The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20030839.tiff Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE ROBERT A. RTJYLE Nov 7 �kk ATTORNEY AT LAW 2002 a61 8TH STREET,SUITE 220-A „q�3 GREELEY,CO$0031-3000 R.ECtJ t-Q TEL:(970)351-811O TV -i0 (970).352-6761 November 5, 2002 Weld County Planning Commission 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Objection to Application - Beebe Draw Farms Dear Members of the Planning Commission: I am a member of the Beebe Draw Gun Club. The Beebe Draw Gun Club property is immediately north of the proposed subdivision of Beebe Draw Farms which is planning 400 lots. I am advised there application is presently pending before the commission. As a member of Beebe Draw, I am concerned that these individual lots, if approved with septic tanks, would be a contaminating influence to the areas ground water, downstream from their property. The lakes of Beebe Draw Gun Club are supplied from waste, seepage and spring water principally emanating from Milton Reservoir. This has been particularly evident this year as Milton Reservoir is almost dry as the result of the drought. Our lakes accordingly have gone down to the point no water is flowing through our lakes at the outlet structures. This is clear evidence that the seepage of water from Milton Reservoir and the surrounding drain tile lines has a dominant influence on the groundwater in the area downstream from Milton Reservoir. Waters customarily seap from the Milton Reservoir area north and is collected in drain ditches and small lakes and eventually drains into Latham Reservoir. W. West Foster, president of Beebe Draw Gun Club, has also filed a letter of objection to the approval of these lots. I also join with him in his objections. Thank you for your attention to this problem. Sincerely, Robert A. Ruyle RAR/sc 2003-0839 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE NOV 1 22002 RECEIVED November 5,2002 Ms. Monica Mika-Daniels, Director Weld County Planning and Zoning 1555 North 17`h Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Beebe Draw Farms(formerly Pelican Lakes Subdivision) Dear Monica, I am submitting my opposition to the request for 400 additional lots in the Beebe Draw Farms subdivision, and urge the planning commissioners to reject the proposal. As a member and past President of the Beebe Draw Gun Club, I am aware of the area in question. 400 additional units will create a severe strain on the existing gravel roads. The area is saturated with oil and gas wells, and there is a considerable large truck traffic that services these wells. Combine the additional traffic created by this subdivision, and you will have roads that are very unsafe. The air pollution and dust will become unbearable for the farmers and residents that now live along these roads. It is hard for me to imagine 400 septic tanks in a concentrated area. Each tank will need to be pumped out at least every two years at a cost of$150.00 - $200.00 per tank. I know, I have a septic system at my home in Wyoming. Are we in such a need for housing development that this is the only answer? The Weld County Planning and Zoning Board can do better. Sincerely)141-644-- Tom Gebbie P.O. Box 305 Centennial, Wyoming 82055 307-755-0466 ^ M e Nettie Draw 6utt Cub Formation of Corporation December 12, 1921 Weld County Planning Department October 30, 2002 GREELEY OFFICE OCT 3 1 2002 RECEIVED Ms. Monica Mika-Daniels, Director Weld County Planning and Zoning 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Beebe Draw Farms (formerly Pelican Lakes Subdivision) Dear Monica: On behalf of the Beebe Draw Gun Club members,I am requesting a copy of the Weld County Health Department report you are expecting soon on Beebe Draw Farms (formerly Pelican Lakes Subdivision). Please send the copy to: Foster Valuation Company LLC 1750 25th Avenue, Suite204 Greeley, Colorado 80634 Thank you for your assistance. Best reg , W. West Foster ;f resident ,i`iheebe Draw Gun Club .- �.. • !t, • la, t ". Tilt Nettle Ural!' C1uu CEluh Formation of Corporation December 12, 1921 Weld County Planning Department October 30, 2002 GREELEY OFFICE OCT 3 1 2002 RECEIVED Ms. Monica Mika-Daniels, Director Weld County Planning and Zoning 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Beebe Draw Farms (formerly Pelican Lakes Subdivision) Dear Monica: On behalf of the Beebe Draw Gun Club members, I am submitting our opposition to the request for 400± additional lots in the Beebe Draw Farms subdivision and urge the planning commissioners to reject the proposal. Our property, which is a hunting preserve containing 320 acres, is immediately north of Beebe Draw Farms. A development such as this would likely contaminate groundwater and create hazards to the environment. Each individual lot will have its own septic system with a leach field. We have invested heavily in habitat and wildlife preservation; and septic systems in this development have the potential of leaching into our lakes, destroying our water quality and habitat. Another obvious reason for opposing this development is the fact that the surrounding roads are used by farm vehicles and are not adequate for a heavy stream of traffic volume. The traffic the proposed subdivision would surely generate on these rural roads will create safety problems. In conclusion, adding 400-plus residential lots in this rural area will contaminate domestic water wells on surrounding ranches, as well as the area wetlands. Also,odors caused by farming and ranching would be offensive to the residents in this subdivision, causing conflicts between Beebe Draw Farms residents and neighboring farmers and ranchers. At your hearing on November 19th, please deny any request to expand residential development beyond what is already there. 411 •= est regards, r2; i W-;:7Vest Foster • t ,, President £. f'dt:tBeebe Draw Gun Club PAT iNA OIL&GAS CORPORATION 1625 Broadway, Suite 2000 November 18,2002 Denver, Colorado 80202 Via Fax (970)-304-6498 (303) 389-3680 & U.S. Mail (303) 389-3680 Fax Ms. Monica Daniels-Mika Director of Planning Services Weld County Planning Department Weld County Planning and Zoning Department GREELFY OFFICE 1555 N. 17'"Avenue Greeley,CO 80631 NOV 19 2002 • Re: PF-1021 R.' s3 PUD Final Plat for 2"d Filing Beebe Draw Farms Township 3 North, Range 65 West, 6th P.M. Sections 4,5,9&17 Weld County, Colorado Ladies and Gentlemen: Patina Oil & Gas Corporation ("Patina") has been contacted by Weld County Department of Planning Services regarding the proposed PUD Final Plat for 2"d Filing Beebe Draw Farms covering the captioned property ("Property"). Patina operates twenty-eight (28) oil and gas wells ("Wells"), associated pipelines and production facilities on the Property. Patina also owns oil and gas leasehold rights and has rights to drill additional well(s) on the Property. Patina is concerned about the impact the proposed development will have on Patina's ability to produce. operate and maintain the Wells, pipelines, access roads and production facilities as well as the drilling and operation of future wells on the Property. To date, Patina has received no confirmation from REI, LLC fie- ("Applicant")that Patina's real property rights to use a reasonable portion of the surface for all current and future oil and gas operations and development are being preserved. Patina requests assurance from the Weld County and the Applicant that the proposed development will not preclude Patina from producing, operating, drilling and maintaining its wells and related facilities. Until this matter is resolved by agreement with the Applicant, Patina is not waiving its rights as a leasehold owner. Any approval of the proposed development should be conditioned upon the preservation of Patina's real property rights that allow it to make reasonable use of the surface of the lands for oil and gas operations. The proposed development must take into account and provide adequate setbacks from Patina's current and future well-sites, pipelines, and production facilities as well as continuous access to these facilities. Patina requests that these comments be entered into the record for the Applicant's proposed development and that we continue to be provided with advance notice of all other hearings affecting the Property. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the undersigned or Dave Padgett at(303)389-3600. Sincerely, PAXIXjjjINk OIL 87 AS CORPORATION ., Vice President cc: Krug, Sobel &Ritter, LLC- Molly Sommerville Chuck Carpenter, Esq./for REI, LLC Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain—Chris Greneaux EXHIBIT 1 weir REI, LLC 3600 S.Logan,Suite 200, Englewood, CO 80110 (303)333-6000 Fax(303)333-7278 November 13, 2002 Monica Daniels-Mica Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 RE: BEEBE DRAW FARMS FILING NO. 2 Dear Monica, It is our understanding that the hearing for Beebe Draw Farms Filing No. 2 had to be continued from November 5th, 2002 before the Weld County Planning Commission due to the fact that no comments were received from the Weld County Health Department. The hearing was continued to the 19th of November to allow more time for the Health Department to respond. As of yet, we do not have a response. It is our intent to proceed on with the hearing on the 19th, under the assumption that the Health Department does not have any objections to the plat as they have had ample time to make any comments or objections. Information had been provided to the Health Department back in June of 2002 and again with our recent submittal in September. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Christine Hethcock Beebe Draw Farms EXHIBIT 1 07(98 • 07 �. 1 '1 i•/ Weld County Planning Department November ?, 2002 ' GP'"El FY 0,"ICE • • NOV 1 8 2002 To: Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 7"'Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Board of County Commissioners 1115 10th Street—Third Floor Greeley, Colorado 80631 From: Jane•Evans Cornelius Coyote Ridge Ranch ' 1830O Weld County Road 43 LaSalle, Colorado 80645 • Re: Beebe Draw Farms/ REI, LLC Second Filing —Case PF-1021 I strongly object to the request for 406 additional lots in the Pelican Lake Subdivision and urge county staff and commissioners to reject the proposals Further build-out will lead to ,environmental degradation and will endanger residents due to inadequate services. The development also epitomizes the auburban sprawl that has become the bane of smart and responsible planners nationwide. As proposed, the huge subdivision would be bigger than the towns of Platteville and Lasalle. Yet it is many miles from regular and even necessary- city services. Not only would the development overtax infrastructure such as roads, it is completely incompatible with its agricultural setting. Simply put, a housing development of this magnitudels not suited to the proposed site in rural Weld County. Here are some specific concerns: • Septic systems in the development involve leach fields in highly porous sand. Waste will leach into and contaminate the water table, area wetlands, Milton Reservoir, feeder op canals for Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company (FRICO) and domestic wells on , " 2 area ranches. Having the"Metropolitan District"which is controlled by the developer monitor septic systems is asking the fox to guard the chickens Jane Evans Cornelius (97O)284-6878 / Hampton & Kay Cornelius (97O)284-O927 1$3OO Weld County Road 43, LaSalle, Colorado 80645 Fax: (303)444-621.3 • 'Further development will degrade fragile sandhills, causing wind erosion and creating a Sahara-like sandbox. The damage from some 30-40 homes already is dramatically evident. On windy days — and there are many— blowing sand fills the air and covers nearby roads. Such degradation surely has a negative impact on rich plant and wildlife populations. • The impact of continuous overgrazing on small horse lots in the fragile sandhills ecosystem will be devastating to agricultural neighbors by spawning erosion and serious noxious-weed problem. • Rural services such as schools, fire protection and law enforcement are inadequate for a huge subdivision. To illustrate, a recent lightning strike sparked a small wildfire near the subdivision, and it took local authorities almost an hour to reach the blaze. The results could be catastrophic if a strike were to occur near hundreds of homesites on a typically windy day. • Schools in Platteville, Gilcrest and Kersey are crowded and budgets tight. Some concerned parentstare driving students to high school in Johnstown to avoid overcrowded conditions. 406 additional homes would cause an increase in students of approximately 800-900 children thereby doubling and tripling the size of existing schools. • The subdivision is surrounded by active oil and gas wells, which include volatile tank batteries. Lightning recently hit a tank battery near Platteville, causing an explosion and raging fire. Again, such a scenario would pose a significant danger and potential liability to the county if the fire occurred near hundreds of homesites rather than in a deserted cornfield. Continual traffic of heavy equipment servicing these wells, frac wells and drilling new wells would pose a significant danger to a large population. • • Roads surrounding the subdivision are designed for and are commonly used by farm vehicles —tractors, farm machinery, loaded hay trucks and wagons, silage and grain trucks, and oil and gas field equipment. This slow-moving equipment is incompatible with the steady stream of commuters and residential traffic that would accompany the proposed development. Weld County has had the highest number of annual traffic fatalities in the state, and the number of serious accidents is sure to climb with . the additional traffic on rural roads. • According to the developer's documents submitted with application for substantial change hearing in December 2001 (Docket#2001-88) decrease in lots from 536 (per original appiication denied 9/00) to 419 would decrease traffic an average of i,uuu vehicles per day. If the developer's statistics are accurate then an increase in lots of 406 would INCREASE vehicles over 4,000 per day. Our rural roads can not safely stand that increase in traffic.- • The subdivision sits amid farms and ranches. While "Right to Farm" policies address potential conflicts between agriculturists and suburban newcomers, most transplants are not prepared for the realities of living near farms and ranches with daily operations that newcomers often view as dangerous and offensive. The result is a hostile environment and the rapid decline of agricultural business. Residents of the Pelican Lake Subdivision could encounter odors from a large dairy to the south and a large feedlot to the northeast; aerial spraying of herbicides and pesticides is commonplace on nearby fields. Flow will the county respond to complaints, and what impositions will established farmers and ranchers face? • Suburban sprawl is a well-documented threat to the farming culture, which already is battered by a failing agricultural economy. Agriculture has a proud heritage in Weld County and•has led to its reputation as the state's bread basket. And rural Weld County —the seat of this agriculture —is not the appropriate place for the kind of vast subdivisions that line the Front Range. Weld County's growth should be well managed so that is makes sense for all county residents. The new planning guidelines recently proposed by a volunteer task force and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners recommends that growth take place in areas where services are available. This subdivision is a clear violation of those guidelines. Than ou, J e Evans Cornelius FROM :Broadway Animal FAX NO. :303 499 0211 Nov. 15 2002 12:29PM P1 Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado Board of County Commissioners Weld County Centennial Center 915 10th Street—Third Floor Greeley, Colorado Re: Beebe Draw Farms/REI, LLC Pelican Lakes Subdivision Second Filing —Case PF-1021 We, the undersigned residents of rural Weld County, strongly object to the request for 406 additional lots in the Pelican Lakes subdivision and urge county staff and commissioners to reject the proposal. Further expansion will lead to environmental degradation; will endanger residents due to lack of necessary infrastructure and services; is an example of ill-managed sprawl; and is completely incompatible with agricultural surroundings. q /t. Name: 1fl .q P ec/E/_/ idM ( /owc// k_rrix.rr/ Srn'rc,e c- Address: Zfsor 44/cA S3 %ferse,y, Ce . eS Comments: .r qS rct cv. r mkt EYaas c pwe�i c.. /4( /yeti,e o//k-> C< l .�ic Q.k eteec- Wee/ tZ . 71/sn.-c Name: Address: Comments: Name: Address: Comments; EXHIBIT IcpV _. - - 4 - U ' r M II. F:s"toSF: [I August 15, 2002 Weld County Engineering Department/Public Works 1111 H Street Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Beebe Draw Farms and Equestrian Center Filing No. 2 To Whom It May Concern: In response to Diane Houghtaling's letter dated, July 6, 2000,the following has been determined by Milestone for the above referenced project: 1. The roadways have been redesigned with vertical curves for grade breaks over 1.5%. This is acceptable for cul-de-sacs. The new curves, however, are not at all labeled. Some are missing length data, some have grade breaks at the PC and PT without the new grades labeled. Please review all profiles and provide the missing curve data. All grade breaks have incorporated vertical curves. Vertical curves include all applicable data. 2. The drainage plan needs to show the freeboard line for the retention ponds on the drainage plan. It appears that several ponds are inside lots. Drainage easements will be required for these ponds. Fencing should not cross drainage easements. Ditches cross several lots. I would prefer ditches remain in the open space. If this is not possible, an easement will be required. Please resubmit the plat with the additional easements shown. Retention ponds and drainage ditches are restricted to open space areas. No easements are required. 3. The sub-basins do not match the report. Please review all drainage facilities and verify the contributing basins to each retention pond. Sub-basins within the engineering plan and drainage plan are consistent with the CUHP output. EXHIBIT 8703 Yates Drive#220 • Westminster, Colorado 80031 303-487-0686 phone • fax 303-487-0685 ca August 15, 2002 Diane Houghtalin Page Two 4. These plans will serve as the construction drawings. I do not believe the retention ponds can b built from these plans. Modify the scale, line weight or contour interval to make the plans legible. Grading plans are incorporated within the engineering plans at a 1"=100' scale to represent grading within retention pond areas. Should you have any questions or need further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me at (303) 487-0686 ext. 104. Sincerely, �,l r Greg Panza, P.E. • r N0V-19-02 TUE 10: 13 AM FAX NO. P. 02 GORSUCH KIRGIS LLP AIIoltnns Al LAW fOw,a I. SUITE 1000 11515 ARAPAHOE STREET I DENVER. COLOIUOO 80202 I TELEPHONE (303) 376.5000 I FACSIMILE (303) 376'5001 G. DONOHUE KANE DIRECT DIAL (3031 3765013 r I / email'. dkane@gursuelt cum Via Fax and U.S. Mail November 19, 2002 Weld County Department of Planning Services Attn: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Kerr-McGee Objections and Request for Continuance Case No. PF-1021 - PUD Final Plat for 2nd Filing of Beebe Draw Farms Township 3 North, Range 65 West, Sections 4, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 17 Dear Ms. Daniels-Mika: r This letter relates to the application of REI, LLC (the "Applicant") for approval of the proposed final plat covering the lands described above (the "Application Lands"). On November 5, 2002, we submitted a Notice of Mineral Leasehold Interests and Objection to Application for Development objecting to the application on behalf of our clients, Kerr-McGee Rocky Mountain Corporation and Kerr-McGee Gathering, LLC (collectively, "Kerr-McGee"). Since that time, Kerr-McGee and several of the other oil and gas operators on the Application Lands have had a meeting with Applicant to review the proposed development and to discuss the coordination of surface development activities with existing and future oil and gas development on the Application Lands. Although the meeting was very constructive and all • parties expressed a willingness to cooperate, Kerr-McGee continues to have a number of significant concerns with the proposed plait of development. Kerr-McGee therefore restates its objections to the plat as presently submitted. We request the Planning Commission to continue the hearing scheduled for this matter or, if the hearing goes forward, to defer approval of the proposed plat until the deficiencies described below are properly addressed by the Applicant. Kerr-McGee will outline its objections in two categories: first, a series of general objections that apply throughout the plat as proposed by the Applicant; and, second, a series of specific deficiencies that Kerr-McGee has identified on a parcel-by-parcel basis within the Application Lands. EXHIBIT (iu1K\58698.01\1272R0.0t I as N0V-19-02 TUE 10: 13 AM FAX NO. P. 03 Weld County Department of Planning Services, Attn: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director November 19, 2002 Page 2 General Objections (a) Failure to Properly Depict Location and Type of Existing Wells and Production Facilities, The plat contains a number of unmarked circles. According to the Applicant, these circles are intended to reflect the location and proposed setback areas for all oil and gas wells and production facilities presently operated on the Application Lands. Kerr-McGee is in the process of reviewing the accuracy of the Applicant's depictions for the thirty (30) wells and associated production facilities operated by Kerr-McGee on the Application Lands. Based on its preliminary review, however, Kerr-McGee believes that a number of the Applicant's circles may not be properly located on the plat. Kerr-McGee has previously furnished the Applicant with detailed information regarding the location and identity of its existing wells, production facilities, Bowlines and pipelines. This important information has been omitted from the proposed final plat. Although the Applicant has prepared a separate series of plats -- referred to as "Oil Well Layout Plats" -- attempting to reflect the information received from Kerr-McGee (together with similar information received from other oil and gas operators on the Application Lands), these plats are not part of the official plat submitted for County approval, Moreover, the Oil Well Layout Plats appear to be based on an earlier drawing of the proposed subdivision with lots, roads and public use areas that do not conform to the present plat. This has made it difficult for Kerr-McGee to verify the locations depicted on the plat. In the interest of public safety, and to provide appropriate notice to prospective lot purchasers and other interested parties, the plat should be redesigned to accurately depict and identify all of the existing oil and gas wells and production facilities presently located on the Application Lands, If the Applicant prefers not to include these details on all pages of the recorded plat, the information could he shown on separate pages designed for these purposes, (b) Failure to Identify and Confirm Setbacks. As indicated above, the Applicant has included a number of unmarked circles to reflect the proposed "setback areas" -- the areas surrounding an existing well or production facility where no buildings, structures or other improvements can be constructed by the Applicant or future owners of the Application Lands. Although the setbacks are uniformly depicted with a 300-foot radius on the Applicant's Oil Well Layout Plats, the circles on the "official" plat appear to vary between 150 and 200 feet radii with no explanation of the (I i fferences. (iPcistiw8.01\4272X(),I)I N0V-19-02 TUE 10: 13 AN FAX NO. P. 04 Weld County Department of Planning Services, Alin: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director November 19, 2002 Page 3 • Note No. 4 of the plat contains the following statement: "The oil and gas well setbacks shown hereon were provided to Landmark Engineering, Ltd. by the client. Landmark did not locate nor verify the location of any petroleum utility system, line, wellhead, lank battery, flowline, etc. It is the lot owner's responsibility to contact the appropriate agencies prior to any and all excavating within this subdivision and to verify the location of any oil and gas well setbacks and easements, buried utilities and lines prior to construction." Kerr-McGee asserts that it should not be the "lot owner's responsibility" to verily the location of existing wells, production facilities, flowlines and pipelines when this information exists and is readily available to the Applicant for inclusion on the recorded plat. In the interest of public satety, and to provide appropriate notice to prospective lot purchasers and other interested patties, the plat should be redesigned to accurately depict the appropriate setbacks from all existing wells and production facilities located on the Application Lands. (c) Failure to Depict Location, Width and Source of Existing Easements and Riehts of Way. C.R.S. § 38-51-106 requires all land survey plats to include "all recorded and apparent rights-of-way and easements, and ... the source from which such recorded rights-of- way and casements were obtained." The County's own subdivision regulations at Section 24- 4-40(D)(6) require that all final plats comply with the statutory requirements set forth in C.R.S. § 38-50-106, The County regulations further provide that "All easements that are not parallel to a lot line shall be designated and identified by bearings and dimensions" § 24-4- 40(D)(7), As indicated above, Kerr-McGee has previously furnished the Applicant with detailed information regarding the location of existing flowlines and pipelines operated by Kerr-McGee on the Application Lands, Most of the existing lines are located on easements created under instruments recorded in Weld County. Other lines were installed under general easements granted in recorded oil and gas leases covering the Application Lands, Kerr-McGee believes that several of the existing easements may encumber the lands to be dedicated as streets within the proposed subdivision. However, none of the existing easements are reflected on the plat as required by State law and the County's regulations. The Applicant should he requited to redesign its plat to depict all of the existing towlines and pipelines operated by Kerr-McGee on the Application Lands. The redesigned plat should include all required information regarding the easements and rights-of-way on GGJC\st;67N.a 1\4'27280.01 N0V-19-02 TUE 10: 14 AM FAX NO. P. 05 • Weld County Department of Planning Services, Attn: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director November 19, 2002 Page 4 which such flowlines and pipelines are located. In the interest of time, Kerr-McGee is providing the Applicant with copies of all recorded easements held by Kerr-McGee covering the Application Lands, For those flowlines and pipelines constructed under general lease easements, Kerr-McGee has agreed to cooperate with the Applicant to identify the precise location of such lines and to generate an accurate legal description for recording purposes. This will require a physical inspection of the lands with tools designed to locate buried pipeline facilities. In some instances, modest survey work may also be required. (d) Failure to provide Locations for Future Wells and Associated Production Facilities. The Applicant has acknowledged the right of Kerr-McGee and other oil and gas operators to drill additional wells on the Application Lands, The Applicant has suggested that any future wells should be drilled from existing well locations. Although Kerr-McGee believes that tins will he reasonable in many instances, there may be instances where the existing well location is not suitable for drilling a new well and a separate location will need to be provided within the legal drilling window designated by the regulations of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. Kerr-McGee is in the process of identifying any such additional well locations. There may also be instances where the existing well location will be suitable, but the area provided for oil and gas operations at those sites may need to be expanded to accommodate the additional wells and the production facilities associated with those wells. (e) Access to Oil,and Gas Wells and Production Facilities. The Plat does not identify access routes to existing or potential future oil and gas wells, production facilities, flowlines and pipelines operated by Kerr-McGee. Kerr-McGee is prepared to discuss and confirm these routes with the Applicant so that the access routes can be identified on the final plat. (t) Surface Use Agreement. Kerr-McGee believes that all of the maters discussed in Items (a) through (c) above should be addressed in a comprehensive surface use agreement entered into between the Applicant and the oil and gas operators, including Kerr-McGee. Kerr-McGee has successfully negotiated dozens or surface use agreements to define the respective rights and obligations of the surface and mineral developers and provide for the development of both estates in a mutually compatible manner. The oil and gas operators are preparing a draft of a proposed surface use agreement to be used in connection with the Application Lands. Kerr-McGee requests that the execution of a surface use agreement he a condition to final plat approval by the County. ODIC 58698.01 V127280.01 N0V-19-02 TUE 10: 14 AM FAX NO. P. 06 Weld County Department of Planning Services, Ann: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director November 19, 2002 Page 5 Specific Objections Based upon its initial review of the Applicant's Oil Well Layout Plats, Kerr-McGee has identified the following concerns relating to specific portions of the Application Lands. Kerr- McGee reserves the right to identify additional concerns when the plats are corrected and revised to reflect the current location of subdivision lots, roads, and public use areas. (a) Section 5 - NE/4NE/4 The Oil Well Survey Hat indicates two wells in this tract: The Kerr-McGee Beebe Draw 41-5 Well and the Aristocrat Angus 41-5 Well operated by United States Exploration ("USX"). The actual wellheads are not clearly identified on the plat and it is difficult to determine the accuracy of the circular well setbacks. This is true for many of the setbacks depicted on the Oil Well Layout Plats, (b) Section 5 - SE/4NE/4 ^ Kerr-McGee is unable to determine the correct lot layout and cannot determine which of the proposed subdivision lots encroach on the oil and gas setbacks. The Oil Well Layout Plat should be updated to reflect the current lot layout. Again, this problem exists throughout the Oil Well Layout Plats. (c) Section 5 - SW/4NE/4 The Beebe Draw Aristocrat 32-5 #2 well is operated by USX and is not identified or labeled on the Oil Well Layout Plat, Kerr-McGee's Beebe Draw 32-5 #9 Well depicted on this tract has been plugged and abandoned and the production facilities have been removed front this site. The final plat should retain a location for a potential future well. (d) Section 5 - S/2NW/4 The flowline indicated on the Oil Well Layout Plat is not properly located. The actual location cannot be determined until a physical inspection is conducted on this tract, (e) Section 5 - SW/4 C HK\55698.0114 58698.011427 280.01 8 0.01 N0V-19-02 TUE 10: 14 AM FAX NO. P. 07 Weld County Department of Planning Services, Attn: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director November 19, 2002 Page 6 Kerr-McGee believes the flowline from the Kerr-McGee UPRR 39 Pan Am "F" #1 Well heading North/Northeast is incorrect. This needs to be verified by a physical line location and additional survey work. COGCC Rule 318a. permits an additional well to be drilled in the center of the SW/4. This drillsite should be reflected on the final plat. (1) Section 5 - Sf14 Kerr-McGee has a potential future drilling location in the NW/4Sfi/4. This drillsite should be reflected on the final plat. The flowline from the Goodnow 16.5 Well to its tank battery near the Page 10-5 Well appears to be incorrectly platted. The actual location needs to be verified with a physical inspection and additional survey work, (g) Sections 5 and 9 - Gas Gatherinit Pipelines Portions of Kerr-McGee's gas gathering pipelines (originally constructed by RGSI) are not indicated on the plats for these sections. The plats fail to show the width, the course or the source (including the recording data) of the pipeline easements. Kerr-McGee has provided REI with copies of survey plats dated August 13, 1993, which identify these gathering lines. We arc happy to provide the County with copies if you wish. (h) Section 9 - NW/4 The Oil Well Layout Plat does nor provide for future drillsites to access Kerr- McGee's rights in these lands, (i) Section 9 - NI;/4 The Oil Well Layout Plat does not provide for future drillsites to access Kerr- McGee's rights in these lands. (j) Section 9 - SW/4 The Oil Well Layout Plat does not provide for future drillsites to access Kerr- McGee's rights in these lands. O u x 15 8698.01\42 72,80.01 N0V-19-02 TUE 10: 15 AM FAX NO. P. 08 Weld County Department of Planning Services, Attn: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director November 19, 2002 Page 7 (k) Section 9 - SE/4 The Oil Well Layout Plat does not provide for future drilisites to access Kerr- McGee's rights in these lands, (l) Section 17 - NE/4 The flowline is incorrectly shown on the Oil Well Layout Plat. The actual location will need to be verified with a physical inspection and additional survey work. Well setback dimensions are unclear. (m) Section 17 - NW/4 In the NW/4NW/4 and SE/4NW/4, Kerr-McGee may want to twin the two existing Patina wells. The final plat should include a setback dimension for these permitted future drilisites, The plat should also include a drillsite and related setback for the permitted well in the approximate center of the NW/4. The Kerr-McGee RE1 3-17A well was drilled in the NE/4NW/4. This was a twin of the Patina LIPRC 17-37 located in the same tract, but no separate setback is identified on the Oil Well Layout Plat. (n) Section 17 -S/2 Kerr-McGee has the right to drill up to ten additional wells on these lands. The final plat should reflect these potential drillsite locations and associated setbacks. Conclusion The plat proposed by the Applicant is defective for all of the foregoing reasons. Kerr- McGee urges the Planning Commission to continue the hearing on this matter and defer approval of the proposed plat until such time as the plat is redesigned and resubmitted to address the deficiencies discussed above. In the interim, Kerr-McGee will continue to work toward a comprehensive surface use agreement with the Applicant. r C DK\,SSG VR.0 1142 7 2 8 0,0 1 NOV-19-02 TUE 10: 15 AM FAX NO. P. 09 Weld County Department of Planning Services, Attn: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director November 19, 2002 Page 8 Sincerely, G UCH KIRGIs LLP G. Donohue Kane CiDK/jej ec(via Fax): Chuck Carpenter (Attorney for RBI, LLC) Christine Ilcthcock (Gibraltar Equity Investments) J. L. Walter (J. L. Walter Consultants) Molly Sommerville, Esq. (Attorney for Anadarko) Dave Padgett (Patina) Shirley Kovar (UXP) James P. Wason (Kerr-McGee) Chris Greneaux (Kerr-McGee) Scott Knutson (Kerr-McGee) Jeffery R. Fiske, Esq. (Kerr-McGee) cc*:\si,9s.01\427180.01 -- IIIMEMORANDUM DC. TO: Monica Daniels-Mika, W.C. Planning DATE: November 19, 2002 COLORADO FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Health Department( CASE NO.: PF-1021 NAME: REI, LLC do Christine Hethcock (Beebe Draw Farms Filing 2) Some items in my referral do not appear to be addressed in the Planning Commission comments. Because of the complexity of the case and for clarification purposes they are listed below. Add prior to recording the plat: 1. Address the items regarding the Beebe Draw Farms Metropolitan District outlined in the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment memo dated November 8, 2002. 2. Submit evidence that the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment has reviewed and approved all changes to the 'Metro District Maintenance Agreement'. 3. Submit evidence that the 'Metro District Maintenance Agreement' has been recorded as a supplement to the Beebe Draw Farms Declaration of Covenants. 4. The applicant shall bo required to provide written and graphic evidence that tho location of residential lots located in Filing 2, Phase 1, immediately adjacent to the one hundred foot environmental buffer and west of the Milton Reservoir are able to meet setbacks for both structure location and location for septic systems, including primary and cocondary envelopes. Place as a note on the plat: 1. The Beebe Draw Farms Metropolitan District shall be retroactive to include all lots in Filing 1 This list is slightly different than an undated list you previously received since item 4 has been found in the comments. O:\PAM\Planning\FinalPlanlpf1021 memo2.rtf EXHIBIT 102? MEMORANDUM 6ir TO: MONICA DANIELS-MIKA 1 FROM: PAM SMITH 171/ WilkDATE CT.NOVEMBER 19, 20O2 BEEE DRAW FARMS PE-1 COLORADO CC: FILE This application has been reviewed with the understanding that water will be supplied by the Central Weld County Water District. The Depait,nent wants to clarify that this application has been recommended for approval with that condition. In the event that Central Weld County Water District cannot supply water to lots in the subdivision,the Department will not recommend the use of cisterns. O:\PAM\Planning1FinalPlan\pfl 021 memo.rtf Main L t' I Louse includes an office, kitchenette, and bathroom have been offered as a substation to_the Weld County eriff. Ili IN jiat . V .spi ct, 1— ir i _ — —< h, 1 Frlir:ut Iakt R:utrh �L,,A., a. _ .r.'i ,_,.� ► r .� --• 4 •L 'J^*'!l. `1 J1 �y.' _ t�� Zr! ,;;i:101,4: = 1�� ' -r iY1 1 pat Ti• � r �Q -. ..e` _ - T Sep .r '°t r 4,-, t". ,- '•# ,. _ . m Ar. s ":•:'4,1:." -*45::-..?.' !-',-• • v 0-4.-7:-.- •v •i+ e , "4 irk/ tr$�`. ( 1 -?r `f ,• ,•.r, ' 4§ Y'! �-7A i " , s lr.-.� fir. >? , �' s' • +''5 1 5. r ' ''�" : 3,= , ;•i '.,'[t 'i 71. : ;:ice : T .�'I'c of �'1' s ' NMi EXHIBIT I Pelican Lake Ranch/Beebe Draw Farm water storage tank built on the basis of a 800 lot PUD as previously approved. •4 s Q' .t ' Lp 1; S 7a q%i i• ,t i R .,, ' . �. ..3��,cy#, �tv ,�v�r� 1 `"., 1w '.., , - .Y. y ag�pr.'t tt S₹ Y? P.' xYv , tierc 7,....-:,,t41,,;‘,111,-,-.---}� �rt`{ss� t� 4 -*4,4„;,,,A,-,-., 0-, 4, '2 r"f 5 . . ' rV. t.:;',Y,-1'''' y e a ..- e �� k A-4, 1 k §et'k ` T "" "t r: r .Y*+ �", ₹ zr :r \..to i s '' ,. . ,+ :.z. .-Nyx� r _,, 'Y..• , va a+„ v . '1.4 fYa �s �" � :ttr r •c " '�'� qe : >" _ti i ... xs^aw ±.N * SLR( \ c S}s i "rZ3K .r 1 ,1 .a4' 03' ..}Ng 3 r "fS i"`5TE ' 1:t.;:' sY' t r j� v°' �'; F`� v ""'. I,-3,' q� 'if, YY, .k P "',1 ,�-' A' t .(S �-/ ' s,�. r x t : 1 7 y��4{yS $��i > ", sfi 4,;,.-',,,y , ++a * ' s i Z;`' t ` , 1 . 4%'Y,� is :4 ,,1 i { � 'Si,P 2 . • ,"``''.36 '.36* �� -4,.., �' ' ',-/•',•,0- 1,-. • � 4 X15 l�� 4 5,44 t, _ µJ.. -. f _ ) {C w .mot ;';�j" i4. t a YSy t M `h '-'. L �,, , 2 Pelican Lake Ranch/Beebe Draw Farm Metropolitan District headquarters building houses mail room, offices and garage. ,,\*.,.; ra < 'Mak I_ 11 T..p� . _ Teems y' 1l f '� y' _�~ 1 Sera A 1}� '1'w. .�. -.ry a -'t y ri... a.v."� *s z cra. "a+• "n"S' , .•" r,psr'�M1'. ryaY . . te+ .^. kr ..r M{ z a^ q,. ... a r . w .,C` kr .. 31.- • r;; �`F-A+,� , ¢"y:.ti!!'} #' hw.aay fir_ «. 2 I Pelican Lake Ranch/Beebe Draw Farm Marina & Boat Ramp opened spring 2002. Note revegetation of disturbed areas. *. , e - Y�` s ' ♦ _ ' 1:L.4Jl1 .,la . fTI .. ' Yf,1�1�4'i1 '1 I t. . y.,_. `• `. ; ,.. • 4P.444� w • r.. '. .- _ _ • '• y ' ' �`S' . ` r #, -erg : , 4r 4 ' r .1,Y�. r ''. :• ' T Y 11 °"�� O1• � �,i 4 . , „ yprIA' ' :3'"''!#• I • r ° ' I • -:1 , ji. 41,4 ,4 .rcy'7.w.' � '�1�/I 1f - .� ,�� rs. r 1.: 0.• . • _ r.+� i w.• -4 y • ' ,• _ 0.`2. ;St r 'I�.l ,. � r�p4� ,(r 4,. . `e t' • 1.1.4: :�.^Al) 5. I rf. �t.. aN r l �e Y tt. •j�„4+ f Y, 1 y F. . • 1. 4:it*. ; 4, 0.• .f' S. 4^0. rift . 4. r. . . ,., • _tAx: A- Y' 4 Pelican Lake Ranch/Beebe Draw Farm revegetation of disturbed areas begins as soon as road and detail work ends. . Crn x. W.a v .. y1 i •..+.. .... ;. • +.Ty✓kk' as - x a"S x^,n' YK. s .w. yS ,b�ari ......,„,4:—.1:-.,z4:,,,),,;,,,,P r"'^ x "' r Ifl,"' ? °r'�, a.... wry. a w. q::. .- *, .✓i vw 41 ° a*+uW.�'��' > ,a."r"..eP.4` +'?'f t1�3r M}4� d P �< X. P y4....‘, r 3 r w '+# ' ': ✓ e 7 •4i4.-.. ttoe:sr� r+ r a 1.+N J" L ..r T n µ in, `�„ M .}+i' j :Y'.d' � q r y.. y1" x� „yy,#q S. ..Gum. it. r"'a ...r :444` ��n Cr.:..4,74-1"-•Y a ""I'j iY§i y�Tt.'. '4' YS. ,y! pk§ , • 1 • .AdaM 7.7C.'4.1.<‘'‘ may. '' :'':''.4 r :4117'4'"l - ...: h. .¢Tci:` a.? Sys 2 s • ;a.a'�'. '� Tq.. a°'r ,,,, 43 , â .tt a `'r 2( ..T r . wJ '` "+' '4,;-a--r,15 ' .. wp.-''A «tr...- yt*y..r f p,.,... `mss .i is ✓mil "�r.x"'f"."+a;,'04'c�^ws ",'y�� .514YY h d"S, ,• .. t L A. X-' ':4 ,.rr.f` i<ip,. ' 1 "Y-;t, +N a b.Y xf ; ,r... - v�',d. ,y -t " � 2 y:-":: , l'2 _dal �'" Y +pe • YpT.� .�::. S. I Pelican Lake Ranch/Beebe Draw Farm revegetation along roads begins as soon as road and detail work is finished. ' . =< ".,StellII " 4. Asp 111 �nl ' 1 • > ,,� 3t r 'R 4°. f k -4,14 rk c y,�"� ',�.33 - ... = .,.. „ ,�„33q'„ �a,c4DA , N , 1< F3.; '" f'+''l_,4F -y4b?:i,,,,tti¢'d sa�`J f. 3s, Y , �i {y „''Y I . ,, d ��440,144 yr'S tRi' t'W}i '� "#' '91.4 S ?. :S-":`,1., a }.. to"4,{;e41..4 �: ''�r8° ` �. :_f.,:, ; yiny-'�tt vM1 rCy c ( � �,� � `,rrt y y � , 'Syg t � ��"C.:'±'1"*.,.1 #�r�,} ,�Ett rsdty h.v ri i+ln � ♦ -.' s " i t.' Et jx 'k S$Y {C"•e. H .4§53 i el :r�t$vii'SC .a51:4 lr' 1a r?•.%. ' ,•.4t 3ddd£.*"""'e` k v tZa,V. W-1': `Yid $, t h.. patS'ed` g• y£ :'-i* i ,,,v to i _ 14I^7 .d+,,..kle t^ri rt n-al ,<- La,_ } a`� '�� " ,44' L ,, ≥lv" '{ 1 �, Y i !'' 4 +v 't,- tix Wt4+` �. *“.:S W' 1L.g5"+i tir C x �. a f ' 3*'r,`.' i i .:,3t t tG 1: i .--N`R* a, .t -k5,4. ,_� i .. . 4.1::,..9M..•.. } v �Tw�'..M R jt; k10. I t lij,4,* .. yri"Ya ; . „- , 4,44,44.4.4t,..,0 } i .i i t ? fir, zii F r < Er s'F } tit L"'tr"' ✓ „N.Y.,. a r •, c . '' '..i..:',..5`;':; ".• e 4 to 1 e 2k"rat,�,.1' A$qxw,4,1,,r,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,1s'a 4 r. r ". ' i t - i w#x! s4 �?,R ''..k;. v`r n r vj. c + � '?f "T t �Fs +. tx G ' '. iN f e : ri 1 x ar vrY5 t s .. 1 ;M kr d F fi . _ t Y2 y'2,,,,.„1„,,,,,4;;.," xf r� b .�r v a'`t, � �at'e�t'�.a'"t i � n r < 1 { .,,� i i as ,r ^, '"?;4-,J.',., of '' av- : Y.. z',.: r.+,o2 'w .„,4. }� {'+ err .o t 4/4"..7:. i ,� . s ^r r :� 4 44.+ i i',,,..,443- /44,44-4Sr Y ?h Y h �3' t r . s f'J S ,,,:::-.,.,.../....,,,,. , g:,,....,),:, { trY +� i ' .. -- r ::,. ..,r,,,,.....,..4 *t+i�, '"$:f.,':',/4/.''S''''''.7, Sf ctr 4 ? �pI i '�. i , Yj 'C¢ s - ) ,� r, v ix ,,:t1-1',),C.:-tr r�+ 3 75 k6 ttiy tit. :+P# ka'e i� S�"y i. r .v �' i ,} d h 'I'.'-:".W, ES'r`t v 4� t o ni a�' „* f t > F ✓$ Va,y datri s �'drla }` 1Y ° ° v Fey u . { a � � ii c#, ° t h,N ri !,;V: r 1.;,;,1 S e st , 1 -. ) l i5A "ti[;`r, ✓: r f t 1r r r i t M1r in J } n $, r. I tf 1�-'1';It .G: 9 k'6 r'{'.;“AL.I' d s.,::' a)11."'1,`‘,,,C,,;.:',.\"5,: r R."'V'' 1 F 1. 5 }1Y ° �. e: T a :.37 .. . > :a 4 2 .: i 2 r5'"fiel e 'ri 4 t L 4'4'b'.4a1. ,a� r q-y.aa1 .C,.ati .'�r'1°FY�5 s.Y .. 4 �' a a� h -i,1 F£�- 'legF.�+"� .Y I. my:1:12:'..i+l a .{ $ah +'tc 4 ego eat - J L Walter Consultingl ll RECEIVED 114 E. 5th Street /// Loveland, CO 80537 / 0) (970)613-2037 \ i N0V 8 2on� FAX (970) 203-1147 Ilk IliALM ow, �' �" le V( l l LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: W,a ff____ Date 11 t 3/o L Job. No. o `�� P°a" ��- Attention �o.... S w, LA- L. RE: WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Prints 0 Preliminary Drawings THE FOLLOWING: ❑ Final Drawings 0 Originals ❑ Contract Plans& Specifications ❑ Change Order 0 Separate Cover Via COPIES , mod Q o S2 Af� YlticQ �i ? . cLciRv-cly These are transmitted as checked below: 0 For approval 0 For review and comment 0 Amend and resubmit ,'(For your use 0 No exceptions taken 0 For your signature ❑ As requested 0 Make corrections noted 0 For bids due 2U REMARKS c vt. vu. r (ti COPY TO EXHIBIT I aaA SIGNED f a.v k � Tj, Sly,,--e,.._ 4O.`\--sv I I SERVICE PLAN ADDENDUM- SEWAGE DISPOSAL FOR BEEBE DRAW FARMS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT No. 1 AND BEEBE DRAW FARMS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT No. 2 APRIL 2001 REVISION 2, OCTOBER, 2001 CERTIFICATION This report has been prepared for the developers of Beebe Draw Farms by David Shupe, Colorado P.E. 5914 David Shupe TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATION 1 INTRODUCTION 3 CONCERNS 5 EVALUATION OF PROBLEM FACTORS 6 SYSTEM PROPOSAL 7 SYSTEM SUITABILITY 8 ECONOMIC EVALUATION 9 GENERIC SYSTEM DESIGN 10 REFERENCES 11 APPENDIX 2 SEWAGE DISPOSAL REPORT For BEEBE DRAW FARMS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT April, 2001 Revision October 2001 INTRODUCTION There are several factors which impinge upon the decision as to the type of sewage disposal and treatment most appropriate for any given development. Among these are: 1. Location relative to existing treatment facilities. 2. Availability of adequate and appropriate management entities. 3. Site suitability for construction of proposed facilities. 4. Economic evaluation, both short- and long-term. In terms of proper evaluation and determination of appropriate sewage waste disposal. Weld County Health Department has sought to be in the forefront of efforts to address the overall needs for this area. Together with them, the developers of the project have studied newly available literature, including the USEPA Response to Congress on Use of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems (EPA 832-R-97-001 b, dated April 1997) and EPA Guidelines for Management of Onsite/Decentralized Wastewater Systems (EPA 832-F-00-012, dated July 2000). As the site is quite remote from existing municipal treatment facilities, and construction of long trunk lines is discouraged both by economic and land-use policies, the planning decision was made early in the review process that onsite treatment would be the most feasible in this case. In fact, Filing 1 of the development was approved and has proceeded on that premise. As the project continues, however, the need has been expressed to develop a management structure which will ensure proper supervision and operational management, beyond the levels currently available through the Weld County Health Department. 3 The EPA contends that decentralized wastewater systems can provide the necessary and appropriate treatment to protect public health and meet water quality standards just as well as centralized systems. The key is proper management. Such systems are particularly appropriate in low density communities such as proposed here. They are adaptable to a variety of site conditions. Also, when properly installed and maintained, they can achieve significant cost savings, while avoiding such concerns as inter-basin transfer and drawdown from local aquifers, which can occur with centralized collection and treatment systems. 4 CONCERNS There are several concerns identified in EPA Report 832-R-97-001b, "Response to Congress on Use of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems" (See p. iii of the Executive Summary), connected with the use of onsite or decentralized systems which need to be addressed. One of these is a general lack of knowledge and public misperception. Many people in the real estate and development professions as well as the general public often feel that central collection and treatment systems are better for property values. Further, few if any formal education programs deal with decentralized systems, even though a relatively high percentage (25% of existing and an estimated 40% of new construction) of homes in this country are served in this manner. A second problem area, one which is prevalent in this state, is that the legislative authority for decentralized systems is split between State and local governments, resulting in a relatively non-unified approval process. A third problem area, perhaps the most controllable one from the private perspective, has been the lack of acceptable management programs. While this need has long been perceived by local health department authorities, which do not have the manpower in most cases to provide such oversight, little if any implementation of effective management programs has been achieved. As early as 1984, this writer attempted to address the need in a nearby County, by proposing the establishment of a management sanitation district for decentralized systems. This approach was felt by County government officials to cause a possible loss of ability to use septic system regulations as a land-use control. On that basis alone, the proposal was rejected. 5 EVALUATION OF PROBLEM FACTORS This report sets forth techniques intended to address these concerns as much as possible. from the public sector perspective, although obviously, some of them can only be addressed by appropriate governmental agencies. 1. Location — In the initial evaluation of this PUD, its remote location relative to existing treatment facilities was noted, and a determination was made in the planning process that the proposed on-site waste disposal was the most appropriate method. The Master Plan for the PUD was approved on that basis. 2. Governmental Schisms — This can only be addressed by State and local authorities, and is beyond the scope of this report. (See comment in preceding section.) 3. Appropriate Management— In this case, the need for adequate management of many contemplated municipal-type services within the PUD has dictated the formation of a Metropolitan District, a taxing entity with compulsory membership, which can provide on-going management independent of individual resident input. The District is intended to be multi-purpose, providing such services as road maintenance, mosquito control, open-space management, recreational facilities maintenance and management such as clubhouse, marina, barns and corrals. It is proposed that on-site disposal system management become an additional function of the District. The enabling provision for such addition is found in Section II B 6. on page 19 of the Service Plan. Such a system would be in keeping with the intent of Management Program 4, as outlined in the EPA Guidelines for Management of Onsite/Decentralized Wastewater Systems, but with some relationship to Management Program 2 as well. These guidelines are included in the Appendix to this report. The Metropolitan District will represent an agency contractually related to each individual homesite to provide oversight, proper use training, and maintenance of each system. 6 SYSTEM PROPOSAL It is proposed that the means of sewage disposal shall be a site-specific individual system located on each lot, providing secondary on-site treatment. Components of the system shall remain the property of the individual lot owner. A composite maintenance charge shall be levied by the District, based upon the Service Plan thereof Included within that charge shall be the following services related to the on-going maintenance of each system: 1. Annual inspection of leach field, and measurement of sludge and scum levels within the septic tank, for verification of pumping schedule. Random -. checking for toxic or hazardous chemicals in field. 2. Pumping of septic tank as indicated by measurements, but no less often than every four years. Tank will be pumped also upon change of ownership, if not done within the previous 6 months. 3. Annual testing of monitoring wells located so as to provide information regarding downstream quality of shallow(15' -20') underground waters, relating to nitrates or other possible concerns. NOTE: No water table was identified to a depth of 15 feet. (See Soils Report) 4. Ongoing education program in proper care and use of septic systems provided to all new owners, either first-time or subsequent. This will include water-use r — — conservation techniques and recommendations as well. All lots in Filing No. 1 not yet sold will be subject to any new covenants, conditions, and sewage disposal regulations of the District. All lots in Filing No. 1 sold but not yet improved will be subject to any new covenants, conditions, and sewage disposal 1 regulations of the Distric onl i) if required by the County Health Department as a condition of septic tank permitting or(ii) if the lot owner voluntarily complies. All lots in Filing No. 1 previously sold and improved will not be subject to any new covenants, conditions, and sewage disposal regulations of the District, unless the lot owner voluntarily complies. All lots in Filing No. 2 will be subject to all covenants, conditions, ( and sewage disposal regulations of the District. 7 Public facilities required within the District, such as the equestrian center, the Marina and others, will also fall under the auspices of this proposal. 8 SYSTEM SUITABILITY The soils report for the development (Horizons Construction Services LLC, May 12, 2000) has clearly determined an extremely high level of uniformity in the upper-level soils over the area, including the percolation or absorption rate. Given that uniformity, the District will provide a uniform design for the septic system for each lot. Final sizing of tankage and field will relate to the specifics of home design, including number of bedrooms, or use of unique water-use features such as garbage disposals. Parameters for locating the field relative to site drainage will be supplied on an individual basis. Risers with concrete lids will be specified at tank ports for ease of access and testing. Tanks will be located to facilitate pumping and testing efforts. Accurate "as-built" drawings of system components will be required to be supplied to the District by installing contractors, at the time of final inspection. Construction inspections of the systems by District personnel and by Weld County Health Department personnel will be required, and will be specified in the design. While the nature of the design has been reviewed by the County Health Department, and final sizing would be verified as part of the permitting process by the builder, any design will be required to be in accordance with current Department regulations. The Weld County Health Department shall have the final approval authority. In the event a homeowner should choose to use an alternative design, such as wetlands, carbon filtration or other technique, specific arrangements will need to be made with the District's consultant regarding alternative monitoring schedules, additional costs, etc. It will also require specific approval by the Weld County Health Department. Further, if any unacceptable impact upon neighboring lots or the District as a whole is noted by such unique systems, the District will have the right to disapprove its continued use within the District. The intent is to maintain a consistent level of service and maintenance throughout the District's service area, as well as a relatively level cost structure for its services. 9 ECONOMIC EVALUATION The district will contain approximately 597 homes at full build-out. Each will require the annual inspection noted above. It is estimated that this would require 3/4 time for a trained inspector. Some 160 tanks per year will require pumping, and 10 to 20 random tests may be conducted. 4—5 inspections/day @1 '/1 hr/insp. $30,000.00/yr. 160 tanks pumped @ $331/ea. 53,000.00/yr. 10-20 tests/yr. @ $200/test 3,000.00/yr. $86,000.00/yr. This represents a monthly cost to the homeowner of approximately $12.00 per lot. The employee's salary would be included in the service charge. 10 ^ GENERIC SYSTEM DESIGN The system type is proposed to be a subsurface single-pass sand filter with no collection. The filter depth would be 4', with sides lined to prevent lateral migration of filtrate. The filter medium is proposed to be a compacted graded sand, all passing a #4 screen, with a uniformity coefficient of less than 4.0 and an effective size of 0.25 to 0.60 mm. The filter sand thus described yields an acceptance rate approximately equal to a percolation rate of between 10 and 20 minutes per inch. This is in comparison to the measured and reported rate of the sandy upper-level in-situ soils, which percolate at a rate of less than one minute per inch. This slower acceptance rate allows time for the bacterial mat to form and remain active, which is essential to the proper function of the sand filter. Filter beds will be dosed on the basis of 4 times per day, using a pump and dosing chamber sized for the lot. The district will keep an inventory of spare pumps in the event of failure, but pumps have a normal life-expectancy of 15 to 20 years. The septic tanks will be of the 2- compartment type, with risers on all ports up to ground level, for easy access. Tanks will be sized based on the number of bedrooms, with a minimum size of 1000 gallons. Under these parameters, the life of a sand filter before needing substantial maintenance should exceed 25 years. When cleaning of filter medium is deemed necessary, the cost of such maintenance will be charged to the homeowner. This avoids uneven distribution of costs over the district. r— Il REFERENCES 1. USEPA Publication EPA 832-R-97-001b "Response to Congress on Use of Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems," April 1997 2. USEPA Publication EPA 832-F-00-012 (Draft) "EPA Guidelines for Management of Onsite/Decentralized Wastewater Systems," July 2000 3. Geotechnical Investigation Report of Beebe Draw Farms & Equestrian Center, Filing 2, Horizon Construction Services, L.L.C., May 12, 2000. 4. Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment ISDS Regulations ISDS Guide for Weld County 5. Consolidated Service Plan for Beebe Draw Farms Metropolitan District, May 1, 1999 6. National Small Flows Clearing House, Morgantown, WV 26506-6064 "The Care and Feeding of Your Septic Tank" "So Now You Own a Septic Tank" "Your Septic System" 12 SYSTEM DESIGN 150 gal/bedroom Tankage 3 bedrooms 1000 gal. 4 bedrooms 1250 gal. 5 bedrooms 1500 gal. Additional bedrooms 200 gal. each All tanks 2 compartment-type (60%/40%) Risers to surface on all comps. System type— Subsurface sand filter(1 pass) with no collection Filter depth 4' Filter medium Sand (all —4) Unit'. Coeff<4.0 Line sides of filter bed with 10 mil PVC or equal Area: 3 bedroom—450/.95 = 475 sq. ft. say 18' x 26' Dist. Pipe vol. 23x4x .3332IIx7.5 =60gal. 4 Dosing volume : 450/4 = 112 gal >60 ..OK Add 160 sq. ft./bedroom field size Dosing vol: 40 gal. additional Dosing pump: Zoeller Effluent Pump, or equal Siphon: May be permissible when sufficient grade available Contractor to have spare pumps on hand in the event of malfunction. Cost of replacement and installation to be borne by homeowner. Inspections required: 1. (By Designer)prior to placing filter sand 2. (By County Health Department) prior to covering components 3. (By Designer) prior to covering components. 13 r ADDENDUM 14 s_ ) ) ) w # I # # * # # m II # 3VN * # * # 36 ** # # ° • - * . # `• 32 - # f # * A Beebe Draw 0- .31*��/ ° * ° *j. * ,1� * * * * * Scit: 1' 000 Pvo.ctgn:•,MY4x NO- EXHIB� #* 7Y 0 * * ° ° ro . { ,k_ * * D 1 JA_______ _ # # # # # I * * V- # - ## * 4-4_ ## .,} 0- {. gyp * 1 6 s 4- 4. * 0+ ma • 'r'vr * 0" * 4 O1 ' * ** • -0- «* r ° * 4 , '. O * *- # * * * 0 # * * I # # * # °* 3:E— # # # ' #* in * # # - # # • ? # * # # 8 # # E # � * * * * * * , * - - * 0- 4- 1 # was # * * # • OIL O * * 0* * # 00 0 0 ,*, 0- 0A5 # if ° 0416 5 # Ilk ° - * a • �4- * DRY # k y"'' O OrIMo Q 4 * * QeIG. 0 # # # * * . 1 rsi 075 _ , 0 ADNDISLO # # # # # # # # • * �j ,yy _ O LA=Ow '� 7Cj Q Townships No iersonpn) # * sI[ l� Q Sections Ght0arsoman ') O * ° * * *.- *j 0 * Q ,fir Ir Q Ab tr(F.ns) ° * J"* * * Ar 20* * • *�* slc 0 **iii Abstracts(f.xu) 7'F lakts zoo o 0mo feel # RZTAcvw TMas7 * # I ••s el. 7,C 'up *- it ©AlC F.e Mlntrals WaMaesonian) / ,* * le*_ 4 MARSHALL * yPRR SB PAN$4.C ...n.u. HSR �'uenl nv AM) H ' wufluiurnn - -n.R nu..nARISTOCRAI ANUUSARISTOCRAT ANGUS # * * - 0 * 4-• LUDWIO 2•i MiR•RQOERa ID iu LuQwl4 I.4BEEfE.DRAW PS DRAW H BB DRAW HSR-NILAND HSR-MAYSIfr ! Y HSR-PARKER ARISTOCRATS;-B ARISTOCRAT ANGUS BB DRAW H FED C-1000p FEDERAL -# UPRR 30 PA F UPRR 30 IMO 00-C ,L HSR-PAGE y * 3T€ a* R NO LDS * "h'�1(i- HS 1-OBORNE BB DRAW H ARISi 0 RAT HSR-PICKRELL HSR-000DNOW �k * * • �F UPRC FEDERAL ,.0.-- HSR-RAFALOVICH ARISTOCRAT ANGUS A ISTOCRAT ARISTOCRAT ANGUS • HSR-RE$MARISTOCRATANOUB WAS ttrt UNAW urflNMIS70LRAT ANOU -* 4 -4 4 ARISTOCRAT ANGUS UPRC UPRC UP Sp NAOCOD BEEBE0 . ARISTOCRAT UPRC A ELL OHMIf * ARISTOCRAT ANGUS )1l€ BEE 8 7"42R 30 PIMP B UP NCR III RTON BB DRAW H HSR-PALLETTE UPRR 3 1 BB DRAW H BB DRAW H BB DRAW UPRC BB DRAW ite * UPRC UPRC L "B"UNIT HSR-PERRYHSR-RICHARDS I iilie RAT ANGUSBB DRAW H BB DRAW HBEEBE DRAW GATT IIE "" j - UPRC UPRC MMM *BrFOG DRAW UPRR rttrt UHAW UP}N y MEGAN H MEGAN H MEGANH 4 HSR-RE * * 0 STATE 1* H LLH +k. UPRR YY PAN AMU 1S �r MEGAN H # MEGAN H MEGANH ' MEGANH BEEBED W UPRR UPRR 22 I AN AM .*. 1sF 0 0 0 L UPRC ,ill. ^//} i EEBE DRAW UPRgW EGAN H O /�n�11 UPRC UPRCUPRC UPRC UPRC MEGAN H MEGAN �EV HMEGANH MEGAN DELL H * 4. * *. ' f STATE • # 4 MEGAN H UPRCIT UPRC MEO ANH MEGAN - MEGAN MEGAN HMEG AN UPRC UPRC o GUNNELS GUNNEL UPRC rN/1NK u N HSR•HOUSE UPRC alC 1100 a WO TIRO Jul I. H R-R0 SENT HALER I iTi McCartney Engineering, Inc. sr -t 3 ,-4 C Consulting Petroleum Engineers 12596 W. BAYAUD AVENUE, SUITE 150 • LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80228 • (303) 985-0326 September 26, 1984 EXHIBIT Mr. Morris Burke Beebe Draw Cattle Co. 1551 Larimer, Suite 2706 Denver, Colorado 80206 Dear Mr. Burke: Pursuant to your request we have evaluated the potential for economic development of coal and/or gravel resources in Section 4, 8 and 10 of Township 3 North, Range 65 West, Weld County, Colorado. Upon our review of the known geology in the area, it is our opinion that there is little potential for economic development of any coal, gravel/aggregrate and/or sand resources on the partials of land under consideration. Deposits of potentially strippable coal, i.e. deposits shallower than 200 feet, are quite common in the area of interest and indeed cover a substantial amount of acreage including the three subject sections. Referring to the attached Figure 1 , the areal extent of the potentially strippable coal , shaded lime green, and its proximity to the subject acreage shaded orange, can be seen. Though the subject acreage appears to be in a large area of potential coal reserves, this is actually not the case due to the thinness of the deposits. The attached Figure 2 shows the areas of known coal deposits of thickness greater than five feet, shaded in lime green, relative to the acreage of interest, shaded in orange. Based on this figure, it is apparent that on the subject acreage , there is little potential for economic development of any coal resources due to the minimal thickness of the deposits. Construction of both Figures 1 and 2 involved extrapolation of the coal depth and thickness between paints where the depth and thickness were known such as at well boreholes, coal outcrops and mines. Confidence in the accuracy of both Figures 1 and 2 for any specific area is therefore dependent upon the distance from the area to the nearest point of known deposit depth and thickness. The subject acreage is fortunately very close to two coreholes, and as such, the deposit depth and thickness as indicated by Figures 1 and 2 are probably quite accurate. The locations of these two nearby coreholes are indicated by the two black arrows on both Figure 1 and 2. Attached Figures 3 and 4 are core descriptions from the northern corehole, DX-26 and the southern corehole, DX-32, respectively. Note that for both coreholes, the coal deposits are present as thin stringers with the thickest being only four feet thick. Economic development of these types of deposits would be very unlikely. Mr. Morris Burke Beebe Draw Cattle Co. September 26, 1984 Page 2 The potential for economic development of gravel, aggregate or sand resources from the acreage of interest also seems minimal, particularly for Sections 4 and 8. Attached as Figure 5 is a sand, gravel and quarry aggregate resource map of the area of interest with Sections 4, 8 and 10 heavily outlined . The map indicates that all of Section 4 , nearly all of Section 8 and the surrounding area shaded lime green, are overlain by windblown sand of little economic value. A small segment of Section 8, the unshaded area, contain no sand, gravel or aggregate resources. Section 10 includes areas of windblown sand , shaded as lime green , of little economic value, as well areas consisting of valley fill shaded in orange . The composition and corresponding value of this valley fill is unknown but it is doubtful that economic development of this area would occur due to Milton Reservoir overlaying half of this area and the proximity of the reservoir to the remaining half. The information presented in this report is based entirely upon data received from the Colorado Geological Survey. Two Colorado Geological Survey publications, "Coal Resources of the Denver and Cheyenne Basins, Colorado", authored by Robert M. Kirkham and L .R . Ladwig in 1979 and "Atlas of Sand, Gravel and Quarry Aggregate Resources Colorado Front Range Counties" , authored by S.D. Schwachow, R.R. Shroba and P .C. Wicklein, were primarily referenced for this study. Both of these publications are available from the Colorado Geological Survey with the "Coal Resources of the Denver and Cheyenne Bains, Colorado" available as resource series 5 and the "Atlas of Sand, Gravel and Quarry Aggregate Resources Colorado Front Range Counties" . available as Special Publication 5—B. In our opinion, the potential for economic development of any coal , gravel, aggregate or sand resources on Sections 4, 8 and 10 of Township 3 North, Range 65 West, Weld County, Colorado, is minimal. Our opinion is based solely upon existing information and we reserve the right to revise this study should any additional information become available which could conflict or otherwise differ from the results of this report. - We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this study. All related data is in our file and is available for your review. Very truly yours, McCARTNEY ENGINEERING, INC. Jeff Harris Senior Engineer JH/cros F[GURE 1 R 71 w R 70 W R 69 W R 08 W R 67 W R 66 W R 05 W R 64 W R 63 W R 62 w t welwigto ¢.� ' in a _zoo 2`/i I PMW.C P•r. I _ • . • /I Ei R a. n a � , r •�L enro Lamont 4I twit � B -- -4444,44. Cosmen f•• ST For t% • `w �r i ��'L{:m ""n` :Sing. >i� / rr� , ��/ �i!// T r r ua M. .,k . r r Coea flan , ev ,1� WI . Si ♦ , .r A T ' T 0.. _ I .•,��III 1 mo., ee.r o-.e 1 Y e ~. re ., I J '�Gaw •i'� a.c ♦ T ' L� Iii►" el i d 1 i:/ ::nS J n envy I •' 5 NIL • . . „ { .h,w c.mow I �.' EI^o La Sal , l I ,r,.e. 'ft-ft ' N Sinn Mu a !� rya• • I`1 M . /./ar� /7/� M c.nlo,. 1 i J Berth.ud z � '� ♦ • +Ir al I N 49t I T r NI I •n`,�;,, �. /;i ��*III r�/ a --1' in (*nit. Mine I o esm—. l.•9. f•VA ISM•.• 2 �l:"n.°I 'i►�•�•��0/9�nva' ' i • ! /'R a.r.= , `/r•/- N •i.e M. I ! S •t_. -. SYrW lL.— •. , alley 10 Na In W ILY i�.•4 1+•�.fO�' • . m.•t. 04ett. B9H ER +w:wi Piwii�•+•�►�;`i 44• S% 1 1 .,t vw, in {�i�i�►•iiii�i�i � . erne g ' 1Oo a S�.., , �:Fs�%�o!iil�:►ia�� •, :• f� •.o•.•IIe a _ �) N 1 Vwrrid,. *1111! a vo _" g ' - — v — ' —e i �el Lai. I00 i0• r..mfie �AM4• �_.. e. .. 71a R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 65 W R 6< W R 67 W R 62 W DEPTH TO THE TOP OF THE LARAMIE FORMATION COAL ZONE / Contour line showing approximate Area of potentially strippable depth to the top of the Laramie V////�4 coal; the top of the Laramie \ Formation coal zone; contour Formation coal zone is within interval 500 feet 200 feet of the surface in / Outcrop or subcrop line of the this area / coal - bearing part of the Laramie Area of complex geology and \ Formation; dashed where \\N extensive mining; faulting and approximately located erosion have locally removed a Coal exploration drill hole some coal beds; significant • Oil or gas drill hole parts of this area have been A W2fnr Ip,r,n mined out FIGURE 2 R 71 W R 70 W R 69 W R 68 W R 67 W R 66 W R 6' 'd R 64 W R 63 W R 62 W pools Parr. i P I ; ' I • e T E R [ 15 I ° 9 .sit C d • tapoa< d[nyo.. I \, O� ° e T.I I, T N . " Cn,n n j •I��'i` 8 FO STJ ` _ '.__o T Fort Colli � -,.• �.� n 1 : �E° T - 7 ' I I .1 wroI MAO.ft 0 I,v,al O. I ! 1 O I I : N • - \ ° o 0 I, coition a 7 rls _�, "-1 0• (11 :��.Im M oIw .war,<n . o o ° 0 a' j e'�" N T wa wtn war y � ',eft e I . ,., �a to �._°_ _±"7 I •wlovn. I Mau Ik • i 1 COm I I I • •M to h `6 Wl .sor •r •1 t T IN m d el___ _ toren ' GPI I ♦ j N f IIOM / __... � 5 —i 1 el 1 d ouK �' i T N ,k�¢nls m� i I / •.�0$i I 5 t) l c. A. e ones t.w,•u J elw\n. I. C•moan _ f (In .:(_a Sal �� "n<r 1 I N an rl 4 N i• j I Q. 1 CT Berth.ud : I.i" I ai+ — • n I v hhh"` w • Grier `cite Io ` o<artKl. d JL7 _ walk . ]qrQ N MeadJT ( T1Tij 1IO III.rt 1■ I Q I 0 "" ,a0ab' ° ° 0 o -^ o I' • 7 • B �_ n7�nI t �L .Lwe j .. (////al)Ahe •: bmoa ,art,.. I ° T r Poi •PM alma V _ / O O amesro.. • w:.ot t�i�- - pJ " li-� ��Q b: °I 2 -I� —! • E — �!Q•alA:® � � \ o I I n I t KYsow ` •South aoqi<L N Crroman and' � • v ..Pros 'val4y IC 47 • L TMMM0 ° i 0 N 1.4p/than \ ®` sum ,,, _ / rt. I M1 T _ 'Cr<icml IEc t � ;�`�' rr 44 4 I _ •l • 1 { .il.� s y $pn Bn.mfiet f� s H ir 219®j I In: j ! $ .. A Z n> .. • Yo R71 W R70W R69W R68W R67W R66 W R65W R64W R63W R62W AREAS KNOWN TO BE UNDERLAIN BY LARAMIE COAL BEDS, FIVE FEET THICK OR GREATER EXPLANATION r =; Approximate outline of areas known , Outcrop or subcrop line of the coal - to be underlain by Laramie coal beds / bearing part of the Laramie Formation; five feet thick or greater ` dashed where approximately located Area of complex geology and extensive Data points: mining; faulting and erosion have a Coal exploration drill hole locally removed some coal beds; • Oil or gas drill hole significant parts of this area have n Water well k•,--is . s ,,.n,-4 es, ,Y , en: FIGURE 3 _ COREHOLE #DX-26 STRATIGRAPHIC SEQUENCE Location: E/4, Sec. 18-T3N—R65W, Weld County, Colorado Date: • June 9, 1978 Total Depth: 191 Ft. DEPTH THICKNESS NAME LITHOLOGY 0-35 35 Quaternary Sand 35-37 22 Quaternary Sand 57-67 10 Laramie Fm. Clay 67-96.5 29.5 Laramie Fm. Clay 96.5-97.5 1 Laramie Fm. Coal 97.5-100 2.5 Laramie Fm. Clay 100-101 1 Laramie Fm. Coal 101-114 13 Laramie Fm. Clay 114-191 77 Laramie Fm. Sand Thickest Coal = 1 Ft. • '"� FIGURE 4 COREHOLE #DX-32 STRATIGRAPHIC SEQUENCE Location: SE/4 SE/4, Sec. 19—T3N—R65W, Weld County, Colorado Date: June 9, 1978 Total Depth: 185 Ft. DEPTH THICKNESS NAME LITHOLOGY 0-30 30 Quaternary Sand 30-88 58 Laramie Fm. Clay 88-92 4 Laramie Fm. Coal 92-97 5 Laramie Fm. Clay 97-107 10 Laramie Fm. Shale 107-115.5 8.5 Laramie Fm. Clay 115.5-116.5 1 Laramie Fm. Coal 116.5-124 7.5 Laramie Fm. Clay 124-126 2 Laramie Fm. Coal 126-136 10 Laramie Fm. Clay 136-137 1 Laramie Fm. Coal 137-141.5 4.5 Laramie Fm. Clay 141 .5-142.5 1 Laramie Fm. Coal 142.5-146.5 4 Laramie Fm. Clay 146.5-147 .5 Laramie Fm. Coal 147-148 1 Laramie Fm. Clay 148-151 .5 3.5 Laramie Fm. Coal 151.5-155 3.5 Laramie Fm. Clay 155-156 1 Laramie Fm. Coal 156-170 14 Laramie Fm. Clay • 170-171 1 Laramie Fm. Coal 171-173 2 Laramie Fm. Clay 173-174 1 Laramie Fm. Coal 174-175.5 1 .5 Laramie Fm. Clay 175.5-176.5 1 Laramie Fm. Coal 176.5-178 1 .5 Laramie Fm. Clay 178-185 7 Unknown Sand Thickest Coal = 4 Ft. FIGURE S RGSW r - .� rrf�{� '' 1.y ' \ I 1� 1: / r id _�� ti 11S)/ !sAJ�r • I y �' .''' / L)e. � ea ) tr3,,..„, ! . ...... . e , 1e .' .. : ate. T ; ót i /r' Xl, • :4, aq . NI T3N ] (. 1 r.O Yt. Y #1..11 )! * ) \ii, -1 ,:. i '‘-<l OLP% .\ 1/4 ..i'0' - q, -C?:::14:4:: rt:i'' it ., 4-tc • i . \ t ., __,,A, . ,..._ . , _,... 4, ,,,,,) .. t. ),...• I , • I:4a ' '4 :\*47 •!:•*„:-.7; ..Iiir SAND•GRAV EL AND QUARRY AGGREGATE c-Landform unit RESOURCES MAY Resource classification Unevaluated Re sauces LA.MDFORM UNITS 4 Probable aggregate resource Fp Floodplain deposit MAP SYH60LS ' Stream terrace deposit • Operating gravel and/or sand pit '© Valley fill (F & T) A Abandoned gravel sod/or sand pit ® Upland deposits X Operating stone quarry O Alluvial fan k Abandoned stone quarry © Wind-deposited sand (aollan) ® Potential quarry segregate resource Area ® limn- ads deposits 2 Selected well or drill-hole location with over- (sla{.ca Ll Saga. spells....) Dl7t burden thickness (ft) over end/gravel resource thickness (ft), obtained from well logs. RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION •," indicates gravel; "a" indica tea sand Coarse Aggregate ." in symbol denotes unevaluated or (at Least SOS retained on (4 screen, unknown prnperty. Visual estimation! "m4" denotes Colorado Geological Survey 1 Gravel: relatively clean and sound Vindaor/Sand and Gravel projects' �'"•-• drill hole 2 Gravel: sign 1 scant lines, decomposed rock, calcium carbonate. ' dashed— Land(orm boundary. solid where w kno or onterred; dashed where approafa..ca or Fine Aggro{ace rJ interred. (greater than 70% passing 14 screen, SOS retained on 4209 screen, uisuaL estimation Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers, Inc. Leonard Rice Leslie H. Botham ( ) 455-9589/2695 Akott Street/Denver. Colorado 80211 August 29 , 1984 Mr. Morris Burk EXHIBIT Beebe Draw Land Company , Ltd . AR 1551 Larimer Street V/� Suite 2706 Denver , Colorado 80202 Dear Morris : This letter report summarizes our office investigation of the coal resources that occur in the Upper Cretaceous Laramie Formation beneath the Beebe Draw Land Company property , east of Platteville , Colorado . The Laramie Formation is approximately 300 to 400 feet thick below the property and gradationally overlies the Upper Cretaceous Fox Hills Formation . The lower 300 feet of the Laramie Formation is known to contain economically significant coal seams in numerous locations throughout the Denver Basin . The Beebe Draw Land Company property is located in part or all of Sections 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 22 and 23 of Township 3 North , Range 65 West . The property is outside the limits of the Boulder-Weld coal field . In this part of the Denver Basin the coal zone within the lower Laramie Formation is within 200 feet of the ground surface . A number of coal exploration drill holes have been drilled to the north and east of Township 3 North , Range 65 West . Most of the drill holes did not penetrate economically significant coal seams (greater than 5 feet thick ) . However , the data do indicate that a number of small non -contiguous areas to the east and south of Township 3 North , Range 65 West , are underlain by Laramie coal beds that are five feet thick or greater ( Kirkham & Ladwig, 1979) . At the Kingsburg Strip Mine , owned by Coors Energy Company and located in Sections 25 , 26 , 35 and 36 , Township 3 North , Range 64 West , coal is currently being mined from a five to eight foot thick coal seam beneath 60 to 160 feet of overburden . This is the only coal mine presently operating in Weld County. The mined coal is of subbituminous to bituminous grade. Our investigation has revealed that two coal exploration drill holes have been drilled in Township 3 North , Range 65 West . These are located in Sections 18 and 19 , less than one mile from the Beebe Draw Land Company property . Neither of these exploration holes indicates the existenceofeconomicallysignificant Hydrology Water Rights � Envfronmental Analysts Urban Drainage „�,• Mr . Burk August 29 , 1984 Page 2 coal seams ( greater than five feet thick ) . It is not known • if these two exploration holes penetrated the entire Laramie Formation . Currently , there are no areas within Township 3 North , Range 65 West , that are known to be underlain by Laramie coal beds that are greater than five feet in thickness . Please feel ee to call if you have any questions or comments . Very trul yours , L RD IC CO LILTING WATER ENGINEERS , INC . c . j n„e2. / ichael ire an Ground-Water Hydrologist MW/kam 68580L01 Enclosure • r doLeonard Rice Consulting Waler Engineers.Inc. REFERENCES Jones , D . C . , Schultz , J . E . , and Murray, D . K . , 1978 . Coal Resources and Development Map of Colorado , Colorado Geological Survey Map , Series 9 . Kirkham , R . M . , and Ladwig , L .R . , 1979 . Coal Resources of the Denver and Cheyenne Basins , Colorado , Colorado Geological Survey Resource , Series 5 . Rushworth , Peter , Kelson , Bruce S . , and Ladwig , L . R . , 1984 . Directory and Statistics of Permitted Colorado Coal Mines , 1983 , Colorado Geological Survey Map, Series 23 . r• 685BDL01 S) Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers,Inc. Exhibit 22P is an oversized map Please see original file ' Water Oualitv I Water Quality continues to be a significant issue for the company. We have continued with our water quality monitoring program for Barr and Milton with Dr. John Stednick from CSU. We participate in five separate water quality related committees conducted under the direction of the Water Quality Control Division. Ban and Milton Lake have both been designated as"impaired water'; bodies by the Division. Each of the lakes has been listed due to high pH that exceeds the standards for these reservoirs(The standard is pH 6.5 to 9.0. We regularly exceed 9.0 and at times have exceeded pH 10 (highly alkaline).) The pH in turn is driven by high algae growth that is due to very large inflow of nitrogen and phosphorous in our water supplies. The effect of being listed on the "impaired water" list is that state and federal law then requires that a TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Loading) plan be prepared for the water bodies that is to address the maximum nutrient loading that will be allowed into the water supply (along with any other alternatives that may be 4 0141 a adopted) such that the algal growth in the lakes is controlled. This is a multi-year process. Similar to what has previously occurred for Cherry Creek reservoir and Chatfield reservoir a plan evolving over 5-10 years would be expected. As part of the process, Barr and Milton are the focus of a $150,000 study plan(federal matching funds through Section 319 of the Clean Water Act)that is to establish a formal water quality group for the reservoirs, complete data collection and identify a water quality model that can be used for Barr and Milton as part of the TMDL process. This 319 plan has received funding approval and has begun the process of organizing the water quality group. In addition to FRICO, major funding for the project has come from the Metro Wastewater District, Thornton and the Bromley District. Separately from the 319 project and the impaired water body listing, at the direction of the EPA the State has also been directed to establish nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorous) criteria directly. We participate in the nutrient criteria study group that also includes most other water providers and dischargers throughout the state. High nutrient loading has been identified by the EPA as the primary source of impaired water quality throughout the nation. As limiting or removing nitrogen and phosphorous from lakes and streams is a very expensive proposition, the issues are many and complex. The state is to develop nutrient criteria by 2004 and to begin implementing nutrient standards after that. While actively being pursued, the issues are so diverse and expensive that it will probably be 10 to 20 years before substantial progress is made in this arena. ,�� 3 �, Statev C4afjfryl„r d^i .EPj �.`� ient, +, iii III 4 L n ': laxonsew• 1 ii `tit 1x;; `4 - + . A � ., : ae .iron * ; � re ul 1:, 1 }� = .# ► grs. .� viziv: , 14 ; -, , i.4 I Plants run under olddai',,, ,. _ ••:,...‘ki.i.i..9;,,,.$4„1.K. • d.S By Mark Obmascik ' . since 1998,under,expfred permits ,', Denver Post Staff Writer that were extended but not updat- t; Too many Colorado sewage federal rids show i plants have polluted too much for fn c 'hornton,�c t yofficia.s,say i' ,'fit y too long because of sluggish state. the state backlog means they may ;.<,, environmental enforcement,feder- ;have to Spend J3U uitllion to to- ; al officials say .move sew asedpoUutkm from A U.S. Environmental Protec }heir main paten r•. tion Agency survey of state water- Ithe'South Platte vpr cti :i quality regulation found that 44.7 bfficials blame much'of the pollu 1, percent of Colorado's 103 major 'tion on the dpsttesm'LitUeton/En- ; sewage treatment plants,were op- a pod se ,. , w ifhlce Sits stating under"expired environmen rated t f 1 tal permits. The only states with agile: worse track records were Nevada, jtae sea t" famed .g: Oregon,Nebraska,Louisiana, New •Mexico, Montana and�Ves n f z� mom t °lOrte t , Permits are supposed to a grdrkkeeled- dated every five years to reflect i lDew in teige- 3'.'. scientific developments in protect mepnt tec�quea shod Slash ther ins water quality. Yet some Colo- redo sewage plants have operated Please see SEWAGE on 26A .-, - fl,r&),y' f trttiiJJ, 4'.-4. l . I lag _ ) -26A ra 'THE DENVER POST Sunday, March fie, _ -d1 PA rips stateláiftjon wet r t n r s s a olio d. .. _ ` -'_ . ?t . r >. E , r :-',• , SEWAGE from Page 1A i b Platte led health officials last summer to occasionally advise residents to avoid con- backlog to 10 percent by the end of next Major violations since 1995 m1l tact with river water. That hurt Denver's year,they say. •: They have 1roVed m efforts to promote the river as a natural Here are the major Colorado city sew- dons for solids,ammonia,°Mork*and in- r Federal environmental regulators say age plants or industrial dischargers with adequate treatment the pastyear, �Ut -' , playground fur Waiters and rafters'A ` Colorado has a long way to go. the most water luticn violations since r If the Littleton/Englewood plant Is _ ""they're playing catch-up, and catch-up 1995: Colorado Tampa Coax Co., 34 violations Colorado has made some forced to meet tougher pollution standards is a tough game to play,"said Bruce Kentfor inadequate treatment, solids, oil and . proposed by Thornton, then Idttleton?'En- of the Denverregional office of the EPA, Eagle River at ttth facilities for nitro grease, iron and manganese. 55 violations three faalkies nitro- horrible mistakes, and glewood customers would he forced.to which oversees state regulators. "They gen,silver,copper mercury,chlorine,fe- Coors Drawls, Co.,31 violations for in- 4 ., rbuild major wastewater improvements,�of- have improved in the past year, but Colo- cal conform, ammonia and inadequate adequate treatment, silver, chlorine and we ve had to babysit • ' finials said x E t redo has made some horrible mistakes, treatment. , ,'-.0° , ' solids. - "To hit their standard would cost us be- and we've had to babysit them.We'd really nee Lakes Bata and Sewer Distrldt,53 Landon Mine, 31,violations for zinc and '' them. tween $25 million and $30 million,"said like to see the whole issue cleared up." violations for fecal conform, inadequate Inadequate treatment. I -, { Littleton/Engiew plant manager Den- Dave Holm,director of the water quality treatment, solids,flow exceedances,am- s ° ` . "" " ::it Stowe. , ; ,k+ � ,a k division of the Colorado Department of monia,copper and lead. ■lndmr, 30 viofabons for flow exceed- vy Public Health and Environment, which is Boulder Sanitation District, 49 viola- ances, mercury nd inadequate treat- Bruce Kent State offlchds they havebeen try rag moral. j ₹ to work out the"diapute by studying what responsible for monitoring the sewage tions for flow exceedances,chlorine,mar- r' of the Denver regional office of the ,;levels of nitrate hution are table plants,said state regulators have been do- cunt and fecal conform. adequate I c.raffling, 27 vlene ns for in-oil and - Environmental Protection Agency lid ''for the river. fie, :, ; , . a • ing their best with limited resources. Colorado weds, 46 oblations for lbw "Compared to other states in the region, , exceedances, chlorine,fecal coition, oil grease and flow eitceedances. ' " "Thornton's argiime to h �y .00. p g y Thornton officials note that pollution con- " , we have many,many more permits to reg- and grease and solids. '• - Scarce: U.S. Environmental Protection , l.centrations in Littleton/Englewood's were t that Convincing, Helm Said. But ulate but not really much more staff," Foantein Sanitation District, 40 viola Agency. "wastewater are nearly four times greater there s enough of a common-sense concern Holm said. "This is an issue we've been than drinking-water standards. k, ; here to 4 k more lnfor iaj wit i a working very diligently on fora year now. ' • eton/ og, -- .•0" "The state needs to be more strlogent on study• , t v"t,: 4 w -Ain't" 8'rrhoul be The anttrend is improving.We're making sig- state$37,000 federal are grantW�hellp them EPA study do's e third-largest with lewm reptthan 250,000 v��said BudeHart, water quas into the allitylatte manager far I th�trope pays.But not an easy ran s Nficant headway." In the early 1990s, Colorado had 11 em- pollution issues along the South Platte customers, has been discharging treated 'Thornton,which serves 100,000 city and Ad-"m lssue because of all theca tt.implcations. ployees regulating all sewage and industri- through metro Denver. • wastewater into the South Platte near :ems County residents. "The state has done'r How reasonable is it to expect(high-quafl- al discharge plants. Today the state em- . Last year, the EPA said, state officials Dartmouth Street and Santa Fe Drive un- is poor job protecting the South Platte's! ty water)after it has flowed through a ma- ploys seven workers to check 375 city and were forced to make major changes in a der a permit that expired in January 1996. As Colorado's population surge produces`; •i"metropoUtan area?" . .7.industrial facilities,though administrators publicly advertised proposal for new per- That permit set no limits on nitrate poi ;more sewage — and more pollution'. " That question won't be resolved until the are trying to hire two more. wits for two refineries along Sand Creek in lution,which results from feces and fertil- Thornton offfrists say they fear it will be- .state replaces the Littleton/Englewood Since the EPA study in October,state of- Commerce City because regulators failed fixer.A new permit almost certainly would : come tougher and tougher for them to permit that expired in 1996.Until that per- ficials hive cut their backlog from 46 ex- to consider limits on ammonia pollution. contain nitrate limits,regulators said. meet drinking-water standards for ni- mit is renewed, Littleton/Englewood will pired permits among 103 major facilities "We had a guy who just blew it,"said the • Ten miles downstream of Littleton/En-, trates, which cause health problems for ..continue to face no legal limits on the r to 37 expired permits at 105 facilities. But state's Holm. "It's not fair to judge us by glewood's discharge pipe is the intake for pregnant women and infants. amount of nitrate pollution being dis- federal officials voice concern that the that one isolated incident." Thornton's drinking-water plant. -'We're looking It$30 million to$40 mil charged into the South Platte. state will fall further behind because per- One of the highest-stakes sewage fights Littleton/Englewood officials say their lion for advanced treatment processes," z Mark Obmascik can be reached at nits for 17 other major facilities are ex- is between Thornton and Littleton/Engle- plant historically has pumped 38 parts per said Hart. ' 'Mobmaseik@denverpost.com tf p piring this year. wood on the South Platte ` - million of nitrates into the South Platte. --v,Rising pollution levels in the South or 303-820-1415. u . • 4•. 1 h 1CH 14, 2002 The Central Weld VOICE, Page 17, t ry--356-7176 mesa. Savo, 50% or morel Legal notices NOTICE CONCERNING 2002 BUDGET AMENDMENT - BEEBE DRAW FARMS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO.2 • . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all 6aereetedparties that the necessity. has arisen to amend the 2002 Budget of Beebe Draw Farms Metropolitan Dls- - trlct No.2;that a copy of the proposed Amedied Budget he been tiled at the DlealctAdministration Bulldog and at Sao Union Boulevard,Site 400,Denver, Colorado,80228,where the same Is open for public inspection;and that adop- ion of a Resdutlon to Amend the 2002 Budget veil be considered at a pubic meeting of the Board of Directors of the District to be held at 990 Union Bouts- yard,Sulu 400, Denver,Colorado,on Thursday Mann 21,2002,at 10:00 o'clock am Any elector wahh the District may,at any time prior to the Mai adoption of the Resolution to Amend the 2p02 Budget,,Inspect and Ile or rents-- -. tar anY oaedions thereto. BEEBE DRAW FARMS METROPOLITAN ,+ -.i s DISTRICT NO.2 ' '-i 3+t T.-Byte/Thomas Burk , . 1L aka rt ...SsoreWy MuWMedN The VOCE in Central Wad County Colorado,Thursday • -.. NOTICE OF OPEN MEETINGS FOR HEARING ON • PETITIONS FOR EXCLUSION OF REAL PROPERTY FROM THE BEEBE DRAW FARMS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO.2 • —..x. ..... Mon of NRW Property given to to at minced aerial.that Petitions for Exdu• roperty haw been filed with the Bowd of Directors of the Beebe Draw Fame,Metropolitan District No.2 The Board of Directors has loud Thum- day Mardi 21,2002,at the hour of 1040 am,at 990 Union Boulevard,Suite 400, Denver Colorado,as the date,time and puce of an open meeting el ' wbldh eudl Pelllona shat)be herd. TM name of the PiMloners and deealption of the properly to be ex • - dude from the DletrKt are as follows: j 1.PETITIONER K 8 H DESIGNS INC PROPERTY: LOT 98,BEEBE DRAW FARMS AND EQUESTRIAN FARMS.FIRST FILING, - PHASE IV,WELD COUNTY COLORADO, also known as 18509 BADMINTON ROAD - 'NORTH ! t 2 PETITIONER: . KVC INC: ' • • PROPERTY: '-.-LOTS 43 AND 44,BEEBE DRAW FARMS - '. di,: AND EQUESTRIAN FARMS,FIRST FL-; ,. WG,PHASE IV,WELD COUNTY ' COLORADO,mho known as 16502 BAD- °', r MINTON ROAD NORTH AND 16504 HAD- PETITIONER:,. r .. IL EA.LINKEDLWBLITYCOMPANY,dba 4 t INVESTORS LNAITED LIABRRY COl- . -k PANY J "i_71 ea .. PROPERTY: "I'"; >t �-1079 1.37 39.44 2,,45 19P30 196,161-167. - r=j. -and 176t68,REPLAT OF FIRST FILING, . r BEEBE DRAWFARMsMC EQUESTRIAN "y".'' CENTER,also know kg CORRECTED ''FIRST FLING PLAT OF BEEBE DRAW • 't Jc, 'r"FARMS AND EQUESTRIANCENTEUSS •hrme remrorat ewad CounyCierkerat • r;'Recordst,an Deosmbsr 19,u see s Re• _ 'caption Na 02200074,Book 1251:Folio • - • 0543,file No.5220,Env:2901.2909,Weld AI interested persons may appear at said hearing to show ratite In vett- ing why such petitions should not be granted. . - BEEBE DRAW FARMS METROPOLITAN 'DISTRICT NO 2 T,. T 3 N J� � 2z z - _ ': 1 ' • ' R 65 W • ry %4'v� J r \ lir J i Range No. 6 t r; -y Mer. We I d N ,L � L./{- u, NORTH // �I -.._�.7 . NaRCO.-LI. 4 O MARCO MARCO BASIN 9ASI)FEXPL3M-St• C 51 4 B4SIy 3ASIS ! ELK AMOCO - - ?RNA 4pq JESSES NAACO 1 ARR, W HICHARSC\ OtlG 1e� :74:,..4 - 1.2 ¶31 2 a1.Z - -�;-Sl.4 II- - ,. 21-3 • (NN • x%15• • • a-I LEI --,-I. w '.Ei •I_I a -4C (E) 1 I Si, 31-3 UP RR 41-S'1HPSEN-,. aSEN , I HSR- t rl JiIS.AN3S ARV',A.NC.5Ni15'T.ANd54R{57 RIS ANG GUN CLUB GUN CLLB UiiN BASIN E ITN HEL'ON HARTMAN �7 g, /. VPRR 39 411 LJ$ CJLLiA5 MARCO NARCD.... MARL C A UNIT BASIN EXPL BRE S IN (W). 4/2 -BASIN' AME"CLEN - "NARCII MARCO JE 1 _h•I BASIN ELK ELK BUCKEfr RICHARD$ I W 32.4 } el:'-. YT22.4 lEi • 12 3 �It 2233) • • 42-3 5CNK:EY:ICZ •42- •_ iW) /I I *2 )'P 2-4C .42 -3C ARIST 32.3 �` 1 �.HSR�5-I XSR- a-1 •05ER PRR _ LJS RIS,]NC.dARIST.aMK1SARISCCRATARIS.ANCUS ANGU5 MCSE?-OPRR 'mgeev 94ELT1• NSKELA LAURICE1CPC STEWARD .MARCO-•.MARC O - NARCQ•`MARR[CO RCQ ARCO NARCO BASIN- BASIN��, NARCO Nang !SNYDER SNYDER SNYDER SNYDER •�23a 334 •r3_4 ^"3-3 •i t23-3 (WI > lE) • • 4 "'z s-i 3 INI 124 . u 23-4C MUST. 33-3C. - `c"4Ep≤P., JEPSEN I AMCCO -`0: 3J KIST an?)3RIST A, FEDERAL ANGUS AR ISCANGLS ARISTCCPATARISTCCR4' �.- BASIN:.` ,A , ANGLS ANIS.ANy" (s PRC UPq[ L'PRC UPRC OES C. N4R V 55ELS - .MARCO' -•_MARCO..-• (51 v4FC0 2 -- 2 -MARCO BASIN ' NARCC N RCO SNYDER SNYDER {EI yy. - a J" SNYDER I SNYDER CC • -N4PC0 C ARC0143 .we ' ,. 344 BB[.—IF 4- •3 •R-2 y� t51 yN,, 24-4 • •♦ 'AUNrt 'A-]C • (VII 36 „4 Z J�(''UPRR39�N �•J '0-16,1 .P4NaM Q -14J3 -' RIT:J,KS.FiARIS.ANGL5 FED 1RLNT.4NGU9 PRIGTOQ+lRiISZ SN(i1$ARI ST-Qf ( n N JFP'FN 4RIS_1 ciliS ANGU51.'3 LPRC_,._._,.UPHC__.. UPR_4.---..._.'.LERC_ AMOCO BASIN LIP R.C. N4RCO WM4RC0.--AARco NA RCO ft PRIMA PRIMA PRINAOBG?RIMAOB GERRITY GERRITY GERRITY GERRITY NYDER fr....- (WI.3 •l II-Io• I•l0 =iv_. 11-Z2 IE7 - - • U +l 31_9 ^"_ • Iwl let D 4 • ;NI � II-1 • H12-4 .Jy� "' C12-3 12-Z H12-1' JPRC BEEBE DRAWy! r q 4HI FED 21-10 ]1-IOC 1Q II-23 II-21 ARIRTOC�A STROH_ STFON,_ .PRR 39.3 UPRR Aff��.3T403 AR IST.ANGJSARISTCCRATARIstCCRAT' ARISTCCRATC PC 9EERE RRIMA O BIG '• STROH ST ' 6J 8451 gg1W PRIMP GERRITY GERRITY SNYDER c BASIN EXP_ MARCO NAACO CORNELIUS PRIMA .., GERRITY GERRITY -6J•2 u.0 BE432R9BEEBE CRAW 2-IONARCO i ,> 1.108G(N) H12S W lEl H 2 Hq-8 — - *9.64 2 •42.9 No 22-10 42-;0• •II-24 • H12.6 . . • U P R.CNG, FEDCI - BEEBE DRAW I-1 •$N1OX� • STAOH- UPI 6tANGLS BEEME DRAW (RIST ',NG 4RIS1OCRg ARISTOCRAT $TROH� _TN ELK ELCaMOCCSR ELK ELK ELK GERRITY GERRIT ERRITY ERRITY MARCO 9"'0u.❑.E) J•9.HJ Ha9 • 3 ELK IS >40 ,ELK (N) * - 9 MORTON O N lY8 LE, 0-11 Ii .- HI 210 X12-9 J¢7 . � 5,13.10 x11_10 0 ` 2-II "JLLEN H IE.l,aERA RYH12-D JPRC PALLETTE UPRR 390 ARBY ANG 'KJVIATT 4 .Y•9-10 BOSSITTTC LIBBY ELK PORTER S7ROX STROH STRCH STROH SNYDER ELK /7 ELK \. ELK ----ELK (5)42 ELK GEPRITY(WI *X12-4 GERRITY ER I,Y I . MARCO/ . '6.10 ./ - • •05.11 •IIPII 12-4 y-MJ5ELx (5) i6.3 __ '1410 •. . . • i *1 (51,4# • STROH 15.3 • 440 5..C 13-II 1A ASR- 16.11 •0'112?13 H.2-IS UPRC pE - RICHARDS sEEBE DRAW - FRICO J.41.).-... NICHOLAS GULICK CIUENTE STROH STROH STROH ;ERRITY GEAR?Ty i2RRITY UPR,CA� - - � SNMOER SNYDE7 HSR • HSR 16.2 ELK �y AMOCO IC*i6-3 74�4-IS , ..3.13 _'' • •0.13-4 (NIyy� lM — •13-I , _IY 16-3 GERRITY- -.- (N T BEE .LRAJJ ` - UPRC 2 -'1'I3_3J • .3-2 YILCENBERUR 42466DAN MEGAN ,,,,2 3 MEGAN$ N CATTLE W UPRR 339'9' UPRC MOORE_Pia:M0GRE H . H16AJ2J ("O Y" STATE y(, ELx `yam SNMOER SNYDER, _ 'eCHRITY GERRITY -AF 16.6 1w)• •1416_GER&j 6 B ELX • *6-3 l::1 •I3.5J I13.c11 AEGANmEGAN MEGAN . UPRC UPRC3 GERRIT ERR Y GERRITY HAAS 1S M4TTHEi GERRYTT G�EjRRiRI,TgY GERRITY SNYDER SNYDER SNYDER SNYDER •X16-II H 16-10 •H 16-09 j(.,11 M-117F -10 •1414.9 - ' !" 6GILEJDER IN3-122•3-I" 13-ICJ • •38. Iz MEGAN MEGAN GEyeR,\IIEG4N GE_C%WILCOX " -,, SNYDER a UPRC UPRC UPRC RRITY GERRIT Z sJ - - AA `L PAN AM NYOER •SNYCER SNYDER GEAR TTY - 1 61�FH14-16 • E • GET.Ty �N,, P. GERR1 ��TTT��` 3.13J t3.1 4J 3I • • ' MI6-14 -X16.13 1116-:6 0111443 3•I( MW.I�HLNOER OPRC OF.RC• ,SUP4J C J& m MEGAN MEGAN MEGAN W4LCCz B0MIENCER IIepR -R'R )' ]NtueH Wfl I'arL -"SIN %flIMA FSa te.SR MSR NSi WA51N - - '--"_ -�.�AS N Pi. ...CO• AMOCO. ELx ELx SMYO E9 SN•YJDER II-' • i}4 • •2-22 -2r •-4-23 13-z3 • • , SR s-at' .▪ :-4r 4-14 21-3J 31-21 41.21 UV :I sA[ • •6 pJG (N] 2 1 -a EA 5 31-23 EACHL'S HSR <_24 3.2.t 2J5 24.u511 UPRC FRANK JPRR FRANK S.MENDELL FR ICJ "RICO CROWS EACHUS AMOCO GRUTSCHY HOFFMAN ----N SNITOBR'N[L4, • ( SNYDER UPRR 22 9ASN EXPL PRIMA C ARIMA - HSR HSR HSR jMS BASIN E I J' ,. •7J-6J PAN AMBAS \'G' 7-72 9-22 JF UPRR I BASIN 5-24 HSR (MI - -SNYDER •- _i) 1X04 • • IW) -, 0 CM•„ - 623 • -.2a ILEIL CO' I51 J r'� 2-21 22-I 2 (� 5-23 HSR-FAl1MAN sr. •11) HSR• C3) • UPRC21 FRANK FRANK-UPRR M0.RIl014: MULVE 2FRICJ U `RICO EACHUS 23EA2NU5'ECHU52 " EPSTE:N�R_ ,�a1 `UMBER"„ � , SER�a.T GEa RI RR PRIMA._" \PRIMA HSF HSR SNYDER SNYDER� 0-234 SNYDER SNYDER SNYOI ' SNYDER • BASIN ' (WI • AMECOA, • IN) 9.22 yyr• 7. . ELK '• ..-u HL.0 22.1- 1 22-: - • 10-22 • 3J2J 3.,,• • M'I -3.)2J �".0 —'�'— EI•C4- CRANK n 2-284 y51 O , HSR• NSR UPRC UPRC HSR 10-2` 9-'} -uRTLER OGII��RRTTLL R GURTLER 23-I0.1 24- �!TE `RANK RtANK R.C.NICr. w4ADELL DODGE DEMEUyES BENIRSCHE. HOPPSN SMgDEa GERRITY G.u. HSR HSR AMOCO SNYDER ELK ELK SNYDER SNr0E0 :� GERRITY 1yN, EL 131 l.,a 1 SNYDER 4NK_21C 15) • 151 MI6-22 (Sl 022-I44k:5-23 *16-23 • ', GURTLER 1421-.5 to-:6 15221E DURYEA HSR HSR 2413; •24-:5J •24-1 FRANK FRANK DOVE _ UPRR 539 UPRC ASHLEY AL3ERSTE1N GURTLER GURTLER GURTLER SNYDER SNYDER BASIN HSR .15R KAISER HSR ELK - FRANCIS - eSR_ B-} • K-TRANC15 (WI • 31-Z7 (M 1•a-26 3.26• 41 . I EI�C3-25 •25.2 (NI • • 1 MOSER 2B-2 ....31•28 MOSER MOSER 26 32HANTY- HN '3-3 P T 3 � . R 65 W Township No. Range No. 6th Mer. We I d • NORTH I GERRITY 6ERRTTY &EATtit V-Z6E4Thfl : ELK ELK BASINSXPL UPRC. MARCO iNAFICO'.C NARCD NIMIC0 NARCO MARCO BASIN BASINEXPLBAS)R SIN BASIN BASIN ELK PRIMA' ,1. 3-6 e] 4-5 INl . •<IN V.VESSELS 244 qIq VESSFIS '[n4RSU6, OBG.. Xi 2i • 1PRC, (w) • UPRC+.[tI I�q — qtr. ' • "..4,8B0 21.2 •31-2 4L2 •-. lE' • I-6 2-6*mil:: *" • 5 3I-5 .i'R J'i\ - a 'r91-o 2!{ )1"3*----- �,r21-3 (N) • 41.35 •� S �� IEI I M009YV 2 - '(N) 1 al•3 (W) 14C (El{3 (Wl' �rC 31'3 JEPSEN-T yB N NSR- ^I' ROGERS WDNIG%+5. ISTJUKUS MIST IiMiI5T.Mab 48157 RISf�'MGGUN CL UB UR RR BASTN SHELTON SHELTON H4RTMAN KNAUB KNAUB r YAUS IRENISCNDEIE aRIRISI-.ANRIS MUST ANGLISW - C GpN CNB WWII' FSASINr uE LK r�+ '.JS AC{ f,ERRIYV GERRITY. •GfRIdTLUDW16 BASIN BASIN E7(PLMARCO NAI(CO, MARCO::. NARZ'D - .h UNR BASIN EXPL BASIN lWl f.. 1 ELK ELK AM-'OLDEN RIfX A r,F.RRITY'•lN) WQYIG ELK B DRAW t real 7NAROOP, MARCO pp BASIN UJCKEYE q D5 v�. Tcq 1.61ELyJL;2-5 12 4 !2.4 JEPSq rF LUDWIG _ -Tf'. 32- UP"'I:[2 (El • i+ �22A lE1 • (Y(��123 �Fnl5)• B 42-2 • iWl X�I-I �iS2 3.6 6 SS 6•S 42-3 425 42-3 BONKIEWICZ'• - RC32.3 I2-4C e2-4C .4N ARIST 323 •NSR-5 N5 LUOWIG 6LDDWIG lit.OW16 MAY.. NIL4ND�Ap15'IO0ipT gEOC MISLAtKA1S ARISTArJtR�AASi.4NaSARISTOCRATARIST.CO ANGUS3;05a4)111 pSpt MOSER UPRR - (, JJ DRAW UPRR O�y++jJ M NNLL UPRR JEPS SHELTON KOSKE LA LAURLE CaC STEWART US ELK ELK ELK ELK E%PL ELK AMOCO NAR -4 NARCD" N41S 4 MARCO T41KRC0 Alma,. OY x*42 IB491fl' ,7E{_ *re__soy_ ELKJ 13.4 234 43-0C— �• BASIN MARCO MAR SNYDER SNYDER SNYDER SNYDER 7,�1yD ' • *10-6 '[9.6 •5 AMOCO 2i'T ,.'V SELS.•• 53.4 •, - I3-3 1233CIW1 • INI 1- 2.6 It-6 ELK PARKER- (N)• I �' E K 9.1 IA- \ 23.40 0' �,43A WRIST. 7�3 •33 3[E •43_ 4 -2 33-2 43.21 i2J '4' IOJ 9J HSR-ANNA NSR-JANAHSR•J.T 0 -HERSX _ 10.5 �} \ 3E JEPSPA+ JEPSEN PRC AMEN' URRC eMO(D (Sh g. - UPRP PAN Pqq E UPRR39C MS'T.map MI A4MLF.F-EDERAL ANGUS ARIST.ANGSARI5T0CRATARI5T0ERA7 , BASIN.` iAHIST ANGUS ARISE ML - U PR C UPRC ELK itELK ELK 6 ELK ELK AM'F ax AMDC OBORIE NARCD NARCD'•-" •�•'•'a'2 N VMS 2E4S NARCD -"'MARCO'-.BASIN I MARCO N RCO (5) SNYDER SNYDER '[� MCREYNOlD5 ELK LFJ MARCO (W3 E..) SNYDER SNYDER IWI• t4-6 1LD ylll I ELK ' •14-4C • WARGO 44' 4RC014 , 13-6 WAHOELL ia/•13-6 • 4F� 4.5 IS4 1 16-S 014-4' •24.4 -'•34,4 • ••: A £4+SC •a LW) • /� 47.2 uFRR39* IS1 tIL 5 �24",.. 3 6 44-2 T -IS.I 'T-IW p�y1p[pA 3CANGU I-134, PANAM 4' I-1445 HSR-FREY MSR-UEON HSR-AR.C.HSR-HAGAN PICKRELL�F4WIa UPRR GOODNOW44NGU5 T ARIST-ANOSARISLANGUS FED ARIELERONSARISTOQY•i1S[ANGUS ARISTOCRAT JEPSEN JEPSEN AN1)'' 4NGU5 ANGUS UPRC UPRC J0RC URRC ELK ELK BASIN IXPL BASIN NARCO MARCO �IA�'NARCP):LY SNYDER AMOCO BASIN U.P.RC. PARco TNAB@".'-..HARCA. NAM PRIMA RMAOBGPRIMA08G GERRITY GERRITY GERRITY PRIMA GERRITY lW) • •• tY tEl 31-8 41.8 BN) • SNYDER DC I 11-10• 2PI0 yr tnc. -IFJ� yy{l,, q 7ELK [', 7 ,31-7 al-7 `II-8 •2i4! �c•MIS7 . .M 9.34?:' 131_9 BBAp55� FED -'� c(WI-11C (El 8.41- 11-221E).• IWI • II-I • 'I Z •H12.a 12-' TROM.Z HIZ-'IT` - 168 ARDELL ARIST MIST (p.g3,1, ..ANRIb 9.44 UPgC BEEBE DRAWy{q.194NJ 21-10 31-K)C IT 1143 H.21 ARISTOCRAT STROH STROH HSR-REwm RLANDw li_iA'iyr MIST ANG ANGUS ANGUS �3!!•' UPRC PRR39�G UP AAR5SLT NOS M IST.NgS ARISTOCRAT MISTOCRATCPCBEEBE PRIMA 08Q - STROH SiR^!1 MARCO MARCO pp MARCO NARK PRIMA O•ELGIN) GERRITY (Ely x ELK 4-7 LK BA IN GBASIN EXPL - MARCO 44 MOW SNYDER BA SIN BASIN E%R 4R6TOCRAT nRAW PRIMA Gc RRITY GERRITY NORRIS y. - • V 12-8 BF W 2.B 9NpYO�ER -6J-2(NI BE 3DR,BEEBE DRAW ..._C� 4O MARCO COR SCULLS -- 11- GERRITQ l51 . . •g_7 A:[37-t(E) • 92_7 H,+)p1 ,�AI., hr 32-6 9-S J'yYl SI[. `Z_9 • `1`'flJO'22-IO 32 • •.. 2 • NIL5 151 X12-6 2-8 H(2-Ya„,• 5-T HSR DBERK :.,.° 22-83:t UPRC 9.64 • U.P.R.C. 42-B FED FED 42-(0 II-24 BEEBE DRAW ICI :'6J STROH • STROH' HSR-GRO-7 H U ooELL `81ST Ag15TOCRAT ARIST - i 7 R WAROEJL-UPRR MI51. AM, , , ANC. UPRR 39 Li UPRC �^J o'5EAMGUSPCFRF DRAW ARIST ANG M6TOCR4 ARISTOCRAT STROH 2 ELK ELK • VESSELS VESSELS GERRITY SNYER 9NYDEI� E1K AMOCO O HSR �� - �^"o' G RITY El1C NA.3R -----7-------- --0(E1 9-10 ELK ELK ELK GERRITY GERRR RRITY GERRITY GERRITY GERRITY (NL�{L O� 3 :ELK II•II -* yr. 2-7 •7_ • 7•A•I. - 840 DRAW B-9 Rf9J7J�E1 9-IIJ 10 99-9 (Wi ELK 15) � lE) WI .II _ - 1- NSR- 11-7 49ARDELL •X8.12 H841\ BB DRAW UPRC MORICN •1340 I1-0O \ ` 10' ,y,12II CULLEN HI2-l' 11I II X12-10 NL-9 PRINVALE HSR-COOK WARDELLVESSEL$ • e. tDERR STROH Be pt.GERMY 99 0FL . GERRD-V' �ySNdYDER UPRC PALLETTE UPRR 39 D ARIST ANG��F^{.OVIATT 8, Iw^O 940 BO t. ELX !PORTER STROH $IRON STROH STROH f ELK ELK VESSELS(E)."„l.1 (wit(I. GERRITY W.r�.2 G '''" ' SNYDER ELK /' ELK I'\ -� ELK /ELK (S)y�'[ ELK IWI *H. £�4h-1 ti \Ly MARCO ' ? J 16-10 '^15-11 GERRITY IL,M GERRITY ""Z IS) •13_7 ^a4.7 7A3 ARIST -. �Sii��i 148-IS •E�gg��DRAW •9-(34 Jf-9.14J5 ELK (5).169 10 . 410 .: -15.,'0 .'t) I i1a-iI IS). _ TT^^I 4. .: i WW•��4RDELL CAT CO 15-9 NSR- AUIEIlEI6=I1 • 61mx1 HSR-N141.L NSA-ROEOER WARCELLB•ANGU$ BB DRAW UPRC UPRC pE RICHARDS BEEBE IRILW FRICO KATE NICHOLAS GULICK rq •�i3 1215 SNYDER BB DRAW. - UENTE STROH STROH STROH BASIN GERRITY •GERRITY SNYDER SNYDER BASIC" BASIN GERRITY GERRITY GERRIwV GERRITY ELK UPRC. SNYDER 3I �1 AMOCO NYOE? HSR " NSW-, • IEI• �B-I (Nl•IT-445 •17-3J(W) •� 1 41.17 '^X16-41E13�L i6 •X16-I INI,.415 3-IS .I}qJ (NIA,, iM•; •13-I ' 'IW8 163.4 I8-2 5 (Nla ' HIS-3 T '—>a2 • m 2 IFE5.3. - 13-` mca- .. ' -_ - BASIN ARD„E,:-� WARD UPRC • UPRC BE®E BEEBE 1 GERR ITv GERRITY B E BEE I, UPRR 3399'B WAROELL. e,n•,u PRR W CATTLE CD UPRC MOB JP4_ WMDELL Ey-._, '.4RK0 5ryY AEEEgggN��rrrOCO SNYDER DRAW-U 40H{AV-U MEGAN AL6 GAN MEGAN STATE ELK `� USNYDER $NYOE!�, - 4 Y swittet%- SNYDER fir. GERRITY `NT BASIN BA51 Xy D' G'mM,rL•-D2J - -7fC12-i6 y� 17-SJ 21PR 822 !R' GERRI Y tatKRITY GERRITY �{/� • WMOd_ • HI8�7 III 7-645 pout, 4217 -' r • LWl� GEliy ELK . 7F6_15 I Ii !LW IB-fiJ WA UPRR 22 PAN 32-17 on N1 S .. N16.6 N16-7 7�N16-B ../' •13-3J �13.fS1 .. AM UT'S' UP gpE'BE �f WMDELL •WMOE WMRrr11 WARD UPRC �DR/Y4JJFRR MEGAN MEGAI# GERRITYuPRCSNYDER GERRITY HAAS J GERRITY GERRITY i `t8.1..- GERR1 Y SNYDER 4SNYDER SNYDER f •.AMOCO -i')8-IIJ 840 X17- • ♦ • * -rY116-12 •H16-II •'J •X16.09 - p •X14.9 r 1 GFFRRRRI�� / I7-IIJ IT-I04 17-9J NGERPoTY � 1 R 11 ha��.. ��yy WMDELL WARDELL•V/Ag0 UPRC abitin Y' : tDER 14-12.'713-114 _IOJ 139, ."SNYDER ARDEYLC' .r. UPRC UPRC UPRC MEGA MEGAN MEGAN aMEGAN co Wit X _ iggiMPRE .KYDER' R-WJ GERRITY . ®ljf SNYDER GERR BiY YEgBITY GERRITY M. t6AJ: - 6EFfi S) '1X114-16 PAN AM—SNYDER •SNYYOCER SNRYIER SNYDER ,SNYDER .SNYDER GM WA E - STATE GE ITT GERRITY Gq . - ryl-•48.13_4- ''8',. 8-IS 'ii 17-13JSIE1• • (El • IWI �N16.13 ,16-w "M16-IS 416-16 yl�_ ` M4.I BO L3-134�13-IN 61• fit - xaRDELL WAR L UPRC1 S NIENOFA RR PR U✓RC 13.I5J C a WAN LL 17-144 •17.154 17_164 AN IA.EIIDER • u UPRC UPR 1 MAAOELL DE uPRr uPR[ NPRC MEGAN MEGAN MEGAN MEG WILCOX _UPRR 39.8 _ it Exhibit 22R is a Real Estate Magazine Please see original file • i ,ir` � 1R g -!� -Lt.:.-17 f re t x .Zk ttritr OF GREELEY _� ® ' .. - 7 ., �-.v-- X d 1 44 F RE�Ea t '� a t N �p t '� / 1 l ik..44 L4 t ^Y ,tic-,,,,,k izt�YdC\ / p ,} 4 • Fi avfit v - `" - s '''',1T' 2 Ht}."4 V "C ti zill }C a al f s i , s { k �±- %#K OF 9 w ,':',,:i.',xl 5 v tmx� ""4.,t., A ti iiyy++ I x",xl,Xt 1 �. . K v� F r' .•S �w• 5 e 'yx .. r i f s-. I L z f 1 "§ '`bite vvS ,+qtr s i 4t ' �� ; ^ A hA r. r: v-.w _. ..... d Liala WE'RE FOR NATIONWIDE! CALL A FREE MAGAZINE! A 1 EXHIBIT • I 0a2 /IT SEE MORE ON THE INTERNET! HomesAndLand.com SELLING YOUR HOME? ASK YOUR REALTOR® TO FEATURE IT IN THIS MAGAZINE 4 } mr Nature's everywhere Pelicans perform over the Lake all summer NR. Pelican Lake Ranch A Lakeside Residential Resort From the beginning, the —— development philosophy included a deep devotion to letting nature have its way. ' s;:�y'� Private 1,000 acre Boating Lake • f �, ,7-ii r 'f,,/,-;J : 7 Tf . .n, -:•; , ... :-A...... A wildlife preserve It . ,40.44 *VII • '.' .:tit: r r, In spring, Canadian Geese Colorado's only Sailing community lay their eggs and raise their goslings on the Lake � ,ire:. . Experience the serenity of living ami� unsurpassed natural be ty II 6� Before �i ��i a l 1 . The Pelican Lake Ranch Plan includes: development began in 1999, ✓ 3,484, Acre Planned Unit Development environmentalist, scientists, and 1,000 Acre Private Lake planners were sent in to analyze Marina & Yacht Club and document the physical The Community Center Lodge includes the Mail 18 Acre Fishing Lake characteristics of the Ranch. Room for the first 188 homes,a Meeting Hall, Future Boat& RV Storage Park The Metropolitan District Office and the School Bus Equestrian Area wildlife population was counted, Pickup and drop off locaTr-tion Stables Miles of natural Trails the plant life categorized, and F historical aspects of the Ranch :,,g Over 1,000 Acres of Open Space were carefully studied. s ;. Community Buildings include: Man, Y" -k. . . Covered Entry House with it was felt, should intrude c ' , Weld County Sheriff Sub Station quietly and with respect. f Community Center Lodge with A Mail Room/Meeting Hall/ Master Plan was created 'p t µ , ''.'. Offices/School Bus Pickup that balanced the social, You can ride on miles of trails Clubhouse to be built with Party Room/Exercise Room recreational and natural Swimming Pool/Tennis Courts needs of the Ranch and all present and future residents. Building Program includes: Environmentally Home Owners Association Fees are sensitive areas are reserved $20.00 per month as buffer zones or open space. Covenant Controlled Community Prior Architectural Control to construction, all building Metropolitan District and landscaping plans must 1.5 to 5 Acre Lots meet the approval of an Lake & Mountain View Lots Architectural Review Board. The views are breathtaking Walk-out Lots Land Horse Lots may not be disturbed, except - City-Style Amenities include: the area within the building Central Weld Water envelop where the home is Greeley Natural Gas to be built. t- Xcel Power Landscaping'' Underground Utilities is relaxed and unobtrusive, g allowing nature itself to take Paved Roads credit for the Ranch's splendor. Fire Hydrants Street Lights Valley School District Your best friend will love the open space Custom homes are always available, or you may purchase a lot and take /y A - � I � L a p ti'T Aft J a 'y '; _ '' � � -, * 4`", ztr. `'* tr, 4-';',.....-t.,:' a 5...1;..:-- 4 ` . 4 ,,,1_,;:,'-:,',r.5 f„` OP'-1:a ..,,,4Hn' °ry R1. ,s-ic l�bp r ,,,Aft„.......-,- ^' , f A„ tt '''Ilk.`l- k.a-- ` a. �i r L" 25 '+� �. - _ ..._ .. � �.miC,*ar,*95 qyc, . pvi₹� .A.,{.�: ,. ax �:Ass on 3,484 acres along the shores of a private 1,000 acre boating lake.t \ �,, T ., �, E � �t '. You can take \ r up sailing an You ca ha'e that horse the private 1,000 you tie always wanted �Nthl -. acre lake Pelican Lake Ranch PUD Plan r° ' a ;, .-r I 1 ` *- 1000 Acre Boating Lake d ' 6� , / yI.A-4, '' i58 ls� I 14-:1 �c ' d ` l� r≥ r tt s )tl I �t 2i s ��4J 1�l)Y:a0� ‘ - ":•:,t;11; l -. \ Yry^ i1i�,7 ate risk> V '?4°�iw7 iii' 1t 17 'ati 4n�R',"Fm ',..'10.4."4..:,,,>1:19[rJ � n �y'3y t<p t i1i'r 7S a 4ap r :::: ` d .t^4.� a• fs1 cif ? �, ,{�: - � i, : 8' Y ',. p 1 '} lV y .2 .i`�p. �, 4 '� I. U .�'41 r �7 .✓f a7� Private 1,000 Acre l} 4 .. f Boating Lake M -V l: 1 � I 1 1 �� You can observe the 1 birdli(e f one your canoe .I I I ch� �� a v S� v. � b 'G Ili i v olice seia+� ono146114e� r ® ��a s 9e f�rf . : ,: . 1. Y ,. v. i ,v11:ac? 55 two years to select a builder, plan your home and begin construction. LJFIL l , 3....,.. . `.=h ,₹.�"^ns,`..:' ,�v�i,,_,. . .�„.,.... . �E`�w�.r. saa.�,�;4. #,s ... g' '»".-.r �.'Se. `' �► Pelican Lake Ranch is a little out of the way, - L but all the good places are. s..— r Brmg the family, Immediate Occupancy Homes . r t iplore the beach, are always available. � II ()kern,the wildlife awl espe term the _�= lifestyle opportunity ` 'Fo" Collins Severance Ealon Galeton Pelican Lake Ranch is conveniently MasonviDe VJldsor .f located in the quiet countryside just... Perk Lr e l ei even* w.,Drake .7 , Gr.�eie1 45 minutes north of downtown Denver ' EVansiKers4? 45 minutes northeast of Boulder - \ 40 minutes southeast of Fort Collins Johnstown aik- La Salle \ 35 minutes east of Loveland ti `? Bert oud -GI st❑ r' 35 minutes north of Thornton 1/4 $ ' 35 minutes north of Denver International Airport 6. Lyons + 30 minutes east of Longmont y--....--- •Hy lane - 'lone Pelican Directions • Niwot IFiresto e•ewes. Fort pto Lake Take 1-25 north to Hwy 66 amestov7 1 -Q Exit(right) east 7 miles to Hwy 85 fastest B//OUlder•Ert'1e •walla ?erg '. Ranch Turn(left) north 1/2 mile to CR 32 ag irtoef� �. �II Turn(right) east 6 miles ltoe CR 39 Jr Lo 'sville fti alts _ Turn left north 1 1/2 miles to entry Su etio II err Lake Turn(left) • P astla e• enderson k Follow signs to Sales Office rondervu�No ten DVX Telephone 1-970-785-9347 Leyden \I mantle- 1 Z' Ada �Cy)y 1 y lack Hawk 1I f s �.Vvans „ Edge La _49-�amum ter U er Gle d le , 11 Su van12:1 , erg nn Park son s ride • 2 nst i,--^.,, _� =—� �' ti �3 G e vma" " ew. urlllk TIM ONT Pulliam .z ' mbert JFe dens Lpb, Valley ?ant mem - -IIC• • Conifer Parke _ l L-k- When you come to ,at Saint V ain Giant Me f .rich N tea"' ton Pelican Lake Ranch, `� ,set/ I you'll come to call it home. �f�l x ' f CR32 4,,-- " HWY66 ' adFmvaawez r °t _' Sales Center and Show Homes ,t,nd,d, f • „r �HWY 85 \ U Z #a Open Daily 11-5 or l �` by appointment anytime Telephone 1-970-785-9347 IPR Pelican Lake Ranch Pelican Lake Ranch 16502 Beebe Draw Parkway Platteville,Colorado 80651 1-970-785-9347 Pelican Lake Ranch is an Equal Housing Development of RE,LLC.All facts and specifications are subject to change without notice. Hello