The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20031499.tiff Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY WELD COUNTY ROAD#1 COALITION REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN AND AMENDMENT TO WELD COUNTY MUD March 29, 2002 PREPARED BY DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 2627 Redwing Road, Suite 350 EXHIBIT Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 r (970) 266-0585 # 2 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(9'^` "" 2003-1499 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY March 29, 2002 Robert Anderson, Planner _ Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Amendment to the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. Dear Robert Anderson, On behalf of the property owners, hereinafter referred to as the WCR# 1 Coalition, we are requesting amendment to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. Enclosed you will find the 11 copies of the 1-25 MUD Amendment proposal to amend the Weld County Comprehensive Plan 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. This proposal meets the guidelines as set forth in the Section 22-1-50 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Below are the list of individuals who as a collective body of one wish to include their properties into the 1-25 MUD area plan. Each of the property owners request inclusion into the MUD and have requested that the Weld county Commissioners recognize this application as a collective effort of the majority land owners in this region. Property Owners: Weld County Road # 1 Coalition Chris Adrian owner of 194 acres on County Line Road #1 303-776-0853 David & Linda Miller 12380 WCR 1 Longmont 303-684-0105 Phil& Marsha Willis 12244 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-6660 Linda Kolby 12136 WCR 1 Longmont Terry& Kathy Braesch 12456 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-7221 Berman& Lois Iden 12490 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-0802 Pat Eckel 12516 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-9985 Ruth Van Zuiden 12540 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-8270 Tom&Diane Seaman 12566 WCR 1 Longmont Ronald Zaruba 12624 WCR 1 Longmont 303-485-2581 Joe Kelliher 12628 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-0968 Gary& Tina Bogott 12748 WCR 1 Longmont 303-702-9729 Roger Steinke 12922 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-1819 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 - Design Development Consultants - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY The above listed property owners, WCR#1 Coalition, request approval by the Weld County Commissioners for the inclusion of there properties into the I-25 MUD Area Plan. Sincerely, Desi Development Consultants l Don d V. Leffler 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY General Description: Currently only one of the properties is located within the MUD, that being the southern third of the land owned by Chris Adrian. Additionally, the balance of his property is located within the urban growth boundary and allows the property to develop at urban scale density. The property located immediately north and _ including the balance of the property owners allows for the contiguity requirements for the MUD inclusion application within the requirements as stated in Section 22-1-50 of the Weld County Comprehensive master plan. Included within this application is the necessary title conveyances and deed research. The applicant (WCR#1 Coalition) have submitted plans for review and correspondence with the respective agencies to coordinate the infrastructure to support the MUD application with the St. Vrain Sewer District, St. Vrain Valley School District, Mountain View Fire District and Longs Peak Water District. Although not included in the MUD area, the property is located to and adjacent to the Longmont City development directly to the west of Weld County Road #1. It is the intent of the property owners to work with their neighbors yet preserve the integrity of their land in Weld County and within the MUD Area Plan. The _ property owners realize the integrity level of the life style they currently have within Weld County and see this opportunity to preserve such values by inclusion into the MUD Area Plan. Furthermore, this opportunity allows for the transitional planning between the City of Longmont and the unique development characteristics of the Weld County 1-25 MUD Area Plan. The WCR#1 Coalition meets the goals and objectives for the MUD within the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The desire to manage growth within the urban scale sprawl from the City of Longmont is best facilitated in Weld County by inclusion into the MUD. The integrated and balanced planning within the MUD will allow for the maximum efficiency, comfort, safety and economy for development and transition to the lifestyle of Weld County. Inclusion into the Weld County I-25 MUD Area Plan will provide for an efficient and cost effective delivery of public facilities and services which assure the health, safety, and general welfare of the present and future residents of Weld County and this area. 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY The proposed amendment is a balanced development that provides a mix of _ housing, employment, recreation and open space opportunities for existing and future residents of the MUD region. The proposed distribution of the region is as follows: Single Family Residential 50% 194 AC. Multi-Family Residential 4% 16 AC. Commercial/Retail 2% 8 AC. (approximately 60,000 S. F.) Light Industrial 4% 16 AC.(approximately 120, 000 S.F.) Parks/ Open Space 28% 108 AC. Roads and Right of Way 12% 45 AC. Total 100% +1-387 AC. 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Contiguity with the MUD As shown on the attached Region Map this area meets the requirements for contiguity and is constant with the guidelines of inclusion into the Weld County I- - 25 MUD Area Plan requirements. This area has regional proximity to urban scale development and is consistent with the goals and objectives of the MUD policies. The adjoining parcels are located adjacent to Weld County Road # 1 on the west, bounded by Union Reservoir on the east and adjacent to and partially included in the MUD on the south. It is the desire of the property owners to join together as a cohesive unit known as the WCR#1 Coalition to request inclusion into the MUD Area Plan. Existing and Proposed Planned Services. Roads: The properties are located on the East Side and adjacent to Weld County Road#1. The southern most parcel is divided at the intersection of Weld County Road #26 and the primary interchanges to the south are Highway 119 and WCR#1 and to the North are WCR#1 and Highway 60. There are intermediate access points to the City of Longmont located at 9th and 17th street of Longmont respectively. Weld County Road# 1 is designated as a major Arterial and upgrades to this road are planned in the near future. Impact fees will be assessed by the County to provide adequate funding to design and construct the necessary roadway improvements. The analysis for the model distribution and estimated traffic volumes are included within the supplemental information attached. Sewer: Sanitary sewer service is available by the St. Vrain Sewer District. Gravity flow extension from Highway 119 main truck line north to the limits of the application is achievable. Capacity exists to handle the proposed development in this region. Fifty percent of the property currently lies within the St. Vrain Sewer District and the balance of the land is not in any designated sewer district at this time. The applicants are in the process of presenting a 208 for inclusion into the Saint Vrain Sanitation Sewer District and have included support information requesting such within this application. It is our understanding that the technical process for inclusion is achievable since the commitment to serve the region to the north, that is already in the district can only be served if the southern half of the application is included within the district for sewer service. Please see the attached outline that our consultant is presently preparing for inclusion areas into the district and formal commitment to the district for services. 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Water: The Little Thompson Water District helps facilitate the Longs Peak water District in this region. After correspondence with both Districts we have come to a common understanding that water service is available and the extension of existing water mains in the Longs Peak Water District will help facilitate the necessary water service commitments and help in completing the looping of the water district system for improving flows and water quality for the district. The District has in place the necessary development structure to provide adequate infrastructure as development occurs. The proposal anticipates the use for continued irrigation water use for common areas, designated open space and park facilities. Fire Protection: Correspondence with the Mountain View Fire Protection District to serve the area demonstrates the ability for the fire protection in the region to be of adequate response time and availability. It is anticipated that additional fire stations and facilities may be needed in the overall MUD area as development proceeds, however, existing facilities are within service range of this region. Law Enforcement: The Weld County Sheriff's department will provide police protection and law enforcement services. A substation is currently located at the intersection of WCR13 & WCR 24 with future substation locations at the Weld County Administration Office at the I-25 location. Additionally, as development occurs in this specific region, the developers and property owners will work with the Sheriff's department to help in facilitating additional locations as warranted. Schools: Correspondence with the St. Vrain Valley School District indicates that the location of this application for inclusion into the MUD is not located in the region where new schools would be needed. We understand the position of the school district due to insufficient funding, student population and new school sites that are available and the current bond issues that recently failed, however, this region is within schools that currently exist and as the funding for new schools becomes available so will the space for local schools in this region. The development in this 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY region is more characteristic of the"funds in lieu of school site" as attached within and the schedule of payment is outlined from the school district for this region. Parks/Open Space Land for parks and open space with trail systems will be coordinated with surrounding governments to ensure the continuity and usability. The applicants _ feel strongly about the preservation of the open space characteristic of Weld County as well as the desire for continuous pedestrian accessibility from surrounding developments for trails, pedestrian corridors, and bike paths. It is anticipated that as development occurs within this region that the interconnectivity of trails and bike paths that work in harmony with open space preservation is for the benefit of the community at large and preservation for all and alternative modes of transportation. Economic, Social, Health ad Cultural Services: A preliminary economic analysis was performed and is included within this application. The analysis consists of an evaluation of development within the regions of Weld County as if included with the MUD region in comparison to annexation to the City of Longmont. One of the primary goals and objectives of the Weld County Comprehensive Master Plan and Weld County MUD Area Plan is to insure the economic viability for development, this comparison of economic development shows that the property owners in Weld County, who wish to preserve the integrity of the lifestyle of Weld County can best be meet with the inclusion into the MUD district and help enhance the character of the MUD by implementing the design criteria as set forth in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, as the area develops residents of the proposed amendment area will patronize the variety of services located in the surrounding community and assist the economic base of Longmont with the continued use of services available to this region. 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Exhibits: ➢ Ownership and Title Documents > Regional Map for Existing Area and New Area to be included In MUD. ➢ Local Map for Location of Sewer District and Region in 208 Application ➢ Support Outline for information being prepared for 208 Application. ➢ Economic Comparison Analysis for Development Weld County vs. City of Longmont. ➢ Traffic Analysis and Model Distribution ➢ Review Comments by Respective Agencies. 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY WELD COUNTY ROAD #1 COALITION Supplemental Information REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN AND AMENDMENT TO WELD COUNTY MUD April 29,2002 PREPARED BY DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 2627 Redwing Road, Suite 350 Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 (970)266-0585 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY April 29, 2002 Robert Anderson,Planner Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley,Colorado 80631 RE: Additional Information in support of the Weld County Road Coalition Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Amendment to the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. Dear Robert Anderson, On behalf of the property owners, hereinafter referred to as the WCR# I Coalition,we are submitting the additional information in support for the requested amendment to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. Enclosed you will find the 11 copies of the 1-25 MUD Amendment supplemental information to _- amend the Weld County Comprehensive Plan I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. This proposal meets the guidelines as set forth in the Section 22-1-50 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Below are the list of individuals who as a collective body of one wish to include their properties into the I-25 MUD area plan. Additionally,enclosed you will find the signature sheet signed by each of the individuals listed below. Furthermore you will find the formal request for representation by Design Development Consultants to represent each of the property owners. Each of the property owners request inclusion into the MUD and have requested that the Weld county Commissioners recognize this application as a collective effort of the majority land owners in this region. Property Owners: Weld County Road# 1 Coalition: Chris Adrian owner of 194 acres on County Line Road#1 303-776-0853 David&Linda Miller 12380 WCR 1 Longmont 303-684-0105 Phil&Marsha Willis 12244 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-6660 Linda Kolby 12136 WCR 1 Longmont Terry&Kathy Braesch 12456 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-7221 Berman&Lois Iden 12490 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-0802 Pat Eckel 12516 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-9985 Ruth Van Zuiden 12540 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-8270 Tom&Diane Seaman 12566 WCR 1 Longmont Ronald Zaruba 12624 WCR 1 Longmont 303-485-2581 Joe Kelliher 12628 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-0968 Gary&Tina Bogott 12748 WCR 1 Longmont 303-702-9729 Roger Steinke 12922 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-1819 The above listed property owners, WCR#1 Coalition,request approval by the Weld County Commissioners for the inclusion of there properties into the I-25 MUD Area Plan. Sincerely, Design Development Consultants Donald D. Leffler — 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Table of Contents Support Information: Contiguity to MUD Area Plan Statement for planned services Project Population Bases. Amendment to Traffic Analysis and support information. Adjusted land use table. Property Owners list and land use schedule. Regional Maps for MUD inclusion. a. Existing I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan b. Contiguity to MUD Area Plan c. Regional Map MUD Amendment d. Large Scale Map of Structural Land Use Map Amendment e. Weld County Road#1 Area Structural Plan f. Large Scale Map of Area Structural Plan Property Owners Signature Sheet Authorization for representation from Property Owners to Design Development Consultants 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Contiguity to the MUD: Currently one of the properties is located within the MUD,that being the southern third of the land owned by Chris Adrian,known as the S. Valley Drive LLC. Additionally,the balance of his property is located within the urban growth boundary and allows the property to develop at urban scale density. The property located immediately north and including the balance of the property owners allows for the contiguity requirements for the MUD inclusion application within the requirements as stated in Section 22-1-50 of the Weld County Comprehensive master plan. As shown on the attached Region Map this area meets the requirements for contiguity and is constant with the guidelines of inclusion into the Weld County I-25 MUD Area Plan requirements. This area has regional proximity to urban scale development and is consistent with the goals and objectives of the MUD policies. The adjoining parcels are located adjacent to Weld County Road# 1 on the west,bounded by Union Reservoir on the east and adjacent to and partially included in the MUD on the south. It is the desire of the property owners to join together as a cohesive unit known as the WCR#1 Coalition to request inclusion into the MUD Area Plan. Planned Services: Included within this application is the necessary title conveyances and deed research. The applicant(WCR#1 Coalition)have submitted plans for review and correspondence with the respective agencies to coordinate the infrastructure to support the MUD application with the St. Vrain Sewer District, St. Vrain Valley School District,Mountain View Fire District and Longs Peak Water District. Included within this application is the responsibility of Saint Vrain Sewer District responsibility to bring service to the properties already located within the district. The property owned by Bogott, Willis and Kelliher is currently located within the Saint Vrain District. It is with the support of the other property owners that the service commitment can be meet with extension of services located on Highway 119 to this region. Furthermore,it is the collective effort of all of the property owners that the required water and sewer service is achievable. Although not included in the MUD area,the property is located to and adjacent to the Longmont City development directly to the west of Weld County Road#1. It is the intent of the property owners to work with their neighbors yet preserve the integrity of their land in Weld County and within the MUD Area Plan. The property owners realize the integrity level of the life style they currently have within Weld County and see this opportunity to preserve such values by inclusion into the MUD Area Plan. Furthermore,this opportunity allows for the transitional planning between the City of Longmont and the unique development characteristics of the Weld County I- 25 MUD Area Plan. 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Project Student Population Yield: Acres of Land Est. Student No. of Units Student Yield Contribution Impact Elementary 539 DU's 0.35 yield 188.65 0.62 191 Middle School 539 DU's 0.14 yield 75.46 0.43 76 High School 539 DU's 0.17 yield 91.63 0.66 93 Total: 355.59 1.71 360 Single Family Student yield is 0.66 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Traffic Analysis Amended Schedule. 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 FROM :GENE COPPOLA FRx NO. :303-792-5990 ar. 29 2002 01:32PM P1 Tel: 303.792.2450 P.O.8a 260027 Fax: 303-792.5990 EUGENE G. COPPOLA P.E.t.ittkmn,Co 80163-0027 April 29, 2002 Mr, Don Leffler Design Development Consultants 2627 Redwing Road, Suite 350 — Fort Collins, CO 80526 RE: Preliminary Traffic Study for MUD Inclusion Weld County Road 1 Landowners Group 387 Acres North of CR 26 and East of CR 1 Dear Mr. Leffler: As requested, I have prepared this preliminary traffic study for the group of landowners _ along Weld County Road 1. This study was prepared as part of the request that this parcel be included in the I-25 Mixed Used Development Area (MUD). The property generally in- cludes the area north of County Road 26 (CR 26) between Calkins Lake and Weld County Road 1 (CR1). The landowners group is collectively seeking to be included in the MUD area. They represent some 13 parcels of land totaling about 366.6 acres. Preliminary site traffic was estimated based upon currently anticipated land uses and densi- ties and assigns site traffic to the nearby roadway system. The following site traffic is ex- pected based upon published Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates. No adjustment for internal trips has been made and therefore, the estimate is consid- ered conservative. FROM :GENE COFPOLA FAX NO. :303-792-5990 .egr. 29 2002 01:33PM P2 • i Deily AM Pk HR PM Pk Hr Ud0 S e 3trro Trips Rate Employmert(1) 15.7 AC 631^ 991 10.17 133 27 I 10.47 35 131 — I CommerclaWRefail(2) 15.5 AC 42.82 6,438 1.03 95 -650 3.74 - 270 291 Residential(3) 218.9 AC 9.57 I 5,158 0.75 101 303 1.01 349 195 ParkfGreenway/Roads 116:5 AC Net Neg. Neg. Neg. Neg. Neg. Neg, Neg. nil kN j • 12,6s7 • 32b {9E).: 654 it7 • (1) Industrial Park (2) 150,000 S.F. of Shopping Center (3) 539 Single Family Residences As shown above, 719 morning peak hour trips, 1,271 afternoon peak hour trips, and 12,587 trips per day can be expected from this parcel assuming the identified land uses and densi- ties. Given the retail element, a significant proportion of the above traffic may be drawn from traffic already using the area street system. Direct site access will be provided by CR 1 and CR 26. These existing roadways border the site on the west and south. Preliminary traffic assignments to and from the site are esti- mated below for the primary roadways and major facilities leading to and from the primary roadways. This distribution is reasonably consistent with current traffic patterns and is logi- cal given the anticipated land uses. Roadway Section % Site Traffic Daily Site Traffic CR 1 North of SH 66 4% 503 South of SH 119 6% 755 SH 66 East of CR 1 28% 3,524 West of CR 1 8% ` 1006 SH 119 East of CR 1 33% 4,154 West of CR 1 1 21% 2,643 SH 66 and CR 1 are currently paved two-lane roadways having one lane in each direction. SH 119 is a divided four-lane roadway. Both SH 66 and SH 119 provide direct access to I- 25. CR 261s an unpaved two-lane roadway. Ninth and Seventeenth Avenues provide addi- FROM :GENE COPPOLA FAX NO. :303-?92-5990 ear. 29 2002 01:35PM P3 tional connections to most of Longmont. While these City streets are expected to serve some site traffic, they are outside the MUD boundaries and were not considered at this time, A comprehensive traffic study will be undertaken after acceptance into the MUD. That study will better define actions needed to mitigate the transportation impacts of development on this site. It will provide more detailed information on a specific development proposal(s) and address items such as Internal trips, pass-by trips, site access, internal roadways, additional roadway laneage on nearby streets, auxiliary lanes, and traffic controls. I trust this letter will meet your current needs. Please give me a call if you have any ques- tions or need additional assistance. Sincerely, • J Eu ne G. Cop *al 15945 e/ �.y'•:soNA% e:• o '0.4OF re4 uy,r:nnprrua� Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Property Owners and Land Use Table: Property Owner Total Ac. Proposed Land Use Density %Ac. Chris Adrian 194 acres Single Family 220 DU's 53.4% Multi Family 180 DU's 5006.0% Commercial/Retail 15.50 Ac. 8.0% Light Industrial 15.70 Ac. 8.0% Parks/Open Space 34.65 Ac. 17.9% Roads,ROW 12.98 Ac. 6.7% 100% David&Linda Miller 1.48 acres Single Family 1 DU. 11-7 Phil&Marsha Willis 53.6 acres Single Family 36 DU's 48.8% Parks/Open Space 16.4 Ac. 30.6% Roads,ROW 11.0 Ac. 20.6% 100% Gary&Tina Bogott 84.5 acres Single Family 93 DU's 50.8% Parks/Open Space 25.5 Ac. 30.2% Roads,ROW 16.0 Ac. 19.0% 100% Linda Kolby 1.0 acre Single Family 1 DU Terry&Kathy Braesch 5.56 acres Single Family 1 DU Berman&Lois!den 1.0 acre Single Family 1 DU Pat Eckel 2.96 acres Single Family 1 DU Ruth Van Zuiden 1.0 acre Single Family 1 DU Tom&Diane Seaman 4.71 acres Single Family 1 DU Ronald Zaruba/Nicolette 3.26 acres Single Family 1 DU Joe Kelliher 11.21 acres Single Family 1 DU Roger Steinke 2.3 acres Single Family 1 DU TOTALS 366.28 acres 539 DU's Density: 1.47 DU's/acre 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Property Owners Signature Page 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY April 12, 2002 Formal Application For Inclusion Into The I-25 MUD Area Plan We the undersigned individuals collectively comprise and make-up the Weld County Road # 1 Coalition. Additionally, we formally submit this Application for amending The Weld County Comprehensive Plan 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. We are requesting as a collective body of one to be included within the 1-25 MUD Area Plan. Chris�AAdr� �,� n Date 4/14,C avid Miller Y�,�(p� Date \\ c yl /91oa rfr �J( Dqtc -/3 -o-9-, Phil Willis Date -1144A-a-1-aJ --t Gc y- 7 3- o?ov.Z Marsha Willis Date ' da Kolby \/ Date At C C110QCp. N. V- \C'--,-c'N.. Te ,,ff Date 7667, ,gite L- /3—C7 Kathy ra_ch a Date Berman Iden Date ,� 9- /S -aooz Lois Iden Date _ <,,.°/ ,d Ai- 75- ,26n- Pat Eckel Date n5t-- od> 62 7 edwing oad uite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (97 Fail(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Page two ' ?t,4-7) 0.,.....0 Ruth VanZ 'den Date ViCA 2- To aman Date F.%.-.-,/ `//2 5 1U ai Dian Se _erDate Ronaldra Date e4;iel . Litelp -• Joe Kell Dat Gary Bo Date � —.ZSct---2. . 9-i3 a Tina otter, Date ater Steinke R Date 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 FROM : DESIGN/LEND COMPANIES CF COLO PHONE NO. : 970 282 7123 Apr. 16 2002 03:01.PM P1 Design Development Consultants CONSULTING SERVICIS FOR TNt COLORADO COMMUNITY April 12,2002 Formal Representation Notice For Inclusion Into The 1.251 MUD Area Plan We the undersigned individuals collectively comprise and make-up the Weld County Road# I Coalition. Additionally,we are requesting that Donald D.Leffler of Design Development Consultants in Port Collins,Colorado formally represent us in the Application ler amending Thu Wuld County Comp trl mat v6 Plan L?5 MivrA l int.17m'nlnmaont Mn map. a Date David Miler Date Linda It Dew Phil Willis Date Marsha Willis Date Linda IColby Date Terry Branch Date Kathy Branch Date rasa Idea. Mir Date loisIden hi Date Pat Eckel 2627 Britain NnMI Mtr 14. Fnit coma citnyi00525 Vni9 266-0365 Fin fl far-7111 APR-17-2022 05:24AM 1'EL)970 2132 7123 ID) PAQE:001 Rage% 200/T00'd £2T1 282 04.6:01 :WONA TS:£2 2002-LS-Cdtl Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Property Owners Signature Page 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY April 12, 2002 Formal Application For Inclusion Into The I-25 MUD Area Plan We the undersigned individuals collectively comprise and make-up the Weld County Road # 1 Coalition. Additionally, we formally submit this Application for amending The Weld County Comprehensive Plan I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. We are requesting as a collective body of one to be included within the I-25 MUD Area Plan. b` a9 Ip,A (j Date 4/ q /0Z David Milllerr Y Y11 1�1(J� Date ylNN ) OJ , tpilypizate_ ri4tc Phil illis Date 7 �tA J y—/3-- o?DO..Z Marsha Willis Date da Kolby \/ Date s c.', Te SI c7 1/�p- Date Kathy ch / Date p Berman Iden�� Date T,/ 4 z NZ%fiw�v�L rr��1+— J5 — co td� Lois Iden Date — LC— 026 — Pat Eckel Date 9c U'� 6-d /5 li de 627 edwing oadj26t7t( e 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970 26 5 Fad(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Page two Ruth VanZ 'den Date -t ---�� y/Z SA To aman Date .cam 5/b Y1O PN — Dian S/3�j�' � •ut D ��at �_2 Ronald Z a Date Joe Kell Dat Gary Bo r Date Tina ott / Date - �j / 7 oL Roger Steinke Date 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 FROM : LESION/LEND COMPRN IES OF COLO FHDFE FU. 1 970 292 7123 Apr. 16 2002 03:02PM P3 Design Development Consultants CONSULTING SeRYICR6 FOR In! CDLUNADO COMMUNITY w April 12,2O02 Puma!041 ke ims Far lealution I1do Tito 125 MUD Area Plan We the unarreigned lndlvlduels raflenlvrly nnmprinn and mac-u*the Weld County Ruud# 1 Coalition. AJd du.thlly,we fbnaaly submit this Appliwlluu for amending The Weld County Comprehensive Plan 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. tlTn nrn minutiae If 1 rnnaar� �� rtiftierM aN'fur r to IY Iilfihld&Within 11191-a:MUD tun its X4"2 9/--74 Attrisn Data David Miller Date Linda Miller Date Phil W1U& Date Marsha Wtllia lu • Date Linda Kolby Date Terry Braeach Date Kathy Braesch two Borman It Date I I Hull oIo ran Cttl►ad nate 2627 Rohde:Road Sake 390 Fan Collor.Colorado P141)256-1596 Fa( )292-7173 APR-17-2082 05:25AM TEL)970 282 7123 ID) PAGE:003 8796% 7PP.7PP'J C7,i L+]7 !].[•n ____ _ Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Authorization for Representation to Design Development Consultants 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970) 266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY April 12, 2002 Formal Representation Notice For Inclusion Into The I-25 MUD Area Plan We the undersigned individuals collectively comprise and make-up the Weld County Road# 1 Coalition. Additionally, we are requesting that Donald D. Leffler of Design Development Consultants in Fort Collins, Colorado formally represent us in the Application for amending The Weld County Comprehensive Plan I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. C2, ap ( Date 4/([{/QZ avid Miller - Date 'ller cad De Oc'- % lis ,u Date Marsha Willis Date Linda Kolly Date \ -( - r esch Date // 5 -6e Kat /a ch Date .f f 4,16f ()L f'u/ x/. Berman Iden n Date/es Lois Iden ' Date Pat Eckel Date di r,// Redwing Road uite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266 585 Fax(970)282-7123 .. Design Development Consultants CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY Page two i 17,1 Ruth Vandtiden lJ Da4te To q 7Ljyan ≤ Date/ / 2 CO 2- Diane Se,_2:t ' Dr.„,„ Ronald aruba Joe Kell Da t( 4— L3-02_ Gary Bo tQ Date --5d4-- ......, -7.-7.7- °2- Ti ogott ,/_ L' ` \ \/ Date Adger Steinke Date 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 t ^� rAN^. Cfku5 a • L/• z 9N/ 77S- 7//7 Vit ‘z, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1555 N. 17'"AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 ' WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us C E-MAIL: (light@co.weld.co.us O PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT. 3540 FAX (970)304-6498 COLORADO January 25, 2002 Donald D. Leffler Design Development Consultants 2627 Redwing Road, Suite 350 Fort Collins, CO 80526 Subject: S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan for one hundred ninety-nine(199) single family lots,one hundred thirty-eight(138)multi-family lots,fifteen (15) acres commercial, fifteen (15) acres industrial and thirty-four (34) acres of common open space. Described as S2/SW4 of Section 31,Township 3 North, Range 68 West; Lot B of RE-1561 being part of N2/NW4 of Section 6,Township 2 North, Range 68 West; and Lot B of god AMRE-531 being part of NW4 of Section 6, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Leffler: The Department of Planning Services' staff and various referral agencies have reviewed your _ Sketch Plan application. Comments made during the Sketch Plan phase of the Planned Unit Development and agency referral responses may not be all inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining application processes. Copies of the following referral agency comments are enclosed with this letter: • Weld County School District RE-1J, referral received 11-30-2001 • Mountain View Fire Protection District, referral received 12-03-2001 Colorado Geological Survey, referral received 12-06-2001 • Weld County Department of Zoning Compliance, referral received 11-27-2001 • Colorado Department of Transportation, referral received 11-26-2001 • City of Longmont, referral received 12-12-01 • Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment, referral received 12-11-01 • Weld County Department of Public Works, referral received 01-18-02 • Longmont Soil Conservation District, referral received 11-15-01 S-615.Estates at Adrian Heights PUD, Page 1 The Department of Planning Services did not receive comments from the following referral agencies: • Weld County Department of Building Inspection • Office of the State Engineer, Division of Water Resources Weld County Sheriff's Office Weld County Ambulance Colorado Division of Wildlife Town of Mead • Boulder County • S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD,Page 2 OVERVIEW The site under review is zoned Agricultural and is located east of and adjacent to Weld County Road 1; north of and south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 28 and southwest and adjacent to Union Reservoir. The City of Longmont's city limits are located south of and adjacent to the site. There are wetlands along the drainage swale that bisect the property from the northwest to the southeast. The wetlands are proposed to be included in the open space. The Planned Unit Development Sketch Plan proposes an urban scale development of one hundred ninety-nine (199) single family lots, one hundred thirty-eight (138) multi-family lots, fifteen (15) acres of commercial use, fifteen (15) acres of industrial use and thirty-four (34) acres of common open space. The application did not indicate filings or phases within the PUD. The Final Plan may develop in filings and phases. A filing is where only a portion of the development is platted at a time. An Improvements Agreement is required only for the filing being platted and developed. In phasing the development, the construction of the development may occur within separate filings or for the entire subdivision. An Improvements Agreement is only required for the phase being developed. Within a filing, a development can consist of multiple phases. The application indicates the site is to be served by both Longs Peak and Left Hand Water District and the Saint Vrain Sanitation District will provide sewer service to the development. Commitment letters for both water and sewer service were not included in the application. The application materials indicate proposed single family residential parcels ranging in size from approximately 15,000 square feet in size to 8,000 square feet. Single family residential parcels will consist of 53 percent of the site. Multi-family will encompass 6.05 percent of the site, commercial will comprise 7.97 percent and light industrial will include 7.97 percent. Open space areas of 34.69 acres or 17.84 percent of the site are indicated in the sketch plan application. Unless otherwise identified, the lots will be bound to adhere to specific bulk requirements, including setback,offset, lot size, building height,square footage and any other applicable standards. Future applications shall designate the preferred zone district bulk requirements. The Department of Planning Services' staff and referral agencies have reviewed your application for a sketch plan on the above described parcel. Planning staff comments are based upon consistency with Sections 22, 23, 24 and 27 of the Weld County Code, any adopted Intergovernmental Agreements, or master plans of affected municipalities. Adherence to Chapter22 of the Weld County Code,Comprehensive Plan,Goals and Policies Section 22-2-60.A.1 (A.Goal 1) --"Preserve prime farmland for agricultural purposes which foster the economic health and continuance of agriculture."The preservation of prime farmland is one of the primary goals of Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code. The proposed PUD site is designated as"Prime"land by the USDA Soil Conservation Service and Colorado State University Cooperative Extension Service. Section 22-2-60.C.2(A.Policy 3)states, "Conversion of agricultural land to residential, commercial and industrial development will be discouraged when the subject site is located outside of a municipality's comprehensive plan area, urban growth boundary area, or 1-25 Mixed Use Development area and urban development nodes." Two-thirds of the site is located outside of a designated urban area. S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD, Page 3 r Section 22-2-60.D.1 (A.Goal 4) states, "Provide a mechanism for the division of land which is agriculturally zoned. The intent of this goal should be to maintain and enhance the highest level of agricultural productivity in Weld County." Potential impacts to the agricultural community shall be addressed by the applicant. The level of development, availability of existing infrastructure, agricultural productiveness of the site, and feasibility for continued farm production on the site shall be addressed in future applications. Section 22-2-70.C.1 (UGB.Goal 3) states, "The County and municipalities should coordinate land use planning in urban growth boundary areas, including development policies and standards, zoning, street and highway construction, open space, public infrastructure and other matters affecting orderly development." The applicant shall demonstrate in future applications how the proposed development is compatible with the County's Comprehensive Plan and the City of Longmonts proposed urban growth boundary. As the City of Longmont currently has open space adjacent to Union Reservoir the applicant shall demonstrate how this project is compatible with Longmonts future open space/parks planning. Section 22-2-190.D.2.b (PUD.Policy 4.2) states, "A planned unit development which includes a residential use should provide common open space free of buildings,streets, driveways, or parking areas. The common open space should be designed and located to be easily accessible to all the residents of the project and usable for open space and recreation" Common open space is defined as any usable parcel of land or water essentially unimproved and set aside, dedicated, designated or reserved for public or private use or for the use and enjoyment of owners or occupants of land adjoining or neighboring such an area. Open space restrictions are permanent, not for a period of years. A Homeowners Association shall be established before any residences are sold, and • membership in the association is mandatory for each residential owner. The Homeowners Association is responsible for liability insurance, taxes, and maintenance of open space, street(s), private utilities, and other facilities. The open space areas function as separate parcels. Section 22-3-50.B (P.Goal 2) requires adequate facilities and services to assure the health, safety, and general welfare of the present and future residents of Weld County. Prior to proceeding to the Change of Zone phase, a Water Supply Information Summary shall be submitted to the Office of the State Engineer, Division of Water Resources for their review and all their concerns shall be addressed prior to submittal of the Change of Zone. Section 27-2-210 of the Weld County Code states " A PUD Zone District shall be serviced by an adequate water supply. All PUDs shall be served by a public water system as defined in this Chapter." Section 27-2-170 of the Weld County Code states"Public water systems serving PUDs must be capable of meeting State drinking water regulations, (Colorado Primary Drinking Water Regulations) and have adequate provisions for a 300-year supply of water. Public Water systems which rely upon Denver Basin aquifers shall also acquire and incorporate into a permanent supply plan alternative renewable water sources to ensure water supplies for the future." Application materials indicate water service is to be provided by Longs Peak and Left Hand Water Districts. Appropriate documentation shall be provided which indicates not only that taps are available, but provide assurances that these connections will be made.The style of assurance may take several forms, however pre-purchase of taps, line extension agreements, tap service agreements, or another form of"participation agreement"will be acceptable. The agreements shall • be approved by the Weld County Attorney's Office prior to submitting the Change of Zone application. S-615,Estates at Adrian Heights PUD,Page 4 The City of Longmont indicated in a referral dated December 12, 2001 that there are several water lines adjacent to the property. The locations of these lines and appropriate easements should be noted on all plans. Section 27-2-176 of the Weld County Code states "A PUD Zone District shall be served by an adequate sewage disposal system. All PUDs containing commercial and / or industrial uses, or those considered urban scale development, shall be served by an approved sewer system, as defined by the Board of County Commissioners. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the sanitary sewage disposal requirements of the overlay zone district." Application materials indicate sewer service is to be provided by the Saint Vrain Sanitation District. Appropriate documentation shall be provided that indicates not only that taps are available, but provide assurances that these connections will be made. The style of assurance may take several forms, however pre-purchase of taps, line extension agreements, tap service agreements, or another form of"participation agreement" will be acceptable. The agreements shall be approved by the Weld County Attorney's Office prior to submitting the Change of Zone application. In a referral dated December 11, 2001 the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment indicated that the PUD has satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regard to water and sewer service. However they did indicate that a commitment letter was not received from either the water district or the sanitation district. The City of Longmont in a referral dated December 12, 2001 indicated that a large sewer line crosses the property and it appears that there are platted lots and multi-family units located above the line, which is not acceptable. They also indicate the applicant should meet with the City to discuss service provisions due to the location of existing City water and sewer lines in this area. — In a referral dated November 26, 2001 from the Weld RE-1J School District, the District opposes this application based on overcrowding at the impacted schools. Future applications shall address the District concerns, as stated in their referral, which may include the location of a school site in the development. Evidence that an agreement has been made with the school district will be required prior to recording the final plat. STREET/UTILITY/ACCESS STANDARDS Section 27-6-50 of the of the Weld County Code states "Adjacent roadways shall be designed to meet the full typical section specified in the Weld County Transportation Plan and Chapter 24 of this Code. Improvements may include the construction of travel lanes, shoulders, bike lanes, medians, curb, gutter and sidewalks, for example. Required improvements may also include the acquisition of right-of-way and construction easements that will be dedicated to the public. Improvements attributed to the development shall be consistent with the direct impact a particular development has on the county road system as determined by a professional transportation study. The Road Improvements Agreement and Roadway Construction Plans shall be considered by the Board of County Commissioners."The property under consideration is accessed from Weld County Road 1, Weld County Road 24 V2 and Weld County Road 28. Weld County Road 1 is designated on the Transportation Plan Map as an arterial road requiring one hundred thirty (130) feet of right-of-way. - S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD,Page 5 In a referral response dated January 01, 2001, the Weld County Department of Public Works has indicated that there are significant transportation and drainage issues. The development shall provide half of the right-of-way for Weld County Road 1 and the road shall be constructed to the City of Longmont's arterial standards. Additional widening may be necessary for auxiliary lanes as determined by a traffic study. Connectivity from the development to adjacent road systems is not clear. No roadways to the west are shown and two east-west streets that dead end on the eastern boundary would continue into Union Reservoir if extended. There is a roadway system to the north to which there is not a �- connection and there are two dead end connections to the south at the railroad right-of-way. The internal street system that connects to Weld County Road 1 shall be congruous with intersections on the west side of Weld County Road 1. A collector system within the proposed development shall be identified with local internal roadways servicing the commercial and residential areas. Commercial centers shall not have direct access to Weld County Road 1. The internal roadway system requires redesign taking into consideration connectivity with surrounding roadway systems. Due to the major traffic impact created by a development of this size, a detailed traffic engineering study will be required for sketch plan approval. This study shall include a description of the project; vehicle trip generation and distribution; verification of adequate acceleration, deceleration, turning radii, and storage facilities at all impacted intersections. Additionally review of bridge capacity; intersection level of service analysis for existing and proposed conditions; warrants for traffic signals at affected intersections; and recommendations for needed upgrades on transportation infrastructure to support the development are also required. The traffic impact study will be referred to a consultant that has been hired by the County. However, the cost of that review will be borne by the applicant. The Weld County Department of Public Works is requiring a drainage report, that meets the City of Longmont's criteria, to be submitted with the Change of Zone application. The drainage report shall take into consideration all off-site flows and show how they are to be transmitted across the site. In addition, accommodations shall be made for all irrigation ditches. Drainage swales are proposed on the uphill side of the roadways for the purpose of containing overland flow. Curbs and gutters are required in the Mixed Use Development (MUD) standards. Drainage swales will not be permitted and storm water sewers shall be required in accordance with the City of Longmont's storm sewer design criteria. Due to substantial transportation and drainage issues it is highly recommended that the applicant meet with Drew Scheltinga, Design Engineer for the Weld County Department of Public Works prior to submitting the Change of Zone application. In a referral dated November 20, 2001 the Colorado Department of Transportation indicated a traffic impact study should be submitted to determine the impact to the State Highway 66 and Weld County Road 1 intersection. S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD,Page 6 Section 27-2-50 of the Weld County Code states, "development within a PUD Zone District shall be designed and constructed to include adequate, safe and convenient arrangements for pedestrian and vehicular circulation and off-street parking. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation shall relate to the circulation system external to a PUD Zone District. All streets within the PUD Zone District,whether private or public shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Weld County Department of Public Works." Appropriate cross walks shall be located where roads and trails intersect.Also,appropriate street lighting shall be indicated within the development. The applicant shall address the Southwest Weld Road Impact Program Area 1 (Chapter 20, Article II of the Weld County Code) and adhere to the fee structure as required per this Chapter. In a referral dated November 27, 2001 the Mountain View Fire Protection District indicated no objection to this development provided the development is able to meet the requirements of the District. The applicant shall submit evidence with the Change of Zone application that indicates all Fire District concerns have been addressed, including the location of fire hydrants within the development. The Weld County Sheriff's office did not return a referral for this proposed development. The applicant shall contact the Sheriff's office to determine what requirements that office has specific to this development. The applicant shall submit evidence with the Change of Zone application that indicates all of the Sheriff's office concerns have been incorporated into this proposed design for the development which may include the location of a substation in the development. In a referral dated December 12, 2001 the City of Longmont indicates concerns with the location of streets in the development and would like the opportunity to review and comment on any traffic studies. It appears that the location of one of the streets will continue east across Union Reservoir. It also appears there is a street that will cross property that is not owned by the applicant. The applicant should review the street design and incorporate the concerns of the City of Longmont prior to a resubmittal of either a sketch plan or Change of Zone. All permanent signs and sign structures shall be delineated on the plat and require building permits. Stop signs, street name signs and property addresses shall be posted prior to construction.A street name that does not duplicate any others in the district shall be listed on the Change of Zone plat. Stop signs, street name signs shall be required at all intersection, shall be delineated on the plat and require building permits. Stop signs, street name signs and property addresses shall be posted prior to construction. Preliminary property addresses shall be assigned by the Department of Planning Services at the Change of Zone phase. The proposed street name and addresses shall be reviewed by the appropriate post office, Mountain View Fire Protection District, ambulance service and the Weld County Sheriff's Office prior to submitting the Final Plan application. The applicant shall incorporate bus stop/mail areas in the PUD. The locations shall be approved by the post office as well as the school district and shall be indicated on the Change of Zone plat. Section 24-7-60 of the Weld County Code dictates utility easement standards for county subdivisions.These standards are strictly enforced by the Weld County Utility Advisory Committee, requiring a minimum width of twenty (20) feet apportioned equally on side and rear lot lines within the development, and a minimum of fifteen (15) feet allocated along front lot lines. Future submittals shall include the delineation of utility easements on each lot as required. ^ 5-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD, Page 7 LANDSCAPING/OPEN SPACE/HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Section 22-2-190.D.2.b (PUD.Policy 4.2) states "a planned unit development which includes a residential use should provide common open space free of buildings, streets, driveways or parking areas. The common open space should be designed and located to be easily accessible to all the residents of the project and usable for open space and recreation."Common open space is defined as any usable parcel of land or water unimproved and set aside, dedicated, designated or reserved for public or private use or for the use and enjoyment of owners or occupants of land adjoining or neighboring such an area. Open space restrictions are permanent, not for a period of years. A Homeowners Association shall be established before any residences are sold, and membership in the Association is mandatory for each residential owner. The Homeowners Association is responsible for liability insurance, taxes and maintenance of open space, street(s), private utilities and other facilities. The open space lot functions as a separate parcel. In a referral dated December 12, 2001 the City of Longmont has expressed concern with the open space aspect of this development. Recognition of open space, trail desires and linkages has not been provided which would recognize the Longmont Area Comprehensive Plan (LACP). The City would prefer more of the development to be clustered which would retain additional open space. There is also a concern with the subdivision location adjacent to Union Reservoir. There are concerns with trespassing both from public to private property as well as from the proposed subdivision to the reservoir. There also appears to be a lot which is platted over the access to the handicapped fishing pier. The developer should incorporate the concerns of the City of Longmont into this application. Evidence shall be provided at the Change of Zone submittal that the applicant has met with the City of Longmont. USES/BULK REQUIREMENTS/COMPATIBILITY OF USES Section 22-2-60.G.1 (A.Goal 7) of the Weld County Code encourages the protection of agricultural land from encroachment by those urban uses which hinder the operational efficiency and productivity of the agricultural uses. The intent of Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code (Comprehensive Plan) is to minimize the incompatibilities that occur between uses in the agricultural district and districts that allow urban-type uses. Historic and surrounding agricultural uses should not be expected to surrender to the impacts of urban development. Weld County operates under "Weld County's Right to Farm", as set forth in the Chapter 22, Appendix 22-E of the Weld County Code, which is intended to alert potential future residents of conflicts that may exist between agricultural and urban uses. Activities, sights, sounds and smells of agricultural operations are common in Weld County. Occupants of this PUD need to recognize that agricultural uses shall not be considered nuisances so long as they are operated in conformance with the law in a non-negligent manner. In addition, the intent of "Weld County's Right to Farm" shall be incorporated into the Estates at Adrian Heights PUD covenants. The property under consideration is located within the designated three-mile referral area of the City of Longmont. The proposal was not within the urban growth boundary or Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) area for the City of Longmont at the time of submittal however the County has been working with Longmont to implement an IGA. The applicant shall address the concerns of the City of Longmont as indicated in their referral response dated December 12, 2001. S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD, Page 8 Section 22-5-100.B.1 (OG.Policy 1.1) of the Weld County Code states "new planned unit developments or subdivisions should be planned to take into account current and future oil and gas _ drilling activity to the extent oil and gas development can reasonably be anticipated."The applicant shall include in future applications a copy of an agreement with the properties mineral owners, stipulating that the oil and gas activities have adequately been incorporated into the design of the site or show evidence that an adequate attempt has been made to mitigate their concerns. It will — be the applicant's responsibility to comply with state statutes regarding notice to mineral estate owners. Colorado Revised Statute, C.R.S.24-65.5-130 (adopted as part of H.B.01-1088) requires notification of all mineral estate owners 30 days prior to any public hearing. At the Change of Zone the applicant will provide the Weld County Department of Planning Services with written certification indicating these requirements have been met. Section 27-2-40 of the Weld County Code states that Bulk Requirements(minimum setback,offset, lot size, height of buildings and lot coverage) in the PUD zone district may be varied from the requirements of a specific zone district. The applicant has not indicated any Bulk Requirements with this application including what type of uses will be allowed in the commercial and light industrial areas. Specific uses as well as bulk requirements shall be addressed in depth with future applications. DESIGN STANDARDS/IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT/SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS Section 24-9-10 of the Weld County Code lists subdivision improvements that are the responsibility of the property owner/developer to complete. The required Improvements Agreement which is entered into between the owner/developer and Weld County guarantees construction of all improvements in accordance with the approved PUD final plan; the agreement is covered in Section 24-9-20 of the Weld County Code. At time of Change of Zone submittal a draft copy of the Improvements Agreement shall be submitted for review. Prior to the Final Plan plat submittal, a completed Improvements Agreement addressing road construction and maintenance, landscaping and maintenance, utility extension, signage, and any other applicable elements of the PUD shall be submitted for review and approval. ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA In a referral response dated November 29, 2001, the Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) stated their concerns. The CGS noted in their field notes that the subsurface soils consist of clayey eolian and alluvial soils which exhibit low swell potential and low to moderate bearing characteristics. The underlying bedrock is expected to exhibit low to moderate swell potential and moderate bearing strength. The Geotechnical report submitted by Terracon, dated February 13, 2001, should be incorporated into individual foundation and footing designs to minimize the risk of foundation damage due to differential settlement and heave. Terracons report contains appropriate recommendations regarding foundation design, individual perimeter foundation drain systems, earthwork and floor slab design and construction. S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD, Page 9 CGS is also concerned with on-site groundwater. Groundwater was indicated at depths from 5 to 13 feet. Water at those depths is a concern for the construction of basements. Full-depth basement are not feasible at this site unless the following actions are taken: Grading to raise portions of the site where basements are planned, constructing a dewatering system around lower level foundations, construct a below-sewer area underdrain system to lower groundwater levels. CGS agrees with Terracons recommendations for fill placement and construction of both an overall area drain and individual foundation drain systems, and suggest that both be tied into a storm sewer line, with automatic pumped sumps provided as a backup for individual foundation drains, if basements are planned. The applicant shall indicate in future applications how the concerns of the CGS will be addressed. MIXED USE PLAN (MUD) To proceed to the Change of Zone phase of development adherence to the Mixed Use Development(MUD) plan is necessary as 1/3 of the project is located within the MUD boundaries. Staff suggests prior to proceeding with the Change of Zone the applicant should apply to incorporate the entire 194 acres into the MUD. If the proposal to include the property into the MUD is approved the re-submittal of a sketch plan which addresses all the MUD specifications would be required. The intent of this review is not to address all pertinent issues related to the MUD plan especially since two-thirds (2/3) of the development is located outside of the MUD boundaries. The applicant should be aware of the following criteria regarding development in the MUD and address the issues specifically in future applications: MUD.C.Goal.1 - Establish a sense of community identity MUD.C.Goal.2 - Assure an attractive working and living environment MUD.C.Goal.4-Coordination of municipal,county,regional and state growth policies and programs which includes the MUD area shall be evaluated in order to minimize discrepancies, promote a better understanding of growth dynamics in the area and avoid duplication of services and provide economics of scale. MUD.P.Goal.2 - Provide adequate public safety facilities such as satellite stations for police, fire and ambulance MUD.P.Goal.3 - Provide for adequate school facilities conveniently placed central to residential neighborhoods and available for use in a timely manner MUD.T.Goal.2 - Promote a pedestrian trail system to service transportation and recreation purposes within the MUD area A portion of the site is located in an area designated as Employment Center- High Intensity in the MUD. The applicant shall be aware of the restrictions listed in Section 26-2-30 of the MUD regarding uses which are included in that land use category. As stated previously specific uses shall be listed on the PUD plan. S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD, Page 10 - 0.1 .� Section 26-2-40 of the MUD requires common open space. Twenty (20) percent common open space is required in the Employment Center- High Intensity land use category. It appears there is not sufficient open space to meet the MUD requirements as detailed information was not provided as required by Section 26-2-40.B of the MUD Ordinance. Section 26-2-70 of the MUD references landscaping requirements. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted which addresses the requirements of the above mentioned section. It is extremely important to address Section 26-2-70.4 which requires an opaque planted screen between two (2) properties whenever the use of a property will conflict with the use of the adjoining property. The screen shall moderate the impact of noise, light, aesthetic concerns and traffic. This is especially important where multi-family uses adjoin light industrial uses. SUMMARY After reviewing the PUD Sketch Plan proposal, it is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services' staff that the PUD Sketch Plan proposal fails to comply with the Weld County Code for reasons previously identified in these comments. The Department of Planning Services strongly advices the applicant to pursue annexation options with the City of Longmont. Should the applicant choose to proceed with the plan as proposed in the sketch plan, the Department of Planning Services' will recommend denial at the Change of Zone. If the applicant decides to proceed with this proposal the following items should be addressed as part of any re-submittal of a sketch plan: The property was not located within the urban growth boundaries of any municipality at the time of submittal. Non-urban scale development would be required for the area outside of the Mixed Use Development (MUD) boundaries which would be limited to nine (9) lots or less. The area located within the boundaries of the MUD shall comply with the limitations outlined in Employment Center-High Intensity. If not annexed to the City of Longmont or redesigned for non-urban scale development, the entire property should be included in the MUD boundaries. An application should be submitted to the County for incorporation into the MUD prior to re-submittal of a Sketch Plan for this property. Coordination with the City of Longmont was not actively pursued. This is especially important since Longmont does own open space adjacent to this proposed development and Weld County is negotiating an InterGovermental Agreement (IGA) with the City. Although the developer did approach Longmont previously to purchase the property for open space, Longmont has indicated they are willing to discuss the possibility of annexing this property. The City of Longmont has numerous concerns with this proposal. The possibility for realignment of roads, moving lots to accommodate utility easements, providing trail access and open space would require the re-submittal of the Sketch Plan. Multi-family land use should not be located adjacent to light industrial uses. Amount of common open space for commercial/industrial uses is not sufficient. S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD,Page 11 The Sketch Plan Information sheet did not adequately address compatibility issues such as; "How is the PUD compatible with the PUD Zone District?" There are also several places in the information sheet that refer to a twenty (20) lot subdivision and non-urban development, which is incorrect. The Landscape Plan is inadequate, more detail is required. Requiring lot owners to implement the landscaping is not a sufficient plan. A Service Impact Plan was not provided which would detail anticipated impact to schools, fire, police and ambulance. The information sheet states: "This proposal should have very little impact to service providers of the area" which is not an adequate plan or an accurate statement. The Sketch Plan Information Sheet indicates that the "increase in road surface and building rooftops are insignificant to warrant additional drainage features. However, each lot shall have the ability to retain, in a detention area, flows in excess of historical storm water run-off rates." This is unacceptable in residential or high density development such as multi-family and commercial areas. A more common approach is to establish the location of larger detention ponds which may require the reduction in the number of lots in the development. If you choose to proceed with the Planned Unit Development application process, the next step is to address the concerns of the Department of Planning Services'. When the concerns are addressed and a Public Water and Sewer Source has been approved by the Weld County Attorneys' Office, a Planned Unit Development Change of Zone application may be submitted, unless it has been determined that substantial changes from the submitted Sketch Plan would warrant the need to submit a new Sketch Plan application. Subsequent submittals associated with this proposed Planned Unit Development must address all issues discussed above, as well as the questions and concerns of the following referral agencies: — Froda Greenberg, City of Longmont Gloria Hice-Idler, Colorado Department of Transportation Glen Segrue, Weld County School District RE-1J Jill Carlson, Colorado Geological Survey Drew Scheltinga, Weld County Department of Public Works Pam Smith, Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment • Lon Miller, Mountain View Fire Protection District Please review the enclosed materials and then call to schedule an appointment so that I may .- reserve a sufficient amount of time to meet with you. The purpose of the meeting will be to familiarize you with the PUD Change of Zone application procedure and discuss any problems or concerns identified in this letter. Once again, comments made during the Sketch Plan phase of the PUD application and agency referral responses may not be all inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining application processes. '� S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD, Page 12 When you have completed the Change of Zone application, along with all the requirements attached through the Sketch Plan comments, please schedule a meeting with me to review the application. If you need any further information, please feel free to contact me at the above address or telephone number. Sincerely, 1 e; Lauren Light Planner Enclosures cc: File S-615 • - S-615, Estates at Adrian Heights PUD, Page 13 ' DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (970) 353-6100. EXT.3540 O FAX(970)304-6498 E-mail address: Ilieht@CO.WeId.CO.US • WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us _ COLORADO WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1555 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 March 14, 2002 Clover Industrial, LLC 3118 Marlin Drive Longmont, CO 80503 _ Dear Mr. Adrian: I would like to clarify an issue that has arisen regarding your proposed development known as Estates at Adrian Heights. The property does lie within an Urban Growth Boundary, based upon location from existing sewer lines,which allows the opportunity to develop the property at an urban scale density. The portion of the property that is located in the Mixed Use Development (MUD) _ must adhere to the restrictions outlined in the MUD. The sketch plan comments are still applicable except urban scale development would be acceptable for the entire parcel. Historically,Weld County has supported expansion of Union Reservoir which should be taken into consideration upon any redesign of the site. If you need further information, please feel free to contact me at the above address, telephone number or e-mail address. Sincerely, Lauren Light Planner cc: Design Development Consultants S-615 Aptoct6, wine FAX TRANSMISSION COLORADO WELL 000N'r. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES _ Fax: 970-304.6490 PHONE'. 970.383.6 I00, Er. 3340 To: Don Leffler Date: February 15, 2002 Fax: 97G 282 7123 Pages: 1, including cover Phone: 97C 266 0585 From: Kim Ogle ito, Planner H kogle@co.weld,co.us Subject: COMMENTS: Attached are referrals received for the above referenced application. As previously stated, staff has not formulated comments for Seewald Farm Estates (Willis)cr for Bogott Carder Estates (Bogott). Given that staff comments have not been prepared, the Department of Planning Services has determined the proposec meeting on Thursday February 21, 2002 is premature. Planners associated with the above referenced cases will be happy to meet with you and/or your cliert after the Sketch Plan comments have been prepared ant distributed. Please find at:ached photocopies of referrals receives for the Was property. As noted. staff has rot received referral comments from the Department of Public Works. _ If you need any `urtner irformation, please feel free to contact me at the above telephone number or e- mal adcress. CONFIDSNTRL This thus:milc h r_nded,hire :.,e .xc of the Indlv,dual„ cnnr. .•,vhic i' " r thicrcanu:I:: nips .r._, .'ruratann that a=Sac! ccr.[itenn a el.:nn extra,nom c:nsurc.nyryni,coaie-luv.:I:the remer ui tit r. ,.,cs.r:i_n,:ul mo n mode_reapmr.:nor:he cniruhycr:rpoem lesoonsia c i..l'dcl'serng L:c Gtslmt:c tc the z:enucu 'eclplen:.you are here'dv m:r,riot '.halt any-!ifsenl.r anon.dstnbunor..ur coop rg of.1: cernraunlcaoor s....:;:v prnmi se!. If}nu base rece.‘ed thi,cnnsmurlcanou m err r.I lease nnuiv,.,inn:ediat2D:nv rc:epo:e urn,rs-Ir.the onghtal Inessaee-c ..s m:::e abosc address su.tic U.S.Postal Senice. .Thank y - . y,oUNTg4y MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: ° t L e 9119 County Line Road•Longmont, CO 80501 (303)772-0710• FAX(303)651-7702 e nee Co, tt Yom,. January 4. 2002 �hrflr eta , Ms. Shari Lockman- Planner Weld County Planning Department d; — 1557 N. I7th Av nuc Greeley, CO 50631 Dear Ms. Lockman: I have reviewed the proposed unit development sketch plan for the Bogott Garden Estates subdivision located east of and adjacent to Weld County Road I and approximately ii8 of a mile '— south of Weld County Road 28 (Case # S-620). The Fire District does not object to the proposed subdivision and subsequent development, provided the development is able to meet the requirements of the Fire District. All applicable codes as they pertain to water supply. fire hydrant locations, street designs, and fire department access must be met. Based on my review. I - have the following comments regarding the sketch plans submitted: • Fire apparatus access roads shall be free from obstructions including locked gates. When gates are proposed they must be approved by the Fire District. Anytime there is a gate there is that chance of delayed response by the Firefighters during an emergency, therefore, a Knox Box must be installed with the Fire Districts approval. Please contact the Fire District for more information on a Knox system. Another issue with the gates has to do with power outages. In the event of a power outage will the gates have the ability to be opened manually or will they have a battery back-up system? • A minimum fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute, measured at a residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch, is required for one- and two-family dwellings net exceeding 3,600 _ gross square feet. Larger residences require a minimum fire flow of 1,750 gallons per minute and may require more depending on the building size and type of construction as per Appendix i11-.A of the Uniform Fire Code. • The maximum spacing between fire hydrants on public streets and along fire apparatus access roads is 500 feet. Each hydrant must also be located within 250 feet of the front property lice of each lot. The installation of fire hydrants, water mains and access roads is required to parallel construction and storage of combustible materials on site. • Prior to the installation of waterlines, construction plans for the utilities, showing the configuration of streets, the location of fire hydrants, the size of water mains and available fire flows will need to be submitted to the Fire District For review and approval. stow 1 Staten 2 Stew 3 3100n. 5a,or 5 Station 9 Staten 7 9119 Ctdy Una R0. '0911 WCP 13 P.Q 4m$75 P.O.Beall 10911 Dobbin Pun P.0 Rot N4 P.O.BOA 40 LapMM,CO _ern CO ]99PP~M. N00 Nwit Pad Lstsfl.CO 4000109* 10090.ra•M 61. 40601 90!44 Mat CO 00549 Nit a,CO 40544 0100913 Edo.CO 10614 O.mne.CC Ba51. COotDi '.)crccr7d uiie 96t9 tOC OLE XA EC:ST 70/2T/7,0 • Ms. Sherri Lockman January 4. 2002 Page Two • Cul-de-sacs must be a minimum of 70 feet diameter. Fire apparatus access roads must be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (60,000 pounds)and must have a surface that provides all-weather driving capabilities. The developer needs to be made aware that all access roads must be approved and maintained when building construction begins • As soon as the final plat is approved, the applicant must provide to the Fire District an eight and one half by eleven map of the subdivision showing the street configuration, street names. hydrant locations and addresses of the lots if available. The Fire District reserves the right to make further comments as development proceeds. Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve of any aspect of this project that does not comply with all applicable codes and standards. We appreciate being involved in the planning process. Should you have any questions, please contact meat(303)772-0710. Sincerely, Lon D. Miller Fire Prevention Officer LDM/Im cc: project file file Im01.03.02 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION 6d Weld County Administrative Offices 4it\ ? 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us Phone (970)353-6100,Ext. 3540 Fax (970)304.6496 COLORADO January 2, 2002 Gary& Tina Bogott Sketch Plan for a 93 Lot PUD in the Agricultural Zone District S-620 1. Building permits shall be obtained prior to any construction. Building permits are not required for buildings that qualify for and receive a Certificate of Compliance, but an electrical permit will be required for all buildings if electrical service is provided to the building. 2. A plan review will be required for each building. Two complete sets of plans are required when applying for the permit. 3. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the 1997 UBC, 1998 IMC, 1997 !PC, 1999 NEC and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. u. 4. Each building will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnical report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. 5. Building height shah be limited to the maximum height allowed per UBC Table 5-B. Wall and opening protection and limitations shall be in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. Separation of buildings of mixed occupancy classifications shall be in accordance with UBC Table 3-B and Chapter 3. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by the Zoning Ordinance. 6. A Flood Hazard Development Permit shall be submitted for buildings constructed within the 100-year flood plain. Please contact me for any further information regarding this project. Sincerely, — eff Reif Building Official Service,Marmara.Integrity,Quality 4.$ 11/413/44.44.4.4.44"-- WOh:iCcLinty, Pia naingCapt. St. Vrain Valley School District .r January 8,2002 ['t� ((.` 1.2 �ta r;.. r, w Shed Lockman Weld County Planning Department 1555 N. 17p1 Ave. Greeley,CO 80831 RE: Recommendation to oppose the Bogott Garden Estates Sketch Plan(Par of the NW%of Section 31, T3N,R68W} Dear Chris: Thank you for referring the Bogott Garden Estates Sketch Plan to the School District. The District has reviewed the development proposal in terms of future student Impacts and available school capacity and has the following RECOMMENDATION: the District is OPPOSED to the approval of this epolicetion due to this development's impact on already overcrowded school facilities. The Beard of Education has established a District-wide policy of opposing new developments that add to the student enrollment of schools projected to be at or above 125% of their capacity. This particular application, which is currently located in the Mead Elementary, Mead Middle and Skyline High School Feeder,will add 93 new single-family dwelling units with a potential impact of 82 additional students in this feeder. The District opposes this development because, as indicated In the chart below, Mead Middle and Skyline High schools will exceed 125% of their capacity with the addition of students from this development. The District may reconsider this opposition should the developer wish to discuss how the development can be better timed to coincide with the District's construction of new facilities, or if other mitigation measures can be taker to accommodate this development's contribution of new students in light of school capacity shortfalls. PROPOSED DEVELOPIVENT CAPACITY BENCHMARK Building Oct 01 Stdtts. Enrollment w, New .Proj. Slone w/proposed Capacity Capacity Enrollment Impact Develoartent Capacity 2035 development 2D05 Eleret&y 504 426 33 459 91% 547 590 o Middle 342 454 13 467 137%,, 572 535 171% High School 1323 1442 16 1434 110% 1633 1649 125% Total 2189 62 I 2752 2814 The recommendation of the District noted above applies to the attendance boundaries current as of the date of this letter. Residential growth and new school facilities could affect the project's attendance area in the future. As of this time,there are no anticipated boundary changes cr taci,ity expansions that woulo warrant a change in the current attendance areas. Should the County decide to recommend approval of this development proposal,the School Districts cash-in- - lieu and/or lard dedication requirements would still need to be satisfied. This requirement invo',ves the dedication of land with the adjacent infrastructure cr payment of an equivalent cash-in-lieu fee based on the student yield of the development. Since this property Is not a likely future school site, the fee would be assessed per the attached chart. Please let me know of any further questions. Sincerely. Glen Segrue,AICP Planning Specialist GS:jkr ST.VRAIN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING DEPARTMENT.395 SOUTH PRATT PARKWAY,LONGMONT, CO 80501.SCOTT TOL.LION,MANAGER.PHONE 303-682.7229. PAX 303.682.7344. Exhibit A School Planning BOGOTT GARDEN ESTATES Standards And Weld County Calculation of In Lieu Fees Single Family $chool Planning Standards Number Projected Student Site Size Acres of Developed Of Student Facility Standard Land Land Cash-in41eu Units Yield Standard Acres Contribution Value Contribution Elementary 93 0.35 525 10 0.62 $35,000 32.55 Middle Level 93 0.14 750 25 0.43 $35,000 13.02 High School 93 0.17 1200 50 0.66 $35,000 15.81 Total 61.38 1.71 535,000 $59,946 Single Family Student Yield is.66 $645 Per Unit 1/8/02 Planning Department i 1 I I i 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I ime wow Op %E, d)' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS CF ErI GINS=R9, OMAHA DISTRICT DMI ER RE3UW.TORY OFFICE, 9_E' S. FLATTZ CANYON RCAD o LITTLZTCS, COLDRADO 8012E-6911 December 213,2001 t �Cl I:C J::t./• �IC:n:1/11g DJh... Ms. Sheri Lockman Weld County Planning Department gr n F 1555 N. 17° Ave. i t;v-sd ' (7 ;° tarn Greeley, CO 50631 RE: Bogott Sketch Plan for a 93 Lot PUD In the Agricultural Zone District, Case No.S-620 Corps File No. 200180879 Dear Ms.Lockman: Reference is made to the above-mentioned project located in the NW '/4 of Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 68 West,Weld County, Colorado. If any work associated with this project requires the placement of dredged or fill material,and any excavation associated with a dredged or fill project,either temporary or permanent,in waters of the United States at this site,this office should be notified by a proponent of:he project for proper Department of the Army permits or changes in permit requirements pursuant to Section 404 cf the Clean Water Act. Waters of the U.S.includes ephemeral,intermittent and perennial streams their surface connected wetlands and adjacent wetlands and certain lakes,ponds, drainage ditches and irrigation ditches that have a nexus to interstate commerce. Work in waters of the U.S.should be shown on a map identifying the Quarter Section, Township,Range and County of the work. If there are any questions concerning this matter please call Mr.Terry McKee of this office at 303-979-4120 and reference Corps File No.200180879. Sincerely, — Ti nthy T. Carey \ Chief, r ROulato.) Office on ►vi St. Vrain SANITATION DISTRICT Wei c/Co"tY Pion, 7iriQUaPt. December 27, 200'. Engineers Review .' _ RECCE,/ vE� To Weld County Planning Department, The following items need to be completed regarding the P1JD case number 5-620: 1. The area EAST of WCR 1 is in the Districts service area but does not border WCR 1 North to South the entire distance. One half(1/2)mile East of WCR 1,North of WCR 24 to WCR 28 is not entirely in the District. (Please see attached drawing for clarification). The location part of the Weld County memo describes the area as follows"North of WCR 26; 1/8 mile South of WCR 28; and WEST of and adjacent to WCR 1". St.Vrain Sanitation District provides no sewer service to the WEST of WCR 1. Is this an error? Should it read East of WCR I? 2. An inclusion agreement needs to be filled out and accepted by the Board of Directors. No inclusion agreement has been submitted yet. 3. There is no sewer system to the area,a plan of how the area will be served needs to be developed and accepted by St.Vrain Sanitation District. 4. Please review the St "rain Sanitation District Statement of Purpose. 5. Current line capacity is a concern. S'ncerely, xv hers Fleck District Engineer 436 Comnan Street Suites 2D3 de 204 P.O.Box 908 Longmont,CO 80502.0908 — Phone:1303)776-9570 Fax:(303)774.2349 Email. mark(�stssn.com m. / "3 - / \ 21 t: / 19 % O 20 © \\ MuulaaN RI / 0 7 - I F l-- l .. . ' .- .— 30 -- .. _ "-" Q I II - I 28 ( .•s / 30 29 g `l a. i . C:: c gmy54* voir I 6 I -�— � , I t' M5kK. O 2,' - k 33 32 l e b 01( O"F.: r + j; Q . -k if _.k II P's I �`' 7 T3N il. r T2N a� — EU.The a e ._ i �. - - 5 �r�`r� eCopP� ngvi dowvale I i� ith - 4rec4 tl Rademi _ r :once q Direct I '� I Ori:lnal �„ .. .;,. „9 — = 1 ;Milky Way i� — P1 NA ` V f. H 03 F , ql ar S . Vista Commercla III ` 6 — Jista Commercial I g I Idaho Cr( • 7. kI I epillie lifINieir: fist. ,____cr___ _,@).__ I __ ---0 319elow I ilLighthoi •. r Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE Interoffice Memo JAN 2 9 2002 ba�t;.£' DECEIVED _ • 1. To: Sheri Lockman,Department of Plannin •�' `�' From: Ken Poncelow as-ease: _;oa�o3• _=- Date: January 21,2002 Subject: S-620 This proposal does not specifically indicate that the access road will remain a private road. The road name must be submitted for approval as the name cannot duplicate other road names in other areas of the county. If the road remains private, everyone should be informed that the Sheriffs Office has significant limitations regarding traffic enforcement on private roads in the event of speeding or other use which may not conform to traffic laws on public roads. Private roads require specific provisions for maintenance. particularly from heavy snowfall and/or drifting, which is not described in the proposal. The road sign with road name and address ranges needs to be prominently displayed at the intersection with WCR 1. These types of developments make locating residences very difficult in emergency situations,particularly after dark. Address ranges at the entrance would be a significant benefit. If this is to remain a private road,there needs to be specific provisions to maintain the signage in perpetuity. All individual addresses must be prominently displayed at the individual residence's access to aid emergency responders particularly during hours of darkness. The Sheriffs Office is very supportive of homeowner's associations that require annual fees in order to maintain the development and enforce covenants. We are better able to address neighborhood issues that may develop with an existing neighborhood governing body. This proposal mentions a neighborhood homeowner's association,however,does not discuss how to continue it into perpetuity. There are oil well and tank batteries within this department. These need to be fenced off in order to mitigate the potential for tampering. These facilities are known to create an attractive nuisance for young people. Tampering not only creates a significant danger to the safety but also environmental damage with extensive litigation and clean-up costs. The Sheriffs Office lacks the ability to absorb any additional service demand without the resources recommended in the multi-year plan provided by the Board of County Commissioners or indicated by growth not considered at the time that the plan was developed. I have no other comments on this proposal. CaiL - IAIM Weld County Referral December 20, C 2001 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services nas received the following item for review: Applicant Gary&Tina Bogott Case Number S-620 Please Reply By January 10,2002 Planner Sheri Lockman Project Sketch Plan for a 93 Lot PUD In the Agricultural Zone District • Legal Lot B of RE-1493; being pan of the N W4 of Section 31, T3N, R68W of the 61n t P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location North of WCR 26; 1/8 mile south of WCR 28; and west of and adjacent to WCR 1 Parcel Number 1207 31 000063 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above Ilsteo Date so the: we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application,please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Department Design Review Meeting: O We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does nct comply with our Comprehensive Plan We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. Zi See attached letter. Comments: V 4-` rCN i&tA) 61) (ill' Li ST )n 4r flfl 1fi Na ti one 4!tM " AU rvi . Signature re „Y.Ap., Date iat{1oa Agency • AGf�l;t waft— _ S We1J Cm:nry P lei n.ng Oep:. 0;555 N 1711 Ave Creelev.CO a0031 0(970)353.4'.00 eh,3540 +(9'C)304-6493 fax _ Itsio Memorandum f tof•k. TO: Sheri Lockman, W.C. Planning w I DATE: January 24, 2002 • FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Pub i - COLORADO Health and Environment CASE NO.: S-620 NAME: Gary& Tina Bogott The Weld County Hearth Department has reviewed this proposal. The applicant proposes a 93 lot PUD on 84 acres. The minimum lot size is .25 acre, with an overall density of one HOME per.9 acres: Public water and sewer are proposed for the development. The application has satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regard to water and sewer service. The application states the water will be supplied by Longs Peak Water District. No letter of intent from Longs Peak Water District has been ,ncluded in the application materials. StVrain Sanitation District is proposed to provide sewer service to the development. No letter of intent from St.Vrain Sanitation District has been included in the application materials. "- The initial impact plan submitted in the application materials appears to address all the environmental impacts of Section 27-6-40. o\PAM'Planning's ketchi5520.rtf 02/15/02 14:57 FAX 970 304 "'98 WELD PLANNING ®002 Jan 22 02 04: 28p MU V"9ab1.r 303- " •-6663 p. 2 Ks(pik ' Weld County Referral December 20, IIDC 2001 COLORADO The Wed County Department of Plarning Services hes received the following item for review: Applicant Phillip & Marsha Willis Case Number S-619 Pease Reply By January 10.2002 Planner Km Ogle Project Sketch Plan for a 36 Lot PJD in the Agncultural Zone District • Legal N2 of the SW4 of Section 31,T3N, RUM of the 6tn P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location North of WCR 26 and west of and adjacent to WCRI Parcel Number 1207 31 000055 _ _ The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant tc this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the ahoy:: listed date so Ina: we may give fug consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Cepartment of Planning Services. If you nave any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Department Design Review Meeting: G We nave reviewed the request arta find that it doss/does not comply with ow.Comprehensive Pien We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. Q See attached letter. Comments: sgrat;re Datev7- Acenc/ /0,r/. c>iLr?. 3 �E" fi Pc.: =oun:y'lu,ning Dept. i 555'4. 1":h Tie.(i:eeluy.2:c -Or:71 'n-O',75'-u t ea:JatO i-f 9'0130-...,08 fax 02/15/02 14:54 F.4S 970 304 "s98 WELD PLANNING Gi2003 Dt C - _ , St. \Trair�'� alley > " • School District January 8,2002 rnt r/o. r, e lit ' /' '-= Kim Ogle Weld County Planning Department 1555 N. .7 Ave. Greeley,CO 80631 • RE: Recommendation to oppose the Seeweld Farms Estates Sketch Plan(Part of the N! of the SW%of Section 31,T3N. R68//). Dear Kim: Thank you for referring the Seewaid Farms Estates Sketch Plan to the School District. The District has reviewed the development proposal in terms of future student impacts end available school capacity anc has the following RECOMMENDATION: the District is OPPOSED to the approval of this application due to this developments impact or an already overcrowded school facility. The Board of Education has established a District-wide policy of opposing new developments that add to the student enrollment of schools projected to be at or above 125% of their capacity, Thls particular application. which is currently located In the Mead Elementary, Mead Middle and Skyline High School Feeder,will add 36 new single-family dwelling units with a potential impact of 24 additIonal students in this feeder. The District opposes this development because,as indicated in the chart below, Mead Middle school will exceed 125%of its capacity with the addition of students from this development. The District may reconsider this opposition should the developer wish to discuss how the development can be better timed to coincide with the District's construction of new facilities. or if other mitigation measures can be taken to accommodate this development's contribution of new students In light of school capacity shortfalls. PROPOSED DEVELOPNENT CAPACITY BENCHMARK au dire Oct 01 Stints. Enrollmentw New Frttj.Stint: w/proposed Capacity Capacity Enrollment Impact Development Capacity 2005 development 2705 Elementary 504 426 13 439 87% 547 560 111% Vlitidle 342 454 5 459 134% 572 577 % Hirn Scndcl :323 1442 6 1448 103%n 1627 1633 123% — Total 2169 24 I 2746 2770 The recommendation of the District noted above applies to the attendance boundaries current as of the date of this letter. Residential growth and new school facilities could affect the project's attendance area in the future. As of this time,there are no anticipated boundary changes or facility expansions that would warrant a change in the current attendance areas. Should the County decide to recommend approve' of this development proposal,the School District's ashen- -- lieu end/or land dedication requirements would still need to be satisfied. This requirement involves the dedication of land with the adjacent infrastructure or payment of an equivalent cash-in-lieu fee based on the student yield of the development. Since tnis property is nct a likely `uture school site. the fee would be assessed per the attached chart. Please let me know of any further questions. Sincerely, Gler Segrue. A,IGP Planning 3cedalist GS.jkr ST.VRAIN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT RUNNING DEPAR-MENT 395 SOUTH PRATT PARKWAY. CNGMON- CO I3C5C1.SCOTT TOILLION.MANAGER.PHONE 303-882-722c.FAX 303-652-7344. Exhibit A School Planning SEEWALD FARM ESTATES o Standards And SKETCH PLAN ® Calculation of Weld County In Lieu Fees Single Famiy School Planniaandert Number Projected Student Site Size Acres of Developed Of Student Facility Standard Land Land Cash-in-lieu Units Yield Standard Ants Contribution Value Contribution Elementary 36 0.35 525 10 0.24 $35,000 12.6 0. 9 Middle Level 30 0.14 750 25 0.17 $35,000 5.04 High School 36 0.17 1200 50 0.26 $35,000 a ) 6.12 Total 23.76 0.66 $35,000 $23,205 m Single Family Student Yield is.66 $645 Per Unit O vat ti N O 118109 Planning Department 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I -- 02.15'02 13:00 FAX970 904 0498 WELD PLANNING C005 - - _ a DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION Weld County Administrative Offices Agit( 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.uc Phone (970) 353.6100, Ext.3540 Fax(970) 304.6498 1111 p COLORADO January 2, 2002 Phillip & Marsha Willis • Sketch Plan for a 36 Lot PUD in the Agricultural Zone District S-619 1. Building permits shall be obtained prior to any construction. Building permits are not required for buildings that qualify for and receive a Certificate of Compliance, but an electrical permit will be required for all buildings if electrical service is provided to the building. 2. A plan review will be required for each building. Two complete sets of plans are required when applying for the permit. 3. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the 1997 UBC, 1998 IMC, 1997 IPC, 1999 NEC and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. 4. Each building will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnlcal report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. 5. Building height shall be limited to the maximum height allowed per UBC Table 5-B. Wall and opening protection and limitations shall be in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. Separation of buildings of mixed occupancy classifications shall be in accordance with UBC Table 3-B and • Chapter 3. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by the Zoning Ordinance. 6. A Flood Hazard Development Permit shall be submitted for buildings constructed within the 100-year flood plain. Flease cortact me for any further information regarding tnis project. Sincerely. j / - i < Jeff Reif Building Official Sorvice.Teamaror4,Integrity,Quality 02/15/02 13:01 FAX 970 304 88 WELD PLANNING I 006 MouNTAA, MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: 9119 County Line Road•Longmont. CO 80501 (303)772.0710• FAX(303)651-7702 NEW .. lj f„ January 4, :002 - r`rhtr r„U vk {' Lp`Mr. Kim Ogle—Planner `' a .r~ 44. Weld County Planning Department cs 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley,CO 8063 I Dear Mr. Ogle: I have reviewed the proposed unit development sketch plan for the Seewnld Farm Estates subdivision located north of Weld County Road 26 and west of and adjacent to Weld County Read 1 (Case it S-619). The Fire District does not object to the proposed subdivision and subsequent development, provided the development is able to meet the requirements of the Fire Distr:ct. All applicable codes as they pertain to water supply. fire hydrant locations. street designs, and tire department access must be met. Based on my review, I have the following comments regarding the sketch plans submitted: • A minimum fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute. measured at a residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch, is required for one- and two-family dwellings not exceeding 3,600 gross square feet. Larger residences require a minimum fire flow of 1.7.50 gallons per minute and may require more depending on the building sire and type of construction as per .4ppendir 111-A of the Uniform Fire Code. • The maximum spacing between fire hydrants on public streets and along fire apparatus access roads is 500 feet. Each hydrant must also be located within 250 feet of the front property line of each lot. The installation of fire hydrants, water mains and access roads is required to parallel construction and storage of combustible materials on site. • Prior to the installation of waterl nes, construction plans for the utilities, showing the configuration of streets. the location of fire hydrants, the size of water mains and available fire flows will need to be submited to the Fire Distract for review and approval. The �- developer needs to be made aware that all access reads must be approved and maintained when huiId'.ng construction begins. • As soon as :he final plat is approved. the applicant must provide :o the Fire District an eight and one half by eleven map of the subdivision show icg the street contiguratio street names. hydrant .ocations and addresses of the lots if availaole. ROM 1 Station 2 SLEW 3 SlMnn a Sr,0pr 5 511101 9 Salon 7 91'ft Coy.Ina R2. 13971 NCR'3 P.0.?as 573 PD.Boal' 10811Omam Run PO.Boa 366 DO Bo..C Longmont.CO ailyroni.CO 290 Palmer in 950e Nmot flow Laaayon• CO 900 ar w. IOC So FoT6t SI. _ 90541 0050• Meta CO 60512 Na.vl.CO 609.2 60006 En•.C060515 Damn•.CC 6051• _ 02/15/02 15:02 FAX 970 304 x49$ WELD PLANNING [ 007 Mr.Kim Ogle January 4,2002 Page Two r The Fire District reserves the richt to make further comments as development proceeds. Nothing in this review is intended to authorize or approve of any aspect of this project that does not comply with all applicable codes and standards. We appreciate being involved in the planning process. Should you have any questions,please contact me at(303)772-0710. Sincerely, Lon D. Miller r Fire Prevention Officer LDM'lm cc: project file file Im01 C4.02 r - 02/15/02 15:09 FAX 970 304 ^8 WELD PLANNING C005 f 7-1c TN"•'e'd l5 Z° ...1;;;;* e" et •aunty Referral - inkDecember 20, IIV , 2001 — ;OLORADO • The We'd County Department of Parning Services has received the following item for review: Acplicant Phillip & Manna Wll'is Case Numoer S-819 Please Reply By January 10, 2002 Planner Kim Cgle Project Sketch Plan fora 3"0 Lot(DUD in tne Agricultural Zone District • Legal N2 of the SW4 of Section 31, T3N, R68W of tne 6th P.M., Wed County, • Colorado. • Location North of VvCR 26 and west of and adjacent to WCR1 Parce/Number 1207 21 000055 . - The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this recuest would be appreciates. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to bee positive response to the Cepartmert of Planning Services. if you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Panning Department Design Review Meeting: 3 We have reviewed tne request and find that It does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan erWe hate reviewed the request and find no co.ntidts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. — Comments: Signature ? la �;�jc C (f:' •_C-- Cate / - �' • Agency J6.,.-, rr •-µe:_.au.-.::at_nn¢¢:-_,. . ._.-'d . 7:Ave _- . -Q Sr n'I -UP__ .,i')ry:.r 2! ' u.-�i�� ...A.' Sfa:. r 02/15.02 15:04 FAX 970 304 -198 9ELD PLANNING ®009 • .A�"I .,p. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT DENVER REGULATORY OFFtC^c, 'i07 5. PLATTE CANYON ROAD o ,ip: n LI:TLETON, COLORADO 80126-6901 December 28.200'. Weld Cc:r;,ty Punning Dap t. Mr.Kim Ogle • Weld County Planning Department Pj „„, a 1555 N. 17°Ave. to C g Pi/ Zed Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Willis Sketch Plan for a 36 Lot PUD In the Agricultural Zone District,Case No. S-619 Corps File No.200180880 Dear Mr.Ogle: Reference is made to the above-mentioned project located in the SW ''A of Section 31,Township 3 North,Range 68 West,Weld County, Colorado. If any work associated with this project requires the placement of dredged or fill material, and any excavation associated with a dredged or fill project,either temporary or permanent, in waters of the United States at this site,this office should be notified by a proponent of the project for proper Department of the Army permits or changes in permit requirements pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Waters of the U.S. includes ephemeral, intermittent and perennial streams their surface connected wetlands and adjacent wetlands and certain lakes,ponds,drainage ditches and irrigation ditches that have a nexus to interstate commerce. Work in waters of the U.S. should be shown on a map identifying the Quarter Section, Township, Range and County of the work. If there are any questions concerning this matter please call Mr.Terry McKee of this office at 303-979-4120 and reference Corps File No.200180880. -� Sincerely, /J Ti •:ty T. ar Chi Den -r egulator, Office mi 02/15/22 15:05 FAX 970 304r a498 WELD PLANNING ®010 �eryC St. 'Train c�'' .N, SANITATION ��3pt DISTRICTS C ys�� December 27. 2G0: "� Engineers Review To Weld County P:ann:ng Department, The following items need to be completed regarding the PL'D case number 5-619. 1. The area EAST of WCR 1 is in the Districts service area but does not border WCR 1 North to South the entire distance. One half(1/2)mile East of WCR 1,North of WCR 24 to WCR 2B is not entirely in the District. (Please see attached drawing for clarification). The location part of the Weld County memo describes the area as follows"North of WCR 26 and WEST of and adjacent to WCR I". St. Vrain Sanitation District provides no sewer service to the WEST of WCR 1. Is this an error? Should it read East of WCR 1? 2. An inclusion agreement needs to be filled out and accepted by the Board of Directors. No inclusion agreement has been submitted yet. 3. There is no sewer system to the area, a plan of how the area will be served needs to be developed and accepted by St. Vrain Sanitation District. 4. Please review the St. Vrain Sanitation District Statement of Purpose. 5. Current line capacity is a concern. _ Sincerely,irlRobert Fleck District Engineer aid Coffman ntrcct Suites 203 K 204 P.O.Boa 908 Longmont.CO S0S02-0908 Phone:13031 775-957!) 1•nx:(303)774.2349 Entail: markuitstsan.com .- 02'15/02 15:07 F_A 970 204 8198 WELD PLANNING Z012 /� DI I �, a r. ' I 21 x - 22 - J 19 i 3 20 O MULLIGAN RE� 5 / / / y /1 6f I - / I / I z . C - i 28 I / -- 29 o I s. I- 2: e\pv i� ^- IS SanbbmmRee air . ` \ e 31 pais,,,U.,4iNit".17,,<Izst:::—C-- -�' ` YV. 32 1 33 9 I— x,10 . Vs rQ,tfri °{1" trg 13 i kc` ,nl©, 'I T3N The Elms • � 0 „ „earn„... suey 1 .'`-- .L 4 ✓� y f Ce .-" "ngvi t wvale I ., ,4'�"411 i °�' Radem:once is Direct I ii. — =--`. On tnal I 'I �. -„ >„_____-�C 9 — _� . Milky Way C, I fi _ N o'# L,��ct�t✓" M eda Farms > Vista Commercial II\' E.- i r Jo \_ r I vista Commercial I; o y''o . fr-- Idaho Cree TY lrr � +�I Yl I .1—, - Bigelow ,� Ltghthou,-,.7.,r,::::;.. , - 02'15/02 13:15 FAX 970 304 8198 WELD PLANNING ®019 • (. CC , — ' . '1" Weld County Referral ' December 20, • 2001 - COLORADO The Weld County Deparment of Planning Services nas recelvec the following item for review: Applicant Ph llio & Marsha Willis Case Plumber S-619 • Please Reply ay January 10. 2002 Planner Kim Ogle Project Sketch Plan for a 36 Lot PJD in the Agricultural Zone District Legal N2 of the SW4 of Section 31,T3N, R68'W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location North of WCR 26 and west of and acjacent to WCR1 I Parcel Number 120; 31 000055 • The application is suomitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would oe appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response net received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Department Design Review Meeting: O We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan I. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 0 See attached letter. Comments: I.i`lr r�2_V I<La f 4 to J -Im pc t-<ttr' E 41 1,(f1F n i t(i.151(?e-ft l"Y1O Lt Tr U. CClAnd. Signature tl r•_t,`,,. Date Agency L. We..Cau-,e Pbnnvv" •}-i:\. :7:h::re.acute).1:i '-dill +IOM\.`i-.,. v,ex:..i4) . Opil lu-r,r9S tu. r -. -. •- .....� .t oi � ov• o�ao ntLU PL4\,�Pa; ®019 <im �5g e-s-6W?tf Page 1 I f • I ' — i ! - wIgcs COLORADO Memorandum TO: Klm Ogle. W.C. Planning DATE: cdatc> FROM: Pam Smith,W.C. Department of Public Healtn and Environment • CASE NO.: S-619 NAME: Phillip/Marsha WI!lis Tne Weld County Health Department has reviewed this proposal The applican:proposes a 36 lot PUD on 53.57 acres. The minimum lot size is.25 acre,with an overall density of one HOME - per 1.49 ea 's. Puolic wate•and sewer are proposed for the development. The application has satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regard to water and sewer service. The application states the water will be supplied by Longs Peak Water District. No letter of intent from Longs Peak Water District has been included in the application materiels. St. Vrain Sanitation District is proposed to provide sewer service to the development. No letter of intent from St. Vrain Sanitation DisMct has been included in me application materials. The initial impact pan submitted in the application materials appears to address all the environmental .mpacts of Section 27-6-4C. 7:7AM‘PIenrinp`awein3At a r1f • Information delivered to the Weld County Department of Planning Services The Department of Planning and Zoning suggests at the time of submission all incoming correspondence and Mylar be reviewed by the planner. In situations where this is not possible, please complete the following information to ensure that submitted material is given to the correct person. In absence of this information a delay in response time will likely occur. PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY Date Submitted: :/`1_ 02-- List item(s) submitted // W C 1l 776 Person submitting inforrgiov? Name: (�l.��U �� ' r 1Y-ev?Arta/ Telephone number(s): 9 2Cv�> Fax number: 9/76 — 2R-2 -9/ 23 1 ( _ Applicant: Ce-- Name: Case number: Planner working with: Has the recording fee for the Mylar been paid? 706 , If no,please pay$10/per page Submitted by: Date: Received by: Date: M:\WPFILES\Buildingforms\foreceiving.wPd r Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY March 29, 2002 Robert Anderson, Planner Weld County Planning 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Amendment to the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. Dear Robert Anderson, On behalf of the property owners, hereinafter referred to as the WCR# 1 Coalition, we are requesting amendment to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and I-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. Enclosed you will find the 11 copies of the I-25 MUD Amendment proposal to amend the Weld County Comprehensive Plan 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Map. This proposal meets the guidelines as set forth in the Section 22-1-50 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Below are the list of individuals who as a collective body of one wish to include their properties into the 1-25 MUD area plan. Each of the property owners request inclusion into the MUD and have requested that the Weld county Commissioners recognize this application as a collective effort of the majority land owners in this region. Property Owners: Weld County Road# 1 Coalition Chris Adrian owner of 194 acres on County Line Road#1 303-776-0853 David&Linda Miller 12380 WCR 1 Longmont 303-684-0105 Phil& Marsha Willis 12244 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-6660 Linda Kolby 12136 WCR 1 Longmont Terry& Kathy Braesch 12456 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-7221 Berman&Lois Iden 12490 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-0802 Pat Eckel 12516 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-9985 Ruth Van Zuiden 12540 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-8270 Tom&Diane Seaman 12566 WCR 1 Longmont Ronald Zaruba 12624 WCR 1 Longmont 303-485-2581 Joe Kelliher 12628 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-0968 Gary& Tina Bogott 12748 WCR 1 Longmont 303-702-9729 Roger Steinke 12922 WCR 1 Longmont 303-776-1819 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 Design Development Consultants DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR THE COLORADO COMMUNITY The above listed property owners, WCR#1 Coalition, request approval by the Weld County Commissioners for the inclusion of there properties into the I-25 MUD Area Plan. Sincerely, (be t Dev ent Consultants Don d . Leffler 2627 Redwing Road Suite 350 Fort Collins,Colorado 80525 (970)266-0585 Fax(970)282-7123 FROM :GENE COPPOLA — FAX NO. :303-792-5990 litr. 20 2002 10:24AM P1 Tel: 303-792-M50 P.O.Box 260027 EUGENE G. COPPOLA P.E. uttieton,CO 80163.0027 Fax: 303-792-5990 March 26, 2002 Mr. Don Leffler Design Development Consultants 2627 Redwing Road, Suite 350 Fort Collins, CO 80526 RE: Preliminary Traffic Study for MUD Inclusion Weld County Road 1 Landowners Group 387 Acres North of CR 26 and East of CR 1 Dear Mr. Leffler As requested, I have prepared this preliminary traffic study for the group of landowners along Weld County Road 1. This study was prepared as part of the request that this parcel be Included In the 1-25 Mixed Used Development Area(MUD). The property generally in- cludes the area north of County Road 26(CR 26) between Calkins Lake and Weld County Road 1 (CR1). The landowners group is collectively seeking to be included in the MUD area. They represent some 13 parcels of land totaling about 387 acres. Preliminary site traffic was estimated based upon currently anticipated land uses and densi- ties and assigns site traffic to the nearby roadway system. The following site traffic is ex- _ pected based upon published Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates. No adjustment for internal trips has been made and therefore, the estimate is consid- ered conservative. FROM :GENE COPPOLA FAX NO. :303-792-5990 .L,^ r. 2B 2002 10:24AM P2 Daly AM Pk HR PM Pk Hr .1 ': r +� `ate a ` *t , i�7ripe Rata :1n r. ;Oil; i RatY Employment(1) 15 AC 63.11 947 10.17 127 20 10.47 33 125 _ Commercial/Retail(2) BAC 4292 4,292 1.03 63 40 3.74 160 194 Residential(3) 387 AQ 9.57 3,828 0.75 75 225 1.01 259 I 145 Park/Oreenway/Roads 166 AC Nag. Neg. Nag Neg. Neg Nag Neg. Neg 4 ' L,hti LL ' f7? .':�'ti�7 '2175 2$1 �.._, is .."r,C (1) Industrial Park (2) 100,000 S.F. of Shopping Center (3) 400 Single Family Residences As shown above, 556 morning peak hour trips, 936 afternoon peak hour trips, and 9,067 trips per day can be expected from this parcel assuming the identified land uses and densi- ties. Given the retail element, a significant proportion of the above traffic may be drawn from traffic already using the area street system. _ Direct site access will be provided by CR 1 and CR 26. These existing roadways border the site on the west and south. Preiiminay traffic assignments to and from the site are esti- mated below for the primary roadways and major facilities leading to and from the primary roadways. This distribution is reasonably consistent with current traffic patterns and is logi- cal given the anticipated land uses. Roadway 1 Section % Site Traffic Daily Site Traffic CR1 North ofSH66 4% 363 South of SH 119 6% 544 SH 66 East of CR 1 28% 2,539 West of CR 1 8% 725 SH 119 East of CR 1 33% 2,992 West of CR 1 21% 1,904 SH 66 and CR 1 are currently paved two-lane roadways having one lane in each direction. SH 119 is a divided four-lane roadway. Both SH 66 and SH 119 provide direct access to l- 25. CR 26 is an unpaved two-lane roadway. Ninth and Seventeenth Avenues provide addi- FROM :GENE COPPOLR FAX NO. :303- 92-5990 -Mr. 28 2002 10:25PM P3 tional connections to most of Longmont. While these City streets are expected to serve some site traffic, they are outside the MUD boundaries and were not considered at this time, A comprehensive traffic study will be undertaken after acceptance into the MUD. That study will better define actions needed to mitgate the transportation impacts of development on this site. It will provide more detailed information on a specific development proposal(s) and address items such as internal trips, pass-by trips, site access, internal roadways, additional roadway leneage on nearby streets, auxiliary lanes, and traffic controls. I trust this letter will meet your current needs. Please give me a call if you have any ques- tions or need additional assistance. Sincerely, �hiteitmi,impa _ ,EQRQE , aVt��.ap�ar�ejFc••pv4 Eug ne G. Coppo a PE 15945 v$r{.r •,. F #1/4$:C;;. l�.Q:::. • Q.P91 - $:yr cotp�� IF a b N. ` . E. \ ` Mulligan C --- ! IF a z \ 4es i Fes, , ! Q 2 1 0 r`w e [ l9 20 \ II 24 19 IF \ I nit I' i 1f ' Fast r ^i I \ 90 I 29 y�31 NAdbo Pe a A _ i b 90 / ; 7 Res BUY R6714 +F Parcels requesting inclusion into the MUD f ,s i • `\ .._ ins Caker I 99 ~ ` 34 lj24 \ W - (Union Res) I \ I IF - j'�� i On -... — ... _ i — ;r--f i ,g Parcel already in the MUD u : i ' I R + / I A 11 P ICJ 1 : 'rk, 1:11 Z l7 r<i' is / is / 14, I 19 \ 44,1 I tl ('� \ N. IE i 1 LI.Ga /.. U Legend oO 1500 3000 Feet T — — 1-25 MUD Area Boundary St. Vrain Sanitation District Boundary Service Area Boundary WCR # 1 Coalition Application W gig In — ' Sewer Lines E Proposed Sewer Trunk Lines ,.r 8 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan I- Map 4.4 Sanitary Sewer Services Nevernbr. 1996 _._ _ J " [97_ - WCR # 1 Coalition Application �,: •4.959, — i .. ja901 ._.:...-. :. . 41 — \ • Limits of Application — I CALKINS I LAKE • ) (UNION RESERVOIR) 32 - .SC - t ! — - ` / - - c�-...-_ / ,, 49 r 'mss- r f N ��.RR \ h Wii.3 f •WESTERN _ GP _. ::-" `4 N • I �.� ` Legend — \\Y. lie9t .—_.�� !<9I% —� kY� » Rogan Garden Estates 'Wrens, —�_r_ �' Tee -r- i c�� , I , I ! Seewald Farms Estates ,— - %/ A Estates at Adrian Heights 3 ' 4 '`'— I . .C \� rte: .Cv ` `} % -r- I 1.,2 0 I A:LE - S.T. 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET _ — — I 5 0 1 61L^UETER (P- )— — ._I.a•Y:=.a_Q..•. ..Wv�� ...«— .a-wac.a-. - :.vr�_-- �+r�•ru-.� �.;:._�, :u:.e.: .. -.....t __� . _ — Scale= 1 : 24 000 a O 1 `r. n — Design Development Consultants 2627 Redwing Road, Suite 350 — Fort Collins, CO 80526 Phone: 970-266-0585 I / ( (---- \— i WCR# 1 Coalition Application — aaz ...>p Existing Limits of St. Vrain Sewer District — N , i — / CALKINS I LAKE • ' (UNION RESERVOIR) 32 - \', \ GC , 1. -3 ( 1 i\\.-- Area to be included in %i/ : ' 1p St. Vram Sewer District G �i �// �1 • ta si \\ I �`\ ` i.� .. WESTERNS off — 6 _,,, o` — \\ ,y Legend 3 i `� "` Bogatt Garden EMITS '� - �r _ y tr"!C �i i Seewald Farms Estates 11 �� _"sr ,r . Estates at Adrian Heights ' ='='- - 1 I. 0 111.LE 9 ST — 1300 0 1000 2000 3000 -1000 5000 5'000 7000 ?EET — _ 1 5 0 11.1L011ETER q1 - --' .. ---, -- Scale= 1 : 24 000 Bo , '1 RetiC Design Development Consultants 2627 Redwing Road, Suite 350 Fort Collins, CO 80526 Phone: 970-266-0585 FPDM : t3JRC FRX t'C. : 3038736604 ..Mar. 29 2002 05:03PM P4 PRELIMINARY I.IS'f O1' WORK TASK FOR AMENDING' THE SVSI) 208 STUDY 1) Gather Background Information A) Current SVSD and City of Longmont 208 Studies B) Current SVSD service boundary map and masterplan C) Additional site topographic mapping D) CDPHP application lbrm(s) 2) Meetings • A) Soaping meeting with CDPHE district engineer B) Preliminary meeting with SVSD director C) Public information meetings D) Presentation at CDPHE hoard meeting(s) E) Presentation at SVSD board meetings) F) Client Meetings 3) 208 Application and Study Revision A) Complete calculations and narrative text to support annexation requirements B) Prepare design exhibits for proposed annexed area and proposed construction features (i.e.,pipe routing, lift station, etc.) C) Prepare estimate of project costs D) Complete CDPHII application paperwork L) Address various letters, comments and concerns in the final 208 study F) Include an appendix of public comments in the final 208 study 4) Prepare SVSD Documents A) Demonstrate through a Masterplan update that increasing the service boundary is feasible, technically and economically 8) Prepare applicat.on documents, as needed 5) Cost Sharing Estimate and Agreements) A) Define,propose and estimate cost sharing between. the developers group and SVSD for various construction features based on contributed flow B) Prepare exhibits for the agreement between the developers group and SVSD. C) Review technical language of draft agrement(s) FROM : mRC FR'< NO. : 3038736604 Ma-. 28 2002 05:03PM P5 LIST OF DISCUSSION POINTS RAISED DURING INITIAL CONTACT WITH CI)PHE -. 1) What is the distance from the subject properties to the existing west-most SVSD service line? 2) Can the SVSD 1X'WTP treat the waste stream from the proposed developments? 3) Can the SVSD=scorpion be modified to include the newly proposed service boundary? (i.e., will lift stations be needed due to terrain constraints, is the sizing of sanitary sewer interceptor pipes sufficient to carry the additional flow, etc.) 4) Will area in addition to the clients developments also be Lncluded in the new service boundary? For example,the area between the western-most existing pipe and the proposed developments. 5) What is the additional flow requirement at the WWTP? 6) What is the cost of construction, how will it be paid for and what is the life-cycle replacement cost? Who is responsible for replacement cost? 7) Are opposing parties to the proposed annexation expected? IF so, what are opposition )Olnts? _ 8) Has initial contact been made with SVSD? The CDPHE would like to have an understanding of their preliminary thoughts before entering the 208 study process. 9) What is the planning time line for construction? wee Adrian•County Sketch Plan — Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs County Processing Fees 1 LS $1,130.00 $1,130.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Preparation of Annexation Map 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 All HisteMal Water Rghts must be dedicated. — Preliminary Plat Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costa County Processing Fees 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $60,000.00 $60,000.00 i . Final Plat Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs County Processing Fees 1 LS $600.00 $600.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $90,000.00 $90,000.00 Deficit Raw Water Righter 220.00 ea $9,500.00 $2,090,000.00 — County Electrical Construction Fee 220 Lot $1,300.00 $286,00000 Arterial Roadway Fee 8957.66 LF $76.92 $689,02321 Existing Water&Sanitary Main Reimbursement Pay 100%of the casts of an 8'water main that fronts the site 3923.74 IF $29.00 $113,788.46 — Pay 100%of the costs of an 8'water main teal is within the site. 2516.96 LF $35.00 $88,093.00 Pay 100%of the costs of a 12'saaner main that fronts the site 3923.74 LF $29.00 $113,768.46 Pay 100%of the costs of a 12'sewer main — that is within the site. 2516.96 LF $35.00 $88,093.60 Onsla Construction Costs Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Curb&Gutter&Walk 42386.26 LF $22.00 $932,057.72 — Pavement 593127.6 SF $1.25 $741,409.55 OBslte Construction Costs Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs — Add turn Lanes to County Line Road 19800 SF $1.50 $29,700.00 Landscape Arterial Roads 6440.7 IF $0.00 $0.00 Utilities 1 LS $220,166.67 $220,166.67 Building Permit Fees-Commercial' Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Building Permit 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Plan Review Fee 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Water 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Sanitary Sewer 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Electrical Fee 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Electrical Community investment Fee 0 ea $000 $0.00 Water Meter Fee 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Public Building Fee 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Transportation Investment Fee 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Misc.Fees 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 — Building Permit Fees-Residential Item Quantity UMts Unit Coat Extended Costs Building Permit 220 ea $1,38725 $305,195.00 Plan Review Fee 220 ea $901.71 $198,376.75 Water 220 ea $6,500.00 $1,430,000.00 — Sanitary Sewer 220 ea $5,560.00 $1,223,200.00 Electrical Fee 220 ea $78.00 $17,160.00 Electrical Community Investment Fee 220 8a $0.00 $0.00 Water Meter Fee 220 ea $0.00 $0.00 Public Building Fee 220 ea $0.00 $0.00 Transportation Investment Fee 220 ea $0.00 $0.00 — Misc.Fees 220 ea $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL $8,752,763.01 Contingencies(15%) $1,312,917.45 TOTAL COSTS $10,065,700.47 Total Area 8,477,191.76 Total Area 194.61 Total Res.Lots 220 Open Space Area 903,928 00 — Commercial Area 2,708,553.22 ii I PSI ' Not For Construction Adrian-City Annexation — Item QuantityUnits Unit Cost Extended Costs City Processing Fees 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,00000 Consultants Fees 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,00000 Preparation of Annexation Map 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 All Historical Water Rights must be dedicated. — Preliminary Plat Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs CityProcessing Fees 1 LS $4,00000 $4,000.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $80,000.00 $80,000.00 e ux Final Plat Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs City Processing Fees 1 LS $3,350.00 $3,350.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $120,000.00 $120,000.00 Deficit Raw Water Rghter 194.61 ac $38,487.00 $7,469,937.54 — City of Longmont Electical Construction Fee 220 Lot $1,300 00 $286,00000 Medal Roadway Fee 8957.68 LF $76.92 $689,023.21 Existing Water 8 Sanitary Main Reimbursement Pay 1/2 of the costs of an 6•water main that fronts the site 392374 LF $14.50 $56,894.23 . — Pay 100%of the costs of an 8•water main that is within the site. 2516.98 LF $29.00 $72,991.64 Pay trz of the costs of a 12•sewer main that fronts the site 3923.74 LF $14.50 $56,89423 Pay 100%of the costs of 12"sewer main i. that Is within the site. 2516.96 LF $35.00 $88,09360 Onsite Construction Cosa Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Curt B Gutter B Walk 42366.26 LF $22.00 $932,057.72 — Pavement 677680.2 SF $1.25 $847,32520 Of site Construction Costs item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Add tam Lanes to County Line Road 19800 LF $1.50 $29,700.00 Landscape Menal Roads 6440.1 LF $220.00 $1,416,954.00 Building Permit Fees-Commercial* Item Quantity Unite Unit Cost Extended Costs Building Permit 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 — Plan Review Fee 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Water 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Sanitary Sewer 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Electrical Fee 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Electrical Community Investment Fee 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Water Meter Fee 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Public Building Fee 0 a $0.00 $0.00 Transportation Investment Fee 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 Misc.Fees 0 ea $0.00 $0.00 — Building Permit Fees-Residential Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Building Penn 220 ea $1,200.00 $264,000.00 Plan Review Fee 220 ea $800.00 $132,000.00 Water 220 ea $15,780.03 $3,471,606.60 — Sanitary Sewer 220 ea $3,000.00 $860000.00 Electrical Fee 220 ea $73.00 $16,060.00 Electrical Community Investment Fee 220 a $244.00 $53,680.00 Water Meter Fee 220 ea $50.00 $11,000.00 Public Building Fee 220 a $625.00 $137,500.00 Transportation Investment Fee 220 a $625.00 $137,500.00 — Misc.Fees 220 ea $7,100.00 $1,562,000.00 SUBTOTAL $18,667,588.17 Contingencies(15%) $2,800,135.23 TOTAL COSTS $21,467703.391 Total Area 8,477,191.76 SF Total Area 194.61 Acres Total Res.Lots 220 Open Space Area 903,928 00 SF — Commercial Area 2,708,553.22 SF PEFUfY Qt ForConstruction Seawald-County Sketch Plan — Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs County Processing Fees 1 LS $1,130.00 $1,130.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Preparation of Annexation Map 1 LS $0.00 $0.00 All Historical Water Rights must be dedicated. Preliminary Plat Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs County Processing Fees 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 — Consultants Fees 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Final Plat Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs County Processing Fees 1 LS $600.00, $600.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Deficit Raw Water Righter 36.00 ea $9,500.00 $342,000.00 County Electrical Construction Fee 36 Lot $1,300.00 $46,800.00 ' — Arterial Roadway Fee 1021.17 LF $0.00 $0.00 Existing Water&Sanitary Main Reimbursement Pay 100%of the costs of an r water main that fronts the site 1021.17 LF $29.00 $29,613.93 — Pay 100%of the costs of a IT sewer main that fronts the site 1021.17 LF $35.00 $35,740.95 Onsite Construction Costs Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Curb&Gutter&Walk 15284.3 LF $0.00 $0.00 Pavement 183411.6 SF $1.25 $229,264.50 4'Gravel Shoulder 6793.02 SY $6.50 $44,154.64 Offsite Construction Costs Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Add turn Lanes to County Line Road 13200 SF $1.50 $19,800.00 Landscape Arterial Roads 1021.17 LF $0.00 $0.00 Utilities 1 LS $231,416.67 $231,416.67 Building Permit Fees-Residential — Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Building Permit 36 ea $1,387.25 $49,941.00 Plan Review Fee 36 ea $901.71 $32,461.65 Water 36 ea $6,500.00 $824,707.11 Sanitary Sewer 36 ea $5,560.00 $200,160.00 Electrical Fee 36 ea $78.00 $2,808.00 Electrical Community Investment Fee 36 ea $0.00 $0.00 Water Meter Fee 36 ea $0.00 $0.00 Public Building Fee 36 ea $0.00 $0.00 — Transportation Investment Fee 36 ea $0.00 $0.00 Misc.Fees 36 ea $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL $2,177,598.46 Contingencies(15%) $326,639.77 TOTAL COSTS $2,504,238.22 Total Area 2,334,171.13 SF Total Area 53.59 Acres REta.. AN Y . r,nr4. �ns 6'i c ion Seewald•City Annexation — Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs City Processing Fees 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Preparation of Annexation Map 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 — All Historical Water Rights must be dedicated. Preliminary Plat Hem Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs City Processing Fees 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000.00 Final Plat — Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs City Processing Fees 1 LS $3,350.00 $3,350.00 Consultants Fees . 1 LS $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Deficit Raw Water Righter 53.59 ac $38,487.00 $2,062,333.43 City of Longmont Electrical Construction Fe 36 Lot $1,250.00 $45,000.00 — Arterial Roadway Fee 1021.17 LF $76.92 $78,548.40 Existing Water&Sanitary Main Reimbursement Pay 1/2 of the costs of an 8"water main that fronts the site 1021.17 LF $14.50 $14,806.97 — Pay 1/2 of the costs of a 12"sewer main that fronts the site 1021.17 LF $17.50 $17,870.48 Onsite Construction Costs _ item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Curb&Gutter&Walk 15284.3 LF $22.00 $336,254.60 Pavement 244548.8 SF $1.25 $305,686.00 Offsite Construction Costs Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Add turn Lanes to County Line Road 13200 LF $1.50 $19,800.00 Landscape Arterial Roads 1021.17 LF $220.00 $224,657.40 Building Permit Fees-Residential item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs — Building Permit 36 ea $1,200.00 $43,200.00 Plan Review Fee 36 ea $600.00 $21,600.00 Water 36 ea $22,908.53 $824,707.11 Sanitary Sewer 36 ea , $3,000.00 $108,000.00 Plumbing Fee 36 ea $73.00 $2,628.00 Electrical Community Investment Fee 36 ea $244.00 $8,784.00 Water Meter Fee 36 ea $50.00 $1,800.00 Public Building Fee 36 ea $625.00 $22,500.00 Transportation Investment Fee 36 ea $625.00 $22,500.00 -- Misc.Fees 36 ea $7,100.00 $255,600.00 SUBTOTAL $4,552,626.38 Contingencies(15%) $682,893.96 ... TOTAL COSTS $5,235,520.34 Total Area 2,334,171.13 SF Total Area 53.59 Acres Total Lots 36 Bogott-County Sketch Plan — item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs County Processing Fees 1 LS $1,130.00 $1,130.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Preparation of Annexation Map 1 LS $0.00 $0.00 All Historical Water Rights must be dedicated. Preliminary Plat Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs — County Processing Fees 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $30,000.00 $30,000.00 — Final Plat Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs County Processing Fees 1 LS $600.00 $600.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Deficit Raw Water Righter 95.00 ea $9,500.00 $902,500.00 County Electrical Construction Fee 95 Lot $1,300.00 $123,500.00 Arterial Roadway Fee 1720 LF $0.00 $0.00 Existing Water&Sanitary Main Reimbursement Pay 100%of the costs of an 8"water main — that fronts the site 1720 LF $29.00 $49,880.00 Pay 100%of the costs of a 12"sewer main that fronts the site 1720 LF $35.00 $60,200.00 Onsite Construction Costs Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Curb&Gutter&Walk 20840 LF $0.00 $0.0O — Pavement 250080 SF $1.25 $312,600.00 4'Gravel Shoulder 9262.22 SY $6.50 $60,204.44 ,.— Offshe Costs item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Add turn Lanes to County Line Road 13200 SF $1.50 $19,800.00 Landscape Arterial Roads 1720.24 LF $0.00 $0.00 Utilities 1 LS $231,416.67 $231,416.67 Building Permit Fees-Residential Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Building Permit 95 ea $1,387.25 $131,788.75 Plan Review Fee 95 ea $901.71 $85,662.69 Water 95 ea $6,500.00 $1,499,482.57 Sanitary Sewer 95 ea $5,560.00 $528,200.00 Electrical Fee 95 ea $78.00 $7,410.00 Electrical Community Investment Fee 95 ea $0.00 $0.00 Water Meter Fee 95 ea $0.00 $0.00 Public Building Fee 95 ea $0.00 $0.00 Transportation Investment Fee 95 ea $0.00 $0.00 — Misc.Fees 95 ea $0.00 $0.00 SUBTOTAL $4,101,375.12 Contingencies(15%) $615,206.27 TOTAL COSTS $4,716,581.39 Total Area 3,801,333.00 SF Total Area 87.27 Acres — E l r ` nyyy /Fa n i,$ G .,,! i �i,, t.i n i:%.:1'tF i.i o . t .01 Bogott-City Annexation — Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs City Processing Fees 1 LS $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Preparation of Annexation Map 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 — All Historical Water Rights must be dedicated. Preliminary Plat Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs — City Processing Fees 1 LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $40,000.00 $40,000.00 — Final Plat Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs City Processing Fees 1 LS $3,350.00 $3,350.00 Consultants Fees 1 LS $60,000.00 $60,000.00 — Deficit Raw Water Righter 87.27 ac $38,487.00 $3,358,629.55 City of Longmont Electrical Construction F 95 Lot $1,300.00 $123,500.00 Arterial Roadway Fee 1720 LF $76.92 $132,302.40 Existing Water 8 Sanitary Main Reimbursement Pay 1/2 of the costs of an 8'water main — that fronts the site 1720 LF $14.50 $24,940.00 Pay 1/2 of the costs of a 1r sewer main that fronts the site 1720 LF $17.50 $30,100.00 Onsite Construction Costs Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Curb 8 Gutter 8 Walk 20840 LF $22.00 $458,480.00 — Pavement 333440 SF $1.25 $416,800.00 Offsite Costs Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Add turn Lanes to County Line Road 13200 SF $1.50 $19,800.00 Landscape Arterial Roads 1720.24 LF $220.00 $378,452.80 y Building Permit Fees-Residential Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs Building Permit 95 ea _ $1,200.00 $114,000.00 — Plan Review Fee 95 ea $600.00 $57,000.00 Water 95 ea $15,784.03 $1,499,482.57 Sanitary Sewer 95 ea $3,000.00 $285,000.00 Electrical Fee 95 ea $73.00 $6,935.00 Electrical Community Investment Fee 95 ea $244.00 $23,180.00 Water Meter Fee 95 ea $50.00 $4,750.00 Public Building Fee 95 ea $625.00 $59,375.00 Transportation Investment Fee 95 ea $625.00 $59,375.00 Misc.Fees 95 ea $7,100.00 $674,500.00 — SUBTOTAL $7,862,952.32 Contingencies(15%) $1,179,442.85 TOTAL COSTS $9,042,395.17 Total Area 3,801,333.00 SF Total Area 87.27 Acres Total Lots {[{44 95 . 1 P 1 OIMM lb i IL OFFSITE UTILITIES SANITARY SEWER FROM HIGHWAY 119 TO ADRIAN — Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs 12 inch San. Sewer 4400 LF $35.00 $154,000.00 4 ft. dia manhole 15 LS $2,500.00 $37,500.00 — Railroad Crossing 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Easements 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Subtotal $211,500.00 — Cost divided by 3 $70,500.00 SANITARY SEWER FROM ADRIAN TO NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs 8 inch San. Sewer 500 LF $25.00 $12,500.00 4 ft. dia manhole 2 LS $2,500.00 $5,000.00 Railroad Crossing 1 LS $0.00 $0.00 Easements 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Subtotal $22,500.00 Cost divided by 2 $11,250.00 WATER LINE FROM WCR 32 TO BOGOTTS — Item Quantity Units Unit Cost Extended Costs 12 inch water main 10600 LF $40.00 $424,000.00 Highway Crossing 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Easements 1 LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Subtotal $449,000.00 — Cost divided by 3 $149,666.67 P LII I Y Not For Construction tfon Hello