HomeMy WebLinkAbout20040179.tiff REFERRAL LIST
NAME: Loyd&Sheila Schlichenmayer CASE NUMBER: USR-1450
REFERRALS SENT: October 9, 2003 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: November 7, 2003
COUNTY
Ambulance Services TOWNS and CITIES
_Attorney _Ault
_X Health Department Brighton
Extension Service Broomfield
Emergency Management Office Dacono
Sheriffs Office Eaton
_X Public Works _X Erie
Housing Authority Evans
Airport Authority Firestone
_X Building Inspection Fort Lupton
_X Code Enforcement _X Frederick
STATE Garden City
_X Division of Water Resources Gilcrest
Geological Survey Greeley
Department of Health Grover
Department of Transportation _Hudson
Historical Society Johnstown
Water Conservation Board Keenesburg
Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Kersey
Division of Wildlife: LaSalle
Loveland Lochbuie
Greeley Longmont
Division of Minerals/Geology Mead
FIRE DISTRICTS Milliken
Ault F-1 New Raymer
Berthoud F-2 Northglenn
Briggsdale F-24 Nunn
Brighton F-3 Pierce
Eaton F-4 Platteville
Fort Lupton F-5 Severance
Galeton F-6 Thornton
Hudson F-7 Windsor
Johnstown F-8
La Salle F-9
_X Mountain View F-10 COUNTIES
Milliken F-11 Adams
Nunn F-12 _X Boulder
Pawnee F-22 Larimer
Platteville F-13
Platte Valley F-14 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
Poudre Valley F-15 US Army Corps of Engineers
Raymer F-2 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service
Southeast Weld F-16 Federal Aviation Administration
Windsor/Severance F-17 Federal Communication Commission
Wiggins F-18
Union Colony F-20 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
Brighton
OTHER Fort Collins alma"
X School District RE-1J Greeley
Ditch Company Longmont
West Adams
X_Boulder 2004-0179
K
COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER W
_X Folsom
rN•a eaaered
10/16/2003 08:50 3039262706 TOWN OF ERIE PAGE 01
•
Weld County Referral
October 9, 2003
C.
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Loyd & Sheila Case Number USR-1450
Schlichenmayer
Please Reply By November 7, 2003 Planner Kim Ogle
Project Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review for a single fan-illy
dwelling unit(other than those permitted under Section 23-3.20.A) in the A
(Agricultural)Zone District.
Legal Lot B of RE-761; part of the SW4 of Section 6,Ti N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld
County, Colorado.
Location 9/10 mile south of State Hwy 52; east of and adjacent to CR 1,
Parcel Number 1467 06 300004
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 16, 2003
0, We have reviewed the request and find that it•doo ,'does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
O We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
❑ See attached letter. /` �� �� � � �Comments: gnn .art/zioiQ! ./data.A/jai lAtg /
Signature
Date jp - /6„
Agency 7(641 J
•
+Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO. 80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax
Lod_o ,
a
( it \ Weld County Referral
•
October 9, 2003
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Loyd & Sheila Case Number USR-1450
Schlichenmayer
•
Please Reply By November 7, 2003 Planner Kim Ogle
Project Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review for a single family
dwelling unit (other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20.A) in the A
(Agricultural)Zone District.
Legal Lot B of RE-761; part of the SW4 of Section 6,TIN, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld
County, Colorado.
Location 9/10 mile south of State Hwy 52; east of and adjacent to CR 1.
Parcel Number 1467 06 300004
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 16, 2003
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
`$, See attached letter.
Comments: ��((jv� '� ? denoR d,
Signature —71' lTThey-\ Date t - j 7JO5
Agency
EXHIBIT
4 Weld County Planning Dept. 41555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO.80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 ❖(970)304-6498 faxr
,
ritk;
MEMORANDUM
Wilke.
COLORADO
To: Kim Ogle, Planner October 13, 2003
From: Bethany Salzman, Zonlrfg Compliance Officer
Subject: USR-1450 Referral
Upon review of my computer and files, a combined Building and Zoning Violation (VI-0300134)was noted.
The violation was initiated as a result of the conversion and utilization of a barn/garage as a dwelling unit
without the necessary building and zoning permits.
For more information, please speak with Peggy Gregory, Building Compliance Officer.
cc: VI-0300134
Peggy Gregory, Building Compliance Officer
SERVICE,TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY,QUALITY
Aottitmtplo
Memorandum
TO: Kim Ogle, W.C. Planning
CC DATE: October 14,2003
•
COLORADO FROM: Trevor Jiricek, EH Services',,,
CASE: USR-1450
APPLICANT: Loyd & Sheila Schlichenmayer
Environmental Health Services has reviewed this proposal for a second single family
residence on a single parcel. We offer the following comments:
It is obvious from the submitted materials that extenuating circumstance led to the
construction and development of the second home on this property. The approval and
continued use of the second home does not meet Department policy in regard to
density of septic systems per acreage (current policy recommends a minimum density
of one septic system per two and one-half acres). If allowed, the density of septic
systems would be one per one and one-half acres. Additionally, the well permit
provided in the application materials indicates that the flow of the well serving the
second home is 6 gpm. I discussed the well production with Loyd Schlichenmayer. Mr.
Schlichenmayer indicated that they have installed a pressure tank to address the low
flow of the well. Pressure tanks are commonly incorporated into water systems to
supplement low-flow wells.
Should this application be approved, we recommend the following conditions be part of
any approval:
Prior to recording the plat:
1. The applicant shall designate envelopes for replacement absorption fields for
both residences. The envelopes shall be designated on the plat and language
for the preservation and/or protection of the second absorption field envelope
shall be noted on the plat. Specifically, the plat shall state that activities such
as landscaping (i.e. planting of trees and shrubs) and construction (i.e.
auxiliary structures, dirt mounds, etc.) are expressly prohibited in the
designated absorption field site.
2. The second residence does not have an approved septic system. A septic
systems permit shall be obtained from the Weld County Department of Public
Health & Environment. The septic system must comply with all requirements of
the Weld County Code. Permitting of the system shall be conducted in
accordance with Department policy regarding septic systems installed without an
appropriate permit. Further, because the system is located within the flood plain
it must comply with the Weld County I.S.D.S. flood plain policy. ' EXHIBIT
I
Page 2 of 2
Recommended development standards:
1. Any septic system located on the property must comply with all provisions of the
Weld County Code, pertaining to Individual Sewage Disposal Systems.
Additionally, please note the following:
1. This application is proposing a well(s) as its source of water. The applicant
should be made aware that while they may be able to obtain a well permit from
the Office of the State Engineer, Division of Water Resources, the quantity of
water available for usage may be limited to specific uses, i.e. domestic use only,
etc. Also, the applicant should be made aware that groundwater may not meet all
drinking water standards as defined by the Colorado Department of Public Health
and Environment. We strongly encourage the applicant to test their drinking
water prior to consumption and periodically test it over time.
g,ouNrq/N MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Administrative Office:
9119 County Line Road• Longmont, CO 80501
(303) 772-0710• FAX (303) 651-7702
VIEW
October 16, 2003
Mr. Kim Ogle
Weld County Planning Department
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Mr. Ogle:
I have reviewed the submitted material pertaining to the Site Specific Development Plan and Use
by Special Review for a single-family dwelling unit at 5090 Weld County Road I (Case Number:
USR-1450, Case Name: Schlichenmayer). The Fire District has the following comments and
concerns regarding this case:
• First and foremost, a building permit was obtained for the construction an 8,000 square foot
pole barn. The plans were reviewed and inspected by the building department for this
specific use and not for use as a one or two family dwelling unit. Because building permits
were not obtained for this structure to be used as living space, the Weld County Building
Department and the Fire District can not possibly know if the structure meets basic life safety
requirements let alone the requirements of the Building Code and Fire Code for an R-3
Occupancy (single-family dwelling). For example: Are there required residential smoke
detectors in the building? Are there proper egress/rescue windows in the building? Is there
proper separation from the garage/storage areas and the living space? This is not an all-
inclusive list of questions,just an example of basic requirements that, again, the Fire District
and Building Department have no idea if the structure can meet the Codes.
• Second, when a single-family dwelling is constructed on a parcel of land, whether created by
a recorded exemption or by a special situation on the same parcel, water supply for fire
protection is only required when the dwelling exceeds 3,600 gross square feet in size. It
should be noted gross square feet, according to the Fire Code, is everything under roof on all
floors. Now that this structure has been partially finished as living space and a second story
has also been constructed, the gross square footage of this structure appears to be
approximately 13,120 gross square feet. In accordance with the Fire Code,the required water
supply for this structure is 3,000 gallons per minute, measured at a residual pressure of 20 iss1
pounds per square inch. The required water supply is not available to this structure. When
the required fire flow is not available or the owner wishes an alternative to the installation of ~
fire hydrants, the installation of a residential fire sprinkler system has been accepted as an
alternative to meeting the required fire flow. If a residential fire sprinkler system is proposed, _ ≥r
the plans for the fire sprinkler system must be submitted to the Fire District for review and X
approval prior to installation. W
•rx'aaao4e-avon d
lamI
Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station 7
9119 Cnty Line Rd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run 50 Bonanza Dr. P.O.Box 40
Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO Erie,CO 100 So.Forest St.
80501 80504 Mead,CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 80516 Dacono,CO 80514
Mr. Kim Ogle
October 16, 2003
Page Two
• Lastly, the Fire District would not object to the use of this structure as living space if the
building meets the requirements of the Fire District and the Building Department for use as
an R-3 Occupancy. Regardless of whether or not the Special Use is approved because all of
these people are family and related by blood or marriage, basic life-safety must be achieved
before the Fire District would be comfortable with the use of this structure as living space.
We appreciate being involved in the planning process. Should you have any questions, please
contact me at(303) 772-0710.
Sincerely,
\A-C-
LuAnn Penfold
Fire Marshal
LMP/lp
cc: project file
Ip10.15.03
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
co\
Division of Water Resources
Department of Natural Resources (a 6
1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 � ���
Denver,Colorado 80203 �t870�
Phone(303)866-3581
FAX(303)866-3589 •
- Bill Owens
www.water.state.co.us Governor
October 24, 2003 Greg E.Walther
Executive Director
Kim Ogle Hal D.Simpson,P.E.
g State Engineer
Weld County Planning Dept.
1555 N. 17th Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Site Specific Development Plan, Schlichenmayer, USR-1450
Dear Kim Ogle
Pursuant to the State Engineer's August 7, 1995 memorandum to county planning
directors, this office is no longer providing comments on land use actions that do not involve a
subdivision as defined in Section 30-28-101(10)(a), C.R.S. This referral does not qualify as a
"subdivision", however the following comments are provided, since it appears that the property
will be served by an existing well.
According to the submitted material, the property currently has two dwellings that are
served by an existing well. The well was constructed in the late sixties and was recently late
registered with the State Engineer's office under permit no. 252966. The historic uses of the
well as registered are ordinary household purposes inside one single family dwelling, fire
protection, the watering of domestic animals and poultry and the irrigation of not more than 500
square feet of home gardens and lawns.
The existing well cannot be expanded beyond the uses registered by permit no. 252966.
Therefore, if the well will be used to serve two single-family or multifamily dwellings, a well
permit must be acquired for the expanded uses. The well permit would be evaluated in
accordance with current statutes and policies in place at the time of application. According to
current statutes and policies, and given the size of the property and the depth of the well, a
court approved augmentation plan would be required in order to obtain a well permit for uses
other than household use only.
If you have any questions in this matter please call Joanna Williams in this office.
Sincerely
Kevin G. Rein
Water Resource Engineer
KGR/JMW
EXHIBIT
p
r4't ft 141.1.1
\\ MEMORANDUM
O TO: Kim Ogle, Planner III DATE: 11/5/2003
r
COLORADO• FROM: Donald Carroll, Engineering Administrator Pit
SUBJECT: USR-1450, Loyd & Sheila Schlichenmayer
The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal; this project falls
primarily under the Use by Special Review Standards, Weld County Code, Chapter 23, Article II,
Division 4, Section 23. Our comments and requirements are as follows:
COMMENTS:
WCR 1 is designated on the Road Capital Improvement Plan in the County Wide Impact Fee
Code Ordinance, Section 20-1-30, as a future major arterial road, which requires a 140-foot
right-of-way at full build out. This section of road falls under the maintenance of Boulder
County. We do not maintain this section of road; therefore, I do not have any traffic counts.
ft,—
REQUIREMENTS:
Future Right-of-Way: The applicant may reserve and show on the plat drawing the future
right-of-way adjacent to WCR 1 designating 70 feet from the section line/center line of WCR 1 to
the future right-of-way line. The applicant should be aware that there shall be no permanent
structures allowed in this future right-of-way.
Existing Access: The limited access to WCR 1 involves sharing an access point for multiple
parcels. Utilize the existing access.
Notification: The applicant has provided the adjacent property owners notification of the
proposed USR use. Include these documents in the file as the use still remains residential.
Access Easement: The applicant indicated that there is a 20-foot access easement by record,
Record No. 02034134. This document should be included in the packet and be a part of the
record prior to recording.
Storm Water Drainage: The historical flow patterns and run-off amounts will be maintained on
site in such a manner that it will reasonably preserve the natural character of the area and
prevent property damage of the type generally attributed to run-off rate and velocity increases,
diversions, concentration and/or unplanned ponding of storm run-off.
pc: USR-1450 M:\PLANNING\USR-10.DOC
EXHIBIT
I Cr
A` .lain A" '- .... 1 � 'y S * •
74 A' .`4�„'�+a. do • _,
�. .s �r , t 1 _ 'eSt i
t ,
-UGFA' tl O- -
y. t,. 1• -•--•- 1� W
x
e. � ' .1
`Ctt,,. S s' .- ...,4f. 4` I a ;0 1 WI j
;7 'S9 a F.k' . r" r, c
k : 1
s
k'
;i
tz fl , .
t }�•' >
„
', F , .t ' t .yam,[. •+�' .
•
ss r4 -• } ' ' ..
{ i•� P-^F a . ¢( `t-tit -, P r
1 /
St. Vram Valley
School District
November 7,2003
Kim Ogle
Weld Count/ Planning Department
1555 N. 17 Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Recommendation to oppose the Loyd and Sheila Schlichenmayer Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special
Review(Situate in the SW 1/e at Section 6, TIN, R88WJ
Dear Kim:
Thank you for referring the Loyd and Sheila Schlichenmayer Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review to the
School District. The District has reviewed the development proposal In terms of future student Impacts and available school
capacity and has the following RECOMMENDATION: the District is OPPOSED to_the approval of this application due to this
development's impact on already overcrowded school facilities.
The Board of Education has established a District-wide policy of opposing new developments that add to the student enrollment of
schools projected to be at or above 125% of their capacity. This particular application, which is currently located in the Erie
Elementary and Erie Middle/Senior High Feeder, will add 1 new single-family dwelling unit with a potential student impact of 1
additional student in this feeder. The District opposes this development because, as indicated in the chart below, Erie Elementary
and Erie Middle/Senior High Schools will exceed 125%of their capacity with the addition of students from this development.
CAPACITY INFORMATION CAPACITY BENCHMARK
(Inaludes proleowd*tannin.plus development's eludant impact;
School Building Stilts. Slot. 2003 2004 2006 2006 2007
Level Capacity OCb02 Impact Stills Cep. Stilts Cap. Stills Cap. Stilts Cap. stills cap.
Elementary 552 482 1 618 04% 580 106% 635 115% 703 127% 775 140%
Middle/Senior' 818 530 0 655 00% 631 102% 697 113% 786 127% 862 138%
Total 1170 1 1074 1211 _1332 1488 1827
-New Erie Hien School capacity boing added in 2006 is not yet counted due to uncertainly about whether the school will Include a middle school or not.
The School Districts current opposition to this proposal may be modified should the developer come to an agreement with the
School District regarding capacity concerns. School District policy acknowledges two possible ways to accomplish this.The first is
for the developer to agree to mitigate the development's potential student impact on capacity by agreeing to a voluntary, per unit
contribution to the School District (in addition to cash-in-lieu funds noted below). Funds collected under this policy would most
likely add classroom space within the subject feeder or, in situations where additional capacity is known to be eminent, provide
portables. The second way to resolve capacity concerns would be for the developer to commit to not constructing any residential
prior to the availability of school capacity. Should agreement be reached on either of these possibilities,this office will write a new
letter to Weld County updating this referral. The developer can contact this office directly to discuss either of these possibilities
further.
The recommendation of the District noted above applies to the attendance boundaries current as of the date of this letter. New
school facilities approved under the 2002 bond could affect the project's attendance area and capacity in the future. Elementary
capacity relief may come as early as 2005, however, no construction schedule has been finalized for this project and the opening
date of this facility remains undetermined. A new secondary facility has been slated for completion in the Fall of 2005, but this
facility may not increase capacity, depending whether it opens as a middle/senior or dedicated High school. Until the Board of
Education makes a final decision regarding the grade levels that will attend the facility, capacity relief at the secondary will also
remain undetermined. Under current attendance boundaries,transportation would most likely be provided.
Should the County decide to recommend approval of this development proposal, the School District's cash-in-lieu and/or land
dedication requirements would still need to be satisfied. This requirement involves the dedication of land with the adjacent
infrastructure or payment of an equivalent cash-in-lieu fee based on the student yield of the development. Since this property is not
a likely future school site,the fee would be assessed per the attached chart. Please let me know of any further questions.
Sincerely, EXHIBIT
ten Segrue,Al
Planning Specialist
ST.VRAIN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING DEPARTMENT.395 SOUTH PRATT PARKWAY, LONGMONT,CO 80501. SCOTT
TOILLION,DIRECTOR.PHONE 303-682.7229, FAX 303-882.7344.
2030044 86179 1702 IDLE.:01 17 2L-289-202 S3JInel3S 1Sno SNUaL:WOd3 2S:TI 20 LB-(lON
M School Planning Schlichenmayer SU
Standards And Weld County
Calculation of
cc
a In Lieu Fees
m
m
c
Single Family
rn
r- School Planning Standards
a
Number Projected Student Site Size Acres of Developed
Of Student Facility Standard Land Land Cash-in-lieu
Units Yield Standard Acres Contribution Value Contribution
Elementary 1 0.35 525 10 0.01 $35,000
cr
0.35
m
Middle Level 1 0.14 750 25 0.00 $35,000
M 0.14
N
W
High School 1 0.17 1200 50 0.01 $35,000
re
N 017
I-
(f)
Total 0.66 0.02 $35,000 $645• Single Family Student Yield is .66 $645
Per Unit
Cu
1
ti
ti
M
m
ti
11/7/03
0
St. Vrau Valley
School District
Fax
To: Kim Ogle From Judy Rusk for Glen Segrue
Roc 970-304.6498 Penes: 3(Including cover)
Phone: Date: 11/07/05
Res SchlichenmayerSU CC:
❑Urgent O For Review El Please Comment O Please Reply O Please
Recycle
• Cornmeofs:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at(303)682-7229.
r-.
ST.VRAIN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING DEPARTMENT.395 SOUTH PRATT PARKWAY,LONGMONT,
CO 80501.SCOTT TOILLION,DIRECTOR.PHONE 303-682-7229. FAX 303-682-7344.
TO:30Cd 86179 170£ OL6:O1 17472L-209-202 S3OInass 1St SNtRJ1:WOad 2S:TT £0 LO-nON
Q DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION
Weld County Administrative Offices
1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO
WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us
Phone (970) 353-6100, Ext. 3540
111kFax (970) 304-6498
COLORADO
November 19, 2003
Loyd & Sheila Schlichenmayer
Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review for a single family dwelling unit
(other than those permitted under Section 23-3-20.A) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District.
USR-1450
There is an existing building permit to construct the 8,000 square foot pole frame garage and
storage building. There is also a building permit that was applied for to convert a portion of the
above building into a dwelling.
1. Building permits shall be obtained for the conversion of the garage/shop into a dwelling.
2. A plan review is required. Details shall be submitted to the Building Inspection Department
to explain all structural and life safety aspects of this conversion.
3. This building shall conform to the requirements of the codes adopted by Weld County at the
time of permit application. Current adopted codes include the 1997 Uniform Building Code;
1998 International Mechanical Code; 1997 International Plumbing Code; 2002 National
Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code.
4. Building height shall be limited to the maximum height allowed per UBC Table 5-B. Wall and
opening protection and limitations shall be in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. Separation of
buildings of mixed occupancy classifications shall be in accordance with UBC Table 3-B and
Chapter 3. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by the Zoning Ordinance.
5. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code for
the purpose of determining the maximum building size and height for various uses and types of
construction and to determine compliance with the Bulk Requirements from Chapter 27 of the
Weld County Code. Building height shall be measured in accordance with Chapter 23 of the
Weld County Code in order to determine compliance with offset and setback requirements.
Offset and setback requirements are measured to the farthest projection from the building.
6. A Flood Hazard Development Plan shall be submitted for the conversion of this building to a
dwelling.
[ 4
EXHIBIT
Service,Teamwork, Integrity,Quality
Page 2
Please contact me for any further information regarding this project.
Sincerely,
„7,4444
Jeff Reif
Building Official
Service,Teamwork, Integrity, Quality
Hello