The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20043583.tiff SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION PELICAN SHORES NORTHWEST CORNER OF CR 13 AND CR26 WELD COUNTY,COLORADO PREPARED FOR: COLUMBINE LAND RESOURCES,INC. P.O. Box 17130 BOULDER,COLORADO 80308-0130 MARCH 9,2004 PROJECT 2002-89 PREPARED BY: WESTERN SOILS,INC. P.O.Box 1728 Lyons, Colorado Phone (303) 823-6867 Fax (303) 823-6863 1PP /cm Poo, m u_ n ; 2004-3583 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT 2002-89 PAGE PURPOSE 1 INVESTIGATION DETAILS 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 2 SOIL CONDITIONS 2 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS 2 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 3 SLABS-ON-GRADE RECOMMENDATIONS 3 SITE DRAINAGE RECOMMENDATIONS 4 LIMITATIONS 5 FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURE 1 BORING LOCATION MAP-NORTH PELICAN SHORES FIGURE 2 BORING LOCATION MAP-SOUTH PELICAN SHORES FIGURE 3 BORING LOGS TABLE 1 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SUBSURFACE INVESTIGAT1OF.I PELICAN SHORES NORTHWEST CORNER OF CR 13 AND CR 26 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PURPOSE The subsurface investigation has been completed for the proposed North and South Pelican Shores residential subdivision located at the northwest corner of CR13 and CR26 in Weld County, Colorado. This investigation was accomplished in order to provide preliminary recommendations for the foundation systems of the proposed residences to be constructed at the site and other pertinent geotechnical engineering recommendations. As part of our field investigation,4 borings were drilled throughout the lots 1 through 14, Block 2 of North Pelican Shores and 6 borings were drilled throughout lots 1 through 26, Block 1 of South Pelican Shores. The locations of the borings are indicated on Figures 1 and 2. Factual data gathered during the field and laboratory work is summarized in Figure 3 and Table 1 attached. The results of this investigation and our opinions that are based on this investigation and our experience in the general area are summarized in this report. INVESTIGATION DETAILS The test borings were completed with 4-inch diameter, continuous flight power augers using a truck-mounted drill rig. The augers are utilized to bore and clean the hole to the desired sampling depth. The augers are then removed and a 2- inch I.D. California spoon sampler is inserted to the desired testing depth. The sampler is then driven with blows of a standard 140-pound hammer falling a distance of 30 inches. The sampler is driven a total of 12 inches or a maximum of 50 blows. The number of blows required to drive the sampler 12 inches, or a fraction thereof, constitutes the penetration test. The test is similar to the Standard Penetration Test described in ASTM D1586-78 (Reapproved 1974). This test, when properly evaluated, is a measure of the soil strength and density. The results of these tests are shown on the Boring Logs (Figure 3). Samples obtained form the borings were returned to our lab for testing. The test results are indicated on Table 1. 1 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT It is our understanding that the plan is to develop 14 single-family lots on North Pelican Shores and 26 lots on South Pelican Shores. We were informed that the residences on North Pelican Shores will be constructed over walk-out basements facing the lake- The excavation plans for South Pelican Shores was undecided at the time of this report. We anticipate that the buildings will be constructed using conventional wood framing techniques and will be supported by poured in place reinforced concrete foundation walls. The loadings are anticipated to be light to moderate, typical of residential construction. if actual plans differ from the above description we should be notified so that our recommendations can be reviewed and revised, if necessary. SOIL CONDITIONS A relatively thick layer of overlot fill was encountered on lots 1 through 14, Block 2 of North Pelican Shores. The depth of the fill appeared to vary from 23 to 31 feet in depth. The fill was underlain by the native soils which consisted of sandy clays, silts and sand and gravel soils. The overburden soils were underlain by sandstone and claystone bedrock at approximately 28 to 31 feet. A layer of overlot fill varying from approximately 21/4 to 4 feet thick was encountered on lots 1 through 26, Block 1 of South Pelican Shores. The fill was underlain by topsoil material, which in turn was underlain by a deposit of slightly clayey to clayey,silty sand. The sand deposit was underlain by sand and gravel soils at approximately 7 to 10 feet. This material continued down to approximately 24 to 29 feet. At these depths bedrock was encountered in all but one of the borings. A more complete description of the subsurface soil conditions can be found on the Boring Logs, Figure 3. GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS Groundwater was not encountered in the borings on lots 1 through 14, Block 2 of North Pelican Shores at the time of drilling. Upon returning to the site several days after drilling groundwater was encountered in Boring 3 at approximately 33 feet. No water was noted in the other holes on this site. Groundwater was 2 encountered at approximately 9 to 11 feet in the borings on lots 1 through 26, Block 1 at South Pelican Shores at the time of drilling. The groundwater level will fluctuate throughout the year depending upon the amount of precipitation, surface runoff,the application of irrigation water and the water level maintained in the lakes. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Due to the amount of fill present on lots 1 through 14, Block 2 at the North Pelican Shore site, we recommend that the residences be supported by a drilled pier foundation system. Using this approach, the piers are drilled through the overburden fill and native soils and well into the underlying bedrock for support. The piers are typically drilled 8 to 10 feet into the bedrock. If groundwater seepage or caving soils are encountered, casing will be required for the pier drilling operation. On lots 1 through 26, Block 1 at South Pelican Shores,we anticipate that a spread footing foundation system can be used for support of the residences. The footings must be placed below the overlot fill and topsoil should bear on the native sands or sand and gravel soils. Site specific investigations should be accomplished for each site within both developments in order to provide final foundation recommendations and design parameters. SLABS-ON-GRADE RECOMMENDATIONS The fill present on lots 1 through 26, Block 1 at South Pelican Shores was predominately a granular fill which appeared relatively well compacted. The underlying native soils consisted of slightly clayey to clayey sands and sand and gravel soils. These soils are non expansive to low expansive potential and are generally considered acceptable soils for conventional slab-on-grade construction. Due to the depth, varying densities and nature of the fill present on lots 1 through 14, Block 2 at North Pelican Shores, there is some risk involved in using standard slab-on-grade construction. Slabs constructed on these soils could be subject to long term settlement. As with the foundation systems constructed on these lots, the most positive approach would be to use a structural floor system 3 • supported by the foundation walls and interior piers also drilled well into the underlying bedrock for support. SITE DRAINAGE RECOMMENDATIONS It is essential that proper site drainage be provided to divert all surface water runoff and water from the roof well away from the foundation walls. Satisfactory long-term performance of any foundation system depends on prevention of infiltration of water into the soils supporting the foundation. The following methods of preventing this infiltration are recommended: 1. Mechanically compact all fill around the building, including the backfill. Compaction by ponding or saturation must not be permitted. The backfill should be compacted to not less than 90% of maximum density as determined by the standard moisture/density relationship ASTM D698- 78_ Backfill which is to support slabs or pavement should be compacted to 95% of maximum dry density. Note,that some moisture will have to be added to the soils in order to obtain the proper compaction. 2. Provide an adequate grade for rapid runoff of surface water away from the structure (a minimum of 10 percent for the first 10 feet away from the structure is essential for unpaved areas). 3. A well constructed, leak-resistant series of gutters, or other roof drainage system,is essential. 4. Discharge roof downspouts and all other water collection systems well beyond the limits of the backfill, a minimum of 5 feet away from the foundation walls. We recommend against landscaping which requires any watering within 5 feet of the foundation walls. It is our opinion that all of the residences should have the protection of a perimeter drainage system. The perforate drainage pipe should be placed at least one foot below the bottom of the slab or the structural floor and should drain to a gravity outfall, if possible, or to a sump pit equipped with a pump. Depending upon the depth of the excavation and the proximity to the groundwater level, it may also be necessary to install an interior drainage system under the basement floor. These drainage lines should be channeled to the same outfall as the 4 perimeter drainage system. Final details for the drainage systems can be provided as part of the site specific investigation for each lot. Special considerations should be given to the depth of any basement excavations on lots 1 through 26, Block 1 at South Pelican Shores due to the groundwater conditions throughout this area of development. For preliminary considerations, garden level or raised basements with 4 to 5 feet cuts below the existing grades would be more suitable than full depth basements with typically 8 foot cuts below grade. LIMITATIONS The borings in this investigation present a reasonably accurate knowledge of the existing subsoils. Variations of the soil and bedrock conditions are always possible. Site specific investigations should be accomplished for each lot in order to provide final design criteria for the foundations,floor systems and drainage systems. If there are any questions concerning this report or when we can be of further assistance, please call. Sincerely, ,,,A 11W 4l3Z WESTERN SOILS, C. ��isZs �� !)RE iet4; YY 10 V, • v By. e � % e ary sson, P.E. §15t i s12r ca eee�e ae4��,`, ~ 5 Laboratory Test Results Table 1 Project #2002-89 PROPERTIES AT NATURAL CONSOLIDATION/SWELL DESCRIPTION MOISTURE CONTENT Natural Natural Unconfined Wading Settlement Settlement Swell Moisture Dry Density Compression (DRY) (Saturated) (%) (PC1) (PSI) (1'SF) (%) (%) (%) Test Boring 1 O 3' 100 0.4 0.2 Fill,slightly clayey, 5.0 106.3 5000 1000 2.1 silty to very silty 3000 4.1 sand,brown. 0.2%Swell upon the addition of water Test Boring 1 @ 9' 100 0.4 0.6 Ea very silty, 10.1 121.1 >9000 1600 OS sandy, gravelly 3000 2.2 clay,dark brown to 1.0%Swell upon the addition of water grey. Test Boring 2 @ 9' 500 5.5 5.5 Eg clayey,slightly 28.8 88.1 1000 1500 9.0 sandy silt,grey to 3500 14.0 black. 0.0%Swell upon the addition of water Test Boring 2 @ 29' 500 0.3 0.3 Sandstone,slightly 16.5 113.6 >9000 1500 0.9 clayey,silty,olive 3500 1.9 brown to brown. 0.0%Swell upon the addition of water 8500 3.3 Test Boring 4 @ 9' 100 1.0 0.5 Fill„silty,sandy to 12.0 112.8 8000 1000 2.7 very sandy clay, 3000 4.3 brown. 0.5%Swell upon the addition of water Test Boring 6 @ 9' 100 0.9 0.9 Sand,very silty, 8.3 117.8 N/A 1000 2.8 slightly clayey, 3000 4.6 dark brown. 0.0%Swell upon the addition of water Test Boring 10 O 4' 500 0.7 0.7 Saiiii,very silty, 6.3 108.3 N/A 1500 2.0 slightly clayey, 3500 3.6 dark brown. 0.U%Swell upon the addition of water BOR'^ LOCATION MAP-NORTH PELIC SHORES FIGURE 1 I I 'a. ) / 1 !lC�E L--J r ft t I Par C: 1. C.- f/' / C' _ L J E I . ;v (.......-'1 // TBlJV ' V • ' [J M r • . f / ; L a • . u \, Sur \� �� r--1 LJ ~ a �� rti 1 i r. IY : '0 tal I ? i I 14. i : ,i .E » �..I lit K r-ISP 1 II. Q , LJ _ k- c--, • ...0 1 - 300' IS TB3 v z• rg c. • y `[{JY• N L.. i I `i J I r ;' N $ J N J Y • �JI�I ,\ E { ,( ?.l J • •. r - • 'l_ ..i,: ' O r -=s4"---- _ " I• � 1 / 2 TI- r"""'NTI Lam:J ii,°+i J N \ '.'� �� r'.J � 10o /%ws: !� � Iv -7 .3 i r�r I IS 4L \ u�. So N > ^ (16a\ay,F1`+ ss \ + / J OW �l •Ls7 II-�• \o". ) / TRACT 0 1 +�, VI P4 *,•--., r"I t r i I 0 \ _ 1 22°1 k . C7 ll CCU '0 rut-21 i z1 rt + ar+r / ,...0 I ` \\ SOUTH PARCEL / �+ L J Z tad /// 54.814 ACRES x ^"s N., 'R 9 1 VA AI .s s 1)17 Irr. L _ J Rr.„ Qr•• - -. te ':. / MOOow ,arcs AND.w J F / r.k TRACE A �� twuor jaw T --..÷—.p.....r,—.r —;v .q. v.,N.�4'-`."y-'1/2a'Z,..i�#,.s;`_,{� ."�" :_"1� h'F t-t='•-/ 5:-=.`--T77-__ . S39'S8'23" cc a W 2627.04' ® CRAM. Sao --I COUNTY ROAD 26 a 12 wA� X VI IN — pvr AIP•Jo.LW CV Depth Below Ground Surface (4 W N N) N H VI O (11 O V1 O I O iiiiii/i `ti`IF-I� .AIq p : ^dry:., �:,�r �- •n . xg,s�;re t H ' ,�,r 4'2''!''`,r`C,t f'%`'t+,a'�t ,,e'• ','. Cr'i',,0,5 I4Ai{�f�. f ivin i !.��>glii—oJf� ': Ts /fr.;; ;;;;;Aakfromettatatiszipawitade///// i'�i4s., m t 'tati zipa tt-a d .,n • is`₹ JogP 'sJ-:':FlitAtiNt = 4— hli_iO1 to w N N i iii///.s'::r;,5,.��.;��:'.l;�:r�µx •:.,-,�, �.! 'e-"If'i�4rr--'.�gc`=r�,.;�,.,:, ,a.t,.r,::,;.. .• H ��//////pair alli E Mi. f iir i-' eir / ii1 i't..'�1 'lj�F't�}7y f. !'�y�4_#4 wi ti3 . rir[31i..GrEp i s ttt,14I'7,,�.,tili ti uu ii d F 4 4..{ ins Lic9. �`' � i! •,1pt� ry•"1 y 71 � :?�W43iC�"�.S'ilc i`�:R'i"ik:l;'Ss-R!b {{t'.f.- N b O 4 z • '+7 O f+ N V O 01 N nr';1,.�•,., �:�n7'a ,.-_.:.zY•=t -.r�e-,zs-�� =':r;- �•I�::,._.. - .. H to ..v.unt_'f==� i:'tIF14�_r.. `i2�-uf.:ecy>.-p!r•.-�t:a: �'r_iF I�.T..`�.'�.i 'pp.;t`w-F;t_iap.._.�erieF !c5e�1u?i:r�+sraifeiVi_:iifi�°•r':iFsx'. F2-`!'r.�.:: : I?'•SS1SYiiDJ O N.ii?•i2�:..,:;r;]ip.. -r 5±Ni�:k tfri -i•:: 3'•;F r; •i•'t tg?ai r.4:}�.kt stij�i]` �_'vot tF.�tr si. , ..:airi :'t1r i ;k os ait..�. 4J r O a t .i duTiettc �.^sL&i, It x'^ r `'tw2.tk•izF k y• •r.i i<-ar,_ F. ,,:;;;a z inr..,�4 i4_ +1;10-er•s7:�': N !L WM 4# n:.,;viil:::.-ivte- ` ft AN- 1 .:1,•&:- _# �I.,'.yr.r_'4i,aa,;_t w w co m 0 to m N ) Pl l,�"��ki A J r-. N /.-.6::.:4? . I)til PiiK-:alt,ii:K. • • a ;Or:A-cc...C.4:•:•;::::., ,•:'..•,•::,r/r/gt Depth Below Ground Surface CO 1.0 N N - VI O VI O UI O VI O I I l?:-. 0-3 rn ul F+ N N N4-3 /L' IT V..� /' 0. ,e 0'.:,:'.:I':4::. 'i ��/ ell O p'UQUi'tO.O.O'®•O/�p6�,O:0, Q':: '•p .2:b'::.' '. • b II. o -at m ili tzi o O m n ci N 3 N � u 0,• O-�.2 o u �c . .�,V_".u.o. :.90•Iw . .. ... 'yJ�L,,J/ 44 Cl W O O / ;o y.d P.Q.n .Q: Q.:o�Q o.O:O. ..U:O:!:, : . (�.)V�1ir•: :' ".t•••• �N��O ..?-n:l ikNn:a'on '•n ozzi„,_n- .O...a.e+..O,e.:e':r'1'!*�'U Vs•.:.. .. .. co• iri 03 II NY tO }Y�:0•�;�oD:.V2{y� Y ' �'• a.V: V,;O;! 1:..V,.UQ•l1.0��/� V. %�' t 4.0 a a //��/� .Q'. �.eOVV e"` OAs��: • "UpUo.�'o aVoy,n'C .y:::' m4.7, 111. 1! r LEGEND AND NOTES FILL, Mixture of silty, slightly clayey to clayey, sands and clayey, slightly sandy silts, soft to stiff, brown, dark brown to grey FILL, Predominately slightly clayey, silty sands & gravels with occasional cobbles, brown, medium dense to dense TOPSOIL, clayey, silty, sandy, dark brown, loose CLAY, silty, sandy to very sandy, brown to olive brown, medium stiff SAND, silty to very silty, with occasional gravel, dark brown to brown, medium dense • '� SAND & GRAVEL, silty with scattered cobbles, brown to orange brown, medium dense to dense SANDSTONE, silty to very silty, slightly clayey, to CLAYST0NE, silty, slightly sandy, olive brown to grey, hard to very hard II 30/12 Indicates that 30 blows of a 140 pound hammer were required to drive a 1— 2 inch diameter sampler 12 inches. [ 10/11 Indicates groundwater level, if encountered, and date which reading was taken. Indictee drill rig encountered refusal due to dense cobbles r Laboratory Test Results Table 1 Project #2002-89 PROPERTIES AT NATURAL CONSOLIDATION/SWELL DESCRIPTION MOISTURE CONTENT Natural Natural Unconfined Loading Settlement Settlement Swell Moisture Dry Density Compression (DRY) (Saturated) (%) (PCP) (PSP) (PSF) (%) (%j (%) Test Boring 1 @ 3' 5.0 106.3 5000 100 0.4 0.2 Fill, slightly 1000 2.1 clayey, silty to 3000 4.1 very silty sand, 0.2%Swell upon the addition of water brown. Test Boring 1 @ 9' 100 0.4 0.6 Fill, very silty, 10.1 121.1 >9000 1000 0.8 sandy, gravelly 3000 2.2 clay, dark brown 1.0%Swell upon the addition of water to grey. Test Boring 2 @ 9' 500 5.5 5.5 Fill, clayey, 28.8 88.1 1000 1500 9.0 slightly sandy 3500 14.0 silt, grey to black. 0.0%Swell upon the addition of water Test Boring 2 @ 29' 500 0.3 0.3 Sandstone, 16.5 113.6 >9000 1500 0.9 slightly clayey, 3500 1.9 silty, olive brown 0.0%Swell upon the addition of water 8500 3.3 to brown. Test Boring 4 @ 9' 100 1.0 0.5 Fill„silty, sandy 12.0 112.8 8000 1000 2.7 to very sandy 3000 4.3 clay, brown. 0.5% Swell upon the addition of water Test Boring 6 @ 9' 100 0.9 0.9 Sand, very silty, 8.3 117.8 N/A 1000 2.8 slightly clayey, 3000 4.6 dark brown. 0.0%Swell upon the addition of water Test Boring 10 @ 4' 500 0.7 0.7 Sand, very silty, 6.3 108.3 N/A 1500 2.0 slightly clayey, 3500 3.6 dark brown. 0.0%Swell upon the addition of water road right of way and the County would like to have 60 feet for prescriptive use. Mr. Rothe added there is a little garage that is within approximately 7 feet of the south east/west lot line on Lot 7 (B). The concern would be having a non conforming structure. Ms. Hatch added there is a structure close to property line according to the aerial photo. Mr. Carroll asked where the building was located. Mr. Rothe stated it was in the southern portion of Lot 7 (B) is where structure is located. Mr. Carroll clarified that the existing structure would cause conflict with the request for a 10 feet easement. Mr. Rothe stated it is a little shed with a cement floor. Ms. Hatch stated staff would consider this a non conforming structured that could not be replaced in same location should something happen. Mr. Carroll stated that as long as the structure was there and being used it would be fine but cannot be replaced. Mr. Carroll would like to see this placed on the plat for future uses. Mr. Rothe stated that would be fine. Don Carroll suggested that instead of running the easement along the southern east/west property line of Lot 7 (B). They could propose a 10'easement between Lot 6 (A) and Lot 7 (B) being 5 on each side. Mr. Rothe stated that would work better since there are existing structures. Don Carroll is asking for a total of 10 feet. Mr. Rothe asked if this could be 5 feet on both sides. Mr. Carroll stated it could be shared. Don Carroll summarized that there will be a five foot lot line easement on either side of Lot 7 (B)and Lot 6 (A). Doug Melby moved to approve Case RS-1064 with the recommendations. Brent Shafranek seconded. Motion carried. CASE NUMBER: PF-1011 PLANNER: Sheri Lockman APPLICANT: Doug Tiefel/River Runs Through It, LLC-Pelican Shores LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the E2 of Section 36, T3N, R68W • LOCATION: North of and adjacent to CR 26 and west of and adjacent to CR 13. For a more precise location, see legal. REQUEST: PUD Final Plan for 40 lots with R-1 (Low Density Residential)Zone Uses along with 193 acres of open space consisting of a river corridor and tow private recreational lakes Sheri Lockman, Department of Planning Services, presented Case PF-1011. Ms. Lockman gave a brief summary of the case. The exclusive utility agreement with Little Thompson has changed. Doug Tiefel, developer, indicated this request applies to the north portion. There is a 60 foot right of way and the anticipation was the south side of the right of way would have a 30 foot utility easement. Little Thompson has altered their plan and have decided it would be better to have the water line in the road and the services will extend onto each lot from the right of way. Therefor, the 30 foot easement is no longer needed he is requesting to change it to 15 feet. The 15 feet will contain electric, gas and phone. Mr. Tiefel added St. Vrain has their line in place on the south side of the lots with an exclusive easement. With the easement being 15 feet the owners can landscape closer to road. Mr. Carroll asked if they were putting the valve boxes in the easements and not in the road? Mr. Tiefel stated they would be in the road under asphalt, the service lines with the stubs will be onto the lot outside the easement. Mr. Carroll asked about the turn off valves for the water systems? Mr. Tiefel stated the valve boxes will be in the road like the southern portion. Mr. Carroll asked if this will be a County maintained road? Mr. Tiefel stated it will be private but paved. Mr. Tiefel added both water district wants the valve boxes in the asphalt, the meter pits will be on the lots. The Board had no concerns. Don Carroll added to be sure to have good compaction around the valve boxes. Brent Shafranek moved to accept 15 foot easement instead of 30 foot. Doug Melby seconded. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Voneen Macklin Secretary MINUTES OF THE WELD COUNTY UTILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE A regular meeting of the Weld County Utilities Coordinating Advisory Committee was held on Thursday, September 9, at 10:00 a.m., in the Conference Room of the Weld County Planning Department at 918 10'" Street, Greeley, Colorado. Members Present: . Also Present: Jacqueline Hatch, Sheri Lockman, Don Carroll, Brent Shafranek, Doug Melby Due to a lack of quorum Jed Reed from Atmos Energy listened to the tape and provided the final approval vote. CASE NUMBER: RS-1064 PLANNER: Jacqueline Hatch APPLICANT: Jason & Julie Rothe do Robert Thomas LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 6 & 7 JB Acres; Pt S2SW4 of Section 33, T6N, R66W LOCATION: Approximately% mile north of C Street and approximately%: mile west of CR 31. For a more precise location, see legal. REQUEST: Redesign of JB Acres Jacqueline Hatch, Department of Planning Services, presented Case RS-1064. The applicant is reconfiguring the lot lines between Lot 7 (B) & Lot 6 (A). Don Carroll asked about acreage. Ms. Hatch indicated Lot 7 (B)will be 1.7 acres and Lot 6 (A)will be 3.6 acres. Mr. Carroll asked if there was a structure on Lot 7 (B). Ms. Hatch indicated there are existing homes on Lot 7 (B) &6 (A)and Lot 7 (B) is on the west side. Mr. Carroll clarified that this is just a lot line adjustment. Mr. Carroll asked for history on the northern section of the parcel and is it attached to the new Lot 7 (B). Ms. Hatch indicated that when JB Acres was created there was a separate parcel that has always been sold with Lot 7 (B), the intent is to combine into one lot. JB Acres will be larger than originally designed. Mr. Melby asked if this would be part of Lot 6 (A)when done. Ms. Hatch indicated that was correct. Jason Rothe, applicant, provided clarification on the proposal. Mr. Carroll asked which parcel Mr. Rothe lived on. Mr. Rothe indicated Lot 6 (A). Ms. Hatch added that Mr. Rothe owns both parcels therefor there is no other land owner. There are two homes on two lots. Mr. Carroll if there would be a sign off from the existing utilities. Ms. Hatch stated it will be required prior to recording. Mr. Melby asked about the surrounding area. Ms. Hatch stated that to the south is the rest of the subdivision, east is agricultural properties, the north is the river and agricultural properties and to the west of these lots was agricultural properties. Don Carroll asked if there was any intent to bring any other utilities to either lots. Mr. Rothe indicated there was none. Mr. Carroll added that when JB Acres was platted there was no lot line utility easements. Most of the utilities come down the County right of way(66`"Ave) and split to parcels or along back lot lines. Mr. Rothe added the utilities come down the back lot lines. Don Carroll asked if the board feels there is a need for additional easements or are they comfortable with the existing. Mr. Melby would like to see the existing 5 foot easement increased on the east side. Mr. Carroll asked about the east-west line on the lower portion of Lot 7 (B)to gain inner connectivity between the right of way and to a utility easement to the west for future uses. Carroll asked if there would be any concern if the utility easement on the east sides of Lot 6 (A)were to be increased to 10 feet. Mr. Rothe indicated there is 5 feet on each side of the property line. Ms. Hatch added the original JB Acres plat does show 5 feet on both sides of the property line between Lot 6 (A) and Lot 5. Brent Shafranek added there should be a 5 foot easement on the east west property line of Lot 7 (B). Ms. Hatch added there was no utility easement on the Lot 8. Mr. Carroll stated there would need to be an easement in case a utility needs to cross the area and he would suggest 10 feet. Don Carroll indicated in summary the board is asking for 10 foot on east/west line on bottom of Lot 7 (B) to get inner connectivity. Mr. Carroll asked Mr. Rothe what the easement on the back property line would serve if any. Mr. Rothe stated it does not go anywhere, the north edge there is a County road. Mr. Carroll stated that the County still has right of way in the area. There is a City Water and Sewer line. Mr. Rothe added there is nothing there. Mr. Carroll asked if the board would like to see an easement on the northern parcel? Mr. Carroll added there is a county easement, the City does have water/sewer line utilizing the OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO CERTIFICATE I, Donetta Davidson, as the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado, hereby certify that, according to the records of this office, PELICAN SHORES NORTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION is a Nonprofit Corporation formed or registered on 02/27/2004 under the law of Colorado, has complied with all applicable requirements of this office, and is in good standing with this office. This entity has been assigned entity identification number 20041072807 . This certificate reflects facts established or disclosed by documents delivered to this office on paper through 10/15/2004 that have been posted, and by documents delivered to this office electronically through 10/22/2004 @ 16:08:48 . I have affixed hereto the Great Seal of the State of Colorado and duly generated, executed, authenticated, issued, delivered and communicated this official certificate at Denver, Colorado on 10/22/2004 @ 16:08:48 pursuant to and in accordance with applicable law. This certificate is assigned Confirmation Number 6075470. 7ya a t '. . 4 7. ALA;-;. VI: 1 i •1,L t S l L 1 f t " .. ... 18 76 Secretary of State of the State of Colorado End of Certificate Vl once:A certificate Issued electronically from the Colorado Secretary of State's Web site is fully and immediately valid and effective. HHowever, as an option,the issuance and validity of a certificate obtained electronically may be established by visiting the Certificate Confirmation Page of the Secretary of State's Web site, lit;•: it t; . .:.,.,t.. co.i:r:hi ' rr,k.ne.car::ht'rj{.;.r, to entering the certifIcate's confirmation number displayed on the certificate, and following the instructions displayed Confirming the issuance of a certificate is merely optional and is not necessary to the valid and effective issuance of a certificate. For more information,visit our Web site, htip sit:w.,.,..sta?e...r../a click Business Center and select"Frequently Asked Questions." ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION FOR A NONPROFIT CORPORATION „c1tl+l7;.—7 Ii Form 300 Revised October 1,2002 Filing fee:$50.00 r"'" ^- i aL^o 4J�c l'.<'i r.17: cAr'n ''n`o -27-fir,; "Talc Deliver to: Colorado Secretary of State e '''" 'i ' " Business Division,1560 Broadway,Suite 200 .sto s h-rr:.s v`>.Tax" °r, Denver,CO 80202-5I69 This document must be typed or machine printed. • Copies of filed documents may be obtained atww gem chafe anus ABOVE 9vACi ?oft OFIice ui8 oei. Pursuant to§7-122-102 and part 3 of article 90 of title 7,Colorado Revised Statutes(C.R.S.), these Articles of Incorporation are delivered to the Colorado Secretary of State for filing. 1. The entity name of the nonprofit corporation is: Pelican Shores North Homeowners Association The entity name of a nonprofit corporation may,but need not,contain the term"corporation". "incorporated". "company",or"limited"or any abbreviation of these terror..f7-90-601(3)(b),CRS. 2. The address of the initial principal office of the nonprofit corporation is: 2581 Park Lane Lafayette,Co 80026 3. The name,and the business address,of the initial registered agent for service of process on the nonprofit corporation are:Name Douglas A.Tiefel Business Address(anal bee street or other physical address in Colorado)2681 Park Lane,Lafayette,Co 80026 If mail la undeliverable to this addrecs,ALSO Include a post office box address: PO Box 17130,Boulder Co 80308 4. The nonprofit corporation(I check appropriate box) will have voting members [J will not have voting members 5. The provisions not inconsistent with law regarding the distribution of assets on dissolution are as€ollows.Ass818 of the Corporation remaining after the payment of all liabilities of the Corporation shall be distributed to the then members of the Corporation in equal shares. 6. The name(s)and address(es)of the incorporators)is(are): Name(s)Douglas A.hotel Address(es) 2581 Park Lane,Lafayette,Co 80028 7. The(a)name or names,and(b)mailing address or addresses,of any one or more of the individuals who cause this document to be delivered for filing,and to whom the Secretary of State may deliver notice if filing of this document is refused,are: Doug TIefel PO Box 17190,Boulder,Co 80308 Causing a document to be delivered to the secretary of state for filing shall constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's act and deed or the act and deed of the entity on whose behalf the individual is causing the document to be delivered for filing and that,tlrg9 t slated in the document are true. �rl:,''l l l �'r�; fir' uviwr Ab kW.rwwa Iamb..e mammas'ep.Al lwre...11.a.a.eWha.a p`6 r.k..4.evra erik. w.rrgi Mile Ow Fords s:i..a1h...>.y.n,.•..,.,y ..Mw,w..tr.niw�a,.wile•ews Alelw.nran,�rr..+ati,l..,r eae.awadr xarM%Lr dinww w••.i Ou class and. t s:.A:+�, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO CERTIFICATE I, Donetta Davidson, as the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado, hereby certify that, according to the records of this office, PELICAN SHORES SOUTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION is a Nonprofit Corporation formed or registered on 03/25/2004 under the law of Colorado, has complied with all applicable requirements of this office, and is in good standing with this office. This entity has been assigned entity identification number 20041111204 - This certificate reflects facts established or disclosed by documents delivered to this office on paper through 10/15/2004 that have been posted, and by documents delivered to this office electronically through 10/22/2004 @aa, 16:07:16 - 1 have affixed hereto the Great Seal of the State of Colorado and duly generated, executed, authenticated, issued, delivered and communicated this official certificate at Denver, Colorado on 10/22/2004 @ 16:07:16 pursuant to and in accordance with applicable law. This certificate is assigned Confirmation Number 6075466. * � nri..;x as sf � �.w... N it 3 iI' �'-' a con 7 *p • rM 4 • v. lot! 1 • • Y t • tx.s,a1 .. i ... .• _r ;Y. �' 76 Secret : . ._.. . , .,. .... ary of State of the State of Colorado ****************************************End of Certificate Notice:A certificate issued electronica y from the Colorado Secretary of State's Web site is fully and immediately valid and effective However, as an option.the issuance and validity of a certificate obtained electronically may be established by visiting the C.ert fcate Confirmation Page of the Secretary of State's A'eb site, iii' "N.uar.a.;s.et{�{c_c..0 l: reriftiCa .Ze•ir;:/;;'r;t.r;:r,_r-3 entering the certificate's confirmation number displayed on the cenfcate, and following the instructions displayed. Confirming the issuance if a certificate is merely optional and is not necessary to the valid and effective issuance of a certificate. For more information,visit our Web site, lair- -u-rx•.s-s.,..,hrt:..:%+.rr.> click Business ('enter and select"Frequently Asked Questions-" ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION FOR A COLORA`n fir•ol.vm O. . cosy s r.evo:•.1,•?. NONPROFIT CORPORATION Form 300 Revised October 1,2002 Filing fee:$50.00 :C34111104 tl Deliver to: Colorado Secretary of State `'s ca) Business Division, 1560 Broadway,Suite 200 c l '.i' l5 STi-:l t Denver,CO 80202-5169 03—L7-2i-204 This document must be typed or machine printed. Copies of filed documents may be obtained atwww SOS.oalernnS *Qovs Sato row orrlcs USE stir Pursuant to§7-122-102 and part 3 of article 90 of title 7,Colorado Revised Statutes(C.R.S.), these Articles of Incorporation are delivered to the Colorado Secretary of State for filing. 1. The entity name of the nonprofit corporation is: Pelican Shores South Homeowners Association The entity name of a nonprofit corporation mar,but need not.contain the term"corporation "incorporated". -company-.or"limited"or ant-abbreviation of-these terms.P-90-601(3)(b).C.R.S. 2. The address of the initial principal office of the nonprofit corporation is: 2581 Park Lane Lafayette,Co 80026 3. The name,and the business address,of the initial registered agent for service of process on the nonprofit corporation are:Name Douglas A.Total Business Address(muot be a street or other physical addrecs in Colorado)2581 Park Lane,Lafayette,Co.80026 .f raa11 Ls undeliverable to this address,ALSO include a post office bas address: PO Box 17130,Boulder,Co.80308 4. The nonprofit corporation(,I check appropriate box) Q will have voting members 0 will not have voting members 5. The provisions not inconsistent with law regarding the distribution of assets on dissolution are as follows:Assets of the Corporation remaining after the payment of all liabilities of the Corporation shall be distributed to the then members of the Corporatlon in equal shame. 6. The name(s)and address(es)of the incorporator(s)is(are): Name(s)Mr9 A-Tle631 _ Address(es) 2581 Park Lane,Lafayette,Co.80026 7. The(a)name or names,and(b)mailing address or addresses,of any one or more of the individuals who cause this document to be delivered for filing,and to whom the Secretary of State may deliver notice if filing of this document is refused,are: Doug retel PO Box 17130 Boulder,Co 80308 Causing a document to he delivered to the secretary of state for filing shall constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's act and deed or the act and deed of the entity on whose behalf the individual is causing the document to be delivered for filing and that the facts stated in the document are true. ^Om Tr t��., J� D..W.IW4a�1+S wu.J ao.a.,..s:r.a-d.-p..4 Sul Y.z-.v.n yfv.a,l.sa4M a•. (� SqU•'+�tent,TE N4alas*.a a.ata,..r�b.RL.b..vn..',tea ..i if iill' ,J'ti•'r.n.1✓w..aaul•.,.9�+cW e'rim`ill...ws:..n.91:.•a�A�Mswarra.K.,avMM n,vT'.•M`IA1.•r'i.lJMtm�.-tls.M11l.afM..J 4.a.,..r. •r, • :tt CVO:: ‘tettt; MEMORANDUM TO: Sheri Lockman, Planner / DATE: 15-September-2004 We ik FROM: Peter Schei,P.E., Cidt a, Public Works Department COLORADO SUBJECT: PF-1011 Pelican Shores PUD(Final Plat) sign-off Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed final plan materials and has the following development referral comments. Comments ❑ Public Works has accepted stamped, signed and dated (September 14, 2004) final roadway, drainage, utility / construction plan drawings, by James L. Blankenship,P.E. Certified drawings will remain in the department's file for use during construction. ❑ The Subsurface Investigation for Pelican Shores, dated March 09,2004,by Gary Rosson, P.E. with Western Soils, Inc. (Project#2002-89) is acceptable to Public Works. ❑ The applicant has submitted on-site Improvements Agreements, which are acceptable to Public Works. The Board Of County Commissioners prior to recording the final plat shall approve the agreements. ci The applicant shall submit an off-site Improvements Agreement for CR 26 to Public Works for review. The Board Of County Commissioners prior to recording the final plat shall approve this agreement. Recommendation ❑ The Public Works Department will effectively `sign-off on this development with no recognized issues, once the off- site improvements agreement has been accepted by the County. The Planning Department may proceed with this case based upon the recommendation,with no restrictions by Public Works.' *PC: PF-101 I Pelican Shores PUD(Final Plat)sign-off Email&Original:Planner PC by Post: Applicant ( i PC by Post: Engineer jr, r,“ v:sit,1t) 3 L1 Page 1 of 1 .� BILL OF SALE FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, RIVER RUNS THROUGH IT, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company("Seller")hereby sells, assigns, transfers,releases and quit claims unto PELICAN SHORES SOUTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, a Colorado non-profit corporation,whose address is c/o Douglas A.Tiefel,P.O.Box 17130,Boulder,Colorado 80308 ("Buyer"),its successors and assigns,the water tap corresponding to account number 110380,issued by Central Weld County Water District(the"Tap"); TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto Buyer, its successors and assigns, forever. Seller does not make any express or implied representation,guaranty or warranty to Buyer and hereby expressly disclaims all express or implied representation, guaranty or warranty as to any matter whatsoever, including,without limitation,the condition or quality of,rights in,title to,fitness for a particular purpose,or merchantability of the Tap;accordingly,the Tap is hereby conveyed to Buyer,AS IS,WHERE IS,WITH ALL FAULTS, AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS, GUARANTYS OR WARRANTIES INCLUDING,AMONG OTHERS,ANY IMPLIED REPRESENTATIONS,GUARANTYS OR WARRANTIES OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY. Buyer shall be responsible for all fees,taxes,including without limitation,sales,use or transfer taxes, now existing or hereinafter incurred,assessed,or imposed on the Tap or as a result of the ownership or sale of the Tap or the this transaction. Buyer shall hold Seller harmless from and against any and all fees and taxes, that are now existing or are hereafter incurred,assessed or imposed on the Tap or as a result of the ownership of the Tap or this transaction. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,this Bill of Sale is executed as of the-% day of Nevwnbes;2004. RIVER RUNS THROUGH IT,LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By: $ U≤c— \ ct e- ; Title: tt`ogwoid STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF-ai ct ter ) The oregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this CI day of �i; 2004, by as U1Pi oi�r of River Runs Through It,LLC,a Colorado limited liability company on be alf of the company. C-• W ILA/l WITNESS my hand and official seal. ys My commission expires: S 6 c QS_ 1 g 3 Notary Public C.\DOCUME-1\reirl\LOCALS-1\Temp\tempmeil.doc 1 Hello