Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20041288.tiff Page 1 of 2 Carol Harding From: Stan Sessions Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 12:41 PM To: Myrna Folsom Cc: Chris Woodruff; Carol Harding Subject: RE: agricultural land assessment Dear John, Thank you for a copy of your letter to the Commissioners. Since I am the Elected Officer in the County responsible for the setting of property values I am taking the opportunity of responding. I am taking your complaint under advisement by checking into the parcel you referenced. Should you have additional concerns with property valuation please contact me personally or Chief Deputy Chris Woodruff. Best Reagards, Stan Sessions From: Myrna Folsom [mailto:myrnai2000@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 2:55 PM To: Carol Harding Cc: Stan Sessions Subject: agricultural land assessment 7050 Loma Linda Ct. Longmont CO 80504 303 833 2992 April 27, 2004 Weld Board of County Commissioners Dear Commissioners: County government is chronically in need of additional revenue to fulfill its responsibility for providing the best services to its citizens. A source that apparently has not been exploited is revenues that might be obtained by the correct assessment classification of lands for property tax purposes. Many land parcels are not being employed for agricultural purposes yet continue to be assessed as such for property tax purposes. Many of these lands are being held by investors and speculators in anticipation of realizing their current values as development properties. It would seem that under the definition provided by CRS 39-102[1.6][a][I] these parcels do not qualify as "agricultural land". Such disqualification should apparently result in their being reclassified as developable "Vacant land", which would be appropriate in assessing the land's value as defined under CRS31-1-103[14][c][I]. To give you an idea of the actual market value of some of these lands, other similar lands have sold for approximately $20,000 per acre and are presently being intensely developed, residentially, commercially or industrially. CRS 39-1-103[14][a] states that "assessing officers are provided detailed information concerning the appraisal of vacant land in the manuals, appraisal procedures, and instructions prepared and published by the administrator". If the Weld County Assessor determines that no adjustment of classification and value of these lands is required or justified, I request that I be given the reasons for these determinations and access to said manuals, procedures, instructions or statutes under which these determinations were made. As an example, Account no. R5575586; Parcel 1313020004 might be considered for review. This particular parcel might be mined before being otherwise developed. However, to my knowledge it has not been used for any agricultural purposes within the statutory time period. I can provide descriptions of other parcels, on request. 4/29/2 004 2004-1288 Page 2 of 2 Very truly yours, John S. Folsom PC: Stanley F. Sessions, Weld County Assessor Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs 4/29/2004 Page 1 of 1 Carol Harding From: Myrna Folsom [myrnai2000@yahoo.coml 2''" f7? 20 TA 3: Co Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 2:55 PM To: Carol Harding _ =!y) Cc: Stan Sessions Subject: agricultural land assessment 7050 Loma Linda Ct. Longmont CO 80504 303 833 2992 April 27, 2004 Weld Board of County Commissioners Dear Commissioners: County government is chronically in need of additional revenue to fulfill its responsibility for providing the best services to its citizens. A source that apparently has not been exploited is revenues that might be obtained by the correct assessment classification of lands for property tax purposes. Many land parcels are not being employed for agricultural purposes yet continue to be assessed as such for property tax purposes. Many of these lands are being held by investors and speculators in anticipation of realizing their current values as development properties. It would seem that under the definition provided by CRS 39-102[1.6][a][I] these parcels do not qualify as "agricultural land". Such disqualification should apparently result in their being reclassified as developable "Vacant land", which would be appropriate in assessing the land's value as defined under CRS31-1-103[14][c][I]. To give you an idea of the actual market value of some of these lands, other similar lands have sold for approximately $20,000 per acre and are presently being intensely developed, residentially, commercially or industrially. CRS 39-1-103[14][a] states that "assessing officers are provided detailed information concerning the appraisal of vacant land in the manuals, appraisal procedures, and instructions prepared and published by the administrator". If the Weld County Assessor determines that no adjustment of classification and value of these lands is required or justified, I request that I be given the reasons for these determinations and access to said manuals, procedures, instructions or statutes under which these determinations were made. As an example, Account no. R5575586; Parcel 1313020004 might be considered for review. This particular parcel might be mined before being otherwise developed. However, to my knowledge it has not been used for any agricultural purposes within the statutory time period. I can provide descriptions of other parcels, on request. Very truly yours, John S. Folsom PC: Stanley F. Sessions, Weld County Assessor Do you Yahoo!? Win a$2O 000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs 4/28/2004 Hello