The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20040098.tiff LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS,INC. 1889 York Street Denver, CO 80206 (303)333-1105 FAX(303)333-1107 E-mail: Isc@Iscdenver.com Web Site: http://www.lscdenver.com TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. December 23, 2002 Mr. Paul Banks Banks and Gesso, LLC 720 Kipling Street, Suite 117 Lakewood, CO 80215 Re: Heit Property Gravel Mine Weld County, Colorado (LSC #021190) Dear Mr. Banks: We have completed a review of the traffic impacts of the proposed Heit Property Gravel Mine project located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Weld County Road 20 (WCR 20) and WCR 25 in Weld County, Colorado. The project area is bounded by WCR 20 on the south, WCR 25 on the east, and vacant land on the west and north. The site is proposed to contain a gravel mine operation facility. Access to the site is proposed from WCR 25 east of the site with a full movement intersection. The remainder of this report presents our findings concerning the traffic impacts of the proposed project. Existing Roadways The vicinity map and the site location map of the Heit Property Gravel Mine site are shown in Figures 1 and 2, enclosed. As indicated, the site is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of WCR 20 and WCR 25 in Weld County, Colorado. The main roadways serving the site will be US 85, WCR 18, and WCR 25. Major roadways in the vicinity of the site are described below: • US 85 is a four-lane expressway, running north-south with a posted speed limit of 65 mph in the vicinity of the site. It connects with the City of Denver on the south and continues through the metropolitan area, and on the north it connects with SH 52. US 85 in the vicinity of the site is classified as an expressway by CDOT. Its cross-section consists of two through lanes in each direction and separate approach left- and right-turn lanes. • WCR 18 is a two-lane roadway, running east-west with a posted speed limit of 40 mph in the vicinity of the site. The intersection of WCR 18/US 85 is currently controlled by Stop signs on WCR 18. 2004-0098 Mr. Paul Banks Page 2 December 23, 2002 • WCR 25 is a two-lane roadway that generally parallels the west side of US 85 between WCR 18 and WCR 22.5. The intersection of WCR 18/WCR 25 is currently controlled by a Stop sign on WCR 25 and the intersection of WCR 20/WCR 25 is currently controlled by a Stop sign on WCR 20. WCR 25 is currently paved south of WCR 20 and exists as a gravel road north of WCR 20. Existing Traffic and Year 2020 Background Traffic Peak-hour turning movement counts (including separate truck counts) were conducted by Counter Measures, Inc. at the US 85/WCR 18, WCR 18/WCR 25, and WCR 20/WCR 25 inter- sections in December, 2002, the results of which are shown in Figure 3. The counts were conducted from 6:30 to 8:30 AM and from 4:00 to 6:00 PM, with the actual AM and PM peak- hours generally occurring from 6:45 to 7:45 AM and 4:30 to 5:30 PM, respectively. Actual turning movement data is attached to this report. Figure 3 also shows the existing traffic control and lane geometry at these intersections. Projections of Year 2020 peak-hour traffic volumes have been made for the roadway system adjacent to the site in order to have a basis for determining future traffic impacts. Year 2020 was chosen because the proposed project is expected to complete its gravel mine operation by this year. Future 2020 traffic projections, shown in Figure 4, were made assuming a 2.25 percent annual growth on the existing traffic volumes on US 85 and WCR 18. This growth rate was obtained by comparing Year 2020 traffic forecasts on US 85 from the "US 85 Access Control Plan, 1-76 to WCR 80" report by Felsburg Holt& Ullevig, December 1999, with existing traffic volumes on US 85. Note that existing traffic volumes (rounded to the nearest five) were assumed while calculating Year 2020 background traffic on WCR 25 and WCR 20. Estimated Traffic Generation The Heit Property Gravel Mine project will contain a gravel mine operation facility.The amount of traffic that will be generated was estimated based on information provided by the developer of the proposed site. It is expected that on an average weekday the proposed project will generate approximately 150 external daily vehicle-trips, with about 75 entering and 75 leaving the site. Of these, approximately 20 vehicle-trips will occur during the AM peak-hour, with 10 vehicles entering and 10 vehicles exiting the site. During the PM peak-hour, approximately 20 vehicle-trips will occur, with 10 vehicles entering and 10 vehicles exiting the site. Estimated Traffic Distribution and Assignment A key element in the determination of the proposed project's traffic impact is the directional distribution of its traffic onto the surrounding roadway system. The relative location of the site, the type of land use, and specific characteristics of the roadway and access system will dictate what this distribution will be. Note that in this particular case, the distribution was based on the information provided by the developer of the proposed site. Figure 5 illustrates Mr. Paul Banks Page 3 December 23, 2002 the distribution expected to be applicable to the Heit Property Gravel Mine project. As this figure shows, 100 percent of the site-generated traffic will use WCR 25 and WCR 18 to travel to the US 85/WCR 18 intersection. Of these,90 percent will be oriented to the south on US 85 with 10 percent oriented to the north. Traffic assignments for the site-generated traffic are shown in Figure 6. Figure 7 illustrates the combination of peak-hour background traffic (from Figure 4) and site-generated traffic from the proposed project for Year 2020. Estimated Traffic Impacts In order to assess the impacts of the proposed project, peak-hour capacity analyses have been prepared for the key study intersection assuming background and background plus site- generated traffic conditions. The methodology used is that presented in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. The concept of Level of Service (LOS) is used as a basis for computing combinations of roadway operating conditions which accommodate various levels of traffic activity. By definition, six different Levels of Service are used (A, B, C, D, E, and F) with "A" being a free-flow condition and "E" representing the capacity of a given intersection or road- way. Table 1, enclosed, summarizes the results of the average weekday peak-hour LOS analyses for the proposed project (actual computer analysis printouts are enclosed) and the following discusses the results of the capacity analysis for the US 85/WCR 18, WCR 18/ WCR 25, WCR 25/WCR 20, and WCR 25/Access Drive intersections. • US 85/WCR 18:This existing unsignalized intersection is currently operating at poor Levels of Service "E" and "F" during the evening peak hour for the eastbound and westbound approaches,respectively. By the Year 2020,both approaches will operate at a failing Level of Service "F" during both morning and evening peak-hours, with or without the addition of site-generated traffic. However, this is an existing full movement intersection utilized by other developments and the traffic from the proposed gravel mine will not add significant delay. • WCR 18/WCR 25:: This existing unsignalized intersection is currently controlled by a Stop sign on WCR 25. As a Stop controlled intersection, it is expected to operate at an excellent Level of Service (LOS"A") for all movements during both morning and evening peak-hours through Year 2020 with or without the addition of site-generated traffic. Site-generated traffic will increase delay by less than one second at this inter- section. • WCR 20/WCR 25:: This existing unsignalized intersection is currently controlled by a Stop sign on WCR 20. As a Stop controlled intersection, it is expected to operate at an excellent Level of Service (LOS "A") for all movements during both morning and evening peak-hours through Year 2020 with or without the addition of site-generated traffic. Site-generated traffic will increase delay by less than one second at this inter- section. Mr. Paul Banks Page 4 December 23, 2002 • Access Road/WCR 25: This site access intersection is proposed to be built in conjunction with the opening of the proposed Gravel Mine operation. This inter- section is expected to operate at an excellent Level of Service (LOS "A" ) for all move- ments during both morning and evening peak-hours through Year 2020. Recommended Turn Lanes on US 85 As previously stated, US 85 is classified as an Expressway and the posted speed limit is 65 mph in the vicinity of the site. Based on the CDOT State Highway Access Code, the following turn-lanes are required at the WCR 18/US 85 intersection: • A northbound left-turn deceleration lane of 1,165 feet including a 300-foot taper. Currently, a left-turn deceleration lane of approximately 470 feet exists on north- bound US 85. Space is available for increasing the length of the right-turn lane by re-striping to meet the State Highway Access Code requirements. • A southbound right-turn deceleration lane of 1,100 feet including a 300-foot taper is required. Currently, a right-turn deceleration lane of 1,120 feet exists on the southbound approach of US 85. r • A right-turn acceleration lane of 1,680 feet including a 300-foot taper is required on southbound US 85. Currently, a right-turn acceleration lane of 1,505 feet exists on the southbound approach of US 85. Space is available for increasing the length of the right-turn lane by re-striping to meet the State Highway Access Code require- ments. Due to the fact that traffic from the proposed gravel mine does not add significant traffic to this intersection and the site is approximately two miles away from this intersection, we do not think that they should be responsible for these improvements. Average Daily Traffic Impacts The Year 2020 average weekday traffic impacts of the proposed project are illustrated in Figure 8. This figure illustrates the average weekday traffic expected to be generated by the proposed Heit Property Gravel Mine project, background plus site-generated average daily traffic, and roadway capacities. The figure shows that all surrounding roads will operate within their roadway capacities. Conclusions and Recommendations Based on the analyses presented herein, the following conclusions and recommendations (shown in Figure 9) are made with respect to the proposed Heit Property Gravel Mine project: 1. A total of 150 external daily vehicle-trips (75 entering and 75 exiting) would be generated on a typical weekday. This total includes 10 entering and 10 exiting trips - Mr. Paul Banks Page 5 December 23, 2002 during the morning peak-hour and 10 entering and 10 exiting trips during the evening peak-hour period. 2. The directional distribution of project-generated traffic is expected to be such that 90 percent of the site-generated traffic will be oriented to the south on US 85 with 10 percent oriented to the north. 3. The US 85/WCR 18 intersection is currently operating at a poor Level of Service "E" and a failing Level of Service "F" for the eastbound and westbound approaches, respectively. However,this is an existing full movement intersection utilized by other developments and the traffic from the proposed gravel mine will not add significant delay. 4. The WCR 25/WCR 18, WCR 25/WCR 20, and WCR 25/Site Access Drive inter- sections are expected to operate satisfactorily through Year 2020 during both morning and evening peak-hours with or without the addition of site-generated traffic. 5. The portion of the WCR 25 adjacent to the site should be paved. 6. In order to meet CDOT Access Code requirements, the following improvements to the turn lanes at the US 85/WCR 18 intersection are recommended (however, due to the fact that the proposed gravel mine does not add significant traffic to this intersection and the site is approximately two miles away from this intersection, we do not think that they should be responsible for these improvements): • A northbound left-turn deceleration lane of 1,165 feet including a 300-foot taper. Currently, a northbound left-turn deceleration lane of approximately 470 feet exists on northbound US 85. Space is available for increasing the length of the right-turn lane by re-striping to meet the State Highway Access Code requirements. • A right-turn acceleration lane of 1,680 feet including a 300-foot taper is required on southbound US 85. Currently, a right-turn acceleration lane of 1,505 feet exists on the southbound approach of US 85. Space is available for increasing the length of the right-turn lane by re-striping to meet the State Highway Access Code requirements. 7. The traffic impacts of the proposed project are minimal and can be accommodated by the adjacent roadway network given the improvements recommended herein. Mr. Paul Banks Page 6 December 23, 2002 We trust that this report will assist with planning for the Heit Property Gravel Mine project. Please call if we can provide additional assistance. Sincerely, LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cr '9NOMA F •. r s'; By: �-� Bpd•- - p�;� s�Benja Lin T. Waldman, P.E. �Q v 0 35827 3,3",• # TW B /SMA/wc ••, .• Enclosures: Table 1 - Figures 1 through 9 Traffic Counts Capacity Analyses �'^ \\Server\d\LSC\Projects\2002\021190\1.Report\R-1HPGM.wpd ) ) ) Table 1 Intersection Level of Service Heit Property Gravel Mine Weld County, Colorado (LSC # 021190, December, 2002) Year 2020 Year 2020 Background plus Existing Traffic Background Traffic Site-Generated Traffic Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of Level of ) Traffic Service Service Service Service Service Service Control Intersection Location AM PM AM PM AM PM Unsignalized US 85/WCR 18 Eastbound Approach C E F F F F Westbound Approach D F F F F F Northbound Left B A B B B B Southbound Left A B A C A C Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 32.2 * * * * * Unsignalized WCR 18/WCR 25 Eastbound Left A A A A A A Southbound Approach A A A A A A Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) 9.1 9.2 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.7 Unsignalized WCR 25/WCR 20 ) East bound Approach A A A A A A North bound Left A A A A A A Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) - 8.4 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.6 Unsignalized WCR 25/Site Access Drive West bound Approach — — — — A A South bound Left — — — — A A Critical Movement Delay(sec/veh) — — — — 8.4 8.4 Note: * Delay more than 100 seconds i x �s3�s dirt N d 3 3Am d 3-u fi`Y K a`fi�e gf. w'` 'F j.- r i- '1rkp` (tat? lr .44-14'r �. �, �� c� v »�r 'F 4 VP! ▪• g` ' ' � a� + '�$� . • jt;ma*� � r vn '°"• '4,•••,, ,,,,,,,,A,'45;,,,,,, + ' e r 4' i` n e .yY,��t`t 4," x3+` g� ' � '?7,3 " , > �+ r ,r,— 6 c�,. .,,,,,,;,-;,..:4.02-&,,,, �5• > c., y ;:it",, .re«i,".: ,,ro4 t 1, x a rwan '` " � . �rd `� .. �� ..,,, ''''','!!t!''';'''' " r g µ� . d s lM yp r • ry� ' "b k Y t f, .G .. .p' vV ` frH #pfd}'f,3.` �Y .a+. e'4Tilt% ; --=,M 4rv. h 5 f7 �t >~ i �i i u �'3' c � '� a . ' 7. t tr ,rt x j1 'f ash' a r =fir �» nr t m " �;y* „„.„.„,4„,74,,_;,„,;:,„:„,,,� rrti irt!..06,!!!*- _ ,1� � .4 ' {_`- p�yrr S ) t .. 9 * •L c':'-'4.4, b 'fC • "1.--,..."•,,, t}ry "rr f - • c l --',,,„:0 5 R �kb :0 m t` _ rJ.„,/,‘,•-„,,:•-i„,„4- ,- - p r xi+ E j.s./� is r ,r tr + "'T'' P r r . zq +Y �:yY" �' 1 A R b art;• t �4 -,'"?,--„,1491'••$-:,/;•::,•,•,?„,„ tt* •, xt r + , a • rw s . �, �. w� a ��_, kx d L if u^ t , Yf r �it, +' `3, < . "'. t > ;xF s E ^ '" "'"•.: 1 :• ""1 tisF � P 1 'sv '{ � _gyp °.s ,` ., , � x e 4 z,� d M3M' ,• �"''' r,.' T .� r w r.,: y�>x x x ':'"rd p St ,f:. w,. . ` r 1rr "tk,' t .r .41 f` ii t3.' r �'^t� ▪ �, r _ x^ 0. :i„.„4 x x "- 1r' kF- fi•'#" a `.x 'rr v ?'. "r,a `; ;a 3 r ,04, y se kt x '.aC ,;, t3.iF"i ,'.r: ! v s rte, t-i q h � "x," a 0,44.:11,'t•..+. O;,� ° �' ' ``1"_+ '=z'+ rta,' i yF< � , A. ‘� ��e 4fvF�`� � � Y � 5 �' v; 4� rte .. �a- • ,4014(.. � . '� S'� v�V +1 �:: `� +v Yak T ''W' ttwff� ,,mo�tt � ; , Figure 1 Vicinity MapDecember,2 2 Heit Property Gravel Mine(LSC#021190) tiritnic Approximate Scak Scale.I'=2,lXJO ce en SITE lam _ _ � WCR20 N U V N co N WCR 18 Figure 2 Site Location December,2002 - - - Heit Property Gravel Mine(LSC#021190) T INC t Approximate Scale Scale:t 2,000'3 I SITE l NI ix 1 WCR20 I 0 12 2) 0 OJ 0, 3- 5 2 i / "^—b- 2 10 ///// 4-4 ce 845 20) y U 67-1(38) 5i 2 z J )12 1) 13(1410(1) 3 ) 2U 11579) 93 I�t�w taw 69(3) 46(3) —i— *60 y 61+ / 1 1160�12�-� 1 19 1)5 1 0 —1.— � 65(413 t � 7.(4)1 8 1)' K / 48(2) 23(1) 4391) 1,030 25) WCR 18 { ! iljHA LEGEND: -- fI s = Traffic Signal = Stop Sign Figure 3 2q13)— AM Peak—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only) ExistingTraffic Traffic 31(15)— PM Peak—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only) r Control and Lane Geometry December,2002 - - " - Heit Property Gravel Mine(LSC#021190) > evc 4 >:e CA 4 1 A Approximate Scak \S\cale 1'=2000 20(3) \\\ Cl ---1K., I I 20 1) K 15(1) 3 \ SITE l 1T) 15 3) WCR 20 5 5---J1 5—, f 5-1 TE 571 r 5 15 0 1) in el z r ,270{30) �5 21 ) 3 ,010 53) 5(2) _� U ) ))�;� 2'300 55 6) , 15 85 70) 5 1�� 1--20 10 2) 0>5(5) 7 ) K 2\ � 30�)� ti1 �5) 353j 665) ,545(38) WCR 18 LEGEND: Figure 4 2�3)— AM Peak—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only) Year 2020 31(15)— PM Peak—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only) Background Traffic December,2002 L.•._ .. Heft Property Gravel Mine(LSC#021190) 111/4. Approximate Scale Scale I"-2000' 3 \ SITE 1 — WC 20 N 1100% ce 10% t 2 7 WCR 18 90% I Figure 5 LEGEND: Directional Distribution of of Site-Generated Traffic __ Percent Directional December,2002 65% Distribution Heit Property Gravel Mine(LSC#021190) me t PI Q Approximate Scale Scale:F-2,000 1a�re 7 io 1°� H l o 3 SITE -----1 I </ to 0 WCR 20 i /^ 10 10 1 ± j t 10 1J �t o K---_ 9---1 mKf— l 7 WCR 18 LEGEND: Figure 6 6 _ AM Peak—Hour Large Vehicle Traffic 6 Vehicle Traffic Assignment of PM Peak—Hour Large Site-Generated Traffic December,2002 Heit Property Gravel Mine(LSC#O21190) 'VC t Approximate Scale Scale'l'=206(7 ili2) --___N 20 3) l N 10 106) U SITE ' 15(1) _ 20i12) WCR20 5 253) SJ ' 5 + 5� 5—1 } 0 5� ' 5 2 0) TO(11) en CSI V 1,270 30) 1,010(53) a)5 2 25(101 3 26(6) 1g2) 5 2� 12) 6 3-4.J 1115(2 5 25 10) 6*) 11 0(3) 55(6) y 85(13) 1 ) 4 t 20 05(5) 70(5) 5 10 2) INN) 15100(255 r�fit)3)5 2 110 /8�2 t 110 6f�) si ( 7 80(12) 3-6t3) 660 75) 1,545(38) WCR 18 LEGEND: Figure 7 26(13)_ Total AM Peak—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only) Year 2020 31(15)- Total PM Peak—Hour Traffic (Large Vehicles Only) Total Traffic December,2002 - " - Heit Property Gravel Mine(LSC#021190) me Approximate Scale Scale.I'=2,000 150/150/1000 ce 3 SITE 150/450/1,000 WCR 20 ce 15/25,925/35,000 113 WCR 18 150/2,250/5,000 135/27,295/35,00 Figure 8 LEGEND: Year 2020 Average Site— Total Roadway Daily Traffic Impacts 350/6,755/25,000 = Generated/Traffic/Capacity December,2002 = Traffic bleit Property Gravel Mine(LSC#021190) r xc Approximate Scale Scale:1'=2000' DE 1 3 I SITE I�\� WCR20 �i`f oe N 2 J � WCR1S e{ LEGEND: = Stop Sign Figure 9 Year 2020 Recommendations December,2002 Heit Property Gravel Mine(LSC#021190) HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis AM Existing 1 : WCR 18 & US 85 12/22/2002 Lane Configurations 4+ 4 " 44 tt .._. r Sign Control w}..r�..+� +...•. f ' Stop A; Sto Free ' t=ree Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Vik•",_.,r veh/h) 3 2 " 60 1l� 8 `19 rho, . , �3 :: 9 '' 10 . . 845 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 3.. 2 : 65 Pedestrians (Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent.8iockage Right turn flare(veh) r,Y Vv 'r�"i .'.pSR r •-Trtc at r j ,y t - w.�.;.�c...� •^,x aY,•�'1'. Medran type' k t " :,.._ . .^ 'k '-•.=,gip:'..:> n «;f w }' :�s .:1 H.,:: .. :. c Rir.: 't..:.s++rr_r9c�.K'1`41ii.. ,.,}:, ., :11,., b�h�if'PF .S.n,�.t•' •-tiJ{.i>i;"t:3'u-'"«. Median storage veh) ...:.. ... ....:.• .._. _,-. ,r.:..3z;=tr.�:Sr_:,sr^ ;e;.r;r ;:t6�:.is v<�S)'.Ya��'�;•r,,rC.•�';u,K K°ro,?' -+. Upstream.signal eft) �T'' : 75 I° pX, platoon unblocked ' rn vatu a 1318 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1318 1541 459 1139 1549 238 936 486 tC, sirigte(s) 7.5 6.5 '.6 9 7.5 , 6.5 6.9 4.1 r 4.1 ` tC, 2 stage (s) tF s Mfr ..;• 4 3.5 40 �.. 3.5 4.0 3.3 " ='22 ; n �� ;cSi' f 2.2 ar.�� , � �r ° �'. a ,s.'•n.,.. .. . ..•w .. ... _�•. r p0 queue free % 97 98 88 84 92 97 92 99 cM capacity (veh/h) , 98 104 549 ' s` 126 103 763 .728 µ' ' '` 1073 h an Z14` , `' 10-T1 ' 1rF rya 't 'N 2'7N5,3: NB 4''S ?7,S)11' $01 7. ;7"'7APr�r�r'"' Volume Total 71 50 58 238. 238 10 ,11 ,459 459 17 Volume Left 3 21 58 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 Volume Right 65 21 t 0 0 0 'I'0 O 0 0 17 • cSH 408 182 728 1700 1700 1700 1073 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity , 0.17 0.28 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.27 0.27 0.01 Queue Length (ft) 15 27 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Control Defay�$)' ' 5.7 32 1" :4::,.•. 1g:p. 0.0 0.0 8.4 O:0 Lane LOS C D B A Approach Delay (s) 15.7 32.2 1.1 ?;:; 0.1 Approach LOS C D ' , tl thr ..r • ..;r+i,..,:.. ,..:- .. +,, 1 u....., ..� ..:'F -A' a 101--,42a Average Average Delay 2.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.4%:"::: ': ''tCU Level o>I'$etvi '..;, A . • • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC# 021190) AM Existing Analyst : Alam SM Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis AM Existing 2: WCR 18 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 e ► BC ;E8fi; W T„ • WBR -,.$BL $ R r .�T . t .:. . ;,,:: Lane Configurations 4 f V Sign Control :;.•:.,";; Free ree Sfop .. ..:....... ....�: . . .. . F Grade 0% 0% 0% V6lt ►e (vet1/h) 5 36 57 12 15' 3 '''<<*'"` ,',_n .' ,4•, p Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) t 33 62 13 16 Pedestrians n• e Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Slocka .: ,.._. ...,.:,.::'�.. ,... :..:.:...._. ...�,•:�..,,:::-� Right turn flare(veh) .:..:.in:.,i+.:•:_>c-.??p;a:...i..-..�•ln'.:Cc','•:.�..,..,�.:..,..;...::..:>p..•,: - o`Rt•�. r'3,.rg{;x:{ - ,y.m:::....x,.:: '.•:v(N•. Median type _ M:c.:YL:d.. T :.:: �, C1 f-c•:C:b'` tx x•:{: i,•...� r',.r •_-:: i{`• <:�.�:�:..:`_,:..r`......•.,..�::• -......_::rw.. ..J..:',:,..;_.,::.,.�_:,-.:�...:::.::�a_- . ........ .... ..m'::,::<y��.:h__,�,.:� .._:,u.:a��-:�:'�t',,..:.::a:.�:::�.-;:=.T: Median storage veh) '..`�`'p'- .:-e�rRs:.._%::.<�:-a.,.::ur-•..••v.,."'ae•.:.w•:.-"::::.:::'•....3::• F¢Kt•r.•i -iJr.::.:rs:,.;�i..::.:i o::�J:�YI!'iir.t`T.:cin}.:�3y;,:,,�.. rT.. Upstream s t. . ............<.. . -pX, platoon unblocked g:• .r.:'. .Gr,Tc^4+M1' :;�Xrr:^ :k'.J;!)".i"i :.'f.�:':.,::'r.: rr;�::-: ;�:`.�,.,-.:.:si.+%^r::'°a,.::...•.•,, r vC confl ctm of :::��'6:'::::;,-,-. :':�-= �� :;�• �. '�-�� ::�;:__�''...,.,.:. vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,.zstage 2 conf vol . ,..... ,,, ......5.1.-.. _, ..�•��.t ... �. �.....• . ,:x:; ._�.... .. . r. 1s fit.� .. . . vCu, unblocked vol 75 • 118 68 tC, 2 stage (s) tFS ..� � Y,-a••. _:3;,... ..,:.r• ^:� • 3.5 3.3' 4 ''•s-' �i„,.; ;•`•.'.. �,;�'- -_.a�, '•. p0 queue free % 100 98 100 cM capacity (veh/h) _�:�. 1524 ::�:.........::.... .:.....:.. , ..s�- 874 995 ty q�rc(�lirie# ;DEB Volume Total 45 75 20 `;°; Volume Left 5 0 16 Volume:. ......J:::.:..:.':.... . 0 13 3 ,.• . _- ..._ �._r ht. : . .... .:.S.�:...'._....:..�:...:...•. .�., '.�:'.:'i >r'frr^., .:':..:lei�. _.r..... ....... r_._. ...,.q>.S::i��....—.t,'L.:• cSH 1524 1700 892 r.,., 0 Volume.to Capacity 0.0 0.04 0.0 - Queue Length (ft) 0 0 2 • Control lay'(s) 0.9 ;; •Q O. 9.1: Lane LOS A A . .. Approach Delay(s) , :.: 0.9 0":Q - 9.1,_ _ .,;� ., .. . . ... . ... . ....._..r = . ' Approach LOS A Average Delay 1.6 Intersection Capacity`Utilization 14.1/0 ICU LevelrofService • • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) AM Existing Analyst : Alam SM Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis AM Existing 3: WCR 20 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 Lane Configurations 4 t Sign Control Stop i Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 0 3 f} 0 7 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 k0 'm!:flow rate (veh/h) 0 3 0 r::..' .1 `8 Pedestrians(ft) • Walking Speed (ft/s) Blockage Right turn flare(veh) Median storage veh) Upis, ►,_".eam,idna! pX, platoon unblocked vC COnflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol ..:..._. .... ....... ::':.:.'.a. r.. .:::'. - Cat.!..:':'::. ..,3'.::':'L'::t.•: =1` rr'C2:. to e 2 con •col . . .., .. �: ..:...:. �_:• ..t: ... . . . _,..:...... ...,...�........ .... ....,_ .. %/Cu, unblocked vol 18 8 8 tC, single (s) .. .. .,.. <. ..... ..... r.:,,. ..: :, ,.�: 6.4 • tC, 2 stage (s) l :3.5 3 3` 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 100 100 ' 1 5 1613 .:.... . .. :.. clUi Opacity (vehlh) - 999 07 _ ` ., ,.... ,. ...... . . Volu,�ne.Total 3 11 8 Volume Left 0 0 0 . . .. ... . ........ R t ��3 cSH 1075 1613 1700 Queue Length(ft) 0 0 0 0 Lane LOS A 4 • CO .. . � ,.. .... ... 0 0.0 ........:.:. ...:•-:...::...':.:,..,:��'...r._..__....._ . :. > ,. ._..::�:.:<�;.." . "gin:. .. . Approach LOS A Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization::. 13.3% ICU,Level of Service • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC# 021190) AM Existing Analyst: Alam SM Page 3 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Existing 1: WCR 18 & US 85 12/22/2002 R. f' a 'r BBL a w4'E 1" -•ESR- WBL • WP ' ; , .Wx 1, L7~w i . r :Sf 3 , 7aB 1:W. Lane Configurations 4 44 r ++ Sign Control Stop :,,. Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 9 11 65 18 5 '`14 48 1030 23 . 10 671 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 10 ` 12 71 20 =:` 5 •,. .;;•••15. ? 52 1120 25 11 729 3 Pedestrians Idtl1 ft .n .W , Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage .. _ RF Right turn flare(veh) 4. :..�. M�h��. Y k � •, ... dd..,.�Ref::≤.^•,:�st �� r: .�.� ��x t 7 �? t ,,,.,�.. edian ' None. =L••..' one . „•��. .v,. x f, - Median storage veh) U.DWearn signal ft r5. 1+` '}. Y, a2:y e :.}',V3 tr 2i pX, platoon unblocked conft4c"fln volume 1433 O(��°'� � :,1 :}; ,.:;;,�.�,,. .. .• :<<.. �:.t•:�:, ��._ vC1, stage 1 conf vol ....xs:.`,'.:: -:y..:.::r'.:::.... .....{:... ..�..:...�:.:•:'aJ. .,._n.1: .:,;:�'q��s ="' "'s±.. i`•!k�`'- "s,.:a,,:::,.-o•..- h}psi^a�'•.:+ca3'.4p2,stage2 conf vo{ ��:..;�:�::,}.�: , � ��• , _. M �ti �'-' ,�T, ,{�_. .. . . r vCu, unblocked vol 1433 2000 365 1687 1978 560 733 1145 tC'sngfe.(s} 7;5:' `'S 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 to, 2 stage (s) tF (s) �;,.$.3 ..:,!4.�t 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 88 78 89 54 90 97 94 98 • cM capacity (vehih) 80 55 632 42 56 472 86,0;`..:'a`=; • .,;S06 5 t3 t�ori .Lane# I~B 1 'V17 L ;.N131 `NB 2_ N. 3 s40 1 8W4W48. l' yM1 i ,, R, A Volume Total ;: 92 40 52 560 .:,560 •'25;; . '1,1 365 365 . 3 Volume Left 10 20 52 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 • 0 3 cSH 204 68 868 1700 1700 1700 606 1700 1700 1700 VaturrietoCapac[ty!; 0.45 0 59,' ;0;06 ::::0:33 0.33 0.01 0: 0.21 0.21 0,00 ;; ? Queue Length (ft) 54 63 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 C.ont tiv.00lay (e):. .. " 36:5 `115 3 `::: :4 `' .0: 'w'`; Q,0 ':0 0 ' •'1.1.Q T 0.0 Q.0 0 0 Lane LOS E F • A B • Approach.Delay (s) 36.5 115.3 Approach ac LOS 1'.0teTiEU n�' plrniThW' T. r xtr 1,7 ^' •s 1" ..,3�iw 17.7 ! f i��M.V7 TAT N- 77754 Average Delay 4.2 interseobbn apacity:U li afio�. 43.6°/b` , 1CC;i Level of`SerVice'' A •, . • • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC #021190) PM Existing Analyst : Alam SM Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Existing 2: WCR 18 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 WAT =V1fBR: S$ � ' { s ,° "`' 3`Ytax ,r •: ;;``,. >.;r.r, 174 Lane Configurations 4 I V Sign Control > ` - re op ' `' Free F <, St • `f .. ..K_.. •.,. .., :.. . . .. :•...• ter... �..,_a. .. Grade 0% 0% 0% 2 69 46 11 13 2 Peak Hour Factor 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 rate veh/h 2.....:: 75 50 12 ::.14 2 i�ou few ........ Pedestrians .... ...... ...... Lane Wcfth :.". .....::.:.. ....... _..., .. Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent BoC[t e: ....,. . ...•_..: .,_.::•:r:... . ..... .. Right turn flare (veh) Median .:,.. ...>.�..:,.,^r•••. �::_... ._.:w:,,•.:�•..rf"',. .. - - 4:' :ay'y'��r:'•;_:::x.':.w4y..4:N:r'�'e'w- , :.-a0.':;.::�_,. ...':: ... :r."....,r ....:� _,.(:.....r.� k ti..gr,r.: i:h'f;;•tl i;�b�P. ..?'.. - _., _ - rK`.;k:,,,. `•E:v!,4r ::rx::fr:.�':K 'ie" `'•r.'; .,u•G'.i,}t� , a• �l.p . .:._::r:..}�,....a'.,.:...'.:..: :sn�:r'.a::'..r::,... , ...."Y..,`.fr:�:i.!'oi.. ..v�-uJ�?i'l:F:u•:r<��'Y �k.✓'.'^::::�:��r...-... • »}`�y'5.�;..::��:':s_._...::.•5s�:Z Median storage veh) v.T^c'., .'.Yy,.•.<.w..r ...: iry rt:::..'•"s:T:`..O.`::P::...r.�... ..�. >,:,wu -,.G' Y,•:r!:,,?:.:}.._r:e..�,�,;rc. •Ky:- •4 -n,, .r„ - :�[.£{:=?u° 'T.Tf7;f'•,:.�,{r'. irYi.'F..r�1�',��.�.. .,p..'; ::.'.'P.. pX, platoon unblocked ... ...y:n. , ..f:....,•:i� .. .,:.,:':.`''vx - ,i.�. ,+':qe:. - '=.•C::^:TL��_:.t..:.i'E:!.,,�u �:_:�., :.`:i-::'1'c..r:n: vc y. 6�.:,. ..._r -.,.•:: ...: ... ....:....: � ,< r vC1, stage 1 conf vol g vCu, unblocked vol 62 135 56 tC, .,;..r,q... : n".` ::.S'4""•r:Y✓. it: .rii. :,•x. • tC, 2 stage (s) a x.-,,.. c..... .:.a..r ry _.. ,... �. ..:'.'.::........ ...... ,.,y:�•c<'rr:"- r'�•::��";:S 'i4''"i�r.! •,(.H?"" a'F.;ir.. 3 3. : :a.. .i1. �,y`Fs.4 Sh ..:i�W T.tw' •:i'°«••-:,n::; p0 queue free % 100 98 100 cM capacity(veh/h) 857 1011. -� �r. *{t•,� �,; as.�.•,:,, - 4` �� Volume Total 77` 62 16 Volume Left 2 0 14 .. .., ..::.-:.•.... .: .::: �....._ .. � :•..:7 . .;tip.' - 12 2 i% YD P'4, • tom. .. . .... ,..-... cSH 1541 1700 875 Vol0f.iWtO Capacity 0:00. .0.04 0.02 - Queue Length(ft) 0 . 0 1 Corttrol7Deta *. . .. . ... A :+�,,:,t.;.. . .., _ , Lane LOS A A Approagh Delay (s) • ,2. 0 0 9.2 Approach LOS r ... n _.. XS.. �" Id ,�b :R��,., :4Y'�-fi ;��..�a�� w.r .... r....,'�`:' �x'. Average Delay 1.1 Intersection',Capacity Utilization • 1• 41%.''' = ICt .L•e' l of Service A ; Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) PM Existing Analyst : Alam SM Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis PM Existing 3: WCR 20 & WCR 25 12/22/2002• - .�_�Y ..t•�.�. ,_ i r _ � ..,�.., : � .- .�.r��l'-, ti,'�r�9..s° :r 'sky Lane Configurations ve Stn Control :•-.7/I4,.::.. . ... ...St .... .,. Free Free � ,.._ , ..Vii?.... .. :.,. , ., ...::: ,.. ...,..... ...G:. _ Grade 0% 0% 0% Yolutrte(vehh} r'r, b 5 2 7 12 0 `k.. :;: __. • . .. ,. Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow.rate(vehlh) 0 5 2 8 13 0 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Pe ..,iii ,...810 ......� ...�.:......_.. ..._. - ... .... .::....... �.... t ��. ..,. .:, Right turn flare(veh) _ u }y 'f. MR.il:. _ Sty::y�::� y.,4a. 'i"s1':-•[':(� �`:i�a-...L,'�, :.X•hgA�. 'Ff.''..t`.} f ::{W ." ?-C�•G:$ Median `7 Pe None „':I..�,r ,;v.nt rti:: -":M:: a."; �; .�: •�.t: :_}nw.,.':�� C &.I_~ ` v. M. Median storage veh) . ..,, . .: ,.._ ....•.:.`r,•',:::.�:;�.......,rr'•�c;•.aa� '=.h'.S+t.:F.?srcen':. ::rZ;t•x.e'?•'• ,:r::.:Yd'. C:i i.. _ ::.i'r:�a,.. :'!•.'C•. 'r.'S�.:-::<:'�'z):;�T°: : ft) rea st ..� pX, platoon unblocked ,...e.. ,,.:y_.....a.�..^e':c: •.:,'::^„.�-•��-d:.y:�d,'.^ :.i:;:,;:.'sis - <:.7�- 14::r:. .g�i::�.:ps sr: vC conflict VOIIJm vC1, stage 1 conf vol stage co nf • -'�" vCu, unblocked vol 25 13 13 Single (s) , . ...-,.......>_ . 6.4 ,.6.2 T.4.1 . ,......:.�............:.':".a::,,.•1,. .u�' tC, 2 stage (s) s ..; .. :.:•:.::...;:.r:i:;pr•:.. :, 3.5 ' p0 queue free % . 100 99 100 M capacity vehih =':. ' 989 1067 1605 Volume Total 5 10 13 ": x;i. ,.ar :.. Volume Left 0 2 0 .. ...... .......c Voiurr0 i � 1.. 5 0 Q ' H t .......:... cSH 1067 1605 1700 a c� 0.01 0.00 0.01 Vo ume to Queue Length (ft) 0 0 0 8.4 1.6 Lane LOS A A 8. 4 ,. ... ;:::-1.6: _.., .0.0•. ...x::.. ....: .. :Y. mach , . . •.� - Approach LOS A i itersecuorM mma ° '$ �; r y i .�s } x.s 41.31 7.3rMe '0 Average Delay 2,2 Intersection Capacity Uttlizatto t >': .13.3% tGt3[ vef of Seriiice !' A` • • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) PM Existing Analyst : Alam SM Page 3 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Background 1: WCR 18 & US 85 12/22/2002 • f _ c .-- 4' 4\ /� . 4/ Lane Configurations 4 4+ 44 r Sign Control :: Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volur i+ (veltifi} " ` 6 5 90 30„.., 10 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 .0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) - " :5:.:.> _98 3 11 33 $7'"_,71d.. :k :16; "; "1<f. r•13_• ,. .27 Pedestrians Lane Width'Ot :r. v •• s..�4 Walking Speed (ft/s) ..0 .r...... .. .....r F :Y'.It. Percent Blockage �. ..�,,.:,... ,. "'•,r��.,, Right turn flare (veh) :.Y:. N4.. a1-�A - ��{="y._.}. �:f'�J,As-:.X ran:l.� -f�%•'fiCx�Yr-a w•: .n iiiii ��64AI:�YI'-'.' i r 4 '0 z" :r ' :�. one:•�..w;-w:..x „�o F; :�,,, vx, r,�? `, fed a��! �:� ��,;.."�.... ��.> -:.�.. . .... .... ..�.�. ,.. �.,, .�, , ...��,-!.�� ._�..::.•�_,t . f��:,.y -_. ... . Median storage veh) .•--.. tream -.. ......u'::an:lns:.x.....-.�.:'.:i::•.:::':<..:r'":r...'.:e:::::......::.: .."...,.v,1.n:l i:.r.,Y;L;." r.'h:� ..'.:T�'x� "2'•,ai--"r`F�4:✓va::�.'.t_r�,. _':ni:',-a: ....K.,h. it........{.....i......(':a::.. "c N.t`i: :•;fw.:.:. .: `^,�t_r,:.. t. . :.'Y:.ix},.. �'.k,^•.ta..- pX, platoon unblocked VC; conflicting vole ie '9979 vC1, stage 1 conf vol •vC2h`stage 2 con, V4i t • k t vCu, unblocked vol 1979 2314 689 1710 2325 357 1404 730 tC, single (s) 7.5 6 5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 4.1 ... ` w'� 4:1 tC, 2 stage (s) tt::(s)" • `35 • 40 ..33 3.5 • 4.0 3.3• 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 75 82 75 0 63 95 82 98 ^ cM capacity (vehlh)`' 21 30 388 . .. 32 30 • 639 482 ;:x, ;t,,:, -_ 870 Ni3'11,,,`1I11 3 N$4.' .$8 1_�r.,$8,, f 17 g 4 t7 4 ., Volume Total 109 76 87 357.,L, 357 16 16 689 689 27 w ,r Volume Left 5 33 87 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 Volume,Right -•: 98 cSH 158 53 482 1700 1700 1700 870 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacty 0.69 1.43 0.18 0,21 0.21 0.01 0.02 0.41 0.41 Queue Length(ft) 100 174 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 66:.9.,:':!:3$9.2 14.1 r7,0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS F F B A Approach'Delay (s) 66.9 399.2 1.5 Approach/' LOSt��ar' Hty F F :1r Average Delay 16.1 lritersecfrort Capacity:Uti ization 59 S o 1C 'Lave'of: ervice A • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) 2020 AM Background Analyst : Alam SM Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Background 2: WCR 18 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 BT, VV4l ,: ., 71 .. £K ', . . , ;' .M:.4 ,M' 'v Lane Configurations 4 V Sig an#rot :: ' :` �_ .. ....� ,. ;: Free f=ree Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volut '(veh1h) - ` ' " $ 15- 15 5 h '. ....:.��• : '. ', . ._ '' . .. .. . _ Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly:110W rate (veh/h) 5' 60 $2 16 16 5 Pedestrians 'r.• ne Width ft . ,.. ..... .. ...�.:;. . , Walking Speed (ft/s) Pir'Oent Blockage � ��• Right turn flare (veh) 1.:'....-. ... .��.�.........aF.1 t';:a--••::.., ... - '::5=:;�-. :}L::�:i;':.•.Yt:? ...•lr. ^ :•r)fyT:..:-�. � Median- e ,.:...: .... .... .... .r,.......... .... ..r..:...,:,._; :�,,:�. op - _�_ _ .,•:• �._. Median storage veh) WifeeesW msignal � pX, platoon unblocked .....:, ...,.•... tsFi� vC confl+ct�n vo tire.. 109:_ T 10'1,' vC1, stage 1 conf vol v,C2,:stage 2 vCu, unblocked vol 109 171 101 hn 1e (s) -...,:.: .....:....,.....4.1 :_ ..f:..:. : .. 6.4 6.2 _....,... :....... #...,..:..> : ......................................... .. ..` -.ass tC, 2 stage (s) 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free °A) 100 98 99 cNf capacity (veh/h) 1482 r" ; n 7= 816 955 ...: rdia:5647#; 75( 1.,rt g1r`,rS13.'7 7- a .u..• Volume.Total 65 109 Volume Left 5 0 16 cSH 1482 1700 847 volume,- Ca c1 0.00 0.06 0?03 :......:....:. Queue Length (ft) 0 0 2 too teeifi : ,_ ,: . 0`6 0.0 4 • Lane LOS A A Approattelay (s) 0.6 '0.0 9.4 :, :<• ...,...... .. .. ...... .. Approach LOS A Average Delay 7.3 Iflterse. fiol Capacity.Utiliz tioh::':`: °: � :'t 9% LCU;Le +a4 fi:S rvice A • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC# 021190) 2020 AM Background Analyst : Alam SM Page 2 LSCI NCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Background 3: WCR 20 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 Pta ttt • • n B1. ; Eg'tu 11 1;, t`iST Sf3TV' SBE Lane Configurations ' 4 1 Sigil:Ccot • Stop ree Free � " r ". Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourlyflow rate (veh/h) • 5::.,. ; 6 16 11 • 5 k... Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) eta . t CQ �.. :....,..., . .:. .... ,. "..; .. .. - - . ... .. . . ... ...,.:...:... .... Vie... .. ..:..,....:::.. ..... ........ .... ..... .t .. Right turn flare(veh) Medan tyPe'l''''';7'' ,.idi4060.:4::.V .f Median storage veh) .. ... :.:xc.:.:�..c-,:::...,...�,.....::.w.:;-:.: ..tF,,.�:N.c•_er.:.: r_t;: — ..',%'x;L:v;�...,,_ !4::";':iP:'tiuE. am si nal ft pX, platoon unblocked vC conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 cant vol vC2, stage'2 conf vCu, unblocked vol 41 14 16 tC single (s) ,.,... ...... . .... .._tC, 2 stage (s) �s 35 ?33 ... 2 p0 queue free % 99 99 100 410.capacity (veh/h) ':y 967 1066 tB1 N8-'177. 7, 77777 Volume Total it 22 16 • Volume Left 5 5 O Volume l fight' 5 0 cSH 1014 1601 1700 Volume to Ca pOCItt, 0.01 0.00 0.01': „ Queue Length (ft) 1 0 0 tr :. . .. 8:6 1,8 OA n of t3et S . ,. Lane LOS A A 1 :;t ...:.,...... :,::r::• Del . . : _�• APProac .. •._..,. ,::.�.::_ .. . . ,. . ._. .. ... • Approach LOSiffigUagra A il .�,�S,7a,+- •,. .. 5'-1'aq +.9i ..s:.. ..w .. 777.'7-71'777 -�a�5.,�'•Average Delay n 2.7 intersection Capacity Utili anon 13:3% ICU Level of Service A: ::: • • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC # 021190) 2020 AM Background Analyst : Alam SM Page 3 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Background 1: WCR 18 & US 85 12/22/2002• -# � may► +,F�(- tA4—t y ��k-" A`'f\i1 Ktp �►�!y g 4' . 3Et: j E?.: 4 ..k gO ..^:.+1a i M13 1 � $S I.rv;_4413.(„t MT19Wi f✓vaS• r^: 78O1w�'^I-.., Lane Configurations 4.. 4. tt ++ Sign Control' "f.. .. Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Vokitne(vehlh) 15 15 100.• 0 5 1"':201'...V.1.1:)! Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92-. 0.92 0.92. 0.92 .0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 1 1 109 33 5 22 '° 7 1 79 38 _ 1 ' T0�3: 5 Pedestrians BtWidth ft Walking Speed (ft/s) .........-. Right turn flare (veh) .. a -;'. .. ,.,.,.: :.•�..-..;,r,.. _ ::'sml.¢.. .r_....;.,,,,, .r.....{,r .• ...:...... ..:;4?s"":"x rt,.:-r-rR? :: ':..�::ter, .',;xr_. t:rt_•.. Median storage veh) Upstream si a (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 2142 299 547 2528 . 29 3 ~$Q0 1099 :'.,..�s:, ': 't17'�7,•��,a ;,;,:: ti. vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2•sage 2 conf vat vCu, unblocked vol 2142 299 547 2528 29 3 840 1099 1717 tC Single (s) 7.5 5 9 7.5 .5 9 4:1 { t, 4.1 ws--• tC, 2 sta g e (s) tl 4,0 3.3 2.2 �' +t = Y 2.2 = p0 queue free % 0 0 77 0 54 93 88 9 cC1ll'capacity (veh/h) ,{T:_ •: 15 11 `481 Q 12 309 31 _. ....� ;� � ' 3 5 .•.:t. ISi t�n�`L n #� EB 1 tt/B ^"N13-1 7.NB,2 611"73, N6 4' :_ ,,_. •3h 4, g Volume Total w 141 0 7 840 840 38 ,; 1 .547 547 : 5 Volume Left 1 33 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 VolumeRight: 109 22 csk 51 0 31 1700 1700' 1700 3 5 1700 1700 1700 Volutr�e td`Cepactty 2.79 'Err 0 12 :' 0 49 0.49 0 42 '0;04 ; x,32 : 0.32 0:00 Queue Length (ft) 372 Err 10 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0405!Delay: .S.'',;: :::;'' 980.3 Err` 11. 0.0 i3:0 0:01 Lane LOS F F B C r A roach D •, . :::_2 980.3 ....: E r Approach LOS F F melon; ammary ,,. Average Delay Err ,:.. Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) 2020 PM Background Analyst : Alam SM Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Background 2: WCR 18 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 l ci * 's" .k,:_, • ` .•EBL_. rBT Lane Configurations 4 T. FreeV �nxGQrtfi� ,�t...:�� . •f� .. _ Free- ..`St - . ". ,. •'��.., . . . . .. _ . ., .. Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(vehlh ............. 70 15 15 5 'r. . . . , ". '_ n`� . ' R:.•' Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate,(veh/h) ( 5 114 7 • ` 1 1 .(, 5 Pedestrians ..�. :.. ..::._ .....:,:::.t�..:.....o....:......:: ........ ..1.t". ir:`•: f[�!. d .� . .Lan .,',: ...:.r..::,... .. - - .. .. . .... ..... ..... . ... Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) ... ... ..3...:.a,:::,.:,-.�:.....,:.<r.,�;.......:,.:r::��:::a: :...,k_,...,r -�'.r'e r-:�.;_,t..:"°;`s;�vr.:'• x•.3^'•,'F=u _ ..t:..........:.. ..�.. 1,r`.,. ...•' :, 't';: �:'!.; :>4::;" r:!.::-h�_:.".''ri rrj,,f:: ,sr... Median: a ..... ..-' .,:... . :.... ...: o.�.-..�:'„- Median storage veh) tfstream. n .. -::.:.. .....: . .. .... ...:,-.::,.:• - ,... .... .. .. ... . ....... .. . .. pX, platoon unblocked _r. vC conflicting'Volume �2...:.,..�.•:,.,. ..:,,.. :..:, _.:...... - ,w.. . �`:r.Y:: M vC1, stage 1 conf vol .... ....:.r,. ......i.._. vO2,stage 2 conf vCu, unblocked vol 92 209 84 >: {G (s) .uj:h' .. in ie -..':..::u•.•w.:e'.':�:`�.�.r. .v:•._-...r...t^: ,4 r, tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % . 100 98 99 .-� a --:r�' 77 975 i eh/h 1502 =""":,.:::........:_.;:...,.;: ::r cM ca ac v U ektibn;Lane# 3.;nr EB 1 "W BA :7S81 -4'� Y .M r'kr L:•k...y.,,� ..p to �.i -?•.�,rzd•,-j Volume Total ;� 120 92 22 Volume Left 5 0 1 1 6• ,. ..:..,,,t:��: cSH 1502 1700 818 0 . .. 003,•': u a� ,.. p Queue Length (ft) 0 0 2 Ociptrof ;... 0:4 Lane LOS A A ApproaCN:DOlay(s) 0.4 0,0 9.5 Approach LOS A ft�fresgri aumrary , ., _ _ .._ ,i Average Delay 1.1 (0tersec ott,capapify.:aPti atloh 1 . % ICU Level of • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC # 021190) 2020 PM Background Analyst : Alam SM Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Background 3: WCR 20 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 {/ cam— y '.1 '.*�T' ,`:,I✓$L '�i,C FC •Ytan C.�l xg ,'"Y'c,, vr< .�`4 4 '' _•w-,ek: -r,? y�• 77 w.Ci•W iJh :� Lane Configurations y 4 '1 Sign Control ..... Stop t '; `..,ti 'Free . Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(vehlh) 10 15 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) 11 16 5 � �. . Pedestrians tam Width Walking Speed (ft/s) p,etcept 8locka a . 1 s .. ..i is.:."•. ., '.4�'�ti:. � .,z, Right turn flare (veh) :}v:rr ':n f r ., .. ..r •.s',,,::^'• e5. ns' 't` �"3.e ,+4•:;'}^.:c� .-v Y -.5 >`r^ : ti!Z >•E.�4. 4'�,,z iar4.;y4. 9'�4.S .dry, s j "Yfi W'?.: fi;i....}4'a -..C:�,t • i. r f u^ y r—•:..., ..;'.' : Ncsne: �:a:,i, r�iY} '�.?.i"Y:"`a.'- '"tr•>. . '�F.'!'i." r y-.7,:t..1t:e tfl.i:?,b'f•;t�i r`.,j�,�xP 3.,Rr...:>•vw_l t.a_lh .. Median storage veh) lip$t ti ream riaf � {S (ft`i:'.. iv: w. . x ,�y`V f`• ...e..t•-.?�. .. ... !i r.::%A'r, rte. A ...>,. .. .�.. .. t pX, platoon unblocked ... ,r�'. ye„•a��. ._...._...I� - — - - - 1:'i'dti - K: - G4:e•:C'. vC Ictln e nft vo u m .n.4 :.5.. vC1, stage 1 conf vol ry - Y. n ,:_.. , ,......,,..,:.: ,. ..:.r:'r„. ...; _ 1�_ - - ''t ads, ..x✓ �•!�... ,_....._:..:-...,:�...,...7S.:...._..:....................a. .,...,, ..,:... �..i... ..._..».....,u..._..,........._. ..,rr>.��, ..��tii��" ,... ...,�;=4aa�.;os�r:. r.....�i?�.. -...K.. . .... . . vCu, unblocked vol 41 19 22 .-�-."i.u;:'.R'Cnv:f.r,•'S a:'•C'f....,..,F_�,l y::. "'�+1k'5 C t x.,..:...,,.6.2. 4.1_ t Stn e 5 -.,...,.� .,...� ,-.�>. •.: ,.�;: tC, 2 stage (s) ,,�:_,_.. ..,r,�4-...•,...- ................ _ - — - -ass a ..:::•[ tF(s) _ _. n._.... "..!..,. sF..v:,. ._�:.......�_ ... ...,{�;.Y3''s" _. .. •s2Kc��.L..::.ii 's:.>.� p0 queue free % . 99 99 100 i veh h .`.967 1059 .1 - ...,.,... �.;..:::.,�:, cM ca ac / 594- .i�: _ - -, :,r.g 5- m t a •4. ?"�7R4 Tf ro .+ e.,qt >i. Volume Iota VolumeLeft 5 5 0 l` 16 16 , : 22 pur'.,..,.:.> ... . :..-. .:r. ...... .._..>. . r...... . .. .�,.. ..`... ry .<..... ; r CSH 1027 1594 1700 to Capacity . .' 0.02 0.00 0. ". :.•...:.. ':. Volume ac 01 p ..: . Queue Length (ft) 1 0 0 Coritobi Lane LOS A A .,!t,:., _ �ti=:r.'S'iF.:'•. - ...a..:R�.... ':�Js>ii::<^•r::5?':;iii. Approach Delay s :', ;. 8,6 Approach LOS A Fri. 07 •n ti•�'+e�"��Q. ar ^g, tt?t - '57 t:r Ct4 �0tlm't.•�!'Y3 ...F t �, - ,: ,.' . EMMa TONZMWFAX,‘5„;�9tl?37�, Average Delay 3.3 tCU: vel;of Se it :'';: ;:_:; Intersection C� ci .Utilrzatlotl:a':.::.:,;: 13>3,�::; . Le AI°` '` : .'.,. • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC# 021190) 2020 PM Background Analyst : Alam SM Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Total 1: WCR 18 & US 85 12/22/2002 Movement :EBL -BT . EBR, 'WBL T' ;WBR:, A ,,, lI'tt' S w:,KS:$ Lane Configurations 4. 4. 1 +4, rt 1 ++ r Sign:Control Stop Stop -Fre . .' :Free E q Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(vehlh) : 6• .,. : .;..5 :::-. 98 : 30 10 .30 '••• 88.;.:::'.`657 r: 15 15 1267 '� 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9279 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ho(jrly flow rate (veh/h) .. T_,.>. .�5:,:•x.;107 • 33 11 33 96 714 16 16 1377 . 28 Pedestrians 140,4,..:#1.0:00 ` Walking Speed (ft/s) e nt BI - - rce . � , Right turn flare(veh) .r: M n e ;,.....:: . _: _t�l vrte:. ....__.... .. ...i... ._. ne-;�_::,. ., . <<r'-'. . _ Median storage veh) • .............:...i:.. ,...,,: Wit*': :�.:.�. . :r: Cream s ft _. .. ...::.v.::: :....... ........ ...:..:. . :•:.:. ��.., tlp ,�� : pX, platoon unblocked VC, conflictprgvdlume " :°°1996 2332.:`:;. 689 :1736' 2343,. "357 1405 ;730',x,.Y,.:,..,1.; ra' vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,.:stage 2 COrt r pka : •, •. ,: �: E = . , vCu, unblocked vol 1996 2:33_2 689 1736 2343 357 1405 730 tC, sin to s '•;r 7.5 6;5V::0.,9-,::',.-- 7,5 6.5' 6.9' 4,1 '. 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(01 .....,... 3,5 7'::f40- 3 3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ° 2:2' s1 ,::,',`'.;g:" z:,: 2-2 ':-71;', -''',."-':;..7P.' ''... p0 queue free % 67 81 73 0 61 95 80 98 ^ cM"capacity (veh/h)`'_ , •.-20 29;-,:::H''..388.::::, 29 28 639 482` ' ' 870 ',. 01r6760i1; Lade r_:. t=B'1-'-‘.7W13---1. NiB. NB 2 :N$,3'' N5$4'`riS11; ix 0,27$x3 ' 5i 4 :x:--7; , ; Volume Total 118 76 96 357 357 16 16 689 689 28 Volume Left 7 33 96 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 Volume Right..; :.:-:..-::"4::::.:107..... .,.,33 0 0 0. 16 0 70'- " 0 28.' 1. cSH 150 49 482 1700 1700 1700 870 1700 1700 1700 Volume;to Capacity :.::0;7.9: 1,55 0,20: ` 0,21 0.21 0.01 0.02 0.41` :',...`,:p'.4.11:.:.-,-..0.02.::::]"....':,:-...:: ::.:: '.r,' .:. Queue Length (ft) 125 182 18 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Control Delay.(s) '.. :85:6-:462 0 : 14 3 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 .9 2 , , 0.0' 0:0, ; . 0.0 :'.'.:. Lane LOS F F B A IVO .....:...: roach Deta (s) 85.6 462.0 1.7 : : . ,,,::: :,., �: sI Approach LOS F F fntersection:5uinmat r:, - ,:,P... , , , , . ..:2:::;:•'' ,. �.. a .a1° �d ._ t ;e:j• .. .�a(h ..�.:a..No'�x_.S,l :�illr. :`i.:., ,8.,. 7� Average Delay 19.2 lntersectiort:Capacity Utilization• :: "6:1:1%.' ; ." LCIi Level;.of;$ervice ° ; :,: $ • • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) 2020 AM Total Analyst : Alam SM • Page 1 LSCI NCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Total 2: WCR 18 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 lY1 C. G,'• r T�. .._fi°',:. '.�[7t. 'I_U I :i.f4'li 5l ,:WBR VDl1..- iM.l? c J ' J1.,..''.{ .71R.ti:i Lane Configurations 4' V e ;. .:. Sign control Free � Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Voiurile(v Wh) 5 55 85 .'-• 25"': 25 5 .��^...._ r• Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly;flow,rate(veh/h) 5 60 92 27 27 5 Pedestrians Width (ft) .. . .......... Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent:Blockage a :. •._E• -_ '. ... :.�� `:E� Right turn flare (veh) . . •. . _ _.one:, Median storage veh) •.::�rr',�. .......,........•>., ,: .;.._ ".. ^Fi',•-::uy+,.r^;yf - .:r:-s:t;�vr:-t:: _;:l�i::::�s....:,.f•, .r :raw ...-.... Upstream signalft . ............. . ..,,....:.........., pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 120 ,:..........'. :.._.: .;: ::.::.•..:::t.:.....;.�...,t'7:?t ,'1�J :r::. ��`•`„'�::-, ....::....:.:: .. . ........ ..... .: • :.�.': . ....... .. _ ... ... ........ . .... ...... ..._.-..'::iii=: ...... ... . vC1, stage 1 conf vol vG�;gage 2 conf vo(,,..��• •�, , ;�-�•.'"- . . vCu, unblocked vol 120 177 106 tC,single (s) t 1 ,. > ............................ ..:. 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s)` '` 2.2 { ` 3,5 3.3 . ...; �_....'.' . .,.. ... p0 queue free % 100 97 99 ._::4t= - :::i,.;...: ;.... ..,. ,�.._.......>,,,,. ..-...'h;:t•yu7ti:-:::1.�t:".•;:•':f^.y:�:�:j.:f:�.::":�t'f.p:rl.:-..-;..:::;^.::.,.f....�.,.....t�y.....:. '—' cM capacity (veh/h) 1468 t; 1 ,:.. ;:. . 810 948 Dirt,tiion 't ai # < °'"'8S 1 µ`W151.fi SC 1 - "'' -j' ur d ` '' T .�i��`': �'' ` ' Volume Total 65 120 33 Volume Left 5 0 27 Volurr a Righf 0 �.. 27 5 y cSH 1468 1700 830 .. . :. .. 7. 0.0 ..-. ......ti 0Q V I e to:Ca c ':. . urn. . ... ., Queue Length (ft) 0 0 3 0 Lane LOS A A s ;.,, ,: roa h Delay " Approach LOS - - ., 'J ,� !',. t.. .yrM'..t�l.,r...�:.r�ekT m�f� b,e, Average Delay 1.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 16,5% ICU Lev rlpf"Servic Pc ; • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) 2020 AM Total Analyst : Alam SM Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Total 3: WCR 20 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 `ti t 1 l ve ► n ,.a„ `n t yE : , 'E 8k _ 1 NBT ' SBT 8Pf ` .44-.1q1 Lane Configurations V 4 1 Sign Control ';::..;�':::::.�-:.�::`°..�Sto`., -. . . .: ,.;:;' ree ree Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (vehfh} 6� 5 5 25 20 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly ftpw rate(veh/h) 5 5 5 27 22 5 Pedestrians .< dth ft Illl aft . ... . .. • Walking Speed (ft/s) :.:....::::!.�:!:: i. .C. .{...a�S -.3' - '�:R:.�': _ tilt:..: :•ti•.:• Percent B!acka a •' ..... '; Right turn flare(veh) ,..,..:.::i' —.".:..:....-:�.:3.'.''1;1 tt.:.1.._.:....::lf:Y^„"t':.•y�.,..y _ _ __"f7'-:'.i$"':�i'::�.'k'�I'.:�:�.".a"�sf.,.•nu...._. w.:.f,'1:Y::"•:':•i ..�'R't:•.., i:4'i .. Medan : .. .o. a.,..:... . .: _.-._ .>... ..,..... :..3..>'t::•,• ' :.. ..., ....,. =�1...z:.''�' - �:��= Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vriT.Y1:= C con vC1, stage 1 conf vol vPi.ksta vCu, unblocked vol 62 24 27 le s :,.; :.•::;.,. :A: ;2. 4.1 tC, single �..:. 6. ., tC, 2 stage (s) t : s} 2 2 - * ,• n .:�,_.� < t _:_ .. ...r....f:..'�;:e.;_ .r ... f st p0 queue free% . 99 99 100 _ 940 1052, 1�gT... ........ ..,.,.. ci vehfh c1i11 Ca a p tY ( `.�,. Volume Total 11 33. 27 Volume Left 5 5 0 5 0 5 - CSH 993 1587 1700 Volumeto Ca �ci .:::> 0.01 0.00 0,02 .•,:, ,.s,:.- ;•.:::.�..,:;:: Queue Length(ft) 1 0 0 Control Deis s :::: :. 8:7 : 1.2 Lane LOS A A o�c Approach�y LOS A N:NrivAiAverage Delay 1.9 intersection:Capacity'Utilization 13.3% ICJ LevelofService A Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) 2020 AM Total Analyst : Alam SM Page 3 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 AM Total 4: Access Road & WCR 25 12/22/2002 MovetlYenf EB�t N13L NBT'; SBT' $15R74.7KfflgaSONZIP•11.9.WIR17657FAMI Lane Configurations �`tr Sign Control Stop Free Free ,.. Grade 0% 0% 0% ,... ,_, . 10 10 20 15 0 VGiume(vets) �.�: 0 ..•. Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly.flow rite(veh/h) 0 . 11 11 22 16 Pedestrians • Walking Speed (ft/s) Pi0441: s Right turn flare (veh) ReAffirOYijA, .r.,. .x::: - v,�;,8 :4'i`� -^cis t:r'v3 '17:�<;ti 41(::;• _rr:..:>,•":i .. ... ... ..,.C.:..F .. ' ...,.-.. � :: _.. ..... ..: ':.. :it.`� .......t ..... .. ......:. .��be . .. Median storage veh) .....,..:re..:...a (ft) .:,,,v,:::;a..,.,._�.::..—s.',,.�,.,..;�,;,-=:•_.r,�.:�e,q.t,.-y:,� ,tn'm:• - °K-: - ,.�t:: •.t'r;.;tYr -:�::: t� t ( } pX, platoon unblocked _ .+ . vC conflictingvo ume 8:. ��'�> vC1, stage 1 conf vol yC2 ;stage 2 conf vCu, unblocked vol 60 16 16 .. .......... single 4 6,2 >., tC, 2 stage (s) .. ...:..... tF s 3 p0 queue free % . 100 99 99 cM capacity (veh/h) , . 941... 1063 1601 .,•'. �. .'� � :�. �-�:: r: •� ��;�� :. - -t Ft /ci-ume Total 11 11 22 16 Volume Left 0 11 0 0 .:.0 -......j Vb{ume Ri ........,.:Mf ght. . . ... 11 0 0 cSH 1063 1601 1700 1700 VPI.u.h e to Capacity 0:01 0.01 (x:0:1 0:01 Queue Length (ft) 1 1 0 0 Control Dela s ..... .... ... ......: � D ,.::..:. _, Lane LOS A A �r...... . :" ...........::::. kippr.cjqh Delay Approach LOS A u ,<;_K �r7�t.� :1+: fgar=r..1. •.�,na�x y₹; b,��A1t{ .SC'i ern.i,..., �71.'Ja}, ;..*:r''>', Average Delay 2.9 Intersection Capacity.Utilization 13,3% ICU bevel of Service • A • • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) 2020 AM Total Analyst : Alam SM Page 4 LSCI NCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Total 1: WCR 18 & US 85 12/22/2002 ♦ MOVEN 47,i1;:. _,t .50:P ; ',EBR,., , Lane Configurations 4 4. tT ++ •F Sign Control Stop Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h} -:n 30 5 78 '15 5 5 15 100 S Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate(veh/h) - `l?' .°::18 117 33 5 .=2 .,'`:` : 8$:;'1679`:::: :'9$ 16 .1093 Pedestrians Lane Wtd Walking Speed (ft/s) per,pecit Blockage it• Right turn flare (veh) .t:..�..:da.. :.. ....:;:•c.:.....::::.. ......."'.::-,.•tt•::....:::�A:.:!'N,v.:t..,.. _i!! !:.:.:':.•:: 'f•-'.•::c._:.::4:::%"is ,1:r."1C7su•z. :. - :_ rt...l... ... ..r ...,.:,;..:. , 1.n.y _ �i..,., J-F�`.'.,.• - 1^�r, - t�•: Men e ; _.. �� .:loo . .. .r:'.•::;. �. .. ;:N n Median storage veh) 0130karn signal(ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 2160 3013 ,. .:547 2554 _.2982- 840 1100. ...v- r.il�7:.,r ,. ,,...• ;�,_., vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, age 2 conf vot vCu, unblocked vol 2160 3013 547 2554 2982 840 110Q • 1717 €C,single (s) `I 7.5 6.5 6 9 : 7.5 '6.5 6.9 4 1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF(s} 4 . :35x , ;40 �r,133 3.5 4.0 3.3 , ..2.2 ' , : 2.2 p0 queue free % 0 0 76 0 52 93 87 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 14 11 481 0 11 309 630 3 ,:; 365 l `bMi. erte i` EB 1 'WB 1 : NB 1' NB•2 NB 3,• tVB 4 'SB 1''' B 2 SB 8 5 4 Volume Total 151 60 85 840 840 38 16 547 547 7 Volume Left 17 33 85 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 Volume Right :;. r 117 22 0` 0 0 38 0 0 0 7 cSH 50 0 630 1700 1700 1700 365 1700 1700 1700 VOjt4tre to Capacity 5 0 f'Err 0.13 0.49 0-49 0.02 0.04 0.32 0.32 0.00 Queue Length (ft) Err Err 12 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 .Cottfibt Delay (s) err Err 116 4`0 0:0 0:0 15 .` '0 O "' 0 0' 0.0 Lane LOS F F B C A r cis ela (s) Er Approach LOS F F Average Delay Err Interse tion._Ca aci Utilizattorr T E:2°� ICU Level of Service G • • r1 Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC # 021190) 2020 PM Total Analyst : Alam SM Page 1 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Total 2: WCR 18 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 41 - t `► 4/ ii} neni ni t t7 P YYOT V BR... DL' �7PR`, 2 1"' Lane Configurations 4 t V Sign Control. ;: Free Free .._ . Stop. " 3r' __ . Grade 0% 0% 0% Vglurne.(veh%h) 5 105 70 25 25 5 �. Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (veh/h) 5 ''114 76 27 27 Pedestrians Laria,AficItkOtyFr. Walking Speed (ft.'s) ..... .. .. .. eCll B Right turn flare (veh) ..�.. ... :... ...k:....::..........s� ... a-::,1 .'. ...:: ,�4:.,�,:•.:iw ::f.::::� � !.�1:.. ix'F. :ICY,'+:::\::��::. i,I.:�...':.�.�:.'. 1 .. Median' .,.,-x;,....;;..;�,'.,.... . . .. . .. ..:.:.::•-,:;.:.. ,;�9n - _,�,.,rt, ,._ha,,; w - Median storage veh) .......... Upstream signal (ft) _....... . .. :... . . ..... . .. pX, platoon unblocked 1 nflictm volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol v:C2, stage`�.canf Vo€., vCu, unblocked vol 103 215 90 .. tC single s :.,,;-:: .-�:..._ : 4 ..,. . .:.. . 6.4 6.2to, 2 stage (s) 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 96 99 1 . ...... .. . .: 771 6$v h/h 489- cM capacity (veh/h) :' -.... ......' :.: .:-..:,�_:'�'°: ,:::, 9 Ulct(o6A0# y 7,.E� . .,.s• . Volurn .To'tai 120 103 33 • • Volume Left 5 0 27 yy .. cSH 1489 1700 798 Queue Length (ft) 0 0 3 PPfltbi e LanLOS A A appr Delay s oach ( � . . . 1.. .... .. .. Approach LOS A g r"�,k ta"ply-.umh�a ..._.. . ry Average Delay 1.4 Interseetiort Capacity:Ukilization 16.6% ICU Level of:Service A • • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC # 021190) 2020 PM Total Analyst : Alam SM Page 2 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Total 3: WCR 20 & WCR 25 12/22/2002 Lane Configurations ■.s 4 . Sign,Control ;; ' Stop a Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume;(Veh/h) ,< 5 10 5 20 25 • 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourtyw rate(veh/h) .. . . 5 ! -:11 5 22 27 5 ,. Pedestrians Lane. #h Walking Speed (ft/s) flock a ... .. ......_:�.-...-: ... ..... ..:: ,:. v Right turn flare(veh) ran type. Median storage veh) ft pX, platoon unblocked vC confl�ct n volume -"• - - , VC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2,..stage cofv ! • -r vCu, unblocked vol 62 30 33 6.4 tG in ... tC, 2 stage (s) ..t .Ns:; 'tL.w....^s .. :fn:. 1::'F -'z''•• ••:Y::1� '�4 2. _:rr:rl ,f:,:5,i:.:7 y,;.: 4F, 'iL.•:°"'1��: 'trf. p0 queue free % . 99 99 100 :. cM capacity (veh/h) 940 1045 1579 -• • Dtc'tlo :trarie#. . B Volume 1 otai 16 Volume Left 5 5 0 11 0 5 Volurrty.tight : � � . ..... cSH 1007 1579 1700 0.02 0,00 `0 Queue Length(ft) 1 0 0 . . .. :. ..... . ....:....._, :' .rte�:.,- 1 5I x . ... ....:.. Lane Lds A A c4 Delay (s 8.6 Approach LOS A • letectsontamrpaiy„ H7777 '""7777;7 77'7- Average Delay 2.4 Intersection capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level ervice'`" : A' _:, :': • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) 2020 PM Total Analyst : Alam SM Page 3 LSCINCCS2-ST51 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2020 PM Total 4: Access Road & WCR 25 12/22/2002 -�' 4\ t Movement .EBL t; NBL' Lane Configurations V Sign Control Stop ,. E_ Free Free Y. ..• 'Y.., ,'. �`. Grade 0% 0% 0% Vadufrie(v,•ehih)'. .... 0 10' 10• 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 Hourly.; ►;rate-(veh/h) ,,,p 11 11 16 22 Pedestrians Lane -'� ..:. . .... ...::. Walking Speed (ft/s) .. ......... . ,....:...........�.............. . , ..�.....,,..'.•� r-�:- '::�:• .. , . ..._..::_�_ ''� .Percent:Blockage . ... :. ... .:.. .... ,, ...0 ., ....�, .....,.,. ..,. .,. i_ . Right turn flare (veh) Median a _.,. . .:,,. ......;. ..:....,.,...._.. .....�....,..�-.:._ ^ ;:r:.y.:,f:::.'•- .. ,,,....t:.:�:..,.�_"._:_. type: _. ,... •' 0 .,...,r,:.. . .. ,.. .. ..{: - ..� , �<< r.R..__....,..;�' . :-;: . .........-......J_� .i. ... _., ._ . Median storage veh) . .� ._ .•. .......: ....,., ..: ... : � .,....,._.:�..-.: °,�� ";r`�=:�i"•'`'+� :.o., rte= 5:�.`; �'� - l� str a .� .. . . ......... . pX, platoon unblocked y vC1, stage 1 conf vol r:E.. vCu, unblocked vol 60 22 22 •to :.. . ..> 6.4.:,24.12?;`. ..,.;. >..:... ::'_.•;..... ...::.. - : <:=r n` •_� -. ... ';1,.�. tC, 2 stage(s) . 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 99 99 / : ' 940 1055 1594 cM capacity (veh h) �` "' � - ' • a1T1 1:Sirect►bn,:tan�-# -. EB �t�YFII� 1 .� NB�. ":`S$ 'i' .�, 1„�:�•r.�.� - .�_��.a: _,.,v.; . AM .. 11 11 16 22 Volume Total .. ;:• �' . ... ,. Volume Left 0 11 0 0 :.. cSH 1055 1594 1700 1700 1 0.01:`:.:r`0.01 0.01 Volume to Ca cit .;; 0.t7 . . .. . _ . .r: Queue Length (ft) 1 1 0 0 Control Delay (s) '8 7 3' 0 Q:- 0.0 Lane LOS A A Approa h eta s .Y r3.it. 0 Approach LOS t A � 6 ± ? j �i. fill } ._ ti;i3717 M1.`;;r,v#i` ,��-�y tr.,:�r�;`i.T..r. -:.,F... 11.rj�.;'�: t`.. a;,:... '�Ca3 P=it.l a.41, Average Delay 2.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization , 13:3% -. `CCtl:Level of Service ;A • Heit Property Gravel Mine (LSC#021190) 2020 PM Total Analyst : Alam SM Page 4 LSCINCCS2-ST51 Hello