The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20031513.tiff tist..N., DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION 1555 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540 C. FAX (970) 304-6498 COLORADO November 20, 2000 Lyons 66 Pacific 15-lot PUD Z-555 1. Proper building permits shall be obtained prior to any construction, remodeling, demolition or excavation. 2. Separate building permits are required for all monument signs. Signs shall adhere to Section 42 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and Section 2.8 of the Weld County MUD Ordinance as applicable. Engineering may be required. 3. Engineered foundations, structures, and building systems are required for all commercial buildings. Engineered foundations shall be based on a site-specific geotechnical report performed by a Colorado licensed engineer. Any fill material shall contain no rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimension greater than 12 inches. All fills shall be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density. Engineering reports shall be supplied for all fill material. 4. All buildings or structures shall maintain distances from property lines and adjacent buildings as outlined in Table 5-A of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. 5. All structures shall conform to the 1997 Uniform Building Code, 1998 International Mechanical Code, 1997 International Plumbing Code, 1999 National Electrical Code, and the current Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 6. Setbacks to oil and gas facilities shall be as required by The Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 7. Development documents shall be supplied to the Mountain View Fire Department for review. Service,Teamwork, Integrity, Quality 2003-1513 8. At the time an application is accepted for a building permit a plan review will be done. A complete review of the building or structure by the Weld County Inspection Department or the Mountain View Fire Department may reveal other building issues or areas needing attention. &.rague , Building i icial • Service,Teamwork, Integrity,Quality STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER OF'coz Division of Water Resources � -°pb Department of Natural Resources FTi o 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 (: I Denver,Colorado 80203 *1876 Y/ Phone:(303)866-3581 FAX:(303)866-3589 March 26, 2001 Bill Owens Governor http://water.state.co.us/default.htm Greg E.Watcher Executive Director Kim Ogle Weld County Planning Hal D.Simpson,P.E. i g Dept.p State Engineer 1555 N. 17'"Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Lyons 66 Pacific,Z-555 Sec. 26,T3N, R68W, 6TH PM Water Division 1,Water District 5 Dear Mr. Ogle: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to subdivide a 35.01 acre parcel into 15 non- residential lots. The proposed water source according to the subdivision application is the Little Thompson Water District. A letter of commitment for service has been submitted, however, the letter obligates service for only 13 commercial lots. Since 15 lots are proposed, evidence must be submitted that all lots will be serviced by the District, prior to final platting. The District will supply treated water to the development. As a condition of activation of the taps, the applicant must transfer Colorado-Big Thompson (CBT)raw water for each lot, administered by the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, to Little Thompson Water District. The applicant must provide evidence that the CBT water has been transferred to the District prior to final platting. The amount of CBT water that must be transferred varies based on the tap size(see below). Tap Size #of shares required 5/8 inch 1 '/. inch 2.6 1 inch 3.6 1 1/2 inch 6.6 2 inch 8.4 Pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(II), C.R.S. the State Engineer's Office offers the opinion that the proposed water supply will not cause material injury to existing water rights, and with the District serving the proposal, the supply is expected to be adequate. If you have any questions in this matter, please contact Joanna Williams of this office. Rrely, %.57R tag Kenneth W. Knox Assistant State Engineer KWK/JMW cc: Richard Stenzel, Division Engineer Water Supply Branch Subdivision file I STATE OF COLORADO r OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources �i;oa co<oq Department of Natural Resources yT 'Ca 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 ' ' Denver,Colorado 80203 k• a c+� Phone:(303)866-3581 FAX:(303)866-3589 Bill Owens Governor http9/water.state.co.us/default.htm Greg E.Walcher Executive Director Hal D.Simpson,P.E. November 20, 2000 State Engineer Mrs. Kim Ogle Weld County Planning Dept. 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Lyons 66 Pacific, Zoning Change, Z-555 Dear Mrs. Kim Ogle Pursuant to the State Engineer's August 7, 1995 memorandum to county planning directors, this office is no longer providing comments on land use actions that do not involve a subdivision as defined in Section 30-28-101(10)(a), C.R.S. This referral does not appear to qualify as a "subdivision". Returned herewith are the materials submitted to this office in the above referenced matter. If you have any questions in this matter please call Joanna Williams in this office. Sincerely Uxw -- \----D Purushottam Dass �J Supervising Professional Engineer PD/JMW Enclosure Weld County Planning Dept. NOV 22 2000 RECEIVED • r f k(iiill.... MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Ogle, Planner II DATE: April 11, 2001 I ' , , ''` m PIi.nning DeptROM: Diane Houghtaling, P.E., Traffic Engineer 7m r • • SUBJECT: Z-555, Lyons 66 Pacific, Change of Zone 11 COLORADO RECEIVED The Weld County Public Works Depai liuent has reviewed this change of zone request. Comments made during this phase of the Planned Unit Development may not be all inclusive,as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining application process. COMMENTS: Internal Roadways: I have reviewed the new layout for this development. The internal streets meet the requirements of Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code. Roadway plans will be required at final plat. External Roadways: I will need a letter from the adjacent landowner verifying that he is willing to dedicate the necessary right-of-way for the frontage road and for the future connection to WCR 9.5. The frontage road right-of-way shall be dedicated to CDOT, and the connection right-of-way shall be dedicated to Weld County. Since the alignment for the 9.5 connection has not been finalized, the width of the right-of-way should be 100 feet to provide for minor alignment changes and turn lanes. According to Weld County GIS data,Mead Road north of State Highway(SH)66 is aligned 30 feet on each side of the sixteenth section line. The developer will need to complete a boundary survey to verify the new frontage road will align with Mead Road. Traffic Study: The traffic study submitted with this development stated that SH 66 will operate 18%over capacity in the year 2020. This includes the widening of SH 66 to 4 lanes. The engineer has submitted supplemental information stating that this project will contribute 10%of the traffic on this section of SH 66. The developer will be required to escrow funds to pay for improvements to SH 66 to mitigate his traffic impacts. Drainage Study: The drainage study was included in my packet. There are several minor issues. I have discussed them,by phone, with the engineer. The drainage study should be modified to include: references for all formulas pond sized to hold the 100-year storm,releasing at the 5-year storm pond slopes at 4:1 a method of converting the point discharge to overland flow before leaving the site RECOMMENDATION: Approval DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS (If Approved): ♦ Roadway plans shall be submitted with the final plat. f A letter from the adjacent landowner agreeing to dedicate the necessary right-of-way to reconfigure the frontage road and to provide a connection to WCR 9.5. 4 An Improvements Agreement including an escrow account for the direct traffic impacts of this project on the adjacent roadways. ♦ A revised drainage study. f A Boundary survey of the properties north of SH 66 to verify the frontage road/SH 66 intersection alignment. If you have any questions, please call. pc: Z-555 M:\W PFILES\diane\DEVELOPMENT\Z-555a.wpd MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Ogle, Planner II DATE: November 27, 2000 Meld Co FROM: Diane Houghtaling,P.E., Traffic Engineer jtilann lug Dept. O SUBJECT: Z-555, Lyons 66 Pacific, Change of Zdt4A V L 9 2000 COLORADO R E C Ef vED The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this change of zone request. Our comments and requirements are as follows: COMMENTS: This submittal does not incorporate any of the right-of-way requirements for State Highway 66 improvements. A preliminary traffic study was conducted for this site; it required State Highway 66 to be six lanes wide. The traffic study submitted with this package has reduced the zoning densities in the surrounding developments. This is not acceptable. The realignment of the frontage road has been submitted to CDOT staff design for review. The drainage study was included in my packet. There are several minor issues. I have discussed them, by phone, with the engineer. The drainage study should be modified to include: references for all formulas pond sized to hold the 100 year storm releasing at the 5 year storm pond slopes at 4:1 a method of converting the point discharge to overland flow before leaving the site RECOMMENDATION: Rejected -Incomplete submittal If you have any questions,please call. pc: Z-555 M:\WPFILES\diane\DEVELOPMEN Z-555.wpd EXHIBIT MEMO Weld County Planning Dept. DEC X 1 2000 To: Kim Ogle, ►ep. n e . Planning From: Rick Dill ,L i RECEIVED Subject: Z-555 Lyons 66 Pacific Date: November 28, 2000 We have reviewed this sketch plan and offer the following comments: 1. Road names within the PUD cannot duplicate existing street names elsewhere in the county. Pacific Circle is too similar to existing derivatives of Pacific already existing in southern Weld County. It is very important for individual addresses to be prominently displayed and easily visible from the roadway to facilitate emergency response particularly during darkness. Street name signs must also be prominently displayed and easily visible at all intersections with the proposed frontage road in the development. 2. The I-25 frontage road is used to temporarily re-route all traffic on north or southbound I- 25 in the event either are closed due to an accident or hazard. This contingency is outlined in the 1-25 Incident Management Plan. Use of the frontage road by the additional traffic volume identified in the study will significantly add to congestion when this occurs. Fortunately, the frequency of occurrence is probably 1-2 times a year for a matter of hours. The developer needs to be aware of this condition. 3. A 6-foot walking path is shown on the drawings but no detail is included in the project narrative. Additional information will be necessary. At this point, there are potential concerns pertaining to the safety of persons using this trail. 4. Without additional staff in accordance to the ten-year projection provided to the Board of Weld County Commissioners, the Sheriff's Office is not able to provide law enforcement services to new residents beyond 2001. Impacts anticipated at this time include private lot property damage vehicle accidents, increased call frequencies from incidents such as shoplifting, fraud, robbery, etc. The Sheriffs Office cannot absorb additional responsibilities without additional resources. SMUT • 0,0uNt4/4, MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT F E Administrative Office: 9119 County Line Road•Longmont, CO 80501 e !$4 a (303) 772-0710• FAX(303)651-7702 Viva December 7,2000 Mr. Kim Ogle Weld County Planning Department 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Ogle: I have reviewed the submitted material pertaining to the change in zoning for the 15 Lot PUD/Lyons 66 Pacific, located South of and adjacent to SH 66; west of and adjacent to 1-25 Frontage Road. The Fire District does not object to the request for Change in Zoning provided the development meets the requirements of the Fire District. All applicable codes as they pertain to water supply, fire hydrant locations, fire department access, and street designs must be met. Fire hydrant locations will need to be approved before the final plat is approved. Construction plans for the utilities showing the location of fire hydrants, the size of water mains and available fire flows must be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval prior to beginning construction of the subdivision. The submittal must include a water supply analysis indicating the available fire flow at the most demanding point in the water system. We appreciate being involved in the planning process. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 772-0710. Sincerely, Lon D. Miller Fire Prevention Officer LDM/Im cc Lyons 66 Pacific, LLC, c/o John Davis, 1210 Commerce Court Unit#36,Lafayette, CO 80026 project file EXHIBIT Im12.02.00 Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station 7 9119 Cnty Line Rd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 P.O.Box 40 Longmont,CO Longmont.CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Nhvot Road Lafayette.CO 600 Briggs 100 So.Forest St. 80501 80504 Mead,CO 80542 Niwut,CO 80544 80026 Erie,CO 80516 Dacono,CO 80514 Dec 08 00 03: 18p 1st Realty Assoc 303-678-8956 . Town of Mead k eau P.O. Box 626 Mead.••e little r,... 441 Third Street with.Ells r.,.re• Mead. Colorado 80542-0626 (970) 535-4477 Mr. Kim Ogle41 Planner Weld County Planning Department 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Case Number Z-555, Change of Zone for a 15 Lot PUD at the Southeast Corner of State Highway 66 and the 1- 25 Frontage Road Dear Mr. Ogle: 11 The Town of Mead strenuously objects to this proposal going forward primarily on the grounds that the property should be annexed into the Town of Mead. As you may know, the Town of Mead has entered into an intergovernmental agreement with Weld County which, if implemented, would have Weld County sending this individual to the Town for consideration of annexation if the property is contiguous to an existing Town boundary. We believe that this property meets that requirement. We hereby request that this process stop and that the individual work with the Town of Mead to annex the property. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter. Sincerely, Michael B. McDonough, AICP Consulting Town Planner EXHIBIT 1 Weld County Planning Dept. DEC 19 2000 iEcE Memorandum TO: Kim Ogle, W.C. Planning WII DATE: December 18, 2000 C • FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Health Department COLORADO 2 CASE NO.: Z-555 NAME: Lyons 66 Pacific The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this proposal. A member of our staff has also observed the site. The application has satisfied PUD Ordinance No. 197 in regard to water and sewer service. Water will be provided by the Little Thompson Water District and sewer will be provided by St. Vrain Sanitation District. Will serve agreements from both districts were included in the application materials. The impact plan provided in the application appears to meet the requirements of the PUD ordinance. The specific uses in the PUD were not identified in the application. Additional review will be required as each use is subject to the Site Plan Review process. The Department recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain water service from the Little Thompson Water District. 2. The applicant shall obtain sewer service from the St. Vrain Sanitation District. 3. The applicant shall obtain a storm water discharge permit from the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment, if required. Silt fences shall be maintained on the down gradient portion of the site during all parts of the construction phase of the project. 4. During development of the site, all land disturbance shall be conducted so that nuisance conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions, at the request of the Weld County Health Department, a fugitive dust control plan must be submitted. 5. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission any development that disturbs more than 5 acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods which are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. a. If land development creates more than a 25 acre contiguous disturbance, or exceeds 6 months induration, the responsible party shall prepare a fugitive dust control plan, submit an air pollution emissions notice, and apply for a permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. 6. The Right to Farm statement as included in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan dated October 31, 2000 be required to be placed on any recorded plat. EXHIBIT M\PAM\Planning\chzone\z555.wpd 1.1 STATE OF COLORADO ^ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ". 'C Region 4 /OT • 1420 2nd Street minain Greeley,Colorado 80631 (970)353-1232 Yield County Planning Dept. Weld County, 125 EFR Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Pk JAN 02 2001 SE Corner ofl25/SH66 December 29,2000 © E of Longmont Kim Ogle RECEIVED Weld County Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley,CO 80632 RE: Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park—John Davis(Case Number Z-555) Dear Kim: I have had the opportunity to review the above proposal and have met with Mr. Davis and his representatives regarding this site. Below are a list of items that CDOT has addressed: • CDOT is aware of the County's plan to build Weld County Road 9%. Our Region Transportation Director, Karla Harding,has asked that a meeting between Weld County and CDOT be held to help determine CDOT's position regarding this new county road,and its relationship to our frontage road. I will be arranging for that meeting sometime in the month of January. • Regardless of the construction of WCR 9'%, CDOT will grant direct access to the Davis property by way of State Highway(SH)66 and the east frontage road. At this time,that intersection is planned as a full movement intersection. • Right-of-way needs for SH 66 are being determined by the CDOT design engineer working on the 125 widening project. That information will be forwarded to the County once we receive it. • Mr. Davis has been advised that the segment of state highway within his site may someday become a cul-de-sac, and the access to SH 66 limited. The SH 66/125 EFR intersection may someday become a right-in/right-out/left-in access. It is also possible that the access may be limited to right-in/right-out only. • Mr. Davis has agreed to realign the existing frontage road as per CDOT's specifications. • CDOT recommends that the County require Mr. Davis to create an access easement through his site to the east property boundary in anticipation of a connection to the new WCR 9'%. • CDOT also recommends that a development agreement be drafted between the County and Mr. Davis acknowledging the possible changes to the SH 66/125 EFR access. Such an agreement should address the relationship of WCR 9'%to this site. The final plat should also address possible changes to the SH 66/125 EFR intersection. I hope that I have addressed the County's concerns regarding this site. CDOT is prepared to work with Mr. Davis and his staff on this development. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, elk& 1ka-I4i . GI a Hice-idler W Assistant Access Manager (970)350-2148 . xc: file IDOONT 9703502199 CDOT TRAFFIC 117 P02 JAN 02 '01 11:41 Hice-Idler, Gloria From: Chou, Charles ^ Sent Friday, December 29, 2000 11:25 AM To: Nice-Idler, Gloria Cc: Forsyth, David; Moores, David; Fielding, Gerald Subject: Comments on Lyons 66 Pacific Commerce Park Gloria, If Weld county has a time schedule for the construction of W.C.R. 9 1/2, then we can check the access on SH 66 at Mead Street. Otherwise we have to accept their intersection design which against our decision at scope meeting. In case we follow their design, how can we get the R.O.W. for the construction of the access they located it out off their land boundary and before our job on advertisement? Since we layout the new bridge across I-25 at south of SH 66, a 60 ft.(min.)wide R.O.W. will be required from the existing south side fence(or ROW)of SH 66. Please ask the developer to reserve that strip of land for SH 66 widening. For the proposed 1-25 frontage road (72'ROW),the curve tying with the existing frontage road should fit in with 40 mph (min.)design and the next curve at northeast shall be for 35 mph design. The drainage system in the developer's plan shell be incorporated with the facility of t-25 interchange and shall have enough capacity to handle the upstream storm flow. If you have any question, contact me at(303)757-9365. Happy New Year IN Charlie . ^ I 1 E QUBIT Hello