The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20031098.tiff PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPME,t4T CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATIQ,N PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: Case Number: Application Fee: Zoning District: Receipt Number: ' Date: Application Checked By: Planner Assigned to Case: TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures). I(we), the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed PUD rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Please see Exhibit A(attached). (If additional space is required,attach an additional sheet of this same size or a copy of the deed) PARCEL NUMBER: 131305000054, 131305000060, 131305000062, 131305000066 (12 digit number—found on TAX I.D. or obtained at the Assessor's Office) NAME OF PROPOSED PUD SUBDIVISION LifeBridge Community PUD EXISTING ZONING Ag PROPOSED ZONING PUD TOTAL ACREAGE 313.5 OVERLAY DISTRICTS TBD PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT GUIDE SUBMITTAL (Specific or Conceptual) Specific PROPERTY OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR PUD REZONING: NAME LifeBridge Christian Church PHONE (303) 776-2927 ADDRESS 10345 Ute Highway, Longmont, Colorado 80504 NAME PHONE ADDRESS APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT(if different than above ') NAME ADDRESS HOME TELEPHONE BUSINESS TELEPHONE if agent is different from the property owner, please submit written documentation from the property owner authorizing ' said agent to represent the owner. Signature: bwn or Authorized Agent r-� 11 2003-1098 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE TETRATECH RMC MAR 1 0 2003 1900 S.Sunset Street Suite 1-F LQq,��gq on �Q�Q501 Ter3� $7 �b159 MEMORANDUM 1.1 `1� TO: Kim Ogle, Weld County Planner FROM: Todd Borger LifeBridge Christian Church, Change of Zone App., New EPA Stormwater Regulations DATE: March 10, 2003 We understand that Mr. Phil DelVecchio, Director of Community Development for the City of Longmont, has raised a concern that generally regards how this proposed project will comply with Colorado's Phase II municipal stormwater discharge permit. To summarize, the present form of the proposed LifeBridge P.U.D. is not in conflict with any existing applicable stormwater regulations as no construction has occurred on the site. As the project continues through the Weld County review process, all applicable r regulations will be followed. I have spoken via telephone with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment(Nathan Moore), the City of Longmont (David Hollingsworth), and Weld County Public Works (Drew Scheltinga) in order to gain a better understanding of the new stormwater regulations. It is our understanding that this site could require a Phase II MS4 permit only if certain criteria is met. If the criteria are met, the site will need to comply with state statutes regarding MS4 programs. In addition, it is our understanding that any earthwork construction, greater than 1 acre in size, will also require a Colorado Stormwater Discharge Permit for construction. These permits will be applied for as the need arises. While a number of issues are still being worked out at Weld County, it appears that this project will not require any major redesign as the new measures are put in place. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call me. H:\4270_0011-ng,Correspondence`.Memo Kim Ogle EPA Storm ater_doc �.......,.,, ,....�..,_�_.... North t I4 FUTURE 1 LONGVIEWUFEBRIDGE COMME RCIAL I NJCESS«EAS Fr BENT 1 11 � - **MO I \N"...- a 7 : LONG VIEW BLVD. al I .S WI9G M FT FOW,/l/l//////////l/////////// -. / '== jtG Giiittr :J iE IO. 60 FEW EDGING RIGHT-OF.WAY i IDMIGNAL NNNILRWAY TO ECETERMIMIO AT i MAL PLAT FUTURE LONGVIEWI UFEBRIDGE r r COMMERCIAL I 1r F 6 W SHOULDER-•-•- •-.7-. ..-07:7;(177C1 aE' 15 FT 9auDEA TO wcul t.aawr.FDaE TO EDGE _____STATE HIGHWAY 118 ♦. 44limi EyWEmTNR000H ONE easnmenacoom WE •Iimi. EXISTING THROUG Air TEWING MOUGH LAEi 4� t �F �/H LMIE �. ._ .mil0 VOWING THROUGH LANE . — OWNGn ROUGH WE �� 1 FOIEW3 TROUGH LANE —$- mamma THROUGH LANE — F� .♦ STATE HIGHWAY 118 _. ___. - STai(AflER•TF-� ;err S&OAD9ITO PYOHT.OF'MAY.Eo(1ETOEMF 1E F1 Bg1ADfDTO RIGHT -Y1Ar.WOE TO WOE ��1� VISTA COMMERICAL CENTER VISTA COMMERCIAL CENTER /yCyCE1ppB!!B /11agT: .--, 4 INTIERSIGIKIN TTW? LAMO®A u an Cixm SOW MEOWN01NYRLRNAr. ILL"MUM NO 711 LN 13 FEET VICE DME APRIL ID 3003 sw1 m. a —n. O TETRA um,.➢TECNAMC HC Z:370001.00 Passim mut FORE GUT G NlEISEFM1Y6 TETRATECH RMC • February 18, 2003 Mr. Kim Ogle Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Kim: We have gathered additional information to respond to your questions and clarify information submitted with the Change of Zone application. The following information is submitted for your review: • Color graphics illustrating phase one improvements. There are two maps that depict the first and second filing of phase one. • Additional traffic information outlining trip generation associated with the first two filings. • Drawings illustrating how the PUD will look from the surrounding area. • Revised Change of Zone Maps that include: (Rj (1)O,pO -ratb) We removed the number of seats in the prayer garden. We will clarify the seating capacity with the Final PUD for that portion of the PUD. - The portion of WCR 26 adjacent to the large lot single family development has been relocated to the property line so that the ROW can be shared with the adjacent City of Longmont property. - At the request of the neighbors, we have removed the vehicular and trail connections to the neighborhoods to the west and the arrow indicating a connection to a street along the north side of the Longview property. • A revised draft of the agreement with the Oligarchy Ditch Company. We will forward a signed copy of the agreement by March 3, 2003 so that it will be available for review prior to the March 18, 2003 Planning Commission hearing. I have included four full size copies of the maps and a complete set of reduced maps. We have also prepared nine additional copies of the original application materials and the supplemental information for the Planning Commission packets. Please call me if you need additional information. Thank you for your assistance. TETRA TECH RMC Barb Brunk Landscape Architect H 4270_001\changeofzone\Febrvery IB.doc 1900 S.Sunset Street,Suite 1-F Longmont,CO 80501 Tel:303.772.5282 Fax:303.665.6959 www.ttrmc.com r • I 0 II I 0 N 1 06 f r LR c+ 9G isp RR}l it ` V k a4 o S�, dk�ht -__----_-'n I ' pj IIFFIN p@ m ' ! C`'t '[�tll�I�F��A�� } `�\ AtT.li r t e ill I, • 1• '\ "t' o�o\ r„,,-?„,,,,c rr-) r � ``i Lim 1111 �m lilt p •, •,, r----, ` - ,F1118M11U�11t1 tll[%If Ili \1 IlHr tlil, IDIOM I ii ' `___ _ i,'IMMUNE IiilWltFlll l u I I i --- k 412' ? 1\ t l ' — I) iL 3 13 1 \ x s 3F \ ; 1 g 5 S to l� �� U 0 r II LL 7 L� L .x2 x \\ I 11': l ) ) ) / I / .) // . ----t ll ...--"' r.x ors ..C -..-. J-- T . 1 , r" — r-,_ ,s.....:*-- +, :41 y 1�_ rAI �► G 1 ,.......-ar ,, . , I, . I Irlik ICJ!%�— ~N ,?= s' :;MO MO EMI ewe O MNIIIIMillniii:Iil. Tir��rr �rir 1rr+r �aim ISM IWO =MN ill —�. "'lawn' IIIIIII all MillsN. NIII=C-.11111:.-MEOW WIN,Mil NM WM i w,Mill III= MO MN i A, 0 O v I r ' N",-----/-.\\. i LifeBridge PUD - Phase I, Filing 2 �, Agriculture -LBCC Facilities `- i Single-Family . ;, Open Space = mousing Senior Housing IN OOP n SpoceId /-/ -I i Date: February 18, 2003 MEMORANDUM co O c CO c•) TO: Barb Brunk, Rocky Mountain Consultants ' Todd Hodges, Todd Hodges Design O m Dave Biekert/Bruce Grinnell, LifeBridge Christian Church o cD Weld County o O rn U FROM: Matt Delich • o LL DATE: February 17, 2003 z SUBJECT: LifeBridge PUD, Filings 1 & 2 traffic analysis 0 (File: 0171ME03) • c0 w > N The LifeBridge PUD is a church campus and residential p co development located north of SH119, along WCR3) in Weld County, z (9 Colorado. The site location of the LifeBridge PUD is shown in Figure a1. The short range and long range traffic impacts of the LifeBridge I PUD are reflected in "The LifeBridge Project PUD Traffic Impact w w Study, " June 2002. The forecasts from this report were used as a (7 o basis of the analyses for the LifeBridge PUD. The analysis future N d for this exercise were the year 2010 (short range) . The purpose of r this memorandum is to determine the improvements necessary for Filing N 1 and for Filings 1 & 2 . Short range (2010) background peak hour traffic forecasts are shown in Figure 2. These traffic forecasts assume that the SH119/ Fairview intersection is signalized. It is not likely that signals would be warranted at the County Line Road/WCR26 intersection using the volumes shown in Figure 2. Table 1 shows the peak hour operation of the key intersections using the short range (2010) background traffic forecasts. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix A. It is expected that the key intersections will operate acceptably_ Acceptable operation is defined as level of service D or better. Typically at stop sign controlled intersections, minor street left W turns will experience delays that are commensurate with levels of service E or F prior to meeting signal warrants. This only occurs C. i during the peak hours. This level of delay is generally accepted by the public. For 20-22 hours a day, all movements operate at level w of service D or better. V U aThe LifeBridge PUD development site plan is shown in Figure 3 J W for Filing 1 and in Figure 4 for Filings 1 & 2 . Table 2 shows the W O Filing 1 trip generation for the LifeBridge PUD. Table 3 shows the Q a Filings 1 & 2 trip generation for the LifeBridge PUD. The trip distribution is shown in Figure 5. Figures 6 and 7 show the a respective Filing 1 and Filings 1 & 2 assignment of the LifeBridge PUD site generated peak hour traffic. ` a 5 F- The Filing 1 and Filings 1 & 2 site generated peak hour traffic W e2S was added to the background traffic (Figure 2) resulting in the short IO range (2010) Filing 1 and Filings 1 & 2 total peak hour traffic LL respectively shown in Figures 8 and 9. Using standard peak hour i"'`0. d traffic versus daily traffic relationships, the road segments of E— WCR26, from County Line Road to WCR3 , and of WCR3'-1, from WCR26 to 5H119, will have traffic volumes exceeding 1000 vehicles per day. r"` Most of the above road segments have a gravel surface. The forecasted volumes exceed the traffic volume based air quality standard that requires road surface treatment (paving) . It is expected that the gravel roads will receive the necessary treatment to meet the air quality standard. Table 4 shows the peak hour operation using the short range (2010) Filing 1 total traffic forecasts. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. It is expected that these intersections will operate acceptably. It is expected that WCR3'1 will have a rural cross section. The basic section will have one 12-foot lane in each direction with the necessary shoulders. At the accesses labeled B, C, and D the left-turning volumes will require left-turn lanes on WCR3' approaching these accesses. Figure 10 shows a schematic of the approach geometry at the key intersections. The functional distance (available for storage and deceleration) between SH119 and the access to Long View is 340 feet. It is recommended that this area be widened and striped to have side-by-side left-turn lanes. Design details regarding these intersections should be addressed later in the development review process. Table 5 shows the peak hour operation using the short range (2010) Filings 1 & 2 total traffic forecasts. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. It is expected that these intersections will operate acceptably. The geometry discussed in the previous paragraph and the approach lanes shown in Figure 10 also apply to the Filings 1 & 2 scenario. The west portion of the Parcel 1 single family residential area will connect to Fairview Drive. It is not known whether Fairview Drive will be built across the railroad tracks providing another connection to SH119. This connection has little bearing on the assignment of traffic related to the LifeBridge PUD in the short range future. The number of vehicles that would use Fairview Drive will not change the operation or geometric requirements at any of the key intersections. It is concluded that with development of the LifeBridge PUD, the key intersections will operate acceptably with both Filing 1 and Filings 1 & 2. The site generated traffic will cause the traffic volume based air quality standard to be exceeded on WCR26 and part of WCR3'-1. It is expected that these roads will receive the necessary treatment to meet the air quality standard. Auxiliary turn lanes should be installed as indicated in Figure 10 as development occurs. ) ) ) CO L , -- Di M • 8 1 c r 1 1 t _____H County ine Road WCR 1) BOULDER COUNTY O WELD COUNTY Z A N W 0 ,^,aC i 1 OY cn D /Y�e WCR 3 1/2 Q n r ,:fix -tn.m P'�14 x 8 iF T FydR� -r ,,*4 �I O C - CD ^. EAT WESTERN RAItRaAp �DJ C O � , j D ILI C:)) Interstate 25 ' co O (D 1 D N 0 0 Adik U) COUl 10/15 5/5 t WCR26 o v) o v M v It a, C 1^ C O U 3 N m C.) m r' 2m \-70/30 0 2 0 15/30 N z - t 1525/1445 r Z n a 1480/1275 30/30 i i f_110/80 SH119 115/45 20/105 t 1025/1440 o 2 0 915/1420 —► o o 80/60 0 0 110/80 0 0 Z o U Z U) N N AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles SHORT RANGE (2010) BACKGROUND Figure 2 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC TABLE 1 Short Range (2010) Background Peak Hour Operation C Y k � � V[ �vrtxb f'sl 'lg. 9r'5eGbOt1 ��'��"` ` �,�`" ,». k �4�(�� N$N�.' � � �;� t;r-..•':,_��f,.��.�. •w h l�t'. � -. rf �- �. i .+C�CT .v..t .. .... .--. } �Yi .... ,... ... .:p .':ke i� County Line Road/WCR26 Y WB LT/RT (stop sign) SB LT A A EB LT C B EBT B B EB RT A A EB APPROACH B B • WBLT A B_ WBT B B WB RT A A SH119/Fairview WB APPROACH B B (signal) — —NB LT C D NB T/RT NB APPROACH C C SB LT C C SB T/RT C C SB APPROACH C C OVERALL B C EB LT EBT B B ----- EB RT --- ----- A A �. EB APPROACH B B WB LT _ A B WBT WBRT A A SH119/WCR3'/z WB APPROACH [ B B (signal) NB LT/T C D NB RT C C NB APPROACH C C SB LT C C __---SB T/RT -- --------- C ---- C - -- - SB APPROACH C C OVERALL N SCALE: 1"=1000' i E p 3 tc 41 • A • I lifeBridge PUD-Phase I.Filing I AN.;omee !ucc Facame: I Senior Housing Progerecreed i FILING 1 SITE PLAN Figure 3 N SCALE: 1`=1000' 1 � T 'I E' I F { Li I II! YL. B EE nr— I, , A: LifeBridge PUD-Phase I,Filing 2 Acimbrt -LBCC Facilities S,wte4finir v HousingOOrppenga�e $enovsing 'r Ppe^y><• FILING 1 & 2 SITE PLAN Figure 4 TABLE 2 Filing 1 Trip Generation lie • �►1A1 T �1M Peat f ur PM Peai�Calol `: r'" Til$• R In Chit 210 Parcel 1:Single Family 56 D.U. 10.86 608 0.21 12 0.66 37 0.73 41 0.41 23 540 Parcels 2-4: 1494 1.54 2301 0.13 194 0.01 15 0.12 179 0.05 75 Church Campus students 253 Parcel 5:Elderly Attached 18 D.U. 3.48 63 0.04 1 0.03 1 0.06 1 0.04 1 253 Parcel 6:Elderly Attached 16 D.U. 348 56 0.04 1 0.03 0 0.06 1 0.04 1 253 Parcel 8:Elderly Attached 16 Q.U. 3.48 56 0.04 1 0.03 0 0.06 1 0.04 1- 253 Parcel 9:Elderly Attached 18 D.U. 3.48 63 0.04 1 0.03 1 0.06 1 0.04 1 253 Parcel 10:Elderly Attached 18 D.U. 3.48 63 0.04 1 0.03 1 r 0.06 1 0.04 1 253 Parcel 11:Elderly Attached 16 D.U. 3.48 56 0.04 1 0.03 0 0.06 1 0.04 1 Total for Filing 1 3266 212 55 226 104 TABLE 3 Filings 1 & 2 Trip Generation fiMt. A.V. :'A> Fmk Ho r4 _ i' #loulr r}, ,(,� Srr 2'' nor ra �^x ii•� ��.y - k'k 4.' 'v b1 +.;" ..sift - �i r 210 Parcel 1:Single Family 115 D.U. 10.25 1179 0.20 23 0.58 67 0.68 78 0.38 44 540 Parcels 2-4: 1494 1.54 2301 0.13 194 0.01 15 0.12 179 0.05 75 Church Campus students 253 Parcel 5:Elderly Attached 18 D.U. 3-48 63 0.04 1 0.03 1 0.06 1 0.04 1 253 Parcel 6:Elderly Attached 16 D-U. 3.48 56 0.04 1 0.03 0 0.06 1 0.04 1 253 Parcel 8:Elderly Attached 16 D.U- 3.48 56 0.04 1 0.03 0 0.06 1 0.04 1 253 Parcel 9:Elderly Attached 18 Q.U. 3.48 63 0.04 1 0.03 1 0.06 1 0.04 1 253 Parcel 10:Elderly Attached 18 D.U. 3.48 63 0.04 1 0.03 1 0.06 1 0.04 1 253 Parcel 11:Elderly Attached 16 D.U. 3.48 56 0.04 1 0.03 0 0.06 1 0.04 1 253 Parcel 12:Elderly Attached 57 D.U. 3.48 198 0.04 2 0.03 2 0.06 3 0.04 2 Total for Filings 1 &2 4035 225 87 266 127 a N 5% 5% WCR?6 // a 10°6 50% i r a 1 re C _ — _ _ - Ns- c, V e e n r.n 15% o e oa._ „ 5% m s----- e2 \l ... " N_/ - J 50% 30% _ SH119 --� 20% 10% Residential Church Camas r TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 5 4 • N 11/11 --C717,1/4N1/41 r/ WCR26 m el v rn 11/40 n 7/8 WCR26 CD in r v d c N 2 M 0 U m .i U- ao v a CA 1-- 24138 24138 /` i 2227 SH119 67/78 -Am- 67/78 - AM/PM FILING 1 SITE GENERATED Figure 6 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N 11/13 RI L 109/101 WCR26 o \ 15/42 �Z Ns- v o \ r 12/12 1131\1T 114' <Y.) 1- v v oe m N N C M 0 rn rn v o v r- E--40/49 i `-26/35 SH119 74/97 -� 74/97 AM/PM FILINGS 1 & 2 SITE GENERATED Figure 7 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC a N 0 0 0 r- to o 20/55 15/15 t r WC R26 0 0 o of N M V C C C O U r 3 � 4) M U- 0 r' 2 m '-70/30 yr 2O Ln 40/60 ('4 iii Z o .c 1550/1485 Z e i— 1480/1275 i /—30/30 L1/4110/80 SH119 115/45 t 90/185 'f r 1095/1520 o 0 915/1420 o 2 o 80/60 Z 110/80Tht N Z N N N AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles SHORT RANGE (2010) FILING 1 Figure 8 TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC S N 0 U) 0 iin ii c) o 25/60 20/20 t r WC R26 0 0 c M Io 1(I N In M U CC c) C C C 0 O U ,.r r 3 N M -m U 0 Cr) 2 m '-70/30 0 40/65 N Z 1565/1495 Z i -.id--1480/1275 30/30 I L1/4f-110/80 SH119 115/45 —i '411t r 95205 ilif t re 1100/1540 —► o 2 0 915/1420 ► of g o 80/60 el 0 0 110/80 o O o to z o u) Z u) N N AM/PM Rounded to Nearest 5 Vehicles r SHORT RANGE (2010) FILINGS 1 & 2 Figure 9 TOTAL PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC TABLE 4 Short Range (2010) Filing 1 Total Peak Hour Operation i :f'Ci':ii��t. I1 *F•ccttji,,� .y rc g t*L' v 1, Cie .F '%"w�;rfk� f•'� _;1H � r f �'' ��,ag 31 n�. q�» '°.�— ' fir`n..— fit"; - r 3 r ti 7: ! !.. .'.'p:. County Line RoadIWCR26 _ WB LT/RT C C (stop sign) SB LT A A _ EBLT C B EB T B _ B EBRT A A EB APPROACH B T.__ B WB LT A B WB T B C WBRT A A SH119/Fairview WB APPROACH B B (signal) NB LT C D NB T/RT C C NB APPROACH _ C C SB LT C C r' SB T/RT C - C SB APPROACH C C OVERALL B C _ EB LT C C EB T B C EBRT B _ B EB APPROACH B C WB LT A B WBT C C _ WB RT B B SH119/WCR3'A WB APPROACH C C (signal) NB LT/T C D NB RT B C NB APPROACH C C SB LT C C SB T/RT C _ C SB APPROACH C C OVERALL C C TABLE 5 Short Range (2010) Filings 1 &2 Total Peak Hour Operation ;:• # a... - - 4^.��t}.!V f h id ] fix.'k � '5 X { rflersect1or� County Line Road/WCR26 WB LT/RT C C — (stop sign) SB LT A A EB LT C B EB T B B EB RT A A EB APPROACH B B WB LT A B WB T WBRT A A SH119/Fairview WB APPROACH_ B C (signal) - -- - NB LT C D NB T/RT C_ C NB APPROACH SB LT SB T/RT SB APPROACH OVERALL B C EB LT C C EB T B C EB RT EB APPROACH WB LT A B WB T WB RT B B SH119/WCR3'/z V/g APPROACH (signal) -- NB LT/T C D NBRT NB APPROACH C C SB LT SB T/RT SB APPROACH C C OVERALL C C a r N l i E p 1 tf WCR26 F Ltie �I C v t lI d 1 y c c lammaB 0 Ufr Z 3 ` A co - i SH119 fr (785_±, d' U - Denotes Lane SHORT RANGE INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Figure 10 APPENDIX A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 .1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. e"e Performed: 3/27/02 lysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: County Line Road/WCR26 Jurisdiction: Longmont Units: U. S. Customary -- Analysis Year: recent hort bkgrd total Project ID: 0171 East/West Street: WCR26 North/South Street: County Line Road (WCR1) Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R - Volume 345 5 5 635 - Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 396 ' -'5- 5 705 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R one 5 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage - Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR I v (vph) 5 16 C(m) (vph) 1158 736 v/c 0.00 0.02 95% queue length 0.01 0.07 Control Delay 8.1 13.9 LOS A B Approach Delay 13.9 Approach LOS B r HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Agency/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Date Performed: 3/27 02 Fy+alysis Time Period: am pm ersection: County Line Road/WCR26 Jurisdiction: Longmont Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent .hortl.kgr. total Project ID: 0171 East/West Street: WCR26 North/South Street: County Line Road (WCR1) Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 610 5 15 500 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 648 5 16 537 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT. Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R 1 L T R Volume 5 15 rak Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 _ ,urly Flow Rate, HFR 5 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR - - I v (vph) 16 . 22 C(m) (vph) 934 607 v/c 0.02 . 0.04 95% queue length . 0.05 0.11 Control Delay 8.9 15.4 LOS A C Approach Delay 15.4 Approach LOS C i-^^ HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 .1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCSZUUU: Signalized Intersections Release 4.Ic Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/Fairview Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4111/02 Jurisd: Longmont Period: a pm Year : recent hor bkgr total Project D: 0171 en.' St: SH119 N/S St: Fairview Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R L TR L TR Volume 115 1025 80 30 1525 70 15 1 10 10 1 25 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 60.0 22.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 0.-•,. Intersection Performance Summary r/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 216 1770 0.58 0.68 21.7 C T 2123 3539 0.53 0.60 12.7 B 13.3 B R 950 1583 0.09 0.60 8.7 A Westbound L 332 1770 0.10 0.68 7.4 A T 2123 3539 0.80 0.60 18.6 B 17.9 B R 950 1583 0.08 0.60 8.6 A Northbound L 302 1374 0.06 0.22 30.9 C TR 353 1605 0.04 0.22 30.7 C 30.6 C Southbound L 307 - 1395 0.04 0.22 30.7 C TR 350 1593 0.09 0.22 31.1 C 31.0 C Intersection Delay = 16.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive .;iazeland, CO 80538 t..one: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/Fairview Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont Period: a p Year : recent . or+ bkgrd total Project ID: 0171 E/W St: SH119 N/S St: Fairview Street n SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R L TR L TR Volume 45 1440 60 30 1445 30 130 1 100 65 1 130 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 58.0 24.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary D-or/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach .e Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 216 1770 0.22 0.66 14 .7 B T 2053 3539 0.75 0.58 18.1 B 17.6 B R 918 1583 0.07 0.58 9.3 A Westbound L 217 1770 0.16 0.66 12.7 B T 2053 3539 0.79 0.58 19.5 B 19.2 B R 918 1583 0.04 0.58 9.1 A Northbound L 269 1120 0.57 0.24 36.3 D TR 381 1586 0.31 0.24 31.7 C 34 .3 C Southbound - L 300 1248 0.25 0.24 31.2 C TR 380 1585 0.41 0.24 32.7 C 32.2 C Intersection Delay = 20.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 ^one: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 ,flail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 .1c ' , Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/WCR3, 1/2 Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont Period: am .m Year : recent ort .kgr.' total Project I: 0171 -0-"' St: SH119 N/S St: WCR3 1/2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R LT R L TR Volume 20 915 110 110 1480 15 25 1 25 35 1 120 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right A EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 6.0 60.0 24 .0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs r` Intersection Performance Summary :r/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 180 1770 0.12 0.66 15.2 B T 2123 3539 0.46 0.60 11.7 B 11.5 B R 950 1583 0.12 0.60 8.9 A Westbound L 348 1770 0.37 0.66 8.6 A T 2123 3539 0.82 0.60 19.4 B 18.6 B R 950 1583 0.02 0.60 8.1 A Northbound LT 326 1358 0.09 0.24 29.7 C 25.7 C R 554 1583 0.05 0.35 21.6 C Southbound L 330 - 1374 0.12 0.24 29.9 C TR 380 1585 0.37 0.24 32.3 C 31.8 C Intersection Delay = 17.0 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive yveland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/WCR3 1/2 Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont Period: _ pm Year : recent short ..kgr. total Project ID: 1171 E/W St: SH119 N/S St: WCR3 1/2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R LT R L TR Volume 105 1420 80 80 1275 30 200 1 200 10 1 30 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right A EB Right SB Right. WB Right Green 6.0 58.0 26.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Dr'? Group Flow Rate C Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 209 1770 0.56 0.64 16.6 B T 2053 3539 0.77 0.58 18.8 B 18.2 B R 918 1583 0.10 0.58 9.6 A Westbound L 180 1770 0.49 0.64 17.7 B T 2053 3539 0.68 0.58 16.5 B 16.4 B R 918 1583 0.04 0.58 9.1 A Northbound LT 339 1305 0.70 0.26 39.6 D 31.7 C R 586 1583 0.40 0.37 23.8 C Southbound L 182 699 0.07 0.26 28.0 C TR 414 1591 0.09 0.26 28.1 C 28.1 C Intersection Delay = 19.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 Pce: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034. E il: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS r APPENDIX B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael ' ' ncy/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. :e Performed: 3/27/02 Analysis Time Period: C)pm iling 1 Intersection: County ine 'oad/WCR26 Jurisdiction: Longmont Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent -hort bkgrd eta) - - Project ID: 0171 / East/West Street: WCR26 - North/South Street: County Line Road (WCR1) Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R 1 L T R Volume 345 20 105 635 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 396 22 116 705 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 /-. L T R I L T R Volume 15 20 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR . Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 116 40 C(m) (vph) 1141 353 v/c 0.10 0.11 95% queue length 0.34 0.38 Control Delay 8.5 19.8 LOS A C Approach Delay 19.8 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael ' ncy/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. .e Performed: 3/27/02 Analysis Time Period: am p Filing 1 Intersection: County ine 'oad/WCR26 Jurisdiction: Longmont Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd(ot Project ID: 0171 East/West Street: WCR26 North/South Street: County Line Road (WCR1) Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 610 20 110 500 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 648 21 118 537 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ,0--- L T R I L T R Volume 15 55 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 17 62 Percent Heavy.Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) - ‘ 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes -- -- 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB - Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 118 79 C(m) (vph) 921 591 v/c 0.13 0.13 95% queue length 0.44 0.46 Control Delay 9.5 18.9 LOS A C Approach Delay 18.9 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 .1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. rr-oLuUV: O.LI Z1assteu 111LCs Cl:LsVll.7 nC_LCaoC Y.1V Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/Fairview Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont Period: pm iling 1 Year : recent ort bkgrd ota) Project ID: 01 9 ' St: SH119 N/S St: Fairview Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R L TR L TR Volume 115 1095 80 30 1550 70 15 1 10 10 1 25 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds - X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 60.0 22.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary r/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 216 1770 0.58 0.68 22.1 C T 2123 3539 0.57 0.60 13.2 B 13.7 B R 950 1583 0.09 0.60 8.7 A Westbound L 309 1770 0. 11 0.68 7.9 A T 2123 3539 0.81 0.60 19.1 B 18.4 B R 950 1583 0.08 0.60 8.6 A Northbound L 302 1374 0.06 0.22 30.9 C TR 353 1605 0.04 0.22 30.7 C 30.8 C Southbound L 307 1395 0.04 0.22 30.7 C TR 350 1593 0.09 0.22 31.1 C 31.0 C Intersection Delay = 16.7 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Loveland, CO 80538 L .ne: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/Fairview Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont Paciod: am Filing 1 Year : recent hor bkgrd otal lest ID: 01 E., +J St: SH119 N/S St: Fairview Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R L .TR L TR Volume 45 1520 60 30 1485 30 130 1 100 65 1 130 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 58.0 24.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 Al Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 216 1770 0.22 0.66 15.5 B T 2053 3539 0.79 0.58 19.4 B 18.9 B R 918 1583 0.07 0.58 9.3 A Westbound L 216 1770 0.16 0.66 14.1 B T 2053 3539 0.81 0.58 20.3 C 20.0- B R 918 1583 0.04 0.58 9.1 A Northbound L 269 1120 0.57 0.24 36.3 D TR 381 1586 0.31 0.24 31.7 C 34.3 C i Southbound L 300 1248 0.25 0.24 31.2 C TR 380 1585 0.41 0.24 32.7 C 32.2 C Intersection Delay = 21.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 1'1°92 Glen Haven Drive eland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/WCR3 1/2 Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont Pr'iod: (gD pm iling ► Year : recent short .kgrd�tota) ject ID: 01 E., .. St: SH119 N/S St: WCR3 1/2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R LT R L TR Volume 90 915 110 110 1480 40 25 1 25 45 1 145 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right A EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 53.0 26.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 - 2.0 2.0 i"` Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 216 1770 0.44 0.64 21.4 C T 1876 3539 0.52 0.53 16.3 B 16.3 B R 839 1583 0.14 0.53 12.3 B Westbound L 346 1770 0.37 0.64 10.0- A T 1876 3539 0.93 0.53 31.3 C 29.4 C R 839 1583 0.06 0.53 11.5 B Northbound LT 349 1344 0.09 0.26 28.1 C 23.6 C R 617 1583 0.05 0.39 19.0 B Southbound L 357 1374 0.15 0.26 28.7 C TR 412 1585 0.42 0.26 31.4 C 30.8 C Intersection Delay = 24 .8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 .1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 2 Glen Haven Drive 1 _land, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/WCR3 1/2 Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont eriod: am p Filing 1 Year : recent shor bkgrd total ject ID: I1 E., '4 St: SH119 N/S St: WCR3 1/2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY 1 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound I L T R L T R L T R L T R I No. Lanes I 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I L T R L T R LT R L TR Volume 1185 1420 80 80 1275 60 200 1 200 25 1 70 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A P NB Left A Thru A P Thru A Right A P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right A EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 4 .0 48.0 27.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Al Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 340 1770 0.61 0.63 25.3 C T 1840 3539 0.86 0.52 25.1 C 24.5 C R 823 1583 0.11 0.52 12.3 B Westbound L 216 1770 0.41 0.56 16.9 B T 1699 3539 0.82 0.48 27.1 C 26.0 C R 760 1583 0.09 0.48 14.3 B Northbound LT 335 1241 0.70 0.27 39.5 D 30.5 C R 633 1583 0.37 0.40 21.5 C Southbound L 196 725 0.15 0.27 28.1 C TR 428 1587 0.19 0.27 28.3 C 28.3 C Intersection Delay = 25.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C 11CS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. /"172 Glen Haven Drive veland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS r APPENDIX C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael '0""‘ncy/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. _e Performed: 3�27/02 Analysis Time Period: (amJpm Filings 1 & D Intersection: ounty ine Road WCR26 Jurisdiction: Longmont Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd(otal Project ID: 0171 East/West Street: WCR26 North/South Street: County Line Road (WCR1) Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 345 20 105 635 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 396 22 116 705 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 20 25 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 23 29 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR 1 v (vph) 116 52 C(m) (vph) 1141 339 v/c 0.10 0.15 95% queue length 0.34 0.54 Control Delay 8.5 20.8 LOS A C Approach Delay 20.8 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4 .1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael "'ncy/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. . _e Performed: 3/27/02 Analysis Time Period: am Filings 1 & 2 Intersection: County Ine 'oa• WCR26 Jurisdiction: Longmont Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: recent short bkgr total Project ID: 0171 East/West Street: WCR26 North/South Street: County Line Road (WCR1) Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs) : 0.25 • Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 610 30 115 500 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 648 31 123 537 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 1 1 Configuration TR L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ^ L T R I L T R Volume 20 60 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 22 68 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage Flared Approach: Exists? Yes Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I LR I v (vph) 123 90 C(m) (vph) 913 511 v/c 0.13 0.18 95% queue length 0.46 0.63 Control Delay 9.6 20.4 LOS A C Approach Delay 20.4 Approach LOS C HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 .1c Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/Fairview Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont Period: cc pm Filings 1 6) Year : recent ort kgrd(rota) Y—nject D• 017 St: SH119 N/S St: Fairview Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R L TR L TR Volume 115 1100 80 30 1565 70 15 1 10 10 1 25 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 60.0 22.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 es., Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 216 1770 0.58 0.68 22.3 C T 2123 3539 0.57 0.60 13.3 B 13.8 B R 950 1583 0.09 0.60 8.7 A Westbound L 307 1770 0.11 0.68 8.0 A T 2123 3539 0.82 0.60 19.4 B 18.7 B R 950 1583 0.08 0.60 8.6 A Northbound L 302 1374 0.06 0.22 30.9 C TR 353 1605 0.04 0.22 30.7 C 30.8 C Southbound L 307 1395 0.04 0.22 30.7 C TR 350 1593 0.09 0.22 31.1 C 31.0 C - Intersection Delay = 16.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 .1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 22]2 Glen Haven Drive Ir 'land, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 .1c Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/Fairview Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont Period: amnlings 1 & 22 Year : recent ort bkgr. total " 'ject ID: 1 St: SH119 N/S St: Fairview Street SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R L TR L TR Volume 45 1540 60 30 1495 30 130 1 100 65 1 130 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 58.0 24.0 Yellow 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 216 1770 0.22 0.66 15.7 B T 2053 3539 0.80 0.58 19.8 B 19.3 B R 918 1583 0.07 0.58 9.3 A Westbound L 216 1770 0.16 0.66 14 .4 B T 2053 3539 0.82 0.58 20.6 C 20.2 C R 918 1583 0.04 0.58 9.1 A Northbound L 269 1120 0.57 0.24 36.3 D TR 381 1586 0.31 0.24 31.7 C 34.3 C Southbound L 300 1248 0.25 0.24 31.2 C TR 380 1585 0.41 0.24 32.7 C 32.2 C Intersection Delay = 21.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. ,?A72 Glen Haven Drive Leland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS liE§ Rli § 1igEi ifitu �Stisc ?ii.a§ i4e Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/WCR3 1/2 Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont $iod:Cgb pm(filings 1 & 2> Year : recent short bkgrd(total) ject D: 01 /1 e et St: SH119 N/S St: WCR3 1/2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R LT R L TR Volume 95 915 110 110 1480 40 25 1 25 50 1 160 Lane Width 12 .0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A P NB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right "A Peds X Peds X NB Right A EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 -53.0 26.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 2.0 2.0 ,..---. Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 216 1770 0.47 0.64 21.6 C T 1876 3539 0.52 0.53 16.3 B 16.3 B R 839 1583 0.14 0.53 12.3 B Westbound L 346 1770 0.37 0.64 10.0- A T 1876 3539 0.93 0.53 31.3 C 29.4 C R 839 1583 0.06 0.53 11.5 B Northbound LT 346 1329 0.09 0.26 28.1 C 23.6 C R 617 1583 0.05 0.39 19.0 B Southbound L 357 1374 0.17 0.26 28.8 C TR 412 1585 0.46 0.26 31.9 C 31.2 C Intersection Delay = 24.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4 .1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. /'"2 Glen Haven Drive - ""-- /eland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Analyst: Michael Inter. : SH119/WCR3 1/2' Agency: Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Area Type: All other areas Date: 4/11/02 Jurisd: Longmont Period: am •m ilings 1 & 2 j Year : recent hort bkgrd tota p^ject ID: 11 . St: SH119 N/S St: WCR3 1/2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 LGConfig L T R L T R LT R L TR Volume 205 1420 80 80 1275 65 200 1 200 30 1 80 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 0 0 0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A P NB Left A Thru A P Thru A Right A P Right A Peds X Peds X WB Left A P SB Left A Thru P Thru A Right P Right A Peds X Peds X NB Right A EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 8.0 4 .0 48.0 27.0 Yellow 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 es"' Cycle Length: 100.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 340 1770 0.67 0.63 29.2 C T 1840 3539 0.86 0.52 25.1 C 25.0 C R 823 1583 0.11 0.52 12.3 B Westbound L 216 1770 0.41 0.56 16.9 B T 1699 3539 0.82 0.48 27.1 C 25.9 C R 760 1583 0.09 0.48 14.4 B . Northbound LT 331 1226 0.71 0.27 40.1 D 30.8 C R 633 1583 0.37 0.40 21.5 C Southbound L 196 725 0.18 0.27 28.4 C TR 428 1586 0.22 0.27 28.6 C 28.6 C Intersection Delay = 26.1 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1c Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. 32.Z2 Glen Haven Drive eland, CO 80538 Phone: (970) 669-2061 Fax: (970) 669-5034 E-Mail: mdelich@frii.com OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ,,� f fi -'Ir•— o cQ 4✓ f //d4 1 rte l ,� f 0 , 1 4 I — i oil ittr,:1,, !I f tiiim i tm. tk . epd,Jet ml L—i.i -r [ ,,,...1 • 'lie' ' ' .------wc.c% co i , 1 t 1 ,ti- L_____ter-. I .J Q G� .l S , --.r .,'t 1 , ' 711 1 I - ` : -71:11'' ` III ill�� I ICI M R t t1t j1c J 1 tiJ e e fU p�pclanglpp b a -7-':-.e,— .- --;r1:1 gle illa e— 0 cs Ili__ . 'ET; p 4 t1'a\ ; C �a da (.la tfli �?citattl ,r . ,,,,,,.,,, i„it i _ . „_,.. a ( I ekil 1 '14,7tl Qb t ` ^a l W Y 'r �,� #r � s el Is , yq y °. gP M I �'M c "� ,�' P'[r�M'ha d`ra`w . -'5 &r'^ 3- { • -1 kY 2kjb, ,y ,: A-, dg < Sw2a...rlfuy � . iti . i r . XJr y 5 i, • M •` .a �. 5 ? Src9'._ '� -' 23 i t 4 S $ r tr4. x " `F, .V ` aak im... p�pq"' f! s, }ri d d , � r js ? R r i; `' #�i . ". x yb * p,fte s. 4 r"' ;}1, ` l [ . ' .k . e f 1S'.. A ,,,cot. _ *,)-7*-tb.l 'I..; = a A ... r.74:- . i$.R ,�,��„ F yI{[ is . . T•e ..4 r'tC1 } 4 2-- a' ;p� 4, '1F"ita „5k-nB ,�Y►1 s is , .. s,4,,, Y ,y.�µ M-�i f "i R ';. r' Qf4 ' .t . A 44" ?tr. ♦ 3 � e l�yw�'§ j it �` r i 'A �'.` +l ... raw.$e :... ,,� yg .' ..i ti . ryy s'„ S7. cxr' i Y }'10- E4 - -,— - A € r { rt. w ' 4: 4 { yy t p e♦ .......-ea. .:f Y t� s ,t` of ` � -� y�.� 1 13 # d . if b .,e 111 R _ r ,�1� .4- h • ,r4-%,‘i n :: a,. .h q� -E/,',.;9,;,:,,T.,'"t. , + �, IL'' '�; _4 P t t. ti ` Pik m. ',.*c f t -k7. ft •' - F .`}} at ' X'7'— - a Rw l# Yku. fx'. .J. \ P�$�a -,, i '`S .. '`,:. a pay "i Vi 4 • K,= � d'. t 4 sv k sr��t t} fir `v X Y' " : ::***-i'4-", # * t 4 k 47 ' .• R ', . {•. `' . i a 1K4.4. '= - vim,S �m u t-S a wc. � *�Y.I Y4 _y, t 3y-� +Fi .. .,' {„�y¢ r • k„4 y{ R - s . t, ,c <,: yf, . -vg's ,. fit yin' > *� ,+ys +:�' '. �a •w mkt s , '`" g. K { t t1.41:: or K ," Itetriit {, 4 r ,tif T F °; 5 . .4 [" >rt xn t Is s a -�� i r, A �� 'ffi' 1' 5:1 t.,i Weld County Planning Department GREEI.EY OFFICE It TETRA TECH RMC MAR 6 2003 1900 S.Sunset Street,SRteF Iregaynn l�, Tel:3 2 E, 0�G�6�y I ,' 1 �/ TRANSMITTAL TO: LULU l LA+. P ICII ht The µ'h. FROM: 1`I n �LU laarb Dlf' nk SSS Klartk 11+11 .eve DATE: 3- 9-03 e.eH , Co 60 Cot) n I r� ATTN: f(\I irn or Le PROJECT: 1" roj L tot -R `r i Cq llllll P PHONE: IQ'ID0) 3S3- Como oo Ext-,2,54a JOB NO: 50- J'1-710. O01. Q O Fax Number: If you do not receive all pages, or if Number of pages sent(including this cover): pages. transmission is not clear please call Tetra Tech RMC at(303)772-5282. Messenger - Delivery _ Pickup _ Other _ Standard Mail FedEx Overnight WE ARE SENDING YOU: Copies Description igar A1rrnnant' l a1nr4 °Dina) If enclosures are not as noted,please notify us promptly. THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: For Approval As Requested For Your Use For Review and Comment REMARKS: COPY TO: Document2 CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING• PLANNING• SURVEYING • OLIGARCHY IRRIGATION DITCH COMPANY AGREEMENT TO MODIFY DITCH AND EASEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH PROJECT LIFEBRIDGE 1. PARTIES. The Parties to this Agreement are Oligarchy Irrigation Ditch Company ("Ditch Company"), and LifeBridge Christian Church("Licensee"). The Ditch Company and Licensee are hereinafter referred to as the Parties. 2. RECITALS. Licensee desires to obtain the permission of the Ditch Company to modify the Oligarchy Ditch ("Ditch") on property described in EXHIBIT A by relocating a portion of the ditch and placing it in a pipeline. Additionally, the Licensee will install utility crossings which plans and specifications shall be completed at a later date and incorporated into this Agreement upon the approval by the Ditch Company (the "Installations"). Licensee owns the property described in EXHIBIT A. The ditch company has agreed to the change in the easement and the ditch subject to the terms, conditions and covenants set forth in this Agreement.. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE: 3. CONSTRUCTION. 3.1 Licensee shall reconstruct the Ditch by relocating and piping a portion of the open Ditch, and installing the Installations pursuant to the plans and specifications approved by the Ditch Company as stated in Section 3.2 of this Agreement. The obligations and benefits to this Agreement shall run with the land described in EXHIBIT A. 3.2 The Licensee shall submit plans and specifications as to the Installations to the ditch company for approval. Upon receipt of the plans and specifications for the installations, the ditch company shall have a reasonable time (approximately 30 Days) days to review the plans and specifications for approval or rejection. If written notice of approval is not given to the Licensee within such time period, the plans and specifications shall be deemed to be rejected. Licensee shall have the right to resubmit amended plans to Ditch Company for review. The Ditch Company may impose reasonable standards for protection of the Ditch Company. This review process shall continue until the plans and specifications are approved by the Ditch Company or until terminated by the Licensee. Upon this approval the plans and specifications shall be attached and incorporated into this Agreement. Licensee shall make no modifications to the approved plans and specifications without the prior written approval of the Ditch Company. 3.3 The Licensee shall notify the Ditch Company at least three (3) business days preceding the date of commencing work involved on the Installations, or replacement of the Installations, permitted hereunder. The Ditch Company may inspect the Installation or replacements during the construction thereof, as it deems necessary to protect its interests. The right of the Ditch Company to inspect the Installation or replacements shall be solely for the benefit of the Ditch • Company and shall not be deemed to be a waiver of the Ditch Company to enforce the obligation of the Licensee to construct the Installation in accordance with the plans and nor shall it be deemed to estop the Ditch Company for the Licensee's failure to install or properly design its installation. 3.4 The Licensee agrees that the construction permitted hereunder shall proceed with reasonable diligence from the initiation of such construction to its completion. The Installations shall be constructed in such a manner so as not to interfere with the flow of water through the ditch to water recipients. Licensee shall be responsible for the carriage of water across Licensee's land, including drainage water, while the Installations are being constructed. Stormwater released into the ditch from Licensee's land will not be in excess of the historic average runoff and will comply with all relevant Weld County drainage criteria, rules, and regulations. 3.5 Licensee agrees that construction on Installations shall proceed expeditiously and with reasonable diligence from the commencement of construction to its completion. Upon completion of the Installations, Licensee shall notify the Ditch Company. The Ditch Company shall accept or reject the Installations except that the Ditch Company shall not be required to accept or reject until and unless all fees billed have been paid pursuant to Section 7 below. The Ditch Company shall not unreasonably withhold acceptance. The Ditch Company shall be entitled to test the Installations by running water through them. Acceptance or rejection shall be in writing. If the Ditch Company accepts, the survey and grant of easement described in Sections 5 and 6 shall occur. If the Installations are rejected, the Ditch Company shall specify the reasons for rejection, and the Licensee shall correct same, and the above process shall be repeated. All portions of the Ditch bottom, sides, banks and all affected portions of the Ditch and lateral easements which are disturbed by the Installation shall be restored to the condition of the property at the time prior to construction. My and all fencing and other facilities appurtenant to the Ditch shall be replaced in a condition at least equal to the condition of such facilities and appurtenances prior to construction. 3.6 The Ditch Company's review and approval of the plans and specifications of the Installations is solely for its benefit and creates no benefit or right in any other Party. The Ditch Company's review and approval of the plans and specifications shall not relieve the Licensee, or its agents, employees, from its duty to properly design and construct the Installations. 3.7 The Licensee shall install permanent markers or indicators showing the location of the piped ditch for the purpose of locating the piped ditch as required by the Utility Notifications Center of Colorado. These markers shall be installed at the entrance of the piped ditch and located at every manhole showing the location of the new pipeline. The distance between the markers shall not exceed 500 feet. Additionally, a trace wire shall be installed along the entire length of the ditch pipeline. 3.8 Licensee shall be responsible, at its own expense, for obtaining any local, state or Federal permits or approvals. It is the Licensee's obligation to investigate and determine the need for any such permits or approvals. The Licensee is responsible, at its own expense, for obtaining all local, state and federal permits or approvals and for compliance with all local, state and federal laws and regulations including but not limited to land use and environmental laws and regulations, and specifically including the Endangered Species Act, prior to beginning construction. The Licensee shall indemnify the Ditch Company for any and all costs, damages, fines, and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the Ditch Company as a result of the Licensee's failure to obtain such permits or approvals or failure to comply with all applicable laws and regulations. 4. INSPECTION. 4.1 The Licensee shall notify the Ditch Company at least three(3) business days prior to construction of the Installations, or replacement or repair of the Installations permitted by this Agreement. The Ditch Company is permitted to inspect the Installations or replacement and repairs of the Installations during construction. Upon completion of the construction, the Ditch Company may inspect the Installations. 41 Licensee shall reconstruct the Ditch by relocating and piping a portion of the open Ditch, and installing the installations pursuant to the plans and specifications approved by the Ditch Company according to the provisions of Section 3 of this Agreement. The obligations and benefits of this Agreement shall run with the land described in EXHIBIT A. The Ditch Company's right to inspect the installations or replacement of the installations in no way relieves the Licensee of its liability for improper design, construction or maintenance. The Ditch Company's inspection is solely for the benefit of the Ditch Company and creates no obligation to the Ditch Company. Upon completion of the construction of the Installation, the Licensee shall provide the Ditch Company with a complete set of "As Built" plans together with a certification from the Licensee's licensed engineer certifying that the Installation was constructed in accordance with the Approved Plans. 5. SURVEY. After completion of the Installations, Licensee shall obtain an "as built" survey signed by a registered engineer of the Installations and provide a copy of the survey to the Ditch Company. As part of this survey, a legal description shall be developed for the easement to be granted to the Ditch Company. The legal description of the easement shall be incorporated into this Agreement upon approval of the Ditch Company of the Installations. 6. REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES. 6.1 The Licensee agrees to reimburse the Ditch Company (or pay directly) for all reasonable engineering, legal costs and administrative fees incurred by the Ditch Company in preparing, approving and enforcing all aspects of this Agreement, the costs associated with billing and collecting these amounts for the Ditch Company and the costs of inspection as described in Section 4. 6.2 Statements for the costs chargeable to Licensee hereunder will be forwarded to Licensee and the same shall be paid to the Ditch Company within 30 days after the billing date. If payment has not been received by Ditch Company within 30 days, Licensee shall have breached this Agreement and Ditch Company may institute legal proceedings to collect the amount due and owing. In such proceeding, Ditch Company shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees from Licensee. 7. LICENSE FEE. As consideration for the Ditch Company to enter into this Agreement, Licensee shall pay to the Ditch Company $2500 (or other reasonable amount approved by the Ditch board) upon approval of the plans and specifications of the Installations. Licensee shall pay to the Ditch Company an additional fee of$1000 (or other reasonable amount approved by the Ditch board) for each additional use or crossing of the Ditch at the time any additional use or crossing is approved. However, nothing herein shall obligate the Ditch Company to approve any additional uses of the Ditch by the Licensee. 8. MAINTENANCE. 8.1 Licensee specifically agrees and pledges to maintain, repair and replace the Installations and the entire portion of the Ditch located on the property described in EXHIBIT A so as not to require the Ditch Company to maintain, repair or replace the Installations or the Ditch in that area. If Licensee fails to properly maintain, repair or replace any portion of the Installations or the portions of the Ditch for which it is responsible after ten days notice of the need for same and such maintenance and/or repairs are feasible due to weather conditions during that period, the Ditch Company may, at its own option, conduct its own maintenance, repair or replacement, and Licensee shall reimburse Ditch Company for the cost of such work, together with interest at the rate of 12% and reasonable administrative fees, within 30 days. In the event Licensee fails to maintain, repair or replace the Installations or the portions of the Ditch for which it is responsible, it shall be held liable for any loss, damage or injury to the Ditch Company. If the Ditch Company conducts its own maintenance, repair or replacement, it does not waive the right to hold Licensee liable for damages caused by Licensee's failure to maintain, repair or replace. 8.2 The Licensee's maintenance responsibilities hereunder include, but are not limited to, the daily obligations of removing trash and debris from the Ditch, cleaning grates and trash racks, and keeping all culverts and pipelines open and free of debris on the property affected by the Installations. 8.3 The Licensee must notify and receive authorization from the Ditch Company before replacing any portion of the Ditch. If the Licensee interrupts the Ditch Company's water supply for any reason, it shall be responsible for all damages incurred by the Ditch Company and its shareholders. The Ditch Company's ,-� shareholders are third party beneficiaries of this Agreement. 8.4 In the event of an emergency, the Licensee may conduct maintenance or repair immediately, giving notice at the time the emergency repairs are made by telephone and in writing to the contacts identified in Section 13. If Ditch Company conducts said emergency work, it shall be reimbursed for the cost of said work from the party with responsibility for the affected portion of the Ditch. Under no circumstances shall the Ditch Company be responsible or held liable for damages to the Installations resulting from maintenance or repair to the Ditch. 9. TERM. This Agreement shall be perpetual unless modified by mutual written consent of the parties. 10. LIABILITY AND INDEMNIFICATION. 10.1 By virtue of entering into this Agreement, the Ditch Company (1) assumes no liability for use, operation or existence of the Installations; and (2) assumes no additional responsibilities or obligations related to the Licensee's future or additional activities which are required by this Agreement. 10.2 The Licensee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Ditch Company from all claims and liability for damage or injury to property or persons arising or caused directly or indirectly by the Licensee's construction of the Installations and the Licensee's occupancy and use of the Ditch. 10.3 The Licensee shall be responsible for calling the Utility Notifications Center of Colorado (UNCC) for locates before construction and repair work is done and shall hold the Ditch Company harmless for any damages and/or penalties for failing to do so. 10.4 The Licensee warrants it will do nothing to adversely affect the current water quality which is being carried in the Ditch. In the event the Licensee breaches this warranty, Licensee shall take all actions necessary to meet all water quality laws and regulations. Licensee shall indemnify and hold the Ditch Company harmless for all costs, damages, fines and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, which are incurred by the Ditch Company as a result of any adverse changes to water quality which result in the water failing to meet water quality laws, regulations or historic usage. 11. DEFAULT. Time is of the essence, and if any payment or any other condition, obligation or duty is not timely made, tendered or performed by either Party, the non-defaulting Party shall have the right to an action for specific performance or damages or both. 12. RECORDATION. This Agreement shall be recorded at the cost of the Licensee and shall be binding on any successors of the Parties. The obligations and benefits of this Agreement shall specifically run with the land described in EXHIBIT A. The plans and specifications for the installation may not be recorded because of their size. 13. NOTICES. Any notice required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given for all purposes if sent by certified or registered mail, postage and fees prepaid, addressed to the Party to whom such notice is intended to be given at the address set forth below, or at such other address as has been previously furnished in writing to the other Party or Parties. Such notice shall be deemed to have been given when deposited in the U.S. Mail. All notices given pursuant to Section 8 shall also be submitted to the Superintendent of the Ditch at the time of such notice. DITCH COMPANY: COPY TO: Oligarchy Ditch Company Phillip S. Wong do Dan Grant, Secretary Schey, Piller, Alspaugh & Wong, P.C P.O. Box 1826 825 Delaware Avenue, Suite P-300 Longmont, CO 80502 P.O. Box 267 303-776-5800 Longmont, CO 80501 LICENSEE: COPY TO: LifeBridge Christian Church LifeBridge Christian Church 10345 Ute Highway do Administrator Longmont, CO 80504 10345 Ute Highway Longmont, CO 80504 r 14. WAIVER OF BREACH. The waiver by any Party to this Agreement or a breach of any term or provision of this Agreement shall not operate or be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach by any Party. 15. EXHIBITS. All exhibits referred to in this Agreement are, by reference, incorporated into this Agreement for all purposes. 16. ATTORNEYS' FEES. If any Party breaches this Agreement, the non- prevailing Party shall pay all of the prevailing Party's reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in enforcing this Agreement through litigation, arbitration or mediation. 17. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the Parties, and their respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns. 18. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement is assignable, provided written notice is given to the other party of the assignment. The Ditch Company must approve any assignments from Licensee to a third party that does not have an ownership interest in the property described in EXHIBIT A. DATED: 3-o S'2OO? OLIGARCHY IRRIGATION DITCH COMPANY, a mutual ditch company By. S VC President LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH By. ,( V - STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF BOULDER ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this Ott day of Wilk,* , 2003 by Naft)N ft l 115-TON as nal cE rr ,of the Oligarchy Irrigation Ditch Compan . M. :.'.My commissio Ezgres 7-21-20c6 v` .�es��^••., . 42r'NOTARY''9 • Witness my ', .an3 official se S` / •1. +. PUBLIC BLIC,r°8 / . otary P t blic "aq' STATE OF COLO' ) ss. COUNTY OF tfinciliA2 The foregoing w acknowledged before me this dk S �•of • z 2003 by a [ +�!� , of Lif Be riidg E'ChrisU�n Qtiurch. Chris Ann Bass, Notary Public My commission expires: State of Colorado My Commission Expires 6/11 Witness my hand and official seal. �/�� /t Notary Public r EXHIBIT"A"-LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 5,TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE 6 PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTH ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE NORTH 89°31'40" EAST 2,696.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE SOUTH 01°05'48" WEST 2,613.02 FEET TO THE EAST ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 5;THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5,NORTH 89°08'41" WEST 856.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°43'11" WEST 2,400.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY 119; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING 6 COURSES: THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT(SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 5,830.00 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09°42'41", CHORD OF SAID ARC BEARS NORTH 87°38'07" WEST 986.99 FEET)A DISTANCE OF 987.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83°36'18" WEST 193.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°53'26"WEST 190.57 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 86°14'18" WEST 361.50 FEET;THENCE NORTH 70°19'49" WEST 66.65 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WELD COUNTY ROAD NO. 3 1/2;THENCE SOUTH 87°37'58" WEST 30.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5;THENCE NORTH 00°43'55"EAST 2,418.11 FEET TO THE CENTER ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5;THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5,NORTH 00°43'36" EAST 1,391.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT B OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1313-05-2-RE 1389 OF WELD COUNTY RECORDS;THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT B THE FOLLOWING 16 COURSES: THENCE SOUTH 71°34'28" WEST 546.56 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT(SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,904.90 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°20'09", CHORD OF SAID ARC BEARS SOUTH 67°24'52" WEST 422.13 FEET)A DISTANCE OF 422.50 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 63°14'52" WEST 1,843.45 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT(SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,310.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°18'41", CHORD OF SAID ARC BEARS SOUTH 65°54'13" WEST 121.40 FEET)A DISTANCE OF 121.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE,NORTH 01°04'27" EAST 831.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 68°57'51" EAST 1,252.40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 27°20'44" EAST 1,224.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE,NORTH 89°41'22" EAST 295.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16°04'00" WEST 145.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 06°35'40" EAST 42.71 FEET; /0' THENCE SOUTH 38°40'00" EAST 57.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63°35'24" EAST 111.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°41'43"EAST 134.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79°06'16" EAST 173.06 FEET;THENCE NORTH 71°27'35"EAST 93.45 FEET;THENCE NORTH 52°23'30" EAST 180.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE,NORTH 00°43'36" EAST 110.75 FEET TO THE NORTH ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 5 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING,EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5 DESCRIBED BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 12, 1906 IN BOOK 241 AT PAGES 392 AND 393 OF WELD COUNTY RECORDS BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTH ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 5; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, SOUTH 00°43'36"WEST 1,159.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE NORTH 71°35'57" EAST 1,736.54 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,398.11 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41°45'31",CHORD OF SAID ARC BEARS NORTH 50°43'12" EAST 995.57 FEET)A DISTANCE OF 1,018.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5;THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE,NORTH 89°31'40" EAST 91.83 FEET;THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT(SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,478.11 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°33'20 CHORD OF SAID ARC BEARS SOUTH 49°49'17"WEST 1,096.78 FEET)A DISTANCE OF 1,123.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 71°35'57"WEST 1,764.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5;THENCE NORTH 00°43'36"EAST 84.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE NET AREA OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND IS 313.490 ACRES MORE OR LESS. r •41`A k.4. -r '. a ', i } r f + a et,' r r .• 'may}` \\ '�pj ' . r Y _ . p 4414. , •� . ' s ^tip k ' tN 4 th. t i Wtip. ` .,. t -7q, . ,... •.. aew I S.' i X _ �� • i y ear._.... ��.- .• ...r -iy+•r .:iC..^" • -...i„.....,.... _& sr ' .4404iiiii, . . • it • — 1' • • " 4 .** j e ***. ‘ it .. ^„ Weid County Planning uF .iiiiii , GREELEY OFFICE L'''+MAR 1 0 2i C 't1FOESII Project LifeBridge - View A { Phase 1 1.ongs Peak (tit 10' N } u x ! 9°°- �Fk fr a8. i ..1 �' by „co.' "4" A S '' ,1r 11 C k * C 20" Flag '.. I PI it 1 �. mss, ! , c. ��Jr n 1''' ' ' '‘I ‘ \ \I \ • °Pt ilinr 11: \ Sid .)[ 1 1 t , \� �- 1, 1 .. ..\:\;\:\ '1` IJ ' ' ts\il doiSI).1\ LI ”.,\I. It 1.\\P eillilh Asa".r (11 it;r l% ‘ ' r- so\ \ e� 11 \ - d 4\ } • i ( \f. ` 1 �• 1')x` 1 `1 kV 4\ " ' - ' �1} 1 1 ill IL-4-.11 c\-\ \ k kli, 11.3 ,..._..,...) 1/4--_-:-.2.-:--- • )s. ‘ \ !:\)•Sb_. -;::::--- - \ 3� c,‘).,, b„------ - \ \\ r _ % _ I •t;. Pi a.% a V, °k �� 20' Flag I. r k' , ) i Q r, /{ r 1 1 t,.\ 3{k 1 r r ! :t, ' + 1 A3 r v ' t 1 COt k l'• i ) Cr 1 ' i � �1 l , tr •• , Son. t/ 11" Op pp _t _— �‘ , �c iWA n 072 flO ti ttt'kw..i wra : laaY. `3 ^ ,- °"`""' h. k, 1, }'+' e� - �,.' t' f..-'.- et ti rs.:r, r r *� F yyy�,�,de I 4 Oka ' 3,t, . ` s' " ...Lf s t` ”4",:4 ' , .yh�, 4t. 1'4t.....,44.42,:..,„,,L, . • i , . C�1+�1Ni r+ ,i >r n c Ccc,,,),!. . .. a ......,",;.4c."p`q.M q a 1 I . I { • ' , '' _! 4 It I 1 . 1 r i ii y(y Ys i �;•• f S ,fit. 1:1.1-4:4.�• • I q. if •6. :� I • • 4 t, �� . r .. ` A ''T'. 5 ~ z3i I > li. ,�. i '.,.. p ds �y, , f " 1;4i t � - 5" ' . Pr- • i< ' rIki i.:_ \_ • _ �' r: i • i• . i • `xz 1�fi &'* r ' t l ]yF dy'1 1-'::: •� j l ;Jo-3- ,Ir ,fit?Qe ` �' i ', , 4 �. � 1 s k { I i ib U I yl t' -- , t it i • Ai" �(`�IY�rad Cl a I E t h s �} t.' r `' .� i �, ` • t }\j3[ • t a �: y ₹ :t. �1 ,�- �� '1 ill -4 ti t1 y 1 . . r sy# iy +: t I '' i )� ',:t4 j ;d �i i �!• el, i 3 . -471::.• k 4- i i 4 t, I eM }' Ai + .a :.r .... . c.W tz r R I 20' Flag n ie li . ` ]emu ` JE y �E �s. R�v7 .. i 4 t I fr e , R t , -1 '',�' r sal + , ;Ii I I = �' , . ° , � � _ 20 Flag � . 1� l '2 I i ;` • P xt II a {y (• III - a, P { Longs Peak • ,I j" A t° i t L t I+ f.it 1 i . ,X° iJ itiat A 1V `4µ 1".i , 1 @10° N 4,,,„ : t •. '� - t... I - v fir':( ; • Fi� .' .1,....,‘,41.1' `J�O I ":r+'i • .1' C. • 1 ' $ -4 !jail ..,, t,•:., la C. 'ilyi 2 , xx�°o ,�/ i 20' Flag 13 y II lualili o 20' Flag ' °l Longs Peak cq. l0• N Site r A S a�F nit r " i . - . l: �.. ,t/I i ,•J t, +�� ... t ., j 5 "�; �°Y t i .,.y iG Al i. 1 'i ,,.. ...,, :i.xz 4'+ `'1 - -S - - - '1141.1 Y 4,4; u i-l w i h, h .P[(:,,,,;)a +l E J ,i z� a.-`+ x 4 , 4 f t Y� a 9 R i�v -orl "� S -a v1 kx" t, Ad t , ht ix !•1•,,if; J F�^ tree , .a � "'f° -- - +s Y' E- '>.. a 'ry{.+ ' Y y G k d5 J"�M X 3m+{ R i? ».n+a�lwy xb�� I H x W[� ., e .(s NY. • ;.�s"! t .. �. Longs Peak @ 10° N 20' Flag ,2,-4,-.3.r::, -:, /V - , , - w W. ef?Hg.. . .-4--,- t 8, .• ts .�� % 4q t I I 1 ��\ �� v Q / \ a` � pglen a' l \�" / \fil, \ Cal\te54 et_,fliegg\CP --- \ I atitrin \i:Cit31^, 0 c,i / --.--- C 6 (tlZa \ it 4 : 1% jtIW\ r` 4 = I �" _1,�t � �.' ' { �� •' Lon s Pcak 'u (0 \ '`�'{ ' 1ill pl....--tcy\- 1-- 1:(\---‘ —Ail i ( . '', \ 1 • tr- • J4 I r LL�^ j■ice L ' ` �''�1 S i li tit 1- 20' Flag 1CS4oq v A. I I ✓v^.'t m ii 7 +; 46714-;; ;;:',::::-,.{.s,p5 i-•,. 4'..1.!/4.- + I 1 +'y ^ L'''''-. '{v af, 2 J P { — 1t jjvv bl j, 4 � S VI LS 7� I l 5 i• ''1' fh �tY i� ' „ 4 ''' 1 v " r "Y R p7 CI : ! '4'. xd s �# . L j'. G� ' r:C711,r(*),, , , r ., rat 7 ny `� r. t &s� ra:'y3 '` uy {� +d a 4 !� �; x+t.A.rt w.f.... ,G, _ _'at . . *,m,,._'a: w •I� �' .z.+s.` } a= ,.:::::(1;"';';V::. . �� .. _ itf..�s.. ( � ' Hello