The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20043308.tiff HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 2004-93 RE: HEARING TO OBTAIN PUBLIC INPUT REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF WELD COUNTY ROAD 49 ARTERIAL CORRIDOR STUDY A public hearing was conducted on November 8, 2004, at 10:00 a.m., with the following present: Commissioner Robert D. Masden, Chair Commissioner William H. Jerke, Pro-Tern - EXCUSED Commissioner M. J. Geile Commissioner David E. Long Commissioner Glenn Vaad Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Debra Miller Assistant County Attorney, Bruce Barker Public Works representative, Keith Meyer and Wayne Howard The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated October 4, 2004, and duly published October 20, 2004,in the Fort Lupton Press,a public hearing was conducted to obtain public input regarding the Adoption of Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study(Study),which was drafted by Felsburg, Holt, and Ullevig. Bruce Barker, County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Keith Meyer, Department of Public Works, presented a brief introduction. Wayne Howard, Department of Public Works,gave a presentation of the project,stating the Study was developed to plan future transportation within Weld County. Mr. Howard explained the project purpose is to provide an extension of Weld County Road 49 from U.S. Highway 34 to State Highway 14. He stated the proposed arterial will improve the connectivity of the existing east-west roadways within the study area, provide a north-south connection between State Highway 14 and Interstate 76, and eventually connect Interstate 76 to an eastern arterial roadway to Denver International Airport. Mr. Howard's presentation included a study process,work plan/schedule,study framework, designation of members of the study team, data collection, the identification of alternatives, an evaluation of alternatives and public participation. Mr. Howard reviewed the four alternative alignments, stating Weld County Road 47 is the apparent preferred alternative. In addition,to initiate public participation, Mr. Howard stated public open houses were advertised via mailers, newspaper advertisements and an announcement on Weld County's website; in addition to the open houses, one-on-one landowner meetings were held. Mr. Howard summarized by identifying the next steps in the process which include the planning process, coordination with the impacted Corridor communities and municipalities. 2004-3308 EG0050 HEARING CERTIFICATION - WELD COUNTY ROAD 49 ARTERIAL CORRIDOR STUDY PAGE 2 Responding to Commissioner Vaad, Mr. Howard stated 750 mailers were sent to property owners within the proposed Corridor. Jeff Jerome, Department of Public Works, stated, of the three alternative roadways, Weld County Road 47 contains the least owned parcels of land along the proposed roadway, with Weld County Road 51 containing the most. Mr. Meyer stated part of the decision matrix for selecting Weld County 47 was the number of property owners impacted. Responding to Commissioner Long, Mr. Howard stated the project is presently a conceptual alignment, and Weld County has no immediate projects in development along this Corridor. Mr. Meyer stated the earliest funds could be available for this particular project would be in 2010 or 2011, and those monies would have to compete against other strategic road projects. Kathryn Roadifer, property owner, stated she is interested in preservation of her farm, and the proposed roadway will run through her sixteen-acre hayfield. Ms. Roadifer stated she has sacrificed for 50 years to preserve her farm for her children and grandchildren. She stated she has invested in her property with the addition of irrigation, concrete ditches and new hay barns. Responding to Chair Masden, Mr. Meyer stated the proposed roadway would impact Ms. Roadifer's property;and he explained the County compensation process for land and rights-of-way acquisition. Jerry Judy, property owner,stated he adamantly opposes the proposed roadway, has spent his life savings on their home and the announcement of the proposed roadway has dropped the value of his property. John Johnson, property owner,stated he owns a farm,feedlot and dairy that could be impacted by the proposed roadway. Mr.Johnson expressed concern that advertising for the open houses was vague and not all of the impacted property owners were contacted. He stated the main problem with the proposed route will be the increase of truck traffic to the community. He emphasized his concern over safety for families and employees of rural communities. Responding to Mr. Johnson, Mr.Meyer stated there will be additional public meetings and stated the Study is based on regional connections within Weld County communities, and options for connecting with State jurisdictions have not been investigated. Judy Kelly, property owner,stated she opposes the Weld County Road 47 alternative for historical and safety reasons, as well as it's proposed close proximity to the airport runway. In addition, Ms. Kelly stated the laterals,ditches and drainage issues need to be addressed. Mila Burrows,property owner, stated she was concerned about the safety issues. Les Peterson, property owner, stated he owns farms on both Weld County Roads 47 and 49 and the drainage laterals need to be addressed. Fred Eifert, property owner, objected to the lack of proper notification of the public meetings and questioned the thoroughness of the study. He stated additional information on grading needs to be provided. Ken Holm, manager for DPG Farms, LLC, and property owner, referred to his submitted letter of objections to the project, stating the road will impact the value of the property involved by crossing wetlands,farmland, pasture and two river bottoms. Mr. Holm maintained that Weld County cannot adequately compensate property owners for the loss of investment when the proposed roadway is constructed. He requested the Commissioners review the alternative routes to determine cost effectiveness and the impact on the environment and wildlife habitat. Bill Roth, property owner, stated he farms and ranches within the proposed arterial and strongly objects to increased traffic and pollution. Mark Van Earden, property owner, stated he owns a dairy and will lose land by construction of the projected roadway, which would put him out of business. 2004-3308 EG0050 HEARING CERTIFICATION -WELD COUNTY ROAD 49 ARTERIAL CORRIDOR STUDY PAGE 3 Mike Reissen, manager for the Greeley-Weld County Airport, stated the Airport Authority Board supports the Weld County Road 47 alignment. He reviewed future plans targeted for the airport's expansion,which includes Weld County Road 47 utilization. Responding to Commissioner Long, Mr. Reissen stated the Study has taken the Airport Master Plan and the existing and future plans for the Air National Guard into consideration. Commissioner Vaad stated the population will increase and there is a limited inventory of roads; therefore,Weld County is trying to plan ahead for the projected 2030 population of 473,000 people. He stated the Study was initiated to attempt to plan for future traffic consequences and the alternatives presented will benefit some and disadvantage others. Commissioner Geile stated the strategic plan is a snapshot of the future and it would be a mistake to wait until the impact is here to deal with transportation concerns. He added that Weld County, along with various other municipalities, has been compelled to address the traffic issue. He stated drainage issues will continue to be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency and these regulations will impact future transportation routes. He stated that people who live within Weld County must realize that change is inevitable and the strategic plan attempts to negotiate that change. Commissioner Long stated he appreciated the public input regarding each route alternative. He stated the County and State continue to look to the eastern plains to incorporate air, freight and rail transportation. He stated there will be future forums for public input. Chair Masden stated that, as the engineering phase progresses, things can be moved around to accommodate some of the issues raised, and emphasized the County will continue to work with regional entities and governments to resolve some of the growth problems. He thanked the residents for their participation and directed them to contact the Department of Public Works with future concerns. There being no further discussion, the hearing was completed at 12:15 p.m. This Certification was approved on the 22nd day of November, 2004. APPROVED: q � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS $ y T Walla WE COUNTY, COLORADO 1861 '.( ,69"1'1 f .-�/��'//✓Gye-Q3 _.) I ' Robert D. Masden, Chair Vtat ,nt/clerk to the Board l\ �': / EXCUSED ' j � William H. Je e, Pro-Tem • Deputy Clerk to the Board U� M. J. ile TAPE #2004-50 Davi . Long DOCKET#2004-93 lenn Vaa 2004-3308 EG0050 ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS DAY OF , 2004: ITEM OF BUSINESS: PLEASE legibly write or print your name and complete address. NAME ADDRESS John Doe 123 Nowhere Street, City, State, Zip C114 .5 fASLkrn3 6300 5. Spouse `*y, tCck , Cen+C+ll'AI, Cci 8 wig JeAv Th-tnkenbr',..q 1p3CX-.)5.`j?ncF�.E \ ke, 5„,tE(df). CEA-rENNIGC.,CC Anil ym-,/ LE (1 /ol( J a 4,26 z. /4'ii, -0-/. 4,eaLe / Lv. c..5( FHrS, 3o3ran9L, 3/S0 E. /St S"v-i (s�egl Co. SoL?T oa r �� T7 ?/ F /. '�>7 'lic cis z (ice 2 't �3 / 4 ; 2 ` ' 4 ? , 717/ L .4,i Wi p/—-et z; z.'621 Izom 5c-F_R-r 3+10i ,LR ¢7 , !EATON CO &0615` - )304- ,7-.�-r �i� 5,20 2 c Ac',c5` r>,--,-..-4, r„--) %3/ S/mw n v°LL .28 F9' l l kit's-� r,ezv fv4J ( R h 1 /LL F4\---S ,g.n2-1 G-(7-12--A1. el t 3 / // (,e-,t, ' ft ieT I n/ , t? 7 ), ' / -1''/7 7Y ‘J f y-,,,j/, g Z)ei-i/ ci , a.� 7/zi 9 12'(/E c/9-v/ )4Zi- k cGe- 7:, Fe) , 51 it ,- . /-/�, iri�r.� oC7z'/y Li z P 5'9 i.A 3& //P/K;, .)o) 3/ vA 7.7629 t-vc,? 1-/� 6-yeelptg Co F063 i 1 eignz N,l %tit e,�.,. ,v sn.,54 i (f /,c( (TAY1a �� (G� Div 1iL S i 107 y?S M 0 »o,8 a7 /'gin Lh �� iotli -)�, (cl °//1 5 , , Og o7 'fa Pj 0 L. • n b h vL+ a 1-y1. -c X9O5, 0 ) inV, d ‘4h VS!id .V WIT) '.t� C.) f 9C)Z' rD T�� - 1-DM L2 etc —"Arc/ Page 1 of 1 Debra Miller From: Bruce Barker Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 11:33 AM To: Dave Long; Mike Geile; Rob Masden; Glenn Vaad; Frank Hempen; Keith Meyer; Debra Miller; Carol Harding Subject: WCR 49 Arterial Corridor Study Reso See the attached. Proposed for the consideration today. Almost identical to the reso the Board adopted back in October, 2003, for the parallel arterials. 11/8/2004 / �3C'8 ;IN It "2 CP :al • r 4,44 .4..0 I. can . (A)f A- 5 At — t "O c) O? ‘N E +., CT1 O �CIN "O o 8 6') L'ii) t cn 2 CI) It L') 7) srd Weld County -Strategic Roadways ■ Weld County has identified seven major strategic arterial roadways which will provide fin an efective transportation system. These roads are suatcgic tr: because of their location and ity- h conneetivetv een other �IRA7F�IC major arterials or I lighways 1©ANINO TRANSPORTAT1101 within Weld County' H the FUTURE shim • WCR d9 is one of these f6M seven roads. P PISBI IM 11011 kF I I II.A IL • Project Purpose • Provide an extension of WCR 49 from US HWY 34 to SH 14. • This proposed arterial will improve the connectivity of the existing east-west highways within the study area and ultimately provide a connection between SH 14 and Interstate 76. r I_I sat R(r IIO1 t i l l-A 1 Project Need Transportation Planning and Corridor Preservation • Identifying a preferred route at this time will serve as a guide to preserve rights-of-way for the arterial. • Planning for this roadway now will allow it to be implemented in an orderly fashion and will allow for minimized impacts in the future. F.7 FIII ,:in Ru 11O11 <AI I I'.AI(i � , Study Process PRO,I E("1 Public Input FR:%ME\\oItK _ l rIMMInli I):\l':\ ('OLI.ECI ION RECOMMENDE ' ALIGNMENT Hi ‘;Ill lt(, 11O1. I V l I I IA I(, o„ 2 ma,wr,Ro.ew•mW canwrsod WORK PLAN / SCHEDULE _- . I -( . -.. : My 4 • „ fYdYm.LL • I _.:- _•°,- ! _ - . ._ ._1-,.. • rt L., r FI:#.ti131'k(i II(11 I",A (1.I I V Study Framework • Establish Local Agency Ra1" � �ir�rs Group o Agee • Define Study Area • Prepare Design °^" Standards • Establish Decision Matrix • - • Develop Public 1111)111 Process > r' 11:1ti131 IC(, Ho' I t1III \•ki C 3 Study Team • Weld County Public Works Department • Frank Hempen, Jr. — Director of Public Works • Keith Meyer— Engineering Division Manager • Wayne Howard — Project Manager • Felsburg Holt & Ullevig • Christopher Fasching — Principal • .le[f Dankenbring — Project Manager �F toy, 1`IA Ct31 It( 1101.IN. 11 I I-A It, � U 10. Study Team (Cont.) • Local Agency Group (4 Meetings) . 'rownofKerscy ■ City of Greeley • Grecicy-Weld Airport • Colorado Departmcnl of Transportation • Colorado Division of\;'ildliIi E10,, I I:t' 31 14' 1171 I NA 1 I 1 A 1(. `gyp° 4 Data Collection ■ Comprehensive Plans • Transportation Plans ■ Greeley Weld Airport Master Plan • Parks / Open Space Plans • Environmental Characteristics • Topographic Features • Parcel Ownership • Development Plans siu Ru 11O1 .F LIJ h VIA, Pu Identification of Alternatives • 13 Mile Study Area was Defined by Four Segments • Alternative Alignments • Alignment A - WC'R 51 • Alignment B - WCR 49 • Alignment C' - WCR 47 • Alignment D - SI-I 37 F(.Itp o: 5 Alternative Alignments OLL¢V Cawiy Pwa e9ll't dWncM M]� STUDY At rERNANYfS n i �. . V_� vim,.Iii�.' ' '$ z._4iL `f R r.Lea wilt C 3L^' r gl�. if IL,Bu RU I IOIT'NI Ir IAk, ,�o0 Segment 1 SEGMENT/ 4 e, ., ?Az1 r 3® � : ' .l' 4 r 1 _ ft I I I Sill Iglf 11O1.I N. l III A Ili A<p . 1 Segment 2 0 we county a«a 09 RrteN cO,m,xuy SEGMENr2 41:471 r Lai Mai grs° - ,. ... __• ... aan - ql z P -- II I SiSi RG Hui .F I II I.A I , 'moo u Segment 3 0 .l.en C u f9 Hwa 49 Rnmru C.arw%y At" SEGMENT3 I I SRI R(. IUI f N l I I I.A I�, 'ago 2 Segment 4 Web Can[y Pxo�9 Fieid Cnrcbi hui SEGMENT( latir .r :42 CRNY I' s« ' 1 i iA r ,L F/4 I I I.'N131'Hll 11O1 I ' 1 1 1 I.Al(, Evaluation of Alternatives ■ Nine Evaluation Criteria ■ Transportation cness ▪ Horironu3l and V'cnical (icomcirs ■ Community Impacts • Land I_Isc Conscyucnces • EX'shirr Dcvclopmcnl Conscyucnccs • Env irnnnuntal Impacts ▪ Safck • Cnnsu-uciion Ecasibilinv • Cons('uclInn ( nsts FI I I-15,31 I R t ILI.Al[, 3 Neld Iounryeoa445Aterlal Condor%dr EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES Eva uation Mabin Surrary Altermtrve A Segner1 AtemallveA SEimert AWm16bC *NS Allerrative D Se;nert ;CR5il Atlernalee ICR191 A9emrBite ICR4I Albman ICA 33) Aaewar;e Sepmaoll 3892 8 3533 62 32.26 CI 4235 Segment i 3367 A 3231 A *01 C 4433 Segmeet3 3833 Al 3583 i3 N.42 C 3933 Segment 1953 3 33'8 A 2112 C 7936 =I TOTAL 14916 13924 117.92 166.91 Appnrm ftern Aenmfn (74 I I I.tiRI ltt, Iit Al I .. l I.I LA If 0U Public Participation ■ Public Open Houses • Over 750 Mailers per meeting • Advertised in IOC al ncvr,spapers • Announcement on County's Website ■ Initial Open House — March 30. 2004 • so attendees • Final Open House —June 22. 2004 • 50 attendees • Landowner One on One Meetinus Fly;, l.ISnl It(' 11O1 r.A111IAll, 4 Recommended Alignment WC 47 PREFERRED g' ROUTE¢ • Preferred Alternati\c jair" I EA Evolved from Evaluation CA,,; Matriti CR„ ' g! • [tcrative Reyiev. with Local s�l Agencies C • Public Input from -N o rent I°' Opcn I,O„„, °A";' � Ftot.. a! al ,` eA IIII.Cnf ko 1 IIUII ,A I I.I to u, � - C ou Typical Sections 4 Ai* _ _- - Rural ultimate Section Interim Section g II ISM HISII[11. t.Al IIIIAIt. 'c 5 What Are The Next Steps? ■ BOCC Adoption of the Corridor Study — WCR 47 Arterial Alignment • Incorporate Into Planning Process • Continue to Coordinate with Corridor Communities • Pursue IGA's with Local Municipalities (If Needed) /(4F_caN: I'll tiBl NG Hof r& I l I.LAl[, , 6 NOV-15-04 MON 03:.05_ PM WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WKS7 FAX:9703046497 PAGE 1 11!1 ,12e.a4 ,i`x:33 3036994941 KEN HOLM PAGE 01 HOLM RYAN TRUI'17 HALL, LLC Cernfeed Public Accountants 3300 South Parker Road, Suite 300 Aurora, CO 80014-3521 (303) 337-4123 * FAX(303) 3374028 DATE:_._: 11/12/04 _..- TIME: TO Wayne Howard,P.E. COMPANY; Weld County Public Wotlts Department --- -_„ FA.X 4 979-304G4,M ken Holm TOTAL NUMHER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SfIEEr: 3 .StE, 44L,,1NSPRi)L IONS: Letter from DPG Farms LLC pertaining to WCR 49 wlyrn Attacked it..a letter, which I prepared pertaining to the WCR49 Arterial Corridor Study on behalf of DPG Harms',IA:. For the record,please forward it on to the Commissioners. T lnrik forwxrdto their npons/:, Kendall It Holm. &lankier DPG Farnp7 LLC Post-it°Fax Note 7671 Date / t a y To L ce r a l /7 ,,,..., From N{/j/n< Co./Dept Co. Phone* Phone e Peels" 7 oA 4) Fez* NOV-15-04 MON 03:05 PM WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WKS7 FAX:9703046497 PAGE 2 11/12/,004,'•'19.58 303E994941 KEN HOLM PAGE 02 DPG FARMS, LLC 3300 SOUTH PARKER ROAD, SUITE 300 AURORA, CO 80014-3521 November 10, 2004 Hoard of County Commissioners Waki County, Colorado yin Wayne Howard, P.E. ProjecrManager Piab`ic Works.Department P.C) BUx 758 1111 H:street Greeley,Colorado 80632-0758 Membe s of the Commission: i attended the public hearing pertaining to the alignment of WCR49 on November 8, 2004., this letter is a follow-up to the comments I made at that hearing pertaining to segment 1 of the V 'CR49 Arterial Corridor study (Study). After reviewing the Study and WCR49 Arterial Corridor Study Appendix I believe the evatuati ofa matrix has two major flaws. First, I cion't understand how all the criteria could be properly evaluated without actually visiting the river bottoms of each site. Wayne Howard has indicated that the same probfents essentially exist in each site. If this Is so, why wouldn't the scoring for each site be identical? It would not take very much in the way of additional points to take alternative C-1 from the lowest level. The second issue is that of construction cost. I gee ne mention in the narrative of each alternative shown on page 9 of the Study, of the fact that Alternative C-1 has no existing right of ways, no mention of wetlands or no mention of a new bridge to be constructed to cross the Poudre River. There is mention of the existing bridge across the Platte, that it is,an interim bridge, implying that a new bridge would be required. All of these issues add to costs. How do these factors mentioned above compare to the other alternatives? Telephone (303) 337-4123 Facsimile (303)337-2028 NOV-15-04 MON 03:06 PM WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WKS7 FAX:9703046497 PAGE 3 11/12/'=9p4 ; 13:5B 303E994941 KEN HOLM PAGE B3 ;board.t4'(County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado October 10,:2004 Page'2'° Do Gosis include economic damages from loss of recreational value of the entire property';or from loss of gravel potential to the property? If so, these costs could be very very;suostantial and should be considered before the conclusion of the study Is reached: I know you think that I am a "NIMBY", but I am not. I believe that planning for both transportation needs and open space needs are very important. However, this particuinrpiece of river bottom is very unique to Weld County, the delta region of two major rivers of Colorado. In fact. Weld County named It a Game Preserve, when It owned the property, as is evidenced by many signs still on the property. 1 ask yea not to destroy the uniqueness of this property by constructing a road through its heat;. Please, at least, have the engineers or planning department personnel pnysicai y visit the sites to more rainy evaluate their criteria. 1-don't think that a visit to the properties is too much to oak, knowing how important this issue isle,:,all of our futures. Rasped fully submitted, doll H. Holm Manager ' OPG Eatvris LW N 5,414:41i a3?tM4.n0"Y.pP.Ta2.D C • U I ell Clit illie :4 :=1.' • Ili. pm:, C14 : re L.vi z . 1.9 -.I...) . a: Amill 4T O NI › o Pe . c, 1:::14 La Cr) _ Ciii) Cii c w EXHIBIT I IA Weld County - Strategic Roadways ■ Weld County has identified seven major strategic arterial roadways which will provide for an ellectiye transportation system. te These roads are strategic + because ()I-their location and `, "if connectivity hem eel, other Swum major arterials or acs theme TRANSPORTATEIN within Weld County' mat FUTURE smut,• \VCR 49 is one of these seven roads. I'I-:i sI3t RG II "o� Project Purpose • Provide an extension of \VCR 49 from US HWY 34 to SH 14. • This proposed arterial will improve the connectivity of the existing east-west highways within the study area and ultimately provide a connection between SH 14 and Interstate 76. F Q ., I I_I lnt RG IIOI_I A t I l f-A h(, -O(J 1 Project Need Transportation Planning and Corridor Preservation • Identifying a preferred route at this time will serve as a guide to preserve rights-of-way for the arterial. • Planning for this roadway now will allow it to be implemented in an orderly fashion and will allow for I1111111111Zed impacts in the future. F �\, III sin RG IIOL I l l.1 I'V IG Study Process PRU.I EC I Public Input I RAVI F,AAORk . . l D\I ' ( ()1I E( I ION RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT famyr Illl XI31 R(I IIOI I V l LI I.A li (Alp 2 W IdCanap...m.NCp1,IVS WORK PLAN / SCHEDULE =. • IBM. .n...4.T _.�.., ----{= j I J:.. . . 1 _A'-'.-4.-.r___A', .7:._ ■"� _ A: _. si-. _ _ . .1E (lbISI;I.Rt i II(II I .\ I'I.I.1 VII i .y Study Framework • Establish Local Agency E —l'iecT Group :a • Define Study Area Gq„ _ r • Prepare Design o Standards NIM _ • Establish Decision - Matrix - • Develop Public Input Greeley " ` Pmecsti Ital. KereeY for I.„, sR( Ili ,, 3 Study Team • Weld County Public Works Department • Frank Hempen. Jr. — Director of Public Works • Keith Meyer Engineering Division Manager • Wayne Howard — Project Manager • Felsburg Holt & Ullevig ■ Christopher Fasching — Principal • Jeff Dankcnbring — Project Manager fL\ 1-11 I tilt' Ru 1101. 1 & I LI I.Aail `�pl Study Team (Cont.) • Local Agency Group (4 Meetings) . Town of Kersey ■ City of Greeley • Greeley-Weld Airport . Colorado Department of Transportation ■ Colorado Division of Wildlife F O 11 1 c;1 l Rt, 11O1 I ,C lal Ivli. PUN 4 Data Collection • Comprehensive Plans • Transportation Plans • Greeley Weld Airport Master Plan • Parks / Open Space Plans • Environmental Characteristics • Topographic Features • Parcel Ownership • Development Plans (4, PI[Ical ltG INN 1 .F I.Lh..\ ou Identification of Alternatives • 13 Mile Study Area was Defined by Four Segments • Alternative Alignments • Alignment A - WCR 51 • Alignment B - WCR 49 • Alignment C - WCR 47 • Alignment D — SI-f 37 E O . IlI.Gil R(. II�)II R L LI.Al(l °UN 5 Alternative Alignments 0 SNA)YALIERNANVES 114- I v rid PUN Segment 1 0 W W Caw�y Nmo 0V Prte,N 6+m,Shcy $R— SEGMENT/ R& ! � 140 fl 1 *IA , ., Lid:. • •41i •� T � i• ll �._... ..... F/0 .. 1. • Ill •Itt R� Hui f x l I I Al(1 �'op 6 Segment 2 0 W¢b Coyly 909J<9 F�'¢M Cvrcw SRM¢ �' ^�^� �-•� SEGMENTZ . Lair , _sikus71 • :19,4. ,, . 4kb Ma St 4,14` `{ Xn.ia i0.rY=. )0.F -q t : r4 ._ _ , fl >.. e_... --J-7.6, �L Imo.. FII-I31'RIi IIUI_I ,l Il.I-IA-IIi '!Uti . Segment 3 0 w¢b mwa A�av am�b Co�.�m,s -^—^ SEGMENTS j, 14;"1/..if £QI�� rb I.. T;I ._ .,.. ... . _.... ,,,, ,,.. IhI 1R1 R(l II�NIR I I I IAHI rJu 7 Segment 4 Wab County Pcop<9 PrtwtlC('! ([My E^r SEGMENT I A t i e I � I I P.I �{ IRG II(lI r,@ I'II IA Evaluation of Alternatives ■ Nine Evaluation Criteria • Transportation Effcctiycness • Horizontal and Vertical C;enmetr. • Communiiv Impacts • Land Use Consequences • Exist in? Dcvclopn ant Cnnsegitenees • Em uonmcnlal Impacts • Safety • C'nnsuuction Feasihilil • Construction ( FLQ , PI(I 5131 RG I IOI I & ( I IIA outs 8 weld foun9V Road a9 Wendt Condor Stud, EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES EvaLat!on Matrx Summary AAer:lalrve A Segment Alenatne B 5n9mert AMENS C Sepal Allenative 0 3z'nen ICli 59 8 lemahve (ER 49I A0entve (Cp 47) M tithe CR3I1 A ler1sme Segment 182 A 33683 E2 32.26 CI 4275 22 Segment2 3300 A 3200 B h.0$ C 4633 E. Segment., 3833 A' 1503 B 3442 C 3933 A' Sol manl4 735/ Al 3359 6 11.17 C 3978 A' TOTAL 149 75 139.24 117.92 166.91 40anerl Preferred Anenolln O I`I I.SRI R❑ IIl)I.I ,F 1 I.LI.A Io, AouN Public Participation • Public Open Houses • Over 750 Mailers her meeting • Advertised in local nev7spapers • Announcement on County's Websitc • Initial Open House — March 30. 2004 • so attendees • Final Open House — June 22. 2004 • So ancndccs • Landowner One on One Meetinrrs {LT;r II 10.Rl Ktl II111 1 S I II I A RI Ac°u • Recommended Alignment WC 47 PREFERRED . `° "II ROUTE,I • Preferred Alternathc ^I Evolved from Evaluation Matrix • Itcraticc Rev icvv with Local Agencies e • Public Input horn Two Open f louses Paz Gee-I -° Great '41ade y a Kersey Il l NISI Rte II' [ & I.I A 'oU Typical Sections a — �Y g Rural Ultimate Section Interim Section plc.; I I I �nl m Ilt)I.I ,c I I I F.At "off 10 What Are The Next Steps? ■ BOCC Adoption of the Corridor Study — WCR 47 Arterial Alignment ■ Incorporate Into Planning Process ■ Continue to Coordinate with Corridor Communities ■ Pursue IGA's with Local Municipalities (If Needed) EC \, I Fl Si l I( IK)I I I I I I.A Icy IMP 11 Caro[ Harding From: Peggy Allsup Armstrong [PARMSTRONG@greeleyschools.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:18 AM To: charding@co.weld.co.us. Subject: WCR 49 Arterial Corridor Study (Docket#2004-93) Dear Sirs and Madams: We are writing this letter regarding the WCR 49 study and road project. For the past 20 years, we have lived on and own farms on both WCR 70 and WCR 72 with crossroads of WCR 45 and WCR 47. We are gravely concerned with your proposal. As the amount of traffic increases, so will the dangers of more and more traffic on either roads 47 or 45. This area continues to be an agricultural hub with many farmers and ranchers using roads 47 and 45 to drive tractors, combines, balers or move stock on a regular basis. Hwy 392 is already dangerous for slower moving farm equipment and the fast drivers who do not recognize or take into account the large farming equipment that needs to be moved. We have always tried to use the "back roads" especially the unpaved ones (such as WCRs 47 and 45) . We are also concerned the Arterial Corridor will only create more and more accidents for our kids who help with the large equipment! We're all too familiar with Weld County's horrific traffic deaths. ! ! ! For years WCRs 43 and 51 have been paved and "maintained" by the county. Drivers are well aware of these routes north and south. We would like to see these roads considered since they are already paved and accustomed to traffic. We hope you will consider our homes and country life which we have worked hard for and try to maintain our agricultural needs. Please consider an alternative route and vote against the this proposal. Michael W. and Peggy L. Armstrong 22881 WCR 70 Eaton, CO 80615 (970) 353-1670 117 (7, m o FP +ten ) 1T! o w a, O EXHIBIT 1 MEMORANDUM 0-0 ttariDig TO: Clerk to the Board WI I p DATE: October 22, 2004 • FROM: Frank B. Hempen, Jr., P.E. COLORADO Diector of Public Works/County Enginee SUBJECT: WCR 49 Corridor Study— Upcoming blic Hearing The public hearing for this project has been scheduled for November 8th, 2004. The final report and appendix has been submitted for your review. As we prepare for the hearing, we anticipate that there will be at least one party in opposition of the final selected alignment. Ken Holm is the spokesperson for the DPG Farms who owns the large parcel between the Cache La Poudre and the South Platte River in which the preferred alignment goes through. Mr. Holm has submitted a letterwith the concerns they have. The letter is included in the appendix, the last five pages. I have also attached a copy for your review. We felt that we should anticipate this opposition as we approach the public hearing. We will be prepared to address concerns that Mr. Holm will undoubtedly ask during the hearing. DPG FARMS, LLC 3300 SOUTH PARKER ROAD, SUITE 300 AURORA, CO 80014-3521 October 4, 2004 Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado do Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager Public Works Department P.O. Box 758 1111 H Street Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 Members of the Commission: This letter is to respectfully set forth, for the record, the objections of a group of longstanding Weld County landowners to the prospective alignment of Weld County Road 49. I and my fellow landowners believe it is important to express our thoughts on this project at this stage of the discussion, and firmly establish an opposition to the conclusions already being formed at the outset of what is sure to be a long, extended and controversial issue. PROPERTY OWNER STATUS AND STANDING TO OBJECT Although I am writing as manager of DPG Farms LLC, I am just one of the founding owners of DPG Farms LLC, which owns a substantial acreage in Weld County. DPG's holdings are approximately 782 acres of river bottom, farmland and pasture located on the upstream side of the confluence of the Poudre and South Platte Rivers. The borders are approximately the South Platte River on the South, Fern Avenue on the West, the Ogilvy Ditch on the North, which is located South of Highway 263, and approximately 100 yards west of the confluence of the Poudre and South Platte on the East. Telephone (303) 337-4123 Facsimile (303) 337-2028 Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado October 4, 2004 Page 2 The DPG property is a long narrow strip of river bottom consisting of approximately 2 miles of the Poudre, 3/4 mile of the South Platte, and irrigated farmland, as well as numerous sloughs and wetlands. DPG Farms LLC is comprised of seven Colorado families that purchased the property in 1985, not solely as a real estate investment, but as a place for ourselves, our children, grandchildren and future generations to have a place to recreate and enjoy, and hold as a long-term "legacy" investment. SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO WELD COUNTY PLANS Your plan to build a north-south highway, essentially through the middle of the property would destroy the ability to enjoy the property as intended. The proposal does not articulate an immediate or future need to the proposed route. ABRIDGEMENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS — UNLAWFUL "TAKING" DPG was specifically structured to hold and preserve a substantial property right for its owners and future generations. It is the property owners' firm belief that any move by Weld County to secure a right of way is a pre-emptive demonstration of an unlawful taking, which deprives DPG owners of property rights and denies compensation for the loss of enjoyment of the property. While the county may maintain that designation of a preferred route does not have the force of law, nor is a recorded deed or title restriction, the owners submit that the practical effect is to inhibit and restrict property rights by imposing a governmental decree. Such action must be disclosed for any future owners or DPG faces the risk of lawsuit. Is this fair to our property interest? DPG Farms LLC firmly asserts that it has the right to use and enjoy property for the uses under which it is now operated, which are legal and law abiding. WILDLIFE PRESERVATION AND ENHANCEMENT DPG's plans for this property have always been to develop the property for wildlife habitat and preservation. To date, the property owners have spent thousands of dollars, not taxpayer dollars, on wetlands rehabilitation projects. Long-term plans include further wetlands development, potential gravel mining, possible water storage for municipalities and/or water districts, and placement of conservation easements on appropriate parts of the property. Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado October 4, 2004 Page 3 Preliminary discussions pertaining to gravel operations indicate that lakes, both deep and shallow, and wetlands would and can be an integral part of the restoration. Possible water storage facilities and a wetlands mitigation bank are also part of the elements of mining gravel. Because of our desire to develop more wildlife habitat, no gravel operation would be along the river bottom or near the existing wetlands and sloughs. Consequently, even though a gravel operation is very a long-term project, most of the existing habitat would remain intact during the gravel extraction time frame, thus enhancing the continuity of the wildlife habitat. DPG's owners are very selective as to whom we would engage as partners in a gravel venture. If gravel is not feasible, the next option may be placing a conservation easement on the entire property. However, a road through the property would foreclose the possibility of a conservation easement. This property lies near the confluence of two major rivers, which are abundant with wildlife and wetlands inhabitants. This property has numerous species of waterfowl, raptors and songbirds, wild turkey, whitetail deer, mule deer, foxes, raccoons and beaver. The DOW maintains a state wildlife area at the actual confluence points of the Poudre and the South Platte. DOW district personnel have indicated that the whole wildlife habitat along the river corridor is extremely endangered because of development issues. It may well be that DOW believes it is powerless to stop the action of another government agency. WE QUESTION THE NEED FOR THE ROAD AND THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION Weld County certainly deserves credit for long-range transportation planning. DPG Farms, LLC's assertion is that this road is in the wrong location. The analysis done by the Weld County Public Works Department for the various route alternatives was based upon several underlying assumptions, which are flawed and erroneous. One of these assumptions is the cost to build the road; there simply is not a realistic and firm budget for property acquisition, engineering and construction. Discussions with Wayne Howard, the project manager, elicited the admission from Mr. Howard that no real estimates have been made based on the specific factors of each alternative route. Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado October 4, 2004 Page 4 In this property's situation, the road would cross wetlands, farm ground, pasture and two river bottoms. A costly and complicated bridge would have to be built across the Poudre River. In addition, discussions with Bruce Barker, the Weld County Attorney, indicate that there are no easements along the section of lines on DPG Farms' property. Barker indicated that this property had been patented prior to 1889 and consequently no easements exist on this property. While this may not prevent a road from being built, it does add substantial, and of this moment, significant unexplored costs to the project. Mr. Howard indicated that safety is a major factor in developing roads and that generally the straighter the road, the safer it is. Examine the alternatives and you will conclude, as we have, that the contemplated route is not the straightest route. We believe that the fact DPG's property is agricultural open space - by our design and plan — penalizes DPG, in that the "rating system" gives an unrealistic and skewed value to land which has not been developed. It is especially alarming that Mr. Howard and those on the planning committee have not visited the sites, to understand the complexity and breadth of the land-owning situation. We extend an open invitation to the commissioners, and Mr. Howard and staff, to come look at this piece of river bottom (that probably looks a lot like it did more than 50 years ago) and appreciate the intrinsic value of this property. ABSENCE OF LONG-RANGE LAND USE POLICY Following discussions with many county employees, DPG owners concluded that there is no long-term plan for developing, maintaining or acquiring open space — other than when a developer comes in for approval there is a stipulation to reserve some of the proposed development for open space. If this is the policy, or lack thereof, we are appalled at the lack of foresight and preparation. One of the major reasons for the growth in Weld County is that new residents desire to have a higher standard and quality of life. Some of this comes from having open space and wildlife to observe and enjoy. DPG purchased this property for recreation purposes, as a "legacy" investment. A road destroys that purpose. It is our firm assertion that there is a common good that accrues to the entire county when property owners preserve open space, develop wetlands and wildlife habitat and pay for it. This enhances the entire county. Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado October 4, 2004 Page 5 DPG formally requests that the commissioners review the other alternative routes. Look closely at each route and determine what each route has to its favor that has already been established, i.e. existing roads, existing rights of way, existing bridges, etc. Which of these routes has the least impact to wildlife habitat and which of these routes is most cost effective? We absolutely believe that the preservation of wildlife habitat should be a high priority in planning considerations. We, as a society can easily eliminate the habitat but cannot easily rebuild or restore it. DPG hopes to preserve as much of the wildlife habitat as possible, so that future generations can enjoy it as much as we have. We trust you will exercise the best in professional and political judgment as you contemplate the potential routing of County Road 49. Respectfully submitted, 747a— endall H. Holm Manager DPG Farms LLC DPGFARMSLLC@00ICOMMISSIONERSLTR.DOC NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Docket#2004-93 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,Colorado,will be considering whether to adopt the Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study, and wishes to hold a public hearing to receive input from the public regarding this matter. The hearing will be held on Monday, November 8, 2004, at 9:00 a.m., in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. A draft copy of the Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study prepared by Felsburg, Holt &Ullevig, dated October4, 2004, may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board, 91510`h Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631. Written comments are also welcome and must be received prior to November 8, 2004, in the office of the Clerk to the Board, P. O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. To ensure inclusion of E-Mail correspondence into the record, please send a copy to chardinq aa,,co.weld.co.us. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DATED: October 4, 2004 PUBLISHED: October 20, 2004, in the Fort Lupton Press DOCKET NUMBER: 2004-93 HEARING DATE: November 8, 2004 TIME: 9:00 a.m. NAME AND ADDRESS: Weld County, Colorado RE: To gain public input regarding the Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study PUBLISH DATE: October 20, 2004, in the Fort Lupton Press FILE NO.: EG0050 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Docket#2004-93 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County,Colorado,will be considering whether to adopt the Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study, and wishes to hold a public hearing to receive input from the public regarding this matter. The hearing will be held on Monday, November 8, 2004, at 9:00 a.m., in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado,Weld County Centennial Center,915 10th Street, First Floor,Greeley,Colorado, at the time specified. A draft copy of the Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study, prepared by Felsburg, Holt &Ullevig,dated October 4, 2004, may be examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board, 915 10th Street,Greeley, Colorado 80631. Written comments are also welcome and must be received prior to November 8, 2004, in the office of the Clerk to the Board, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632. To ensure inclusion of E-Mail correspondence into the record, please send a copy to chardinqaco.weld.co.us. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DATED: October 15, 2004 PUBLISHED: October 20, 2004, in the Fort Lupton Press Affidavit of Publication NOTICE-04-93 WCR 49 WC CLERK TO THE BOARD STATE OF COLORADO County of Adams SS. I Karen Lambert of said County of Adams heiup duly sworn,say. sat alit publisher of Fort Lupton Press Mat the same h. weekly newspaper of general Cucaluuou o.un printed and puhr, ed im tilt mwm t Fort Lupton said a and state that then of advertisvmue n,of which the annexed is a we copy has been published is,said weekly wspaper fur A_eweeks. that the notice published in the regular and e of e. number said newspaper durum the pet acid met puhlie of said notice and in the newspaper proper and not supplement thereof. that the first puhlwa h of saidnotice was unnamedhin the issue of said newspaper hearing the date sit 1 A.D. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ad the last publleatlan thereon,in the IrnlirPeriCWSIlalrnf, Docket N200493 bearing date, tits IO@02'WM1 that the .aid The Board of County Fort Lupton Press Commissioners of Weld County. Colorado,will beconsideringwhetherto has hemh published o. .wily and a ,mpedly durine the adopt the Weld County Road 49 Arterial period sit at la, t Gtu xk,. t prix the Corridor Study,and wishes to hold a d rhd ab .erterd public hearing to receive input ftom the to s� d Mat wad newspaper w a,at the time of earn of the public regardingthlamatter.The hearing punt ot said notice duly qualified for Mat purpose wwhill will be held on Monday,November!'8, th.. - Fkit uu ucclitilltd. 1a Act Concerning Legal Notion. AJ .and p l l c, sand the l res,f Printers and 2004,at 9:00 a.m.,In the Chambers Punt thcre.o.r aJ u,5,5 ci l all Acts and Pars of Act,in Board o/Count'ratio,Comm County of WeM Conflict with the Pmciz�onx co this Act uppmveu nod i, 1921, act County, Colorado, Weld and all amendments thereof,and particularly as ended by a Centennial Center,91510th Street,First appr^,Td,ALAI]30, I 523,and an act approved May 13, 1931• Floor, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. copy o of Karen Lambert "draftthe Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corddor Stutly, prepared°c by Felx4,200, Nob 8 Wavleexamined dated office of he Clerk aytot h Boamined Publisher 10th. tree,Greeley, oloraoerQ915 Writ Street,Greeley,are Colorado wel 8e 31. and Written comments also welcome Subscribed and sworn to before me this must be received prior to November 8, .11/30/2004 A.D., 2004,in the office of the Clerk to the / A{�// VAC/ 80632.Board,P.O.Box 758,Greeley,Cofolorado �y�.!`_ eende p ensure Inclusion d,E-Mall V V l ' / cormpontlena into g record,place yto BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY,COLORADO Notary Public DATED: October 15, 0 PUBLISHED: October 2 20,2000,In the 139 NORTH MAIN Fort Lupton Press BRIGHTON. CO 80601 � o1P Y.:.C/49�/o BOBI JO .i BOND r Nei•._ ;� oF eap{- oc, Carol Harding From: Rick Brown [ricbro@lakewoodco.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 10:20 AM To: Carol Harding Subject: Road 49 Corridor Study EE( n= -.E Board of County Commissioners, Weld County Co. Gentlemen, since I cannot attend the Nov. 8th public hearing to voice my objections to the proposed project, please consider the following for the public record. 1. I object to the expenditure of Weld County Tax dollars on the project without a clear mandate from citizens that they wish this project completed. The route chosen clearly leads one to believe that the Weld County/Greeley airport is going to be the focus of growth in the future and we will be subsidizing this growth to the benefit of a few rather than the entire county. Additionally, we will also be subsidizing all the development that will spring up along the corridor, thus the developers once more reap the benefits at the expense of the residents who live along the route. 2 . I object to the project as it will bring increased traffic, pollution(noise and air) and negatively affect the quality of life. It will take farmland out of production, contrary to the County's comprehensive plan.It will negatively affect property values of those living next to the roadway, without compensation. 3 . The east side of the Greeley area has become a target for all kinds of projects that negatively affect the quality of life of residents. We have no method to mitigate negative impact because of the system in place. It favors development and developers and ignors citizens who have legitimate complaints. The Comprehensive Plan is also ignored, to promote growth and tax base increases with only one goal in sight, that of increased revenues. To increase revenue at the expense of those many citizens that suffer adverse impact is wrong. Thank You, Rick Brown 23752 WCR 58 Greeley, Co. 80631 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Docket#2004-93 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, will be considering whether to adopt the Weld County Road 49 14 Arterial Corridor Study, and wishes to hold a public hearing to receive input from the public c°Cii cr PREFRE_�r regarding this matter. The hearing will be held on ROUTE in Monday, November 8, 2004, at 9:00 a.m., in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, First Floor, CR74 • Galeton Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. CR72 or A draft copy of the Weld County Road 49 j CR70 Arterial Corridor Study prepared by Felsburg, Holt & Ullevig, dated October 15, 2004, may be ' 39 examined in the office of the Clerk to the Board, CR66 915 10`h Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631. The • Study and other project information are also Clovedr Alden • CR64 available for review online at www.co.weld.co.us/departments/publicworks. • CR6z 1 Written comments are also welcome and must be Count Argo • `¢ k/�r� received prior to November 8, 2004, in the office Greeley : f of the Clerk to the Board, P. O. Box 758, Greeley, CR58 Colorado 80632. To ensure inclusion of E-Mail • cc 37 •• 0 correspondence into the record, please send a ' 3q copy to chardinq(a)co.weld.co.us. ¢ 0 ¢ Kersey U CR54 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS North WELD COUNTY, COLORADO DATED: October 15, 2004 PUBLISHED: October 20, 2004, in the Fort Lupton Press J , CERTIFICATE OF MAILING The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Hearing, Docket #2004-93, was placed in the United States mail, first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the following property owners. Dated this 15`" day of October, 2004 ABERNATHY BRETT L AMENDOLA MARY F 1760E 18 ST 220 W 26 ST GREELEY CO 80631 CHEYENNE WY 82001 ACHZIGER CHARLES LEE &AGNES LORENE ANACAPA LAND COMPANY LLC 4935 SAINT ANDREWS CT C/O DEBORAH MILLER LOVELAND CO 80537 PO BOX 11749 PLEASANTON CA 94588 ACTION PURSUIT PAINTBALL LLC 22335 HWY 34 ANDERSON ARLEN E & VICKIE S GREELEY CO 80631 35197 CORNERSTONE WAY WINDSOR CO 80550 ADAMS TAMMY E 39505 COUNTY RD 51 ANDERSON EARL A EATON CO 80615-9503 23070 WELD COUNTY RD 70 EATON CO 80615 AFFORDABLE HOMES GREELEY INC 3511 W SERVICE RD ANDERSON HARRIETT J EVANS CO 80620 23279 COUNTY RD 66 GREELEY CO 80631 ALBRIGHTON JOSEPH C & TONDA C 25147 GRANDVIEW WAY ANDERSON KEN E GREELEY CO 80631 39539 COUNTY RD 51 BLVD B EATON CO 80615 ALDANA FORTINO SR 1759 FERN AVE ANDERSON RANDOLPH DUANE & DEBORAH K GREELEY CO 80631 34047 WCR 47 EATON CO 80615 ALLES GARY D & SUSAN C 26285 WELD CO RD 47 ANDERSON RANDOLPH LEE & NANCY JUNE GREELEY CO 80631 1810 HEMLOCK AVE GREELEY CO 80631 ALLMER JACK L 1100 FERN AVE ANDERSON RAY GREELEY CO 80631 23702 WELD CO RD 70 EATON CO 80615 ALM RAYMOND A & VICTORIA M 22459 WELD CO RD 70 ANDERSON ROBERT R & SANDRA F EATON CO 80615 23364 WELD CO RD 70 EATON CO 80615 ALTERGOTT ELAINE 21982 WELD CO RD 84 ANDOLSEK EDWARD F & ESTHER D AULT CO 80610 35484 WELD CO RD 45 EATON CO 80615 • CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET #2004-93 Page 2 ANSLEY PAUL A & ETHEL R TRUST BAKER RON & MARSHA AS TC 1/2 INT 25740 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD 28806 WELD CO RD 51 KERSEY CO 806449719 GREELEY CO 80631 ANTHOLZ FAMILY LP BANGHART ARNOLD W& LINDA L 34018 COUNTY RD 39 3050 EAST 24TH STREET EATON CO 80615-8901 GREELEY CO 80631 ARAGON DAVID J BANGHART SCOTT ALLEN & TAMMERA 435 N 35 AVE # 389 2930E 24 ST GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 ARCHULETA TIMOTHY R BARKER JEFFRY W& LINNETE M 39248 BVLD E COUNTY RD 51 25835 SANDY KNOLL BLVD EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 ARMSTRONG DAVID R & LOIS ANN BATES DUANE W 39657 COUNTY RD 51 39467 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615-9512 EATON CO 80615 ARMSTRONG MICHAEL W & PEGGY L ALLSUP BAUER DANIEL G & KATHERINE A 22881 WELD CO RD 70 22517 WELD CO RD 76 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 ARY RYAN C BAY FAMILY TRUST 36250 WELD CO RD 49 36986 WCR 49 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615-9409 ASCHE LONNIE & SUSAN BEACH STEPHEN H 22080 WELD CO RD 74 33820 COUNTY RD 47 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 AUSTIN CHARLES L BEAN TODD P O BOX 1 26462 COUNTY RD 50 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 AXELSON HOWARD N BEARD GARRY D 21026 WELD CO RD 64 629 14 AVE GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 BADLEY GLENN & REBECCA BECKETT PATRICK W 22261 WCR 54 25501 HWY 392 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 BAHL THOMAS J & KAREN L BECKLES LLC 34516 WELD CO RD 51 1020 9 ST#202 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 BAKER DANIEL L & DEBRA K BEEKEN CRAIG L & DOROTHY J 32776 VISTA LAKE RD 1799 HOLLY AVE GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 3 BELITZ GARY A & DONNA L BLUM LORAE D 1024 6TH AVENUE 24205 COLO HWY 392 GREELEY CO 806314104 GREELEY CO 80631 BENNETT BILLY W & NANCY B BOHLMEYER MARTIN E 24304 COUNTY ROAD 74 25870 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 BERRYMAN ALAN D & KATHLEEN L BOND JESS & IRENE P O BOX 525 26421 WELD CO RD 388 KERSEY CO 80644 KERSEY CO 80644 BERRYMAN FARM COMPANY BONNELL SHARON A & JAMES H P O BOX 525 34974 WELD CO RD 51 KERSEY CO 80644-0525 EATON CO 80615 BICKLING FARMS LLLP BONNEY JACQUELINE K 21586 HWY 392 23736 WELD CO RD 58 GREELEY CO 80631-9640 GREELEY CO 80631 BINDER BRUCE L & DIANNE L BOOT HILL FARMS INC 24676 HIGHWAY 392 37584 WELD CO RD 51 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 BISHOP GARY & CHERYL BOOTH LAND & LIVESTOCK CO 34707 COUNTY ROAD 51 P O BOX 72 EATON CO 80615 LUCERNE CO 80646 BISHOP SEAN M BOOTON GARY D & VIRGINIA R 39550 BLVD B COUNTY RD 51 39488 COUNTY RD 49 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 BLANDIN EARL G & MARGARET L BOROUGH DAVID E 39517 WELD CO RD 51 P O BOX 762 EATON CO 80615 FREDERICK CO 80530-0762 BLANDIN GARY L & CYNTHIA BORYS RICHARD M 34218 WCR 51 1525 GLENMERE BLVD EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 BLEHM HARRY & BERTHA BOSCH PETER 25545 SANDY KNOLL BLVD 5518 W 2 ST KERSEY CO 80644 GREELEY CO 80634-4236 BLEVINS ROY JR & JUDY MAE BOSCH PETER & HENRIETTA 2651 E 18TH ST 27629 WELD CO RD 47 1/2 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 BLUM BENHARD R & DORIS A BOULTER MICHAEL J & DAISY I P O BOX 88 22019 WELD CO RD 54 LUCERNE CO 80646 GREELEY CO 80631 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 4 BOWERS ROBERT C BROWN WESLEY A & JACKIE L P O BOX 746 24504 HIGHWAY 392 GALETON CO 80622 GREELEY CO 80631-9645 BOWMAN DANA A & JULIE L BROWNLEE BERTHA E 39250 COUNTY ROAD 49 27535 WELD CO RD 49 1/2 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 BOWMAN STEVEN L BROWNLEE STEPHEN M & JEAN M PO BOX 753 24142 WCR 72 GALETON CO 80622 EATON CO 80615 BOYD SHELLY A BRUCE JULIA L 39587 COUNTY RD 51 2550 59 AVE EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80634 BRANCH LLOYD BRUG REATHA J & LEO 6600 W 20 ST#13 25893 SANDY KNOLL BLVD GREELEY CO 80634 KERSEY CO 80644 BRANCH PATSY J BRUMLEY KEITH L & SHARA M 3180E 18 ST 32660 VISTA LAKE RD GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 BREWER MICHAEL R BRUNTZ DANIEL A & KRISTEN M 39241 BLVD E COUNTY RD 51 31501 WELD CO RD 53 EATON CO 80516 GREELEY CO 80631 BRIGHT MARY J TRUST BUCKLEN ROBERT D &VELDA R 25540 HWY 392 1504 44TH AVE CT GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80634 BROWN KURT L BUCKRIDGE J H 39683 COUNTY RD 51 39445 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615-9503 BROWN PAUL K & MICHELE M BUDERUS THEODORE A & DANIEL J P O BOX 345 26246 WELD CO RD 45 GALETON CO 80622 GREELEY CO 80631 BROWN RICHARD C & MARY E BUMGARDNER ARNOLD ALLEN & LORETTA D 23752 WELD CO RD 58 22643 WCR 70 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 BROWN ROBERT E & JEAN M BURROUGHS ANTHONY S & VIOLA P O BOX 709 MANZANARES KERSEY CO 80644 39701 WELD CO RD 47 AULT CO 80610 BROWN THOMAS & MARJORIE FAMILY TRUST 22543 WELD CO RD 54 GREELEY CO 80631 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING — NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 5 BURROUGHS ROBERT C & PATRICIA JO CASTOR KAREN S P O BOX 579 39493 COUNTY RD 51 AULT CO 80610 EATON CO 80615 CANNON NORMA K CECIL CAROLYN KAY 1664E18ST 25017 WELD CO RD 74 LOVELAND CO 80538 EATON CO 80615 CANTRELL JOHN W& LINDA S CECIL FARMS PO BOX 480 1639 35 AVE CT KERSEY CO 80644 GREELEY CO 80634 CARDENAS FLORA M CECIL GLENN DEWAYNE P O BOX 202 25017 WELD CO RD 74 KERSEY CO 80644 EATON CO 80615 CARLSON CARL EDMOND & NANCY I CECIL GLENN DEWAYNE 22601 U S HWY 34 36640 COUNTY ROAD 51 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 CARLSON LUANN D CECIL TERRY THOMAS 39548 BLVD B COUNTY RD 51 1720 23 AVE EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80634 CARLSON LUANN DORIS CENTENNIAL AG SUPPLY CO 39448 MAIN ST P O BOX 557 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 CARLSON ROBERT L & RUBY M CERVI CATTLE COMPANY LLC 24643 WELD CO RD 70 P O BOX 1930 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80632 CARLSON ROY I & ELVERA D CHASE ANNE M 34269 WELD CO RD 51 105 N CHIMNEY PARK DR EATON CO 80615 WINDSOR CO 80550 CARROLL DALE ROBERT & PATRICIA ANN CHITWOOD CHARLES H & JEANINE H 25704 CO RD 54 1/4 25740 COUNTY ROAD 54 1/4 KERSEY CO 80644 KERSEY CO 80644 CARTER VIRGINIA A CHRISTIANSON DENNIS L 39531 COUNTY RD 51 801 N MAIN ST EATON CO 80615-9503 YUMA CO 80759 CARWIN MERLE A & ANNETTE CHRISTMAN JOHN DEAN & DEBORAH KAY 38627 WELD CO RD 51 P O BOX 246 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 CARY BRIAN W& BABETTE M CLARK C H & MARY LOU 33059 COUNTY ROAD 51 14749 COUNTY RD 66 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 6 CLARK JAMES R COULSON JAMES RICK 2170 HEMLOCK 829 E 3RD ST GREELEY CO 80631 FLORENCE CO 81226-1605 CLOUGH JOSEPHINE COX NORMAN GENE 2112 40TH AVE 1620 HOLLY AV GREELEY CO 806343902 GREELEY CO 80631 CMH HOMES INC CRAIG GARY ROGER 3455 W SERVICE RD TBD BLVD B COUNTY RD 51 EVANS CO 80620 EATON CO 80615 COLLINS CHARLES O & RUTH L CRAWFORD SCOTT W 24227 WELD CO RD 72 24637 RAILROAD ST EATON CO 80615 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 COLORADO - GAME FISH & PARKS COMMISSION CURTIS TODD 6060 BROADWAY PO BOX 336873 DENVER CO 80216 GREELEY CO 80633 COLUMBIA JAMES N CUTHRELL DEBRA L P O BOX 310 2626 W 1 #301 PIERCE CO 80650 GREELEY CO 80631 CONGDON RICHARD STEPHEN D P G BIRD FARM INC P O BOX 285 3300 S PARKER RD STE 300 PLATTEVILLE CO 80651 AURORA CO 80014 CONNELL JOHN DAVENPORT MONTE S & SANDRA D 23465 COUNTY RD 72 38538 WELD CO RD 51 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 CONNELLY JAMES H DAWKINS JAMES KENTON & CHRISTINA 26779 WELD CO RD 45-1/2 22110 COUNTY RD 76 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615-9419 COPELAND ROBERT BARRY DAY DAVID H SR & SYVILLA A 23760 COUNTY RD 72 P O BOX 126 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615-0126 CORMAN BRUCE DEJONG HENRY G & NADINE F PO BOX 520 P O BOX 384 BURLINGTON CO 80807 KERSEY CO 80644-0384 CORMAN GEORGE W III DELGADO JOSE 1040 36TH ST 39635 COUNTY RD 51 EVANS CO 80620 EATON CO 80615 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 7 DENDOR RICHARD A & SANDRA J DOMINGUEZ JIMMIE & ROSE 39523 COUNTY RD 51 25612 WCR 54 1/4 EATON CO 80615 9503 KERSEY CO 80644 DENDOR RICHARD A & SANDRA J DOMINGUEZ MONICA 1517 9 ST 24428 WELD CO RD 72 GREELEY CO 80631-3113 EATON CO 80615 DENNEY WADE W & TERESA DUDDY LYNETTE M 35986 GRANDVIEW DRIVE 39593 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615-5100 EATON CO 80615 DICK BRENDA & SCOTT DUDLEY WILLIAM M & CARLA C 39491 COUNTY RD 51 23038 WCR 70 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 DILKA CLIFFORD D DUELL LUCILLE C & JOHN R TRUSTEES P O BOX 10 26542 WELD CO RD 51 KERSEY CO 80644 GREELEY CO 80631 DILKA CLIFFORD L & FREIDA DUGDALE MARK A P O BOX 83 39650 BLVD A COUNTY RD 51 KERSEY CO 80644 EATON CO 80615 DILKA ELEANOR (LE) DUKE ENERGY FIELD SERVICES INC 25800 WELD CO RD 54 1/4 370 17TH ST STE 2500 KERSEY CO 80644 DENVER CO 80202-5644 DILLARD FAMILY LLC DUNN ROBERT A & VALERIE S P O BOX 333 25497 HWY 34 GALETON CO 80622 KERSEY CO 80644 DILLARD HERSCHEL W DUNN WILLIAM J & JUDY G P O BOX 333 24011 WELD CO RD 58 GALETON CO 80622 GREELEY CO 80631 DINNER ALBERT JACK & MELVIN DUVALL FRANCIS & SHARON 1814 14 AV 2889E 18 ST GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC DVORAK NEAL 3300 1 AVE #460 2438 6 AVE DENVER CO 80206 GREELEY CO 80631 DOIRON RENEE A DYER GRADY & NAOMI E 37715 WELD CO RD 51 35010 WCR 51 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 DOLL RONALD J LIVING TRUST-1/2 INT DYER ROY V & JANET L 26596 WELD CO RD 45 25975 STATE HWY 14 GREELEY CO 80631 AULT CO 80610 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 8 EHRLICH REUBEN FARMER RONALD D & PAMA L 2733 8 AVE 25620 HWY 392 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631-9642 EHRLICH ROBERT L &JANICE E FARMLAND RESERVE INC 25041 HWY 263 50 EAST NORTH TEMPLE GREELEY CO 80631 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84150 EIFERT FRED CHARLES & BLANCA LYDIA FAULKNER DAIRY II LLC 34101 WELD CO RD 47 37440 WELD CO RD 51 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 EINSPAHR KENNETH FAULKNER DAIRY II LLC 23292 COUNTY RD 74 C/O MIKE FAULKNER EATON CO 80615 300 E 16TH ST#301 GREELEY CO 80631 ELDER MARLENE S TRUST 40491 COUNTY RD 43 FEIT AMELIA (LIFE EST) AULT CO 80610 32752 WELD CO RD 45 GREELEY CO 80631 ELDRIDGE IRENE 26751 WCR 47 FEIT ROBERT &VIRGINIA ANN GREELEY CO 80631 32059 WELD CO RD 47 GREELEY CO 80631 ELDRIDGE STEVE 34936 COUNTY RD 51 FERGUSON RAYMOND E & GARY G & CHERYL EATON CO 80615 L 34294 WCR 47 ELLIOTT CURTIS RAY & PATRICIA SUSAN EATON CO 80615 3226 E 18 ST GREELEY CO 80631 FERGUSON RICHARD P 35453 WCR 47 EMERY DEBORAH A EATON CO 80615 39667 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615-9512 FLATT JOYCE A 5500 2 ST RD ERICKSON WILLIAM E & CLARA J GRLLEY CO 80634 34695 WCR 53 EATON CO 80615 FLOT PAUL & JUANITA J 26907 WELD CO RD 45 1/2 EVANS JEREMY P GREELEY CO 80631 517 STARWAY ST FORT COLLINGS CO 80525 FOE LOIS E 1357 43 AV #34 FABRIZIUS LOUIE S & GINA D GREELEY CO 80634 35631 WELD CO RD 49 EATON CO 80615 FOLEY RUTH M TRUST 24495 COUNTY RD 62-1/2 FANTON LOREN L GREELEY CO 80631 24604 COUNTY RD 76 EATON CO 80615 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 9 FOOSE RICHARD L 10% INT FRENCH DARRELL LEE & KATHERINE GRACE 33399 WCR 51 38020 WELD CO RD 45 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 FORTENBERRY CLINT M FRONT RANGE FEEDLOTS LLC 38688 COUNTY RD 49 P O BOX 517 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 FORTENBERRY T DEWEY & BECKY E FULBRIGHT EDWARD D & JOYE L 18549 WELD CO RD 86 1331 E 20TH ST AULT CO 80610 GREELEY CO 80631-6201 FOUTS ROBERT D & ROSE M FULLER STACEY L 24802 WELD CO RD 72 39625 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 FOX JOY W REVOCABLE TRUST GALETON COMMUNITY CHURCH 3005 SUNSET DR P O BOX 323 EVANS CO 80620 GALETON CO 80622 FRANCEN BRENT R & LENORA GALETON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 25343 WCR 70 24852 1ST EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 FRANCEN J ELMER GALETON WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT 25343 WCR 70 P O BOX 331 EATON CO 80615 GALETON CO 80622 FRANCEN NELS ARTHUR FAM TRUST (1/2INT) GALINDO FRANCISCO 31938 COUNTY RD 47 2345 16 ST#402 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80634 FRANK ROBERT V GALLEGOS LUIS ALVAREZ 1443 41 AVE 39238 BLVD E COUNTY RD 51 GREELEY CO 80634 EATON CO 80615 FRANKLIN DOUGLAS E & CATHERYN S GANN THOMAS W & JESSICA G 32505 WELD CO RD 53 39651 COUNTY RD 51 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615-9512 FRASER CHARLENE GANTENBEIN GLENN E & CAROL F P O BOX 1911 33487 COUNTY RD 49 GREELEY CO 80632 GREELEY CO 80631-9647 FRAZIER MICHAEL L & LILA W GAONA JOE & RITA 2717 E18 ST 23266 COUNTY RD 74 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 FRED DALE & MARLENE GARAND ROBERT M 1510 69TH ST NW 627 WADAS CT MINOT ND 58703 JOHNSTOWN CO 80534 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 10 GARCIA LIDIA GLOVER LAVERN J &ATHLYN K 2745E 18 ST P O BOX 44 GREELEY CO 80631 KERSEY CO 80644 GARZA MARCOS & CANDELARIA GODBY C DON & HELEN L P O BOX 328 37632 WELD CO RD 37 GALETON CO 80622 EATON CO 80615 GARZA RICARDO GODING THOMAS L & JANE C P O BOX 326 907 BELVEDERE CT GALETON CO 80622 FT COLLINS CO 80525 GAVETTE BRIAN D GOHEEN RICHARD P & MARY 800 1ST 23655 WELD CO RD 64 KERSEY CO 80644 GREELEY CO 80631 GEBAUER STUART L & STEPHANIE L GONZALEZ JESUS L 36095 COUNTY RD 53 1804 7TH ST EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 GEISICK BARNARD IRVEN & SANDRA ANN GOODWINE WILLIAM TROY & CAROL ANN 32879 WELD CO RD 51 38470 COUNTY RD 49 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 GEMAEHLICH RONALD R & TAMMI R GRANT JAMES H & JUDY A 32518 WELD CO RD 51 38499 WELD CO RD 45 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 GEORGE RICHARD L GRAUBERGER DEANNA JOYCE PO BOX 1072 2230 HEMLOCK AVE GREELEY CO 80632 GREELEY CO 80631 GIES MARGUERITE TRUST & JAMES L GREELEY CITY OF 19381 WELD CO RD 74 1000 10 ST EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 GILL DENNIS E & SHERRI G GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT 37815 CR 51 AUTHORITY EATON CO 80615 P O BOX 727 GREELEY CO 80632 GILLHAM BEN L & BYRA F 27059 WELD CO RD 51 GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT GREELEY CO 80631 AUTHORITY P O BOX 729 GLOVER LAVERN GREELEY CO 80632 C/O KERSEY TOWN OF 332 3 ST GREEN GEORGE L TRUST 50 INT KERSEY CO 80644 4250 W 16TH ST# 1 GREELEY CO 80634 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 11 GREEN GERALD G HAGEN DARUS G 39301 WELD COUNTY ROAD 49 24467 WELD CO RD 76 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 GREEN HARVEY R & CONSTANCE J HALL BILL J 37424 WELD CO RD 45 32712 VISTA LAKE RD EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 GREEN JOHN W & ROBERTA L HALL KEITH M & TRACY G PO BOX 514 37190 WELD CO RD 45 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 GRIFFIN-HOLDER CO HALL ROBERT L R & BETTY J PO BOX 511 35251 WELD CO RD 47 ROCKY FORD CO 81067 EATON CO 80615 GRIMES VINCENT D HANSBERGER MICHAEL M & NANCY L PO BOX 718 25556 WELD CO RD 66 GALETON CO 80622 GREELEY CO 80631 GROSSNICKLE TRAVIS HARDGRAVE BILLY D & CHARLOTTE L 24430 WELD CO RD 58 22511 WELD CO RD 72 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 GUERIN MICHAEL L HARSH SHANE D 144 KLEIN ST 35500 COUNTY RD 47 BOX 531 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 HART JOHN E & KELLE A GULLEY STEVEN E 25865 SANDY KNOLL BLVD 33605 COUNTY RD 53 KERSEY CO 80644 GILL CO 80624 HASTINGS GARY E GUNTHER HELEN D 39243 BLVD E COUNTY RD 51 24566 WELD CO RD 58 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 HAYENGA KIRK I GUTIERREZ JOE 32515 COUNTY RD 53 26929 COUNT RD 45 1/2 GREELEY CO 80537 GREELEY CO 80631 HAYES JUDY GUTIERREZ VIOLA 38190 COUNTY RD 49 P O BOX 755 EATON CO 80615 GALETON CO 87062-0755 HECKENDORF RICHARD F & JOANNE L HAFLEY SHAUN C P O BOX 154 24921 HWY 263 KERSEY CO 80644 GREELEY CO 80631-9720 HEINZE CLARA 37141 WCR 53 EATON CO 80615 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 12 HEINZE LEONA J HILLMANN VICTOR F 39521 COUNTY RD 51 27200 WELD CO RD 45 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 HEINZE LEONA J HOCKLEY BRIAN 39446 MAIN ST 2209 9 ST#8 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 HELDT WILLIAM M & EDRIS L HODSON MARK A & LISA A 24218 WCR 70 RT 1 BOX 134 26349 DAVIS RD EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 HELMING MARLIN D HOFF HERMAN R & MARY M 25044 HWY 392 24702 HWY 263 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 HERGENREDER DAVID DEAN HOFF ROBERT L & BARBARA J 24489 WELD CO RD 54 24472 COUNTY ROAD 38 GREELEY CO 80631 LA SALLE CO 80645-9733 HERGENREDER ESTHER HOFFMAN RAYMOND L P O BOX 46 32925 COUNTY RD 53 KERSEY CO 80644-0046 GREELEY CO 80631 HERGERT ROBERT &ARLENE HOFFNER PAULINE 106 S 5 ST 25605 RD 62 1/2 LASALLE CO 80645 GREELEY CO 80631 HERNANDEZ JESUS A HOLDREN STEVEN D & KATHRYN M 2915 D ST 32929 WELD CO RD 51 GREELEY CO 80634 GREELEY CO 80631 HILL DALE GLEN & LORI M HOLTON THOMAS M PO BOX 745 12032HWY52 GALETON CO 80622 FORT LUPTON CO 80621-8360 HILL GLEN L & HAZEL HOLTON VINCENT A 22911 WCR 72 P O BOX 664 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644-0664 HILL GLEN L & HAZEL M HOMAN LARRY E & JACQUELINE J 22911 WCR 72A 25574 SANDY KNOLL BLVD EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 HILLMAN JOHN H & JUDIETH L HOP ANDREW JAY & PAULA LEE 25644 WELD CO RD 54 1/2 27294 WELD CO RD 47-1/2 KERSEY CO 80644 GREELEY CO 80631 HILLMANN HENRY & HERTA D HOP ANDREW JR & MURIEL 3197 E 18TH ST 27454 WELD CO RD 47 1/2 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET #2004-93 Page 13 HOPKIN REX L & NORMA J HOWES MICHAEL E 145 1 ST - PO BOX 306 14780 WELD CO RD 80 KERSEY CO 80644 EATON CO 80615 HOPKINS CHRISTINE D HUDSON LOUIS C &VALDA ADAMS TRUST 4926 W 2 ST 2650 58 AVE GREELEY CO 80634 GREELEY CO 80634 HORN DARREN E & CYNTHIA K HUFFMAN DAVID L 26344 DAVIS RD 1741 69 AVE KERSEY CO 80644 GREELEY CO 80634 HORTON FAMILY TRUST HUMPHREY RONALD LEE & JUDY K 652 E AMHERST PL 23398 WELD CO RD 74 ENGLEWOOD CO 80113 EATON CO 80615 HOSHIKO FARMS INC HUNTER JAMES R JR 28607 WELD CO RD 50 38360 WELD CO RD 51 KERSEY CO 80644 EATON CO 80615 HOSHIKO JEAN A HUNZIKER DELL A & LINDA J 28607 WELD CO RD 50 38876 WELD CO RD 49 KERSEY CO 80644 EATON CO 80615 HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION III HYMER BONNIE G 961 WEIGEL DR P O BOX 771 ELMHURST IL 60126 GALETON CO 80622-0771 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF TOWN OF KERSEY IMMING BRUCE J & CAROL J ATTN EXEC DIRECTOR HOUSING AUTHORITY 36503 WELD CO RD 53 P O BOX 117 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 INDEPENDENT BANK HOWARD CECIL J & SHIRLEY JUNE C/O VECTRA BANK/ACCOUNTING DEPT 27249 WELD CO RD 49 1/2 1650 S COLORADO BLVD GREELEY CO 80631 DENVER CO 80222 HOWARD WAYNE A & KRIS A IRVINE INC 7227 W CANBARRA ST 711 39 ST GREELEY CO 80634-9798 EVANS CO 80620 HOWE RANDALL R ISRAEL WILLIAM R (HEIRS OF) & LETHA S 26130 COUNTY RD 76 2820 E 18 ST EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 HOWES MICHAEL BLINN IVIE LOYD J & DONNA D 14780 COUNTY RD 80 35600 WELD CO RD 45 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 14 J QUARTER CIRCLE CO JONES MICHAEL STEWART & LORI MAE P O BOX 747 33153 WELD CO RD 51 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 JACKSON BILL JONES TESS MORGAN 39231 BLVD E 25593 HWY 392 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 JACOBSEN BRIAN W JOSEPH DOUGLAS D 24462 HWY 263 1275 NCR 27E GREELEY CO 80631 BERTHOUD CO 80513 JAIMES BERTHA A JUDY JERRY S & LEONOR N PO BOX 115 32020 WELD CO RD 47 LUCERNE CO 80646 GREELEY CO 80631 JANSSON DALE A & SALINDA K JURGENSMEIER RONALD S & MARY 37410 WCR 45 2979 E18 ST EATON CO 806159109 GREELEY CO 80631 JOHNSON BRUCE A & SONS INC KALLSEN NANCY KAY 34998 WELD CO RD 45 1707 58TH AVENUE EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80634 JOHNSON GARY L & SHERL L 'CARLSBERG THOMAS L 38493 WELD CO RD 51 36037 COUNTY RD 49 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 JOHNSON HOWARD W& MARY S KEISS RIKI L & MARVIN W 23952 WCR 58 P O BOX 356 GREELEY CO 80631 GALETON CO 80622 JOHNSON JOHN D KELLY JUDITH ANN 23016 WCR 74 23101 COUNTY RD 64 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 JOHNSON LAWRENCE J & SUZANNE M KELLY JULIE 22605 US HWY 34 36530 COUNTY ROAD 51 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 JOHNSON NEAL A & SUSAN M KEMPEMA KYLE D 34426 COUNTY RD 45 2201 COUNTY RD 53 EATON CO 80615-9210 KERSEY CO 80644 JOHNSON SCOTT ALLAN & LISA MAY KENLINE JONATHAN G & MICHELLE A PO BOX 729 35781 COUNTY RD 51 GALETON CO 80622-0729 P O BOX 723 GALETON CO 80622 JOHNSON WAYNE C & TERESA O 1700 FERN AV GREELEY CO 80631 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING — NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 15 KERKSIEK CARL J & KATHLEEN D KLEIN JAMES DAVID & BETSY ANN 24435 HWY 392 28465 WELD CO RD 49 1/2 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 KERSEY APARTMENTS KLEIN LOUIS L 1566 TERRA AVE 4555 W 18 ST SHERIDAN WY 82801 GREELEY CO 80634-3220 KERSEY COMMUNITY CHURCH KOHLHOFF HENRY F (1/2 INTEREST) P O BOX 158 27213 WELD CO RD 78 KERSEY CO 80644 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY STATE BANK KRAMER STEPHEN W& CYNTHIA A C/O VECTRA BANK/ACCOUNTING DEPT 26518 WELD CO RD 49 1650 S COLORADO BLVD GREELEY CO 80631 DENVER CO 80222 KREPS FAMILY TRUST KERSEY TOWN OF 24509 WELD COUNTY ROAD 72 332 3 ST EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 KREPS RONALD D & JANET P KERSHAW DOUGLAS J 35885 GRANDVIEW DR 34285 COUNTY RD 47 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 KREUTZ RANDALL R & PAULA E KIELER CHAD W & SHEILA L 35990 COUNTY RD 51 23390 WELD CO RD 74 P O BOX 726 EATON CO 80615 GALETON CO 80622 KILLGORE CLIFFORD E & BETH E KUNTZ LINDSAY ANNE 26825 WELD CO RD 45 1/2 39344 BVLD D COUNTY RD 51 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 KINDVALL RONALD O & PATRICIA J KUTCHER DENNIE L 38012 WCR 47 25056 WELD CO RD 76 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615-9508 KING MARCIA LYNN LAEGER VICTORIA ANN 24085 WELD CO RD 64 25329 WELD CO RD 66 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 KIRKENDALL CHAD M LAMAR KENNETH P & DIANA S 39583 COUNTY RD 51 C/O CRIDER BRYCE E EATON CO 80615 12733 COUNTY RD 76 EATON CO 80615 KIYOSHI BOB MITANI 24016 HWY 263 LAMAR KENNETH PAUL & DIANA SUSAN GREELEY CO 80631 37622 WELD CO RD 49 EATON CO 80615 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 16 LAMBORN DONALD F LEMASTER DON E &ADELITA 39653 COUNTY RD 51 35808 PLEASANT HILL AVE EATON CO 80615-9512 P O BOX 325 GALETON CO 80622 LAMMERT GARY 39649 COUNTY RD 51 LEMONS JERRY EATON CO 80615 24725 COUNTY RD 58 GREELEY CO 80631 LARSON A W& NANCY D HC 33 BOX 5525 LEONARD ROBERT V &ALICE M MILES CITY MT 59301 38857 COUNTY RD#51 EATON CO 80615-9513 LARSON EVERT V& INEZ M TRUSTEES 25999 WELD COUNTY RD 62 1/2 LIBSACK HERMAN E GREELEY CO 80631 23985 COUNTY RD 64 GREELEY CO 80631 LATHROP CHERYL L 39535 WELD CO RD 51 LIND ALBERT JR & JOAN EATON CO 80615 25745 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD KERSEY CO 80644 LAUCK HENRY II 23700 HWY 263 LIPPINCOTT CHARLES T & SHIRLEY A GREELEY CO 80631 36496 WELD CO RD 49 EATON CO 80615 LAUDERMILCH SHERI F 1230 N RIVERSIDE DR LOHR DORTHULA L & RAYMOND W INDIALANTIC FL 32903 32549 COUNTY RD 51 GREELEY CO 80631 LAWHEAD LARRY REBECCA 23962 WCR 76 LONG PORK INC EATON CO 80615 25480 WELD CO RD 80 EATON CO 80615 LAWHEAD RICHARD V & TAMMY G 23500 HWY 392 LOOKHART DICK L & CHERYL A GREELEY CO 80631 PO BOX 104 KERSEY CO 80644-0104 LAWLEY KATHRYN L 25575 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD LOPRESTO NATHAN SALVATORE KERSEY CO 80644 39555 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615-9503 LAWSON REX A 24529 HWY 392 LOWER LATHAM RESERVOIR COMPANY GREELEY CO 80631 P O BOX 398 KERSEY CO 80644 LEDALL GORDON M & LINDEE K 33450 WELD CO RD 49 LUEPSCHEN KATHRYN A GREELEY CO 80631 38747 COUNTY RD 63 GALETON CO 80622-0352 LEGLER JASON W 39643 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET #2004-93 Page 17 LUPPENS JEFFREY J MARTINEZ MARK Z & DONALDSON DELORES L 107 49 AVE CT 27735 WCR 47 1/2 GREELEY CO 80634 GREELEY CO 80631 LUSTER WAMADA M & IRENE M MARTINSON RUSSELL L & PATRICIA S 2884E 18 ST 2983E 18 ST GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 LUTTERS TIMOTHY G & MARCIA A MASSEY ROGER MARK & MAXINE ELOISE 23340 WELD CO RD 66 35620 WELD CO RD 45 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 LYONS ROBERT CHARLES MATHENA LARRY A 36340 COUNTY RD 49 36995 WELD CO RD 53 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 LYSTER FAMILY FARMS MATHEWS PAUL R &ALISA M 22727 WELD CO RD 64 3237 E 18TH STREET GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 MACKENZIE JOHN W& HELEN A MAXEY GEORGE A & ELOISE J PO BOX 178 26331 WELD CO RD 49 KERSEY CO 80644-0178 GREELEY CO 80631 MAES JULIE A MAXEY JEFFREY A & DEANNE M 27703 WCR 47 1/2 26468 WELD CO RD 49 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 MAGNUSON DONALD O & JEANETTE R MAXEY KEITH R & KELLY S 404 COTTONWOOD AVENUE 26114 WELD COUNTY RD 49 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 MANNING HENRY L MAXWELL ANTHONY W& SHERI K 39645 COUNTY RD 51 25933 SANDY KNOLL BLVD EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST MC CLOSKEY EDWARD J & LISA D COMPANY 27266 WELD CO RD 49 1/2 ONE M & T PLAZA GREELEY CO 80631 BUFFALO NY 14203-2399 MC DONNELL WILLIAM M MARCY DEWEY R & DOROTHY JANE 3003 E 18 ST 24576 WELD CO RD 64 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 MC KENZIE RODNEY W& JUDITH D MARTIN WALTER S 25149 GRANDVIEW WAY P O BOX 785 GREELEY CO 80631 GALETON CO 80622-0785 MCCAULEY CLARENCE W 3065 ASPEN DR LOVELAND CO 80538-2572 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 18 MCCORMICK DAVID H MILLER MICHAEL S II 15805 N COUNTY RD 25E 39451 COUNTY RD 51 LOVELAND CO 80538 EATON CO 80615-9503 MCKEE LUCILLE L 16.67% UND INT MILLER RHINIE A & ALICE A 32202 COUNTY RD 45 31225 COUNTY RD 53 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 MCLAVEY BERNARD R & BRENDA J MILLER RICHARD A & MARSHA D 32864 COUNTY RD 49 31875 WELD CO RD 53 GREELEY CO 80631-9648 GREELEY CO 80631 MCLAVEY GREG T MILLER RONALD R & CYNTHIA M 24056 HWY 392 25615 WELD CO RD 54 1/4 GREELEY CO 80631 KERSEY CO 80644 MELLIN KENNETH W MILLER SCOTT A 25614 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD 25990 COUNTY RD 66 KERSEY CO 80644 GREELEY CO 80634 MENDELL STEVEN K & GWENDOLYN S MINK JEFFREY L PO BOX 625 2805 E 18 ST EATON CO 80615-0625 GREELEY CO 80631 MENG MENDELL E JR & KELLY L MITANI BOB KIYOSHI AKA 4300 BUTTE RD KIYOSHI BOB MITANI LOVELAND CO 80537 24016 HWY 263 GREELEY CO 80631 MEYER JUDITH A 2516 E 16TH ST MOELLER DARRELL & DANA GREELEY CO 80631 24552 HWY 263 GREELEY CO 80631 MEYER JUDY K 37412 WELD CO RD 45 MONROE MYRICK W EATON CO 80615 26784 WCR 45 1/2 GREELEY CO 80631 MEYER TOMMY JOE 22378 HWY 34 MOODY J GALE GREELEY CO 80631 P O BOX 1456 HAINES AK 99827-1456 MILE-HI SHEEP CO 1631 N 35TH AVE CT MOORE ELAINE R GREELEY CO 80631 39639 BLVD A COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 MILLER RICHARD O & MARGARET E 24057 WELD CO RD 54 MOORE ROBERT J & CATHERINE A GREELEY CO 80631 2001 HEMLOCK AVENUE GREELEY CO 80631 MILLER LARRY JOSEPH & JANET KAY 25596 WCR 54 1/2 KERSEY CO 80644 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 19 MOORE SARAH P NAUGHTON LENNIE D & ROSE E 1848 14TH AVE P O BOX 715 GREELEY CO 80631 GALETON CO 80622 MORADO RAMON & MARIA NEIMAN D E 24797 3 ST 23757 COUNTY RD 70 P O BOX 705 EATON CO 80615 GALETON CO 80622 NEUSCHWANGER LARRY G & PAMELA K MORENO IRENE 25820 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD 25146 GRANDVIEW WAY KERSEY CO 80644 GREELEY CO 80631-9694 NEWBY JASON MOWERY GLADYS P 209 POUDRE BAY 26475 WELD CO RD 51 WINDSOR CO 80550 GREELEY CO 80631 NEWTON BETTY ANNE 1/2 INT MURATA BRIAN A & GENE PO BOX 267 22000 WELD CO RD 62 ALLENSPARK CO 805100267 GREELEY CO 80631 NICKERSON STEFANIE LEE MURRAY KEVIN V & VICKY L 22968 WCR 72 24507 HWY 392 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 NIGG KARL F & MARY E-1/2 INT & MURROW ALLEN B 6849 HAMPTON DR 10572 COUNTY RD76 SAN JOSE CA 95120 EATON CO 80519 NIMMONS DATHEL DAWN MURROW ALLEN B 32114 CR 51 39450 MAIN ST GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 NOFFSINGER MANUFACTURING CO INC MUSGRAVE KIRBY L P O BOX 1150 33060 COUNTY RD 51 GREELEY CO 80632 GREELEY CO 80631 NORTH WELD PRODUCE CO MUSGRAVE MARILYN P O BOX 399 BOX 714 GREELEY CO 80632 GALETON CO 80622 NORTHERN COLORADO FARMS LLC MUSGRAVE MARILYN N 800 8 AVE #235 15484 MCR 18 1/2 GREELEY CO 80631 FORT MORGAN CO 80701 NYKAMP DANIEL E & JOANN NATION GARY H & CYNTHIA S 1685 HOLLY AVENEUE 22794 HWY 392 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 O CONNOR JOSEPH D & ANN M 25504 COUNTY RD 76 EATON CO 80615-9508 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 20 OESTREICH RON OTTEM DAVID R & JULIE C 8018 S JOHNSON CT 32757 WELD CO RD 51 LITTLETON CO 80128 GREELEY CO 80631 OGILVY IRRIGATING & LAND CO OTTINGER CHARLES & RENEE 822 7TH ST SUITE 760 37276 WCR 45 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 OLDS KENNETH M JR OWENS JOHN D & JUDITH L 1212 50 AVE 25765 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD GREELEY CO 80634 KERSEY CO 80644 OLEARNICK MICHAEL S & SUSAN L OWL CREEK SUPPLY & IRRIGATION COMPANY 23768 WELD CO RD 66 P O BOX 206 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 OLEARY DOLLY SUSAN & DANIEL E P &A TURKEY FARMS INC 37507 WELD CO RD 53 C/O CONAGRA, INC EATON CO 80615 1 CONAGRA DR CC362 OMAHA NE 68102-5001 OLEXA-RYAN MARY P 24633 RAILROAD ST COUNTY RD 51 P H JOINT VENTURE EATON CO 80615 22305 COUNTY RD 76 EATON CO 80615 OLSON VERNON L DIAN M 25541 WELD CO RD 74 PADILLA GLENN EATON CO 80615 35012 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 ORAND MARY-MARTHA H 39236 BLVD E COUNTY RD 51 PALSER DONALD D & BEVERLY A EATON CO 80615 22685 HWY 392 GREELEY CO 80631 ORR GRACE ELLA-1/2 INT P O BOX 343 PANENERGY FIELD SERVICES INC KERSEY CO 80644 C/O PANHANDLE EASTERN CORP P O BOX 1642 ORTH EARL A HOUSTON TX 77251-1642 39539 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615-9503 PARKINS PAULA 24851 COUNTY RD 74 OSBORN RICK P O BOX 736 23015 COUNTY RD 62 GALETON CO 80622 GREELEY CO 80631 PARKS J SCOTT OSTER QUINTIN L & TRACY A 32499 COUNTY RD 53 109 3 ST GREELEY CO 80631-9641 EATON CO 80615 PELZ JOE & CAROL OSTER RICHARD E 28271 COUNTY RD 74 1011 11TH AVENUE EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING — NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 21 PEREZ JOSE JESUS & HERMELINDA POFFENROTH DAVID D & DOLLIE E 23436 HWY 263 39633 COUNTY RD 51 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615-9512 PETERS ALFRED J REVOCABLE TRUST (1/2) POPE TAMMIE S 25641 WELD CO RD 54 1/4 24632 2ND AVE KERSEY CO 80644 EATON CO 80615 PETERSON LESLIE E & JOAN M POPHAM DAVID 19882 HWY 392 P O BOX 471 GREELEY CO 80631 KERSEY CO 80644-0471 PETERSON RICHARD F PORTILLO THOMAS A DVM & JACQUE K 23249 HWY 392 27371 HWY 37 GREELEY CO 80631 KERSEY CO 80644 PETERSON SUSAN K PRIDE JEFFREY ALAN & STACY LAYNE 23603 COUNTY RD 70 27655 WELD CO RD 47 1/2 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 PFENNING ROBERT D & ESTHER M PROCEEDS LLC P O BOX 724 PO BOX 519 GALETON CO 80622 GREELEY CO 80632 PFENNING ROBERT N JR CARMIE J QUICK WILBER L & PAMELA J PO BOX 327 24582 HWY 392 GALETON CO 80622 GREELEY CO 80631 PFLEIDERER JOHN W& LINDA L REAM JANET L 25900 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD 22999 E HWY 34 KERSEY CO 80644 GREELEY CO 80631 PIEROT PAULA M REITZ RONNIE DEAN MURIEL E 35814 PLEASANT HILL 24328 WELD CO RD 76 P O BOX 314 EATON CO 80615 GALETON CO 80622 REYNOLDS ROBERT L & ELSA MAE PINON MANUEL & BETTY 23526 WELD CO RD 66 36584 COUNTY RD 51 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 RICKARD STEPHEN GERALD & MELINDA JOY PIPER CURTIS D & JULIE M 22512 WELD CO RD 72 601 S 1 ST - PO BOX 461 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 RIDINGS WILLIAM G PLATTE VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 23816 COUNTY RD 66 P O BOX 16 GREELEY CO 80631 KERSEY CO 80644 RIGG THOMAS E & KATINA A P O BOX 1342 AULT CO 80610 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 22 RIMKO SHEILA M RODRIQUEZ ARMANDO PO BOX 1236 1701 HOLLY AVE GREELEY CO 80632 GREELEY CO 80634 RINARD TROY C &TAVAN L ROGERS MICHAEL TODD 24038 WELD CO RD 58 23541 COUNTY RD 66 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80634 RITTEL LARRY L & KATHY K ROJAS HUGO PO BOX 324 24639 RAILROAD ST GALETON CO 80622 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 ROADIFER W CATHERINE TRUSTEE OF 3791 E 18 ST ROOD CARL O & SANDRA L GREELEY CO 80631 23998 WCR 58 GREELEY CO 80631 ROBB RANDALL E & JULIE C 2934 E 18 ST ROSA JESSICA L GREELEY CO 80631 23700 WELD CO RD 58 GREELEY CO 80631 ROCHELLE CONNIE S 39663 COUNTY RD 51 ROSENQUIST STEVE L & SUELYN EATON CO 80615 23982 WELD CO RD 58 GREELEY CO 80631 RODRIGUEZ CARMIN (LE) 2544 E 8 ST ROTH GERALD LEE & JANET MARIE GREELEY CO 80631 32100 WCR #49 GREELEY CO 80631 RODRIGUEZ CYNTHIA D 1218 FERN AVE ROTH GREGORY S GREELEY CO 80631 25210 HWY 392 GREELEY CO 80631 RODRIGUEZ JIM S & VICKY A P O BOX 652 ROTH ROBERT A KERSEY CO 80644 25540 HWY 392 GREELEY CO 80631 RODRIGUEZ OTHONIEL & ROSA MARIA P O BOX 725 ROTH VIRGINIA R (HEIRS OF) GALETON CO 80622 25540 HWY 392 GREELEY CO 80631 RODRIGUEZ PABLO R & VIRGINIA M 25970 SANDY KNOLLS - PO BOX 543 ROTH WILLIAM L & PHYLLIS A KERSEY CO 80644 2210 FERN AVE GREELEY CO 80631 RODRIGUEZ PEDRO & BALVINA P O BOX 303 ROUSE GLEN & PEGGY WYKES GALETON CO 80622 1100 N MADGE GULCH RD - PO BOX 189 SEDALIA CO 80135 RODRIGUEZ SIMON & MARY EVA 34255 WELD COUNTY ROAD 49 EATON CO 80615 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 23 RUEB SCOTT SCHANK ESTHER M 39515 COUNTY RD 51 4020 54TH ST RD EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80634 RUYBAL RICHARD G & DONNA K SCHAUMBERG TRUST NO 1 PATRICIA H 24576 WELD CO RD 54 1/4 1357 43RD AVE #24 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80634 RYAN EDWARD L & SHARON K SCHELLER MARC E & BRENDA L 24805 2 ST 34478 WELD CO RD 45 P O BOX 747 EATON CO 80615 GALETON CO 80622 SCHELLER OTTO RYAN LINDA A 22595 WELD CO RD 70 39487 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 SCHLAGEL WALTER M & MILDRED I RYAN THOMAS MATHEW (TRUSTEE OF) 26256 SANDY KNOLLS PL 9080 ILLAHEE RD NE KERSEY CO 80644 BREMERTON WA 98310 SCHMIDT DOUGLAS J SAGEL MICHAEL A 27551 COUNTY RD 49 1/2 31499 WELD CO RD 53 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 SCHMIDT EDWARD D & JANET K SALAZAR JOHN F & CYNTHIA A 24250 COUNTY ROAD 58 P O BOX 728 GREELEY CO 80631 GALETON CO 80622 SCHNEIDER DENNIS G SALAZAR MANUEL M JR 25278 COUNTY RD 80 P O BOX 743 EATON CO 80615 GALETON CO 80622 SCHNEIDER JOHN K & PERRI P SANDDOLLAR INVESTMENTS LLC 39529 WCR 51 1500 NORTH PARK STREET EATON CO 80615 CASTLE ROCK CO 80104 SCHNEIDER LARRY D SANDERS CHRISTY & TIMOTHY 39645 COUNTY RD 51 3017 SILVER LEAF DR EATON CO 80615 LOVELAND CO 80538-2819 SCHNEIDER WILLIAM P & TAMMY S SANDIN FARMS LLC 26233 WELD CO RD 51 26589 WELD CO RD 49 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 SCHOTT WILBUR LEEROY SCALLON GREGORY J 22314 WCR 54 1/2 9734 COUNTY ROAD 70 GREELEY CO 80631 WINDSOR CO 80550 SCHUMACHER JOSEPH A & NANCY 7109 W. CANBERRA STREET DRIVE GREELEY CO 80634 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET #2004-93 Page 24 SCHWALM HAROLD P & PARTICIA I SELBY DOUGLAS LEE & LORI J 22577 WELD CO RD 64 1/2 23605 WELD CO RD 70 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 SCHWARTZ BRADLEY J & DAWN M SESSIONS FAMILY TRUST 33534 COUNTY ROAD 47 32558 VISTA LAKE RD GREELEY CO 80631-9651 GREELEY CO 80631 SCHWISOW EVELYN M SHAFFER DOUGLAS D & LINDA 22795 COLO HWY 392 27391 HWY 37 GREELEY CO 80631 KERSEY CO 80644 SCOPEL KAREN L SHAFFER RONALD L & SHARON L 39585 WELD CO RD 51 25580 WCR 54 1/4 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 SCOTT DAVID A & BERNA D SHAWCROSS JIMMY F & LINDA S 37418 WELD CO RD 45 25187 WCR 54 1/4 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 SCOTT MICHAEL L SR & MELANIE B SHEETS HOMER W & KAREN E 39661 COUNTY RD 51 24797 PLEASANT HILL EATON CO 80615 PO BOX 773 GALETON CO 80622 SCOTT MICHELLE S 34998 COUNTY ROAD 51 SHEETS JOHN & APRIL EATON CO 80615-9527 38136 COUNTY RD 49 EATON CO 80615-9401 SEARBY TOM J &ABIGAIL L 32485 WELD CO RD 49 SHEETS WILLIAM DEAN & EVA JEAN GREELEY CO 80631 BOX 58 KERSEY CO 80644 SEBALD RAYMOND W & MARIE C/O BARRY BECKWITH SHOSTROM RONALD D 24 CHEYENNE AVE 39605 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615-9512 SEBOLD STEVEN & RENA SHULER RONALD 24500 HWY 392 35870 GRANDVIEW AVE GREELEY CO 80631 GALETON CO 80622 SEEWALD ANDREW J & PAULA JO SHULER RONALD & MARTHA 38010 WELD CO RD 45 P O BOX 714 EATON CO 80615 GALETON CO 80622 SEGELKE DENNIS E & JOLENE M SIGG ROBERT J & JULIE J 25902 WELD CO RD 54 1/4 22049 WCR 74 KERSEY CO 80644 EATON CO 80615 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET #2004-93 Page 25 SILBERMAN PAUL STAUDINGER DOUGLAS JAMES & COLLEEN 23852 WELD CO RD 58 LOIS GREELEY CO 80631 24260 WCR 392 GREELEY CO 80631 SILVA JOE C & MARIE N 24250 HWY 263 STEINMETZ MARTHA B GREELEY CO 80631 25296 COUNTY RD #58 GREELEY CO 80631 SIMMONS JACOB J III & WENDY Y 32649 COUNTY RD 53 STEVENSON DONNA L & SHANNON S GREELEY CO 80631-9641 23738 WELD COUNTY RD 58 GREELEY CO 80631 SMALLWOOD BRIAN T & LANAY L 39511 COUNTY RD 51 STILLE M GENE & M DIANNE EATON CO 80615 35886 WELD CO RD 49 EATON CO 80615 SMITH JACKIE DUANE & ROBERTA IDELLE 28879 CO HWY 37 STOLTE DOUGLAS D GREELEY CO 80631 31370 WELD CO RD 49 GREELEY CO 80631 SMITH JEREMY J 23514 COUNTY RD 72 STRANAHAN JEFFREY EATON CO 80615 39730 COUNTY RD 49 EATON CO 80615-9414 SMITH SHAWN M 39820 WELD CO RD 49 SUPINO JAMES V EATON CO 80615 39435 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 SNYDER CAROL J 39578 WELD CO RD 49 SWIFT BEEF COMPANY EATON CO 80615 1770 PROMONTORY CIR GREELEY CO 80634 SPORLEDER DONALD E & BARBARA A P O BOX 322 TAFOYA CARL M GALETON CO 80622-0322 25150 GRANDVIEW WAY GREELEY CO 80631 STANLEY CLAYTON C 1410 28TH ST RD TAYLOR EDDIE JOE & THELMA MARIE GREELEY CO 80631 P O BOX 332 GALETON CO 80622-0332 STARMAN KENNETH D 33431 COUNTY RD 53 THORN LESLIE E GILL CO 80624-9507 25776 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD KERSEY CO 80644 STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE STATE SERVICE BLDG THOUTT RANDY L & SANDRA KAY DENVER CO 80203 25038 WELD CO RD 58 GREELEY CO 80631 STATLEY JOHN A & SHENANDOAH 23962 COUNTY ROAD 58 GREELEY CO 80631 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET #2004-93 Page 26 THUROW HAROLD H VAUGHAN KATHRYN A 22358 HWY 14 25719 COUNTY RD 74 AULT CO 80610 EATON CO 80615 TIMMERMAN INVESTMENTS LLC VAUGHN KENNETH L 22499 WELD CO RD 70 25701 COUNTY RD 54 1/4 EATON CO 80615 KERSEY CO 80644 TIMMERMAN TERRY L & DIANA P VEGA DE NUNEZ ROSA MARIA 22499 WCR 70 1731 FERN AVE EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 TOKUYASU ROBERT N & BETTY L VENEGAS CASTULO 24016 HWY 263 25114 HWY 263 GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 TRIANGLE CROSS RANCH INC VETTERS FRANCES A DE SARBO P O BOX 727 37416 WCR 45 GALETON CO 80622 EATON CO 80615 TRIGGS MICHAEL G & STACY L VETTING JAMES E 38640 COUNTY RD 51 2143 45 AVE EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80634 UHRICH HAROLD R & EMMA VIGIL JOHNNY L 31386 WELD CO RD 51 39640 BLVD A COUNTY RD 51 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 ULRICH MARIANNE VONFELDT LEONARD F & SARAH J 36477 WELD CO RD 49 39597 WELD CO RD 51 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 US EXPERIMENTAL POTATO STATION VONFELDT VICTOR R & MARTIEL L P O BOX 1167 34030 WCR 47 GREELEY CO 80632 EATON CO 806159304 UYEMURA DOUGLAS C & DOROTHY WADSWORTH DONALD E 2119 CHERRY AVE COUNTY RD 51 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615 VAGNEUR LANGE LESLIE TRUST WAGNER DANIEL 2140 FERN AVE 4113 W COUNTY RD 4 GREELEY CO 80631 BERTHOUD CO 80513-8564 VAN ARSDALE JACOB B WAGNER GARY L 39629 COUNTY ROAD 51 26990 COUNTY RD 45 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 VAN MAANEN EDWIN &AUDREY WAGNER HERBERT JR P O BOX 262 25967 COUNTY RD 18 KERSEY CO 80644 KEENESBURG CO 80643 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET #2004-93 Page 27 WAGNER RONALD L WARREN CHARLES L INVEST CO 1/2 INT 37228 COUNTY RD 49 2101 E 4 AV EATON CO 80615 DENVER CO 80206 WAKEFIELD GARY L & ROSEMARY WARREN WILLIAM W & THERESIA R 25554 SANDY KNOLL BLVD P O BOX 762 KERSEY CO 80644 GALETON CO 80622 WALKER BRUCE D WATER RESOURSES LLC 39545 COUNTY RD 51 3026 4 AVE EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 WALKER JOHNATHAN WAUGH SHIRLEY 39503 COUNTY RD 51 6050 WRIGHT ST EATON CO 80615 ARVADA CO 80004 WALKER REX W WEAVER SCOTT & ELIZABETH 35250 COUNTY RD 47 39469 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615-9503 WALLACE WILLIAM S WEBB JARED D 39631 BLVD A - COUNTY RD 51 38028 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 EATON CO 80615 WALLS GERALD R WEBSTER FARMS LLC COUNTY RD 51 C/O MAGNESS INVESTMENT GROUP LLC EATON CO 80615 1200 17 ST#660 DENVER CO 80202 WALTER DARREL L & CYNTHIA K 26712 WCR 45 WEIGEL KENNETH J GREELEY CO 80631 39507 WELD COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 WALTERS STEPHEN W &AMY R 25654 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD WEIGHNER MARK J KERSEY CO 80644 35607 COUNTY RD 49 EATON CO 80615-9307 WAREHIME DAVID E & SHERRY 23539 WELD CO RD 72 WEIGLE KATHLEEN M EATON CO 80615 26865 WELD CO RD 45-1/2 GREELEY CO 80631 WAREMBOURG KLUBERT & HELEN ROSE & ALBERT WEIL JAMES ROBERT & SUSANNAH 101 W CHERRY ST ELIZABETH LOUISVILLE CO 80027 25844 SANDY KNOLLS BLVD KERSEY CO 80644 WARNER PAUL L 24025 COUNTRY RD 76 WEILAND RAE BARNETT (TRUSTEE OF) EATON CO 80615 1814 14 AVE GREELEY CO 80631 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING — NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET#2004-93 Page 28 WEINMEISTER DAVID L WHITE J ARMAN 23041 COUNTY RD 54 25751 COUNTY RD 54 1/4 GREELEY CO 80631 KERSEY CO 80644 WELD CO MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY WHITE JOHN R & KATHRYN P O BOX 727 24495 COUNTY ROAD 54 GREELEY CO 80632 GREELEY CO 80631 WELD COUNTY WIKUM MATTHEW K & ROBIN N 915 10 ST 23922 COUNTY ROAD 74 GREELEY CO 80631 EATON CO 80615-9407 WELD COUNTY FISH &WILD LIFE ASSN WILHITE RODNEY L P.O. BOX 1122 PO BOX 129 GREELEY CO 80632 EATON CO 80615 WELD COUNTY INVESTMENT GROUP INC WILKINSON WILLIAM D & ELIZABETH R % PETE BOSCH 23279 WELD CO RD 72 12420 MAGNOLIA EATON CO 80615 CHINO CA 91710 WILLIAMS WARREN WELLS BARRY DBA 39533 COUNTY RD 51 PO BOX 357 EATON CO 80615 104 HILL ST KERSEY CO 80644 WILLIS PHILIP 39229 COUNTY RD 51 WENTZ DAVID A EATON CO 80615-9503 39645 COUNTY RD 51 EATON CO 80615 WILLOUGHBY MARGARET S 25081 WELD CO RD 74 WERNER ARTHUR T & ELAINE LIVING TRUST EATON CO 80615 243 42ND AVENUE GREELEY CO 80634 WILSON KERI 39246 BLVD E COUNTY RD 51 WERTZ RONALD G &ALMA A EATON CO 80615 25120 WELD COUNTY RD 80 P O BOX 763 WILSON STEVEN W GALETON CO 80622 711 39 ST EVANS CO 80620 WEST RAY A 34435 WCR 47 WILSON STEVEN W EATON CO 80615 39551 WELD CO RD 51 EATON CO 80615 WESTERN EQUIPMENT TRUCK INC 2055 1 AVE WINDYKA LESLIE ANNE GREELEY CO 80631 P O BOX 839 KERSEY CO 80644-0839 WHITE BENNIE LEE P O BOX 344 WINTER GREGORY A GALETON CO 80622 22196 WELD CO RD 74 EATON CO 80615 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING - NOTICE OF HEARING DOCKET #2004-93 Page 29 WINTER RICHARD D (1/2 INT) WYATT JAMES D & JILL 24959 WELD CO RD 66 PO BOX 774 GREELEY CO 80631 GALETON CO 80622-0774 WINTERS MARK YAMADA RONALD L & KAY M 4420 W 51 ST 2857 E 18TH ST GREELEY CO 80634 GREELEY CO 806319739 WITHERALL TROY D YBARRA GENOVEVO E 39637 CR 51 33200 WELD CO RD 49 EATON CO 80615 GREELEY CO 80631 WITWER STOW L &WITWER MARIAN G YEAROUS MICHAEL W 2333 17TH AVE 25701 HWY 263 GREELEY CO 80631-6859 GREELEY CO 80631 WOLF RANDY J & BARBARA A YOUNG JOHN D & BARBARA J 23989 WELD CO RD 58 P O BOX 752 GREELEY CO 80631 GALETON CO 80622-0752 WOODWARD MELINDA S ZABKA FARMS INC 25673 HWY 392 617- 6TH ST GREELEY CO 80631 GREELEY CO 80631 ZIEGLER LAIRA L WRIGHT JAMES H 37560 COUNTY RD 49 22378 HWY 34 EATON CO 80615-9411 GREELEY CO 80631 ZIMMER JOSEPH R & LORI L 22114 WELD CO RD 74 EATON CO 80615 Jeffery W. Dankenbring Fefsburg Holt & Ullevig Carol Harding From: Peggy Allsup Armstrong [PARMSTRONG@greeleyschools.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:18 AM To: charding@co.weld.co.us. Subject: WCR 49 Arterial Corridor Study (Docket#2004-93) Dear Sirs and Madams: We are writing this letter regarding the WCR 49 study and road project. For the past 20 years, we have lived on and own farms on both WCR 70 and WCR 72 with crossroads of WCR 45 and WCR 47. We are gravely concerned with your proposal. As the amount of traffic increases, so will the dangers of more and more traffic on either roads 47 or 45. This area continues to be an agricultural hub with many farmers and ranchers using roads 47 and 45 to drive tractors, combines, balers or move stock on a regular basis. Hwy 392 is already dangerous for slower moving farm equipment and the fast drivers who do not recognize or take into account the large farming equipment that needs to be moved. We have always tried to use the "back roads" especially the unpaved ones (such as WCRs 47 and 45) . We are also concerned the Arterial Corridor will only create more and more accidents for our kids who help with the large equipment! We're all too familiar with Weld County' s horrific traffic deaths. ! ! ! For years WCRs 43 and 51 have been paved and "maintained" by the county. Drivers are well aware of these routes north and south. We would like to see these roads considered since they are already paved and accustomed to traffic. We hope you will consider our homes and country life which we have worked hard for and try to maintain our agricultural needs. Please consider an alternative route and vote against the this proposal. Michael W. and Peggy L. Armstrong 22881 WCR 70 Eaton, CO 80615 (970) 353-1670 [T? 1 �E LO Ik 14 0 CC] CC (-) UI in Wei County Roclu -r9 CR74 A team `orrioor `uciy Galetonl CR721cc Flpp ell OIX i U CR70 392 I �c= `W !, CR66 ICloverlyl CR64 Alden l ! I . CR62 t ewel y Wry263 Rep Greeley i 5 �a,e e I CR56 ..... N I 37 ! 34 + e! cc Kersey 1 oI CR541 0' FELSBURG H�� U°EVIL Octobei 2004 -1 'a WELD COUNTY ROAD 49 ARTERIAL ' CORRIDOR STUDY APPENDIX -1 F 3 OUN -1 -a Pre .4 Weld County Public Works Department -1 P.O. Box 758 1111 "H" Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Ps - , edby: 41 Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 Principal: Christopher J. Fasching, P.E. Project Manager: Jeffery W. Dankenbring, P.E. FHU Reference No. 03-237 October 2004 EELSRURC HOLT & ULLEV[G I 4 iFY Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study g APPENDIX 11 EVALUATION MATRICES HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL GEOMETRY DESIGN CRITERIA PUBLIC COMMENTS hj, 1 4 N IRFELSRURG (IHOLT & ULLEVIC yy iil 41 nyFA In Se l „,'.;..1, ,1-4 4t '+ V flt1 'E • 3 p x Q4[.F� d 14h, s `r .. I M15% & � s+ 1 Y b i 1F{ 1 l 5ry "I'''' 'friy`h 1 sx e j ttl I i�Y Q 'k � T .t � 24x . p fi 11 FIO it t� F c Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 3 °uN [ii 1 1 A. if The following are the evaluation matrices that were utilized to evaluate the alternatives for the Il study area. The description at the top of each evaluation matrix correlates to the respective Il segment and alternative as it is shown in the report. is The alternatives were evaluated for each segment using the following nine criteria: la ✓ Transportation Effectiveness ✓ Horizontal and Vertical Geometry ✓ Community Impacts ✓ Land Use Consequences ✓ Existing Development Consequences ✓ Environmental Impacts i ✓ Existing Safety 1 ✓ Construction ✓ Construction Cost 1 The criteria were assigned a weight factor by the local agency group that would emphasize certain criteria more than others. The scoring for the matrices was based on a range from 1 to 5 with 1 being the best. When the total scoring for each alternative was compared to the other alternatives for that segment, the alternatives with the lower scores were considered to be the better alternatives. It should be noted, however, that the purpose of this process was to screen alternatives and to develop relative rankings of the alternatives. A minor difference in the scoring should not be interpreted as definitive; these alternatives could be considered as relatively similar. FELSRURG C� MOLT & UI_LEV'IG 'V 'C�F1O 9 L uN_ Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 0 Evaluation Matrix Summary t4 !� Alternative A Segment Alternative B Segment Alternative C Segment Alter! Segment Alternative Alternative Alternative Alternative Segment 1 38.92 A 36.83 B2 3225 C1 4 4 Segment 2 33.00 A 32.00 B 28.08 C 4' ' 1 Segment 3 38.33 Al 35.83 B 36.42 C 3' Al 1 Segment 4 39.50 Al 33.58 B 21.17 C - Al 1 1 4 Total 149.75 138.24 117.92 16 1 1 Apparent Preferred 1 Alternative 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The lowest scoring depicts the overall preferred alternative. 1 1 1 FE!.PLRC HOLT �A I,L.EV'IC : 1 _ 1 4 • • C<F 1 i a Ut Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Evaluation Matrix-Segment 1 (US 34 to SH 263) Alternative A Alternative B1 Alternative B2 Alternative B3 Alternative Cl Alternative C2 Alternative D Weight Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Evaluation Criteria Factors ScoringScoring ScoringScoring ScoringScoring Scoring Scorin g g g g Scoring ScoringScorin Scoring �� Scoring Scoring 4 Transportation Effectiveness 1 Out of Direction Travel/Requires Lower Speeds 2.0 3 6.00 3 6.00 1 2.00 2 4.00 2 4.00 3 6.00 5 10.00 Horizontal and Vertical Geometry Horizontal and Vertical Geometry 1.0 2 2.00 3 3.00 2 2.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 3 3.00 3 3.00 • Community Impacts • 4 Aesthetic Impacts 2 3 2 5 2 4 4 1 Access Impacts 3 3 1 3 2 5 4 1 Right-of-way Impacts 4 4 5 3 4 4 3 1 Known Historical Significance Impacts 1 5 5 3 1 1 1 ill Average for Community Impacts 2.0 2.50 5.00 3.75 7,50 3.25 6.50 3.50 7.00 2.25 4.50 - 3.50 7.00 3.00 6.00 Land Use Consequences 1 Land Use Consequences 1.0 2 2.00 5 5.00 4 4.00 3 3.00 4 4.00 1 1.00 3 3.00 Existing Development Consequences 1 Existing Development Consequences 1.0 3 3.00 4 4.00 3 3.00 5 5.00 2 2.00 5 5.00 3 3.00 1 Environmental Impacts I Wildlife 4 5 4 5 4 4 3 1 Flood Plain 4 5 4 5 3 3 2 1 Air&Noise Quality 3 2 2 3 2 4 4 1 Average for Environmental Impacts 1.75 3.67 6.42 4.00 7.00 3.33 5.83 4.33 7.58 3.00 5.25 _ 3.67 6.42 3.00 5.25 Existing Safety 1 Traffic Safety 2.0 3 6.00 3 6.00 2 4.00 3 6.00 2 4.00 2 4.00 3 6.00 I Construction 1 Ability to Phase 2 4 3 3 1 1 2 1 Constructability 3 5 4 5 2 2 2 1 Average for Construction 1.0 2.50 2.50 4.50 4.50 3.50 3.50 4.00 4.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 - Construction Cost 1 Construction Cost 1.5 4 6.00 5 7.50 4 6.00 5 7.50 4 6.00 3 4.50 3 4.50 1 1 Total 38.92 50.50 36.83 45.08 32.25 38.42 42.75 1 The criteria are scored from 1 to 5 with 1 being the best. 1 Adjacent Residences 2 5 1 5 3 10 8 1 PI PHI-BI-R(1 1 IIICLT l.LL6\ IC 1 1 1 1 k i 1 p 4 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 4 a Evaluation Matrix-Segment 2(SH 263 to SH 392) a Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C Alternative Dl Alternative D2 4 Evaluation Criteria Weight Scoring Weighted Scoring Weighted Weighted Scoring Scoring Weighted Weighted Scoring Scoring , Scoring • • Transportation Effectiveness Out of Direction Travel/Requires Lower Speeds 2.0 1 2.00 1 2.00 1 2.00 3 6.00 3 6.00 • • Horizontal and Vertical Geometry • Horizontal and Vertical Geometry 1.0 1 1.00 2 2.00 1 1.00 3 3.00 3 3.00 • Community Impacts • Aesthetic Impacts 4 3 3 5 5 • Access Impacts 5 4 5 5 5 • Right-of-way Impacts 3 3 2 4 4 • Average for Community Impacts 2.0 4.00 8.00 3.33 6.67 3.33 6.67 4.67 9.33 4.67 9.33 1 Land Use Consequences Land Use Consequences 1.0 2 2.00 3 3.00 2 2.00 3 3.00 3 3.00 1 ' Existing Development Consequences • Existing Development Consequences 1.0 4 4.00 3 3.00 3 3.00 5 5.00 4 4.00 ' Environmental Impacts $ Wildlife 1 1 1 1 1 $ Flood Plain 1 1 1 1 1 ' Air&Noise Quality 4 2 3 4 4 $ Average for Environmental Impacts 1.75 2.00 3.50 1.33 2.33 1.67 2.92 2.00 3.50 2.00 3.50 Existing Safety 1 Traffic Safety 2.0 4 8.00 3 6.00 3 6.00 5 10.00 4 8.00 I Construction • Ability to Phase 1 2 1 3 3 I Constructability 2 3 2 4 4 I Average for Construction 1.0 1.50 1.50 2.50 2.50 1.50 1.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 I Construction Cost Construction Cost 1.5 2 3.00 3 4.50 2 3.00 4 6.00 4 6.00 I Total 33.00 32.00 28.08 49.33 46.33 III The criteria are scored from 1 to 5 with 1 being the best. 1 19 Adjacent Residences 18 10 13 17 OPFELSBURG - (d HOLT & CILFVIG E ar le 4 :-.. 4 o,.. ID Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 4 4 Evaluation Matrix-Segment 3(SH 392 to CR 74) i 4 Alternative Al Alternative A2 Alternative B Alternative C 4 Weight Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Evaluation Criteria Scoring Scoring Scoring Scoring 4 Factors Scoring Scoring Scoring — Scoring 4 Transportation Effectiveness 4 Out of Direction Travel/Requires Lower Speeds 2.0 2 4.00 3 6.00 1 2.00 1 2.00 • Horizontal and Vertical Geometry i Horizontal and Vertical Geometry 1.0 3 3.00 3 3.00 2 2.00 2 2.00 iCommunity Impacts 4 Aesthetic Impacts 4 5 4 4 iAccess Impacts 3 5 4 4 4 Right-of-way Impacts 4 4 3 3 4 Average for Community Impacts 2.0 3.67 7.33 4.67 9.33 3.67 7.33 3.67 7.33 aLand Use Consequences Land Use Consequences 1.0 3 3.00 2 2.00 2 2.00 2 2.00 • • Existing Development Consequences • Existing Development Consequences 1.0 3 3.00 5 5.00 4 4.00 4 4.00 1 Environmental Impacts 4 Wildlife 1 1 1 1 • Flood Plain 2 2 2 2 1 Air 8 Noise Quality 3 4 3 4 • Average for Environmental Impacts 1.75 2.00 3.50 2.33 4.08 2.00 3.50 2.33 4.08 Existing Safety 1 Traffic Safety 2.0 3 6.00 5 10.00 4 8.00 4 8.00 • Construction • Ability to Phase 2 2 2 2 1 Constructability 3 4 3 3 • Average for Construction 1.0 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 • Construction Cost Construction Cost 1.5 4 6.00 3 4.50 3 4.50 3 4.50 • I Total 38.33 46.92 35.83 36.42 I The criteria are scored from 1 to 5 with 1 being the best. • Adjacent Residences 20 14 16 18 I I III EELSRURC I rd HOLT ULLEV IC i1 �I 4 4 ,---/0y,,; ,c, ':,s.4 4 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 4 Evaluation Matrix-Segment 4(CR 74 to SH 14) 4 4 Alternative Al Alternative A2 Alternative B Alternative C 4 Weight Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Evaluation Criteria Scoring Scoring Scoring g Scoring 4 Factors Scoring Scoring Scoring Scoring iTransportation Effectiveness i Out of Direction Travel/Requires Lower Speeds 2.0 2 4.00 3 6.00 1 2.00 1 2.00 4 Horizontal and Vertical Geometry Horizontal and Vertical Geometry 1.0 2 2.00 2 2.00 1 1.00 1 1.00 I Community Impacts O Aesthetic Impacts 4 4 5 2 O Access Impacts 4 4 5 1 O Right-of-way Impacts 4 4 3 2 11 Average for Community Impacts 2.0 4.00 8.00 4.00 8.00 4.33 8.67 1.67 3.33 Land Use Consequences ` Land Use Consequences 1.0 3 3.00 2 2.00 2 2.00 2 2.00 Existing Development Consequences 11. Existing Development Consequences 1.0 4 4.00 5 5.00 3 3.00 2 2.00 Environmental Impacts Wildlife 1 1 1 1 Flood Plain 1 1 1 1 ID Air&Noise Quality 4 4 3 2 10 Average for Environmental Impacts 1.75 2.00 3.50 2.00 3.50 1.67 2.92 1.33 2.33 Existing Safety '4 Traffic Safety 2.0 4 8.00 4 8.00 4 8.00 2 4.00 1 Construction 7 Ability to Phase 3 1 2 2 Constructability 2 3 1 1 lb Average for Construction 1.0 2.50 2.50 2.00 2.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 3 Construction Cost Construction Cost 1.5 3 4.50 3 4.50 3 4.50 2 3.00 1 Total 39.50 41.00 33.58 21.17 ID The criteria are scored from 1 to 5 with 1 being the best. 1. Adjacent Residences 20 18 22 7 $ IPFFLSIiURG sI (4 HOLT & U LLE VW 3) y 7) r A It <.ti ` I i> t OP A ,< Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study l 1 ll HORIZONTAL AND VVERTICAL'GOM EETRI" DESIGN CRITERIA , i IIFELSRURG (, HOLT ULLEVIC p "MA ' T�. t 4$ 3a * 'D•th ce.'11 t r, S'((Yt r� �'1I Fl r .: a ,,. alb HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL GEOMETRY STANDARDS tetWeld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study I. (from US Highway 34 to State Highway 14) Wine 4 o COLORADO The following design criteria is applicable to the ultimate arterial configuration. The design criteria .4 for the interim roadway configuration may vary from the ultimate design criteria. All applicable criteria and interim and ultimate roadway configurations are subject for review and approval by Weld County Department of Public Works. Design Element Values Units "1 Roadway Classification Arterial Posted Speed Limit 55 MPH Maximum Design Speed 60 MPH Minimum Lane Width 12 Feet Minimum Driving Lanes 4 Curb and Gutter Type Type 2 Shoulder/Bike Lane 6' Paved Minimum Right-of-Way Width 140 j Feet Horizontal Alignment Criteria Minimum Curve Radius 1,505.00 Feet Minimum Stopping Sight distance 570 Feet Minimum Length of Tangents Between All Curves 150 Feet Minimum Clear Zone From the Edge of Travel Way(6:1 Slopes or flatter) 30 Feet Superelevation (e max) (M-203-12 Superelevation Streets) 4% Vertical Alignment Criteria Minimum Length of Vertical Curves Crest 180 Feet Sag 180 Feet K-Value Ranges Crest Vertical Curve Minimum 151 Sag Vertical Curve Minimum 136 • Stopping Sight Distance Minimum 570 Feet Minimum Passing Sight Distance 2,135 Feet Maximum Grade Break without a Vertical Curve 0.P0% Maximum Longitudinal Grade 4% Minimum Longitudinal Grade 0.5% • FELSBURG /1 H & ■ ULLEVIG • q y p 31t44144,,,104,44:11.V4 j) �rxt1 vB #1s zt v i.4,' 4,£ j .ak a t ; 1 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study PUBLIC COMMENTS FELSBURC C� HOLT & ULLEVIC "y ) $, t i : 3 ♦♦ G $9 xti 6h� Q Y �,B:}{1 w. f 'ic '.'i$4 it • P R r11 414 '3 s � k i y !it; "I x z2 u i APR-15-04 TRU 10:06 Al! WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WKS7 FAX:9703046497 PAGE 2 :1/2 yjnv, • t� Water and Sewer Department 4 City of 1100 10�Street, 310 Floor• Greeley, CO 80631 • (970) 350-9701 Greeley April 13,2004 Mr. Wayne Howard. PE Project Manager Weld County Public Works P O. Box 758 1 Greeley,Colorado 80632-0758 1 ' Subject Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study ' City of Greeley's Dill Farm Property(5-65-11) Following is City of Greeley's response to the Open House Questionnaire-March 30, 2004 1) Do you own property near the project corridor? YES -NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 Sec. 11 1734 Holly Avenue-Weld County Parcel No. 096111000048 I 39 Acre Parcel at the northeast corner of Holly Avenue and E 18th 58) This property is on the western edge of the study corridor,approximately 1.3 (aka wCest of proposed extension of WCR 49 2) Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? YES-To the east or west of the parcel -Not through it Why? This City of Greeley fee owned 39 acre parcel is planned to be developed by the City Park's Department as soccer fields 3) Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? YES Why(Safety,Environmental,Land Use,other reason)? This City of Greeley fee owned property is planned to be developed by the City Park's Department as soccer fields 4) Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? No Additional info concerning this property: Property is leased for agricultural purposes Patina ina Oil ec Gas Corporation is installing a well within this property (Contact: Terry Bresnahan-970-785-0352 (office)303-8864043 (cell) Please fbrward'all future notifications/information/1,o ,this s dy,9a me at the above address. Sandra J. Briggs, Right of Way Agent� , H. C. Peck &Associates, Inc., Representing, it 'f�reei,t� Water&Sewer Department- 970 350-9701City bf Greejfy/ Copy to Jon Monson, Director, Water& Sewer Department Stuart Lannan. Eng. &Planning Manager,Water& Sewer Dept. Ron Williams,Parks Director, City of Greeley Bill Roth, Tenant Terry Bresnahan, Patina Oil &Gas Corp. a X p-.:v T N G 01, 1 �fnrcyura /u/>i C O M M O M I T Y • r T �IT ' S A •'•rerun anti improve/%e uol% T • D 1 T t o a 9 Y l�ro`or grecley/fiin..96/inF/y cow/own andecvl q/�oc/.:x..wiviw.v. APR 15 '04 10:42 9703046497 PAGE.02_ � tr 1 " day p� d� 3x sa �#. M y { 4 4t f yty � I ts* .: A 4'44444:44,4,-$gas � ` ' 4,r, . 4 { 4 ;. Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Attendance List 4 Public Open House tWeld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study US Highway 34 to State Highway 14 4 Tuesday, March 30, 2004 4 Platte Valley High School 4 Please sign in below: 4 ll Name Address Phone Number 4tell. AuLi(k, it,h tkitf 2221,5c/ifkvr, 7 >-,,c-kit, En z /s `1s'l-2 Yell ; ,r.' a• /f//r � l t'y ,, ,, (�, 73 '7 ?L W( 6� �w�r,�;, �:13 - / �hh(>`7 ,� 1t,EL1 H �tl t& r�?7 Lt it kS (-7 �la{1rJSiow� CO " `�l 9�p 4 1 :IA‘._c Sc.,,...„,-, s 75 ‘ c 3 {Zs-\ C.,2sz. \ s-, �s S L -3 Zcl 4 I o '- Sr4A( - tyg; 4%(2- `i`7 5>-3 -c?to 3. JI ' \ov�� Z5513 7- C'" n . -- - �� 6?mil / is Y ? b4)-. _fs? -cf/) 7 �! (. / �� w � sv�3J ✓"ciQ >F7 / 312 - ?7v :4 `(iei ,1- �� se?r,tick 6G G-1�,�� 7 C - 6,(c. oII as . 4/14lc/eh A J /1, < 3_578' mac, s i Gl'/� „ s5'-273 5— cc-/e.! f),,,,F,- - 2217 Hzt,i 3, c) C eg�r � ' ;49'175 ? ._ tA C' N i CLo L'h DI-1 l -DC E. 5$ C;(`das kt., CO 3S I --(D y A 23 (ri w c i' 7z Ea � ys' $6oE d[.'l��Z kt-1�YZ Y -� Y�I Jo[p /l C e E / /"�,Q.-. 3-5 -7 `.moo( /ne Z.CL:1 7�._4 17 z 2 / "a r >- r9-tli Gr- 414- 3 5z-s-1d 7 c 1, i�i Q�+ v)( ti [--! Cic s I rte-- E-� ; aL `/rcl-ek,3 '# //,/ ,' /jig -,,-- /n./-% 4 .0 • r• r.o pl "aiy FELSRURG c, \ HOLT & 4;- ■ ULLEVIG O Felshura Holt& Ulieviy • 7 ip t t icc Pt i" �'I� Jr '3 S Ids -4 {,14 9 qA, ' <xdCf� 4a'ey Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Attendance List Public Open House Weld County-Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study US Highway 34 to State Highway 14 Tuesday, March 30, 2004 Platte Valley High School Please sign in below: e Address Phone Number z .Cal`t<V 3S u F�/ R 6-y 3S(0 = it73 g JAvL W P‘04(R 2yo2_ GocJL 7cu yy- L;zS -TITv/ STS [� d‘ `Id,t,O r-kify 37 & 3SI . 72gd �� ?me yry 3 Yb3 '? I3&vv4 83y -i4-54.,4 \�5v 1 (-Jon/Ain l-:(0 VF ,ii� A )/ e t o.Iii 30 4 q / / s^ 1/Alp()\ ?Si/6sC (2 L/4 & ,3s 3 9CY1 kc175K , rtzikMC zl15 yi MRS C /( , X5. 2- 1SS2/ .. fro ) .3 cz r(,, RY1t i 90 G-)cR_s 6 /F . 3-5 " ��. fftcV '3ztoose t;i .Srh LAicygt[) (Lai 37?-Usty `E � _e ?c/// Cvr 7 rL« '�� //c ,--)Y277-G,° c' -Li (Cc . IDL c_ CD i 20 zriLlSr 350 2/<f Lc -ry �oisiC- C, � ',*; � � to ;\ �i�e. 30 - 73"1'`( ,!( /( 2VYJc. ,.✓ci2 I Sit.- 825// fir/ x' 15-- 14 e Lr) z/12I<S CcJC' I c) o 353 - 7787 cEfZ6 34957 &lee yj £!¢v71t1 VS-€1-221F-- y-009 /17‘ea- I:73 -79 33 vt � ri ' C 4 FELSBURG O '� ' UHLLLTEVIG UUN Felsbur9 Holt P< UMeviy S .vWy N•1d f3-Ys� r(A41,0 t "r� ¢vr6M .ua 4 t' oM5 �st ix t 1, '74 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Attendance List Public Open House Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study US Highway 34 to State Highway 14 Tuesday, March 30, 2004 Platte Valley High School Please sign in below: Name Address Phone Number /70/4" ElOiti acOlCti 226 war >77 z 6-,-/ye« 3/ 33-2'95--6.) ...a. 3a9a_"5 LScRSl Gir,Ai ti:i ► 337-t s 27d9 e We R 3/74 4 . -4 N( DDu(< -I iieit II ICLi,t( t1 7,_3�rJJ) ti 1 < lire ( ( -fr t L. 4� >A '_ plc y_L, 1Z aced N\=MLo c� kG C gc��t I`\3 -I S(,I J U 2, a,ee, 02& ad'.s wc, R y-7 4S7 33? — S 71— 2c-v)/14 Rc:,,� ea3lN l--7( R roc- Crce\ey 353--cS3a r _ �7 \ . \ \ \ ' \ . \ \re'cr',i._rL'1 �r.�t. cl /u / ,ir -'� ft t/[� =:. ^1 a 30 z. > ?-r ' ( 1 \�n�. k, , ,i) , ‘Ac v7t- 3� v 9' c�O c e Li? =J U,c E'er ii?n c? .(_;-0&-L5 term Y �6 (4 / S(^� 3zy i ?r,/ 5 Poiroi et 4 ei,Z2_ � !floc,' Arc A 1S,"ri i();2 7, /JO IAA LI (,'R o lc �c-G 4JL' X 9/1 t v E 7 -a. (6ra,C.624(0 , P6 ,f/ x-,7 1 %i it., e Iv 7 Z -- tr. l.A a C . . FELSBURG 0 .4! i SHOLT & w *. ■ ULLEVIG UN .. Felcturg Holt& Ulleviy t r ;'ar '.t^. l z 1 i b: {V l I i.: #fit -:,-.A.: -. : 4# Cchv alit` t air. k j Yh 9 Vti]J h J 4Al't.„,-,0,,E;;,,,,"•41;,1,41.- fier : y� €{ g3yy �Av p t4: 1 ��.f hB Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Attendance List Public Open House Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study US Highmay 34 to State Highway 14 Tuesday, March 30, 2004 Platte Valley High School Please sign in below: Name Address Phone Number '>NAI,r T, :i/STD 1 375R- 7i_/ 4 i`� cry '2// c--,GCN CA. I r{ Yt i ILL Jsg3t k„..) Lro c) I- 5 ' % 2,3 ,0-eruinc?-1- tchkfro lc I I ScfL Avc - CreeiQst%g I _730--&&'7 11 4l 4 /L&' JS.3-c/ 04. 97 A i^ SPedti Sj, ,by,i-' 02(1(1(r) llct raj 3 QQJL S a �( (€3V � � GrL � C //cL�f (( tt rz1L �2Vo/l tOck SF -Lr�eQ¢_uj Oo ‘68‘31 3s6 yl4 4 /C _ua. 84,u turn. 3S 6- `l f S f1-viA.e &k.L .,2,s- aC- woof S / l ree(py, Co 35) - orf77 Nny EI 2 \AL z35es C"efZ5 6 ccl ,/f� C, ce3/ >53 C7 2S Y �� z�. 1R t � ' it do A- J7 h f ' C � peG/," icy_,yu, 1 J wcck < L*" Cn. �hc�lol5 �!F - 7` ucyl er-“s t -z y� 6..cIZ `i S— Cree.(cy, F `)c) / ti �v c, .✓ S +3i 5'r`/ t o-. 50 c �e^5a F(10/2pc ) L v4,L/ S 1 It .Ly,;3 (-)y,;3 (-) c��CIC 9 �l Fcz -to r•0rp/S-Ltsv-01) , ,x,16-� °wn (1-)1� eQ n�J oik keR5€ t1 804'J t z'a ( Y��crrr i wit (cf: 5 1 I tin 2_(r,,> /zee: ( (Uw 4 &_ h X014 ��o'� a �Rc. o 11/4w1 a6 G eek .c\-.. ec651 LO 'a FE[SRURU .'Y 4 H O L T & c i`•'' ULLEVIG UUN Felsburg Holt& Ullevig a pia flix9 :t ((� v ,k tg' y; a, i 1/424114 'FUN ..irlorkti s E 3y°d� '42;11; f Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Yes No If yes, where? 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? / s — riDST+':,_-/ \- ✓ -2,1 ci / 0 ( C 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? a 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? 4. a a a � Name h Lj qh/Ptinii Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: a a Address V'L/L.1 " `J W6 � Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager % Weld County Public Works P.O. Box 758 Phone 'IC --?c;- "/ ? Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 A Felsburg Holt& Ullevig Tifit23e: j:$14 to f � . • APR-09-04 FRI 11 :01 AY WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WKS7 FAX:9703046497 PAGE 2 Weld Cour(ty Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire _March 30, 2004 Please tilt out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Yes.) No ft yes,where? Le_ {.e /tad Si at/e5 /n our yard on ,Jt. of /J/ak/C,ever . .�✓= (-60 r^ s,,hs or 5/ 474d rl'nr -iv f/tee. river' 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? LIE ((/ie,3 •67 / " Air novSf i5 on Mt Fos-Is/Jo U} 5/ 4/ l iv,,a ed C Yu 1, 4 / S an /tips/ _ '_1)t^e 1 /„ Ccrm,/u ;or °of / /o0/for s • $r,lcf /^ni/y /klP r 3. Are there areas within the corridor I that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land _ Use, other reasons)? //I S-l0i ,l, iar iuctt :cc( / /ln• 5 S�5.4e, ..1 5 w ri�r�r JY injr/,kat4JrCr $/J-.`i a' Agee /oec ,r, /4,s ose � l _<<= for _�S fF'R rS • C✓ur.ny f•61,"f 'fin^.R. / / / // o6vf %y�..le An, l l / / _.1/it Il'.4 e fr5.ly(e /uP Ic /Le A0 c e) /Jn 5 I dRrt/ Q../ .Gaff �o ZtrYte , i / no/ h?ore) CO.c.Srr, (� y lY1a jut erosion, - read rvou/c( LU.',511 Ci:i'l e✓,IA far/, riexd Or CGULI a lat Jar 4-'t p UT w Jer y syi earn. 4. Do you have any other comments regarding/ the alternative alignments? /74__Leg/ze a" eacha/y ,7224/ L<rd..r3'Sr/y ci re,-1S SeinVoi2 _ r/ / .Pvnr,vnra l�1� ,o/2 / _2._/ -_i-a,5 _7 J/��/•- Ey,51,/,7/ /Ji,'ll o./on/ ,l//wy 3/ - ar,d usi„ ,Oo Y .37 Q/4'nel? logic ''L n/ .Sir401P r�oc�_i7 51�,,,S /L r/ [ 1J/ Q(4n ve // ) ed 1/jOJ/I /%'r a l-4 /1.FChrl 4 -S G CCes s -4 Re on,/72ot Name dam✓ / /54 r'7/tie1 Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address: 2k (J hi(e 5/ Wayne Howard, P.E. Ct �G Project Manager ' ee , a / Weld County Public Works Phone-i/7 7� j_Jtc) tirS '7 P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext.3788 Fax(970)304-6497 rK'i S {j'AI#sUiiem; .. . . . . APR 09 '04 11:37 9703046497 PRGE.02 4a iJ ��rc l ryi M1r• ' If 4n M Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire .4 March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. ire 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Yes No yes, where? CThr'vne.r 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? p Y e-re.r not ;)A O r A I 1-, e O h k 92 kit X- �3hr� PrChir 1A)A ; 71- s Ahif7 OAS-,' ^Qd/ 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? 11 �,c (7, a P bu-i t1)�ye i v es ' Ds j^0 11,) It v-ortr, S u 1 l 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? Name nit. I rJ r C4 Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: • Address SIn 9 Jo a Wayne Howard, P.E. I-a/i)1") N � / Project Manager (� K/>(0/f Weld County Public Works P.O. Box Phone Gt-,SLR.- 6,) ? 7 / Greeley, 8 Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970) 304-6497 Aizioataa Felsburg Holt&Ullevig wT F i-V .04r: fXAY 1 ¢4) ;r 1 A =Y J 3-4/14 A TA by 4 it 14J0 K p p � V'E V 1 •ggu � �p 4a4` 11 a M Ce f.l 'A Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Ye No es, where? /(2rr 3 w 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)( for the arterial alignment? Why? l�o A — -r L.,,- c ,c3 I— ci , ,,e,,Al ; u 9() 3. IX A --Pi •2�,, A , it-f c.e q It Nil. h-)--`A(A11 . 1 I.,: 1.6 f Y in �J (.A 90 A C , 1 1�.Q t c 7p S k Cat" I \ • \ ? cez_0 4,--2_ R 0- O Hi.,r r- 4n - rr t,-.S 3. Are there ree areas l within the corridor that should be avoided? Why (Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? & 4-e. i-�0 p<; .p ,,c, (d'rj e.,1/4,4_ ,��.t& . LA-.2 . O `A'�,.Q V— rc�poScs; S (-i--)0,-,3 4p c 1 � ccia r w a --,- 14 0-, c1C( .em �A-.2 C.,f vV c in cc.'-(1/4^- C vvik e-�e c oSS czt • C vr�ci Lc c't-•-orn- 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the a ernative alignments? L --t- )0c 'JIc so r L.F? -`,. c t.. .3D L..F no (4 Imo—So,-;± 1 k--F, 0_ 0-21 A 4S { r)r-,/% 0-tA C dI-rl ��cy.�, 9-c/cn . \ C3\.0 (1.IL cc-e Li, V\ 04 (� ��,i.� Y,' r, *Lc, ././`j 7J A/ c..9Ce , //i CNLNLSX 11F C,-c, u c l i o_,, --G.S-�-�./ _ c 11 Cc r �) L. t a-kA... � i r r4 sUL —t— P ry A (rg C 'lSc Vl osz A c v V-o o s C CO r r Name—gcX6 _ Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address D--)4O I( (-0 C Qj Wayne Howard, P.E. ^/ Project Manager �`a �1� `-'� , f (�f).1' Weld County Public Works Phone 9'5 O - 36- A-{ I (0Greell( P.Q. y, 708 ey, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 Felsburg Holt&Ullevig r ,k , r +ri° 4m,) a3 33, gip? i 4 tit. I - Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study r Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Yes No yes, where? I -nit(J9- 70412Cit ELIL die 4/5 t Se/ /sit A,aacltavt, an Cie 58 . 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? Zait .-y L CE 63 - -/LL, /Lo a_cl. [d a/ "c nten.o 1[l(t� Lgc ,�a-t�J�/w� �e .iwrc�J . — a a oe r t�o OL �Lp QQ7LPI A7 d glq 4/ t �� 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use,� other reasons)? y � � .L 4 Z.-¢; flli�b pG 'art i.t no 4.17k, /L.¢. . - .vO-Ll_ t1t..ti 0-GVV j� t _on,osfy-�//a"" .niAJ Q Pa �i tt cry/ flu./ C t 'atazt Lo t-e i o 'fLCLtJ-4_, '- Dpi i, Q®�? _ `oaf,eit.Gt a-ry - 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? �J-f�W 14- f 1 /L AFL. Q esyt&L 0AQko? . — YLO 07Ut. 7xw ¢t�Qj wt 4 -G4A w-kaj v tt I u C -t�'�. ±ll.f f I. -g-1.4.4t) ) 2f� JAI/ p i 4S -- D t t2a.n-o Cti /2_z Qe Livl e l Quh -/Lizrult ( a �Ltrnp Qa c�Cr� Name g-/-1-06-j_ Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address aid /1 WCGe 5S Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager Q° JCL, em 806 Z4 Weld County Public Works P.O. Box 758 Phone 970 - .3 S 6 - tf /6/ Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext.3788 Fax (970)304-6497 Felsburg Holt&Ullevig , bx)� i � , NYC : .0ttiCe ry 4 . APR-05-04 MON 01 :45 PM WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WIKS7 FAX:9703046497 PAGE 4 Weld County Road 44 Arterial Corridor Study F .:r ' Lem. ,.. .... '�:.... ��i..s...:• Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please rill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? re- \Yes / No TFye's,where? 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? J�% 7 nr L7 s yr/ ;27 cf,2 k! ClInfL y — 44-5C) J41.9r di n s i t3,c: Fitt_: 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety,Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? f - c 4"-7/1 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? ✓_ �! w&STE2L Y lt7ourE5 /f /'/'.c_42 Tc; %UGEd l>>l�I/7 — ALL c-, ✓b TC C`a/✓NCcl 4.v. /f /9J1! NiL //e Name rR f V r A!/C Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address_ /5'7 4./( �{ ✓ice l Wayne Howard, P.E. JZL'I_ `L !/ Q c. `a06,- Project Manager Weld County Public Works Phone35-.2- 95-Fr/ P.O. Box 758 Greeley,Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax(970)304-6497 ;(—f !r� Iioit 3 iiiiewC RPR 05 '04 14:20 9703046497 PPGE.04 v � t t tk r # > fi i '`tP e y r t;lcill :try, t i i to s 4 x'a 4 �s4 - tyr ' j F Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? cYes No I yes,where? Ck A \ t itkpEEb c'ki&, f NLOx t4- 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? 5I �r\r Ian Patrk\ks out Last u\F wsAtA-vEh TC LauE CAN), OFF Rot't ik.)E WR'NT A kn fl Y 1Ni coiJT el Out R0%E. 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? (k,4' AI.1D RFLTF9E TAAi �� 3 Tl1F REST CSF (N,,F H uST kT MA k2 r fain Z.T ciS k 1.1tEistkr 1M&t)�h. Name .f�RERT , \M• t if\ ANL Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address (p( 1 L.�AM'M l—1. Wayne Howard, P.E. �1S fC u i Manager (� Er E _ Project County Public `l.�>�+- Weld Pu Works Phone (Qrl(t) ,�� ^ `t7 l(0 G 758 eeey,�Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 Felsburg Holt& Ullevig f0; ,•4 t t t x ttJ�, i Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study -4! Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Yes i No s, where? �IiY3c Wce S8 2. Do you have a preferred location(s) for the arterial alignment? Why? 5'✓te,C O r.(9 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why (Safety, Environmental, Land // Use, other reasons)? r 4P 9 ///2 pr (=S5' .l )3ercv.se O* 1rCr w� //� /C4^ej 1/oJ So 91O c S./Cy you i4o W clkvir//t CCr vn 1c•nn4 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? Name /✓e r s s vh e k l Er Cri'vss,i c/r C Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address ?Y y-3C (Jc e Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager Weld County Public Works P.Q. Phone (57a/ 3S'- F5'V/ Box 758o Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970) 356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970) 304-6497 Felsburg Holt&Ullevig 4 k a F �F.la$: 4FN s _! APR-05-04 WON 01 :44 PM. WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WKS7 FAX:9703046497 PAGE 2 a-! '\ Wel unty Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire - March 30, 2004 ease fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. /1. Do you own property near the project corridor? V� No � 'leg,where? �il� 5l ,QM_ iZ_f 2. Do you have a preferred locations or the arterial alignment?Why? _L;_t0.1%C.)011r—t 3st.:1:aga) p l 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided?Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? 4. Do you have any other comments '--a- nr!p +�tematiae.aGgnmawts? ;" NS0 0N'ik') ' G- �I4M1,-, X41. a • •cam ivl ttC) t4u� � kl1O u Name c' c� rp/ Mail or Fax O stionnaire To: Address_G5S\n) 3 ,p \ j Q Wayne Howard, P.E, 9 1 Cr) got Gh�� Project Manager yv` L e Weld County Public Works Phone P.O.Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 iFax (970)304-6497 r':: ate•; -: � . ,:- ._ .... .._. J..<.....:. ,.. .___ --=_`-'"., ..,ter_-,,..f�•,,,, Hq ”•ir Hoy:&Ll,ev:g PPP 05 '04 14 20 9703046497 PAGE.02 c k, ^ , z "add' #` t fscil e 4,ritt itr (12:34 P�w•� bJI t t *IL APR-15-04 THU 10:07 AY WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WKS7 FAX:9703046497 PAGE 3 r�FR 1B^on nc :21 PM FLEETWOOD CONSTRUCTION 9705327695 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study rrrr,� Wt.14e'atlK4a..:.. Opel, House Questionnaire March 30,2004 Pla:rse fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. Si 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Yee No yes,where? .. - _4-`-934 gJ , 5 2. Do you have n preferred location e)for the arterial alignment?Why? 2 cowLy _ qI I t °; pa-/)p//. ` re_ &I I� -- __— 42) nit n iokrie r r"0l4 k>i4'L le-1C — - - (-14r•ve ` I hr/>i1jIn { rketc • 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided?Why(Safely,Environmental, Land Use,other reasons)? 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? r,( Li g (;re 51 CiXed, if y) GI i r6C. .J rude trap � yay • 3/ -+U I-LAI Iy- Name 0j Cc:Je,ph �J t Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address ,(c2.e1 NCX v2 7r Wayne Howard,P.E. _�jP .1. +D r ( Project Manager Weld County Public Works Phone 17b) 3J2 —O 2C, P.O. Box 768 Greeley,Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356.4000 art.3788 Fax (970)3044497 .."01..:., .r ,Oa CU* r Holy&Lllev< APR 15 '04 10:43 9703046497 PRGE.03 d • 6U '+ 9S� rXG eft 5 S 4 th �` iy'�rtjt s' ' Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? No yes, where? 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? � f (/5 zdCe 5/ / .S/ YOrJ)) 7/ A)eecI kCcn1$/ e> G mgt /2C re-55 0� 011 .e &41 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? 4 // / ( /fit, 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? FCC/2-- fo.„- go.sci s / CEO /c(, / �('G P / ��1/3 I Vie e X:7,, r7O w -/✓ ,n51 G.4 2 �w L✓Ov/j ra-vi-// fro G/11 / N c ?OA cJ, �Jr S�/to,/ 2SS 4y Ire/ !.4 it/ 2J AJni/Ai �/� �' �ou �7 /.Lis✓ / c.,i�..J-, 7Lre '`6•---✓ i,j >Lie ddr,;(s, . 7 s 4.,,e/ D 4 .8,fasS Name "c1-.1 r\e.)l("- C- Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address 367g / WC/2 6/ Wayne Howard, P.E. / Project Manager G 4 2, i - Weld County Public Works P.O. Box 758 Phone C/TO— 95c/ 273.5 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 Felsburg Holt&Ullevig ,b1 R «'Y 1&�%t�ryT• ' q 1 4 rc cc; $.„)40 do Voc, el J ( 5 N� 1 . 4 $6 I I, • • 'ter ; . • 5Pq ti,F� 14 . 4..7 ✓ x � ' F: I4 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study sJ Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 ral pab Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Yes No If yes, where? .L./ C 1? S \ 6C, Ck)i'l 04 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? W y? A.,.. G I)C.1 ��C �Q� of�z-a ,j At 1O b , l l /71 610Gui bl I61�P) - w�rz �1 l 6.>(.4p02) )57 a(C2_0 , (670124-1E-4-6 0.4 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? I�lt CCAPI CxUo1J PAcrc A )6c4 CCN+ GQat �I � / iirt 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? Ert S 'p (-x , Lu_ cllAfl P4 I4 P4 Name i 41 oAULP Y1-. r Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: E4 F4 Address LDC'2 c (jA lc \-Or ( Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager ZJIJpL�� Weld County Public Works P.O. Box 758 F ' Phone C (� - LISLI Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax(970)304-6497 Felsburg Holt& Ullevig 1ST%tla n h '1;"' x ti gtt 1,3*, 4411 Iietr; k 'P 54y 1i1I 4 211112,;4 111rr APR-0`-04 WON 01 :44 PM WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WKS7 FAX:9703046497 PAGE 3 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Pl•,+ase fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? `Ye No yes, where? ;lei _reek- Oil 2. De you have a preferred location(s)for the/ arterial alignment?Why? y _- e.l:^t i /7O leifer47 i S{_ ,(bass• Iat, st /?i .rl-e—d7o,, o- -v9 // 2/ / lo t' - '7/9.< //en /7 be -r n / /,e </0k G/.-�.�.� Act-e 1-4.rh 7eu4-.s o h 4-S.7 aM.L ri50-0T c ri 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided?Why(Safety, Environmental, Land y" Use, other reasons)? 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? vn 'f (frt.,c one 7r<f1riG ?o Co A p-orJ Y7 f ,{ �f •:' r_ YvF,oSce SF c.✓ <2r/r, scar j (✓i--1{:of C-e.rc;S /n-C l l ".��*.° :S... /am �-d� 0P ;Z e.t. Name r, Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Addre,S`s ,-fig_S l �',elf; �/ ,9 Wayne Howard, P.E. erex4 Project Manager Weld County Public Works Phone ��U ?S 2 - C--V23.' P.O. l y 78 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext.3788 Fax (970)304-6497 • :i burg tiol'.&Udell; PPR 05 '04 14:20 9703045497 Pgf;F.Ri Tztca(4�+p' 'j� J tt 5Y. t rti d F. Vs y'143ak 4 �af ,,,,p;* s#. Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? es No • I • -s, where? 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment?Why? 1hjC� LICc rs-kra L04 - 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? 4. Do you have any other comments /regarding the alternative alignments? Name 1(-(,/ 9 �)a-o�,,t A o4u) Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address e ' F � ' N eJ4/ Wayne Howard, P.E. nI' n/� j Project Manager (71 _OD 1/4 Weld County Public Works P.O. Box 758 Phone 910 c Je= ch, &�G I0 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970) 304-6497 f Felsburg Holt& Ullevig it 1 3f 77a i�.'.Yf'w j € 1 1 ti yb �^ ¢ pp A tY 8aJ1/4 ury ,�� , , Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 5411 Open House Questionnaire 441 March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? (Yale No If yes, where? 5 C i -2 - /( ( 2 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? < Cl -P 4 "1 '1 9 Qa w.r C�i0frPt'� L 1n C 4 • 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? R <V 7 o./ t 4-, . ‘7"--\ -4 t, F P t4 R , 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? R c1 A., d 2 S /� )4 - , c1-P ,4 Name C} I 5r R A"X_ Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address / v f-,-Vat , ,,_9 Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager Gc --\—C? r (p U 7/ Weld County Public Works P.O. Box 758 Phone 9' 7 - 35 2 • S !l t 5 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 Felsburg Holt& Ullevig s�� >f 0 t "4,474, >> ( v • 4 � ieY AYµT:It kr "laid t� ii e !hi { ay { ( s {ro �i�S I i "iP '` P '4"YY-no -L 5444, Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. I4 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Yes No yes,where? ogiy g .Q .,-ez t C/ea 39Z 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? G R `77 oz 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? n n y / — 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? (2-4.4.4,---c- 4/ 9 0. 3 i . 3 7 6 ,e -n e3A � Jam, dad s ,vim /y Name_ etie-c_ete) 10edj►` Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address 3.2/0 a ev C, 2 9 9 Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager / / Weld County Public Works P.O. Box 758 Phone 976, - ? S(^ — o 2. 97 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970) 356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970) 304-6497 Felsburg Holt& Ullevig } 4 A ��y :4 P J3 ba # , L p '.,kMM}pY y Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 4 Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. Fit 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? („—Yes) No If yes, where? �j( / /J ® // 0 ell /� F'Ca 1_'_Lh'� k'CfG� CI �I es1 c, r rt '7 he 'e n t,( bit 94 "9.2 1-Muce a ;ost side ,j 119 7Oo, (tea 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? �� y7 becaos I t wau.lj rroode ocresc as Me /,v/J l"vCry �* (ki v)00r g 1e C/ c ( /a,4 Greeley 0Ji fo4 ® /r o Seok,o1r non' Mt m/ li6K !S Vt/rcot C✓uYvfv1f oucrws- Q63 by Cl/tievhv -}7GFfic //iavi-l7 d- Soal4 C 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why (Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? Ll9 has numerous joy s i nclue:lF-Id_ gco/era1 Covoec/ian /,r• /9 )ics irr,)col-inn &reds- dl lr'�C 0 0 J arIPviofs 40 `'9 eve not payed — 6aid eagie irei fret is N9 on ion-e7cee Creek 4. Do you hav, any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? (S/r/1-e )2J 37) //Oh Is. RI 53 /,oi Qn eXisfrirg hr/cl�9e /u71 14 > e /0rc7ecf f i rn,t , Name T ,4- go/ Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address 32ioo we/c y9 Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager 6rre/-ec 8063/ Weld County Public Works J P.O. Box 758 Phone (97.6) 356-0299 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 Felsburg Holt& Ullevig 1 3 t �2 i4t `f: P ' R n Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 4 Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Yes No s, where? 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? tt, 7 s rh if 1T u1/4i-z/7 /1 Z(/I TA- ld o fl74 ✓ 7o-4.19 S © ti yo 74 //i, , e ) 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why (Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? Rg-a-J .//J s fie/ ides ` � m r( cai-1le /five_ ( rl� l ( /^- w 1 r{k- /7`l9A Y/c• `' 7/'/! 5 dit 2471-�(1"/ A -a // -Mgr r r/ '-e - ,t tea/ -e Name O t Sr YvA Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address 2 t./..2_c0 /&y 2( 3 Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager Getc pley (15-o. J063 / Weld County Public Works Phone 9) 69--- 36-12- <j 3 7 Z. P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970) 356-4000 ext.3788 Fax (970) 304-6497 W senors Felsburg Holt& Ullevig Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study -4 Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? No -s, where? 2. Do you have a preferred location(s) for the arterial alignment? Why7 I / k / / I p it 4_ -cy r',tv hick cc: ' riff, 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why (Safety, Environmental, Land U e, other reasons)? l / j Pa-S- C._ p ti ' • te1 s///r ' f % / 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? 4P-fil,” r‘ S —24 t , �� f��r /'!��, , ( Name C31hhCL �� Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: • • Address `9 Y G-f- . 1 Wayne Howard, P.E. ret° l e N LA 'h Project Manager C�L3 , Weld County Public Works � � c� P.O. Box 758 /7 • Phone 3 (7 7 7/ G� Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970) 356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970) 304-6497 Felsburg Holt&Ullevig any ( `,4 Fi ' 51-42‘i ii; P Sh tvijwj ;;t�:d r t s z' rn.4,4k44%,, Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 04 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? Yes No s, where? r iAic2 `l7 i eel we en 3y q- S 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? lucid �,(2;,1 y9 ,j/� <e ate O,7 y oa' q 400res nee SSS it 5,,t7 ¢ only l b-. <iae ce- Soar: 0C Y^ e ol-ket plans need 2 . 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why(Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? r9gt 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? CIE P 04 -e A°Ht. w ©K U/2 v.eJy, :nitre the :s 1-Ai e car e fAcA u5S ouC ( td k cc 4 7 . Name 1&( k Va Eel-Tole en Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: 2-76�� AddressWe / 11 ? 2_ Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager ( o ro)6 3/ Weld County Public Works P. 758 Phone 9)& ?62,- 9C90 Greeley,r Co Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 Felsburg Holt& Ullevig ti Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire March 30, 2004 Please fill out and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. 1. Do you own property near the project corridor? No Yes s, where? CDQtie(l of wcf-. y7 f I,oCQ7(0 2. Do you have a preferred location(s)for the arterial alignment? Why? 1)3d— sl — I + iS AL-i,e,aig`I) jagOfQ 3. Are there areas within the corridor that should be avoided? Why (Safety, Environmental, Land Use, other reasons)? / NI`t1 1-(" )St I S Uel�`(� j�c 1"-J 71re A¢J 4. Do you have any other comments regarding the alternative alignments? /) Name 4/40b W I/V3 c 2 / Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address 2'7U 2.<— pot 7� Wayne Howard, P.E. �� 0� J J� �S Project Manager 19Z5-1 f Weld County Public Works yC4 P.Q. Box 758 PhoneGreeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970) 356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax(970)304-6497 Felsburg Holt& Ullevig b Z R �v_ Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study adip Attendance List 'de ..:r s..:d' sit ..'' " - g'it a j -1 ..,essay. ,..,re2-. aile Please sign in below: Name Address CL t iS Fy'l� A Phone Number f� 600d S. Sy(4 ode l.✓c' X03-72) - 1144O /4//c Vera/ v e., ,fie i&sa4 2-2,0-4 we, 117 3 S2—95-Q 0 9 ) q S l4 1 ,r3 ,3 (>7Q c ki--- 3S606 wilt 19 //St/ - 3C 2:3 Tci m - B2lg4J - ir_ ev Z Kc a 3 Cc<-11 3_S--G-1 X33' -i)cLttr, 2- fieP +dll./1dU,tilC eg /36-7 fl4q %7' pill 353- 950 � �IZ/F}nJ �f pp 27z..km ve,¢. ,--17 i� cy.ex....cy. 352 95Z te _' ha..h 42r,c/ekSCDi ,346,37 cycle 4/7 597-an/ 3q.D- 9144fe wn&2. J�.V/f�cwR 7,)S' c✓ to ?.7>c_ actelt 00 3SG-6Cy 7, ticl 1 q 2 E e G '3 (0'03 7 W C.0- C*r0.4 g5—V-2 z 1 r '400 y S1910 Q432 `tc{ AuE Gcc eL ff. 330-8091„ // G: koa. s/ �C3 -332- yi2.-i eh \?,Aat/no /7 3.7ty3 / cc/ G2 n ,,// !!? 2-2 - o"2fl 880 C�cE 5l Gr`ce�t� 77o3 5-3 OV77 L'^Cti*(t\ £ hut? knsERERt? C ?7 Looks (T• TcHA>Sroit)&) Ct'?G ) .ce-4 G a0a r uIdwhsoov s1t4t was ifs o /S r_ 0205-0 Pr 33 z5c cie S3 c:.,,,' (-es_re; ;70_39 ' IP FELFRLRG ,o C,H O L T&OtiF LLLE\'IG Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Attendance List r,c.._ Please sign in below: Name Address r. Phone Number to t/A +1/4_ 5 t sow, 2_3277 GR 72 3V— .3937 RAckaadiabr,f.v1 te2 B78Z f-A: tttt ( ,eks.„:c. (4_ Ivv3d .)cQ_ ryes- y/ yid-- Fro A 937512 we j? Sg 5g-6—V53 ,22VMHLz=2 c25-416 le) e,2a-y"// '3 -<Fea6 � D t) F� 7 ',� 2 2 ;' O F rti' �ll _3s-2 3-4(0 F Q (l I g Loot 4-gs-� �� a4/0 & -0Ve 9Ll ¢ 9c..caY a goit L.,KK S8 .35Z.-446 i Carl a �nv�c\� I�Oc •P3998 coca 5 b 353- &3ac) John.4- 1/4L' lvat, a4 s 6xe_5Y sea- qua9 .44 Cif cl 0?.29 9`7 t i-i-vv1f ,3N X53 -o2 6 /6. '14()744 !.a$ c_ a1S?i IAJ0 6 3s1-6s/‘:, Olt FEL`BL RG (II; OLT & D L-LLE\'IG J Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire June 22, 2004 Please provide any comments below and leave with a representative or mail/tax to the ad/ndress/number provided below. 4:rDort acres5 /hares Sense ' (age ap0rec,aIt 11-t- 2L✓4nt{, 104 fr2 i - arc Oltared /41 On✓/n-l-y .& e a 5/ was not f1/..6Pies7 G,ia;ce - /.(/Gh s;-le. /as Aeen Uary ALlg re / Fr Future• ftR.ercnce Pit Plumb t8, h 6bw5 on he 74 slylrl// h(;�ye. NA 1 fhweaf- aF -y.,t1(2ve/ /o, . /V, Ae2tte. eir a AAncl o '1,S. rernr4ir7) on 9-2e- re-4.s•••1 ; fie /IF +Li itself, r r4 r✓n �/ rea/a cJ J Io�1 Ath..i y 37 /&a.t/ GUenf /op? 0,4 on • 1 /a /An / lnnrLier,! aAno�l 74a/ /ro✓re ci/ri-(,l ht Yir5/7 / Gel v7sl — G/pr,r -e&/1JcZ'/nri ( %dr//k4i.tl -M inaei/5,6 ¢' /i)Ar %,/ /V65 /Jd 7 11/ LS-f- a1 ;Lit • Name ctr5ka r9a jeer Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address r?8kOG Wct 5 I Wayne Howard, P.E. Cr&t(ti( O) 8063 / Project Manager Weld County Public Works Phone 35a -Ot 72 P.O. Box7o8 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire .t June 22, 2004 Please provide any comments below and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the ad''d//ress/numbe�rprovided below. /low increh //a/fees 'f"Ae pro ec-6 eDs-/ JYO w /s /7" candec" -fax Wo //ars ar-e used �jol,, `aVey0 &C.- Ole/ermined 7Ja g//it pn5 Wa✓ie 7t/7eir a X do/%rs ssPkyt`" eon ��/s pr,ec*/ 77o? /c ;11 w)knc or care) //eh T suv es*'Ma -t- fA/S/roj6ct 5Aoa/d o -iro a?tic 71-e... or CP`>"E✓E'r,C>f.,vr, /roe PSS To O'r°TErrrl/r/P. / 7" !/ c prof Pc71' /6 7n 1Ae rSeS± /✓I�Prest-tJ C en-//re e o urn /47, i%e rojc t has no /.�r.n ed/a e ene C/ to 71-167bra gel Corndor, w; deve/e { Tent r �ne, Aree .> Mere/ore. ffi e 71i x/ do//rs .stn/ * f/(.4( e PI V 714osa ivj money /n7terFsfs 7hAi" are Aokim Aah ds L,,/f4 61 a 17. 4 frt• n/j)Dr/Fy6. 7`i/s /s % s.7ua6on 74Aat >S eeto ly ?OA J' 0- 74 ; Its .6P-514. Z CGradekt q to you_ f O 71474 lAis. wenden iffrovj Pc-71 7rO 1A o f e Uo 714e 2//G7`12 Teo?lea -/-)e rej/A-�ar mfor�/hyteeth- and-7‘21 p ie/S OT J/� • /' V Name it CJC Z7ro w/'7 Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address a 3 Ira bvCR .≤Z Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager G ree /-Py er;, 8063 / Weld County Public Works P.O. x 758 Phone In Q70 -34-a-q16 w303-5 G�715f Gael y, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 Y r nh r a q„ ;r a Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study Open House Questionnaire June 22, 2004 Please provide any comments below and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. cr �e e �a ��na �� t c ' ? fc� -� Tyr:: � (da-fie) csc 4 A ( o l \ h1 CSC- '2 RQa �&' —k romp • ,r c.\ 1• coca v-das I - If1m r s r1/44. 0sA)'e LC . c Name �>C, \ J��✓w� Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address 446 ( ( UJ C rO S j Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager R a 1 e H Rae3 ( Weld County Public Works P.O. Box 758 Phone ? /O - 3 S - N r ( Greeley, Colorado 80632.0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 r z,„ ;tsg,- 41, 4 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study :. ZIT Open House Questionnaire June 22, 2004 P/ease provide any comments below and leave with a representative or mail/fax to the address/number provided below. & n Med zt a-cct ct n.y pad 2 U -' Du�� 't"l{`� �/� tenth- -s/ °act ,Qa . -1da.0 7n-e4�t2, 7'L0 -,t om�-nq SP rin .,o Q ..//--��.u'c2G j aL/t-�.,J ce 4 0_21,nd,it `ti 400..044, t�-P.. ,wn na ,w !/ - ,r1/ u � Stt /2-6 et .a q-5, . .420 La wt — 1-011-4 we la.le ? `ItJA-0 Cam_ c ,.o Ott tl . d &-unw.n ? 7 ? Name Mail or Fax Questionnaire To: Address Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager Weld County Public Works P.O. Box 758 Phone Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 (970)356-4000 ext. 3788 Fax (970)304-6497 a 4.2? A a, 3 Jeff.Dankenbring From: Iisajohnson5@non.agilent.com Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 12:01 PM To: whoward@co.weld.co.us;jeff.dankenbring@fhueng.com :e Subject: Weld County Road 49 Corridor Study Hello Wayne and Jeff, My husband and I were unable to attend the WCR 49 corridor study last evening and I was told that we could send you a message to request the questionnaire. I believe the .... questionnaire might be the right forum for expressing my concerns. However, I would like to state as a resident of Weld County Road 49 I am very opposed to a four lane highway. We just built our home and the reason we selected the property we have is for the peaceful serenity of the rural area. A four lane highway sort of ruins the peace and quite. I know that WCR 51 and 43 are also being evaluated and as both of these `. roads are already paved they make a more appealing less expensive alternative. WCR 51 would pull more traffic through Galeton which might pull in addition revenue to the local • w. business ' s which is a win win for everyone. Sorry I 'll get off my soap box and save the remainder of my comments for the questionnaire. Please send me a questionnaire. My email is lisa_johnson5@non.agilent .com if you have a soft copy. Our mailing address : Scott & Lisa Johnson P.O. Box 729 Galeton, CO 80622 Regards Lisa Johnson Agilent Technologies 815 14th St. SW Loveland, CO 80537 970-679-3447 - w v .r -w 1 z 4nC i>4}s.: e y z ,�tko g144)7. j(.k •bV�S�yYyik 1 � � I DPG FARMS, LLC ''!' 3300 SOUTH PARKER ROAD, SUITE 300 AURORA, CO 80014-3521 October 4, 2004 Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado do Wayne Howard, P.E. Project Manager Public Works Department P.O. Box 758 1111 H Street Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 Members of the Commission: This letter is to respectfully set forth, for the record, the objections of a group of longstanding Weld County landowners to the prospective alignment of Weld County Road 49. I and my fellow landowners believe it is important to express our thoughts on this project at this stage of the discussion, and firmly establish an opposition to the conclusions already being formed at the outset of what is sure to be a long, extended and controversial issue. PROPERTY OWNER STATUS AND STANDING TO OBJECT - Although I am writing as manager of DPG Farms LLC, I am just one of the founding owners of DPG Farms LLC, which owns a substantial acreage in Weld County. DPG's holdings are approximately 782 acres of river bottom, farmland and pasture located on the upstream side of the confluence of the Poudre and South Platte Rivers. The borders are approximately the South Platte River on the South, Fern Avenue on the West, the Ogilvy Ditch on the North, which is located South of Highway 263, and approximately 100 yards west of the confluence of the Poudre and South Platte on the East. Telephone (303) 337-4123 Facsimile (303) 337-2028 a- I.y ry Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado October 4, 2004 Page 2 The DPG property is a long narrow strip of river bottom consisting of approximately 2 miles of the Poudre, % mile of the South Platte, and irrigated farmland, as well as numerous sloughs and wetlands. DPG Farms LLC is comprised of seven Colorado families that purchased the property in 1985, not solely as a real estate investment, but as a place for ourselves, our children, grandchildren and future generations to have a place to recreate and enjoy, and hold as a long-term "legacy" investment. 41 SPECIFIC OBJECTIONS TO WELD COUNTY PLANS Your plan to build a north-south highway, essentially through the middle of the property would destroy the ability to enjoy the property as intended. The proposal does not articulate an immediate or future need to the proposed route. ABRIDGEMENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY RIGHTS — UNLAWFUL "TAKING" DPG was specifically structured to hold and preserve a substantial property right for its owners and future generations. It is the property owners' firm belief that any move by Weld County to secure a right of way is a pre-emptive demonstration of an unlawful taking, which deprives DPG owners of property rights and denies compensation for the loss of enjoyment of the property. While the county may maintain that designation of a preferred route does not have the force of law, nor is a recorded deed or title restriction, the owners submit that the practical effect is to inhibit and restrict property rights by imposing a governmental decree. Such action must be disclosed for any future owners or DPG faces the risk of lawsuit. Is this fair to our property interest? DPG Farms LLC firmly asserts that it has the right to use and enjoy property for the uses under which it is now operated, which are legal and law abiding. _.y WILDLIFE PRESERVATION AND ENHANCEMENT DPG's plans for this property have always been to develop the property for wildlife habitat and preservation. To date, the property owners have spent thousands of dollars, not taxpayer dollars, on wetlands rehabilitation projects. Long-term plans include further wetlands development, potential gravel mining, possible water storage for municipalities and/or water districts, and placement of conservation easements on appropriate parts of the property. L Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado October 4, 2004 Page 3 Preliminary discussions pertaining to gravel operations indicate that lakes, both deep and shallow, and wetlands would and can be an integral part of the restoration. Possible water storage facilities and a wetlands mitigation bank are also part of the elements of mining gravel. Because of our desire to develop more wildlife habitat, no gravel operation would be along the river bottom or near the existing wetlands and sloughs. Consequently, even though a gravel operation is very a long-term project, most of the existing habitat would remain intact during the gravel extraction time frame, thus enhancing the continuity of the wildlife habitat. DPG's owners are very selective as to whom we would engage as partners in a gravel venture. If gravel is not feasible, the next option may be placing a conservation easement on the entire property. However, a road through the property would foreclose the possibility of a conservation easement. This property lies near the confluence of two major rivers, which are abundant with wildlife and wetlands inhabitants. This property has numerous species of waterfowl, raptors and songbirds, wild turkey, whitetail deer, mule deer, foxes, raccoons and beaver. The DOW maintains a state wildlife area at the actual confluence points of the Poudre and the South Platte. DOW district personnel have indicated that the whole wildlife habitat along the river corridor is extremely endangered because of development issues. It may well be that DOW believes it is powerless to stop the action of another government agency. WE QUESTION THE NEED FOR THE ROAD AND THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION Weld County certainly deserves credit for long-range transportation planning. DPG Farms, LLC's assertion is that this road is in the wrong location. The analysis done by the Weld County Public Works Department for the various route alternatives was based upon several underlying assumptions, which are flawed and erroneous. One of these assumptions is the cost to build the road; there simply is not a realistic and firm budget for property acquisition, engineering and construction. Discussions with Wayne Howard, the project manager, elicited the admission from Mr. Howard that no real estimates have been made based on the specific factors of each alternative route. Y PAL flat 4 . 4 Board of County Commissioners se Weld County, Colorado October 4, 2004 Page 4 se In this property's situation, the road would cross wetlands, farm ground, pasture and two river bottoms. A costly and complicated bridge would have to be built across the Poudre River. In addition, discussions with Bruce Barker, the Weld County Attorney, . .w indicate that there are no easements along the section of lines on DPG Farms' property. Barker indicated that this property had been patented prior to 1889 and consequently no easements exist on this property. While this may not prevent a road from being built, it does add substantial, and of this moment, significant unexplored costs to the project. • Mr. Howard indicated that safety is a major factor in developing roads and that generally the straighter the road, the safer it is. Examine the alternatives and you will conclude, as we have, that the contemplated route is not the straightest route. We believe that the fact DPG's property is agricultural open space - by our design and plan — penalizes DPG, in that the "rating system" gives an unrealistic and skewed value to land which has not been developed. It is especially alarming that Mr. Howard and those on the planning committee have not visited the sites, to understand the complexity and breadth of the land-owning situation. We extend an open invitation to the commissioners, and Mr. Howard and staff, to come look at this piece of river bottom (that probably looks a lot like it did more than 50 years ago) and appreciate the intrinsic value of this property. ABSENCE OF LONG-RANGE LAND USE POLICY t Following discussions with many county employees, DPG owners concluded that there is no long-term plan for developing, maintaining or acquiring open space — other than when a developer comes in for approval there is a stipulation to reserve some of the proposed development for open space. If this is the policy, or lack thereof, we are appalled at the lack of foresight and preparation. One of the major reasons for the growth in Weld County is that new residents desire to have a higher standard and quality of life. Some of this comes from having open space and wildlife to observe and enjoy. DPG purchased this property for recreation purposes, as a "legacy" investment. A road destroys that purpose. It is our firm assertion that there is a common good that accrues to the entire county when property owners preserve open space, develop wetlands and wildlife habitat and pay for it. This enhances the entire county. -y . r gAr .=ti V " k4 Shat �r' Board of County Commissioners 60 Weld County, Colorado wee October 4, 2004 Page 5 s a DPG formally requests that the commissioners review the other alternative routes. Look closely at each route and determine what each route has to its favor that has already been established, i.e. existing roads, existing rights of way, existing bridges, etc. Which of these routes has the least impact to wildlife habitat and which of these routes is most cost effective? We absolutely believe that the preservation of wildlife habitat should be a high priority in planning considerations. We, as a society can easily eliminate the habitat but cannot easily rebuild or restore it. DPG hopes to preserve as much of the wildlife habitat as possible, so that future generations can enjoy it as much as we have. We trust you will exercise the best in professional and political judgment as you contemplate the potential routing of County Road 49. Respectfully submitted, a•• endall H. Holm Manager DPG Farms LLC Y DPGFARM5LLC2oM1COMMISSICNERSLTR.ODO • • • • • ? 9 Yew r . d $ -� 4 UY i e .&It Y1 A l YQ ��rr. ry y P l Y t n '11 i { KFE p 5 I 4F .a 1i 1 S f 4 4 4 4 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a I I I I 1 I I I I I i I i 303.721.1440 FELSBURG fax 303.721.0832 H O L T St. 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 600 ULLEVIG Centennial,CO 80111 4 4 I I X3' 3 `4f 3 �w , 3 vs e c t ii s i- -u a , nw '' is +tt ,. .., x .1 3 ¢: �r} T. . -. o{ r is '3 4 r+c �}�' „41i�Y3 �'aS t 4 3 +w' k , t � ty wft w "1'u '� ' ,� ll j a x }t d4 7� I'Gg ? { :'fie`,. C,, . �.. sa, e �.:aa.o.EP t..+ �#`rf' #�� ' 0 / i n rn CC CC CC U U U cal cc N Arteriol Corridor Itudy CR76 I S T r CR74 �, t ' i Galeton CR72 ¢ 449. Us CR70 39 CR66 _ Cloverly CR64 Alden to CR62 a� 3 s¢ River Greeley Q��` s• CR58 N ¢ 37 U 1345 N. Kersey 0 CR54C.) ili H O L T R& October 2OO4 ULLEVIG WELD COUNTY Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study / p els ou Prepared for: Weld County Public Works Department P.O. Box 758 1111 "H" Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 600 Centennial, CO 80111 Principal: Christopher J. Fasching, P.E. Project Manager: Jeffery W. Dankenbring, P.E. FHU Reference No. 03-237 October 2004 FELSBURG (IHoLT & ULLEVIG le l 'F.1.O 0Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 10 °uINI S 0 NO TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES * Page Page RI Preface INTRODUCTION 1 Figure 1. Study Area 1 Preface 1 Figure 2. Land Use/Environmentally Sensitive Areas 4 • Strategic Roadways 1 Figure 3. Study Alternatives 6 Project Background and Study Purpose 1 Figure 4. Evaluation Matrix , 8 Study Process 2 Figure 5. Segment 1 11 • Public Input 2 Figure 6. Segment 2 13 • II. EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS Figure 7. Segment 3 15 * 3 Figure 8. Segment 4 17 Environmental Issues 3 Figure 9. Recommended Alignment 19 • Figure 10. Recommended Alignment (South) 20 • III. IDENTIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVES 5 Figure 11. Recommended Alignment (Middle) 21 Design Parameters 5 Figure 12. Recommended Alignment (North) 22 • Construction and Right-of-way Schedule 5 Figure 13. Typical Arterial Cross Section (Ultimate) 23 • Generation of Alternatives 5 Figure 14. Typical Arterial Cross-Section (Interim) 24 • IV. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES 7 • Segment 1 9 APPENDIX (SEPARATE DOCUMENT) • Segment 2 12 Evaluation Matrices Segment 3 14 Horizontal and Vertical Geometry Design Criteria • Segment 4 16 Public Comments • V. CHAPTER 5 - RECOMMENDATIONS 18 Illi Alignment 18 S Study Implementation Process 18 w Arterial Implementation Process 18 S • S S S • S s S S pFELSBURC3 S C4 HOLT & ULLEVIG 0 October 2004 • -F. 1.O • r ales Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study • 'UN • • • • I. INTRODUCTION I PR FY \ CT m • PROJECT E-- I. Weld County's transportation system is intended to provide for the safe and efficient movement of goods vv it LO it LIMITS throughout the county. Transportation planning is crucial to the County's future success including the local • and surrounding municipalities. Success can only be achieved with an effective transportation system. The a • planning process goes well beyond looking at the existing needs of the transportation system; it must look cc ' well into the future to identify the needs and uses for years to come. • — CR76_ I STRATEGIC IC ROADWAYS 1 • CR74 Ili Weld County has identified seven major strategic arterial roadways throughout Weld County which will Galeton provide for an effective transportation system. These roads are considered strategic because of the CR72 en I location and connectivity they will achieve with other major arterials or State Highways within the County. - ct Weld County Road 49, from Interstate 76 north to State Highway 14, is classified as one of the County's CR7o seven strategic roadways. I PROJECT BACKGROUND AND STUDY PURPOSE O I � The purpose of this study is to establish a preferred alignment for a north-south arterial roadway east of L CR66 Greeley which will extend the existing Weld County Road 49 to the north from the intersection of State • Highway 34 to State Highway 14. This proposed arterial will improve the connectivity between the existing Cloverly Alden CR64 10 east-west highways within the study area and provide a north-south route to Interstate 76 at Hudson. By _ identifying a preferred route at this time, this study will serve as a guide for Weld County and the local • agencies within the project corridor to preserve rights-of-way for the arterial so that it may be constructed CR62 ei • as needed. Planning for this roadway now will allow it to be implemented in an orderly fashion and will Gs r_ allow for minimized impacts in the future. The study area as shown in Figure 1 extends north of US 34 for k rt 263 Ili 13 miles to SH 14. Greeley 5- QW``Q F'I CR58 II 4 - ¢ 37 U II a3 I = 3a Kersey cr cc U CR5a.. II Figure 1. Study Area li I IR FELSBURG I rill HOLT & U L L E V I G Poge 1 October 2004 • • • `e .r Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study • nt, f UN • • • • ST" D i-Rt I'C [SS, • • The study initiated with an extensive data collection effort to better understand the opportunities and the • constraints within the study area. Comprehensive plans and transportation plans from the communities located within the study area were compiled and reviewed; parcel ownership information was collected; • known development plans were assembled; environmental data compiled by the County was mapped; and • other relevant information was also assessed. With this information and with input from the public (including representatives of the local entities), a number of alternative alignment routes were identified for • the corridor. These alternatives were then evaluated based on a number of factors including: transportation • effectiveness, roadway geometry, impacts to the communities, future land use consequences, existing development consequences, environmental impacts, safety, constructability and construction costs. The results of this evaluation process were then discussed with the local entity representatives, and a preferred • route was preliminarily identified. The preferred route was presented to the public for comment, and • additional refinements of the preferred route was made. The results of the study were then assembled into this report. p: 773L Tr • Local entities including the Town of Kersey, the City of Greeley, the Colorado Department of Transportation • and the Greeley-Weld County Airport have been actively involved with this planning process since its • beginning. A Local Agency Advisory Group, comprised of representatives of the local governments and ' other agencies, has met four times throughout the study to provide input on data needs, the identification of alternatives, and the evaluation of those alternatives. Input from these entities has been important in the selection of the preferred route. The general public has also been an integral part of this process. An initial open house for the project was held in March 2004 to receive input from the public on concerns, issues, and opportunities for potential ' routes through the project area. Over 100 residents attended the initial open house for the project. A second and final open house for the project was held in June 2004 to receive input from the public on the • preliminary preferred route; over 50 residents attended. • In order to ensure maximum public involvement for both open house meetings, notification was sent to all of the property owners within the study area (over 1,400 total notices were mailed) and a notice was posted on the County's web site. A 1 I 4 • FELSBURG /, HOLT & U L L E v JO page 2 October 2004 4 1 s .1O Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study II. EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS The information that was collected during the data collection process served as the basis for creating and ! evaluating alternative alignments. The sources of the data collection were Weld County, local municipalities, the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Available existing land use plans, transportation plans and specific development plans were compiled as ! well as aerial photography, right-of-way and parcel ownership information, environmental considerations, railroad crossing information and USGS topographic information. All of this information was assembled to determine the physical characteristics of the study area. I As part of the data collection effort, several comprehensive plans and transportation plans from the communities in the corridor were collected. The plans include the following: I + Kersey Transportation Plan (Draft) , Kersey Comprehensive Plan (September 1998) Greeley-Weld County Airport Master Plan (Draft 2003) ! This chapter summarizes the information extracted from these plans and the information received from the County's Geographical Information System (GIS) department. E V Existing environmentally sensitive areas were obtained from the County's GIS department. Areas of environmental concern include the following: ! a Flood Plains Bald Eagle Areas (Endangered & Threatened Species) Black-tailed Prairie Dog Areas (Candidate for the Endangered & Threatened Species) a Swift Fox Areas (Candidate for the Endangered & Threatened Species) Mitani-Tokuyasu State Wildlife Area (SWA) These areas are shown on Figure 2. Most of the environmental areas are concentrated around the South Platte River and the Cache La Poudre River. The floodplain does stretch to the north around Lone Tree Creek. I I I FELSBURG ! C4 HOLT 1 ULLEVIG L E V I G Page 3 October 2004 'F / O d'G C Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study c , T 1)N LAND USE/ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS LEGEND: Endangered & Threatened Species Data collected from Weld County rill Flood Plain -- Town of Kersey Primary Urban Growth Area (PUGA) I`-r Bald Eagle olSD°°°" °"` Existing Parcel Lines —"— Town of Kersey Secondary Urban Growth Area (SUGA) f ' Canidates for the Threatened & Endangered Species = Mitani-Tokuyasu State Wildlife Area (SWA) --- Town of Kersey Planning Area man Project Limits MN Annual Average Daily Traffic AZ Black-tailed Prairie Dog r a"Y w K�v,�R.' x ' / re I yl� . raj 4 / + ''• ^a.:. . 'AM '' y' . s n =sir e. 1 '":rt9 „t .t`r",`n. ;;;,-. " 3ra:.�a�®ax:.,25 ,aa __ she �'• _la otie _ —_ ._ _✓ 1t+.1�.-, `a � ` '"v �i j g It 4' m ww F��AA3 a ,ara" •'i LE,a `� ' SWilli aid __ RA pi��.�, r v S-66:40'� _• �' of .,.. .. .xr 0, d ' ,,y� 't..! r �t�� W .0 lei ,Fr' �A 014 `S1c,: :d. i_ ₹�`�' -`� -.r,�„r _ I , ��} .f� a �:� � ice.. lira/ "'r'r` ' .fli i � .cc a � 'e_ �_ ■ !fit y p ;, _ ,'1�� `, _ _ i . H 7r1 +w. -4,-_,-.....•,s. e✓ � _ :.O7�� r'..Ckai - w' A ok .isipmE,-- pc% ___ -i . — , w c., PEP [ 1 - ,Y L ; LYs '��""1- IN :.� '►� _ � 1#n Willa. fea" .a �,.•' " • ! r FT ■ L Ili_ 1 t /,v y ..' ' 4: ASIMau t ♦ i,..�,F i e a.mean S�,._��:_ir. tom �:r ;� � 'e�'1 _,et'�s� .EE I I��i�'// r'' — _ /4 _ i�' I .: �I � � ir•r _ lO C■�re!•!t0 hr l- ," iii ll l dt rem. S r ) {i I � �' �� +'° �I� ��` L7Ci k � fi�]t \t om �'� - >x ,m,. 'v I .�e .--_, ria TA -AI i7�'}e�.r� �y r... - - ? r. a..� ' r ~ .T_ H E."t. "ei. '.S `� .r - _]a eZi ilf T • 1 ( I ,`IY a. i Figure 2 i I a FELSBL RG 1 frill L LLEVIG HO LT T & U Poge 4 October, 4004 MIL I P in px- Y, Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 01Jti - P • III. IDENTIFICATION OF ALTERNATIVES GENERATION OF ALTERNATIVES Several alignment alternatives were identified for the project area. The alternatives were generated based t 'Fes. e i I LI6 S on input received from the public and the local agencies. Initial alternatives were sent to the local agencies for comment and they were then refined. Developing new alternatives and refinements of existing Before the alternatives shown on Figure 3 were defined, basic design parameters were established for this alternatives has been an ongoing effort given the additional public and local agency input. The alternatives study. These parameters were discussed with the local agency group, and it was agreed that some that were considered in this study are shown on Figure 3. flexibility should be exercised in certain areas pending the nature of the surroundings. Design parameters ,+ for the preferred route and for Weld County Strategic Roadways are as follows: Classification is a major arterial road Right-of-way width is 140 feet (Additional right-of-way may be required for auxiliary lanes at major intersections such as State Highways that turn east-west) The typical section for Weld County Strategic Roadways is shown on Figures 13 and 14. The posted speed limit for this proposed arterial is anticipated to be 45 MPH to 55 MPH. Construction of these arterials will be dependant on new development and may require that half of the typical section or two lanes be built initially with the entire roadway being built as traffic demands increase. Access control for the preferred route should follow the guidelines set forth in the Weld County Roadway Classification Plan (June 2002) ( ,k TRU CTION AND RIGHT-OE-WAY SCI-HEM I ' At this point in time, there is no specific schedule for purchasing rights-of-way and constructing this arterial. The construction schedule for this arterial route will be highly dependent on the growth patterns in the area. Weld County and the local agencies within the project corridor will use this study as a basis to obtain rights- of-way for the arterial as development occurs. Road rights-of-way will either be acquired through landowner dedication or purchased by the governing agency. Furthermore, as development occurs, it is anticipated that developments adjacent to the arterial will be responsible for the roadway construction as a means to mitigate their traffic impacts. The County and local agencies within the project corridor will ultimately be responsible for those portions not funded by developments I 1 0 1 1 1 1 FELSBURG HOLT & U L L E V I G Page 5 October 2004 4 S S ice, Ifj ri S c, . Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study S outi S S S S S S S ' o LEGEND: STUDYAL TERNA T/VES is — Existing Parcel Lines Existing Paved Roadway MI Mitani-Tokuyasu State Wildlife Area (SWA) Existing Gravel Roadway ate New RoadwayI. maw Data collected from Weld County Project Limits GIS DepaNnent • �.. % .�$ttu 'r: . =�.� r4 :0 l / �_'e +: -T --r- - i. 4. �'� JTy -t ^ ., � . �. . S� .`y,•_�._, G' ' •"•. _I n• n p, d\i,. C �f10 may_. ¢yam layq ibi -gr /s arri i'k :� ��1� � �27d'M�%��A.iG'1`Yi l"ill�.,3 _ n31Gi � ti/ r__ /ate aeau - ��' oI •X F .✓, =fi►at j"'sv�= a + � .eks5 r,i I ® 7 illilt rht j,. _ S. OILc> y m. " ,. . a_c.�y a — _li, - - .\ ^ j .. . 0.F is ~~. iv.pgyq► `' 1l �: ;:Pr -�".'a.�, it. 'jam ;a{�.a.� r D2TPig. PiI Iffrobi ,,,e, . ...., i, ........-rfil• 94 a, } ka oci ' -- - Iest,i n _J� ':# _ s; ia,�i K "'4,11 Hill a fi ^11 11 7sk • ' larnF .. F?�'. iiik rl. ' ' •r.e ., er ,yll - A I',Lrt.::Y IOjs it gla t".yI- I .r ♦.4 . 7 Y• .-1 —dmi• • ,Ammi at 1 ...., I. mss • , .10... if , . Is . 55. ' mil I.s_ F:_÷afgai7 a_4 .� - 'i' y ( $ 5`. _1 -I s •tp 4 i ' tv - Li - -.a :_. _ci : _ r 2.... LI,\ _ . .—' Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 Zar I Segment 4 I 0 g r O Figure 3 OPFELSBURG (i HOLT & ULLEVIG L E V I G Page 6 October, 2004 ;F1.O Y 4. `' Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study O r UN IV. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES > Environmental Impacts (Weight Factor = 1.75) The project area was divided into four segments for evaluation purposes. Each segment of the alternative • Environmental Impacts are a measure of each alternative's impact on the environment including was evaluated using the following criteria: threatened and endangered species, wetlands, noise and air quality. k Transportation Effectiveness (Weight Factor= 2.0) ✓ Threatened and Endangered Species ✓ Wetlands • Out of Direction Travel / Requires Lower Speeds v Air& Noise Quality V Out of Direction Travel is a measure of the level of directness for north/south travel and a measure as to whether to lower the desired speed limit, i.e. through a town. Existing Safety (Weight Factor = 2.0) Horizontal and Vertical Geometry (Weight Factor= 1.0) • Traffic Safety ✓ Traffic Safety is a measure of expected conflict points and improvement of existing problems as • Horizontal and Vertical Geometry is a measured achievable design speed based on guidelines set well as a general assessment of hazards. forth in AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2001. r Construction (Weight Factor = 1.0) ik Community Impacts (Weight Factor = 2.0) • Ability to Phase • Aesthetics ✓ Ability to Phase is a measure that assesses if the alternative lends itself to being constructed in ✓ Aesthetics is a measure that assesses if the alternative is pleasing to the eye. phases or if it would need to be constructed as one project. • Access • Constructability ✓ Access is a measure of the level of convenience and clarity of access to existing and future ✓ Constructability is a measure of the feasibility of construction based on rerouting existing traffic, developments and adjacent property owners. utilities and drainage through the corridor. • Right-of-way Impacts ✓ Right-of-way Impacts is a measure of the number of displacements that would be required of Construction Cost (Weight Factor = 1.5) existing and future developments in order to construct the alternative. • Known Historical Significance Impacts • Construction Cost is a relative comparison of costs to construct the alternative. V Known Historical Significance Impacts is a measure of the impacts to known existing historical buildings or sites. These criteria were incorporated into an evaluation matrix as shown on the next page. Each alternative for Land Use Consequences (Weight Factor = 1.0) the different segments was then evaluated and ranked from 1 to 5 with 1 being the best. The scoring was then multiplied by a weight factor that was established by the County and local agencies, and the weighted scoring was then totaled for each alternative. The alternatives were than compared. The "best segment • Land Use Consequences considers the consequences and opportunities for future residential and route" was then evaluated with other"best segment routes" from adjacent segments to ensure that the commercial development plans. arterials were continuous throughout the study area. Existing Development Consequences (Weight Factor= 1.0) This chapter describes the detailed advantages and disadvantages of each segment alternative. • Existing Development Consequences considers the impact with existing residential and commercial development plans. FELSBURG , H L T U L L E V I c--6t, Page 7 October 2004 r i C -r- Weld County Rood 49 Arterial Corridor Study GUN , Evaluation Criteria Comments Scoring Weight Weighted Factors Scoring Transportation Effectiveness Out of Direction Travel 2.0 Requires Lower Speeds Horizcrtal and Vert;cai Geometry Horizontal and Vertical Geometry 1.0 Cor-u-Lnity impacts Aesthetic Impacts Access Impacts Right-of-Way Impacts Known Historical Significance Impacts Average for Community Impacts 2.0 Land Use Consequences Land Use Consequences 1.0 Existing Deh.eloonnent Conse uences Existing Development Consequences 1.0 Envircin.nentai impacts Wildlife Floodplain Average for Environmental Air& Noise Quality Impacts 1.75 Safety Traffic Safety 2.0 Constructio Ability to Phase Constructability Average for Construction 1.0 Construction Cost Construction Cost 1.5 Total The Criteria are scored from 1 to 5 with 1 being the best. Figure 4. Evaluation Matrix �i FELSBURG HOLT ULLEVIG Pogeg October2004 • k(F. I 6 0. a ' ° ' ..:., Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study ili cJl SI N 0 SEG),IENT I Alternative B2 All of the alternatives for Segment 1 extend north from US Highway 34 at WCR 49. The alternatives differ Alternative B2 is shown subtly shifting to the east twice as extending north from US Highway 34 before north of US Highway 34 as discussed below, but the existing WCR 49 alignment south of US 34 is planned crossing the South Platte River. The entire right-of-way would be need to be acquired since this alternative IS to remain. Segment 1, specifically, extends from US Highway 34 to State Highway 263. does not utilize any existing roadways. This alternative crosses the river at only one location; therefore, a • cost savings would occur. Current design standards could be applied to this alternative since it is proposed Alternative A on native land which will also assist with the traffic control. This alternative has historical impacts as it splits a 100 year farm located north of WCR 58. As this alternative crosses the South Platte River, it Alternative A extends from US 34 and shifts to the east at approximately WCR 56/2 to WCR 51. After impacts bald eagle areas, the flood plain and comes very close to the Mitani-Tokuyasu State Wildlife Area.5 aligning on WCR 51, Alternative A takes a direct north-south route to State Highway 263. Since the One disadvantage with this alternative is the location it ties into State Highway 263. majority of Alternative A does not utilize any existing roadways, this alternative would require acquiring a majority of the right-of-way and would have a relatively high construction cost. Since this alternative is Alternative B3 9 proposed on native land, the roadway would be designed to current design standards and could incorporate access control. Traffic control for this alternative would not be a concern except at the cross Alternative B3 is the most direct north-south route considered in this analysis. However, several roads; however, phasing this alternative could be problematic. Two adjacent residences would be residences south of WCR 58 would be impacted with such a direct route. Similar to Alternative 51, • impacted with this alternative. This alternative also impacts a bald eagle area and the flood plain adjacent Alternative 53 crosses the South Platte River and the Cache La Poudre River which increases its 7 to the South Platte River. construction costs. The alternative also comes within close proximity of the Mitani-Tokuyasu State Wildlife Area. The entire right-of-way would need to be acquired, and a bald eagle area and flood plain are also Alternative AB impacted with this alignment. This alternative skirts the edge of a 100 year farm and lies on the eastern 9 edge of a proposed gravel pit that will eventually be turned into 100 Acre Lake. O Alternative AB is a variation of Alternative A and Alternative B1. Alternative Cl lil Alternative Bl Alternative C1 extends from WCR 49 to the west towards the WCR 47% and WCR 58 intersection. This I, Alternative B1 shifts approximately 1/2-mile to the east upon extending north of US Highway 34. After alternative proceeds to the north utilizing an existing bridge (18th Avenue) across the South Platte River and then turns north to WCR 47. This alternative brings some cost savings, at least for the interim t crossing WCR 58, Alternative 51 shifts back to the west before crossing the South Platte River and the a ID Cache La Poudre River and connecting into State Highway 263. Since this alternative meanders back and condition, by utilizing the existing bridge over the South Platte River. With the existing bridge, there would 7 forth and doesn't utilize existing roadways, the majority of right-of-way need to be acquired. Due to this be fewer impacts to the existing flood plain and wildlife areas. Traffic control would be a minor issue for alternative crossing the river at two locations, the construction cost would be relatively high. This this alternative and less right-of-way would be needed for the areas that utilize existing roadways. This alternative would be designed to current design standards and access to the alternative could be restricted alternative would not impact any known historical buildings or parcels. If this alternative was constructed in 9 as development occurs. Traffic control for this alternative would not be a concern except at the cross the near future, this alternative could serve as a truck route for the proposed gravel pit north of WCR 58. roads; however, phasing this alternative could be problematic. Five adjacent residences would be This alternative was developed in cooperation with the property owners adjacent to WCR 471/2. impacted with this alternative. This alternative impacts a bald eagle area and the flood plain adjacent to 0 the South Platte River and the Cache La Poudre River. The Mitani-Tokuyasu State Wildlife Area is also 9 located in close proximity. This alternative would also impact a historical 100 year farm north of WCR 58. D I I _ _ 1 II FELSBURG (II HOLT & ULLEVIG L E v I G Page 9 October 2004 I I / r �, '1r Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study p . .. _ p Alternative C2 P Alternative C2 is very similar to Alternative C1 except it utilizes more of the existing WCR 47'/ roadway. A major disadvantage to this alternative is the number of residences and businesses it would impact adjacent 1 to the existing roadway. Up to 10 adjacent residences would be effected. From a geometric design standpoint, the 90 degree curves are less desirable than a straighter alignment. This alternative would require less right-of-way than Alternative C1; however, phasing and traffic control would be more problematic with this alternative. 1 Alternative D 1 Alternative D was derived after receiving public input. This alternative extends the existing WCR 49 north of US Highway 34 and east to SH 37 which requires a significant amount of east-west travel. The existing bridge over the South Platte River could be utilized and the existing highway right-of-way could also be utilized. A considerable amount of right-of-way would be required between WCR 49 and SH 37. 1 Best Segment 1 Route 1 In order to minimize impacts to existing residences and minimize construction costs, Alternative C1 is the preferred alternative for this segment. After listening to concerns from the property owner concerning the parcel of land between the South Platte River and Cache La Poudre River, we have modified the alternative as shown. This refinement of the alternative would also better serve the proposed City of Greeley Parks Department and the proposed soccer fields. 0 I I I I 1 1 1 FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 10 October9004 I 1 ` 1- , L 1 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study 1 i_7//•,,,1 1 1 at worn Preferred Alternative Other Alternatives That Were Evaluated SEGMENT 1 1 • x v 3-e i . • \ \,1 lid" •'•.J _ :City PaAYSi '2"Ct 'yV :: w 1 i 4i iM f t 21 � .oP9ttment f, , - �a :, i,:o [F Ids 0 ■ °i� . l w z• „t . " \� r. ] '�, 1 ,i _,,„_4.. , i, ..-- •...,, ,414...4. sca - , :4,- A k. ,,a , ...! 1 l # 1. 1 ��t, • "4 �* Ii et ', . . i - 1il L. /�1 ` r I ~, . fir.. ') ,\.\ . )/+ .5 i , / -� a.. ? / r\\ d 44. ,,,. •} 44 "�'y't1 :lift 1 r:lif is I lain \ 1 ilig 3 • iii , __,:,,,it,..---.- - !\,,,ot,,,.• it itop*,--—— T.iiri , 1. . _ fit- .... , 4,0,.... ,, ig . XV-41., i�T �` ,�.."+� , g r •x s F t i l i 4• s' A; o: o • r 4 q 3 F' to c s. ,yv `� F ,I .� ,Vnu .0 in .' 1 ; !h 4+�� nni n ti i . . i[r� III � LL�YYY , �� i 1�� 4':2figi1 i ' gy ye w I • y �. C Olt I'I ` 7. i '..4 [ i ,a. :,. :07..itiia',T., 1.1)ilipp=1 E..1:7 vi.,,,,.'t rt ,.a�avannm,'v�tv4ca�-a9•iawx� ." > 'CM Figure 5 Illi FELSBURG (II HOLT & ULLEVIG L E V I G Page 11 October. 2004 I 1 I`C7 . Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study ouN 1 1 ` _t-` 1EV[ 2 Alternatives Dl and D2 1 1 The alternatives for Segment 2 extend from State Highway 263 to State Highway 392. None of the Alternatives D1 and D2 shift the alignment from SH 37 back west to WCR 51. These alternatives are 1 alternatives meander back and forth between county roads except for Alternative D as discussed below. longer than the other alternatives within this segment as they require a mile of east-west travel. Due to the additional length of these alternatives, the construction costs are anticipated to be higher for these I Alternative A alternatives. Alternatives D1 and D2 would impact 19 and 17 adjacent residents respectively. Access 1 control would be an issue for these alternatives as well as aesthetic, air& noise quality and right-of-way Alternative A utilizes an existing paved road and extends along the WCR 51 alignment. There are some impacts. These alternatives do not appear to impact any wildlife areas or the existing flood plain. 1 sight distance issues along this alternative such as the intersection of WCR 51 and SH 392 given nearby ,' I trees. There are 18 adjacent residences that would be impacted with this alternative. Obtaining the Best Segment 2 Route additional right-of-way beyond the existing WCR 51 right-of-way may be problematic with the close I proximity of adjacent residences. The ability to phase this alternative would be very good; however, traffic By utilizing an existing paved roadway and having a nominal number of adjacent residences, Alternative C control during construction would be an issue that would need to be addressed. Restricting access given is the preferred alternative for this segment. I the numerous existing residences may not be easily done. The aesthetic and air & noise quality impacts ' associated with this alternative are a disadvantage based on the number of adjacent residences. This alternative does not appear to impact any wildlife areas or floodplain areas. Alternative B Alternative B lies on the existing WCR 49 alignment as it extends north of SH 263. There are several jogs in the existing WCR 49 alignment which have an adverse affect on the right-of-way impacts and the horizontal geometry for the alternative. The extension of Alternative B2 from the south would impact the existing feedlot north of SH 263. This alternative would impact approximately 10 adjacent residences, I which may also have adverse impacts on their access locations. The construction phasing and traffic control for this alternative would not be as significant as Alternative A due to the majority of WCR 49 being f an existing gravel roadway. The construction costs for this alternative would be higher due to the lack of an existing paved roadway. 1 Alternative C 1 Alternative C extends north along the existing WCR 47 alignment. This roadway is currently paved from 1 SH 263 to WCR 66. This alternative would have a cost savings by utilizing the existing paved road. 1 Approximately 13 adjacent residences would be impacted with this alternative. The ability to phase and construct this alternative would be fairly simple with the existing roadway; however, traffic control would 1 need to be addressed during construction. This alternative does not appear to impact any wildlife areas or 1 the flood plain. This alternative also compliments the anticipated growth patterns surrounding the Greeley- Weld County Airport. I 1 1 1 1 FELSBURG 1 C- HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 12 9October 4004 1 I 1 .O 1- rl I 11 rI Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study I 1 1 -----74e ir - Preferred Alternative Other Alternatives That Were Evaluated SEGME/V T 2 ,r fI i F I "' aiui f _.t, i Aral V 4„4 .� ' I wri s. 'WR A +v O I„ • t V 1 tir � .�_ J %pi y t 4 7 :II�- .` `' -` -"fig--�... . L,, ,. y L I A S ., 4•' 1 , ../4 41111, P.� . I • .�, L R 5�0 prig Pr 11:0______Fr- ... Af ' I. rake$ ,1 , 1 i Fiji g. -0 Ks/ a ■�� c' • L " . GOJ i� I I ,IiEi . r 'Mir t _ . :- a - _, arast 4 2 ,Atilit11144116. Y • a ,_ . ' fI t r .I1 &t! I Figure 6 II FELSBURG (' H0LT & ULLEVIG Page 13 October, 2004 3 it C Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study UN SEC`TENT 3 Best Segment 3 Route Segment 3 extends from State Highway 392 to WCR 74. None of the alternatives within this segment In order to avoid the adverse impacts to the town of Galeton, Alternatives A & B ranked almost the same transverse back and forth between the county roads; all are straight north and south. and either alternative could be the preferred alternative for this segment. Alternative Al Alternative Al is located on WCR 51 which utilizes the existing paved road. As this alternative approaches Galeton, the alignment shifts to the east in order to avoid going through the town. By shifting to the east side of Galeton, the alternative generates impacts on the flood plain. WCR 51 also crosses the flood plain north of WCR 72. Additional construction cost and right-of-way are also associated with shifting the alternative to the east. The out-of-direction travel for this alternative is slightly worse than some of the other alternatives. A total of 14 adjacent residences will be impacted by this alternative. Alternative A2 Alternative is very similar to Alternative Al except this alternative runs through the Town of Galeton. Due to the intersection at WCR 51 and WCR 74 being offset, there will be several right-of-way and existing residential impacts to realign WCR 51 so it is continuous. When this alternative is widened to the ultimate typical section, there will be numerous adverse impacts within the town of Galeton. The construction phasing and traffic control will be problematic with this alternative. A total of 20 adjacent residences would be impacted by this alternative. The traffic safety of the close adjacent residences could be a concern as well as the ability to restrict access from adjacent residences to the arterial. Alternative B Alternative B follows the existing WCR 49 alignment. This alternative crosses the flood plain north of SH 392. A total of 16 adjacent residences would be impacted by this alternative. Alternative B would have adverse aesthetic and air & noise quality impacts on the adjacent residences. The ability to phase this alternative with the existing gravel roadway would be good, and the constructability of this alternative would also be good with the existing roadway. It does not appear this alternative has any adverse impacts on wildlife areas. Alternative C Alternative C is shown on WCR 47 which is an existing gravel roadway. Similar to Alternative B, this alternative crosses the flood plain just north of SH 392. This alternative would impact 18 adjacent residences which would have additional air & noise quality impacts. The phasing and traffic control of this alternative would be easily done with the existing roadway. No apparent wildlife areas will be impacted with this alternative. pgFELSBURG C/ HOLT & ULLEVIG L E V I G page 14 October 2004 , crf ,`a 4 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor (. r,,. Study . Preferred Alternative Other Alternatives That Were Evaluated SEGMENT 3 rukr—r. ; r . rte, . fE. - .r 's � c, )3- Alt C 4� _ _ _ • : -A. ,I tiiiiPi ~ ' 6 ,y t I I, � •R � � �� :, a � vi -lay , A ` Vit; 0 � �s - /:ai'1,-, .,;:;.:,,....-c4.°- ‘ -. AEI e . „4. A 4.1- '. -al y� p _ L P t`' i7 . as - •• . .,. C'' _4rt �- / -.0 PI: r:,. 4 1',V ' �,, lk .3.t4 1 ,.--7,........„."::,..-„,.,„: .., - �t III" , _. ..„ ._. ' I CAlY O. i�A l•�� r k �; itdi , t. y .ay , 0 .. Ittr. I40,7thrii— , .. �� .� �F : sly r o .a . HI s Q 1 .. c.4, r.,,_, - ja.:1 4' PP , i , a h11 rY r- '' `j� j t y y �� d, ..mmi 77, �' 2- ' .• : 1 1. .' �e��_..� :k�' p 1t:> Figure 7 4 FELSBURG HOLT & U L L E v I G Page 15 October, 2004 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study SEGMENT 4 Best Segment 4 Route Segment 4 is the northern-most segment and extends from WCR 74 to SH 14. Similar to Segment 3, none Due to the limited number of adjacent residences, Alternative C is the preferred alternative within this of the alternatives evaluated for this segment meander between the county roads. segment. Alternatives Al & A2 Alternatives Al and A2 are very similar except for the transition through and around Galeton. These alternatives extend to the north utilizing WCR 51 and skirt the edge of the Camfield development. These I alternatives would impact 18 to 20 adjacent residences which have adverse effects on traffic safety, air & noise quality and adjacent accesses. Alternatives Al and A2 do not appear to impact any apparent wildlife areas or flood plains. These alternatives would have adverse impacts to existing development mainly within the Camfield and Galeton areas. The connection to State Highway 14 for these alternatives would require some realignment due to the bad existing skew angle of the existing intersection. This, in turn, would have an adverse affect on the existing gravel road connection north of State Highway 14. Alternative B Alternative B is along the WCR 49 alignment which is currently a gravel road. This alternative would impact 22 adjacent residences. Obtaining right-of-way from the numerous adjacent parcels may be problematic as well as restricting accesses in the future. The construction phasing and traffic control for this alternative could easily be done with the existing gravel road. The sight distance and intersection layout of WCR 49 and SH 14 are good, and WCR 49 extends north of SH 14. The numerous adjacent residences would experience aesthetic and air & noise quality impacts associated with this alternative. Alternative C Alternative C utilizes the existing gravel road on WCR 47 as it extends to the north. The intersection of WCR 47 and SH 14 has good sight distance and configuration. Only 7 adjacent residences would be impacted with this alternative which is a fair amount fewer than the rest of the alternatives. There are no apparent historical, wildlife or floodplain impacts associated with this alternative. The horizontal and vertical geometry could be designed to current standards. Due to the limited number of adjacent residences, the impacts on traffic safety, air & noise quality, aesthetics and right-of-way would be limited. The ability to phase this alternative could be easily done with the existing gravel road. The constructability and construction costs would be minor for this alternative. AFELSBURG HOLT & U L L E V I G Page 16 October 2004 f v � `` Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study rl aver- Preferred Alternative Other Alternatives That Were Evaluated SEGMENT 4 L i Jf- -'k-t, - 'a /. r .R"n ys«P' � r t e { r a � - r e - _ , ` Alt, c ,a� CR 47 _ r , rrr .. a wwwn \vt,. w w w w v a n w w w w w • k w A_q jl� RIS£ jf "'sRS'-_I • a s� y '� y es. x w.J C 1 y�. - a _ --y- fir i"f �� a ! '.t Yfi�` 4 _ t c. 7j• t; Y I J• ,4 teat per. /• a it \\\1 ky .y :4s pp 44 - _ r , --cgiss , ir 't ,, 1T"T,•ii `..t �.1 # l .\ A ..,�iY..A l�v�. & i-u ® � IC l, AR A Omni Rood it rA t '� ,yl d: L .ri. Ilit _ ' ae l• ore , „'* _ _ ! a`" � . :ft __ _ .,�i +�:ap. ear 1-..P t t .. 5i ,jot \,. A• ar Q, g - f. „4 f _ n Figure 8 FELSBURG C1 HOLT & ULLEVIG L E V I G Page 17 October, 2004 4F.I.fJ 4 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study tar , uUN V. CHAPTER 5 - RECOMMENDATIONS ALIGNMENT After the evaluation process was completed, the preferred alternatives for each segment were displayed for the entire corridor to review the connectivity of the different segments. The preferred alignments for the corridor are shown in blue on the following pages. Since Alternative B and C ranked almost the same in the evaluation process for Segment 3, the adjacent segments were analyzed and the connectivity of the ,, alignments were taken into consideration before selecting Alternative C for Segment 3. The location of the preferred future alternatives is approximate to allow subtle alignment shifts and flexibility to fit with future developments within the corridor; however, the overall functionality of the arterials should not be compromised as a result of any modifications. It is envisioned that two lanes of these arterials could be constructed as an initial phase with the ultimate roadway width being constructed when traffic demand warrants a 4-lane arterial. The typical sections for the interim and ultimate roadways are shown in Figures 13 and 14. IMPLEMENTATION F C STUDY PROCESS It is the intent of Weld County staff to present this study's findings to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration in a public hearing. ARTERIAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS At this point in time, there is no specific schedule for the construction of these arterials. The construction schedule for the arterial route will be highly dependent on the growth and development that occurs in the area. Weld County and the municipalities within the project corridor will use this study as a basis to preserve rights-of-way for the arterial as development occurs. Rights-of-way not preserved through the development process may be purchased as needed. Furthermore, it is anticipated that developments adjacent to the arterials will be responsible for the construction as a means to mitigate their impacts. Based on conceptual cost estimates that were prepared for this study, it is anticipated that construction for these arterials could be approximately $2 million per mile. The County and local municipalities in the corridor will be responsible for those portions not funded by developments. pFELSBUR0 (1HOLT & ULLEVIG L E V I G Page 18 October 2004 �tiF./ /, em . Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study u\ RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT s- 1.7-.9:1/2t. .. 'v`.' : a€k.a it ,- at ';y,. w ... `"� Pr -. .... •{ 4 _ -.t r 1 Mr i-- .''',Jon ,.,. i ,— rir: i p 'y am r- -a'fs ttJ ii 'y�,! �:_ f>.r.r.�.- - AT 2, Airmipm ( WWI iii 1 �"Si. FRI -r i�l idelel r / i. I. ��,g ,. - 111la • Ertl II t.._ � 1 ei rr�� ✓ .J• F ity a.-�_ ._ND II I s F.; I'° ° '' : '''�' !1 ��ry -S ,411016 ,." mg v 4� w�k:'r'Lc_ie .L��•_.Ji_ 1'..:.Ali t ..'eti. alutrr lorall pl I ll il /ea, lit -%r,,r9"7„ IS LIPW4Irhin#3. IT :11 7P i — ,i - IF. Fmk ia,..,41.,111 i'v . may ON. , t 0AANICrtir sr-79.1k > -i , {; ' PC .4.1 P'1�iY�Fr I,. • a y .. FolikKw i 'InX \ > Q . 4 _* Z _.$f 'i u_ i ° � L}c.. 0,Li '`• �t• Y"L'• a r:r, ..� s'i '11 w ,� { v L'tiWI A flSa' > P v.:it '• A►-. -� �,o , Vasa' ii �. I "t - '- ` A Ella 7 —.._..t. - f �-ii--r~1 rt—w i'F— C.{ ‘t,:- L - i r,„ 7 sir: 3%1;11 ':i,N _.:'u;, , - �� y . ,nti ."W in YE'1:�,�� ,. Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 I Segment 4 Figure 9 4 FELSBL RG C, HOLT bt l,-LLEVIG Page 19 October, 2004 ifr ' 4 C r , Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study ot/N IIIIIIMIIMIllt RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT (SOUTH) •.% •�. ° '.I, .i" I t, 'I 2IS), '• • - f F` I 1J.S:J/ • tilt _ 4A t r arri- ' dt s "I'll r• gfC71r�+�+ •r"':�` " +� 's �+-'.: 1 i _ �° ' 1 / • I A, a • f e fx r ' ,A .: a.1 'yam � -i J g t {l- r y . t_Th � .i. !z'-4 'g Y e �1 a �- \ ■ �1 1 f"- - T ' may{+ �@�pyy� 1 r. � •S��it- I 1G\�£,. -ff�G�IJ� w 9 .. Nf 7■F�, • 4 �'� ' H , _ \ � . �rEr. '+ ..,.—'�fa .-- ti _` t -v: ,Ciffi Parks; 1 .F- , Ir.R 4.--,-11- --a '+' iY " ;fizz i , "� \ ‘1-..1.<41. t it'lL a\.' �.:• _ a fffI t� y. }'� 3 �• • L[d Kt\' —;---1„ '7 R!. 4:4---------- I it' '174 .---ivii 'rant' 1"-N..1, ..‘<., • - ::, --,.7-/-a-.7::::kiir,/,'• ' .:pfiti.%1;:-P7-11f, .. %L. . ' ''-‘• . kr; S'D1/44,64,- ' i i. i N. z I. � � °'-■ r uI'I%fY"o *\ ,•iv1,t it kr Airy / I f X - *.\\ 1 Si „ ; . 101.4 ,42.0 I? " • ' • - p . .., . , ..\\ . ..1: 1 IN't 1 It. y w • t ii , '' r S . lel ,Oe MITIMIM ,,.- A. i .(a _ ',Zvi . '''i. . ._ »\ , • - '° C`C' f *`1.•$ ...� I W1.1 - -moo; ,�°'..'s ,— _-._ Figure 10 IIFELSBURG C1 HOLT & U L L E V'I G Page 29 October. 2004 •F.I ! J Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study ''1/tip ?� -- RECOMMENDED AL/CNME/VT (MIDDLE) ris m — P v . f 2 r4 [ , /� - �� - w rsr ilk iv i,a' ?� r 5z� i� O =y, ,. �.u. i� • 441 15, 1 ' :.' t ,- .... ip I it" . T' • : _ IIt" a j , "'� ��' '_. :t X. 41à ra v .. .is • clTer i9 ,r .a Inc }'G . _ J JC w . Il en_e. wc`� we a ..- ee - enee`a � r 1, r y; f, � C . ,', _ w ►JIMea . rt.IN,,x irwt : '. * t4r:7 — to'Ffw� M. \ -i p� .,ES..��g F�. -, `1 A+F J } / i•J- , t• d .. ee — —. '_ tlf i MIt ,."a till Y' / ! y ti '� ,• tip k . 44 (` +J .y Imo! G� • !.434• - •�� .,k�1'' �;C' ' �� is '�`�� Y Ak s --`*-.-,�._® • ,.. . ,.,N.‘,„00,,._,-r - " .r - AI :e. x RP _. „ftg _ _ :,. ..•'Ira t!tc!; k r i..,I. •Eleg.e� • k: n \ • 1f, -- u!!t ' i y y'. •;��' -tt ��: ` _ , , r —dP • ��la-: ii . 7 . 9 ,,,,„,:`mss . ..1 t. A•-f7. F - — •� _;'L %-'�, ► ..•'v / . n ;.::. �d% i n t, : .,. e -u_ [ti . , r I ass f.�; ��'� . .. . _ 1 — ,titer Figure 11 P. FELSBURG (MOLT & U L L E\'I G Page 21 October• 2004 Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study emu` Jk,- RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT (NORTH) or t i alMiltr‘%7 '�'+r PC-Pa —*a .. ..sx a •3 ' fair .r' S44 F- '�1� N ys/( �' f ..,p_ - f Cot. y., a-'.:� . J:. . {, "_41' ap4 tl�� ryf .... . .� f;� J>� .. ,� _ _. ..:.i+ 1.� , ..:c'si.,k„�.?L». -J ' t ill •� .s::. s. ''� rfc* '. , .ate # y .. . \ ��' " 'y S++e p' Y \ �xll . / 4N atf' /—�/�,I W - WY , t. f Yl . t �' T F4F#'" LL,llucw w r`r .,�4' r 3 i k <;;;1744 .t , 444 Alt. C F w,- , .. �- T 44 � TTr r.. rT7'• • • • •'1 'f i' f -' s 1 --ay. oua./r `pc � www ■ _ ,x 39t ■ ■,w . � _. w �� _a ... . ww . . � rw �_Y . . . . . ._y,j l � ■ ■ � � � v � � w � . . . iew R44 , '% ? - i. ..r s II) .. . ..• �e - di. +.'` V !. ... ,-c.' i \ •`�: 8 r"' R n'9h + ti "N!EE•N, sf."4 4 4j ".°s it-Y1 - .ope-+'..x n.F 1 { !ilk." '? t n sffir2 La4¢if't /x. " a '44 .fY4 1 - `T „4-y -, .. 1'� f f ,. k{: d ;k l jP j /{ '-! of s;. �;Ac - r +' .! .cv,'a y a } ` i. 4 + . v, nr 7�` ,.''�• + ^Cry A rc� \'.y ` L A .�. ~ I Y! tS " _ .ti .hW. . of I / l'.-' list v 4 - -s " r. z,. a �•Ja,. ^ ti �, '! Figure 12 4 FELSBURG FiOLT & ULLEVIG L E V I G Page 22 October, 2004 diN !r �. Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study bi/NA TYP/CAL ARTER/AL CROSS SECT/ON (UL T/MA TE) 140'FUTURE ROW. 8' 6' 12' 12' 12' 16'-26' IT 12' 12' 6' 8' SIDEWALK I SHOULDER AUXILIARY LANE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN/LEFT TURN LANE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE AUXILIARY LANE SHOULDER I SIDEWALK 2.5' -.- CURB d CURB R GUTTER GUTTER +I OPP II • boonlIIYA.M 'MI.MIFI.H ..1610$40,1% M.AMy4pYlYlln.✓ ""4.4.4. Urban Ultimate Section c_ 440'FUTURE R.O.W. 8' 12' 12' 12' 16'-26' 17 12' 12' 8' _ SHOULDER AUXILIARY LANE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN I LEFT TURN LANE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE AUXILIARY LANE SHOULDER 4' 4' SHOULDER SHOULDER 4111 r* _ 11 rill.' r.'A,Muy.1UN,µM �1 ~ _..1/40,,,,,,,µ414011 rMWAl.,,4,,, WMyAYWn W 1 ""MNW,4IWA 44a4.401.4,Alt aitWo"° Rural Ultimate Section YY."`AW" Figure 13 4 FELSBURG HOLT & UL LE VI G Page 23 October, 2004 • C. Weld County Road 49 Arterial Corridor Study ctiN TYPICAL ARTER/AL CROSS SECT/ON (INTERIM) ti 140'FUTURE RO.W. ► Z' 8' 12' tY 8' 3' ► SHOULDER SHOULDER TRAVEL TRAVEL SHOULDER SHOULDER (GRAVEL) (PAVED) LANE LANE (PAVED) (GRAVEL) ► ► ► • av •a•.nwai� �.. -� N�.naxn...yy„� WH• ^nd'MW µ '410,Y 44. .- 4YAW'xMMNL 4..aa .uY•.'W/M+uMJ W.WM4 H . '^x6k.04.AHw,IWyWWJN'•`•- I / Interim Section Figure 14 _ FELSBURG HOLT SL ULLEVIG L E V I G page 24 October. 2004 Hello