feet including 300 feet taper is required.
Currently, a right-turn deceleration lane of 780 feet including 160 feet taper exists
on northbound US 85. Space is available for increasing the length of the right-turn
lane by re-striping to meet the State Highway Access Code requirements.
• A right-turn acceleration lane of 1,680 feet including 300 feet taper is required.
Currently,a right-turn acceleration lane of 1,100 feet including 300 feet taper exists
on northbound US 85. Space is available for increasing the length of the right-turn
lane by re-striping to meet the State Highway Access Code requirements.
Average Daily Traffic Impacts
The Year 2020 average weekday traffic impacts of the proposed project are illustrated in
Figure 8. This figure illustrates the average weekday traffic expected to be generated by the
proposed Adams Pro;erty Sand and Gravel Mine project, background plus site-generated
average daily traffic, as well as roadway capacities. The figure shows that all surrounding
roads will operate within their roadway capacities.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on the analyses presented herein, the following conclusions and recommendations
(shown in Figure 9) are made with respect to the proposed Adams Property Sand and Gravel
Mine project:
1. A total of 170 external daily vehicle-trips (85 entering and 85 exiting) would be
generated on a typical weekday. This total includes 10 entering and 10 exiting trips
during the morning peak-hour and 10 entering and 10 exiting trips during the
evening peak-hour period.
2. The directional distribution of project-generated traffic is expected to be such that
100 percent of the traffic will use WCR 8 west of the site to come into the site. Of
this, 80 percent of the traffic will come from the south on US 85 and 20 percent will
Mr. Paul Banks. Page 6 November 25, 2002
come from the north on US 85. While going out, 80 percent of the traffic will be
oriented to WCR 8 east of the site and 20 percent will be oriented to WCR 8 west of
the site. All site-generated traffic going south will use the US 85/WCR 6 inter-
section. The south-oriented site-generated traffic will use WCR 8, WCR 27, and
WCR 6 to travel to the US 85/WCR 6 intersection.
r 3. The US 85/WCR 6 intersection is currently operating at a poor Level of Service "F"
for the eastbound and westbound approaches. However,this intersection is expected
to be signalized in the near future. With a traffic signal,this intersection is expected
to operate satisfactorily through Year 2020 during both the morning and evening
peak-hours with or without the addition of site-generated traffic.
4. The US 85/WCR 8 intersection is currently operating at a poor Level of Service "F"
for the eastbound and westbound approaches. This intersection is expected to be
converted to a 3/4 access intersection in the near future (left-turn from WCR 8 onto
US 85 will be restricted).
5. All the other intersections(WCR 8/WCR 27,WCR 6/WCR 27,and WCR 8/Site Access
Drive) are expected to operate satisfactorily through Year 2020.
6. The following improvements to the turn lanes at the US 85/WCR 8 intersection are
recommended:
a) A southbound left-turn deceleration lane of 1,120 feet including a 300-foot
taper. Currently a left-turn deceleration lane of approximately 800 feet
including 235 feet taper exists on southbound US 85. Space is available for
increasing the length of the left-turn lane by re-striping to meet the State High-
way Access Code requirements.L. b) A right-turn deceleration lane of 1,100 feet including 300 feet taper is required.
Currently a right-turn deceleration lane of 780 feet including 160 feet taper
• exists on northbound US 85. Space is available for increasing the length of the
right-turn lane by re-striping to meet the State Highway Arress Code require-
ments.
c) A right-turn acceleration lane of 1,680 feet including 300 feet taper is required.
Currently a right-turn acceleration lane of 1,100 feet including 300 feet taper
exists on northbound US 85. Space is available for increasing the length of the
right-turn lane by re-striping, to meet the State Highway Access Code require-
ments.
7. The traffic impacts of the proposed project are minimal and can be accommodated
by the adjacent roadway network given the improvements recommended herein.
L
Mr. Paul Banks. Page 7 November 25, 2002
We trust that this report will assist with planning for the Adams Property Sand and Gravel
Mine project. Please call if we can provide additional assistance.
Sincerely,
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.
OO
B ,QUA 40/7004#1.41%• �s�
enja inT. Waldman, P.E. U.at r•
cc 35827 02
1.1*
e �a
BTW/SMA/wc Ax• .
Enclosures: Table 1a
t
Figures 1 through 9
Traffic Counts
Capacity Analyses
\\Server\d\LSC\Projects\2002\021010\I.Report\R-ADP.wpd
F
a
Table 1
Intersection Level of Service
Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine
Weld County,Colorado
(LSC#021010,November,2002)
Year2002 Year 2020
Year 2002 Background plus Year 2020 Background plus
Background Traffic Site-Generated Traffic Background Traffic Site-Generated Traffic
Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of
Traffic Service Service Service Service .^,enik... Service Service Service
Control Intersection Location AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM
Unsignalized US 85I WCR 6
East bound Approach E F E F - - - -
West bard Approach F F F F - - - -
North bound Left B B B B - - - -
South bawd Left A C A C -
- - -
h Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 76.1
-
Signalized US 85/WCR 6
East bound Approach — — — — D D O D
West bound Approach — — — — D D D D
North bound Left — — — — C A C A
North bound Through — — — — A D A D
Nod bound Right — — — — A A A A
South bound Left — — — — A
D A D
^ South bound Through B A B A
South bard Right - - - -
A A A A
Entire Intersection Delay(sec/veh) - - - - 15.7 33.4 - 15.7 34.2
Entire Intersection LOS - - - - B C B C
Unsignalized US 851 WCR 8
East bound Approach F F F F F F F F
West bound Approach F F F F F F F F
Nod bound Left C B C B E C E C
South bound Left B D B D C F C F
�.. Critical Movement Delay(sec Neh)
Unsignalized CR 27/WCR 8
F. East bound Approach B B B B 8 C B C
West bound Approach B B B B B B B B
North bound Left A A A A A A A A
Sad bound Left A A A A A A A A
Critical Movement Delay(sec Neh) 10.8 13.3 10.8 13A 11.8 17.2 11.9 17
Unsignalized CR 27/WCR 6
East bound Approach A B A B B B B B
West bard Approach A B B B B B B B
North band Left A A A A A A A A
South bound Left A A A A A A A A
Critical Movement Delay(sec Neh) 10 12 10 12.1 11 14.1 11 141
Unsignalized WCR 8/Access Road
North bard Approach - - A A - - A B
.- Critical Movement Delay(sec Nell) - - 9.4 9.7 - - 9.4 11.6
•
Note:
3 •Delay More than 100 seconds
L
1
L
•
)
A
hl.'�{ q [ ff }�a:! +,i4'''''''''',:— i�r. rGS+ r `,v >ync, ''' '' y_*) 6-',41
f
,'+ !xti I* i 2. i FyVr.'a,‘ `Y i, i Nry rd"�r ,,A5y1j,L I-viyr{.`y� p.,.„,.,4*-,Tt now '• {1•p�'e� ��14{td [a. �,[,.�WtSb
:* L{1p@+„ 'y� ;
t47i'%„ " ',F.', tyn W ' �.k�we s\ M1`•'ki'!. '` 1+ :{alsi,t It ,! )"ihZ"Fd Ntri:YAl:eC M Vi i",, s i i�; P �':Y,hh�/
y v Y '4,U S ei ; • % t,1.'..oit tS3>yYBi .i,.C`\ 4,„�"w{Fwy4 '{• s Y . 4 > d� e� 5 S r fi ri.a : it ,n x4 S r i5. /', �} 4 S(t t ''
[• _, ii,fe JY`x y '" .. 4,w2i /.. L i.. k ? ,y q.. k S f to et x' ✓ Cd. , ",jw,rt�af- JA v "ai ak tgg Vq,I1.C''^'1 t 'f_e41 6' J sC!k r r YN{ •.,410 i'iEy; i!e.�riixt Stl,4,;, yr �'FS.r prod rti'L ,.S •.::r $Yk ^'�`,Sr��'q' \ ° � k �' N,'A+ µ � +' ;1 y v`�.`��1 -.vt>&' ; t; ,54G?E p[& 'qn ..:�.!'.
r it''*/yr '< i 4Sr 4 '^'e T' y! a 1? ) ✓r �, + >��, h P.G A, •V { f'i w I f4,',r``:r ..J f'a � -; r! ,,
fre
v Ar i�F T �h r 7 r a v▪ w r yd �v )I,r S 4rr�94a;ytl�' 6'4'N4,i Hr d ,�;!' '' `y "v "a'x a
�.r\ 11{ IpIA t t1 ^ Yt▪ i'.1 l rf r\t 11i1J,,r f !3 V r yy :. v �� �rl.y � �kb ta'V
s v {w t al4 q 7 '
q: )yt' ! A .rM1 v tte; d .° t�,+�'.1 41 < •,r �, p 4 i �. 1 Aopmrvmerr Scek
1 E°.,°*.:„I i n ▪ ! i 'may t 1 a .L X51 ( �91.fi i ix 'r � a iY4 a V^..w x� I 15rT;f'ey 1• Scale I'•Ma
bo .:„I o f₹'ir,� ti t 1 ' S' t ' '. rt s �, ' r y eNijn P 1 i a ' P ) ''',3t1.3).° 21:41
ye y, „ v. " r%. 4 "( ,a
t p ! "1 1 S4 iPrd.n a p f 75f, r F e4
»n;i; qr' „itt ty- Y r r¢ ,It''''' a7r�5a1 � y lzti et ..44,-,‘:',",-\',.4 , t Wahl Y (e a ry
i IFn l Y e 31./.-,1,
k ' zy d k .c ,;•‘.(1•4?, i”; .
.r xd(" , 1 .� ,� GJ,�r er d ' a y "r'r'y [> x
-t,.s nt,'4^ZigY F r r'inr k .it"°A Y ' aloe'•*- ( i tilt
,,if t'”. { e . x ,, �r,? ,''ty
ai. e 1 a 3
i� 4'i ,ti n r 1 l �r \ r ai pt e14 ,5 ''' ,,i 3" ,•'4 k y i t -7‘,:,..+.,.5 M1 q'!n . 7 w . Y ,a..w r a ,..,
r i i + t o f n � z r a C& „6' � ,``fd'1 r�S �'M'G •O,''•Yit ' e,,,,,,,'‘•
pP� ¢i � ! r ,Sn. ^h SY � �m�r'''f �^t r " v �' < ,,,,,, ,,,,,,::,:es...;,...?",..� f� c.
d r t rr err1 u t, ! v .45 g .14,,,,,,,I014'
'S` 9 ,N 4714,944)1V44;411,
"Fi a,' ( tP>` , > 4... o
i' ! i✓ k ' ,.•. c w f✓ PlYire 4qP i a+ . ,4, �rt � +, yi e
� "Y ':� ish� r�}�,�{,rY ef`�'�d�� q �' r ? } q +" t� tbl SS �.
tl y',ry* r d rYk k D d !Ve f } aS>d Cie QR - ' 'fr ≥ ,, 5 t
' r,, s'w' , ,. ,t f i ,',"•,,..!••$..',.:qy ,if A• ` .f�' 4 1<{dr ,6Y�r`:„,, ; a e 4,,,, •yak 0: 11 - a,°r •40.,•,;1/4.4 i. ss ,),
�°, aw a', i, 1, ^,e t }rr i ,9 ,• a !^rror^'{d) '� e? B r l .Y
U0„4.; } afK i' r ;t1F Sf:A'\* c (n7&tR^'+t $s)'� >'r',,4 kke2 'A`77/ t°'Jd'n 7y/i1.� ( f ^x�k yr F :21,‘-‘14,,t,, yrr •._
,1} n t • t C r , 3 w• A lF��{,r.°� yra'v"+Y�4rP fi , dry te`F✓r F�i � > h f
qC " 4 i4 ° t Y F } h{° 1.r1i.. � r, -l�fi I 4 f' ,/.a $
N e{..Fe Y% ^ r• i ' r" �r�IRs, F,✓^. I'p f,„ 9z s/°c a p e 11Nk 5,./C � • X. :,fi, Act..
.. ,,x..
i},s 2 r ry ,t'L.4 d .rY e ) �N<Y s GA %' - •P I w f .
y1/2�;�:ott ciP4 ;e a r ▪ ,`• r;{ • M . '&6 b,3.a a g`Q.r Y" fiJ''� 3 . .'>' e -_ syi�v "!k +' _
L.!.
N•'6 a , 1-q 4w ,, fyrt ua rM1 • FFi�
k�j ti al z p 4.4 •pb 'pro`'f �" " r' f5,3 4 ,44.,•-•d F , w e e
yp, 1 t) Y3> 1Sa44 � Qyx 14. 1/'i,�yl k 0M`!a.-1 .4 h5
v k k'rt pkeyFk� a 41 v it to ll f�+ fi vrtl;� °"try A 4 try.w Yu n
,:•,',11/..:` l+ x�.'V Y` �tS Chi ..p..44,,,:',i
A. "ty�'k,�. ! s ,4: a C
ix- >+xd ',tact;
J,x 1 4.$e a8wti�9i r fk%'•r v s R
l'-,`".$1.4"� D' , r*3 + ^'�. `""'" a r% 'j"$ 47rs `y L r s I r �'r. °j `.y- '' t T 9 ,c tr,
. ` �I f..i M a• • r h p,' ..y7M- '!V''9�#91,:‘,„;
4 °x . rof $ 5',w, ,z ° w:kV..y i
BFI £ l »r v_r g,. p„ r f� t• '' r t > Yy 11 vt 4�'l� rt e' p- w) /. �y, ro' S ss,'�' '
,. j a •d/ °» , a ' "'' a ' ''" 1,1A s."t Y t v9 >� Kk. x'xu r dp HaN :-...26-:.:;r2',5'.v .,
S i , 7 k ` 1 r: v I ir•:14:(4144 '' Tif f r `1'Y,, ,�i I kf .p ,..
4 f �!
e4� .y r l * t • Y i" .ya 41 loc'4.f•r r St ° s it c p ^W�'k e f. { 5.� t +
§ s'r 4',2{,`•,,, 1 r• o. '^,f+,. ,), q s{ sY , r fr \�✓,t �' I w,p a
Ry v as t '''1]yr r hit, ) ry t'kt ) ry,' t ' ic 'h • aF ,
sjI- ..w,.w C, r x '.0,0"4,;::4 •X']• r 9 r'!i.AW d a ',,,44$,•:^1V;,1/4-,^,,‘4,.:4,,, ,• ^ ;. t i, eV \ I
' �YT^{,+Y x. ° , rti( ^ '! Sys f �e ✓ �14t , 4+ F 5a
�e ,2 tt • t 77 XI 1 711,'•fy{ � �` r !'4,;f!!7....41444, h v • ' e t ' f' }
r .r 1, uYVf tr xry °i 3`,tif" w it ) .*%,"',4 oy 0 .ie <F'',.‘-'...,1''.'"i-',...:ir . f' i
<,...,
r I ., .,i , fep,Y �E, i w. L > T 64r ! ,A w➢ tyY 1 '-'...,3;• r ,5
toy F r-ab Vi le:s uS'wia7`rt.+ * ,:•••
1 '* 7 ! t 1 7, ,'4 j"I�Lir m*r
r,. 2, 7 i d b, "Cep S 1,c1(,„;14......:17,..;.,3/477,-,,:id,..,,,,* i M A I t v ,fi. M'b
v„ti,771;,'' '•1 ••.4•;% µ•,.1,.:-.-....-p{}a '14, dfm*.- `y r r ,. U r ny ,^P. tM1u^K..•.'sa' pn,^+' yScx >ar
d: F 'lFVV'y+eaN 1 . i+'ilr Y %ieefK . , ' '4444.1';',I44,:,‘,44 ,,: / hr `�, 'T's 1 V4 figure
`i�± i h R A rrr y t•+yy'' Jq„ es.,,,H:, e t y,Y: 7 (V ri -.n eip Ate, { 'a74k'r td '.iN{U�,�'d
y..�r v.,. 'h � gas�7°l+ti$+ 1V' C ..., q r n,i,�" d' V
icinity
ii, Map
November, 2002
Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine (LSC #021010)
.
f / ` 117 `\
M1 36 1) K
115�I(t) — \
B2 ) 34.95R))
'J 1l 13 6
/ la(1)53131) `x1 24(1)
-- H�+ 272) 151w)
I U- �h4ABPmximaeSoak
Scek:1•807Vet5 C,332
930(45)) I
4 \±}..)1 31173)
� 1fr132 2I1I1,5383 - - -4) 1214,S JJ8�3e) 2 18i3(1)a \\
ei �lJI
fi 2 4` 1`0 2
1 1 1 2 51-U L° 1
1,307 47) I p 5 1 ,tin 7 1 3
931(459)(2) \ 5 4_11 r_�11(2)//
34(2) I SITE �—�'—� 13 1771)22/
03 2J1�J I LT 9 ' \� 1993)
, '
ela7� 19 4 1 1
45 4101 I 8 6 _L {
62(3)
17 1) — — — — — — —
860(559) 1/
1,596(32) I WCA 6 F Figure 2
LEGEND:
( = Stop Sign _Jill—+ Existing Traffic, Traffic
—1111— Control and Lane Geometry
5 . AM Total Peak—Hour Traffic (Lar•e Vehicles Onl November,2002
3 2 PM Total Peok—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only) Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine (LSC#021010)
i
C
180
45 1) 45 ) /251$]0(2)5
J) J 1) I�1-5 10
/ 20 1`((`2 ...5 1) 1x-10) 1)
/ J02) 1S� 1 L�(2) 15
5 10 �' r3 IS])
5 22)25
9 Approximate Scale
255(8) Seale:P•807
WCR8
1,270) 4
1,395 85) I I
5 15 I
5 5JI L25120 J)
5 S J L5 1> 5
5 —.-
5--) / 1-35 5 I
5 s 1r I �03)20 CS I
950 e0) I 183��e)
2,3080) J 5 245f2)3
_ -- _ I 1 Cr
S 55 J I L L 5 5
1,9600(70) \ >Z 5 1�)l r-1 i0F1.)5
1,400(65) /2856
l0 ) I SITE I
LaS LIM- 519 12112)
)
5(11 —�7�p�7�1i x10 III
eK2.395
I p01) _ _ _ _ _ _990 90)50) WQ 6
Figure 3
LEGEND: Year 2020
5_(±) AM Total Peok—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only)
]2 - PM Total Peak—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only) Background Traffic
November,2002
Note: Traffic volumes rounded to the nearest five. Adams Property Sand and Cravel Mine (LSC#021010)
.
11
Approximate Seek
Seale:i'-AYr
0% 20Y.
L � was
80% , 80% 80% 1 '
Np ca�{
•
o
SITE
80%
80% 1WCR e
80•% Figure 4
Directional Distribution of
LEGEND: Site-Generated Traffic
r---� = Percent Directional65 November,2002
• Distribution Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine ((SC#021010)
///
'\
I
10n 10 211') l r�
a
6 0 n
B
Approximate Soak
Scale: . £00
Wate
2 I L2 2 LT 1
a aI i tS
It a
a aJ
(V---- I, SITE o
f �e II /
B
e
9 •
WQ6
Figure 5
Assignment of
LEGEND: Site-Generated Traffic
a — AM Large Vehicles Peak—Hour Traffic November,2002
a PM Large Vehicles Peak—Hour Traffic Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine (LSC#021010)
38 3) �_ 49 J) 244)5-27.1)..L
171'3
I010m-1 r'_ 1B1) J 1-10241)
22 rim
2 2 14n (7,12)
r_,_) 11
4 14 `)III S 1x43)
17$111‘E.
4 e‘4 1)24 Appmx/matt Scale
16 3) Seale,)'-8CO
WOl a 19S0 45) I
1 I II
4rl{112(2L51 2L51
J X73 0
2 O—1 (-32 2
4 J�{(3-1(932
r� ) 16 w
4 e5 11) reify
8321§4) 0 22
I
25;�JJ{�'L2 ,
1,307 47) I 0 5 IMO-) 1-711) 3
931 45 5 11 2
3±(2) 82.) I 41f12_(21) )
10317 a8 SITE 137�7 Q
0 34TJ { sin I 199(S)
a (7y,) 4 I
�7�
45 4.2_0-31i
I-6 1414 e)
B2(S) 17(1) L____ _
ee o87) WQ5
1,eo4o) Figure 6
Year 2002
I.
LEGEND: Total Traffic
IN AM Total Peok—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only) November,2002
=
3 2 PM Total Peak—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only) Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine ((.SC#021010)
ai it r
1 ,
w
�i .
`S
y 180
{51) 45(3) • 231)J�2)S
)alai ) ou JIL15 to
10 0 2 rim} Jo iK_,_� F 151)
15 8)la it l 1r-5 15(3)
10 9 (2):—// Approximate Scale
255(5) Seale P.,10J
wale (/
L3s(85) I I
5 15
I ,70)
J 3) 5
3 5—1 F35 3
5 5�I Fie C�
395.050 1 °n12(15I5 E) \\
2.305180) r-- - __ _ J 8 S 15 J4I t3 S 1
II S S�J L_5 5
5 5
ro
70) 11, 1 (7 1)
BS) 1 5 5� Ir- 152)
12) ISITE �I 53r2)J �L5o 5 25 (5)/
8ri �17� , 2008) II
45 4511 I r10 20(8) L_ _ -. _ _ - _ _ J
85b) 201)
1,000(95)
2,405(58) wOt6
LEGEND: Figure 7
$� = AM Total Peok—Hour Traffic (Large Vehices Only) Year 2020
3 2 PM Total Peak—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only)
Total Traffic
November,2002
Note: Traffic volumes rounded to the nearest five. Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine (LSC#021010)
}
•
68/1,600/5,000 Approximate Seek
Scab!'-bW
35/39,335/55,000 103/1,630/5,000
Was
I 1
170/170/5,000
68/39,400/55,000
i
S
:f:
I
I
SITE
I \ 68/7,820/10,000
i
Waco
65/7,520/10,000 Figure 8
135/39,900/55,000 Year 2020 Average
LEGEND:
Daily Traffic Impacts
Site—
Total Roadway November,2002
350/6,755/25,000 a Generated Traffic Capacity Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine (LSC#021010)
Traffic
-.)I1L
1 L 1- T Ap
1 Y poximite Sub
�IIr Scale:/'-lAV
1 wu s _ „1
I 4-
1s
_I
I I
t a
-li �I SITE
was
Figure 9
LEGEND: Year 2020
= Stop Sign
Recommendations
s = Traffic Signal November,2002
Adams Property Sand and Gravel Mine(LSC#021010)
I
Counter Measures
:Site Code : 1 PAGE: 1
/S STREET: CI-27 FILE: cr2lcr-6
,AJTIIET: CI-6
Sue of the Vehicles and Trucks
DATE: 11/19/02
Time Prom forth Pros East Proa South Prom Vest Vehicle
,Begin IT TRIO LT IT TRIO LT IT TRIO LT IT THIO LT Total
6:30 0 37 0 1 2 1 3 7 1 6 0 2 60
6:45 0 25 0 0 0 1 0 18 0 6 2 0 52
I TOTAL 0 62 0 1 2 2 3 25 1 12 2 2 112
7:00 AM 0 28 0 2 0 1 0 11 2 4 0 0 48
r-1:15 2 32 0 0 1 4 2 24 0 4 0 1 70
7:30 0 36 0 0 0 1 0 24 2 1 0 1 65
7:45 0 63 0 0 0 1 0 21 4 2 1 6 98
al TOTAL 2 159 0 2 1 7 2 80 8 11 1 8 281
8:00 AM 2 29 1 0 0 2 0 21 1 1 0 1 58
8:15 0 22 0 0 1 1 0 18 4 1 1 1 49
Break
4:00 PM 1 33 1 0 1 3 1 37 2 5 1 1 86
4:15 0 24 0 3 4 2 2 51 1 2 1 0 90
4:30 0 39 0 1 2 0 1 44 3 1 1 1 93
4:45 1 46 0 0 1 0 0 42 1 1 2 1 95
4, 411L 2 142 1 4 8 5 4 174 1 9 5 3 364
5:00 PM 0 33 0 0 0 3 0 58 5 1 1 4 105
5:15 2 36 0 0 2 7 2 54 3 1 2 0 109
5:30 1 48 0 0 0 1 0 35 4 2 0 0 91
5:45 0 21 1 0 0 2 0 43 4 5 . 1 3 80
-RI TOTAL 3 138 1 0 2 13 2 190 16 9 4 7 385
..AT TOTAL 9 552 3 7 14 30 11 508 37 43 13 22 1249
Counter Measures
rSite Code : 1 PAGE: 1
1S STREET: CR-21 PILE: cr2lcr-6
../.34111ET: CR-6
Sue of the Vehicles and Trucks
DATE: 11/19/02
PEAL PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:45 AM - 7:45 AM
DIRECTION START PEAL BR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ...
PROM PEAL HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left
North 6:45 AN 0.85 2 121 0 123 2 98 0
East 6:45 AM 0.50 2 1 7 10 20 10 70
South 6:45 AM 0.80 2 77 4 83 2 93 5
West 6:45 AM 0.59 15 2 2 19 19 11 11
Entire Intersection
North 6:45 AN 0.85 2 121 0 123 2 98 0
East 0.50 2 1 7 10 20 10 10
South 0.80 2 77 4 83 2 93 5
Vest 0.59 15 2 2 19 79 11 11
CR-27 N
S
2 121 0 r:-tt :?r:::t:: 3:# ct ER?:.:
LI
123 _ 2
„„
CR-6 10
2 L 7
1
2 19 CR-6 :
15 83
4 77 2
k
f
Y'' ' ccCR-2 7i;ri
Counter Measures
Site Code : 1 PAGE: 1
1/S.STREET: CR-I7 FILE: cr2lcr-6
I/a4TREET: CP-b
. Sun of the Vehicles and Trucks
DATE: 11/19/02
PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM
DIRECTION START PEAR RR VOLUMES .... PERCEITS ...
FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thu Left Total Right Thru Left
lorth 4:45 PM 0.85 4 163 0 161 2 98 0
East 4:45 PM 0.39 0 3 11 14 0 21 79
South 4:45 PM 0.81 2 189 13 204 1 93 6
Vest 4:45 PM 0.63 5 5 5 15 33 33 33
Entire Intersection
North 4:45 PM 0.85 4 163 0 167 2 98 0
East 0.39 0 3 11 14 0 21 79
South 0.81 2 189 13 204 1 93 6
Vest 0.63 5 5 5 15 33 33 33
CR-27 :`.:::S N
S
: :33i 194:
4 163 0
167 0
:aiiiiiiiii?:i:i3K:K:KERK 20 :::::: r
';:#: CR-6 14 3
w ......... 5 L 11
Jtiffi_
5 15 CR-6 it
J5 204
;; '.;•z-:-ii;:;s:=:€ r: 13 189 2
17 9::::::: ::#
'''M„'
:..
Counter Measures
site Code : 1 PAGE: 1
1/S STREET: CR-11 FILE: crllcr-6
P illET: CR-6
. Movements by: Trucks DATE: 11/19/02
PEAL PERIOD ARALTSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:45 AM - 7:45 AM
DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ...
FROM PEAL HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left
North 6:45 AM 0.50 0 4 0 4 0 1100 0
East 6:45 AM 0.25 0 0 1 1 0 0 1100
South 6:45 AM 0.50 1 1 0 2 50 50 0
Vest 6:45 AM 0.25 2 0 0 2 1100 0 0
Entire Intersection
North 6:45 AN 0.50 0 4 0 4 0 1100 0
East 0.25 0 0 1 1 0 0 1100
South 0.50 1 1 0 2 50 50 0
Vest 0.25 2 0 0 2 1100 0 0
ga
CR-27 la N
S
KagNiKgopei
0 4 0 :-f
4 0
gg:::::::KtN.::::::::}sit.:::::::---- 6 :i::: r
CR-6 1 0
o L
i
0 2 CR-6 ::t
J
2 2tNaiEefitOgeffe
i >
111.1.111111.1111.111
II 41
-415 60f-e . tO - E
H 6
I
i
7
in
Ti. )411 '.-/
------ -
A
1 - . - \‘'rt
I
• 4a(of i
Counter Measures
Site Code : 6 PAGE: 1
CIS STREET: 0S-85 PILE: usB5cr-8
V STREET: CI-2
Sun of the Vehicles and Trucks
DATE: 11/19/02
._te From forth Prot East Prom South Prot Vest Vehicle
iegin RT TARO LT HT TARO LT RT TIRO LT RT TARO LT Total
:30 0 326 1 7 0 8 3 176 0 0 0 1 522
6:15 0 339 5 1 0 4 5 151 1 0 0 0 506
it TOTAL 0 665 6 8 0 12 8 327 1 0 0 1 1028
.:00 AM 0 292 3 6 0 12 6 ISO 1 0 0 0 410
7:15 0 350 3 4 0 8 8 166 0 0 0 0 539
:30 1 351 3 6 0 8 4 164 1 0 1 1 540
:45 1 291 1 0 1 11 10 161 2 2 0 1 481
HI TOTAL 2 1284 10 16 1 39 28 641 4 2 1 2 2030
:00 AM 1 242 3 3 1 5 8 151 0 0 0 0 414
6:15 2 236 6 1 1 8 1 131 0 0 1 2 389
Break
4:00 PM 1 240 8 1 0 2 11 310 0 1 0 0 574
:15 0 233 6 2 0 3 19 372 1 1 1 0 638
:30 0 220 4 3 0 3 18 371 0 0 0 0 619
4:45 2 227 3 5 0 3 17 364 0 1 0 0 622
`a SazAL 3 920 21 11 0 11 65 1417 1 3 1 0 2453
3:00 PM 1 241 5 2 1 3 20 383 2 1 1 1 661
5:15 1 233 2 3 1 7 20 397 1 1 1 0 667
:30 0 229 3 5 0 3 20 392 1 1 0 0 654
:45 2 183 2 5 2 3 27 294 6 0 . 0 1 525
fR TOTAL 4 886 12 15 4 16 87 1466 10 3 2 2 2507
/ TOTAL 12 4233 58 54 7 91 197 4133 16 8 5 7 8821
r
Counter Measures
Site Code : 6 PAGE: 1
- I/S STREET: 0S-85 FILE: us85cr-8
SAL STREET: CR-8
•
Sum of the Vehicles and Trucks
DATE: 11/19/02
PEAL PERIOD AIALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM
DIRECTIOI START PEAL ER VOLUMES .... PERCEITS ...
FROM PEAL HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left
Iorth 4:45 PM 0.96 4 930 13 941 0 98 1
East 4:45 PM 0.75 15 2 16 33 45 6 48
South 4:45 PM 0.97 77 1536 4 1617 5 95 0
Vest 4:45 PM 0.58 4 2 1 1 51 29 14
Entire Intersection
forth 4:45 PM 0.96 4 930 13 941 0 98 1
East 0.75 15 2 16 33 45 6 48
South 0.97 17 1536 4 1617 5 95 0
Vest 0.58 4 2 1 1 57 29 14
tNg
US-85
S
4 930 13
L
947 15
r
CR-8 33 2
— ......... 1 L 16
2 7 CR-8 :tF
gg
°92`...
4 1617
4 1536 77
§.50:8:::
Y: Y; �;::US-85 'ri
ii
US' s{
-al 15 trill-6 r
ar- en tit
; I
i
I
NI \
< (-
L
1
C ;,
6i'4
/
1 ! 4- 1 \ I
r
Counter Measures
Slte Code : 8 PAGE: 1
'/S STREET: 0S-85 PILE: us85cr-6
if SHEET: C➢-6
Sus of the Vehicles and Trucks
DATE: 11/19/02
:ise Pros ➢orth Prom East Pros South Pros ➢est Vehicle
Begin RT TARO LT IT THRO LT HT TIRO LT IT TARO LT Total
6:30 6 321 3 1 0 7 2 172 1 18 0 2 545
6:45 7 326 2 0 0 2 1 144 8 26 0 3 519
°V TOTAL 13 653 5 1 0 9 3 316 1S 44 0 5 1064
1:00 AM 13 286 3 0 0 4 1 163 12 14 0 2 498
7:15 6 347 2 2 1 1 3 181 10 23 0 4 580
' 1:30 8 348 1 3 0 2 1 172 12 19 0 1 567
1:45 10 295 1 1 0 0 5 157 8 21 1 4 503
II TOTAL 37 1216 1 6 1 7 10 673 42 77 1 11 2148
1:00 AM 6 242 0 1 1 2 3 158 10 18 0 3 444
8:15 4 237 2 0 2 1 0 122 8 15 1 3 395
Break
4:00 PM 5 237 4 3 0 1 8 324 21 18 0 6 627
,:15 11 216 2 6 0 3 2 371 12 10 0 7 640
I:30 2 225 0 4 1 1 0 356 14 11 2 1 617
4:45 2 221 0 2 1 1 4 387 14 12 0 6 650
SAUL 20 899 6 15 2 6 14 1438 61 51 2 20 2534
5:00 PM 4 241 2 3 1 2 5 397 17 8 1 15 696
5:15 3 254 2 1 2 2 5 408 18 9 0 4 108
i:30 8 215 2 3 0 1 3 404 13 16 0 9 674
-:45 4 119 0 3 0 0 8 322 12 13 1 4 546
IR TOTAL 19 889 6 10 3 5 21 1531 60 46 2 32 2624
`7 TOTAL 99 4196 26 33 9 30 51 4238 196 251 6 74 9209
Counter Measures
Site Code : 8 PAGE: 1
I/S STREET: OS-85 PILE: us85cr-6
H/I STIES!: CR-6
Sus of the Vehicles and Trucks
DATE: 11/19/02
PEAR PERIOD ANALYSIS POE THE PERIOD: 6:45 AM - 1:45 AM
DIRECTION START PEAL RR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ...
PROM PEAL HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left
North 6:45 AM 0.94 34 1307 8 1349 3 97 1
East 6:45 AM 0.75 5 1 9 15 33 7 60
South 6:45 AM 0.91 6 660 42 708 1 93 6
Vest 6:45 AM 0.79 82 0 10 92 89 0 11
Entire Intersection
North 6:45 AM 0.94 34 1307 8 1349 3 91 1
East 0.75 5 1 9 15 33 7 60
South 0.91 6 660 42 708 1 93 6
Nest 0.79 82 0 10 92 89 0 11
US-85 N
.........
S
34 1307 8
L
1349 5
r
CR-610
15 1
L 9
0 92 CR-6 x.
14`::
_ J
82 708
42 660 6
1398si:;'
:::;:•:U S—8 5:
i
I " I Vh
L v j i ' l '
N
d ,
)�
____Th
A ,
i � �
J (<? k i f
( : ?.:.,.c„.
KitI i i
i
i
I Y;.
9 i i yritt5 eiii
di 11-D
3 01 itlei City"
r
Counter Measures
Site Code : 20 PACK: 1
/- S_STREET: CI-21 PILE: cr2lcr-8
/^REET: C9-8
Sum of the Vehicles and Trucks
— DATE: 11/19/02
line Iron Korth Pros East Pro' South Pro& Rest Vehicle
Begin IT TARO LT RT TIRO LT RT TARO LT IT TARO LT Total
6:30 1 40 2 2 5 3 0 7 1 0 1 3 11
6:45 1 28 0 0 4 5 2 14 1 3 6 1 65
"V TOTAL 8 68 2 2 9 8 2 21 2 3 7 4 136
1:00 in 5 27 2 1 11 5 0 9 1 S 3 1 70
7:15 8 17 1 1 5 3 2 21 2 4 5 3 72
1:30 7 45 2 4 4 5 1 20 2 2 4 1 97
1:45 9 47 1 4 4 3 0 15 0 3 3 6 95
RR TOTAL 29 136 6 10 24 16 3 65 5 14 15 11 334
9:00 AM 4 30 S 3 2 2 1 21 2 4 2 5 81
8:15 3 19 1 0 5 1 3 14 0 3 2 2 53
Break
4:00 PM 0 28 3 3 1 1 3 37 0 5 8 7 96
1:15 3 19 3 S 1 3 5 45 1 5 11 6 107
1:30 2 32 2 5 4 4 4 40 0 4 11 10 118
4:45 3 43 3 2 3 4 4 38 2 1 5 12 120
1 Tsi4L 8 122 11 15 9 12 16 160 3 15 35 35 441
5:00 PM 1 27 3 2 5 3 8 53 1 2 11 14 130
5:15 4 43 3 2 3 5 3 50 2 1 5 15 136
1:30 4 39 4 4 3 2 9 26 1 0 6 11 109
i:45 1 13 2 4 1 4 5 32 8 2 . 4 12 88
RR TOTAL 10 122 12 12 12 14 25 161 12 5 26 52 463
IT TOTAL 62 497 37 42 61 53 50 442 24 44 87 109 1508
Counter Measures
Site Code : 20 PAGE: 1
'/S STREET: CR-11 FILE: cr2Tcr-8
/Y,ZTREET: CR-8
. Move.ents by: Trucks DATE: 11/19/02
PEAL PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM
DIRECTION START PEAL HR VOLUMES .... PERCENTS ...
FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left
North 4:45 PM 0.25 1 1 0 2 50 50 0
East 4:45 PM 0.38 0 0 3 3 0 0 1100
South 4:45 PM 0.38 0 3 0 3 0 1100 0
Vest 4:45 PM 0.50 0 2 2 4 0 50 S0
Entire Intersection
North 4:45 PM 0.25 1 1 0 2 SO 50 0
East 0.38 0 0 3 3 0 0 1100
South 0.38 0 3 0 3 0 1100 0
Vest 0.50 0 2 2 4 0 50 50
CR-27 }:::::::::: N
E
S
1 1 0
._• 2 0
..in...eim...v.,gei.,:v:
....:::::7
::::::::.:sit::
:• CR-8 3 0
i L 3
i0 3
0 3 0
;;;y�frCR-27 s;'t:
4
Z1
-015rf U, - E
5
ifor
- - —
÷7
34 ' I
14
a
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 AM Background
1: WCR 6 & SH 85 11/21/2002
*
Y 7o1+}'(r e{iei xt. f,r.M1 -.iz.ft�r ,,��...+ :-At( "�r+'�,yA0 `�rltl•E i. Jn ��Aw..9et'��ta� `�. aL^�. �®,....iiL 'r , •.\'
Lane Configurations g. 4. Tt r 'i eft r
SIgR"Control = _ 'Stop Stop. `≥;Free . - • Free n s.
Grade 0% 0%
Voluipe(veh/hj', i 10 r*0 .82 9' f '- 1 5- 42 c`,G6,0 6 x ;11307 34
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
HoTI flow rate;(veh/h) "` 11 0 . '89 .-'' 10 1 5 46 'x17 7 9_- ;1421 37
Pedestrians
Walking Speed (firs)
Pe den B n,Ilia a `w Ta. a
'....I'.... �.� 9-#.. . s -.. �y_'�u�`�'v.�'�Raa.s+:.-_ ' .✓r�lY.�''�'�ice,`.' �w�p:.�.,i S��..+.., .. ,r ... ._ .,. ',i._ ;`5 �'.� ....Right turn flare(veh)
M an,Wi } - �t�lo e`�ta,5,t'" r o, `vr"',t'a r ' :... P ,,
. �.'f'r`!:R�'n'�.`$�4.s-�ca`S.,.� s�Svi:'E.::i.�t.��a:r�.,tc'a•c 4��.�Yt;�. .a.�,.c.�.J��. . .S?...cYS.+�.�'_::1::.
Median storage veh)
q ryiott' ,vim€rtte(1$94 2253 X719 �1 2G B4"1'e359 1458 { r"$4+ A 724$3.41 uWAf-. :.
.. �. e :mot_ �__,x
vC 1, stage 1 conf vol
tC, single(s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1
ttT--4S` a �+�$ - '--a '
tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
upe e"e la' � x -=10t)i o is 5',Ko 99r�z90rt -:"
-q.-v� ..t�+5.. ....,. .�. z, c., t x. - B''�. a ice_..:��2 r _ ...
cM capacity (veh/h) 38 36 376 47 35 638 460 874
t^taar >. w3'i..:: sa) `a . .:.sit •� "3t> 'st«v`�`'�tai4.ylf,.av ': �'ta*'.` S ,'.5,
Voj_u`i;ie dtaF, ,r' V " : ib0+.. 1,6 .1t:O6-':'359 59'+s' T .s 9 7 0 10 ^37 rt;%!?,
Volume Left 11 10 46 0 0 0 9 0 0 0
g9.1}t(ne�Rlfjht _ :_89 65.: st' »s x-0y:: `4ti�t« R7;' w 0
cSH 190 66 460 1700 1700 1700 874 1700 1700 1700
Vola.rr2"t6Lapscity b_S2 b;25 R,10 j✓�21y 2_jk y0,t70 x 001 `:D42 X042 -0,0.2 '
Queue Length (ft) 67 21 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
oeflf7nG )ay5) s 43 l w-75 1 _ �h?, U)0. 30x4 r;r0a� �..; Y h;0 0 00' 0 0 .
Lane LOS E F B A
A.PP 3 ch"Dela`y:(0_ .43 1 761 �.� ?sz t FY ' °� 0'y 4.
Approach LOS E F
Average Delay 2.7
IitTE75ecttpn ap'agitr Y.012.idrr %. 62107/1( 't. „)CI{
Adams Road Property( LSC#021010) 2002 AM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 1
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 AM Background
2: CR 8 & SH 85 11/21/2002
l 1 f & 4\ 1 P �► ,� r
Lane Configurations ,j, 4' ?T r tt art r
Sig cjrbl " Sfdpk .,... .. .z f f6P [un. r ... _, y`.Fjeg.• Free_..::
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Voli ine(yeh1h) 1 . ,r 0 . _ 2 'r •' ` w:k 7 ; :?0,14 §3.1 23 4 Y::'l33 ;1
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly'1�owrateweh/h) -i 1 1, 035 ., 0 • ;4& _ -;;t2, 686 X25 15 _:1448. 1
Pedestrians 1�OfiggifitteWalking Speed (ft/s)
Right turn flare (veh)
g 9 Tiyd A N6 2 r xx t{,27'ifs tOTl 2..?.1a''"xi �$ � .kr= + y if
Sl�:' rl..� z>.2`S.t.:f.'_`'�`-�4t_.s�...:.. -w..... . ,�e�w Fv �_. _�:3�'tw.;.::
Median storage veh)
! 46) tz2
vC1,stage 1 conf vol
VCf1. ;�P dl Li u�2'A`.k�a;3 - igiaJ T''gigWi ". irgin a s »'3 ;..y f ,•:
tC, single (s) 8.9 7.9 8.3 8.9 7.9 8.3 5.5 5.5
II
tF(s) 4.2 4.7 4-1.-0 4.2 4./ 4.0 2.9 2.9
fle @. eWit--�,.�'"�g96�43��$z..��D':�. ..id` !-'rj,D4.�`�',xK9ag.X��ai5.v.sYie`Ye .
cM capacity (veh/h) 20 18 247 46 19 491 230 550
zt7la "ticivh i- . an .t.Wfili ti-w r[3r} ti e;lit H.it't gi r. .
--. i.Y b_'x .sue`' ♦ .f'X 1..s ...t" SC __ -
Y i F rc "'2. is VIMA' 4�tt215Zatl al riV24 ;1�` 'a f' -`..
ex aFa Yrr"': '� �'.�:.i-. si.'.b.�._ v` l,.rS' d.s H ....,. ,c+.nF.,. .+._-l--� �..o..� ..a.: � r
Volume Left 1 35 3 0 0 0 15 0 0 0
-1-700
cSH 19 67 230 1700 1700 1700s _550 1700 1700 1700 '
Vg1u ae. _a' iaaa,,a011SZO. 0 fl i' 'i0 X0-20,-.�0 Q1 :,,"0 N- Q-` -ttl 3 0 DQ
Queue Length (ft) 8 92 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
P reC s 7tic1i'?'gi ,�E'.'.150 ;Y' 2U,*z,'~.Skti.0 ±0:0 } 0.0 '? 11xF . :'s�tr0 * :O:b, ,�'b_O� -,� e "..
Lane LOS F F C B
,4P..P4k�tray^�,$)�§4''r21 $A'. " s ` 3',�De `. '. ._....i3a 3 •.+.�.[s; ',�,..� �xs�$"+ .,'., .__ '�..h; r;• _ '
Approach LOS F F
11tt• -('e+ a`"er-:
Average Delay 4.1
ikkgatifiAV °apty'UPrOli.§11fl50'0%q,y-E ID.C94 e(of ervigM;1 K Q <. , , "r Z 4t
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2002 AM Background
Analyst, Adam SM Page 2
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 AM Background
3: CR8 & CR27 11/21/2002
f C 4\ t ► 1
Lane Configurations 4, 4 4, 4,
Slgn'Control , . ::: Stop' ,•.. 8topa , ee > Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume(vehip . ¢ 18 14, 18 _ 4C a 1 `6' 's 6 `,64 4 5 5 ,' 117 21
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 .0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
ftl ttrfyjflow rate,(veh/h), ! 7 2Q 15 20 X26 7 7 70 =`' -5 5 .127 ,23
Pedestrians
L e"W.dth tft) k ,
Walking Speed (ft/s)
PP §,§14-B1'G1(9ge 'y.s�k fi s ..._... h-.1�tt. . ..�....~'v4. i.... ,r, v . .. �.. e s , •
Right turn flare(veh) a . .
",rs,' �2 tom= -� rs'--� ��' - ,,
�t_ .411+.L. i,a s.i��t .V .L. aii-;eoG..'�''.2'3�' sret�OfC,�,'L'3,.��i �',?..�iC*. _,.. 1%11•.tx.;,tje. t�S' ,a.. �.:-
Median storage veh)
v on io b UkW4 54<�'C2;3P ,P73. 0P7: 24§,,g ? : jSo nit. -7.ki `` :75 aC'
vCi, stage 1 conf vol +��
p;,,�� r p x Y�.F ii 4 NC f X t x s
VG 9�.?: 1:x+01. �7-'.�'z�' .�--x`.�'r�.. J"z.�.<�. r :'.�'�;�:,. wv6nM��.z� *+.�S, �o�✓,. S� i !a
tC.single
f(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.6 4.1 4.1
t,D2r 4:3-tsj t'Kr.., --;y. t: 2��--it ?;Gai R-d. ESr `.Y .il �._:
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.7 2.2 2.2
cM capacity (veh/h) 668 658 910 662 651 894 1431 1524
tic ,r.i -S"�.""�5+ - a f.4 p Kn.:: u, �»Fy u'"iv.. i _f
t��t1i�sSS't�� >- 'iii.L,;...._.c S��-�)t^+ "�'��`� � _.u�.a�LmS.:a'"'dcise .sb?-'-i y f:
� ='e e a -� 'Top k- '�'a6 4 f 9, ''�^al N.k.2Ca, L,<a &r �.� al, �,•. eacs s� 'ta- `: -z x, r
.:.-.��f �.�:tR.., � zs. L�.�./d:�.�,fe.Y �..�!!'S� f te3v t,4L � .Y� 'k✓-&��x.._i-c:., 5 ' -..a�..�ice.Volume Left 7 20 7 5
cSH t� 735 678 q1n431 1524
hh
W8Wib ..YCiz .4.-06 :1-P O o:: giY04 v { .",,zf, 9 { w .:_a
Queue Length (ft) 4 .^6 0 0 a� a zr-rv,_
La�nn}e(LOS�j r 1 BB A A hp
Fes". `-h 't ,
Approach LOS B B
(k1Willi etre.`1t._Y?tf liz :arc
Average Delay 3.3
fnlettveM„Crap§4,6 1.til4 tien* a t 9% : tfreS,Ul evelofService
•
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2002 AM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 3
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 AM Background
4: WCR 6 & CR 27 11/21/2002
f t t P ti 4 r
Lane Configurations .j. 4. 4. 4+
S�q �ontroY Stop ^'Stop Pies_" 4_,; Frge
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
u(11ut11gc(v4111h� s, 2 2 l5 :°` Z ' 1 ' 2 ' .`c''.s„4.l7 :r :,z -;,...:114(K-3_:,..12t. ;; 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourlylfowjate(veh/h) 2 2% 16 8 t 2 e4 >Rf3 > 2 ,0;!' 132 : 2
Pedestrians
LangNdthJft) '25
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent.≥ Ipe_Jkaie -- .
Right turn flare (veh)
mod :. F`.
Median storage veh)
vL n E tu5ne„x; 29 3 27511;1 ?: s'7d3.7� 27�`y v'95„:*3417.-fflar
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
u � _
lll_'.2'aS{a rohf#�0I •ne
�t(C,, single 4 - �(ss)) { 7 1 6.5 6.2 7 1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
^_! tainar�'1DS(K i...d. �• }-,�_ !x-P _•Y .eis".f} t.1iJ"s.- sE .JC:�`..P 4 i ce. �5 rw,fk y: ;e. .L
tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 33 2.2 22
�9251.12H60 7D0„ " OQ t ,r t:, _3lba_ti:.` t 0
cM capacity(veh/h) 722 670 917 694 670 974 1451 1510
is Ns -tom -"-. : t � :tc,. .y ,--v.�,. -s*b�-� � � .. ,
+ .., .c..^l* �i s..�L✓_rte.a..u�i �.: aL. ;.yL W' H.ti .—
-::
Vo.9i tai._ . ..` , ,r21 4 Y11',-C 90 r .:1 En5✓q. 1}}, .r e-WF,ry ti 4r. r ti'.<.
Volume Left 2 8 4 0
cSH 859 734 1451 1510
Votume o Capacg @;0;02 '0.01 . A p0 Q Oq n '
Queue Length(ft)2 1 0 0 ,
CotUI D (Sant. s;-r9 3 ,l0 0 t 0 4� '0 b y y �cti� :a
Lane LOS A A A
Approach LOS A A
` l.ft�. �il 'C bar fT,(r�lY..i+.`h�`'4T�3�-"'-.'�zi _ •...�zta � ?'ri .«`r. . o..r:c _t n.�c:.:'" � � .,~a ^•C'`„v4 "7 xv,a�ee
Average Delay 1.3
lnt?sei3h Capaetty OIPT¢ation . ;9 7Sicf l 1q,jJ evefd#Sele)rg! A' a :"W "WP, .
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2002 AM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 4
LSCINCCS2-ST51
5
i
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 PM Background
1: WCR 6 & SH 85 11/21/2002
Lane Configurations 4, 4, 1 4? r 'I art r
§i-dypdcrib-srxril1 x.. Stop. • :``Stopa x, - "•Free } 0• x.40; -xi_.
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volqigj h)` 34 1 45,.;;. 6 ;j 4 t9 ' X62,: :159¢ , :..,17:., • 8,: 931 17
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
H_64 ErnyYjtate�(veh/h) 37 ' :"',-, 11' " 49 , 7,.. -` 4 'wi0;' :6T 1735- 18 , t,.7 -?1(21.27,:;;',..,7.21§-
Pedestrians
Walking Speed (ft/s)
e $ f ?.9,ec ,_ : .,.� Ii i a ,. .ha TAi< A: . ,. --
Right turn flare(veh)
t ,y�l�dllttFt °•ityrs.s.',n4.,,. s;nA645-�...r..t rY4.'�;f '<-< 9.�e 3P'.` '1u.}:ati 4f,C a:r�s,-'_ .:.tY t' i.aaitt'.
Median storage veh)
-YgOft racr?e ,2Q39. a3 15047 $38�'gZiaga 1030"x ;: -- 2 'ft53 d .`'`'`
�L vjC1, stage 1 conf vol
KGF h I _ . i -:ligiti: ggl . �`.t�?ifr�.. i i .J�, . TS t`'.fitilc . Guy`.a",'.'i�...
tC, single (s) 7 5 6.5 6.9 7.5� 6.5 _6.9 4.1 4.1
t:. L r e6'�g.1/4:,; ;s: . • t i A, x: l.. ca$-.r +cv'Pei� ..47_:,'a . .- ,<�if'ls i A, w
tFy(s)g�� 7 3.5 '4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.33 2.2 -2.2
P.. '` d,g r2 .�::'` `0 - P, 7P+ A- 46:171rX.84. ",...GMs P ` ±s_.[:'Y gig n .s0:'_:..=
cM capacity(veh/h) 22 13 512 13 13 296 670 353
Y °1i. ifiEflraZ' - "�r{�C-S.r 1 z a r ..rart a v -Ls ^�-... �-
1n =��a�'"�"5a .'r� AK � �I.«AK'�k�Svsa"� �sr+''�AiZw�' �alV? S.fii;fy-.
Volume Left 37 7 67 0 0 0 7 0 0 0
Vol4t;r,.es 01ta .' , : Jg_,•x,i:4*I.suP:> -3 4, . x04, g≥O— ' 0 ;r1/ tQ 1t1.8<
cSH 47 24 670 1700 1700 1700 353 1700 1700 1700
Votuiiie gaiapacity ,,., -i 87_£874 b 10 t151Y,0 51 t' o n 42 .0:30 kp430 G0 i
Queue Length (ft) 219 65 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
C trb elay t L,597 5 3.75 7 11 0 0 0 -t t0 04' Q -s 7 4, ".i- 0 0 ;A:4 .0 O,y :, ' ;;-
Lane LOS F F B C
Bizr?c } lay02u X975 f3767W0.4 W )}A4] _` . , t � �'_
3 Approach LOS F F
Ft t'i a:44t w'ffkli - r`x+.rr t-...a 4 <i';_a;.:`- ,,:T.>-, . , -,.,'Yyt'l r._s4: .tt ti3'rP: �• i as e
p.
Average Delay 20 4
(nkersi-cgli?P*LhtUplgat(oh i t'` `P-4 _ r? ICU e 4:O,:k eRiN P:7 €3' B c .:, ,
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2002 PM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 1
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 PM Background
2: CR 8 & SH 85 11/21/2002
Lane Configurations 4, 4, R 4T r ' ft r
9. tQ Stop` Free Frets
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Grunt ¢ ),".r 7 air r � '4 ' t6 ..:,ii:2 a, 4 _t,1536 77 _ ,.13 49r: 3P5:4-. -2;c4
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Houily,11oi'rate(veh/h) 1 }{ 2 4 17 '_''i2 is T6 4 `_1670 •:. 84 14 1%a1J't ;»;4
Pedestrians
���;,�WrgWalking Speed (ft/s)
Right turn flare
(veh)
MnG
Median storage veh)
X. ,10.M ,IT.riie'L7>t90d' AQ, .g , 5 a-21ar,g 22 {„8354015".'. -c' rl; 17Pici tleiil'
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
� tronv01r to � �{ s.t��aa:t u i spa c`L :,:x;.3'1..
{tC, single(s) 8.9 ,yaf.7..9 8.3 8..9.. 7.9 8.3 5.5 5.5
t Jr S-.=;�. d,;{;+.�.i���Y=.W.�.aouY,L 3,eJ 3+�' 'f 3+ t:Y✓*•i�FY. ,� ,[ a.. ..S':+� ...J_ J�.
tF(s) p/_ 4.2 4.7 4.0 4.2 s�4(7, 4�q.0?�¢� 2.9 p 2.9
�ry '"/P `73 .F.?..'91_s' `s a nk- 41 Zs[;1V_r.�e 2.3v..:i29�C: i".s. is`. . te-�s 3L.. ..>:..
tc{Mq capacity(veh/h) 12��{ 6 367_ 6 -6 202385 159
` SISZ. e'ry 'w� ifi fr , a liklii�.`aE �fi iYaiv.:�'.. f is ,�y:e .L ``g:':+�
tar. s.r ':L s�a�?�n _.....�3.Y,�.
Vsi e . "^'axe tgli: -'r� gt._§.V PI r 1 4 "14: 05 505 ` ^4W -Intro ;,.
Volume Left 1 17 4 0 0 0 14 0 0 0
Vog4.J lghtt ,. .; 4 u 6' `iiSfl_. '., 9
cSH 15 11 385 1700 1700 1700 159 1700 1700 1700
Vq r te,Qo aci(�> O 39 5 affQi { 031,9 *b aflS �+D 09 6,30 10.30 000 3 F ` ;'
Queue Length (ft) 32 Err 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0
Cis 3afa'11jsj- t 3184 n I≥fr 0 . . 130` `00. 98, .; x;00
Lane LOS F F B
e.
t{C Approach LOS F F
rilv-t-;:rtfq PtyFl:ai tr{�F' a..+im— .t r .: 1 r .T..?.s�3 .c'ti s�+,E,s sz v - a o.e' ,.,o-' w '�••:-i, l5-" ?'..v� ;3
Average� Delay 127.9
y
_ LIW Wi P gR pI§Wice ,.,fA
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2002 PM Background
Analyst,Alam SM Page 2
LSCINCCS2-ST51
(
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 PM Background
3: CR8 & CR27 11/21/2002
i —► - T C t— t 1 1 t \ d
Lane Configurations 4, 4. 4, 4.
S194 Gogtroj rs ,',('$top•' . ç1, t. .r , fop • s r:'Free Free -
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
V.W,01( eh(h),t- 52y,,s 3iv:` ,;4.;w on xt:t 4 ≤.s;10 sg, 6 ;f 67 ?ft:: . .13__ 152,.,• A2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
11§Ati )l(5wJate_>(veh/h) ` ° 57 " '25 . _4 15 :"'15 1,1 I::;;182:, r..26 14 165 13
Pedestrians
Lahe":Ithr a +, ,
Walking Speed(ft/s)
'
' Right turn flare(veh,)�y,
Median storage veh)9' o(i 11q "."/426 c to_k „ 9SZI o- q5 zil +4i$ K 408 y r C .;i
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
Ye. C f-+r'r a �yY'1. 'iirr`!S"{��� a + 'r"�4� s f r 7N.t�r•-+: l:- e-
Xa�.: � �.� - ���1.� .1:?3ti'9cr Stn .�.}.t'3� T¢•.3'_� 4:yC FS3' .t7' ..c �} g::;1',
tC. single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.6 4.1 4.1
'3V, l 1 N ka < t Wtza,): 1ieri � tit+.3 . 2` .2 i
tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.7 2.2 22
cM capacity (veh/h) 513 516 872 506 521 _ 759 1398 1363
aararur�s�rea��t�ads �� � .,
e'„3 �i�- ms's- `"-c'-- - t ' �S- sa" +at ,''^latfr i F ga?: ^'f;s4....,
•-'fJ/..t.�= = 4',•a-�rec -�`•f�-'arma'6jy�c' yjy y�S5i h '•��i.
` ^Per' tw61-1a 'troll maw wci-fr:3'Fdn`�'r' j;�tµeecf,j-t 4-Al ee..'iT.5� r - -
Volume Left 57 15 7 14
oTtligJlt 4sr" yC�Lg?rgg��A�LL ; µ^ (�
4 - Z;.�R .eF �f'J»T.A:ii iiti Y = ti... A� icni, J. ;t_. r�i: .: .A."..,
' cSH 525 561 1398 1363
o1udb;.f ?Oapae b,- 7 t4W:.to:0? 4pf . - `^ _ -:::::PM,:. . . - . y<
F Queue Length (ft) 15 6 0 1
I, °ozIMefaynn)u._ - .S3 t-3 `~r?(.rs t k 7 '- M.. `{
Lane LOS[ ` B B r�A A
Aa, • ;R•e�aY�s)_ �, 'fBps z z ht56,. " +, x A=AWMY''�_ .- ' ,- t_,
Approach LOS B B
lei !`*ad�t-cic .01 + s ,:'i `q
L.*-Sh z: i. .6 s -t' �_ L ,.- i.-kc+xi{} 2..t 4D>
1 Average Delay 3.5
ttaeaiejoitCaprcdyUtilikaficin " 3qW 1CffLevef`o"1SO 7 s ,.A •:E- 7..,,,.;:1-,;:_
Adams Road Property ( LSC #021010) 2002 PM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 3
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 PM Background
4: WCR 6 & CR 27 11/21/2002
�, yp T•P r di"v of..
�,sA"?'.. 4iti7 r•.: �.,rm - "veAPva"�At4� eiu�sti�' ' `P `.� i ._Cte v»ts.V' �'1 �._�eY:� "'F;_`.•S.
Lane Configurations .j, 4, 4,
`G?fY. Ont(OI ,t r 1_�.�.�.�;i':.. '$topit t '.a: F(ee .». Freers(_.,.
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
163 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0-92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
H°11,0 z d Fate_,-(vefUh) . - '5 ."51s_. �5 ; 12 177 "-; 4
Pedestrians
Lan10fdt)0)
Walking Speed (Ws)
eQ4 !Q9eN Y 4 .NF ' tiF!' F K
Right turn flare(veh)mgeirdowesawiAti4i _. _"
c.rs:«.i Se..._ -4mn, k :aS4S' F1:i°y..:geStAX. .i1i_s•...::.
Median storage veh)
.k1§P,Iiirne ; "`•438:..x? �( -'9: X424'?7��341 +49oa' t$.`ll.`4 'Aa" 0$'.ril''{jR *,.,?.,.=:t
vC1, stage 1 cant vol .Jw
,.._.. _ `^'�'st' ..Y.'2 -, n��.'„: m t-`:z}�aF,'.'r Ys1*•,' �Klfta v-.='"F.��"� :�� .l�'`;."5 ?�-
tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
Q.. i .sx n+..". ..,,t ;�F' :9s�_ .:S.. .v: c..n.._.:: �:�i ,cw.:`+`1`. „s..ta. ;"'r:'.
cm capacity (veh/h) 538 521 863 528 520 834 1394 _ 1363
2�rre•'_"uCw�F•-y''�3�a �iiaroL's/ a.�`ii.- ,c"Ss7„Y� ~ '1 ~ems �t'R_5� •"'Ka.X•h.3;.
.i L i t~ r '/F "Cba,tA..L i z'__,:
Volume Left 5 12 14 1
cSH 608 526 1394 1363
y� �`• X19.; 1 x t :t S..o .A:v ., .a, -.
V .��acity ��(�3.e'�.a .T �' i—!,1bY�=�.St":ti.:�S,:A�2L.�ctg. ��' r:�'
Queue Length(n) r 2 2 1 0
�. r`I._�h`5','�ItISG�. ' 1.,J1 "xrt 6 y'L .-,`�4:F:r ,?r.✓!:.`"},FP�G` ic4. • ,h{y,^�_i , '"?" z )
Lane LOS BB AA
.. rkit .s.x._rs-E..4 .s; SY s Sry3 c>'.s5.'x".e -:_a<> -raZe :`=
Approach LOS B � B
� I'1t,(��•1'�t il.l'�tii,';)rlgn•+�.;i:� s,'`. :,d ' v+.c.s �' rs r y-^" ✓ ,.. ,:.an d:�-�� ,...
Average Delay 1.1
fnlerWU 515,, rty Utihz blank g4i;$:% .: CPU•-esite7 g$:97 v de.?, " r
Adams Road Property( LSC#021010)
2002 PM Background
Analyst,Alam SM Page 4
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 AM Total
1: WCR 6 & SH 85 11/21/2002
._
1 --► - , C ~ t 4\ 1 t \' j d
Lane Configurations 4+
ft r
Sign.Control Stop : P7 .; ree, r �,`.Eq6
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0"70
Vptpett veh/h).;, 10 • .-0 82 ,.41.::-.T;*:,,1 d5 'y' 42 ?;668 ,6 t' 8x' 1307 .i34
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 9.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 6.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92
Houjly flow_rate(Yeh/h).` 11 0 ,89 •/.,1,4§4 "1 Sa 46 a26 7 'r,:9:- 1421' ,''37
Pedestrians
*7_,e Mdttl (ft)' , l31 j?p ' Y yh _ .i :!1 btr y t
#x
Walking Speed (ft/s) "' a
P4 A5113.105.49§.;dockage- __ . k Ar ay yr,, r ` y.-H`
r .. tr ..,v7-Y_+:..'. i< ""E+k�% ., '..ASS
Right turn flare (veh) '" ' -
Illl4djat17%De`i„FeiS i x:; f,}0^B ' 5 �cj�l�y.' ;�'r� *y u[:-'?, .-+-! -'l <:.:' x
'4-.a:5d`r e-_1...k.eli tNi Lai,'g�.ieat..w� -Sga�i-`fuiTr�. -t'r�--•.S Trw"l 4`a.J'>kv.L�. . [ .
Median storage veh)
pfhc11P.9 pta'tlte -189892627 v7 0i ls$4 P-24 6331-58xx+. c TAIN :
vC1, stagQe�1 conf vol
. .q !- 0, f{tD1. -?'' t 7.✓ :`" y � YWbi K
- _ —Kt' war"W 11-0...412--3.52 : + .t. .,:.--
tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5;} ^`� 6 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1
tF (s) 3.5 4‘.t0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
id eg ! I 't -w71`F Q0 93 a'(gI 1 -*g. wpo. ti ox i
cM capacity(veh/h) 37 36 376 47 34 634 460 868
i c'aA 1"rh-".. 3.'S:F.f_3L+otgt a�i'W`.rs T3 f Miff.ftr.?.:i :te.pZ .iaL]e' a
1yligtgJaT ijO0 . .:2S', 6 363 t- 3,'Q 7 rieNA-,10-* _Z10:w r ;
0 t;..
4. -.:
Volume Left 11 18 46 0 0 0 9 0 0 0
1 Voltgrr.e FWOht _ :-:,.ii:-A39 >5: .}. t0x -to-; 2# 10 ?7:_°z;;[O st:A . OT m&7 t•:
cSH 190 57 460 1700 1700 1700 868 1700 1700 1700
VolumetoCapacity ",, 53,-544 ._;(')' 0171A.M.Sti2W1 ,AD:.# On1 . , 0`42_ Od2'PtQQ ` .:...
•
Queue Length (ft) 67 41 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
I CPtsAgfleiay(s)=;a 71ri46t4 N(99,.F..r- I'B, a0 U AMPS cd-9 0,_ .9 2_i";O 0 0 0 cy0: .-
Lane LOS A
App zkti Deipi2 ) ,`4?':4 a109 W3 0,;.8-- .+ ,3 glk7;,, at? 3�r "�s� sti s
Approach LOS E F `{`" "Z `' '
1)---:;‘tf f_Wir:?1—fl`f°l.-t"c �,ti itB r'₹ qY— M<� `$ 'v-71i4u� n � .7.. , I 1..
;L. .- s ra _4
Average Delay 3.3
)nte('secdon C44: Uttl¢2tien . , a`: 7°l0 w; Lally eTbFServlce`!Wir 1, '1,A,;+ Y .z c F r .i
It Adams Road Property( LSC#021010) 2002 AM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 1
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 AM Total
2: CR 8 & SH 85 11/21/2002
t 4\ t t 4,
Jf i1_ t h ;_,:
Lane Configurations 4. 4, r T? P
S gri entrol x, Stop Stop r � 1 p e
0% 0% 0 0
Grade 0%
%j°
r
V,o1u' I-INONti. ' 1 1_ ,0 32 ' : '0 >s 19AtYa. _•§31 31 z.1�r 1332>s :; t.
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 6.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Np flolk rate(veh/h) 1 1,+. """-0 35 ;686 34 17r; ;1448 -1
Pedestrians
Walking Speed (ft/s)
eTdetttABlg« ? ?t .: : 3
Right pr�y turn flare_ (veh) •' '" -"
M [[y]i %evs �' t`l0ne- r r- ... Re 9C`x ss".:. jai +b{ " '4 k.1 '.fit C sh..rB 4.
Median storage veh)
kgegin 119 I . S3 2097 724, L452:':'21I6MT 3 R'1449 Y:r " , , ?297&?. 'rep'_ -
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
.
tC, single (s) 8.9 7.9 8.3 8.9 7.9 8.3 5.5 5.5
_c_ •:J r '.YaF� t � . :w ZL ,r,.�~.
tF(s) 4.2 4.7 4.0 42 4.7 4.0 2.9 2.9
p&1,10 re e"°hnr &< 5 9:4, 1t-00
. . _
cM capacity(vehlh) 20 18 247 45 19 491 230 _ 545
Mf `Y .` tl''' 0v^•+�t't- �`i+ � Y'sit: ctg-r'',-.,(a� far".riWi5'c�P„s v r -. s , l
gt
vorimaj.z+ e'.r :. tj 5 t "k 4t3 . t t + . of K`t7W2*`s1"'tZ4 1 ,= z w.2 2 ..
Volume Left 1 35 3 0 0 0 17 0 0 0
Voly ii TrIbbL, i ;p ic ,0 :.,•:,,n ,Zt' 0k ,<-0,_:ii:VP °: i v;- . �v1 .�
cSH 19 68 230 1700 1700 1700 545 1700 1700 1700
X4Igrie to' 4apatAty triT BlA, ,01 :b 20 ø0 t04}32:a o3 '0:l3 g0 4.3 0,00
ii Queue Length (ft) 9 96 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Ccutop,. sy 2 y222S�1604; 2Q�, - ;0D 4 49d;t o9 & a ki.o ,430;•Fi i09 ;=- .;;;Z ,:_.:
Lane LOS F F C g
Approach LOS F F
Average Delay 4.3
In q.gfgtl a .1f tllrn[i3n 3z "-. % -f (:UC vgt'17 W0„r6e" :L. sA._° t `it
Adams Road Property( LSC#021010)
2002 AM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 2
LSCINCCS2-ST51
!
•
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 AM Total
3: CR8 & CR27 11/21/2002
. ,. , RIMMNAVIDNIMEYEEMEEF. - ,. .. . laa
Lane Configurations 4+ 4, 4. 4
Sign Qko1 Sfog r Stop Free' '' _. F
Grade 0% 0% 0% x0
1101ube,(vehfh` 6 u:ax � .g?F� ti8 ..41:r 24 6'. S..,4.,`f64::.:17.:"., ..:617.,Q,:!? :1,17-f;:;:,:21
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9-2 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.b2 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Noud,2 4wrate'(+7eftlh) 7 el5 2.4 a'^ 0 • ' 26 '7.; :r 7 s; 70 -5 5`r;:127 i:23
Pedestrians
gifffagirg}_:; ‘,.ell', n. :.;=x
pW(alllkkiing Speed)( (ft/s)
f A
}7'?in6iMi�+S14§2.i ', wa :'F: . .). 1= • v . e ::i-' J.r Js_
Right turn flare(veh)
tVleitel1 ' fka4 ` � � 4i.n x€ �w_ t�iz }``"x rr. t e
Median storage veh)
fl trq."� 54`: 38:.fi 3-q-: PiPB.�'eg e.'.,?2_W' 56 it „•} S 7 i rr^ C �-
vC1, stage e11 conf vol - _ �v.`�._ �, ,....r_.
gg }fl# YQt L'i f s s 4^3 ! i .'r T f it y +'. i ' l �+ t tl`.�
.+ N--+S' 4 f T t -FY"�>_' fin.
t(Ct,s�ingle (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.6 4.1 4.1
.f.Q..I la gilligi :'max F e::#... •,ili .i aii-M "1- w s y',sz e 3' '.f r + t_i +r
i
tF_ (s�)�.^� �5$ 3.5 _4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 y3 p7 �22z�� Y Y�J 2�2[g.`31...3.".geate..aa` Yrt�F.-..r`.��.u'S'.'^'� i�e•.d c b PI1. a i �; r_...:±'FiCgittt rare r1?.
cM capacity
Q(veh/h) 668 658 _�9_110� 647 651 894 11e4_31 _yy 1524
` .�y'gt�Zy�.ei7 9 i : y�/p��f±o ,72/��'WaCciil.....>. r.'T„t'�.e '..��Ysi Fayy"3!�Sggea,,Val" .;:ti....
ai t gagat Tc KK iS M S-53 T:�J`/''�-' 1≤ T—�. 1lF" 1'-i ti Ilj f?--Ii;Kfti
Volume Left 7 20 7 5 " ''
cSH/ _ u 7y(6y0�.} x}{6772 1431 1524 sa. - rte... `` "..:; `` '_ •1 ._
[k��ag� ry ] 'd if2 1 x -";: n-
� �aC�._t� V,` r. �.. ;�� .������ L` :�;+�;,� -����~�'� rr ; :i�.,��;_- 4 r .
Queue Length (ft) 5 6 0 0
Lane LOS w-.. ;Q '' ` m.. +..
Q �{ .f_ B B A A
-
{ a p`,S- l 44 1) ; ,X 3 .LO KIj`3^an' ITV SI 1/J rei `GF , Yf ':.1 ,. ...r
Approach LOS B B `
firgi ac)„-[:I,r3(tArgil .y ! � 'iy }}Gl n f Z r y -.✓^ >✓.>r
f Average Delay 3.4
I
t()tet, aPaY ? faa= s $9°Ice siGU Cev@Ipf Service A:: it, ,
s.
k, Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2002 AM Total
Analyst,Alam SM Page 3
LSCINCCS2-ST51
I
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 AM Total
4: WCR 6 & CR 27 11/21/2002
Lane Configurations 4. 4, 4,
SignGpntrbl .c, ?', St P Stop` F
Grade 0% ., ree: :.. Freeyr::...
0% 0% 0%
Vol'u;, rietyefl?2.:' 2 %---:':?:•;.2.,!..., t'15-',',,I.; .7 • 1 i•2 ,.4 :;f 77tv,.6 2 5,0 12trs_:.' 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 -0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
•
• Hop iyt,flo ,rate(veh/h) , • 2 2_- 16 8 >: 1 :2 4 84,'x. ; 2 .--,;,::20.1._:•132 ,, =11
Pedestrians
Lri2yWdtf`(ft), `
Walking Speed (ft/s)
P.0114:9-.1g.5)-O4.0.17 .°s,
Right turn flare (veh)
Aida $?::. n10f1E11rxsrss O e re kF KCIA' 3?M a J
Median storage veh)
1.SYi 1t Gins , r ;Tig c .,'" .: '
1/Q, fIidiiticfWb1? e. `7r`23J ' t 232 "'7'137-;::-M;i16',/- ('236 ..i85- 42 '-,fy r ;.1:-
yyv�C`1, stage 1 (cyonn(f}�]v{ol . = �. ,86;`y ..�. .r-
T[ iia�i i/..'y-'.•.+0I ;i: t ti-f�e'p�ii.. ✓ ✓ �.\ 4 ,4 f'vst ^•y S..La y v �iy_c5 -
,/-. C LIyL.i.YR�i D ".r'X'� P"C.<✓ �° i � .. .. .i.'.. S _rv�ti.Y�''.>'&?�. l�Y:h�: ,
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1
lG a�fs�;Mr ci 'c L o r-t n� r by 4 1
tF(s) 3.5 40 3.3 35 4.0 33 2.2 2.2
P ifireYr� Co n, =100 .:jQ._,P1B.I�syr e9."4 f.9� t00 + 00 ,._c . .-_.:ca 00 a , x ,-.-
cM capacity(veh/h) 717 666 912 690 663 974~ 1440 1510rEaSt } hv4`f ¢ti.��.. s.:#y": + Yt• �' �^* 10.'+/
-cYl'.�.'4 -sip `� ';-m. -.r,_ ail. :alit ,i tr';. a, 3-` };''�^�,,'' .,�� . .tl•
j fi 'fotar ;U 21 1,1, 96,K_g1427:&4i :, e . - rf<$ D. =x 7z7 ' 1�_
Volume Left 2 8 4 0 ' " ' ' •
1 fi)�tje`Right, , '46 ; 2 _ ' ,2 '-.° >: y • . ..,
cSH r 2 ,14 : ��> - 4yj f
854 729 1440 1510
V,jj ita3;apacdy 0,02 0 01 0 06° < 00 , t, a
Queue Length (ft) 2 1 0 0
Q§5: 61 aYS ` t93 '1tioltF'�.A4 `=00 >. WAel> i,s" } ... : e. ,�k_c�`:. . .
Lane LOS A B A
I. ApitoachD,,tay o ., :.93_ 40'0.. '50at :,...,,,,;.9.04. M'. .--: ._.-.r` _ -.u^a-; t .•
Approach Approach LOS A B
!ii zitsarg°i l t4�tirii1 t . i
_. -_. .'Pr ;v. F S •.a„��k t-�•.ra- A l fw. Y.1'r1. ''S
Average Delay 3. ,.
),rWireCeClidi Capacity-Utilization `YO76X:,' ICU..CeQiel o `Se. ice •? 7K aaC: = r
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2002 AM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 4
LSCINCCS2-ST51
•
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 AM Total
5: CR 8 &Access Road 11/21/2002
— ► 7 f— `1
Lane Configurations it 4 V
Cpntror Free ; Free; ' )off aU
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Votu ye11Rl N',_ r49t4.!? c w..._
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0-92 0.92 0.92 0.92
I-joucly1rgW(ate`'Svetvh) =41
Pedestrians
4fi'tj`e3VC!8tti( . P= ' °
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Right�+(ee turn flare(veh)
MY31.��9S:/:CY' Yt. v...w_ y gl• Cr��3Y32. ...n�� "Q%)T:t Y ✓.iZ:'.4f�... Q f: .f l�.d .an9.tt:E:r .. %4 Z,lii 6�Sla, ���':.:
Median storage veh)
` G �q l y
V 3.' .10W �1 Miir K },tl`fi,,`3 f77��J7y M,7::: iNPP. 3`.^.!1: Ifi "_'i :141th...tRgi .+�. A�-5�t- eti .}'yn'.-
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 4 -•''
t��.�.`.a 1591 �� �ie y
}:' " 'j �1 �„ .. 'ltr ) �siAnaL'+G�'�fc"1c'. ': , a �'� k-•- �.�,-�' Sa��r:�'..
tC single
,�,� ff _
(s)� 4.8 7.1 6.9
c
tF(s) . .. _ 1`fie .9
.;Gir.1 Q �• iIG''Y ''rt� :°. i..J _ .�i�s�.₹W . QI�1e�
cM capacity(veh/hi 1211 757 859
Volume Total 52 53 11 —'
Vo`'�a� sr 1 _ 'T o , •'AO. V L'-,4:.. r y g v 3 c� ' -y ..
`�!.L..i'SF."� ir -r - ,',L.._.. .. n.S...'S.'�zkx�,',+ '; ....:a.. '5 i - 1{.i.•. -.
Volume Right 11 0 9
CSHdr,*Mfrs �(� C�
'sew Volume .�r.03 12 0.00 0 0.01
�� to Capacity 0.03 j. t��
��".t4�.
Control Delay(s) 0-0 0.0 9.4
c 2
Approach Delay(s) 0.0 p0 r0 9.4
v
t 4ac�ilt.Q. ,t Ate :'elg2K r .iJr' t.irt ei#;;;-r
•- f �" ( 9fU 4Y�8 � f �'. i� ? \ x R4`y�t r a* -r2 » a sz,. r "s j. s.:g�. ("3 t _.._ ,U �� - e� a�.NiThrtfaailial'IatragniitUrgatenZinglefig "
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service ° `�
A
m,.<._; ti's.._. s ..; .....>L'tcE*.`:
r
Adams Road Property( LSC#021010) 2002 AM Total
Analyst,Alam SM Page 5
LSCINCCS2-ST51 g
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 PM Total
1: WCR 6 & SH 85 11/21/2002
Lane Configurations 4, 4. 1' tat A vi tt r
5 srorgookoLg'fi. _r-:- : : f,StQP. -: Stop, ,;,Free , .: L. ,_ : Ftee :'.'
Grade 0% 0% 0'% 0%
Vaiume(veh/h)_, - ,`44 1' _ ,45 ':- 14 'i:-4 - 9 62 1504 ' ,' 17., 6 :1;04.-",[,:71747
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Houd j!owrate-(veh/h) rjrie237 1 49 15 '- /4 • , 10 67 1;743' 18 -'7: 1012 18
Pedestrians
Walking Speed (fts)
Right turn flare (veh)
f ts...' E.. �ti _r: ,r None r ;_-' e :r, . c _
-e i t e ` NoneW tir ..�, ± ,,-. . . , 5 r `r� ' ` '.` :
Median storage veh)
g . g6.8)EG P1lU1T f� (Id3 92 50.&f 244T*a•`2922'�-872' Y630'! ' �C 762' Th{ <,':
vC1, stage�7y 1 conf� vol s
�%'�. ffilajjeet Val .tv?2-S 4 { 1 Ze.TM .`t:fi `eiP6_$ w :Sa r4 f,` 7N,r4W'�vb}-We -.. :. 3�"a+W - �S'x e£ .^x.35 .
ttC, single (sy) ' 7.5 6.5 69 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1
:s's-:._S Ae` :v.:3rki,.�S.Y='iJSt €X a.,c .; :f.i-',Wimow^di:- ci-j4'.. ri .,t'� ;;;:::_� 1 K'.,. � r--:;. . ,.
tF (s�)� 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
PORffe iraiaz s ?DM 2ak1;e3.�Sgl a�= le:W,te ty ' s" x.,'r4� ' '98 s
cM capacity67Q� <.r f F_, t.. :: ,x
� (veh/h) 22 _ 13 512 12 13 294 670 351
'�; -�,q }' ls i---+e r+s + nit--
e,a' :.rz 'fi. ,e, ix3F X2. r•S.iT. .lt'''abli-l;:.2'a "w it
�to(U M`A. 87s`r. g 7s x'87 2 x87 • `18 .9ct1,2h3%506,*x'506 $Fse�-i1 `gtV YN Volume Left 37 15 67 0 0 O 7 0 0 0
Y: .V dghtg^rgc G9 -/S:02.1.14' 9,} Qr ,ags4 8rei '.o, -v r:0 ' F 98 k
cSH0 1700
ti sr
46 18 670 1700 1700 1700 351 1700 1700 1700
? QG?. Yts- .Vir"(,'' ,9x:: ;0fi"IQgx.a;5f v t)i51 N ea o1 "Sb,'iVA0p0 ,0 30;. 0 0: . :,c
Queue Length
@rt r'(ft) _ ��{220 102 8 0 0 70 1 0 0 0
i. ,cafifral:Dai• g9"�,''lZt4 ::-s f i,9 , � U.rt-,
Q aa- 3u1)Y.M'�5't`S.zi'.x'Q o; )o ot lr 0 0�; C.�Y rir::
z
Lane LOS F F B C
s "
t ' e(a )
LOS y a 8 9 '771 4 k Q 4 `, w pL31: _'fi _ t'
ApproachF F
s atC ...0 S •. .. is A:; S1/ .:4•.z?.A 4.. ;.ra.�.i &.li •1/.1/:12 is y > '
Average Delay 25 2
tt Inter eetSt utp-X irzcitt gtlor{, r , -•6§ti£a%ak ICUL`evelrof Se-ace-M 'vg;--41;gt3 -.
Adams Road Property ( LSC #021010) 2002 PM Total
Analyst,Alam SM Page 1
LSCINCCS2-ST51
3'
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 PM Total
2: CR8 & SH85 11/21/2002
Lane Configurations 4,
SJg41n=0M tv±tt ` ,Stop._. " . ,-:::!:rsOrz.•; -* -.rztree ; Z flee , ,
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
;t61 s( 4 ` i 1c2; rs4'4 ' ..M,t§c. ?;�2_ )_J7 .4 4,536 _85 .- 36
'9 ,,. _A_
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 �0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9.2
licig owtate(veh/h) 1 '?` i�'4 :. 47.u :¢ . ;18; : 1A:4=4,970,,4;::9-2;W46 1011 4
Pedestrians
26§M Li e
Walking Spe�'ej�d(�ft/s)
Ptga amfYey-1..t1i : .t. ,( a S.'vlieit k�.•.Ah w S "..`c _T '�„ .. r _(-
Right turn flare(veh) ""
!1+ r6 t f ice.':tiNan:.:91 r ,( 661.A. gete ::r O
Median storage veh)
gaiT,c r alg e's1190y n MS-M2g r 26-35 r n P.
v�C1, s'a{{t�aa�7g;ggeyy1��.�coyn�f vol
{tC,, single(s) 11rt 8.9 7.9f, 8.3 8.9 7.9 8.3 5.5 5.5
f.g.I.uv :g§.`sY:t..>(-_ -Z E4"k, T XY 4W'� ,'aoi ;;'4_::z.t,i. .r'a y�sh ns.. .. K
tntFF1}�(((s')' y�p��{py 4.2 4.7 4.0 4.2 4.77 4.0 2.9 (y 2.9
rvul: ..T.:5ii of W ?iffAa;S VglE:, J-tfe�i. i 3g.:P. .f. S4 ,4- ; 6:4.. "'t{m
' cM capacity(veh/h) 12 5 367 6 6 202 385 157
Nfinfieufv
gg-W .bl.l; t 'c;g rl..38:x e �" $35 .18 {92 • 16 05 `�?51:Kiers4 ':, - .
Volume Left 1 �17 4 0 0 0 16 0 0 0
5ld1a ttit).t4-: r_a Ze4i g1g . ' A\s.,p, L• t 92a::. 0 : �.,. . ii.icf0:"� i4 Y _
cSH 15 12 385 1700 1700 1700 157 1700 1700 1700
!Mto ag-4-6 ? i A 3.47. O1,a,6 -9 d9'e 0.05 l04K03pNNP0" }0D0;Z4- ::
s Queue Length(ft) 32 Err 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 0
_ ill s Ygf 399 s $grr' %: 4"4 z304),T A 0 o 30 5 r 0 0 r 0 0' r0 0 =
Lane LOS •F` . F: BR :_.,__ v .. �Q _ s ,
r Efio J'aagtt.{i 4 439c=2jY'°yt^�5PP ' F_ •da '_i',Ist».�.:......-:A Jrwv'`.::`'F._r1"..t: : �s"...,n,.i,
i Approach LOS F F
i..
riirifq:`,Flia _` i-iii C^ _Y ; - .. ri, ,i,s
� _ . Ch. ee� � a. •:. ."_e. r .. V♦, t ;.c:S"A- '-q:;'.rl ... r!9'? a ;• C=s 3.--t¢xs
Average Delay 135.0
)n[ersgPrRaga tyUtl f#Oi u Sfi '# < `n ICU Leaet o(Service ` Ttl " ;'A;;=
t
b Adams Road Property( LSC#021010) 2002 PM Total
Analyst,Alam SM Page 2
LSCINCCS2-ST51
6
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 PM Total
3: CR8 & CR27 11/21/2002
C 1 T iig��' T' aq� l rb
Lane Configurations
S)gp.b jtrol .Stop.` ',_ .
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
1.0_:
Peak Hour Factor 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.9-2 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 L 0.92 0.92
H2w llpvtrate_{fretJh): 57 "`29 13 , '15 15," 11' 7 'X182 26 14 .= 165 : :13
Pedestrians
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Right turn flare(veh)
MNierelto ;x m a Nig�or x Npne
Median storage veh)
$- 1 ri bm0 er^ . 42c 42:1' z'172,'? 35 '+ 41 , 'f95 51' v7 ,v..'>; I7,d8 n J a'i
y�a!{A�
vC1, stage 1 conf vol ' ' "' __ `' -
1�fi€df �l .' ram.: ' � `T.:' r ,�3`•-. 4�.}�A. :,' 'rF'.' - °- -,.. :,:
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.6 4.1 4.1
tF((sf) 35 40 33 3.5 4.0 3.7 X72.2 2.2
R��t ilfe lr, a-,1. !$9{?xv54."
cM capacity(veh/h) 513 516 872 495 521 759 1398 6 g� �1�3663, mac?
—
~',w ,:�,.�7� it g : - ire.3TatnY "�s4h O.455VeZ-w`i
f
t r 4".1y!yyjh t; 094y�;EX:c` :gi r.2 i� 1).1A ( ₹ ID ly' `Yc •+•~FSS:7-1..�S�--:,' (•,'rya x J.L�Y nJ��i. YRO. .nom) � �aLf�.'r•]_�y .`r�.....�92Y tea?.,.:.. • M a4 . ..S�J�.�:N h`�h.n r-S4
Volume Left 57 15 7 14
cSH 544▪ 556 1398 1363
yolcirie d�Ca a i ;'��0.18• AQ 0"64 p0i' — -' ;w s
( Queue Length (ft) 16 6 0 1
r r �N..k3',: �w• , .k: �w 2 k.-.:- j
� Al " �r 13 =12.0'6 -cicf d klai.9 ...:.c -r'tr't - . A_:=''..
Lane LOS B B A A
Y12:4' "'`,"0 3- ��;:O b
Approach LOS B B
'� __nt�z'j f:#I E;t5 ISM s ✓., ai by t a-'- 4.r t} a.. n. +-t 't)s'. -tea
_- -��^�-rxt+.�_i...:�..r�sa �.,.r ,.� __..n,i:.Y.�a.......�i`ep,`-�,�'Sc...���=°*rscr.: >=�.�-,�•ti�,"3z
1 Average Delay 3.6
hi(efs2 ofi gacity t40.#TJOh:}ax 31 et K ECU Levels service;4a e . -'q �r -
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2002 PM Total
Analyst, Adam SM Page 3
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 PM Total
4: WCR 6 & CR 27 11/21/2002
-
Lane Configurations 4. 4. g. 4.
Sign:C9j of ,Step Y %Stop ;'tee. . : : Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume(vihlhy' _ ` 5 • T5 *5 4.f.,%11414M:::;;3 O 73 :189 z 2 1 163 `:12
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hot flOw ritetyitt/h),. 5 5 5 i° 0 14 , 205 r ;r<2 1 17 % 13
Pedestrians
LaneWdfh
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Pe[f ent$fockage, ti_ }s $ .,z� z . .. -
Right turn flare(veh)
Median storage veh)
vC afln Jfi t14 ;'422 M44P2 5.]S4'- Qg,, '427 20. r t90; " ` I aca— ,b,c ,;.
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
(q?2t 5fag1 t� OI
tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
.;,;..4,0;!.,-,7,;*,.
tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
cM capacity//' ��it� (veh/hi 535 518 859 524 514 834 1384 1363
4=-i]C_Y' •'t�: : .. V $ �Rh6 i rtk wf`t�F5w ,.ux••t- k ..
- [�a2�w�`v��''" z+a.. ..�...uct...JTi
P•i=• f't'7lfK '217:-.::P r4;� i'I �t` CI k -"s.7, r• ✓ -.
�TPi7c�ril��$y!!``iiMWMA-'`mss c3_1S i S' ; tom. ._`a - !fit stiintei Fb . :
Volume Left 5 12 14 1
cSH 604 522 1384 1363
Voltlikaa G`?ptn?7D,03 402.0.1; T dF)f 5zOt0<0. ' ;.:. ,t . ; _' '..: ° :` ;717;;;L:137.1:
Queue Length(ft) 2 2 1 0
OODY9l aj! 4xi:111 iZ l E.ggr 0 9R : ,'
Lane LOS BB AA
Approach LOS B B
f !- �p'g'��•'�I(!ts(- �... i-y„ r -rX 1 .r:4i /"� vrc:' a -.•_ 's ],.J K.x ._. �,.�'.
3.3.r}3�ih-��e�C_r.�'-!¢.,i= •___..?s.�..a:; .�..�.._.,....,-���.��v=..S H 7�_•azG.-?z:�i'i',:"�m ,..a. .. ..Laaati..v.
Average Delay 1.1
Ingifi.et, o + ,..EgittVAlVafloP ,,;`34:7d;n7,?. _dCCl`LeVel`ofServlce q. ' .,'
Adams Road Property( LSC#021010) 2002 PM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 4
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2002 PM Total
5: CR 8 &Access Road 11/21/2002
C ~ 4 P
Lane Configurations fi 4 V
Sign:Ckntrbl Free 1 !Free::. 'Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Vo i hie(xehft . . . 92 0? z 0.; 33 .2 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
1-1.0r tty fIotatd(v2hlri) '100 ;11`. Q' 36 ` 2 9
Pedestrians
Lat1C-. Ia ftgpr' r• • ; w
Walking Speed(fUs)
Right turn flare(veh)rat
_iltIg i .w s .trt Y/ 'z 4 r' y -,�:_ t ,�y.-. r....:
taR il..b"va1t3..�';.c�.J _ Lb�:z.�1�� '-. k4.�'��Qne . _.'.F33w`:�i u�w�-...'�\ i..F,..d��L9iK'�i-X`�.��s� .t-s2?'?:i
Median storage veh)
v,/C1,Cs�taa�ge 1 cent vol%
•M :TOn7` .a. a' of 2•� <i^ a :Li ZXx� -ii.} I.:1x N..i. c."-x. eA _ ,.j' ."�u,S�s1 a •:
yt/C,,�'siinngle(s) 4.8 7.1 6.9
tan-10'; at .n-t:::G { "�+.','�₹rt'tJ�Y..v`.... Y`•. .9*' -r_>A?�. "�` z �2 1 r r..
ttF(s�)� _j (2 8 4.1 3.9
bl O w!.9C.i
cM capacity(veh/h) 1146 715 792
Volume Total 111 36 11
5 d Ie. r e 11417,9' a, �'xLp��.zi t.
Z.)... .v:'vk r..,�...n...a... 2L_ -`F `:.--:C' ... ..... _V. _._. ?nF�[:. a. . •lam`•.
Volume Right 11 0 9
1xnzf'vs% 4:.
Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.00 0.01
ggP1eM . . 'u.,.i' t ,Y. : . . r .`v . 'H3a` •y �"li �,x Via.-„_ �.-. " •.
Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.7
`: �.1t�.�i�-.,.c s' l .:.
Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.7
�rG , ri z Stri INI -�\. h r. t
��Jsex�.i�s v=r .?1:+t Y„�s(:c.Y...,_. a.aw
Intersection Capacity Utilization 15.9% ICU Level of Service A
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2002 PM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 5
LSCINCCS2-ST51
•
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Background
1: WCR 6 & SH 85 11/22/2002
NIWWWWCWgillgjaMilWattPaglEgingVARSJIMISAIMIR
Lane Configurations 4. 4, '1 TT r ) ft r
IdeafFfovfveppp t_1,900 190,0 ,1900`-1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 i 1900 1900 1900;__1900
Total Lost time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
LanetUhl`Factor X1:00 ;1.00,. 1 00 , 0.95 1:00 " 1.00 ,c-.E95 ; __1.00
Fri 0.88 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt?rptected ;_ _ ;Q99 , 0.97 0.95=;1 00 ..1:,00 0;95 ..1,.00„;;,1:'00
Satd. Flow(prot) 1640 1757 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
PJ Permitted '._ fi ' ' ;7y01,..98, ' ' ' ` :-.0:8:7,. ,_:!:,0,06.';k:-.4i00 '' 1:'00 032 '1,00 ,1;00
Satd. Flow(perm) 1610 1569 110 3539 1583 417 3539 1583
Volgrmle_Y.PC1: dt's ' h. 10_. -&5•uit-85. ±H-<10. j;..-1;§.;:i.... 5. !15, _ 990„_,:;10 ..;4lkii'1960, 2)-05
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
C4i y:,'...., w i 2...a..'ci���.''$44.:,it5��»9.1i1A76 1,g'. ,t.law't.°�. i1_04�-1.3$
Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 108 0 0 21 0 49 1076 11 11 2130 38
rit"[G ighi ` r Penn 5it '_ t- w .°Perm, :^s'c,'9, K `Pmtp('s_,,,1 3ElAO.1pm*pt-: „`:W_ Perm_
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
,e"ff d -h4s 4 , (Bk " 2 ' t:;`k ,'3" 2 II.ti'r?:h. 5,::c4,14. 6
Actuated Green, G (s) 16.0 16.0 72.0 -68.0 68.0 72.0 68.0 68.0
Ei Ctly errh'('5) 416x0)• =46:0 ;`.72:0 ','68,0 ealp 730 ,c68 0 ;_68.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0 16 0.16 0.72 0.68 0.68 0.72 "0.68 0.68
C(earan8G me'(s')= c:- "";4:0.x- ' ,' •;T4:0 " . r 40 :ci 4,0 .54:0 ,4.0",44'0" 444,0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 258 251 146 2407 1076 354 2407 1076
tIALW_;ript.„W. . t.. ,-e- Y _ `r"C001 X030 _'�'- 0''00> x060 Rf
v/s Ratio Perm c0.07 0.01 0.23 0 01 0.02 0.02
V',:e.S t10 :��ri " , r4 42': 0.08 0.34 =.0.45 0_ ,01 0,03?;,0_,813 0.04
Uniform Delay, dl 37.8 35.8 17.7 7.4 5.2 4.5 12.9 5.2
Progtession,ED—a4 1,00 - _ 1100,,. 1.00 ` 1 00 ; 1.00 ''11:00 , 1t00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 4.9 0.7 6.1 0.6 0.0 0.2 5.2 0.1
Delaytgs l -"x . • 42.7 .36:4 : 23,8 8.0 ..z.-5'.2 4.7 18.1 5.3
Level of Service D D C A A AB A
dip e1a'. '.O 47x7' -I. :T.?: -36;4, - .8-p •?-..: '. A178 .
i' Approach LOS D D A B
f _ a . .
HCM Average Control Delay 15.7 HCM Level of Service B
;GRIME(
, E( itto;ga alalty fatlo `mp 78+,; .eaj`fitt 4c} t.:,t"j".z ., -::4 p i n i -
Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0
I l2. -i-ocfio,y,, aigety Utilization 72 9%. I_CU:Levelof Service `C .
c Critical Lane Group
Adams Road Property ( LSC #021010) 2020 AM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 1
LSCINCCS2-ST51
6-
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Background
2: CR 8 & SH 85 11/22/2002
C '\ t `►
Lane Configurations 4, 4, ft r ►) ft
siosorierL. Stop'
Grade 0% 0% 0°/0 0%
Yxalut�'eSve(U.. 5 5 -s ,5. • : 20_
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly dw#af&'{yeh/h) ", 5 ;,. 5 81. 22 ! 5 '.1;033 27 _- 16 > 2172 ; 5
Pedestrians
Larieia ', ' ,.
Walking Speed(ft/s)
Pe a-XiD Y
s..�..- - .Ai�. .'.�:�1Wa'.� l; t�T�i.+i. _ . ..^ ._ ,�.. -,�� � `�r>Y. i y., _.. . ;. ._ .__ _. -.
Right turn flare(veh)
)11t4f2 tie-+24}'9'- 4�:' -4.4ZNbn2nrit',ajklailtlone„�&tgt:a .z SY-t,raa*.i-i3�'�C..., _..._.
Median storage veh)
- ; h .4 :itirr& 758ig2.70131.086:% i�.p,,,�.263ax, jstri21t7 r ' j'fid60 . t
vryC11, stage 1 conf vol ry
.��`-1S-J
tC, single (s) '8.9 7.9 8.3 8.9 7.9 8.3 5.5 5.5
tF(s) 4.2 4.7 4.0 1 4.2 4.7 4.0 2.9 2.9
_
cm capacity(veh/h) 0 2 127 0 2 360 95 366
x c- - s T a.., .r ..: y liAta? •
'a'4.'ht -ay... _rn;5?"i Y'td1,�4`�.•.
•)9 x Lr..tl' 1b5+�! i ' :�3fL'k.i'�i'. '..�Tw2 �.
P
L.
Volume Left 5 38 5 0 0 0 16 0 0 0
cSH 0 0 95 1700 1700 1700 366 1700 1700 1700
Vol _%1 WWaty.' . Ef_ .Sgrr f;U6,4n 3Q1/2:71;O 3Q 'c0 02 ,'0,Q,4 N.O Y ` 4i?$12 00 r,
Queue Length (ft) Err Err 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0
Cbti ►fief +is ' " _.`Errs Ejrke4S4 _o1p ''tT.o 't,UQ K 5j'32 (i0 ,4t0.0; , < 00,
Lane LOS F F E C
( Approach LOS F F
Average Delay Err
Lnt eft7C1apacity Utiliiatfon " . 71( 1% •=. 'tCU CgveTofServi5e`F,* .r t `C.
•
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2020 AM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 2
LSCINCCS2-ST51
D -
i
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Background
3: CR 8 & CR 27 11/22/2002
--► ♦ ♦ '— ` 4\ t t `► 1 41
Lane Configurations 4. 4. 4. 4.
Sign.;ControTi t :,-Z S fop_ , ` .:Stop . .. 'Ftee, .5i'.�c ... Freer;','
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume.(veU1h) z '-'..::;:t-10 X20 Hc':•-;-A5:••• 20 :25 ii, 10, 10 _':' 96 - 15 `, , 5 18@, : 25
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
HQ)irll flowjate,(vehm) - 11 x_22 46 „22 27 ' - 11 . 11--. 104 ; `'-5 _ - ,5' 196 ,27
Pedestrians
LaheM i tt (ftr.> ; : • .. . "a ,•:.N,
- Walking Speed(ft/s)
I ent ckage 35 . ._, _ ''_'. . , ' . . . . _ ._
Right turn flare(veh)
,-.x, gi r .',-� .... 2 i^,r r 3-.. 3. 4 ,t -..
_ _ �._:'�3'. NQQ��. :e'n.�. �:'?c��et7e'�h�.«'r�i,=..%. ...... ....�, x 7.._.y.• a+�`S�'���^r�i�-..v-;-:•:d
Median storage veh)
1/q, nTii tIn Firithgi ... 73 ._ 52 - 09,'t"X76 ` 62-ri_': Ot"r22$ :ti . ic" 1110 a ti
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
. i5A. _.. _... __'h xa':L`.v lti. fTt i75.X2h?��S:Y�>•..k r tnr ;ai 3�En�-,Yµl' F ,<. `
tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.6 4.1 4.1
tC )it.ObE " t ::A" 3:'. 'i1 dx.r 's.xrrAi.;sf,'~E' F .-'2-:iS .' z
tF 5 4.0 33 35 4.0 37 2.2 2.2
p0:f§tie- ) t98_ 9b` .s90l�' '`9. St rya F�"F g9E. -5J9a, v y;t ric. t ` _
„� „- 1.p0
cM capacity (veh/h) 550 566 831 548 558 853 1346 1480
p �+
,,C Y` 0 T `+7�f' �.:35''s '. • t`'J` �" .t `` �s:..' T` '"'`4iti .:z, x•.
i.-. .,6 _... ...�r�"i-YY..r..2w ?'ll • ��4$c r .i �Zd;4 C.�='�l_rJ. ..`s.. 7t 1�Yc]. . .. .
fcrairL?h_ 11t;at+.-e._`2 4✓ titi'`"^'1� 'i_r_i(�iF�,:v' � g.s_t:>'S�' ca=t{aeta;s:to_-t�V� `-i'-` .≥• t-21�'kti4
tie 1t �,yrj r Y». v,r4>K.11 ':+Vic.. . tdY7"n," v i . "-;y',.'
�7c11t�me�b,�al"��s'i,.3�49 v-�t)f"i�ru`l ••�,ay`L�2$ r r'c�^h� o_ •,c�,.i F ., _ i4 -v,-�Y .-Y�.mi�"i'�F .
} Volume Left 11 22 11 5
t Sgl1O1:9;Rl9D. 16,2'::A . :' . 6 c4Zis4- -; ' . , :p,.
{ cSH= 629 592 1346 1480
yolyll„OOV WCJty ,ED Q8 0& 0 > . 1 , 4:0 .`' , ..4.51
Queue Length (ft) 6 8 1 0
Cbn(ro1 -arO r ., : t4 2 i1 s ' kS a ,;`,01 .. .Jt _ t. , _,
Lane LOS $$����♦ BB A A
ApCc�oa��o Ai yyyyy��(ota :{}, 1 2Z St1f, :.,&,�€`Q;B.r`; .r i.. .•�� .-Rs n.r •c. ♦ .t.?A1 . Si ....1;`x.'4 '
Approach LOS BBr B
111Ckt--t�''nit' $giii.i 1- ,V-V .3...,. c 1/9 a -; A c.4. - \ .r i' 5c i R i!;w `A-..
I Average Delay 3.0
i tptersecG9'97CapaddytJtdi atwn y t '23 b/y 7 JG4LLevel,ofgeryicer if ' zA
i
t
k, Adams Road Property( LSC#021010) 2020 AM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 3
r LSCINCCS2-ST51
b
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Background
4: WCR 6 & CR 27 11/22/2002
,v 1�t � �nn•.At NI _
Lane Configurations 4. 4+ 4. .j.
SignGontrol ' Stop Stop °"Free "Free
Grade 0% 0070 ... 0% 0%
Volume veh/h 5 =`5 • 15 10 K.5 _5; 5 120:, 5 5 1$5,_₹:$ 5
Pea
Pe Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hoiir(yflow rate(veh/t)) 5 "5 '16 ,, 11 .v_ 5 • 5
Pedestrians
Iano Width km :
Walking Speed (ft/s)
.$ _.. . . .
Right turn flare(veh)
N�eliian 'rte`.; t None, t r'NQQe
Median storage veh)
it nflicfitTg`4r�`kWni *'X67 "361 204 'k Y378 t 4'`, 133 re 207.: �? f c` 136
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
tF(s) 3.5 y0p 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
pU,,;t.eucfte�,'O ien@k l9. iir7.{' g4WPnu E W.a100 �•'s'_`. ,?ts�u`�. 2:1 1T1D.F..: S_._
cM capacity (veh/h) 578 561 837 561 561 916 1365 _ 1448
K.?.j. 'tq �S+'i 'S-r4 trey{` etl*, c i v t i- a It -t "' ;
`A'J.ra--� 'FV_ r..:.u���3_SX.�hY�.,�`..rni2i 1Y.'Ja�?�`^\ra�Yf�'.3"rC ,1��au.i3�'SF�i�M��3�:.c�•L.. v«v t:
VOlum y dtaT"'.??`i, r... t v» ,f +�T�`$'. t cS :44 :�.�'b'�3##i ?X''V1-s $':
g _._..:`� 22=s� F1�1 `232 .��.C�',.� ,�. 4ti°+�� ,, <� ��} .� y r�-�.t� _ . . ..
Volume Left 5 11 5 5
VQlumeRrght_ 16 _ "X5Y.
cSH 705 621 1365 1448
Queue Length (ft) 3 3 0 0
CdiStf. betay.te) ` <10 3 1l`.°
Lane LOS BB AA
�xpP 6ac�ibelpY ls� c . 10 3 11 0: q � .v ' _ x•Approach LOS B B
Average Delay 1.5
n'tWCion apacittrafg 6ot5 ,t;' s 22 06-6;" `A. 51CCisP: , l or /rinse h,.r A N • +sue 3 ,
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2020 AM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 4
r LSCINCCS2-ST51
i
L
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Background
1: WCR 6 & SH 85 } 11/22/2002
11 •— t `\ I t \► ♦ 4/
Lane Configurations 4. 4, ►) ft r >S TT r
IdeaJFlow',(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 ' 1900 =1900 1900 1.900- 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util Factor: 1:00 1.00 1.00 :0 95 :;'1 00 ,1.pO' 0.95. '1.00
Frt 0.93 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
, FIt Protected 0.98 0.98 • 0;95 : 1 00 1.00 0.95 1,00 .1.00
,
Satd. Flow(prof) 1694 1725 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
FIt,P,ermltted 0.87 . ,-0:89 0:12' 1 00 1:00 .;006; , 1.:00",1.00
Satd. Flow/perm) 1507 1570 225 3539 1583 106 3539 1583
Vgjume(yppLc, _ 35 ••: 5 , 45,: 10 ,“ •,i; ;10 L65 ,2395 .'20 ..-.11.540...-.1400,..,:.-:'-20
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Ads .Ig3r _ _ =38 , -45 494& 11 ' '5 1:; ? 7 msg2$03'y, :2 w '11'R 522 i ,22
�. te1'� 1 r . 1
Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 92 0 0 27 0 71 2603 22 11 1522 22
T rn7 epe.,ss .`;;e. Perm :r7, .: 95-»_, term ' .. ' pm+pt i't r'Peim pmpt--•:% erm
Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6
Pg jjtfed Phases , -t 4 _' 8 'C `s li 2 c. 6 `6
Actuated Green, G (s) 14.0 14.0 74.0 70.0 70.0 74.0 70.0 70.0
Effe`r tjve Gre!?h-,g• s):, 14,0 '> ;44.0 74:0; ;...70.0 X0;0 -74`.0., .;,70,0, 70.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.74 0.70 0.70 0.74 0.70 0.70
C)e ancOrTftne:{ f -. - • 4.0 -4;4:0 . .: 7'40 1;`40 ;;i4°0 40'-` 40 ';4:0
Lane Grp Cap(vph) 211 220 228 2477 1108 145 2477 1108
vfs I3 atl4 tsrbt7:r: :'-'. .:•17->"::-..:::t.` 7-2::'..:-..-''. - ,cool 'c0 74 0.0 �0 0 43 .
vas Ratio Perm c0.06 0.02 0.22 0.01 0.05 0.01
glcfRat!p'as ;._ 0.44 '^ . 0;12 0.31 =',1:05 '0".02 008 061 ,:_0.02
Uniform Delay, dl 39.4 37.6 6.1 15 0 4.6 46.4 7.9 4-6
Prime[-esslon.F@ctor, '100 , 1.00 1.00 _'21.00 1.00 1.00 1.0Q. 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 6.4 1.1 3.5 33.2 0.0 1.0 1.2 0.0
D01ay(s 45:8 3$.8 , ,, 96<< 48 2 4.6 47:4`: ;9.0,-„. '4.6
Level of Service D D AD AD A A
App€each Ue1ay,(s)_ 4S8_ • , , •'• 38:8 ;i ?46 9 ;z9...:3.::;-,.
i Approach LOS D D D A
s . - , 7i
HCM Average Control Delay 33.4 HCM Level of Service C x
RC,cr1au, fiig914.0yratio ;.;-1...s:--;, .,rOt92 ; "
} - r'a`. 3+262; b1 ..'°�: -, -_�.•; -,:,±-5...',;,':.
Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Sum of lost time (s) 120
Intersection Capacitf':Utilization . 94.3% • ' -ICU Level:of Service ,;`< =,E ` .,
c Critical Lane Group
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2020 PM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 1
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Background
2: CR 8 & SH 85 11/22/2002
c '- 4\ t p \ 1 -/
Lane Configurations e1', 4. 'i tt r 'i +1' r
Sgr1,�C0rltrol ` Stop •
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
yo101'10 vetvh)., 5 5 5,; 20 5 " ':15 5 ',2505 y,` :`80 X15_ _J§,?*•;1: 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Houma flow rate(veh/h) 5 5 , 5 22 :=5 16 5 .'2505 %-:87 16 5"1516 °-, 5
Pedestrians
Lane wiidut,(fl)
Walking Speed(ft/s)
Percent$IQckagC
Right turn flare (veh)
Median storage veh)
.let nftictiigriWiiie `2832 .41.52' '758 33f5 737' 253. `7, ,5°' „ 2592 : ,,, _,
vC1, stage 1 conf vol s
vO2z a�e2mnfvol ?v
tC, single (s) 8.9 7.9 8.3 8.9 7.9 8.3 5.5 5.5
tF(s) 4.2 4.7 4.0 4.2 4.7 4.0 2.9 2.9
71 cM capacity(veh/h) 0 0 232 0 0 93 211 56
��__'. X-:.� H.. `SiV'X tae7A` y tR 'Fa*E's f:.:t " yr y s p
'?;E5 -.t'.^Ic�L�. .�;t.�3`:-�"�'�`: -.=xt�{T.i�.d3';"iu...3:F�h�.'vilw:..��.a:�.��' ..�� ��m�E��:�Y.L-'£Y..;4'AaC_. _
I 9
Vo1i 1 tal;
Volume Left 5 22 5 0 0 0 16 0 0 0
V..�.,�..9lutilce9,....1 ht
. ....t:. r . ._ .d td'. .�7:: ".�#`. i �:i•' _C+� ..
cSH 0 0 211 1700 1700 1/00 56 1700 1700 1700
otitrti@ .Gapacity
Queue Length (ft) Err Err 2 0 0 0 25 0 0 0
co f aroelay{s). Em { 1x 22 5 s 0 0 , 0 O ..0 az 3 0 a b�0 A:O 5 0.
Lane LOS F F C •
F
f �PAfdac�i,DelayCs) Erzcr- "p0x + *i "]�ggl�4na � 7 'Approach LOS F F
{
Average Delay Err
:101: Upn P.apacdy 41Wiaratio(1 4 .LI9 3% _ IC f ever S6-11*,r9' ,_ ', C
Adams Road Property ( LSC #021010) 2020 PM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 2
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Background
3: CR 8 & CR 27 11/22/2002
C t A\ 1 P ► d
Lane Configurations 4, 4+
Sigh h.Control Stop :Stop' ' Free Free•'
Grade 0%0%0%0%..'
Vali rpe(veh/h)_; 55 30 5 •15 15` s 10 . .10 .-255 25 .:15 ' 230 15
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hour(yflow,fate`(veh/h) ,60 , '33 .5 _ 16 =16 • 11 11 277 t27 ,46 -
Pedestrians
LaniWdth(ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Pecce t Blo !sage£ • <:
Right turn flare(veh)
Medea at
Median storage veh)
Vim'-6.'4111c(lf \toluene
vC1,, stage
1 conf vol
VCt !-< g7i4« 0Rf V01 -`''.; a 3,..,.aYe, .T•s'�`- i,.,,^g < <u" �'f _ t .?,� a `�i+.+:'^
a. �4�> x'% .. ;s'.:.?9i�t•'F � •.+3 .t~•ti< `n :.-``_ trh,�':_ 5��.,_bc :-':
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.6 4.1 4.1
to ,t49.4(s) . _ .. a:1- r- r '!. X t�2�k;'y. +.. '1 t ..,
tF(s) 3.5 40 3.3 35 4.0 3.7 22 ' 22
cM capacity(veh/h) 374 397 780 364 400 667 1298 1256
ilol " {a�� t4 ,ITI ,g .j8` "QQ3' `+3 5 i g s x '� gn ywy 7 r t42 ,E ,7 t�iiz
�wY�1' 1[tY.'4 w r�E Sa +t�J.cS,t� � c�i't'� .rY. ew;<_� �"'.`tE �_. � .k1��S s .Y"�r: � t�E,h�a*
Volume Left60 16 11 16
cSH 393 427 1298 1256
- uG 1r
•.>3 ,.�" - _-;:j6:0-1 1.
Queue Length(ft) 24 8 1 1
Gontra1 Dei?f(sfl <. 7,2� d`yAX r f 3 "i}6
Lane LOS CB A A
A201€4414-9:0,M1.7
Approach LOS C B
Average Delay 3.5
InterseF�f rt Capacity UtilizationOg5°I + ' 1G{�[e'vgi ofSzsrvice rf A? a rT Y �c •
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2020 PM Background
Analyst, Alam SM Page 3
LSCINCCS2-S1-51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Background
4: WCR 6 & CR 27 11/22/2002
f --► - T ` t 4\ t t `► 1 4'
•
Lane Configurations 4* 4+ 4+ 4+
Sigij'Con'roh* .' Stop;` `Stop; r Free Free""
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
WpitifrAl,etb.]:' '`� 5 15, ,. 5` 15 ::;5 :,:5` ;15 - ;'285-.'",..:521-5 5 - .i.24E:4/2- 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Houft9llowiate.(veh/h) 5 '`S : 5 , 16 5 .5 16 :310 �. .5 _ •r5;-,• 266 y,.5
Pedestrians
LanSW!dt f thy:
Walking Speed (ft/s)
PercgiiToa ,es's< sr
Right turn flare(veh)
Ivii dl .R. ` 'ta i_., No k_A w;u6F Nons t t, <'m_ ".,_ `.
Median storage veh) r c S �, -w ?s` e;''
*C -niA 'ATL�n 4.33 628:,:! '269'G_=?6V3 x°':;628 f312?.',, 272 ;' ; '' f-ktr ._ 3X5£, r'`T f_I
vC1,stage 1 connff vol
tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7A 6.5 6.2 4.1 4.1
ttr -3O7:e'(S) .S.`fi _*. 1':_ 4":14Tri A .r3 -,.V,ti?y:t ;i a_4`!sOP-t'5„iti4 .r .i_ .'.- r"ai.1 _.. - ?.-'::
tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
s iirtle T2 g ` =;3 ..:,99. .,w59 t"`:W19,. "'96 t 9 1.4,99 itig 99` x_, s 1, : ' 0Q t.
- _
cM capacity(veh/h) > 380 393 770 380 393 728 1292 1245
'_ w. _..h'ti '4Y?`'it. u "AFC °w:t_fryttz: tateSYm[.faiY k� a3.�Cu.GC_
yQQ
VoT�.n ? °'�` 16` ,,27' 332 217741st`4"'�ii1F1' ,T+ s< " trY ; .a '
Volume Left 5 16 16 5
cSH 463 424 1292 1245
V [dn}a� o parity '4-04 6:Q6's A� '_;b 00n r
,... -. �:.> ._.. _ _ .�. _ mac.�'
Queue Length(ft) 3 5 1 0
G`olj e(ag { _ 't31 14f ,,0 5 s0 2
Lane LOS B B A A
r A)k acitiJe14ZA Y`-ty:-:. '3 1- ,n'¢97 ).,.:4 -i-:noT2, y.'4?r '$+ 1 " ,`,:e0(.. .--!:;?:,;"r- _ rt - mac--
Approach LOS B B
Average Delay 1.3
ttlte14e' p C pa'c(W t}t.iiizatioo ,w? a:V P.: 7.11.0 J 0§2§1'x' ' v1ce ,wyw; : .A - ' -.' 7-‘7,: $.'t
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2020 PM Background
Analyst,Alam SM Page 4
LSCINCCS2-ST51
's
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Total
1: WCR 6 & SH 85 11/22/2002
Lane Configurations 4, 44 ►) tt r ) ft r
Ideal Flow,(vphpl)• 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 <1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Util Factor 9.00 1:00 1.00 0 95 ;z 1:00 1.00 0.95 -1.00
Frt 0.88 0.98 1.00 100 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt Protected0.99 0.97 0.95 1.00 1,00 --0.95 , 1.00 =x1.00
Satd. Flow(prot) 1640 1412 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
,FIT Permitted 0 98 0;86 0.06 : '1.00 ="1.00 0.22 • ,�1.00 ` 1.00
Satd. Flow(perm) 1609 1251 110 3539 1583 412 3539 1583
Volu,Pe ttph).";r4';:'.., 10 - 5 85 , 18 ;,5 .; ,5 45 998 s, '-to io,:.X960 ,!.135
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Ad 10 io-hy3: ^� 11, _ 'i5 , 92 20 _ 5 ;'5-^ 49 ::10p?.r' `4.11 g11:."',2ir 0i-:::. 38
Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 108 0 0 30 0 49 1085 11 11 2130 38
Hegg..VehilclesM . .'2%u '2%z, "2% '40.-707,-:Y-2% 2 2%- -''214M% ,221O T +2 :y172%
Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
ProteC e ,,I?haser. r4 's ' 8 .. 5 `2 . . ,'.1.-,' 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6
i4 o v aip(s) '16:0 16,0.7 .. "->72.0 :68.07{-1;A§.0,- ,72p?,-..?;68..:0 •6&0
Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 16.0 72.0 68.0 68.0 72.0 68.0 68.0
Act atejg tat4),;.! 0:16 ;0.16 . 0"72 ' ...0..o8,:)-7.0:68_ f.16,7-.4,;(-1.:o4,8.'-,:648`
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
t-aJ,gnppsee (y h) =257 . ^ -20.0 146 -:2407-676- ";35,J ,.2407 ,; 076
v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.31 0.00 c0.60
v/s:Raf10 Perntj c0:07.. - 0:02 0.23:? 0:01 0.92 `0,02
v/c Ratio 0.42 0.15 0.34 0.45 0.01 0.03 0.88 0.04
Unrforn Delay,_d1 37.6_: 36:1 . 17.7 7.4 , 5.2 ' /1.-.5 12 9 5.2
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 "1.00 1.00
1tt,(e entalpelay,d2 50 I,6 : ' 6.1, "0.6 0;0 0.2 ` 5.2. 0.1
Delay(s) 42.8 37.7 23.8 8.0 5.2 4.7 18.1 5.3
Lgje ,.Serplce: •,. r'. D :D. : - C s'atA_.. .- A %A ns:::cf .."„,.. =A
Approach Delay (s) 42.8 37.7 8.6 17.8
- ,
F{Ct='/fi�vefat eVi glig0t4y._•_ "S.c':', 15 7 .HC1VI tevel of Service., . "1 , f'er4B t a .tzg`
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78
CycleLL&Fgth,(s)1 .;'_,100,0 ''Sum of lost time(s) _ , ,'12.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.9% ICU Level of Service C
c Critical,L-ane Group -
Adams Road Property ( LSC #021010) 2020 AM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 1
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Total
2: CR 8 & SH 85 11/22/2002
Lane Configurations 4. 4. tt p ►) tt r
$ign:Cpntrol ' Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
VoTur'he(velf/h) • 5 5< t. 35 , `.'5 x, 22._ 5 =9S0 -33 � , 97:; 1998 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly f@w rate:(veh/h) 5 5 , " 5 38 '• 5 24;;` •5 ;1038 36 18: 2172 5
Pedestrians
Lane`Width.(if)'"
Walking Speed (ft/s)
P,gk,:ght$IdaKa9e r,. X .._ t .
Right turn flare(veh)
Median storage veh)
tgfce u tLQ-,tcaume ;2762 `328-8 ,t080; 2<? 58 516 ` fZ7: A _.u' A(10,8:Miz
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
VC21 ta.1W- o.Pfvol4k : ' -. -.` `JR+'r4+a;,t"i' "lr'`.r °''�`..st.+.V ' r , 'tea <L =1 *:
tC, single (s) 8.9 7.9 8.3 8.9 7.9 8.3 5.5 5.5
�'�' k+���r,
tF 4(s)) j��pL 4.2 4.7 r4t.0 4.2 4.7, 4.0 2.9` X2..9
Pp-27�`i7.s.S^`..4"�1./�:"f," - .;��o a-P f•NS e.r.�&a.xi₹ e11 914 6016 4.7SAM''�k...' ' :3A`>711-f4k..i k.
cM capacity(veh/h) 0 2 127 0 2 360 95 362
j.fr'; s'. fS '' _ t`4 ♦�,ijl+W y/7 a a r-K' Yom".'.. S� i
'IeL3'DSiiJ f.. al `i : Isiah L•Yw't�g + [4v -T.'Vrit �i"'.ri ri. ...
ggirl?W3thfI t 3_'.116' ici67;rr. 5+ ' ¢`z 36 'sw B'{{ 8 A6 5 ,��`,Y≥ - . .
�_6__ � �_..�, y....Via; '�
Volume Left 5 38 5 0 0 0 18 0 0 0
—.
cSH 0 0 95 1700 170.0 1700 362 1700 1700 1700
Queue Length (ft) Err Err 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
3 Con7Fo�9etay (s)' Err 'Etc 45-x4 '
Lane LOS F F E C
3 Approach LOS F F
L
( Average Delay Err
a
L
L.
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2020 AM To(al
Analyst, Alam SM Page 2
LSCINCCS2-ST51
r-
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Total
3: CR 8 & CR 27 11/22/2002
/ «
tOM } Thafg :4-ai12V,. I1' rf8 _ A-. t. >s:aSBR
Lane Configurations 4, 4. 4. ,.
Sign Control'. Stop, Stop Free fi r Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
VolQ e,(veh/h) 10 `- •20 23 20 25 10 10 " �6 5 b_ .. 180 25
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
• Hourlyzf4ow rate(veh/h) 11 '22 ;25 22 27 11 11 "104 5 5', 196_ : -27
Pedestrians
Lar;e WidtJ(h) r-'-
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percef1J31dckage
Right turn flare(veh)
Medla , v CIO 8 E 1r 1 'a Sv< �(Onfl d a rax ," f r
_.�1��1`�4's::wall. a.._�.'f.`_" �. �,..,..F.'s�._�.asi .,� u,a.�..•��,xt -,3..,.s�r ..,�.w_s '�,��a�.. :�^� . •
Median storage veh)
v �cn f)ictmjvolume 373 *Ci_52r �2Q3 "_r385 : 362L,�z(_67' X733" ss ; �"ya:,5g7<, 2
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2-::s age 2 donf vof ( yg�' 'k e f,
tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.6 7.1 6.5 6.6 4.1 4.1
. . .
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.7 3.5 4.0 3.7 2.2 2.2
p(L�(ueue wee%zT S` 7ta ' �9�' 9 �3rr _ • 89 4.1b0 ;: 7:::;•
cM capacity(veh/h) 5+50. 75`66 744 j 533 X55[8[ 853 1346 1480
i . 't> ,T�.'- F 'CZi5Tc i[tfv fraVAi A :jtt-Si s' ing1;_�- x Y -ta'Y W a�i ( -..
.- k`:��r��..ic..�r u_ :4.c� t rr. iP�� t.�. 1_;t{`.
_
VofugTofaf . _ ,�8 tt6D �� ? p •L,: - "`�.. W - -.. ._ � ,
e -• �> ��-''s , '.'f"-:: �'z�.22V'e, v r . E`-�? '"
Volume Left 11 22 11 5
VOW_m_p�tZc)ht wz i r25a � . ` i : 27a .s. . a . a
cSH 628 585 1346 1480
Voueto-paciLJ �, dxb9 , `: 00 ':. `nom r: ;.
Queue Length (ft) 8 8 1 0 a '
Cott01110. ay ).', --_ .10P3flg 08 ,-'102
Lane LOS BB A A
f 4-117,611,
Approach LOS B B
�-
�) .Er. 5 D3C! A � .. � � ! :.rnP# .v..,..�:, � r,.�-cs,.t'!sex tip-x3.�1 s,::4 :?_ `'.:'i•••o.. x :;2:-x^'
Average Delay 3.2
fn�r5cfioCapaaty UUliiafloll- 3,1 b/p c� ��fCfFL evel d $er5lce` w A ,W:.
Adams Road Property( LSC#021010) 2020 AM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 3
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Total
4: WCR 6 & CR 27 11/22/2002
t C 4\ t r ti t
>
Lane Configurations 4, 4, 4, 4,
Sign Cgntdl S}op' :Stop • T `}rFree :: • Free
Grade 0% 0% 0%
0%
Volume°{yell/h) 5 5 15 10 ' 5 .5 ,5./M420 120 5 - :.5 185 •13
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
HoQrly low;rate(veh/h) - 5 5 .. 16= . 11 ,5 5 5 ='"t30 "-5 5: 201 '- , 14
Pedestrians
Land-Vldth,(ft);
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Pe[eent Bloi kage_
Right turn flare (veh)
'e;,.iX - '_'' 7;r2:1s
Median storage veh)
\!011NEWtli''jcofgme 371 866 b "2b -'. e Z "370 'f 133 t. 215 y Y - 136.._
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
'6102 Taj Lortf901
tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4..1 4.1
tF(s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 1.2 2.2
p(}ye 'f4 vi r t99_ 99-44 n9l_t``r ,R�"rw Pir ..ti9r9_r t 10b .{4PP,'�4 ?.≤ 1,90 . tiffic:,
>�s.s 1. w..>_.,
cM capacity(veh/h) 574 558 832 557 555 916 1355 1448
a
r--. < :.t�:�.'�'.'. .,_r.' ;..-`khs•.�C:f.�� ��..�u`�?3rt_..,_., . . !'�`�:F't_:::
,Si.v'iS x
Volume Left 5 11 5 5
Wilk-MO-Pt .: 1;13x16 '5 e.:5, e14r ' rt •
cSH 701 617 1355 1448
Sicildia*.rcitteiP,Sief
Queue Length (ft) 3 3 0 0
Lane LOS BB A A
Approach LOS B B
a. itt,.T]��:'`39"e1 RYti°�i�l l���r :1r_J�` °`y."y_._>}.:T"a:� .1:�.�,�.'^ -'.�t-., ':f. � s e. t:}..� x� Y-.r .0 y" `? tT•+Y n:4x
SMa lz7'.4_��+ �°i`eL.Sn9.7".`v.+L•=a`sv�e'sar�.'$v'-ss:a a "�^+'. �zrdi.5..:cFc`+.c's
Average Delay 1.5
tt"feR§g§rt'4 WglglCy illi*0/1. .4.c: 4; IDY-XeVel 6fSeniice 7°
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2020 AM Total
Analyst,Alam SM Page 4
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Total
5: CR 8 & Access Road 11/22/2002
c 4— 4\
Lane Configurations j, 4 Ire
SigrYCagfrnl :" Free :;'Free Stop'
•
Grade 0% 0% 0%
�(oN jeAveh/h}.: 45.. •10 0 45 ' ...',2.,` ;8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly low rate(veh/h) - 49 11' `.0 49 2- 9 ,
Pedestrians
• Lan T- th eft):'
Walking Speed (f/s)
Perctzflacl(age •
Right turn flare(veh)
1 N0l,1@''
�....�
Median storage veh)
QS n64§..'"'fr ie l �0 7b3r+„ �4: TM _• 7 s� , Xtr
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
tC, single(s) 4.8 7.1 6.9
tF(s) 2.8 4.1 3.9
cM capacity(veh/h) 1202 754 850
Volume Total 60 4((9��, 11
Volite eft e:i... £ . 4` fi ,Y.4 2 ... R :`` •
Volume Right 11 0 9
Fes" -s 3> t7A0 1'02 829Rr Y
Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.00 0.01
Control Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.4
`3..-a A :.r • e ,a fix i trf �'v+�: . {y��fc _ 7C t!'"[?:
Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 9.4
OF'+ '1 "yllicActa ' `" 1T9, k*�,tii i' r -�. ife zraxr x wvw��cxmJ
..�. J4 _a:. � . . .:s≥ i t ;:s`4 .<dfy,��� ���w !, �„z �.nnM.
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A
•
L
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2020 AM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 5
LSCINCCS2-ST51
is
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Total
1: WCR 6 & SH 85 11/22/2002
A.--
f --► f '— \ t t `► 1 -'
Lane Configurations ,I+ 4+ ►t ft r TT p
fdeaf Flow(yptipl) - 190O 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900-- 1900 ' 1900. ; 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0
Lane Util .Factor '• 1:00 1'.00 , ,,1;00 '0:95 1.00 . .1.00 0 95 .,'1.00
Frt 0.93 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Flt;Protected r ,-•';` ' _0.98 0:97, 0.95 -1).00-,;,:-1.00 0.95 400.,--1.00
Satd- Flow(prof) 1694 1378 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583
Flt;Permitted - ,0.87.:' 0:87. 0 12 ,',100 ' 1::00 0:06 1.00 -:.1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1501 1238 225 3539 1583 106 3539 1583
)/olurne,(gphl r 35 -Y5,; 45., 18 t .tt5 _ ,10' 6,5, 2403 520 >'10 14p0::,,,.-4J20
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
fici stagaiip`fafif-'Lim sv33,8 .9;,w ,9 K` 20, . .r5 , ,41; :71 -;2612.x ,22_.: 1i<kc ,§22 .`':22
Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 92 0 0 36 0 71 2612 22 11 1522 22
1-fea [ehteregcro -2% ^2b%';::;..42%':',2'''50° 1:2% `2%''',.'2% '17-2%?472%o r ,22% ✓2% .:2%
Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm
Profe8fed`Phases _ 4' `8 $ 2 ' 1 /6.' . _
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6
Acjy ted,�ree ;p(s) .- . .:140 -t ;=14'10 , , t V7S0 i70 0 , '70;0 ...-"74,0 :70:0. 70.0
Effective Green, g (s) 14.0 14.0 74.0 70.0 70.0 74.0 70.0 70.0
Actuatedg7CRatio 's 014";. 014 '_ 074, ,:'.0`.70 0:70; _0<74 ;;0:70 0:70
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
'_G elp_-'(yph) . 210_" f73k >.r 1228, -2477 1,108: ti445 -'2477 1108
v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.74 0.00 0.43
v/ignO.o Perm ., _ _ ' c0.06 0;03 .c0:22 ;; � ;0:01=. 0 05 ,0;01
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.21 0.31 1.05 0.02 0.08 0.61 0.02
,J,0ltforirlDely;:d1 , 39.4.:- 38,;1 - 1.,.....:„'6.1 .i:).5..0_ 4.6. 46.4 -7:9 4.6
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
frrcre¢ienla(Delay,Id2 fi;5_` 4 .;- , 2;7 _ . ;,x3.5.:::,•34..5,,:, .O 0 "'1:0 1,2 0.0
Delay (s) 45.9 40.8 9.6 49.5 4.6 47.4 9.0 4.6
Level'bJ Senfice .: -D'. _. ";D i ,'A :::;?-p -A.. D A A
Approach Delay (s) 45.9 40.8 48.1 9.3
Psd °7' _f°Mill .i t %2 C L^ 4 u�" 2` i6v Yny=�t7 V ti 4etta w a
e ...,.aiaa..5T ,Tcrta� S. '`;;e.� w:kcl�,"�:" , . .__.._.,: ,....xis,. -.:i:,.,:4 ..:,'"
ErA ' veta.O all/ p'belayr , M .. 3,<4F2 4 <wHCM'Levef of:5_en7ice ` r 3:s.C< 7 t:7k'r'.#'r_ Cif.,
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92
Cycf ength,(s)L' „ - 7:100..0 :-.+80M-.0004-6,:04,0).. 1:.c.. -12.0 , ' _ _
Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.6% ICU Level of Service E
Qs-tent-foal Lane Group
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2020 PM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 1
LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Total
2: CR 8 & SH 85 11/22/2002
C 4\ t t \ •/
wee _. e } _ gra (a ` salty l=" .R
Lane Configurations 4, 4, 1 Tt r li ft r
S(gn;Coptrol Stop Stop T. Free ;'Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%0
�'5 20 5 „17 5 ;2305:288-1:::•.-51 %_1395 - v:'.•5
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92-0.92
Hdurlylowrate;(veh/h) 5 5': ' y5 22 . 5' - •18 >:5 2505 .x.:96 -18; 1516• • 5
Pedestrians
Line Width(ft) .i'
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Peccgnt, 3lockage ,
Right turn flare (veh)
4•!e) pJ' s �s:;'.1-`.. �'hlone'? ...';-.,. ..-.-�-att9r e..�t+ �>-?.0,°_,.'. .' ...�.': vT,�,.,. s 1
Median storage veh)
vG tdp�iif�(tiny�4 (BJn ;2838 4165. 1 758 18320}->-'407.S.:41125-3":7;15 .2-
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
tC, single(s) 8.9 7.9 8 3 8.9 7.9 8.3 5.5 5.5
tF(s) 4.2 4.7 4.0 x,4.2 4.7 4.0 2.9 • 2.9
p0} i]efred,°4' _, 4:_x 0 ` ` b;^_`'' J8 '" P . . 14 , "9Q. > c t 'e',,e -,;; `'
cM capacity (veh/h) 0 0 232 0 0 93 211 56
.-.. vYsr•,��.,`a'z � _ ✓'��' ;rts��re;:..tz�+.ta.-.st-. 3 ., '4r.y<?,.��u� a'`o'b�T._.::.4L .. S_x...:.��.�iw�: ...�'__-::x;
Voitiiried7bfai j6K"x_ 6' °5 '`(2585 ?1253y_4 X86' . '��f8` 1,7.58 , '75aM 't $ ` z
Volume Left 5 22 5 0 0 0 18 0 0 0
:iy :0_�.e.1Y6i __ ..�.sr
cSH 0 0 211 1700 1700 1700 56 1700 1700 1700
Queue Length (ft) Err Err 2 0 0 0 30 0 0 0
Lane LOS F F C F
Appctr Delays} _;:Err Etr ' 0 0
( Approach LOS F F
Average Delay Err
Interseoflo(j,t apacit�(�Olzatidn 79 3 ICULLevel ofSeivice :`':C`- x ;; . • -
Adams Road Property ( LSC #021010) 2020 PM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 2
e LSCINCCS2-ST51
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Total
3: CR 8 & CR 27 11/22/2002
7 c t 4\ t P r
Lane Configurations .{, 4' 4+ 4,
Sign`Control • Stop Stop Free £` Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Vol tije(veh/h), 55 30. 13 2...15‘...; 15 10 10 .255 25 15 230 15
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 60 337. • 14 16 16, a11' 11 = 277 27 16 '250 : 16
Pedestrians
Lane Width(ft)
Walking Speed (it/s')
P rcu Elo
Right turn flare(veh)
Median storage veh)
yC= o�rfllct�ng3uditlfne ,§22, •;61;7 258
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vCZ,)tage 2conf vol
tC, single (s) 7.1 6.5 6.6 7.1 6.5 6�.,2, 4.1 4.1
•1C vlysta,. ,&(s} r r ';.7 :iii
tE(s) 3.5 m4.0 3.7 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
;` $.4 14 . R8.'o! 95n^• S.P 39 i " ,9
cm capacity(vehh/h) 375 397 69/ 354 400 " 748 1298 1256
r •n '` .Kr . hYr'"4' ..i^ �'1' `Y�' -. 3 "�':Li T'�-. i r c i T'li. 3fY ; ._.
�..� ,tL;St'L`C. �..a^�• t s.X._c.STr:'5c..tsE'nY i.'• a+;.Y:a**Y? v..� v_le ;'y'�'.J_`.1_ie.,s'_.,T.�.iii �.t�}a::�.vrh+ �aS-a.:.-:
�'TFlx`
Vdtun e'Thtal 1:97 r V 3 •
-
.tq,5
Volume Left 60 16 11 16
w, ` . ,..: .
cSH 407 429 1298 1256
VglQme# HPac4y :0;26 r OrfU':> fl 6,1 0 01 a ,�
Queue Length (ft) 26 8 1 1
C,lcon ra 910t(!)1 " .s1?0 A41.ei.. Q. °y*0 e i k;*i' +;' i.
Lane LOS CB AA
APP oactLUelag>C _' ;17 0 ' tcav 0'3 0.6
Approach LOS C B
' -A
•-r t IYla i".ie Y•r :.:�fi i - ..t S-..s�Y"� a.��'vt r .0 5: .:� `i4 •� -aSr�rz,.- �..�. ,y
t�i
Average Delay 3.6
IntesegUon;Caperty4UGl¢ati9n 39 0% " fU Leverof Seiyice ' A
r
3
Adams Road Property ( LSC#021010) 2020 ?M Total
Analyst,Alam SM Page 3
LSCINCCS2-ST51
I.
t
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Total
4: WCR 6 & CR 27 11/2212002
J r< t 1 t t ► 1 d
Lane Configurations 4. 4, 4, 4,
Sign:Control _ Stop :Stop • Free, Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Vol0:rne jveh/h) .', 5. 5,. 5 15 , ;'5. . '5. 15 :_285 _ 5 5 '.'245 8
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
I-(ourlyr,`flow rate(veh/h) 5 5. 5 16 ;,, 't5 5. 16' •,=310 . 5 5 266 9
Pedestrians
Lani 1Ndth(ft),:.`
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Right turn flare(veh)
ti
Median storage veh)
vC"co011icting volume 635 '629 271 -635 , :°631 312 7:11-:: 315
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2stage2confvol K ?�t_' - 1, ,
tC, single(s) 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 • 4.1
•
qq 9
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
p0>9lietret '%a-: ,.
cM capacity(veh/h) 379 392 768 379 391 728 1288 1245
"^'i'^ a�J,,t .. :t (1 ,r, r ;y'•A+'+ir T _^-a5 b{ «'y'
VolpmeT tal374: 16 . -27 332 :: 280
Volume Left 5 16 16 5
Volume RFgb1 5 5 5 9 t:-
cSH 462 422 1288 1245
Volujfie to,Capacity,, T. '0:04 0:06:; .9.01 0 00 ;
Queue Length (ft) 3 5 1 0
ConTrgt;pelay(a�° .• -:131 14'.1x; 0.5 ." -
Lane LOS BB A A
ABP[QACKD;e1ay,(s)_ :: • 13 1
Approach LOS B B
Average Delay 1.2
)14.010 10ji Capacity Utilization '•32 8% 1C ttLeKel of Sgrnce `'"
k
1
G
Adams Road Property( LSC #021010) 2020 PM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 4
LSCINCCS2-ST51
I
L.
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Total
5: CR 8 & Access Road _ 11/22/2002
c ~ 4 P
Lane Configurations 1. 4 V
Sign,Control :'' Free 'Free
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h):; 184 10 0 98 10 ' `0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.-92 0.92
Hotlyt(9w.rate:(veh/h) 200 11 0 i10�, 11 0 ,
Pedestrians
LaneWldtti tft),
Walking Speed(f/s)
Perienf Blockage r
Right turn flare (veh)
Median storage veh)
ypigontLgUng,4elume ;211 u' e312.4.. 205:
vC1, stage 1 con!vol
ve2rstale 2 cog!vot t :. . 3
tC, single (s) 4.8 7.1 6.9
tF (s) y2.8 4.1 3.9
cM capacity(veh/h) 1042 560 690
Volume Total 211 107 11
Volume Left 0 0 • 11' 4
Volume Right 11 0 0
?.z7`_ '::
Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.00 0.02
Queue igggtfi{1t)... ,b .: O ,-Z4I . 'S4,35filcc.
Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.6
Approach Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 11.6
Appro4 LQ tiCTZ. '. • . .nom g j
a
Aver age'DAieyti �3 r•,; .?v`eQ 4 .: ' sd # " C.: sc :F; R y ,.W sti,6 nth :,,
Intersection Capacity Utilization 21.2% ICU Level of Service A
% <"
Adams Road Property( LSC#021010) 2020 PM Total
Analyst, Alam SM Page 5
LSCINCCS2-ST51
Weld County Planning Department
GREELF' OFFICE
g� AUG 2 5 2003
ME Banks and Gesso, LLC •
720 Kipling St.,Suitb'M°C : '
■■ Lakewood, Colorado 80215
August 22, 2003 (303)274-4277
Fax (303) 274-8329
www.banksandgesso.com
Mr. Kim Ogle
Planner
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Kerr-McGee Surface Use Agreement
USR-1436: Adams Sand and Gravel Mine
Dear Mr. Ogle:
This purpose of this letter is to provide written evidence, of behalf of the Premier Paving, Inc.
"...that an adequate attempt has been made to mitigate the concerns of the mineral owners on
the subject property" (Weld County Zoning, Division 4, Section 23-4-260 G.11).
As stated in the Application for Use by Special Review (USR-1436), the mineral owners of the
subject property are as follows: Wayne A. Adams, Gerald A. Adams, James L. Adams, Shirley
A. Gray, and Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain Corp. All of these mineral interest holders have
r•-• been notified of the Planning Commission Hearing Scheduled for September 16, 2003, and
proof of notification was submitted to you in a letter dated August 4, 2003.
Premier Paving, Inc. has a real estate contract with the Adams Family (including Ms. Gray) to
buy the both surface and aggregate rights. A copy of this signed contract was also included in
the Application.
Kerr-McGee has notified Weld County, through the referral process, that"KMG is optimistic that
a surface agreement can be finalized..." (a copy of this referral letter is attached). Premier
Paving and Kerr-McGee continue to be in negotiation regarding this surface agreement, thus
constituting on-going attempts to mitigate Kerr-McGee's 'concerns'.
With this information, we believe that Premier Paving is satisfying Section 23-4-260 G.11 of the
Weld County Zoning Regulations, and that the hearing process should proceed as planned.
We will, of course, notify your office when the surface agreement between Kerr-McGee and
Premier Paving, Inc. has been finalized. Please let me know if you require additional
information regarding this issue.
S' erely,
Paul Banks
attachment: Kerr-McGee Letter to Weld County, dated July 18, 2003
cc: Russ Otterstein, Premier Paving, Inc.
Lee Morrison, Weld County Attorney's Office
.08A1Q/03 11:41 FAL 970 304 6498 WELD PLANNING fill 002
Q KERR-MoCEE ROCKY MOUNTAIN CORPORATION
7000 BROADWAY•SUM 3000 DENVER,COLORADO 00202
July 18,2003
PHONErn 3032060000
FAY;mamma001
Mr.Kim Ogle
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley,Colorado 80631
Re: Case Number USR-1436
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine
Townshin 1 North.Ranee 66 West
Section 19: S/2NE/4;NENE
Weld County,Colorado
Dear Mr.Ogle:
Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain Corporation("KMG")owns the oil and gas leasehold
interests in the S/2NE/4 and NENE/4 of Section 19,Township 1 North,Range 66 West, Weld
County,Colorado(the"Property"). KMG currently operates one natural gas well and associated
production facilities located in the approximate center of the NE/4 and has rights to drill up to
three additional wells on the Property. Also,KMG's affiliate Kerr-McGee Gathering LLC
currently owns and operates a high pressure natural gas pipeline that traverses the Property.
KMG has met with the applicant and their consultant to discuss the proposed mining
operation on the Property. KMG's objective is to resolve any issues regarding the compatible
development of the mineral and surface estates through a surface use agreement prior to the
Applicant receiving final approval of the project. Therefore,KMG requests that Weld County
Department of Planning Services recommend as a condition of approval that evidence of an
executed surface use agreement between KMG and the Applicant must be provided prior to
scheduling a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners.
Although an agreement has not been reached,KMG is optimistic that a surface agreement
can be lmalized and we look forward to working with the Applicant and the County throughout
this process. Thank you for allowing KMG to participate in this referral process and if you have
any questions regarding KMG's operations on the Property,please contact me at 720-264-2627.
Very truly yours,
Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain Corporation
opher J. neaux
Landman
cc: Russ Ottenstien—Premier Paving,Inc.
Tug Martin—Banks and Gesso
Weld County Planning Department
GREELEY OFFICE
SEP 0 4 2003
r ■■ Banks and Gesso, LLC 720KiplingSt.,SuiRl'E?CEIVED
■■ Lakewood, Colorado 80215
(303) 274-4277
Fax (303)274-8329
www.banksandgesso.com
September 3, 2003
Mr. Kim Ogle
Planner
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: USR-1436, Adams Sand and Gravel Mine
Dear Mr. Ogle:
We have reviewed the referral comments you forwarded to us via facsimile on August
11, 2003.
We would like to respond to the comments raised in these referral letters as follows:
1. Kerr-McGee: As described in our letter to you dated August 22, 2003, and in Kerr-
McGee's referral letter dated July 18, 2003, Premier Paving is negotiating with Kerr-
McGee to finalize a surface use agreement for the oil and gas wells on the Adams
property.
2. Zoning Compliance: No conflicts were listed.
3. Environmental Health: Please see the attached letter to Charlotte Davis regarding
her referral comments. Premier Paving will commit to obtaining all the required
permits and approvals recommended by Ms. Davis. We are concerned, however,
with her request that certain permits be obtained prior to plat recordation, as stated in
the letter.
4. Fort Lupton Fire Department: Please see the attached letter to Larry Richardson.
The Fort Lupton Fire Department indicated no conflicts, but requested emergency
access to water. Premier Paving will pursue this request with the fire department.
5. Sheriffs Department: Please see the attached letter to Dave Tuttle. Premier Paving
will commit to covered loads, 300 feet of access road paving, and discussing a crime
prevention program with the Sheriff's office.
6. State Engineer's Office: The concerns of the SEO are being addressed through the
Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) permitting process. Premier Paving is
developing a Temporary Substitute Water Supply Plan as required by the SEO prior
to exposing groundwater.
7. CDOT: Premier Paving has submitted a Road Improvement Agreement to Weld
County Public Works (see attached letter to Donald Carroll dated August 25, 2003)
Mr. Kim Ogle Page 2
Weld County Planning
September 3, 2003
and is working with Weld County Public Works and CDOT to finalize a Road
Improvement Agreement that meets the requirements of both entities.
8. Dept. of Building Inspection: Premier Paving will comply will all applicable building
permit requirements.
9. Natural Resources Conservation Service: Banks and Gesso, LLC has recently
contacted Mr. Wells at NRCS to seek his recommendations regarding seed mix and
mulching. Please see the attached letter, dated August 18, 2003.
10. Weld County Public Works: Premier Paving has submitted a Road Improvement
Agreement to Weld County Public Works (see attached letter to Donald Carroll dated
August 25, 2003).
11. Brighton: Please see the attached letter to Mr. Robert Ray, Brighton City Planner.
Although it appears that this site is not within Brighton's Planning Influence Area,
Premier Paving intends to buffer visual impacts via berms along the east and west
perimeter of the site, as suggested by Mr. Ray.
12. Fort Lupton: Although we have not received any updated referral comments for the
current USR from the Fort Lupton Planning staff, the attached letter responds to their
previous concerns.
I believe we have adequately addressed the concerns and issues stated in the referral
letters. Please let me know if we can provide further information to assist you in
preparing your staff comments prior to the September 16, 2003 Planning Commission
Hearing. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Maureen Jacoby
Project Manager
cc: Russ Otterstein, Premier Paving, Inc.
Banks and Gesso, LLC 720 Kipling St.,Suite117
■■ Lakewood, Colorado 80215
(303)274-4277
Fax (303)274-8329
www.banksandgesso.com
September 3, 2003
Mr. Larry Richardson
Fort Lupton Fire Department
1121 Denver Avenue
Fort Lupton, CO 80621
RE: USR-1436, Adams Sand and Gravel Mine
Dear Mr. Richardson:
As requested in your Weld County Referral response dated July 14, 2003, Premier
Paving, Inc. will work with the Fort Lupton Fire Department regarding emergency water
well access.
Please feel free to contact Mr. Russ Otterstein at 303-940-3668 to discuss this matter.
Sincerely, �^
Maureen Jacoby
cc: Russ Otterstein, Premier Paving, Inc.
Kim Ogle, Weld County Planning
r
Banks and Gesso, LLC 720 Kipling St.,Suite117
■■ Lakewood, Colorado 80215
(303) 274-4277
Fax(303) 274-8329
www.banksandgesso.com
September 3, 2003
Ms. Charlotte Davis
Weld County Environmental Health
1555 N. 17th Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: USR-1436, Adams Sand and Gravel Mine
Dear Ms. Davis:
Thank you for your referral comments dated July 29, 2003, regarding the proposed
Adams sand and gravel mine. On behalf of Premier Paving, Inc., we agree and will
comply with your proposed conditions and requirements. We are concerned, however,
with your recommendation that the requirements be met "prior to allowing the plat to be
recorded."
Each of the listed items requires time, money, and often detailed information about the
plant or site equipment to receive a permit or approval (for example, specific equipment
model numbers are required to receive an air emissions permit). It is not economically
feasible or efficient for an operator to obtain these permits until the plat has been
approved for the desired land use. Premier Paving can and will, however, commit to
obtaining the required permits and approvals prior to commencing operations.
As you know, Weld County regulations require that a Use by Special Review (USR) plat
be recorded within 30 days of County Commissioner approval. It is not possible to meet
all of your requirements in that time frame. We suggest that either your
recommendations be made conditions of approval (and not conditions of plat
recordation) or that the plat recordation time frame be extended to six months.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions or comments. Thank you.
Sincerely,
9Cia6RT
Maureen Jacoby
cc: Russ Otterstein, Premier Paving, Inc.
Kim Ogle, Weld County Planning
UN Banks and Gesso, LLC 720 Kipling St.,Suite117
.■ Lakewood, Colorado 80215
(303)274-4277
Fax (303) 274-8329
www.banksandgesso.com
September 3, 2003
Commander Dave Tuttle
Weld County Sheriffs Office
1950 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: USR-1436, Adams Sand and Gravel Mine
Dear Commander Tuttle:
Thank you for your referral comments dated July 13, 2003 regarding the proposed
Adams sand and gravel mine.
As you recommend, Premier Paving will commit to covering all truckloads and paving
300 feet of the access roads to Weld County Roads 8 and 27.
As you may be aware, gravel operations typically demand very little police services
when compared to residential, commercial and other types of land use. Premier Paving
will be happy to discuss with you the "Crime Prevention through Environmental Design"
program to further reduce the likelihood of criminal activity at this site.
Please contact Mr. Russ Otterstein of Premier Paving (303-940-3668)to discuss this
program. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Maureen Jacoby
cc: Russ Otterstein, Premier Paving, Inc.
Kim Ogle, Weld County Planning
PPM
1EMIER PAVING INC. 5085 Harlan St.,Denver,CO 80212•Phone:(303)940-3668•FAX(303)940-3648
August as', 2003
Mr. Donald Carroll
Engineering Administrator
Weld County Public Works Dept.
P.O. Box 758
Greeley, CO 80632
RE: Road Improvement Agreement for Adams Property;
USR-1436: Sand and Gravel Mine Application
Dear Mr. Carroll:
As we've discussed, Premier Paving, Inc. has applied for a Weld County Use by Special Review
Permit to operate a sand and gravel mine on property just south of Weld County Road (WCR) 8
between U.S. Highway 85 and WCR 27.
All entering vehicles will use the WCR 8 entrance. Vehicles leaving the site will use either WCR
8 (-20%) or WCR 27 (-80%). Premier Paving proposes the following road improvements to
accommodate truck traffic associated with the proposed operation, based on your comments:
U.S. 85 at WCR 8 Intersection:
All incoming vehicles will use this intersection, plus outbound vehicles heading north on U.S. 85.
1. Increase the southbound left-turn deceleration lane to 1,120 feet, (including a 300 foot
taper) by re-striping to meet the State Highway Access Code requirements (per LSC
Transportation Consultants' Report, August 20, 2003, pg. 5).
2. Increase the northbound right-turn deceleration lane to 1,100 feet (including a 300 foot
taper) by re-striping to meet the State Highway Access Code requirements (per LSC
Transportation Consultants' Report, August 20, 2003, pg. 5).
3. Increase the northbound right-turn acceleration lane to 1,680 feet(including a 300 foot
taper) by re-striping to meet the State Highway Access Code requirements (per LSC
Transportation Consultants' Report, August 20, 2003, pg. 5).
U.S. 85 at WCR 6 Intersection:
Only southbound traffic leaving the site will use this intersection. Per our traffic consultant, LSC
Transportation Consultants, Inc. and CDOT, no improvements are necessary for trucks to make
a left-hand turn from WCR 6 to U.S. 85 at this intersection, since it is signaled.
Mr. Donald Carroll Page 2
Weld County Public Works Dept.
August AC, 2003
WCR 8 Ingress/Egress:
All incoming vehicles will use this access to enter the site. Northbound (on U.S. 85) traffic will
exit at this location.
1. According to our traffic consultant, expected traffic at this access does not meet the
volumes necessary to require acceleration or deceleration lanes (See attached LSC
report dated August 20, 2003).
2. Access road will be paved from WCR 8 to 300 feet into the site.
WCR 27 Egress:
Southbound (on U.S. 85) traffic will exit at this location. No vehicles will enter at this location.
1. According to our traffic consultant, expected traffic at this access does not meet the
volumes necessary to require acceleration or deceleration lanes (See attached LSC
report dated August 20, 2003).
2. Access road will be paved from WCR 27 to 300 feet into the site.
3. A Ditch Crossing Agreement will be negotiated with the Fulton Ditch Company prior to
construction.
WCR 27/WCR 6 Intersection:
1. Reconstruct the northwest corner turn radius to allow sufficient space for southbound,
right-turning trucks. Based on information from the Weld County GIS department, this
improvement can be made within the existing right-of-way.
2. According to our traffic consultant, expected traffic at this access does not meet the
volumes necessary to require acceleration or deceleration lanes (See attached LSC
report dated August 20, 2003).
3. A Ditch Culvert Relocation will be negotiated with the Fulton Ditch Company prior to
construction.
Surface Improvements:
1. WCR 8 (between U.S. 85 and WCR 27): 3" new HBP with gravel shoulders.
2. WCR 6 (between U.S. 85 and WCR 27): 2" new HBP with gravel shoulders.
3. WCR 27: no surface improvements are proposed.
Right-of-Way (ROW) Dedications:
1. WCR 8: Dedicate 40' from current center line.
2. WCR 27: Dedicate 65' from current center line.
Mr. Donald Carroll Page 3
Weld County Public Works Dept.
Augustaf, 2003
Please let me know if these improvements are sufficient to meet county requirements. Thank
you.
Sincerely,
Russ r tein
attachment: Report from LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc, dated August 20, 2003.
cc: Paul Banks, Banks and Gesso, LLC
N W Banks and Gesso, LLC 720 Kipling St.,Suite117
.■ Lakewood, Colorado 80215
(303) 274-4277
Fax (303) 274-8329
August 18, 2003 www.banksandgesso.com
Mr. Norman J. Wells, Jr.
District Conservationist
National Resources Conservation Services
57 W. Bromley Lane
Brighton, CO 80601-3025
RE: Request for Recommendations
Premier Paving, Inc., Adams Sand and Gravel Mine
Located within: TIN, R66W, Section 19, Weld County
DMG Application #M-2003-012 and Weld County USR-1436
Dear Mr. Wells:
Thank you for your referral comments to both the pending Division of Minerals and Geology
(DMG) application and the Weld County Use by Special Review application for the proposed
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine.
Based on your comments and the requirements of the DMG, we would like your
recommendations on the following issues:
1. Our currently proposed seed mixes for permanent and temporary cover are found on the
attached page (Tables E-1 and E-2). In your March 17, 2003 letter to the DMG, you
stated that "...rates listed for the particular species...are 3-4 times what NRCS would
recommend planting? Would you please recommend an appropriate seed rate for
each species?
2. Please recommend an appropriate timing for reseeding.
3. Please recommend mulch specifications (type and amount per acre).
In response to your referral letter to Weld County, dated August 1, 2003, I would like to make
some clarifications and updates to the proposed reclamation plan.
A. Timing of Topsoil Replacement: Topsoil stockpiles will be reseeded immediately (or
as appropriate based on weather/season) using the temporary cover seed mix, unless
concurrent reclamation plans allow for re-spreading within the growing season.
Although Phase I may take 7 years to complete, for example, portions of the phase area
may be reclaimed concurrent with mining operations. If this occurs, topsoil may be
removed in one area, stockpiled for a short period of time (less than a growing season),
and then re-spread in the reclamation area for permanent seeding.
B. Final Grades: Premier Paving will comply with DMG regulations regarding reclamation
performance standards, including Rule 3.1.5(7): In all cases where a lake or pond is
produced as a portion of the Reclamation Plan, all slopes, unless otherwise approved by
Mr. Norman Wells Page 2
NRCS
August 18, 2003
the Board or Office, shall be no steeper than a ratio of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical ratio),
except from 5 feet above to 10 feet below the expected water line where slopes shall be
not steeper than 3:1."
C. Fertilizer Testing: Based on your recommendation, soil testing will be performed and
fertilizer will be applied as necessary prior to seeding.
If you have any questions about my request, please feel free to call me. Thank you for your
input regarding this project.
Sincerely,
-1 . rea_
Maureen Jacoby
cc: Russ Otterstein, Premier Paving, Inc.
Banks and Gesso, LLC
A-.
Table E-1: Reclamation Seed Mix for Disturbed Areas
PLS2 Percent
Species Variety ' s
(lbs/acre) of Mix (%)
Buffalo Grass 3.5 30
(Buchloe Dactyloides)
Sideoats Grama 2 15
(Bouteloua Curtipendula)
Blue Grama 3.5 30
(Bouteloua Gracilis)
Little Bluestem 3 25
(Schizachyrium Scoparium)
NOTES:
'Availability may dictate the need for substitution or omission.
2 Pure Live Seed pounds per acre; rates shown are for drill seeding. Double rates for
broadcast seeding.
3 Percent of mix calculated on a seeds-per-square-foot basis.
All substitutions shall be approved by the land planner (Banks and Gesso, LLC; 303-
274-4277).
Table E-2: Temporary Cover
Common Name , Seeding
Grasses Variety Rate in PLS2
(Ibs/acre)
Thickspike Wheatgrass Critana 3 0
Streambank Wheatgrass Sodar 3.0
Western Wheatgrass Arriba 3.0
Slender Wheatgrass Premier, San Luis 3.0
Creeping Red Fescue Dawson 1.0
'Variety unnamed native unless specified.
2 Pure Live Seed pounds per acre.
Adams Sand and Gravel Mine Amendment 02045
Premier Paving, Inc. May 2003
ME Banks and Gesso, LLC 720 Kipling St.,Suite117
■■ Lakewood, Colorado 80215
September 3, 2003 (303)274-4277
Fax (303) 274-8329
www.banksandgesso.com
Mr. Robert Ray
City Planner
City of Brighton
22 S. 4th Ave.
Brighton, CO 80601
RE: USR-1436 Weld County Referral
Premier Paving, Inc., Adams Sand and Gravel Mine
Located within: TIN, R66W, Section 19, Weld County
Dear Mr. Ray:
Thank you for your referral comments regarding the proposed Adams Sand and Gravel Mine.
As stated in your letter to Kim Ogle at Weld County, dated March 14, 2003, and reiterated via
your e-mail to Mr. Ogle dated August 11, 2003, we understand that Brighton is concerned about
the visual impacts to travelers on the adjacent U.S. 85 and WCR 27 resulting from the proposed
asphalt plant and mining operations.
To address your concerns, we reviewed the "City Building Principles, Policies and Strategies:
The Brighton Comprehensive Plan, Adopted February 23, 1999, Revised February 13, 2001".
According to the "Planning Influence Area Map" in this document, the Adams property is not
within the Brighton Planning Area, as Weld County Road 6 is the northernmost boundary.
To mitigate potential visual impacts along the traffic corridors, however, Premier Paving has
proposed to maintain a buffer zone containing vegetated berms along the east and west edges
of the property. The location of these proposed berms are shown in Figure 5.2: "Extraction
Plan Map" of the Use by Special Review Application (USR-1436). Berms will be of sufficient
height to provide suitable screening, and seeded with a quick growth seed mix specified in
Attachment B of the USR Application. These berms are designed to buffer visual impacts from
mining and plant activities.
The location of the asphalt and concrete plants were also designed to minimize off-site visual
impacts. Both plants will be located approximately 1,600 feet from U.S. 85 and are not
expected to be highly visible for off-site traffic. Existing trees on the site will be maintained (as
shown in Figure 5.2) to provide a visual screen between the plants and WCR 27.
I hope that these measures address your concerns regarding this project. Please feel free to
contact me if you have additional questions.
Sincerely,
Maureen Jacoby
cc: Russ Otterstein, Premier Paving, Inc.
Kim Ogle, Weld County Planning
Banks and Gesso, LLC 720 Kipling St.,Suite117
■■ Lakewood, Colorado 80215
(303) 274-4277
Fax(303) 274-8329
www.ba n ksand gesso.com
September 3, 2003
Mr. Brian Grubb
Fort Lupton City Planner
P.O. Box 148
Fort Lupton, CO 80621
RE: USR-1436, Adams Sand and Gravel Mine
Dear Mr. Grubb:
We have reviewed your referral comments and those of the Fort Lupton Planning
Commission based on our previous submittal, USR-1422. Although many aspects of the
site plan have changed since your initial review, we have addressed your previous
comments as follows:
1. Conformance with Land Use Plan: The Fort Lupton Planning Commission has
expressed concern that the proposal is not consistent with the Fort Lupton
Comprehensive Plan, in that the land use plan designates the area between County
Roads 10 and 6 as Agricultural. According to Figure 3 in the Land Use Plan,
however, the Adams property is within the Weld County Referral Area, and not within
a Fort Lupton Agricultural Zoning District. Because of this location, the site is subject
to the Coordinated Planning Agreement between the City of Fort Lupton and Weld
County. As you note in your referral letter, the long-term use of this property is in
conformance with the Coordinated Planning Agreement.
Also, the gravel reserve on this property is addressed by the mineral component of
the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Section 22-5-80(A) states that one goal of
the Comprehensive Plan is to "Conserve lands which provide valuable natural
mineral deposits for potential future use in accordance with state law." Section 22-5-
80(A.1) states that "Access to future mineral resource development should be
considered in all land use decisions in accordance with state law..." The Adams site
is located within a significant mineral resource area according to Colorado
Geological Survey maps. These maps were adopted by Weld County for the
purpose of identifying such areas.
2. Road Improvements: The Planning Commission is also concerned about road
improvements along Weld County Road 8 and Weld County Road 27. Premier
Paving has recently submitted a proposed Road Improvement Agreement to the
Weld County Public Works Department, which includes adding additional asphalt to
Mr. Brian Grubb Page 2
Fort Lupton City Planner
September 3, 2003
bring these roads up to Weld County standards, adding acceleration and
deceleration lanes and increasing turn radii where warranted.
3. Right-of-Way: Premier Paving, in its Road Improvement Agreement, has agreed to
reserve additional right-of-way along Weld County Roads 8 and 27, as requested by
both Fort Lupton and the Weld County Department of Public Works.
4. Landscaping: Berms will be seeded and watered as necessary using on-site water
resources. It is not expected that trees will be necessary to mitigate visual impacts
for this property.
I hope that I have addressed your concerns. Please let me know if you have additional
comments based on your review of USR-1436.
Sincerely,
Maureen Jacoby
Project Manager
cc: Russ Otterstein, Premier Paving, Inc.
Kim Ogle, Weld County Planning
Steve Mitchell, Fort Lupton Planning Commission
Weld County Planning Department
GREELEY OFFICE
AUG 2 5 2003
Kim Ogle RECEIV,_3
Department of Planning Services
1555 N 17th Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
Case Number: USR-1436
Sixty-five years ago, our parents, Ted and Helen Adams, became Weld
County taxpayers by purchasing the first parcel of our farm. Over the years,
they added additional acreage purchasing the last parcel in 1962. Originally,
this land was used for agriculture later becoming a dairy farm. It has been
leased for many years for vegetables most recently for raising field corn.
Due to the current conditions, a good portion of this property is now idle. All
farms adjacent to our property are currently for sale. One property in the
area is an industrial operation while another is already zoned for industrial
use.
Our options for developing,the property are limited because the sand and
gravel deposit is protected by a 1974 state law that protects the deposit and
does not allow any development until the deposit is removed. Weld County
Land Use Plan also recogni7Ps this state law, and our property is in an area
recognized by the county as being a mineral conservation area.
We now have the opportunity to sell this property to Premier Paving. The
president of Premier Paving, Russ Otterstein, is a very reputable
businessman. He adheres to strict standards in his operation that exceeds
EPA mandates. Russ is committed to installing a slurry wall around the mine
areas before mining occurs that will seal off the property from surrounding
groundwater and minimize impacts to nearby wells.
We understand the concerns about the truck traffic. The original proposed
haul routes have been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding county
roadways. Only 60 trucks will use CR 27 (all will be southbound). No trucks
will be making left turns onto US 85 from CR 8, and only 15 trucks will be
using CR 8 to head north on US 85. All trucks will enter the site via US 85
to CR 8, however plans are progressing to take all traffic internally to road 8
without creating additional traffic on Rd 27 or CR 8.
We also feel strongly that Premier Paving's purchase of this property would
benefit the community. In addition to employing up to 25 people, the
property's eventual use as water storage will be beneficial to the surrounding
communities.
We invite people to visit Premier Paving's plant located at 690 W 62s in
Arvada. When visiting you will note minimal dust and the neatness and
professionalism of Mr. Otterstien's operation. Premier Paving uses the latest
technology for limiting noise and air pollution.
Due to the current drought and farm prices, it is no longer feasible to keep
this property for agricultural use. It saddens us to know that this property
would no longer be a farm, but farming as we knew it is impractical in this
day and age. It is important to us to get this matter settled in our lifetimes in
order to benefit our families.
s
J Adams
Shirley Adams Gray ^
U
2
ME Banks and Gesso, LLC 720 Kipling St.,Suite117
■■ Lakewood, Colorado 80215
(303)274-4277
Fax (303) 274-8329
www.banksandgesso.com
June 23, 2003
Weld County Attorney
Attn: Lee Morrison
PO Box 758
Greeley, CO 80632
RE: Qualifications for Water Information —Adams Sand and Grave! Mine
Mr. Morrison:
Per our conversation from Friday, June 20, 2003 regarding the additional requirements
for the Water Supply discussion for the above referenced permit application, please find
the following resume's for Mr. Joe Tom Wood and Mr. Phil Martin of Martin and Wood
Water Consultants. Mr. Wood and Mr. Martin are the sub-contractors who are
responsible for calculating the water supply needs for the Adams property. I hope that
you will find this information sufficient for your needs and that the USR (Mining)
Application for the Adams Sand and Gravel Mine can now be forwarded to the Planning
staff for processing with no further delays. Should you require any additional
information, please let me know so that I may supply that information as soon as
possible. Thank you for attention to this matter.
Sincerely, -
Tug Martin
Banks and Gesso, LLC
Attach: Resume's
Cc: Project File
Russ Otterstein, Premier Paving Inc.
[5) L ( 1EOVE
�
JUN 2 4 2003 I)
WELD COUNTY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
06/20/2003 FRI 14:49 FAX 3035'—‘324 Martin & wood water 4-H Banks °-'esso ]002/005
Martin and Wood
Weraaa.ea.ns,se.
PERSONAL RESUME OF JOE TOM WOOD,P.E.
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEER
EDUCATION B.S.General En2neaing,Staid University,1968
M.S.Civil Engineering(Nybabgy),Start td University,1989
REGISTRATION Professional Engineer. Colorado,P.E.No.17829
- Texa,P.E.No.34062
- Arizona,P.E.No.19155
EXPERT
QUALIFICATIONS
Qualified as an expert witness In Water Courts for Water Divisions I,II.Ill,and IV,in United States Cart of
Claims, and United States District Court for Colorado,variously In areas of water resources engineering;
water rights engineering;water quality;water accounting;values of crate;and change decrees.
PROFESSIONAL
EXPERIENCE
03/91 to Present Presides,Martin and Wood Water Consultants.Inc.,Golden,Colorado.
Management of changes of wale rights, *des of historic uses of water rights,plans for augmentation,
water apply and darned analyses,and valuations of water rights.
1984 to 1991 Via-President,Jehn and Wood Inc.,Denver,Colorado,
tandems Includes change of water rights,wrote rights evaluations,plans for augmented*,surface water
and rind wrote modeling,and surface drainage analyses.
1979 to 1984 Water Resource Engineer,Bletchley Assodates,Inc.,Denver,Colorado.
Experience includes water source analyses and expert witness testlmorny relating to plans for
augmentation,changes in water rights,rate use eludes,end watershed yields. Evaluations of water rights
tar various purposes. Computer applications to water rights analyses,*and and river hydraxic analysis
and design. Studies of mWefl and snovnndt flood hycdogy and design of ddnags systems.
197610 1979 Project Manager,Lake Livingston Project,Trinity River Authority of Texas,Livingston,Texas.
Eyadema Irdudes managing a 65,000-acre. 1,750,000 acct Lake Livi gstan for MUNI*al,irdhahial,
and agricultural uses. Management of lake involved water quality monitoring, operating of wastewater
treatment plants,septic tank and shoreline facility control programs,flood water and water apply releases,
and maidanance and repair of project fealties. &pert testimony in court of law involving flood litigation.
Detailed report on severe drought of 1978.
1975 to 1976 Assistant Division Manager,Trinity fiver Authority of Texas,Arlington,Texas.
Exparlence includes preparation of reports and analyses iwahMg water rights applications,surface water
supply,and water way,inducing engineering report on flooding below Lake LNkgston.
06/20/2003 FRI 14:49 FAX 3035.024 Martin & wood water 444 Banks °—Gesso 11003/005
PERSONAL RESUME OF JOE TOM WOOD,Pt PAGE TWO
1969 to 1975 Water Resources Engineer,Forrest and Cotton,Inc.,Dallas,Taxes.
Experience include preparation of basinwrid*stades of water quality and wastewater treatment,inducing
mathematical model of water qualty for the Sabine River. Design of various drainage improvernents
utllzirg oomputar models. Preparation of Information end court exits involving flood litigation.Hydrologic
design and evaluation of numerous surface water supply reservoirs.Indudre splfl design,water apply
capability,and drat evaluation.
Basin wide analyses of water rights and water apples of Brazos, Navasota and Guedakpe Rivas to
determine availability of cooing water for MIN canpaniss.
Surface water supply reservoir and souroataUeahrant analysis for long-rerge water supply stuck for the
City of Dallas end North Central Texas Can of Governments.
PROFESSIONAL National Society of Professional Engineers
AFRUATiONS American Society of Civil Engineers
Colorado Water Congress
American Water Resources Association
American Water Works Association
PUBUCATIONS Tunnel Vision-An Analysis of River Call Data in the South Platte River Basin,'1984.
'Happy Birthday, Orr- (Or Engineering Lessons for Expansions of Water Rights),• 1993.
Presented to the Colorado Section of the American Water Resources Association In Denver,
Colorado an April 22, 1993 and at the Calmat Water Congress's Summer Camrendan in Fort
Collins,Colorado on July 8,1993. Published in IS torn on October 16,1995.
In Defense of Old Transfers,' 1996. Published In final torte and presented to Colorado Water
Congress in Denver,Colorado on Noverrber 25,1996 and to the Colorado Water Utility Council of
the American Water Wake Association In Westminster,Colorado,on Danis 13,1996.
The Titre'Conwrptive Use,'Its Origin,and the Early Development of Mdhoddogies,"1997;a
paper presented on March 14. 1997, at the Annual Symposium of the Colorado Section of the
Amalan Water Resources Association In Thomas%Colorado.
RELATED EXPERIENCE
1. City of Englewood,Colorado: Analysis of historic yields of Englewooc'a water lights,inducing preparation of eedsbits
and expert testimony for transfer of rights to alternate points of diversion. Monitoring of applications for water rights
by others in South Platte River Basin to protect Englawood's water rights.
2. Water lights Augnantalon Plans, Colorado: Provided water rights engineering for over 30 decreed plan for
augmenWion,inducing 20 m the South Platte River Basin. Provided water rights engineering to objectors to other
Diets for augmentation.
3. Water Rights Engineering,Colorado: Evaluated water rights for sale or lease. Evaluated changes of water fights in
su pat and in opposition to water rights application filed in various Water Courts.
4. Development of Computer Programs for Analysis of Water Rights.
Developed cattier programs for the following pupates:
Crop consumptive use; Stream *pinion malting from rivenlont and surface inigadan (Glover Method);
Groundwater analysis(adaptation of PLASM program); Reservoir yield and routing Basin wide statistical analysis of
river cell data; Analysis of in-priority status of an individual water right Analysis of cumulative, in-priority rates of
dversion by several water rights diverting at a common poke.
06/20/2003 FRI 14:49 FAX 3035:-7624 Martin & wood Water iii Banks '—gesso X004/005
Martin and Wood
Water tboatteate,tea
PERSONAL RESUME OF PHIWPPE L MARTIN,C.P.O.
EDUCATION Bachelor of Science hi Geology.University of Massachusetts,Amherst 1978
Masud Sdxne In Computer Woman Sydeme,Regis Unkrers ty,1999
CantlSng Eduwtlai in Aborted Ground Water Hydeuirs(gradate level)
Colorado Water Law and Ground Water Flom and Transport Modeling
Colorado School of Mines and Denver University
PROFESSIONAL
WERIENCE
03191 to Present Vice President,Mann and Wood Water Caekrtarte,Inc.,Gdden,Coloreds.
Expsrienoe Includes al faoets of work relabg to water resource management aid development project
management, tedaioal srpervilon, computer epplrstlona relating to grand water including flow and
transport modeling, and batwing with legal aid adririatraaw entities regardng veal permitting and
water court apprcatio e.
1985 to 1991 Project ttydrogeologlet,Jahn aid Wood,Ina,Denver,Colorado.
�— Ekpedence Included project design and management of a technical alas, project coordnetion ad
stpavislon, canput r analyses involving catputer modeling of general 2D aid 3D flow and twat
systems with regard to stream dapleaon, deaatakg dkainage, eokde Vanepon, and aquifer lbw
charades prediction. Tedaioal elpatlse attained in ground water hydraulics, borehole geophysical
kroapretaaon computer programming, conarer ial aid monitor well design and construction, sea
rohe6Rteaon, drainage, and dewataing. Adninisbative skills included client contact and development
interfacing with State and local agendas for permitting aid regulatory matters, aselstirg In preparation
and revew of WaterCourt decreed
10/04 to 01185 Project Hydrogeologist,Law Engineering Testing Co.,Denver,Colorado.
Experience Included acting as Assistant Project Coordnabr fora large aoele hazardous waste
investigation and remedelar study in Altaty, New Yak Performed staff speMalon, water parity
sampling,water level analyses,aid lewd D site bang.
1981 to 1984 Staff H drogeologlst,Blatohley Associates Inc.,Denver,Colorado.
Experience included participation In large sale proud water inrestagaaans for commercial and residential
developments, involving ground water resource assessment,wet design and construction, monitor well
design and installation,well rehabilitation,drainage and dewatedng analyses,water quality aemplkg,dl
shale hybogeologic stales, herd rood and gavel mine assessments,geotednical dudes,ocrwhuotlon
obseivatlon aid inspection,coordination of wet pemitti g pnowdaes,ground water cora:der modeling
involving salutations of wed field and dewateri g scenarios,well cost estimating,and use of geophysical
methods for ground water masaura evalualon.
1979 to 1981 Field Engineer,Chen aid Associates,Inc.Denver,Colorado.
Etpulence included geotechrial duties involving foundation and Ste feasibility studios, inspection aid
in-field testing of site out and fill operations compaction testing.caisson inspections,foundation relatsd
gaud wets investigations and laboratory testing d sob and rock.
06/20/2003 FRI 14:50 FAX 30357624 Martin & wood water 944 Banks gesso 0005/005
PERSONAL RESUME OP PIIILLPPE L MARTIN,C.P.G. PAGE TWO
PROFESSIONAL State of VVyomrp,Registered Professiortal Geologist No.1318
AFRUATIONS Americas Institute of Professional Geologists
Codified Ptofessiotpl Geologist No.7444
Naomi Ground Water Assodatlon
Association of Ground Water Scientists end Engineers
Colorado Ground Water Association(Chairman,Microcomputer Convnitta1986-1987,
Condor 1987-1988,Denver GeoTech Gerson and moderator,1986.1988)
Colorado Waes Congress
PUBLICATIONS Matln,P.L, "The Use of a Numerical Model in Detendning the Effectiveness of a Dsyraterhg
System', Proceedings of the Fest National Swrooslun on Praetor AtQReeeons of Grano
Water Models. NWWA Ohio.Auoust1984 (Paper presented at Columbus, Ohio, in August
1984)
Martin.P.L., 'Senate 919 6 and Computer Numerical Simulation at Ground Water Flow-A Brie
Examination of the Possibilities and the Problems'. Proceedncs of Dew Gerlach '86,
Colorado Section of the Arne/tan Institute el Professional Geologists, May, 1988. (Presaged
at Denver,Colorado,November,1985)
Malin. P. and Jahn, J., 'A Ormadsan of Two Different computer Modeling Approedmes as
Applied to Stream Depletion De trretmru; Journal of the Computer Oriented Geolodal
Society.Norther,1988
Martin,P.and Jahn,J.,"Further Comparisons of Differing Modeling Approaches to Mdllayaed
Aquifers',Presaged at Denver Gooiest'87,October,1987
Matln R, Barclger, S. and Steels, T., 'Teller County A Case Stud/', Proceedings of
National Ground Water Assodalian, USEPA, USGS, CGS
(Presented et Denver,Colorado.March 2002).
ADDITIONAL SKILLS Carputer famitietty walleyed*ci ground water flow aid tramped models,CAD Systems,
many analytical ground water programs, programming capability in tartan and basic.
Tedrow. have testified and marled as an expert witness in Division I Water Coat Jefferson
County District Court at State S.B.-6 hearings, and at State Board of Water Well Contractors
hearings.
a
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
I(Visk lDGREELEY,GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us
E-mail address: kogle@CO.Weld.CO.US
PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT. 3540
COLORADO FAX (970)304-6498
April 17, 2003
Paul Gesso
Banks &Gesso
720 Kipling Street, Suite 117
Lakewood, CO 80215
Subject: Water for Mining Special Use Permits, Application Requirements
Dear Paul:
The Department of Planning Services is presently holding two applications, the Heit Mining application
and the Adams Sand and Gravel Mine for Premier Paving. Both mining applications were prepared and
submitted by Tug Martin of your office.
As you are aware, the Board of County Commissioners met in a work session to discuss the issues
addressed in your letter to this office dated March 21, 2003 specific to the requirement of adequacy of
water for permit applications. The Board's direction was to amend portions of Section 23-4-280 of the
Weld County Code. These changes are under review by this office in conjunction with the Attorney's
Office.
The County Attorney's office has prepared a minimum application standard for all Mining Special Use
Permits, regardless of whether or not the changes to the Code are made. The application for all Mining
Special Use Permits should address the following items:
Water Consumption
1. An analysis of the amount of water which will be required to be replaced for each phase of the
mining operation and at build out.
2. The analysis should address the amount of water consumed in the mining and processing of the
material including dust suppression
3. The analysis should address the issue of water consumed for domestic purposes by on-site staff
4. The analysis should address the issue of evaporative losses consumed from exposed
groundwater including a discussion of the feasibility of lining.
Water Replacement Source
1. A description of the surface and well water rights and their anticipated yields when converted to be
used as replacement for the water consumed in the mining operation.
2. Projections as to the mining of replacements to the river system from these sources.
3. A description of methods proposed to monitor, prevent and mitigate against direct injury to users
of wells in the vicinity of the gravel operation as a result of alterations in the groundwater regime
occasioned by the mining operation or to said impacts.
This office requests that information pertaining to Water Consumption and Water Replacement Source
as outlined above be submitted to this office. With this information in hand staff will set both cases for
Planning Commission review.
It is my understanding that the Heit Mining application is not in process and the Adams Sand and Gravel
application has been placed on administrative hold pending additional information. This case was
scheduled for May 6, 2003, however, staff would request your support in asking for an indefinite
continuance until this material is submitted and staff has time to review the documents. Mr. Martin is
aware of this situation for both applications.
Should you have any questions or need further information, I may be reached at the above address,
telephone number or e-mail address.
Sincerely,
Ki Ogle
Pla
ec: M. Mika,Director
C.Gathman,Planner II
L. Morrison,Attorney's Office
File: USR-1422
STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY •
Department of Natural Resources Weld County t'.
G'Ec{
1313 Sherman St.,Room 215 COLORADO
Denver,Colorado 80203 JUN 2 3 2003 DIVISION OF
Phone:(303)866-3567 MINERALS
FAX:(303)8328106 !n S r�,eYis ; + ,
q , ;;, GEOLOGY
RECLAMATION•MINING
SAFETY•SCIENCE
Bill Owens
Notice of 1 17 Conctmetion Materials Governor
Reclamation Permit Amendment Application Consideration Greg E.Walther
PP Executive Director
Ronald W.Cattany
Division Director
Natural Resource Trustee
DATE: June 19, 2003
TO: Weld County Planning Department
915 10th St
Greeley, CO 80632
FROM: Carl B. Mount, Senior Environmental Protection Specialist ltar._-C'Fx-C_t Pt
RE: Premier Paving, Inc., Adams Sand and Gravel Mine, Permit No. M-2003-012, AM-I
Please be advised that on June 19, 2003, Premier Paving. Inc., whose address and telephone number are
5085 Harlan St., Denver, CO 80212; (303) 940-3668, filed an Amendment application to M-2003-012, Adams
Sand and Gravel Mine, which is located at or near Section 19, Township IN, Range 66W, 6th Prime Meridian. in
Weld County. The application decision is scheduled for September 17, 2003.
A copy of the application is available for review, unless you receive a CD, at the Weld County Clerk &
Recorder's office and at the office of the Division of Minerals and Geology, Room 215, 1313 Sherman Street,
Denver, Colorado 80203.
If you desire to make comments or objections of the mine plan and/or the reclamation plan, they must be
submitted within twenty (20) days of the date of the newspaper public notice to be considered in the application
review process by the Division. You should contact the applicant for the newspaper publication date. If we do
not receive your comments or any objection by the end of the public comment period, the Office will assume you
have no objection or comment to the proposed activity.
r
Office of Office of Colorado
Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey
Hello