The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20043234.tiff ��n�in�tl - PIctmir Todd Hodges Design, LLC Change of Zone Application Urban Planned Unit Development (Specific Guide) Prepared for: Applied Films Corporation 958G 1-25 Frontage Road East Longmont, CO 80504 Prepared by: Todd Hodges Design, LLC 1269 North Cleveland Avenue Loveland, Colorado 80537 Submitted: August 3 I , 2004 EXHIBIT I al-- 1269 North Cleveland Avenue • Loveland, Colorado 80537 • (970) 613-8556 • fax: (970)613-8775 email: toddhodgesdesign ,earthlink.net 2004-3234 Todd Hodges Design, LLC Table of Contents Applied Films PUD Change of Zone Specific Development Guide 1. Application Form 2. Authorization Forms 3. Response to Sketch Plan Planning Staff and Referral Agency Comments 4. Development Guide 5. Weld County Road Access Information Form 6. Reduced Change of Zone Plat 7. Evidence of Adequate Water and County Approval 8. Evidence of Adequate Sewage Disposal and County Approval 9. Deed 10. Surrounding Property Owner Listing 11. Mineral Affidavit 12. Weld County Treasurer Statement of No Taxes Due 13. Utility Service Providers a. Qwest Will Serve, August 24, 2004 b. United Power request by Applied Films c. Kinder Morgan Retail Gas Division request by Applied Films 14. Drainage Report, Attached 15. Change of Zone Plat, Attached 16. Application Fee, $2,100.00 Check #052135 1269 North Cleveland Avenue • Loveland, Colorado 80537 • (970) 613-8556 • fax: (970)613-8775 email: toddhodgesdesign(aearthlink.net PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION DATE RECEIVED: RECEIPT#/AMOUNT#FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE 1$ CASE#ASSIGNED: Weld Cowry Planning Drr "^--• APPLICATION RECEIVED BY PLANNER ASSIGNED: L0f4Gf ufaT OI-I-ICE Parcel Number 1 31 3 14 000046 AUG 312004 Application Submitted-Not Dee:i (12 digit number-found on Tax I.D.information,obtainable at the Weld County Assessor's Office,or�(tvlL�(weiEd.'Y.�; (Include all lots being included in the application area,If additional space is required,attach an additional shee ) L. Legal Description Lot A, RE-1009 located in Pt. SW4 NW4 , Section 14 ,Township 02 North,Range 68 West Property Address (If Applicable)9536 1-25 Frontage Road, East Longmont, CO 80504 Existing Zone District :AG Proposed Zone District:_C-3 Total Acreage: 5.293 Proposed#/Lots 1 Average Lot Size: 5.293 Minimum Lot Size: 5.293 Proposed Subdivision Name: Applied Films PUD Proposed Area (Acres)Open Space: 1.0586 acres Are you applying for Conceptual or Specific Guide? Conceptual Specific X FEE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY(If additional space is required,attach an additional sheet) Name:Applied Films Corporation Work Phone#(303)774-3200 Home Phone# N/A Email Address NA Address: 9586 1-25 Frontage Road East City/State/Zip Code Longmont, CO 80504 APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT(See Below:Authorization must accompany applications signed by Authorized Agent) Name: Todd Hodges Design, LLC Work Phone#: (970)613-8556 Home Telephone#: N/A Email Address: ToddHodaesto7awest.net Address: 1269 North Cleveland Avenue City/State/Zip: Loveland, CO 80537 UTILITIES: Water: Central Weld County Water District,tap number 885 Sewer: St.Vrain Sanitation District, Current Septic Permit Gas: Kinder Morgan Electric:United Power Phone: Qwest DISTRICTS: School: RE-1J, St.Vrain Valley School District Fire: Mountain View Fire Protection District Post: Longmont I (We)hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements,proposals,and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my(our)knowledge. Signatures of all fee owners of property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs,a letter of authorization from all fee owners must be included with the application. If a corporation is the fee owner, notarized evidence must be included indicating the signato has •: -•a au •i ty to sign for the corporation. / .----- �l v Signature: Ow• or Authorized Agent ate Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Date 95861-25 n Frontage 9 Ste. 200 Longmont, CO 80504 USA Telephone (303) 774-3200 r'4pplied Films Fax (303) 678-9275 www.appliedfilms.corn August 11, 2004 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that I, Larry Firestone, Chief Financial Officer, Applied Films Corporation, hereby authorize Todd Hodges Design, LLC, to represent Applied Films Corporation in the endeavor to Change the Zone of Applied Films Corporation's property located in part of the SW 1/4 of the NW '/< Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The parcel is known as Lot A, RE-1009. In my absence, Applied Films Corporation hereby gives Kris Hawkins or Michael Derbort permission to represent Applied Films Corporation at all hearings. Larry Firesto e, Chief Financial Officer 95861-25 Frontage Rd. Ste. 200 Longmont, CO 80504 USA Telephone (303] 774-3200 Fax (303) 678-9275 ''Applied Films www.appliedfilms.com August 16, 2004 Weld County Government Greeley, CO To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to provide evidence that Lawrence D. Firestone (Larry Firestone), Applied Films Corporation's Chief Financial Officer, has full authority to sign contractual documents on behalf of A pplied Films Corporation. Sincerely, G%G 41 /4.4 Thomas Edman President & CEO Applied Films Corporation /', Response to Sketch Plan Comments from Planning Staff& Referral Agencies The following items address questions raised during the Sketch Plan application review. 1. Central Weld County Water District correspondence is attached. 2. St. Vrain Sanitation District correspondence is attached. 3. A completed Notice of Inquiry Form from the Town of Firestone is attached. 4. Correspondence with the Town of Frederick is attached. 5. Correspondence with CDOT is attached. 6. Correspondence with the Mountain View Fire Protection District is attached. 7. Correspondence with the Frederick Fire Protection District is attached. 8. Correspondence with the Weld County Sheriff's Department is attached. 9. Correspondence with Weld County Public Works Department is attached. Jacqueline Hatch ,.From: Hice-Idler, Gloria [Gloria.Nice-Idler@DOT.STATE.CO.US] Int: Thursday, August 12, 2004 10:01 AM i o: Jacqueline Hatch Cc: annejohnson@gwest.net Subject: PK- 1059 Applied Films Jacqueline, I spoke to Anne Johnson this morning regarding obtaining an access permit for this proposal. Because no "change of use" is being proposed at this point in the process, I'm unwilling to issue a permit. The current access is considered "grandfathered" until we know what development is planned. I anticipate that a new permit will be needed in the future, but issuing anything now would be premature. Even if the zoning were to change, CDOT would still be reluctant to issue a permit until a site plan was presented for our review. If you have any questions, please call . Gloria Hice-Idler Assistant Access Manager CDOT Region 4 1420 2nd Street Greeley CO 80631 (970) 350-2148 1 Page 1 of 1 Jacqueline Hatch From: Lee Morrison Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 10:55 AM To: Jacqueline Hatch; Anne Johnson @ Todd Hodges Design, LLC Subject: Applied Films-Water-Sewer-Annex Importance: High I have reviewed portions of the record in this matter and the following is my understanding of the situation. The Towns of Firestone and Frederick are both in the vicininty but the property is in the Firestone IGA. The applicants will agree to enter into an annexation agreement prior to the final plat recording which may still be for future annexation date such as at site plan. Firestone is not asking for the annexation agreement at a particular time so before final plat should work. Unless Firestone would agree not to object, annexation to Frederick would not be appropriate under the IGA agreement so any comments suggesting annexation to Frederick would have no weight. The site has water service from Central and a commitment to upgrade when the final use is identified if needed for a commercial use to a 2" tap. This indicates adequate water. Sewer will require petition to the district. Since there is service on adjoining property and the parcel is in the 208 area, admission to the district is simply a matter of form. I would suggest that that be accomplished prior to recording final plan and that actual tap purchase be done once the end user is identified and actual demand known at site plan stage. In summary, they should be allowed to submit COZ Let D. Ho4..Kw. Assistant Weld County Attorney 915 10th St., PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 (970)356-4000 x 4395: FAX 352 0242 This e-mail contains confidential and/or privileged information. If the reader is not the intended recipient,please reply and delete your copy of this message." 08/31/2004 Kit a Notice of Inquiry -mile Development within an Intergovernmental Agreement Urban Growth Boundary COLORADO Date of Inquiry: H I : I l 'C Planner i t ; < Town Referred to: Ordinance #: Name of Person Inquiring: / , , c. l,- Legal Description: , Legal Parcel#: Property Owner: Major Crossroads: 4 c ; _ i c Type of Inquiry: - , , - , �. ,a , t„ C t c ,a The above person inquired about developing a parcel of land inside your designated intergovernmental agreement urban growth boundary. This person has been referred to your community by Weld County Planning to discuss development options on this site. Weld County Comments: ( ' 7 t " ,/ /2 , . , ,I Town/City Comments: ❑ Platteville, Dacono, Firestone and Frederick Intergovernmental Agreement: If the person applies to Weld County to develop the parcel, the Town/City of desires to have Weld County require a binding annexation agreement between the person and the Town/City of , which requires the person to annex the parcel to the Town/City upon the terms and conditions stated in the agreement. ❑ Mead, Kersey, Milliken, LaSalle, Fort Lupton, and Dacono/Erie Intergovernmental Agreements: Has the person petitioned for the parcel to be annexed to the Town/City of ? If so, what is the status of the petition? If not, does the Town/City of desire to have the person petition for annexation, or may the person apply to Weld County to develop the parcel without first petitioning to the Town/City of for annexation? Comments: I _~--7---- � -- 1 1 A{., Vin-, % -- Signature/of Weld County Planner Signature of Town/City Representative 1, White copy:Applicant; Yellow copy: Town/City; Pink Copy: Weld County It is the applicant's responsibility to return the completed form to Weld County. +Weld County Planning Department ❖1555 N. 17th Avenue,Greeley,CO 80631 +(970)353-6100, Ext.3540)+ (970)304-6498 Fax 9586 I-25 Frontage Rd. i-^ Longmont, CO 80504 Telephone (303) 774-3200 Fax.(303) 678-9275 Applied Films Corporation September 10,2003 Mr. Bruce Nickerson, Town Planner Ms. Judy Hegwood,Town Clerk Town of Firestone P.O. Box 100 Firestone, CO 80520 RE: Annexation Application for Applied Films. A parcel of land described as Lot A of Recorded Exemption, RE-1009 located in the part of the SW4 NW4 Section 14, Township 2 North,Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Nickerson and Ms. Hegwood: On behalf of Applied Films Corporation, I respectfully withdraw our,application for • annexation to the Town of Firestone and request a refund of the unused portion of our $5,500.00 fee. The application was made on December 24, 2002 by our representatives, Todd Hodges Design, LLC. The reason for withdraw is due to conditions placed upon the annexation request that cannot be met based upon meeting contiguity requirements. The Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Firestone and Weld County specifies in Section 19-2-70 of the Weld County Code, "Each MUNICIPALITY will give serious consideration to all petitions for annexation of lands within its Urban Growth Area and will not decline to annex such properties except for good cause. For the purposes of this Section, good cause includes without limitation the following: . . . (2) the area is not reasonably contiguous in fact to the MUNICIPALITY'S existing boundaries and its annexation would result in disconnected municipal satellite." Our application is not eligible for annexation due to lack of reasonably-attainable contiguity. The resulting annexation will create a disconnected municipal satellite. King Surveyors has concluded the following conditions and the reason they cannot be met outlined below: 1. Annexation of an additional ten (10) foot strip of land along the western boundary of Legal Parcels 1313-14-000007 (Griffin) and 1313-14-000006 (McDaniel). The act cannot be reasonably achieved as it would require both property owners to agree to annexation. Our wishes to annex into the Town of Firestone should not force others to annex their properties. 2. Annexation of a strip of land across Flextronics Legal Parcel Number 1313- 14-005001 to gain contiguity. This act is not reasonably achievable as it would require annexation.. Our wishes to annex into the Town of Firestone should not force others to annex their properties. 3. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) will not provide written evidence that upon annexation of right-of-way under CDOT jurisdiction, CDOT will not hold the annexing jurisdiction responsible for maintenance and services. Upon withdraw of our annexation application, we will commence preparing an application through Weld County. The location within the Mixed Use Development area warrants a Planned Unit Development process to achieve this end. Our project parcel lies within the Intergovernmental Agreement Boundary between.the Town of Firestone and Weld County. Therefore, you will receive future referral opportunities. We will consider an annexation agreement through this process to ensure annexation at the time when annexation is a viable option per State Statute. We respectfully request written closure and a return of materials submitted. Please send an outline of how our application fee has been used if a total refund of our$5,500.00 fee is not available. Please contact me at 303.7743246 or my representative, Todd Hodges Design,LLC at 970.613.8556 for collection of unused fees and materials. Sincerely, Law ce D. Firestone C of Financial Officer c: Todd Hodges Design, LLC ✓ Lee Morrison, Weld County ,r1 9586 I-25 Frontage Rd. Ste. 200 Longmont, CO 80504 USA n Telephone (303) 774-3200 Fax (303) 678-9275 Applied Films www.appliedfilms.com VIA FACSIMILE 303.833.3817 June 11, 2004 Mr. Stephen J. Pauken,Town Administrator Town of Frederick PO Box 435 401 Locust Street Frederick, Colorado 80530 RE: Applied Films Sketch Plan PUD in Weld County, Colorado. . Dear Mr. Pauken: Thank you for taking the time to visit with us yesterday regarding your desire to annex our property currently under review for a Sketch Plan Planned Unit Development (PUD) in Weld County. Last week, your planner, Carrie McCool contacted our representatives at Todd Hodges Design, LLC to discuss the option of an annexation. We appreciate being able to hear the opportunities available through the Town of Frederick. It is our understanding we will receive procedural guides and cost estimates for the land annexation and development process through the Town of Frederick as well as a listing of impact/development fees assessed in the Town of Frederick. Upon review of this information, we will be able to make a decision that is at the best interest of our long- range planning goals. At our meeting, you agreed to not contact other jurisdictions or property owners regarding this opportunity until we have provided you with our decision. Your confidential consideration is appreciated. We look forward to receiving additional information from you. Sincerely, y,j1 Kris Hawkins Michael E. Derbort Exec. Asst. IT Director Plant Facility Manager Dennis Messner LuAnn Penfold [Ipenfold@firehousemail.com] Int: Monday, August 23, 2004 11:18 AM To: Dennis Messner Subject: Re: Applied Films Corporation, Change of Zone for Lot A, RE-1009, Weld County, Colorado I don't know that I have anything that would prohibit a specific use. The use would just have to comply with the building and fire codes, etc. Zoning would determine if a use should not be allowed for a particular area. LuAnn --- "Dennis Messner" <dennis@messnereng.com> wrote: LuAnn, I have reviewed your letter to Jacqueline Hatch of the Weld County Planning Department regarding the proposed Change of Zone request for the vacant Applied Films property. I certainly understand that appropriate fire protection measures are to be incorporated in the design and construction of any use that is to be constructed on the site. Are there any constraints that you are aware of as Fire Marshal that would preclude certain types of uses from being permitted? Thanks for your assistance. **4—'"nnis R. Messner, President �ssner Engineering, Inc. 150 E. 29th Street Suite 270 Loveland, CO 80538 Tele: (970) 663-2221 Fax: (970) 663-0368 E-mail: dennis@messnereng.com ********************* THE LATEST ON LADDER 49 Enter Contests, See the Trailer & More http://www.firehouse.com/ladder49/ GET THE BEST FIREFIGHTING CONTENT & FEATURES Join Firehouse.com's MembersZone Today http: //cms. firehouse.com/launch/ GET IN THE ACTION TODAY! 1 Engineering, Inc. MEMO TO FILE Project: Change of Zone for Lot A, RE-1009, Weld County, CO Project No. GRD - 484 - 04 Client: Applied Films Corporation Date: August 23, 2004 Re: Telephone conversation with Dave Puccetti, Fire Marshal, Frederick - Firestone Fire Protection District (Approximate Time 3:30 pm) The item(s) addressed during the conversation were: I asked Dave if he was aware that his District had not responded to the Weld County Planning Departments request for review comments for the P. U. D. Sketch Plan for one lot with C-3 Zoning. Dave stated that since the Applied Films property is not within his District's service boundaries he did not review the Sketch Plan. He advised that we should contact LuAnn Penfold of the Mountain View Fire Protection District for their requirements with regard to the application. I told Dave that we had already done so and asked him to provide a short note to the affect that the site is not located within his District. He said that since we had already received comments from LuAnn Penfold that he didn't feel it was appropriate for him to respond in writing. Dennis R. Messner if- Z.1 j Civil Engineering Consultants 150 E. 29th Street, Suite 270 Loveland, Colorado 80538 (970) 663-2221 9586 I-25 Frontage Road, Suite 200 T: 303.774.3200 Longmont,Colorado 80504 F: 303.678.9275 Applied Films USA www.appliedfilms.com August 16, 2004 Dave Tuttle Weld County Sheriff's Department 1950 O Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case#PK-1059 Dear Mr. Tuttle: As part of the review criteria for Case #PK-1059, I would like to view the program "Crime Prevention through Environmental Design." Could you please call me at 303.774.3210 (or email at khawkins@appliedfilms.com) and let me know how to set up an appointment? Thank you, Kris Hawkins Executive Assistant khawkins@appliedfilms.com ,,e todd Hodges (Todd Hodges Design, LLC) 08/24/04 10:52 FAX 303 678 9275 APPLIED FILMS ftiJ002 Sheriff John B. Cooke August 23,2004 To: Kris Hawkins From: Dep.Bill Wagner Ref.: Crime Prevention Through Enviornmental Design Evaluation On August 23n4 2004 I conducted a Crime Prevention Through Environmental Headquarters Design (CPTED) evaluation at Applied Films Corporation located at 9586 E. 1-25 1950"0"Street Frontage Rd. at the request of Kris Hawkins, an executive assistant with the Greeley,CO 80631 Ph.(970)356-4015 company. Fax(970)304-6467 I met with Ms. Hawkins and she gave me a tour of the property. The property I evaluated is used for the business and contains large rooms which are used as a warehouse and office spaces. Ms.Hawkins advised they have had no crime problems Fort Lupton Substation 330 Pads Avenueat the business. Ft.Lupton,CO 80621 Ph.(303)857-2465 Based upon the discussion with Ms. Hawkins and the tour of the property I can make Fax(303)857-3027 the following suggestions and comments: Positive observations Southwest Complex 4209 WCR 24,h 1. The building is equipped with a fire alarm system. Longmont,CO 80504 2. The outside of the building is very well landscaped and has decorative trees Pk(720)6524215 placed making it easy to discern the parking lot from the pedestrian area. Fax(720)6524217 3. The building has decorative shrubs in place between the sidewalk and the building making a natural barrier which detracts from graffiti. 4. The parking lot on the west side of the building is well illuminated by North Jail Complex several lights visible in the photographs. The exterior of the building itself has 2110"O"Street several lights which illuminate the sides of the building. Greeley,CO 80631 5. The exterior doors to the building are metal and appear to have adequate Ph(970)356-4015 locks. F.rd.3922 Fax(970)304-6461 6. The entrance to the building itself appears to have adequate lighting through the use of overhead lighting. Suggested Improvements "...to provide an 1. Replace any exterior lights which are not working. 2. Have an intrusion alarm system installed environment 3. Fence the area between the property to the north as this is a parking lot for designed to another business and this would give the appearance of a barrier from maintain and someone casing the place by using the parking lot for the business to the enhance the north. general health, 4. Repaint the parking spaces in the parking lot. welfare, and safely 5. The east side of the building could use the same lighting treatment the parking ofthe people of lot on the west side has in place. p p 6. A fence could be placed along the property line on the east side of the Weld County. " building. r 08/24/04 10:53 FAX 303 678 9275 APPLIED FILMS QJ003 8. Keep the decorative trees trimmed up so as not to obstruct visibility from within the building. A general rule here is no higher than 15 ft.with branches no lower than 3 ft. Overall,this is very well kept piece of property. I am enclosing some photographs. I hope these images can help illustrate the suggested improvement areas. I hope this evaluation proves to be beneficial. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Respectfully submitted, Deputy Bill Wagner Community Service Division Weld County Sheriff's Office Page 1 of 2 Anne -^ From: "Dennis Messner" <dennisramessnereng.com> To: "Anne Johnson"<annejohnson©gwest.net> Sent: Monday,August 30,2004 8:51 AM Subject: FW:Applied Films Corporation Original Message----- From: Peter Schei [mailto:pschei@co.weld.co.us] Sent:Thursday,August 26, 2004 2:18 PM To: Dennis Messner Subject: RE: Applied Films Corporation Good Afternoon, Dennis. Thank you for your patience. You are understanding my comments correctly. We are on the same page. In my opinion, generally speaking -this is a zone change - period. Have a nice afternoon, Peter. P.S. The few of these that have come thru my office,tend to have public input wrt zoning as the main concern...at the hearings. Peter Schei, P.E., NSP.E. Public Works Department Weld County pschei@co.weld.co.us • From: Dennis Messner[mailto:dennis@messnereng.com] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 4:31 PM To: Peter Schei Subject: Applied Films Corporation Peter, I would like to get some clarification on your comments for the Sketch Plan for Applied Films. The application is to obtain a C-3 Commercial zoning for the entire property. No specific use is being proposed and no division of the property is proposed. At the time that a specific use and/or division of property is determined,the appropriate designs will need to be performed. No traffic investigation report or roadway improvement designs are to be required until a specific user with a definite site improvements plan or a subdivision of the property are proposed. Am I understanding your comments correctly? Thanks for your assistance. Dennis R. Messner, President Messner Engineering, Inc. 150 E. 29th Street ,—.Suite 270 “oveland, CO 80538 Tele: (970)663-2221 8/30/2004 Applied Films Corporation Applied Films PUD Specific Development Guide Introduction The Applied Films Corporation's Applied Films Planned Unit Development (PUD) proposes to change the zone of a single lot within the Mixed Use Development Area from the Agricultural Zone District to the PUD C-3 Zone District. The property is located east of and adjacent to State Interstate 25 Frontage Road East and approximately '/2 mile south of Weld County Road 22. The site is located north of and adjacent to land annexed by the Town of Frederick. According to the Weld County Code, the site is located within the Intergovernmental Agreement Urban Growth Boundary Area with the Town of Firestone. An Annexation application was submitted to the Town of Firestone on December 24, 2002. The Annexation application was removed from the Town of Firestone per a letter dated September 10, 2003 from Applied Films Corporation. This letter is attached. The reason the Annexation application was withdrawn from the Town is that contiguity required by State Statute could not be reasonably reached. The Town of Firestone is aware of this application proceeding through Weld County. A signed Notice of Inquiry Form is included herein. This Development Guide is submitted with this Change of Zone application through the Specific Development Guide option. Administrative/Staff Review of the Final Plat application is hereby requested. The goal of this proposal is to change the zone of a single lot located in the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area from Agricultural to PUD C-3. The layout and design of the site is currently beneficial to the residential use and respectful of surrounding urban uses. Site-specific design will be reviewed through Weld County's Site Plan Review process. The desired end result of this process is to change the zone of the property. Subsequent property owners will be required to submit a Site Plan Review application for changes to the property. This Site Plan Review process shall incorporate the lot coverage, landscaping, signage, and setback requirements, for example, prescribed by the Weld County Code. The intent of this application is to Change the Zone of the property for use compatible with surrounding land uses. Proposed land uses within this property include those allowed by right in the C-3 Zone District with the exception of those uses listed below. The development of the site will be compatible with the architectural style of the surrounding land-uses and with the overall character of the area. From uses listed as Use by Right in the C-1 through C-3 Zone Districts of Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code, the following uses are restricted on the subject site: Airstrips, Commercial Junkyards, or Salvage Yards. The following Development Guide has been prepared in accordance with Section 27-4-20 and Article VI of Chapter 27, Weld County Code. 1 Section 27-4-201.14. Initial impact plan addressing all impacts this use will have on the proposed site and surrounding land uses. A listing of potential impacts is cited in Section 27-6-30 of this Jr' Chapter. (SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT GUIDE) Section 27-6-40. Component One—environmental impacts 1. Noise and vibration 2. Smoke, dust and odors 3. Heat, light and glare 4. Visual/aesthetic impacts 5. Electrical interference 6. Water pollution Development of this proposal should not result in any negative environmental impacts, including the above listed environmental concerns. The use of the site will continue to be residentiaUagricultural until such time a change is applied for through the Site Plan Review Process. At the time the use changes to the PUD C-3 Zone District, a Site Plan Review is required to evaluate the above environmental impacts of the use. 7. Wastewater disposal All wastewater disposal on the site will be through the use of an existing Individual Septic Disposal System (see attached permit). Future PUD C-3 uses will be serviced through St. Vrain Sanitation District. A Letter dated September 15, 2003 from the St. Vrain Sanitation District signed by a representative of Applied Films, and a letter dated August 19, 2004 from St. Vrain Sanitation District have been included in application materials and has been provided to Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney for his approval . Inclusion into the St. Vrain Sanitation District will be applied for after the Change of Zone application phase. It is understood the current fee for this particular site to be included into the District is $2,085.00 and may increase without notice. The application process includes payment of this fee, paperwork completion, and acceptance by the District Board. & Wetland removal To the applicant's knowledge, this proposal does not remove wetlands. 9. Erosion and sedimentation 10. Excavating,filling and grading 11. Drilling, ditching and dredging Any on-site grading, drilling, ditching or dredging will be done sympathetically. Erosion will be kept to a minimum. The site shall remain in its current state until development changes the use of the site. A Drainage Report dated August, 2004 prepared by Messner Engineering, Inc. is included herein. 12. Air pollution 13. Solid waste 14. Wildlife removal 15. Natural vegetation removal This proposal will not result in negative impacts to the above listed concerns. The existing residential/agricultural uses and any future allowed commercial uses should not create negative impacts to air pollution or contribute to solid waste concerns. r-. 16. Radiation/radioactive material To the applicant's knowledge, there are no radioactive materials located on this site. 2 17. Drinking water source The drinking water source is through Central Weld County Water District. A letter dated August 13, 2004 is included herein and has been provided to Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney for his approval. 18. Traffic impacts Impact to traffic on the I-25 Frontage Road will remain consistent as is currently. Future building permits shall conform to the county-wide traffic impact fee. Future traffic circulation will be addressed through the Site Plan Review Process. A copy of correspondence from CDOT is attached indicating the use and access are "grandfathered" until future development is proposed through the Site Plan Review process. A Traffic Impact Analysis is a requirement of the Site Plan Review Process. Section 27-6-50 Component Two—service provision impacts 1. Schools 2. Law enforcement 3. Fire protection 4. Ambulance Service providers for this Planned Unit Development include the St. Vrain Valley School District, Weld County law enforcement, and the Mountain View Fire Protection District. Correspondence with the Mountain View Fire Protection District , the Frederick Fire Protection District , and the Weld County Sheriff are included herein. As the proposal is for Non-Residential zoning, the impact to the School District is non-existent as no additional residential lots are proposed. 5. Transportation (including circulation and roadways) 6. Traffic impact analysis by registered professional engineer The existing access from the I-25 Frontage Road shall remain until an end use of the property is proposed through the Site Plan Review process. Loading zones and parking areas are not applicable to this particular application. However, subsequent land use changes on site may be proposed and subsequently evaluated through the Site Plan Review process. As specified in Section 26-2-80.B, a Traffic Impact Analysis is required at Site Plan Review. The Design Standards and Circulation System guidelines listed in Sections 26-2-80 C and D shall be used to submit any subsequent Site Plan Review application. 7. Storm drainage Storm drainage will be handled on-site. A Drainage Report dated August, 2004 prepared by Messner Engineering, Inc. is included herein. 8. Utility provisions 9. Water provisions 10. Sewage disposal provisions The drinking water source is through Central Weld County Water District. Support documentation is included in this application and has been provided to Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney for his approval. All wastewater disposal is currently handled through an Individual Sewage Disposal System. Future development on site will receive sewage disposal through St. Vrain Sanitation District. Utility providers will have the standard easements. 3 Section 27-6-60 Component Three—landscaping elements 1. Landscape plan 2. Treatment, buffering or screening and perimeter treatment 3. Maintenance schedule for landscaping elements 4. On-site improvements agreement 5. Evidence of adequate water Any landscaping improvements proposed for future uses shall be proposed and subsequently evaluated through the Weld County Site Plan Review process. This process shall address how the site shall adhere to the 1-25 Mixed Use Development Plan of the Weld County Code. This proposal does not require on- site improvements at this time. General parameters of this future plan shall include a variety of plants that are drought-tolerant. Appendix 26-G shall be consulted when making plant selections. In keeping with the necessity to reduce dependence on water, an efficient irrigation system design, maintenance and irrigation schedule should be included in future Site Plan Review applications. Section 26-2-70.C specifies that a parking lot with at least 10 spaces shall incorporate a minimum of 10% landscaping, 75% of which shall be in living plant material. Loading and storage areas shall be screened with an opaque screen. In addition, 75% of the length of any future parking lot frontage shall be screened from public view. As this project is located along the I-25 Frontage Road, additional requirements must be met. One 2-1/2 inch caliper shade tree or 6-foot evergreen for every 40 feet of street frontage shall be planted. These plantings may be grouped. 2. PUD rezoning consistent with Chapter 22 of Weld County Code ^ Goal 3 "Discourage urban-scale residential, commercial and industrial development, which is not located adjacent to existing incorporated municipalities." Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code defined urban scale development as developments exceeding nine (9) lots and/or located in close proximity to existing PUDs, subdivisions, municipal boundaries or urban growth corridors and boundaries. This application proposes to change the zone from Agricultural to PUD with Commercial, C-3 uses. This proposal is located within the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area(an Urban Area). Section 22-2-190.D.2.a PUD.Policy 4.1 states, "The design of a planned unit development should ensure compatibility and harmony with existing and planned uses on adjacent properties and within the planned unit development." The applicant has carefully considered the uses on-site, adjacent properties and the existing residential use of the property. Any future development will necessitate another review procedure, the Site Plan Review process, through Weld County. 3. Compatibility within PUD zone district 4. Compatibility with surrounding land uses The current use of the property is not changing at this time. Therefore, the design of the subdivision takes into consideration the existing uses of the surrounding properties and municipalities. The Town of Frederick is the southern property boundary with Business/Light Industrial uses. I-25 is the western property boundary. The northern and eastern property boundary is the Del Camino Center PUD through Weld County and is used for C-1, C-2 and I-1 and I-2 uses. 5. Overlay districts .� Upon review of the Weld County flood hazard, geological hazard and airport influence maps, this proposal is not located within these overlay districts. The proposal is within the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area. Subsequent Site Plan Review applications shall adhere to standards outlined in this 4 Chapter of the Weld County Code. The property is located within the IGA boundary for the Town of Firestone. As discussed previously, the applicant did propose annexation to the Town on December 24, 2002. Contiguity requirements could not reasonably be obtained. The Annexation application was withdrawn from the Town. The Town of Firestone is aware of the process through Weld County. A signed Notice of Inquiry Form is included herein. Section 27-6-80 Component Five—common open space usage The common open space areas within this subdivision are designed and proposed to be consistent with the requirements of Section 27-6-80 of the Weld County Code. 1. Permanent common open space restrictions 2. Establishment of homeowners organization 3. Mandatory membership in homeowners organization 4. Homeowners organization responsibilities S. Homeowners organization powers 6. Ownership and maintenance of common open space 7. 15% common open space allocation Section 26-2-40 and Appendix 26-E of the Weld County Code specifies that 20% of this particular lot shall be Common Open Space. The configuration of the Common Open Space has not been made in this application as the end use of the property is unknown. Future uses on site will be required to submit a Site Plan Review through Weld County. However, much of the Common Open Space requirement can be reached with the required landscape buffer along the I-25 Frontage Road. •*". Section 26-2-50 and Table 26.1 of the Weld County Code specifies for all commercial and industrial uses, the maximum lot coverage is 85%. This is the maximum percentage of the total area of the lot that shall be covered by a structure. The final site configuration has not been made in this application as the end use of the property is unknown. Future uses will be required to submit a Site Plan Review through Weld County. This Site Plan Review shall meet the maximum lot coverage requirement. Future uses on site will be required to establish a Homeowners Association to govern the method of open space restrictions, as well as the maintenance and ownership of the common elements, including the Common Open Space. This organization will be required to be established prior to the Site Plan Review Process. Section 27-6-90 Component Six—signage All signage within this PUD will comply with the sign standards set forth in the Weld County Code and shall be reviewed through the Site Plan Review process. Future signs require a Building Permit to be reviewed at Site Plan Review per Section 26-2-90.D.1 of the Weld County Code. General Guidelines, as listed in the Weld County Code, Chapter 26 are as follows: • Awning Signs are not to exceed :25 square feet OR 10% of the awning surface, whichever is smaller. • Marquee/canopy/overhead canopy/under canopy/ projecting or wall signs shall be mounted at least 14 feet above the driveway and at least 9 feet above any walkway. Such sign cannot be higher than the top of the wall, roof eave or parapet line. • On-site detached signs shall have a minimum setback of 15 feet and a minimum offset of 10 feet from the right-of-way. Such sign shall incorporate landscaping extending a minimum of 3 feet from the base of the sign in all directions. Sign height shall not exceed 25 feet. 5 • One Development Complex sign shall be allowed per street frontage. This sign shall not exceed 25 feet in height and a maximum of 150 square feet. Some flexibility is allowed per Section 27- 6-90 of the Weld County Code for signs adjacent to I-25. Section 27-6-100 Component Seven—MUD impact This proposal is located within the Mixed Use Development Boundary as delineated by Weld County. Throughout this Development Guide, specific references have been made illustrating how future development will conform to the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area standards as outlined in the Weld County Code. Section 27-6-110 Component Eight—intergovernmental agreement impacts This proposal is located within the Intergovernmental Agreement Urban Growth Boundary area for the Town of Firestone. Please refer to enclosed correspondence between the applicant and the Town. Design Guidelines have been proposed through Article III, Chapter 19 of the Weld County Code. Such guidelines will be used to guide future development on site. General Guidelines to be incorporated are as follows: • Building Height (Table 19.1): 50 Feet for the Principal Building. • 20% Open Space is required (19-3-320) with an additional 10% of the parking lot to be landscaped with at least 75%living material (19-3-330). • A 50-foot landscape setback shall be illustrated on the Site Plan Review application materials. This setback shall be measured from the future right-of-way(Section 19-3-340). • The general guidelines of Lighting listed in Section 19-3-400 and Minimum Standards listed in Section 19-3-420 shall be followed when making plans for on-site lighting. These elements shall be reviewed at the time a Site Plan Review application is submitted for review by Weld County Planning. • The minimum setback for a commercial building from the I-25 Frontage Road is 150 feet as specified in Table 19.3 of the Weld County Code. It is noted that this setback may be reduced to 100 feet if an additional 50 feet of landscaping is installed for a total of 100 feet landscape buffer. • The general guidelines for Signs listed in Section 19-3-610 and Minimum Standards listed in Section 19-3-620 shall be followed when making plans for on-site signs. In addition, the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area has standards to be followed as found in Chapter 26 of the Weld County Code and referred to elsewhere in this Development Guide. These elements shall be reviewed at the time a Site Plan Review application is submitted for review by Weld County Planning. 6 • Report Date: 08/13/2004 12:06PM WELD COUNTY TREASURER Page: 1 STATEMENT OF TAXES DUE SCHEDULE NO: R0042088 /'ASSESSED TO: APPLIED FILMS CORPORATION 9586 E 1-25 FRONTAGE RD LONGMONT, CO 80504-9458 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PT SW4NW4 14-2-68 LOT A REC EXEMPT RE-1009(.17R)SITUS: 9763 1-25 FRONTAGE RD WELD 80501 PARCEL: 131314000046 SITUS ADD: 9763 1-25 FRONTAGE RD WELD TAX YEAR CHARGE TAX AMOUNT INTEREST FEES PAID TOTAL DUE 2003 TM 2,779.80 0.00 0.00 2,779.80 0.00 TOTAL TAXES 0.00 GRAND TOTAL DUE GOOD THROUGH 08/13/2004 0.00 ORIGINAL TAX BILLING FOR 2003 TAX DISTRICT 2337 - Authority Mill Levy Amount Values Actual Assessed WELD COUNTY 21.474 695.76 RESIDENTIAL 407,125 32,400 SCHOOL DIST RE1J 40.374 1,308.12 NCW WATER 1.000 32.40 TOTAL 407,125 32,400 CWC WATER 0.000 0.00 MTN VIEW FIRE(BOND 2008) 0.300 9.72 ST VRAIN SAN 4.925 159.57 CARBON VAL REC 6.657 215.69 WELD LIBRARY 3.249 105.27 LONGMONT CONSERVATION 0.000 0.00 MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE 7.817 253.27 TAXES FOR 2003 85.796 2,779.80 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURERS OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY AND MOBILE HOMES-AUGUST 1, REAL PROPERTY-AUGUST 1. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIERS CHECK. P.O. Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 (970)353-3845 ext.3290 -,caad File# RE: Other Case No. APPENDIX B WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS INFORMATION SHEET Weld County Public Works Department Date: ' 1111 H Street,P.O.Box 758, Greeley,CO 80632 . Phone: (970)356-4000,Ext.3750 Fax: (970)304-6497 I. Applicant Name Applied Films Corporation Phone (303)774-3200 Address 95861-25 Frontage Road City Longmont State CO Zip 80504 2. Address or location of access9536 I-25 Frontage Road Section 14 Township 2 Range 68 Subdivision otARE-I009 Block Lot Weld County Road 1#25 Frontage RdSide of Road East Distance from nearest intersection NE Side of WCR 20.5 &1-25 Frontage Road 3. Is there an existing access to the property? Yes X No #of accesses I 4. Proposed Use: Current DI Permanent Viol Residential/Agricultural O Industrial ❑ Temporary O Subdivision A Commercial ❑ Other Proposed C-3 5. Site Sketch Legend for Access Description: �po gL AG E = Agricultural _ Ix RES = Residential _ 04.O&G= Oil&Gas D.R. = Ditch Road °. 'ea. Please refer to attached plat for details. Approximate Site Location. Not to Scale. Existing Access Points> WC OFFICE USE ONLY: Road ADT Date Accidents Date Road ADT Date • Accidents Date Drainage Requirement Culvert Size Length Special Conditions ❑ installation authorized O Information Insufficient Reviewed By: Title: 8 CHANGE OF ZONE DRAINAGE REPORT for APPLIED FILMS - P. U. D. located in the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6t1i P.M., \% eld County, Colorado Prepared for: Applied Films 9586 E. 1-25 Frontage Road Suite #200 Longmont, Colorado 80504 August 2004 Project No. GRD - 488 - 04 Prepared by: /'1 MESSNER Engineering, Inc 150 East 29 St,eet. Suite 270 Loveland Colorado 80538-2765 Telephone (970)663-2221 I1VJS2YJ 41f/N1J/LS VEE Engineering, Inc. Project No. GRD - 448 - 04 August 25, 2004 Peter Schei, P.E. Weld County Public Works Department 1111 H Street Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Mr. Schei, The enclosed report represents the results of the Change of Zone Drainage Report for the proposed "Applied Films P. U. D."to be located in the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the P.M. in Weld County, Colorado. This investigation was based upon the proposed sketch plan; on-site observation; and available topographic information. The investigation was performed according to the criteria established by Weld County. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Respectfully Submitted, '^ MESSNER Engineering, Inc. Cameron W. Knapp, E. I. T. "I hereby state that this Change of ZoneDrainage Report for the"Applied Films P. U. D., to be located in the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the P.M. in Weld County, Colorado " was prepared by me or under my direct supervision for the owners thereof and meets or exceeds the criteria established by Weld County." _ • _ . . Dennis R. ; _ ' ner Q' Registered • sional Err State of Color A� 8ds os/ Civil Engineering Consultants 150 E. 29th Street, Suite 270 Loveland, Colorado 80538 (970) 663-2221 TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS ii INTRODUCTION 1 SITE DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF BASINS & SUB-BASINS 2 DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA 3 DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN 3 EROSION & STORM WATER QUALITY CONTROL 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 - REFERENCES 5 EXHIBITS Vicinity Map _ Existing Conditions Exhibit APPENDIX I Drainage Calculations APPENDIX II Charts, Graphs, and Figures Details ii INTRODUCTION The following report represents the results of a Change of Zone Drainage Report for the proposed"Applied Films P.U.D."to be located in the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6`h P.M., in Weld County, Colorado. This investigation was performed for the Applied Films Corporation, the owners and developers of the project site. The purpose of this report is to identify and define conceptual drainage solutions to existing problems or problems that will occur on-site and off-site as a result of the proposed development. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based upon the proposed sketch plan; grading and drainage construction plans and reports for existing developments in the vicinity of the project site; on-site observations; and the available topographic information. SITE DESCRIPTION The property is legally described as Lot A, Recorded Exemption No. 131-14-2-RE-1009 and contains approximately 5.29 acres. More specifically, the site is adjacent to the east I-25 frontage road between Weld County Road 22 (Sable Avenue)and Weld County Road 20. (Refer to the included Vicinity Map.) The existing Applied Films facility, (located on Lot 1, Block 3 of the Amended Del Camino Center P.U.D.), adjoins the site to the north. The I-25 frontage road borders the west side of the property. To the east lies Lot 2, Block 2 of the Amended Del Camino Center P.U.D. where the Flextronics site is situated. Neighboring the property to the south is the Smith residence and the Del Camino South L.L.C. Annexation. — ^ The property is currently zoned for agriculture and contains a single-family residence. A single story ranch home is located on the west side of the site with a looped gravel driveway that provides access at two points to the I-25 frontage road. On the east side of the property is an existing barn. A gravel drive extends from the barn to the northern access point along the I-25 frontage road. The existing ground cover consists mainly of native weeds and grasses, and non-irrigated vegetation. (See Figure 1 below.) The site is generally considered moderately sloped, with slopes ranging from 2%to 7%. (Figure 1 -Existing Ground Cover of Site - - Picture taken from south end of Applied Films parking lot, looking towards the south) The"Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado"prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil 1 _ Conservation Service, indicates that the surface soil consists of"Vona Sandy Loam." This soil type is described as a deep, well-drained soil that formed in eolian and alluvium deposits. The "Soil Survey" identifies the surface runoff potential as slow to medium, and the hazard of erosion as low. There currently are no major irrigation ditches or channels that traverse the site. DESCRIPTION OF BASIN & SUB-BASINS The site is located in Zone C as identified on the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map for Weld County, Colorado, Community -Panel Number 080266 0850 C, dated: September 28, 1982. The site is not located within a designated flood way or flood plan. The"South Weld I-25 Corridor Master Drainage Plan", completed by Anderson Consulting Engineers, February 17, 2000, is a Master Drainage Plan that analyzes the existing Tri-Town Major Basin that surrounds the Frederick/Firestone area. The subject area is located within this major basin and any proposed drainage improvements to the site will conform with the recommendations and concepts of the "South Weld 1-25 Corridor Master Drainage Plan". The general topography surrounding the site is influenced by an elevated region immediately to the south. To the north of this high area, (which includes the proposed Applied Films P.U.D.), the historic drainage pattern flows in a northwest direction towards the East 1-25 Frontage Road and also to the northeast where natural drainage courses meander to the St. Vrain River. This existing drainage condition means that the adjacent properties to the south, specifically the undeveloped Smith property, produce off-site runoff that traverses through the site. The property is divided into two separate sub-basins. The Existing Conditions Drainage Exhibit designates the sub-basins as 'A' and B'. Sub-Basin 'A' contains approximately 2.64 acres from the west half of the _ property. This area drains from southeast to northwest in a uniform manner. Runoff from the site has been prevented from flowing onto the neighboring Applied Films facility to the north by the construction a small drainage swale along the property boundary, see Figure 2 below. This swale redirects surface runoff to the west and into the roadside ditch that is located along the east side of the I-25 Frontage Road. The peak runoff rates during the 5-year and 100-year storm events for Sub-Basin 'A' are 1.14 c.f.s. and 5.36 c.f.s. Sub-Basin 'B' makes up the east half of the site with 2.65 acres. Runoff is directed uniformly overland in a northeast direction . (See Figure 3 below.) ..•,. a .�. tit� • 't t 2 (Figure 2 -Picture taken from northeast (Figure 3 -Picture taken from northeast corner of site, looking towards the west) corner of site, looking towards the southeast) Flow exits the property and continues onto the open field on the south side of Lot 2, Block 2 of the - Amended Del Camino Center P.U.D. The 5-year peak runoff rate for Sub-Basin 'B' is 1.00 c.f.s. and the 100-year rate is 5.50 c.f.s. DRAINAGE DESIGN CRITERIA The drainage analysis for the proposed Applied Films P.U.D. was conducted according to Section 24-7-110 of the Weld County Code. Since Weld County does not publish technical data or storm drainage design - manuals, certain design criteria comes from the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. The peak runoff rates for the property were calculated using the 5-year and 100-year recurrence intervals as - dictated by Table 24.2 of the Weld County Code. The Rational Method, as implemented in the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual, was used in - determining peak flows at various concentration points. Spreadsheets from the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual were used to first determine the weighed runoff coefficient for a contributing sub-basin, and then to calculate the peak runoff rates. (See the Drainage Calculation Section of this report.) Table RO-3 from the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual was used for recommended imperviousness values for various land cover. The Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curve for the Firestone area was used to define the necessary 1-hour precipitation values. The Hydrological Classification for the on-site soil (Vona Sandy Loam) is Type `B'. DRAINAGE FACILITY DESIGN There currently are no specific improvement plans for the proposed Applied Films P.U.D. Any such future plans will include a complete storm water infrastructure design in accordance with Section 24-7-110 of the Weld County Code. A final Drainage Report will provide details and discussion on all proposed drainage - improvements. The anticipated drainage pattern of the property under developed conditions will resemble the existing - drainage pattern, so as to reasonably preserve the natural character of the area, but yet be modified to prevent property damage to neighboring sites to the north. The area comprising the Existing Sub-Basin 'A' will likely continue to drain in the same manner as it currently does. Although surface runoff follows the existing grades in a northwest direction, an existing swale intercepts runoff from entering the neighboring property and routes flow to the roadside ditch along the I-25 frontage road. A similar method, (redirecting drainage west to the roadside ditch), is anticipated for Sub-Basin 'IV since it currently drains onto Lot 2, Block 2 of the Amended Del Camino Center P.U.D. Existing drainage from upstream areas that currently pass through the property via the I-25 Frontage Road ditch will be maintained. Any proposed site access _ points that connect to the Frontage Road will be provided with adequately sized culverts to accommodate flow in the ditch from these upstream sources. Future uses of the site will consider the effects of off-site runoff that enters the property from the south. 3 Most likely, the off-site runoff will either be intercepted and rerouted by constructing a drainage swale along the southern property, or the offsite runoff will be routed through a detention facility on the Applied Films P.U.D. and the release rate from the facility will be adjusted to account for the off-site flow. The contents in the tables, charts, and figures presented in this report, come from the Town of Firestone's _ "Storm Drainage Criteria" and the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. These diagrams facilitated in the existing drainage condition calculations. If it is determined that the future development of the property creates a situation in which the runoff volumes and peak flow rates exceed the levels attributable to the site in its existing state, then storm water detention will be provided on-site. Detention facilities will be designed to detain the storm water runoff from the fully developed condition during the 100-year storm and release the detained water at a rate not to exceed the existing 5-year rate. The existing 5-year peak runoff rate from the site was calculated as the sum of Existing Sub-Basins 'A' and 'B', (1.14 c.f.s. + 1.00 c.f.s. = 2.14 c.f.s.). EROSION & STORM WATER QUALITY CONTROL Erosion control considerations will be made based upon the short term, during construction activities, and the long term, when development of the site is complete. The long term measures incorporated to eliminate erosion are the anticipated methods and materials to be used to provide the ground surface covering at the driveways and the landscaped areas. Any structures and surrounding hard-surfaced areas will provide a deterrent to erosion. The establishment of landscape plantings and ground covers will further aid in deterring erosion. The recommended short term erosion control methods to be incorporated into the construction requirements for the project is the placing of sediment control devices. These will be recommended in order to prevent debris and sediment from flowing from the areas disturbed by construction activities onsite to the adjacent road and properties. Wind crosicn control measures will not specifically be recommended due to the small aize of the site and since it is anticipated that the disturbed area will be open and subject to wind action for an extremely short time. The season that the area will be open should be coordinated to be that with the lowest wind potential. - If blowing dust becomes a problem, a combination of surface roughening and water application should be used to control the dust. - If it is determined that the development of the property creates an introduction of new pollutants into the runoff water, provisions will be made for the storage, treatment, and removal of such pollutants. Volume III of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual offers many Best Management Practices (BMP's)that are - effective for the removal of many of the pollutants associated with urban and commercial runoff. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The existing drainage characteristics of the property have been defined and the total 5-year and 100-year peak runoff rates have been calculated to be 2.14 c.f.s. and 10.86 c.fs. — 4 The site is not located within a designated flood way or flood plain. All proposed drainage improvements shall be designed according to Section 24-7-110 of the Weld County Code and any previous Master Drainage Plan for the basin area that the property lies within. Offsite runoff from upstream areas that passes through the site will be considered and addressed in the Final Drainage Report. If the area to be disturbed during the development of the property is greater than 1 acre, a Colorado Department of Health and Environment (CDHE) Storm water Discharge Permit will be required. Proposed erosion control and storm water quality measures will conform to the recommendations of Volume III of the Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual. Maintenance of all erosion and storm water quality control devices will remain the responsibility of the developer until the completion of the project. Provisions will be made to maintain any proposed on-site drainage improvements since Weld County does not maintain drainage facilities. REFERENCES I. Town of Firestone's "Storm Drainage Criteria", (current revisions). II. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volumes I, II, and III," (current revisions). III. "Soil Survey of Weld County - Southern Part," United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, printed 1979. IV. "South Weld I-25 Corridor Master Drainage Plan", Anderson Consulting Engineers, February 17, 2000. 5 EXHIBITS v N, NM APPLIED FILMS P. U . D . N �.... ,.,� — ---� ..4 _ 1 _ 1 •.�.. ' e8,well •••=:-_-- , ..e.7-7 -. . • • . _ r.,„, ... : .._:„. .„,. , ... • . . . i,...„...., , . _. i- . IP ^-, CH Trailxr 'it . . •i• `.� % Park ,. i •1— - '.r T .i• II P r ` xr— o S.1.. . ry I / \ ti / I Firestone 6th Annexation, \ i \ pil Re-r: No. 2546405 • \..;••••-'•,‘ 5,sio)1 LvbiZ�ey4 1 ` +. • , %• : 1\ May 5, 1997 • •.L __ ii ..-:.7..i;...) _z.t:. TG - ) I 1- .••••••• I I I_ • .--u, T `° Flume /r - +f' I i �o-* X= l ;, �� II f almo i'f \ tr • No' .i0 zgok• / ' \J if j �0 f.00 -O'. C r a• • "�la P l SI „Do�. tit f V m1 C . r r i 1 if. /15% .., ... z ,.....„•......4....;:,, ., . 2 ' . I, Del Cochin South. LLC I 1 1 1 I' Annex tion II./L;*o .The Town of Frederick, Cr• Rec. No. 488690 .� p, _, l;' January 9. 1998 ' l z• I, .4,. • i ,'0, •i . . I ii ! fri . . • t II i :� ` • L -in , ..., .----. ._ , L_'!, BM •• r. ; 4920 �� 4 •s I •• 114925 ..a�\ • VICINITY MAP - " Scale: 1 = 1500' Being a Portion of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter, Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado HLL Iph I/� DEL CAMINO1N-ER P U.D. N V es Line of the NW Y4, _1_A' O (Existing Parking Lot forIn ill S c.14, T.2N., R.68W. I a0 —I I I d 'IBM. Fa III Q I U a p p - o� e 4 o _ LOT 2, BLOCK 2, AMENDED 1 o r Z Z W , , .Indicates Flowline 1 p c9 ADEL CMINO CENTER P.U.D.O Q Ph t .a. u mF— 2. 4ac. ` <tj ;> t W 2 N d J ff Z li �' . O N o o o � - �/ a ac N Z c _ — W W l LO (ft HI Ex stln 9J20- o N F— N l I I 1 > I Hag I � � - \-N\ i§) cTwA4 _ t W 300' Rot I A Indicates Existing I t III Cdlora o Deptm nt ,I Concrete Drive R i f l f T ansport do / r — - I I7-1 \ Indicates of — - ExistinE istin1%dgels hIt. Itxlstin (Existing � Barn i�.1 , j 1 9P RESIDENCE Fusel LBarn J I I ` / o O ImaimH it.6 noWestl Qu rter Colrner l S- w o `� U South Line of the NW Y4i DEL CAMINO SOUTH L.L.C. ANNEXATION w lec. 1 , T2N., R. 8W. TO THE TOWN OF FREDERICK Q Sec.14, T.2N., R.68� W wUQr' :Ca --S01Z� Typically Indicates Existing Ground Surface ContourLii r J CU - Tr `.. e Drainage Basin Limit Identifier 0 k- PI 1 Y w Typically Indicates Drainage DATE: MAR. e• 2004 Flow Direction SCALE; AS NOTED 0 Concentration Point Identifier DRAWN: C.W.K. 40 160 Basin 'Er----Design Point, Basin Number CHKD: D.R.N mom 'mum � Area of basin in Acres Project No. 0 ao 240 5.23 ac.GRD-488-04 1- - 80' 3.4 5.7 Q+w c.f.s. SHEET QS c.f.s. 1 of 1 APPENDIX I DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Area-Weighting for Runoff Coefficient Calculation Project Title: APPLIED FILMS P.U.D. Catchment ID: SUB-BASIN'A'-EXISTING CONDITIONS Illustration seise LEGEND: Plow Direction 1. was 5 Catchment Subama 3 B oonshay Instructions: For each catchment subarea,enter values for A and C. Subarea Area Runoff Product ID acres Coeff. A C* CA input input input output Undev. 2.15 2.00 4.30 Street 0.17 100.00 17.00 Roof 0.09 90.00 8.10 Gravel 0.16 40.00 6.40 Drives 0.07 90.00 6.30 sum: 2.64 sum: 42.10 Area-Weighted Runoff Coefficient(sum CA/sum Al a 15.95 *See sheet"Design Info"for inperviousness-based runoff coefficient values. Page 1 CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD ..� Project Title: APPLIED FILMS P.U.D. Catchment ID: SUB-BASIN 'A'-EXISTING CONDITIONS-Syr.STORM I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID= 'A' Area= 2.64 Acres Percent Imperviousness= 15.95 % NRCS Soil Type= B A, B, C, or D II. Rainfall Information I(inchlhr)=Cl *P1 l(C2+Td)*C3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr= 5 years (input return period for design storm) C1 = 28.50 (input the value of C1) C2= 10.00 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.786 (input the value of C3) P1= 1.40 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet"Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time(Time of Concentration)for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C= 0.17 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C= (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5= 0.17 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C= (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland Reach 1 flow LEGEND Reach 2 OBesol' Flow Direction Catchment Reach Boundary NRCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas& Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) C.aveyance 2.5 I 5 7 10 15 I 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V TI ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.0400 350 0.17 0.29 19.80 1 0.01(X) 400 15.00 1.50 4.44 2 3 4 5 Sum 750 Computed Tc= 24.24 Regional Tc= 14.17 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction using Computed To ediction using Regional Tc Rainfall Intensity at Tc, I = 2.48 inch/hr Rainfall Intensity at Tc, I = 3.26 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp= 1.14 cfs Peak Flowrate, Qp= 1.50 cfs •—, Page 2 CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: APPLIED FILMS P.U.D. Catchment ID: SUB-BASIN'A'-EXISTING CONDITIONS-100yr.STORM I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID= 'A' Area= 2.64 Acres Percent Imperviousness= 15.95 % NRCS Soil Type= B A, B, C,or D II. Rainfall Information I(inchlhr)=C1 *P1 /(C2+Td)"C3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr= 100 years (input return period for design storm) C1 = 28.50 (input the value of Cl) C2= 10.00 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.786 (input the value of C3) P1= 2.68 inches (input one-hr precipitation—see Sheet"Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time(Time of Concentration)for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.43 Overide Runoff Coefficient,C= (enter an overide C value if desired,or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5= 0.17 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired,or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration ^ LEGEND i1III) O Bib Flew Direction Catchment Reach Hounder, N RCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas& Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 I 5 —1 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.0400 350 0.17 0.29 19.80 1 0.0100 400 15.00 1.50 4.44 2 3 4 5 Sum 750 Computed Tc= 24.24 Regional Tc= 14.17 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction using Computed To ediction using Regional Tc Rainfall Intensity at Tc, I= .4.75 inch/hr Rainfall Intensity at Tc, I= 6.25 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp= 5.36 cfs Peak Flowrate, Op= 7.05 cfs Page 3 Area-Weighting for Runoff Coefficient Calculation Project Title: APPLIED FILMS P.U.D. Catchment ID: SUB-BASIN'B'-EXISTING CONDITIONS Illustration LEGEND: now Direction fee I 9 Cadman Subarea 3 Boundary Instructions' For each catchment subarea,enter values for A and C. Subarea Area Runoff Product ID acres Coeff. A C` CA input input input output Undev. 2.28 2.00 4.56 Street 0.00 100.00 0.00 Roof 0.13 90.00 11.70 Gravel 0.19 40.00 7.60 Drives 0.05 90.00 4.50 sum: 2.65 sum: 28.36 Area-Weighted Runoff Coefficient(sum CA/sum A)= 10.70 "See sheet"Design Info"for inperviousness-based runoff coefficient values. Page 4 CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: APPLIED FILMS P.U.D. Catchment ID: SUB-BASIN'B'-EXISTING CONDITIONS-5yr.STORM I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID= Area= 2.65 Acres Percent Imperviousness= 10.70 % NRCS Soil Type= B A, B, C, or D II. Rainfall Information I(inchlhr)=Cl * P1 l(C2+Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period,Tr= 5 years (input return period for design storm) C1 = 28.50 (input the value of C1) C2= 10.00 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.786 (input the value of C3) P1= 1.40 inches (input one-hr precipitation—see Sheet"Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time(Time of Concentration)for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C= 0.14 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C= (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5= 0.14 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration overland LEGEND / Reach 1 flaw ReacrA' O B g ��J Flow Direction Catchment Reach 3 Boundary N RCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas& Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 -5—1 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.0400 375 0.14 0.29 21.22 1 15.00 2 3 4 5 Sum 375 Computed Tc= 21.22 Regional Tc= 12.08 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction using Computed Tc ediction using Regional Tc Rainfall Intensity at Tc, I = 2.67 inch/hr Rainfall Intensity at Tc, I= 3.50 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp= 1.00 cfs Peak Flowrate, Qp= 1.31 cfs Page 5 CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD - Project Title: APPLIED FILMS P.U.D. Catchment ID: SUB-BASIN IT-EXISTING CONDITIONS-100yr.STORM I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID= 'B' — Area= 2.65 Acres Percent Imperviousness= 10.70 % NRCS Soil Type= 8 A, B, C, or D II. Rainfall Information I(inch/hr)=C1 *P1 /(C2+Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period,Tr= 100 years (input return period for design storm) C1 = 28.50 (input the value of C1) C2= 10.00 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.786 (input the value of C3) P1= 2.68 inches (input one-hr precipitation--see Sheet"Design Info") — III. Analysis of Flow Time(Time of Concentration)for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C= 0.41 ..... Overide Runoff Coefficient,C= (enter an overide C value if desired,or leave blank to accept calculated C.) 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5= 0.14 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) — Illustration �•. overland LEGEND Read" flow Reach2 O Begrmub Flow Direction f Catchment Reach 3 Binumb ry N RCS Land Heavy Tillage/ Short Nearly Grassed Paved Areas& Type Meadow Field Pasture/ Bare Swales/ Shallow Paved Swales Lawns Ground Waterways (Sheet Flow) — Conveyance 2.5 I 5 —I 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow Flow ID S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance V Tf ftift ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output Overland 0.04(X) 375 0.14 0.29 21.22 1 15.00 2 3 4 — 5 Sum 375 Computed Tc= 21.22 Regional Tc= 12.08 IV. — Peak Runoff Prediction using Computed Tc ediction using Regional Tc Rainfall Intensity at Tc, I= 511 inch/hr Rainfall Intensity at Tc, I = 6.71 inch/hr Peak Flowrate, Qp= 5.50 cfs Peak Flowrate, Qp= 7.22 cfs — Page 6 APPENDIX H CHARTS, GRAPHS, FIGURES & DETAILS TIME - INTENSITY - FREQUENCY CURVES - 10 I I I , I , - po�� , - - , --a---- I o______p- I o .a I a pa , , - a_ I moI I , 0 , I I II I I - , , a �� I _ a �__ I I , I I I I I , I I �a I , , � , I , I I - 8 �a , i�� a I I I - O , I p . — I , 7 - I I i aaI_ft I I I I - , �Wt I -I I - , , I I , I - I ��a I , i I I I I O S m I , , ..C - = as I vI I I \�� — I I 1 v ____I II a II I \A<\p I I aal— I a , 5 I , , . fO I �o— W I IF O I I I I — Z , , ' ' d —_ �I I �� \ - I I I . 7v I I app �I a Z 'I , I oa , �a�� -- -1 I , 7 , , S� '�' I I a-� . aI' • _ 3 .• I - p F• �� A I I �� I I I � �� I r{f.r._W.M.�r 7.68 I , I �\ __ . e� a '-aa ' I S, fl ��w��a , -- _ v"�__� I I e Iaaa � �� I I ....... OI -.r - I , _�._ -p I I 1.46 I I , I I I � � �a 0 ^ 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 STORM DURATION OR TIME OF CONCENTRATION, tc (minutes) • DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF TABLE RO-3 • Recommended Percentage Imperviousness Values Land Use or Percentage Surface Characteristics Imperviousness Business: Commercial areas 95 Neighborhood areas 85 Residential: Single-family Multi-unit (detached) 60 Multi-unit(attached) 75 Half-acre lot or larger Apartments 80 Industrial: Light areas 80 Heavy areas 90 Parks, cemeteries 5 Playgrounds 10 Schools 50 Railroad yard areas 15 Undeveloped Areas: Historic flow analysis 2 Greenbelts, agricultural 2 Off-site flow analysis 45 (when land use not defined) Streets: Paved 100 Gravel (packed) 40 Drive and walks 90 Roofs 90 Lawns, sandy soil 0 Lawns, clayey soil 0 See Figures RO-3 through RO-5 for percentage imperviousness. Based in part on the data collected by the District since 1969, an empirical relationship between C and the percentage imperviousness for various storm return periods was developed. Thus, values for C can be determined using the following equations (Urbonas, Guo and Tucker 1990). C = K + (1.31i' - 1.4412 + 1.1351- 0.12 for C4 ≥ 0, otherwise Ca = 0 (RO-6) COD = K00 + (0.8581' - 0.78612 -- 0.774i+ 0.04) (RO-7) • CB =(CA + C00)l2 in which: = °/0 imperviousness/100 expressed as a decimal (see Table RO-3) 06/2001 RO-9 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Hello