Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20051942.tiff 4- a set> _ Weld County Referral IApril 15, 2005 C. COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Robert Parson Case Number MZ-1025 Please Reply By May 13, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project Minor Subdivision Change of Zone from A (Agriculture) to E (Estate). Peace Haven Estates. Legal Lot B of RE-3358; Pt NW4 of Section 10, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location East of and adjacent to CR 19 and south of and adjacent to CR 84. Parcel Number 0705 10 200023 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) June 7, 2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. [ See attached letter. /Comments: Signature 4 �� Date Lf //r/DS Agency / 1A/- Af EXHIBIT •Weld County Planning Dept. +918 10'"Street, Greeley, CO. 80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-649 2005-1942 441- DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES BUILDING INSPECTION NORTH OFFICE ne 918 10TH STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540 FAX (970)304-6498 COLORADO April 18, 2005 TO: Sheri Lockman, Planner FROM: Lin Dodge, Building Tecir"'7it-' RE: REFERRAL NOTES FOR MZ-1025 — Peace Haven Minor Sub 1. Please reference Weld County Ordinance 2003-6, the Weld County Code Ordinance 2003-6 (Addressing Code) Section 2-13-70, H-1-g-6 which suggests cul-de-sacs running north and south to be named "Way". I find no duplications for either Peace Haven Drive or Peace Haven Way, therefore, have no objections to "Drive". PEACE HAVEN MINOR SUB Developer: Robert Parsons MZ-1025 (Change of Zone from Ag to Estate) Planner: Sheri Lockman PT NW4 10-7-67 ZONED ESTATE IS NOT IN FLOOD PLAIN (0465D) IS NOT IN STORM WATER PROJECT AREA RIF AREA #1 NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ENGINEERED INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS NATURAL GAS - XCEL ENERGY POUDRE VALLEY REA QWEST COMMUNICATIONS WINDSOR/WELD DISTRICT RE-4 POUDRE FIRE AUTHORITY AULT PO STANDARD ESTATE ZONE BULK REQUIREMENTS 8 ESTATE-ZONED LOTS Lot 1 9223 Peace Haven Drive Lot 2 9219 Peace Haven Drive Lot 3 9215 Peace Haven Drive Lot 4 9211 Peace Haven Drive Lot 5 9207 Peace Haven Drive Lot 6 9204 Peace Haven Drive Lot 7 9214 Peace Haven Drive Lot 8 9224 Peace Haven Drive Lin Dodge, Building Tech 4/18/05 04/26/2005 TUE 14:20 FAX Z0o2/004 Weld County Referral "DC. April 15, 2005 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Robert Parson Case Number MZ-1025 Please Reply By May 13, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project Minor Subdivision Change of Zone from A(Agriculture) to E(Estate). Peace Haven Estates. Legal Lot B of RE-3358; Pt NW4 of Section 10, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. 9 Location East.of and adjacent to CR 19 and south of and adjacent to CR 84. Parcel Number 0705 10 200023 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) June 7, 2005 O We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan O We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: Signature - / - a %.c�J Date Z for UJ Agency c -sue FA:te N'"i,✓�,�oc� rJ�, :•Weld County Planning Dept. t918 10'Street, Greeley, CO. 80631 •:•(970)353-6100 exL3540 t(970)304-6498 tax 04/26/2005 TUE 14:20 FAX 1003/004 Mirere Fire Prevention Bureau Phone:970-221-6570 102 Remington Street Fax: 970-221-6635 Fort� Authority Collins,CO 80524 Internet_wwwpoudre_fire.org To: Sheri Lockman Weld County Planner From Michael A. Chavez Fire Protection Technician Re: MZ-1025 (Peace Haven Estates) Date: April 26, 2005 CC: Robert L Parsons Jeffrey W. Couch 40455 Skylark Drive do TEAM Engineering Fort Collins, CO. 80528 3468 Shallow Pond Dr. Fort Collins, CO. 80528 The following comments are applicable to this proposal: In accordance with the 97 LCLUC 8.1.4c,Other Standards, the Poudre Fire Authority will enforce the 97 Uniform Fire Code along with it's accompanying local ordinances as follows: Poudre Fire Authority has no objections to the request for the rezoning of this property from Agriculture to Estate.AVo the following Poudre Fire Authority requirements shall be required for this project know as Peace Haven Estates (Case#MZ-1025). PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Approved numerals or addresses shall be provided for all new and existing building in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or mad fronting the property. 1997 UFC 901.4.4 WATER SUPPLY: Residential(Outside GMA) No Residential building can be greater then 400 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 800 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 500 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 9012.2.2 REQUIRED ACCESS: A fire department access road shall be provided and maintained unobstructed. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 04/26/2005 TUE 14:20 FAX - j004/004 These two conditions, if not met would require the instillation of a fire sprinkler system. I) Water Supply—If a hydrant,when required can not be provided for whatever reason, afire sprinkler system shall be provided 2) Fire Apparatus Access- When any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more then 150 feet from fire apparatus access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility it shall be fire sprinklered. CUL-DE-SAC: A dead-end street cannot exceed six-hundred-sixty(660)feet in length. The turn-around at the end of the street must have an outside turning radius of fifty(50) feet or more,and an inside turning radius of twenty-five (25) feet, Short fire lanes are permitted to facilitate a second point of access when a street is greater then 660 feet. All structures beyond the 660 feet limit must be fire sprinklered if a second point of access cannot be provided. 1997 UFC 902.2.2.3 SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS: These proposed residences shall be are sprinklered. r ja_ (1[7 - ��� APR-27-2005 WED 10: 17 AM WINDSOR SCHOOL DISTRICT FAX NO. 970 686 5280 P. 01/01 NpR 1 9 2005 Weld County Referral April 15, 2005 Ci COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Robert Parson Case Number MZ-1025 Please Reply By May 13, 2005 Planner Sheri.Lockman Project Minor Subdivision Change of Zone from A(Agriculture) to E (Estate). Peace Haven • Estates. Legal Lot B of RE-3358; Pt NW4 of Section 10, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location East of and adjacent to CR 19 and south of and adjacent to CR 84. y Parcel Number 0705 10 200023 • The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be • deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) June 7, 2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: 8/�y{//,[�,//,L � rg 444,4,49 .�h. aro-faint�t #/r.2 i f ,',J.u. 44444,11-- tit / ` �°``La A.tv char Oa tai crn.% d-cw t/2e.�ne p.Ih ,+.e,,, �a44-kna-1(-o Ai tv ciao moo// /c 6 4 u 4�cvr ,eirtiQeay.., a.�' /vsG - tnt'. Signature / Date �/e',4r Agency WwieC set - 'Vv"" d- *Weld County Planning Dept. 0918 10'h Street, Greeley,CO. 80631 +(970)353.6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE APR 2 7 2005 RECEIVED ° Memorandum TO: Sheri Lockman, W.C. Planning ik DATE: April 23, 2005 FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Public COLORADO Health and Environment CASE NO.: MZ-1025 NAME: Robert Parsons/Peace Haven Estates The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this Change of Zone application. The application states that the subdivision proposes 9 lots. However, this is a change from the reviewed Sketch Plan material. Additionally, the Change of Zone plat map has a layout for 8 lots. Therefore, the Department is unsure of the exact intent. The overall septic system density is different with 8 lots than with 9 lots. The application states that the minimum lot size is 4 acres (unchanged from the Sketch Plan) and that the total acres is 49.15 (again, unchanged from the Sketch Plan). The Department is unable to determine what the application is in order to make a comprehensive review. The application has satisfied Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code in regard to water and sewer service. The application states the water will be supplied by North Weld Water District. A draft agreement from North Weld Water District has been included in the application materials. Sewer will be provided by individual sewage disposal systems. As previously stated, the Department is unable to determine what the application is in order to make a comprehensive review. Preliminary percolation data was submitted in the Sketch Plan application materials from Earth Engineering Consultants, Inc, and comments are as follows: The findings of that geotechnical report, dated November 1, 2002 indicates most of the site is expected to be suitable for conventional septic systems. Two 6-hole percolation tests were conducted on the property in the vicinity of Lots 3 and 7, and provide limited information on the soil absorption capabilities on the entire 49 acres. The Larimer Canal borders the property on the west. A 125-foot septic system setback has been delineated on the lots bordering the canal, which is more than adequate for the required septic system placement. Because of the large lot sizes and anticipated conventional septic systems, primary and secondary envelopes are not required on the lots. The applicant has placed Primary and secondary septic envelopes on the 8 lot layout. These envelope sizes are adequate, based on the information above. With the unanswered questions regarding the number of lots, the overall septic system density and the minimum lot size, the Department offers preliminary approval with the following conditions: 1. Water service shall be obtained from North Weld County Water District 2. This subdivision is in rural Weld County and is not served by a municipal sanitary sewer system. Sewage disposal shall be by septic systems designed in accordance with the regulations of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division and the Weld County Code in effect at the time of construction, repair, replacement, or modification of the system. 3. If primary and secondary septic envelopes are placed on each lot: All septic system envelopes must meet all setbacks, including the 100-foot setback to any well. 4. Language for the preservation and/or protection of the absorption field envelopes shall be placed in the development covenants. The covenants shall state that activities such as permanent landscaping, structures, dirt mounds or other items are expressly prohibited in the absorption field site. 5. A stormwater discharge permit may be required for a development/redevelopment /construction site where a contiguous or non-contiguous land disturbance is greater than or equal to one acre in area. Contact the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment at www.cdphe.state.co.us/wq/PermitsUnit for more information. 6. During development of the site, all land disturbances shall be conducted so that nuisance conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions,at the request of the Weld County Health Department, a fugitive dust control plan must be submitted. 7. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission any development that disturbs more than 5 acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods that are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. 8. If land development creates more than a 25-acre contiguous disturbance,or exceeds 6 months in duration, the responsible party shall prepare a fugitive dust control plan, submit an air pollution emissions notice, and apply for a permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. 9. "Weld County's Right to Farm" as provided in Appendix 22-E of the Weld County Code shall be placed on any recorded plat. O:\PAM\Planning\sketch\mz-1025 Peace Haven.rtf • RECEIVED APR 1 8 2005 (0710 sipil Weld County Referral Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE IMAY U 2 April 15, 2005 C 2005 RECEIVED COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Robert Parson Case Number MZ-1025 Please Reply By May 13, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project Minor Subdivision Change of Zone from A(Agriculture)to E (Estate). Peace Haven Estates. Legal Lot B of RE-3358; Pt NW4 of Section 10, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location East of and adjacent to CR 19 and south of and adjacent to CR 84. Parcel Number 0705 10 200023 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) June 7, 2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. g. See attached letter. Comments: r Signature Date y 2eo Agency Wa Cy,,ttot Call- / 777 c"�{Yp``�JO"y� +Weld County Planning Dept. +918 10'h Street, Greeley, CO. 80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax THE WATER SUPPLY AND STORAGE COMPANY P.O.BOX 1584 2319 E.Mulberry Street FORT COLLINS,COLORADO 80522-1584 April 28, 2005 The Weld Co. Dept. of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Project: Peace Haven Estates,Minor Subdivision Change of Zone from A to E Lot B of RE-3358; Pt NW4 of Section 10, T7N,R67W of the 6th P.M. We have not yet had the opportunity to see or review detailed construction drawings. Therefore we are unable to determine whether the right-of-way provided for the ditch is adequate and accurately located and whether other potential impacts to the ditch are being dealt with or mitigated to an acceptable level. From our standpoint,the construction of the project will necessitate the preparation by the developers of engineered plans at the appropriate time which will reflect construction details for all proposed facilities including,but not limited to,drainage facilities and structures,roads,paths and fences, ditch crossings for utilities, bridges and so on which may impact our ditch or ditch easement. We will reserve the right to have those plans reviewed and approved to our satisfaction and will require the developers to construct those improvements in accordance with the approved plans before we give final approval to the project. We request that final approval by Weld County be conditioned upon our approval of the engineered plans and construction details as described above. Thank you for providing notice to us for the filing of the application and the status of your review. Please continue to keep us informed as the application proceeds through your process. If you have questions,please do not hesitate to contact us. Sinn rely, Dennis J. Harmon Manager e l 4got in' Weld County Referral April 15, 2005 wipC. COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Robert Parson Case Number MZ-1025 P/ease Reply By May 13, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project Minor Subdivision Change of Zone from A(Agriculture)to E (Estate). Peace Haven Estates. Legal Lot B of RE-3358; Pt NW4 of Section 10, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location East of and adjacent to CR 19 and south of and adjacent to CR 84. Parcel Number 0705 10 200023 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) June 7, 2005 O We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan O ,We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ite See attached letter. Comments: Signature � �^ Date y—a 9 a `� Agency � /� /1, f. ft>.SAC/ /On • +Weld County Planning Dept. ❖918 10th Street, Greeley,CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 ❖(970)304-6498 fax DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES BUILDING INSPECTION NORTH OFFICE 918 10th Street GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 PHONE (970)353-6100, E XT.3540 FAX (970)304-6498 SOUTHWEST OFFICE C. 4209 CR 24.5 LONGMONT CO 80504 PHONE (720)652-4210 ext. 8730 COLORADO FAX(720)652-4211 April 29, 2005 Robert Parson Minor Subdivision Change of Zone from A (Agricultural) to E (Estate). Peace Haven Estates MZ-1025 1. Building permits shall be obtained prior to the construction of any building. Building permits are required for the principle dwelling, for buildings accessory to the principle dwelling and any future entry way and or gates. 2. A plan review is required for each building. Two complete sets of plans are required when applying for each permit. Each building may be required to be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. 3. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the codes adopted by Weld County at the time of permit application. Current adopted codes include the 2003 International Building Code; 2003 International Residential Code; 2003 International Mechanical Code; 2003 International Plumbing Code; 2003 International Fuel Gas Code; 2002 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. 4. Each building will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnical report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. 5. Fire resistance of walls and openings, construction requirements, maximum building height and allowable areas will be reviewed at the plan review. Setback and offset distances shall be determined by the Zoning Ordinance. 6. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 2003 International Building Code for the purpose of determining the maximum building size and height for various uses and types of construction and to determine compliance with the Bulk Requirements from Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. Building height shall be measured in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code in order to determine compliance with offset and setback requirements. Offset and setback requirements are measured to the farthest projection from the building. Please contact me for any further information regarding this project. S440 R Building Official Service,Teamwork,Integrity,Quality STATE OF COLORADO -OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER of coo )ivision of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources �� 1i 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 Weld County Planning Department `% April 26, 2005 GREELEY OFFICE �� *' Denver,Colorado 80203 p r t896i� FAX(303)Phone )8663) 358981 MAY 0 � 2005 Bill Owens www.waterstate.co.us Governor Ms. Sheri Lockman RECEIVED Russell George Weld County Planning Department Executive Director 918 101h Street Hal D.Simpson,P.E. Greeley, Co 80631 State Engineer Re: Peace Haven Estates Case No. MZ-1025 NW1/4 of Sec. 10,T7N, R67W, 6th P.M. Water Division 1,Water District 3 Dear Ms. Lockman: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to subdivide a 49.15-acre parcel into nine single-family residential lots with an average lot size of 5.46 acres. A Water Supply Information Summary Form was not included in the referral material. Our records show that the State Engineer's Office previously commented on this subdivision proposal by our letter dated November 12, 2002. The proposed water source for this development is identified as the North Weld County Water District ("District"), however, a letter of commitment for service from the District was not provided. From submitted ,-- materials it appears the developer intends to extend the water line to the subdivision from an existing 8 inch water main. Based on current information on file in this office, the District will typically furnish 70% of an acre-foot (228,000 gallons) of water per tap per annual water year if the allotment for the Colorado-Big Thompson (CBT) project water, as determined by the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, is 50% or greater. The District will restrict the delivery as necessary when the CBT allotment is less than 50%. Please note, the two wells mentioned in the letter of November 12, 2002, Permit nos. 243581 and 243582, have been canceled at the request of the owner. Pursuant to a letter received January 6, 2003, Mr. Robert Parsons indicated the wells had not been constructed and wished to have both permits canceled. Due to this action, these permits are no longer of concern in regards to this proposed subdivision. Pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(II), C.R.S., the State Engineer's office offers the opinion that with the District as the water supplier, the proposed water supply may be provided without causing material injury to existing water rights and the supply is expected to be adequate, provided the applicant obtain a letter of commitment for service from the District for this development.We recommend that the County obtain a signed copy of the water service agreement from the District prior to the final approval of the subdivision. If you have any question in this matter please contact Megan Sullivan of this office. Sincerely, nra D.-ea/F^ 6v Dick Wolfe, P.E. Assistant State Engineer cc: Jim Hall, Division Engineer George Varra, Water Commissioner, District 3 Water Supply Branch Subdivision File DW/MAS/Peace Haven Estates a Weld County Referral Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE ' APR 2 April 15, 2005 C 2005 RECEIVED COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Robert Parson Case Number MZ-1025 Please Reply By May 13, 2005 Planner Sheri Lockman Project Minor Subdivision Change of Zone from A (Agriculture) to E (Estate). Peace Haven Estates. Legal Lot B of RE-3358; Pt NW4 of Section 10, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location East of and adjacent to CR 19 and south of and adjacent to CR 84. Parcel Number 0705 10 200023 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) June 7, 2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: Signature Date Agency �� CA) ❖Weld County Planning Dept. 4918 10'h Street, Greeley,CO. 80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax Applicant: Robert Parson Planner: Sheri Lockman Case#: MZ-1025 47 57 48 I WCR 84 WCR 19 6 0.4 0 0.4 0.8 Miles Weld County Referral Map/ �T Highways Major Roads NLocal Roads / Railroads W \ E Streams B Ditches fk Lakes `.e Floodplains r L £ ♦rw ... 4 w14 I .-n. Y� w N o c a)E N Ql a) .E E o a) o _ a o To o w c o al o N N o a 5 Q E co _ — co 0 E ,� `o N co mS� u_ 0 p a) c o) o ) m 10 'n t O I Q. � Z ) Z° Zo 2 a O c c c U 6• 3 >,c U O a) N O one o'v'v' > co .- 0 UQ C/) u) v) v) o m aw U Q _ .0 aI d��' .5 l0 a) c N O v_, cn E E y a� 3 0 -•c 4) u) E .5 o co rn co 0 coo O r O) 2 +' .3 N O N • ul CD ir`oi V coE cU) .. = S CO CI P p U O rnrn Na U) 0 c ,13 O U co TD 3 yt ao m o'•v_' m 7) i a) 15 i U O 30 �o � 4.1 o }' c ` -v m > V 0 �_ c 0 W in in in E• a O C C Cl) 8 = z o Lb E a) E E 2u) °' � -IC w 7 00 " U) 0 N a o 0 I.- 7''> E O▪ c > a) O co y ` — 'o RI RI co 0 O ' 0 N co u) E v) co � 2 N of v, , 0 W O oar co O a) CO z — 0) .0E _ g $ c J C E c c N C7 V 0 N Z el a`) _ 2 o o x ` ., o O — N ._ O Nam Q$ � a � �' o (� ix co � E � $ o O. O Q o � co g 8 8 MI Weld County Sheriff's Office M e mo To: Sheri Lockman From: Ken Poncelow CC: Date: May 6, 2005 Re: MZ-1025 The Sheriffs Office recommends the following improvements for this housing sub-division: 1. The Sheriffs Office requests that builders and developers designate an area by the entrance of the sub-division in which to place a shelter for school children awaiting the school bus. This area should also include a pull off for the school bus which enables it to safely load and unload children out of the roadway. 2. Either mail distribution within the sub-division or a central drop off location within the sub-division should be developed so that residents do not have to cross a county road to obtain their mail. 3. A permanent sign should be placed at the entrance to the subdivision detailing the name of the sub-division, address,and a graphical presentation of the roadways within the subdivision. There should be a plan developed to maintain this sign. 4. If the roadways within this sub-division are not maintained or adopted by the county, individuals purchasing property in this sub-division should be notified that the Sheriff's Office will have limited traffic enforcement powers. 5. A plan should be developed to maintain roadways within the sub-division especially during inclement weather conditions for emergency vehicles. 6. The Sheriffs Office is very supportive of homeowner funded homeowner's associations. These associations provide a contact for the Sheriffs Office and a means of maintaining common areas. 7. If there are oil or gas production facilities within this sub-division, they need to be fenced off in order to mitigate the potential for tampering. These facilities are known to create an attractive nuisance for young people. Tampering not only creates a significant danger to safety but also of environmental damage with extensive mitigation and clean-up costs. The Sheriffs Office lacks the ability to absorb any additional service demand without the resources recommended in the multi-year plan provided to the Weld County Board of County Commissioners or as indicated by growth not considered at the time the plan was developed. I have no other comments on this proposal. Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE MAY 1 7 2005 MEMORANDUM RECEIVED WIID ing C. TO: Sheri Lockman, Planning D ment DATE: 16-May-2005 Q FROM: Peter Schei,P.E.,Pubh s Department COLORADO SUBJECT: MZ-1025 Peace Haven Estates Minor Subdivision(Zone Change) Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this change of zone request. Comments made during this phase of the subdivision process may not be all-inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining application process. Comments External Roadways: ❑ CR 84 is classified by the County as a local road (in the vicinity of this development) and requires a 60-foot right-of- way. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way and the documents creating the right-of-way shall be noted on the change of zone plat. If the right-of-way cannot be verified, it will be dedicated on the final plat. CR 84 is gravel and maintained by the County. ❑ CR 19 is classified by the County as a local road (in the vicinity of this development) and requires a 60-foot right-of- way. The applicant shall verify the existing right-of-way and the documents creating the right-of-way shall be noted on the change of zone plat. If the right-of-way cannot be verified, it will be dedicated on the final plat. CR 19 is gravel and maintained by the County. ❑ This development will introduce additional vehicle trips to the roadway system from the 8 proposed lots (77 vehicle trips to the roadway system). This increased level of traffic on unpaved roads creates fugitive dust and surface maintenance problems. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the County to proportionately share the cost of improvements. The cost will be based on a proportion of the traffic generated by the development to existing traffic. ❑ Public Works recommends the development proportionately share in roadway stabilization of CR 19 (1.0-mile) and CR 84 (0.3-mile) for a total route distance of 1.3-miles. It has been Weld County practice is to mitigate dust adjacent to new developments on unpaved roadways. The current traffic count of 100 aadt and the proposed addition of 77 vehicle trips represent a 44% development responsibility. The improvements agreement would escrow $36,528 ($4,566 per lot) based approximately on $62,000 per mile for stabilization and 1.3-miles. See attached off-site improvements agreement. o The applicant must submit the signed Agreement For Improvements For WCR 19 and WCR 84 Road Stabilization for Dust Control(off-site)with the final plan application. o The Board of County Commissioners shall approve the off-site improvements agreement prior to recording the final plat. ❑ Based on the proposal of limited development and apparent low traffic impact, a traffic study is not currently required by Public Works. This 8-lot development will add approximately 77 trips per day to the transportation system. Page 1 of 2 Internal Roadways: ❑ The internal roadway right-of-way shall be 60-feet in width including cul-de-sacs with a 65- foot radius, and dedicated to the public. The cul-de-sac edge of roadway radius shall be 50-feet. o The typical cross-section of interior road shown as two 12-foot gravel lanes with 4-foot gravel shoulders on the change of zone plat is acceptable. ❑ Stop signs and street name sign locations must be shown on the final roadway construction plans. ❑ Intersection sight distance triangles at the development entrance will be required. All landscaping within the triangles must be less than 31/4 feet in height at maturity, and noted on the final roadway plans. ❑ The applicant shall submit to Public Works stamped, signed and dated final plat drawings and roadway/construction & grading plan drawings for review (with the final plan application) and approval. Construction details must be included. ❑ The applicant shall submit Improvements Agreements According to Policy Regarding Collateral for Improvements (with the final plan application). These agreements must be reviewed by Public Works and shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners(BOCC)prior to recording the final plat. Drainage: ❑ The Sketch Plan Drainage Report for Peace Haven Minor Subdivision, dated August 2002, by Dennis Messner, P.E. (Colorado PE 26109) with Messner Engineering, Inc. (Project No. GRD-440-02) is acceptable. ❑ A final drainage report stamped, signed and dated by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado shall be submitted with the final application. The 5-year storm and 100-year storm drainage studies shall take into consideration off-site flows both entering and leaving the development. Increased runoff due to development will require detention of the 100-year storm developed condition while releasing the 5-year storm existing condition. o The final drainage report shall include a flood hazard review documenting any FEMA defined floodways. The engineer shall reference the specific map panel number, including date. The development site shall be located on the copy of the FEMA map. The applicant shall prepare a construction detail for typical lot grading with respect to drainage for the final application. Front, rear and side slopes around building envelopes must be addressed. In addition, drainage for rear and side lot line swales shall be considered. Building envelopes must be planned to avoid storm water flows, while taking into account adjacent drainage mitigation. ❑ Final drainage construction and erosion control plans (conforming to the drainage report) stamped, signed and dated by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado shall be submitted with the final plan application. Recommendation ❑ The Public Works Department recommends approval of this change of zone. The applicant shall address the comments listed above at the specific step of the review process stated. The review process will continue only when all appropriate elements have been submitted. Issues of concern must be resolved /�q{/-j}-�, I with the Public Works Department prior to recording the change of zone and final plats,' n �"i ..iLJ) r 1w“.(1.) fer rce l F PC: MZ-1025 Peace Haven Estates Minor Subdivision(Zone Change) -- Email &Original: Planner: Lockman PC by Post: Applicant:Jeff Couch w/TEAM Engineering PC by Post: Engineer: Dennis Messner w/Messner Engineering, Inc. Page 2 of 2 • r. Weld Co Linty Planning De GREE(Ey Off/CEpartmer MAY 7 2005 AGREEMENT FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR WCR 19 and E$4 ROAD STABILIZATION for Dust Control l•c V ED THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of , in the year 2005, by and between Robert L. Parsons, developer of Peace Haven Estates Minor Subdivision, hereinafter referred to as "Developer", with an address Weld County Colorado, and the County of Weld, State of Colorado,by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "County," with offices located at 915 - 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer has obtained approval for a Subdivision Final Plat for 8 (eight) lots for Peace Haven Estates Minor Subdivision, hereinafter referred to as the "Development," and WHEREAS, WCR 19 from SH 14 to WCR 84, and WCR 84 Development frontage hereinafter referred to as 'the Road", will need ROAD STABILIZATION for dust control, in part, due to the increased traffic generated by the Development, a distance of approximately 1.3- miles, and WHEREAS, WCR 84 abuts a portion of Peace Haven Estates Minor Subdivision, 8 (eight) of the lots will need WCR 19 and WCR 84 for access to the Development, and WHEREAS, Peace Haven Estates Minor Subdivision, requires WCR 19 and WCR 84 and will constitute 44 percent participation for the Road based on a current traffic count of 100 aadt, and WHEREAS, the proportional costs of STABILIZATION for the Road attributable to the traffic generated by the lots in the Development using the Road, is estimated to be $4,566 per lot. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follow: 1. TERM A. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first written above to the completion of STABILIZING the Road and final accounting by County and payment of all land development charges by the Developer for the 8 (eight) lots accessing the Road, or five years if WCR 19 and WRC 84 are not STABILIZED. 2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE COUNTY A. Weld County shall STABILIZE the road, within five years of the date first written above, the Road at a current estimated cost of$62.000 per mile. The stabilization improvements are anticipated to be for two 13 foot travel Page 1 of 5 lanes designed in accordance with generally accepted engineering practices but the actual design shall be at the discretion of Weld County. B. Design, construction, and maintenance of this portion of Road shall be the responsibility by the County. C. County or Developer must STABILIZE the roads within five years of the date first written above or forfeit all rights to land development charges, which are the obligation of the Developer whether already in escrow or remaining to be paid. D. Weld County shall perform a final accounting once STABILIZATION is complete and may collect from the escrow account (or from the developer if the amount in the escrow is insufficient to satisfy developers obligation) up to 44 percent of the total cost of STABILIZING WCR 19 and WCR 84. If additional traffic is generated prior to STABILIZING WCR 19 and WCR 84, such that the percentage of traffic generated by the development is less than 44 percent, the County shall adjust the percentage charged to the developer proportionately. Any amount which must be collected from the developer, which is not paid within 45 days of final accounting, shall assessed interest in the amount of 8 percent per annum. 3. OBLIGATION OF THE DEVELOPER A. Developer agrees to pay the amount of$4,566 per each lot accessing the Road. The actual amount shall be determined in accordance with paragraph 2.D. B. The Developer agrees to escrow monies as follows at the sale of the first lot $4,566, at the sale of the second lot $4,566, at the sale of the third lot $4,566, at the sale of the fourth lot $4,566, at the sale of the fifth lot $4,566, at the sale of the sixth lot $4,566, at the sale of the seventh lot $4,566, at the sale of the eighth lot $4,566. The escrow account shall be set up according to paragraph 4 herein. C. The Developer shall not be released from this obligation unless County does not STABILIZE the road within the time frame set forth in paragraph 2.C. herein. In no event shall Developer's obligation under this Agreement exceed $36,528 subject to adjustment to a higher or lower figure from the first quarter of 2005 to the year and quarter in which the contemplated work is being performed based on "The State Highway Bid Price index contained in the "Quarterly Cost report" of The Engineering News-Record as published by The McGraw-Hill Companies. 4. ESCROW AGREEMENT, the terms of which will be subject to review by the County that provides at least the following: M M, mo_DE,woP�TREvIE ...e,z,. ,7 PI-NIZAMPIWCZ-1025 Pca€4 Hove,Fens Mmor Sohihneoi Vow Chugs)eft:r. ,m Page 2 of 5 A. The cash in escrow when fully funded is $36,528. B. The escrow agent guarantees that the escrowed funds will be disbursed according to the terms of this agreement and will not release any portion of the funds without prior written approval of the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. 5. SEVERABILITY If any term or condition of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, this Agreement shall be construed and enforced without such provision to the extent that this Agreement is then capable of execution within the original intent of the parties hereto. 6. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY ENFORCEMENT. It is expressly understood and agreed that the enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and all rights of action relating to such enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to the undersigned parties and nothing in this Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right of action whatsoever by any other person not included in this Agreement. It is the express intention of the undersigned parties receiving services of benefits under this Agreement shall be an incidental beneficiary only. 7. MODIFICATION AND BREACH This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding between the parties to this Agreement and supersedes any other agreements concerning the subject matter of this transaction, whether oral or written. No modification, amendment, notation, renewal, or other alteration of or to this Agreement shall be deemed valid or of any force or effect whatsoever, unless mutually agreed upon in writing by the undersigned parties. No Breach of any term, provisions, or clause of this Agreement shall be deemed waived or excused, unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have waived or consented. Any consent by any party hereto, or waiver of, a breach by any other party, whether express or implied, shall not constitute a consent to waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach. 8. NO WARRANTY. Neither County nor Developer, by virtue of their entering into this Agreement and upon their promises to perform the work described herein, make warranties, either express or implied, that the improvement work and/or maintenance of these roads meet standards other than those generally required for counties and cities of the size and type similar to County. Page 3 of 5 9. BINDING This agreement shall be binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have signed this Agreement this day of , 2005. BY: Developer ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO Chair, BY: Weld County Clerk to the Board Deputy Clerk to the Board APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Attorney r Page 4 of 5 r- Cost Estimating for Offsite Improvements Agreement 16-May-2005 PAS Weld County Road 19&84 stabilization for 1.3-miles. Weld County Public Works Dept. Two 13-foot lanes=26-feet. one-mile estimate one-mile 44% Material Quantity Units Cost per Unit Total Cost Percent Cost Street Grading 2,542 ydA3 $2.60 ydA3 $6,609.20 $2,875.19 Street R n(Class 6) 2,542 ydA3 $15.00 ydA3 $38,130.00 $16,587.63 Chemical Stabilization 15,253 ydA2 $1.00 ydA2 $15,253.00 $6,1135.49 (DC2000) Engineering&Supervision Costs(fixed) $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Grand Total = I $61,992.201 $28,098.301 =%Total For 1.3-mile= $36,528 Estimate of Quantities Material Length Width Depth Area Area Volume Volume Weight feet feet feet ft^2 ydA2 E3 ydA3 ton Street Grading 5,280 26 0.5 - - 68,640 2,542 - Class 6 5,280 26 0.5 - - 68,640 2,542 - Chemical 5,280 26 - 137,280 15,253 - - - Proportional Share Applicant(adt) Current(aadt) Percentage Participation 77 100 44% Page 5 of 5 Hello