The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20040627.tiff HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 2004-23 RE: AMENDED CHANGE OF ZONE#613 FROM THE A(AGRICULTURAL)ZONE DISTRICT TO THE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ZONE DISTRICT - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC A public hearing was conducted on March 24, 2004, at 10:00 a.m., with the following present: Commissioner Robert D. Masden, Chair Commissioner William H. Jerke, Pro-Tem Commissioner M. J. Geile Commissioner David E. Long Commissioner Glenn Vaad Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Esther Gesick Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison Planning Department representative, Sheri Lockman Health Department representative, Pam Smith Public Works representative, Peter Schei The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated February 27,2004,and duly published March 4,2004, in the South Weld Sun, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Cattail Creek Group,LLC,Go George DuBard,for Amended Change of Zone#613 from the A(Agricultural)Zone District to the PUD(Planned Unit Development)Zone District for eight(8)lots with E(Estate)Zone uses, and one (1) lot with A(Agricultural) Zone uses, along with 7.19 acres of open space. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Anne Best-Johnson,Todd Hodges Design, LLC,represented the applicant and stated they concur with taking public testimony out of order to accommodate those who will not be able to return after lunch. Sheri Lockman, Department of Planning Services,presented a brief summary of the proposal and entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record as written. She stated the application is for eight lots with E (Estate)Zone uses, one lot with A(Agricultural)Zone uses, and 7.19 acres of open space. She gave a brief description of the location of the site and surrounding uses. She stated 14 referral agencies reviewed this proposal, 13 responded with comments that have been addressed through the Conditions of Approval, and staff has received numerous letters of opposition from surrounding property owners. She stated the applicant does have an agreement with the North Weld County Water District to service the homes and lawns for the residential lots,and the applicant is also proposing to irrigate the open space and residential lots with water from the Woods Lake Mutual Water and Irrigation Company(herein after referred to as "Woods Lake")and the Larimerand Weld Irrigation Company. She stated the application included a letter from Doug Seely, Tetra Tech RMC, indicating Cattail Creek should have no problem delivering irrigation water to the site. She stated the applicant is proposing to pave the internal road and has agreed to proportionally share the cost of improving Weld County Road 7 from the 2004-0627 PL1628 HEARING CERTIFICATION - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC (AMPZ #613) PAGE 2 westernmost access road easterly to Weld County Road 31. She further stated the applicant has been in negotiations with Bonanza Creek Oil Company, which holds the mineral lease for the property;however,they have been unable to enter into a Surface Use Agreement at this time. She stated staff recommends the addition of Condition of Approval #1.A.4 to state, "If a Surface Use Agreement is reached with Bonanza Creek Oil Company,the plat shall indicate the agreed upon drilling envelope locations,including setbacks. If an agreement is not reached,the plat shall indicate the four 400-foot by400-foot drilling envelopes and the one 800-foot by 800-foot drilling envelope location per State statute." She stated the applicant has also requested an administrative review of the Final Plan. Pam Smith,Department of Public Health and Environment,stated the amended application changed the lot sizes from one (1)to four(4)acres. She stated the lots will likely have conventional septic systems, and there are no septic system envelopes in the floodplain. Peter Schei, Department of Public Works, stated the interior two-lane road will be paved. Responding to Commissioner Geile, Mr. Schei stated he has not reviewed the Improvements Agreement. Chair Masden requested testimonyfrom any member of the public who could not return after lunch at 1:30 p.m. Mike Miller,surrounding property owner,stated the members of the public will wait to speak until after lunch to allow appropriate time to address the issues. Ms. Johnson gave a brief chronological history of the activities on this case and stated following a denial by the Board on October2,2002,the applicant applied fora Substantial Change,which was approved by the Board with authorization to proceed with the Change of Zone phase on this property. She gave a brief description of the location of the site,which is 161.34 acres,and stated the surrounding land uses are agricultural and residential in nature. Ms. Johnson stated the applicant has worked with the various referral agencies throughout the process, and the Town of Eaton,City of Greeley and Town of Severance have indicated no opposition. She stated the mineral owners and lessees were notified,and Bonanza Creek Oil indicated no conflict with the proposal. She further stated the location of the development was determined to be the least productive portion of the parcel, the lots will be situated on approximately 33 acres or 20 percent of the overall site, 18.42 acres have been designated as a non-buildable area, and each four-acre lot has a 1.5 to 2-acre buildable site. Ms.Johnson stated there is one 114-acre lot proposed,which is 70 percent of the site; it is currently under a center pivot irrigation system, and it has been farmed in the past. She indicated the location of common open space,which consists of five percent of the site. She stated the proposed land uses will be residential,open space,and agricultural,and the design will be determined by the development covenants and the Homeowners'Association. She further stated waterwill be provided by the North Weld County Water District,irrigation waterwill be overseen by the Homeowners'Association, sewage will be provided by individual sewage disposal systems, Lot 9 will continue to use the existing access,and the remaining lots will use the internal road which has a central access from Weld County Road 70. She stated the proposal meets and exceeds the criteria for a Change of Zone, she reviewed a slide presentation for the record, marked Exhibit T, and stated the applicant is requesting an administrative review of the Final Plat. Responding to Commissioner Geile,Ms.Johnson stated the road maintenance and snow removal will be done by the Homeowners'Association,and it is subject to acceptance by the County after one year. Chair Masden recessed the meeting for lunch until 1:30 p.m. 2004-0627 PL1628 HEARING CERTIFICATION - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC (AMPZ #613) PAGE 3 Upon reconvening, Michael Miller,area resident,stated he represents the 168 people who signed the petitions that have been included in the file. He stated the application was denied in 2002 based on issues of compatibly,buffering,screening,and the lack of irrigation water. Mr. Miller stated the changes were enough to meet the criteria of the Substantial Change;however,he does not feel they are substantial enough to overturn the denial. He stated there is a 22-foot drop in elevation from the subject site to the neighboring site on the west,so it will be difficult to screen,and they have not addressed any screening on the north or east. He stated the applicant did speak with Larry Rogstad, Division of Wildlife, regarding fencing for screening; however, they have not followed through with presenting a plan. He stated new petitions were circulated for this hearing because the former documents were not recognized by the Planning Commission, and it is apparent the proposal is still incompatible. He stated the common open space has been reduced to create larger lots, which eliminated any buffer or screening on the east or north, and the larger lots will be unmanageable and difficult to irrigate. Mr.Miller stated Commissioner Geile previously suggested pursing a cluster PUD at the last denial hearing; however,the applicant is not doing that because it prevents future development of the agricultural lot. He stated the applicant is claiming that the unbuildable and outlot areas are open space; however, there are actually only seven acres of common open space that can be used by all of the residents. He read the definition of common open space for the record, and stated the proposed open space does not meet the intent of common open space because there is no place for people to meet, and it does not meet the 20 percent minimum. Mr. Miller stated the biggest issue of concern was irrigation and the illegal diversion of water. He stated in response to a letter from the Water Commissioner, the applicant has blocked the diversion flow. He further stated the applicant provided a letter from Tetra Tech RMC that claims there is adequate water for delivery; however,the engineer's finding is based on information provided by the applicant,not from the water company. He explained the actual delivery last year from Woods Lake was three-quarters of an acre-foot per share,which is not adequate to water the subject site. He stated the applicant claims to have one-half share of the Larimer and Weld Irrigation Company water, which is early water that cannot be stored. He stated it must be used and then returned to the system,and most years it ends in June or July. Mr. Miller stated there is not an adequate irrigation plan showing how the water will be divided among the eight lots, and contrary to previous testimony,the applicant is now indicating the lots will be able to use North Weld County Water District water to irrigate the lawns. He stated the engineer provided assumptions in his report based on information provided by the applicant. He further stated the applicant claims this was the least productive portion of the property; however, the farmer it was leased to does farm similar parcels in the area. Mr. Miller stated the covenants state Cattail Creek Group will retain control of the architectural review until the last lot is sold, and they do allow for large accessory outbuidings. He stated the Board of Directors may allow two horses per acre,which if allowed the lots will be reduced to dirt because of inadequate irrigation water and no common open space for horseback riding. He further stated the Weld County Comprehensive Plan discourages development on prime farmground,as advertised by the applicant,and he submitted sales flyers, marked Exhibit U. Mr. Miller stated he recused himself as Chair of the Planning Commission hearing for this case, and after it was approved he spoke with some of the Planning Commission members who indicated they were unaware that there was not adequate open space. He stated the issues of concern still remain and this proposal is worse than the first application. Debra Page, surrounding property owner to the west,stated the community elected not to hire an attorney because they have a strong case against this proposal. She stated she has been managing properties for more than ten years and she has found that covenants are difficult to 2004-0627 PL1628 HEARING CERTIFICATION - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC (AMPZ#613) PAGE 4 enforce. She stated they bought their property under the false pretense that the surrounding land would remain farmed,agricultural land,which could not be developed for at least ten years because it was exempted land. She further stated the applicant is nota lifelong farmer trying to preserve their land, rather, it is a limited liability company consisting of realtors trying to make a profit. She expressed concern with the negative impacts of construction and encroachment, incompatibility, and limited common open space, buffering, and screening. She stated there are 128 residents within two miles who are opposed to this proposal. Commissioner Geile commented the issue of misrepresentation of the property she purchased needs to be addressed through another venue. Ms. Page stated they did retain an attorney in 2003 and they have community issues as well. Patrick McNear,owner of Scott Realty Company,expressed concern that the amended application does not address the initial concerns of incompatibility,irrigation,etcetera. He stated it will continue to be a burden for the ditch company, and the proposal received complete rejection from every surrounding property owner within two miles. Mr. McNear stated the property was purchased for $480,000,the applicant sold most of the water for that value,and is attempting to sell lots that have development restrictions for $150,000. He stated comparable sites in the area are selling for $80,000, and the houses will not be compatible with the type of housing in the area. He further stated the area has suffered from the drought, the problems will be sold to a third party, and enforcement of the violations will likely end up in court. He stated he believes in property rights and providing land use options for farmers; however, he also believes in the rights of the surrounding property owners who will be harmed by this development. Responding to Commissioner Geile,Mr. McNear stated the applicant sold the 92 shares in the Divide Canal Ditch Company that supplied water to the Woods Lake. He stated without those 92 shares they will not have late-season irrigation water. Mr. McNear corrected his statement and stated the applicant sold 92 acre feet of water rights. Dennis Shulte,surrounding property owner,expressed concern with traffic on Weld County Road 31 and the intersection of Weld County Road 74. He stated there have been accidents;however,there are no planned improvements at that location. He stated the applicant will be required to pay a proportional share of the costs to stabilize Weld County Road 70 as part of this development. Mr. Shulte stated Weld County Road 74 leads into the town of Eaton, and it is likely traffic from this development will use that route. Commissioner Jerke commented each home would be required to pay an impact fee of almost$2,000 for improvements in the area,and Weld County Road 74 is a priority in the area. Gary Whitman,Whitman Bros, Inc., stated he used to farm the subject site and he confirmed that due to the shape of the site, it is not as good as the land under the pivot irrigation system. Responding to Commissioner Jerke, Mr.Whitman stated last year half of the land in the pivot was left idle,and yesterday he was informed that this year they will likely only receive 50 percent of the water supply. He stated once the drought is over the water delivery supply will return to historical rates. He further stated the 92 acre feet of raw water would be helpful; however, during a normal year without drought conditions, it would not be needed for the pivot sprinkler. Jerry Jergensmeier, surrounding property owner, stated he lives on 12 acres west of the pivot irrigation system. He stated they constructed their home in 2001; however, they discovered the water line was not large enough to serve an additional house and they were required to dig a well. Mr.Jergensmeier stated based on the size of the property,the well is confined to domestic use only. 2004-0627 PL1628 HEARING CERTIFICATION - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC (AMPZ #613) PAGE 5 He stated they are unable to have outside animals ora yard. He further stated the development will benefit his property because it will bring in a two-inch line and he may be able to purchase a tap to irrigate a lawn and some trees. Mr. Jergensmeier stated he was not approached by any of the neighbors who are opposed to the proposal and the delay in the case has hindered his opportunity to receive another water source. He stated he receives Woods Lake water and has been able to raise some alfalfa. There being no further comments, Chair Masden closed public testimony. Doug Seely,Tetra Tech RMC, stated he was hired by the applicant to address the physical water system,not the water supply. He stated subsequent to his initial report,he has issue in more detail and acknowledges that the report does not adequately address the water supply system. Mr.Seely stated based on the ditch diversion records regarding the water rights,he feels there is an adequate water supply. He stated the applicant owns 180 shares of Woods Lake water, and they have designated 160 shares to the pivot irrigation system and 20 shares to the proposed residential lots and open space areas. He further stated the applicant also owns 3.75 shares of Larimer Weld water,of which 3.25 shares will be allocated to the center pivot and 0.5 shares to the residential lots. Based on the information provided by Woods Lake,he has determined that the average yield of 34 acre feet will be adequate for the native grasses proposed in the open space area and on the lots, excluding the lawns around the residences. He stated the water designated to the pivot irrigation system will produce an average yield of 251 acre feet per year,which is adequate for an agricultural crop. He explained the water delivery system, and stated the infrastructure is now in place to deliver water to the individual lots and open space. Mr. Seely stated the lot owners should be able to irrigate approximately seven times per year. Mr. Seely stated Woods Lake would not be responsible once the water is delivered to the parcel. (Switched to Tape#2004-13.)Commissioner Geile commented the system sounds very complicated and questioned if it will be organized through the Homeowners'Association. Mr.Seely stated the Homeowners'Association proposes to assign an irrigation manager who will handle delivery to each of the lots and the open space;each lot could run for 12 hours and then the remainder would irrigate the open space. Responding to Commissioner Geile, Mr. Seely stated if the owners do not get the allotted water, then the water could be held in the account for Woods Lake and be delivered at another time. Alan Overton, North Weld County Water District, stated they are capable of providing water, although there will not be enough to irrigate a four-acre lot. He stated they will be constructing a line for fire flows, it will cost $200,000 to get water to the site, and the new line will benefit their distribution system. Responding to Chair Masden, Mr. Overton stated they are currently planning an eight-inch line that will provide 500 gallons per minute fire flow,which is comparable to what the Town of Ault uses on a peak day. Ms. Johnson stated the Division of Wildlife did send a referral response regarding options for fencing,and the applicant will provide a fencing plan once they receive approval for this Change of Zone. She stated the irrigation water is being supplied as a bonus for this development. She referred to a photograph of the site,marked Exhibit V,and stated there does not appear to be a 22- foot slope in the area from the point where the photograph was taken. She displayed an overhead, marked Exhibit W, showing the Recorded Exemption parcels within a one-half-mile radius of the property. She stated 25 percent of the properties within one half of a mile are less than five acres, and 62 percent were created through the Recorded Exemption process that does not require covenants or provide governing restrictions. Ms. Johnson read a portion of the Covenants for the record, which clarified each lot will be allowed two dogs and two cats, and horses will only be 2004-0627 PL1628 HEARING CERTIFICATION - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC (AMPZ#613) PAGE 6 allowed if granted approval by the Homeowners'Association. She also read Section 27-2-35 for the record regarding a buffer zone,and stated the lots will be compatible,they are larger than many of the surrounding parcels,the proposal has been reviewed byvarious referral agencies,and there are numerous Conditions of Approval to ensure compatibility and that this will be a sound development. Commissioner Geile commented he would like to hear more testimony regarding the water service. Commissioner Jerke concurred. Mr. Morrison stated it is within the Board's discretion to hear additional testimony. Ruben Hergert, Woods Lake Mutual Water and Irrigation Company representative, stated the property has a one-half share of Woods Lake water,which is only enough for a garden. He stated 27 acre feet would be the most provided on a good year,and the amount is significantly less during a drought year. In response to Commissioner Jerke,Mr. Hergert stated last year each share yielded 15 acre feet. Mr.Miller stated Mr.Seely represented that the water would be delivered seven times per year. He clarified that the development only has access to early water, which is usually not available after June. Ms. Page stated she owns 10 shares of Woods Lake, 10 shares of bilateral for the right to run the water,and one-half share of Larimer Weld. She stated they farm 8.5 acres of hay; however, they did not receive enough water last year to irrigate their crop. She reiterated that Woods Lake is for holding capacity only,water must be purchased and put into Woods Lake,and Larimer/Weld Water does not go into Woods Lake. Mr.Seely explained he spoke with Ruben Hergert who indicated Larimer Weld yielded an average of 28 acre feet per share, and that amount was verified with Larimer Weld diversion records. Mr. Seely reviewed the method used to calculate his figures and estimates provided in earlier testimony. He stated he contacted the Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) regarding native seed grasses which indicated that irrigation water should be kept to a minimum to help reduce the amount of weeds. Ms. Johnson reviewed the criteria for approval for a Change of Zone to the Planned Unit Development Zone District,and stated there are no criteria requiring the provision of irrigation water. She stated the amount of water available is being provided as a bonus. She stated the property must be maintained in a healthy state. In response to Chair Masden, Ms.Johnson stated she and the applicant have reviewed and agree with the Conditions of Approval as discussed,as well as the additional language provided by Ms. Lockman. Commissioner Jerke stated testimony indicated there are 128 property owners within two miles of this site,therefore, it is apparent that there are few traditional farms left and much of the area has been divided up. He stated it is not always possible to prohibit development,and in some instances the lack of development harms the values of the land already developed. He stated much of the site will be preserved in agricultural production, the larger lots are more compatible with the area,the applicant has tried to address the concerns of the Commissioners expressed in the previous hearing,and it appears the water will be adequate for native grasses because agricultural production is not likely on the lots. 2004-0627 PL1628 HEARING CERTIFICATION - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC (AMPZ #613) PAGE 7 Commissioner Vaad commented he was impressed with the comment that there are 128 people within two miles and 168 signed the petition. He stated the nature of this area is changing,and he read Section 27-2-60 for the record and it is adequately addressed in the findings of the Draft Resolution. He stated the maintenance of prairie grass will require minimal water, the number of animals will be limited by the Covenants to four household pets, and the configuration has been changed to better accommodate the area. He commented that a lot of the properties in the area have been established through the Recorded Exemption process, in five years there could be 12 lots with minimal controls through the Recorded Exemption process,or as presented there will be some controls through the Planned Unit Development process. Commissioner Geile stated based on the number of residential lots in the area, he feels this proposal will be more compatible than agricultural activities,although the center pivot will continue to produce crops. He stated the proposal is consistent with the identity and character of the area as encouraged through the Planned Unit Development goals. He expressed lingering concerns regarding water delivery and the limited availability of water; however,the proposal does account for the ability to deliver water if it is available. Commissioner Geile stated in accordance with PUD.Policy 7.1, the developer will be responsible for bringing North Weld County Water District service into the area,which will also benefit others in the area. He stated the Architectural Design Standards stipulate what the developer can do,and property values will not likely be lowered in the area. He further stated screening on the north and east is still an issue which needs to be addressed by the developer at some time; however, he does support the overall application. He stated he appreciates the testimony provided,and the Conditions of Approval will help ensure the applicant produces a quality development. Commissioner Long stated there has been a lot of creativity in finding ways to adhere to the intent and purpose behind the Weld County Code and Comprehensive Plan; however, he feels this proposal misses some of the intent. He stated the County must encourage good stewardship of the land, he is unsure whether the irrigation plan will be adequate, and he does not feel the designated areas meet the intent of the common open space. He also expressed concern with the lack of screening on the north and east. Chair Masden stated the changes to the proposal have resulted in a better application,including a new water line that will benefit the area,and larger lot sizes which are compatible with the area. He stated many of the opponents live on subdivided parcels and the area is changing. He stated the water may not be available all year but that is true for everyone,there will be strict standards for the types of homes allowed,and the Homeowners'Association will determine whether any further types of animals will be allowed. Mr. Morrison stated the issue of whether this will be processed as a Specific or Conceptual Guide needs to be addressed. Ms.Lockman stated she provided language to the Chair Condition#1.A.4 regarding an agreement with Bonanza Creek Oil Company, and requesting a determination regarding an administrative review. Commissioner Jerke commented due to the amount of public concern and opposition,he feels the Board owes it to the public to hear the final plan. The other members of the Board concurred. 2004-0627 PL1628 HEARING CERTIFICATION - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC (AMPZ#613) PAGE 8 Commissioner Jerke moved to approve the request of Cattail Creek Group, LLC, c/o George DuBard, for Amended Change of Zone #613 from the A (Agricultural) Zone District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development)Zone District for eight(8)lots with E(Estate)Zone uses,and one (1) lot with A (Agricultural) Zone uses, along with 7.19 acres of open space, based on the recommendations of the Planning staff and the Planning Commission, with the Conditions of Approval as entered into the record. His motion also included the addition of Condition of Approval#1.A.4 to state,"If a Surface Use Agreement is reached with Bonanza Creek Oil Company, the plat shall indicate the agreed upon drilling envelope locations, including setbacks. If an agreement is not reached,the plat shall indicate the four400-foot by400-foot drilling envelopes and the one 800-foot by800-foot drilling envelope location per State statute." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Vaad. In response to CommissionerGeile,Mr.Morrison explained the indication was that the Final Plan will be reviewed by the Board,which classifies this as a Conceptual Plan. Upon a call for the vote, the motion carried four to one with Commissioner Long opposed. There being no further discussion, the hearing was completed at 3:20 p.m. This Certification was approved on the 29th day of March 2004. APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: 4/ / ' / UU. �t t .ac. Robert D. Masden, Chair Weld County Clerk to the 0.1`O_ �{ r� . Ii Veil BY: tR 7 illiam H. J-rke, Pro-Tem Deputy Clerk to the Boa�� / M. Tile TAPE #2004-12 and #2004-13 CAA Emc\,( David . Long DOCKET#2004-23 //del/ Glenn Vaad 2004-0627 PL1628 EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case AMPZ #613 - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description A. Planning Staff Inventory of Items Submitted B. Planning Commission Resolution of Recommendation C. Planning Commission Summary of Hearing (Minutes 02/03/2004) D. Clerk to the Board Notice of Hearing E. Applicant Letter and map addressing Condition #1.A Prior to Scheduling dated 02/03/2004 F. Ruben Hergert Letter of Concern dated 03/08/2004 G. Nancy Kurtz Letter of Opposition dated 03/20/2004 H. Patrick McNear Letter of Opposition received 03/20/2004 James and Tricia Mangum Letter of Opposition dated 03/18/2004 J. Lee Anderson Letter of Opposition dated 03/16/2004 K. Doug Hayward Letter of Opposition dated 03/18/2004 L. Mike and Debra Page Letter of Opposition dated 03/17/2004 M. Patrick McNear Petition of Opposition (12 pages) from various landowners received 03/22/2004 N. Barb Perusek Letter of Opposition dated 03/10/2004 O. Sonia Burron Letter of Opposition dated 03/20/2004 P. North Weld County Water District Water Service Agreement received 03/23/2004 Q. Debra Page Petition of Opposition (3 pages) received 03/24/2004 R. Planning Staff Certification and Photo of sign posting received 03/24/2004 S. Applicant Letter from Otis, Coan and Stewart re: Bonanza Creek Oil interests dated 03/23/2004 T. Applicant Copies of 5 Overhead Transparencies submitted 03/24/2004 U. Mike Miller The Group, Inc., property sales leaflet, submitted 03/24/2004 V. Applicant Photo Index showing position of Slide 5a, submitted 03/24/2004 W. Applicant Map showing Surrounding Property Subdivision History, submitted 03/24/2004 X. Y. Z. ATTENDANCE RECORD I/, y/yn /y1�n / / `^' v Y)3_L` r � 6 JEANNE REYNOLDS HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2004: DOCKET#2004-20 - STROMO, LLC a Agren•Blando Court Reporting(7 Video,Inc. grit;DOCKET#2004-23 - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC � 216-IbM5ir S1180•Denver,OO80101 303-296-00177'• Faxx:'.3 303-296-0203• 1-800-739-4846 DOCKET#2004-24 - CARL HILL, C/O WESLEY AND JULIE HILL 4450 Arapahoe avenue,sure loo•Boulder,co 80303 303-443-0433•Fax'.303-443-8365• 1-800-473-6833 www.agrenblando.cam PLEASE legibly write or print your name and complete address. J tli-rcruLz.r-ei nsColo Q c.,oj. C,0m• NAME ADDRESS John Doe 12b3 Nowhere Street, City, State, Zip �n frr--7. 3-7'211, .ziss''i R2 of' _ ` � - ,fro �/ JC JIEK peval &G (7/ a), 2J "' 57 �� / g f13 a �. ss..— G6can(��i CAs, $. I1 jt`so c-Ilc, PCJC�FY l� _S,-t--b(1) 5-W2 ( 151 3-T C¢-r-,e 1 Cc (3(( /Lang ✓t. .,b-- r37 2_ 4 Sf. ) AL4N 1'2ntero,v P ©, &A: re, 3324/7 /$-y es Li a.t- co Gave, An (Zssne .- /'iI) E• Z9'`y si: , SFetZ7I> Ln7.'alat&d3 re) &is-3$-. (-11C-fi td / <dr�y s l�s N. Cho.e 4A /c✓g-Ib+ri Cu PP0537 fi t::Pznrahnson 124G N . rilevadvd An 1Jvi4?Q &G 1( 37 Ow cQel %I��O_S. —Cm-rise/51- �C`/cF tHfocUti ( c O��p� //fur �v 3 ,/0'L W&t 7i( �7�c�(oi 0D 8oCa3� r- n�J (i /` 1�-Ci .ei ie 7° �a c‘3/6raI ' \ '-F P r-\;-9gCJC,(` 70 U--(e. 701 I DeJto /1 1y37yW 0 dw (1O. 'co )3r ATTENDANCE RECORD HEARINGS ARE AS FOLLOWS ON THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2004: DOCKET#2004-20 - STROMO, LLC DOCKET#2004-23 - CATTAIL CREEK GROUP, LLC DOCKET#2004-24 - CARL HILL, C/O WESLEY AND JULIE HILL PLEASE legibly write or print your name and complete address. NAME ADDRESS John Doe 123 Nowhere Street, City, State, Zip c ,D .iTh . Da�,��. C1/200 cc)\ 'lam ��ktfgb3i IA\I,Mtz. (Vu-4- HIZ$O Cit, b (n Ji-'( , (C) 913 Cb-No .7%Y/T, 35 1; lt't/C 3 / LCT1F7OA/ Co 71/Q r a Fl e rj e st / X 3 I5 c Jc P 72 El a-Ion, ear g‘56(S if019Pin F/PrCi ert tr nn .� /r/� r/' CCt 0RD t�r.i 2� , v/ leee& cit .100 u --g a q3I; cg 30 Htiosopece 8064a J RaY SUR PCT r 37yt3 £Q /39- I/rQ r- oa /,2 , d O r& ?2 / �8�+ 6 eiriv 7 '7W d jirkedaiat /10/09,1- / �"f� Oda #3' �AS a rt 4311 I-.y G S r-rt �' La,ti6„„�,�� C b So 0-4 s �� 53Z� U1 �T Ce r' (c( .^ //Ail ! 1/ Id — 336 / (.) C,.,✓{ 13 Alit/0,A Co/a 267s �u/1 Y 314 fi5/MP '? 4 34/'/ /l we/Z 2 '/ /to /e7 CO /O‘3/ Hello