The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20031167.tiff 05/07/03 12:00 FAX 970 304 6498 WELD PLANNING 001 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE FEB 0 4 2003 rest RECEIVED Weld County Referral VIII January 21, 2003 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Melvin and Jacklyn Shubert Case Number USR-1419 -- - Please Reply By February 12,2003 Planner Kim Ogle Project A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for any use permitted as a use by right, an accessory use, or a Use by Special Review in the commercial or Industrial zone districts, provided that the property is not a Lot In an approved or recorded subdivision plat or lots parts of a map or plan filed prior to adoption of any regulations controlling subdivisions (Parking and Maintenance of Carnival Equipment) in the A(Agricultural)Zone District. Legal Part of the NE4 of Section 17, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location West of and adjacent to WCR 5;500 feet south of WCR 34. Parcel Number 1207 17 000019 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) April 15, 2003 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan 0 We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. X See eNeriaathluettareasmam403 ,G.dew: oPAA Comments: 1I4e w$-row erb+o we,t .lo-Kus wut, .�u weultC.Gi(,rc4o .tet 92��.{' fifes �Lu's'letteGscafesp uer� Sad ,'f (v .�zU u lw / 'T/�,. Tows. ",yula� 4,, Signature ,i(.e,t 4.a.e t' D. Fs ck4,Gw a4 '�ayvr c Date 1/21/03 Agency les'WY1 41441-40t ,Q.e�a.uttisfrQ-'f07' 11 i-. +Weld County Planning Dept 01555 N.17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 6(970)3046498 fax RECEIVED JAN 2 3 2003 EXHIBIT 2003-1167 P2 # 05/07/03 11:58 FAX 970 304 6498 WELD PLANNING WI)001/001 • Weld County Planning OFFICE Department a • MAR 6 2003 (//i RECEIVED • Weld County Referral February 10, 2003 C pF;rr.n R.n VFR 1 2 znnl COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Conine Lewis&Troy&Kristl Case Number USR-1421 Miller Please Reply By March 12, 2003 Planner Wendi Inloes Project A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a single family dwelling unit(other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20A) in the A (Agricultural)Zone District Legal S2 NW4 Section 20, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location East of and adjacent to WCR'3; Ya mile south of WCR 32. Parcel Number 1207 20 200094 The application Is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) April 15, 2003 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan XWe have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: Signature FiLCI�l� CGo �tltlrk Date Ag /,,yJ 2003 AditAgency 0 rnlyt iltil}�Y'R7�y�.' ,..-, *Weld County Planning Dept *1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO,80631 3(970)353-6100 ext3540 3(970)304-6498 fax 4 EXHIBIT 7- re.*bog St. Vram Valley School District March 10,2003 Monica Daniels-Mika,AICP Weld County Planning Department 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO 80631 RE:Mitigation Agreement with LifeBridge Christian Church Change of Zone {Situate in Section 5,T2N, R68 W} } Dear Monica: Pending approval of the above application by Weld County, this will confirm that the St. Vrain Valley School District has reached an agreement with Lifebridge Christian Church,evidenced by the signatures below,in regard to the donation of mitigation funds to address the lack of school capacity for the Lifebridge PUD subdivision. Lifebridge Christian Church has voluntarily offered to mitigate the impacts on the capacity of the Skyline feeder secondary schools with a$1466 per unit payment on all single-family units. In addition, should the senior housing not be restricted to eliminate future students this housing as well would be subject to the mitigation fee volunteered by LifeBridge per the attached schedule. This mitigation essentially solves the issue of exceeding the school benchmark by providing the funding necessary to add classroom space or help construct new schools to accommodate the expected student yield from this project. In reliance upon the expected receipt of these funds prior to or at the time of the recording of each final plat for units within the subdivision,the School District will not recommend denial of the project at this time. This agreement therefore,supercedes any previous recommendations of denial made by the School District. The cash-in-lieu of land dedication fee of$645 per unit shall also be provided in conformance with the school land dedication policy already established between the County and the School District. As indicated above,the mitigation payments shall be provided for all units in each final plat or filing of the LifeBridge PUD subdivision prior to the release of any individual final plat for recording by the County. Any future changes or variations requested by the developer on the standard mitigation calculation and payment schedule would need to be considered by the School District Staff and/or the Board of Education. This could include evaluating the possibility,but with no obligation,of the District deferring future payments by the developer if the necessary additional school capacity is completed prior to construction of the first unit in this project. Any changes, determined to be acceptable by the District,would be communicated to the County Commissioners and Staff in writing. Thanks for your assistance in this matter. Any further questions can be directed to the contacts and phone numbers below. Sincerely, School District: Developer: LifeBridge Christian Church Sc i` Toillic`n,AICP By. ruc Gn Director of Planning Adminy trator, St. Vrain Valley School District LifeBridge Christian Chu hEl EXHIBIT 303-682-7229 303-776-2927 Fax 303-682-7344 Fax 303-776-2902 Pe.)O3t/ ST.VRAIN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING DEPARTMENT.395 SOUTH PRATT PARKWAY,LONGMONT,CO 80501.SCOTT TOILLION, DIRECTOR.PHONE 303-682-7229. FAX 303-682-7344. File: FDB VOLUNTARY CAPITAL MITIGATION New residential development has an impact on the capacity of existing school facilities within the district due to the predictable increase in students who will reside in the development. Without an additional source of capital funding, the ability of the district to provide adequate education facilities and opportunities for these students, concurrent with the need for capacity, is severely hampered. The Board of Education recognizes that the primary source for funding new school construction necessarily must be through a bond election. However, the Board shall consider other options for obtaining funding assistance and providing capacity, concurrent with the need, including the mitigation efforts of developers through voluntary gifts, donations, and agreements. Benchmark Review Each school has a programmed student capacity number that is dependent primarily upon the number of classrooms in the building and the staffing ratio of teachers to students. For purposes of determining the availability of capacity that will provide adequate educational opportunity for students of the school district, a benchmark of 125% of the building's capacity is used. The enrollment of students beyond this benchmark imposes a significant strain on the core facilities and the daily schedule for a school facility, thus negatively affecting the quality of education that can be provided. The District has determined that once a school reaches 125% of capacity, based upon enrollment and projections expected within the next five-year planning period, a referral response recommending denial of any residential project will be forwarded to the appropriate local governmental entity. Benchmark Mitigation A developer may voluntarily propose mitigation through a gift, donation, or other means to alleviate the impact on school capacity generated by students who will reside in the new residential units. Acceptance of the mitigation proposal shall be within the discretion of the district, in consultation with the affected local governmental entity, and shall be guided by the methodology contained in the regulations accompanying this policy. Adopted: July 31, 2002 LEGAL REFS.: C.R.S. 22-54-102 St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1J, Longmont, Colorado File: FDB-R VOLUNTARY CAPITAL MITIGATION Definition Voluntary capital mitigation is the voluntary contribution of funds or other in-kind gifts, donations or agreements by a developer of proposed residential units that would assist the district in constructing additional classroom capacity. By definition, voluntary capital mitigation funds will be used for capital improvements or projects and not on operating expenditures. Method of Evaluating Voluntary Capital Mitigation Proposals Once a school has been determined to exceed the benchmark capacity and the district has commenced writing letters recommending the denial of developments in response to local govemmental entity referrals, the district may review possible mitigation options from developers to determine whether a positive recommendation to the referral may be provided. The following voluntary capital mitigation proposals shall be considered by the district in determining whether a positive referral letter may be provided. 1. Construction of a new school facility or classroom space to serve the students of the proposed new residential subdivision. 2. Donation of funds that could be used toward the construction of new facilities or classroom space to serve the students of the proposed new residential subdivision. Acceptance of the mitigation proposal shall be within the discretion of the district based on an evaluation of student impacts on core facilities and the timing of the potential capacity relief. Any cash-in-lieu of land payment or land dedication requirement based on IGA's with the cities, towns and counties shall not be considered to be a capital mitigation for purposes of this regulation. Guidelines for Determining Appropriate Capital Mitigation Donations The calculation of the voluntary capital mitigation amount shall take into consideration the following components: 1. The cost of the classroom — Standard classroom size times the construction cost per square feet, including common space. 2. Students in classroom — Standards for the number of students per classroom at elementary, middle, or high school (staffing ratio) times the 125% benchmark capacity. 3. Cost per student — Total cost of the classroom divided by the number of students in the classroom at 125% of capacity. 4. Cost per dwelling unit — Cost per student times the student yield per type of unit. Calculations would be made for each school level within the applicable school feeder area with the mitigation amount considered only for those schools exceeding the 1 of 2 File: FDB-R benchmark capacity. Any variation from this standard calculation proposed by a builder/developer must be reviewed by the Board of Education. Approval would only be granted if it was determined that there was an exceptional benefit to the district. Timing of the Voluntary Capital Mitigation Funds Voluntary capital mitigation funds, if accepted by the school district, shall be provided prior to or at the time of the recording of each final plat for units proposed within the subdivision. This would allow for the use of the funds to begin construction of classroom space concurrent with the construction of new residential dwelling units. Other methods of staging the voluntary contribution would need to be reviewed by the district on a case-by-case basis. If a sufficient revenue stream is provided for and assured through an agreement with the developer that allows the district to fund necessary capital improvements up front, the district would consider forwarding a positive referral letter. Use of Voluntary Capital Mitigation Funds The district will use voluntary capital mitigation funds that it has received as follows: 1. If funds donated will allow for the complete construction of classroom space to bring the capacity of a school up to the facility size standards per policy, the district will commence with the design and construction of the project as soon as possible, pending coordination with other building additions scheduled for the school. 2. If funds are not adequate to complete the construction of the classroom space to bring the capacity of a school up to the facility size standards, the district shall deposit the funds in a capital construction account for the applicable school feeder area. Design and construction will commence as soon as sufficient funds can be obtained either through additional developer donations or other funding efforts. 3. If the school is already at the facility size standards, the funds shall be deposited in a capital construction account for the applicable school feeder area for use in the construction of a new school to relieve the overcrowding at the existing school. Donations provided under this circumstance could be used to reduce the amount to be requested in future bond elections. 4. Funds may also be used to provide temporary capacity on a short-term basis until the completion of the necessary permanent classroom capacity can be provided. 5. If development causes enrollment to exceed the benchmark at one or more schools in a community that does not have a self-contained feeder system (i.e. elementary, middle and high school all in the same community), the funds allocated to the school level(s) within that community shall be used only for capital construction within the attendance boundary of each individual school that serves the community. Approved: July 31, 2002 St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1J, Longmont, Colorado 2 of 2 MITIGATION OF IMPACTS ON SCHOOLS - COST FOR ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM SPACE MOBILE HOMF COST OF CLASSROOM I i STANDARD CLASSROOM SIZE-SQ. FT. 1000 (Includes classroom area and associated hallways) CONSTRUCTION COST PER SQ. FT.' $ 129.00 ! ; TOTAL COST OF CLASSROOM $ 129,000.00 J STUDENTS IN CLASSROOM _ _ _ _ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 24 . STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY. 30 ; MIDDLE SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 22 STUDENTS 0 125%OF CAPACITY. 27.5 r ; HIGH SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 24.5 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY; 30.625 COST PER.STUDENT I _ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL $ 4,300.00 _ MIDDLE SCHOOL $ 4,690.91 I __ HIGH SCHOOL $ 4,212.24 STUDENT YIELD PER DWELLING UNIT ... i ELEMENTARY STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.26 MIDDLE STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.07 L HIGH STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.09 + I i COST PER UNIT FOR CLASSROOM SPACE I I ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ; $ 1,118.00 I MIDDLE SCHOOL , $ 328.36 .... _-.— _-._..I- .. HIGH SCHOOL ; $ 379.10 ; 1 $ 1,825.47 j_-_--- I _ i '-Classroom sq.ft. cost estimated for a 5 classroom addition with architectural fees and construction costs ! it o Is (n -i1 v W m ) ) ) MITIGATION OF IMPACTS ON SCHOOLS - COST FOR ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM SPACE MULTI-FAMILY COST OF CLASSROOM STANDARD CLASSROOM SIZE-SQ. FT. 1000 '(Includes classroom area and associated hallways) CONSTRUCTION COST PER SQ. FT.' $ 129.00 • TOTAL COST OF CLASSROOM $ 129,000.00 ; ' STUDENTS IN CLASSROOM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 24 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY 30 i MIDDLE SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 22 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY 27.5 HIGH SCHOOL 100%o OF CAPACITY 24.5 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY 30.625 I COST PER STUDENT i ELEMENTARY SCHOOL $ 4,300 00 MIDDLE SCHOOL $ 4,690 91 • HIGH SCHOOL $ 4,212.24 , STUDENT YIELD PER DWELLING UNIT : I ELEMENTARY STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.15 _ _ MIDDLE STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.08 I I HIGH STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.02 r i COST PER UNIT tOR CLASSROOM SPACE 4 . ELEMENTARY SCHOOL $ 645.00 { _ I j - MIDDLE SCHOOL $ 375.27 r HIGH SCHOOL , $ 84.24 I ' $ 1,104.52 • I 1 _ ... _—. lc! Classroom sq. ft.cost estimated for a 5 classroom addition with architectural fees and construction costs 11 N O W a tp m MITIGATION OF IMPACTS ON SCHOOLS - COST FOR ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM SPACE CONDO/TH COST OF CLASSROOM I STANDARD COST C-LASSROOM OM SIZE SQ. FO T. $FT. 10029.00 (Includes classroom area and associated hallways) CONSTRUCTION 1 TOTAL COST OF CLASSROOM $ 129,000.00 STUDENTS IN CLASSROOM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 24 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY 30 MIDDLE SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 22 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY 27.5 HIGH SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 24.5 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY 30.625 COST PER STUDENT j ELEMENTARY SCHOOL $ 4,300.00 MIDDLE SCHOOL $ 4,690.91 r 4 HIGH SCHOOL $ 4,212.24 • STUDENT YIELD PER DWELLING UNIT I ELEMENTARY STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.13 MIDDLE STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.11 HIGH STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.05 I 1 COST PER UNIT FOR CLASSROOM SPACE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL $ 559.00 _ MIDDLE SCHOOL $ 516.00 HIGH SCHOOL $ 210.61 i $ 1.285.61 Ca '-Classroom sq. ft. cost estimated for a 5 classroom addition with architectural fees and construction costs j 11 O IfD cr' v IA I1 ) ) ) , MITIGATION OF IMPACTS ON SCHOOLS - COST FOR ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM SPACE 2L3-FLEX COST OF CLASSROOM STANDARD CLASSROOM SIZE-SQ. FT. , 1000 _ ;(Includes classroom area and associated hallways) ! CONSTRUCTION COST PER SQ. FT.' $ 129.00 , TOTAL COST OF CLASSROOM $ 129,000.00 STUDENTS IN CLASSROOM ! ELEMENTARY SCHOOL • 100%OF CAPACITY 24 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY 30 • MIDDLE SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 22 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY 27.5 ' HIGH SCHOOL • 100%OF CAPACITY 24.5 @ STUDENTS 125%OF CAPACITY 30.625 I COST PER STUDENT I i_ !_ _ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL $ 4,300 00 MIDDLE SCHOOL $ 4,690 91 HIGH SCHOOL $ 4,212.24 j STUDENT YIELD PER DWELLING UNIT ! I I ELEMENTARY STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.37 ; f MIDDLE STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.11 HIGH STUDENTS PER_UNIT 0.08 COST PER UNIT FOR CLASSROOM SPACE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL $ 1,591 00 . MIDDLE SCHOOL I $516OO , _ i_.. HIGH-SCHOOL I $ 336.98 i j $ 2,443.98it ? 'Classroom sq.ft.cost estimated for a 5 classroom addition with architectural fees and construction costs I _ "ti o ITr (n -1 v W m ) ) ) • MITIGATION OF IMPACTS ON SCHOOLS - COST FOR ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM SPACE SINGLE-FAMILY COST OF CLASSROOM ; STANDARD CLASSROOM SIZE-SQ. FT. 1000 .(Includes classroom area and associated hallways) _ CONSTRUCTION COST PER SQ. FT! i $ 129.00 TOTAL COST OF CLASSROOM ' $ 129,000.00 STUDENTS IN CLASSROOM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 24 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY 30 MIDDLE SCHOOL 100%OF CAPACITY 22 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY: 27.5 HIGH SCHOOL . 100%OF CAPACITY 24.5 STUDENTS @ 125%OF CAPACITY 30.625 I COST PER STUDENT ' ELEMENTARY SCHOOL $ 4.300.00 MIDDLE SCHOOL $ 4,690.91 HIGH SCHOOL ; $ 4,212.24 STUDENT YIELD TER DIILIELLINQ UNIT I I ELEMENTARY STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.3 MIDDLE STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.16 HIGH STUDENTS PER UNIT 0.17 I COST PER UNIT FOR CLASSROOM SPACE ; ' __ - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL T$ 1,290.00 MIDDLE SCHOOL - I$ 750.55 I I _ _ , HIGH SCHOOL j $ 2,756.63 _ I Classroom sq. ft.cost estimated fora 5 classroom addition with architectural fees and construction costs I I 91 bri cn N m 0 W m IN REGARDS TO LIFEBRIDGE MEGA-COMPLEX X -1 Vii; I: 0? Fes :, - _) Robert and Victoria Schnepp 11723 Beasley Road Longmont, CO 80504 Copies To: David Long Rob Masden Bill Jerke Mike Geile Glen Vaad r 11EXHIBIT U IPA #/coy r We are currently residents of the Elms at Meadowvale Subdivision east of Longmont. When purchasing our home in 2000 for possible retirement we wanted a quiet, spacious place with good views (at an increased premium), and a safe place for our grandchildren to come and play. We are sure many of our neighbors purchased their homes for like reasons. Many of them are willing to commute up to an hour each way every day for this kind of neighborhood. When purchasing our home we inquired about the future of the vacant land to the west of us. We were assured it was residential, but we were told that it could include a church. We had no problem with a church, feeling that they would make good neighbors. We were not, however,prepared for the prospects of Lifebridge. We have since learned that this expansion project has long been opposed by Longmont and Boulder County. Longmont has expressed concern over the scenic quality of entry into the city, which is one of the most beautiful along the Front Range, and the Department of Transportation's studies of the traffic and congestion along Highway 119,to no avail. Also,the requirement of Weld County's mixed-use development and planned unit development standards requires that any proposed building should be compatible with existing development. However, Lifebridge has stated that they do not see church as just one hour on Sunday and that is why they are proposing this Mega-complex, although many other churches offer some form of worship, outreach ministries, and activities throughout the week without requiring this size of a complex, and while remaining compatible with the existing communities. The dictionary defines a church as"a building set apart or consecrated for public worship." We fail to understand how such things as a dinner theater, athletic facilities, and commercial spaces meet this definition. Lifebridge has stated that they plan to finance this venture by member donations (with prospects of recruiting 15,000 members), leasing space in the commercial area, (possibly to Aims college), and selling homes for profit, as well as selling the front acreage area. However, we see all of this buying, selling and leasing inconsistent with the conventional idea of a church. This has taken on the aspects of a business venture of a large corporation headed by a CEO. We want you to know that we have a deep belief in God and all the beauty that He has created. We are appealing to all those people who will vote on and approve this projected mega-complex development to first ask themselves this question: "If I were in these peoples places, where my neighborhood was being threatened by loss of safety, increased traffic, visual and light pollution, and endless construction, as well as possible decrease in property values, would I vote yes to all of this?"Or just be glad it is not in my backyard. Since Glen Vaad, Weld County District 2 commissioner is a member of Lifebridge and has recused himself from voting,we,the people of District 2 are left with no representation in what is in our best interest. Robert and Victoria Schnepp I I IISI .1RI ('O\1I'.\ I.1iI I ('I IL R( 111.S p ErcbYP .�>,r ,+"". 'S''R •.. yj 1 diJ` ERR �•M1� fM 4 � Sp �£,T�1Ito ` . �t THIS IS A MEGA-DEVELOPMENT ear, -•q ^ Y i x. J w'F+a Ma On '7.... yJsy • 4 M e...i ^'Ldp(-4e Y ,_10- N.s.a+< l+Y+ .--, a �� r r _.ar. t i 4. ` `-may Taw;"4' r ` '4 A41414- zYJs♦ '"" 9R4...._ 4 • , _war kAr.tCCKK��s*e :a.' I se- pa_�+ ° v i T ' ry.i a1� —1500 seat outdoor amphitheater —attached/single family homes —6000 seat auditorium —neighborhood center —2500 seat indoor dinner theater —luxu homes IIaIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIN r"^ TOWER OF BABEL I 44:44k atiM � �4Y a4f%Pi i x ' E e Vf}a � d f vM RrN+ :. iii gyp - rd",. '.a , is 'Me building of the Power of Bahel hp Pieter nruegel 1563._Imp/www.lowereotbahel coin/ "Then they said. 'Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the sky. and so make a name for ourselves, otherwise we shall be scattered all over the earth.' The Lord came down to see the city and the tower that the men had built. Then the Lord said: 'If now. while they are one people, all speaking the same language. they have started to do this, nothing will later stop them from doing whatever they presume to do." Genesis 11 4-6 Map of Surrounding Area - Source Rand McNally 2001 -2002 X - Location of PZ-1004 i cu O �` n. )Mull an ... . ,..roResanc h / ' a"iew 80542 Mead • a ril e. Ca 01 I } ( iiB d ' I 1 gg t `7 I ©Mepsco,Inc. - —' I i e�Pl A—_it- ._ Faster! Sanborn € Reservoir Wheeler 4H mm's Reservoir ® m�wr. Lake Soso ` I 1 I Z5 -f_I r 31 ` • Vitt# © 36 • ate. ' ! ( E 0 1/4 1 Mile rikriT i T 3 N QaI ONE - _ is T 2 N TZN -' 3 ,..,If t2 ,} if Course C-7,"' 80504 ono,/Club m 4 PAR ent 4-1 : ..[ice , W max. R 0 '/a 1 0 k 1 0 'd 1 Mile _ - 119 i ,�. 9d l f._,_._� Aj Q l - - �� 80621 • .__ _ /4ca " FIRE it O,.t {: p Mgr FR �,666 �n a ake � _ LtJ4, - EXHIBIT il 80530 Frederick) 80'5y30 ' ii ` �. q. _ .�.... I _. __• PP M' iWq Firestone reply Frederick ederick reply iL it . i. }.-4 =4s: ar I'" �. '.. ' i _. 0. i�'.7i:1 e.,'.1!:: . jtiki—tif 's TOWN OF FREDERICK 1 ,71.Nw ' alpil Weld County Referral ! •a•r :'•t' 'c..PC' 'i: VP,'4 7. • `licit 43} • G R,EI3F RICK.CO 805343 i priook4t ,,3011 E.I3 ,2388 • 144 c x01ti 83,1,381 7 COLORADO • 1i., 2.1'4 1 apt .. ,a . --• L,:•^ ..7.',0 NO—er.of%':i' »_ .5-en:?ces'AA•4i,8L'8!t1".t'it?47W1.,n;t sz. tiE y,:]♦+ firm ..;-. jb,.trrh $:.:,-.$,..-.5.-:. .i.3^ ;:a"-xr. -c, se 1 .O0, -i,•1 Na • :Nr!Qi = , a•. %EEC NCI RESPOND AGAIN, "-- !Crr+:.,..#0 I S JeTT P4erc NEW HEARING r. t r I I 7ATE 'rhe Town r s•web•r;''r, nv.9 n, :••'. •rtr i,.:-,.;.ir.:e',t-::srs f..r they I 3 Walt C'hurel; We wan_ $ - , ;0 t:fitonwihh• . &,. I r' '-.4e, a.-17:1••••'Cr• a Agric:$1u-a:M'4..0 veT:.[E)E.4Y,F•:(R-'s Low . t ---c;‘a.-..ef,'s*s•.'11Y• ‘7,..$dx Res,cio t f"4...r Medium:�.3Yrst,Res i ontai: R-' .•1v! s -#. r,� i_e.,-c,:.:etlt5,,sSr`.d: 4.,:•,"" �:ye-c. :.-.-- •••ac: and :i•) �.t ocat�'errttlY7l3 . .r,. :@:'f4;1.•'VT,a x•.pure.-•Soo:on.` `.`-'s R68ti,tit of t^Q iD V.i, eie r....t..4,elly, / jlr.t,s �� . e ..::: =` $.v$.v :.•a`iamr- v)4'...R 2a 'w!'i`i'+`ame 4.0.-ert tot 1'•if:%%N tt of ao0 ad0soork 2i7c'Buis i µ qrt t! A'd:`•w CS a4C Mayur Ps.-* -itA _ Llce:;•'',1imp.-a1; , - ,a•acswece4. t_ial.sx006::.715 wwwwwww. ':4 a O -stet:r-s a:--"• n c ?rut.•„r.-0,,t ';c:"i*-cps, •a. Arsy oor•evsots 0'eecl rMiter hi -'PL Gbleader 1) •+l,-.u-^; t 'P.,9 i®,.riks .M:.,''' Se .-.4o L Pca.i-Y1 spI- 81, tNawt we wed hats ittl bat we •'.i*'jofea fi,-$ ;:.:'': : t:k - : u"corn:'*_ user A,:Y resoo..-44--+t recess:bids"or or.Vii oats May 80 dowse*w' e A .. A ``tRi-*wet.r...1 t^!:?r '^•alt.0-!`atsres!N moss -f v0u hews any'wrier q uest els regentWatespplestien, .. WOO County Ptanninq C orrrnl:s'on Hearing (f Apri122,2402 at 9:00 sin., .. , • • . . : , . appilcablei Southwest Weld CatnpliK 420SWCR24M Longmont,CO J i'VP.'73'...?,Th,T wow:.',e Polize•g and fi a fh at#does/doOs'^t:2:Jip1}'vilth our R r enShe Piav1 _ J .3,.. ,..;.+a If:- w-"c'tP- "1►-•4 ..e erg!Ind n..,x►<<fi Ott Car WlereS t. Ale ar.a:- is :s'rrr i. I1 � r- GA ' I .'1 A r�•`..r V _ 1: t iC f J, 3 414. J 0 4,1 i.. -:; .J? `fig ` '.... ._. ;,0ii• _ .'' '•••...., :tea ':., '4.01 a••W. 79,+�s,1 Anwar} (X? [}t1Cyj1 e, 1$4-410rrli�SM? $ '1 ,,, n 1 1 EXHIBIT I w•_. fi L, 14047 lait M.U.D.D. Map Published by Weld County In existence since before 1990 ??? 'l Th-aC;s Lake ri e. '�, ice . , a f ei :, s .as q� ilitriligat:.A\ 14 Res. \ ' '- '`+. a ,, 19 10 )\ Jit ,; :f 24 10 Oa.OS N. il 1 I \\‘'. : 11 Fos \ r ,,,,33: 1 30 s0 ,� sa Rs ~ \ P �► a \soselLa(1 �i ��ndbnr , R� � . WO t ,� .aa fair I._--,rt c S I / s S '\ • •\ —� &elrhs lake ' w'� 3= • 1 ) r(Union Res. \ i , _ i €. • ..:-6:41011411 IN lati /i '�--Wilin-_, i' ric,r,aa- Ns � }'fir, "�I� III;•• / 6 1 `-_ IP PA ,.tDF / scar. .� • I ''.7.,. -4 .,. 1'1.'1. ViDr:cf, •.,77,.. "frnr 4,- If° .'"., --— . — '41% • 12 y 7 r-A." -.""--11443X0r. I'', ...-F-7 ' j / l- ' - • .5.p. k......_,....... ,, .,,, , , . !e is + J i , I r `ti .. , • 1 , iik_._,„40 Ai, li: ........._, ... L ki,si‘ , .C.a. DIS is ► armg\l/ r R F—LJ-1 Legend 0 1500 3000 Feet —25 MUD Arae Boundary r j with. site Faccm.— Land Intemity &\\ Town/City Amaatiome MEEmployment Center— High Intsuity ME Regional Park County Boundary '., a Ragland Commercial — Radium in Edging Rood r F r'es+slty �'1 Corumnlly Pak Proposed Rood a i i 6 r g Li .1 _ \."N MtasTatirf Canter— tower tntens ty ,p'1 N hood Park Regional T^°t Syetern �rno ins Ra I Li\ TrondR Carter Other CanmuuRy Trail A RadicesLb s of Hietaria/Comrnurity Canter 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan Map 2.1 Structural Land Use Map SIFT 1. 2001 luilding 90 f mock p as see from th F aim di Location and foot print size taken from phase one filing one in application. This is a mock up and may be slightly larger or smaller than actuality. Elevation of grade is an important variable. The 90 foot heights will tower over the already existing residential communities. Pictures such as this could have been provided by LBCC and their consultants. Mock ups like this could also show how 90 foot buildings will be visible from a wide area from CR 1 to up and down the 1-25 corridor. i t v-es yew,sms t % �.,' }'? ` .x.. �Air p rbil 4,44 i p l :x# r. ,.' AN ',t 9 1'' ', l' i q! ,I :qea fht� .m�gn.�sx.wvM F&�.' ,+-�•_-•.e,+mwa.. ,.fit K� _.,..u..r, "k""„ _-- `± . .t I..6 _ .. � -�. e-i ---831- ..;s °* ` °` ' +`::, „o-xt ',rv.' m*, a°, at a Po� .,� .xe.=......x_ :.. ...... _..:��_ ; ,�. . �, .�°'.*� � ,� F.; -.ryr i .,.e4':: +3R:.....:..r. .. ....„ s ^ i5a.,.: i9T „..„.:.w„ ":.:'.rF Y.s ' '{ }Y,tr >R ^�LTx �.. ,: ..,.,.. m,w .- aa.._r.-�r^_a.+a s— .°'S : .;. .. um,. ,. Notice the semi-rural low density of this community. Most of these houses were built about or more than 5 years ago. 7W , LAND USE APPLICATION \ SUMMARY SHEET LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHANGE OF ZONE milk COLORADO April 15, 2003 PRELIMINARY DRAFT# 6 CASE HEARING DATE: March 18, 2003 NUMBER: PZ-1004 Continued to April 1, 2003 Continued to April 22, 2003 PLANNER: Kim Ogle APPLICANT: LifeBridge Christian Church : do Tetra Tech Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc., 1900 South Sunset Street, Suite 1-F; Longmont, CO 80501 REQUEST: REQUEST:Request for a PUD Change of Zone from (A)Agricultural to PUD with (E) Estate; (R-1) Low Density Residential; (R-2) Duplex Residential; (R-3) Medium Density Residential; (R-4) High Density Residential; (C-1) Neighborhood Commercial and (C-2) General Commercial and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses in the Mixed Use Development Overlay District LEGAL: Lot B of Recorded Exemption 1389 and Part of Section 5, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of& adjacent to Weld County Road 26; north of& adjacent to Hwy 119; west of and adjacent to Fairview Street ACRES: 313 +/- PARCEL#: 1313 05 000054; 1313 05 000060; 1313 05 000062 and 1313 05 000066 POSSIBLE ISSUES SUMMARIZED FROM APPLICATION MATERIALS The criteria for review of this Change of Zone application is listed in Section 27.6.120 of the Weld County Code as follows The Department of Planning Services'staff has received responses from the following agencies: Weld County Code Compliance referral received 12-30-2003, 2-12-2003 Weld County Attorney's Office referral received 12-31-2003 • Weld County Sheriff's Office referral received 1-8-2003 • Mountain View Fire Protection District referral received 1-9-2003 • Longmont Soil Conservation District referral received 1-14-2003 • St. Vrain Valley School District, RE-1J referral received 1-15-2003 • State of Colorado, Division of Water Resources referral receiveo 1-15-2003 • St. Vrain Sanitation District referral received 1-16-2003 • Weld County Department of Building Inspection referral received 1-21-2003 • Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment referral received 1-27-2003 • City of Longmont referral received 2-6-2003, 3-12-2003 • State of Colorado, Division of Wildlife referral received 2-8-2003 • State of Colorado, Geological Survey referral received 2-11-2003 Weld County Department of Public Works referral received 2-21-2003 • Oligarchy Ditch Company Agreement received 3-3-2003 • State of Colorado Department of Transportation, Traffic referral received 3-3-2003 & 3-6-2003 • State of Colorado Department of Transportation, Hydraulics referral received 3-7-2003 • Town of Mead, referral received 4-11-2003 IEXHIBIT , LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 1 1 x Preliminary The Department of Planning Services'staff has not received responses from the following agencies: • Left Hand Water District • Boulder County Department of Planning & Engineering • Great Western Railroad • Long's Peak Water District LIFEBRIDGE CHRISTIAN CHURCH PUD,PZ-1004,page 2 IE •ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER i I. cAL ! WEDNESDAY, APRIL 23,` 2'o(1a 1 • r,, ♦ 2 EXHIBIT pte q. s lA.} • ^ y . •F tit wz _ xqqy * + Fly . • e't 9 44?0` 3'14. F •i. .. {¢y}' Y .43 TVA f" Y `..', 41•4‘..•i*.u' 4 .t X..' -- .y ; f ,, - -, .•, . a,rr. w F ANDY TEMRI..ETON,FOR THE REGISTER SEEKIN: SERENITY: Stacy Schotro and her 6-year-old son Bradley stand next to metal shutters the family installed in`ts I Costa Meld home to block tight and sound from neighbor Trinity Broadcasting Network.TBNtap• ng bid1 denied By JOEL ZLOTNIK Costa Mesa council rejects broadcaster's friend cif the �=.ty t But) any. THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER thing that got.s on outside is _--- request to tape outdoors, pleasing not,c•ompatibin‘v;th the neigh- COSTA MESA • tact' Scholrn spent ,neighbors who want peace and quiet. ho,rh:,nd." S rho ,i,..1 ion delighted some $4,000 on metal seen- world. On Tuesday at the net- The City Council Pt}riv retitilent.ln tll neighborhood rity shutters to block work's headquarters she had a Tuesday morning stepperl in south of Tl<N. :, -tone's throw I _ out the light and sound visitor take a Polaroid of her in and voted unanimously to re-- front t In `fan Diego (T-405) 'tom her bedroom window front of the Virtual Reality ject TRN's request to tape Freeway A T1>N official,bow- j _hat emanates from her neigh- Theater. outdoors. The council said ever, said the city has over- bor, the Trinity Broadcasting Neighbors say their peace TBN's permit allows taping . stepped its authority and is i.n- Network. lind cruet are at stake. Offi- only indoors and that's how it fringing on the network's Marcia Special journeyed coals from the Christian televi- should remain. constitutional rights. il from Denver to witness the sion station,which reaches 90 "I'm a fan of TIIN and ev- The most .e:cal neighbor., i splendor that TRN founders million [.';S.i S.view..r., say their crryt'hir.�� it's ► t' o � ,. wall n. (n>:,' ,oil�C'. +1'}'St!J•i.,1;::�: ':9i'w'•`` Zl:ii-E!a ANDY TEMPLETON.FOP THE REGISTER SEEKING SERENITY: Stacy Schofro and her 6-year-old son Bradley stand next to metal shutters the family installed in its r,:osta Mesa home to block light and sound from neighbor Trinity Broadcasting Network.TBNtaping bid KY JOEL ZLOTNIK Costa Mesa council rejects broadcaster's friend of the city (But) any- THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER request to tape outdoors, pleasing thing that goes with the e is not compatible neigh- COSTA MESA • neighbors who want peace and quiet. borhood." tacy Schofro spentS The action delighted some $4,000 on metal secu- world. On Tuesday at the net- The City Council early residents in the neighborhood rity shutters to block work's headquarters she had a Tuesday morning stepped in south of TBN, a stone's throw out the light and sound visitor take a Polaroid of her in and voted unanimously to re- from the San Diego (1-405) from her bedroom window front of the Virtual Reality ject TBN's request to tape Freeway. A TBN official. how- that emanates from her neigh- Theater. outdoors. The council said ever, said the city has over- bon the Trinity Broadcasting Neighbors say their peace TBN's permit allows taping stepped its authority and is in- Network. and quiet are at stake. Offi- only indoors and that's how it fringing on the network's Marcia Special journeyed dials from the Christian televi- should remain. constitutional rights. from Denver to witness the sion station,which reaches 90 "I'm'a fan of TBN and ev- The most vocal neighbors, splendor that TBN founders million U.S. viewers, say their erything it's done," Council- whose back yards share a wall Paul and Jan Crouch have cre- religious freedom shouldn't be man Gary Monahan said."I've ----- ated to spread prayer to the compromised. always considered them a SEE TBN • PAGE 2 Conditions for outdoor taping In November, Trinity Broadcasting Network applied for a permit to tape outside. The Planning Commission voted in March to postpone any decision for nine months. TBN appealed the delay to the City Council. The council early Tuesday denied TBN's application. Conditions originally proposed for outdoor taping by the Planning Commission: • • Buses must leave The "million The use of heavy j the premises by 10 lights" display, equipment y outside is only p.m. and would not left, could only allowed from 9 a.m. to 6 be allowed to park be lit from p.m. near homes. • Thanksgiving All activity on the Exterior lighting A• +4 week to premises would end would be adjusted T Jan. 15. at 10 p.m. to avoid shining in �,�,�+� e1. neighbors lfx- • b' t d :;I It would have to Taping could occur weekly be turned off on Thursdays and another windows nightly by 10 p.m. 20 times per year. :003 . ORANGE COUNTY / FROM LOCAL 1 TBN: Lawsuit not ruled out FROM PAGE 1 Neighborhood faction said he had no record the let- ter was of theiiikkolv: ter was ever received. with the TBN parking lot,said Trinity Broadcasting Network ' ,', ,„.*.:.i..44" :-.,, Casoria said he hoped to they have endured buses rum- in Costa Mesa opposed its avoid any legal action by tiling past their homes after plan to tape its religious agreeing to conditions on the 10 p.m., honking car horns, programming outside. outdoor taping. bright lights from the tapings "My goal is to work without and the"million lights"display ee lawsuits,"he said."We wanted that adorns the palatial build- .,,,„,_ :; �„ �.,'*� '� .. �'S"� to work within the city's sys- ing. -n , tern." Schofro, whose bedroom •' But he didn't rule out a law- 1 overlooks TBN, said she in- " ' i :� :: suit that could be filed by a 1 stalled the electric shutters to 40 '. . . 'A r third party. He said TBN has ensure a good night's sleep. ° �;� 16-',..4X, , been in contact with the b She said Tuesday that she's a 7 VatKIX4" y ga American Center for Law & a resting a little easier knowing 73 - s-1 , , Justice, which sent a letter to h the City Council is standing k�," � ; , :� the city cautioning it against p behind neighbors, but she '- restricting TBN's activities. G doesn't know how long it will The Register City attorney Tom Wood I- last. shouldn't be contained by its foot ornate building that said reasonable restrictions , v "I do believe (TBN) will al- walls."I've always seen this on neighbors likened to Caesar's can be placed on TBN without ways be on a mission to get TV, but 1 just couldn't imagine Palace in Las Vegas.The corn- violating the Religious Land i what it wants,but this is a big ... this is past amazing grace," plex, open to the public daily, Use and Institutionalized Per- c step to get some peace and she said. is called Trinity Christian City sons Act. i quiet for our neighborhood," Casoria said the emotion of International. It houses the Casoria said TBN's pro— c Schofro said. the neighbors held more Gold, Frankincense and gramming is seen on every TBN attorney John Casoria weight with the council than Myrrh Gift Shop, a virtual-re- continent except Antarctica. 1 ..id that recognizing the need the facts. "The council basi- ality theater, a dining room Network officials will travel to i to be a good neighbor,the net- cally closed their eye?: and and TBN offices including China this summer to try to 1 work was open to placing con- ears to four months'of in- Crouch's 8,000-square- open the door for broadcast- ditions on outdoor taping. For vestigation by their own(plan- foot executive suite. ing there. nine months he said they have ners). TBN's original permit, is- "We have countries around been working with city staff City planners who viewed sued in 1996;requires that all the world that invite us-to and neighbors to come to a so- outdoor tailings earlier this activities be conducted inside come and build TV stations, lution.Paul Crouch declined to year found'diet`would have"._Lie building. but we can't get cooperation r comment. minimal impacts on the neigh- In 1999,the city sent a letter from the city of Costa Mesa," Special, who said she was borhood. to TBN asking that the net- he said. called by God to make the trip TBN tapes their flagship work apply for an additional to TBN, wasn't familiar with program, "Praise the Lord," permit if it planned to tape CONTACT THE WRITER: the outdoor taping dispute. live each Thursday from the outside on a regular basis. (714)445-6696 a But, she said TBN's beauty studio in its 65,000-square- TBN attorney John Casoria or jzlotnik@ocregister.com E h SURFING COMPETITION POWERS UP c .' E t, f � t` P - l n a fR✓Qam.<.. "� u a F ..,,i a _ s.�.. a n i� 9 � �sl � • r d r Kau„..._ a Li `1 ,_ Ica., v t { vrd�� Sta.c_ Z T v 1 ( 1Z J ;v • Local 4 Thursday,Feb. 6,2003 ORANGE COUNTY / DEATHS { TBN seeks permit to tape shows outside City officials will watch one tonight to , ' # r a q MORE INFO see if neighbors' objections are valid. w '.--. -' I , k1 ' '. ' The Planning Commission will 1 ' i== S ,° s'.r , o : 4 y4,,;,.Mra:;%''' meet at the Trinity Christian �... ° <! Center, 3150 Bear St., for the By JOEL ZLOTNIK hibited on the site next to the +° % "t 7 p.m. taping. THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER San Diego (I-405) Freeway > Y i -_ "We can only imagine if they � COSTA MESA •City officials are get their permits what this will `I ,*, .y ' '` j � sunsets give the program a dif- set to gather under the stars turn into," neighbor Stacy t, �- ', , ,« ferent look and feel,and it reg- tonight to watch a Trinity Schofro said. mo ° -� 4 - isters quite favorably with our Broadcast Network taping, Trinity officials said they ,.. Sr -- A. i . .. viewers and parishioners" hoping to see if the outdoor would expect to tape about 20 ...yam- ,I, a & ti - Because of neighbors' corn- program fits with the neigh- programs a year outside and -^•",.r- 5."". `r. plaints, the commission also borhood's character. that it wouldn't affect the will review TBN's operating Some residents oppose out- neighbors. "The reality of the r permit. door taping,saying the Trinity situation is that the fountain in "It's the same as if it's a ho- Christian Center - with the the plaza makes more noise CHAS METIVIER/THE REGISTER tel or shopping center," said lights, tour buses and outdoor than putting on the program," NEIGHBORS: Diane Dorrien and Lars SIvrinq are among those commission Chairwoman Ka- music - already intrudes on said John Casoria, TBN at- objecting to Trinity Broadcast Network taping shows outdoors. trina Foley. "We want to come their quiet neighborhood. torney. up with reasonable solutions ' "We go to church, but The Planning Commission gram, "Praise the Lord," Filming outside,being done to- that will allow the neighbor- church and a circus don't go was set to take up 1'BN's re- which begins at 7 and lasts night for the commission's re- hood and TBN to co-exist a lit- together," neighbor Lars Sivr- quest at its Feb. 10 meeting, about two hours, Casoria said. view, would improve the pro- tie better." P ing said. but city staff has asked that it He said the program, which gram, he said. ''4• TBN has applied for a per- be continued to Feb. 24. airs nightly, is broadcast live "We have such beautiful CONTACT THE WRITER: ri mit to tape any time on its Commissioners tonight will from TBN's Costa Mesa in- weather in the summertime," (714)445-6696 or grounds, something now pro- watch TBN': signature pro- door studio each Thursday. Casoria said. "The beautiful Izlotnik@ocregIster.com Pearl Howlett Community Park MAIL HOUSE IN THE PARK - ,-,:'.F.iiii . ,dr:N.441atilliDD", . •' r ■ � �9y. `ifill ., r 111. 62 ft• i. ,,, t._ ..' - •s,■ ,. [...:.�-Pwr.r :.°,.,•.� ,',!s-tr---1 .. 'ts + � `t Y, � M ,� � ■tllti^,w�� ■ r.�.. ��.� • r ?'. !�'; s i'. !i - ' -t 3iM2H. 'iY.ly'®'irly{rflpr tr f 41141.1* IA • �► :-.rOrs ,. W .,�. 7 ...._A1:�a..•,. ■. w a - x ''1'R': '* s. +:T iL r.. • ti .,yi[ � "� .. ..::' _..: ��^L.': •`y v �� ,f.f�r:_.' .3 � '& ..:iE`�1. :. ,:.:: ._..... _.... •,.. .,:,- :,o • .Orr },-y :'M,-�;^_��?3yi?�Ti .i-:,,; '...7.,7-'",'"' ... ... .... , ,r af�d:�.. t .r . 3._. -cf•.JP•-,-•. ., •fir is '!t- :..vti}.t<{..._•• . . .. �, -...3 .,r„ '5 E,,'..,., ...........�-r-. ...-,., r_r '� �r:Yi :Y 4 1 ^A -'1.-;: 1 X ^'1 { *'''''.4" ..'''''''''''' '.2,'::.' .„P ' ,., <, , ..':...: .,-.-. �r r_� ' ( #i '"s .._ =�iJ:. 3 ih a:�'sF°�".�L.li- :r...'i 'u�''r'��g�� .... ..�' - -r .._ ..,'a.'�. .. :-.. � L `.YY�({ ry#N:'.: 33— �N:mry �*�� . ..YSL�J3�Y1.il)i�lS Y Y, II. 't '?3ir,....1. ,}y� y_i.., .i::. J- !:, •�` .:2s" -r 'r{;'F. .lr.; 'Y�3�.d$„ft �'...�'' •cr _.,.....,,-.... , 'yw,I*,f,•,� . , a, i. .,1•f ..,'r-- .{f•,r•.!-3S' ki.! ::r. ra ,�:,.. ...<.,. ,ry,,:.tf.;-{. :o ,:r. ..... ,, ' w:' �^ :.. ' .?jr - rf�i:•#• airy fq,1y.,.,~ r :.L.;:. '- .. . ... : . _ . !: -; �.z ',.-4,V.-, '",21- '-''':'-' :- • ?33. ..•c�:r :iii::::.''.'ir`r_ ' :a, - .>3ari4.4 S'g;(- .. ... ... " ., - i"a3_ . . - •?1- y, :a '1 JV td il" Kz::14°agt,raz 'hi 4,4;i4!-'-e.,4 ",',._ :n: - ..-. '._.•� ;' .. _' ..,. .� �' ,c oJ` f :aa.. .,[., a._.fh cr ' .,{.:: '[, .:a �Se.•• fi"' ;* • ty:..l..;., '. �: .. ._ ,•. .• ..',:-::1 f ;.. .�•r .. _ "f-., —•�;rla� -!' _ - rPF ::..t!5ra' �-..?Y r .-_ _..._.--.,.... .._... ..._.....`. ..._...:,as:txt�. ,•, • r � 104* • 1VIRR•4 r_:N a•.fis:,:k4 - . • i•-•� jP f 39fP � }i ^ 01Q1 r I oor sna r _ ''''''''''',-,•-,._ a 6 f i t _ h ur^� ti. ,r•1 rc t'.t S• '+• r r 1 (7.+',--, .w� J •tx! I Ita. I• , 3 3 • 6 4 t t 3 4 S I 4 3 2 1 ` hcE. r t fyt rf 1 'k-q J•e..x L ([r` . �4. 1 r n•� , .0 ≤ $ I Arrow /1SMK MMK WNW w■ UPON w+K tw* wr03 tvns imam WNW*mow Willi I 1 �w' r�t� 3, f m,• {,µr' "- �,3„} *- . at .... _. _.___..PLCASWf._...� E.__..._.._...._._...�.._ _. _.... HAMM *• •P .. , r , � L;,1' N! *� '. !' 1•'4'I i 0 ZC IW' :.1 ' \, 1 �� N.:, u3k • . ` su ..k >S •{•OF r I :na,r.' a 1..a.....,,,,,o4�,s'i:-'.{�t, f rrti, :i.? 1_7,,t' ! a ffL0C. 19 s! } 1 LOCK ZOK ., < r r,S .:.: ... . .�._�.i.?:4^2ii3 tea'9ci3ke'^. ,.r.., ,.. S t t 2 3 • S 4 , 2 3 I S r 2 3 1 I .. .-.... ) ,P•�A Mpy 4 "SW "W. *a"' K N PLAN O. w PAM SIN �1{r 14J■N 3 . {-Nr)1J t4N1N *Mu 11.2011% ` 3 RSy 'n1'wT 30071' _ 0101 e,AC[Y t ,tOnN r ''• ... !r 3 HAW 001 DWI Y r� l6 / ♦ i ( 1 I':. .•3 S■r 1$ 1S0'. U■.URN U■.■Ozzie, j Md EMI'0' 2 .-I ti/MNt E ~r• '- I x 3e, I•` 1 1 �N yi '103K; 1 P Uri ' nt■e, Wit -/' t IJ -•,.., 1 • P 1 i • ,; ..1e, \ >V5 1 +�1■ . ..twr nnP. 1 3 K tJ 'ii • The community park will 0101 rat'A' 2 S 3 *SR NOr NAB'C 11KP. , \ . i 4 WAIF it falt - �F \ r P4�K ' OJ ytNgQKOt1AN f' , „~e, _.\� �r r�. % be the center of activities ,'�k1r 3 1X, rune, a VIM 'd, ` *ma / w w. Ail , .rw.. . sir r A • '� PUN. / 48, oar /.r 1.e,'.O>h rP -&. : ,��nAt1e, / i ' Lif Br � �- � � � ► �3 -swimK rNt■N , r s , r�,e, ; i for children in the e IC�ge OP . P r . "�" 4 N, ommunit \.\ ,.3"'' �.. 113ne, �1Y j neighborhood. I .. rlrix. f Park •� % •• Directly Complex - h _ :: ; ql■K ' ael%PACEW u,.N - Picture •1 e, " 7 } : ,« 8 connecting Pearl Howlett ' s1, Howlett Road Location Pearl Howlett Road ea o ett Location := ., ., .• a [ -:ri,: to a 5000 car parking lot P. ... .. N .'1 M N .. .r 1y re. .. ... COT to the :3y - will endanger the health ` ' ' -in safety and welfare of our West ,� �''h` ' � ° 1 N N �, N s v1 N V1 . d r ... 1,.1 M In L'J r., ,'> — o M N M a a children. 1 o F M d' . Cr Cr ... } I ` M ! V' M - �' M P N c N "' M t. . 03 _- .4 EXHIBIT .Y 4i< : 1 _ rrc ,}../ arYan,9'x r.")r P.r l\ N 4:/(-- "' 1Y M d• Hello