Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20042410 4 MEMORANDUM IYi`,P�. TO: Board of County Commissioners June 21, 2004 COLORADO FROM: Jacqueline Hatch SUBJECT: USR-1458 — Kenneth Shannon The applicants for USR-1458, Kenneth Shannon do Kenneth Alles and George Paulsberg with Alles and Associates, Inc. have submitted the attached letter dated June 14, 2004 and an updated plat dated June 11, 2004. The applicant has addressed the following two items that were required to be completed prior to scheduling the Board of County Commissioners hearing. 1.A of the staff comments regarding a signage plan has been addressed on the updated plat showing a two signs, one at each entrance not exceeding 16 square feet. 1.B of the staff comments required that the applicant submit a lease agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad for use. The applicants have state in their letter that they will not be utilizing the railroad right-of-way so no lease agreement is required. The applicant has also addressed other issues raised at the Planning Commission Hearing in the letter. Thank you 2004-2410 ALLES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 428 N . SECOND STREET LASALLE , COLORADO 80631 TELE : 970 . 284 . 9562 FAX : 970 . 284 . 9564 E - MAIL : A L L E S C O@ C O M C A S T . N E T June 14,2004 Project No. Shannon 0302 Ms.Jacqueline Hatch, Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Co. 80631 Re: Preliminary USR #1458 Subject: Requested Signage Details &Request Scheduling w/ County Board of Commissioners. Dear Ms. Hatch, The attached plan sheet has the signage plan details you requested. We understand this is a required item before you will schedule a meeting with the County Board of Commissioners. Please notify Alles &Associates in addition to the applicant. A review of the public input, planning commissioners'comments,planning staff comments and motion with comments by the planning commission members has been completed. The following changes and additions have been made to the plan attached: 1. The use of the Union Pacific Railroad property adjacent the site is not being pursued at this time. Operations will be contained within the bounds as shown. 2. The detention ponds have been moved onto the property as requested. 3. The gate for access to Parcel C has been moved to align to the cross driveway. 4. The gates for both entrances have been inset to allow parking room for a truck to stop and unlock the gate with out traffic conflict on WCR 27. 5. The offset distances for the building on parcel C has been clarified. 6. The building on Lot B has been moved to the center. Shannon Pipeline Co. operations will be 90 to 95% contained within Lot B thus the concern for cross traffic issues between Lot B &Parcel C will be very small. The majority of the storage units on Parcel C will be leased to others. A letter has been sent to Richard&Nancy Stutz who own the parcel between the two of this USR allowing them access to their septic system for maintenance. We trust these changes will result in a positive response from the commissioners. Sin9erely, 7-2 George D. Paulsberg, P.E. #35359 Enclosed: Revised plan of USR #1458 Letter mailed to Mr. &Mrs. Stutz File contains oversized "Topographic and Plot Plan " map -- dated 06/ 11 /2004 Please see original file FROM : SHANNON PIPE LINE CO INC FAX NO. : 303 659 8950 Jun. 04 2004 12:32PM P1 Richard & Nancy Stutz 1752 WCR 27 Brighton, CO 80601 Dear Richard & Nancy, Please be advised that as per our conversation with the Weld County Planning Department and yourselves, we would like to offer you access to our property so that you may be able to service your septic system. Access wilt be provided by caffing me at my office or by simply stopping in at our on site office during any operating hour. Thank you, we look forward to being your neighbor. Ken Shannon Shannon Pipeline Co. Inc. PO Box 843 Brighton, CO 80601 -.303-659-8850 c�, � ±, - A Lcw-z mk.oaa.0 +.LA d14;,vo--Q 2E= JUL -6 PM 2: 00 RECEIVED July 2, 2004 Robert D. Masden WELD COUNTY COLORADO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS P. O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado Dear Mr. Masden: Per your letter dated June 24, 2004 regarding my application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit #1458 I am returning the letter signed and request a hearing by the Board of County Commissioners. I look forward to hearing from you regarding the hearing procedures. Sincerely, Kenneth T. Shannon P. G. Box 843 Brighton, CO 80601 4 _ N i Z t . a i BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE (970) 336-7204, Ext. 4200 FAX: (970)352-0242 ' P. O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 II D C. COLORADO June 24, 2004 Kenneth Shannon P.O. Box 843 Brighton, Colorado 80601 Dear Kenneth Shannon: Your application for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit #1458 for a Mineral Resource Development Facility (oil and gas support and services) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District has been recommended unfavorably to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission. The legal description of the property involved is shown as part of the NW1/4 of Section 29, Township 1 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, including the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way and Lot B of Corrected Recorded Exemption #3360. If you wish to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners, it will be necessary for you to indicate your request by signing the bottom of this letter and returning it to this office. Regular hearing procedures will then be followed. In order to proceed as quickly as possible, we must receive your reply by July 26, 2004. If we are not in receipt of your request by that date, the matter will be considered closed. Sincerely, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO \rz � . , Robert D. Masden, Chair RDM/eeg I/we,��/j4?,1'^7t / / f�}ci�.�'7�_ do hereby request the Board of County Comfmigsioners to consider the above mentioned application. Page 1 of 1 Carol Harding From: nancyj._stutz@hud.gov Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 7:36 AM To: Carol Harding r-,Li,. j Subject: Case#USR-1458 Docket#2004-77 Attached please find a letter from affected homeowners regarding the zoning request listed above. Please review our concerns prior to the meeting to be held September 1st. (See attached file: Zoning proposal.doc) Re: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a use permitted as a Use by Special Review, (Oil & Gas Support& Services) in the A (Agricultural) Zone. Part of NW 1/4 of Section 29, township 1 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Thank you, Richard and Nancy Stutz 1752 Weld County Road #27 Brighton, CO 80603 (303) 659-7692 (970) 412-4816 OMIT 7 / / t _ 8/30/2004 Richard &Nancy Stutz 1752 Weld County Road #27 Brighton, CO 80603 (303) 659-7692 (970) 412-4816 The Department of Planning Services Weld County Colorado 1555 N. 17th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Case Number: USR-1458 Docket Number: 2004-77 Part of the NW ''A of Section 29, township 1 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Re: Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a use permitted as a Use by Special Review, (Oil & Gas Support & Services) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. As the owners of the residence at 1752 Weld County Road# 27 we are against this zoning request because we will be directly in the middle (landlocked) by the proposed equipment and mechanical yard on Weld County Road 27 south of Weld County Road 6. Please be advised of the following concerns from the property owners who's home is at this address. The following concerns outline what we know will have a direct impact on our living conditions and our quality of life: Item#1 Well Contamination: If a detention pond is placed as shown on the proposed drawing it will be less than 15 vertical feet, in gravel, and 200 feet horizontal upstream of our shallow(30 foot) domestic well which feeds the residence at 1752 Weld County Road# 27. The concern is that run off from contaminants such as oil, fuel, antifreeze and solvents from the proposed equipment and mechanical yard will leach into the aquifer and contaminate the wells that the residents relay on for everyday use. If these same ponds are lined in hopes on containing these contaminates they will become mosquito infested and be a health hazard to all individuals in the south Weld County area. West Nile Virus being at the top of that list. On the proposed plan there is no indication of a fuel storage containment facility. 2 The mechanical shop will most likely have a septic system and the possibility of this septic system contaminating local wells is very real. The owners of the surrounding properties are asking for, in writing, guarantees that the pollutants that will be emitted by the detention ponds and the septic systems will not affect their wells. Item#2 Fence: The proposed chain link fence with lattice strips if installed as drawn on the plan will create a vision hazard for residents trying to leave their driveways to access Weld County Road #27. In addition fencing the power companies right-of-way which is used on a monthly basis by United Power will eliminate access to the rear of the resident's property and septic system, tank and leach field, which have been in place since the home was built in the year 1956. This proposed fence will eliminate the right-of-way that the property at 1752 Weld County Road#27 has been dependent upon since 1956 to access the rear of the property. Access to the property on the south row line would not be possible and the result would be that the home at 1752 Weld County Road #27 would be landlocked. ` "'", The area from Weld County Road#27 back to the irrigation well (which is metered by United Power) has 4 power poles and guy wires in addition to the septic tank and leach field of the neighboring property owner which makes it undesirable for use by heavy equipment. A simple solution to this concern would be to place the fence on the north line of the power line right-of-way and offering the resident a long term agreement from the front of the property back to approximately the irrigation well. Item #3 Noise, dust and fumes pollution: The current proposed plan shows the two 100"x 200"buildings at an eye pleasing set back from the property line of the resident's home, however on the existing plan as drawn the dimensions are really only a 20' set back. This puts the building in direct line of the bedrooms on each of the houses that will sit north of the buildings. This being the area where the mechanics would be doing most of the work through the day and possibly late into the nights it would cause a high level of noise pollution for the residents of both homes in question. Noise would come from sources such as loud radios, air tools, compressors, sledgehammers, engines and noise from the heavy equipment as it is moved in and out of the buildings and yards. In addition this heavy equipment also emits fumes and noise. 3 Steam cleaning operations emit fumes and yard pollution that will end up in the detention ponds, which will ultimately pollute resident's wells. As these properties will be used by heavy equipment and open storage, the problem of migratory dust will become a hazard and nuisance to all the resident along Weld County Road #27. Since there is not landscaping proposed there will be nothing to stop or slow dust. A suggested solution would be to have these building placed at the rear property line and centered on the property along that line. The proposal should include noise barriers near the residence's homes and method of dust abatement. Item#4 Traffic: Weld County Road #27 is a high traffic road with only one lane each direction and no shoulder. The proposal has two separate yards owned by the same company which will involve a high volume of traffic entering and exiting Weld County Road #27 going from yard to yard past the front of the home at 1752 Weld County Road #27. In addition individuals traveling between Fort Lupton and Brighton use this same road. A great number of these individuals are seniors traveling back and forth to doctors, hospitals and shopping, these individuals usually do not have the reflexes to stop quickly in case they would encounter a large piece of equipment entering Weld County Road #27. We have witnessed numerous accidents in the past 30 years involving this exact scenario. Item#5 Zoning: It is difficult to understand how an industrial entity has the ability to get a USR in an area that has been zoned for agricultural use only. The proposed company has nothing to do with agriculture. Is this USR being used as a tactic to avoid higher property taxes and lower rent fees to the railroad? r'^ 4 Item#6 Community: This area appears to be taking on a look of all industrial and gravel pits similar to the Commerce City district. The industrial property in this area may look good to the county because it provides a tax base but at what cost to residents and the community? Not all residents have large plots of land that they can sell for industrial use. These residents are being forced out of their homes and their property is being devaluated and landlocked. The industrial business brings a few jobs in the county, however the owners of these business and very few of their employees live in the community. These individuals live elsewhere taking their tax dollars, shopping dollars and care for community pride out of the area. They do not become neighbors to the current residents nor live where they develop and pollute. These businesses strip families of the peaceful environment and quality of life, which they have a right to live. This property owner would like to offer a solution to what appears to be undesirable circumstances. In January of 2003 a market analysis valued the home that is �-- directly affected by this proposal at $298,480. If Mr. Shannon would purchase the home at a fair market price it would eliminate at least one yard entrance onto Weld County Road #27. Mr. Shannon would also have the ability to pass from yard to yard. He would not have the inconvenience of going in and out of yards to use his facilities to its maximum potential. This would result in less traffic on Weld County Road #27 and reduce the potential for the chance of accidents. ➢ At the time the sellers were dividing their home from the ground to be sold the homeowner approached them and asked if there was a possibility of purchasing the small partial of land that the septic system sits on which is the power line right-of-way. They explained that the county regulation would not allow another division of the property since they had already reached the limit of recorded exemptions. Since that time I have spoken with the planning commissioners and they felt there would be no problem with dividing off that small parcel and they provided me with the paperwork and instructions on how this could be done through a boundary adjustment. It is our hope Mr. Shannon would give this proposal serious consideration. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS n 7HE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PU LICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. I, Jacqueline Hatch, HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER le. ALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST /AFTED'4 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HEARING FORUse-his IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT. Name of Person Posting Sign Sign re of Person Posting Sign STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me this / day of I! , 2004. WITNESS my hand and official seal. -- l fat tar)/1/717Dito-- Notary Public My Commission Expires: IO�c4� CAL v' t� ago F�*�XH°M +ILL,ir, R "19Y Rat yti. . r. • k M1 � 4e itri ty l j my.Arwr _. ._.. -:._._.1 C._.._.._I . m:-:. i tii 'ii• i_...,....., i = • :i 6 KIM ..I I' :I I' I/I Ii. "Mk . ICI WM :I I. rf..T I AI II , II I' ..j:.0001,firi g� 11 _ ,r imermidirt ii ! r ... r- r — I: i mac ....0p.--..,r_III /': ve, 1 w.T . �, I „ a+ at alias :1 im, I VIII .Ildiallerii4 i: II• �1 i il: II . I 1 F�r .I I _ I :. I. _ a0'NON 1 I I: .I 1 I: II trusts11 I a c,. !0 a I a_ a I _ �/ 1 :1 .I -• , . . IM I i I:i • ';i . 1 +.��i I, II I II *, as I: it - I 9re , .,Bh�arOr%1 a `°g.yve I II - 1 • Spiv i1 i „!W I EJ(HIBIT ra add R L I:1 T al J (A-774758 Hello