The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About380003.tiff 11 11 t r > il ill . / ( I . 100/859 Also see 100/736 & 813 S . H . 7 SE4- : Sec 33 T 1 R 68 . 9/19/1938 (Correspondence to regarding R/W Deed 12/23/1942 Copy of deed ( unsigned . ) State Highway Department plat and description . • SW4: Sec 34 T 1 R 68 . • 9/19/1938 (Correspondence to regarding R/W Deed 12/28/1942 Copy of Deed (unsigned . ) (Refer to Deed signed by T . Caslett in 100/813 . ) State Highway Department plat and description . 1/ 6/ 1964 Agreement with S . H . Dept Project S-SG 0046 ( 3 ) a v Q + •• t *ATE�� i I cii 1 J a; �' ", � ,��iE �T � c •C.11oe a0 4 • " � !VL, . p en I,.; \ 2.,L,,t-, . - I ...„-) 2....:.-A),Icir .i:N\ j. --el il N. t4-1:. -7, ' -•--1 la e n Iran:a:a 20 2: 22 �n L-72 tt--/ ) !I a • a :.) f 4 23 �l vRA n; t 2 6 r- _ , �'1' c or- r-•- nom* �a •a j i�j , i s ' F • L •, I F„ t o° F' t 6^7 thA ft 28 1/4,...,43/ . 22 LS I 20 r \ :{ 4 m C l 4- I 4 \ , , 0 •;1 TLt iJ I/ 3: 32\ LIL 33 1 /51 ` r •35 i " sk ro t anrcrre ,,,,, I 27-74:::..- ,1 2 • A ✓tr us ter a 3 r r T Lc se R.68 W. cr,.. J w n > `: 4- " A' A • /OS°00' s'/a.' �i t D • 4 t . 0 • , ,0 0+ nx n . �� C> a t� I 3 / S 11 i . / es - , —c) • • 4/22/1964 Agreement with State Highway Dept Project S 0048(1) 5/26/1965 State Highway Commission abandoned portion R68 T1 S35 6/19 _ "` y" /'l FORM C.O.H. IB j ." 0rc LENT OF hTIGliI, 9�� AYs s.Nnz 7 DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Y ✓ STATE OF COLORADO CHAS. E. SHUMATE 4201 E.ARKANSAS AVE tC'Nit Reg' CHIEF ENGINEER DENVER, COLORADO 80222 STATE OF COLORADO May 26, 1965 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Greeley, Colorado 80630 Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of Resolution No. 1261-C, approved May 10, 1965 by the State Highway Commission, in connection with State Highway routings in Weld County. A portion of the Weld and Adams County maps which have been colored to indicate the addition and deletion on the State Highway System resulting therefrom, is also enclosed for your information and file. Very truly yours, CHAS. E. SHUMATE Chief Engineer T. . Reseigh • Planning and Research Engineer TCR:JRM:jh Enclosure cc: File R. F. WELD CO, COMMISSIONERS W1 EMLtV,COLO. RECEIVED MAY28 1965 Q��i��igiz�ls1lla�I4i6IQ ., & • • Resolution No. 1261-C Approved May 10, 1965 • RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED, that State Highway No. 7 in Weld and Adams Counties be relocated to follow the alignment of Project No. S-SG 0046(3), and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that all portions of the old highway relocated by the construction are hereby abandoned as a part of the State Highway System, effective May 10, 1955, od J `til '`0 °o3%I —1-- ell- `oa3x__ - - ..v) r 6z.Y" Imo : .c 1 a ` ns T2N. !---- �+ �—ill o��l�� I\. �I pp �,, ° ' ii el u %ir p°°`'� �° iwi C --_— �I 9 111 ,2,;(111alistikr?,,IAA:.,. .i-....,L.F4S 7,v , ' ` I /I FR'D CMerl M Igrail •C I ffiERMWARN I0 JCZ MARI, Igo op.,' I' — _ 1 o �I V I s i , D o o I GIBS' 1 w i T i■ v , CC r �I ��P' � ��ti � '7.111.r., 7 brifillin '''''--r: :III 0._... 1,,.:. ow, '• • •L; ---: I•, _ I RIFJ1,1 a -2:1°-.--.-- -----"‘? .1,1.101 , NM, , IF I 1 (i ! 0.'''/-r I —It. ..:'. . . Z__ _/1_�L1T� JJJ �I EiUEit , 0. . iI. r 4. ED. 1,811.1.--lii _Arimms i . ' I . j IM lay ' IA willgilti.r.111v ' '''. illiplp. i r°.r.rrr, ezo i-, _.,.,,c7E • o 14i,...BASE•.!Am_ _ �� ' ° - t, _ __-.- -. -B BASE 1D J1Y(FBT0 �d e llitgoml r •mom„^ I'� ` j' • - x.arp 'I VtJi rte _ e llv " I 1 iii:• �°o•. .04�r u,.; ,e i' /r_.1/((10'°m Ell \ ii•T.IS. Ea' I �m �-- .� T .m �,. - ,;! . .-gro-AT "pi!. . 3 . •=cap `�il!a�� ,-.--„;,,,-.7.444,, E!® ��`` �1 xr mx.n A Z .. zz OlYl}�jj� _-_ __ /( A i i+@ EI g ,.i 1. ' . AO,VA Pill" .' ., ›-F. frp.4.71. 11111 - IMI f. 19C 43 II 1 RRNf0fil '�a 117 , �\ I a.f f,��1 +��i�•$ IL;• L5Iflr`°5� —Il�c °°a;4,- 9.., -1----4---- 7.:�.s:� ...� ,-7..,' °vs. \ . TJ__ P ABANDOINED P0IRTI0N w .;;;,,+ •,,,,,I�,° -. ; ,,,,,,..‘•r.,,..,,,,;1,,,,,_ - cOT:^.]c C�,; o7 xJ'..PP;:_i;_.1:2 File No. 907.a � a�� ' FORM C.O.H. Ie �` O L O R-A _D �. Projects 0048(1)Sr � C .. -o- a v te ADDRESS ALL COMMUNICATIONS TO CHAS. E. SHUMATE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS Chief Engineer 9201 E. ARKANSAS AVE. E Nif s,INE s0% DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DENVER 22, COLORADO May 11, 1964 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Greeley, Colorado Gentlemen: Attached is your completed copy of the Cooperative Agreement for Project S 0048(1) , beginning at the Jct of SH 1 (US 287) and SH 7 in Lafayette-easterly to Interstate Route 25, signed by you on April 22, 1964. Please accept our sincere thanks for your splendid cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, CHAS. E. SHUMATE Chief Engineer By Yrt:(:::arear T. C. Reseigh�j?!. Planning and Research Engineer WHL:mm Attachment cc: Earl Hurt R. F. File With COI oGNIVISSI0NERS GREELEY.COLO. RECEIV ED MAY1 2 19M P.!d. atitV11►11jgl'I4lje Form PR-4-SH S Rev. 8/21/63) Project ; , S 0048(1) , County Yield Date April 22, 1964 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT entered into this 22nd day of April 1964 , by and between the County of Weld , party of the first part, and THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF COLORADO, a public corporation for the use and benefit of the STATE OF COLORADO, party of the second part, WITNESSETH that WHEREAS, The Department has constructed, or proposes to co s ruct, or provide for the construction of, a project known as Project S 0048\1) approximately 5.534 Af miles long, beginning at the Jct of SH 1 (US 287) and SH 7 in Lafayette — easterly to Interstate Route 25 on State Highway No. 7 in the County and WHEREAS, the said State Highway is part of the Federal Aid Secondary System, NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aid Act of 1950, the Parties have jointly reviewed the Geometric Standards governing the type of construction for said Project and have agreed as follows: That, the 1964 Annual Average Traffic Volume, as determined froM actual vehicular count, by the Planning and Research Division of the Department is''found to be 1250 vehicles per day. Therefore, in accordance with approved and established practices, the traffic volume twenty years hence is estimated to be 2625 vehicles per day. Consequently, the type of construction shall be that designated as Type B of the Geometric Standards dated August 1, 1952, (revised November 1, 1956) , more fully described a's follor.s• The surface shall consist of Plant Mix Asphalt , 2rr feet wide on a roadway 2/ feet wide. The maximum grade shall be 5.10 percent and the curvature shall not exceed 0 degrees and 0 minutes. The rights of way shall not be less than 125 feet .in..width,. except through the .31ownXiXiXof Lafayette where the established street widths shall prevail. Bridges and Separations shall have a design load of V Those structures having a length less than sixty (60) 'feet shall have a clear roadway width, between curbs or wheel guards, of 3/ feet• and those having a length of sixty (60) feet and over shall have a clear roadway width of V feet. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Successors and assigns of the Parties Thereto. • This Agreement is executed with reference to the signatories on behalf of the County by virtue of a Resolution passed at the meeting of the Board of County Commissioners held on April 22, 1964 a certified copy of which is attached hereto. Weld.C4unty 1.862 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Adams County 1.863 Boulder County 1.809 W E L D COUNTY Total 5.534 2/ Width varies in Lafayette. 24 feet wide with paved shoulders Chairman outside of Lafayette. �—� •--� / //, � 3/ Bridges previously constructed. Member C airman, Pro-tem SEAL Member ATTEST: THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF COLORADO a public corporation, for the use and benefit of the DEPARTMENT County Jerk OF HIGHWAYS of the STATE OF COLORADO CHAS. ESHUMATE, Chief En ineer Baer v - t. Form PR-4a-SH 3/1/64 CERTIFICATE Greeley , Colorado April 22 19 64. This is to certify that at a _ regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, held on April 22 19 64 , the following resolution was adopted: "RESOLVED, that this Board hereby approves a certain Agreement with THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF COLORADO, a public corporation, for the use and benefit of the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS of the STATE OF COLORADO, dated April 2?. 1964 , 19 64 whereby the County has reviewed and approved the Geometric Standards designated to govern the construction of a Federal Aid Secondary Project to consist of improvements n State Highway No. 7 , beginning at the Jct of SH 1 (US 287) and SH 7 3n Lafayette - easterly to Interstate Route 25 as per terms of said Agreement on behalf of Weld County by signatures of the entire Board." SEAL County Clerk - COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT REGARDING PROJECT S 0048(1) : BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that they hereby approve a certain agreement with the State Highway Commission of Colorado, a public corporation, for the use and benefit of the Department of Highways of the State of Colorado, dated April 22, 1964, whereby the County has reviewed and approved the Geometric Standards designated to govern the construction of a Federal Aid Secondary Project S 0048(1) of improvements beginning at the Junction of SH 1 (US -287.) and' SH 7 in Lafayette easterly to Interstate Route 25, approximately 5.534 miles long, asiper terms - of said agreement on behalf of Weld County by signatures of the Board, copy of said agreement is attached and made a part of this resolution. The above and foregoing resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote: i)AYES: , cLi THE BOARD OF COUNTY COSSIONERS DATED: APRIL 22, 1964 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO MB 32: 7, 2 . !. A/7 COUNTY ATTORNEY TO JOIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS PARTY PETITIONER WITH THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS . BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereby approves Colorado Department of Highways Project Number 50048 (1) Lafayette - East, which provides for the improvements of State Highway Number 7 in Weld County, Colorado, and authorizes the County Attorney to join said Board as party petitioner with the State of Colorado Department of Highways in the event it becomes necessary to acquire needed right-of-way by condemnation, it being understood that all court costs and awards to property owners are to be paid by said Colorado Department of Highways. AYES:] `ter ) /C/l ,P_ it, lea.r,7/.6c, r�q THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS ONERS DATED: APRIL 8, 1964 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO MB 32: Page.5.56 File No. 907. 1/16/64 Aikt FORM GD.X. IB •' Adh C ° LO II,R A b 0 ADDRESS ALL COMMUNICATIONS TO NTIPrwr CHAS, E. SHUMATE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ' Py 4201 E. ARKANSAS AVE. I Pf i; ' Chief Engineer N(S'�`at M DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS DENVER 22, COLORADO January 16, 1964 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Greeley, Colorado Gentlemen: Attached is your completed copy of the Cooperative Agreement for Project S-SG 0046(3) , Interchange at Jct SH 7 and SH 185 (FAI 25) Southeasterly and Easterly toward Brighton, signed by you on January 6, 1964. Please accept our thanks for your splendid cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, CHAS. E. SHUMATE Chief Engineer By L. . G( T. C. Reseigh (((JJJ Planning and Research ngineer TCR:WHL:mm Attachment Form-PR=4-SH 6 Rev. 8/21/63) Project S-SG 0046(3) County Weld Date January 6, l964 ,COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT entered into this 6th day of January 19 64 by and between the County of Weld party of the first part, and THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF COLORADO, a public corporation for the Use and benefit 'of the STATE OF ,COLORADO, party of the second part, WITNESSETH that • WHEREAS, The Department has constructed, or proposes to construct, or provide for.the constr c ion of, a project known as Project S-SG 0046(3) approximately 2.978 At ' miles-long;- Interchange at Jet SR 7 and pH 185 ,(FAI 25) , Southeasterly and Easterly toward Brighton . on State Highway No. 7 in the County and WHEREAS, the ,said State Highway is part of the Federal Aid' Secondary ' , System,'• , , NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aid Act .of 1950, the Parties have jointly reviewed the Geometric Standards' governing 'the, type of , construction for said project and have agreed as follows: . That, the 1963 Annual Average Traffic Volume, as determined from actual vehicular count, by the Planning and Research Division •of the Department is found to be 1250 • . vehicles per day. Therefore, in accordance with approved and established practices, 'the traffic volume twenty years hence is estimated to be , • 2625 . . , vehicles per day. Consequently, the type of construction shall be that designated as Type A of the Geometric Standards dated August 1, 1952, (revised November 1, 1956) , more fully,described as folloa:s. / . The surface st}�1 consist Plant MiAed Asphalt , 24 feet ' wide on a roadway 44 feet wide. The maximum grade shall be 2.8999percent - and the curvature shall not exceed 4 degrees and 0 minutes. The rights of way shall not be less' than 150 feet in width, k`NFL'tXN;hTtitighx)thlexiDcann .(.s4xxz'f XXXXXXXXXXxxxxxxxxXXXXxXxXxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXxxweavo QC4maelt mpos&metX mixt ii69Uix1XX Bridges and Separations shall 'have a design load of 31 'h'k1t ;$ Those structures having a length less than sixty (60) feet shall have a clear roadway width, between curbs or wheel guards, of - - feet and those having a length of sixty (60) feet and over shall have a clear roadway width of 44 feet. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Successors and assigns' of the Parties Thereto. ' This Agreement is executed with reference to the. signatories on behalf of the County by virtue of a Resolution passed at the meeting of the Board of County Commissioners held on Janury 65., 1964 a certified copy of which is attached hereto. 1/ Interchange connection and Detour BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS on Adams-Weld County Line. (Not included in Project length.) WELD COUNTY 2/ Paved Shoulders fr '3/ Bridge across Dry Creek H-20 5-16 - _. . ._ _ ' Z I/124e- . Loading. Union Pacific Railroad Chai man Underpass E-75 Loading. Member Jam✓.---/ .zil S E A L Member -- ATTEST: THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF COLORADO a public corporation, for the use and benefit of the DEPARTMENT \,...49_,...."._ck„, OF HIGHWAYS of the STATE OF COLORADO CounJerk CHAS. E. HUMATE, Chie- Engineer i yel-. 1,na By e.P• e- t e( Go%/—_ Form PR-4a-SH 3/2/61 CERTIFICATE Greeley Colorado January 6 19 6 This is to certify that at a rogu!ar meeting of the Board of County Commissioners of Wptd County, held on JLcuary 5 ' 19 A•T4 , the following resolution was adopted; "RESOLVED, that this Board hereby approves a certain Agreement with THE STATE , HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF COLORADO, a public corporation, for the use and benefit of the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS of the STATE OF COLORADO, dated ,,17anun x 6 19 3 whereby the County has reviewed and approved the Geometric StanclaIds designated' to govern the construction of a Federal Aid Secondary.Project to consist of improvements on State Highway No. 7 , $iBterchange`et Jct SH 7 & SH 165(FAI 251 Snnthemmterly & Easterly toward Brighton, as per terms of said Agreement on behalf of Weld County by signatures of the entire Board". SEAL ' County Clerk R- !) i �J(Q.& r (hAt aa) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT REGARDING PROJECT S-SG 0046(3): BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, that they hereby approve a certain agreement with the State Highway Commission of Colorado, a public corporation, for the use and benefit of the Department of Highways of the State of Colorado, dated January 2, 1964, whereby the County has reviewed and approved the Geometric Standards designated to govern the construction of a Federal Aid Secondary Project S-SG 0046(3) of improvements approximately 2.978 miles long, Interchange at Jct SH 7 and SH 185 (FAI 25) Southeasterly and Easterly toward Brighton, as per terms of said Agreement on behalf of Weld County by signatures of the Board, as per attached Agreement, and made a part of this resolution. The above and foregoing resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote: • AYES:7141A-e EEn,dW4 4 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATED: JANUARY 6, 1964 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO • MB 32: page ,18: cJe /4 7 0 0 74,,k5-S G o0274 (3) AUTHORIZING COUNTY ATTORNEY TO JOIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS PARTY PETITIONER WITH THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS: BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, hereby approves Colorado Department of Highways, Project S-SG 0046 (3), which will consist of improvements of present SH No. 7 and construction of Railroad structures at location of Colorado Blvd. and SH No. 7, and authorize the County Attorney to join said Board of County Commissioners—as a party petitioner with the Colorado Department of Highways in the event it becomes necessary to acquire needed right-of-way by condemnation, it being understood that all court cost and awards to property owners are to be paid by said Colorado Department of Highways. The above and foregoing resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote: di / / � /' AYES: 0... .../1-1214/,/,, / Cam. rill: l _6-t / //l(;4&9 td. .77 O., ,,.v,.l SIO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS RS DATED: FEBRUARY 19, 1964 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO MB 32: SO 1. . V ,OZ'._/ OS-SG 0046 (3) ZF Brighton -.West CHAS.E.SHUMATE �1I • �V GEORGE N.MILES Chief Engineer SN , .ME DISTRICT ENGINEER STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ' DISTRICT NO.I 3O,E.ARKANSAS AVE. DENVER 22,COLORADO February 11, 1964 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Greeley, Colorado Gentlemen& It now appears that some condemnations will be necessary in acqui— sition of right of way for the improvement of State Highway No. 7, west of Brighton, Colorado, for which we are asking your coopera— tion by joining the Department in such condemnation. A copy of the standard resolution is as follows& nRESOLUTION5 Be it resolved, that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, hereby approves Colorado Department of Highways, Project S-SG 0046 (3), which.will consist of itprovements of present SH No._7 and construction of Railroad structures at location of Colorado Blvd. and SH No. 7, and authorize the County Attorney.to join said.Board of County Commissioners as a.party petitioners with the Colorado Department of Highways in the event it becomes necessary to acquire needed right of way by con— demnation. It.being understood that all court cost and awards to property owners are to be paid by said Colorado Departmentcof Highways. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Charles E. Shumate • Chief Engineer j"Sx_b-Ci, � George N. Miles � District Engineer RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIPTION Ws13 Co. f6 . - CW4k 7/12/3' Revired..1.21.($ ..Acres, more or less �9 Fedoral.Aid.-Seoondary Proj. No 4 ` Y NAME...fiettif.. 91.J.-!.2 ra tce.e/. 644 ADDRESS221 -Kittr1dge..Bldg.,--nenmar,-.-CoJarada. Base Line Adams LOCATION: Road S. R. No , Between Lafayette and..S..R..- 185 , MELD Co. S. Boulder S:E[..'-4 Sec. 34 Twp 1-.North Range-.-68.T.--o£..tha..6th.-P.M. NORTH r 1 N • • - 4 S WA Sec, 34 1 TIN R68 W 1-- 29.5' 1 Ni n al Q ♦ N ly h y� c.,i` I N f H 0 • � iJ Z 589.5/1 W 264O.D Ft. ,R o d REQUIRED Right-of-Way to be shown in Red. N 89'5/'E 2639. 7 f�. +.: ' V MEXISTING Right-of-Way to be shown in Blue. 4 ^' g Y DESCRIPTION Scale--lira= 3-00' k V A right of way along the south side of the Southwest Quarter (SW 4), Section Thirtyfour (34) VS 0 cn flln Township One (1) North, Range Sixtyeight (68) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, and more part- - icularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest Corner of said Sec. 34, as evidenced by the existing fences, said Southwest Corner being at Sta. 256407.5 of the location survey for F.A.S. Project No. 4; Thence N. 89° 51' E., along the south line of said SW 41 Sec. 34, 2,639.7 feet, more or less, to the Southeast Corner of said SW 4, Sec. 34, as evidenced by the existing fences, said Southeast Corner being at Sta. 282447.2 of the said location survey for F.A.S. Project No. 4; Thence N. 0° 45t E., along the east line of said SW , Sec. 34, 50.0 feet; Thence S. 89° 51' W., along a line parallel to, and 50.0 feet distant from,the said south line of said KW ,1 Sec. 34, 2,640.0 feet, more or less, to the west line of said SW 1, Sec. 34; Thence S. 00 26' W., along said west line of said SWP 4, Seo. 34, 50.0 feet, to place of beginning. Said right of way containing 3.03 Acres, more or less, including all previous road grants. %:-z , -a (Previous road grants were probably 1.82 Acres, lesgving 1.21 Acres, net.) 'a 1 Recorded at =clock M. • Reception No Recorder. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That I, Thomws...G. Sigler Citof the ouun y of Denver And of State Colorado for the consideration of ......... .... .. .. - - T.wenty..Six..and..52/l00....(.=26..62).. - - - - - - - - - - - - - DOLLARS, in hand paid, hereby sell and convey to Weld County, Colorado, the right of way for a public highway over and across the following real property situate in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, to-wit: A right of way along the South side of the Southwest Quarter (SW*) of Section Thirty- four (34), Township One (1) North, Range Sixty-eight (68) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, and more particularly described as follows; Beginning as the Southwest corner of said section 34, as evidenced by the existing fences, said Southwest corner being at Station 256-07.5 of the location survey for F. A. S. Project No. 4; thence N 89° 51" E, along the South line of said Southwest Quarter, Section 34, 2,639.7 feet, more or less, to the Southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter, Section 34, as evidenced by the existing fences, said Southeast corner being at Station 282-47.2 of the said location survey for F. A. S. Project No. 4; thence N 0° 45' E., along the East line of said Southwest Quarter, Section 34, 50.0 feet; thence 8 89° 51' W., along a line parallel to, and 50.0 feet distant from, the said South line of said Southwest Quarter, Section 34, 2,640.0 feet, more or less, to the West line of said Southwest Quarter, Section 34; thence 8 0° 26' W., along said Meat line of said Southwest Quarter, Section 34, 50.0 feet, to place of beginning. Said right of way contains 3.03 acres, more or less, including all previous road grants. Previous road grants were probably 1.82 acres, leaving 1.21 acres net. The consideration herein stated is in full compensation for all damages which would be considered and assessed in any award or verdict in a proceeding under the Statutes of Colorado, to condemn said strip of land for public road. Signed and delivered this day of ,A. D. 19 In The Presence Of STATE OF COLORADO,) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me )SS. County of Weld ) this day of 19 by Thomas 0. Sigler WITNESS my hand and Official Seal. My Commission Expires Notary Public fPC)/KS Right of Way Deed. ,;7 THOMAS S SIGLER One Dollar and other good and valuable considerations less than One Hundred A right of way along the South Fide of the Southwest Quarter (Sw1) of Section Thirty Four (34), Township One (1) North, Range Sixty Eight Sixth (6th) Principal Meridian, and more (68) West of the particularly described ribeedd as follows: Beginning at the Southwest Corner of Said Section 34, as evidenced by the existing fences, said Southwest coder being at Station 25607.5 of the location survey for F.A.S. Project No. 4s Thence N 89° 51' E., along the South line of said Southwest Quarter (west, Section 34, 2,639.7 feet, more or less, to the Southeast Corner of saidSouthwest Quarter, Section 34, as evidenced by the existing fences, said Southeast Corner being at Sttion 282-47.2 of the said location survey for F.A.S. Project No. 4: Thence N 0° 45' E, along the East line of said Southwest Quarter, Section 34, 50.0 feet; Thence S 890 51' R., along a line parallel to, and 50.0 feet distant from the said South line of said Southwest Quarter (Sn), Section 34, 2,640.0 feet, more or less, to the West line of said Southwest Quarter, Section 84; Thence S 0° 26' 1!, along said Wejt line of said Southwest Quarter (Sww), Section 34, 50.0 feet, to place of beginning. Said right of way contains 3.03 acres, more or less, including all previous road grants. Previous road grants were probably 1.82 acres. Net acreage taken, 1.21 acres. .c ... - December 28, 1942. . • Mr. Thomas Cosslett 710 5th Avenue Longmont, Colorado Be:. Additional right of way Dear Mr. Cosslett: Ease Line Road. During 1938, C. 0. Plumb, County Commissioner had some correspondence _with owners of lands relative to additional right of way for the base line road, but the matter was never settled. Recently, I addressed a letter to Thomas G. Sigler relative to the right of way and we have a letter from Mr. Sigler stating that the property had been sold to you. I am anxious to clear up all matters pertaining to my office before my term expires and would like to make settlement for the additional right of way through the property. According to the information furnished by the County Assessor, your land is assessed at 155 acre" dry land, *1690; and the Board has approved payment of twice the assessed valuation for the additional acreage required for the road, or 1.21 acres $22, a total of $26.62. If this arrengedent meets with your approval, please sign the enclosed deed and voucher before a Notary Public and return theca to this office in the enclosed envelope. We will then forward you a County warrant in payment for the deed. I shall appreciate it if you can give this matter your mediate attention so that payment can be made before January 12, 1943. • Very truly yours, Fred 0. Ford, Chairman, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM{IISSIONERS, • WELD COUNTY, COLORADO &icls: 3 • Denver, Colorado December 26, 1942 • Mr. Fred 0. Ford, Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Weld County • Greeley, Colorado Dear Mr. Ford: I sold the farm, herein referred to, in the late summer of 1939 to Mr. Thomas Coslett, Longmont, Colorado. Up to the time of the sale of farm to Mr. Coslett, the County had never served me with any notice of condemnation, nor had we reached any agreement on such right-of-way due to the uncompromising attitude of your Mr. Plumb . It is therefore my opinion that I \. have no rights in this matter, but that they �� have passed to Mr. Thomas Coslett. May I there- fore suggest you contact Mr. Coslett in regard 00 to this matter. Yours truly, J� THOMAS G. SIGLER TBC/c /00/8'. 9 December 23, 1942. Mr. Thomas G. Sigler P. 0. Box 689 Denver, Colorado Re: Additional right of way Base Line Road. Dear Mr. Sigler: During 1938, C. 0. Pi, County Commissioner, hsLsome correspondence with you relative to additi 1 right of way for the "Base Line" road, but the matter was never settled. I am anxious to clear up .all matters pertaining to my office before +y term expires and would like to make settlement for the additional right of way through your property. According to the information furnished by the County Assessor, ydurland is assessed as 155 acres dry land, $1690, and the Board has approved payment of twice the assessed valuation for the additional acreage required for the road, or 1.21 acres 9 $22.00, a total of 426.62. If this arrangement meets with your approval, please sign the enclosed deed and voucher before a Notary Public and return them to this office in the enclosed envolope. We will then forward you a County warrant in payment for the deed. I' shall appreciate it if you can give this matter your immediate attention so that payment can be made before January 12, 1943. L - Very truly yours, Fred 0. Ford, Chairman,' The Board of County Commissioners, Veld County, Colorado. Bnols: 3 ;/ ., J//t"rt,`a I Denver, Colorado December 17 , 1938 Mr. C. 0. Plumb, Chairman, Board of County Commissioners, Greeley, Colorado Dear Mr. Plumb: I regret that we have been unable to come-A0 an adjustment on the twenty foot right-of-way. Have endeavored to be reasonable in my demands, even to the extent of waiving loss to me of two "For Sale" signs, and offering a' ' one time to deduct the ul5.00 for crop, which under favorable condi- tions might even produce *25.00 on the 1.21 acres taken. I now withdraw all previous concessions and accept your proposition as outlined in your letter of September 19th to put up a good steel post fence with four wires and stays. You to give us the material in fence now belonging to me. It ismnfortunate that this small, but troublesome matter could not have been adjusted earlier. Very truly yours, • TGS*E Denver, Colorado November 29, 1938 Mr. C. 0. Plumb, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Greeley, Colorado Deer Sir: Your letter of the 26th at hand. I believe that you are mistaken in saying that the statement was made that a new steel fence would be of no value to me. A new steel post fence such as your first letter indicated would of course be of more substantial material and better than the present fence, and as such a structure would, at most conservative of estimates, cost $100.00 or more, it was figured in as a part of consideration to be paid for right-of- way. I still insist on $50.00 for the twenty foot right-of-way, $25.00 for the NN)( old fence, and $15.00 for crop, and if any damage has been done for the tak- ing down, and perhaps removal, of two "For Sale" signs by surveyors or high- way crew, I expect reasonable compensation. I wrote you last week regarding the removal of signs, but perhaps in writing your letter of the 26th you overlooked this particular item. Awaiting your further advices, I am 0 Respectfully yours, D 671 TGS*H U� o ) 5 D ° off 6 cAQ v P r /0�2'-s"9 • r"1 \ ^ • • • • • Nove.•:ber• • • -11r. Thos. G4 Sigler P. 0. Box C89 • Deaver; Color:tGo• Dear Ur. Eiglert • At the Vile you called nt our Offices you indicated that inasi Mb a3 you 8 ;•adiy had i'. ;,o0d steel—post ::e.;ce around your farm, you (d ld not Cansider the ;:roposed nem fence of value to you. With this in wind, we offer you :2.B0.10 s full cerlpene.ntion for the rieht of ray rc aired b,: the State Highwery Depart.=ent for Im2ravtr:ent of the Woe—line road, for which you have been :;end a r id.t of way deed to be ca:ipleted. If this is :igreea ale, will you kindly forward the enclosed voucher rand the deed which you now have, having both the deed and voucher properly signed and ackno ledgeds to this office :.1t, your earliest convenience and a County Tarrant All _ye mailed to you. Very trury your; • C. Q. Plumb; Chairi an, ' £3 :;.D OF COUNTY CJ;l I:ZI0.UhE: � .r D i;OJleiY, LOW..: ). CDPtd • ?nc1. • • . / 0,0/ Ei Denver, Colorado November 20, 1938 Mr. C. 0. Plumb, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Weld County Greeley, Colorado Dear Sir: On the 13th of this month I visited the farm with the intention of re- painting two signs that were on the south line of my land and, much to my regret, found that the two wooden signs which were there a short time before were missing. I had spent between two and three dollars for paint materials. Upon investigation, I found that the surveyors had evidently beeneeon the inside of the fence, had staked it out and probably pulled signs up in order to make surveying easier. I called on Nr. Watts who was doing the road work, who seemed very honorable, and he informed me that he had not taken the signs. However, I believe he had a blue- print which showed that there were four signs on the premises, which is correct . One sign is worthless. Then there was a Morrison mine sign, which I believe is still there. The two wooden signs which are now missing advertised the farm for sale. One of these signs was about 2 1/2 x 3 feet , and the other about 3 1/2 x 4 1/2 feet. Mr. Mul- ford, who put the signs up, informs me that it has always been his custom to put cleats at the bottom of the posts holding the signs. It has occurred to me that nuite likely your surveyors had taken these signs down and it is possible they are keeping them to be put up again later. I certainly hopeAfor, in my opinion, it will cost from 418.00'to G2O'°2- to have signs made, lettering done by painter, and the signs again erected. If the signs were left on the premises after they were taken down, some- one has taken them away. I sincerely hope that the surveyors can give me some light on this subject. Recent inquiry as to the cost of erecting a mile of steel fencing, with, however, more substantial posts than are now on my land, I was informed on good authority would cost X450.00. Therefore, my estimate of 425.00 for the fence now on the premises would be extremely low. Hoping to hear favorably regarding the sign matter, I am Yours very t y, Thomas G. Sigler, P. . Box 689 Denver, Colorado /6i ./ Denver, Colorado November 10,1938 Mr. C. 0. Plumb, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Weld County Greeley, Colorado Dear Sir : Replying to your letter November 5, 1938, it seems to me that if the County does not want to put up the new fence as originally intended, then I should be entitled to $25.00 additional. This might be slightly more or less than the fence is worth, but probably is a fair figure. I still feel that the $50.00 asked for the road right-of-way is fair plus $25.00 for the fence. Will be at the farm tomorrow about two o'clock; If you should be in that vicinity tomorrow, would be Very glad to discuss the matter further with you. Yours very truly, /, Thos. G. S ler P. 0. Box 689 Denver, Colorado • ten K. ..,1'..! .►-.n, •. ,�: .' :;:•.7.n:��:rs.. l V. ..1.N:4.1 .',":1.1.1.71,i�1�++1.,7 :1 _._o•r: ern �4i • • e1 • • • November 5a 1958.• Mr. Thomas 4. Sigler Box 609 . Deanver„ Color:do • Dear Sirs I have : TLLuz lila:, .11: u= f€:tce to be built Lc 3tatc Departiaant win be cuu t.ruetcd only an t:c cutY: 3icie a' Section 51.• avuhero in 'i:c ixoojeot, tih'. :."iacoi tiro to be sioved and rcbuilt €,itit new po.,t t.:,' :t o. zJuixdllec.1 neocosetitry to get a .,'ubstentiai fence. • Lo the tiet .' ,.ce Ls not being built on yoax pooperty, we offer, at this time, to alloy aaseozed valuation for the ;agreeige • of ].cent taken for =4:.;itiaon:.1 ri .t of ,. V r;. trui,v yow' • -C. 0. Plnrb, t1ai2X a*, THE BOA.' G'OF Mrri i ]i ' ''ICI.i",t, . TM D C0iJ!fl, COW: . tai • • • • • • • • ,Ire 3/_ 'jt Denver, Colorado November 4, 1938 Mr. C. 0. Plumb, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Greeley, Colorado Dear Mr. Plumb: Your letter of the Second received. In your letter of October 27th you made mention of the fact that in some instances the State Highway Department is asking for more than twenty feet, and it occurred to me that possibly you wanted more than the twenty foot strip previously asked for. Any reference to the excess over and above the twenty foot right-of-way referred to any- thing in addition to the amount originally asked for, namely, twenty feet. As to any damage done to crops, I would say that I have been informed that last year's tenant had seeded some fifty or sixty acres, part of which pro- bably was along the South line of the land. However, he was not authorized to do so and, if i find upon investigation that no crop has been planted, would not of course demand any compensation.for crop acreage. I have been extremely busy and for that reason have been unable to take up various matters of importance with tenants. Mr. Morrison, the tenant who has tan acres bordering a short distance on the South line,has no crops in along the fence and I feel very sure will not cause us any trouble by moving the fence back twenty feet by approximately two hundred feet. In conclusion, I beg to state that the amount asked for is $50.00 for the twenty foot strip and the erection of a fence, as previously described, and $15.00 for crop damage. Said $15.00 to be rebated if said crop has not been seeded along the proposed twenty feet to be used in right -of-way. This is subject to your investigation, of if left with me will receive reasonably prompt attention, and adjustment a.s outlined. Assuring you every fair consideration, I am Respectfully yours, • 0 CY etS1 Jy -'i •'r�r":y:;:v.:r . .. .. ,. � es.+k',•wSfX,BS .. [.. 4..*r «�'r^Tr'Y' ,,,«-w„?Fr�m I No7emb3r ?, 10;:3, T• G. P: 0. Boot 08 Donv3ri, Colo. Dour Ir. Etglers I do not understand what you ra e atking for right of way from your letter dated November lst. It is my understti::dIng that no lane in caoesa of tvzr ty feet is ta'.:.en by the ne,7 right of may rorilirt alts. re agree to pay any reasonablo oo st of the daange to crape on tine land, but will not pay for the andOxttthbn the t:enty foot strip. Tory truly yours. C. 0. Plumb, Charms.' THE .90.CD OF COMM 'COLIIISOZONER3 ZI.D COUNTY, COW DO • fi Yl ' t d ; krei w �y'rjr 4 �, ¢yam I' r Denver, Colorado rn b • " November 1, 1938 n 11 Ud 1 I nio ' Mr. C. 0. Plumb, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Greeley, Colorado friDear Sir: Answering yours twenty-seventh, beg to advise that I had heretofore requested $50.00 cash for 20 ft. right-of-way• along south line of SW}, • Sec. 34, Township 1, No. R68W; $15.00 for each 1/4 acre or fraction thereof for any land taken in excess of 20. ft. heretofore mentioned (provided any such fractional acreage taken does not specif- ically damage the property , to . , a greater degree than taking the strip Of 20 ft. would as an average ) . On account crop reported to have been seeded $15.00 additional. It is , of course, understood that you erect a substantial eat four wire legal fence on the premises, and that compensation be paid me for any damage done and not repaired by workman. If this understanding is not satisfactory, you may start condemnation suit at once. Want three weeks time to get ready for court and jury trial. If case goes to court , I reserve the right to raise amount of damage asked. I claim new road detrimental rather than beneficial. Respectfully, TGS/CW P.S. -Delta County is much more liberal in allowance for dry acreage taken than Weld. Land is cheaper and yet they paid $255.00 for three and a fraction acres and did it quickly and without squibbling. / a ay 8's-f �.. ... ._ a .n .' .!- 74 3:`�f}5J�F•"i'"'�#., _ 9p • • • • October 10, 1938. • -Br. Thomas O. Sigler P. 0, Box 689 - Denver, Colorado. - Bat additiodei Right of ley Bale lilkso Hi Dear Biro I have your letter concerning right of way which we requested for improvement of the Base Line Hoed. I am still firm in my belief that the benefits will far exceed the value of the land taken. This is particular34y true in a case such as yours where the land is of low valuation. I find 9n the Assessor's office that your • land is assessed at less than $11 per acre. Figuring this as 70% of the true value of the land, the total valuation of the 1.21 acres taken will amount to between $18 and $18. There is mot the leeugiestina in my mind but that the valuation of the fence which will be built by the Highwey Contractor will be several tines that amount, le have received dome of deeds from miners of irrigated lands who have agreed with us in the stand we have taken. I enclose the right of troy deed with the correction mentioned in your litter and insist that I see no justification for expenditure of County money to reimburse you for this right of way. You will be given opportunity to protest your rights pi Court if you do mot see it to eis, the emelsimSidWedwi a I ea that them the saved is built you will -weer with me is the stand I haws token. Very truly yours, C. 0. Plumb, Chairmen THE BOARD OF COUNTY C1YS I8sTO 11'{i:., VELD COUNT!, COLORADO. COPid Incl. i _v' �,• f • .. P �{ L. Pµ g r October 27, 1958. ..F.`: Ir. Thos. G. Sigler sr P. 0. Dow 889 s ,. ' . Denver, Colorado Dear Sirs n i= jv We are informed that the cottract has been awarded on the Base-Line 4K:,, • Righwry and the contractor has moved his equipment to the project preparatory to starting wworka 1 • Be have not received the deed for the additional right of way along rl your property. If you have any questions or desire further information 2.!?,;1 relative to the right of way, ye shall be glad to go over the matter with your, jr • ,4 ) le find, in come cases that the State Highway Department is asking for more than twenty feet additional right of gray and r.rye are will trig to pay IA. . for the land required in excess of twenty feet, outside of the present fence s= line, at the rate of the assessed valuation. , ',, . ., If we cannot peach an agreement concerning this right of gray, we shaL� . find it necessary to start condemnation proceedings and let the settlement rest -tr..-:?,,L paneviom. let ` with the Court. As stwted in ourbenefit*tag, we believe that the resulting from the improVement of the road and the new fence are ample cam ."" her srw ' tine for the additional right of way. We have found that property o s al ' other recently improved highways are generally agreeable to sthis arrangemen Please return the deed, properly signed and ackenwledged, or let us ` ,y,.. know what your intentions are in this matter. Immediate arrangements must be made for -the right of way o that the contractor may proceed with the rork �` without interference. Very truly yours. .),,,J-,•,1,.„,,, . Co 0. Plumb Chairmen, x , THE BOARD Os COUNTY 35IOLE2,S, r -A17:i. MX COUNT!, COLO AD0 '•11,-•,... 4,. '. 1i / <;. 3 trio.. • 4 , Y Y 4 Denver, Colorado September 27, 1938 Mr. C. 0. Plumb, Chairman • Board of County Commissioners Greeley, Colorado Dear Mr. Plumb: Your letter of the nineteenth at hand. I don't think widening of the road much of a benefit. Broad boulevards are nice, of course, but as present sixty foot thoroughfare is graveled and in good condition, to widen it an • additional forty feet only adds to its cost and maintenance and is unnecessary so far as my land is concerned. Furthermore , with diverted traffic will come more undesireables, an increase in thefts, tresspassing and damage by hunters and others, and please bear in mind that my quarter section is in one of the very few highest assessed school districts in Weld County and that such school taxes have been, so I am informed, paid under protest for several years back. I would, also, ask the Commissioners to consider the uncertain margin of income due to weather and other conditions as ordinarily come from dry land. With one-half this year's wheat crop of less than five hundred bushel of inferior wheat and the small rental of buildings, with $39.00 rent unpaid, I am already $160.00 in the red for this season. Add to this taxes and upkeep of improvements and $300 to $400 for painting buildings ' every four to five years, other expenses, etc. , it seems to me that I would be cooperating commensurately and with every degree of fairness by giving the County an additional right-of-way of twenty feet along the south line for the sum of $50.00, with the understanding that a new fence be erected as outlined in your letter of the nineteenth at County expense. Mr. Mulford, former owner, informs me that he was awarded $100.00 by a jury for 99/100ths of an acre ditch right-of-way and he has offered twice that some since if ditch owner would vacate. Personally, I recognize the County can take by condem- nation proceedings, pay little if anything, claim benefits, etc. , whether they exist or not--so I must submit to the inevitable. Denver County property owners have been swindled through taxation for the Moffat Tunnel. No parcel of land is free--they pay and will continue to pay for years to come for something from which they receive absolutely no benefit. . Experience has proven that larger acreage is often more profitable and easier to get a better class of tenant where suf- ficient land is available and where some grazing land is to be had, so that I should prefer to add to rather than take away a part of my holdings. la0Q.O • Mr. C. 0. Plumb -2- 9/27/38 As a tax payer I appreciate the apparent attitude of the Board in endeavoring to keep down the cost to the County and tax- payer of all possible expenditures, but I doubt if there would be any kicks from fair-minded citizens anywhere if County Commissioners in any Co}inty should pay to farmers a fair price for land taken and erect substancial and legal fences according to law. With a . national deficit of about thirty-nine billion dollars, I don't be- lieve the farmers have received their just share. It's regrettable that we farmers have to submit to regimentation and other forms of . government regulation. This year my allotment is thirty-three acres wheat--next year, 25 acres--now can, collectively, all these things work anything but hardship? Please note that my middle initial is G instead of 8. Very truly yours , T. G. Sigler P.S. - House tenant has lease on buildings and ten acres on south line. Would have to get permission to take twenty feet for road. Imagine we would not have the slightest difficulty in securing same. • Inc. T. G. Sigler P. 0. Box 689 Denver, Colorado • /o2/837 • r Sept.19, 1930. •• • Than 3. Sigler Box 009 Dent, Colorado. Dear Sir; As a means of diverting part of the traffic south of Boulder ;emotion on Highway 87. The State Highway De at is building a road across fres Highway tee on the county lino between Adams and Weld and extending through Boulder county to State Highway 87. Construction is on a wide 100- foot right of way which helps eliminate steep sad deep scde ditches. Culvertsmand bridges are all built with the idea of per- manency and side drains and approaches left in saber-one condition. Ditches. drops and checks which nest be moved will be rebuilt and left in as good or better condition than that in which they were found. A good steel-post fence with four wires and `stays. woven wire where you now have woven wire'' will replace your materiel elsewhere.present fence. You can use the present fence We have found land owners willing to deed the needed right of way in return far the benefits to be had from such a high class road and the new feaof4 this policy has been followed wherever oiled toads have been oonstsuoted is western Weld county additional right of way needed. Property owners: on the oiled road froa lt.Imp%n West. and on the oiled road from Windsor South. as well as those on' Highway 185, cooperated in similar fashion: we could do you a double favor by building this road and at the same time paying a fancy price for your land. We do not believe that a sensible way to spend road money and believe you will agree with us. We are asking that you Page 2s 8ept.19,1938. consider what this road means to you in a financial way and that you sign the enclosed deed as evidence of your appreciation. Saoh an act on your part will make our road money go farther. Someone who can't have an Oiled road past his plate will get a graveled road. If you wish any further explanation, we will be glad to give it, if possible. We will go over .the plans of the proposed road with you if you wish. enclosed dee d, that you will cooperate by returning tbs properly,signed and acknowledged, to our office in the near future, I ash Very truly yours, C. 0. Plumb, Chaisson, The Board of Country Commissioners, 'Weld County, Colorado. • /rrya, • J/-43, RIGHT OF WAY12DESCRIPTION ld oe. ft g I • Required 1• ..(4 .).Acres, more or less Federal Aid Secondary �oj_ Np 4 Erie Colorado. NAME�E3.1[i ADDRESS Erie', Base Line • Admit LOCATION: Road S. R. No ,Between Lafayette and S.R. p185 NELD Tt Co,s. Bou`loer. • SE o Sec 33 TwP 1 North Range 68 1C., of the 6th P.M, 4. NORTH • Vi , ry i' t t ' S174 Sec. 33 t it! TIN R68 W 1 7 :4 C i r I _ . 1 . fib, M1 j h I t' ' It. a.1 4 a n i 141 .„„ ,i,$) N N ' hh 04 PI Ra e A Sjr5PW g466.8 ft • ^r„=REQUIRED Right-of-Way to be shown in Red. N 89•S/ E 24655 ft. ! a tE EXISTING Right-of-Way to be shown in Blue. DESCRIPTION Scale-1 inch= 3001 It t ! A right of way aleag the 4eath side of the Southeast Quarter (SE t) Section Thirtythrse (35) ' sit Township One (1) North, Range Sixtycight (68) Nest of the Sixth Principal Meridian. and more papt— b icularly described as follows* Beginning at the Soatlwsst Scorner of said SE }. Soo, 33. as evidenoed by the existing towel, said Southwest Corner being at Sta. 231442.0 of the location survey for F.A.S. Project No. 4j 1, Thome N. 89° 511 E., along the south line of said SE to Soo. 33, 2,465.5 feet, mere or less, to the L Southeast Corner of said Sec. 33, as evidenced by the existing fences, said Southeast Corner being at Ste, °' 256407.5 of the said location survey for F.A.S. Pro jeot No. 41 Thence N. 0° 26' E., alms the east line of said Sec. 33. 50.0 feet] Thence S. 89° 511 W. along a lime parallel to, and 50.0 feet distant Yvon/the said south lino of said SE 41 Seo. 33, 2,466.6 feet, more or less, to the west lime of said SE 4, Sett. 331 Thence S. 0° 511 E., along said west line of said SE j, Sec. 33, 50.0 feet. to the place of beginning. ' A I' Said right of way containing 2.83 Acres, more or less, including all previous road grants. •i" (Previous road grants were probably 1.72 Acres, leaving 1.11 Acres, net.). 1' 6 1j 7,/ �� -/.2 i Recorded at o'clock M. fl Reception NO Recorder. K)JOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That I, Charles J. Rini 1 o ' the County of Weld And State of Colorado for the consideration of - Thirty Night and 8 .8 5/100 ($385) DOLLARS, in hand paid, hereby sell and convey to'Weld County, Colorado, the right of way for a public highway over and across the following real property situate in the County of Weld and State of _Colorado, to-wit; A right of way along the South side of the Southeast Quarter (8 141) of Section Thirty-three (33), Township One (1), North, Range Sixty-eight (68) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, and more particularly described as follows; Beginning at the Southwest corner of sai utheast Quarter, Section 33, as end.dammed by the existing fences,11Wid Sou et corner being at Station 231-42.0 of the location survey fo . A. S. Proje No. 4; thence B 89. 51' B., along the South line of said South aa� Quarter, Section 33, 2,465.5 feet, sore or less, to the Southeast corner of sa Section 33, as evidenced by the existing fences, said Southeast corner being at Station 258-07.5 of the said location survey for F. A. S. Project No. 4; thence B 0. 28' O., along the east line of said Section 33, 50.0 feet; thence 8 89' 51' N., along a line parallel to, and 50.0 feet distant . from, the said South line of said Southeast Quarter, Section 33, 2,486.8lient, more or less, to the Nest line of said Southeast Quarter, Section 33; thej a South 0' El' East, along said Nest line of said Southeast Quarter, Section 33, 50.0 feet, to tho place of beginning. Said right of way contains 2.83 acres, sore or less, including all previous road grants. Previous road grants were probably 1.72 acres, ling 1.11 acres, net. The consideration herein stated is in full compensation fbr all damages which would be considered and assessed in any award or verdict in a proceeding under the Statutes of Colorado, to condemn said strip of land for public road. Signed and delivered this day of ,A. D. 19_ In The Presence Of STATE OF COLORADO,) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me )SS. County of Weld ) this day of 19, by Charles J. Rini WITNESS my hand and Official Seal. My Commission Expires Notary/Public sight of Way Deed. ba/6 / ,.4t/-// • • raa Charles J. Elzi Weld Colorado One Dollar and other good and valuable considerations less than One Hundred • A right of way along the South side of the Southeast Quarter (SEt) of Section • Thirty Three (33), Township One (1) North, Range Sixty Eight (68) West of the Sixth (6th) Principal Meridian, and more particularly descried as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Southeast Quarter SEt), Section 35, as , evidenced by the existing fences, said Southwest Corner being at Station 231-42.0 of the location survey for F.A.S. Project No. 4; Thence N 89° 51' E, along the South line of said Southeast Quarter (SF ) Section 33, 2,465.5 feet, more or less, to the Southeast corner of said Section 33, as evidenced by the existing fences, said Southeast Corner being at Station 256-07.5 of the said location Burley for F.A.S. Project No. 4; Thence N 0° 26' E, alongthe East line of said Section 33, 50.0 feet; Thence S 690 51' W, along a line parallel to, and 50.0 feet distant from, the said South line of said Southeast Quarter (SEt) , Section 33, 2,466.6 feet, more or less, to the West line of said Southeast Quarter (SE*) Section 33; Thence S 00 51' E, along said West line of said Southeast Quarter (SEE), Section 33, 50.0 feet, to the place of beginning. Said right of way containing 2.83 acres, more or less, including all previous road grants. Previous road grants were probably 1.72 acres, leaving 1.11 acres, atee 7�ec r-f • December 23, 1942. Mr. Charles J. Elsi Erie, Colorado Re: Additional right of way Base line road. Dear Mr. Eizi: During 1938, C. 0. Plumb, County Commissioner, ha* some correspondence with you relative to additional right of way for the "Base line" road, but the matter was never settled. I am anxious to clear up all matters pertaining to my office before my term expires and would like to make settlement for the additional right of way through your property. According 1puthe information furnished by the County Assessor, your land is assesse ' a$ 90 acres irrigated, $1530; 28 acres grazing, $90; and 40 acres dry, $400, and the Board has approved payment of twice the assessed valuation for the additional acreage required for the road, or 1.11 acres II $35, a total of $38.85. If this arrangement meets with your approval, please sign the enclosed deed and voucher before a Notary Public and return them to this office in the enclosed envelope. We will then forward you a County warrant in payment for the deed. I shall appreciate it if you can give this matter your immediate attention so that payment can be made before January 12, 1943. • Very truly yours, Fred 0. Ford, Chairman, The Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado. Enols: 3. • • 4,/ �r rNA WATMAN EASTMAN KODAKS ~ CHARLES J. 12 T '7 FOUNTEERIN PENS McMURTRY PAINTS NYALS REMEDIES PRESCRIPTION DRUGGIST ERIE, COLO., San,l,39 _192_ To the Board of County Commisioners Greeley, Colo. HGentlemen: Regarding Right of Way for Base Line Road in S. E. + of Sec. 33 T.1 N. R. 68 W. I have been expecting to hear from State highway Engineer, regarding ditch right of ways, but have had no word from him. As to payment for land required for this right of way, I do nod feel that $20.00 is a fair payment for this when other land is being given a nww steel fence , just because such land was not fenced at all. I think I should have $30.00 for land and $20,00 for crop damage. Also I wish a culvert palced near my Bast line so we will have a way in and put t171rard the new road from near our buildings and also an assurance that all ditch rights now existing will be protected. Yours Respestfully 447 . Pc • 35/- 8 • • • • Decizibor 15, 19,,}3. • Hr. Charles J. Flzi • • rrie, Colorado • ' Dear Lir: • ? 1,ir1ve not t-4:::rd ?rola you in re.A. to my letter of No eLther 3rd., in -.Lich :lc T.2-;at :;e :ould py assessed Valuz.:ti of y r Lhc; land .t u •..fired To2 1'!1$hwa y vay. Ile enclose her®,:;t_h : voucher for 323.00 'or the • .ch t of ref:,uire3, I*U Lcros. Please ..:!; 1 thi'. voucher :end return the voucher Ilue, deed o :d €. wa r Tnt '.;311 be :Aled to you. • Very truly your „ Ta r?. t? -iF e.:v:T 2 ca.c.`3: , ,«.La, COu:,.Y, ...L9.tJ....: C. 0. Plumb,• • • • • Lt7 • • Novoluber 5, 19".8. • • 11x« ;3h:::.•3.e J. i1:,f brio,, Culora;'o • • • pear sir • T haws: Zonuti w..'.ut rt:,C rZC:?; "c tCe to ':o Lu Ut by the State I':L i» ;i i)oix.:rtaccit. 'eiU be con4d-iructAyl out j on t''c South side or LleetIon 51, tlwo iers IL V.v.. irojc.ct, J4IiO5 ?C t b' !freed and robuilt uit:1 uou r.u?,:1ted um +.2ecE1op,...1r7 to get a aabutiitial ?once. • As tih:1 'novo :.craeo Ls not +le Lx c7.i .t on yol. .7!"+.�lm , ve offer, at t₹�i.. ti i t3, to ullao e.sseszed v fiat or for tho acreage of IftnA taken :ar .d i t Lotaca rich ": luny. V zr tral' your, C. 9. Pl b1 Chs.irman. tit WARD or CO ?TY CO!• t :T:}::r';, is COUNTY, CaDRAI)O :•*'—ti'�Ir.:.-- ._ .� ,.,.s., ir-^TF-MO-=-Ll ,. n :Aon,r.,-A, ,.ms'.r.,E7!wia..s T ...;,.,,, a. /�. • October 28, 19384 Mr. Charles J. Flea. Frio, Colorado • Dear ari • Te have bean infor:aed by the State Htghwiy Depart Lent that the contruct has been awarded on the Base-Line road :rd tie contractor his :loved his equipment to the project ;xeparatory to starting ''urk. '3 e have had no response to our letter Litii reference to the deed :or ad":i tional x ght of way along your property. If you have any • questions or desire fl.rthcr inforr:ation rel :tive to the right of malty, ere l;hall be glut; :o go over the matter rr i.th you. re 2ind, in :,ome cases, that the St&ite highway Department is asking for more than twenty teat additional' right of ,*may am. titre are willing to pay for the Lind required in exeess of twenty feet, outside of the present fence line, at the rate of the accessed valuation. if rre cannot reala an agreement cozicer tng this right of may, ire sall find it neces:>axy to start condemnation proceedings and let the aettlea nit rest ''i th the Court. A4 stated in our pregious letter, we believe Mat the be_:efits resulting from the improvoc;ent of the reed ^and the new .rent* ;u'e ample compensation for the additional right of way. Ve have found property owners along other recently improved highways generally agreeable to_this arrangement. Please return the deed, properly uigtied and aoInowledged, or let us oiov what your intentions are in this matter. Immediate arrange_' ,ts most be made for the right of way so that the contractor may proceed with the work Athout interference. Very truly your., C. 3. Plumb, Chairman THE BOARD OF COU N I COMISL IONF2S, uOUEi!, COLORAO. / Id, d; I;p . } Sspt.19,1938. , . ' • Mr. Charles J. 2lai 4r. .. Wrist Colorado Ji - Dear Sir! { As a means of diverting part of the traffic i4 south of Boulder junction on Highway 89. The State Highway Department is building a rood across from highway 186 on the county line between Adams and Weld 44 and eztdading through Boulder county to State Highway Y9. c•• Construction is on a wide 100 foot right of . '>, way which kelps to eliminate steep and deep side ditches. s .` Culverts and bridges are all built with the idea of per- k mammy and side drains and approaches left is ausber-ode condition. Dttoehes drops and cheeks which suet be . moved will be. rebuilt and 3s ft in as good or better condition than that in which they were found. r A good steel-post fence with lour Sires end stays, woven wire where you now have woven wire, will replaces your present fence. You can use the present fences material x' elsewhere. `; ^' We have found land owners Willing to deed the s seeded right of way in return for the benefits to be had , ; from such a high class road and the new fence. This policy . has bees followed wherever oiled roads have.been constructed in western Weld county and additional right of way needed. f' Poprerty owners on. the oiled road from Vt.Lnpton ,-. West, and on the oiled road from Windsor south, as well as �� those on Highway 188, cooperated in similar fashion. We could do you a iouble favor by building this road and , at the same time paying a fanny price for your land. We ' do not believe that a sensible way to spend road money ii / �/7cy { , . 035 -`/ fak Page 2: Sspt.19,1988. and believe jot will agree with us. We are asking that you consider what this road means to you in a financial way and that you signs the, enclosed deed as evidence of your appreciation. . Such an act on your part will make our road money go farther. Someone who can't have an oiled road past his place will get a graveled road. If you wish any further explanation, we will be. glad to give it, if possible. We will go over the plans . of the proposed road with you if you wish. Hoping that you will cooperate by returning the enclosed deed, properly signed and acknowledged, to our office in the near future, I am, Very truly yours, C. 0. Plumb, Chairmen., ISE HOARD 07 CCCFIY COJSISSIOg8RS, WAZD Coydi', COLORADO. /G' °/2 07�_ J el °Li/. ;hi/. ) /5a i,.. / �— ?.6 ! _.,cis-t- •ct� ci 6- ,c. Az"0/73 i i ,� i oy9 ' af J / g A $6 / . f Arty — 8 ,— - G - — — r°tie 1S / / L/;� a fir/ . 27 , , 3 a,' c/i.,, 3 8', 7'— . 4, si,_ . , y ,.- 6' i --- Lev — 3v 7�_ cl.� G� I (' 3c) 7 s' - _ ,-1.4, ;oUztt, ,, L� L1,r 33 —e.oK r) ?da Jnti �, � a ! 7 6.26 fine. c r art, r d / /a ii .i 5'JlQ '." I _—. IAA' #_. y r ! �� i/tea 1✓ it:a ;J ,}- • (J (I 3 g u 'U- - f t. - �3- ,_____.---- . 4, i tree W q ) , 1 a ; TU .-/ a /-/( c<Yvs, AlUtl ' I .. L it' ikia/YS/7 • !`:� 2/- 4 ^.�RINx.1�i,°,^.�.. yy,"•£ipgl�r -. �T.. ..—. ._ :r"eT2 6 i26 8 r ,O x?--ti,, .. 3, 03 - .„..c ,66 /IAN,. - /69C --- 7/ �i.`. a___, j, A, 1 i y - G f /5 cr ,.c4 - / 6 a 3 , _ . j c, 6 Q /r ti v 1 , 1 1 “ 1 3 a 13 /CG/747 �I (\ Hello