The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About840078.tiff RESOLUTION RE: GRANT REQUEST OF ARIX, ON -BEHALF OF -BEEBE DRAW CATTLE COMPANY, TO ERE-ADVERTISE CHANGE OF ZONE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, ARIX, on behalf of Beebe Draw Cattle Company, has submitted a letter to the Board of County Commissioners requesting that a Change of Zone application be pre-advertised, and WHEREAS, a copy of said letter is attached hereto and in- corporated herein by _reference, and WHEREAS , after review, the Board deems it appropriate to grant said request to pre-advertise these matters . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com- missioners -of Weld County, Colorado, that the rainiest made by ARIX, on behalf of Beebe Uraw Cattle Company, to pre-advertise the application for a Change of Zone be, and hereby is , granted. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly -made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 24th day of October, A.D. , 1984 . ' ° BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: £ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Weld County Clerk and Recorder w— and Clerk to the,1Board Norman Carlson, Chairman BY: El/' �' Depot oun Clerk J - ine eon, Pro-Tem AT-PROVED E TO FORM: At &� Gene R. Bra ner EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNING (AYE) ounty A orney Chuck Carlson 1i J T. Martin C n C lai (; p ( 840071 I /42'1 C Neal Carpenter. President A Professional Corporation Eugene R.Brauer Engineers Architects Planners Gordon W BruCbreve netAMIX 9 Patrick C.Dwyer Ro J.Shreve Dale J.Steichen Robert D.Thomas Greeley, CO • Riverton.WY Gary R.Windolph Ore rn, UT • Laramie.WY Grand Junction.CO October 22, 1984 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Complex 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Board Members : SUBJECT: BEEBE DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN CENTER P.U.D. , ARIX PROJECT NO. 832-55.00 The developer of the captioned site respectfully requests to preadvertise for the December 12, 1984 Board's hearing of the Change of Zoning Application from Agricultural to P.U.D. At present, the Application for Change of Zoning will be heard by the Planning Commission on November 13, 1984. It is understood that this request will be considered at a regular work session. Please notify either myself or Mr. Morris Burk if our presence is required and the date of the meeting. Sincerely, A , A Professional Corporation 76(tz Arthur F. Uhrich Project Director AFU/pt xc: Morris Burk 800 Eighth Avenue P.O. Box 2021 Greeley,CO 80632-2021 303-356-3930 • c1D (7.ANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) REZONING APPLICATION Case i,': Dept. of Planning Services App. Ch'd By: Date Rec'd: 915 10th Street App. Fee: Receipt r: Greeley, Colorado 80631 Record. Fee: Receipt It: Phone: 356-4000, Ext. 4400 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. Please print or type, except for necessary signature. • I (we) , the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Weld County Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached sheet (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available) : PRESENT ZONE PROPOSED ZONE TOTAL ACREAGE OVERLAY ZONES SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: Legal Title: Beebe Draw Cattle Co. Name: A Limited Partnership Home Telephone #: Address: 1551 Larimer Bus. Telephone #: 620-0967 Denver. CO 80202 Equity Owner Pursuant to contract for Deed Jan. 31 , 1983 Name: Beebe Draw Land Co. , Ltd. , A Limited PartnershipHome Telephone #: Address: 1551 Larimer Bus. Telephone #: 620-0967 Denver, CO 80202 Name: Home Telephone //: Address: Bus. Telephone //: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above) : Name: • Home Telephone 1/: Address: Bus. Telephone /l: Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in the Weld County Assessor's Office: Name: Beebe Draw Land Company, Ltd. and Beebe Draw Cattle Co. Address: 1551 Larimer, Denver, CO 80202 Name: Aristocrat Angus Ranch, Ben Houston , General Partner Address: Platteville, CO State of Colorado-Board of Land Commiss. Name: Upland Industries Corporation 620 Centennial Bldg, 1313 Sherman St. Address: 110 North 14th St. , Omaha , NE 68102 Denver. CQ 80203 See attached page for lessees of mineral rights I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all statements, proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. BEEBE DRAW LAND COMPANY , LTD. COUNTY OF WELD ) B MORRI BURK, GENERAL PARTNER STATE OF COLORADO ) c)EE. Q � � '---, G' Signat re: Owner or Authorized Agent VIOTA„y ` a Subs ib d and sword to before me this 2Ztii day of Sa1+Gmgi/l , 19a. -7/ J'QO °F COIORa BLrif, • C(.� �j,C ,Nig .Commission Expire NOTAKY IC //�� My Cc;nission expires: fpctObej 3� X1985 ? aut. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section 3, Township 3 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. A part of the South Half (S1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4) and the South Half (S1/2) except for parcel conveyed to School District No. Ninety Nine by quit claim recorded November 6, 1911 in Book 346 at Page 310. Section 4, Township 3 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. All of Section 4, except that portion of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4) lying east of the Platte Valley Canal . Section 5, Township 3 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. The Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4, NE 1/4) the South Half of the North Half (S1/2, N1/2) and the South Half (S1/2) . Section 8, Township 3 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. All . Section 9, Township 3 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. All . Section 10, Township 3 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. The West Half of the Northwest Quarter (W1/2, NW1/4) the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SE1/4, NW1/4) the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SW 1/4, NE 1/4) , the East Half of the Northeast Quarter (E1/2, NE1/4) the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NW 1/4, NE 1/4) and the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE 1/4, NW 1/4) except those parcels described in decree and declaration of taking, in Case No. 2336 , the Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company, A Corporation vs. Charles D. Howard and Alvin Jessup, recorded May 31 , 1910 in Book 327 at Page 436 under Reception No. 156016. Also that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 10 lying west of Milton Reservoir. Section 16, Township 3 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. All . Section 17, Township 3 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. All . Planned Unit Development Plan AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE Application No. Subject Property Beebe Draw Farms and Equestrian Center STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of property (the surface estate) within five hundred (500) feet of the property subject to the application. This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty (30) days of the ap ,l cation' ubmission date. i BEEBE DRAW LAND COMPANY, LTD. Mr The foregoing instrument was subscribed rand swornis Burk, General o before rmeethis 24 oft. day SQPflMtS2C _ 19t1-.. WITNESS my hand and efficia soh•,' Pty Commission expires: * ,� i Nly. C 05.5 4 Li985 iell r-- Jfao�UBLIG y� p 1�C�YU� f3ctPber Col. r r Notary Pub is Planned Unit Development Change of Zone NAMES OF Cl,NERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET Please print or type NAME ADDRESS, TOVN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION fi William W. Ray and 17376 Weld County Rd. 46 62105532000007 Patricia A. Ray LaSalle , CO 80645 62105533000004 Donald J. Moser and Route 1 , Box 151 Mollie Moser LaSalle, CO 80645 62121303000015 Beebe Draw Cattle Co. 1551 Larimer, Suite 2706 62105533000005 Denver, CO 80202 62105533000006 62121304000001 62121304000002 62121303000014 62121303000011 62121311000004 62121311000002 62121315000008 The Beebe Draw Gun Box 310 Club Greeley, CO 80632 62121303000016 Carl A. Jepsen and .20121 Weld County Rd. 42 Virginia M. Jepsen LaSalle, CO 80645 62121302000001 The Farmers Reservoir 80 South 27th Ave. and Irrigation Co. Brighton , CO 62121311000003 62121311000008 62121315000009 Jerrold J. Wardell & 18253 Weld County Rd. 32 Anna E. Wardell Platteville, CO 80651 62121307000006 62121318000002 62121318000001 ' 62121318000013 62121319000010 62121320000008 Grace Gunnels 11335 Elliot Avenue — El Monte, CA 91732 62121320000007 Maynard G. Ludwig & 17978 Weld County Rd. 39 62121306000003 Marilyn A. Ludwig Platteville , CO 80651 62121305000012 Benjamin Knaub & 3080 S. Jay Joanne Knaub Denver, CO 80227 62121306000001 Jerrold J. & Anna 14015 Weld County Rd. 43 6212132200000/ E. Wardell Hudson , CO 80642 62121321000002 c/o William K. Frank Planned Unit Development Plan AEFIDI.VIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE Application No. Subject Property Beebe Draw Farms and Equestrian Center STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and leases of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land which is the subject of the application as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office, or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. BEEBE DRAW L ND COMPANY, LTD. Morri Burk; General Partner i The foregoing instrument was subscribed and .sworn to before me this 2pfll day of SO D@11 , 19a WITNESS my hand and o�'f +C,ra r,yq 5 �\ 4r ��',Oi My Commission expi s1 RP,y o Jt E.' Commission Exp�re i cv6 October 3R i�aS,` pltrLir `� lill ��--*:7:j6 ' ,ty23> ' Notary Pub Lip VVV .00 O^ tL- • . ed-E0 ' ?O63 ( MINERAL AND/0R SUBSURFACE INTEREST OF1NERS Beebe Draw Cattle Co . Beebe Draw Land Co . , Ltd . 1551 Larimer , ;;27066 Denver , CO 80202 Aristocrat Angus Ranch Ben Houston , General Partner Route 2, Box 76—A Platteville , CO 80651 Upland Industries Corporation 110 North 14th St . , #1000 Omaha , NE 68102 • State of Colorado— Board of Land Commissioners 620 Centennial Building 1313 Sherman Street Denver , CO 80203 United States of America BLM— Northeast Resource Area 10200 W. 44th Ave , Wheatridge , CO 80033 LESSEES Coors Energy Company P.O.Box 467 • Golden, CO 80401 Champlin Petroleum Company P.O.Box 1257 Englewood , CO 30150 tvlachii— Ross Petroleum Co . 3420 Ocean Park Blvd . , 13070 ' Santa Monica , CA 90405 Vessels Oil & Gas Company 600 South Cherry, 11220 Denver , CO 80222 • Amoco Production Company 2.O.Box 591 - Tulsa , 0;C 74102 BEEBE DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN CENTER APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONING THIS STATEMENT IS TO ACCOMPANY THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUMMARIZING AND DESCRIBING THE IMPORTANT FEATURES OF THE PUD AND TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL OF WELD COUNTY'S REQUIREMENTS FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE TO PUD INCLUDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN r \ THIS SJATEMENT IS ACCOMPANIED BY A BOUND SET OF DETAILED EXHIBITS NUMBERED THRU 17 , AND REFERENCE WILL BE MADE TO SPECIFIC EXHIBITS IN CERTAIN CASES. -PORTIONS OF THIS STATEMENT WILL BE REDUNDANT BECAUSE THE ORDINANCE ITSELF IS REPETITIVE. I .A. THIS PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE WELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. THE APPLICATION IS FOR PUD ZONING INVOLVING SEVERAL COMPATIBLE AND MUTUALLY SUPPORTING USES ON APPROXIMATELY 4300 ACRES OF LAND (SHEET 2 OF 2 OF VICINITY MAP), AND ADJOINING ANOTHER 2200 ACRES OF LEASED RECREATION LAND INCLUDING THE MILTON RESERVOIR . THE INITIAL STARTING POINT IN THE PLANNING AND ONE OF THE PRINCIPAL USES AND MOST IMPORTANT FEATURES OF THE DEVELOPMENT IS THE COMPLETE EQUES- TRIAN CENTER AND TRAINING FACILITY FOR ALL TYPES OF EQUINE USES, INCLUDING A CROSS COUNTY COURSE AND APPROXIMATELY 18 MILES OF RIDING TRAILS THAT WILL EXTEND THROUGHOUT THE GREEN BELT AREA. 2. THIS IS NOT IN ANY WAY A TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OR DEVELOP- MENT, AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT IT WILL APPEAL TO ARE NOT GOING TO BE TYPICAL OF THE OWNERS IN CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISIONS. THE 4300 ACRE PUD IS COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT () . IT WILL INCLUDE THE MOST COMPLETE EQUESTRIAN CENTER IN THE WESTERN STATES. THE CENTER IS DESCRIBED IN DETAIL IN EXHIBIT © . EXTENSIVE WATER RECREATION FACILITIES ON THE MILTON RESERVOIR AND LARGE SINGLE FAMILY HOMESITES ALL ARRANGED ALONG THE EXTENSIVE GREEN BELT AREAS AND EQUESTRIAN TRAILS COMBINE TO MAKE A COMPLETELY UNIQUE COMMUNITY WHICH BENEFICIALLY UTILIZES THE WHOLE 6500 ACRE TOTAL AREA. 3. THIS IS A UNIQUE COMBINATION OF AGRICULTURALLY ORIENTED EQUESTRIAN AND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE -WHICH NEEDS A LARGE RURAL AREA, BUT ONE WHICH WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH PRESENT SURROUNDING AGRICULTURAL USES AND ZONING AND WHICH WILL NOT REMOVE ANY PRODUCTIVE LAND FROM AGRICULTURAL USE. 4. THE CONCEPT ALSO INCLUDES AN INTERIOR AREA ADJACENT TO THE EQUES- TRIAN CENTER FOR R-3 ZONING FOR UP TO A MAXIMUM OF 100 LOW DENSITY CONDOMINIUM UNITS TO BE BUILT IN SMALL 4 UNIT 2 STORY BUILDINGS FOR USE OF EQUESTRIAN CENTER MEMBERS AND PARTICIPANTS IF THE NEED FOR THEM IS DEMONSTRATED. 5. THE DEFINITION IN THE ORDINANCE OF A PUD FITS THIS PROJECT COM- PLETELY: "THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT ARE TO: ENCOURAGE FLEXIBILITY AND VARIETY IN THE DEVELOP- MENT OF LAND TO PROMOTE ITS MOST APPROPRIATE USE ; IMPROVE THE DESIGN, CHARACTER, AND QUALITY OF NEW DEVELOPMENT; FACILITATE THE ADEQUATE AND ECONOMICAL PROVISIONS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SERVICES ; PRESERVE THE NATURAL AND SCENIC FEATURES OF THE DEVELOPMENT AREA; ENCOURAGE AN INTEGRATED PLANNING APPROACH; AND ENSURE COMPATABILITY WITH WELD COUNTY ' S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. WELD COUNTY IS AUTHORIZED TO REGULATE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS BY SECTION 24-67-101, ET. SEQ, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, 1973 AS AMENDED." 6. THIS PUD WILL RESULT IN THE CREATION OF A HOMOGENEOUS COMMUNITY OF PROPERTY OWNERS WHO HAVE TO HAVE THE SAME INTEREST IN THE LIFESTYLE BEING OFFERED OR THEY WOULD NOT BE WILLING TO BUY UNDER THE SEVERE RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE BEING PLACED ON THE DEVELOPMENT. 7. THE POLICIES ON PAGES 59 AND 60 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPLYING TO RESIDENTIAL TYPE DEVELOPMENTS CANNOT BE APPLICABLE TO SUCH A LARGE MIXED USE PUD SUCH AS THIS. THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT ESTABLISH A PRECEDENT FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA. WHILE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SEEMS 10 ENCOURAGE RESIDENIIAL GROWTH ADJACENT TO EXISTING MUNICIPALITIES THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE IN THE CASE 1 OF THIS LARGE AND UNIQUE PUD DEVELOPMENT WHICH REQUIRES THE SPECI- FICS OF THIS SITE THAT CANNOT BE DUPLICATED ANYWHERE ELSE. THIS PUD IS UNIQUE AND UNLIKE ANY CONVENTIONAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP- MENT ANYWHERE ELSE IN WELD COUNTY OR IN THE FRONT RANGE AREA. ITS SIZE AND COMBINATION OF USES WOULD MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO BE LOCATED IN OR ADJACENT TO ANY EXISTING CITY, SINCE IT COMBINES SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING OWNERSHIP WITH THE COMMON OWNERSHIP OF A FULL SERVICE EQUESTRIAN CENTER, 3000 ACRES OF COMMON GREEN BELT RECREATION AREA AND ACCESS TO A LARGER AREA FOR WATER SPORTS. THE FOLLOWING FACILITIES AND SERVICES ARE TO BE PROVIDED TO TH PROPEgTY OWNERS AND WILL BE OWNED BY ALL OF THEM, SEE EXHIBITS AND A. EQUESTRIAN CENTER: INDOOR ARENA AND RIDING SCHOOL OFFICE AND EQUESTRIAN CLUB BUILDING OUTDOOR ARENA STABLES AND OUTSIDE PADDOCKS DRESSAGE AND STADIUM JUMPING AREAS CROSS COUNTRY COURSE SPECIALTY TRAINING AREAS HAY AND EQUIPMENT STORAGE BUILDINGS B. WATER AND OTHER RECREATION FACILITIES: FLOATING DOCKS FOR SMALL BOATS LAUNCHING RAMP PROPERTY OWNERS CLUBHOUSE WITH SWIMMING POOL AND TENNIS COURT C. PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION WILL OWN: ALL PUD ROADS AND EASEMENTS EQUESTRIAN CENTER FACILITIES RECREATION FACILITIES GREEN BELT RECREATION AND COMMON OPEN SPACE AREA THE TOTALLY UNIQUE COMBINATION OF ALL OF THE FEATURES INCLUDED IN THIS PUD ARE NOT AVAILABLE NOR COULD THEY BE MADE AVAILABLE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO ANY TOWN IN WELD COUNTY OR ANYWHERE ELSE IN COLORADO THAT WE ARE AWARE OF. THIS PUD WILL NOT REALLY CONFLICT WITH THE RESIDENTIAL GROWTH POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BECAUSE ALL OF THE NECESSARY MUNICIPAL TYPE SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE TO THE PUD SITE. THE PUD WILL BE SELF CONTAINED WITH ITS OWN ENVIRONMENT AND ACTIVITIES AND WILL NOT HAVE EITHER AN ADVERSE ECONOMIC OR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ON WELD COUNTY. SEE EXHIBIT SECTIONS O AND (ID . B. ANSWERING THE POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS STATED ON PAGES 48 AND 49: 4 1. "ANY USES OF PRIME IRRIGATED FARMLAND FOR USES OTHER THAN AGRICULTURAL WILL BE CRITICALLY REVIEWED TO INSURE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT THE AGRICUL- TURAL INTERESTS OF THE COUNTY AND THAT THE DEVELOPMENT WILL POSITIVELY CONTRIBUTE TO THE OVERALL ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT AND TAX BASE OF THE COUNTY." a) NO FARMLAND IS BEING USED OR IS INCLUDED IN THIS PUD APPLICATION. b) THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND THE EDAB HAVE EXPRESSED THE OPINION THAT THE EQUESTRIAN CENTER AND ITS RELATED ACTIVITIES WILL BE A DEFINITE ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL BENEFIT TO WELD COUNTY. c) THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS WILL BE PHASED AS DETAILED ON PLAN SHEET(D OF THE APPLICATION. BUILDING PERMITS WILL BE LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 50 PER YEAR. THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL THUS MAKE A POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION TO THE TAX BASE OF THE COUNTY, PRODUCING A SURPLUS OF 2 8. THE EXTREMELY LOW DENSITY WITH A MAXIMUM OF ONE HOME PER EACH SIX ACRES OF THE PUD NOT INCLUDING THE 2200 ACRES OF THE MILTON RESERVOIR LEASE. IV. 28.3. 1. 1.4 ADEQUATE WATER SERVICE AND METHOD FOR HANDLING SEWAGE HAS ALREADY BEEN DISCUSSED IN II 3) ABOVE . SEE EXHIBITS 12 AND 13 . V. 28.3. 1.1.5 "THAT STREET AND HIGHWAY FACILITIES PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY ARE ADEQUATE IN SIZE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROPOSED ZONE DISTRICT." a) THE COUNTY ROADS SERVING THE PROPERTY (32 AND 39) ARE ADEQUATE IN SIZE TO PROVIDE ACCESS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. ( SEE TRAFFIC STUDY IN EXHIBIT 14 ) . U.S. HIGHWAY 85 IS ADEQUATE TO SERVE THE ACCESS R ADS (SEE LETTER FROM STATE OF COLORADO, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS) . WCR 32 AND 39 WILL REQUIRE IMPROVEMENTS IN QUALITY, HOWEVER, TO PROPERLY MEET THE OPTIMUM NEEDS OF FULL DEVELOPMENT. THE DEVELOPER PROPOSES TO UPGRADE THE COUNTY ROADS SERVING THE PUD SITE AT ITS OWN EXPENSE THROUGH THE FOLLOWING PROGRAM: 1. UNDER A ZERO COST CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY, THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION WOULD PROVIDE COMPLETE ROAD MAINTENANCE ON APPROXIMATELY 7 MILES OF COUNTY ROADS (SEE LEER FROM ARIX TO WELD COUNTY ENGINEER IN EXHIBIT 4 ) INCLUDING GRADING, DUST CONTROL, SNOW REMOVAL AND MAINTENANCE OF FULL TIME EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS. MAINTENANCE WOULD BE PROVIDED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE ROADS IN QUESTION ARE PAVED. ADEQUATE LIABILITY INSURANCE TO COVER MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS BEING PERFORMED FOR THE COUNTY WOULD BE CARRIED BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION AT ITS OWN EXPENSE. 2. ESTABLISH A FUND TO PAY ONE-HALF THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST OF PAVING THE APPROXIMATELY 7 MILES OF COUNTY ROADS SERVING THE PROPERTY TO THE STANDARD COUNTY PAVEMENT SECTION. THIS LEVEL OF IMPROVEMENT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO RESTORE THE ROADS TO THEIR CONDITION PRIOR TO THEIR HAVING BEEN RECENTLY REVERTED TO GRAVEL, AND TO SERVE LARGER VOLUMES OF TRAFFIC. b) THE ROADS WOULD BE PAVED AT SUCH TIME AS ACTUAL COUNTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES WARRANTED THIS LEVEL OF IMPROVEMENT AND THE MIX OF TRAFFIC WAS SUCH THAT SUBSEQUENT EARLY FAILURE OF THE PAVEMENT WOULD NOT BE EXPECTED. THESE CONDITIONS TOGETHER WITH THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST WOULD BE SPECIFIED IN THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT THAT WOULD BE CONCLUDED WITH THE COUNTY AT THE PUD PLAN APPROVAL STAGE. DETAILS OF THE ACCESS ROAD PROPOSAL TOGETHER WITH TRAFFIC STUDIES AND VOLUME PROJECTIONS ARE CONTAINED IN EXHIBIT 14 e) PRIVATE INTERIOR ROADS WITHIN THE PUD WOULD BE GRAVEL CONSTRUCTED TO COUNTY STANDARDS, AND WOULD BE FULLY MAINTAINED, INCLUDING DUST CONTROL, BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION AT NO COST TO THE COUNTY. VI. 28.3.1.1.6 COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 21.5. 1.5, PAGES 20-5 AND 20-6. 1. THE PROPOSED CHANGE OF ZONE IS NOT LOCATED IN ANY OVERLAY DISTRICT. 2. THE PROPOSED REZONING DOES NOT CONTAIN A COMMERCIAL MINING DEPOSIT. SEE LETTER FROM LEONARD RICE CONSULTING ENGINEER, EXHIBIT 15 . 3. SOIL CONDITIONS ON THE SITE ARE SUITABLE FOR THE USES INTENDED. SEE SOIL REPORT, EXHIBIT © AND SOIL MAP, SHEET 1 OF 2 OF VICINITY MAP. EXHIBIT ® . 6 C. r"..-7' , .. r . I. 3 i9 1 .LO;3<Sq r; i:F4 .. . • December 3 , 1984 Mr. John Martin, I am writing this letter to express my opinion against the purposed Beebe Draw/Milton Reservoir development, as I may not be able to attend the public meeting December 5 ,1984. The problems of a development such as purposed, fifteen miles away from any population center, are overwhelming. A few of the problems include: 1) Roads in the area- the developer may promise oil roads etc. but who will maintain these roads in the future . A drive on Weld County roads makes you aware of the huge maintenance problems . . 2) Pressure on the RE-1 School District - Even if a developer promised land for this it is a small price for him to pay, the tax payers of this district will foot the burden. 3) Police and fire protection - this is a very remote and rural area. 4) Misuse of limited agriculture land. The praire land in this area is .a very aandy and delicate ecosystem. Intensely developed there can be several unseen problems of land erosion and sand blowing. 5) What effect will a development as purposed have on adjacent agrriculture land? 6) Water usage and pollution - a development as this takes a huge amount of limited water. What effect will 600 closely packed septic systems have on water in the area? 7) Air pollution - the remoteness of the development dic- tates increased driving in the front range. 8) The Milton Reservoir is not in any condition to be any- thing but an agriculture reservoir. To portray this area as a summer playground of waterskiing, sunbathing, windsurfing, horseback nature riding is a cheap ploy by the developer to sell. The mosquitos , horseflies and other insects along with rattlesnakes etc. make this area less than ideal in the sum- mertime. With all these problems , I as a lifetime resident of the Beebe Draw community cannot see how anyone who has seen this area could vote for the development purposed. The developer has shown no regard for the area and is prepardd to promise anything to get his way so he can make a huge profit. I would hope you see beyond all the pronises and vote against the purposed development. Thank you, /AM-- A _ /2Lc Ai/'L i I Stan D. Bruntz , DVN Greeley Area Chamber of Commerce 1 . 1Ck1R NEWS RELEASE • YOUR OPPORTUNITY VIM FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Greeley Area Chamber of Commerce wig v Steve Abrams DEC 352-3566 51984 December 3 , 1984 ill 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 GREELEY. COLO. Beebe Draw Equestrian Center Over the past several months the Economic Development Advisory Board ( EDAB ) has reviewed the Beebe Draw Farms & Equestrian Center project and supports the application for a Planned Unit Development change of zoning . Specifically , EDAB concurs with the following: 1 . Development of this project adjacent to existing city boundaries is not feasible . 2 . The acreage designated for the residential tracts is not suitable for agricultural use . 3 . The nature of this development is compatible with the intent of the comprehensive plan . - more Greeley Area Chamber of Commerce FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Greeley Area Chamber of Commerce Steve Abrams 352-3566 December 3 , 1984 2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2 4 . This proposed project meets EDAB ' s goal of diversified developm-ent . 5 . The nature of the project is compatible with the quality-of-life goals EDAB seeks to promote . 6 . This project can have substantial positive impact on the image of Weld County . 7 . The developers have met critical concerns in this proposal ; a . Water will be commercially available . b . Extensive negotiations with the county planners have led to a satisfactory proposal which minimizes the county ' s liability for road maintenance . - more -- Greeley Area Chamber of Commerce FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Greeley Area Chamber of Commerce Steve Abrams 352-3566 December 3 , 1984 3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3-3 8 . There will be substantial support and interest for this project on the front range . Therefore , EDAB respectfully asks the County Commission- ers to approve this application for a zoning change . NOTE : Three members of the Board did not participate in the vote to support this project due to conflicts of interest . - 30 - Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting November 13, 1984 Page 8 The Chairman called a recesss at 4:10 p.m. The meeting was called to order at 4:20 p.m. by the chairman, Bob Ehrlich. CASE NUMBER Z-412:84: 13 APPLICANT: Beebe Draw Cattle Company REQUEST: A Chance of Zone from "A" Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development (R-1; R-3; and recreational uses) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Sections 3, 4, 5 and 10; all of Sections 8, 9, 16 , and 17; all in T3N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately six (6) miles east of Platteville; east of Weld County Road 39 and south of Weld County Road 38 Bob Ehrlith, Chairman, asked to be excused from participating in the request due to a possible conflict of interests. The vice-chairman, Sharon Linhart, is chairing the meeting. APPEARANCE: Morris Burk, property owner, stated he bought this land in 1978 and gave a brief background history of the property. This parcel of land contains approximately 4,300 acres. They have a lease with the Milton Damn for recreational uses for twenty Years, renegotiable every five years. They are asking that this parcel of land be rezoned to allow for approximately 1,500 single family and multiple family dwellings on approximately 1,500 acres and an equestrian training and riding area. There will be over three thousand acres of greenbelt area with horse riding trails. Any equestrian events seen at the Olympics can he held here as well as other equestrian events. He discussed how this proposal complies with the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. There will be no prime farmland taken out of production. The size of each lot, approximately two acres, and the use make it impossible to locate next to an existing town. Building permits will be limited to a maximum of fity per year so the fiscal impact on the area can be controlled. In this way the fiscal impact can be reviewed as outlined in their written plan. They have worked with the State Fish and Wildlife Department to preserve the wildlife in the area. Central Weld Water would provide water to the area and they have agreements with both ditch companies. The Planned Unit Development will be buffered on all County Roads, and all -accesses to the individual properties will he within the Planned Unit Development itself. Individual septic tanks will serve the Planned Unit Development area. Each individual lot will be located on a greenbelt area. There are currently twenty—nine oilwells on the property and these will also be protected by a greenbelt area and any residences would more than meet the setback requirements. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting November 33, 1984 Page 9 Tape 183 — Side 2 Mr. Burk reviewed the traffic study done on the proposed Planned Unit -Development. They will maintain seven miles of gravel roads in the area plus dust control. They will pave Weld County Road 32 from Platteville into the project, but they have not set a definite time limit on this. All interior roads will be permanently maintained by the association. He also discussed the possibility of forming a law enforcement authority district. Steven Blue, Arix, presented a drawing of the Planned Unit Development. This was retained by the staff as evidence. Drew Scheltinga, Weld County Engineer, felt this development would have a major impact on the Weld County Road and Bridge Department, especially on Weld County Road 32 and 39. This is a huge development and by the developers projections there is the possibility of traffic increasing to five or six thousand cars per day. Tape 184 — Side 1 Louise Allen, Rosall Remmers Cares, Planning Urban Design and Research, discussed the fiscal and school impacts the Planned Unit Development would have on the area. Art Uhrich, P.E. , Arix, reported the Weld County Health Department has now given approval for individual septic systems to be placed within the Planned Unit Development area. The Chairman asked Rod Allison to read the recommendations of the Department of Planning Services staff, which is for denial, into the record. The Chairman called for discussion from the audience. Craig Anderson, surrounding property owner, asked that this request be denied because it is a residential venture rather than an agricultural project. David Karpell, Rocky Mountain Energy, a Division of Union Pacific -Railroad Company, stated they own the mineral rights on all odd numbered sections. They would like to maintain the use of any area which may have a mineral deposit. Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting November 13, 1984 Page 10 Rod Allison reviewed the recommendation from the Colorado Geological Survey which stated this is not considered a mineral resource by the state. Audry Ward, Property owner one mile south of the area, spoke against this proposal fearing the electric lights from the project would interfer with her study of astronomy. Neil Peters, Attorney, Amoco, stated Amoco is the holder of the lease rights and they would like to be sure that if this request is approved their rights are protected. They would also like a provision written into the standards and filed with the plat that oil and gas is a use by right and that they will be able to drill in any area they feel would be productive. The Chairman called at recess at 6: 15 p.m. The meeting was called to order at 6:25 p.m. NOTICE: Bruce Barker is now serving as legal counsel to the Planning Commission. Jean Marks and Carla Moser, surrounding property owners spoke against this request. Carl Jeppson, II, stated that he felt developments of this type should be next to an existing town instead of starting a new city in the middle of nowhere. Dave Harvey, equestrian instructor, reported they want to move their equestrian center from Fairplay to this area because of the longer season and the lower altitude. Pamela Staley, Engineer, Amoco, discussed oil formations in this area. She presented a map with geological formations for the area. This was retained by the staff for evidence. Tape 185 - Side 1 MOTION: Jack Holman moved Case Number Z-412:84: 13 for Beebe Draw Cattle Company he forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval. While it not good to put a Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting November 13, 1984 Page 11 development out in nowhere there should be no problem with this one if the developers do what they say they are going to do. This is a development that could not he located next to a town. The housing development probably could, but the equestrian center would probably not fit into an area next to a town and the development is not taking prime agricultural land out of production and that the following conditions be met before the Board of County Commissioners take any action on this request: 1. The Central Weld County Water District shall provide the water supply to the Planned Unit Development District. The water supply system shall be provided, consistent with the requirements of Section 8-10 et seq. of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations, pursuant to Public Water Supply Systems and Fire Safety Requirements. 2. The applicant, developer and/or homeowner's association shall provide and maintain all roads internal to the Planned Unit Development District. The roads internal to the Planned Unit Development District shall remain private and must comply with the design standards listed in Section 8-1 et seq. and 8-2 et seq. of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. 3. Prior to the Board of County Commissioners' meeting the applicant and representative of the Weld County Engineering Department shall identify which County roads are impacted and determine the required improvements and maintenance to paved roads. 4. Prior to the Board of County Commissioners' meeting, the applicant shall meet with the owner and/or lessees of the mineral rights and determine that the uses permitted in the Planned Unit Development Distict are compatible with the existing and future development of the minerals under the subject property. Motion seconded by Doug Graff. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jack Holman - yes; Louis Rademacher - no; Bill McMurray - yes; Stephen Hamilton - no; Paulette Weaver - No, she feels that this is a very attractive proposal, but there are some real problems with its noncompliance with the Comprehensive Plan. That it is not contiguous to a town. This is a development that is larger in area than many of our towns in the County and once it is developed the population will Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting November 13, 1984 Page 12 be greater than many towns in the County. Just in terms of size of the development and the equestrian center it would be possible to put it contiguous to a town and it would solve many of the problems of costs of providing services to the development . She does not feel this is necessarily the best use of the land, and in light of cost to the County, whether or not we like it or not, the cost is there and is a significant detraction from what in many ways is an attrative proposal. Doug Graff - yes; Lydia Dunbar - no; Sharon Linhart - Yes, and she wished to complement the applicant on the thoroughness of their application. It is her feeling they adequately addressed many of the concerns she had including a major concern, which is our compliance with our Comprehensive Plan. She feels the applicant has adequately addressed these. Bob Ehrlich — Abstain. Motion is a tie vote with four voting for the motion and four voting against the motion and one abstaining. MOTION: Paulette Weaver moved that Case Number Z-412:83: 13 for Beebe Draw Cattle Company be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission taking no position on this request. The Planning Commission is not recommending either approval or denial. Motion seconded by Jack Holman. The Chairman called for discussion from the members of the Planning Commission. Discussion followed. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Jack Holman - yes; Louis Rademacher - yes; Bill McMurray - yes; Stephen Hamilton - yes; Paulette Weaver - yes; Doug Graff - yes; Lydia Dunbar - yes; Sharon Linhart - yes; Bob Ehrlich - abstain. The motion carried with eight voting for the motion and one abstaining. The meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted Zo +s. g`ocW Bobbie Good Secretary rjg/ "._ � OF CO Oy7 bn V in h O RICHARD D. LAMM * I * GOVERNOR * * JOHN W. ROLD *1876 * DIRECTOR COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313zSHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)866-2611 November 13, 1984 Mr. Rod Allison Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street sareeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Allison: RE: BEEBE DRAW SUBDIVISION We have received and reviewed a geologic report on two (2) core holes on the proposed subdivision property. These moles were drilled to determine if potentially economic coal and sand and gravel deposits exist beneath the site. The Laramie core hole did not find coal seams in excess of 3.4 feet. Two core hole logs west of the property indicate that many of the coal seams are discontinuous. An exploritory hole was drilled in the ancient Platte River channel , northwest of Milton Reservoir. This hole indicates that approximately 60 feet of sand overlies gravel in the channel . This drill hole data from the Leonard Rice economic geology report indicates that economic coal and gravel deposits are not present beneath the site. Based on this information, we have no objection to the proposed zoning change. However, we continue to recommend that a geologic report, as required by Senate Bill 35, be completed for this development. We recommend that this report be completed prior to approval of the final PUD application. Sincerely, rpal Turney ) c=: -7 y `; ` Engineering Geologist ��1 d�lv})1t��_�� bj 1:0I 16 1984 JET-84-118 _ Weld Co.-Planning Commission GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST...KEY TO THE FUTURE RESOLUTION OF THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Paulette Weaver that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission that application for: CASE NUMBER: Z-412:84: 13 APPLICANT: Beebe Draw Cattle Company ADDRESS: 1551 Larimer, Denver, Colorado 80202 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from "A" Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development (R-1; R-3; and recreational uses) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Section 3, 4, 5, and 10; all of Sections 8, 9, 16, and 17; all in T3N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately six (6) miles east of Platteville; east of Weld County Road 39 and south of Weld County Road 38 Be recommended to the Board of County Commissioners with the Weld County Planning Commission taking no position on this request. The Planning Commission is not recommending either approval or denial. Motion seconded by Jack Holman. Vote: For Passage Abstain Against Passage Jack Holman Bob Ehrlich Louis Rademacher Bill McMurray Stephen Hamilton Paulette Weaver Doug Graff Lydia Dunbar Sharon Linhart The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. Z-412:84:49 Beebe Draw Cattle Company November 13, 1984 Page 2 CERTIFICATION OF COPY I Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on November 13, 1984, and recorded in -Rook No. IX of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 16th day of November, 1984 Secretary BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Jack Holman that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: Z-412:84: 13 APPLICANT: Beebe Draw Cattle Company ADDRESS: 1551 Larimer, Denver, Colorado 80202 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from "A" Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development (R-1; R-3; and recreational uses) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Sections 3, 4, 5, and 10, all of Sections 8, 9, 16, and 17; all in T3N, -R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately six (6) miles east of Platteville; east of Weld County goad 39 and south of Weld County Road 38 be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: While it is not good to put a development -way out in no where there should be no problem with this one if the developers do what they say they are going to do. This is a development that could not be located next to a town. The housing development probably could, but the equestrian center would probably not fit into an area next to a town and the development -is not taking prime agricultural land out of production. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Central Weld County Water District shall provide the water supply to the Planned Unit Development District. The water supply system shall be provided, consistent with the requirements of Section 8-10 et seq. of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations, -pursuant to Public Water Supply Systems and Fire Safety Requirements. 2. The applicant, developer and/or homeowner's association shall provide and maintain all roads internal to the Planned Unit Development District. The roads internal to the Planned Unit Development District shall remain private and must comply with the design standards listed in Section 8-1 et seq. and €-2 et seq. of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. Z-412:84: 13 Beebe Draw Cattle Company November 13, 1984 Page 2 3. Prior to the Board of County Commissioners' meeting the applicant and representatives of the Weld County Engineering Department shall identify which County roads are impacted and determine the required improvements and maintenance to paved roads. 4. Prior to the Board of County Commissioners' meeting, the applicant shall meet with the owner and/or lessees of the mineral rights and determine that the uses permitted in the Planned Unit Development District are compatible with the existing and future development of the minerals under the subject property. Motion seconded by: Doug Graff Vote: For Passage Abstain Against Passage Jack Holman Sob Ehrlich Louis Rademacher Bill McMurray Stephen Hamilton Doug Graff Paulette Weaver Sharon Linhart Lydia Dunbar The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Bobbie Good, Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on November 13, 1984, and recorded in Book No. IX of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 15th day of November 1984 211 .:A34-Ls- (\c O' f-4 77)- � /�r,n,e,a/e}, WE, THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE BEEBE -DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN CENTER HAVE BEEN SHOWN THE PLANS, SCHEDULES AND APPLICA- TION MATERIAL THAT IS BEING SUBMITTED TO THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE. MORRIS BURK, GENERAL PARTNER OF BEEBE DRAW LAND COMPANY, LTD. , THE APPLICANT, HAS MADE THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTATIONS TO US: 1. WATER WILL BE SUPPLIED TO THE DEVELOPMENT BY THE CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FROM THE EXISTING 12" MAIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROADS 39 AND 38. 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE COMPLETED IN PHASES, WITH NO MORE THAN 50 BUILDING PERMITS TO BE ISSUED IN ANY YEAR, WITH THE EARLIEST RESIDENTS BEING IN 1986. 3. THE ENTRANCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE OFF OF COUNTY ROAD 39 AS SHOWN ON VICINITY MAP SHEET 2 OF 2. THE ACCESS ROADS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE WCR 32 AND 39. 4. UNTIL SUCH TIME AS WCR ROADS 32 AND 39 ARE REPAVED, THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO WELD COUNTY FOR MAINTAINING 2 MILES OF ROAD 32, 4 MILES OF ROAD 39 AND ROAD 3B FROM 39 TO 43 THAT ARE PRESENTLY RETURNED TO GRAVEL. THIS MAINTENANCE INCLUDES DUST CONTROL AND SNOW REMOVAL. 5. THE PROPOSED HOMESITES WILL AVERAGE 2 AC-RES. THE MINIMUM SIZE HOUSE WILL BE 1-500 SQ. FT. NOT INCLUDING PORCHES OR GARAGES. NO MOBILE HOMES OR TRAILERS WILL BE ALLOWED. NO PERIMETER FENCING WILL BE PERMITTED ON ANY TRACTS AND NO ANIMALS WILL BE ALLOWED TO GRAZE ON ANY OF THE AREA EXCEPT AT THE EQUESTRIAN CENTER. NO MORE THAN 5% OF ANY TRACT CAN BE FENCED FOR A HORSE PADDOCK. 6. DOGS WILL BE STRICTLY CONTROLLED, AND NO HUNTING OR OFF ROAD VEHICLES WILL BE PERMITTED. PROVIDED THAT ANY APPROVAL BY WELD COUNTY INCLUDES THE ABOVE LISTED CONDITIONS AND REST-RICTIONS, WE DO NOT OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED BEEBE DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. DATE NAME ', I ADDRESS /01/3/8 N k//"..'M Ll� -4 osec-- Ecrnrc /88 Yet Mit'Y3 /% 1 //stet! R/a3'E4L is`^� a-Cr"N r.gt6Ce 1O`23 C,r-{�.\,cv f Mor'd< 7 4C�� I ( r�l c1 o trt�i`lam/ { /G ,1 -.z . . e 47972'' ArtC' 9d 39 Plaftwiec, (0. Po&si to •n7Arg 711 eir /G/ e tru:/ )7970 fr;ea.g? eetA..,-uPie5 en.?ohs/ io-Al- 8,/ eoatild .1Gn .?.4- 14'[/37 Gxf7 3qi AAS4Be Pte, f3oCa4� L ' /0- 3n-?d uP W. , O, /737r &Jo C/4- /U - 3O 5c/ Qccielti ?7<;� WE, THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE BEEBE DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN CENTER HAVE BEEN SHOWN THE PLANS, SCHEDULES AND APPLICA- TION MATERIAL THAT IS BEING SUBMITTED TO THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE . MORRIS BURK, GENERAL PARTNER OF BEEBE DRAW LAND COMPANY, LTD. , THE APPLICANT, HAS MADE THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTATIONS TO US: 1. WATER WILL BE SUPPLIED TO THE DEVELOPMENT BY THE CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FROM THE EXISTING 12" MAIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROADS 39 AND 38. 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE COMPLETED IN PHASES, WITH NO MORE THAN 50 BUILDING PERMITS TO BE ISSUED IN ANY YEAR, WITH THE EARLIEST RESIDENTS BEING IN 1986. 3. THE ENTRANCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE OFF OF COUNTY ROAD 39 AS SHOWN ON VICINITY MAP SHEET 2 OF 2. THE ACCESS ROADS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE WCR 32 AND 39. 4. UNTIL SUCH TIME AS WCR ROADS 32 AND 39 ARE REPAVED, THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO WELD COUNTY FOR MAINTAINING 2 MILES OF ROAD 32, 4 MILES OF ROAD 39 AND ROAD 38 FROM 39 TO 43 THAT ARE PRESENTLY RETURNED TO GRAVEL. THIS MAINTENANCE INCLUDES DUST CONTROL AND SNOW REMOVAL. 5. THE PROPOSED HOMESITES WILL AVERAGE 2 ACRES. THE MINIMUM SIZE HOUSE WILL BE 1500 SQ. FT. NOT INCLUDING PORCHES OR GARAGES. NO MOBILE HOMES OR TRAILERS WILL BE ALLOWED. NO PERIMETER FENCING WILL BE PERMITTED ON ANY TRACTS AND NO ANIMALS WILL BE ALLOWED TO GRAZE ON ANY OF THE AREA EXCEPT AT THE EQUESTRIAN CENTER. NO MORE THAN 5% OF ANY TRACT CAN BE FENCED FOR A HORSE PADDOCK. 6. DOGS WILL BE STRICTLY CONTROLLED, AND NO HUNTING OR OFF ROAD VEHICLES WILL BE PERMITTED. PROVIDED THAT ANY APPROVAL BY WELD COUNTY INCLUDES THE ABOVE LISTED CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, WE DO NOT OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED BEEBE DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. DATE NAME ADDRESS /0/0 _ / 9 - 54 G f � � ,J�a �n � y /o - /9 ,�� w ,Pl, " ,ern R/7Pi-6 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE BEEBE DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN CENTER HAVE BEEN SHOWN THE PLANS, SCHEDULES AND APPLICA- TION MATERIAL THAT IS BEING SUBMITTED TO THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE . MORRIS BURK, GENERAL PARTNER OF BEEBE DRAW LAND COMPANY, LTD. , THE APPLICANT, HAS MADE THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTATIONS TO US: 1. WATER WILL BE SUPPLIED TO THE DEVELOPMENT BY THE CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FROM THE EXISTING 12" MAIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF ROADS 39 AND 38. 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE COMPLETED IN PHASES, WITH NO MORE THAN 50 BUILDING PERMITS TO BE ISSUED IN ANY YEAR, WITH THE EARLIEST RESIDENTS BEING IN 1986. 3. THE ENTRANCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE OFF OF COUNTY ROAD 39 AS SHOWN ON VICINITY MAP SHEET 2 OF 2. THE ACCESS ROADS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE WCR 32 AND 39. 4. UNTIL SUCH TIME AS WCR ROADS 32 AND 39 ARE REPAVED, THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO WELD COUNTY FOR MAINTAINING 2 MILES OF ROAD 32, 4 MILES OF ROAD 39 AND ROAD 38 FROM 39 TO 43 THAT ARE PRESENTLY RETURNED TO GRAVEL. THIS MAINTENANCE INCLUDES DUST CONTROL AND SNOW REMOVAL. 5. THE PROPOSED HOMESITES WILL AVERAGE 2 ACRES. THE MINIMUM SIZE HOUSE WILL BE 1500 SQ. FT. NOT INCLUDING PORCH-ES OR GARAGES. NO MOBILE HOMES OR TRAILERS WILL BE ALLOWED. NO PERIMETER FENCING WILL BE PERMITTED ON ANY TRACTS AND NO ANIMALS WILL BE ALLOWED TO GRAZE ON ANY OF THE AREA EXCEPT AT THE EQUESTRIAN CENTER. NO MORE THAN 5% OF ANY TRACT CAN BE FENCED FOR A HORSE PADDOCK. 6. DOGS WILL BE STRICTLY CONTROLLED, AND NO HUNTING OR OFF ROAD VEHICLES WILL BE PERMITTED. PROVIDED THAT ANY APPROVAL BY WELD COUNTY INCLUDES THE ABOVE LISTED CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, WE DO NOT OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED BEEBE DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. DATE NAME ADDRESS /a/3//ePt G � G�cc /( /3/42,o— C /Ts t.3 of-so,2 (� Date: November 13, 1984 Case Number: Z-412:84:13 Request: A change of zone from "A" Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development; R-1, R-3, and recreational uses. Legal Description: Part of Sections 3, 4, 5 and 10; all of Sections 8, 9, 16, and 17; all in T3N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Location: Approximately six (6) miles east of Platteville; east of Weld County Road 39 and south of Weld County Road 38. The Department of Planning Services Staff recommends that this request be denied for the following reasons: 1. The applicants have failed to demonstrate in submitted application materials or in oral statements prior to this meetingthat the request is in conformance with Section 28.3. 1. 1.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. Section 28. 3. 1. 1.5 requires the applicant to demonstrate that street or highway facilities providing access to the property are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zone district. The Weld County Engineering and Planning Departments have determined that the following Weld County -roads are not adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed "PUD" District: (A) That part of WCR 32 from Platteville to WCR 43; (B) That part of WCR 43 from WLR 32 to WCR 30; (C) That part of WCR 30 from WCR 43 to WCR 49; (D) That part of WCR 39 from WCR 32 to WCR 44; and (-E) That part ofWCR 38 from WCR 39 to the Platte Valley Canal. To date, Weld County has no future plans to budget for the necessary public road improvements that would be required to support the proposed development. The subject site is located outside of any municipalities master plan for future expansion of street or highway facilities. The applicant has not expressed a willingness to upgrade the affected street or highway facilities at his own expense. , . , WIlD To Rod Al 11SAn _2lanni ng Date October IU�LA� 7j0d7 i.. ,�;1r ^ ,G y COLORADO -From _ odney H Hutrhincon, Fngineering Manaaer/ I"M,441 subject:Beebe_-Orew Farms Fquestrian renter Sketch Plan Application We have received a supplemental letter from the Beebe Draw Farms' engineer proposing a mutual road improvements plan. The applicant has based his road improvements proposal on the premise that Weld County has capital improvement funds available to devote to the road network serving the proposed development. Quite to the contrary, we have no capital improvement program. All available funds are now committed to maintaining our 3000 miles of roads at present service levels. This is not always possible, and some of our roads are being degraded. We have been forced into a mode of de-building our transportation infrastructure and are unable to provide adequate, facilities for the levels of usage our road network is now experiencing. Certainly, it is inconceivable that we could financially support the severe increase in service levels required by this development. A traffic increase from 200 vehicles per day to 3000 would require improvements far in excess of those proposed by the applicant. The applicant has requested that the County share in the improvements to six miles of gravel road. There is no doubt among all parties that these gravel roads are not sufficient to serve the project. There are, however, at least eight additional miles of roadway which are also inadequate to serve the development. The paved section of Road 32 into Platteville and the paved portion of Road 39 north to Road 44 are in poor condition. These roads are narrow, lack shoulders, lack adequate vertical and horizontal alignment, lack proper structural base, and the pavement sections are deteriorated beyond repair. These roads, along with the sandy section of Road 32 along the south boundary of the subdivision, will not properly serve any increase in traffic volume. In reality, this development requires upgrading of at least 14 miles of road. Based on the applicant' s projections for County Road and Bridge income from the development at build out, these initial improvements have a 75 to 100 year pay-back period. Not only are the proposed improvements insufficient, but the County should not be shouldered with the responsibility of mitigating this development's impact on the road system. The proposed improvements package incorporates a 14 year stage construction plan. Our experience has shown that stage construction methods, such as those proposed, are not effective. The base course becomes contaminated and loses its structural value in a very short period of time. In addition, the surface treatments are not adequate to support interim traffic loads prior to paving. We have tried these methods on Weld County Roads 16, 39, 41 and 100. None of these attempts at stage construction were successful . These roads experience relatively light traffic of less than 100 vehicles per day. Yet, the applicant has proposed pavement only after reaching 1750 vehicles per day. Even then, only 21/2 inches of pavement is proposed. In accordance with the Colorado Department of Highways' Design Manual , we anticipate a the need for at least twice that pavement thickness to support the projected traffic volume. D Ll(0&57? ,i 0CT 18 1984 geld Co. Planing Cornmission Rod Allison, Planning Beebe Draw Farms Equestrian Center Sketch Plan Application `Page 2 It is not conjecture, but rather experience-supported fact, that the stage construction proposed will not work satisfactorily. The proposed road improvements would be administered through a long-term (14-year) agreement between the County and the Homeowners ' Association. Our experience has shown that long-term commitments such as these are not effective, even with the best of initial intentions and well-conceived plans . The slightest problem, dis- content, lack of sales, change in financial abilities , or change in the desires of the residences becomes a difficult situation which always falls back into the County. Even if the County were willing devote over $869,000 to this project, we do not think that a 14-year commitment with the future property owners would be an effective way to pursue these improvments . We also feel that the cost of improvements would increase to over $4,000,000 over the years . We realize that the road improvements needed to properly serve this development are beyond the fiscal feasibilities -of the project, but that is not the fault of Weld County. The problem is attempting to develop a parcel so far removed from existing services . The Weld County Zoning Ordinance is quite clear in that the applicant is required to show adequate existing access facilities . The site is not located to comply with this requirement, nor can it be made to comply without serious financial impacts on the developer as well as the Weld County Road and Bridge Budget. RHH/b f EmORAnDUm 464( 40, Wig O Rod Allison, Planning November 8, 1984�'[` Date Donald D. Warden t\' Vt COLORADO From 1 Fiscal Impact Analysis of Beebe Draw Subject: At your request, I have reviewed the fiscal impact report submitted by Beebe Draw. I have only reviewed the report from Weld County Government's perspective, and not from the School District's or special district's point of view. The methodology utilized in the fiscal impact analysis is a reasonable methodology and the data is reliable with the following exception. The report appears to not include the future maintenance cost o₹ the road system that will be required to support the project. The project, as described, appears to have two major impacts on Weld County. The first impact will be the impact on roads and bridges. I concur with the memorandum of October 10, 1984 to you from Rodney Hutchinson, Engineering Manager, regarding the cost of the roads. I would not recommend approval of the project until there is a commitment on the part of the developer to pay for the road impact in the area. Without a commitment up front, I cannot envision Weld County having the financial ability in the future to accommodate the road system requirements. Not to get the developer before the project is approved or approved conditionally upon solving the road problem would do nothing but aggravate the current road and bridge problem -in Weld County. The key problem to be resolved is the development of the road system to support the project. Once the system is in place, obviously there will be maintenance costs associated with the road system developed over the next several years that would have to be absorbed by the Road and Bridge budget. The second area of significant impact will be law enforcement, as indicated in Undersheriff Rick Dill's October 26, 1984 memorandum. Again, I would concur with Undersheriff Dill's comments and suggestions. This project does meet the intent of a law enforcement authority (LEA) and should be created as part of the development. The LEA would have it's own mill levy to support the law enforcement services required. Finally this project, like all others in Weld County, will not contribute added property tax to Weld County as long as the Home Rule Charter 5% limitation remains with it's current status. The added assessed value will only contribute to lowering the property tax mill levy without any appreciated actual property tax revenue to Weld County Government. The above comments are directed only at the fiscal impact and are not in any way intended to be pro or con for the project's approval or disapproval as a land use issue. The key recommendation is that the project should not be approved until the problem of road access and development is resolved between the County and the developer. If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact me at extension 4218. I can also make myself available at any hearings you desire me to attend to discuss the above if needed. DW/ch M;r4 as ,.. rYY ,� ,✓ YJ✓.�.y�,1 7,1-;/ ✓a4/ ;0.y j, ..✓ 11 -?C:NE: 234-6336 November 8, 1984 Mr. Rod Allison Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, -Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Allison: I would like to take this opportunity to comment on several items concerning the LaSalle Fire Department with reference to the proposal of Beebe Draw Farms and Equestrian Center. I would first of all like to refer to my letter dated July 19, 1984 (see enclosure #1) in which S raised some questions about hydrants and water pressure. The proposal did not answer these questions. I would also like you to consider the following comments and recommendations: 1. No parking to be allowed in either the standard or one way cul-de-sacs. 2. The hay storage building #4 should have at least a 100 foot separation from any planned future buildings. 3. A 6 foot chain link fence with barbed wire on top shall be placed around all oil and gas wells to prevent the tampering with valves, etc. Where deemed necessary by the LaSalle Fire Department, guard posts shall be installed to protect the wells from vehicle damage. 4. The Uniform Fire Code has been adopted by the LaSalle Fire Protection District and shall be enforced in the Beebe Draw Farms and Equestrian Center. Please see enclosures #2 & #3 for some of the main concerns at this time. 5. All future drilling and abandonment of oil and gas wells must comply with all state, county and LaSalle fire Protection District standards. (See enclosure #4) 6. On page 17 Item #6 changed to read, "Fire protection will be handled by the LaSalle Fire Protection District." 7. On page 17B the third paragraph changed to read, "The Association will support the LaSalle Fire Department." 8. On page 17c 1. A) 5. changed to ` read, "A pumper, of a type to be determined by the Developer and Fire District Board, for use by the Volunteer Fire Department under the control and direction of the LaSalle Fire District at a time to be determined by the Developer and the -Fire Protection District Board." 9. Cn page 17C under Responsibilities and Duties Item #4 changed to read "Maintain rescue equipment stationed on property for water safety, when needed, and provide storage. Item #5 Delete. /372-,C v14. Y -ells -ere r O ( O71 Ca 7) 118 MAIN STREET P.O. 3OX 414 LA SALLE, COLORADO 80645 I would also like to mention that the proposal states that the "Property Owners Association will maintain the roads including snow removal". This is -critical to the LaSalle Fire Department and I would stress to the Developer that a good maintenance and snow removal program should begin immediately when the project roads are completed. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this proposal. Sincerely, lc�L,/ Gary Sandau, Fire Marshal LaSalle Fire Department GS:js LAND-USE APPLICATION SUMMARY SHEET Date: November 13, 1984 CASE NUMBER: Z-412:84: 13 NAME: Beebe Draw Cattle Company ADDRESS: 1551 Larimer, Denver, Colorado 80202 REQUEST: A Change of Zone from "A" (Agricultural) to "PUD" (Planned Unit Development) (R-1, R-3, Recreational Uses) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Sections 3, 4, 3, and 10; all of Sections 8, 9, 16, and 17; all in T3N, R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: Approximately 6 miles east of Platteville; east of Weld County Road 39, and south of Weld County Road 38 SIZE OF PARCEL: 4,328, acres,more or less POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS: The duties of the Planning Commission are set forth in Section 28.3 et seq. of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance; please find a copy of this Zoning Ordinance Section in your case summary packet. The applicant has not adequately addressed the issue of traffic impacts, road improvements, and road maintenance as they relate to a Change of Zone to a planned Unit Development District. A copy of Section 28.3.1. 1.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and the referral comments from the Weld County Engineering Department are enclosed. The Department of Planning Services has not yet received comment-s from the LaSalle Fire Protection District. The Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey Division is requesting additional information from the applicants in order to determine if the subject site contains commercial mineral deposits in accordance with C.R.S. 34-1-305. The staff will recommend continuance of the November 13, 1984, Planning Commission meeting if the commercial mineral deposits matter is not resolved. A copy of the Colorado Geological Survey's comments and C.R.S. 34-1-305 are enclosed. Also, the Colorado Geological Survey Division indicated that there may be a problem with the proposed on-lot sewage disposal systems. The Weld County Health Department has been forwarded a copy of the Colorado Geological Survey's comments for further review. • Land-Use Application Summary sheet Z-412:84: 13 Beebe Draw Land Company Page 2 A copy of the referrals from the -Sheriff's Department, Pan Handle Eastern Pipeline Company, Platte Valley Soil Conservation Service, and the Farmer's Reservoir and Irrigation Company are enclosed for your review. The Department of Planning Services Staff has not received any objections to this proposal. FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: z-4J2:84:13 DATE OF INSPECTION: October 15, 1984 NAME: Beebe Draw Cattle Company REQUEST: A Change of Zone form Agricultural to Planned Unit Development LEGAL DESCRIPTION: parts of Sections 3, 4, 5 and 10; all of Section 8, 9, 16 and 17, all in T3N, R&SW of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado LAND USE: N Agricultural production E Milton Reservoir, Agricultural Production S Agricultural Production W Agricultrual Production ZONING: N Agriculture LOCATION: approximately 6 miles east of E Agriculture Platteville; east of Weld County Road 39 and S Agriculture south of Weld County Road 38 W Agriculture COMMENTS: The subject site adjoins Weld County Road 32 to the south, Weld County Road 39 to the -east, and Weld County Road 38 to the north. All of these roads are gravel or sand base and could provide access to the property. The topography on the subject site is mainly broadly rolling sand-hills. There are several oil and gas production facilities located on the subject site (oil well, tank battery, heater, treater, separator) . The Platte Valley Canal and Evans Number 2 Ditch are located in the northeast corner of the subject site. BY: fit) R d Allison, Current Planner II RA:rg 28.2.2 PUD Rezoning Application. Upon determining that the change of zone to a PUD District application meets the submittal requirements of Section 28.5.2, the Department of Planning Setvites shall institute the change of zone procedures in Section 21.4 of this Ordinance. 28.2.3 PUD Plan. The Department of Planning Services shall ensure that a proposed PUD Plan is located within a PUD District or is within an area subject to a concurrent application for a change of zone to a PUD District. Upon determining that the applicant has met the PUD Plan submittal requirements in Section 28.5.3, the Department shall institute the applicable procedures under Section 21.4 of this Ordinance. 28.3 Duties of the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider an application for a change of zone to a PUD District or an application for a PUD Plan. 28.3. 1 Change of Zone to a PUD District. 28.3. 1. 1 The Planning Commission shall hold a hearing to consider the application for the change of zone to a PUD District. The public hearing may involve either the rezoning application alone or may include the review of a concurrent application for a PUD Plan within the proposed PUD District. The Supplementary District Regulations, Section 40, and the Overlay Districts, Section 50 when applicable, may also be reviewed concurrently. The Planning Commission shall provide recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners concerning the disposition of the requested change. Such recommendations shall be made within sixty (60) days of the initial hearing date. The Planning Commission shall recommend approval of the -request for the change of zone to a PUD District unless it finds that the applicant has not met one or more of the applicable requirements or conditions of Sections 28.3. 1.1, 28.5 and 28.6. The applicant has the burden of proof to show that the standards and conditions o₹ Sections 28.3. 1. 1, 28.5 and 28.6 are met. The applicant shall demonstrate: 28.3.1. 1. 1 That the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 28.3. 1. 1.2 That the USES which would be allowed in the proposed PUD District shall be consistent with the Performance Standards of the PUD District contained in Section 35.3 of this Ordinance. 20-57 I, III 28.3. 1. 1.3 That the USES which would be permitted shall be —• compatible with the existing or future DEVELOPMENT of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning, and with the future OPMENT as projected by the COMPREHENSIVE PLAN oRrMASTER ri PLANS of affected municipalities. ii 28.3. 1. 1.4 That adequate water and sewer service will be made II available to the site to serve the USES permitted l' within the proposed PUD District; 28.3. 1.1.5 That STREET or highway facilities providing access to the property are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zone district. In ! the event that the STREET or highway facilities are not properly sized and are planned to be properly sized in the future, in conformance with the Weld County Thoroughfare Plan or in conformance with the MASTER PLANS of affected ir municipalities, the applicant may either wait to secure the rezoning until the improvements are made by the appropriate unit of government or the applicant may express a willingness to upgrade the I! STREET or highway facilities at his own expense in i, order to expedite approval of the requested change , ,of zone. In the latter event, it will be I necessary for the applicant to either construct the necessary improvements before the building Fr permits are__issued, or submit suitable performance guarantees to Weld County to ensure construction of the required STREET or highway facility improvements. i 28.3. 1. 1.6 That there has been compliance with the applicable • requirements contained in Section 21.5.1.5 of this J Ordinance. 28.3. 1.2 The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall forward the official recommendation of the -:A'+ . Planning Commission and the information contained .in the official record, which includes the Department of Planning Services case file, to the 'std Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) days :IV ''•after said recommendation has been made. • 28.3. 1.3 If the Planning Commission recommendation is I conditional upon the applicant completing certain specified items prior to the publication of the notice for the hearing by the Board of County ,, `, Commissioners, then the ten (10) day period shall commence upon submission of the items by the applicant to the Department of Planning Services. T 28. 3.2 PUD Plan Q; 20-58 hl"m • • • ' 1 • • I • • • �� ] •. spy T EJ !e4N$ M .� < 1 �... �'•- - • r 4 ° Ono lY / • . \ x Ef. 1 ; I / 2-43,41II _,.....-L. . 14'first Correction_ Pt -e". F. r1 -/i �� • ,orrection r -\-'-- - " 4,403:• -- f `„_ Line L ! I I fl °°•�v gel .5„, • 1 ® .I u on :K• /6V.E. M, ••�° [ /n rn 4-4-1' � ' • •� 0 tr. 1 ../ J�1Fr l/N.ON °�,/ aL pC° • �F V. . tl.a �, • L• I • 0 /�1 �L/ • • y��r`/� • _ _ I'a�Y�l • L.fi°NY. I \.11 . -..._._. \ �r •. n •• • , ii: J•I/" ♦_e •r '].� • j • l.w _ 1\ x.-- I •t°✓�'I.J- - i�. .•xL.. - • • . �. a° 1 • f i? • e° • rip w'! • I- 10 • °d I • pyyp `p• •Y • ' '•-'•O.cn • x i' • c' .r• ♦ ,..x 2\2 !• . a xf •A• a . P• of • !cot, ° (Ijy(ptT _ • n• • o i 1 c _ - L „�1 sir¢?'• •/ . •1• • �• x o- \ x • n'/..Fri L• 1.- e. .�gt I n 011! m a•�In x14/ I .aZl�v / x]• I °' • • a°4 ] • \.g• 1,-• .. _. ;4 t -v3>,Y`�'- _ T x• a II, •of ° ° � • n •o! I�r'.4• LCR ST•p,• •E .• r 1 :. •„•° •A(' I• • • •°� ••�• ••..N I/ - --• _ •! • ° • tar ._ ..__—.. _ _._ _ �� ..35 49 • I c ff a A fx i ,r3 •'� p x N • •31. Cr) 1 glIV. • d. Q Piarq > f f] •• .39'• • �• •I I •�• 1 1 t 1•113-!--i--• ••/ I\.f°oLr II 1 I • ..1;® ' 4 fa ^u. , _.►i"tat � ----- is 1 — n f]_ + • /M) 1 f YI ppw • • 1 • • • N •2 •.E ♦ ti 1-,TTE ILLe V h x• II n - x. . zo , :./J ns I rk I . IL �! x. _ i xf �• �� x] � 1I il ;L I f. 3t I 32 35 •lc j 5 i 0 lit,' C. i 32 I 33- •® • 1 • �2 ` , . i 1 Y = i • o . ciroY — o II � hr1. I .I II . . 0 A et rn=..z..............!,_. , ri 1 33 24�. °• C .elsrocnx °• • f x' n .` 1 o x �° xs • ----3.4 P1NEnETT •a .• u i k- \ 1 x + • V . ......L. , ---4-i: ; .4 _. __27 i . ---1.--,______T_ err !./. " Lb 7;..•". ,, t\ es:a '''.---.7‘.--) 1, .4 . .np % • 4 Z r w � I 50 �•1 O\ .\ • V . 1 . O .,\ .!t.'?b V 1 C1 =._f -e {t om ~t- 1} - ( (�\�i \ O \(J � �\�\ , a�� fir ' l • � \\io ``� \ • v cfri wo Y r o. -*J le ' I a o o \\ \\ - ,,-6 1 - 25 \c!, ft\ r -/? YtO J. —LT J �� -7;-- ' ' st - ovy'v 1 i i S Z �V ,z/I� y v s \ to ' 1 vim, v 1 "_ - - C� >al. o® em a V � -� 743'LT ON �•r V V _ f..A Vii. I - - r� ap Y o r h -Jr" ,A' =Y_ _ I` � - "—Ia62 ; :- ra a e" 14 N 48'7 ',�� \ W �u�.� w a / as.a \pjE.lD co: rat) JZ +<ia �.r j .rm+ +f `F'. 24 i y A . .r� J e , ammo ,, _'. i o_ 'ti i { L) j 1� il- ..,a) Y o O r b / REFERRAL LIST APPLICANT: Beebe Draw Cattle Company, LTD CASE NUMBER: Z-412:84:11 SENT REFERRALS OUT: October 15, 1984. REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY November 2, 1984 Z m H O ¢H co H < C E 2 Z W I-4 P O. h a W a = Wzcn O O O gi 0 0 0 W ill 0 14 U z ca ii F42 2 vwi a 2 —_-- County Attorney (plat only) 7( RE-1 School District XX c/o Lee Triplett, Ph.D. Weld County Health Department P.O. Box 157 k XX Gilcrest, Colorado 80623 Engineering Department , Z XX Louis Rademacher County Extension Agent X Planning Commission Member ,( XX 13184 Weld County Road 13 Longmont, Colorado 80501 )( XX Office of Emergency Management La Salle Fire District Attn: Mr. Gary Sandau Colorado Geological Survey P.O. Box 245 X Attn: Ms. Julia Turney La Salle, Colorado 80644 XX 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 F.R.I.C.0 (Referral Packet Delivered X Attn: Mr. Manual Montoya t by applicant) 80 South 27th Avenue Brighton, Colorado 80601 X � State Engineer L- XX 1Division of Water Resources Central Weld County Water Dist. 1313 Sherman St. , Room 818 n Attn: Mr. Dale Olhausen, P.E. Denver, Colorado 80203 2235 2nd Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 State Highway Department 1420 2nd Street Brighton Soil Conservation Dist. Greeley, Colorado 80631 A' 60 South 27th Avenue Brighton, Colorado 80601 Colorado Department of Health { Water Quality Control Division Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. 4210 East 11th Avenue L Attn: Mr. Owen Jones Denver, Colorado 80220 X 635 North 7th Avenue P.O.- Box 127 Attn: Mr. Bud Mahn Brighton, Colorado 80601 Colorado Division of Wildlife Attn: Mr. Don Bogart X Rick Dill, Undersheriff Weld County, Colorado 80631 317 West Prospect Fort Collins, CO 80536 ito 46c inkv To_Rod 011ison,--Pa-arming_ Date October 1Q,- B4'= ^ COLORADO From _ Rcdnay FH THutrhi son, Engineering Manager( 7 Subject: Beebe Draw__Farms FquPstrian Center Sketch PlaznApplication We have received a supplemental letter from the Beebe Draw Farms' engineer proposing a mutual road improvements plan. The applicant has based his road improvements proposal on the premise that Weld County has capital improvement funds available to devote to the road network serving the proposed development. Quite to the contrary, we have no capital improvement program. All available funds are now committed to maintaining our 3000 miles of roads at present service levels. This is not always possible, and some of our roads are being degraded. We have been forced into a mode of de-building our transportation infrastructure and are unable to provide adequate, facilities for the levels of usage our road network is now experiencing. Certainly, it is inconceivable that we could financially support the severe increase in service levels required by this development. A traffic increase from 200 vehicles per day to 3000 would require improvements far in excess of those proposed by the applicant. The applicant has requested that the County share in the improvements to six miles of gravel road. There is no doubt among all parties that these gravel roads are not sufficient to serve the project. There are, however, at least eight additional miles of roadway which are also inadequate to serve the development. The paved section of -Road 32 into Platteville and the paved portion of Road 39 north to Road 44 are in poor condition. These roads are narrow, lack shoulders, lack adequate vertical and horizontal alignment, lack proper structural base, and the pavement sections are deteriorated beyond repair. These reads, along with the sandy section of Road 32 along the south boundary of the subdivision, will not properly serve any increase in traffic volume. In reality, this development requires upgrading of at least 14 miles of road. Based on the applicant's projections for County Road and Bridge income from the development at build out, these initial improvements have a 75 to 100 year pay-back period. Not only are the proposed improvements insufficient, but the County should not be shouldered with the responsibility of mitigating this development' s impact on the road system. The proposed improvements package incorporates a 14 year stage construction plan. Our experience has shown that stage construction methods, such as those proposed, are not effective. The base course becomes contaminated and loses its structural value in a very short period of time. In addition, the surface treatments are not adequate to support interim traffic loads prior to paving. We have tried these methods on Weld County Roads 16, 39, 41 and 100. None of these attempts at stage construction were successful . These roads experience relatively light traffic of less than 100 vehicles per day. Yet, the applicant has proposed pavement only after reaching 1750 vehicles per day. Even then, only 21/2 inches of pavement is proposed. In accordance with the Colorado Department of Highways' Design Manual , we anticipate lt the need for at least twice that pavement thickness to support the projected traffic volume. L ,I 0CT 18 1984 :'ald Co. Planning l:nmmission Rod Allison, Planning Beebe Draw Farms Equestrian Center Sketch Plan Application ` Page 2 It is not conjecture, but rather experience-supported fact, that the stage construction proposed will not work satisfactorily. The proposed road improvements would be administered through a long-term ( 14-year) agreement between the County and the Homeowners ' Association. Our experience has shown that long-term commitments such as these are not effective, even with the best of initial intentions and well-conceived plans . The slightest problem, dis- content, lack of sales , change in financial abilities , or change in the desires of the residences becomes a difficult situation which always falls back into the County. Even if the County were willing devote over $869,000 to this project, we do not think that a 14-year commitment with the future property owners would be an effective way to pursue these improvments . we also feel that the cost of improvements would increase to over $4,000,000 over the years . We realize that the road improvements needed to properly serve this development are beyond the fiscal feasibilities of the project, but that is not the fault of Weld County. The problem is attempting to develop a parcel so far removed from existing services . The Weld County Zoning Ordinance is quite clear in that the applicant is required to show adequate existing access facilities . The site is not located to comply with this requirement, nor can it be made to comply without serious financial impacts on the developer as well as the Weld County Road and Bridge Budget. RHH/bf • C Neal PreardeM ARE `nq.,;rn,.a Architects Pla^^ea {egeneR Brauer N , Patna st Dwyer ROber1J Shreve 6ieele y. CO • Riverton C:V Rorer.ID-TStethen Robert D�nomas Ore m. UT • Laramie.WY GaryR wmaoioh Grand Junction. CO 1271-150/84 (83255.00) September 28, 1984 Mr. Drew Scheltinga Weld County Engineer Road and Bridge Department 933 N. 11th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Drew: SUBJECT: BEEBE DRAW FARMS EQUESTRIAN CENTER SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION This letter supplements our discussions of September 25 and my letter of September 6 concerning traffic impacts and road improvement requirements associated with the proposed development. Primary objective of the following discussion is to define in preliminary terms some of the quantitative aspects of the proposed road maintenance and improvement program. To summarize the proposed program, the project developer, via the Property Owners Association, agrees to: 1. Maintain portions of the County Road network which are now in gravel until they are paved; and 2. Establish an account, funded by building permit related fees, to be dedicated towards paving these gravel roads at some point in the future. SCOPE OF ANALYSIS The traffic impact assessment concludes that virtually all development related traffic will move to/from U.S. 85 via WCR 32 (west and south) or WCR 39 and 44 (north) . At present, approximately 4 miles of WCR 32 is surfaced, east of Platteville; the remaining 2 miles from WCR 35 to WCR 39 is gravel . Approximately 2 miles of WCR 39 is surfaced between WCR 44 and 40; the remaining 4 miles to WCR 32 is gravel . WCR 38 is gravel . As noted, the developer plans to maintain approximately 18 miles of gravel road within the development , and will have a maintenance crew plus equipment (dump truck, front end loader, road grader, truck mounted tanks, and attachments -- plows, hoist, winch, etc. ) . Apart from the question of equity, it would be impractical for the developer to maintain 800 Eighth Avenue P.O. Box 2021 Greeley,CO 80632-2021 303-356-3930 Mr. Drew Scheltinga Page 2 September 28, 1984 treated surface roads -- the maintenance crew would not be trained or equipped for this . Hence the developer proposes to maintain the portions of WCR 32 and 39 now in gravel . Of the 13 miles of road in question the developer would maintain 7 miles; the County would retain maintenance responsibility for the remaining 6 miles. The imediate effect of this proposal is to remove some 7 miles of County road from County maintenance responsibility, permitting the reallocation of current County maintenance effort to other portions of the overall road system. County maintenance of the paved portions of WCR 32 and 39 would continue as required. Over time, as the gravel portions of MCR 32 and 39 are upgraded to surfaced condition, the County would take back maintenance responsibility. GRAVEL ROAD MAINTENANCE PROGRAM The maintenance program for gravel roads is proposed as follows: 1. Grading, shaping, ditch clean-out once a week per 150 ADT. 2. Application of waste oil or waste oil/diesel mix four times per year at a rate of 0.15 gal/sq. yd. or approximately 10,000 gal/mi . 3. Restoration of road base material at a rate of 6 inches per year per 750 ADT, for a 30 ft. width. 4. Spot repair of localized problem areas (culvert cleanout, more frequent grading at intersection approaches, excavation and replacement of soft spots, etc.) on an as-needed basis. The road grading, oil , and spot repair materials/equipment costs would be _1__ borne by the developer. Road base material would be made available to the developer -- he would furnish transportation from the County materials source area. The grading and shaping work would emphasize cutting out on side ditches and moving material into the roadway, so that over time the roadbed would be widened to a nominal 32-36 ft. between edges of shoulder. This will ultimately permit a 24 ft. treated surface road plus 4-6 ft. shoulders 4--— The combination of periodic gravel placement, oiling, spot repair and maintenance of crowned cross-section for drainage should work to develop z a stable and strong roadbase over the period of gravel road maintenance. " SURFACE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Eventually traffic volumes may increase to the point where the frequency of gravel road maintenance functions (grading, new base) becomes so great that it would be more economical to treat the roadway surface. We C Mr. Drew Scheltinga Page 3 September 28, 1984 propose that the initial level of upgrading be a 24 ft. wide double surface treatment, followed at periodic intervals by single surface treatments. This would be scheduled for shortly after placement of the last gravel fill lift on a particular section of road, so that a compacted, crowned base is in place. Criterion for initial double -'-- surface treatment. would be when traffic volume on the road section reached 750 ADT. Supplemental single treatments would be applied at three year intervals or 500 ADT increases (eg. at approximately 1250 ADT, 1750 ADT) . At the point when traffic volume reached 1750 ADT, and other conditions concerning the mix of traffic justified the action (eg. acceptable levels of heavy vehicles) the road would be overlayed with a 2-1/2 lift of HBP, 24 ft. in width. STAGED CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS The initial grading program, in addition to providing adequate level of service during relatively low traffic volume periods, accomplishes three important things. First, -it permits widening of the roadbed in increments to accommodate the ultimate section. Second, the gravel replacement and oiling activities permit development of a smooth profile and adequate crown for ride comfort and lateral drainage. Third, the combined effects of traffic loading and spot repair of soft spots will develop a strong, uniform, compacted base. The interim surface treatment is applied at a point when the road base is in good condition, but requires surface protection from drainage and wear to be preserved . Periodic surface treatment continues to preserve the base and bonds the asphalt to the base. During this period, profile and cross-section adjustments and spot repairs can continue. Paving the roadway occurs at a point when traffic volumes are sufficient to wear down the surface treated road. But by this point, the base will have been compacted, the profile and cross-section developed, and drainage accommodated. Thus the cost of paving is minimized -- place mat, paint center and edge lines. UNIT COSTS AND ALLOCATION The developer will obtain and operate the gravel road maintenance equipment in any case. Hence an operating cost factor equal to the County value of $50.00/hour is used. The level of effort will be considerably higher than County standards, on the order of 50 hours per mile per 150 ADT annually. In addition to the grader work, the oil dust control/base stabilization will be applied. Mr. Drew Scheltinga -Page 3 September 28, 1984 Following summarizes the unit costs of the various maintenance and road improvement items, and the allocations between County and developer. COST ITEM COUNTY DEVELOPER 1. Maintenance of gravel road, cost per mile, 1/wk per 150 ADT, per year o Grading $50/hr, 2 mi/hr (4 passes) 50/2 x 52 = $1,300 - $ 1,300 o Waste oil , @ $0.90/gal . = $9,000 - $ 9,000 2. Fill material , 5,100 ton/mi/750 ADT/yr. o Borrow source $5. 30/ton $27,000 o Haul @ $0.15/ton-mile, 15 mi . $11,500 3. Double surface treatment, $2.00/L.F. $2 x 5280 = $10,560 per mile $ 5,300 $ 5,300 4. Single surface treatment, $0.75/L.F. $ .75 x 5280 = $3,960 per mile $ 2,000 $ 2,000 5. Overlay, 2-1/2" HBP $10.50/L.F. $10.5 x 5280 = $55,440 per mile $27,800 $27,800 Maintenance and improvement programs for the two sections of roadway (WCR 32, WCR 39 to site access; WCR 39 to site access and WCR 38) are sum- marized on the following tables. Note that these reflect the maximum rate of build-out, which presents the most conservative estimate of costs. The more likely build-out pace will extend the program over a longer period, and reduce per-year costs. To summarize the overall road program: ° Costs of maintaining and upgrading the six miles of gravel road to ultimate paved status are $1,703,700. The allocation is: - County $869,500 or 51% - Developer $834,200 or 49% Approximate cost per mile to grade, sh-ape, fill and pave a comparable road at one time are approximately $235,000 per mile. Cost per mile of staged construction is approximately $284,100 or 20 percent greater. However, this cost is spread out over a 14 year period, so the time cost penalty for delaying construction is less than 1.5 percent per year. In other words, if current construction funds can be spent on projects with an effective rate of return greater than 1.5 percent it is economically preferable to defer construction to match growing traffic demand, rather Mr. Drew Scheltinga Page 5 September 28, 1984 than build now and have excess capacity. The maximum construction cost for the County in any single year would occur in 1989, in the amount of $186,200; average annual construction cost would be $62,200. Sincerely, ARIX, A Professional Corporation Stephen ft Blue, P.E. Manager, Transportation Engineering SMB:kv xc: Morris Burk Art Uhrich . • 7 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 in 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o T 0 CO NJ. a a a ^ ^ . a a . U N O L0 t0 N '.O r1 M CO N U) .-i in N. n .-I Y.') N. N 0) I. Cu M nr t0 n MN. CO CO E r-i .-I NJ in in in in en -d a C b9 C) 0 0 0 0 a a a a a a 0 a en a 0 0 a a 0 a a a a a a 0 0 a a 0 N^V Y o) .4- 0 a a a a . a a a . a N ^ .--I tO 0 tO M In .-1 In �Y M Ln .--I V O .--I N in in tD CO V ri .-1 .--1 .--1 LC) CY .-I L[') O Ln0 O In 0 0 00 Y Ct -1 0 .-1O) r.4 O .'I 0 .--I N. .r CO CO -a I I 1 coa 1 1 1 1 I F- CO F- LO I- M F- N J .--1 J N. N d In N 0 N \cdY .N CO CO In In 0 0 J 0 0 0CD 0 • O _ 0 CC F- O I- O I- 0 I- 0 F- O I- 0 F- O CO L n r0 . .-I 0 M in L n NCO 0 0 u')M I 1 I I I I 1 CO ^ N LO Mtn - t0 .--In N. F- Cr) L� O Lc) O N .-I N..-I N en c' .-1 in Z isi CC Z CD 3 O O O O 0 0 > v .500 .500 .E00 .E00 .E00 .E00 .E00 .EO .E00 .E0 .E0 .50 E0 'EO O O .--I A-I M N. N 0) d' CO t0 .-1 0 .-I t0 .- 0 a aa a r .--I L • N CC Imo Lo a L0 a in a in a 0 . N. a LL') ^ O a 0 N O N 0 a 0• in 0 7 0• a NJ • in - CO - a • N •• • CT • • I.... L7 en .-i M .-i M.-I in N in Cu N Cu .-I NJ r-4 .-4 .-I .-I .--I .-I .--1 .•I .-I .--I .ti .-1 .-I .-I N 0 a ----------------'_------- Z Cr) ___—_—_ LLJ O 4-4 N 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 NI NJ NJ NJ 0 0 0 Z U LO V a a a w a a a a Z E M NJ NJ in NI N. CO in tO CO CO N LO L0 Lo W E in CO CO CO CO CO I_ � O .-i in N. ti N M M M M M in V d' cl- •71- Z • 0 49 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O Ln 0) LI) ."I t0 0 CO 00 0 CO 0 Ya ^ a a I . ^ I I N in Cu .-4 n O g 0 M CO 0 Cu ict CO ri a - Cu ad U .--I '-I ccC7 .--I 0 __-- ____—_______—_— ---___ • f a = E Z = E OO CO It') O 00 LO OO 0 N •. O . 0 . O • a • 0 CO Z > .-a 0 .-I in •--i 0 .-I O I . .-• 0 a aI a b 1 I I I I O_ VI (f) NM NN JN J NJ I", N N 0 VI' O•N CO CO CO VI N 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F— O F— O F- O F- O i- 0 F- O I- 0 0 In LL) n O) Ln Ln M .-I Cu At 0 0 In LL) O^ I 1 I I I I r � l.� O .M-1 O CO N O N t M CO V CO .--I 0 .-I in I- 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD a)) 0 N 0 t0 CO CV CY LCil CO.0 CO 0 NJ CO 0 O a NJ 0� 0 COO Q .--4 •-I M .-I ....I .-L .-I .-I Cu Cu N CO —--— in d' In LO N. 01Id CO CO CO 0O CO 0) CT pal O) 0) CT o) 0) o) - 01 •--I .--I .--I N N .--I .-1 .--I r-I .--I .-1 v--4_�_ C r yy 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 a O 0 O 0 N 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O M n 0 0 N N N CO to to Lo a to a a U ri to a N N l0 Al V' l0 a '.0 l0 t0 t0 tO N V as I\ Ct e. V O Ct C V Ct d' C E .-I Ni Ni Ni Cr) M M CO M M M en 0 b9 V O O 0 a O O O O 0 a a O O a O O O a yo en ct Ch ct Ni O O to n I I 1 1 I IA w w a a a w n a 0 r1 to CO t0 O V M to r 1 V N N . n N- to Ct 69 C —_ 0 0 to O 0 0 to O 0 0 to O 0 0 N NJ .-10 NO r4 0 NJ LO .-I N. O1 b I I I I I I 0- I- 0 F- CO I- R I- M J to J .--I Ni a (-1 N V) a Na.to \V N CO CO N V) 0 0 X 0 O Q CC CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ce O I- to I- ut I- O I- O I- 0 0 d 0. IN 0 cel M N M t o M a ti CA I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 a I-- re) u_ 00 00 N Lc) M O MO) NJ .Z .--I N ct CO W CC -E0 W 3 _ _ a- O _ O 0 O O O 0 O I-' 0) EN E0 E0 EO EO Ni cc M o CL 14 t0 a into a to a Ln a I I I I I I I 1 I a i--1 •L 0 Mr-I M .ti M N MN MN T r1 0 Za ____________-_ CC N M +I L.LJ N O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 U CC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z V 0 IT NJ tO N. to to to a-I CO CO CO CO CO CO CO Q 3 a a a a a wa a a a a Z • CO en N I\ n .--I CY 0 .--I .-1 r1 .--I .--I .--I w .--I 5 ri CY 0 0 0 .--1 a-I 1- .--I .--I I-I .--I .H .--I I- M ] rl NJ CO CO M M CY V V CI- cr Cr Z 0 4 - t0 cc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Y O) M Ct .-4 CO 0 0 tD 1- CC N a a a a aI I I I 1 0 0 CO V OI to O) V M to V K V e' NJ to 0 0) .--1 . Irck .-- M M M F M M 00 LO 00 Ln O 00 LOO 0 N 0. O • O • O . O JO • O N. rn Z t N 0 .--.4 O N O .--I O N •-ln I 1 I I I A 1 I 1a a 0 D_ O r CO r V I- M J to J .t U U U r V) N V) to NN tri- m N N 0 0 O m 0 cm C] O 0 0 O 0 0 F- O F- O I- 0 I- O I- O 0 (NM Alf() N V a a V COa ^_ I I I I I I I I I COLL ON O V NOl en M— 0 r1 N Lo CJ) Ol I- 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 to 0 to 0 0 CO LO fr) .-1 CO NJ en r O1 to M NJ Q dr 0 '-I N Ct N. 0 M to at N M CO •.1 it n (-I — .y .-I N NJ NJ M en M y " to N. CO O) 0 r1 N M R to a N- CO .O CO CO CO CO co rn ON O) rn O) CIl rn ON at 0 O) CA ON CA at CI at Ol O) O) O) CIl 0) CC >- r- -1 1 r1 .-+ .--I r1 .--1 -I--I .-1 .--I .-1 r1 .--I WE-84-0013 10.0 ihrn O RICHARD D. LAMM * * JOHN W. ROLD GOVERNOR * u'"�* DIRECTOR */876 COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY October 23, 1984 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 715 STATE CENTENNIAL BUILDING-1313 SHERMAN STREET DENVER,COLORADO 80203 PHONE(303)866-2611 LD r-C p yi it i �Il�nl Mr. Rod Allison 1\c Weld County Department of Planning Services L3 25 1984 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Allison: Planning Cnmmissiml RE: BEEBE DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN CENTER We have reviewed the PUD change of zone application for the proposed development. The reports of special concern to us are the coal resource evaluation, percolation tests run by Empire Labs. Inc. , Soil Conservation Service letter and background geologic information. The geologic data provided with this application is very preliminary; therefore, our review is preliminary in nature. This area is underlain by Laramie Formation, surface deposits of windblown sand and water deposited sand and gravel . Milton Reservoir lies within an abandoned north-south trending channel of the South Platte River. The sand and silt material that covers most of the property is highly erodible, has fast percolation rates, and may have locally shallow groundwater levels perched on top of the Laramie shales. The channel deposits may be economic sand and gravel resources and the Larimie coal beds may be a potentially -economic coal resource. These conditions may adversely effect on-lot sewage disposal , foundation stability and future land use. Dn-lot septic systems are effected by percolation rates , depth to groundwater and depth to bedrock. Cultural features such as development density will also effect the suitability of individual leach fields. Three of the six percolation tests did not meet Colorado Health Department standards for standard on-lot septic systems. Test boring number 5 has a percolation' rate of 40 minutes/inch, however, this testAoutside of the area of platted lots. Fast percolation rates and relatively large number of lots increase the potential of groundwater polution from malfunctioning septic systems. We recommend that a central disposal system be designed for this development. A central system will provide a manageable, long-term sewage disposal without great risks to groundwater resources. The windblown sand and silt that blankets the site is subject to wind erosion. The addition of roads, paths and houses will increase impermiable surface area and alter drainage patterns on the site. Although the sands are very permiable, we recommend that a drainage study be completed for this project. The study should take an overall look at drainage trends and road and trail locations. Any minor drainages that will be blocked by roads or driveways may need culverts. Concentration of runoff from house clusters may need minor erosion control and roadside ditch design. We recommend that this study be completed prior to final plat. GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST...KEY TO THE FUTURE October 23,1984 WE-84-0013 Page two The windblown material on the site may be subject to consolidation when loaded or wetted. The Soil Conservation Service review indicates that locally shallow groundwater levels exist on the site. To adequately evaluate the site geologic conditions that will affect development, we recommend that a geotechnical report be completed for the development. This report should address the site geology and subsurface conditions that may affect foundation, utility and road design. We recommend that this report be completed, per Senate Bill 35 requirements, at the preliminary plat stage. Oil and gas resources, coal deposits and sand and gravel resources are found at and around the proposed development. The sketch plan shows careful accommoda- tion of the producing gas wells. The preliminary coal evaluation report has no data for the development site. While drill holes in the area show no extensive coal beds, an operating coal mine exists in the area. We recommend that the geologic and geotechnical report include one or two drill holes to identify any potential coal resources. The eolian sand that covers most of the site is of little economic significance. However, the ancient South Platte channel north-northwest of Milton Reservoir may contain an economic gravel deposit beneath the windblown sands. We recommend that this potential resource also be evaluated during the geologic investigation. We will be glad to complete our review of the proposed development when the geologic report has been submitted for our review. Please contact our office if you have any questions. Sincerely, -Julia E. Turney Engineering Geologist bj JET-84-108 H K c v C v 4 •p T • >.L I- C v y T— - - T 1- OO C .• y. R'> j °` N a ; a O 7L O d — '` 'V ,.0 a as c •O C p s E p p v = y °_' °`' LU.E ?. ` C U� 3 u 0 - -0 >-. 0 ,- — >a o >• o 0 K v p C CO 0 E - o y co y c u'- L c u 0 E v u 3 N .-, v ._, u 3 ._ _ •U w a.oc � c� E uo` � � °�' mats•nL. opo,_. r oaD ° r, L Ov ._ C 10 >.,..= E NL > C_v TLO .. - O"- E v -D - O 3 -: 00 o � o°oa `° Cay` noLoE� � .�.c toy 40 � �•a � n c p .. � En0 g °c°YE a -0 E ° uc -. 0 u u L a n c O T v ` .N.. � .n.. «. n ti i.. CD.T. ` O c ro . O C " E n . C U L T a ea Cpb'O nw hy.. n 'y v C C v'0 O O .E U v •.• T ap 3 y�- L ,' p O. EnaT ° -, y a C. 0E � Caa � u""' c� Dana Lc iuT.= � c9 = Oct s EEcC � .0vy v -a• azce, c � =3 � o > $ :a.Ea o00 -oco OpJ ^' >. o'.o ,,; c C v o -rtir 00 _• • m L E O 'G'..• u N c`a bpn n :n.. .L. Oy c o c" a rat O C °= m N c -. 0 ••••• 1. L E .c X ad T c. _ ° on 0 v t ca X as C O L .0 n G E X .0 n - O N L rl CC C c �i, ova_ O “ DC aOfO .E TL CU ,II Tv Cy'C U-3 ` y O . 6 ` c -O 0 ... - rum2 ON = - <0 U,.. -0 a o .-, a .. N - O E .a N `J H„_, v a' •~-'.L, C c N W y N 9 ri L v J ..v.. �O G O �to= = ._ 0-2 c e., .b v cn n._ n 4- O O C CD r. Z d - wr C W ° U a _ J _ urcr: �. 00 n C T L '� L T u N O C .G C Lid r 8 .O ,oL,cw _ t- ° '_ a i. 0mac .. naa •E > - TL. uum,cn3 � °ua <�cvv � � .a `' O O' ._ ' ca.- b J J (� C E o 3• N E ca 'D ➢. OE to.C... .c . 1J p L c L,-, ._ -C O L = 0- U• Z A 1Y O 3 - o 'h G as E �, °' h vrvi L O E O p, C u y u y O O L. T n p a T,U Lv n op-R. < V '.G-.. � aa)i O,..- .= a U v ` o o` - G " Rco ` � o �Ly o'` `v O - �o3 JC =-2 . W Q Q � � @ o n ° ,,,-, -=— o � > c o ° o o" on v 3 X o COLA. n o� o Co._ °a-° 0 101 ? ` c = J n v CD v v R D c C .V h -ca o g.ct o c E -u c u 'E rJa . o u'E Oc u v CO o E ° E .`-'.E a'c o f o •M T.oc-&E- c o O 3 o EL n v �, c �v,, � L E Ns O- c > -c 0 c — ra � .. coo 7R cam ° " 3 TV, > .. v � c > > — :n � — $ -0— -ac >O3 o2 > Tco ,_ ° Tu 2._ CnJ w "3 n o .a. v J N C y X .., cC S a = 't.. PO v p .r La_ TL.. "J G - O O C v p, O O G F u n c a 9 s ` T " v ;� E .°0 L >.- c c 0. - n E •- - E c o c j r; _ U u L L -• - , _ _ - _ =... ❑ p z U E .� 1:-0 > L J --0 .` 1-1 C .n 2 _ -rm C C C _ J TO v.`_' 3 .:� r t.' i- -i >. u" v G -0C 7LL JWCDVF Lc � - - r• v C y Co - u L " c O v = y 40 0 _ - C J O .- 1. .E o O O.0 > "3 O a U '. a. 0 a - >; a a = = TV-1 o � ° • 0 C E •p ¢ u 0 p p`'_ wZ _ -C -0 E4. Nom' `�" �� Z J - uE � cacaoca quoI-I Q � u E0 o � oc° ^ Eoaa.)a) E 0 _ C. N- '0 � .... J v v o a J — v n ^ n tom , u v `✓. •0 u •.J a c r+ E >. " C C 'o ''r E `v.- u•, ^J = — n n U . • •0 0 — a. �. 0 L O n a .gi n 0 t -O.z v OU ca O 0 .J , V 0 ca y a .° v '- G 9 v v, y L • CO �+ V T a 7, C W N w C V �' OC o O O O p > a 0 n y — .+ E n CA G'"o ° E E Ts- J U c n • r = `- C C .: 'n u ,' C T 0 n c0 'J T'O .0 C � U n • •-w n r o = G E E - p m a> O .- C: O n c v o a` m v X n 0= v '.' O T 7,.- ` '- 0 -' 5 n .0uE CAv cOca EcaV u v L y ' v a u G ti O '0 V a 'J - rc .0 u a` L G 'J.._. E ,, �.D G V .. S c D G 1.., v = ,-• -That C c u• -o C L O y _ (1 c: Om .E p ;c c EO 21.. .v..•C CO C � y E ` = 9 E ° cwaC � � C � tc3 � U � :En3c > CL � G V.OG fCCMC 2Cvcu E z -o� a 2.E a c o u o �. H m ° u_ 'o a v N ° '4h c_ ='n. c U u .E .? 'E vL CUL J y N ca n ca G T a n-0 y r1•.V a. C g E 0 L la v J v .T. a > t V ._.. O N p ` n a C � c ^s '0 -e a`� • v TL a 30 -0 = v c�c u 3 c o z 'O 0 o a u ,_ .ou - .yii - a W O > r C > c `^ 6._ y -a '� ` L N C L J.O T� 6 a,0 0 .T� o n v a O j7. C o W -o c aa a E.ca 0 J c T y 0 L v O J ._ c v, c N 0 r - .U E .. La L L.O T' �-0 a V, M OV D•U .C rla ...Li' 3 o °...al) o` v v o Oct t o v v C u, E p v u u n Q c .v.. .V 4)--C3 M Liu L 7 C ti: .. �.n.O c t O L' O-E p L S L-. U ° .c o C • Q D r u 111 O -J 0 ,ao' F n CCF)_ Q•o ' ,= g 0 � 3 a a-` � v co o � o � E o.— ••-• a O y�-W ° 0 0 C 11 .O v W N ° -O .V...'. D N 2 cm "_, G r v ur 'Ur, E N G VNi C G v L N E N Y c p a'w a v'u c t .ta't ci c� o o `ya � va) ra. c 0—° -- E " v a > o•- 'E a LA o o O o. c a � CU•—•0-os v B o E O N _e•—c..) ,4, o v .Et o •E Ea = u D L.' -0 E ° ° °.... 0 a a`0 ▪ O'CtiO v u TV —.-. L — L 10 E .0 > O7 J4- 0.- JLv ` v UJ c .. c a I-vEcJ � O -° .. -o � a „ u ` o ° c� = en ET �� T-� o � Et c -0 T c'- J � U X a E J a'7 c � v T U p > — cr t C G L n ° V C 0 V,"C c . U G -" a T— Cl O 3 O o c u".. .Y C v von - u J ,- J_ o 3 n vn J OL - - v m UU -000 ._ LLn v � .CL L.0 .J-. JO.- .. O •JO vc. > � V, ... '0 L ._ _ L n v n u a-- Tut L.p� .. u G v y cm u E 0 u y ° L n L • J V, v m V c0, 0 0 CL 'V' V -0= '� m v G .4-4� .... C .E O L C u v E — 'J tract- � — 3 7 T� L V V T T � ,G Q J y v N ,v,,.N D � O p c o _ ° n-- cn -C 'cc-- .-. . v 0 c 4-1 p O C CO v 7 U— J r 0 G — -17= 0 X > v a 9 n v O v m m r U •_ .0 cs G O u n -C O O G ,... � " O = N c O. GO N N 40 — 0 °-:— " -- aQ iCJC0 .:. G - a ... .... i E a OD n 9 ` ma y y.. 2 T u n vHay ° sv a 0..., - oE ' oo 'Oai °' � ou,.- ao• ss3u .=s'u'o.E c ° .C• u `. pp 0 se o v„= J — ,_ . o E E"p 'J .0= 0 > T OI v .E T oO te 7 G � 3 n � U .≥ T•C O a)•ok c a 2 in 0 c J r - 0 as m'V..°. a• A ti c v N 3 —v u- v N F- c n c o L c a .. m u = O '^'.-. O .- v, O' U V v " .- N'- E V ,'c E .-:o C N ° U4- 0c ° --= J 0 V CJ V aL a � y .-7 c cf.. E . E u E 'E °aE n9 -' cE L. E n ai h � u o 3 .o .. L o .O; v1RMilh1 vC O ?Sh 'A c4-1 on 4•17 ; u ' V] � C -c C 6 L n ` u n C r- ....z.L E J � -O v v� CO O b i O t''I M C U ,... c ,C O n p .'f, _ E a n E3 _ E` 7 `.€ n-- " E �. �.,... E ....._-, c — — J c' _ ... 7 O .... O 0 j O L O a 0 L , �1 -1 ° `. i y `> 0 E `- O u T �i V y a 3 .+ ., E `° a: , . a -3 v a u o r. v a , v a n i ' ' E . AnDUm To Roo Allison, Current P n r Il3ate October 26, 1984 COLORADO From Undersheriff R. Dill Subject. Impact Analysis Beebe Draw Analysis of the proposed growth within the Beebe Draw Farms development is provided by the literature submitted to the Planning Department. I have used the proposed housing units multiplied by 3. 12 persons and condominiums occupancy rate of 2.58 per unit to arrived at total serviced population for the development. Using this formula and the 1.9 sworn officer staffing per 1,000 population reported as the national average for suburban counties, the following analysis can be made: Cumulative Officers 1986 - 188 persons 188 persons .36 1987 - 156 persons 343 .69 1988 - 182 persons 525 1.00 1989 - 182 persons 707 1.34 1990 - 182 persons 889 1.7 1997 - 151 persons 2,130 4.0 I used the hourly costs for 1985 of $17/hr and calculated total law enforcement cost during the 12 year buildout as follows: 1986 - $ 12,730. 1987 - 24,398. 1988 - 35,360. 1989 - 47,382. 1990 - 60,112. 1997 - 141,440. *Note - costs have not been adjusted for inflation for the period. Admittedly, this is an estimate based upon national law enforcement staffing patterns. However, the impact upon general fund costs appear to be understated even when conservatively evaluating law enforcement staff costs. It would appear that traditional methods of funding law enforcment services for such a develop- ment would be better served by a special law enforcement taxation district or contracted law enforcement beyond basic service levels. If you have any -questions, please give me a call. r t RGD/bh I�2'11 ui.�n Ir COT 26 1984 Weld Co. Planning Commission THE FARMERS RESERVOIR & IRRIGATION CO. 80 S. 27TH AVENUE BRIGHTON,COLORADO 80601 65-5 7373 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Rod Allison VIA CARRIER: Department of Planning Services MAIL: X 915 10th St. OTHER: Greeley, Colo. 80631 SUBJECT: Change of Zone from "A" (Agricultural) to "P.U.D." (Planned Unit Development) JOB NO. ORIGINAL PRINTS LETTER X FOR YOUR INFORMATION AS REQUESTED FOR YOUR PROCESSING _ OTHER REMARKS: The Farmers Co. has had problems with developments changing the historical sheer flows either by volume, quantity, or quality of water into our canals. We feel that the burden of proving the development of lands that was historicaly farm or pasture land does not injure or change the operation of the canal is that of the developer. Please find enclosed a copy of the "Design Review Process and Design Criteria for Facilities." This same Review Process is required for any of the Farmers Co. Canals that may be effected by development. If you have any questions don't hesitate to call. r 10/29/84 SIGNED DATE COPIES TO: All Directors w/o criteria -REPLY REQUESTED Hydro-Triad, Ltd. w/o criteria YES NO John Akolt w/o criteria --�, Tech. file OCT 311984 Yield Co. Planning Cnmmissiou 0 .no 1 im SMA uo n vio3, -,r,b4ono er.r 40n n NA t ;rV, sTRFer 1 -U EL-EY COL(DRACC' 2063' w:-.. ,.,,, x � CASE NUMBER Z-412:84:13 COLORADO Ocotber 15, 1984 REFERRAL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN : Enclosed is an application from Beebe Draw Cattle Company, tan for a Change of Zone from "A" (Aa rnitural) to "P.TJ.D." (Planned Unit Development) (recreational and residential uses) The parcel of land is described as part of Sections 1 4 5 and in. all of section 8. 9, 16, and 17: all in T3N. R65W of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado - The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is apEroximately six (6) miles east of Platteville; east of Weld County Road 39 and south of Weld County Road 38. This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions . Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this recc=est would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- taca the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 14 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 14 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by November 2, 1984, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in this matter. 1. We have reviewed the proposal and find no conflicts with our interests . 2. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to 3 . Please refer to the enclosed letter . Signed Agency Date /.////////,) //////, //J////,� ' �r�'-' d Lij?_ a I. di Rod Allison, Current Planner II �� 3 11984 Lk CZ:, RA:rn WPM Dn. Planning enmmiteinn PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY P. 0. BOX 127 BRIGHTON, COLORADO 80601 November 5, 1984 Weld County Department of Planning Services Attention: Mr. Rod Allison 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Reference: Case Number Z-412:84:13 Dear Mr. Allison: Please find enclosed one (1) map showing the location of our pipelines in Sections 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 16 and 17. Please be aware that our pipeline rights-of-way are 50 feet in width, being 25 feet on either side of the pipeline. If you should need any additional information, please call me collect at 659-5922, ext. 241. - Sincerely, PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY Ken Neff Right-of-Way Representative KN/mh Enclosures ia l Platte Valley Soil Conservation District 60 South 27th Avenue - Brighton, CO 80601 October 23, 1984 Mr. Rod All ison, Current Planner Weld County Colorado Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, -CO 80631 RE: Z-412:84: 13 Dear Mr. Allison: We would like to re-emphasize the fact that these soils are very fragile and are susceptible to erosion. As long as the BeeBe Draw Company, LTD and Homeowners Association follow the guidelines in their plans and continue to work with the Platte Valley Soil Conservation District and the Soil Conservation Service then the erosion should be controlled. Sincerel y ig141 Bob Warner, President Board of Supervisors 1 I. i• c:j c,l 1 [CI 25 1984 Weld Co. Planning Cnmmissiaa CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT I itels\ C . ') DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)3564000 Ext-4400 -315 70TH STREET a � GREECE Y,COLORADO 80631 a fk' S 'T.Y r;. O'`. Y.. COLORADO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, November 13, 1984, at 1:30 p.m. to review a request for approval of a Change of Zone from "A" (Agricultural) to "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development (recreational and residential uses) from the Beebe Draw Cattle Company on a parcel of land described as part of Sections 3, 4, 5, and 10; all of sections 8, 9, 16, and 17; all in T3N, R6SW of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado containing 4,328 acres, more or less. This public hearing to be held by the Weld County Planning Commission for the consideration of the above referenced request will be conducted in the Weld County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. Comments or objections related to the above request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services, 915 10th • Street, Room 342, Greeley, Colorado 80631, before the above date or presented at the public hearing on November 13, 1984 Copies of the application are available for public inspection in the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado (356-4000, Extension 4400) . Bob Ehrlich, Chairman Weld County Planning Commission Po ha published in "._. La Salle Leador To be published one (1) time by: November ovem 1, L984 ' Received by: �, %` - Date: L/4 ., w • .. )1 MAILING LIST Beebe Draw Cattle Company 2-412 Mineral Owners Aristocrat Angus Ranch Ben Houston, General Partner Route 2, Box 76-A Platteveille, CO 80651 Upland Industries Corporation 110 North 14th St. , #1000 Omaha, NE 68102 State of Colorado Board of Land Commissioners 620 Centennial Building 1313 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 United States of America BLM-Northeast Resource Area 10200 W. 44th Avenue Wheatridge, CO 80033 Coors Energy Company P.O. Box 467 Golden, CO 804011 Champlin Petroleum Company P.O. Box 1257 Englewood, CO 80150 Machii-Ross Petroleum Co. 3420 Ocean Park Blvd. , #3070 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Vessels Oil & Gas Company•- 600 South Cherry, #1220 Denver, CO 80222 Amoco Production Company P.O. Box 591 Tulsa, OK 74102 4 MINERAL AND/O3 SUBSURFACE INTEREST 0D!NERS Beebe Draw Cattle Co . Beebe Draw Land Co . , Ltd . 1551 Larimer , ';2706 Denver , CO 80202 Aristocrat Angus Ranch Ben Uouston , General Partner Route 2, Box 76-A Platteville , CO 30651 Upland Industries Corporation 110 North 14th St . , $1000 Omaha , NE 68102 State of Colorado- Board of Land Commissioners 620 Centennial Building 1313 Sherman Street Denver , CD 80203 United States of America BLM- Northeast Resource Area 10200 W. 44th Ave . wheatridge , CO 80033 LESSEES Coors Energy Company P .O.Box 467 Golden, CO 80401 Champlin Petroleum Company P.O.Box 1257 Englewood , CO 80150 Machii- Ross Petroleum Co . 3420 Ocean Park Blvd . , 53070 ' Santa Monica , CA 90405 Vessels Oil & Gas Company 600 South Cherry, 51220 Denver , CO 80222 Amoco Production Company P.O.Box 591 Tulsa , OM 74102 1d1333tl NUf113tl 311330100 „L G ../§2,440--. - CB61 AIM''LL8£"Kid Sd 4 S M >~ o o i Ili N o m< a < ❑ tg-g3R: N J W „ I », r » !i ° i pp ta„ A C71-' td ttl s �� oo g o a' 7 rd �� '' In 0) (D 1. no3 � tm lm V • s n O La_ O „ I I o I Su' �. m (D fD. $ ' g hoc O c` 0)U N 1 ' I f- ° ,* Off-' 00 .� W db g sDom'u m ' 3 '� m:• H o I i 5 nj I-S I'Y Il' < .`� o_� 5 al �c3 O w i I. p '• o O. OWN01 < y ojop m E E m7. N a5 RS Q ≥ s m 7m 1 CC w t- 3 3 O w o r ow •\ "�7 �r. W f O O f} a y o_ � =2 O ca (0 r0-d V w a Q ,u, cp ,y` N art i 6 a a R mH w gN. a =o OP 00 N I0 a. is o p0 v ;$ 0:5x w a W z pd1v % n a S30IA �CD D n 4 • n O '<' RIC• f eo W0) 0)In 0) ? S33tl0i 231S1 d1 ,a� n t g B a ; o 0 a3 .14130311NUfl13tl OIiS3WOO xa iet,z4 reel Apt law unod sd W ?IX .o• X )• O> ❑ ❑ a Y.1. N - Q3a< 0'aL41 "� ri „ m » » $ m y w m< x i ? Cj e.a g g.1< in ! R ">. m Q I in U S110 0 �„ Gp o3,2. . m y No' o mm „ g z Gt• w it 0co g E. rm-$ a4 o. tw 'fi 0 sm-atg . 2'• m LL. ¢ UI D i ' k I m„ S & < rt Cr) E D. o• m -m "h a rm. n co a\ 1 D am; _ „ � mg 0 0 CI \ $ O.. fD O p 3 �c 0) w w o0 0 �V1 Jul o O N- fn ll R a • sss ; -Ia c8awl p .-I j o n. �,, ' a F-' rt 01 • a si.� . om • �s +' o � �_ g m 3Yxa-I m d zz -pox -P i c o Irc I 33Utl35 a _ �,� �? t 2 O W 0 E n of 3• g O ";II . a• — z U) C'. N E 0 S33IAU3 a • r 3 I't 0) a + a rt 2 k pa p, : I 9333 tl0i tl31StlW K. a 4 0 ^,d s W 7 °* 3 m •m. h• '+ Y• 1k rnl'i I. lc$$ g £Z - U1 (� xm ,. . az Zp —....'100 "0 3 S� I f J pa s e »I Q N rm .t, )( p n D£ m17 'I SOH C` 2 Y m mm ; O y _ H w mN xm i H'b x i\^^ ' o £ 5m m in 2 W U a 9 Imo.' o },m m ' al off J< o °„^po3ma 9 to ti n. a 0• Z 7 a : tam. "•„ fI d =f v N I 2m tit R sv 4 f ..—... N go � � o w D n mI ❑❑ ttri �' H g 3 8 .4 '0 0 ' i6 cc +1 En _ a0 83 �R -Inm Ea..7,- u) l0 w w s� q = a a° 0� rt a• n Y^ �pe° 9 � C) e= .04 ? od I. I n p„C rn �' G • • ; aa =- O: cwai d' Ga W p w o,,, I. y 4 co En fN"f •u Deaf y Au. HHIZ o a ¢ 0o Px g D o -1 Fi poR ' -ZN H e w rCf r. a w `C '�, xOr N • H. !ap 7 I a m 9.p gam n. z c c z as w a 0 ¢ I DIM! � 03 m coO L >° 3 a. V z PH o a cwi S301A, :r R"rt, n ` C� o 6 ni-22:: S a .-.-.. W a+•'-Ia 8 S33i 20A tl31SV , L ''°n 3 CC •-I O y,�'-- ! csaIAwf'LL13£u110SSd 1d13O3tl Ntl1113tl O11.33WOO F e.etc, // /2Qai� PI vX aXv Vt. ❑�❑ a tai )4 onma $g » • D O w N -'id a w'B'. a �7 1'"' rn 'Z7 t� ❑ • • a": m , 1a a » o' n m< SU W N ' ` L�' ° • o s Do t i m c coO I rt $ 0 • o „s a r n m gI 0 2 r.-T-15.3" 3 -•R g —nm3 ?, J N D Y I D mma Lt n. 0) rt °, hp-s a S �oc�. o ITC 2 I o I tl l „I« ° 1 � 4 0 00 ° O Q o 3 mNamoc » i v D u) ' ? a - n 7a . o 1��yyyy—••�y{{,1:5; w • . Is 3 bi.N I (p m $ 3 Pd aCD o g. .° 'oro "1co o1 ow 1-�c., a rt •w N ; f �4.'s g C77 O w i w o 02 n c I-1- 0 g m O = < N < n 5* f•n O. z I O) R5 Lu cn N Lu ° w ° 301Atl3; \OVV �Li e, 9 a N 'm S ma Is w l _; ; O -•�g3 a. W 2 N N O en >.74 g y a I S301Atl3 -� fie I. O: [j p Lo r, 8 S33.4 KW tl315vW. -r/ ego- C` 1d1333N Nafu3UI3ISS3WOO ale, /j,/1r1—.. E86t Apt•Ltae-wioA Sd P' .IX P' XYI OD Dap AI WI N .' < So *.i.e3 mw m J • e »I« i 43 'o 4 —la, 0. 1 ❑ w 1Z I g s'; Mg t i a O Q '� ` pa al 4 N WI-, F —0 2', y .. 0 It_i ftl • D • I D Su - ≤ W O) rr- a £ L. a 9.D c;. o W e (Yi l0 n < Y g m a'i ❑❑ °° Ire 3 q pT p y y'n p m • 3 N ao Rio r cc> c 0a H N '< 1 Ra in a9 �CO cc wW f1t o w o ,w.- ow \ 9 F'- ri o! f I. O 0-0 ?c � rov w whIH N z ° r 3 co1 9=a: < --. gl7 � �a Al n. o -.< Cl. Z C , 1--I w m ¢ 371Ak m 1 c tP o a20 - 14 o d 1L z ,� rin g w c) S3JIA .°� S I•C ^_ t ;£ M•° UJ 3 8 S33iR0Aal.S1 •- a I Ssg=s . P v X °I )( fn O? ❑LQ❑ A m _ � < w y t - I CA, -D I£ Tn -I D 0 ° _. l< 111 a i fl � l I : i 1m» “i. g r �7 �y s w -.5 . a . E 2 t o ° c i `8! ' N O O - 4 o 3 : ea 31 WOE� N i cj 0 ° ° 33-1 N 2 ° ° G n s � W >a O cn Mp g i i mr d. rt o £N g.a. a =x o o f a I y , 2 (/� aQ to o I n ! �p D mw ❑❑ + r, (D al i -o ae :og ° 4 �i rIp � � < a < 3 : 4 0., rr a . o ,I ao NtflW a oc., a c n� (D . z < �I _l -Ian N ¢r ',1 I-I > o = I E07 O ! n q zo co V oz p I I eclIw wloo O1 4 "- p�7EiH -o T ' ° 3m �Q a= �.z . � w w w i, C v ? oo ur, m 1..4,`I• 'a ta C0�1 :?! Z sLL rl r-I ¢ N ¢ I on I a or 4dp a9i •Iw ra i w U N �j s p1 r t•» �,< � a =� b w s3al, N tJ uc m iv - d 5 01 a a W n p ttl Ir S333 moo. a. i :k 2 a. 4 a$3 Cj (2 7 O ' \ t j f an rn k • .soot: .9 S °g3 i Ultra. Df mn ❑ UiRU „2 l le elel a » '� m o1 g ID •ci 33 44 Kg It; I° pW 3 o tt ich p w i I s �' S s rw £ Bliss o cigit _W :: •» j , cc m :t'S • ° '< I D lit. A- (Q F� Okc cap 3. e 1q a °lal X c ° » N I .0: aLuc CV I'aI o I ` +m I gg ,`-I CI 8 £ <. a ti3e jm U lD 0 ^K i p O. O s -1 5. ° r //�� O aj ppp w w M. `3 NI -6 z CO a Q n ` f.S • VI GQ O t�_• u; < G p O! ' �Z N cc wk Q ow o �.,, "; k 9 ( D. w C] a �lQ3E' ow A O L'3 3 V it U o;, 3 11 .**1 S. i t..) r I cl O S v ; 5 =i ro w W FIE N� r:. �{ 11 Z sS aiis • O. z e 1,--i o N Q w I¢ I 371AIRS Z.: "•c a- 'Qo g = R �.3£ ° o W o• < w i rno __ro d O z M 0 li o i S371Atl31 1-i n ° ° w a) w � G g. s g n 3 S j S33i Hi tl31SYW1 'a ? $a ° 4 ° U m WWd 9d ..z -- --- 13130311 NUf113B 011833100 ,� c% /1..2,�r,— 6B8t MM'�ILBe a .IXPXP aa> ❑D A ul "' + l8ta5°<� » ! D O rn w —1m xPo e ❑ v! »o s< m a '"o 9 0o o -' n t N 7o T\ P••Jc8 Slv N o .j Ltiiuia 2i D _ D „ I03 ea 1 0 _. 1On _W I I a Ss�s s a� ❑a m cc g `` ��oo;o � z _ o� N ( A O P+ n ^ a i^r .§ 5 3 1 c.s• i LL g an' In I o O (� W i ° 5 o a 0 A - 1- w¢ NCC � � $ 05] 011Ca`� 3 $ ' aS. N' W wegel rp GGmp > = < M' A ao >v a < 3cr _9 �p s_ bi CUJ w O 2 to WO am ° R (a� Fes- ` 1� ro w c<iik- _< I 1�- '$ 3 m a_ qv ~» E u ✓ _NN W m a 1� r'i S O NV!,1Z ° ° a W Z� La i—I� N rd < a„ Rom ~� try °� {� 3 S= °p£ l2 d w u] u�i S33IA1 a (' ; o.g o• U N I S S33.4 ECU U S 3 1d133311NUf11lu 311S3WOO ( C861 A1or lL LBGE wiad d D VX PXP OD ❑ A WI N ♦ ,e 2.4.WN f n� a g• o m< cc . D �< 3 »nag 2 •a• 1 • i 0• obi. m 2.r " `F �' e» I 0 bJ 00 h7 C t T 3 5, 5; Q po e • `-m. I w N. CjH 2 F o? 3 ' a a D D• I 1 A., m • r0 n li 1 C a• n d a r $ O,, 0i-z- m . 0 ❑'N CO ! - a9�9g • 3 J ml i ` �� a 0. rt a p, e �ay rt iiIII O m ≥m inn of ro I li II c o 1- tall •r�l ?1/48 > =I a •r a F.. y .3.0 . 4 , c a?2 O X00 ' -cc $' '� n 3ffia A2. co Vi= a 8.. "du- a a�' i x�.;F �. cams.¢ P V w o w 30 IL, ti \ Y ! -$ a -;� a 01 O w wt? as- W •V w crie (n 4 \ Dj• F" cc N 01 Q 2 I w ¢ 301NI $ +s.3 GGG��\ a. of p , S3]II a _ o.S S33i tl0i tl31S /, w �, w m ` S rz�[/ /JJ/�.�Cu- ¢eeL Omr'LL8£WIOi Sd CC 1d1333H NWf113tl O11S3WOO pp P wX P P OD ❑ D A WI W as;Y W. ] m ~ P Di1 ,pg D "o; ie Sx _ m 1 a dm a • • t O o @@ F-' co N * ! m 9.3 a • m ^Q e cm?: Fad a WNIF�{ 2 F �� ma�,� 9 N 2▪ i r a R < 3 a c� DD m H1aV• Q., 3 p3�sF5 , • LO W a- N in ! \ o •• O 1 < 0 32 ; 3om E! 'ONO t/ m i“,.. ta. m isr g t_ M1r ' m$ a �7 omRcfc N W w� dap ,.. �� V , " mw {�yt m 32.'Rm° o " co U s V U et≥ o Sj F° Z' CD cr, N iD e a % g o a 01 CC cwi z '"O.rN-I w o w o ii 3 y %/ a w pl e z m c�} r-1 r-I u U i _ G PQ - 0 P o A n a f•• d iz OM +., w f- w ¢ ' 3. g•• 003 Q. W in 4-1 'a- 0 S3 a -...i.U u.iCC F-, CO w 8 s33i tloi 83 m � XmX � py' ❑ ❑ A� PI N oe' :`Sg2' • ta n o o m.Fee x its < D D 4 v, i 2.g 2 Y ;WI ° <r 3a-a till Cis phi I o `' Q ` " T4 p a• 1�L I mm al a $ @a$» st.R n J " m l» m D qb D 9�•' ii (n (p s c y a.z•�c c a 3 Q3 n G� D❑ f+ LTJ C,] D 8o ]aF o > . Lm C I g$ a od m 1� I n $13,1 12.' o o� " . & O OF F~.. < n eiop• 9m : c C3 0 nri N R 0 Ol r-+ w ;• _ S ti 3 V D toC w n m?2.39 --1 N ,IL 6 - L3 i--- k LCD W 1. rC Q ≥ c¢ < r I`2. .�(l�l(\� 7� N(D m% F ^ i m • w Ol O w o w o .3 $ <.. lei N a ">6 a 3 i$ A •rl w 1 °. R < m %H •1. W W I- •C S m LAs an 1.. V LL -.. a g •3 1 =z N ; P. w ¢ � 371�tl31 '� $• o ..2. • a• in • z rtS M 5 u S301A83 $ s 3 W W . S33i EU 831StlW 0 --— p P .. X IP o2. ❑Ct�LpJ 1 D I " . , 6, RL' oI co 0Ql 12, _ N ' � $ a a a33mn (y"ill ^m O It J F j ` . am*' B.q cg 00 Q1 w mO m_ Si J n. 2 C �L3a+ F cZa oca 3 F 6 it o m' l400? m e Q " " m «, I .. ❑❑ • r- ' 0, 2 3 • boo "o : '1 • I a, r0. 0. Pit!t7 -Ia • 0 D. 3 if1 I ii 6) q 1 =7v ; ≥m . . In w s: f3 o I Oa (��5 r• 48_s "c LL o. 3 O1 0 + I F� o m . 1.y e • a` 2. 0 l W I . to L n 7. 1co w66 VOW it - U1 3 F-' ._W 1 ilt \. 2c w w P 30NItl3S 1d1303tl Ntl013tl `" a r a 11-3 St 3 e. d. w CO 2. w S W z al,--I 04W N o I S37160351tlN011d0 F 2 I S S33i 803 831SVWiSOd'WOOS 0 et _ - E , _ 9L61 'AV'008E wnod Sd s_ J I s « e Ln 2 o ,& �4 • W a¢ "' I , C� w LL g� 0) l� w, i'a3 wa 'el r ¢ „� la¢ _ --o CV co N a = -- ;<" I O r 2 CO ,`a 0 w w so loo lo, ioow w I Q) coace h ' o ros 3 loo 0 Owr w ro 8 w -n ;u .. I- w .- _ < f cat• F7 C) u. — :o Ih<o ;viJ> pc., a a z¢ 4 a gi,J w n LL ¢LL wt. W 5-- O� I" w a O O. VS U3W o o a 0 y ¢ 301Atl3S 1d1303tl Ntl013tl a a a z 0 D n U S301Atl3S 1VNONd0 F w I %.0 M 2 S333 SIM tl31SVW1SOd 110SNO3 o 2 CC 9.61 '1dtl'ONE 01103 Sd h nni A-1 m v X m • , a '' teat AIN'rL LBS wjo Sd 3. 1 �e Li m& 4 m o 'ii; Oa.Q. � ggg? ❑❑ m Up b� ig .Rr rn `. Ic t... • m � � e7rrn s N w"r U-D �I/ Jil =02la l� �n3IN�¢a ¢ C 'r a i * Z . $ -• W ro �a 81_ --- S: S. a' CC 1d1333U NS013tl 311332100 22L �� EMI Alnr'1 LSE was** m ?rx PX9r ❑OD o u u + fit -g » ?it < 2 . 0 O ❑ tiII= i m -J 5 5 5 5 ' I S » ll ° 2I t 6pc, w WW�t O 1 ((pt N• $nQffQQa 0ZIrIMMIl W• E.!a O w o t 46 a �0 E _ da N rF ,� SI if 7. p O , <3 a c� <rt Cn H 5 CC coo al N °o w o o� ',D' �y O n o e c F,s 3' (C�o W we O CZ'. ¢ tr s.3 at 2O= £oo W r D co j(< no M �qq o�yy; fail _ N O - LIJ O > w> LL 1 • O v' a • n rf • Y vCC 44i In 41 U J a a33-4 o� O o W • OIS N iii • 2.4 La 0 F ?ro .y CO • 21 w LT a r hS ya di W '5 �.,'8'� mss-,`a'� F � q H. Q S. n F s o r o._ i!•1 ti W 371Atl3S Jd13038 Ntl013tl E a I �Fpj ` $a a- -,_n t a it z III,,, 00 �a) n S301Atl3S 1tlN01140 • F y ` W ;430230 W cal 2 S33i tlOi tl31SWEISOd LlOSN00 2 e 3 9L6I 'Jdtl'008E 2110,1 Sd I - - gc w j cs 9 Q 1114 12' mi ❑❑ i • eM �ncns,0 . CO 0 E G Oj A S nri7 • 79 la LO W is - I a O �� ` " qq $ • � � s� 1O Q O� �J (] m3▪ o»M rl • o? Nw G S ` 6aS's° mUp tIi ≥ o IUJ Ill o f i - a j'0 �'.b !T wv 3� I:, •� � !.c �' ' tg.4' c fa "7S• ni3gr oa �� I? r�a�/j 76^ ^ f a uId wl—'�' O M+ ` ai s S o-99 •Fyc301Atl3 agN o 0. W r ''U v S3]IAtl • 3 WO .--I 2 S33i Hi 831Stl1 1413O3*Nuns3tl 3LLS3WOO -4944W--- E88L44Int 14,totW+ai Sd °D X ? X ^ on �p a . . • $ a< -4 a p - -0 -m-n�n n N 4.i R4 -<.w a g n mN e < i .n „ g � ; D �-a Mo. I. W H' a ° 2 t i Qb c o Jrc « I.,is 1, » I 1 i 131. 0: ❑❑ -° O H. 7 0 403 483'3.1-8a5. 33 Op 22 o O 1 o OI� it 1 ya' Fit.R "..,“ w Lf) e� �q • �y al nN0F g � ° zm �I W_ �a CC 33 O ' t.�CC�' % O 't r� a 3tiYc 2 :2—ffs Ol w w IR SC W w T'I > ≥ lIi m > QQ po w so Y c i R2n23a • A so fi l �I N. W13 J! J - 3OIAk S � � 3 w G. W o (DI S S301A I I cc .C a q _ S33S SOS 331S! SJ W >cor_777 wat ono3Sd 1d1333N NUM.3tl-OLL83WOO jW ✓a6f1 ,42f22,4-- L1161 A1^f'LL86 w'oi Sd m :NIX o1XupD ❑ ❑ a N $m %< aue >s- it. r I ❑ ,!` € ° » p, 1 T. I m< o i D m slr; min ` z < 0 g P w '3^�'' I. ° ,r=p = a��Y c r.. F0 y rP k)✓ E tt 0-0 ; - 0 6 9 Q pn ejd « yD D 9ra S 4 fgh(pO p n$'V cYt [�Q39 Q W V MO in r I I $: ea .. 3gn O ❑❑ " a (pD� �I1- 4 9 c n z 3 Ntoc " O «I cE IS t.,ii %t�fi $ msa; g� " II 3 c�z .- `e I o. - W We 6 > > z Co; - ter. 3 9 4 in -lc= N. CD rn ¢ su a � • I ' o ow CAD' " Q �� S w� � flUHI wcw O(/( , I 007. ID = ~ hr• I BR wIr- wF. h ! n e, '` � Y In�k � z- rFmf•� a d !L oa :bi .i I0 a " ¢ '�33IA 3 it /kb. �n �w.�` - r., t;or'LL9£Wlad Bd = IN I s3alnS. E Y8 S333 NOS S31SdN 1d13O3tl71tlfll3tl 01183INOOocc ❑ ❑m of mn • ❑ ��2 aA I' Yp O _ _ D 4 I�il ill } OCh N 4 Q anmo neO4, p a ``: _ mpQ '„ �. 77C ti3OONN1 4 F 1dm nuA ei e I e .j a m''9. .� Ul a i #o 'm o » Q tDgggqq} r mi' ❑❑ (�� O g A° �Qc po CO 0 P pc nOi Om coi. FH-' m lc t g'a mam a '. '� W og OO « y 0a O` u ompoo p °+ g< CJ N > N yk AI 'a • o R a -2 N cn�z U! r-I N ¢ o 'C ` ryry N k� U7 o �I o 8 8 w N O �k N w z 7 e t e co LT*; U N ¢ ≥ fW m c • N ('D R 3.0 ra° SIgp O7 U g>u wm o '<� p LJ O o 3i> R • CC �5 y�I w orir w • v i5i ' zo NO w ≤ V A- v� Z F° _•eQ LL cm 0 .4U w ww S 1e --trii I ,` Ss as ma z a ¢ m ¢ 3OIhS I - _ p g o w 111A I "�P bgg 3 CL. V z �jci) () w o S3OIA1 'l 3'I n °i t/"�° 1°__ �..s u W m O S S33S SOS S31SV 1 i } \a .. orm a .. 3 Y e a T 0 7 m« c <' q IRy7 i F ile'3Y a. II J « j» ' a '! D m' ❑❑ ° 7C6 0 8s000ma 3 Q I a B n v� tnPw g 3 3" 'p ° o3 0_ I 1 w or � G ; a 3 :3Hn" o N p w p ; vs. ..� . J-PO ° m � mMs ofe m LL s_ 't. a D'\ O' 'a omn: f.a . da p 'A 2 '� Q a ! ° CQ 2 Q e w a p y • H'JhO ' O ¢ 1' �. Y y p' Q 1V\CY) CC w� oo.53; 2. d � S-1 Ox LL a w NS (s.:•10 ,�t (�� a e egmz; p" ` w w ,n ¢ 3DINtl3 �"` Q4 W j `- m';.3 dW z 8 djS3DIAS: ' gCC 2 O rS S33S SOS S31STNl a Copy of notice mailed first class to: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY COLORADO PO. BOX 736 GREELEY. COLORADO 60633 Arthur F . Uhrich ARIX P.O. Box 2021 Greeley, CO 80632-2021 Hello