Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Browse
Search
Address Info: 1150 O Street, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 | Phone:
(970) 400-4225
| Fax: (970) 336-7233 | Email:
egesick@weld.gov
| Official: Esther Gesick -
Clerk to the Board
Privacy Statement and Disclaimer
|
Accessibility and ADA Information
|
Social Media Commenting Policy
Home
My WebLink
About
800034.tiff
p N RESOLUTION RE: CONTINUATION OF HEARING CONCERNING THE APPLICATIONS OF GLENN BILLINGS FOR A CHANGE OF ZONE AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS , the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado held a public hearing on the 24th day of December, 1980 at the hour of 2: 00 o'clock p.m. for the purpose of considering the application of Glenn Billings for a change of zone from C-Commercial Zone District to A-Agricultural Zone District and for a Special Use Permit for Agribusiness, Corn Alcohol Pro- cessing Plant, and WHEREAS, the applicant was present at said hearing, ela- borated on problems that have been encountered, and requested that the hearing be continued, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has considered the request of the applicant and deems it advisable to continue said hearing indefinitely, however, action shall be taken no later than January 1, 1983, and that at such time the hearing date is set, the applicant shall pay the associated hearing costs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Com- missioners of Weld County, Colorado that the hearing concerning the application of Glenn Billings for a change of zone and for a Special Use Permit be, and hereby is, continued indefinitely, but that action shall be taken no later than January 1, 1982 , and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado that at the time the hearing date is pLo3CC� 3JUJ34 RI-S0LJT ION Oi gate _Decembex 16, 1980 _ ., . COZ-344 : 30 : 15 - APPI_iCAT1 N N - Glenn Billings ADDRLSS 3835 West 10th Street , Greeley CO 80631 Moved by Don Billings for pas a e by the We ;: , Be it Resos red • "C" ; Commercial "A" ' Agricultural p opor t.,, Pt , NE Sec. 19 , T6N, R65W be 'cc�. ens continued The applicant has requested that this application be continued. The applicant should be aware that the request will require re- advertising, the sign will have to be reposted and surrounding property owners will have to be renotified when a hearing date is established. . 4`,01 r Y f � b2 Bette Kountz .r,t ° Cr Chuck Carlson Don Billings Jerry Kiefer Bob Ehrlich Wilbur T,Jafel Bob Halleran Fred Otis Bette Kountz rid lNcl C !i ri LIiC' I • , Carol Ballew co , s ,art, n rere ;• • cC, t • ;;,, December 16, 1980 VII the d Ca:• 22nd December 80 BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Date December 16, 1980 Case No. SUP 4 453 : 80:43 APPLICATION OF Glenn Billings ADDRESS 3835 West 10th Street, Greeley CO 80631 Moved by Don Billings that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for site approval of Fuel Alcohol Plant covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to-wit: Pt. NE2 Sec. 19, T6N, R65W continued be recommended The applicant has requested that this application be continued. The applicant should be aware that the request will require re- advertising, the sign will have to be reposted and surrounding property owners will have to be renotified when a hearing date is established. Motion seconded by Bette Kountz Vote: For Passage Chuck Carlson Against Passage Bette Kountz Jerry Kiefer Don Billings Wilbur Wafel Bob Ehrlich Bob Halleran Fred Otis The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Carol Ra11ew , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on DPCPm1Pr 1 h 1 980 and recorded in Book No. VII of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission. Dated the 22nd day of December , 1980 . Secretary BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI ! SIONERS Moved by Don Billings that the following resolution be intro- duced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission : Be it therefore Resolved ay te Weld County Planning Commission that the following be adopter by the Board of County Commissicners : Unit Development for Fuel Alcohol Plant Accessory Structures UD-2:80:2 To be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons : The applicant has requested that this application be continued. The applicant should be aware that the request will require readvertising, the sign will have to be reposted and surrounding property owners will have to be renotified when a hearing date is established. Motion seconded by Bette Kountz Vote : For Passage Abstain Against Chuck Carlson Jerry Kiefer • Wilbur Wafel Bob Halleran Fred Otis Bette Kountz Don Billings Bob Ehrlich Thi Chairman declared the motion passed and ordered that a certified copy of this Resolution be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings . CERTIFICATION OF COPY I , Carol Ballew , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County , Colorado . adopted on December 16, 1980 and re- corded in Book No . vii of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission . Dated the 22nd day of December 19 80 Ca-4-e, eez."6„..,___ Secretary 5, i o i< i RLSOLU11ON Or P r,,, - I,,, � ! l.r , • Date November 5, 1980 r, 3/11 :80:12 APPLICATION Ot Glenn Billings ADDRESS 3835 W. 10th Street, Greeley, CO Moved by Don Billings for aa�sage by the Be it Reso I ved b,' Cv.t y er ror r'elb- "C" ( Commercial Zone "I" ; Industrial Zone pr:ipor;;r in We(: „ ty ,, , (see attached) be E c-, (rerU *MCKICic'' a< a , ; - ' - for the fol]low,ncj rc It is felt that there is not a complete resolution of the problem of capability in that the industrial zoning may allow things which may not be capable. Therefore, the proposal is not consistant with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as suggested by the Planning Staff. This provision is found in Section 81.5.1.1 under Duties of the Planning Commission. t}y: Bob Halloran Vote: i or Pa .say.? Jerry Kiefer Bob Ehrlich Wilbur Wafel Chuck Carlson Bob Halloran Bette Kountz -Irma White Don Billings he Chdirw r, deciarcd 1 wd r'dec w' to the fl �r rc `. r e Ig s Dianne J. Reed l.^orrn, lot, JO h(-'1,TLi on November 5, 1980 VII - the rt.irJ c. , 7th - November 80 _ titer Date : December 16, 1980 CASE NUMBER: SUP-453:80:43 NAME: Glenn K. Billings REQUEST: Fuel Alcohol Plant LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE4, Section 19, T6N, R65W LOCATION: Adjacent to the south side of Lucerne between Weld County Road 39 and the Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-way THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : 1. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that this request is in agreement with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan in that the plan states that the expansion and development of agribusiness and agriculturally oriented industry will be encouraged, provided these enterprises do not adversely affect the total economy or environment. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services Staff that the proposed use would not appear to have any adverse impacts on the agricultural interests of the County, the total economy, or the environment. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the proposed operation is in compliance with the provisions of Section 3.3.E (2) of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. 3. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff that the attached Development Standards will minimize impacts on surrounding uses and the area to the greatest extent possible and provide adequate protection of-.the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. This determination is based, in part, upon a review of the information submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request and the responses of the referral entities which have reviewed this request. The Department of Planning Services Staff recommendations for approval is condi- tional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards being recommended and adopted for the Special Use Permit. 2. No building or electrical permits shall be issued on the Special Use Permit area until the attached Development Standards for the Special Use Permit have been placed on the Special Use Permit plat and said plat has been delivered to the office of the Department o£ Planning Services. 3. The applicant shall submit a plan for a fire protection system for the fuel alcohol plant in accordance with the design standards set out by the National Fire Protection Association and the Uniform Fire Code requirements prior to the issuance of any building permits on the property. Said fire protection system shall be reviewed and approved by the Eaton Fire Protection District. VT:rg GLENN K. BILLINGS SUP-453:80:43 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1. Uses permitted on the hereon described parcel shall be a commercial fuel alcohol plant and all other uses permitted by right in the Agricultural Zone District of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. Structures and facilities shall be as shown on the plat. 2. The Special Use Permit area shall be maintained in such a manner so as to prevent soil erosion, fugitive dust, and the growth of noxious weeds. 3. All accesses shall have the approval of the Weld County Engineering Depart- ment. All accesses shall be constructed in accordance with the recommendations and/or requirements of the Weld County Engineering Department. 4. All phases of the operation shall comply with all County, State and Federal Health Standards and Regulations pertaining to air quality, water quality, noise emission and sanitary disposal systems. 5. All structures shall be located at least 80 feet from any existing structures to the south on property owned by Agland, Inc. 6. No vehicle parking or traffic congestion resulting from operations of the fuel alcohol plant shall occur on Weld County Road 39. 7. A parking area for vehicles associated with the plant shall be provided on site in accordance with the parking provisions of Section V of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. 8. The owner/operator shall be required to maintain a permit for production of alcohol with the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Bureau of the United States Government. The owner/operator shall be responsible for complying with the standards of the Federal permit. 9. Representatives or members of the Weld County Health Department, Weld County Department of Planning Services Zoning Inspectors and/or Colorado Depart- ment of Health shall be granted access to the site at any reasonable time in order to insure the operations carried out on the site comply with all ap- plicable Weld County and State Health Regulations. 10. The Special Use Permit shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the Development Standards stated above and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Any material deviations from the plans and/or Development Standards, as shown or stated above shall require the approval of an amendment to the Special Use Permit by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans and/or Development Standards shall be permitted. Any other changes from the pland and/or Development Standards shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 11. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be responsible for complying with all of the above stated Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the above Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Special Use Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. VT:rg 12/11/80 COMMENTS SUP-453:80:43 Glenn K. Billings To date our office has received one letter from a surrounding property owner in response to this request. A copy is included in the attached report. VT:rg 12-11-80 4 • Date : =cember 16, 1980 CASE NUMBER: SUP-453:80:43 NAME: Glenn K. Bi I I lags REQUEST: Fuel Alcohol Plant LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the NE4_, Section 19, T6N, R65W LOCATION: Adjacent to the south side of Lucerne between Weld County Road 39 _ and the Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-way. THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE Continued FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: The applicant has requested that this application be continued. The app] irant should be aware that the request will require readvertising, the sign will have to be reposted and surrounding property owners will have to be renotified when a hearing date is established. • VT:rg � I Date: November 5, 1980 CASE NUMBER: Z-341:80:14 NAME: Glenn Billings REQUEST: Change of Zone from "C" Commercial Zone District to "I" Industrial Zone District LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. NE14 Section 19, T6N, R65W LOCATION: Adjacent to south side of Lucerne between County Road 39 and U.P.R.R. Right-of-way THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The applicant has complied with Section 81.7 et. seq. of the Weld County Zoning Resolution regarding the application requirements for a change of zone. 2. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services Staff that the applicant has demonstrated in the submitted application materials and statements made prior to the scheduled Planning Commission Meeting that the proposed rezoning is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The following policy, found on pages 64 and 65 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan addresses industrial development. It states "zoning for industrial use in areas outside the-areas covered by the canprehensive plans of the existing municipalities shall be encouraged only for low employee concentration, agriculturally related industries or other industries that can show they cannot reasonably be accomodated within the areas covered by the municipalities' canprehensive plans." The applicant has submitted information which- indicates that the proposed industrial uses will have low employee concentrations and be -agriculturally related. Furthermore, the plan states that the expansion and development of agribusiness and agriculturally oriented industry will be encouraged. provided these enterprises do not adversely affect the total economy cr. environment. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services Staff that the proposed use would not appear to have any adverse impacts on the agricultural interest of the County, the total economy, or the environment if the condidtions for approval recommended here with are followed. 3. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services Staff that this request will be compatible with the surrounding land uses, will have adequate water and sewer service to serve the permitted uses within the proposed zone district, and will have adequate road and highway facilities to provide access -to the property. In addition, the property does not appear to have sand, gravel, or other mineral resources on or under the subject property and is not located within a Flood or Geological Hazard area, and that soil conditions do not present moderate or severe limitations to development. These determinations are based, in part, upon a review of the information submitted by Dept. of Planning Ser as Recommendation Glenn Billings - Z-341:80:14 Page 2 the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request and responses of the referral entities which have reviewed the request. The Department of Planning Services Staff recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. A unit development plan and amended RE shall be approved for the proposed 12.180 acre parcel and the 2.893 acre parcel by the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners before the Industrial Zoning becomes effective. 2. The applicant shall submit two unit development application and plats which are in canpliance with Section 6.6 of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. One application and plat shall be for the 12.180 acre parcel; the other application and plat shall be for the 2.893 acre parcel. 3. No building or electrical permits shall be issued on the subject property until the two unit development plans have been approved by the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. 4. The applicant shall provide an additional right-of-way reservation to achieve a width of 60 feet on State Highway 392 frown the centerline of the existing highway. In addition, no new structures shall be erected within 85 feet from the highway centerline. These items were recamlended in part by the Colorado Division of Highways in its letter of October 23, 1980. Glenn Billings Z-341:80:14 CHI'S: 1. The Weld County Environmental HPa1th Section is unable to render an opinion to this request due to a lack of information regarding the proposed use of the Industrial Zone. Refer to Health Department letter dated OctohPr 28, 1980. Since this time, additional information has been submitted and a revised recommendation will be forthcoming from the Health Department. 2. To date the Department of Planning Services office has received four letters regarding the proposed rezoning request. Two of the letters state objections to the request. The other letters request additional information regarding the proposed use of the property. Copies of the letters were distributed to the Planning Commission members prior to the November 5, 1980 Planning Commission Meeting. 3. The Eaton Planning Commission did not respond to the referral sent to them. CAC/dr • A public hearing was conducted on December 24 , 1980 at 2: 00 P.M. , with the following present: BILL KIRBY CHAIRMAN LEONARD ROE - COMMISSIONER , EXCUSED NORMAN CARLSON COMMISSIONER LYDIA DUNBAR COMMISSIONER , EXCUSED JUNE STEINMARK COMMISSIONER Also present: - ACTING CLERK TO THE BOARD, JEANNETTE ORDWAY ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY, LEE MORRISON PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE, TOM HONN The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated November 17, 1980, duly published November 20 and December 11, 1980 in the Johnstown Breeze, a public hearing was held on the request of Glenn K. Billings for a Change of Zone from C (Commercial) to A (Agricultural) and a Special Use Permit, Agribusiness, Corn Alcohol Processing Plant. Mr. Billings was present and elaborated on the two problems that they have encountered. The first problem is the high interest rates and secondly the lease with Union Pacific Railroad Company has not been consummated Mr. Billings requested that a decision on his request be continued to a future date in 1981. Commissioner Steinmark made a motion to continue this hearing indefinately, that action be taken no later• than January 1, 1982 and further that at such time the hearing date is set the applicant must pay the associated hearing costs. Commissioner Carlson seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. 47/Ctl • CHAIRMAN / • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: 'Mr".�:2 ,s� F��. itv, ti, • WELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AIv CLERK TO THE BOARD \-_, ECeputy County erk D ET Ili 80-75 i TAPE 80-110 • • LI-IR 2052 APPLICANT : GLENN K. BILLINGS TIME : 2: -P.M. DOCKET#80-75 DATE : DECEMBER 24, 1980 REQUEST : COZ and SUP - Agribusiness Corn Alcohol Processing P1 ant- NAME ADDRESS , )7-fA('' x'' 3 ,c1444. s- 3S a1 /0 cd7.4,CA / 6 /0 - AvoluAk_ ( ,szd 7 (11C) • • DecembeJt 12, 19$0 M4. Vickie TitaxleA Weld County Department o4 Plgnning 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dean Vickie: RE: Fuel g Food4, Inc. Alcohol Pnoduct4 Change o4 Zone Fuel and Foods, Inc. nequeit that the zone change 4rom "C" Commehc.iae to "A" AgAicuttuAe COZ-344:80:15, SUP-453:80:43, UD-2:80:2 be laye.d ovelc to a 6utune date. The pnopo4ed developvus have not completed .satiz6actony agneementa with Union Paci6ic Ra litoad and the .cn6la ionahy inte&ezt natez make £1 un4ea4able to proceed at the time. I have been a suited by the DevelopeAus that they 4utty intend to locate in the area at a tateh date. I will keep you weft £n4 onmed ass any change4 come about. Thank you 4ox your az4Ltance in thus project. Condia t y, egr.f,e4Viag& 93 Glenn K. Bitt ing4 Fon Fuel and Foods, Inc. GKBbsyh Ear-LAL,mg 260 Factory Road P.O.Box 338 Eaton,Colorado 80615 COOP (303)4543391 December 5, 1980 Weld County Dept. of Planning Services 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Case Nos. UD2: 80: 2 and SUP453: 80: 43 Gentlemen: Agland is submitting this correspondence in response to the zoning request being handled by Mr. Glenn Billings on behalf of Fuel and Foods, Inc. As was noted at the previous Commissioners hearing on this request, Agland has no objections provided that the fire protection issue is taken into account in the hearing procedure. Specifically, any new construction should be in compliance with the NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION HANDBOOK NO. 30 : FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS CODE. Copies of portions of that pamphlet have been enclosed with this letter. It is our impression that Table 1I-6 is applicable and that for a bulk plant in Agland's vicinity (in excess of 100, 000 gallons) an 80 ' setback from the property line is required. Be- cause of the complexity of interpreting which table is applicable, your own personnel may wish to examine the pamphlet in more detail. Thank you for your consideration of this input on the rezoning request. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact either myself or Mr. Amos Finch. Sincerely, kiArleg4/ee 7SQ70�� Stephen C. Parker ® c' Corporate Counsel �' 1g� n (J.) SCP/bla enc s. �, zounti1 k. )4 I do hereby request that the Board of County Commissioners cancel my application for a COZ, C to I, as presently scheduled for December 3, 1980 . Le ce...e., /M_Ii4"r WEl9 CR'+"‘"-. `►SSIP0 ,,. ra NOVA 3 1980 , Li W - - r-t F V COLD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)356-4000 EXT.404 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,-COLORADO 80631 O November 20, 1980 • COLORADO Mr. Glenn.x. _Bill ngs 3835 West 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Request for a change of zone from "C" to "A", special use permit and commercial unit development for a fuel alcohol plant on a parcel of land described as Pt. NEQ Section 19, T 6 N R 65 W of the 6th p.m., Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Billings: Your application and related materials for the request described above are cxmplete and in order at the present time. I have scheduled a meeting with the Weld County Planning Carmission for Tuesday, December 16, 1980, at 1:30 p.m. This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners' Hearing Roan, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. It is recommended that you and/or a representative be in attendance to answer any questions the Planning Commission might have with respect to your application. It is the policy of Weld County to refer an application of this nature to any tc n or municipality lying within three miles of the property in question or if the property under consideration is located within the canprehensive planning area of a town or municipality. Therefore, our office has forwarded a copy of the submitted materials to the Greeley Planning Carmission for their review and comments. According to our records, the Greeley Planning Commission is scheduled to review and comment on your application on December 9, 1980. Please contact Ken McWilliams at 353-6123 - Ext. 242 for further details regarding the exact date, time and place of the Greeley Planning Commission Meeting. It is recarmended that you and/or a representative be in attendance at the Greeley Planning Carmission Meeting to answer any questions the Carmission members may have with respect to your application. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me. � � � . Vickie Traxler Assistant Zoning Administrator cah cc: Ken McWilliams Raymond & Marlene Curtis City of Greeley Planning Commission 32933 Weld Co. Rd. 39 Civic Center Lucerne, CO 80646 Greeley, CO 80631 t - _. — 8I _-LR Cc-,?lee,t,vs_,2, :34 ������� FOR �G�G�u����� ['Wt D� 3 A:1ya, _ .:e"::T RN TO"° scecn so r:czse. NO IhSUfANCE COVERAGE PROWDE17— 1. T.c ioL' w'Zg,:rvtce is- J.ecte1(che..i.one.) NOT FOR INTEIINATIIINAL MAIL O El:..7,1 In whorl vr1 Cz'e!:liver.' —� (Sea Reverse) O Lhcd to Fh.ort,date,.rd c3J....s_cf delvcry _4 SENT TO ; O RESTRiC 1 ED DFz till_rY Glenn K. Billings co chcv✓to w?totn-T1,'-._e e,..:Yc.T.I _t STREET AND NO O KESIRIC TED DE17.+.^.Y. 3835 W. 10th St• Show to whom,date,and addi.,s cf delivery.$_ PO STATE ,IP�Sae 80631 Greeley, (CONSULT POST IAS E.-Z e-C1:1 FEES) - POSTAGE 5 ---- — . 2. ARTICLE AwORE:.:,,'--O 1 D: CERTIFIED FEE c m Glen K. Billings us SPECIAL DELIVERY _ C y 3835 W. 10th St. re RESTRICTED Z - „ Greeley, CO 80631 c en w SNC:VTOV,'D'1A',D c ,.'r'j 3. Art-iC:_CD'C;LRIPL.CNI: y 0:.E 0ELI.ERED FiE;:i,EFEC V . CEP.",.r:ED NO. INSURED V.C. `, y Lu SHWr V.HO.1 DATE - y A'.DAnDA-SaCF C :' P26 0262911- DELIVFRY A a r �(t '.v:-ts,.�'. n�------_Lfr:dr aceeorn,jz=a; to te, SHCI1OV,HO'A:A'ADDAT: --------- - --------- --- R 67 m D E I RARE V..'H FESTP C'ED C - I i_,a.et_. :I t c..-___w._._'L_bCd ab-.e. C, s DELIVERY La 0 2:G,..;U?7 :;Ad'--•-.ce Q.1n':,c..zedagent SH0N TO WHO"! DATE A',D ,J ee ADDRESS OF DEL AVERY 1A.TH C RESTRICTED DELIVERY '"I 1 JL,1 TOTAL POSTAGE AND FEES $ - I s/ O..`i e_CF et?.;Er" POSTMAF.K a POSTMARK OR DATE t7 6 n C. AL_^.:;.E:S.;E� _aa c.:7•f requested) E 11-20-80 '1_ 0 cn :,1 6. L•:=A6LL -it*)2-,i L' ER C;'.:.USE: CLERK'S a. L:, I"iT1ALS �..._..-. .. ��_._-tiGrO lain a -._:g a . • Greeley, Colorado from the office of THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS November 1c3 ,1980 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO RE: Glenn K. Billings Change of Zone (C to I) Hearing - December 3, 1980 - 2 : 00 P.M. Please be advised the hearing set for December 3rd before the County Commissioners on the above captioned matter has been CANCELLED. The notice regarding the new hearing date is attached herewith. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact our office at 356-4000 extension 227 . THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO OAAA. 4ekt14- MARY Aft FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY `�✓I C�7 Deputy County Clerk O DATE : Novi er 14, 1930 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 2tth of December, 1980 DOC 80-75 Glenn Billings , COZ , C to A and SUP, Agribusiness for an Ethanol Plant • OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD -4- `-eiU/CJ C-& Deputy The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO i)71/1/1-‘c./y/ LEONARD ROE - ABSENT , i -- cam / )Li 70e6eit Redte, 19— Phone 353-1153 3835 West 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 November 14, 1980 Mr. Charles Cunliffe Assistant Zoning Administrator Weld County Department of Planning 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Chuck: This letter is my official request that the change of zone, Special Use Permit, be pre-advertized for the County Commissioners Hearing on said zone change on the Curtis property at Lucerne. The bill will be paid by myself as soon as I receive said bill from the Johnstown Breeze. , f/(IA! Q /- 1, ,-- _-{--- / i e . ‘ , , oz.).. . Sincerely, Itex-/Aeetire' p Glenn K. Billings Weber Realty, Inc. Acting with Power of Attorney For Mr. and Mrs. Curtis Eel fir,.,,.. ,;' Z i-, A \\ ; . 1 n \'92)® /8) No!! 1980 N.:: REC' 1VEP vla�.d 6oueh! -u 'IA P1oniaB �9yam18S a ,�v co L� Novembers 12, 1980 Mt. Chan.ee4 CunL L 6e Ass-c',tand Zoning Admin-ustratox Weld County Depaktment a6 PLann.%ng SeAv..ces 915 10 Street Gxeeley, CoLoxado 80631 Dear Chuck: The subject pxopexty .cis now zoned Commexc.iae, Located .in an area Lde t f ox AgxucutturaL Bu Lness zoning Aox the .6ottowLng tceazon-6: 1. The adjoining pxoperty to the south, owned by Agand, Ls zoned AgA.i-BuoLneis and Ls being used by AgLand as such. 2. The pxopeAty ha3 exLi,tLng Union PacLi Lc RaitAaod main tine and xaie spuA along said pxoperty. The AgxL-Business intended {yoA the Land must have xaiL service. 3. The pxopexty Loa,?/so. boxdexed on the west by U.S. 85 Highway and on the noxth by CoLoAado Highway 392. The eat,t boxdeA ob the pxopexty ha's weld County Rodd 39, which .vs an asphalt xoad. Making thin pxopexty LdeaL {pox both Aade and tAuck sexvLce, and by it/s controlled access only 6xom County Road 39 makes the pxopexty eacsy to cant'col and well pxotected. 4. Zoning oU thiz pxopeAty -ins cons-ustant with. Weld Counties Com- pxehenzLve Plan. The paxceL aU Land -vs to smatt ioA Lts use as agxLcuttuxe - it does not have water xLghts with the Land, and will not suppoAt a petvoon OA 6amit y .in agA.i.cuLtuAe pAo- ductLon. As a commexcLae zone, its Location sepeAated PLUM d.vicect access box commexc-cae stoxes, makes it undeziAabLe fox such a use. The commexcLae zone does not pxovLde 6oA manuiact- uALng o6 agALcul uAe pxoducto. TheAe6yoxe, the exLotLng zoning tc 4auLty. 5. The highest and bust use oU the Land then must be an agALcuLt- wt.aL zone to suppoAt agAL-business manu6actuAing. BspecL LLy when the pAopo4sed use o4 the Land Lo agAL-business cleating a gxeat potentZat box all oU weld Counties {yaAmexts and 6axmety, thAoughout the state. 6. The pxoposed agxL-business uses water only {6oA domestic puAposeo, theAe6oxe, not dep'LvLng ox changing any use o{y ag'Lcutture water. 7. The LncAeased use oU Aait sexvice by the pxoposed agAL-buoLneos haws unLdmdte.d potent,cae as well ass truck seAvLce. 8. The poxposed agAL-buoLness wLl be an asset to Weed County and CoLoxado, equal many o{y the majoA LndustAies we now have hexe - non-pollutant Low employment, Large pxoduct.ion, excettent tax bake. 9. Each o{y the above -.terns, in themselves, pxove that the camm- excLat zone that exL4tt, Lo 6auLty. That the highest and beat use oU the Land .us to change the zone to L.L. /7y,% 10. Page 64 8 65_ o6 Weld County Comprehensive Plan addAesses Lndu/stALae development. Shall be encouraged only 5aA Low employee concentAatLon agxLcuUtuxa ty Aettaed. The pxoposed .industry Lo a tow empLoyeA - 10/15 people. The .industry, Food and FueL, Inc, Joint Venture with BL-Co CaApoAat on, pAoduces aecohoL, co-pxoducts, dLotiJled dxLed gAaLn and carbon dioxide (CO2) . Thexe -us no xe-Ldue OA waste. Contracts Uax the purchase o6 said Land have been signed and ctasing dates set subject to youx zoning appxoval. (Copies w.c Pt be supplied upon Aequ-ucement) . ///7/ %4 c (T2.��,Y,�y 6702 ,7E j)lG x«43 •l/74'efn2l" kfr? c€y. LJ!lal& a cJ 9 9/ November 6, 1980 Weld County Board of Commissioners 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado Weld County Planning Commission 915 10th Street Thomas A. David, Esq. Weld County Attorney 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Application of Trailer Specialties, Inc. for re-zoning; Your File No. Z-341 Dear Madams and Gentlemen: I am writing this letter on behalf of Trailer Specialties, Inc. with the intention of clearing up any uncertainties as to that film's ownership of the acreage which is the subject of this re-zoning proceeding. I believe that the uncertainty was interjected into this case by reason of statements at the Planning Conmdssion hearing on November 5, 1980 by the representative of Arthur F. Stanley. What I am referring to specifically was the representa- tive's assertion during the hearing that Trailer Specialties, Inc. is in default on a promissory note which is secured by a deed of trust on the subject property. I was not present at the hearing and therefore was unable to respond to that assertion. In the first place, there is a question as to whether or not Trailer Specialties, Inc. is in default under the terms of the note. The note represents part of the purchase price for the property and under the Contract of Sale, the purchaser, Trailer Specialties, Inc. , was entitled to have one acre of the property released from the lien of the deed of trust at any time after the closing and was entitled to have an additional two acres released at the time of making a $17,500.00 payment which was due on August 28, 1980. It is true that Trailer Specialties, Inc. has not made the $17,500.00 payment at this time, but it is also true that Mr. Stanley had stated prior to August 28, 1980 that he would not release the additional two acres upon the making of the $17,500. 00 payment. Under these circumstances there is a legitimate question as to whether Trailer Specialties, Inc. was required to make the $17,500.00 payment on August 28, 1980. ) ) i; ; . h Weld County Board of Commissioners Weld County Planning Commission Thomas A. David, Esq. -2- November 6, 1980 Of far greater importance, however, is the question of whether a mortgagee has any standing to countermand an owner's request for re-zoning. As I understand it, Mr. Stanley's representative stated that a foreclosure proceeding was inaninent and for that reason the mortgagee, Mr. Stanley, had the right to in effect cancel the landowner's request for re-zoning. If nothing else is accomplished by this letter I hope I can at least convince you that this suggestion by Mr. Stanley's representative is in error. A landowner's title to his property is not lost by reason of the commencement of a fore- closure proceeding, much less the threat of the commencement of a foreclosure proceeding. His rights remain fully alive until such time as a sheriff's deed or a public trustee's deed has been delivered to the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. It is impossible to know in advance who the purchaser at the foreclosure sale will be, even if it is assumed that the proceeding progesses all the way to a foreclosure sale. Once a foreclosure proceeding is commenced the sale cannot be scheduled to occur any sooner than 45 days from when the proceeding is commenced. The landowner has the right to cure any default right up to the date of sale. If the sale is concluded the landowner then has a right of redemption exercisable during the six month period after the sale or, in the case of subdivided property, during the 75 day period after the sale. Mr. Stanley, therefore, had absolutely no right to represent himself as being the owner or even a prospective owner of this property. His comments and those of his representative should be considered, if at all, simply as the statements of a citizen having no direct interest in the property. You will note, incidentally, that Section 8.2 of your zoning code does not require that notice of a zoning amendment proceeding be given to mortgagees. My client considers the statements of Mr. Stanley's representative at the hearing to constitute unwarranted interference with the right of a landowner to exercise the privileges of ownership. We trust and hope that the representatives of Weld County will regard Mr. Crosier's statements in the same light. Very truly yours, William E. Shade WES/cc from the office of October 27 C=,EPJ TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 19 80 P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY , CO 80632 - Dear Mr. Billings: In accordance with the Weld County Home Rule Charter the attached notice will be published in the Johnstown R rLePzp newspaper twice. You will receive a billing for said publications directly from the newspaper. These publication costs must be paid prior to the date of yo;_,_T nearing. If you have any questions Please call 356-4000 ext 225 . -<- - t/ <-� 7 --;� Deputy Clerk to the Boar,: -- - - - .... - - _ ---- -- - -- ----- - - - -- -- -- - - -- - -- - ---- - - - - -- --------=- ---- ------ -------- --- - - - --- ----- ---- ------ - -- -- - - - --- - - - - - --- -- --- -- - - --- --- --- --- - - -------- - - - -- ---------- -- - ---------- - - - -- -- -- - - --- - - DATE: Octo: 27, 1980 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners: ` If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 3rd day of December, 1980 at 2 : 00 P .M. : Docket No. 80-71 - Glenn Billings, COZ (C to I) • OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD Deputy ' (I The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO V® ‘ er As-e I'', I 38.,-,i1.11 \\ r _( JI((l �(r, ' ( I,rI I !I ; ( Iljl.tot:, "If, I Cctobeh 10, 1980 Nonoxabte William Kenbey, ChaiAman Wa-Pd County Boated o{y CommizzioneAz 915 10 Sweet Gxeefey, Co.eoxado 80631 Dean Bi.2_,e: RE: InduzTniae Zone. Requezt Lucehne, Cotoxado _ Thy tettex tee act az owl. xequmt and agxeement to pay {y ox adveAt .ing o{y thiz pxopehty {yox a change o{S zone {yxom com►nehc-ia,e to -indurtn.c.ae. It Lo de iAou.o o{y_the appt i.cant to ztaxt eonntnuctLon .i.mmed- .iatety a{ytex the appxovae o{y the Boaxd o{y Commizzione . By pxe-advent z ing we. milt have much va-2u.abte tone. _ I ado xequezt a. px.ivate meeting by the boated, at your con- venience, to appxize you o% the {yut,e magnitude o{y thiz pxo ject. In acting az the.vc agent and xequL ed to keep af_e £n{y oxrnati.on contAo.Jed, I {.ind ThLo meeting to be most .unpoxtant to the Boaxd zo there ahe no zuhpx-vsez and no quezt1on-o unannwehed. Time needed zhoutd not be. ►rime Tian 15-20 m.inute4. Coxd.i.aeey, WEBER REALTY, INC. /Cat-e- re— Glenn K. BI. i,ng4 AdmJ.niztAat ive AzzLtant GKB/zyh ,�a g 1011 `� f\ i" WOKS OCT 1980 ino cap, --,, �ti?�:I€ 1 p t.t""1- . '-- ,,, 0 Ge 9�.� .e-, .LO + <9,-, � 5 E�• COLO< ` e92si ,2 �REEB- � I and Envelopes LC) Mail Notices 5 •Type DPS Recorr,n�en in ato - Xerox Packets for Planning Commission a�5 and Board of County Commissioners_ Attend Nearing - . Transcribe & Type Minutes Record Plat Affidavit of Publication STATE OF COLORADO ss County of Weld, I Paula A. Barton of said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am an advertising derk of _ THE GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE, and NOTICE THE GREELEY REPUBLICAN Puma*to Bit 1.06441'INPs Of 191.$1111‘ of crlbhae'Mlsfif•WOW COWItyt«un that the same is a daily newspaper of general Resolution,a Public Mating Ytt11 As IWO in the Chambers of the Board of County circulation and printed and published in the City of Commissioners of Weld County, Greeley, in said county and state; that the notice or Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, advertisement, of which the annexed is a true copy, has Colorado, at the time specified All persons in any manner interested in the been published in said daily newspaper for consecutive following proposed Change of Zone and (days) (weeks); that the notice was published in the Special Use Permit are requested to attend and may be heard regular and entire issue of every number of said BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the County newspaper during the period and time of publication of in Planning Commission the Cl may be examined said notice, and in the newspaper proper and not in a in the Office of Clerk to the Board of the County Commissioners, located in supplement thereof; that the first publication of said the Weld County Centennial Center,915 10th Street, Third Floor, Greeley, notice was contained in the issue of said newspaper Colorado DOCKET NO 80 75 bearing date APPLICANT Glenn K Billings 3835 W 1061 Greeley, Fifteenth CO CO 8 806331 DATE December 24,1980 December 80 TIME 2 00 P M day of A.D. 19 • REQUEST Change of Zone from C and the last publication thereof; in the issue of said (Commercial)to (Agricultural) AND newspaper bearing date the Special Use Permit,Agribusiness,Corn Alcohol Processing Plant LEGAL DESCRIPTION Fifteenth A parcel of land located in the NEV.of Sec 19,T6N,R6SW,of the 6th PM,Weld day of December A.D. 19 80 • County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows that said The Greeley Daily Tribune and The Greeley 19Beginningo aco thensidering NE cornerEast o saidf Sec a Republican, has beenpublished continuously and 19 and considering the East line of said P section as bearing S 00°53'x4"E with all uninterruptedly during the period of at least six other bearings contained herein relative thereto, months next prior to the first issue thereof contained Thence 500°53'24"E, along said East line, 433 00 feet to the True Point of said notice or advertisement above referred to;that said Beginning, newspaper has been admitted to the United States Thence 500°53'24"E,1692 82 feet, Thence 581°36'54"W, 19699 feet to a mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the point on the Easterly ROW of the U PR R, Thence N08°23'06"W, along said ROW, Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof; and 1748 24 feet, Thence 588^53'24"E, 423 61 feet to the that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified True Point of Beginning for publishing legal notices and advertisements within contains+/—12 180 acres The BOARD OF COUNTY the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY,COLORADO BY MARYANN FEUERSTEIN T)PrPTnhPY 1 5, 1 9RO COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD Total charge: $1R_56 BY Keltha White,Deputy DATED November 17,1910 Tl e.GiWggy Deity Tribune Dec 15,1910 o h—r Clerk Advertising g lIJJlerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 15th day of—'December A.D 19 80 My Commission c;:pires Feb 23, 1981: My co mission a pires _ a4,,(2.1 _X>C-_ 6 IU Notary Public PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE pursuant to the zoning laws of AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION the State of Colorado and the Weld County Zoning Resolution, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld THE JOHNSTOWN BREEZE County, Colorado, Weld County STATE OF COLORADO ) Centennial Center, 915 10th Street,Greeley,Colorado,p at the in ) ss time y mannered interestedsinsthe following proposed Change of COUNTY OF WELD ) Zone are requested to attend and I, Clyde Briggs, do solemnly swear that I may be heard. am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze; BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the that the same is a weekly newspaper text and maps so certified by the County Planning Commission printed, in whole or in part, and published may be examined the Office to the Board o of the Clerk to the of the in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, County Commissioners, located in the Weld County Centennial and has a general circulation therein; that Center, 915 10th Street, Third said newspaper has been published Floor, Greeley, Colorado APPLICANT continuously and uninterruptedly in said Glenn K.Billings County of Weld for a period of more than 3835 e10th O 80681 fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the DOCKET NO. 80-71 first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has DATE. December 8, 1980 been admitted to the United States mails as TIME' 2 00 P M second-class matter under the provisions of REQUEST. Change of Zone the Act of March 3, 1879, or any from C (Commercial) to f amendments thereof, and that said (Industrial) newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly LEGAL DESCRIPTION. A parcel of land located in the qualified for publishing legal notices and Northeast Quarter (NE%) of advertisements within the meaning of the Section 19 ownship 6 orth, Ranxea 651 l,Vest of the 6th P.M., laws of the State of Colorado. Weld re County, u ty Colorado being That the annexed legal notice or advertise- follows. ment was published in the regular and Beginnin at the Northeast entire issue of every number of said weekly tio 9NEand cons of said newspaper for the period of .Z. eenseca- Section 1 considering the North line of said section as tive insertions; and that the first bearing North 90 degrees 00'00" Wes at, with herein other bearings publication of said notice was in the issue of to; said newspaper dated.1.4:3.411 $x,A.D. 19 Thence North 90 degrees 00'00" and that the last publication of said notice West, 129.00 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 53' 24" was in the issue of said newspaper dated East, 30 Thence 00 feet; . South 41 degrees 27' 18" /AV.W., A.D. 19fO West, 280.35 feet, Thence 76 degrees 16'48" In witness whereof I have h eunto set South West, 99.25 feet; Thence South 08 degrees 23' 06" my handihis ...J.. ..... day of , East, 191107 feet, A.D. 19. 65' Thence North 81 degrees 36'54" East, 198 99 feet; Thence North 00 degrees 53'24" West, 2125 82 feet to the true � /� G� Point of Beginning Said described parcel of land Publisher contains 15.073 acres, more or less, and is subject ubie her to ease- ments rights-of-way granted or reserved by as instruments of record or as now Subscribed and sworn to before me a existing on said described , parcel of land. Notary Public in and for theCounty of THE BOARD OF COUNTY Weld tate of Colorado, this .1 F... day of COMMISSIONERS .D. 19,46WE CCOL RADd BY:MARY ANN O� FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND , 1-eeitek"<" RECORDER AND Notary Public. CLERK TO THE BOARD BY•Bette M.Foose DATED: October 27, 1980 My commission expires // /-.�� PUBLICATION• October the0 and Johnstown Breezember Co Legal 80-279-Clerk to Board (Billings) FLO'V SHEET APPLICANT: G1P1lr K . & I lJ CASE w �P 453,-k 42,REQUEST: F'te` Aic \,0\_ '�`a ---- LEGAL: Y"-. N EYE ��c�i�r \S --1-6,N R WW i LOCATION: '&cp,A\- -co -r\ Sou-4-\ Sick r4 Lu-Cierv,e \opj- Lo .(v, '-- Cd: ' ,d . 39 ouv,a t,,P R R 12o w DATE I BY Application Received I1-17- b SIT Application Fee - Receipt # L)4910 IF (1"irO -vr i I Recording Fee I1" I7-&d \}T Application Complete < <- IR � - L .P.C. Hearing Date: Dec e "ccjc 1 b, \c&I II- 19-' -b uT Letter to Applicant Drafted 1l ` I a- Vt Referrals Listed ' ' - - ' It—VI -tr.) VC Field Check by D.P.S. Staff Mik VT File Assembled \-1 Q- Wo 'U'(' Referrals Mailed \\-\ C‘_%0 `\'\ -%0 "�T Chaindexed 1\ -%O \Y1 Notification of Applicant . Surrounding Property Owners Researched II- QI® w; ;, Airphoto/Vicinity Map .Preapred @1 -al - y Property Owners Notified by: NoUe..v n\o42.-y .lo 11- )_,L4- so .x 1,- Agendas Mailed by: 1 wAR.Ni Ober 41414. t i - q - VO d ' f. Legal Approved by County Attorney Q\)(3% _ Referrals - Complete , It-Ir. %kb VT Preliminary D.P.S. Staff Comments \z- 4-c?t-O l51 _ Staff Conference (Z-q" 'VN D.P.S. Comments 11----lO- %-b VC P.C. Hearing Action: COV 12= 1(O-.to -c-`e-1 P.C. Resolution `L"a3- ck. 'C,• Case Sent to Clerk to Board \2--23-%0 A, r. C.C. Hearing C2...-2,1- 0 Action : CO, ,\kkoc, ‘Z-ay-$U UT: _ C.C. Resolution Received gam. I , 1`a 1_ History Card Complete C.C. Resolution Sent to Drafting , Drafted on Mylar Document Sent to Clerk and Recorder P.C. Minutes SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Weld County Department of Planning Services 915 - 10th Street Greeley , Colorado 80631 PHONE : 356-4000 Ext . 400 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY : Permit Fee : /'/p. do Case Number : SuLP 153:Sro: y3 Recording Fee : o0, OD (a�3 App . Checked by : Or Receipt No. : //4/9 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURAL GUIDE REQUIRE- MENTS : Print or type only , except for necessary signatures . I , (we ) the undersigned , hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning a proposed Special Use Permit for the following described unincorporated area of Weld County : LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Use Permit is proposed : 50.e o/coed EA/i1 4/ 1-- PI-- LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT AREA : STREET LOCATION : X273 Lveddca,i)/y f d X37 ZONE : ,rle/./ j,Lu,.-e- PROPOSED USE : 4/E,70/?6 / proikas bfs7,//ed di(at, d Q FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR SPECIAL USE : NAME : �aLmflv�� �.cv- ADDRESS : 32 /33 6 /IR.L3dj' TEL : NAME : Mk. 1e-►e. ADDRESS : 32 ,-, 3 e&,eiI Ra.a5 TEL : ;73,3--5--i>90 NAME : ADDRESS : TEL : I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all state- ments , proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge . COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Signature : Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed ans sworn to before me this //ttg, day of 9//09-e4KIARA.) , 194 . Q. SEAL Notary Pub is My commission expires : Ocl. f 1 93 j N pare QA O� 10,4 `oca-1 I'll e tVEl`t o`Q £ec. 19 1 -1-: (2 m . 1 R . 65 w. iLe (041t P/4 , we(ot Co. , C(o 1.eihe wwre par4;c_ t\c,rl 4 c&esc.4o 14 as 4U0vJ C It ee i Vi I t od (4.‘e ME- carmer igq SoxC ( Sec le) eth.oC coos kern , E.ctSi- lithe, re. rc,'od S&c4-1 at.t ca b r.t1 S. 00°53` 24 „ t to:Ot all 0AL+Qv- hc4ariKgS CotA4 C,A%a c-dC \\erQlt.% V'e vcti-ivQ Gt.e6. 3 Iltetetcfe, S. Ob° 5 3, 214-6E_ 1 aco.i S a, rj £4S+ (Ah,e 4 3'5 . 004e+ 4.6 ikt li.t.t. poiheBe"... a-,i ; -Nphc,e S o0° 53' z.14 "R , IG°J 7-- 82- 4ei- ; keuNte. 5 816341 54" 1A) ) ( c) 6'.°'°) 4e+ � a P e iKi o e 64i-eth l% "ROW 0.4 +( e U, F., RR j -Theme No8° 2. 3 ' o(" w , akt•hg set d RO ) \7i g . z- 4 `1,emoe S. 8S°5 3' 2.q"E , 42. 3 . , I -tree+ 46 `!-ke. CoV`Atn s — 12 . 1 g o a, y( 1Ss tr e_, C.o„,, 1. - o L z0`43 C� B/LLItvdS ZONE CHANGE COMMERCIAL TO INDUSTRIAL S ....d L U_ `°94/'s-,---.0,- ti I _ ""e6-• i9 �J r. a 4/.,A'6.674/ isa,srz So,ao• c7..41.39,, D a '_ , tsrP� " 4 c. % o I. N f ta a1 gl G i1 N Y• 1 " 0 M D. ul _ - sera."/'-GOO' Ic o Ip 0K , 1,2,1_811. Oli, i'l° ,96.99' 10I 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in the Northeast Quarter (NEq) of Section 19, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado being more particularly described , as follows: , Beginning at the Northeast Corner (NE COR) of said Section 19 and considering the North line of said section as bearing North 90°00'00" West, with all other bearings contained herein relative thereto; Thence North 90° 00 1 00" West 129.00 feet; Thence South O0° 53' 24' East, 30.00 feet; Thence South 41° 27' 16" West 280. 35 feet; Thence South 76° 16'48" West, 99.25 feet; Thence South 08° 23'06" East,1911.07 feet; Thence North 81° 36 '54" East, 196.99 feet; Thence North 00° 53'24" West,2125.82 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Said described parcel of land contains 1.5.073 acres, more or less, and is subject to any rights-of-way or other easements as granted or reserved by instruments of record or as now existing on said described parcel of land. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE. I hereby certify that this plat was prepared under my supervision and that the same is correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. " r. ^ Jas•e eese , - r y Colo . .. P.E. & L.S. No. 4392 PROPERTY OWNER'S A''ROVAL I , Glenn Billings, being the acting agent for i,Cup7zo,n WSJ;:1t... the sole owner in fee of theAdescbed property do hereby request the zoning as shown on the attached map. ` -e -6• t Glenn Billings/Acting Agent / Th Dre_goi ng 'cert. fi cati on was acknowledged before me this ' -- / day of ' f/ , - , A.D1, 1 &9., i �$i tr ss my1hand and official seal . My omrni4Sion ..exp res: ,, , , ,- ,�/ ', , -,,s4 / Notary Public • -etx a.'.'� COMMISSIONER'S CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the Weld County Planning Commission has approved and does hereby recormend to the Board of Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado for their confirmation, approval and adoption of this Zone Change as shown hereon and described this day of , 1980. Chairman, Planning Commission BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado do hereby confirm, approve and adopt this Zone Change and regulations this day of , 1980. ! Attest: Chairman, Board of County Commissioners I County Clerk - By: Recorded: Deputy Date: .024,ese �'�y rreerrny eam6lr 2.1 1�PJ - -ANT Glenn K. Billings CASE SUP 453 : 80 : 43 F _ - Tit- E=.RALS SENT OUT ON: No_vPmhPr 19 , 1980 0 z, U REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: December 5, 1980 _ C u a - H C.C. - - Z. 0 0 O - _ - - - - - - - -- __ l 1-f I-11 _ - ..• _ _ - - _ U r'. P: c RE='ER L4LS RECEIVED X - County Attorney (plat only) it- I— County Health NOV 1'4 County Engineer. _ - - Greeley Planning Commission c/o Ken McWilliams Greeley planning Dept. _ Civic Center Complex - _ Greeley, CO 80631 P.C. 10/28/80 - Ron Miller - - _ Soil Conservation Service 4302 W. 9th St. Rd. . _ - " - Greeley, CO 80631 • _ _ Colorado Geological Survey 1313 Sherman Room 703 - - - - Denver, CO 80203 X • State Highway Dept. - Z_ 3-1a3 1402 2nd Street - - • - _ " Greeley, CO 80631 . - - ' - " - , New Cache La Poudre Irrigating CO. - - Box 356 —__ Greeley, CO 80631 ; - __ BOB Halleran eran - - - -•2-7 • - --- - - - - - - r, 4_- - - - X/ - L•-11 s Imo -Eaton- `ir - Dit_rict: • ; /� - 'DEC Duane ,Wilson _ - - Rte. 2 , Box 152 • . - _ - -- - Eaton, Co 80615. . - - \ - CU e- • .By6n��!L4 ,fir, llyr'_ I, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICE.' • F L PHONE (303)356-4000 EXT •AE I 110VS1JOU 915 10TH STREE -� GREELEY,COLORADO 8D63 fl Pj 1i ) WELD COUNTY j Engineering Departmefll s __ CASE NUMBER SUP 453 : 80 :41 i COLORADO REFERRAL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: _ Enclosed is an application from r=1Pnn Billings for a special use permit for a fuel alcohol plant The parcel of land is described as pt. NEa Section 19 , T6N, R65W The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is Adjacent to the south side of Lucern between Co. Rd 39 and Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-way . This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions. Any cou,uients or recommendations you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recou,uiendations. If a response from your office is not received within 21 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to • respond within 21 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by December 5, so that we may give full consideration to your recou,unen ation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in -this matter. 1. )C We have reviewed the proposal and - find no conflicts with our interests. 2. A formal recommendation is under consideration�,� 3 �}� �1> be •submitted to you prior to`L 3. Please refer to the enclosed letter. h �� � �` ,j Signed , Agency .Cn ,'nec,--<<� _ 3� ,d3' ��$� ,�{./ Assistant Zoning Administrator DEPAf ;ENT OF PLANNING SERVICES r PHONE (303)3561+000 EY.? ri 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,cOLORADO SDE31 �0�c ��71 - 1° CASE N(JMBER EIg 4 s • u n • a • .,OLORADO REFERRAL TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN : Enclosed is an application from for a special use permit for a fuel alcohol arcel of land is described as pt. NEy Section Thep • The location of the parc el of land for which this application has been submitted is � Adjacent to the south side of Lucern between Co. Rd 39 ` and Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-way ice for review and recoenda- submitted to your off application Aymns recommendations you consider relevant o to This comments or r reply will help recommenda- tions. would appreciated. Your prompt. ensure prompt considera- tion facili- tatethe processing be yPof the proposal and will our office not of ourecmIf a response from your may be in- terpreted is received your within 21 days recommendations. from our office,days of mailing office. If you are unable 21 by y ndto mean approval s (but wish to do so at a later date) p respond within 21 y notify our office to that effect. to our address Check the appropriate boxes below and return so that dd �7s listed much for replyby December 5 Thank you very above.ul Please ioour recommen ation. full consideration coopo eration in -this matter. your help and coop reviewed the proposal and- find no conflicts with our 1, help have interests. 1 recommendation is under consideration an d will be A formal 2. ou prior to 3. Please refer to the enclosed letter . x`7 ^ ,3 Agency /_ ../:-c% `� � „f Signed � �iit- = . [� inistrator `c , ,, 0 Assistant Zoning �� :, _:� ' , {J/ • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICP • PHONE (3D31 356-0000 EXT.-► 91S10THSTRE GREELEY,COLORADO 806 :P; '' fl _m_j s® • CASE PUMBERSUP 453: 80x1 , . 11 ' COLORADO . - REFERRAL • TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from r1Pnn Billings for a special use permit for a fuel alcohol plant The parcel of land is described as pt. NE4 Section 19, T6N, R65W The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is Adjacent to the south side of Lucern between Co. Rd 39 and Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-way This application is submitted to your office for review and recommenda- tions. Any comments or recommendations you consider relevant to this . request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facili- tate the processing of the proposal and will ensure prompt considera- tion of your recommendations. If a response from your office is not received within 21 days of mailing from our office, it may be in- terpreted to mean approval by your office. If you are unable to respond within 21 days (but wish to do so at a later date) please notify our office to that effect. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. Please reply by December 5 , ,1980 so that we may give full -consideration to your recommendation. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation in -this matter. 1. ( We have reviewed the proposal and- find no • conflicts with our. interests. - 2. A formal recommendation is under consideration) and will be - submitted to you prior to �;\ ' 3. Please refer to the enclosed letter. ";E�' 1,C-)0 - //'�fn' _[/n 'ECc.I 1!E,,{��-J�, p� L_ n _�/.�{j� Agency (c., -o r;r licit Count" Al t `--,!?%` V 0 Signed r iG'C�r,,�,!., D 0.., 7� pit l /•c� a.S \C L...' - - Assistant Zoning Administrator Weld County Health Department BOARD OF HEALTH Fran Christensen, Eaton A M Dominguez,Jr,JD,Greeley 1516 HOSPITAL ROAD Robert Drennan, PhD,Greeley John P Cullen, M D Annette M Lopez,Greeley Acting Medical Director GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 Kathleen Shaughnessy,PHN,Ault (303)353-0540 Lois Smee, FNP, Ft Lupton Arthur G Watson,Platteville December 3, 1980 David Werking,DDS,Greeley John M Wheeler,Greeley TO: Vickie Traxler FROM: John G. Hall .kk c)12 SUBJECT: Fuel Alcohol Plant - Glenn Billings 1. The applicant must apply for an Air Emission Permit through the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Health, 4210 E. 11th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80220. 2. Odors from the fuel alcohol manufactoring or lagoon areas must not exceed the 15:1 dilution to threshold as specified in the Colorado Air Quality Commission's Regulation No.2. 3. Any discharge to waters of the state, will require an NPDES permit. 4. Noise - must meet the requirements of 25-12-103 CRS 1973. 5. Lagoons, if utilized shall be lined per CDH stipulations and guidlines. ..,•,/, r - - llt t.` T Eaton Fire Protection District Eaton, Colorado 80615 December 3 , 1980 Weld County Board Of Commissioners Weld County Department of Planning Services Re: Amendment to recorded exemption #360 Change of zone (Case #2-34 : 80 : 12) Board Members: We would like to reiterate the concerns stated in a November 14, 1980 , letter from the Eaton Town Board to Mr . Chuck Cunliffe, Weld County Planning Department. The location of the proposed alcohol plant in proximity to Agland' s refined fuel, propane and ammonia facility, and the lack of adequate water for fire protection at either facility presents a very clear potential danger to life and property in the area. The Agland plant capacities stated in the Eaton Board ' s letter are conservative and fail to mention the large quantities of aviation fuel, lubricating oil and alcohol that are stored in above ground tanks, susceptible to accidents which could cause fire and explosion. We quote Eaton' s letter : "The Agland plant facility has the capacity for 165, 000 gals. of refined fuel, 165 , 000 gals. of propane, and 48, 000 gals. of ammonia with many smaller mobile ammonia units. " The heavy increase in vehicle and rail traffic brought about by the proposed alcohol plant will greatly increase the risk of accidents. Should an explosion occur at either facility, the likelihood of a chain reaction that would eventually release the 48 , 000 gals. of ammonia, is high. It is virtually impossible to predict the scope of such an incident. An adequate water supply and distribution system for fire protection in this area is an absolute necessity. If the Board should decide to make changes required to allow the con- struction of the proposed alcohol plant, the Eaton Fire Proptection District will insist that prior to the issuance of the building permit, the plans meet all N.F.P.A. and uniform fire code requirements and approval of the District Board and the Eaton Fire Department. While the Eaton Fire Department is knowledgeable of fire codes, it does not have the design expertise or the engineering credentials necessary to design fire protection systems. The system design should be performed by a qualified engineering firm. 14 December 3 , 1980 Thank you for your intelligent consideration of all factors concerning this matter. We are certainly willing to be of any service to you. The Eaton Fire Protection District Board Si, Duane A. Wilson, President /Z444/997 5-1rPL'41\-ii Gerald M. Smith, Secretary/Treas . The Eaton Fire Department has received this letter and are in complete agreement with its contents. 567 .q/J� The Eaton Fire Department VC;�'" Alex Bopp, Fire Chief 'c't,`z - October 24, 1980 To Mr. Glenn Billings: In regards to your question of the land immediatly north of Agland petroleum bulk plant to Lucerne, Colorado being in the Eaton Fire Protection district, Yes, it is in our district • bounderies and we will serve the area for fire protection to the best of our ability. Sincerely, EATON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT • Duane A. Wilson President DAW/do A AMA r I 1 1 Y k tiK h•- Eav t y -- 1 _ _ t ..+_. ..: �j. '.. - !� , . i Ef' - i .,+ »;A 'a c. I GREELEY CIVIC CENTER GREELEY COLORADO 80631 PHONE (303) 353-6123 December 10, 1980 Vickie Traxler Assistant Zoning Administrator Weld County Division of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Vickie: The City of Greeley Planning Commission reviewed the Special Use Permit application for the extension of the runway at the Weld County Municipal Airport at its December 9, 1980, meeting. The Commission recommended no objection to this proposal with the stipulation that the developer provide a means for adequately handling 100 year storm drainage flows in addition to the facilities constructed to handle the 25 year storm flows. At this meeting, the Commission also considered the proposal for a change of zone from "C" to "A" , Special Use Permit for a gasohol plant as an agri-business and Commercial Unit Development southeast of Lucerne. The Commission recommended no objections to this proposal provided adequate services are available from the various service entities. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully, Ken McWilliams City Planner �ca0 J KM:vlp /cc. cO ' I rjgC G�®� �ev�,62,9 � g1Sf "A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESS" THE TOWN OF 223 1st STREET /% EATO S7eN,COLORADO 80615 PHONE 454- ' r� 33� A ` • November 14 , 1980 To: Chuck Cunliffe - Weld County Planning Department Weld County Commissioners Re: Amendment to recorded exemption #360 Change of zone (case #2-341: 80: 12) Dear Chuck, The Eaton Planning Commission and the Eaton Town Board have reviewed the zone change requests stated above with the knowledge of the proposed plans for this area once the zone changes are granted. Our position is that, generally, we feel that an alcohol production plant and trailer repair shop would be advantageous to the agriculture business and the County but we do see one potentially serious draw- back, that being the problem of adequate fire protection in this area. It should be pointed out that the pro- posed alcohol production plant would be located directly north of the present Agland bulk petroleum plant. The Agland plant currently has the capacity for 165, 000 gallons of refined fue1, 165,000 gallons of propane, and 48 ,000 gallons of ammonia with many sma- ller mobile ammonia units. Presently, there are no fire hydrants at all in the area and the only water is from wells located in a field east of the plant which are inaccessible at certain times. Although any fire involved with these flammable materials is fought with foam,water is required to propel the foam and cool adjoining tanks. To allow the construction of an alcohol plant next to an already bad situation without proper regard for adequate fire protection would be a serious mistake. /113 ��b 16 1810 NOV1980 N,, RECEIVED CO Weqou>l f • Lc, F1.nnfng Cc®cj S108 ,�• REGULAR MEETING SECOND MONDAY OF EACH MONTH Sw a ca�aaa�a��J892 c` .k -2% • L THE TOWN OF 223 1st STREET EATON,COLORADO 80615 PHONE 454.2876 3538 EATON Therefore, our recommendation to the County is to allow the zone changes which are necessary in order to build the alcohol plant and trailer repair shop provided that the owners of the alcohol plant meet with the Eaton Fire Protection District and work out an agreeable plan for fire protection prior to the con- struction of the plant (issuance of building permit by the County) . Sincer ly, • Gary A. Carsten Town Administrator GAC/gmh REGULAR MEETING SECOND MONDAY OF EACH MONTH 'A-Ingo/cow/eel 189,2 co,:c„ 0•1� '�'� COLORADO STATE DEPARTMEg OF HIGHWAYS * N � * DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS _ Weld County 1876 SH 392 December 1 , 1980 Billings Zone Change S. of SH 392 and W. of Co. Rd. 39 at Lucerne DOH FILE 45100 Ms. Vickie Traxler Department of Planning Services Weld County 915 Tenth Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Ms. Traxler: We have reviewed the Glenn Billings applications for a zone change, commercial unit development, and special use permit. Our previous comments on this land use proposal addressed the need for additional right of way along the south side of State Highway 392. The present applications do not apply to the piece of property adjacent to the highway and, therefore, our right-of-way comments are not appropriate for this particular site. There is no specific information in these applications on the amount of vehicular traffic which will be generated by the alcohol plant. Based upon information included in the previous referral , we would not anticipate any significant traffic impacts on the State highways in the area. Thank you for the opportunity to review these applications. Very truly yours, DWIGHT M. BOWER DISTRICT ENGINEER Albert Chotvacs Assistant District Engineer AC:da cc: D. M. Bower D. N. Fraser (2) File: Crier-Jacobson via Rames-Finch-Graham �� 3 w/encl . ;�� A 6) cP f' DEC 1980 FIE � CEIIVLW, iv ell f CI__2S'g �Y7 P.O. BOX 850 GREELEY, CO 80632 (303) 353-1232 -E = CnS - T c 17; - I1 November 24, 1980 -I !' gj COLORADO To Whom It May Concern : You are receivinc a copy of this notification because your name appears as a surroundino property owner owning property within 500 feet of the proposed use. The Weld County Planning Commission will review a request from Glenn K. Billings for Fuel Alcohol Plant on property described as follows : Part of the NE4, Section 19, T6N, R65W The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is : Adjacent to the south side of Lucerne between Weld County Road 39 and the Union Pacific Rail Road right-of-way If you have any suggestions or objections, will you kindly notify us in writing before December 10, 1980 . The meeting by the Weld County Planning Commission is scheduled for December 16, 1980 This meeting will take place in the County Commissioners Hearing Room, first floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, at 1 : 30 p.m. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact the Department of Planning Services at 356-4000, Ext. 404 . V ' TQ,. ,re, Assistant Zoning Administrator Following the hearing before the Planning Commission this request will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for their review. Should you desire additional information concerning the hearing before the Corr.:rissioners, please contact the office of Clerk to the Board, 356-4000, Ext. 225 . CC:rg 11-24-80 SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR RFZONING: • Name: Raymond Cunti.z Home Telephone #: 353-5790 Address : 32933 Weed County Road 39 Bus . Telephone #: 353-5790 Lueenne, Cotonado 80646 Name: MaAttane Ccuttbs Home Telephone #: 353-5790 Address : 32933 Weld County Road 39 Bus . Telephone #: 353-5790 Lucerne, Cot ado 80646 Name: Home Telephone #: Address : Bus. Telephone #: Applicant or Authorized Agent (if different than above) : Name: G.eenn K. B,i to i.ngis Home Telephone #: 352-6692 Address :3835 Wez.t 10 St)teet Bus . Telephone #: 353-1150 Guetey. Coeonado 80631 Owner(s) and/or lessees of mineral rights on or under the subject properties of record in t' -i Weld County Assessor' s C "ice: Name: / ham E t Staneey Address : 1205 47 Avenue, Gheetey, C'o onado 80631 Name: s \ C: Address: Name: Address : Mailing List - Glenn Billings 7-341 :80:12 PROPERTY OWNERS October 12, 1980 13667 W i.P,P.i.am G/LatAy R £ Ha vc.ie t J. Leaigren POBox 1 Lucerne Costillo 13667A Lily (LE) Lea1gren -13697 Johe T £ Gundu u..pe elotte.itt Box 6 1122 24 Avenue Coup. Lucerne Greeley 11.3664A Cotohado Potato T.eake Company :7173697A Robert £ JohephLne CohtLLeo o T4 Ent F & L Ent. Inc. 33024 L Lncotn. Avenue 800-South Cotumb.ine Lucerne Denver, 80209 13702 Rebuan R £ Ava E. Rohe 13735 ; Donaed £ Beatn.ice Hungeabung Lucerne, Co.eorado 976 North. Bctb om Avenue Gneetey -T3701 John £ Matt G. Heivicena 740 43 Avenue Court 13732 Donald K £ Robert C U.uc.ee6Ii.i, Betty Adam.5 Gree.eey, Co.eonado Box 29 Lucerne 7>-?=13700 Many Lopez £ AtL ano B. Diaz Box 8 x, 13731 Monbort ob Co.eorado, Inc. Lucerne P 0 Box 6 Gnee.eey x'13696 Jesbery 6 Adnea Squiae4 33020 L.inco.en Avenue 13677 Etzi.e I £ Me.ev.in B. 6 Tho►.,c% £ Thetma C. McKinney Lucerne (1 2117 5 Street Gneetey 13695 John P. Donley 1012 9 Avenue 13679 T/ui tea Spec.ca .tieh, Inc. Gneetey, Co.eorado No- Acktteh-4 500 street Greeley, CO 80631 C-y 13679A Ag.land, Inc M/M Arthur E. Stanley 260 Eactohy Road 1205 47th Avenue Eaton Greeley, CO 80631 N 13678 Rebunn R 6 Ava E. Rohe i Lucerne Cotoado )1, 13681 Bain C. Randa t Tru4t4 (4 Int) Edna Berg 4 Intl 6310 East Lafayette Btvd. Scottsda L, Arizona 85251 13680 R.ichand K. Ketty 2248 12 Street Greeley, 13693B Agtand In Conp P 0 Box 338 Eaton, Co.eorado 13699 C. H £ Cantea £ Rogea L Schutz _ — 200 1 Street Eaton, Co.eonado 13698 Joe 0 £ Beata ice Corodova . 33024 L.incob Avenue Lucerne f sm m P - A O w E�RIViLflL! -ti '..-. rM 33 a.o U )- «�� z.� two cd.0 u g O c. +- d a to 5 o w0 04 q a Eo° .g.ra) .G� o Q.co u, u o M �.�;,[ o a) a ctj 0 o G7 Xs. •a) O �, bo c, tp�' 0.0 O. N c00,� Q+Tit , O E a+"- ,L.�U a M: � ? 1] cN1 co ::-1 O,n Hb a) G O cV• �= F , cd• N A y.q 110 co :~i QeBga ,nO n000p „> U a. ro v 33'Qw y�� p, y al q • `n co ar a.) 6) .O O U O V. O CI•CI' !I; ' -p a) 110 O k L1 b'y I'd q >. ° Ei 18 C q q 4) g U a) O § a`3 g u O O a. U A � M� as� td.R . O O U 27 .0 " % 3 m q cd a ho 2 g .� 4. / •G a+ " y o p.O. ' o't1 t1 71 o 4) m cz ;22 �5Q�Q5� v a Fr, .�1�H�o$ g2525o` u A o q,•.' .CCE cd I;•._. a) L's, .o 0 a.,E. 110+. k. F. - OOOO M t' u 4) vi U 4. bp e. E.d 4J Er! U E N s-0 08 {-. .. p......... W H 3'E co iv a .o y Oa t-'.L n'''' Ws V cg w •"y V NN1:88888888S82 • t.� •a• ° 4txbn E-' �❑�+`" y a) 3 ogrrAgcU °� N boo $025 a)� �~ cv G O �a0 110 ❑ O °..cow b 'o",gg .N..O N,-, �'++ .o cf N 0 Ca) r. g O u o-�' a) f3,ate) ' N ti .-.►', vi p•...C N ..' a) ctl F"." a) 4) cN.;� M .-4.',...,j,..; U_ N F,3._,-. U L O N U.I]'b .ti0cn- it bo N +"G+ tC'C7 4. `'S ° -'-- a ca ca w. -°x'35 Ln 0 a0i `° °J.4.., v'a) a. ! -ti p—. ., • r 144440.4^I';'0'300.41% ,.� ) .n td ,-,• r . .. I. r ....:.•-'.'r )I .,...,.Y,,, .:.4,,yi.,ytj ra..:+.. _ + cn I 110 , -07 _ 2.. F., aaa.. = \ , d oil c6 ° v ° ~ai ° � U V ZI > � >:. s-CC- d ^w dq{i' aiq �'iq al q p ,~-+ r~+ ' p ° y�2 .C w §7) 02. 'a p •- p,o� ;.a q I,' 0,0 q �p.O y A o"� �„ � �� 8. g•A'8 E H H o o'� ,n R > O em«°q 8-.7:2,1ai O �'i q0 .nu �Pu p�� 110 • o §z3 � A u 8.a V .g-am � \ cba°'3 a)�,,'B. 0 1 24 x- �, ,205tn g. an O�'d • >•'''.5 • N �° _ .r,.+ O �! G a Cam" O O �7 ° aµi i1 ,».� Q' G a .+ a -9....,4.,L0 0) I+a.. 4, 0 .5A.r.•:. O % a.) ‘5:_, :EU i 6 t cr, O 0 ";,-1,V,.3 c ux *.i •� 6� '6 N s > `" 5vo"� :11 .2_, °'� o " �° p as 13 co a 0 .0 o 3 n q° ° q °� q v H b U bA a�N E' yB ago au ;, .Oau vq - q c� �°� cd,n a)P—I 5 00 o C p ,.u'84. .d ad ... (V A ymm sg� a) ap do id al 8 \14\ ,, °� o q ° � q1i1t ° p 8o oi 'M °o z Q O ' & z a• Z;oy i14 \ � q. asis3 0 uE. a a e t' OeQY m csi 2 E ''-0 i•5 k. DO qq 0 . i D,�A•g •1 N U•� 10 ii 1.B•!4-6..co 0 \\ gp°,4 \ . p• ix83 '"E5 04gFHgieaLN o a.�c"d � a w M --- - T M , Oe4t eaIt Phone 353-1153 3835 West 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Novembex 3, 1980 Mx. Chan.2e4 Cuntii31 e km.L.stand Zoning Adminatxatox Weed County Depaxtment ob Planning Sexv ceps 915 Tenth. Skeet Gxeeaey, Coaoxado 80631 Dean Chuck: RE: Z-341:80:12 Mx. and M44. Raymond Cuxtvs have the bottow.ing paan4 box Paxeea A .in the xeque..t o6 zone on the Lucexne pxopexty which will .include manu6actun- t ng o6 the 6 oaaowLng type4 o b tx thous: Ut(LLty txailexz, horse tta i.eex4, custom bu i,et txaitexi and boat bed gooseneck tna i,eex�s. The Cuxttis' indicate that thvice Ls not a bu.ildex o6 'such txailuc s in the aexa and they have had many xeque4t6 box these types. They will a zo continue with the xepai t o6 4emL-txa.i eex4, txuckz and anticipate the making 06 eexta in pants paws the xeba11d1ng o6 damaged unit . It a oux undexustand.ing that by manubactux.ing the above, exL ting zone would not be coxxect. The aocatLon o6 a new building wowed be on the 4outhweist pant o6 Lot A with the building xepLac ng the Lange bcvcn now being coed. Ene.Co4ed . 4 p.ictune o6 type o6 pxopo4ed buitd.ing, paws a bid on the bu tding by Pxeiston Steen Bu.itd.ing Company. Coxdiatt y, WEBER REALTY, INC. e/gee- 04- Glenn K. B-c,P.P,ing4 Repxe4ent,ing the CuntZs' GKB/4yh Enceo4uxe • um-1 I Titesitott ;,, t . STEEL, BUILDING CO. 1 . . , c i $ , trailer ;.peciclties, Inc. June 1?, 1980 ' ` ?9�3 Vveld County Road 39 Lucerne , Colorado 80646 PROPOSAL AND CLN1 RACT EUILI ING: 1. One ( 1) 80' x 50' x 16' Preston all steel building. SI1EwChk: 1. All sitework shall be the responsibility of the owner, earthwork recommendations are as follows: A. Site preparation shall include removal of all debris and vege- tation under proposed building site. b. Earthwork shall include excavation, placement, surface compaction and addition or disposal of earth in the proposed building site. C. Euilding pad shall be level and shall extend a minimum of 6' outside of the perimeter of the proposed building. G. Owner shall locate proposed building on property and establish finish floor grade. F. Any additional fill material that may be required to raise finish floor grade shall be furnished and placed by owner. F. The building pad material should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum dry density. C. Subsurface investigation is recommended, but has not been included as part of this contract. CONCRETE: 1. All concrete reinforcing steel and welded wire fabric shall be sized, using A.C.I. and C.R.S.I. design recommendations. ?. Cast in place concrete shall be 3000 PSI - 28 days, reinforced follow- ing A.C.I. and C.R.S.I. design recommendations and include the follow- ing. (Can't) Page _. A. Engineered footings and piers based on 1500 PSF bearing capacity. E. Approximately 260 lineal feet of 30" by 8" insulated and rein- forced grade beam. C. Approximately 41,00 square feet of 6" concrete floor reinforced ` with 6X6-6/6 welded wire mesh and sloped to drains as required. D. Cne ( 1) 6' x 50' x 6" overhead door approach, reinforced with 6x6-E/6 welded wire mesh and includes a reinforced rolled front • ewe. E. One ( 1) 4' x 4 x 4" rear personnel door slab. F. A 2" thick sand base shall be placed below concrete floor slab and door approaches. G. Two (2) 2' x 2' x 2' area drains, includes framing and grating. (under floor waste lines by others) . H. Overhead door protectors: Four (4) 6 5/8" O.D. x 7' , 4' above grade, 3' below grade, encased in concrete and filled with concrete and painted. EUILIING DESIGN: 1. The structural frame work shall be of a slope beam design with flush mounted girts and top mounted purlins. Full beam endwall (east end- wall only) . 2. The structural frame work shall be designed for 20 PSF liveload and 20 PSF windloaa. 3. All structual members including the purlins, girts, and door jambs shall have one coat of red oxide primer. 4. Includes a full beam endwall for future expansion (East endwall only) . THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION: • 1. Insulation : All exterior walls and roof insulation shall be white vinyl faced fiberglass blankets, 7" in roof system and 4" in walls. The entire interior perimeter of the grade beam shall include a 2" x 2.4" rigid insulation. 2. Preformed Panels : All roof and exterior wall panels shall be preformed 26 ga. factory painted steel. All interior walls shall be lined and trimmed to the roofline with preformed 26 ga. factory painted steel (except wall area above over- head doors) . (Con't) Page 3 3. Flashing and Sheet Metal : All flashing and sheet metal including rake trim, eave trim, corner trim, door trim, gutter and downspouts shall be 26 ga. factory painted steel. Includes approximately 50 lineal feet of gutter,(south elevation only) with downspouts. EUILGING COLOR: hoof: — halls: Trim: Gutter: DOCK; A'T ItINLLMS: 1. Exterior Metal [hors and Frames All exterior personnel doors shall be Ceco Regent (or equal) 1 3/4" 3070M, 20 ga., steel doors, with 16 ga. metal frames and includes the following: A. Two (2) blank steel Ceco (or equal) door. B. Cylinder lock sets. C. Latch guards. D. Aluminum thresholds. E. Butts. F. Weatherstripping. G. Bottom door sweeps. H. One field coat of enamel. 2. Special Exterior Doors : Two (2) 14' x 14' Windsor (or equal) overhead doors and includes the following: A. 24 ga. steel sectional. B. Insulated and weatherstripped. C. Bottom door angle irons. D. Electric operators (3-position control) . E. Fully backed with .024 aluminum. FINISHES: _ • I. Painting : Overhead door jambs in addition to red oxide primer shall receive one field coat of enamel to match trim. Both exterior steel personnel doors shall receive one field coat of enamel to match trim. The four overhead door protectors shall be painted. MECHANICAL: 1. Plumbing System : All under floor rough-in for area drains shall be furnished and placed by owner. MISCELLANEOUS INCLUSIONS: (Con't) Page 4 1. All necessary engineering and drawings (building and concrete only) to obtain the building permit are included. All drawings shall be stamped by a Registered Colorado Professional Engineer. 2. Energy analysis showing compliance with Colorado Energy Conservation Standards. 3. All Freight is included. • 4. All Colorado State Sales Tax is included. 5. All labor, tools, and equipment required to install, place and erect the above mentioned materials are included. 6. Preston Steel Building Company will furnish the owner with Certifi- cates of insurance covering Workmen's Compensation, Public Liability and Builder's Risk. MISCELLANEOUS EXCLUSIONS: ' 1. Building permit fee is not included. 2. Permits and fees not specifically mentioned as included are not included. 3. Items not specifically mentioned as being a part of this proposal are not included. 4. On site power shall be furnished by owner. 5. Site drainage plan is not included. Total Price of Building:$5i1,406.00 Terms: 10% downpayment with order 20% completion of concrete 60% delivery of 'building material 10% completion of contract Note: This proposal-contract may be withdrawn by Preston Steel Building Company if not accepted within 30 days. Accepted this day of , 1980. Between (Con't) Page 5 Trailer Specialties, Inc. , Authorized Representative: Phone: And Preston Steel F&uilding Company Authorized Representative: Phone: Pry ton Steel ilding Company Fred Taucher Sales Manager Fl/pt. < < •. i y r y,� -, � 4 .F �,. 1 •' q� 4•, �• 4 r ...{'•` , - • x i',".•!.. {.:s ' .:-.1?:*. .( �+.✓'�'-4'i ,S . ice • r.t•� Zi J . . 1 '' .e y f i b t41 ttw',` g t ` k. "L+ - JJJX��U f g N,y Y,-.-4.-- h 1 _ 5s .,, • } ..i--‘,‘.....1..1, \ f,•. ' A ,, lI�' 'T • i 1., i sa,lea •_YCr '• .Z:44.:44 Z.v .� ,�. 30"4.._ ,_ { ' r §.t r "emu r tR ,e.' .0., •d �"_Tr--�7.'. 3,1c ......a,.... ..,..„.4..:„........„-,.;,... } i;_ a A.:-',.'ii! • t :i r -� - .7,1::-.' t '�,� ,L "^ - "-I, -c-,•' ++".N,.." - ---'-a-'------;.:.-y ...a," : • ' .�.xrr'� a. , .-- y `•.` • _;•'.a' .•,-;•,-� try ,44--,_ ' ,..111 ,-g ,�Y^!.0,4-7'''' m."t om-.,,,,,,.•..,4,..,.,. �r�l-y .+.a_...-i�t ir'i.y • �r,q £ t'4 f•4.i:". •.µif '`P+ • t i •r • •• ' ==""1-t.:•- y :.,.,cz`.:••ts?a..... ,;kr..r 4., r4 f ..c47`.*. .i lrt • 47-1--z71---,5 ` 1t! Platteville Fire Station, Platteville, Colorado1.C , _- - ti's • *�� / Tg---- * • `i� + err ;r�J: j Tt.....i;.:).L.:fe;...:1-,44,:itr l• r t� '� ^{i.,......si,,..t.‘T.:..:,,,... ` 7f�GC'fjLrt J6JfC L% nit ,,( jThi, . `' fit. ?I! _ hit..., .. x — 4:0''''..,.:1------'4A 1* ',t,i: .t..4::1:•-,-..':','-',0,7-;,:"=- 1 A 1� yY '',t!• dr. ' ,/.44.4-"?..- f,r;.¢.�rhi'G" ti2,4 , it � •"f ' : .. -+.1'+• —Yit�,*-' +k'' 7ts' -• ...w • +.V ,•+'"' :e:i i G°1�fG- .aC yy t``� f _4 . ..-,w.w.•rw .,+{y s`.s. �'1: _,•� .,. _ . .',.. , •... ._X31.fr a�a_:r...c: y r .�.:�-.�r-.-.`:•s- - • .: Mountain Bell C.D.O.Building,Encampment,Wyoming --4rAnnouncers'Booth and Press Box, Greeley, Colorado You're invited to share our years of experience in a wide variety• of projects.We can meet your specialized building needs,without wasting` "-' your time and money. - . 'When you need a new building `or an addition to your;present i, k.,:. r *;facility, just tell us how you plan to use it, when and where;you need it, ' *' - and what you've budgeted for it.We'll take it from there.Acting as designer,;t -. --,,,,,-,......t.:.,-,4-.1„; #;z 3, f, :;r• engineer, manufacturer, and general contractor, we can handle the .'z;,.. ', ' { r ,R . ` • complete project, relieving you of all the detail work.'That s why we t,` -•-:-.-„t,.•., •N .,.,z1.,..4 a , " *.develo d our full-service program; by doing what we do best we hel ou • �.' r 'A.1)..1 '.'. '4 '. Pe P 9 x �, PY ,: , i1 u . t. Ito do what you do best. :; t ..;. • , • ;: ,, ,. ' , s •, :4rir•., : ' • , y1 t. °. r 4, , .i Whatever your business,,we can.help.'Because our business r 4.-x-,,,- ' .ls more than buildings.,:-'4..:, a `3 _ r . ; ., `k 'ft 3 , * - . _ . f ,k,. 4- .I ,e4,,L,.., +} !' rid t `E(. .4.,:., -10: �.R i. •r• .. ' •Preston Steel Buildiri Co. '...-.:'---.7.4--:',,,"- r*; r t ' '''''',.,i,',';1-...::,•-•.;.'. . } :BOX 1198, :Greeley,''Colorado 80631,'=(303);353-2288 'Y• t.,o,...,.,_,A i,‘...7,,,,-.-, t..-.,•:;',- �{ i ,...:,V, i •�,�• _.. ♦. -: 'r't it ' *41, 4 Y �' �rS�AA'7f-_T • 0 ; c- •-t j£yz . tw. ,• • •fi : �� .t�ry;ya{ :.,4--4.'-: �j'4� t },�,�. :.., s• •. 'f. •. ;r 5:, ,j'� a 4 —..,,. .4,,,,,„A,,,,,,,,,„ . .,40,y 1.?`t....zt a ,,,, - iii} ,.....`�,, ,t r::s. i, -.'', -.• "_ •..J'7w K'z�.Z - r i3eri.! e 1 • October 24, 1980 To Mr. Glenn Billings: In regards to your question of the land immediatly north of Agland petroleum bulk plant to Lucerne, Colorado being in the Laton Fire Protection district, Yes, it is in our district bounderies and we will serve the area for fire protection to the best of our ability. Sincerely, EATON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Duane A. Wilson President • DAW/do �� 28?9,�1i ti°, 7 °c1-1980 VEp CSl ram to„„, gang,„„or� qa •,.._.....;."'-� a...------data .�.... _ _.:. -,a..0 n .._", _ i��.o ...m- k - —_,:ilr,nr j s.+wr'� - — . — } .mss . — :,ae,.` ��,+-; -,-;-,....--r_, `: ' ? Imo. - D ,__:-c rs.-i a�-► La{ — - `—A--- - -_ - _ =- -_- de - ! .--. j l *' fr ��t.�-s.��'3 = fin 1*�• �+��f .�e ..r.. ..r= . ,-4$.4,--",.. . • 1—‘1.- GREELEY CIVIC CENTER GREELEY COLORADO 8O631 PHONE (303) 353-6123 October 29, 1980 Mr. Chuck Cunliffe Department of Planning Services 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Chuck: At its October 28, 1980, meeting, the City of Greeley Planning Commission reviewed the Weld County Referral for the requested rezoning from Commercial to Industrial and the Amendment to Recorded Exemption #360 for the 15 acre parcel south of Lucerne. The Commission recommended no objection to both requests with the condition that the various service entities are capable of providing adequate services to the industrial development . If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully, yll/€4.-f..)14 it.",...1--11-‘1414-4---,1 Ken McWilliams City Planner KM:vlp �h u) OCT 1980 moo, N RECEIVED a, o Wild County co c-$,.., plandag COlfMISSIO1 0 ��!lg1 Sl tilt\l\ , "A COMMUNITY OF PROGRESS" weld County Ptanning C.,,,.,r.i ion '' RE Z-341 :80: 14 1 . Page 64 5 65 ob weld County Comprehen-6Ave plan addxezze4 Indurtaiae development. Shalt be encouraged only box low employee concentration agx.icuttunaely xetated. The proposed .indurtay ,us a tow emptoyex - 10-15 -people. The Indu.4tny, Food and Fuet, Inc, Joint Venture with B-io-Co Coxpoxation pxoducez cic.ohot, co-pxoduct4, di tL led dx.ied grain and carbon dioxide (CO2) . There -cis no xez i.due ox waate. Contxact4 box the puAcha3e ob 4a.id Land have been 4Lgned and cto4-Lng date4 4et 4ubject to you,. zoning appxovat. (Copiez walt be huppti.ed upon re m:aement) We axe now woxlung out agxeement with Union Pac.ibLc Raitaoad box additional Land Lea3e and use ob cont.inuouus xai.e hpux, which' now exiztz along pxopeaty on the We4t z.ide. No.v e Factox: Any change bxom the exerting noize w tt be mo4tey by incxeazed txucfz and xait txabb.Le on ..i te.,pta.nt noL6e wowed be negotiable obb the pxopeAty. The need box coin pxoduction in Bxazi l xevex4ed the unbar m.i,gxati.on by cJceation ob new yobs on L arm s and xeta led agxLcut tuxat buz i.nezz. 2. Fautty zone now. County compxehenz.ive Flan 80 acxe.4 inaigated ass being the 4mae,ee.4t Land 4ptit .in the .vvc.igated area a3 being econom-.ca Ly taxge enough to be opexated ah a pxoducti.ve banm. The Land in que4t.Lon hays poox biguAa Lon box itAigatLon hays only 13 acae4 ,uv'.Lga₹a.bte - no ditch ox xeiexvoia watea with the Land. Ra.LL Road. The main Union Pac ib.ic tine plus the existing Loop xait 4pua and othe,x bins. taA agx.i buzfiters .in the area along dictate the highezt and best use .us box agn.i- bw J.ne-5 ,indurtAy. Any commexac.at type zone to be 4uccezzbut must have adequate pubti.c accezz box the puxcha3Lng ob pn.oduc t.. The exL.sting paxcet doe/5 not have Ouch acce44. Just the oppo4s.cte..bon 'indwstAcat production where matexialJs cote detivexed to one point with the balance ob the Land cPo4ed to the genexal public by pexma.nent baaaiexs (UPRR-US. Highway 85 to the we4t, Coto 392 and the Two Ditch to the Noxth. The Land coming to aemo4t a point on the South) . Hen the tAuch xepa.i,x bu - eu on the South baeance 06 ti :cxeage would not comply with a commexc.ca.2 zone .i1 in .the butuAe tuck pars wehe man a.ctuxed these. Theheboxe, thus paxcel 4hould a.?zo be changed, bon butuxe gxowt'h. '' 3. I bind that the County Commexci t zone .us in conblict with the City 06 Gxeetey'.s and yet the location ob thi4 pxopehty must be xev.i.ewed by the Gxee.eey P.2ann&ig Commi ion and hays xeceived unan.imouus appxovae by that body. 4. Encto4ed you wilt bind 4ub stantiaZ mat,eniae on the pxopo4ed Gaoohot plant planned box the £oca.t on. Endox4emen s by the EPA, Pxusi,dent ob the U.S. Department ob Agx.icuttuxe, Depahtment ob Revenue, Coloxado State Un.ivex4-i.ty, the development 06 Ga. oho.2 .in 8xazU, Char, gxaph4, ebbect4 on the economy, production set by U.S. Government EnvL&onmentae Impact, Satiety, Etc. 621B 7 . gy , c , /`C se, 1.980 �, nQ 9a°e� 0444,� W cs? ®s�, mo=o 0 • `---- 0e6 ea Phone 353-1153 3835 West 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 SUMMARY OF FOOD FUEL, INC. In 1981 (early pant o the yeah) , 15,000,000 gae.eonu pen year wLU generate approximately $34,000,000 pen year on Gxo44 Produce Sate4. Use on pen month ba iz: --- 500,000 buthetz pen month Witt Pxoduce: 1 ,250,000 gatton4 pen month Witt Pxoduce: 4,500 tons o6 Diztc Led Dried Grain Witt Pxoduce: . 9,000,000 £64. ob Carbon Dioxide Use on peA yeax baa-4: -- 6,000,000 buzhets corn Witt Pxoduce: 15,000,000 gattonz per yeax Witt Pxoduce: 54,000 tong ob D-ustiited Dx.ied Grain Witt Pxoduce: 108,000,000 £64. ob Carbon Dioxide In tote .1981 ox eax.ey 1982, 30,000,000 gallon pen year generate approximate $68,000,000 per year on GAo44 Pxoduce Saeez Use on per month ba4Ls: - 1,000,000 buzhetz pen month Witt Pxoduce: 2,500,000 galonh pex month Wit Pxoduce: 9,000 ton4 VL6.t ,Pted Dried Grain Witt Produce: 18,000,000 £b4. ob Carbon Dioxide Uze on per year bazi4: - 12,000,000 bu4he.P' ob corn Witt Pxoduce: 30,000,000 ga ton5 pen yeah Witt Pxoduce: 108,000 tons ob DLt fled DAied GAain Witt Pxoduce: 216,000,000 £b4. ob Carbon Dioxide • • The in6oxmatLon shown here wa4 4uppfi,ed by the OwneA4 to Uebex ReaP.ty, Inc. the pxopo4ed industry and its accuracy could way. Baaed on the pxoduc .i.on in the 4 vast year ob operation. One can pxofeet Lncnea4ed production when the pant -cis entanged which the owner have in mind. Glenn K. Bitting4 ManageA Inds.tx .ae Department GKB/4yh IAN q PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPAI` TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT R GREENE UNION 1735 NINETEENTH STREET 4 ',ENERAL TRAF, , AGENT PACIFIC DENVER,COLORADO 80202 II II II (303)620.8368 September 25 , 1980 File: SM-58-257-Lucerne- Food & Fuel, Inc. ,Mr . Glenn R. Billings Economic Development Director Weber Realty 3235 West 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Billings: Please refer to your letter dated September 16th to Mr. Lanny Munson, Agent, Union Pacific Railroad, Greeley, Colorado, concerning your selling property near Lucerne, Colorado to Food & Fuel, Inc. , and their need for rail service. As you know, the property your client desires to lease is presently leased to Great Western Sugar Company. Before we can approach Great Western Sugar to see if they would be willing to relinquish a portion of their leased area, will need an Industrial Lease Application form executed by Food & Fuel, Inc. Will you please forward the attached forms to Food & Fuel, Inc. for their completion and return to me as soon as possible. Please make sure question No. 9 is answered to the best of their ability, showing origins , destination and estimated volume. Sincerely yours, n ,_-- //, / . Mc1gbL'' Traffic Agent /be ID 1 Enc. Wi 2 y� ) cO 21 10 'ern Redtv Phone 3.53-1153 383.5 11'4.,1 10th Slrrvt CrvrIv\, Colorado 806:31 October 28, 1980 - • Mrs. R. McNabb Tnai6ic Agent Union Pacific RaLLroa.d Company 1735 19 Street Denver, CoLonado 80202 Dean W . McNabb: Fite: SM-58-257 Lucerne Food and FueL, Inc. Enclozed you coat bind aLL mateniats reque4ted by you reganding I ndu tAia L Lease ob rat,Lnoad land at Lucerne, Colorado. Ass to que4tion #9, the attached production sheet 4hould give you a strong indication oU the amount o6 rail 4ervice needed. Even though they hope to pwcchaze 100 ob a t corn produced in WeLd County, this would not be po44ible and they witt have to rely on ishipmentts 6rom others ahem, even out 496 state.. The products pnoduced would be 4hipped to deotinationz throughout the United State4. We ahe a so awaxe that Grew Weztern Sugar now hoLds a lease on the Land in question. Based on past years usage and the possibility they could move north on the exizting property, 4tiU giving Great Western basically the same amount Land. The change looks 4easible to us. We do hope the change can be woAked out in the best interest or att. Sincerely, WEBER REALTY, INC. • WEBHAN CORP. Glenn K. Sittings Economic Development DiAector GKB/syh Enc2osuhe • ., 'O.form A •' . ( 1-5-7c ) RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY INDUSTRIAL LEASE APPLICATION -- SECTION "A" (1) Name of Lessee: Floyd D. Redgen Food 8 Fuel, Inc. " If a Corporation -Joint Ven.ture w.cth B.io-Co , a corporation of (name of corporation) the State of Colorado (State of incorporation) (Corporate name should be exactly as stated in its Articles of Incorporation.) Names and Titles of Officers - F,Pnyri p_ Rorf©oh, Pho rlont S-tantet A. Nightenga ee, Vice Pne ident John K..nfzade, Secicetcay Principal Place of Business - 6342 Wez& 10 StItee-t, Greeley, Colorado 80631 If an individual - (name of individual) of (Street, City and State) If an individual - doing business (name of individual) under a trade of name (Street, City and State) doing business under the firm name and style of n is If a partnership - , a partnership (name of partnership) consisting of s and all of (Street, City and State) (2) Mailing address of individual to whom lease is to be sent for execution 6342 We 10 S,tAeet, Greeley, Colorado 80631 (Street, City, State and Zip) . (3) Billing address 6342 Wept 10 S.tAeei, Greeley, Colorado 80631 (Street, City, State and Zip) - -- (4) Name and phone number of individual to contact in event of questions re requested lease 303-352-7879 Floyd D. Redgen (1) !ECrION "A" Continued (5) Effective date of lease Jay 1, 1981 Term desired 99 yeah Lease (6) Will advance permission to occupy be required? YES XX NO SECTION "B" (1) Use of leased premises Afcoho.L plant • (2) Commodity handled Atcohot, conn, dizttten4 dAied gnain, and CO2 (3) Will you handle: (Yes or No) Anhydrous Ammonia Xx Flammable Liquids within the exLstilig codes (4) Will improvements be constructed? (Yes) X (No) If so, please state: (Type) Map at_tnnhcd #1 (Size) (When) (5) Will trackage be required? (Yes) (No) (New) (Existing> If so, please give length and description - (6) 'Will device be required for loading and/or unloading(Yes)( (No) If so, please indicate type: Overhead Overtrack XX Under- track xxx Portable Non-portable XX (7) Will a Conditional Assignment be required for financing purposes , if so, please furnish complete name of lending institution, together with address of institutions agent No (8) Will property be Subleased? No If so, portion or all No Also, please furnish information for Items (1) thru (6) Section "A" and Items (1) through (7) Section "B" for sublessee. (9) What traffic will be involved? (Origin - Destination) Pnojected totae moade oA modacts in and out nekm,4 to nttnnhod Qho t #9 (Estimated CIL per year for UPRR haul) Stnht ►,p with i c ma,nnn pnfinn yecvc pant eaAty 1981. Late 1981 projected to 30,000,000 gallows peA yeah, with the po�s�s�b c,P.i ty ob a 60,000,000 gatton pen yeah p.eant at thus 'site in the neaA butane (on r• b butane) . (2) itteruLdT.)0 SECTION "C" (1) Do you now have an existing lease or agreement at this location with the Railroad Company? No (2) To the best of your knowledge, furnish a description and location of the lease site desired. If possible,- please attach a detailed drawing Man attached • (3) Additional information pertinent to lease request : at tth-cz ,tune we do not know the de4sti.nati.on of the. products produced. The corn we Luse we ahe going zo icy and buy tocaX2y az much az pozzkb.Yz. (Signed) (Individual) (Partner) (Corporation) (By) (Presid'ent) (getweDal ) Forward Application To: Director-Real Estate Union Pacific Railroad Company 1416 Dodge Street Omaha, Nebraska 68179 • (3) Introduction This publication was prepared as a support document for planners and financiers involved in decision making which affects the economic development of fuel alcohol. Primarily, -it grew out of the concerns of the Environmental Group, the Board of NE1EI), and others that it was • essential to have an orderly development of the new fuel alcohol industry based on the best information in an open process. This document is designed to be used with other more specialized information on planning and finance, technology, and agriculture. Since the fuel alcohol industry will tend to develop in a decentralized manner, much emphasis is placed on local considerations. The best up-to-date feasibility study references which complement this document are: • Fuel Alcohol Opportunities for Indiana . 580 pages, June 1980, Environmental Group, to be published by Department of Energy, Office of Alcohol Fuels • Fuel Alcohol Opportunities for South Carolina. 483 pages, May 1980, CEM, Box 21028 Columbia, S.C., 29221, (803) ?98-8616 ii 6. Where Wi1.l the Leadership to Implement Fuel Alcohol Production Come From? If the fuel alcohol economic development occurs, it will be as a consequence of leadership; leadership which affects policy, which • determines direction, and which sets the example. A great deal of activity is ensuing on the legislative front; the Executive Branch of the Federal government has many agencies involved at this point in the development of the fuel alcohol industry. The private sector has clearly taken it initiative. Joint ventures exist among representatives of the petroleum industry and the food industry. The distribution and marketing of fuel alcohol is increasing tenfold every six months in some parts of the United States 4 and there are many long-term incentives already promulgated as Federal regulations which affect excise tax as well as corporate income tax and investment credits. All of the facets for the development of a new energy industry are surfacing. The concerns and issues are documented in the media on a daily basis. 82 bills are pending before Congress at this point which relate to the fuel alcohol industry in one way or another. The role of the planner and financier in the economic development of the fuel alcohol industry is very significant. • • I-9 on these mixtures suffered any adverse effects in condition or • performance. Results showed that spark-ignited internal combustion engines run on a mix of up to 20% anhydrous fuel al'bohol suffered no damage nor any diminition in performance: Furthermore, the engines required no mechanical modifications. These findings prompted the launching of the National Alcohol Program on November 14, 1975. The program was further defined by three separate government decrees in 1979 for the purpose of the proper conditions for a gradual complete transformation from a gasoline • economy to a fuel alcohol economy. • The Brazilian program (known as Proalcool) is based upon the • production of both anhydrous and so-called "neat" alcohol (around 190 proof) . It is managed and coordinated by the Federil government, which sets its goals, writes its guidelines, and provides credit and financing for the operation. The original goal was to become energy self-sufficient by the end of the century, but because of the Arab oil embargo of 1973414, the program was accelerated. • In 1977, 1.3 million cars in the city of Saa.o Paulo were running on gasoline mixed with up to 20% anhydrous alcohol. Four hundred ✓ volkswagons owned by the Sao Paulo.:Telephone elephone Company were modified in the same year to run on only fuel alcohol (190 proof) . Their entire fleet of 10,000 cars now run op fuel alcohol alone. • 1-12 • b. Present J Brazil still imports almost 85% of its petroleum fuels, with an annual price tag of an estimated $6.5 billion per year (as of mid-1979) . Part of Brazil's problem is that it has based its transportation system (to serve the world's fifth largest land mass) primarily on highways and motor vehicle transport. Current alcohol production in Brazil is about 790 million gallons per year, about seven times more than that of the United States, and accounts for an estimated 14-15% of the country's automotive fuel needs. Most of this is still in the form of gasohol, but more and more cars are being built or modified to run on fuel alcohol alone. Already, no motor fuel being sold in Brazil is pure' gasoline: based on the brand, the fuel contains 12-1:". fuel alcohol. By 1982, all gasoline will contain 20% fuel alcohol, the maximum possible without engine modification. c. Future • According to Lester R. Brown of the Worldwatch Institute (Worldwatch Paper 35, Food or Fuel: New Competition for the World's Cropland, March, 1980, p. 16) : "Industry sources in Brazil . believe they can produce 20 billion liters of alcohol for fuel by 1985, enough to provide 60% to 70% of the fuel requirements of the projected automobile fleet of'12 million vehicles. Government officials are less optimistic. They project a production of just under 11 billion liters of alcohol by 1985." The following map • 1-13 2. What Does the Brazilian Experience Tell Us? If we are to learn from the Brazilian experience, we must examine the pluses, minuses, challenges, and lessons which it contains. a. What Are the Pluses of the Brazilian Fuel Alcohol Program? There is no doubt that Brazil has embarked on a very ambitious undertaking. Although the future of the program lies in some doubt, it is clear that Brazil has come a long way towards replacing their basic petroleum needs with a renewable resource. Probably beginning in 1985, all new cars sold will be fuel alcohol driven. At that time, drivers will have up to five years in which to convert the cars they want to keep after 1990. This will create some hardship on the part . of the poor, but a decision is pending on a program to provide grants for engine conversion to low income people. One important social benefit expected from the Brazilian fuel alcohol program is the creation of jobs at the farm level and thereby a possible reversal of the urban migration trend in the long run. It is also hoped that the program will provide an improvement in income distribution and a more balanced development throughout the country. Economic objectives being sought with the program include savings in scarce foreign exch .nge through substitution of imported fossil fuel, and strengthening of the internal market through intensified useage of domestic production factors. For example, the Brazilian I-16 1. What is the Total U.S. Production Capability for Fuel Alcohol? • Over the past several months, many governmental agencies and private organizations have made projections on feasible fuel alcohol production levels in this country. The following Table I- 1 presents • a spectrum of the more recent production estimates. It can be seen ' • how, over time, the estimates of the public sector have gradukily increased. Note particularly the successive projections by the • Department of Energy (DOE) as its policy on fuel alcohol has developed. The November announcement by Secretary Duncan at a national gathering of governors was later elaborated on by President Carter in his January 11, 1980, statement (a copy of which may be found in Section III-A (Incentives and Regulations) of this guide) . The �::-- target set for 1981 of 500 million gallons of fuel alcohol production L. was put in the context of replacing 10% of the projected consumption of.unleaded gasoline when blended with gasoline for gasohol. Recent indications may suggest that this target will be superceded by a more ambitious national goal as the Federal government's policy on renewable energy develops. Figures I- 2 , I- 3 , and I-4 provide the DOE's April, 1980, projections on ethanol and methanol and general t =• Federal fuel alcohol goals. To arrive at these estimated production levels, various avenues have been proposed. The following Table I- 1 presents a summary of eleven different implementation paths presented by various groups over the past. year. One of the first and least feasible I-22 .1 • 1ll O • +) O O - I I I I I I I I a N a i O O 0 I O I I I I 0 0 OO a.0 • I 0 O o N-o O r-i 1 H H H '•z 0 0 O 6 co I OO I O I •O 0 I p O O. HN vs u'1 N 1 O O. I I I I I I 0 1 I . - N H H +? I i •H H WCO I 1 O I Q I I I I H 1-4 .+3 rE o a) I I I I N I I N- O z 1 i>3ON �, U I N (t C lO Z 1 O Cs A it V Ow p �O 1-4 H O I ul I I I N. I I `� A P w �! a Z..-1. H 0 'd Ii -t E4 d o4-3 O 1.4 0) .C d r-{ O i) •ri •rl 1 i-. � � 4) - O O � N > > � I4 'd 0 O t~ N 4 i C N ~ W fz } O O O .O q u0W. N G) O 0 a) W O o Q' N O\ � �p WO Cl)U] p� O CO O\to� F� cd ri +� +) ri ►� [� W [� 1 O +) O •rI O ri 0)) t l i P C O U) I I r-i •ri I > 1 U) 1 Vi U) I rl t) r-1 cd O I O .ri ?-A N- O 4i N- 1-I H !~ 00 • HH U) O\ O O ri O L - E-1 C/)s U rn (n r.2) O W ••._.• O Q U m Cl) • 1-23 b in c Co O 1 T i l i l CO 1 c, r- C ° O s 1 ; m _ co. 1 r: co 1 r. a 1 o \ . . - • `/ Q a O O w a O 0 U W A ■y col•-- 0 cO rte+ ~--• —1 O J 0 I = MN* r' a D r-1 1 irio V1 •-a .C W a W(..) CC) Q W a US 00 LL CC 0 i DM* 2 LL4-4 i I 0 4-1 0 1 9 m HI C r• 0 4-i a to j .C11 4 .$ 1 H rUi . U] t P 8 r- I-24 $U0II J lo $uo!II!W 1 1 1 I § § E . I 1 1 1 I 1 1 co . oh . + e0 f e r 1 oa . el •g2 t O O oCO 0 ur Emil ri H a ° [MTNI ii U O r m CO O f 8 4 a o • E ita ca H s U Lt. 4f an i rft 1-2r5 d r C •.. • O In to C C.7 O .Z ...7., , g . O Z ea v) (11) Emil •C is• UI( V4Owill CIO 00 O1 M■iii (, Q s .. i < DO M C A .t, w) •c 'Vf c$ 1 O ia� c � H 0 CDO a C4 To " III . ' D.4 C4 . •... r.- t F--z... gt, 8 ;.,- - .O . F Will Z 1 � N .°c F 00 ° 1.m). < CrS H '; rail O I. cri iI I c l . 0 Q) } X U e 4-' 1 O M .y. CO o a) 'i p„+ 1 illiii4 , V Z • O wN .• -iii i :4‹ Email 1 0 •. ,; 4-a l 1 1 1 1 . H O OD kO d' N U P, w .1QaA lad suoiie J Jo suoiipg 1-26 - recommendations (column one) was put Forth in the Harvard Energy Project's book, Energy FuLure. This approach was predicated on the development of "energy plantations" across one billion acres which would yield (through efficient cellulose-conversion) approximately. 6% over our domestic fuel needs by l.he year 2000. The use of current "set aside acreage" for fuel alcohol feedstock cultivation (column two) was promulgated by the Solar Energy Research Institute in Fuel from Farms. Through the production of corn on 13.4 million acres of set aside land and an additional 5.3 million acres, 4.7 billion gallons of fuel alcohdl could be produced annually. • The use of different kinds and mixes of feedstocks has been proposed by various sources (columns four through eleven) . These vary from the primary use of corn (column four) , increased production of high carbohydrate crops (column five) , and introduction of new crops such as fodder beets and sorghum hybrids (column nine) to the use of distressed grains and crop culls (column six) , food processing wastes (column ten) , and cellulosic materials (column eleven) . By using a combination of these methods, production estimates vary from 7-10 billion gallons (column three) to 100 billion gallons (column six) of fuel alcohol by 1990. • • In the next two sections, a closer look is given to the primary basis for these projections -• the potential of different feedstocks and agricultural land use configurations and the options summarized in columns five, six and seven are discussed in greater detail. There are, of course, other considerations in addition to the alcohol yield per acre or per ton of crop. Other products result from the production of alcohol which are also very significant. For this reason we call them co-products as opposed to by-products. The products of distillation include carbon dioxide as well as distiller's dried grains. These grains may be used for livestock feed. Table I- 4 shows typical yields of major crops in the United States. Corn and soybeans are produced in large quantities. In 1979 the soybean harvest exceeded the corn harvest for the first time. ' In 1924 no soybeans ' were planted in the U.S., while corn was grown on 100 million acres. Over the years soybean production has increased and corn production declined. Soybeans, when crushed to obtain oil, also yield another product - soybean meal. Soybean meal is sold throughout the world for its protein value and it is used as a livestock feed as well. The reason for this is • that the carbohydrate to protein ration (C/N ratio) is optimum for the healthy, balanced weight gain (added muscle protein) of livestock. • The soybean meal C/N ratio is lows 5 to 1 and consequently has become • an important livestock feed. Table I- 5 shows the value of the co-products of fuel alcohol production in terms of C/N ratios in the last column. Distiller's dried grain (stillage) from corn based fuel alcohol production is approximately the same C/N ratio as that for soybean meal. It is possible, therefore, to use corn or beets or other high C/N ratio crop residues from fuel alcohol production for livestock feed. • 1-31 the consumer because the food is distressed before consumption. Distressed grains and other crops may be used for the production of alcohol. Typical examples include coarse and fine ,grains which rot in the process of long-term storage; culls from citrus crop production (approximately 25%) ; and cull potatoes (up to 40% of the crop) , both of which are never harvested. Not only do these crops become available for fuel alcohol production, but the co-products renew the value of the distressed feedstock. The heat and yeast action involved in the cooking and fermentation processes effectively sterilizes the distressed crops or culls, making them edible (there' are, however, exceptions here depending on the nature of the crop damage) . Other benefits occur as well. If co-products of fuel alcohol • production are not used to feed livestock, they may be returned to the fields. The form of these co-products may be tailored to many purposes. First and foremost, the co-products are in a form which is more accept- able for composting than if the crops had been left unharvested on the fields. In a sense, fuel alcohol production partially digests the co-products, making them more palatable for the microbes in the soil. Composting can return soil previously subjected exclusively to chemical fertilizers to its former productivity in approximately four or five years. This overall increase in production capability may be up .to • 15%. Over the years the_absence of organic material or organic by- products in the soil has caused the quality of the soil (in particular '-39 _ its tilth) to decline. Because of this, water and natural fertilizers - do not penetrate the soil as easily. Returning the co-products of fuel alcohol production to the soil can remedy thisAsituation. • Ir40 D Potential of Local Planning Districts • There are several factors to consider when assessing the potential P of a given locale for the development of fuel alcohol production. Whether planning and coordinating local economic development or financ- ing individual plants, it is incumbent upon the decision makers to be knowledgeable about current and projected resources and markets. Being able to assess the viability of various technologies is also critical (and will be covered in Section II: Manufacturing Process and Section III-D: The Decision to Manufacture) . This section provides a discursive outline of a comprehensive feasibility study that could be conducted to determine the existing and potential resource base and markets associated with fuel alcohol product- ion. While the origins of this outline are based on a comparative study of two counties in South Carolina (see Fuel Alcohol Opportunities for South Carolina, Council of Energy Management, Incorporated, May 1980), this outline could apply to various sized geographical areas or political boundaries. There is no hard and fast rule on the optimum size of a geographic area for fuel alcohol development planning/financing purposes. The average expected plant size produces from 7.2 to 10 million gallons per year (in Brazil, the average is 11.6 million gallons per year) . This size range can handle feedstock from approximately 80 square miles of corn (roughly a five-mile radius) , given typical yields of 225 gallons of fuel alcohol per acre (at 90 bushels of corn 1-41 ------- per acre) . Several such plants can be supplied by the productive acreage in most agricultural counties, depending onAtheir size, without impacting food/feed markets. The political, governmental and economic structures of counties present additional advantages as planning regions' for fuel alcohol production. Additionally, the economics of fuel alcohol investment requirements support this scale of planning. The capitalization required for a 10 million gallon per year fuel alcohol 'plant (using the Office of Alcohol Fuels, DOE, April 1980, figure of $1.75 per gallon per year ' capitalization cost) would be under I20 million. County banks (using the Federal Reserve Board vernacular) can support the debt financing portion of such capitalization costs. Certainly, the equity resources ' are available in most counties for this level of planning and financing. It is worth noting that the average outflow of cash for county energy needs currently exceeds this level of capitalization requirement. Again, the following study outline is comprehensive and may appear exhaustive. But most of the information Identified should be currently available. And it becomes more a matter of assembling existing data from multiple sources rather than initiating major survey efforts. On certain dimensions, however, such as available grain storage facilities and local attitudes of potential DDG buyers (dairymen, feedlot operators) , it may be important to gather up-to- date data for specific planning and funding purposes. I-42 The outline addresses the following topics: resource base; • production capabilities of fuel alcohol feedstocks agnd energy resources; demand potential for fuel alcohol, DDG, carbon dioxide and related employment opportunities; additional economic implications (including indirect, induced and substitution effects) ; and finally alterhative implementation scenarios. I-43 1. What are the Basic Resource Features of a Local Planning District Relevant to Fuel Alcohol Development? Three major bategories of resource features are relevant to fuel • alcohol development: environmental characteristics; demographic features; and capital assets. Much of this basic information can fie . found in existing planning documents and local statistical data inventories. a. Environmental Characteristics Several environmental factors affect the local production capabil- ity of various feedstocks for fuel alcohol production and the subsequent consumption of co-products, distiller's dried grains (DDG) and carbon dioxide (CO2) . The land forms, specifically regional contours, slope and drainage factors; the geological context, both subs rficial and surficial; and water systems (ground and surface) are all important factors behind the determination of alternative crop and cropping patterns. Soil characteristics and climatic conditions are particularly key when factoring in the economics of irrigation and fertilizer requirements. When siting individual fuel alcohol plants, attention should be • given to waste water emissions and .air pollution through steam genera- tion emissions. Closed-looped design (e.g. recycling of processed water and co-generation systems) will reduce the potential impact of these variables. I-44 • b. Demographic Features Basic demographic features fall into three major classifications: population statistics; institutional resources; and human activity systems. (1) Population Statistics - Key demographic information is needed in several areas. Statistics on population growth is of value to near and long-term projections on local fuel alcohol demand and meat consumption. Fuel alcohol production and increased livestoc$ production (as a consequence of reduced feed costs due to available supplies of high protein DDG) can, of course, be exported to markets outside the local planning district. The larger the local planning district, however, = the more important these demand factors in local markets will become. Additionally, employment and education statistics are valuable when considering the availability and quality of the local labor market. While plant sizeq and technology vary, an average size (10 million gal- lons per year) conventional batch process plant (requiring approximately $25 million in capitalizatio4 will precipitate 90 direct jobs associated with.the operation. See Section III-D: Decision to Manufacture for labor data. Continuous innovative.technology may require over 40. Discussions with local bankers and planners in the farm belt indicate that the leverage on those jobs is almost seven or eight, when considering the multipliers of indirect and induced economic impacts 1-45 from such events in the basic agricultural industry. Opinions do vary, however, on this point. Some persons with a national, as opposed to local, orientation, are less convinced of the full jobs creation potential of the overall fuel alcohol industry. (2) Institutional Resources Five major institutional resources should be examined with regard to both their potential roles in supporting fuel alcohol development and the potential impact of the emergence of a fuel alcohol industry on those institutions: government; decision-making (power centers) ; . education; business community; and community support services. Depending on the size and configuration of the fuel alcohol development envisioned, these institutions will be involved and affected. The various roles of these institutions are discussed in greater detail in Section IV: Transition to Renewable Fuels. (3) Human Activity Systems Conventional planning Studies on land use, transportation and industrial development will provide relevant infdrmation on the potential fit between the fuel alcohol development and on-going as well as planned area development activities. Energy studies will provide significant• support documentation for demand side factors and potential substitution effects. An excellent county energy study was conducted by the Future Studies Program at the University of Massachusetts in April, 1979, entitled Franklin County Energy Study: A Renewable Energy Future. I`46 1 - While this study did not investigate the full potential of fuel alcohol and biomass in general, the handling of energy balances and renewable • energy implications was very thorough. c. Capital Assets It will be of value to inventory when possible, key capital assets in the local planning district. When considering various financ- ing options (both public and private) , liquid assets may be brought to bear on near and long-term financing. See Section III-F for financing information. Known capital stock (equipment, buildings, space) already avail- able in the local planning district for rehab or conversion will provide alternatives for the pace of the phasing for fuel alcohol development. Familiarity with local capital resources will also provide indications of the feasibility of raising local bond issues for fuel alcohol plant construction. 1.47 2. What are the Current and Potential Production Capabilities of Fuel Alcohol Feedstocks and Energy Resourbes? Local production capability for feedstocks and energy sources for area fuel alcohol production must be _examined to determine the potential scale for economic development. While large scale plants - i factor in the freight costs of feedstock transportation by trick and/or rail, the feasibility of small scale and co-op sized fuel alcohol production depends more on available local sources of feedstock and energy. Based on the local demand for- fuel and the market for the co-products, DDG & CO2, later expansion of production levels beyond the local supplies of feedstocks and energy may be economically viable. a. Agricultural Feedstock Production s ' Existing cultivation of agricultural crops suitable for fuel alcohol feedstocks should be examined. Discussion of the spectrum of • these crops can be found in Section I-C-2. The following map (Figure I-6 ) and table (Table I-7 ) illustrate corn production levels, part of 'a statewide study conducted in May, 1980, by the Council of Energy Management, Incorporated, in Columbia, South Carolina. This kind of data was collected .f or all the suitable crops under cultivation in that state. Note that five year averages for harvest production levels per acre were used for baseline projections. While the productivity per acre was not considered a variable (although indications are that new cultivation techniques, such as I-48 • 71 * a V >1 A z W U •.+ RI CC CU , J ' D -I O OC .. Mi ea •.+ / • g7 r 7 '� A i y \ \ •�\\ O ■ •■• N■NP 1 •� 0 a \\\ ;y� \ \ • /■■■ ■■ FI C '\\1\4\\\\ \\ \ \\\\ ■■■■ ■ f.4 7 \\\ .\\\\\\\\V\ 1 �i ■ \\\ •r\\\\\ t} • ,_.� f� • \\\ \\\\\ �■ ti• ■■• ■ n\\\\\\y(.\\\ ~ • 1 , I J !■.,.■►_-■■■rIR ■ \\\\\\J- ■■J■ ■G■I 1 7■ \\\\ r- r Y" .■■■w■■�■ _, �.�..-�•� Y V ( � � / • .Y .�J'� • i • �� U i f �. +, X ,< / U) / I& • t z a CU < .0 u C a LI .`•�•j• • •\\• c. •" : -; ro h •o C •i tit '/pp E Q CI Oa S I' 4 • Y • v S. MI i �'• •`• / e`• L la� >1 Q+ re o o .,,%t•s I. �, 8• E CE to E 5 -.+ • t • i s \ •e • LI II al C >. Cl O ' v • /' S '\ >. U R3 O' V C• w N U O U S /" t •� t • y rn y U) a a E •o II ".4> • C •\ • < of Q Ul 0) 4 N a .0 Ill-' U) w U y s i 4 i C .C 0) r :I1.0 a, w .C In • CU o 01 oN .C oO C .-I w W y < •O in •.+ N •Q,•••1 a, O al t) 7 Cr.0• ...0""',f..�•� N .C • 0 '4 C ."+.+ U)) ••C'• i o 0 v •u N a .-I C U .'.... '• La I .C k. • 31 oj, • .C • O 0 O C 03 h a, ► , 1 c -- N -- y -- .-I -- u OU) .. cc t I _ \\� d \\� U LL . \♦__ __ ___ ' ) \\♦ Ld U) 1-49 • -0 '� •0 CO CO VD N CO ON CV CO CU O c'') n C ^ q 7 III O if: a% • W 1' "_ N r- 03 1� C 0 O O v0 0s O 0 O0 C U) C •r 0 O a V. • N M LI 0 L 0 U) 0 a U •"'C •ty L 0 cd u a a) +� r ra ^ -) > ••• Q r10• a)CO > ..+ .0 r0 0► M d 0% 0 O -� C C as ► r") U) r•••. t.0 CD rm. 0' w oa, r0 O r Q% M L w r� M n � C O. N00 O r 01 cr. LA, '.0 d q W ^ 1- M rd CO — -i •N • a) sr �� sr r.1 OD r .ri r0 ^ t O 7 a) U1 L u V b E; U110 a ` O CO •CO 0\ 0) Os 0► v hU 0 . •'- 0 k.0 10 N. u9 ►1l 60 CO •rl U q >- a .rl C �.. Id in vl [`CO Pc 0 �� OO< 0 H E I 1CH N b C H N N N•� p. o •� 10 a 0 . ON O1 U) 1/1 ^ r yar L• a v+ .C Cl) r� ri 1a 0 . P.m a O A U) p O • O 703 r- q O ro ' a t0 CD rE p Cl) +) -1-. .0 Z N NC) wee) f� '0 CU CV LIIl N IA Cl) to U) al ♦' O a m N. L VI U O N. I-1 U 0 0 a) - 00 0.. L.UJ^ Cam' U 'D .- • F6 P +) +3 U) O C 'fl O M •• sr) r. c0 • .C•. N U) to W C • 0 " "~ 1 1-1 •ri •ri O L r— 0 - r0 H 0 r -P +) }}�� b O ' Cl.So/ A = rp O O .0 cd o U m C .C +3 +3E-+ rd. C C Q C C 4 1- 0 ?,H •V Q 2Q ' aQ O �, cfa ad A Ol O g CO +' CCU J x000 7 O^ C CX1 0 CD L +' I I 0 4-i O c i, U • I 1 0. .0 1 '• r••. 0 1- r Q. •ri •rl .O •rl C CU r0 ca U) r-i r-1 1.4 AO �.II EQ •- N .- O Ern C 'd 0 0 a) O N a •-•• 1.0 4' N � � I MN E 03 _ �� CN CC'1 0) E '0• H0 Id ck Ul c-� . a • a' s.+ +•► v Col X CO Lza++ CV X CV 141 C .C 04+ a 1 a uo 0 C OO► b � 0 u 0. d� XN CO +3 +) C.4 .� = Q O. 0. r Q NO • Z Z a) •'O 0 0 U) O O. N H cop 0 r o b bcol O Vl O 0 ~ L C C .. ¢ wa .dca w 0 a b a 0) Ir u a a Y .1 L ry 0. 0. aai0 a - • I-50 • A IN V1 N Q m es.' cu V .0 t\ t0 c w W O O O N > N .- co ,a e •. L O A ..or— m - .N CI.O 4.. L O w 0 L.) I '' vt C C C A O e0 L-) -.I CO r\ .-•• T VI 1 A OJ r\ 4.• A LO O1 0 O 01 O .— ^ ✓ Li. CT N A O 11'1 111 ell V r- O t O A a •-• co O1 Co CT A •1 7 W .. r— N 4.0 Ui r- • A �..� A N e L L e w J IL A ~ > C 1. r- 7 C . u = •r O L C L. C C1 O r.) L ¢ in E 4., a, � CO m 0 •7 „... NJ VD O► •r U -- w s_ v1 O - r.... cor O- OJ 03 C r.. r•. 0. vi ., 0 O1 ON ,c; O N 'fl r•-• .— O. C C I IC L 7 4J r— Nr� •r- 0 r-i OJ r` r` d O ea a.c O► O• v1 V i� r- 0J .C In r— r— L >f at C • 4..1 03 J 0 - C 0 7 N ea 0 ..- •.- . CU el A CO 1 ►I1 ra VI N v1 -e U 4+ r 0.1 CO L 'Cr en L u U 0.1 CU ° 7 U 0 SO reel P cu •. • in L Q- 7 � U C O • Cl)4) 0.+J +•1 M 0 O - 1' a N cm I.-•NT r- PI fin v1 Q L.L. L 0 • 1....11 .•.. L •� 61...a L.-- r i-1 0J 4' +-e X17 a v .••- A 0 4a A A AC C b 7 ,C 4.1 4+ 41 I--. rp L 7 C O E v) v) �^- C Q 4 a cad >1 O 0 c L u 41 44 a Q O •4-' ri 17 U U 0 0 4.1 4- CO Cu 0w A AU ° 7 r I 4-b 4-J O c C >,u 0. 0 •• ••- � ••- O 13 r a 0 v1 r— r— L A A C W3 0 0 0J O ~ 4.► 0 0 ••-0% •r' r''1 Eel 0 C L L Oct N 41 el t0 4 U) 4.r UI 7 N e� 7 A A O VI OJ L A CO C.- cm E Ln — a L L LI O O as A• r 7 •O La DSO 4'A• 4+ 01 ,,C UN 01 .C .C 04- C• 4, = 'C 0.it) C. X 1" 1.0 • 7 7� 0J • C •VD 0 0 in 7 C 0 Nr _NtPJ 0.•- 0 41 = C A Q1 Q1 ..- y, ✓ a CC w wr— 1 •r— •.- 0 LI1 Cr 4J . E E00 -a ✓. .I 7i J v v •_ M L C v N LeiiW 7 vI WO C F QQ4d = 0 0) e0 tI9 In • .0 >. 41L • '° ¢ CO u 0 1-51 no-till practices can lead to substantial increases in productivity levels) , five year projections were made on $% and 10% potential increases in acreage under cultivation. At the county level, these formulas can be more exacting if more detailed information is known about acreage lying fallow, set aside, or in rotation systems. b. Utilization of Agricultural Wastes and Residues While agricultural waste, such as distressed grains, overripe , fruit, and damaged vegetables are an undesirable and unplanned phenomenon, they do occur and can be used productively as fuel alcohol feedstocks. The lost value of spoiled crops and contaminated • crops can then be regained partially through conversion to alcohol. Sterilization of the output mash (depending on the source of any contamination) enables the protein value to be retrieved as well in the form of potable DDG for livestock feed. While fuel alcohol production facilities will rely-primarily upon reliable supplies of agricultural feedstocks, waste products can be processed as supplemental feedstock if the front end processing equipment Will handle the particular waste and the residues are either compatible with the DDGS or'can be separated. If the residues are not marketable, they will have to be properly disposed. In this case, the residue would be an economic liability; offset, however, by the lower feedstock cost. I-52 Agricultural residues, such as potato culls and citrus crop culls, constitute in some cases up to 40% of the total crop yield. Much of these residues can be retrieved for suitale fuel alcohol feedstocks. Management of such operations will be necessary, as the residues also serve the purpose, when ploughed back into the soil,' of improving the tilth of the soil and preventing erosion. $tudies exist (such as R. 'B. Campbell, et al, "Crop Residue Requirement for • Water Erosion Control in Six Southern States") on the appropriate percentage of residues needed for maintenance of such factors as erosion control. c. Utilization of Food Processing and Community Wastes Food processing waste, such as cheese whey, often present liabilities for communities in terms of disposal. Such continuously available by-products can provide "free" and easily convertible feed- stock for fuel alcohol production. Review of potential food processing wastes in local planning districts is recommended. In Wisconsin, cheese whey-based fuel,alcohol plants are already.in operation. "Not only is fuel alcohol generated from otherwise_lost resources; but the co-product, DDG, redeems and enhances the value of that nutritional resource. Most food processing wastes are. carried off in the wastewater stream at lower concentrations than general fuel alcohol feedstock requirements. To become economically feasible for use as a feedstock, these wastes will have to be separated from the waste water stream or concentrated at the food products plant. I-53 Municipal and community solid waste (MSW) disposal represents the greatest pollution control task facing many cities and counties across the country.- MSW is typically disposed in sanitary landfills. The relative expense of operating sanitary landfills is increasing as the level of regulatory requirements for sanitary landfill construct- . ion and operation increase. Finding environmentally suitable and socially acceptable landfill sites is a very difficult task today. Disposed in landfills, MSW represents in almost all cases an economic liability. MSW does, however, contain potentially recyclable materials and it is also possible to extract useable energy through incineration most commonly, but also through recovery of methane gas (methanol) and fuel alcohol. It has been estimated that municipal . solid waste could yield up to 25 gallons of fuel alcohol per dry ton, according to "The Report of the Alcohol Fuels Policy Review" (DOE, June, 1979) . Production of fuel alcohol from MSW involves technology and equipment much different from the typical fermentation process for production of fuel alcohol from grains. Conversely, fuel alcohol can be produced from grains by the same processes and facilities used to produce fuel alcohol from MSW. Before MSW can be used as feedstock in fuel alcohol production, the recoverable and recyclable materials plus inert matter must be separated. Fuel alcohol production could be an integral part of the municipal solid waste disposal facility. Residuals would have to be I-'54 landfilled; however, the quantity of material landfilled would be much less than originally wasted. A d. Sources of Energy for Fuel Alcohol Production There are several alternative sources for energy requirements - • of fuel alcohol production. These fall into three primary categories: non-renewable (oil/gas fired boilers, electrical steam generation from coal/nuclear) ; renewable (agricultural residues, methane, low head hydro, solar) ; and conservation (cogeneration and recycling) . Tha various .technologies and their suitabilities are discussed in greater detail in Section II-E: The Whole Process. Obviously, the locally available energy sources will reduce ' the energy cost factors for the fuel alcohol production facilities .and reduce the local planning district's net energy and financial deficits. Inventory of locally available energy sources for fuel alcohol production enables prudent choices for energy inputs and consequent plant designs. e. Integration of Input Resources for Fuel Alcohol Production When study has been completed of both local feedstock and energy sources suitable for fuel alcohol production, an integrated perspective can be developed on the potential indirect and induced economic effects of the supply side factors. Such a perspective is of value to both overall economic development and financial forecasting in the local planning district. I-55 3. What is the Local Demand Potential for Fuel Alcohol, DDG, C02 and Related Employment Opportunities? It is of value fa both planning and investment purposes to project demand figures for fuel alcohol, _DDC, CO2 and attendant job markets. • a. Fuel Alcohol Fuel alcohol demand may be derived from projections on popula- tion growth, passenger vehicle and truck registration trends, gasoline and diesel consumption rates. Based on 10-year historic trends, five' and ten-year projections can be made on total automotive fuel demand levels. Targets for market share of gasohol can then be estimated. Typical targets are 10% replacement with gasohol of no-lead consumption (the 1982 national target set by the Department of Energy) ; 100% replacement of no-lead; and 100% replacement of gasoline consumption. These projections can then be compared with feedstock supply projections and fuel alcohol production capabilities. b. Distiller's Dried Grain (DDG) The principal co-product of fuel, alcohol, distiller's dried grain (DDG) can be marketed as both a protein diet supplement for livestock and reconstituted protein base for food. Local demand for J DDG can be projected on livestock production. As with fuel alcohol demand, livestock production projections can be roughly based on I-56 population increases and average meat consumption. It should be noted again that all of these projections are to determine local demand as a starting point. 'It will be necessary, of course, to factor into subsequent industry expansion, export market potential for both fuel alcohol and DDG (and meat and meat/dairy by-products) . When computing DDG demand levels for various livestock, rule of thumb ratios for dairy consumption of DDG as a portion of total feed rations can be applied. It should be understood, however, that the following figures are of value only for making such general demand . projections. There is no attempt meant here to oversimplify the science of feed rations. . Converting from percentage of daily rations to fuel alcohol equivalents (i.e. the gallons of fuel alcohol that . will yield the particular DDG daily feed requirement) , the following _-- estimates may be used: o 1.0 gallons of fuel alcohol for head of cattle per day; o .7 gallons of fuel alcohol for calf per day; o .4 gallons of fuel alcohol for swine per day; and o .07 gallons of fuel alcohol for poultry per day. Target setting for DDG production is not of primary value here, when considering fuel alcohol as the major production goal. It is essential, however, to factor in consequent DDG production levels associated with fuel alcohol targets. I-57 • c. Carbon Dioxide • Approximately one-third of the mass of the feedstock going into a fuel alcohol plant emerges by weight as carbon dioxide. The larger the alcohol plant, the more significant the production of carbon dioxide. For farm size stills or farm co-op operations the value of the carbon dioxide is negligible except that it may beI vented off and pumped to locations where storage of feedstocks or other silage is necessary. Having a relatively inert, carbon dioxide atmosphere is a benefit, for such a condition minimizes the spoilage of feedstock and other stored farm materials. .Most vector problems in farming operations are,also prevented as a consequence of the carbon dioxide atmosphere. For larger plant operations, carbon dioxide is recoverable. Often it is compressed and then liquified for shipment to other areas. The value of the carbonidioxide at current market prices is approximately $.03 per pound. For large plants; i.e. those producing upwards of 20 million gallons per year, approximately $300,000 worth of Carbon dioxide can be produced per month. This sum is not negligible and can justify the operating equipment necessary to compress and store the carbon dioxide for shipment to other locations. There are several national markets for carbon dioxide. It is used as a chemical feedstock and it is used in the beverage industry. Recently, a growing demand for carbon dioxide in tertiary oil recovery has developed. Liquid carbon dioxide is forced under 1-58 pressure' into formerly producing oil wells and causes an effect whereby the solid parafins are dissolved by the carbon dioxide and the well returns to production. It is thus worth investigating such local markets for CO2 when anticipating the construction of large scale plants in a local " planning district. d. Jobs Associated with Fuel Alcohol Production As noted previously in this section in l.a: Demographic Features, an average size fuel alcohol plant (yielding ap,proximately 10 million gallons`per- year) will create 40 to 90 direct jobs, depending on the technology used. And the leverage on those jobs has been estimated from 7 to 8. The following Table I-8 was developed for the recent Council of Energy Management study, Fuel Alcohol Opportunities for South Carolina outlining the kinds of jobs created for unskilled labor, those with basic employment skills, and technical education as well as professional. Job categories are listed under each of the economic headings for jobs created by direct; indirect; induced; and substitution effects of fuel alcohol development. ' . When fuel alcohol production targets have been established • based on feedstock and energy supplies and demand projections for fuel alcohol, estimates on the number of jobs implied by the required scaling of the development can be made. I-59 bfl • --- .r4 u) o x a) O O id R' + N .o 0 a 4-) CO O U C Cl) 1n a � + •H .r •0 ) N Q) 0) 0 C 1 C) .r1 U) +3 +3 U) 0) a +0 C 0) •r1 C C C a C .C O •rd al 44 r- -H U) >2 U) ME En 0 CI) F-i a >2 ,r C •r1 C id CO = a) U) U) U) 1.4 i o CO C C 4 Cl)1-4 H (1)bn +O a) .r4 C .x .- U' rC b cad a) c E E CO o .rri - .rC 1-4 a) •0 0 QO) 0 m U +' •C w a '�' 3 a)rd ,d a .a + 0 ) 0 .r•1 .C U U f1. .rl la b O >~ cd .(2 Ord 0 Q) Q) 'b . 0 rC Q) 0 C g a) w 1-i >2 U) Cr Z O w Cl) w >2 w 41 1J Er Gx. CO 0 NJ � ., 0 U x 0)I—I .r-1 OC 1A C 1n U) • O U C CON U) •r1 Id C a) �.= a .0 H 4o rd -H 'd C U) U) a) •rl H x 4-) U) 7.4 0.C H .al .C C N 0 i-1 C N Q) co .rl +i .rv-I 0)) �U O aG O• +� rl N A. � C b x U cox -H .d . a) 0 c .C 3 '- rd • G C . o •rd ;.4 o aN) o o a) a) cCd •rC Hi o Cu C •'CC1 'd H £ U) ME P- 3 > 03 U) 3 > W W U E- Ct. W O a) to d P •rC .r-4 .8 o rd . i�1 o H C Q x ' 0 0 -i-) .0 0 a b Q) U • aN) H LO 4D H -� N W 0))14 0 •C .a) 1d C O U) U) Fa C rol I`1 +3 .r1 .C C a) Q) U 0 -H - O'0 o Q)) a) • H C a' -H cd .C o acrd ( aOO) t� CD tun - .C H ,rt cad MI >2 CO M E O In E-4 E-4 - Cr) w w > a • 0 +3 ti C a) m 0 C > 'd a H C 04? � a H E 0 -H N Cl) cd r-I .r1 G +1 mi a b H w c vii E-+ W I-6o • • N g 42 _ 5 •r1 • o °O -4 +3 g N co N Si .C o +) a) as CD N a�) a o a) a) Z rd W .Z Z 4) En ww Z xw < RI �° CO m 4 rd C S-, o, a) L.) - N o •b 0 O +-) a) +) o o cd H • O O U ' ''-,r0 rd i O O .11:JH W • Q U H O O U N •••4 CO +3 N (Oy H N +) 4 +� N 4f • +, N N N Sa Sa •r� W +3 Cl)cOd / -- (Z, O •H_ +) •ri a) •rl 0) a) H Cl) CO +, •ri .O a) 4O U) O a) Si a) +3 cd a) •rl p 5 ++ .C Si O •rl t~ +) C •r-1 O O O H '.)' '---- 4-) l V� •ri H E C •r •H a O •r l .rl O 4 lU_ o ••ri Ts a) U 40 a) 40 EQ N O O 444DDD VI • % rl .C 0) q HZ O O go O O a) H W U Z W W W OM W < < W a Si 0 1:1c. +- d U . 1 CO +) U) O CO 4 Cl) +3 Cl) a co H r-1 +) cd +' ,� �NI .,-I N •r�l (I) Cl) pay - 5-i +3 .a N g o L+ a) +' cd a) •r--i § O o O O •ri Z U .4 a.o 1r4 440 O 0)) k o aa)) 0i . a-)1 b0 E W •U) O r-) U A XI U Tc. W W W U U3 c < O o O . P H O 4 O m r • a) 0 > O � a •O 0 V I.4 80 o O • O V) E• w U), Ill I-61 I - - 4. What Other Economic Implications Should be Taken into Consideration When Planning and Financing Fuel Alcohol Development? Three major areas of consideration should be addressed in any comprehensive fuel alcohol development study: indirect and induced etfedts'and substitutions. Key factors in each of these categories are reviewed briefly below. a. Indirect Economic Effects Five significant indirect effects of fuel alcohol development are plant construction; supplies to the fuel alcohol facilities; transportation impacts; farm products and practices; and energy co-generation. • Plant size and ownership will determine the nature and scale of 'construction operations. Smaller plants will vary from owner-built to turnkey facilities bought as design and construction packages. Larger plants will require the use of engineering design firms and construction companies; designs will be based on site specific parameters to a large extent. Depending on the number and scale of these enterprises, a local planning district may be able to support the development of a fuel alcohol plant manufacturing firm. Both service and supply systems above and beyond primary feedstocks and energy supplies will develop as the fuel alcohol industry grows in a local planning district. Materials such as enzymes, yeasts, acids, alkaline reducing materials and maintenance I-62 and clean-out supplies will be required. Servicing including periodic parts replacement will be necessary for such items as belts; gaskets; motors; pumps and the usual array of plumbing, electrical and mechanical equipment. Existing and new businesses capable of meeting these orders will be called upon continuously as fuel alcohol plants go into operation. Transportation sectors will be impacted in two ways - through the new supply of an alternative liquid fuel and through the require- ment for transporting feedstocks, fuel alcohol and DDG. Both public . and private transportation systems can be analyzed for the prospective impacts in these areas by 'local fuel alcohol production. Farm products and practices will be impacted by the emergence of a local fuel alcohol industry. Both cropping patterns and live- stock production should be examined from the viewpoint of increasing productivity, responding to new markets, and maintaining the balance between food and energy production. The economic implications for farm production are reviewed in detail in Section III-B: Farm Production. Co-generation opportunities should be, looked into. There are numerous sources of intermediate quality waste energy that could be used for fuel alcohol production. Such sources as nuclear . power plants, large manufacturing Sites and heavy industry could logically produce energy needed for fuel alcohol plants at the same time they produce energy for the primary application. I-63 Depending on the scale of livestock production in the local planning district, methane generation could become a significant factor in energy supplies to fuel alcohol production. Integrated farming designs, such as that mentioned in Section III-C: DecentralLza- tion of Manufacturing, held great merit and opportunities fcr tailor:,ng this and other renewable energy sources into the development of a local fuel alcohol should be examined. b. Induced Economic Effects Impacts from the development of a local fuel alcohol industry ' will be felt in seemingly unrelated sectors. Several such induced effects will occur in such areas as: community services, land use, tax structure and debt financing. Community services are modified by any economic expansion program. In areas of high unemployment, new jobs mean less demand on welfare programs, increased tax base and more opportunity for additional needed services. Where developing employment opportunities attract more people to the area, greater demand is placed on existing services, and growth requires more planning and increased budgets. Education • and health services are primary sectors impacted in this regard. Modifications in public agencies responsible for environmental quality control; consumer protection and worker safety among others, will be necessary. Land use planning (reviewed more thoroughly in Section III-I: Role of Local Government) should be considered as fuel alcohol development proceeds. Particular attention should be given to the changing use of farm land now under cultivation as well as lands currently unused.- The tax structure of local planning districts may be impacted as the tax base increases due to jobs creation in the area and the • multiple effects previously discussed. Section III-I: Role' of Local Government reviews various options for specific changes in tax structures for incentives and controls for the newly emerging industry. Debt financing options (addressed' at length in Section III-F: Financing) for both fuel alcohol facilities and attendant business and industry development should be reviewed as well. c. Substitution Effects In the development of any major industry, complex relationships exist with respect to the principal input resources and resultant products and co-products. New industries continually displace old industries. There are several potential substitution effects that can be anticipated with the emergence of a fuel alcohol industry. Fortunately, the jobs creation potential of this industry is far greater than that of the potentially displaced or impacted industries. Substitution of gasoline by fuel alcohol occurs with every gallon of fuel alcohol used in place of gasoline. The local substitution effect is felt by the gasoline suppliers, but it does not stop there. Substitution is felt all the way up to the international level. I-65 Approximately 2.35 gallons of crude oil are required to produce a gallon of gasoline. When fuel alcohol is substituted in the form of one gallon for 10 gallons of gasoline in a gasohol blend, it is not necessary to import 2.35 gallons of crude oil every time 10 gallons of gasohol are made and sold. In this case, from a national economic standpoint, such substitution is desirable, for it reduces our fuel oil import requirements from foreign nations and reduces cash payments abroad. In the case of diesel, through the use of twin tank systems whereby a turbo charged fuel alcohol is injected from a tank into the carbuerating mechanism of.a diesel engine, less consumption of diesel fuel occurs. In this case, the substitution can be much greater than that occurring with gasohol, for one gallon of fuel alcohol replaces 1.3 gallons of diesel fuel. Fuel oil substitution by fuel alcohol will probably not occur until special blends are developed and both the price of gasoline increases as the ,price of fuel alcohol decreases. It has been estimated by Samuel Eakin at the Oil Express meeting in Washington this past March, 1980, that this crossover in costs/pricing will occur in the second quarter of 1981. However, fuel oil dealers and distributors, to date, have been least responsive, to the advent of fuel alcohol. It is likely that small scale farm producers of fuel alcohol will be able to use fuel alcohol in their stationary heat generating systems such as those used for grain and hay drying as well as home I-66 heating systems. No major modifications of operating equipment will s - __ be required for this application. With regard to the primary feedstock substitution effect, soybean production will experience the major impact. In the past, soybean cultivation led to a substitution of corn acreage as a consequence of several factors. One of the key factors was the greater productivity per acre of corn production, requiring less acreage for the same level of targetted production. As demand for fuel alcohol feedstocks increases, it is likely that more acreage will be planted in corn supplanting some soybean production. This substitution effect is in itself neither costly nor harmful and will occur gradually as a consequence of normal market forces. ', -- Additional substitution effects can be anticipated with the • continued development of additional applications of fuel alcohol and its co-products. The economics of such substitutions are less hazard- ous than those that occur with replacements in other industries and the economic benefits of the widespread domestic production of a renewable liquid fuel will be enormous. More detailed consideration . is given to the transition to renewable energy in the last section, Section IV of this guide. 1-67 Two Polish scientists proposed, before a U.S. Senate subcommittee, a rubber process that could be developed more quickly from an alcohol base. Distilleries-were irdered to produce industrial alcohol to con- tribute to the nation's war effort. The United States was producing al- most 600 million gallons of alcohol by 19L,1+, nearly four times the 142 level. Half of this amount was going towards the production of synthe- tic rubber, the rest into other vital uses. Smokeless gunpowder, med- icines and as a power booster in aviation and submarine fuels were some of these uses. Alcohol and gasoline blends helped to prevent the icing of carburetors in aircraft. Even jeeps, generators and Land Rovers were fueled by alcohol. However, by the end of the war, the Commerce Depart- ment decided to stop fuel alcohol production because of the uncertainty about its post-war uses. The benefits of fuel alcohol have not gone unrecognized. In 1978, all 33 cars in the Indianapolis "500" were fueled with 10O; fuel alcohol. Additional uses of the co-products of fuel alcohol production include the high-protein feed supplement of Distillers' Dried Grain (DDG). Ethylene and acetaldehyde can be produced from alcohol as well and these yield a number of petrochemical industry products. This guide, however, will concentrate on the production of alcohol for fuel purposes. • II-5 Furthermore, new emissions control systems such as the three- i way catalyst with exhaust oxygen sensors for carburetion feedback for fuel alcohol have been shown to be equally effective using gasoline or gasohol. One test performed by the EPA comparing indolene indicated that gasohol compared favorably with the indolene standard used in tests for tailpipe hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and evaporative hydrocarbons. Two measurements are made in these tests. One involves fuel vapors from the gas tank when the engine is left to idle and from various locations such as the pump at gas stations. Where the commonly exempted pure summer grade gasoline failed these tests, a 90% indolene/10% fuel alcohol blend showed definite improvements over pure indolene in ' tailpipe hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions: nitrogen monoxide emissions equal to the summer grade gasoline and a slight increase in the evaporative emissions relative to the pure summer grade gasoline. This is the specific basis on which the December 16, 1978, EPA approval was made. • In effect, the EPA regulations on gasohol are based on its performance on tests set up for the fuels for which gasohol provides a substitute. In terms of industrial production of gasohol, there are require- ments with respect to the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air require- ments. Any business or corporation setting up fuel alcohol production ; ;, t� should follow the normal EPA procedures and permit processes. III-15 Information is available on these processes from each of the EPA Regional Offices. A typical letter of response from the EPA Region 3 office is shown in Figure 111- 2. • • • III-16 .,'''cost Figure III-2. Letter from•Region III EPA Regarding Permits ,p' S t A YV ` wa ° UNITFD STATES ENVIRONM[.N IAL I'I:l)1I.CTION AGENCY r;F',41 PRolEc,-,' I.I GION III • um AND WALNIIr ',Iltl I I ', PHILADLLI'HIA. PLNNSYLVAINIA 1')106 In Reply Reter to : 3EN23 _ FEB 15 1x980 Dear Mr . Paul Montney of our office informed me that you were interested in obtaining information about EPA permits necessary for construction and operation of a gasahol plant . According to Mr . Montney, you stated that the proposed plant will have no .wastewater discharge . If that is the case , a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permit will not be necessary . I have enclosed copies of some pertinent pages out of the June 7 , 1979 FEDERAL REGISTER which describes where such permits are necessary. -- The 'necessity of obtaining a permit for emissions to the atmosphere will depend on the type and amount of pollutants expected to be discharged . Mr . Blaszczak of our Air , Toxics and Hazardous Materials Division will contact you about this ' matter . If you have any further questions , please cotact me at 215/597-8821 . z/Ic, Sincerely yours , 11 tc" • 1%•t sec c < r3 z-c z• ,e .a•.% Daniel D. Sweeney 20s - t1 7- - 2( Po-e New Source Coordinator • cc: Mr . R. Blaszczak (3AH11) III-17 Figure III-6 January._11 , 1980 Presidential Hessage_ on Alcohol Fuels UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Or AcnIcULTunc /AR M(RS HOME A('IIIf116 I IA HON W•„III,nroII D C 202n0 .If•N 1 G 1:14 SUBJECT: Presidential Message on Gasohol TO: State Directors, FmHA Attached is a copy of President Carter' s message of January 19801 outlining proposals and steps that will be .taken to accelerate the production and use of gasohol . We are now working out the details of FmHA's involvement 1n • these efforts and will be sharing that information with you in the very near future. In the meantime, we thought it important that you have a copy of the President's message on the subject. J; ES E. THORNTON ssociate Administrator R F e r w r: f) Attachment J A N 21 1980 III-24 !(BARGOED FOR RELEASE ATIL THE END OF THE BRIEFING JANUARY 11 , 1980 Office of the White House --Press Secretary THE WHITE HOUSE • STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT This Administration' s program to accelerate dramatically America' s production and use of gasohol is yet another important frpfC Qq which we will be waging -- and winning -* out energy War, fa sues all across the nation can now take P48 in ono of the most exciting endeavors of this new decade. 9y Using Naerica4 fesourcea , we are enhancing the international ec9044491 0Q14;4901 004 w.ilitar' stranif h Qt trh, 0104 rotstaq , overall, wy Adathistration is committed to a program which wi4 , ®rovide bgtwesn $8 . 5 billion an 113 billion of assistance tg imulaCe production of alcohol fuels over the cooing decade, he will quad } to currant gasohol production capacity by the d S! this yair, Ourinq 1961, vs should be capable of yrodVciag othginol •� au enamel rats fig 5-0Q million ga�lona macs thila siY tiNse the (currant nets. ;f thus guount pf ethanol lorq sl; turned into gasohol, it would replace almost 10 percent g; 5yf ' ar44Q1poto4 0.49;14 to; 4111940,4 V*1Aline ii 1V14. Our overall gasohol program will spur the investments that wo together must make for a more amour, energy future. We will croota new markets for our. farmers. We will no longer have to throw away waste materials which can be turned into profitable, essential fuels. Our nation' s snormous' agricultural and fiber resources can bi used co help provide a secure source of energy for our future. By pro- ducing gasohol from fiber and agricultural by-products, we can meet fuel needs for millions of Americana , including our farmers . 1 1 ! • III-25 Office of the White Clouse Press Secretary THE WHITE HOUSE • FACT SHEET THE PRESIDENT' S ALCOtjQ1 f'UEL$ Plied The President ' s program will provide substantial stimulus to accelerate domestic production of alcohol fuels from eourcea other than petroleum. The proyram will quadruple current 9agohol production capacity by the end of 1980,. The President silt o target 'tor domestic production capability of 500 million gallons during 1981. If this amount of ethanol were all blended tO make gasohol , gasohol would then account for almost 10 per cent of our anticipated 1981 demand for unleaded gasoline . This represents approximately a six-fold increase over existing alcohol fuel production capacity. Today ' s announcement reviews initiatives already underway or proposed as well as new initiatives not previously announced. This program includes a variety of incentives , from tax credits to loans and loan guarantees , to; --permit gasohol to become economically competitive with unleaded gasoline at the pump; and --stimulate new investment in facilities to produce ethanol. These initiatves are designed to increase greatly the use of -gasohol, a_ 90%/10% blend of unleaded gasoline to alcohol, in passenger and commercial vehicles , as well au to encourage increased use of alcohol directly as fuel for off-highway use , such akin farm equipment. • KEY ELEMENTS OF THE PRESIDENT' S PROGRAM --Permanent exemption for gasohol from the 40/gallon federal isocline excise—tax. The President originally propose an exemption QU gasOby f rem the• 40/gallon federal excise tax 1n 1977, In tipvemkmrr 1978 , he signed into law the current exemption which expire# in 19U4 , In April 1979 the President proposed that it ad wade perma- nent in order to provide a long-term incentive which inveetgrq in ethanol Plante can' count on over the life Of tngirq�� �,Gipq� The Senate version of the Windfall Profits Tax bill WQNld ui nd --- the exemption to the year 000 ; the President suppocte this extension. This exemption provides a subsidy equal to 404 per gallon of ethanol . In . concert; with the tax credit discusrly4 below, it is the most important incentive available to accelerate 4lcohol production and use. 11T-26 • --40C/gallon production ( ,x credit. The President supports the estab- fiaiment of a tax credit for producers who use the alcohol directly ___ wit►►out blending with gasoline . This use is expected to occur mainly on farms. The Senate version of the Windfall Profits Tax bill would provide a pc.,2_�:ion tax credit of 40C/gallon for aliu)iol over 190 proof , 30C/gallon for alcohol from 150 to 1`)0 proof. --Si _b_i ll ion federal credit program. The President proposed a new S) t, illion ten-year program of loans and loan guarantees for .con- rs,ctiun of t,mall and medium-scale alcohol and other biomass )r,).iuction facilities . The smaller facilities would be located mi : o.ly on individual farms for use in farm equipment . This proyra!n . l also a.,:, ist farmer cooperatives for the production of alcohol ! Jr either on- taem or (;oin,nercial use . In general , plants eliyitl.e tor this assistance will produce less than 30 million gallons per year, with most on-farm facilities producing less than 5 million 9+1.lons per year. Funding for this program would be authorized at an annual level of 5300 million, $250 million for loan guarantees and $50 million for loans , and will be administered through the Departments pf Agriculture 4nd 1~natgy. Energy Security Corporation programs for biomass . The President 'supports Op allocation of up to $1 bullion o assistance available = through the proposed Energy Security Corporation for the construction of plants for the production of ethanol from biomass . The gSC will hays a number of financing tools , including loans, loan guarantees , price juarantees and purchase agreements to encourage private investment in facilities with significant potential to reduce imports. The Senate ,ill, S. 932 , includes such a provision, and the President urges .)rompt Conference Committee action on this legislation. • i revision of the entitlements program. The Department of Energy has -evised the crude ofl entitlements program to include ethanol produced from biomass. This provides an incentive currently equal to about SC ,er gallon of ethanol used in gasohol. Since the entitlement program shdeea out along with crude oil price controls -- ending on September '0 , 1981 -- this program offers its benefits to those who begin pro- uction soon, thereby accelerating. our near-term use of gasohol. O% investment tax credit. The Energy Tax Act of 1$70 authorizes 4 01 additional investment tax credit for equipment to produce liquids r gases from biomass sources including the production ;If alcohols his tax credit is in addition to the existing 10% investment tax redit, for which alcohol production facilities are AIWA @14044, tndpt F4rrnnt law this credit will expire in 1912. III-27 sing �asohol in federal ve1icles . At the President' s direCtiq , the J4era government haw examined ways to increase the Use of gasohol • federal motor vehicles . In rusponse to the President' s d4ractive , General Services Administration had issued o bulletin tQ all federal joncies to promote the use of gasohol, in its motor Vedic}p p}pp, leff0Ygr pQ§si4la, irm program management. As an important additional jncentiv9, the spartment-of- Agriculture will include the production of farm commodi- Lou for alcohol feedstocks au a major objective of agricultvcal slicy -- alongside the production of food, feed, and fiber. It is spatted that the grain reserve targets , commodity price supports , and slated agricultural policies will be managed to accomodate the grain iquirumente of ethanol plants on an equal basis with the graip needs other consumers and users of grain. This does not, however, include Jecial earmarking or subsidizing of grain for alcohol production. .cohol production research and development. The Department of Agri-, ►Hurd and the Department of Energy administer research and duvulop- ' :nt programs to improve our methods for producing alcohol fuels from .omass and to broaden the range of biomass products which can be used make alcohol. In FY 1980 , a total of over $30 million is dedicated this effort. This R&D is important for improving the competitive ,ability of alcohol fuels as well as the net energy balance. 10 million ga l son tartlet. The President announced a national target --.r alcohol production capacity -- 500 million gallons annually during F= =1 . This capacity level is adequate to make gasohol in volumes equal almost 10 per cent of projected unleaded gasoline consumption. . bstantial amounts of alcohol will probably be burned directly, partic- arly for on- farm uses , rather than used for gasohol for commercial sale . BUDGET IMPACTS • Under the gasohol program recommended above , federal expenditures ( tax and outlays) , including direct loans and loan guarantees , would range between $8. 5 billion to $12 . 8 billion for the period 1980-90 . These estimates will vary depending on the rate of alcohol production and aro summarized by major expenditure as follows ; 1980-90 (in billions) 1/ --Federal tax revenues lost because of 4C exemption for $l. 4 - 6 . 7 . gasohol and the 30-40% production tax credit for alcohol fuels --Tax expenditures for investment tax credit for alcohol plant . 1 equipment III-28 • --Loans and loan guarantees for alcohol and other biomass projects 3 . 0 --Energy Security Corporation (up to) l. Q --DOE , Agriculture , Commerce , SBA assistance programs for research, development, technical, assistance, 1. Q - , ,Loans/lgan guarantees , etc. 2/ 48. 5 - 1;. Q • LEVEL OF FEDERAL ASSISTANCE The President ' s Alcohol Fuel Program provides effective subsidies of 400 to 470 per gallon for alcohol production -- without taking account of the benefits due to the $300 million annual credit program. All alcohol production will .qualify for a 400/gallon tax subsidy through either the gasohol exemption or the production tax credit. The investment tax credit for new investment yields an additional amount of approximately 20/gallon. The DOE entitlements system currently provides roughly 5' /gallon on alcohol used in gasohol. addition to these federal programs , about half of the states provide exetlrptton from all or part of their own state gasoline taxes. This additional incentive is worth between $0 . 10 and $0 . 90 per gallon of ethanol. BACKGROUND • Today, without in.ce:ntives , production of ethanol is not economically attractive when compared to gasoline , although rising world oil prices continue to improve the economics of gasohol. Net production costs for ethanol (after credits for sale of by-products) are approximately $ 1 . 30 per gallon compared to wholesale unleaded gasoline prices of $0 . 85 - $0 . 95 per gallon . With the President' s program in place, however , it is expected that an equivalent Federal subsidy of almost $0 . 50 per gallon of alcohol will be available to producers. With this program combined with subsidies already available in over half of the states , the resulting economies for ethanol production are even further improved. yrimarily as a result of the 40 per gallon federal excise tax exemption which the President signed into law in November 1978 , — )ur :apaeity to produce ethanol for energy has increased from next nue_hLny 1U months aoo to about 80 million gallons per year at the 1979 . The adineniscr4iion is pleased with the widespread III-29 • commitments now being de to ethanol productioi nd u6e across the country. . With strong support from farmers , businesses and other investor, , the President ' s program is expected to almost quadruple current annual production capacity by the end of 1980 . During 1981, the 1rsslda4 ' 4 target of 5Q0 million gallons of annual capacity should by feachgde In addition , we expect that commitments will be made during 19@1 t9 Construvt taclliti,es which will ultimata ' a014p tp p0ody4 wgl; 10 ggcNVO 94 5Q9 pillion gollons per Year, APhiwvinj the 500 million galloq target Will rugyirw Rory than I si.4'fgld increase in productioq capacity in lees then tWQ yoaril Attai unt of ttlip terge3t will reggird 4Quroeeivo aGtioa in On rivato• A9qvf farmers , coopec 4VNiff byvi0p#49ff ti nkprgi ,94 4uyrY' NET ENERGY BALANCE Rapid growth in alcohol production capacity will contribute to achieving our energy goals . Alcohol plants require energy to warm the fermentation and to distill the alcohol. When this energy comes from coal, wood, agricultural residues , waste heat, geothermal energy, or solar -energy, the nation benefits especially. Questions 'have arisen over whether a net energy gain results from the production of alcohol fuels . Numerous studies have examined this ,„.:issue and most conclude that the net balance is small but positive, and exact estimates differ, depending on the feedstock and process employed. It is expected that improvement in technology efficiency and ability to utilize feedstock by-products more effectively will • improve the net energy balance. For example, a plant using food processing residue for feedstock and coal for fuel may achieve a net reduction in imports approaching its total production. Also, the use of coal in the alcohol production process improves the oil savings attainable through increased use of gasohol. Thus the use of coal or non-fossil fuels for alcohol pro4yctien it highly preferable to use of oil or natural gas. • 1. Thin does not include the value of an entitlement subsidy for gasohol provided under DOE' s crud9 price control rv.qulg onvf puccgnt1 ' about 5; per gallon. ? , Agencies aro estimated to provide the amounts shown under yacioug existing programs over ten years , The specific lung} 104 Yiq dopundn' on future budvut and program clecisiong . -- III-30 We have also examined the documents covered by the press in December with regard to the draft version of the Alcohol Fuels memorandum by the then Under Secretary, John M. Deutsch. Further, the writers have reviewed the reactions from members of the House of Representatives and Senators. The best inform;..tion nvaila.ble tod; y, then, is that the Executive Branch of the government is encouraging the development of fuel alcohol incentives. The Energy Research Advisory Board of the DOE has established their position and the Secretary of Energy has asked the Office of Alcohol Fuels to review and report on the Gasohol Study Group report in order that the Department of Energy may establish their position. The results of these two efforts should establish a strong base for decision making by planners and the financial community. I1I-31 2. Livestock Production Livestock production in the United States represents a significant part of our fuel supply. The following sections discuss the-current and potential livestock production levels and practices and how they will be affected by the development of the fuel alcohol industry. The key factor in fuel alcohol production affecting livestock production will be the utilization of the by-product-DDG as a high-protein feed source. Therefore, the focus in this discussion is on the changes that will be brought about by the advent of this new feed and its nutritional value. • a. Nutritional Composition of Distiller's Dried Grain Feeds The nutritional composition of distiller's feeds is closely related to the composition of the cereal grains used in the fermentaion process. Only starch and CO2 are utilized for producing alcohol and the remaining stillage contains a three-fold concentration of nutrients. Variables in raw materials and processing impart changes in nutritional composition; however, indications are that changes due to these variables are insignificant. Reliable values for nutritional compositions of all feeds are important and while it is impractical to test nutritional compositions of each batch of mash bill, representative samples are crucial. See Table 111-7. IIT-51 Table II1- 7. 'ypical Nutrient Composition a istillers Feeds (Corn) _. Distillers Distillers Distillers Dried Grains i Dried Grains Dried Solubles With Solubles Moisture, % 7.5 4.5 9.0 Protein, i 27.0 - 28.5 27.0 Fat, % 7.6 9.0 8.0' Fiber, ;' 12.8 4.0 8.5 Ash, 7' 2.0 7.0 4.5 Amine Arid:;, % Lysinr 0.60 0.95 (Available 0.60) Methionine 0.50 0. 50 (Available 0.60) Cy:.A i nr' 0.20 0.40 0.40 Histidine 0.60 0.63 0.60 Arrinine 1.10 1.15 1.00 Aspartic Acid 1 .68 1.90 1.70 Threonine 0.90 0.98 0.95 Serine 1.00 1.25 1.00 Glutamic acid 4.00 6.00 4.20 Proline 2.60 2.90 2.80 Glycine 1.00 1.20 1.00 Alanine 2.00 1.75 1.90 Val ine 1.30 1.39 1.30 Isoleucine 1.00 1.25 1.00 Leucine 3.00 2.60 2.70 Tyrosine 0.80 0.95 0.80 Source: Distillers Feed Research Council, Progress Report Distilled Feeds , III-55 • Table IIi-7. .,apical Nutrient Composition of stillers Feeds (Corn) Continued Distillers % Distiller: Distillers Dried Grains Dried Grains Dried Solubles With Solubles • Amino Acids, % Phen lalanine 1.20 1.30 1.2Q Trypt.oph in 0.20 0.30 0.20 Fatty Arid:: Linolrlc, % fat 47.2 49.1 48.5 ingredient 3.6 4.4 3.9 Lino1 ens c, % fat 5.2 5.1 5.0 % ingredient 0.38 0.46 0.40 . Vitamins Folic acid, mg/kg 1.1 1.7 1.0 Pyridoxine, mg/kg 4.0 13.0 6.5 r Niacin, mg/kg 42.0 120.0 77.0 _ Pantothenic acid, mg/kg 6.6 22.0 11.0 Biotin, mr-,/kg 0.20 0.50 0.30 Riboflavin, mg/kg 3.3 22.0 9.0 Vitamin B12 mg/kg 0.00025 0.007 0.0015 Thiamine, mg/kg 2.0 7.0 3.5 a-Tocopherol, mg/kg 0.0 55.8 30.5 Inositol, gm/kg 0.95 8.8 3.2 Choline chloride, gm/kg 1.0 5.8 3.4 Source: Distillers Feed Research Council, Progress Report Distilled Feeds III-56 Table III-7. Typical Nutrient Composition of Distillers Feeds (Corn) Continued Distillers Distillers Distillers Dried Grains Dried Grains Dried Solubles With Solubles Energy Cattle DE, kcal/kg 3408 3608 3570 ME, kcal/kg 2794 2959 2927 TEN, % 83 80 82 NE milk 2150 2210 2210 NEm 2050 2030 2035 NEp 1347 1335 13 5 Poul try ME, kcal/kg 1631 2750 2620 Swine DE, kcal/kg 2030 3305 3085 ME, kcal/kg 1835 2985 2790 TDN, % 46 75 70 Source: Distillers Feed Research Council, Progress Report Distilled Feeds III-57 Table III- 7. Typical Nutrient Composition of Distillers Feeds (Corn) Continued Distillers Distillers Distillers Dried Grains Dried Grains Dried Solubles With Solubles Minerals Phosphorus, % 0.37 1.60 0.95 Potassium, % 0.15 2.10 1.00 • Calcium, % 0.05 0.30 0.35 Magnesium, % 0.07 0.60 0.35 Sodium, % 0.05 0.15 0.05 Sulfur, % 0.56 0. 58 0.40 Iron, ppm 105.0 200.0 200.0 Copper, ppm 15.0 55.0 50.0 Zinc, ppm 50.0 100.0 80.0 �__:= Manganese, ppm 10.0 60.0 30.0 Selenium, ppm 0.3 0.4 0.3 Cobalt, ppm ( 0.05 0.08 0.1 Barium, ppm 1.15 3.15 2.45 — --Aluminum, ppm 0.00 9.2 5.0 Strontium, ppm ' 1.3 8.8 3.4 Boron, ppm 4. 3 9.5 8.2 Chromium, ppm 3.2 3.7 2.5 Iodine, ppm 40.05 <0.05 (0.05 Source: Distillers Feed Research Council, Progress Report Distilled Feeds III-58 The following Tables III- 8 to III- 9 reflect the results of a number of feeding trials for beef cattle of 500 and 800-pound weights. The study reflects that. the control groups experienced weight gains at 9% slower rates than the three groups receiving distiller's feeds. l Tables III- 20 to III- 21 below demonstrate that DDGS yields positive outcomes in terms of growth and costs. The Tables III- 8 and 111-9 below are from J . R. Prethour's report to the Distillers Feed Research Council on April 18, 1974 . Tables III- 10 through III- 17 represent the composition of various, experimental diets which were fed to swine of like breeds, ages, and weights under standardized conditions. Tables III- 10 through ITT- 17 represent the results of the application of each various experimental diet and also compare results to a control group fed similar diets not containing DDG supplements. Various nutritional additives are also a variable, yet were also part of the control diet. The results clearly indicate favorable rrowth as a result of DDG supplements. • Distiller's dried grains also have favorable impacts upon poultry product ion. The foll owing Table III- 18 is performance data on broiler breeders fed varied diets in a controlled experiment over 252 days. Poultry fed diets of 5%distiller's dried grain with solubles performed relatively equal to or hotter than broilers fed other diet supplements having less desirable cost factors and handling characteristics. : - III-59 publication is intended primarily to link performance specifications and plant and operation to the traditional Business Plan. The contractural arrangements for feedstock and product and co-products and the financial recommendations of the intended producer are more or less routine in the business world. What is not routine is how the technology and market are linked to the Business Plan. Even the permits associated with the Business Plan are not unusual. Environmental planning is taken for granted in this day and age. Operating permits relative to the skill of personnel and the construction codes are routine. The permits required in relation to , the production of alcohol from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms represent requirements for additional permits but the BAT & F is not in any sense, a hazard; but merely an assurance program for , the Treasury Department Tax Revenue Program. The ultimate decision to produce is based on applying an appropriate technology to the situation and an appropriate scale to assure a reasonable return on investment. High quality information is required for this purpose. The purpose of this publication is to provide a good background on the potential of the nation and the technology available at this point for producing alcohol. The mechanisms and procedures are provided to allow planners and financial officers to determine the potential in the local arena for fuel alcohol production. III-86 • property tax reductions for fuel alcohol facilities, reductions in permit costs, or development funds/programs. The market continues to expand. III-154 r - b. Commercial Use of Anhydrous Fuel Alcohol Currently, the greatest potential commercial market for fuel alcohol is in the blending of 200-proof fuel alcohol with gasoline • for gasohol (a 10/90 blend) . As fuel alcohol supplies increase and gasohol marketing expands, the potential for use of straight 200-proof fuel alcohol in modified engines increases. In Brazil, where national targets have been set for conversion to 100% fuel alcohol, and in other locations, higher ratio blends (up to 20%) have been used successfully with no engine modifications. 1979 Consumption of gasoline in this county was almost 104 billion gallons (Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration Weekly Petroleum Status Reports) . Approximately 41 billion of those C r-- gallons was no-lead consumption. The current DOE target for 1981 production of fuel alcohol is 500 million gallons, which when blended with no-lead to make gasohol would replace approximately 10% of the anticipated 1981 demand for unleaded gasoline. Table 1-1 •on page 1-23 of this guide provides additional projections (and their modifications) on potential fuel alcohol production targets which can then be compared with projected automotive fuel needs. Currently, gasohol is being marketed in 41 states across the country. As of January, 1980, close to 4,000 stations were selling gasohol (The Energy Consumer, PP 20-31, Department of Energy) . At that time 25 states had some form of subsidy for fuel alcohol/gasohol production in the form of state tax exemptions, credits, rebates, • III-153 2. What are the Marketing Considerations? Marketing concerns can be addressed by reviewing available data on consumer behavior as presented in various consumer acceptance reports and responding to frequent marketing questions asked by distributors, jobbers and retailers. a, Consumer Acceptance Gasohol has been receiving immediate and significant acceptance among consumers in areas where gasohol is available. The following Summary of Research conducted in April 1979, by the Iowa Development Commission provides evidence of strong consumer willingness to purchase gasohol on a regular basis at prices higher than those for gasoline. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE AND MARKET POTENTIAL OF GASOHOL SUMMARY A POTENTIAL MARKET FOR GASOHOL DOES EXIST AND UP TO 10 PERCENT OF THE CONSUMERS IN THE MARKET COULD BE EXPECTED TO USE THE PRODUCT ON A REGULAR OR OCCASIONAL BASIS UNDER SIMILAR MARKETING CONDITIONS. Based on the data which is presented in Sections A through D of this report, the following conclusions can be drawn. Research assumptions are listed at the end of the summary. 1. Stations introducing gasohol can expect increases in sales volume in excess of 200 percent. ITI-155 --- -- • During the 90-day test period, sales volume of ---•• unleaded gasoline including Gasohol at the five participating stations reflected a 3. 7 times increase over the same period a year ago. During the test period, 232, 608 gallons of Gasohol were sold by the five stations while 59 , 201 gallons of regular unleaded were sold; indicating Gasohol out sold regular unleaded 3. 9 to 1 during the test. - • 2. Ten percent of the total sample indicated a willingness to pay a 5-cent premium and two-thirds of the people who had used Gasohol ' indicated they would pay 5 cents more. Sales results did, however, show a slight elasticity in price between controlled markets with 2-cent and 4-cent premium. • With two stations in the test maintaining a 2-cent premium for Gasohol above regular unleaded and two stations maintaining a 4-cent premium (one each in similar sized markets) , by the end of the test , ---- a slight price elasticity was evidenced. Those `i markets maintaining the 2-cent price premium reflected a higher percentage of sales increase than those stations maintaining a 4-cent premium. No conclusion could be drawn on price elasticity at the 5-cent level because of variance in the markets . Of the 1, 077 interviews conducted in phone surveys II and III , 10. 6 percent of the sample indicated a willingness to pay 5 cents a gallon more for Gasohol than regular unleaded gasoline on a regular or occasional basis . Data from the same question, when asked of Gasohol users , showed - that 66-2/3 percent were willing to pay the 5-cent premium. In the one market where the product was available at a 5-cent premium, 5. 2 percent of_the market sample did, in fact, buy tht product more than once. 111-156 3. Awareness of the word "Gasohol" was high prior to the announce- ---- ment of the program. However, awareness and knowledge of the product grew to a near total level by the program's conclusion. Prior to announcement of the Gasohol Project , 68 percent of the respondents reported being aware of the word "Gasohol . " During the second and third phases of the study, Gasohol awareness increased beyond the 90 percent level in the market area where Gasohol was being sold. Of those aware of ' Gasohol ' s availability, 88 percent knew'where Gasohol was being sold in the market areas . 4. Based upon the survey results, under similar marketing conditions, 15 percent of the potential consumers in the marketing area would be expected to try the product at least once; and 10 percent of • the consumers in the market would be expected to use it more than • once. In Phases II and III , 15 percent of the total sample had tried Gasohol at least once. In the same surveys , 10 percent of the total sample used the product regularly or occasionally. It is interesting to note that two-thirds of those persons purchasing Gasohol one time are likely to become regular or occasional users. 5. Agricultural ties were not predominant among Gasohol users, and interest in the product changed normal buying habits. • Despite the heavy rutal emphasisfound in the markets - surveyed, 6X percent of the users of Gasohol derived no income from farming; and 66 pe cent had no affiliation with farm co-ops. Twenty-two percent of the purchasers sampled indicated that they had changed stations in order to buy Gasohol. 1I1-157 6. Consumers felt that agriculture and energy would benefit equally from Gasohol. In Phases II and III when asked who would benefit most from a national Gasohol program, energy or agriculture ; 27 . 4 percent responded "energy , " while . 28 . 4 percent responded "agriculture . " The remainder had not formulated an opinion. 7. Documented comments from actual users substantiated previous performance testing and again pointed out the desire of users to continue using the product. Based on the 1, 608 point of purchase questionnaires returned, 67 percent of the users reported better overall performance; and 29 percent specified better mileage. From these responses , the data arrived at through the phone surveys was substan- tiated, in that. toughly three out of every five purchasers of Gasohol had become regular or --= occasional users . The users indicated that if Gasohol were avialable at most service stations , over . 90 percent of them would purchase it. {. T e survey sample felt that additional research was needed and that -the federal government along with farm and commodity organizations should carry the burden of this effort. The survey group also felt a tax credit on Gasohol would be beneficial. Only 10 percent of the third survey group felt additional reserach on Gasohol was not needed . while 65 percent felt it was. Fifty-five percent favored a tax credit with the largest numbers supporting a credit between 2 and 5 cents . While = I1I-158 • '' it was determined a portion of the market areas - would be willing to pay a premium for Gasohol, the major limLtinq factor given by 27 . 9 percent of the • respondents surveyed felt price was the major area needing further research. * * * * ASSUMPTIONS Two assumptions pertinent to the overall project were made at the ' outset. They were: 1. One station per marketplace, given the sizes of the markets sampled, would provide' a fair test of consumer acceptance. 2. That the five market areas in the state may not reflect the market potential of the product statewide. • Two additional assumptions were made during the second and third phases ' for purposes of. analyzing the data that may tend to reflect very conservative responses. They were: 1. During the course of the interviews if a person was not aware of the availability of Gasohol in their market area, it was assumed that they never would be and would never purchase the product. 2. If a person was aware of the availability of Gasohol but had not tried it, it was assumed they would never try it. The following consumer acceptance report summary was also provided by Oil Express at the March, 1980, conference previously cited. ---- 111-159 SUMMARY ._ 1. Gasohol acceptance is steadily growing. In the first study in September, 1978, 15% of the Iowans interviewed had used Gasohol. At this time, 27% of those surveyed have used Gasohol with acceptance in individual markets as follows: Gowrie 30% Cedar Rapids 30% Ames 19% 2. The most important benefit of Gasohol mentioned by all respondents ' was "Extending oil supplies" - 30% "Improved auto performance" - 20% and "Importance to the corn market" - 13%. 3. Availability remains the primary reason for non-users not having tried Gasohol with 29% giving "Not available/not at my station" . as their reason. 21% felt it was too expensive and 17% hadn't gotten around to purchasing the product. 4. Gasohol continues to receive a high engine performance rating with only 21 out of 514 users surveyed reporting problems. Rougher running engine and plugged fuel filters, which are not unusual problems in initial tankfuls of Gasohol, were experienced by 10 of 21 users. 5. If Gasohol was available at "Most service stations" 54% of the respondents said they would use it regularly or occasionally. Iii-160 This is a sizable increase over the 11% who responded similarly in the first Iowa Development Commission's consumer acceptance study. 6. An overwhelming 74% of those surveyed felt Gasohol use would become more widespread. A primary reason for this expected . growth includes Gasohol 's petroleum extending ability - 40%. Also, many thought that its price would eventually come down - 16%. 7. Consumers out ranked farmers as benefactors of Gasohol 41% to 33%. This is a shift from the first study which listed energy and agriculture as equal benefactors. 8. Although price continues to be the #1 problem associated with Gasohol's growth, its value as a premium fuel was recognized by 59% of the users and 36% of the non-users who indicated a willingness regularly or occasionally to pay a 10¢ premium for the fuel. (The remaining did not know) . 9. 89% of those surveyed felt the state should continue to promote Gasohol and 68% favored the continued exemption from the state fuel tax. 10. After 6-8 months, station spokesmen who were interviewed in the tested markets said they had "Virtually no" complaints about Gasohol 's performance in their customers' cars. III-161 A more recent Harris poll, conducted in January, 1980, indicated that consumers preferred fuel alcohol products two to one over other alternative liquid fuels. This survey, by the way, was one of the largest and most representative polls conducted by Harris, reaching some 7,000 families across the country. A key determinant in consumer acceptance at this point appears to be availability of the product. Major factors behind consumer decisions to purchase gasohol include interests in the extension of oil supplies, improved auto performance, 'and boosting the farm economy. To further illustrate the magnitude of the public response to gasohol, a consumer acceptance test and marketing survey carried out in Holdrege, Nebraska, back in 1975 by the Research Division of the Nebraska Department of Economic Development provides an interesting story. One station in Holdrege was provided with 20,000 gallons of gasohol, a supply expected to last for one year, based on the comparable sales history of no-lead in that community. In two weeks, the 20,000 gallon allotment was sold! Despite the local and national attention given this marketing experiment before and during the sales, this response was clearly unanticipated. b. Common Marketing Questions The following questions are frequently asked by distributors, jobbers, transporters, and dealers regarding the marketing of gasohol. III-162 • (1) Will the sale of gasohol at the pump increase overall dealer sales? To date, experiences have been very favorable. The introduction of gasohol has led to three to five fold increases in overall pump , sales. (Pester-Derby, Fina among others) . (2) How much more are consumers willing to pay for gasohol over comparable no-lead prices? Initial reports suggested that a $.02 to $.05 increase was the acceptable margin (Pester-Derby; original Iowa Study 1978) . Now gasohol is frequently selling as much as $.10 over no-lead at greater volume levels than the other fuels. Current indications are that price is less of a consideration, given the octane boosting record of 'fuel alcohol, than availability of supply. (3) What is the octane boosting power of fuel alcohol? Octane ratings for gasohol vary from 2 to 3 points depending on who is posting the rating. Testing at Land O'Lakes Labs has revealed up to 41 point boosts to unleaded gasoline when mixed with fuel alcohol. But the tendency of many refiners is to understate gasohol's octane rating, according to Oil Express. Amoco, Chevron, Gulf, Arco, among others, consistently post their gasohol at up to 1 point beneath actual testing results. Not only the majors choose a more conservative rating approach; many independent • III-163 marketers tend to play it safe as well. While the Federal Trade Commission holds gasohol exempt from federal requirements to post its octane, several states still require posting. And as one marketer noted to Oil Express, "We'd post it anyway. The octane is the selling point". • (4) Does gasohol improve milage? There has been much debate over whether or not gasohol yields increased or comparable mileage ratings, with equivalent no-lead. Oil Express has suggested that varying test results reflect the differing conditions under which road tests have been conducted. The Nebraska Department of Roads 2 million mile road test demonstrated that gasohol powered vehicles used 6.710 less fuel than those run on unleaded. The Department also found that gasohol improved starting and overall performance under winter weather conditions. The burning characteristics of gasohol and gasoline are different. Gasohol is a mixture of a spectrum of hydro-carbons. Gasohol • contains these same hydrocarbons and ethyl alcohol, a liquid containing carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. While hydrocarbons tend to explode, fuel alcohol tends to burn more slowly. The combination of fuel alcohol and gasoline yields a "smoother" fuel. If fuel alcohol alone were burned in an engine the mechanical energy produced compared to the thermal energy available could be quite high. It is for this reason that the mechanical energy produced by III-164 gasohol sometimes exceeds the mechanical energy produced by an equivalent amount (thermally speaking) of gasoline. As better controlled tests and comparisons are made, a better basis for comparing gasohol and gasoline will become available. (5) What restrictions have been imposed by major refiners on marketing gasohol? The policy of majors regarding the sale of gasohol has been changing. Indications thus far are that restrictions have been ceasing. The following status report was compiled by Oil Express for their 2nd Annual National Gasohol Conference held this March in Washington, D. C. Gulf:: Last week Gulf reversed policy and now allows gas- . ohol charges on the Gulf card. Marketers are free to sell gasohol as long as they debrand pumps, spokesman Nick Flocos says. And those marketers who take possession of their inven- tory when it 's delivered are free to hlend Gulf unleaded in- to gasohol . But Gulf dealers who don't own the gasoline in their storage tanks, must switch to Gulf's so-called "buy/ sell" type arrangement before blending gasohol. "Otherwise, there would be tremendous difficulties in accounting," Floc- os notes. Gulf will begin test marketing gasohol at six com- pany operated stations in Philadelphia next month. Exxon: Exxon also changed its policy last week to per- mit sale of "non-Exxon branded motor fuel, including gasohol" on the company's credit card. Marketers are also free to blend Exxon gasoline into gasohol, but in both cases they must debrand pumps. Though Exxon says it has no plans to test 111-165 • market gasohol, company officials are checking the compati- . --- bility of tanks and other equipment with alcohol and gaso- hol, sources say. Citgo: Citgo has done nothing to discounrage its market- ers from selling gasohol, says official Stan Dean. They are free to blend Citgo product to make- gasohol and they may charge gasohol sales on the Citgo credit card. They should debrand pumps. Citgo is test marketing in four cities. , , Shell: Dealers and jobbers are free to sell gasohol and may use Shell product to blend gasohol, but they should de- brand pumps and accept sole responsibility for quality, spokesman Tom Denman says. Shell is accepting gasohol sales on its credit card. The company is not presently test market ' ing gasohol , but that policy is open to change. Union: Dealers and jobbers are free to market gasohol and can blend their own gasohol from Union product, says spokesman Barry Lane. But marketers should debrand pumps to show that gasohol is not Union's product. Union has no form- al policy on gasohol sales on credit cards, but so fan charges for gasohol have been accepted. That policy is under review. Union currently has no plans to test market gasohol. Chevron: Chevron marketers are free to buy and blend gasohol, a company spokesman says. Marketers must debrand pumps, and let customers know that gasohol is not a Chevron product. Marketers may use the Chevron credit card for gaso- hol sales, "on a temporary basis," the company says. It has __ announced plans to test market gasohol through 30 stations • outside Seattle. Mobil: Branded jobbers and dealers are free to sell gasohol, but they must remove the Mobil brand and they may not use Mobil's distinctive round pumps. Mobil sells pump disguises for this purpose. Lessee dealers must install a separate gasohol tank and pump at their own expense. Mobil - has no objection to a marketer's blending gasohol with Mobil product, spokesman Jim Amanna says, and Mobil will accept gasohol sales on the company credit card. i Texaco: fhe' company offers branded Texaco lead-free , - gasohol to independent marketers in areas where Texaco sells the product, says spokesman Bob Cutter. These marketers can use the Texaco brand on pumps and can use the Texaco credit card. Marketers may also blend Texaco product to make gaso- hol or buy it blended elsewhere. ' But these marketers must debrand the pumps, cannot use the credit card, and must post a sign in the window explaining they arc selling unbranded gasohol . Texaco is selling Gasohol at 600 stations in eight states and will add 500 more stations by March, Cutter says. III-166 • Sun: The company is currently reviewing its gasohol r.:.-. policies at the highest levels, and they may change soon, spokesman Bob Dietshe says. Independent marketers can sell preblendcd gasohol, and they can blend Sun product to make gasohol . The company does not want its credit card used for gasohol sales, but that issue is being restudied. Amoco: Independent dealers are free to sell gasohol but they should"debrand pumps to avoid confusion with branded Amoco gasoline currently being test marketed in four cities. Marketers who blend Amoco product to make gasohol may use the Amoco credit card. Marketers who buy gasohol blended with other than Amoco product should not use the credit card, spokesman Carl Meyerdirk says. I11-167 • 3. What are the Key Factors in Distribution of Fuel Alcohol? ( The commercial marketing and distribution process and costs for fuel alcohol do not vary significantly from that of gasoline. The major cost differential occurs in the mixing and distribution of fuel , alcohol-gasoline blends, where costs are 1/20 higher per gallon than for the same operations regarding gasoline. The total costs of mixing, jobbing, and transporting gasohol blends come to approximately 510 per gallon. The 1/20 blending cost is generally borne by the producer. The following diagrams (Figure III-33 and III-34 ) illustrate the alternative production and distribution scenarios for individual on •farm fuel alcohol production (the "milk run" model) and farm co-op fuel alcohol production. The on farm still production capacity might range from 50,000 to 500,000 gallons per year. These plants may produce 160-655 proof fuel alcohol that could be used directly on farms if engine modifica- tions were made. • The fuel alcohol product could also be sent to local upgrading facility where 200 proof quality fuel alcohol could be refined for later blending and distribution. The farm co-op fuel alcohol production scenario is shown in Figure III- 34 . Here the size of the plant could range upwards of 1 million gallons per year. Blending can take place at co-op owned terminals, jobber terminals or transported to refineries or , 111-168 a 0 J1 ce Q p g m ��o I 1:::(j/e . ..1 ctu-4-106,4 cc O 7 O: gW ct W _hi= Q�' 4. -I-) Ls« , � C., 4-) J rd O A. a) g • o v .,� ; �, J H U Q' co b U 1 O .+ P4 V H O O p, Z ��- )� C., O b- i cg 40 0 I a O W a. 4 - `-' 2 I O 1�<� W 3 o U Z te0Q - -.) O c W u.4 ? d W CC H GI 4 2 N P41 Y 4' d re J Y V• /. W HH j / p O a) O W (J1 ,.. von cc-III-169 • et oc CE-_. aumi a a 1 J ° � 0 W O W a ~ 0 CI ,aoJuz• • W � V Cl7Qh , o O‘ ° ® H a) • JWI O ❑ z i- O z • Q in c 7 .. Zzr a0m O. � QW a d a ..) u z0 a) 1 = 0OOW x • ~ Crl O 2 0 -r et J Q) o � p � H ° 0 000 U) - •r, c` • 0 \W i O 0 i u 9 Cn o �, cc d / D1 N . Y � 2 ' 8 et a • /7 L '••JWZ• 'CiJW2• O O0 O • kU cd H H � ❑ O O } Q J U1 r+1 I" Z Q -� 4 J ' z S w H a is • pJ CC ZIn 2 <0 )a) W ICIa OG W O .. O CC CC F- 0 a) (-Li a O • • -- III-1 70 petroleum product terminals. The figures illustrate the final distribu- .--- tion paths to the retailer from these blending facilities. Generally, ownership and location of the upgrading and distillation facilities will determine blending locations and the type of retailing system. As with any fuel product, certain precautions must be taken in the handling and storage, transporting, and blending of fuel alcohol. None of these, however, present serious impediment to the marketing and distribution of fuel alcohol. The following sections call out the major considerations. For more indepth ,information, refer to "Problems and Suggested Solutions for Handling and Storage of Gasohol" by Harry B. Lyons, Petroleum Operations Engineer found in the National Gasohol Conference Proceedings (March 1980) and "Marketing Alcohol" by Joseph C. Weber and Stephen A. Smith of Colorado School of Mines from Weber, Long and Smith Phase II; Colorado Gasohol - Gasoline Market Study (June 1979) ; and "Gasohol; Fundamental Economic and Marketing Considerations in Determining Whether to Market Gasohol" by Hank Finch, Vice President, Finch Oil Company, Incorporated, Fayeteville, North Carolina. a. Handling and Storage There are three major areas of concern here: storage precautions, equipment safeguards and safety and health precautions. III-171 (1) Storage Storage of fuel alcohol and gasohol occurs in four locations: vertical bulk plant storage, service station underground tanks, jobber top-loading racks, and bottom-load terminals. Storage problems center primarily around the introduction of Water to the tanks, through seepage and condensation. Appropriate selection of storage facilities is based on considerations of size, diagrams of water pressures, accessibility for cleaning, and Vj accessibility to trucks for blending. Periodic bottom sampling, proof sampling and measuring through use of alcohol hydrometer and laboratory thermometers are recommended for quality control maint- enance. Storage stability of fuel alcohol blends may be subject to oxidation or microbial attack and subsequent deterioration. Antioxidents may be introduced to ensure long storage life, but research to date has centered on methanol blends and may not be applicable to fuel alcohol blends. Tanks previously used for gasoline products may be used for gasohol storage with minimal clean-up, for the alcohol will automatically clear out the tank (including varnish, oxidized gasoline and rust) . When first introduced, then, the bottom should be dredged after 24 hours to collect the residues before dispensing any gasohol. It may take up to three fillings before the tank walls are completely clean. Use of existing underground tanks presents some problems in terms of initial cleaning. I1I-172 It may be preferable when installing new tanks, however, to select an underground unit. This minimizes the list of fire hazards (common to all combustible fuels) and reduces evaporation loss (which, again is almost the same as for _gasoline) . It is critical, regardless of above or below ground storage, to use an appropriate pressure-type vent, which is the basic control on evaporative loss. (2) Equipment Safeguards Special attention should be given to seals and gaskets. The plasticizers on conventional buna V seals will be deteriorated by alcohol and should be replaced by thuroelastomer type compound seals. Fiberglass tank piping and fittings should be used in place of • alcohol-based pipe dope. (3) Safety and Health Precautions Flammability is the major safety concern when dealing with handling and storage . Fuel alcohol has wide flammability limits (from 4.3 to 19 volume percent) when blended with other fUels and can be explosive. Preventive measures (including flame arrestors and fireproof electric motors and pumps) should be taken. Above ground storage of fuel alcohol near petroleum products where a common dike is shared should be avoided; the standard fire fighting foams for petroleum fires are not compatible with fuel alcohol. The foams that do handle alcohol fire and petroleum-alcohol fire are not as of yet widely used and are currently more expensive than common fire-fighting foams. III-173 Health hazards occur through potential skin assumption, . ingestion or fume inhalation. Gasohol has been found to remove more of the oil from the skin, but is no more irritating than no-lead. Ethanol is less toxic than gasoline; however methanol is more toxic and will necessitate different handling procedures. Inhalation of fuel alcohol vapors should be avoided. Personnel taking Antasuse, Likrium or Valium should not be exposed to fuel alcohol fumes or severe medical repercussions could develop. b. Transporting In general, the least expensive method of transport is through the distributors/jobbers own truck fleets. Common carrier ✓ truck rates tend to be prohibitive. Rail is the third alternative, attractive when high volumes (29,000 gallons per car) can be handled. Truck and rail tankers are the two major means currently ✓ available for bulk transport of fuel alcohol. Basic considerations for truck hauling include complete tank drainage before loading; complete flushing of tank if products other than petroleum had been carried; refiguring of volumes as fuel alcohol weighs more than gasoline (6.6 pounds per gallon) ; required designations for flammable material; investigation of over_the road trucking options (i.e. two way hauling as opposed to dead-heading) . Rail transportation presents a viable hauling option as well. I EI-17k • It will be important for distributors to familiarize themselves with E --- delivery schedules; demurrage limitations; and options on available team tracks where fuel alcohol cars may be parked at no charge. Technical considerations include such things as rail car volume (about 30,000 gallons for furel alcohol) ; size requirements for tank car couplings (rive inches) for unloading; and requirements for auxiliary pumping units to load and off load trucks. c. Blending Blending is increasingly being handled at the jobber top-loading rack and at bottom-loading terminals. Blending at the service station tanks is becoming less desirable. The separate facilities, blending pumps and quality required for large scale manufacturing of gasohol tend to rule out the service station option. It is necessary to conduct proper measurement (through printing loading meters) of both fuel alcohol and unleaded during the blending process for two reasons: to assure the correct 10/90 blend that qualifies for the Federal (and state) Road Tax Exemption and to record blending for future auditing purposes. The general procedures for loading into tank trucks is to load the fuel alcohol first, then load the remaining 90% gasoline mixture. This requires time and precise measuring. When top-loading, care must be taken to avoid fumes and given the relatively slow load rate, it is recommended that the fuel alcohol and the gasoline be kept at about the same temperture. I1I-175 H Co-Products of Production The co-products of production include primarily the residues left over from fermentation and conversion and the carbon dioxide produced in the fermentation process. Each of the co-products of production ha;; a variety of applications. The carbon dioxide can be used in the traditional applications of the gas in a gaseous liquid or solid state. For large scale plants most carbon dioxide will be purchased by single purchasers for use in tertiary oil recovery. Smaller plants may find purchasers of carbon dioxide for use in the beverage industry or the production of dry ice used in the food industry for temporarily preserving foods in transit. The use of the distiller's dried grains (DDG) and the solubles (i.e. protein dissolved in liquids) find application in the feed and food industry and potentially are capable of being used as fertilizers. Based on the presence of various minerals (nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) distiller's dried grain and solubles should be worth approximately $20 per ton as a fertilizer. The dried residue, however, conventionally sells at over $100 per ton, the price range being from $100 to $145 per ton. If the costs of drying are factored into the pricing it is more profitable to use distiller's dried grain with solubles as a feed rather than a fertilizer. In some applications, drying is not required if a continuous and ready market is available for the stillage as it is obtained from the fuel alcohol production process. DDG is a valuable foodstuff for III-176 animals. Fuel alcohol production concentrates the nutrients in the ( feedstock to a point where the concentration is increased by a factor of three. The losses, other than nutrients, amount to the removal of starch for the production of the sugars, which then become, through fermentation, alcohol. The nutrients do include fat originally found in the feedstock. That has not been changed through the process of , conversion or fermentation. The co-product emerges at roughly one-third the volume of the orginal dry weight of the feedstock. The energy value of distiller's dried grain for animals is equivalent, pound for pound, when the distiller's dried grain is compared with the original feedstock. . . Mineral values have increased on a pound-per-pound basis and the vitamin content is usually triple of that of the starting feedstock. Protein represents approximately 30% of the dry weight of distiller's dried grain with solubles when corn is the feedstock. This medium protein foodstuff is similar in many ways to soybean meal. Nutritionists examined the chemical and biological assays of distiller's dried grain with solubles to formulate diets. The ration composed of a variety of materials calculated based on moisture, .protein, fat, fiber, and the total digestible nutrients. The energy content is considered to be the metabolizable energy. Various amino acids are also taken into consideration. III-177 Research at the University of Nebraska indicates that distiller's dried grain resists microbial degradation in the rumen of growing beef animals. Eldon Kienholz reports that the estimate of the University of Nebraska translates into -the fact that a ton of distiller's dried grain is equal to 12 tons of corn for feedlot beef, because of ' these characteristics of resistance to microbial degradation. Methods •of production are used in farm production (refer to Section III-B for a detailed examination of the nutrient value) . With respect to the financial considerations the distiller's dried grain can be thought of as a feed and the value of that feed can be determined by comparing the presence of' equal amount of nutrients in other feeds to estimate the cost. As a protein supplement, DDG with solubles is currently worth roughly 50% more than it is as an energy supplement. This means that DDG with solubles will be priced ordinarily somewhere between corn and soybean meal. The two best examples of materials that have been produced which relate to the use of co-products in local planting areas are the grain alcohol fermentation by-products for feeding in Colorado by the Colorado State University Experiment Station at Ft. Collins. It is V part of their General Series and it is number 983. Copies can be obtained from the Bulletin Room of Aylesworth Hall, Colorado State University at Ft. Collins, Colorado, 80523. The price is $3.50. From time to time they are out of print, but they do keep re-printing as the demand increases. II1-178 • Another document developed for a specific amplication is the Fuel Alcohol Opportunities for South Carolina. It is available from the Council of Energy Management at Box 21028 in Columbia, South Carolina, 29221:f This 483-page publication devotes the entire first section to the South Carolina resource base where existing and potential production of feedstocks is considered and in the Technology section 'there is a portion on how distiller's dried grain handling is carried out in wet or dry forms. As part of the Economic Development and ' Policy section of that publication under Direct Effects (Section III-B-2) and III-B-3) distiller's dried grains and carbon dioxide are dealt with. The largest section of this publication which deals with the indirect economic effects involving distiller's dried grain is an 89-page development that shows how distiller's dried grain may be used in the -_=- rations of all of the livestock feeds existing in the state. The development of this information was a combined effort of Clemson University, the Council of Energy Management, and the Energy Research Institute of South Carolina. • The research and development program that led to the feasibility study mentioned above was used as the model for the Office of Alcohol Fuels, Department of Energy, April 9, 1980, publication_ called Alcohol Fuels Opportunities for Idaho. This publication is available by contacting Julie Thompson at the DOE Office of Alcohol Fuels, Room Room 6A205, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. That is *Furman Ott, Sr, President, Telephone 803-798-8616 II1-179 the Forrestal Building; the zip code is 20585. She may be reached That publication is available free of --- by telephone at 202-252-9633• charge. Another fine source of information is the Distiller's Feed Research Council. They have many reports and the best contact there is the Executive Director, Bill Isgrigg. Bill's address is 1435 Enquirer Building, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202. His telephone number is 513-621-5985. II1-180 I The Role of Local Government The production of fuel alcohol is certainly a business question, but it is also much more than that. The transition from non-renewable to renewable energy sources will impact upon every citizen in some way. It will affect local business, local taxes, local traLsportation and local industry. Since all these are concerns of Jocal government, we must consider what role local government can and should play in the emergence of a fuel alcohol economy. This section is basically a simple expansion and application of the principles outlined in Section I-D above, "The Potential of Local Planning Districts". • 111.'1 81 1. What Obligation Does Local Government Have to Understand the Implications of Fuel Alcohol Production? One thing the chronic energy crisis has done for all of us is to impress upon us the omnipresence of energy in every facet of human life. Energy runs our factories, drives our cars, lights our homes; ' businesses and industries, and enables the planting, harvesting and distribution of our food. Anything so all-pervasive must demand our. closest attention. In 1979, Franklin County, Massachusetts, carried out a county- wide energy audit and discovered that $47.7 million ($23.2 million for transportation alone) were flowing out of the county each year. to pay for imported energy. This represented an unconscionable drain on local resources, and the county decided to do something about it. Emphasizing the replacement of fossil-fuel-fired energy by alternate renewable energy sources, Franklin County initiated a program which would make itself much more energy independent, and at the same time, retain the financial resources now going out of the county for use within its local communities. This was an excellent example of what can happen when local governments understand the full implications of energy, its uses and costs. Fuel alcohol production does have potential for impacting significantly on local economies. Unlike some of the more exotic and tremendously costly high level alternate technologies - such as coal liquefication and oil shale recovery - fuel alcohol production could have an immediate, as well as long term effect on the cost and 1II-182 supply of energy. Rural communities in particular stand to gain great benefits by having a new market for their agricultural products and a new reason to stay on the land. For the first time, farmers will have some control over the value of the "real" dollar, instead of being controlled by energy costs which rise at each step of the ' journey from the OPEC countries to the American farm. Urban communities would likewise benefit from conversion to fuel alcohol through lower costs for consumer goods, lower costs for transportation, and lower levels of airipollution. The national good would be served by reversing the flow of money out of this country, which money would then recirculate many times over, produce greatly increased tax revenues, and reduce the balance of payments deficit. We would no longer be forced into the frightening J position of dependence for our energy on unstable and highly volatile foreign control. For these and many other reasons, it is not only advisable, but even essential that local governments fully understand the advantages and disadvantages of something which could change their local economies so drastically, and so rapidly. III-183 2. What Kinds of Support Can Local Governments Give to Assist Local Fuel Alcohol Development? ---- j Governments create climates, climates which either promote or inhibit growth. Local laws, regulations, ordinances, and even leader- ship styles can make a local community attractive or unattractive to the people and industries who reside in the community. Some of the areas in which local governments can act to assist local fuel alcohol development ire: a. Financial ; b. Legislative/Regulatory; c. Planning; d. Education; and e. Leadership. a. Financial Local governments have several financial tools at their disposal with which to promote local fuel alcohol development and production. First of all, there are discretionary and surplus funds which can be used either directly or indirectly in this regard. The money can come from a variety of sources: general tax revenues, bond issues, com- mercial bank loans to public bodies, excess public revenues which come about simply as a result of good management practices. ' Available local government funds can conceivably be used for direct grants to help construct or operate local fuel alcohol production facilities. Local governments might even take a look at the possibility of a publicly-owned alcohol plant. In rural communities, a good idea might be to have the community own a finishing plant to produce anhydrous alcohol from neat alcohol collected from many individual on-farm distilleries'. Tank trucks could also be purchased with local government funds. III-184 Direct public grants to alcohol producers is also a possibility, but the local government is more likely to fund alcohol development in an indirect way, through educational grants, tax incentives and the like, which will be discussed below. Government-owned property offers another opportunity for assist- ance. Property which has reverted to a city or county for failure to pay back taxes; buildings once used by government which have been replaced with newer structures; vehicles which are now considered expendable - all these could be put to good use by being deeded over, at nominal or no cost, to producers of fuel alcohol. Public bond issues are another means of raising capital for such things as fuel alcohol production facilities. Local governments in many states can sell general obligation bonds. This is just another way of borrowing money, with the local government acting as security. Towns and townships, for example, could sell their bonds to local savings and commercial banks, which have some familiarity with their ability to repay. State laws usually set limits on the amount of bonds outstanding for any local government (up to a certain percentage of the local tax base) and restrict the use of bond proceeds to physical public works: building or repairing roads; constructing buildings; etc. Bond proceeds could thus be used for constructing public alcohol production facilities, for building or repairing roads to and from the facilities, or installing increased sewage and waste disposal capacity for such plants when necessary. III-185 General obligation bonds provide interest income to bond holders which is exempt from Federal and state income taxes. The interest rate which the local government would pay is then less than the rate on taxable securities (tax exempt bonds generally sell for about two-thirds of the price of taxable corporate bonds) . General obliga- . tion bonds also carry a fairly long term, of 15 to 30 years. Both these aspects of bonds make them a desirable financing vehicle for , fuel alcohol production activities. Another good source of financial assistance available to local governments are the Federal funds which flow into their community and over which they have some control. Just to mention a few of these (see above, Section III-F) , there are: (1) Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Urban Develop- ment Action Grant (UDAG) Funds. These funds are for communities which are severly distressed economically (high unemployment, distressed housing stock, etc.) . UDAG funds have already been offered by HUD to communities involved in the DOE Cooperative Agreement Program for building alternative fuels facilities (including alcohol plants) . (2) EDA Public Works Grants EDA Public Works grants (already described in detail in Section III-F above) , which must go to a unit of local government. III-186 4 (3) HUD Community Development Block Grant Funds This is a less likely source, since they are oriented towards low and moderate income housing and would not generally be an ample source of 1'undu for other purposes. (4) Revenue Sharing Funds Revenue Sharing Funds, which come to locality uncategorized; i.e. , with few restrictions, the locality can define their use. This source can be an excellent financing vehicle for public alcohol facilities, with no interest charges and few legal encumbrances. • Revenue sharing funds, however, can be used as a substitute for local taxes, and within the Proposition 13 era it is probably not feasible to use large amounts of revenue sharing funds for alternate fuels facilities. P b. Legislative/Regulatory Most of the possible ways in which local governments can influence the development of fuel alcohol production boil down to two major categories: taxes and codes. Under possible tax incentives should be mentioned: (1) Property Tax Exemptions • Lonal governments could exempt fuel alcohol production facilities from property taxes, either permanently or for a certain period of time. 111-187 • (2) Sales Tax Exemptions Where applicable, local governments could exempt fuel alcohol equipment from sales taxes, thus lowering the total price of the systems. As for codes, local government can facilitate any exemptions or waivers necessary to the construction of fuel alcohol factilities, so long as this does not endanger the safety or health of the people of the community or prove harmful to the local environment. Zoning ordinances, building, safety and health 'codes are the items to which local governments can look when trying to assist in the development of a local fuel alcohol' program. Fees for building permits or building improvement permits can also be waived for fuel alcohol facilities. Exemption from levies for sewage and industrial waste removal offers another possible avenue for assistance. Some of the items just mentioned under legislative/regulatory possibilities also impinge upon the next area of consideration: c. Planning Under this heading are included such things as: land use, the sizing and distribution of plants, the integration of farming and energy production, sewage and solid waste disposal, and environmental concerns. (1) Land Use Planning Because fuel alcohol production is so intimately tied into the 1II-188 use of the land and its produce, local governments can do a great deal to help or hinder the development of alcohol as an alternative fuel through their land use planning efforts. For example, agricultural land is an absolute prerequisite for producing fuel alcohol. Close attention should be paid to the long range plans for the use of fuel . alcohol in the local planning district. The question of whether or not to import any or all of the feedstock for local fuel alcohol production must be considered as a land use, as well as an economic problem. If the decision is to become as energy self-sufficient as possible, then certain steps can be taken to ensure that enough agricultural land remains available to support the transition to renewable alcohol fuels. This can be done in a variety of ways, and one of the ways involves an area ++e have already discussed: taxation. Tax programs which provide some encouragement to maintaining farmland within its existing use have been tried in most of the fifty states. The basic programs currently in use are: (a) Preferential Assessment Property taxes are based on the assessed value of the property. Property is ordinarily assessed at its "highest and best" use, or the use for which the maximum sale price can be received within the existing market for land. Farmland which does not have potential for development purposes is always taxed less than farmland which can be used for either. In order to discourage the loss of farmland to III-189 developers and to encourage the farmer to stay on his land, preferential assessments can be used to keep farmland from becoming assessed as A residential or commercial property. (b) Deferred Taxation This would be the next step beyond preferred assessment. Under this plan, land is assessed at both its "highest and best use" and at its agricultural use. Taxes are paid by the farmer based on the agricultural assessment, while taxes on the "highest and best use" assessment are deferred until the land is purchased by a builder or land developer. Limits can be placed on the amount of deferrment; e.g. five or ten years. This type of plan can also be strengthened by placing a special "conveyance" tax on land that is deferred if it is sold within a certain time period of its original double use assessment. (c) Restrictive Agreements • Some states permit the use of restrictive agreements, whereby a farmer signs a contract with the local government in which the farmer agrees to use his land for agricultural purposes for a certain period of time, while the locality agrees to tax the land based on a use assessment. Heavy penalties are usually imposed, if the farmer reneges on his part of the contract. All these tax stabilization plans may help the local governments maintain a large percentage of their land for agricultural uses, but their value should not be over-emphasized. They have not always acted III-190 as a deterrent for land developers since the added cost is usually not significant enough to forestall the sale. Also, such tax plans have the added disadvantage of shifting the tax burden to other, non- agricultural property owners. (2) Sizing and Distribution of Plants Obviously, planners who are interested in developing fuel alcohol as a viable alternative for their region will also be concerned with the number, size and distribution of future fuel alcohol plants. These issues are dealt with in two other 'sections of this guide: III-C, "Decentralization of Manufacturing", and III-E, "Plant Sizing". (3) Integration of Farming and Energy Production In addition to land use planning, attention must also be paid to 4 the integration of agricultural production with the changing nature of energy useage in the local planning area. For example, this would involve such things as highway/road and construction maintenance, agricultural waste useage and transportation factors. For a more detailed discussion of the problem, see section III-B of this guide: "Farm Production". (4) Sewage and Solid Waste Disposal Great attention should be paid by local governments to the type of alcohol plants introduced into their areas. Some plants utilize highly sophisticated recycling systems which produce a minimum amount of waste sewage and unusable by-products; others can create a health, a III-191 safety and environmental hazard unless tightly controlled and supervised. For a description of things to be aware of, see above, Section II-E: "The Whole Process". (5) Environmental Concerns Care should be taken to ensure that whatever fuel alcohol production facilities are introduced, their impact on the environment should not be negative. This can be accomplished by setting an environmental impact assessment program where the production facilities do not fall under national Environmental Protection Agency requirements. d. Education Local governments have a two-fold opportunity to assist fuel alcohol development in their localities by way of education: through education of their people by government programs; and through support �. of other educational institutions interested in offering training and technical assistance (as well as research and development) in the field of fuel alcohol production. (1) Local Government Programs Local governments can promote awareness of the advantages of fuel alcohol as an alternative fuel through such means as public forums and hearings on fuel alcohol production, the printing and distribution of pamphlets and brochures, establishing a central hot-line for information on alternate energies and energy conservation, and sponsoring energy contests based on fuel alcohol production. I1I-192 ,FF (2) SupporL of Other Educational Programs Local school districts can be encouraged to introduce energy conservation courses (including fuel alcohol production; into their curriculum. Cr_ar}.ts can be given to local community colleges for the same pruposu, or even for training and/or technical assistance programs in fuel alcohol manufacture. Support by local government of alcohol research and demonstration proposals for local institutes of higher learning can sometimes mean the difference between getting or not getting a grant. For more information on possible initiatives in education, see below, Section IV-C of this guide. • e. Leadership 4 Beyond the very practical steps we have been discussing up to now, local governments have an obligation to lead by example. By the very nature of our governmental system, elected officials represent and serve all the people whom they govern. It cannot be a "do as I say and not as I do" situation. If local government, for example, should decide to run all government vehicles on fuel alcohol instead of gasoline, and if the experiment proves successful, the people are more likely to believe in fuel alcohol and want to follow suit. The . number of thins you can do is only limited by your ingenuity and your willingness to take the first step. III-193 energy required to produce fuel alcohol. As the technology advances, the energy requirement is lessened considerably. Many processes, in- cluding batch processes, are now capable of producing fuel alcohol with a net energy gain. As far back as June-1979, the DOE recognized that there was a small energy gain possible at that time. The issue concerning food and energy or food vs. energy deals with the degree of production by and large. If a great deal of land is con- verted to fuel alcohol production, it is felt that sooner or later there will be competition over land use for food vs. energy. The Environmental Group has compared eleven national and international studies on this mat- ter(see Section I-C: The Potential of the U.S.). When these studies are aggregated (and each does have a different view) , it appears that it will be difficult in the foreseeable future to realistically precipitate • a competition for the use of land for food and energy. The issue of safety with respect to fuel alcohol is one that first arose publically during Congreeional hearings of the House Agricultural Committee in testimony presented by AMOCO. Currently, there exist stan- dards promulgated by both Occupational Safety and Health Administration and American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Generally speaking, it has been determined that there are no extraordinary conditions to deal with regarding safety. Safety is a concern but it is not an insurmount- able difficulty any more significant than safety considerations for pro- duction of other liquid fuels. Engine difficulties and pollution relate to the use of fuel oleo- IV-13 4 • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVES - y , ALABAMA James A. Geesey IDAHO Aldred F. Ames (205) 832-7125 (208) 334-1521 ALASKA Clyde S. Courtnage ILLINOIS Virginia Ormsby (Acting) (907) 271-5009 (217) 492-4108 ARIZONA C. Dave Metz INDIANA William E. Wilson (602) 261-3818 (317) 269-6210 AR:ZONA Paul A. Luke IOWA, Forrest E. Koch hh�- (Indian ONLY) (602) 261-3818 (314) 425-4312 ARKANSAS Willeen M. Hough KANSAS Reinhold P. Rinne (501) 378-5637 (303) 837-3057 CALIFORNIA Nephi W. Clayton KENTUCKY William G. Glasscock (Central) (209) 487-5356 (Western) (502) 885-5311 CALIFORNIA Ralph G. Cowles KENTUCKY Charles Mason (Northern) (916) 484-4314 (Eastern) (606) 233-2596 CALIFORNIA Wilfred Marshall LOUISIANA Jack Kyle (Southern) (213) 824-7521 (504) 387-0227 , i CALIFORNIA High Taylor MAINE Loraine Thurston (Bay Area) (415) 273-7081 (207) 622-6171 Ext. 272 COLORADO Reinhold P. Rinne MARYLAND Robert C. Roberts (303) 837-3057 (301) 269-0177 CONNECTICUT Charles N. Hammarlund, Jr. MASSACHUSETTS William A. ..Fitzhenry (203) 244-2336 (617) 223-6468 t DELAWARE Robert C. Roberts MICHIGAN John B. Arnold, III (301) 269-0177 (Northern) (218) 727-6692 Ext. 326 DISTRICT OF Robert C. Roberts MICHIGAN James L. Collison COLUMBIA (301) 269-0177 (Lower) (517) 277-1886 ` FLORIDA John R. Jones MINNESOTA John B. Arnold, III (904) 224-8525 (Eastern) (218) 727-6692 GEORGIA Leroy B. Anderson MINNESOTA Stanley J. Pechaver , (404) 881-2857 (Lower) (612) 725-7124 t A D-2 • ^ -:. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVES con't ) MISSISSIPPI Bobby 0. Ainsworth RHODE ISLAND Charles N. Hammarlund, Jr. (601) 969-4342 - (203) 244-2336 . MISSOURI Forrest E. Koch SOUTH CAROLINA S. Townes Holland , , (314) 425-4312 (803) 765-5676 MONTANA Miki Laws SOUTH DAKOTA Warren A. Albertson (406) 449-5221 (605) 224-8280 NEBRASKA Warren A. Albertson TENNESSEE Mitchell S. Parks (605) 224-8280 (615) 749-5911 NEVADA C. Dave Metz TEXAS Leonard W. Curfman (602) 261-3818 (Western) (806) 762-7661 NEW HAMPSHIRE William C. Cannon TEXAS Jose (Pepe) Villarreal (603) 225-6450 (South) (512) 724-8159 NEW JERSEY Clifford J. Rossignol TEXAS Norris Willis (609) 983-2192/93 (East and (512) 397-5823 • Central) NEW MEXICO James S. Swearingen (505) 988-6557 UTAH Jack Ockey . (801) 524-5119 NEW YORK Robert Messick (518) 472-3688 VERMONT William C. Cannon • (603) 225-6450 • NEW YORK Charles N. Hammarlund, Jr. (Brooklyn, (203) 244-2336 VIRGINIA David C. Wenzlaff Brooklyn Navy (804) 782-2567 Yard, I, Long • Island) VIRGIN ISLANDS Arturo Febry (809) 753-4436 or-4187 NORTH CAROLINA Dale L. Jones • (919) 755-4570 WASHINGTON Frank McChesney (206) 442-1543 NORTH DAKOTA Cornelius P. Grant (701) 255-4011 Ext. 321 WEST VIRGINIA Rene V. Zabeau - (Northeastern) (304) 623-3461 Ext. 272 OHIO Phillip F. Lavelle • (614) 593-8146 or WEST VIRGINIA Carlton P. White 593-1627 (Southern) (304) 253-2723 OKLAHOMA Hunter Kemmet WEST VIRGINIA Franklin 0. Sampson (405) 231-4197 (Western) (304) 529-2311 Ext. 2591 OREGON Thomas G. Current .WISCONSIN John B. Arnold, III " (503) 221-3078 (Northern) (218) 727-6692 Ext. 326 • PENNSYLVANIA Anthony M. Pecone WISCONSIN Thomas Mihajlov (215) 597-2811 Ext. 7739 (Southern). (715) 834-9508 PUERTO RICO Arturo Febry . WYOMING Jack Ockey - (809) 753-4436 (801) 524-5119 753-4187 (. 1 D-3 4 STATE OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION t ALABAMA Fred Braswell KANSAS Randy Noon (20 5) 832-5010 (913) 296-2496 ALASKA Paula Wellen KENTUCKY Bruce Sauer (907) 452-4761 (606) 252-5535 ARIZONA Rich Wetzel LOUISIANA Thomas Landrum (602) 255-5705 (504) 342-4594 , ARKANSAS Alford Drinkwater MAINE Nancy Holmes (501) 371-1370 (207) 289-3811 CALIFORNIA Dick DeZeeuw MARYLAND Bruce Williams (916) 920-6033 (301) 787-7307 COLORADO Bob Merten Marvin Bond (303) 839-3218 (301) 269-3885 CONNECTICUT Joe Belanger MASSACHUSETTS Chris Hansen (203) 566-5898 (617) 727-1990 ii DELAWARE Dan Anstine MICHIGAN Randy Haamson - - (302) 736-5647 (517) 373-1054 w FLORIDA Will Kirksey MINNESOTA Dennis Devereaux (904) 488-6146 (612) 296-9078 GEORGIA Rob Harvey MISSISSIPPI Robert Smira (404) 656-5176 (601) 961-4403 HAWAII '1'akouhi Yoshihara MISSOURI Deborah Goldhammer (808) 546-3730 (3'14) 751-4000 . IDAHO Gail Dameworth MONTANA Georgia Brensbal (208) 334-3800 (406) 449-4624 • ILLINOIS John Lehman NEBRASKA Steve Sorum (217) 782-6675 (402) 471-2941 Mark Nelson NEVADA Kelly Jackson (217). 782-8220 - (702) 885-5157 INDIANA Mary Failey NEW (317) 232-8954 HAMPSHIRE Tina Oleson (603) 271-2771 I IOWA Tom Pearson (515) 281-3151 NEW JERSEY Louis Jarecki (201) 648-6293 Doug Getter J. ( 515) 281-3251 D-4 STATE OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Con't t t NEW MEXICO Gerald Bradley VERMONT Larry Ogden ( if)')) 8;7-3221 (802) 828-2393 . Ext. 217 VIRGINIA Penn Zentmeyer NEW YORK Mark Bagdon (804) 786-3511 ( H) 474-7875 Irwl Smith NORTH (804) 786-3519 , CAROLINA John Manuel (919) 733-4493 WASHINGTON Paul Juhasz (206) 754-0700 NORTH DAKOTA Mike Maiilum WEST (701) 224-2250 VIRGINIA Rebecca Scott (304) 348-8860 Dean McIlroy (701) 224-2232 WISCONSIN George Plaza (608) 266-0985 OHIO Bob Yaekle (614) 466-4573 Ann Bogar-Rieck (608) 266-0985 OKLAHOMA Rex Privett (405) 427-3829 WYOMING Butch Keadle (307) 777-7284 OREGON Richard Durham (50 3) 378-4998 PENNSYLVANIA David L. Krantz (717) 787-3735 RHODE ISLAND She11y Greenfield (4U1) 277-3374 SOUTH CAROLINA Cathy Twilley (803) 758-8110 SOUTH DAKOTA Verne Brakke (605) 773-3603 TENNESSEE Margot Myrick (615) 741-2354 TEXAS Bob Avant (512) 475-5588 3 UTAH Jim Byrne (801) 533-5424 D-5 , 93 1 t 4 t , /4-if,„:( NOTICE Pursut to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado and the Weld ounty Zoning Resolution, a public hearing will be held in the Chambers of the Board of County Comnissioners of Weld County„Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, reeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any mapner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are i7equested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO *NOWN that the text and maps so' certified by the County Planning Commission may be examined in the Office of the Clerk to\ the Board of the County Commissioners , located in the Weld County Centennial Cent-er, ;'415 10th Street, Third Floor, Greele\t, Colorado. APPLICANT DOCKET NO. - 8'0-71 Glenn K. Billings 3835 W. 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 DATE : December 3, 1980 / ' IME : 2 : 00 P.M. / / REQUEST: Change of Zone, from C (Commercial) to I (Industrial) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A parcel of land loq'ated iri, the Northeast Quarter (NEa) of Section 19 , Township 6 North, Range ''65 West of the 6th P .M. , Weld County, Colorado being more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the Northeast Corner (NE COR) of said Section 19 and considering the North line of said section as bearing North 90°00 ' 00" West, with all other bearings contained herein relative thereto; Thence North 90.°00 ' 00" West, 129 . 00 feet; Thence South 00°53 ' 24" East, 30. 00 feet; Thence South 41°27 ' 16" West, 280 . 35 feet; Thence South 76°16 ' 48" West, 99 . 25 feet; Thence South -08°23 ' 06" East, 1911. 07 feet; Thence North 81°36 ' 54" East, 196 . 99 feet; Thence North 00°53 ' 24" West, 2125 . 82 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Said described parcel of land contains 15 . 073 acres , more or less, and is subject to any rights-of-way or other easements as granted or reserved by instruments of record or as now existing on said described .parcel of land. \ THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: Bette M. Foose DATED : October 27 , 1980 PUBLICATION : October 30 , 1980 and November 20 , 1980 in the Johnstown Breeze a) 80-71 H H H , l4 41 LO I. _ _ _ _ _ N CO •• 0 CO X .._ - x'nr. Yj o 00 $-ICU - - �1 .- - .- ' , • . Pa (T) 0 $.-I �' N , „ - s ; z , H I< H. ; N 0 in 0 , -, O 0 u \N 3.4 ,: as " hr-1 C7 X' rH U' 'Z: ^_i'- John P. Donley -S; 1012 9th Avenue m. Greeley, CO . 80631 4-) -; I ut 0 Hm a0 o N - _ _ '02.775-7 — b� Sa VD a U (Yl tJ. ..s'r a ,sae is a , •H U) (Do � O r - „ . ",. e .I •,;,', ,.rib..,l•_,.. e`--- - - � +� o -- ` N : M � v 0 � 0 . '''f . - - — —� t.23 ,--I U ,��,•c-v iv 1 ntaSY41A?k N ' r E-I to (NI N •;1 - v -- . ` - `g it rs$ue^�ifto 1 I in Q1 0 H A.M NUN 0 N H CO 3.} (n N 0 �'I - or-) C1 O -4 3-I - �] r't C7 - ii LI,IA:,i : ,J'-_•,vC 4C�tiJSr ---7,11.- .;...7:i 5 � i1(' { IiJi .,LS Sii I J 'r� - t / .-r 'tj'GP0 1R7i1-3)J 454 I 0 f•-I 3� O 31 0 0 H 80-71 O L• LD x • M • 0 '1' -1-i l0 L?: rV l „I + 'J l0 • U O 1''[ RtITt� ,,cc -H ,. <4 O (...7 00 ' - - --- -- -- - 0 H (0 0 y' i fo' C1, O CO r one) W i---1H -H 'J O ..... ., O •H O O SaF21 C) ,i , . ,. , U Xr0 s La O •.4i>, . .. 4-4 ' H -I ct+ Sa �-y 0 • 0 N N y o 0 O rt I] I� C7 --- a in a M/M Arthur E. Stanley 5 , 1205 47th Avenue o • Greeley, CO 80631 ao ' -P -" , N 3n •r! VD ;.! 0277571 H H -I� N O i Sa 4-I lfl Ki (C1 co na�_<'_ 0 ,- 00 � Q _ 4 O 0 00 O lI U) 31 r. L.. 1' i t cd !1 N U '''� — U . o 0� \ � , LZS +� 0 C / I '',_• _ U U ,4 O "'!1 U NW X P4 Fa ' ,I0 ,. A, • , ,-/ r of • lfl CI) 0 "1 0 O '1' , (d r,C o -r! r.G o 0 00 CO b FC 0 0 0 0 0 0 O La M O C..1 U rl La ,5 • J �a 0a0 - , O ooar �, ' 4—I O U U (NI 0 0 M 0 O O r.) "n �l 0 rrtt �l _ 80- 71 80-71 ' i .:_S: ` --_c3NY T:". ? : ..! ' i Glenn K. Billings Jeffrey & Adrea Squires 3835 W. 10th Street 33020 Lincoln Avenue , z -Greeley, CO 80631 ,.- Lucerne, CO 80646 _ ii , . ., _ - _-_ 0277572 _ ' 0277569 —c en . $FD k^ c,,i,.- _ Td, 1,31713:s hAPO id lb-.u0•.-- _ _ `- a _-_ ...... _ _ _ - _ 8 ___ _ $0 7l :kor -- - • x - , . T - -i; Mary Lopez & Atilano B. Diaz John & Maria G. Herrera ' Box 8 !' 740 43rd Avenue Court ', Lucerne, CO - 80646 ` Greeley, CO 80631 ry -- -,,p -II_ ___ _ _ . _ 10277-568 _ 0277567 I,y w( „ti- 4.1 k.`_d,_ ..r,a.-T......a. ..w-e -..__..CU}U 4Y7V :1': .� _ _�- _ -s• .� 1 V ..7..'- - 1 d irl - N TO fn H 'el -• is Ocle Pa 00 U) U 0X - , . 0 a) s H H 1-) 0 , l0 U N . . i 00 O r-I 'T•,-I "I, en 00 ,-I cd 4c-ifl )4 • M "0 Rf ',, , y-1 ty. 0 X O cd '� ai H 0 0 = , R'-' GO 4J H #4 U) CU (r'. -,, .. a a • 4) cd 'd , ----- U SO W 7 I. 0 O •0 W o o Robert & Josephine Costillo • w °° w 0-1 ; 33024 Lincoln Avenue ' Lucerne, CO 80646 "' 0277566 , l i 3f r ir_'' •>US M1-. r.• H �' -- - _ _------- _- - _- _ M 7, >1 l0 °J A• .�c_. �•1 agert H H 0 O .,,,;� A H 0 !� M . U 4) ,.0 `, , y vl 0 D, v 000 ;` - ; 7r; spnr'i,`-N y.-. \ •1..1 c, c._) ..f. . !.. L, ,C(eVHaf!�� ` ' i N >I " f • •'-I CV �I co rH-I a i,6 ',,,,4 f n+fi�ca:_s Ix N C7 I •f•,,°-GPO 9979-r,.)4- 's • U 80-71 U H f;co 124 CO 0 U - -- - - ----- W _ 10 H O -- -- _.« _ U U U c!) U al G al H O H N O w J fT.,, '. Lry "' - Jose T. & Guadulupe Costillo ".11122 24th Avenue Court ' ; ' , Greeley, CO 80631 T• U -tti .t L .. - - H - 0277565 o = -0 H - - - 0 CO rd 111 i+1/4.0 s ? H 00 0 1/4.0 0 0.'' O U - - l0 O • j �00>,i•SP.,ttt- O >C LH U G O ,,`s _ H O _ � W U U t.�ro s:=t{ 0 • H 04. 0 - 1 c+i O U 0 O - f~ U H O 4__J __ 0 • f-r b0 '.O - Z r`. c_7 C N W _ , a) >~ Ca a U `d • b0 10 J-i 1/40 U '.0 , P 00 O U 00 0 I-) (� H O 0 I , U' •r- U W N a • • PO ct 14 � a) U -0 H rn q H 0 0 N H )" Sa - H Z U {~ ~r' VI U zy P ,-aO O ra aaa J _ __ 80-71 _ �N. _ _ 80-71 _s trs . ^ ' �e.. .p..,.':---ra i,2;r_ - m� 3i St•.DLR. Camp'ctu Cents 1,2,au_.1 5,-n! f y:.s;3?,_'53 if.'w.r. -._.URN TO",pace 03 , o R.e your address m+,9e'_ i 1rRN TO space 6n --- _21e" _ _ 3 reverse, or i i1•c6.40v,'3 aervlce,.::y,3cc.?;..,.r,k one.) a =4..'. 1. vac follem ;crv:cc is requested(d:eck one.) G ~4 :g Shoo.-io,-ho+t.a-'i to 4 4 �� r F ate ue: iKi Show to whom-.r.d d;te drl_ :roil —c li She:,to 7.-'foal r' .�a._,i a.'.-_.__•-a3,1_*very,.._ A 2 O SFew to:✓horn,c'.3te a:'d a?:_.s cf+'1'•l,^err.,,__r RE"-_,"II._ :rl;il'__'.r:_'it:'y 'v ;c '-_.] RESTFUL ZED L.'FLI!'f.1 Y a --1a Shoes nr ?:__,!e _ .--. _d F -' SLcw to:,20:^ :1 d•..:c'.._ _ .1... .a..— 1 O RESi...1"'f;E_: ;'sT':a. O Iu3§T^uCTLD ' '_LIVERY. - •q a She-.7 i.r w[ttrr.Cr,9'.,sea a:, , r4^-ez.ery.S_- i SL.o.v to who_*",t, a,and 2•li:_s of c I (Cs-''_Se_.r..`1 erg._ R , ..:3,S) - (CC`:S;.LT1:03x:1.15"1r _.:F1.r&) — 1 2. ARTICLE,-_'213111-'1...7 S ;Q• ?. ARTIC'-E ADDRL:r_a O. 22 ae Bain C. Randall Trusts c Edna Berg I c C. H. & Carter & Ro9. L. a g $6hu1l� A 6310 East Lafayette Blvd. , ,S¢otts} aQQ ]�sire�t�_Ea ©i1f cl -.-:Titre s= _ _ dale A 3. A:'.7iYa_r e: v 3Y_z.. iv,-3,r_- :a,; „ 6Yo F.:::!. .c o ,Er F'D a:El:-.."'ETA-)7/3. CaIT!-IrD NC, a:i‘e_.:t__9'P:" A 0277560 0277563 '\ r� m c i ;i,: .3;f:i s≥rein Oynatar1 of,, r1 :ssea or 53 fiidnt), 1 at Wry-_-7s•_�t?in et-•=._r3 e-_.3.--i-ma or a-.cn2! -I !have receir.a3 the erti_e:i.s-nberl a'eoae. rr "1.„ I love received the:3r?;:'e e oritccl a'; .e as I S a'3NA7UF'._ DAdrLc see fth..-_:orizeda �' r C.1CNA711:1 3Adfi:e:see ClAut.horized agent m Q A 0.7STE^. .7.1—P7Thrly/ POSTMARK 7,• CAI r.7; i;LfL':6iY m r 5. AOD53E S,Co-z..otets cK ty f!requested) E.,1 5. Ai Dr.E:s!va.n::Lvt7 trry it te@t'lestedl Or; .13 V1 ' C. 6. LINABLE TO OLL:VE.3i 5!-CAUSE: CLE, ,lit'2A%L!'TO DELIVER 2=Gt4:SE: F..7i� 0 9 I'11 CLERIC'S ITIALS ' O ., i Iie1j3A a x ''GPO:t979-3000-45;9 GnQ r 3.7a--on 1ta ,d _80-71 _ _ ._ - 80-71 ' sin ,' Si'..'.i.:a. _L.; ,pie,e a'rr.3 1,2,and ��.'r45 ER _ C.o�pte_P. - 2, _,..,. ��.®,; -, -n 9,',,i yo r address ra the"i?ETi1RN TO"space ca n, 1 1 <'<n_-• , _URN TO"space ca d 1. T? folio-log acrv'ce is requested,; :ak one.) 1 P i, foil n -;s rrt-if u arc. ck one.) G a N 111017 to t..,:era a-:3 i4.:to ea..._rca --G I Ex S'.:v., rJ "own t3 '.,- 1 _—G 9 O Si:r:•::,c,no'n,d:.tc ar3at'%,t'7,of z'_':c^ry..•--�.. 7) Li ,' .✓' '100' 1, a 311-'.'. ,n't'_ll:,:_/,.--__^y ! m O R_T.STI'.ICTL73 DELIVLI.Y �,' El Rt:.f_eCTEi)y"-izivaZY 1 �I SSho.ftn�'tr_^,_a,-1�_'ed_;..: ._...,........_C � 5}c.. i3c::rr,a,iu_, L 3I_4T 'C TL's r..Ii-1r.RY ,... - .� RED. ,'.Lt ;_3'1T.:^Z'�I y J ` Sher to Hoe T9,(iota,end f e .i^,ery.S__- Shs.v to w�6-. •z r'4. of t' Lvcry.5 fl 1 (CL:�.°LT F.' is 1."•!".;TER i c ) (CC _'LT P..a _"S.Lrt .''t ,,__,) ?_ CiTIC _A>II 'S'3: • � 2. ARTiC.::ADORE:L r..3 IC. 1 70 23-- -- Agland Inc. Q. Richard K. Kelly P. O. Box 338 4 z 2248 12th Street z m Greeley, CD 80631 m -Eatont_ CO 80615 `________ tml 3. Ar.TIC1 a 0-'_74-11,1i0%.0-'_74-10-'_74-0-'_74-11,1i0%. r _, ;a A',act. s.^:aRe;e:'".. _ , m '' i„.:..-".=.7E,-",=.3 ,.n_ CE3ti1:=.sO.0 .:,.s:. ,.'d ti="•�7E-1Zr1 C=S. C_nTil=1:rD NO i 1f:Si.IR O!'.0. � 33 0277561 is 1 n _ 0.2715 1_ t' a a -- .; _ `=,n;wr ra of add,.:see or c nt9 to 14.'w.ysect3inc,gr.r_roofs__d,•=ma orates:, + — --�_' 1:•v-e recee ed die a•?iela dcscr b_d a,o.e. m I r:.rec_:.,\.,their;c le described at ve. 9 w,ruf.. _iressee DAu,::o'zed agent m &'C"','11."-.C , Q Atslre:aee ❑Authorized agent 1•• g 4. DA =lJi::L ii OST[�7ARK 11) --/--/ ' i'-2 4. ^CA rtt 5 i.41.rya ,, 11, a RI, o� ,� Q A!O 51 ;wa.r,ra c:' if IQ ® 6. AOORE`S(Carepktl cniy If requested) a ® y requested) A 9 m m 1 T 7 tz- 6. L.,,'.Ar3t,2,T.1 DLs IVC �aCAUsL: +:'.t:Re,S pry 6. U:nAZ.Lt:TO D't"LtVOtE iI CAUSE: CLER:S p I I-I:TVALS O 1141T1ALSj 77 I S L_________ :,.. _—_ ____L______—I _ — .r 1,4<.,-'0:1979 36,:59 *GPO:1979-200-459 - .+ 80-71 i U H ®56°OEH r•.,Ftc+e rterla 1,2,and r j aJ a) I T A.i yam address in the":;=11JRN TO"space on �� e a L'-" 0 ® w J a) 3I _ TV TV rse. 1 -• x P 01 d ��J ®d U 1 1 C mi 3 he fol.lv.,:r.service r acoctzd(..h ck one.) ` < ,-•I lug Ii f=C •rii rn I �Shew iu whorl and date de.:-..:::... .............—¢ yl U cn 'b n O ¢ i --7 Sh)w t.) ,her:,date and ads: .s of deliv^y,._ %ra •ri cu O , gX Q a p 0 • O N w _, w LI RESTRICTED :,_VERY — I. Lug �� > kg w~ N aJ U O > > f _ {J I °� a r R1 q OO w w o¢ .)I _ Sh,'-.v to%horn aria'.date a.._ . I M W L-• CU a) PI w I— N • 7.1 W 'EC= � RLJ a.�,.CiI'II'):.,.,'�'1~,`'s�• 0 � a o0 co ® cis • 8 as '�G - ® `'2=''(,)) 0. 4 _OU w of Shaw t.whom and c.- ,of ecl.very.S— _ a D c' lac U w b z0 w L— Rl z 7 L LL a w COL,,SULT PC,S i':S I 1 ES) `_M cc o r1 =`' o �+ 4a a) w Q �' 30lAfl — — -- — -- -- —i r r I Mural o O w 1 Q w 2. ARTICLE ADORES::,; "s`.: WI a I~ 2 z L—I S� U S3�lA 70 Or-- w 0 6 o L- ® a) o m Joe O. & Beatrice Corodova I ,E...-. 9 A�„ Ca M U, «� A w : $33J H03 831ST 33024 Lincoln Avenue Lucerne, Co 80646 m 3 4'TIC,'DEtCRII'TI'JW, - ---- - m 'I:n:STE!'.'D h^.. c:r'FiED No. INSURED i:r7$ z 7-'i C--;,' Q m ___ �_ 0277564 oa I tv st gAtway!,o-taJn cigratura of addressee or agent) jam_ p� �� I _ -I I dare recei•,Ed the aiticie described above. LL sL a) cc Q 1� m 5' (r 4Tl)FE (:Addressee 17Authorized agent e, a I M O rz¢ a) O ,-I () a a)cij p c. u ¢ > U 00 > '> c o 3: C1ATE OF DE.LIVRY POSTMARK —1 ��tr a ,, G w 'W o� =c / IF W L- w cap c L CC cd a) ❑ (if-q �a u ,� o W ❑ D l j i r4 p ® �'= S 1 a, U w I__ _H OPaDrilit!0m3S, \" w W W o L o MUMS C 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERK'S INITIALS yc9 a h n S33j H03 H31Stf6J1f y - s *GPO•1679.300-459 _I O J a L I ��� 80-71 f' O _i , , to a5 ENDER• Complete Items 1,2,and 3 Mi �O/ ,,_1 —+ O o Add your adlreta In the"RfTURN TO"space on o F� i' U — mzeYse w L. L!J 1. 'The fol:ow:eg r, �� ff Ft c W ;; U > W y servC;w.s requested�_, ck one.) - �o C, r��1 m r J p rp w _. o ! Show to whorl and ht.!.d'Jv_ud --et L1 CO W � Sho-v to whom•i'a_e rind 3.' •-s vl delivery —t!� Poo co o I�l c�_, � � � « * v C� o c2.s a <4 fir , a) 0 J o x> m u ❑ RESTRICTED L'"'_?;VERY twa� Zy O Li.)F- a� COi CE '� w w lw o0 oc uz t, > > (r�C)p 0 U (0 — F- Iv O O O w o , p� Sho.! i Scr,L a (late d<l cored lam LS Ci@0 2—U) ~J U U LL J U o� Oc 0 RLS3?Ir:TEED7 ' i-.,LAY• ,11.:0 CJ yc� iJ I . g c 0 ❑ a . —, — 1117 Ra aJ ,•D .,.-I „ LL aU! 2 _o Shaw to who (la and v n1'de!•tiery.S_-- MJ� c� M, 2 c +-J C� p ¢ u' ac 30IAH3S .o U LLUI cm 44 01 N N 0 S33IAHMS — (C.d=,I;LT I.`n f_,7t15TI id F _,r5.ES) al C) 0 ,o O C.) c, a!UN L'71 mu 2. ARTICLE A^DRESSCD TC: Lt a Jx "' '� 1 Trailer Specialties, Inc. zI 500 "0" 'Street o m1Greele_y, CO 80631 I '• —i „ 3. :ncLE D' cR.. „aril: --- --- iii o Jar-OI£TE• O r)0. ;�aTIFIF^�r a. ! 1(d1Rc'D J'J. L 1 c? 4i® ,� I {1 :4 _ ig t-'� CO 0277557 L� U ;—�� ti 1 Alwai s obtain sisal:Lea of add.•;see or a,�,�nt1 a, U L--I m I I;.:re rec;, ,!Lie art:,l4 ucscribed above. �' �u s�_! ci) C~,s'is M W m S c NrR DA;d e. a/ C7Au+hprized agent 0 - 1--I c ' w 4 > 0 0 0 co _7, ` - t wed ,__I I 1Lo M C')"ILL cd a ni a) oo > ❑ —1 ��� ' ��� �' ta` OU °" J (0 Pa Wt— a w ❑ Y.i 4 (S ,-,1-g CO ® `C!J C_7 <4 O Lu • v C . t d CF:ir:t;Y - Ttie �' 3 a) a`�- u w w n — —2,3 r•- nr - S1 N gL '138 • may ,_, m cc S. Af36RLS 'Cc,r;.*Jrta oiav if requested) 4Qlz O cr1 O W COVf ,--IU-C S333 60! -_.._..-_..,.__ _..a_. •.a 1—) ,-I C'> ,, 6. UNAP1 E TO DELIVER%r.CIIUSE. �iiL3'%� LI °_ Ca c' Z:;„1'0'•1 i79 Doc,:1 Q I Ce `- a W 0 L,� ® =J FQ Let_. 1-1 p PA -¢ L -.Q •,.i (1) C9 r- 0 1 - —�-��— t7 e w C/) a) -7Iri Ld •H 1' c, O; IX Q '� 'C WI h n-I l0 T au 9 F 0 to R L it w W es_ a1 00 �¢ 1 CO c �r o�J O J (n U ®Q )"L �W J ❑ yO� 7,', .',f, �y �W H LJ L— ' w ❑ n-:? Yw Sri ntow �` < o o CO 0 c'L O W O I- o-' ' of �Ez ,-" o II- , ,u,-1_ ...a 0 ;o -:Q� o'er a C/�D9 ® �¢ U U n�� fa;. CU U 0 ¢ ¢ 0, a-,0_, o=.7. �i�'o,�n L≥� O `VILL �C r'' Ir' �w a W W I- v>0 cnnco inco yQ¢ C �� il— LL ai f_ i �o ai '_ ai L ? F-1 u ¢ .) Er 331Aa3S MGM raa_nlat) o !¢ —2 >a O G .1 W c7` CO 44 z w a s �1 ® 4 L N C0 I 1 a) U S301A83S ldi;0lld0 c ,p W o U ') ' C''y la 5C U a , L- iv) i W M O J G 21 p O —' S3 F103 831S116J1S8J 1'!i"sf)00 o n aaa 9L61 ldd`00S£wlo3 Sd • �a_ _ � - 80-71 a - 1 '7! u 1 u. -_ ,,.LAI a .L--11 zit`,c e,a, �� Z °z 5B o m ,i ',X-:_! fn:'::- .v=price ns^t1-_ _-_.nk one.) �_ QU N LL �n lY� asi.lil• :F'�lr._ ',f% , v -C 0 I Oa_ -r - — r "'1 r St!'-- \ tr- --S..-''..r P<'rver;•_ _ .J R .`.L_ _C-1_ ' ./. ',' W i r I !f.:. -.:1_,T r'. -;';...E:, � ., cS) — — — a 1 Reburn R. & Ave E. Rose 8 O N 2. - g Lucerne, CO 80646•N J ��a-A.-TIC _ .__gin..�,„r — — 1 z—I lO n - - _ '° - L 7' �;�• us r,,_ '-gin c ,,, o of eddrsmee or€_arzt9 rtj co C7 __ al i:'v recci:J1t':a.“'_'- _`~"n�cdaoc:a. — a ..","c:'.: 71F.'E 1:1-Ad _esseo OA::.tl.c izzd t 4-) _ __- k„ ey4 ___,L(7, i ID HC7 — rs i4 n i _ II r 4 3 urlfihL< <7�.;_s.?uEti£ECaus£• `\ 'CL K.5 =' A russ/O c4 ii -- ` li� GFo:1979 300-453 crn fA Sr\DER a Compel'..;,Ite y_, 80 ^-3i 2, —1 revc}Add yi.�z:7.,. `"m tae"RETURN TO"space oa rI2. T..,fe:Iass•+r?erule. 'C{t= 't';•i^ ) _� -'' s� ek ore. to X! SLocv 1 ••/horn 2r.1 d,to&.' r-L ft — j O SI_,•r q, —ti • Z v Iti7 :L:: - J�''yY 41 0 ! I�1K. :e d,Lt„,,,. N S "���>®J } I—'I RI`ia-: :LT; -' .:irY- '+ - a `88 )>�O IJ LII S:.zcY . ai and c- .. :a._,v ry•=i F • C) U x O 7,� M, a , IT["LE....Oi:_s__a ,., - -- m o .l Agland Inc. '3 0 o " _�� z� 260 Factory Road U U a �� �:� Eaton _ CO 80615 y[ ry{� .CL ,71-2.,-1.::::',..- '--- - 9999 S o r6 Ila CS �, mr 0277558 I m It — m I:_. re c^,od�.e ar: a c y rib d ac ,e. 3 t) m! s'-".-.TL.:"_ r_n 1..2sec ❑ALt erized 2zera i a O L- Y — Y il mI7-,,,A.,E ,,.:- •.,;1.:.791, F 1>7.�. -rT^A ADD:ti�?a rCc"7p,. ,.4 J if repo CO C � w 'i0. LvN_LiEi,. •, ':`3r_w_u.s=: - ...5-15:-. 5- ...�N f r10];;r a.t r. ` N _u u ro Q �� _ —____ 80-71 _ ZS *EL'vGER. C,trpf•te,te.ma 1.2,22:22? } 'y r, s I - -{ ..`...'d yc��2. l,u..s m 1`.r.`r FTURN TO"apace oa O r� ;•_lets( • r r`1 M CI J )-1 I`a__ W �7¢ ! Fl 1. The folloc;ai 5 selt.iee t•-.`c lievted i check one.) u to-¢ U ,` LL CU Show to who— ; 1e del.,•....cd -� w a 41 v L� �y p O w , O Show tc oho z-d 2... ss of delivey _ I ¢ �, cow pp Lrl > > . ❑ RES1R1CTE..:iI_LtYF;:]' - '" ci IL. •r-1 Z ii n A 1?-2-a r'I 1 LU ail r "JCL>- 0 13 10 > _ show to he• ^r l hate dc'_„,ed Q •-•- 0 O s +H3 f' COoo — a oW-fie. NCO o w i RiSTR C'E: -,');�`L2Y' § W aa) O O ® u-tr N �i a Sli_1»f to who i,: e,and ad;re a of lslivery.$__- Fir • '� reo }� C!] O w o ti LL `27 1;14 a) r�o U J i U ¢ toPal It — (CJ.'Si LT i ` t tt i ::"2.1:EIiS) -- ' z2 • �7 0 o` •\ �+ U �` [, ARTICLE':a3DRF __;) •_i S 0 o al o x o ° y i Elsie McKinney etal W ,� a • NN w z 2117 5th Street 4 23 Greeley, CO 80631 1 — n3 AR rIEL2 L'F._:CR".F.' : . m RF 3ISTERED NO. a_ATii- ED"-0 I ENSURED:S7.,, i T2 � N- :J " u „ 0277556 - c- 01 ci I 7 to"w,aIs''btain s;M1ctt;3 of add,oases or a «nt)+�9 6:1c_,) c.__, a d H 1 'i"-,i e received the e,t'c., ;,scribed above. k ® 2 ii� W. m ,s__ ILLA ¢ o .. m S!'.'.. i (J TU%£ Ad ceases Anthar)zed agent ,� U. I=` ( I I LU¢ a) H } .7 P 0.¢ cae ( / - 147 L --> FS�• ¢o tocm a - L"¢ r`I O cc z DATE O LIVE Y K -- BA w¢ H - o O, c R) 13 0O ' w c m 0 c..i`U O m Cal ¢�'(n Illa LL ¢ U ( E. ADDRESS lC pi'tn orl%0 requested) . CO� IL clo0 X O 0 a C!] V] W 'w v~i m �" rr)r— I- S c =LLH 0 0 ( . �o H ' ii �, tail' _ 6. UNABLE TO S1ELI1 a o BECAUSE. CLE.K'S a. z o Pa W ca` a) O a) • w •n . W o-,-c$ - H H U ____ I-1 O 'INITIALS W H O t� i gE $-I 0 >-1 S333 d03 L M <4 •P-I W H Itl C5 - ' *GPO:1979x00-459 T — 80-71 I •`k , L5 I _ o `' G o a) vli 3T NDER. Compktc items 1,2,and 3 l' ® a ca " !averse. yew s^Sc sa in the 'RETURN TO"space on o� a . '"--% �� -I „�Ii o e.--._ -I ao 1. The following service:s+r.guested(check one.) �� ¢e v, tn %� o W c � j] Sho:v to whoa and late delivered d 1 ¢ o L i i- cd O w I S ❑ Show to v.ho-n,d:tc and ad;.itts 3 of dclivery �Ir! toa ' O _ c ao ❑ Rl"_1IRl:TIT %LLlVFRY !!I LCC W cu CO t t w c m Show to c`ic_•1:—d date delitc.,..1 __q 1 ® 'z3 O ❑ RES'iar.TE_2 Oi:',IVE:RY. H 0 O W ° Show t�who.I, a td z'' Cf delivery.5__-- i Wtm` 0 w o 9-.9-A c 1.4 P t .--.- (COIN ) W H 0 -J a 0 f I S33d z ARTI%L a�iDRE.. L3 TO: I N W x a — 12,1 c Monfort of Colorado, Inc. a P. 0. Box 6 z1 23 G_reeiey, CO 80632 �_ 9 - u U u p3. ARTICLE L:,hCR ,':kU.l': -------- -- H1 `� 9 FiC•ETEALD L3. :.;Eil l U ND.N . ME:Ur-EC NO. •'L7 N �� _ I + W m ,� oCO 23 0277555 l f-u Ili 5¢ fiU �- L't1J " . h (Always obtain t'jnat•3ra of avid:.ssee or a.v nt) cam_- - o�; c a) co ice_ 'ta L re >-. , u m I Fete received the article described above. G = w� H } r — C' a H 13 p c7 M w Ai E..NATURE ClAdalcasee �A:,-hurized agent L s W 5¢ I-A a) O �¢ H CO Si �� H N CO > o Y 1, w b W w w z[i DATE OF G'-LIVERY POSTMARK c� ® CT) '- 0 � � o LL � � 0 OCT 2 4 1980 c\JIi . VA a � � H sg xZ " o o D _ ��, !i • la co a) - V) a I LL N ¢ • 5. ABDriE53 ECasg.i3. .tv d raga j .:..->:;!.. r11-= Y rn o U PD W - -,_ ,-I ,a j 0 U r) •a7 z 1 ` >~ N O i3 .O Co a) n rl p H 0 WU a) a , 5333 I " PU W �O U] Ra N C-7 ,i• 6. UNALLE TO DZL1VEa ezt";ISE .E3A'S I O `"Ifil lS j 41 li 1. 4/ •ri . 1 W -- ..,.�._-�•. *GPO-1979-30C 559 a) U U U Q rI �`j _- I I c= CO r`, w •r•I G' I CO ._ c- `cll., O, - �Q !r-! / I "�1 Qc_ rn a.a a Iii H a) o o= G Wa a H } R� =Q a) '.O EE F -I 0 } > o -92 I C)> O v¢ O W --i o oa •'J �Ci N 0O W w oQ oo x 1,�-', ,p,�, f LL V W i H Z > ❑ - 'i,n x, 000 L CD ® W a• K'� J ❑ _J :..._=', ...c._., D o w I -'¢ ,-23 8 ® �zc -! • -N O w 0 r moo �oow �ww cz,-' - Q �LL o U U o a -- cc o.- oo� 0�7 on' Iii ,0 a. F.'.C. �G •• I l— hH ca .-1~ Ii a w0 i- ino vlco Su.,,,, ,=i,¢� G �0 �_ zo H I =a a) {I ¢ 30IIIN3S id13030 raanl3e p ¢ 0 C ro N SA I o L a) a) Ha) cc ow tb Q O .r.j ,4 ^ o s3alria3s-Mild() ''-'t fi M Llu ca E i S333 HO)1131SVEASOd 1lnSNO3 n© O O W ...5 N CD Qr� a 9L61 '1dV`QDRf mina cA I , — 80-71 c ' ,� rn d 3S:AII;ER: CompSere Items 1,2,and 3. . , `�J0�e ...1 / o Ad your at3rlre a in tha"RETURN TO"spaca on i xeve . = o ' �� m 1 Tic follot.,in.;,.er i.c a is regs_,tcd(c`.eck one) ., rf r0 i Slimv to unom nd late c'cc + , —G l•' ,N4�/' 0' 0 Shea to v.�hc,:, it c and r'4?: of trettvary __t t- g' ^1„�1° as t! RESTtvt('nEO 1-1'_PIIR'f :rd Show,is v.'ie.t aryl d.tc:;'.i;-n;d _e L' Rrsi I� y'ED??rLittERY. Shrit in wnn n,clzt ,arid 03 .E ,Ri dsLvery.3_ ;,,j CD a ��'' . (C'i- LT P S"P 1 AST R.:ti C.K. i.ES) E . 2. E.ARTICL DDriES.s�D TO: — — < a T,p Lily (LE) Leaf gren , -1 (.5 mi Box 6 `—I � a Lucerne,_ C080646 �. a tilt i= R:71 -;:s.. -I z J i m r.---%'z.TE,:aa '—J,. CLF.T]r^lED NO. 1Pt-EEiJ i0 NO. vTa . 1 ,.t __ 0277551 r 7-- _ < fa l.21 !11 M i 'Malts c�:.,Sol r y•.atura of celdressoe or ezantl (, ,---1m 1`err:received the article described abc-;e. 4® '� co a— Al Pie-."itTUii'_ QALLI-zssee ,iarized agent g �I cti. 510 J O to N o0 '� �„` es Q4! o :a,3 LnT 7-BSc CVLAV PaSflAgK. U C. r EL awn ESC(rcw-r3:+fts ese',y If requested) 'I � rI la cV o. <>�LC Tt7 S:_.6`;:—R 9CCAUS.''.. , CLLRt f', LIZ .+ aiTs"aLs E-,.:.,, > If/e in r�R " GPO:1979300-459 St N x la ly l z w 80-71 0 — 0% v- Q SENDER. Complete stems 1,2,and 3. U) S O I Add your address In the•'RLTU RN TO"space on ` icvcrse.co O m 0 t� I p , I W 1. The following service is requested(check one.) 7 Sit q Show to whom and date dehvere I tt U u x �� j 0 Show to whom,date and addre c.2�edrvery _ Om ,,''o o Q�5f I r I ca 0 RESTRICTED DELIVERY Z U rL r, (4.4r �;' -- I Show to whom and date dchvered n Ica ( -- C o O 1 I 0 RESTRICTED DELIVERY. V O a J 1 �;� �Q I' Show to whom,date,and address o(dehve _ .i w a^ ry$ 0 �` I (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEEno fa 110-'-3 2. ARTICLE AODRESLED TO: c CO IE 3:I g William G/Larry R. & Harriett 12- •...--.- xi A Leagren a P. 0. Rnx 1 T,iirernp _LQ_ _80646 n 3. ARTICLE tiESCRIPTIoN• I m REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. I INSURED NO. — -- 0277550 32 m r, (Always obtain signature of addressee cr agent) e^I to'a I have received the article described above m SIGNATURE DAddressee (]Authorised agent 0 w 4 t�G CiC C?< •j DATE OF D'ILIVE Y OS ARK - m 0 /e' :) q - &e Y G 5. ADDRESS(Camplste arty if requested) II.98d'F I/ m r V m ./ry J is m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER EECAjSE: CLER? 0 I INITIALS P *two•19792C 1•I u u u _ 80-71 's F `� I C--r I n 5'T.x7ER (o uplc.;e:t:..s 1,2,a• t' f ) v e e 'y�j A yc.:_'-14.;.', n L.F s L'RN TO"apace on Up O`-(3'_j PA dJ .� ®? • [ u �' n¢ G G c' _seance:�requ.st:.3(_1Y:k one.) Ii P� c (� r�.= al d:.la �i ci cal r., ct J = y i St:ar io tv'iQ t: J @ .-ere3 —Q aH if c-n �''° F LA-1 • ¢Y .1 L� Show F kr-r 2_4%, J a 1ra_•s 0f delivery _— CU LT: 4 i Du C4 U gi Y ≥ �! Rlski:'Lif1T ._`_'i'i?Y �Q HO 'wa ri (d O cc w io SY nv?ur,hC __3a!e .4'-.et1 'cC ?� N co o w' a U E w' t1 +—I ca W w ! RTi: Ti;. _..�i�' .teY. CO 0 "1-:(`,1_ O O `�'= N O LL o Sh e, c,no 4:..:2,and r-d, =�of 3eiivery.t�_ f l' egg O X U =ptL- W U o ca—i ' w w rn y O I , o f.21 1J L.T. w¢ (Ci;:v :;LTF ;,'ytTl b''t7;:r:ES) C3 O G z0 ( ULI'l Z AR TIC Lc..--1DRF':_,_: iU E Lii O aai wi G .o aai '- i S33d EII: i Colorado Potato Flake Co. i Zpac7 A rx o � 0 z F & L Ent. Inc. i i m 8_00-south columhinp,,_D.envpr, G0_ -__; — n a. AR rICLE 17s r,CRc; 'I;': —Iu u•u m RE:;:STE�is f,.7 r LI. .FIED,i3 i I USUi11D RS 7 ; i r I „�_ 0277552 i • c.) el n_ col—`�F:iw2ys rQ.t Ir.s:3" u:ra of odd asses ors- nip 4,3 Wa al — co m r have race,+ the 3 s.:tc described abo e. �— m SIGNATURE DAC.iic aee DAu,hanzed agent c1_—I 0 wQ1 ° c G +� U OLi.ca G+' CO > o0 2 DA-"T OCTF t V POSTiAARK c� (d OH CO w N w wo w I D C u — JJ t—I O ® 'E. t-1 O W ® = O U 4D , U w a F 0 ._,..-9 c pa • O c c 4 I w 5. ADDRE:S(Complete only If reWeeLd) x c 41 ,O U O- 'I-u" (t1 ., L VI n O- ="-I--- O t~ +) -`0== al al w uai m • �_ G c b WILLI ® �7 to a w r.—_ 1 IJ cm CO a (° ai O >1 aJ U) I " - r —� . . O ? r2� r I 'n' U O r ;EN m S. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERK'S Eu O Z co0 O L'= a c-1 0 INITIALS c...) f� Co A F *GPO:1979-300-459 H kL,..1 =� u u u i ' �._s- w 80-71 ® o J1-1 © n J an sr t,uER np'e,. rte^.s 1,2,a G t (�, um,:¢ ( _� A< a .T1 Aid yu,r z3dr_ss in Wu"%I 1 URN TO apace cn — ae cd r-� L.— r--1 _ — reverse, l - x I _u cm M Y � i. i;. foil.), ,�servrce: T.gt sied;eheck one ¢o tD LS a ra 1 .0 al \o w 5,d Slim:,t.)whom : date ;L• a ) ` oeF O -. WI ucei-� ' cn O O Y ≥ ` X .:.a a,e� ::tcfc ¢ co „RO a O CO w L �� She,✓to who. ,._to 2r,i a delivery.- _ I o a > d(i s of . w 1 P ° Iy w ,5 w oo �ci REDS:.;:;::.-.TED 17--",24/1-:mot' i 0 —I a U co ii, v= d O W o r c, Sh,T.•.40 v;no: ,, .u :.. , t CNJ UL, a� NS ice. U w ¢ v -1 —Q s� b0 >C L,E 4 2 ci 1- RCa.I,: ;E:`.L.' +'v�3tY, . t o gg ''o (d N N '�•;c' i+ �t N ¢ w ¢tfl . ur,c 2, chCr_ dice, d '_. .;Qi delivery.S-- 0 a` r-I LL0 co n-1 a O I O a L O N v (Ci .�i LT}., ..',fir`.=1"E -Oi:FEES) a f—I RA 3 P•I r�7 Ni _ - a L. .RTICL. A,DDRr:,.. 1. :O:EU • c • o Donald K. & Robert C. Virleffi, Z a Betty Adams i m __Box 22 TarrPrlle_r0--$ ' . . u u u tirrlCL :;'_;:.Ri:s : 064h - , Ca m K,l::STE',_i, IT% C- ITIFIED Nr I 1 ( INSURED 1,≥y i c xi !1 7" I ,'(,l ® tu J I III Q2U514 ; _ 'W c a w 't' n t YIW--Y3 L rain s, :.,.-a Of i Lt"= x� r. ox fn --- ! _' ' �drl:eseeora_ani) i J= e e_..., ¢ Y to `<? m I e received the article " yrbed above, d c6� cc o '- oN w¢z Sf,^.3`r.TUflE a ��4 H� ¢— w a I<L.,..., m° ElAd_ rssee ClActhoiizedagent C7 O c� al 0 '≥ ,o ' m= ow IF3 ,�,,, rL ‘,.;-,%.")/(.._-�L� d7e �w I rl al -, o s≥ s Imo sow t7 6` _-- /r_-;! , W 1- O r7 O W p w 0J .o¢ �¢¢ ,o<nt3 , W c�� I- '-o ow „N 33 DATE OF L•ELIVERY t O -,'—I O <4 U a , 0 =a> a>> m, a ¢ m POSTMARK f I� Gs A o ¢ ¢ o� ooh o � ,000W 0 C , 0 �+ w W :I-LLI ,xi,o in<o ,indo ya,c a O ! -�' 5 Eh /J[)]YUUA(/�� m z o p., w w ix 3IIIALI3S 1c1B330 faln13d CO Q 5. ADDRESS(Corte eta an:y if requested) �, �7pIJ I W o—el O cV al U S3III1183S ltlf�II11d0 '' n a LI- WI O O I-I SBA H03 a31StfraS0d 1111SfJ03 of n w �`' �� 9L61 '1dd`008 R+ G. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: s t7 E INITIALS *GPo.1979-300-459 I, a r f mr-..._ --- ___________ :n,ct sr- i'Lit C:nplcie i::+11,2,.7,3..3 o ., yoar adares;is L' "R%1 URN TO"rpac;,cn 11_ A' fo)'.,c.,,, ire: :cr-;cs-te (c''sek one.) �I // — -1 '-Ll Ji•C V t`)t ',. ;,_„1(L,.C.:127,-f`� _ 1 1/14\'' y a``t,D �pi�{, �✓ `�y� r ttLS it .sL�,. TNe��W 1 /, =a<<�y s' '• `rR'_ - a - . L."1. ICJ .•'', I i t e - i tif ` 'iDonald & Beatrice Hungerburg il976 North Balsam Avenue xlGreeley� CO 80631 i� :r, —- ---------------- — G •e I. C. "i 1 I �� 77 u) —:-- 0277553 I -- — i... '�` f :=, Q i ^,—'r _ _.., Zit r.--12."._ 3 07 '!re l ern — ---- — = —� f ;.s.4 �. 1� 11_-c r::c:- J t≤_e _:t_c'.?deLc$i;t:3 al•o•e (,r} nI :L+- '3'"••;" JA' -,_"ce j DA.'l;cru-.•tl a,.Yrt O9. Si�� / ,� j v �1 W..t`'-'..."_ t' ^f i) iy-4r,._..x Pt:Sr r'liC 4. Z. 1 •rr /r' _ /a 1 Y w. t -..,;1 C u,. ,: i sr- ..m,y if ragvas�i3. � ,.e .ter, r* ``1 /q (/�/ p p It t*- 1_..T'L__,b= .;.dart. —r-67:77.::1— I b Ci :Mr.aas tI cti 1� IN ` ;=L _.___••__-+ems --- _z..-._vvr-s.._r- �- -_cJ • , '3 -3 H N N \ r C47 ti,t,t ,-21,,,1 i -'y * - _:r--�L �^ .. ;JRN TO".433e:,.'i j - ,:/..,.. * �' 1 ±'':,fcL :.', '':.en.-1:- ,.-_zs^_stc, -k one-)CC A: iP.'•,)'''''„'7,-1' ' \ - —1 ' '6 Af 1::: O' . _,, ` ;� r ��� - 1 51:,a 1.1 W1_r..n _..,,;-.Ad-_ - %f ..e;y.$ __ ) .. X 4 3 ' IULf� Glenn K. Billings ___ 1 v • 'u LC< 3835 W. 10th Street j i'''13.1,1 �' ,us ci.P IlfL r J� Greeley, CO 80631 t] J. r! l,---1tnjI;. -1;TI:LEE-_ H-,ifu'�- w Ili:---1 (v.v.,' �� 'rC� r---1, a li7.±I..CEr-:..1 O, _:RiiiYED_ P_» i 'ISU%LD+. ' {Cr< 'I, p(��•-d. ,.5".._;'.--_,.,`-'--~ ti= 6q— '7 ,1�=`�_�.,' _S2r• ..,� 1:^c.rf c-^ssea o e:nnS`(QU Y'1 J1 �i_ f r- I I 1% recd, t]the =cri .1 a;cce. i J _-_ A' r.'C' .7."2E CAcii* wee ❑A 3u criz d agent 4� / � FL...T i£tl l:zL:L TTM� 3aSTMAFiX In Ll5. AQDRFaS 5*n-1 pidls C-'ti if ts�uSItsd) 1 _n S. Ur !. TO •DE'IVER BECAUSE: CLERX'S 4 O IN ITT ALf3 a A F Y GPO.1979-3c--C-459 7 4 { _ ___ �• -s`e '/ T! R L 6.,,dys_�' :_r,1,:r"r.''_JRNTO"FP=on �€0;; ;,�EIi ,or-iFi,te i'.:ms 1,2,and i " ----::-12--1.--'1' .. _��- __ -n Act[yoar a 21',0:5 In G':. . . :ORN TO'space cu w__- - 0� T_.Zra__ —._ - 'ylk �O!?u,:,.'.^,:d'T✓ �-;:trtL_:,:'�•, ..:1d+1nt.).... _ i fc urncir�zer Lce .c'-" ,,,-.'1'.;:k one.) ✓ 5;:n,, , v.".rm: _, �i ' —•' --G y I. PI Shoo/to,Thom.n3 d-te d..1-.- ;:u -G 5 - Shr,T :c ;�:d cc. _,_.:17i, _ ur)i. T} .,-_-' ` :.J Sher,:to ivho i1,d ,and« ;r"r e'i..:y—--- t- i=.,:,:'.:E�? "s;`!Et'! °1 (-2, i r J T Y.3 J a ... '•_ j'J'h�-r':,i, <j 1, ...`)ii^�! ..E,' •_� ' GCS S'L-lJr./-,13-.,1,L lu..:�.; .I _— :ITJA.,tL si'.. ...,V F lG - - J L'':L^'�RY _ 1 Show t-,wr:r_: _. .,a.+d cf do:.;ery.f-_-- ___, i Reburn R. & Ava E. Rose —i Robert & Josephine Costillo --- -I, Lucerne, CO 80646 33024 Lincoln Avenue I Lucerne, CO 80645 1 ------- •` smi i1�' ="Ev.._7 D''7: 771EE -:�. ' r.::avn-siE.. i 9 �{ "?I [;�Ci;�TE:LLO ti0. GET;:lrzzu z-.+. 1 ..___.._�F6.1. � 7 '13f li J a ���/ i-T ‘33,i___....r! 1�1 �/' - - s _________,+s: _____ car v:c c9 cddzs ea or ev�n!' — i d ( � b!w_y,LI.eein:,;-1., sre of.fasc es or.L.:_,-:-.n',...?...._ m 3'_. :received the r,lc described above. �y -_1e33 S'G�LTURt DAda;:ssee DAuth iI�e t m-i1 1`11:1,,E;Teck.icd the 7I+1015 Ae zh:d calve. 11 (4 -ti S:i' TVS:- DM/_csse9 CA.:ho'ized agert D T r D»LIVERY POSTMARK L.,r'I:�F a£ti,,•L:av • T it f/ t iv drequested) aI/ (' ,- I/ 1 6 l ( �1 5. ADDRESS(ce7s�clex arS• if >IE1at-- ( -- .7Li�f . A te_, r»(t'.:• toou .d,1rsqua m ( �� 55 - t , i a �••� r CLER B ;y �� - 6. UNABLE TO -- - - -.R EECAUSE: - .. U.,,`as_:ye 1.,:,..3-1;_:s t->-NUE:. i O tN1Y 1.5 Aid F I.4 • B9 ! 4' i - GPO:1879-300.459 r►. I. 7' ..y,.. d'1,.,LLy ILs RN TO"snare,,1 r 3L 'LER: Comp_^te it_r_s 1,2,and: 1 __ 3t=, 1 Adu'ycar e__.e s in the'LTA URN TO"apace an 12, 1. :Follow_ ;;:.er.°..,'t requested(,:tcck one.) —1 1. P'.^f — _ q� S1 Low Er -.-1-1c-1 date d'.':.r-z.,1.. ' --• flipl or.,,v.ir3 e 7 7 -a si.0�✓1.+iVh.M.,,i_:3 gad address _p 1 SCNIL' ,request-',.',� 'leek one.) ,1 dress o. ��Shnxtor,itcr. _ 1', todsi ^i _ ,aq , RL,Ts_;:1ET _:IIi'V RX ,,� '-O'] ,^ __. J __ '10`v ,1 r. 1,.2te.der-1_..,., 4} Shc t� I �, y 1':"-'7_ •.i ^ro c.'_.. --till j Sho. 71G2-u-r.a ,. +e,std t:_c:e ofCcitvery.31 Rr:i,::f sLOI� L..VERX, 1 sEe.,.`towhoro,_ ^-dcc'; of_ ,,i_ry.S__-_ dJose T. dulupe Costillo 1122 24th Avenue Ct. - John & Maria G. Herrera -----i e if Greeley, CO 80631 I 740 43rd Avenue Court Greeley, CO 80631 , I _ P,,-,STES,EL:ND. _gT1F[ED NC. I -- M 'e I * th .r....,1 NC. k 'a ____-_-., c._:s.2}70-75:;11. 1 m -- I a2-17(7‘/,P ifO ..Aiways ai�twin si.,zt',Irs of addr_asaa or grant) y, ,r � �- -----,raj— ,, ?:a.s receives the ar -le described atsave. ,,,—___ v,`r=51:'00,_i,--,;. a of�_dd. _5aa or or .aatJ StCA(ATUAC °Arrressee C]Aut�oelzed.a -- --_ agent n7i I ✓e remived tre arty-_•'escribed abc;.e. - 7, .....',TI.;71E DAd:.,uee LDIt1--IL'rczizcdagent n _R 4 — 7 DATE Or'73Ft.II/Eli', POSTMARK rn i 4. i_{ :,mo t_°_,- `"S.1 _ fl d DATE OF d,:Lik•�,:y - 1/// 1 POSTMARK Cl"S. ADDRESS(Cornplees only If requested) el rt °jI 5. Al'F,ES(s:-. ,•:.r,7 t :f requested) Id .i m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER aLCAUSE: CLERKS I "'aITIALS 7-- 1 INITIALS J- �..s .-_ �� GPO;18]9.363 459 1► \ I _ G"r. 1976^C, i•A,47. �% Olt It .t , cnt. __NDER Ce_..p.e�C�:,.1 1,2,and S cl SENDEa. Coirp?sic itc a 1,2,are:J. .I\" 1 -1 yr31 aul�^a in 1'::•`i3 i=t1RN TO":lace ra . o Ada yon;.'.Lw in C..) C i uRN TO"space on ET3Q 1 The foio' r-..:zV:a;is.e,.,_...'.1 r '.`7k ore.) ` I. 1I c f:_';a:; ii � .�;,erv:e::,r_cact:^d check one.) y I._ S'-i.,;to:'iC i3 t r.d'L�,r..- �s i ` , S;.u;v to k?`ion a: d.".c deL•;c,e� r• p J Sh_ 'to• „c, z_' and 4:. . _:.', :,.y... 3 f] S'cw t,s i,Irt,,•,, , end a?_rc s of del:r y._ __ :n '-- R;E:.:':;ED 7- "`^.,�1,,1}�• 1 t�. L- Ri_sTi2:f'Ti.D^..r LIVERY _ �3 a SSh v`*c z ru • t;". C, r Show to 7,..'n.,..,_ 0,:ate..'M G a Sh.,v t i who-n C. l3,:r.1 -, .;of 4e_very.$__ Sh T-/to who:',1,..1,and ra:_.. of c.z1wary.$___ Mary Lopez & Atilano B. Diaz ' __ Box 8 Jeffrey & Adrea Squires I Lucerne, CO 80646 33020 Lincoln Avenue Lucerne, CO 80646 .7=;:-.7,..f.,; MO, CFF,TIr:rt7 ma. i 1i1�':'.:ii..,3. 1 •" r4ti6:..,3[`d`J*;J. Ur -.A P_3, f.:::s'Si"at=D l'3. b ,,n( 7 f - J'7'/ /J 1 7, (,.%%,275 al:ta3n CSr"., !ra of addrecsee or arj.-tt ! • 731 _ a';,��; *�irz r;c5•ra of Jo a or s r.t) m I'__ave received the article described a`-xe. I ,i T Sias reccis e i he' t,e'a r'.:is,cribed a 3ove. �; S.Cfi iTur r DALcLes ee �/it marized age3x} 3� m' sizm4TL;A7' °Ado/cssea UA�hoi z agent j.4. " t =�lcif U e61-..,.„--. TE OF=a•Y PIISIMAAY� A cY _ _ w D'' _ 4�� '�, — `<. A �llrs..3' (Crrm,�,'c"s 7I1f�'H r•g3tKU3t)' `'t / Li'.5. A0_71_'�ICa:pIrta only/if request 11 . ,c • z s G. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERKS "t"� -"� " m_._ate 6• U.'e...:LE T.3 DE..01-,. C•AUS�. { `Y;f,i" iA11T1AL5 - i; ) t*tITiQ, *GPO.1979-300-459 "40V?U. 337:,-',r,afi9 a� c t`Eit.., C cn:p. i.:.t^._s 1,2,., — �� t —. — _�— Y. , • + A-13 S:-:t ft:,_ze Ln vi.:•,,' URN TO"*pace on �I u�`7.NI,ER �ic:,si:t a l'er•*1,7,.nd 3. — --r_sccr ,.. ikil _ a3 it'd r. s, si,inn ZL'RN TO''!pax: ro Je 1. '3 f Ilaw:r scry 13 r,:?s"i,c1 , :k one.— ) 33_—__. �a=._ �__._�—���_ `'l i. e r:.i—a serv':a:;:arle_r:a(:::eck one.) 1?, -v to csrlo-,1 sr'I 1" dt' - _ r }" li .rJSI:O,Jt0Ci7:"7_�._ L '�2t„`_ ., __ _ _ ` "tS Vt:t `'n•r ti da:. Y c ❑ RI ST:Er D r`� `�,T I:" ❑ Sl "v t- an,,date cad adt ..;,g:?e1i';- --C `� - Shaw to cm( • d,, ❑ R.NT aC T Ei ilL:IF_:.I' g i R7ST:;ii TY -' . .Al.111' y Si.try t e t,hi r: 3__3.. -ti �1 Si._w±, '.._,n -"c'$- t_ _.c.IL-_„_ry.;_- ; J R'5SIC't'iF__.•ir'.. ,...�`s' Si;a to*horn, td ad.-_:*of i c.. e ry._e._ _ u Joe 0. & Beatrice Corodova 33024 Lincoln Avenue `carte 'i-r'-rai g rr • Schulz C. H./Carter & Roger e Lucerne, CO 80646 200 1st Street ' Eaton, CO 80615 ri3IJ"3E'.pSTEr fP . :,- _ ----- "D^ .ea sir. _r.c, .— v iEO:E�. a 711 L i^tirl5"y_C;�..°„?IIS__.�/�f ear a;�;,3 a'_.-__ i m — -'C �!/� "37 1 i .-...�_ O_, 1,,e„wayo.:vein sig:,at:.re of add,asses or aGart1 ;M rn I I,_ve received the al:+c_e C crib a c%tovo. e m `:'L'_:.Tu : OA:a,_=e DA_id:orizsd agent T have rece,ve3 the article scribed above. O m EICNATU a DAdthessee 17AnthorIzed agent �T 0-CIEL. , POSTS1Ai11C� "14. rriDATE C:7,-Dr LIVERY 1 -"MARK _ r h :I r 5. ADORE N R:0;:'c',,.rttiy,f request4a) i JD Z --1-`—�—V �f'. P ZL 5 AOOFt=.s(s;ampkta 3u:1Y if -I' IL. , . ,6. 1_.6LF TiJQ_�E`., L�1US-. .� �... t7 IT T,-1 .5 ) 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLE;ZK'S P I ✓f O IN1T1A1.s H *GPO:1979300-459 I 14SI ,\ M1-- -- I `'_ I / ` c�nE .5 `° )EFt-....' Fu y'` .ss,.n+ - HNTO'..,,ace„5.1 n s, 1 11 —�C; > 1 n 1 �I Est' r(<e;i ;^._- ,_,l"t9 L'L'.`.21C a0 -' ,—I 13 . ,, _ -.f `i ._J Sherri;e;."- ' "7,1-,,q a [ k i " r� I-1 t) • _ �! 'f R St.i7'_ _Ft: ,.'-i_a'sJERY 1 GJ k ',' r 'J 1tia 'ea o it �I,,.:v 2C .vi1.- _ onto 6Li:-. .'s �� ) 5 v _ -s s� y - o .,Y, w at r e 0 dhs:_ .(1 a:3 ., '1 1-i �O .0 Q 1 I 4 .N ,ca • sS o o �I Ti - �, c )isr , i . Donald & Beatrice Hungerburg f, � y „ ; N vs s °a a'�11 ;� a G, �, U P4 d 976 North Balsam Avenue `' �# .. `3 r a z o ? % , L I' ��9- i -"'+ Greeley, CO 80631 j L Vr t.1 r a of w V .. I Lt. 0 G +!c.IEll Jvvv ,. c~ N x v • ~ s a (11 p'II ,, t�. Off Vi b>: Cn fX rq .b O\ �+ C R I a �� F. I4L: C s.o�.._._-.._.!. I f n .� r'1 N N a r9 :a , .ATE'= Z'(F/9:V If L. c.-.,`s 4� 0 0 U e �~ u�a_•�` aI ICJ /'l n_2� t 1 L. �" A PI ra lPT.RECISI-7O11O,IN•=iii,.:n Awn r„,-'0 1 _ .�"� -- ^t. PS Form 3N11 .17:175.-F5-------- .,n 1 7 71 is 1veais o',t,;ir..�� _ ru of mddra ee or a 715---------------- n -- i -I '"lave received the a1',,;!e dk:wribei above. ,11 an•.'�1 agent r s;��laTua� -`- - ism E Of-'.�L3vti aY O' �^ J I 1 s� Y z aaaRE iCanalam en!y H,spupud) , i'i rei d i' _ t m 11 6 tiNAGLE T6 DELIVER BECAUSE: INITIALS .1 ) CU HG \ Ti ' 1 I> ;1979-300-45P A �� a 1 N - ,.L]1 c' L? O q m a .J I•+ rs Sr. ER• xe sec.�.'`a 2,aril' n ' T p 1 ~ ry f', •L' 1.1 L,) �' �� r l'M Cr iple- - n 6J+ Ei •K 3 [y fl JI u U ' Ac'y�:s s _ m t„ 'T3_:1-TURN TO"apace v 1 7 �' fry �a cf�`�.1� �j I-I �' La {'.,', •u =j ,,.•)y 1ti CC �� I• 3i, L:i:_ly�c11.,'...:-,�_7rr.�'??-`.i1:+,_i.�C C.) �r w m c� w� is cG vii • �' " ;3: ,...,V%� I - f� Shr..;:osvhr.:..-„_ ,.a;.'Q .._ca....,,.....'—�; -' 1- o W 1 4 1 Sr - r=ar , a s i iC, v,L__ _i I rIC7 y I ca ::_ _ t �� R�r. i ag`L r `� L PS f nrm 2811,Jan 1919..-----.--. EIPT,RRGIST8R60.RdS,URFD l_R_U C<) .I .-;,Y t She.J 11.,Jis;- 61I-_,aryl ":c:i I-•-'.--*A ory„S I y `,} T TO ( John P. Donley \' - �, „ '' 0 le;i. 1012 9th Avenue c, L-, i ym� Greeley, CO 80631 { 11 i { " Si me -rr1=d - - + •`p' ro ♦.1 r ,e T r Sit;:i,'-1 L+i.+7 NO. CE+s'1r'l.'D KO. ..d�RZ....a • .3a elf i , �.: A3 _. J 't1 ,Y• x kO. r-1 X11° ti 6 :II ry/ ,"45 �i _ - ' r; °' o0 i r, � a t;.i Jo.•r- ':_ lin-_ :-:_tire of cddr'_-zea co a-,_nti' u I r.: - " C3 E r pI-i 6 ,41• N,p , pp '1 • t�� :.tl',di$CR-b�.)al,-,ve. I Tii Ia 0 i i F• , J ,t aai a)I., '� 0 -I I E1 `k, ('(, 331 &:i;1_'>,Tu' - DAs'."•..,seetjgA!Yl'Icrized agent r . ti f... '`; PQ Iy Is I's( ; Li LJ 1 15 GGG y jy i ;:"Ii rl + I" ! I _y IF1 ~" $ '4.T..:+. r_.?L . P£)STMARK 17 4 Li wa ur iri cn O N r I,-. I" I d cv e 9 ' 4"r ,'t, q ; .r€�' �' a � I�� L� t_a �+ �: ��tp C: 11400 m g t ' 3 P-: i. is S, P_S1D::ES „o.-;:.hell r y if nquunal) PS Form 3B11 ,lan.19%9 nc•um,ne..EIPT_REC,ISTEriFO,I+•:" "':O Ur,,,'I Ci'.11 ri F• � a" jr ([J t� - Ij TS L l .y a N� o •� !, iG i I s, i ri . v m cyo I . 1 s R :.' , ,_ ZI .8 . ¢ 131 1 ---4 - r-i `.• is � C'' `I ' a a • i , Fr(mod a ^i +, r I t= �' " S ..) wi /{`,'fi L_ r �11'1y,� ' VA c '1 .: fw` Yom+ 1-J O �� o J 1�. ( ? � w w I-1 GO U j, y� C9 A lei ij US i il r v IC1 J F •ri O I .a L, v n ssm.m.�., I-] Pin 1-7 PC Farm 7,17.1-1 Jan 1979 f:IPT,RFGISTFPED.INSURED Atto CENTIV IF.D MAIL I.-... _�._.)_;v=ie__-�..n-..��_ I --- �� �r-��_., :irl: }F4:,t,' • tJ • �,,. - wo N"�, � ) r62 Shotr ::,ho:'1_t.,3',.:d,_,', d.44 t � �' ' '1 ?? •• U g 'a m t-. Rf s Laic S Er;it :"iv1;Ci'. IP 'u H �.a ,tea Shn^''t :Ir•l z ,'e.'^' ._ � r •,° '- ' ,' -, a C) \ 1 v a _ REu"at:,CTED I;7.!!Vial'. z -� n o f d 11.,�ofdelwery.W-- • `n c I ," T, ,- .J .:, 1 t—I O ` `� d Rl 1J CO J C, R _ r`; ;� F � �l( , r ? Reburn R. & Ave E. Roseg:I — u ° a4 r'f; Lucerne, CO 80646 ,! r I N .C a) 1-I O ..) OVI ',,,. I , .' r U t, L, a, 1-1 U O :i ' U I a �,•, w o 1 C ;i • V1 1.•I ' 71 - i u k`' Ill ` IVr 1 .Kr: .r. ), .s: 4) Oal h �' am, rl' tiL. w u7 it P4 t/I Ly+ to I, •<, > r d\I a `f' r^.EMSTEFEL NO. c.:c.TlFteD DO 'i1GB-:_D no, ) 4-1 0I` I E-I Lel O C e I I iris , �In , - I -�J/J7'c :_-------.1___—=_—=_ - -- .,.ea s�,..R .,�nuzlzur_�a Ln cn •�s,rY ? Sr..m ewa:. s)r'-��:see of,ddt ) I. y •_---- ..s^ _ 5388�f Elora) _k m ',h-ye received the...MCI.;d:scribed ae•roe. u - 0 I I I n c I I ,,V.F'ATURE DAdd.essee QAuttiorized asent Fl t' w (7C-1-Z y DATE -L ELtVERT PQSTMARK V I. °C� ^� mar- - r".r 0 I m 'mod' C �"' - ; _/J- S�e- ?a y1' d �, •• - _ '� , ,T-1 5. A©DR5 S(Coin 4ate only ft requested) rt.' .i • '•U rA 'd I^ CI •,7 o 33 86 -. :', 4: o C7 A p V y P '� �' C.1 h •i 3 a, ? F' ,, O ♦O E` i; aq R• 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER CCAUSE. CLERK'S 1 r'",¢, _ ;) ., C4 O 17: I^ 0 I r O INITIALS_. �,' • t O J E p 0 I. !,, _ -r `, c. .9.:1 J E3 �' C: U r H 0 0 ci y II.� ' I GPO:1979„00-as9 t."' n a E. G w G r - m 11 1)) r'1:r��� l_1 N W I) ;�I at ty I unit If,,,,,Li �rfi- -7p 1,t• ,91 2- -....1...�_._.... I� Ea 1. i` Et _,� .,I '13,_—: 511 el • - ,-URN TO' r „n IPS Fnrm 3911.Jan.1919 RETUHi RECEIPT.El -IST°MED,l'r".�tful+�l)A;L,CER' i)I s_ -— ^�S _ iJu J.g csry a ze ^ck one.) I jr-'_o r.he.n�ti,._tc't. : --- �' t_1 S'_`-,, to .,':r•,•-. E7 aqd•2:_.:•2:_.:, 3 c C.)uv:' ••__ !�. cc ELL VI RIC- EL;•..--.._'LIVERY u -- cz.i S..r,,vtorac-.a,_0;,te;dcu:_ , 1 _aM O RESTi?'CTED f-I-11 I I i l ShL.i to whom,date,and i-.4.._-_,:s4 of c'ciare —ry•$__ _ " I I 2 - • I - 0 .d.,--e=.ra,=qv,a* a.0=LI.7.1-_n srsci i•-• u r Monfort of Colo. Inc. o ri P. 0. Box 6 1 Lo f l Greeley, CO 80631 I 171 ^ I 1 �� ci N ra a...11 _ '^ \ _ l� I . H .- .:J rr-{� ¢1 1 .,:j ) q 7 - t`, - rtttaln 5;--c Ft; of,,,-.:1„: a, 7 _ '"- q t" H •r I U N CO0 !y f 's � I I= J'l I -—�- :� __ e or 8_ nil _ - >°.g 1 ° ,I) .- Z a) 'n m a �{ m I 1:�' received the u e': �c_., b^d 3,-1,1). I i r� r s� a d 1I O �' u a t1/ s, ,C1AT)?71r OAon.;ssee 0Autlnrizedaz-cnt � ! � � � K U C/] U i1 � W O......1. 1..,`')] '0 CPI 1 r wTick ,' id H q 1 1 ›•,,, t � 4. —...--__2______ E.f= _I❑r, ,—i c/1 a) `^ u v p 3 L1?,TE OF YZCL06tLfd+ POSTMARK a) a) H Ej s' (i / H PfPT,REGISTERED,Ih;s1Jl3Gi)AND CI Z 5. ADDRCSS(Complete=Is If requested) P&Fenn Soil.Jan 197'1 W cZf C7 f1 m 71 -1 ` R. 8. UNABLE TO or.uvCR BECAUSE: E�1c— 3 c u O —Iiii q �' . V (-INI 1AU a e'u a }, c, ••., ci e ,C \�`,a ,`erg' Q I ffi GPO:1879-.moo-45a v r' a 1, Ca a) `i, O p I E .n a ..i ._. ' X) C) ♦ • 0 n -- �. = z • a �,� O N i ,I 1 W VA (UC . r;'a {' :+ <' .. P'a • 0 Div . Irt O Iil .•• r n F" O G JJ U ? 1 ch �� ) O I r ..cci,, �1 'b W O u 1 r? s s, w E vii PG in di O N s ~ Iii L I. I i❑ 14 I-1 :n a) t .z„t U (t 7 O 1� L' s a) P: O O a K I.. Li ri• 9 i I'S Form 3811,Jan 1919 U W A EIPT,REGISTERED,I,..f4ut-[0 P`J)C.,:,i•rik- !f)r;r.iL _ ''' /'>' -- _ a� ,6.6,1wc,:i^'lr.ss 10 ihc''i:}';EJRN TO" p on Ad 1 yt,s - ,..'':^ ..-. JP.N TO'. pare 41 a r.urat. 3 r.irra, ��. ti I -r‘rf. fcU'wi'_,.sill n_..rl,ie>tc3( i`ck one.).... St 1. '.._ie icl.ov.in;ser*>c_ __ v:est 0(r 4,_.:k one.) Sherd to•ant LI1c1 ca;e d ;,•- -a.. —C 7''Sl_cw 4o v,nczr.L--,a;:ra d.u--- —^.D �i r` Sho*•,,. .gin-, rat, u:d Pr:dr: ,,f dcli,,-zry,..—� �f ,..-„ n '^'c_ .'c I c'_ivrrv.., :1 '• S�_�,. Lo s.nc. c and ad�:r_:- � 1 r. tir ;;.-)'‘_:7,1s,,E tt rn O '.?ESTR:T.CTED 7-EL-b'3RY IZ.Se _ " H- m: - a c 1v -- —4 = Show to when)anti:_i':dei:i;.. — e. RES'A7J iE.1V1_1',....R.''. LI FI::S—..1CTEn,;tw VERY. 1 S'o ':c cs_.:-,ri,c...-,and address of de very.g— Sncr7 to whir,c_.,2_and sd i± of a^].very.$ 6 - Richard K. Kelly — I Bain C. Randall Trusts 2248 12th Street ) Edna Berg _ Greeley, CO 80631 •1 6310 East Lafayette Blvd.,_• I Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 -----1 3 P.:fl. rn nCT-.rnti:=C 63,. cw.1.T.Tr 6EEn fro. arr.,.-4EO P°O. -75 / !a j --- tit Z d,qs� iikI ",2-ire:..an rssrc o adur:.� a or eriant) o lA3wz7s a:.lnain r-.>•.::.t re of c. .r ' I have received the article"described shove. g` ".---we, ".---we receiv.-A ti-e Ertcle C�inz.c.Obc.d ab e. Pq S:OatiATURE DAdisesseo L]Authorized agent n j i9 3Y ATL€tE [lAd4: s [1Autyoriz d agent m a O triL.' r)ATE OF,3�LIVERV ..---------- 7.,,,\"'",,,,,,, C ®ATE OF ffi�L[tfERY POSTMARK m //--14-- k.--- --""7-' _ �/ c,1 St 12ElnES3(L.0-.-'::mt y !requested) 5. ADDRESS(Complain os.y if requested) �i n 31 Lhl r 4L 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUS CLERK'S O. 1+dpQLE TO��10 J S' LSt1J��r t(i�9�1 m INITIALS O - c I Gee:1979-3'4.1 G.:l {GPO•1979-300459 URN,.Atli)(A- _4.r in:1" r., '1 JO J 1 ' fc?av. i:arlf: .gaest:d`,c', lk orje. t ;' 3 s o-:rt0trho_`:1, _ dad,' t2w>i`.rh;C.r__ G m �T_' '.Z:_, ,�j,,r�Y `l ,S-'1'.,a t: -.1`12(..-..1i. i L._'-9 eS.i.i.-` _.,.4 i Sho i:t v,ht i,,do 2.,r_r,d-'42:s,cf i 11r,ery.$.__. 1 Agland In Corp - P. 0. Box 338 , • I I Eaton, CO 80615 - 6 ''1 :6 �.� 9-C}, 471_0 .>_ 7_.ors 7:1.14. i F a4w,r 6n...1,t. -,Ci.. I l/ r N Y 1 i ,, 9 �_ i._MaNic,•u n:n.,_ -,us;,,f 6-�aae or 6. . m 1 4�1,c tev;ivaci rho t G :4.ig;^ 3cribc•1 a ave. I, a®D 7� SIC'-',A [7 TC7E A?L c�ee COAu*horized agent d7 I 1 - .r r DAT Cr ra`? `~�__ Ft]rMAR s_ car^ss �y(GonnaR .;tr n�uasr�e) s. a"` n T r 1� G. G::_:+ )^LE T b _ii i;..szcAUS6: �d, CL � 'S P r I 0.7.111.41.5 to IVO:23Fn.3:.,:z-D
Hello