The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20050446.tiff @cpnwilceng amigiineem, OGt�C denver • durango • grand junction • trinidad August 25, 2004 Mr. Bruce T. Barker Weld County Attorney P.O. Box 758 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Coordinated Planning Agreement Weld County and the Town of Gilcrest RGCE Job No. 162.0029 Dear Mr. Barker: Enclosed please find two copies of the signed Coordinated Planning Agreement between Weld County and the Town of Gilcrest. Attached to each agreement is a map showing the proposed Urban Growth Area. The Urban Growth Area was established as part of the update to the Gilcrest Comprehensive Plan that was adopted by the Board of Trustees earlier this year. The boundaries were determined based on major transportation routes that could have impacts on the Town. These boundaries are: WCR 44 on the north, SH 60 on the west, WCR 38 on the south, and one-half mile east of US 85 on the east. By designating this area as a Future Planning Area in the Comprehensive Plan, this guides the Town in decision-making so that the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan can be achieved. Please let me know if you need anything else to move this forward for consideration by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. Sincerely, RG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.) c� 7 7 6444971/ Babette Morrow, AICP Senior Planner cc: I.fMMonika Mike-Daniels, Weld County Planning Linda Chosa, Gilcrest Town Clerk 2005-0446 EXHIBIT 1331 17th street • suite 710• denver, colorado 80202• (303) 293-8107 I fax (303) 293-8106 R:\0162\0029\Bruce Barker letter.doc Page 1 of 1 Sheri Lockman From: Bruce Barker Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:32 PM To: Sheri Lockman Subject: RE: Gilcrest IGA October 18th is the day Monica and I will be down at Douglas County from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. with the BOCC. I can stop in Gilcrest on the way back. But let's make certain before that date that the Board is OK going ahead with the Gilcrest IGA. Should have a chance to discuss with them on September 30th. From: Sheri Lockman Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:32 PM To: Bruce Barker Subject: Gilcrest IGA Babette Morrow called about setting up the town meeting for the Gilcrest IGA. They would like to do it at the next feasible regular town meeting on October 18 at 7:00. Will this work for you? 09/15/2004 Sheri Lockman From: Babette Morrow[babette@rgengineers.com] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:54 PM To: Sheri Lockman Subject: Gilcrest IGA Sheri, just a note to let you know that you should be receiving our signed IGA agreement next week. I sent a copy to Bruce Barker and one to Monica Mika. Call me if you have any questions. Babette Morrow RG Consulting Engineers (303) 468-8461 babette@rgengineers.com 1 a Kit DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 918 10`" Street GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us CE-MAIL:PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT. 3540 FAX (970) 304-6498 COLORADO August 16, 2004 Ms. Menda Waren Town of Gilcrest 304 8th Street Gilcrest, CO 80623 Dear Ms. Waren, Mayor: The Department of Planning Services is hoping that Weld County and the Town of Gilcrest will be able to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement at some time in the future. Please contact our office when the Town is ready to proceed. Until the Town takes action our office will consider the Intergovernmental Agreement with Gilcrest to be on hold. Our office will continue to recognize an Urban Growth Boundary Area located 1/2 mile from existing sewer lines. Sincerely, Sheri Lockman Planner II Page 1 of 1 Sheri Lockman To: Monica Mika; Bruce Barker Subject: Gilcrest IGA The new mayor of Gilcrest, Menda Waren, finally returned my phone call. She is still very interested in going forward with the IGA and is going to talk to their attorney and other town officials. They are no longer using Modus Management. She is hoping they are ready for a town meeting. Bruce, are we ready to have the town meeting? Is the draft of the IGA ready? She is also going to submit some additional information about their sewer capabilities for our review. 06/16/2004 Page 1 of 1 Sheri Lockman From: Bruce Barker • Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 2:19 PM To: Sheri Lockman Cc: Monica Mika Subject: RE: Gilcrest IGA Jeff Fisher called me today and wanted to know what the notice needs to say. I asked if the Town has approved and he said that he thinks so. I told him that he should call to either you or Monica to get a Planning Commission date to put in the notice. The notice needs to include a copy of the CPA. He says he has the list of landowners. He will probably be sending to Monica not only a draft of the notice, but also a request for the County to foot some or all of the bill for the notification. We will need to respond to let him know if the draft is OK and if the County will pay any of the cost. From: Sheri Lockman Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 12:31 PM To: Bruce Barker Subject: Gilcrest IGA Have you heard from Gilcrest regarding the town meeting date? - 3 .2- S' Sy 05/14/2004 DEPARTVT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540 FAX (970)TIVE304-6498FILES WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1555 N. 17TH AVENUE ' GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 C. COLORADO January 28, 2004 Paul Chacon Town of Gilcrest 304 8th Street Gilcrest, CO 80623 Dear Mr. Chacon, Mayor: The Department of Planning Services is looking forward to processing an Intergovernmental Agreement between Weld County and the Town of Gilcrest. In order to proceed with this agreement, I am requesting the opportunity to meet with you to discuss the public participation process and review proposed Intergovernmental Agreement boundaries. Please contact Wendi Inloes or me to set up this meeting. Wendi and I may be reached at the above address and telephone numbers. We would be happy to meet whenever is convenient for you and look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, Monica Daniels Mika, AICP Director cc: Mike Geile SERVICE,TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY,QUALITY ‘?"-- DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540 WI I D FAX (970) 304-6498 WEBS 155 N. 17T www.co.weld.co.us O 1555 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO February 20, 2004 Town of Gilcrest Paul Chacon, Mayor PO Box 128 Gilcrest, CO 80623 Dear Mr. Chacon: A letter was sent to you on January 28, 2004, asking to discuss a possible meeting to refine the process of the proposed Intergovernmental Agreement with Weld County and Gilcrest. I want to again make myself available to meet with you at your convenience to discuss this agreement. Should you have any further questions, or to set up this meeting, please contact me at the above telephone number. Sincerely, �7 Monica. Daniels-Mika - ----- Director [MONICA Mika - Re: Gilcrest Coordinated Planning Agreement Page 1 From: MONICA Mika To: 'fisher©modusl.com".GWIA.CENTDOMAIN Subject: Re: Gilcrest Coordinated Planning Agreement I need to get support information that you are able to provide public water and sewer in your proposed area. After we get this,then we should schedule a meeting to talk about the process. We will also need to have a public meeting and invite all property owners in the influenced area. I can help with the list of owners. >>> "Jeff Fisher" <jfisher©modusl.com> 12/15/03 10:48AM >>> Monica, We have a Board meeting tonight at the Town of Gilcrest. I would like to update them on the progress of the IGA. Do you have any additional information for me? Many thanks. --Jeff Fisher Project Manager Modus Management LLC direct phone: 303.638.4565 Original Message From: "MONICA Mika"<mmika©co.weld.co.us> To: <jfisher(Wmodusl.com> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:58 AM Subject: Re: Gilcrest Coordinated Planning Agreement > I will ask Bruce Barker about the status of the agreement. I have not seen a map, but I will ask our CAD guy to make one for this case. I am not sure what the time schedule will be on this. I will get back to you. > >>> "Jeff Fisher <jfisheramodus1.com> 11/06/03 03:37PM >>> > Monica, > I am following up a voice mail I left for you a couple of weeks ago regarding the status of the Coordinated Planning Agreement between Weld County and the Town of Gilcrest. It is my understanding that our attomeys have reached consensus as to the language of the Agreement, and it was now up to the Planning Departments to establish the area to which the Agreement will refer. >As I mentioned in my voice mail, we have decided to include only that area within one half mile of existing Town boundaries, as is currently represented on the County's UGA maps. We feel that getting an official Agreement on file now- even without changing current boundaries- is in the Town's best interest. And once the Town is able to upgrade its municipal services, the exhibit could at that point be amended to show a larger area, and we wouldn't have to re-draft another agreement. >Would you please respond to this email with your thoughts on the subject, and let me know the status of the Agreement from your perspective. >Thank you very much. > --Jeff Fisher MONICA Mika - Gilcrest UGA Page 1 From: "Jeff Fisher' <ffisher@modus1.com> To: <mmika@co.weld.co.us> Date: 9/30/03 1:54PM Subject: Gilcrest UGA Monica, I am sorry we were cut off while speaking on the phone this morning. I understand the criteria for accepting an urban growth area revolves around whether the municipality can adequately provide water and sewer services to the land within the UGA. In its present situation,the Town of Gilcrest's water and sewer facilities are adequate only to serve the area one half mile outside its current borders. However, as part of its comprehensive plan update, currently underway, the Town has identified the area depicted on our proposed UGA map as the limit of future growth of the Town and has established a Future Land Use Plan within this boundary. Accordingly,the Town has prioritized the improvement of its public utilities with the intent of increasing its serviceable area and maintaining (or improving) current levels of service. Therefore, it is not clear to me whether the Town meets the County's criteria of serviceability for this proposed IGA. In short, does the Town's PLAN to upgrade water and sewer services sufficiently meet the County's requirement that they can provide these services to the UGA? I'm sure we will have further discussions regarding this issue. Specifically, I would like to discuss Lasalle's Coordinated Planning Agreement with the County. As I understand it, they have some kind of a "phasing component" in their agreement that allows their UGA to be larger than would otherwise have been accepted. I would like to hear more about this arrangement and see if a similar one would benefit the Town of Gilcrest in any way. Thank you very much for getting back to me so quickly on this issue. And I apologize again for our bad telephone connection this morning. I look forward to finalizing this discussion with you as soon as possible. --Jeff Fisher Project Manager Modus Management LLC direct phone: 303.638.4565 CC: "Babette Morrow" <bmorrow@modus1.com> [MONICA Mika- Re: FW: Gilcrest-Weld Cosntv,Coordinated Planning Agreement , Page 1 r' From: BRUCE Barker To: "cbeery©GORSUCH.COM".GWIA.CENTDOMAIN Date: 9/25/03 5:05PM Subject: Re: FW: Gilcrest-Weld County Coordinated Planning Agreement I have asked Monica Mika to contact you or someone else you would suggest to discuss the size of the UGA. Again, the question is whether water service may be provided throughout the UGA by either the Town of Gilcrest or its contractor. >>> "Carmen N. Beery" <cbeery@GORSUCH.COM> 09/24/03 02:59PM >>> Bruce: Sorry I neglected to attach this to my last e-mail. Here is a proposed UGA map as prepared by our Town Planners. Let me know if this does not meet our needs or if you need any further information. Carmen Beery GORSUCH KIRGIS LLP Ph: (303) 376-5000 Fx: (303) 376-5001 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and privileged, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attach the original message, and delete the original message from your computer and any network to which your computer is connected. CC: Mika, MONICA [MONICA Mika - FW: Gilcrest-Weld Countyeapordinated Planning Agreement . Page 1 From: "Carmen N. Beery" <cbeery@GORSUCH.COM> To: "bbarker@co. weld. co. us(E-mail)" <BBARKER@co.weld.co.us> Date: 9/24/03 3:04PM Subject: FW: Gilcrest-Weld County Coordinated Planning Agreement Bruce: Sorry I neglected to attach this to my last e-mail. Here is a proposed UGA map as prepared by our Town Planners. Let me know if this does not meet our needs or if you need any further information. Carmen Beery GORSUCH KIRGIS LLP Ph: (303) 376-5000 Fx: (303) 376-5001 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and privileged, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attach the original message, and delete the original message from your computer and any network to which your computer is connected. rMONICA Mika- RE: Weld Co-Gilcrest IGA,. Page 1 From: BRUCE Barker To: "cbeery@GORSUCH.COM".GWIA.CENTDOMAIN Date: 9/9/03 12:07PM Subject: RE: Weld Co-Gilcrest IGA Sorry I did not respond last week. Our system for sending e-mails outside of the County was down a good portion of the week. This agreement is one that has been used for many of our municipalities, and in that process has been copied and pasted repeatedly. I think what happened with Section 3.3(c) is that the first sentence got cut off and never restated. It should read: "If The MUNICIPALITY provides municipal water service to property within its boundaries, subject to its rules and regulations, it will provide water under provisions similar to those indicated above for sewer service." (Emphasis added.) Then cut out the next sentence regarding 21 day notice. I hope 3.3(c)then makes sense. The reason for the sentence regarding the developer is to make certain no one may argue that in 3.3(c), the municipality agrees to install water infrastructure without assistance from the developer. I think the decision regarding the extent of road annexation is one that ultimately needs to be determined by the municipality. I know it does not state that, but really, if the County disagrees with the Town, what remedy does the County have? I would say the only remedy is to get out of the agreement. Ultimately, the municipality always has the last say on which properties are annexed and which are not. The 12 month termination provision in Section 6.3 was what was suggested by other municipalities. I think the Board would be OK with whatever time frame the Town feels comfortable with. As to a new Section 3.6, I do not think the Board would go for that. With the above-stated changes to Section 3.3(c), the idea of that section is to require the Town (or a district under agreement with the Town) provide water service throughout the Urban Growth Area in return for the Board of County Commissioners requiring the developer to hook up to public water. Instead of a new Section 4.7, I suggest a sentence at the end of Section 4.1 saying something to the effect of"nothing stated herein requires the MUNICIPALITY to annex any property." I am OK with your proposed Section 6.5. Could you draft it? Attached is the current version of the agreement without the change to 3.3(c). Let me know if you are unable to open it. If you wish to make the changes to the attached and get it back to me, I will review those changes with the Board and respnd. Thanks for your assistance on this and I, too, look forward to getting it done! Bruce Barker. >>> "Carmen N. Beery"<cbeery@GORSUCH.COM> 09/03/03 03:42PM >>> Bruce: I am sorry we haven't been able to connect via telephone on the County-Gilcrest IGA. I have had a lot of out-of-office meetings and hearings lately. In an effort to move things along (I know both the county and town are anxious to have this agreement in place) I thought I'd send my thoughts and questions via e-mail. Might make it easier for you to respond too. 1. Section 3.3(c) is either confusing or unnecessary. It appears to say-Town will provide water within its boundaries in accordance with Town rules and regulations; Town will comply with any agreements it has MONICA Mika- RE: Weld Co-Gilcrest IGA^ .. Page 2 with water districts. These things go without saying. And the provision that the Developer will provide infrastructure-why is this in an agreement between the County and Town? If the point of the rest of Section 3.3(c) is to parallel 3.3(b) and say that Town will consider extension of water services outside its boundaries, it doesn't clearly convey that. I am not at all sure what this section is trying to say. 2. Who decides what properties a road "primarily serves"for purposes of Section 4.3? What if the Town and County disagree? Inclusion or exclusion of a county road was an issue in the Town's latest annexation. 3. Why such a long termination notice period in Section 6.3- 12 months? Would you be comfortable with 1 or 2 months? 12 months is a long time for either party to be bound to a process if they feel as if it is just not working out. 4. I would propose a few new sections that clarify the intent of scope of this agreement- at least, as I understand the intent and scope. Such as: new section 3.6 to clarify that nothing shall be construed to require the Town to provide municipal water or sewer services outside of Town's municipal boundaries; new section 4.7 to clarify that nothing requires the Town annex any property; and a new section 6.5 to clarify that neither party is intending to waive any of its independent discretion to render the ultimate decision on land use applications within its own jurisdiction. My only concern here is that someone reading this agreement 5 years from now understands that we're trying to cooperate and consult- not tie each other's hands. I would be happy to make any of these proposed changes for your review if I had an electronic version of the document. Feel free to respond to any of my comments via e-mail or telephone. I have a semi-normal week the rest of the week here, so I should be in most of the time. I look forward to finalizing this. Carmen Beery GORSUCH KIRGIS LLP Ph: (303) 376-5000 Fx: (303) 376-5001 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and privileged, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attach the original message, and delete the original message from your computer and any network to which your computer is connected. CC: Mika, MONICA Voneen Macklin -Coordinated Agreement- ^IdCo/Gilcrest Page 1 From: "Jeff Fisher" <jfisher@modusl.com> To: <vmacklin@co.weld.co.us> Date: 06/24/2003 3:37PM Subject: Coordinated Agreement-WeldCo/Gilcrest Voneen, Per our phone conversation on June 24, 2003, we are in the process of updating the Town of Gilcrest's Comprehensive Plan. As part of this process, the Town would like to enter into a coordinated agreement with Weld County regarding growth area boundaries. We are currently in the process of establishing the geographical area that will be included in this agreement. When this excercise is complete, we will notify you and provide you with a map so that we can move forward with finalizing the coordinated agreement. If you have any questions, please contact me by phone or by email. Thank you very much. --Jeff Fisher Project Manager Modus Management, LLC direct phone: 303.638.4565 CC: "Babette Morrow" <bmorrow@modusl.com> 6 WELD COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 915 TENTH STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, CO 80632 IWD WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us PHONE: (970) 336-7235 Q FAX: (970) 352-0242 • COLORADO April 17, 2003 Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE APR 1 7 2003 Jeff Fisher, Project Manager RECEIVED Modus Management LLC 4890 South Jellison Street 3o3 - X137 - hbze Re: Coordinated Planning Agreement-- Weld County and the Town of Gilcrest Dear Mr. isher: Enclosed at:the two originals for the Coordinated Planning Agreement betwectl Weld County and the Town of Gilcrest. As we discussed, you should contact Monica Mika, Planning Director, at (970) 353-6100, ext. 3450, to discuss the map to be attached to the Agreement. Please have the Town approve the Agreement and see that the two originals are signed. Send them to me at: P.O. Box 758, 915 10th Street, Greeley, CO 80632. I will then see that the Agreement begins the process of consideration in Weld County. Please feel free to call me at (970) 356-4000, ext. 4390, if you have any questions or comments regarding the enclosed. — Si rely, — ruse . B er,z,SWeld County Attorney Enc. pc: Monica Mika-Daniels 3-25-03 COORDINATED PLANNING AGREEMENT This Coordinated Planning Agreement is made and entered into effective as of the_day of, , 2003, A.D., between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, whose address is 915 10th Street, P. O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632, hereinafter called the "COUNTY," and the TOWN OF GILCREST, a Colorado Municipality, whose address is 304 8th Street, P.O. Box 128, Gilcrest, CO 80623, hereinafter called the "MUNICIPALITY." RECITALS A. The COUNTY exercises governmental authority regulating land use, growth and development in its unincorporated areas, which areas include lands surrounding the MUNICIPALITY; and B. The MUNICIPALITY exercises governmental authority ovenhe same matters within its municipal boundaries, and annexations, and is able to provide municipal services and facilities for efficient and desirable urban development; and C. In Title 29,Article 20,Colorado Revised Statutes,the General Assembly of the State of Colorado has granted broad authority to local governments to.plan for, and =regulate_ the development and use of land within their respective jurisdictions; and D. In said Title 29, Article 20, Colorado Revised Statutes, the General Assembly has further authorized and encouraged local governments to cooperate and contract with each other for the purpose of planning and regulating the development of land by the joint and coordinated exercise of planning, zoning, subdivisions, building, and related regulatory powers; and E. Existing and anticipated pressures for growth and development in areas surrounding the MUNICIPALITY indicate that the joint and coordinated exercise by the COUNTY and the MUNICIPALITY of their respective planning, zoning, subdivision, building and related regulatory powers in such areas will best promote the objectives stated in this agreement. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual-promises and undertakings herein set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish procedures and standards pursuant to which the parties will move toward greater coordination in the exercise of their land use and related regulatory powers within unincorporated areas surrounding the MUNICIPALITY. The objectives of such efforts are to accomplish the type of development in such areas which best protects the health, safety, prosperity, and general welfare of the inhabitants thereof by reducing the waste of physical, financial, and human resources which result from either excessive congestion or excessive scattering of population, and to achieve maximum efficiency and economy in the process of development. However, any action taken pursuant to this Agreement that pertains to any land within the municipality,for incorporated areas, and within the County, for unincorporated areas, is subject to final approval by the governing body of the municipality or county, respectively. 1 2. DEFINITIONS. For the purposes of this Agreement the following terms shall be defined as set forth herein: 2.1 Development. Any land use requiring regulatory approval by the elected governing body of the applicable party in the Urban Growth Area except for an amendment to a plat or a down-zoning, neither of which creates any additional lots and except for a Recorded Exemption or Subdivision Exemption. Existing agricultural uses,which are lawful uses, either as uses by right under the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, or as legally existing non-conforming uses, are also exempt from the definition of "Development". 2.2 Non-Urban Development. Developments comprised of nine (9) or fewer residential lots, located in a non-urban area as defined in Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code, not adjacent to other PUD's, subdivisions, municipal boundaries or urban growth corridors. Non-Urban Development shall also include land used or capable of being used for agricultural purposes and including development which combine clustered residential uses and agricultural uses in a manner that the agricultural lands are suitable for farming and ranching operatic IP ine ne.x+fcity (4U) Years. Non-Urban Development on public water and septic systems may have a minimum lot size of one(1)acre and an overall gross _density of two and one-half (2'%) acres per septic system. Non-Urban Development proposing individual, private wells and septic systems shall have a minimum lot size of two and one-half (2%) acres per lot. 2.3 MUNICIPAL Referral Area. The area located outside of but within three miles of the MUNICIPALITY's municipal,:boundaries 2.4 Urban Development. Developments exceeding nine(9)lots and/or located in close proximity to existing PUD's, subdivisions, municipal boundaries or urban growth corridors and boundaries. All Urban Development shall pave the internal road systems of the developments. Urban Development requires services such as central water, sewer systems (including permitted septic systems), road networks, park and recreation facilities and programs, and storm drainage. 2.5 The Urban Growth Area is hereby established and shall consist of all lands so designated on the map attached hereto and referred to herein as "Exhibit A," EXCEPTING those lands located within the MUNICIPALITY's municipal boundaries. 3. PLANNING COORDINATION. This Agreement is intended to be a Comprehensive Development Plan adopted and implemented pursuant to C.R.S. §29-20-105(2). Following the execution of this Agreement by both parties, COUNTY Development approvals in the MUNICIPALITY's Referral area will be processed and determined in accordance with the following: 3.1 Referral. The COUNTY will refer all proposals for Development within the MUNICIPAL Referral Area to the MUNICIPALITY for its review and recommendation. Such referral will include at least a copy of the written Development proposal and preliminary COUNTY staff summary of the case. The COUNTY will allow not less than twenty-one(21) days for the MUNICIPALITY to review same and furnish its recommendations to COUNTY staff prior to formulation of the COUNTY staff recommendation. If the MUNICIPALITY does not respond within such time,COUNTY staff may proceed with its recommendation, but any MUNICIPALITY comment or recommendation received on or before the Thursday next 2 preceding the meeting of the Board of County Commissioners or Planning Commission at which the matter will be considered will be transmitted to the Board or Commission. If the MUNICIPALITY submits no comment or recommendation the COUNTY may assume it has no objection to the proposal. If the MUNICIPALITY submits recommendations, the COUNTY will either include within its written decision the reasons for any action taken contrary to the same or furnish such reasons to the MUNICIPALITY by a separate writing. 3.2 Development Outside Urban Growth Area. To the extent legally possible the COUNTY will disapprove proposals for Urban Development in areas of the MUNICIPAL Referral Area outside the Urban Growth Area. In reviewing proposals for Non-Urban Development in such areas, the COUNTY will apply its Comprehensive Plan and zoning and subdivision ordinances, and, where appropriate, the MUD Plan. 3.3 Development in Urban Growth Area. The following shall apply to proposed Development in the Urban Growth Area: (a) Upon receipt of any proposal for Development of property then r.urrent:y eligible for voluntary annexation to the MUNICIPALITY, the COUNTY ot, in writing, notify the proponent of the opportunity for annexation and notify the MUNICIPALITY of the proposal. The COUNTY will not consider such proposal for Development unless the applicant or its predecessor has submitted a complete annexation petition and been denied said annexation by the MUNICIPALITY Board or electorate for a substantially similar development on the same property within the preceding twelve(12)months. The COUNTY may consider such a proposal if, after a period of seven months from the date of:filing of a complete annexation petition, pursued in good faith by the applicant or its predecessor, the MUNICIPALITY has failed to approve or deny such annexation. (b) The MUNICIPALITY will consider the extension of sanitary sewer service to property in the Urban Growth Area, subject to its rules and regulations, which include provisions requiring a written contract for extraterritorial service and the construction of new mains and other facilities necessary to serve the property with costs assessed in accordance with the MUNICIPALITY'S rules and regulations. MUNICIPALITY agrees to give notice of any proposed change in said rules and regulations to COUNTY twenty-one (21) days prior to adoption. (c) If the MUNICIPALITY provides municipal water service to property within its boundaries, it will provide water subject to its current rules and regulations. MUNICIPALITY agrees to give notice of any proposed change in said rules and regulations to COUNTY twenty-one (21) days prior to adoption., Where water furnished by the MUNICIPALITY is received in whole or in part from an outside water provider such as a water district, the MUNICIPALITY shall exercise its obligations under this agreement consistent with the terms of any such agreement. Developer shall be responsible for constructing any infrastructure necessary to serve the property with municipal water service. The MUNICIPALITY will negotiate in good faith with the water provider to explore ways in which the extension of water service outside MUNICIPALITY boundaries can be coordinated so as to achieve the purposes stated in Section 1 above while still recognizing the rights and obligations of the water provider and its constituents. 3 (d) In recognition of the availability of public water within the Urban - Growth Area as indicated in paragraph (c) above, the COUNTY will require public water as a condition of approval of any subdivision, rezoning or planned unit development and will not approve such Development until the applicant obtains a written contract for same with the MUNICIPALITY, or water service from a water district, if the MUNICIPALITY cannot provide water. This Agreement shall be prima facie evidence of the availability of municipal water within the meaning of §32-1- 203(2.5)(a), C.R.S. (e) The COUNTY will not grant any waiver of current Municipal street standards for any Development without the consent of the MUNICIPALITY and will consider identifiable impacts on the MUNICIPALITY'S road system resulting from such Development on the same basis as in-COUNTY impacts. (f) To the extent legally possible, as determined by the COUNTY, the COUNTY will deny proposals for Non-Urban Development in the Urban Growth Area. Nothing in this subsection shall restrict the COUNTY from approving the division of ownership parcels located in t'iy Umn'; Growth Area having residential improvements served by septic systems, regardless of the size of resulting lots. Furthermore, the County shall not be restricted from allowing the expansion of legally existing non-urban uses provided adequate protection for future urban uses is included in any such approval. (g) If any MUNICIPALITY recommendation of disapproval of a Development proposal is based upon a conflict or incompatibility between proposed uses in the Development and anticipated MUNICIPALITY zoning classification for the property,the COUNTY will not approve same unless the applicant demonstrates (i) that no such conflict or incompatibility will reasonably occur, (H) that suitable mitigation measures to be imposed by the COUNTY as conditions of approval will eliminate or adequately mitigate adverse consequences of incompatibility or conflict, or(iii) that the MUNICIPALITY'S anticipated zoning classification of the property is unreasonable because of existing or planned uses of adjacent property. The MUNICIPALITY shall be given notice of, and may appear and be heard at any hearing or other proceeding at which the COUNTY will consider such issues. (h) The parties anticipate that ¶ 3.3 (e)-(g) will be addressed in more detail if a Mutually Acceptable Plan is considered and adopted for the UGA or the referral Area. — (i) The COUNTY shall require that all storm water detention facilities in subdivisions approved within the UGA shall be designed to detain the storm water runoff from the fully developed subdivision from a 100-year storm and release the detained water at a quantity and rate not to exceed the quantity and rate of a 5-year storm falling on the undeveloped site. 4 3.4 Mutuality of Impact Consideration. The parties recognize that decisions by one party regarding development may impact property outside of each particular jurisdiction. The parties agree that those jurisdictional boundaries will not be the basis for giving any greater or lesser weight to those impacts during the course of deliberations. 3.5 Referrals to County. The MUNICIPALITY will refer proposals for Development which lie within 500 feet of any property in unincorporated Weld County to the COUNTY for its review and recommendation. Such referral will include at least a copy of the written Development proposal. The MUNICIPALITY will allow not less than twenty-one (21) days for the COUNTY to review same and furnish its recommendations to MUNICIPALITY. If the COUNTY submits no comment or recommendation the MUNICIPALITY may assume it has no objection to the proposal. If the COUNTY submits recommendations, the MUNICIPALITY will either include within its written decision the reasons for any action taken contrary to the same or furnish such reasons to the COUNTY by a separate writing. Where the DEVELOPMENT is proposed as part of an annexation of more than 10 acres, the provisions of this section shall be deemed satisfied by compliance by the MUNICIPALITY with the Notice and impact statement provisions of the most current version of the Municipal f,nnexaCon Aci then in effect. If any COUNTY recommendation of disapproval of a Development proposal within 500 feet of any property in unincorporated Weld County is based upon a conflict or incompatibility between proposed uses in the Development and existing or anticipated zoning classification for the property,to the extent legally possible the MUNICIPALITY will not approve same unless the applicant demonstrates (i) that no such conflict or incompatibility will reasonably occur, or (ii) that suitable mitigation measures to be imposed by the MUNICIPALITY as conditions of approval will eliminate or adequately mitigate adverse consequences of incompatibility or conflict. The COUNTY shall be given notice of, and may appear anu be heard at any hearing or other proceeding at which the MUNICIPALITY will consider such issues. 4. ANNEXATION. 4.1 The MUNICIPALITY will give serious consideration to all petitions for annexation of lands within the Urban Growth Area and will consider, in any determination to annex such properties, without limitation, the following factors: (i) the extension of one , or more municipal services to the area would place an unreasonable economic burden on the existing users of such services or upon the future residents or owners of property in the area itself; (H)the area is not reasonably contiguous in fact to the MUNICIPALITY'S existing boundaries, and its annexation would result in disconnected municipal satellites. 4.2 The MUNICIPALITY will not annex properties located outside the Urban Growth Area unless such property is both eligible for annexation and the MUNICIPALITY'S , Board of Trustees determines that it is necessary to the MUNICIPALITY for municipal purposes such as utilities. 4.3 To the extent legally possible the MUNICIPALITY will annex the full width of each COUNTY road right of way contiguous to newly annexed property unless such road serves primarily COUNTY properties rather than existing or newly annexed Municipal properties, in which case the MUNICIPALITY will annex none of such COUNTY road right of way. Nothing in this subsection 4.3 shall require the MUNICIPALITY to annex any unplatted COUNTY road right-of-way for which the owners of such property do not desire to be annexed. 5 4.4 Notwithstanding any provision hereof to the contrary,the MUNICIPALITY is not obligated to annex any property within a Development approved by the County after the execution of this Agreement by both parties which does not conform to the County Urban Growth Standards, unless a waiver or modification of such standards was granted by the COUNTY and approved by the MUNICIPALITY. 4.5 Nothing in this Section 4 shall be construed to limit the MUNICIPALITY from annexing any land within the Urban Growth Area, regardless whether such annexations are involuntary or result in disconnected municipal satellites. 4.6 In determining off-site improvements to be constructed by proponents of in-MUNICIPALITY Development, the MUNICIPALITY will consider identifiable impacts on the COUNTY road system resulting from such Development on the same basis as in- MUNICIPALITY impacts. 5. IMPLEMENTATION OF AGREEMENT. Following the mutual execution of this Agreement each party will promptly enact and implement such amendments to its existing eg;.iatior ,, as may be necessary to give effect to the provisions of Sections 3, and 4. Ec::n ;cr:v shall have sole and exclusive discretion to determine such measures and any new ones enabling it to perform this Agreement. Each party's land use regulations as referred to herein are ordinances whose amendment requires certain formalities, including notice and public hearings. The mutual covenants in this section and elsewhere to implement this Agreement promptly are given and received with mutual recognition and understanding of the legislative processes involved, and such covenants will be liberally construed in light thereof. 6. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 6.1 Severability. Should any one or more sections or paragraphs of this Agreement be judicially determined invalid or unenforceable,such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement, the intention being that the various sections and paragraphs are severable; provided, however, that the parties shall then review the remaining provisions to determine if the Agreement should continue, as modified, or if•the Agreement should be terminated. 6.2 Enforcement. Either party may seek specific performance or enforcement of this Agreement in a Court of competent jurisdiction, but neither party shall have any claim or remedy for damages arising from an alleged breach hereof against the other, nor shall this agreement confer on either part standing to contest a landvse decision or action of the other except as a breach of this agreement. This agreement is not intended to modify the standing the parties may possess independent of this agreement. This Agreement is between the MUNICIPALITY and the COUNTY and no third party rights or beneficiaries exist or are created hereby. 6.3 Termination. This Agreement will continue in effect until June 30, 2004, and shall be renewed automatically thereafter for successive one (1) year periods. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, either party may terminate this agreement by giving at least twelve (12) months' written notice thereof to the other party. 6 6.4 Amendment. Upon the request of either party, this Agreement shall be subject to amendment according to the same procedures as the original adoption (requiring the written consent of the amendment by both parties); provided, however, that changes in the Urban Growth Area defined in ¶2.5 herein may occur by resolution of the MUNICIPALITY concurred in by the COUNTY when the change is a deletion to the UGA or an addition of property which (a) was in common ownership and contained within a common legal description with property previously included in the UGA; or (b) directly adjacent to and contiguous with property previously contained within the UGA and capable of being served by MUNICIPAL services, including water or sewer, within a reasonable period of time. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the date first above written. COUNTY OF WELD, by and through the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF WELD By: David E. Long, Chairman ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board By: Robert D. Masden, Pro Tem By: Deputy Clerk to the Board By: M. J. Geile By: William H. Jerke By: Glenn Vaad TOWN OF GILCREST, COLORADO By: Paul Chacon, Mayor ATTEST: By: Linda Chosa, Town Clerk N1'➢/OYMRR`OdndAyJ 7 c.,;ku(6, ?k, 3-25-03 �cY 6 COORDINATED PLANNING AGREEMENT This Coordinated Planning Agreement is made and entered into effective as of the_day of, , 2003, A.D., between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, whose address is 915 10th Street, P. O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632, hereinafter called the "COUNTY," and the TOWN OF GILCREST, a Colorado Municipality, whose address is 304 8'h Street, P.O. Box 128, Gilcrest, CO 80623, hereinafter called the "MUNICIPALITY." RECITALS A. The COUNTY exercises governmental authority regulating land use, growth and development in its unincorporated areas, which areas include lands surrounding the MUNICIPALITY; and B. The MUNICIPALITY exercises governmental authority over the same matters within its municipal boundaries, and annexations, and is able to provide municipal services and facilities for efficient and desirable urban development; and C. In Title 29,Article 20,Colorado Revised Statutes,the General Assembly of the State of Colorado has granted broad authority to local governments to plan for and regulate the development and use of land within their respective jurisdictions; and D. In said Title 29, Article 20, Colorado Revised Statutes, the General Assembly has further authorized and encouraged local governments to cooperate and contract with each other for the purpose of planning and regulating the development of land by the joint and coordinated exercise of planning, zoning, subdivisions, building, and related regulatory powers; and E. Existing and anticipated pressures for growth and development in areas surrounding the MUNICIPALITY indicate that the joint and coordinated exercise by the COUNTY and the MUNICIPALITY of their respective planning, zoning, subdivision, building and related regulatory powers in such areas will best promote the objectives stated in this agreement. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and undertakings herein set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish procedures and standards pursuant to which the parties will move toward greater coordination in the exercise of their land use and related regulatory powers within unincorporated areas surrounding the MUNICIPALITY. The objectives of such efforts are to accomplish the type of development in such areas which best protects the health, safety, prosperity, and general welfare of the inhabitants thereof by reducing the waste of physical,financial, and human resources which result from either excessive congestion or excessive scattering of population, and to achieve maximum efficiency and economy in the process of development. However, any action taken pursuant to this Agreement that pertains to any land within the municipality,for incorporated areas, and within the County,for unincorporated areas, is subject to final approval by the governing body of the municipality or county, respectively. 1 2. DEFINITIONS. For the purposes of this Agreement the following terms shall be defined as set forth herein: 2.1 Development. Any land use requiring regulatory approval by the elected governing body of the applicable party in the Urban Growth Area except for an amendment to a plat or a down-zoning, neither of which creates any additional lots and except for a Recorded Exemption or Subdivision Exemption. Existing agricultural uses,which are lawful uses, either as uses by right under the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, or as legally existing non-conforming uses, are also exempt from the definition of "Development". 2.2 Non-Urban Development. Developments comprised of nine (9) or fewer residential lots, located in a non-urban area as defined in Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code, not adjacent to other PUD's, subdivisions, municipal boundaries or urban growth corridors. Non-Urban Development shall also include land used or capable of being used for agricultural purposes and including development which combine clustered residential uses and agricultural uses in a manner that the agricultural lands are suitable for farming and ranching operations for the next forty (40) Years. Non-Urban Development on public water and septic systems may have a minimum lot size of one (1)acre and an overall gross density of two and one-half (2'/) acres per septic system. Non-Urban Development proposing individual, private wells and septic systems shall have a minimum lot size of two and one-half (2'/z) acres per lot. 2.3 MUNICIPAL Referral Area. The area located outside of but within three miles of the MUNICIPALITY's municipal boundaries. 2.4 Urban Development. Developments exceeding nine(9)lots and/or located in close proximity to existing PUD's, subdivisions, municipal boundaries or urban growth corridors and boundaries. All Urban Development shall pave the internal road systems of the developments. Urban Development requires services such as central water, sewer systems(including permitted septic systems), road networks, park and recreation facilities and programs, and storm drainage. 2.5 The Urban Growth Area is hereby established and shall consist of all lands so designated on the map attached hereto and referred to herein as "Exhibit A," EXCEPTING those lands located within the MUNICIPALITY's municipal boundaries. 3. PLANNING COORDINATION. This Agreement is intended to be a Comprehensive Development Plan adopted and implemented pursuant to C.R.S. §29-20-105(2). Following the execution of this Agreement by both parties, COUNTY Development approvals in the MUNICIPALITY's Referral area will be processed and determined in accordance with the following: 3.1 Referral. The COUNTY will refer all proposals for Development within the MUNICIPAL Referral Area to the MUNICIPALITY for its review and recommendation. Such referral will include at least a copy of the written Development proposal and preliminary COUNTY staff summary of the case. The COUNTY will allow not less than twenty-one(21) days for the MUNICIPALITY to review same and furnish its recommendations to COUNTY staff prior to formulation of the COUNTY staff recommendation. If the MUNICIPALITY does not respond within such time,COUNTY staff may proceed with its recommendation, but any MUNICIPALITY comment or recommendation received on or before the Thursday next 2 preceding the meeting of the Board of County Commissioners or Planning Commission at which the matter will be considered will be transmitted to the Board or Commission. If the MUNICIPALITY submits no comment or recommendation the COUNTY may assume it has no objection to the proposal. If the MUNICIPALITY submits recommendations, the COUNTY will either include within its written decision the reasons for any action taken contrary to the same or furnish such reasons to the MUNICIPALITY by a separate writing. 3.2 Development Outside Urban Growth Area. To the extent legally possible the COUNTY will disapprove proposals for Urban Development in areas of the MUNICIPAL Referral Area outside the Urban Growth Area. In reviewing proposals for Non-Urban Development in such areas, the COUNTY will apply its Comprehensive Plan and zoning and subdivision ordinances, and, where appropriate, the MUD Plan. 3.3 Development in Urban Growth Area. The following shall apply to proposed Development in the Urban Growth Area: (a) Upon receipt of any proposal for Development of property then currently eligible for voluntary annexation to the MUNICIPALITY,the COUNTY will, in writing, notify the proponent of the opportunity for annexation and notify the MUNICIPALITY of the proposal. The COUNTY will not consider such proposal for Development unless the applicant or its predecessor has submitted a complete annexation petition and been denied said annexation by the MUNICIPALITY Board or electorate for a substantially similar development on the same property within the preceding twelve(12)months. The COUNTY may consider such a proposal if,after a period of seven months from the date of filing of a complete annexation petition pursued in good faith by the applicant or its predecessor, the MUNICIPALITY has failed to approve or deny such annexation. (b) The MUNICIPALITY will consider the extension of sanitary sewer service to property in the Urban Growth Area, subject to its rules and regulations, which include provisions requiring a written contract for extraterritorial service and the construction of new mains and other facilities necessary to serve the property with costs assessed in accordance with the MUNICIPALITY'S rules and regulations. MUNICIPALITY agrees to give notice of any proposed change in said rules and regulations to COUNTY twenty-one (21) days prior to adoption. (c) If the MUNICIPALITY provides municipal water service to property within its boundaries, it will provide water subject to its current rules and regulations. MUNICIPALITY agrees to give notice of any proposed change in said rules and regulations to COUNTY twenty-one (21) days prior to adoption. Where water furnished by the MUNICIPALITY is received in whole or in part from an outside water provider such as a water district, the MUNICIPALITY shall exercise its obligations under this agreement consistent with the terms of any such agreement. Developer shall be responsible for constructing any infrastructure necessary to serve the property with municipal water service. The MUNICIPALITY will negotiate in good faith with the water provider to explore ways in which the extension of water service outside MUNICIPALITY boundaries can be coordinated so as to achieve the purposes stated in Section 1 above while still recognizing the rights and obligations of the water provider and its constituents. 3 (d) In recognition of the availability of public water within the Urban Growth Area as indicated in paragraph (c) above, the COUNTY will require public water as a condition of approval of any subdivision, rezoning or planned unit development and will not approve such Development until the applicant obtains a written contract for same with the MUNICIPALITY, or water service from a water district, if the MUNICIPALITY cannot provide water. This Agreement shall be prima fade evidence of the availability of municipal water within the meaning of §32-1- 203(2.5)(a), C.R.S. (e) The COUNTY will not grant any waiver of current Municipal street standards for any Development without the consent of the MUNICIPALITY and will consider identifiable impacts on the MUNICIPALITY'S road system resulting from such Development on the same basis as in-COUNTY impacts. (f) To the extent legally possible, as determined by the COUNTY, the COUNTY will deny proposals for Non-Urban Development in the Urban Growth Area. Nothing in this subsection shall restrict the COUNTY from approving the division of ownership parcels located in the Urban Growth Area having residential improvements served by septic systems, regardless of the size of resulting lots. Furthermore, the County shall not be restricted from allowing the expansion of legally existing non-urban uses provided adequate protection for future urban uses is included in any such approval. (g) If any MUNICIPALITY recommendation of disapproval of a Development proposal is based upon a conflict or incompatibility between proposed uses in the Development and anticipated MUNICIPALITY zoning classification for the property,the COUNTY will not approve same unless the applicant demonstrates (i) that no such conflict or incompatibility will reasonably occur, (ii) that suitable mitigation measures to be imposed by the COUNTY as conditions of approval will eliminate or adequately mitigate adverse consequences of incompatibility or conflict, or(iii)that the MUNICIPALITY'S anticipated zoning classification of the property is unreasonable because of existing or planned uses of adjacent property. The MUNICIPALITY shall be given notice of, and may appear and be heard at any hearing or other proceeding at which the COUNTY will consider such issues. (h) The parties anticipate that ¶ 3.3 (e)-(g) will be addressed in more detail if a Mutually Acceptable Plan is considered and adopted for the UGA or the referral Area. (i) The COUNTY shall require that all storm water detention facilities in subdivisions approved within the UGA shall be designed to detain the storm water runoff from the fully developed subdivision from a 100-year storm and release the detained water at a quantity and rate not to exceed the quantity and rate of a 5-year storm falling on the undeveloped site. 4 e 3.4 Mutuality of Impact Consideration. The parties recognize that decisions by one party regarding development may impact property outside of each particular jurisdiction. The parties agree that those jurisdictional boundaries will not be the basis for giving any greater or lesser weight to those impacts during the course of deliberations. 3.5 Referrals to County. The MUNICIPALITY will refer proposals for Development which lie within 500 feet of any property in unincorporated Weld County to the COUNTY for its review and recommendation. Such referral will include at least a copy of the written Development proposal. The MUNICIPALITY will allow not less than twenty-one (21) days for the COUNTY to review same and furnish its recommendations to MUNICIPALITY. If the COUNTY submits no comment or recommendation the MUNICIPALITY may assume it has no objection to the proposal. If the COUNTY submits recommendations, the MUNICIPALITY will either include within its written decision the reasons for any action taken contrary to the same or furnish such reasons to the COUNTY by a separate writing. Where the DEVELOPMENT is proposed as part of an annexation of more than 10 acres,the provisions of this section shall be deemed satisfied by compliance by the MUNICIPALITY with the Notice and impact statement provisions of the most current version of the Municipal Annexation Act then in effect. If any COUNTY recommendation of disapproval of a Development proposal within 500 feet of any property in unincorporated Weld County is based upon a conflict or incompatibility between proposed uses in the Development and existing or anticipated zoning classification for the property,to the extent legally possible the MUNICIPALITY will not approve same unless the applicant demonstrates (i) that no such conflict or incompatibility will reasonably occur, or (ii) that suitable mitigation measures to be imposed by the MUNICIPALITY as conditions of approval will eliminate or adequately mitigate adverse consequences of incompatibility or conflict. The COUNTY shall be given notice of, and may appear and be heard at any hearing or other proceeding at which the MUNICIPALITY will consider such issues. 4. ANNEXATION. 4.1 The MUNICIPALITY will give serious consideration to all petitions for annexation of lands within the Urban Growth Area and will consider, in any determination to annex such properties, without limitation, the following factors: (i) the extension of one or more municipal services to the area would place an unreasonable economic burden on the existing users of such services or upon the future residents or owners of property in the area itself; (ii)the area is not reasonably contiguous in fact to the MUNICIPALITY's existing boundaries, and its annexation would result in disconnected municipal satellites. 4.2 The MUNICIPALITY will not annex properties located outside the Urban Growth Area unless such property is both eligible for annexation and the MUNICIPALITY'S Board of Trustees determines that it is necessary to the MUNICIPALITY for municipal purposes such as utilities. 4.3 To the extent legally possible the MUNICIPALITY will annex the full width of each COUNTY road right of way contiguous to newly annexed property unless such road serves primarily COUNTY properties rather than existing or newly annexed Municipal properties, in which case the MUNICIPALITY will annex none of such COUNTY road right of way. Nothing in this subsection 4.3 shall require the MUNICIPALITY to annex any unplatted COUNTY road right-of-way for which the owners of such property do not desire to be annexed. 5 4.4 Notwithstanding any provision hereof to the contrary, the MUNICIPALITY is not obligated to annex any property within a Development approved by the County after the execution of this Agreement by both parties which does not conform to the County Urban Growth Standards, unless a waiver or modification of such standards was granted by the COUNTY and approved by the MUNICIPALITY. 4.5 Nothing in this Section 4 shall be construed to limit the MUNICIPALITY from annexing any land within the Urban Growth Area, regardless whether such annexations are involuntary or result in disconnected municipal satellites. 4.6 In determining off-site improvements to be constructed by proponents of in-MUNICIPALITY Development, the MUNICIPALITY will consider identifiable impacts on the COUNTY road system resulting from such Development on the same basis as in- MUNICIPALITY impacts. 5. IMPLEMENTATION OF AGREEMENT. Following the mutual execution of this Agreement each party will promptly enact and implement such amendments to its existing regulations as may be necessary to give effect to the provisions of Sections 3, and 4. Each party shall have sole and exclusive discretion to determine such measures and any new ones enabling it to perform this Agreement. Each party's land use regulations as referred to herein are ordinances whose amendment requires certain formalities, including notice and public hearings. The mutual covenants in this section and elsewhere to implement this Agreement promptly are given and received with mutual recognition and understanding of the legislative processes involved, and such covenants will be liberally construed in light thereof. 6. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 6.1 Severability. Should any one or more sections or paragraphs of this Agreement be judicially determined invalid or unenforceable,such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining provisions of this Agreement,the intention being that the various sections and paragraphs are severable; provided, however, that the parties shall then review the remaining provisions to determine if the Agreement should continue, as modified, or if the Agreement should be terminated. 6.2 Enforcement. Either party may seek specific performance or enforcement of this Agreement in a Court of competent jurisdiction,but neither party shall have any claim or remedy for damages arising from an alleged breach hereof against the other, nor shall this agreement confer on either part standing to contest a land use decision or action of the other except as a breach of this agreement. This agreement is not intended to modify the standing the parties may possess independent of this agreement. This Agreement is between the MUNICIPALITY and the COUNTY and no third party rights or beneficiaries exist or are created hereby. 6.3 Termination. This Agreement will continue in effect until June 30, 2004, and shall be renewed automatically thereafter for successive one (1) year periods. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, either party may terminate this agreement by giving at least twelve (12) months' written notice thereof to the other party. 6 6.4 Amendment. Upon the request of either party, this Agreement shall be subject to amendment according to the same procedures as the original adoption (requiring the written consent of the amendment by both parties); provided, however, that changes in the Urban Growth Area defined in ¶2.5 herein may occur by resolution of the MUNICIPALITY concurred in by the COUNTY when the change is a deletion to the UGA or an addition of property which (a) was in common ownership and contained within a common legal description with property previously included in the UGA; or (b) directly adjacent to and contiguous with property previously contained within the UGA and capable of being served by MUNICIPAL services, including water or sewer, within a reasonable period of time. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement effective as of the date first above written. COUNTY OF WELD, by and through the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF WELD By: David E. Long, Chairman ATTEST: Weld County Clerk to the Board By: Robert D. Masden, Pro Tem By: Deputy Clerk to the Board By: M. J. Geile By: William H. Jerke By: Glenn Vaad TOWN OF GILCREST, COLORADO By: Paul Chacon, Mayor ATTEST: By: Linda Chosa, Town Clerk C„MNDO.r,PMP',.CP .P. 7 Jeff Fisher,Project Manager MODUS Modus Management LLC 4890 South Jellison Street MANAGEMENT Denver, Colorado 80123 (303) 638-4565 Fax (303) 932-8698 MEMORANDUM TO: Monica Daniels-Mika, Weld County Planning Director FROM: Jeff Fisher, Project Manager DATE: December 19, 2003 RE: Gilcrest Coordinated Planning Agreement Supporting documentation—2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Enclosed please find the Final Draft of the Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan, prepared as part of the town's 2003 Comprehensive Plan update. This document describes the town's current water and sewer facilities, including five-year demand projections and an "Ultimate Projection" study,which details future expansion projects that will be needed to accommodate growth beyond the five-year projection. This Water and Sewer Master Plan is still in draft form because it is part of the Comprehensive Plan update, which is undergoing final review. It is not anticipated that there will be significant changes made to the document, which is, along with the Comprehensive Plan, scheduled for official adoption on January 20, 2003. Please contact me either by phone at 303-638-4565 or by email at jfisher@modusl.com if you have any questions regarding this information. Thank you very much. rr- LJ Town of Gilcrest V • � � r 1 �3 A' , e i ¢v t t44,5 ,f r - �3n. iP cw„ MO .a4G�, _ • 2003 Water & Sewer Master Plan December 2003 ®RAFT Prepared by: RG CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. -"1331 17th Street, Suite 710 Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 293-8107 RGCE Job No. 630.0001 Town of Gilcrest — Water and Sewer Master Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. WATER SYSTEM 4 3. WASTEWATER SYSTEM 14 F 4 APPENDIX f 24, h.3.. LIST OF FIGURES v. _ t FIGURE DESCRIPTION ,rs 1-1 FUTURE LAND USE MAP aY 2-1 EXISTING WATER SYSTEM ≥fz 2-2 FUTUREWATER SYSTEM 5 YEAR PROJECTION 2-3 FUTURE WATER SYSTEM ULTIMATE PROJECTION b 3-1 EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM 3-2 FUTURE SEWER SYSTEM-5-YEAR PROJECTION 3-3 FUTURE SEWER SYSTEM -ULTIMATE PROJECTION AND WWTP SITE 1 3-4 FUTURE SEWER SYSTEM-ULTIMATE PROJECTION AND WWTP SITE 2 r RA0630t0001\WordQ003 Gilcrest W&S Master Plan TOG r aoc _ RG Consulting Engineers, Inc Town of Gllcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 1 — Executive Summary SECTION 1 : EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Water and Sewer Master Plan is to summarize the Town of Gilcrest's (the Town) existing water and sewer systems' components and to provide a guideline for infrastructure improvements that will accommodate anticipated future growth. This document will summarize anticipated future development and outline the proposed water and sewer system infrastructure that will be needed to provide service. This document will also provide preliminary cost estimates for these improvements. The growth projections, including development types and planning areas, are based on the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update written by Modus Management, the Town's planning consultant. 1.2 LOCATION The Town of Gilcrest is located in the east % of Section 28, Township 4 North, Range 66 West of the Sixth Principle Meridian, in the southwest part of Weld County, Colorado. More specifically, the Town is located on the west side of Highway 85, about eight miles south of Greeley and four miles north of Platteville. 1.3 CURRENT POPULATION The Town's 2002 population is 1,204. For the purposes of this document, projections will not be based on population, but rather Single Family Equivalents (SFE). One SFE is equal to a single- family residence's water demand or wastewater production. In physical terms, one SFE is a five-eighths inch (5/8") water service line and a 4" sanitary sewer service line. Presently, the Town of Gilcrest serves 339 SFE's. 1.4 FUTURE GROWTH PROJECTIONS Infrastructure for the 5-year and ultimate projected growth will be evaluated. The 5-year growth projection is estimated to be 391 SFEs which is based on the Town's 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update. The 5-year projection estimates 52 more SFEs which is a 15% increase over the Town's current 339 SFEs. One proposed subdivision is Country Meadows, which is located in the northern part of the existing Town limits. It includes 159 total single-family developed units which has a build-out schedule of approximately 10 years. The ultimate growth projections will be based on build-out of the Urban Growth Boundary as established by the Town's 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update. Ultimate build-out will include developments on the north side of County Road 42 and west of County Road 29 (see Figure 1- 1). The total area of the Urban Growth Boundary is 2,213 acres. Ultimately, 4,392 SFEs are anticipated in the Urban Growth Boundary. Page 1 r rg consulting engineers, inc. Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 1 — Executive Summary The existing, 5-year, and ultimate SFE numbers are summarized in Table 1-1. Table 1-1: SFE Numbers PAes fptro1 „S .$ Existing 339 5-year 391 Ultimate 4,392 It is important to note, that when planning for future capital expenditures, the SFE count is the _ important value to monitor. The total number of SFEs will trigger a project, rather than the calendar year. • • Page 2 r rg consulting engineers, inc. 4.4 �I ._.COUNTY COUNTY ROAD 44 Ye^a I der + t 1•.e ttwa i A' I I 117 ',14...; gg ii °413 �i. / 1 M E2 Y?j aoeos 1 ___ IL I '+! ". �I ,r I, 4I Air s .! i i �wr r i � I r II ed — _ ♦ — I /;" % i sr A'— • 0.4 a N 04 O MM _ COUNTYRC3D 38 — — — Toam twos. — — — — Urban Geowthk 9 Fabee Flans;Area NOTE: a l ° "°°°° " °', LAND USE EXHIBIT CREATED BY MODUS MANAGEMENT. Low Oensdy residential III r J MMiun density residential `fHO clonally residential 18 � Cornmerdat J c crosdl ng mancaoQgo S. Downtown mixed ownnnwooltresidentpal 1331 1718 street . use 72 . denier, colorodo 80202 (303) 293-elm - -- -J rains cow WATER AND SEWER MASTER PLAN ;370001- ... PIA Duraam_ FIGURE 1-1 AS sNoa.„I N CHECKED� �- FUTURE LAND USE MAP DEC 2003 s""°a°"` to TOWN OF CILCREST anal d 1 Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 2—Water System SECTION 2: WATER SYSTEM 2.1 EXISTING WATER SYSTEM The Town's existing water system can be seen in Figure 2-1. The overall system consists of a connection to the Central Weld County Water District (CWCWD), water storage, a booster pump station, and a distribution system. The Town also owns and operates two groundwater wells that serve as a source of potable water. The groundwater is mixed with the water supplied by the CWCWD. The final water is in compliance with all State regulations, but allows the Town to use less CWCWD water, thus minimizing service costs. 2.1.1 Central Weld County Water District The CWCWD provides potable water for Town of Gilcrest. The Town purchases shares of CWCWD water. Each share entitles the Town to a specified amount of water annually (1.0 acre-foot). The Town currently owns 253 shares. The total water consumed by the Town is measured at the existing Master Meter and the Town is billed by CWCWD. The Town is responsible for billing the individual customers based on readings from the water service meters. CWCWD is responsible for treating and delivering the required volume and flowrate of potable water to the Town. Supply from CWCWD is through an existing 14" waterline which runs in Weld County Road No. 42. A 6" waterline and Master Meter are connected to this 14" CWCWD waterline at Elm Street. This 6" waterline conveys water to the Town's two existing storage tanks. Once the CWCWD water passes through the Master Meter, it becomes part of the Town's distribution system. The system also includes a network of buried pipelines and a booster pump station. The existing storage tanks, booster pump station, and pipelines are maintained solely by the Town. _ The Valley High School campus is served by its own Master Meter connection and is not served through the Town's Master Meter or water system. 2.1.2 Existing Storage Tanks Two water storage tanks are located at southwest side of the Eighth Street and Railroad Street intersection. The tanks were designed to provide a total capacity of 0.4 MG, but the actual storage volume equal to 0.29 MG. The tanks provide emergency storage if CWCWD was unable to provide service to the Town. A calculation of the actual water storage tanks' capacity can be seen in Table 2-1. Page 4 r rg consulting engineers, inc. Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 2—Water System Table 2-1: Actual Water Storage Volume '" itp Propose, e ti {' p_ a_ 1Nat�eF equal Diameter !Capacrfy�",kropose ep z-, rz .� ryr- j . tgaIkitili' Dep6h.( , Aftiatcr _ aITQn _ Tank 1 35 100,000 13.9 13.9 100,000 Tank 2 48 300,000 22.2 13.9 187,700 Total Volume (gallons): 287,700 2.1.3 Existing Booster Pump Station The booster pump station is located at the water tank site. Because of the under-sized pipes in the distribution system, the water pressure provided by CWCWD is too low for typical residential/commercial usage in some parts of the Town, but there is enough pressure to fill the tanks. The booster pump station takes water from the tanks and pressurizes it to the — requirements of the Town's system. It has three discharge pumps, with a combined capacity of 500 gpm at 60 psi. 2.1.4 Existing Distribution System The existing distribution system consists of buried 2", 4", 6", and 8" waterlines located in the roadways. Most of the pipelines are Ductile Iron, but the 2" lines are PVC. 2.1.4.1 Demand Scenarios There are three water demand scenarios that are evaluated during a Cybernet computer modeling process. The first is Maximum Daily Flow (MDF) which is defined as the average daily flow of the month with the highest total consumption; this is typically July or August. The second scenario is Peak Hour Flow (PHF), which is defined as the highest demand flowrate experienced during the year. It is the day and hour when the most water is being consumed by the Town. The third scenario is MDF with Fire Flow (FF). This applies a 3,500 gpm fire flow demand with the MDF. Typically, the largest demand scenario is MDF with FF. 2.1.4.2 Existing Water System Model A Cybernet water model was performed on the Town's existing water system. All three scenarios described in Section 2.1.4.1 were evaluated. There was a modification to the MDF with FF scenario — a 1,500 gpm fire flow was used instead of a 3,500 gpm fire flow. This is because currently there are not any large structures served by the Town's system. However, in the future when larger commercial buildings are constructed, the fire flow should increase to at least 3,500 gpm. The MDF and PHF scenarios satisfied all Town criteria for water pressure and pipe velocity. These criteria are provided in Table 2-2. However, the MDF with FF scenario did not satisfy the Town's pressure or pipe velocity criteria. High velocities were experienced in the 4" pipe in Elm Street near Eighth Street. This is a result of a fire flow demand located at Elm Street and Twelfth Street. The pressures in this section of pipe also did not satisfy the criteria. Page 5 r rg consulting engineers, inc. '- r Z,, „ y. �, . ,.,w -,�- t Y of S4f i k' t« rL S l'C s. ,n - FOURTEENTH ST. WELDOUNTY R, EXIST. • 4' �CWCW0 i !Dr 4 :` ry^ r. c. F 1 ti .� METER , .4,a " `! 'A kIIRTEEN ST. �' a i.. �'4 '1 r a 1 T. F �. e 1 'i, etas ` a x ,_ t a¢ . i1Lti _&"1ii4i 'i` bx�' ;;A0.b h s L 4 NTHST* e ,r .iig-i ' u 1 °: #-_E r Al;II w -4-kit;try.. — tt �Ila �4`I`�s" a �t4;¢ .� t' i o- .Ti ,pt! Make# •� % /! r 5 tA' �. -- x, Y \ hy Su Ivy .: �`k , ' a�"'1 -,;..10,1,„.5, � ¢ % Y t $ 4.1 Ip, v ` '3 �' T l4. , ., 1 '� 44. r ' '`: A �, ] ° iL . F y�l-i .Jir'i�tii.:1; _� �� .i:',4-' i f , ,(✓ `-pp y"sin' .., I. _ - na; t j. . , :p lil� fL • 1 g y }" ` ' Q",'� 'f' -€,4/ 1, — iti'a 'r_y��-' T. -1 (: ar 4`:f 4 t",$ ,, n p ter, t .,,Y♦ '`P , �` 4 7 Ill �av ar �` y xn +. a 5 a+c y DCO / l 1'Al r. I.si ail ! - f ab�,"r �v w� x ivw t v et a 1� '��"' i.l •_$ VV. 4,y�r },+ .. rtii" �" "4/1,31 .4.J; f �r'-'�'' .n M -1� Ir s3 id'. • i > �y a.'4-2 1.44 1 , t nV-. (. i'.,, ,1B pr I-- 6 ic'i-4 TMj,4'"'1 `?y,� 4 1 °. ;I'i�..b k! ' +�� {°•ts` k a rf ��0 It t �' . 4 �y 1 � .4,i-...--� {a Lr ; , *c `fie Fna yn — t:PI tat I . a . 44 + "t,',11.q-, s i ${•Yl. ^... N a/ r./, i i{ I t 1 v ai� . ,i �iit tyxT k • e 1(I0-pan=,uluinc9 p . •-•• 1331 17a snot •.a 710 • u'.,IaS. emoz "am WATER AND SEWER MASTER PLAN 'imam o .7 FIGURE J?-1 1'y00' rn w. EXISTING ®m male w TOWN OFWATER cIwR6STSYSTEM �`r 1 Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 2—Water System 2.2 POTENTIAL PROBLEMS If the Town were to grow as expected, the existing water system infrastructure would need to be upgraded. Each component is summarized in the following sections. 2.2.1 Potable Water Storage The existing storage capacity of 0.29 MG is not sufficient for a standard of maximum day flow plus fire flow. Assuming a future fire flow demand of 3,500 gpm for two hours, the fire flow volume is 420,000 gallons. If the MDF with FF standard is used, the total ultimate required storage volume is 4,800,000 gallons. 2.2.2 Booster Pump Station The booster station is only capable of pumping 500 gpm at 60 psi. A future development such as Country Meadows adds to the demand. Eventually, the system's demand could exceed the capacity of the existing pumps and expansion will be needed. However, with upgrades to the existing distribution system and with elevated water storage, increasing future pumping capacity may not be required. The elevated tanks would be able to provide the proper pressure without the aide of pumping. Additionally, more CWCWD Master Meter connections will supplement the necessary service pressure. 2.2.3 Distribution System The existing distribution system cannot supply fire flow demands to all parts of the system. If the Town's water distribution system is not improved and future developments are served, there will be insufficient water pressure and excessive velocities during MDF and PHF situations. 2.3 WATER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA The future water system components were based on certain design criteria. When considering _ future developments, the same criteria should be used when evaluating and designing water system components. The water system criteria are as follows: Table 2-2: Water System Design Criteria ♦f Average Day Flow (ADF) per SFE 540 gallons per day Maximum Daily Flow Factor 2.5 times ADF Peak Hour Flow Factor 6.0 times ADF Minimum System Pressure 40 psi Minimum Fire Flow Pressure at the node 20 psi Maximum Pipe Velocity at PHF 10 feet per second Provided Water Storage per SFE 250 gallons Page 7 r rg consulting engineers, inc. Town of Gi!crest _ 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 2—Water System 2.4 FUTURE WATER SYSTEM In order to accommodate future growth, the Town will have to improve some components of their water system. As previously described, the existing water system is already inadequate, so even with a small amount of growth, the system will be stressed. The improvements to the water system were based on a 5-year and ultimate build-out projection. As stated previously, it is estimated that there will be 391 SFEs in five years, and 4,392 SFEs ultimately. The 5-year and ultimate water systems are shown in Figures 2-2 and 2- 3, respectively. 2.4.1 Future Central Weld County Water District Connections The Town will need to add additional Master Meter connections to CWCWD. These connections will be paid for by future development. The current single connection will not supply enough water pressure and will leave the Town vulnerable to a shut-down if there is a _ problem with the existing connection. 2.4.1.1 5-year Projection As seen in Figure 2-2, there are not any required Master Meters for Country Meadows development that will occur over the next five years. With only 52 total SFEs planned in that time period, the existing system will provide service similar to the current quality. 2.4.1.2 Ultimate Projection As seen in Figure 2-3, there are a total of four proposed Master Meter connections to serve ultimate build-out in the Urban Growth Boundary. There will be one new Master Meter along County Road 42 and Orange Street. There are two planned along County Road 29 and the final Master Meter is planned on the east side of Highway 85 near County Road 42. The CWCWD distribution system is not currently built in County Road 29. Any costs associated with a new CWCWD waterline will be passed on to the Town. In the end, all future Master Meters and _ CWCWD waterlines should be paid for by the developments. 2.4.2 Future Potable Water Storage The water storage volume will need to be increased. It is already insufficient and future growth will increase demand on the limited storage volume. CWCWD has already expressed its desire for the areas they serve to have more storage. It is recommended that any future water storage tanks be elevated so that re-pressurization is not required and doing this will eliminate the need for future booster pump stations. The basic concept behind the Town's water storage is to have one tank that can serve the entire area. With upgrades to the distribution system and an elevated water tank, then adequate system pressure will be attainable. At this point, a single 1.0 million gallon elevated water storage tank is proposed near the existing baseball diamond. This location is central to the ultimate service area and will provide the Town with a total of 1.3 million gallons of storage including the existing tanks. This value is considerably lower than the suggested volume of 4.8 million gallons. That is because elevated water storage tanks are generally smaller than either ground elevation or buried tanks because of their higher cost. However, the 1.3 million gallons Page 8 r rg consulting engineers, inc. Town of Gilcrest — 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 2—Water System will provide the Town with fire flow storage of 420,000 gallons and still have almost 900,000 — gallons remaining. All future developments should fund the future water storage tank. It is estimated that for each - new SFE included in the service area, the developer should provide 250 gallons of storage. It is recommended that a portion of the water tap fee be allocated for a new tank. At a time when the Town has collected a portion of the total funds and can comfortably pay off a bond for the remainder, then the project should be considered. 2.4.2.1 5-year Projection The 5-year projection of 52 SFEs is only 1.2% of the total anticipated ultimate population. It is unlikely that a tank can successfully be funded within the next five years. Thus, this facility should be initiated after 2008. 2.4.2.2 Ultimate Projection As stated previously, a 1.0 million gallon tank will be required for ultimate build-out. It is likely that this tank will be constructed after at least half of the ultimate SFEs have been occupied. It should be centrally located, near Eighth Street and Starbird Street. This location will allow the — entire distribution system to be pressurized while reducing the amount of headloss. 2.4.3 Future Booster Pumping The existing pump station can barely supply MDF and PHF; only a small amount of growth will exceed its capacity. However, as new developments are established, Master Meters and new distribution mains will also be added. It is likely that with larger and new distribution pipelines, the water pressure provided by CWCWD will be adequate for the customers. In other words, when new developments come on line, booster pumps may not be needed. However, this will work only if an elevated water storage tank is installed. If ground elevation tanks are constructed, then additional booster pumps will be needed to provide adequate system pressure. Because this Master Plan assumes that the future storage tank is elevated, then additional booster pump stations will not be required. 2.4.3.1 5-year Projection County Meadows will require a Master Meter when Phase 2 is constructed. In the meantime, a water system model demonstrated that modifications to the existing pump station are not required for Phase 1. 2.4.3.2 Ultimate Projection As new developments are built in the Town's service area, it may be necessary to expand the existing pump station. However, this should be evaluated as the Town grows. The impacting development should fund any improvements to the pump station. The intent is to eliminate the — need for more booster pump stations as the Town expands by improving the distribution system and constructing the elevated tank. Page 9 r.. rg consulting engineers, inc. Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 2—Water System 2.4.4 Future Distribution System As with most of the water system components, the existing distribution system is undersized. As the Town grows, larger mains should be added and looped throughout the entire service area. This will ensure proper delivery pressures and minimal service interruptions for all customers. The Town should also increase the size of some of the existing waterlines. The smaller lines in Elm Street, Railroad Street, Twelfth Street, and possibly others should be increased to at least 12 inches. This will allow more water to flow through the Town when Master Meters or the existing pump station are off-line. 2.4.4.1 5-year Projection With an anticipated 52 new SFEs over the next five years, significant improvements or extensions to the distribution system are not required. Country Meadows Phase 1 is expected in the next five years and the water model of this subdivision indicated the system will provide adequate pressure under all demand scenarios without improvements. Phase 1 is expected to connect to the existing 6" waterline immediately downstream of the existing Master Meter in Elm Street. Phase 1 will construct an 8"waterline loop to serve their 39 SFEs. 2.4.4.2 Ultimate Projection With growth primarily expected to occur to the north, south, and west of Town, new 12" water mains are needed in addition to upsizing some existing waterlines. These new 12" mains should reach north of County Road 42, west of County Road 29 and near County Road 40. Also, a 12" main should be installed on the east side of Highway 85 to serve developments in this area. Page 10 r rg consulting engineers, inc. " �'4 T 1 FtO RTEENTH ST. (WELDOUNTY Lr x_42) 4,u° .:,;-.,-,»...— t } Wits_ Mik ' r }?ROPOSED 8'' LINE }, 2,0-1 a.= y. nr�. ` ` UNT1RS''MEADOWS Wr , ix ns k r� iF r:W1' ..t' 3„- 4, PHASE.:I _..� I , E.XIS I' 'ø:ratt 1r ;s•V,'Cz ' d � rt 't fix., ' i "96.= •° I�1' i.,.� I 1o�3,r!7q�r : 1 � 7 1. .- � •� .,,.-. � f X5: 4 y .w*fG vWYyf rr' `tR`,'P. -..� ." _rte d •:"7'iRix! dal iz'• w�-k. ,'0I-rz a 4 !'�� \ `� T ^F 4 '41� f / �. .G P Ny M tiA'n, tl 'S I ?' i" _ 7' V' •,Jl4 ra. Sq. } NTH STS I' fir,- r •- e'`�" .' m t ,:.r s� 1 1,,. .'• 9 E I r. 1, .1'''',°14r.1 ( e' 'it.,f � .+, v°-h' `.�.y rr • �y. �� f Yom: x-f�lr A� FiXx r t ' r il- b� T ..".'-.41/4. :"-„,",,..7% t C� ^-,.I' 0 it, r4 ,, T'. , .J f A-sr t 4.is . e - ' 7:7 �� •ry. t a F ) / 11 i Ya :� !F ' aaP 0. vv 1t .c' �' 41', r x i { 'F ` tl co. J r‘U4- ri-r c ' :�>> gym, ' : ,-,it ;} ' # , k ( �i I° ,s,";, ' t`IeR,,1�,.yy}}a-, r i-"- f .r'�idy#a. �}f( , r rr'k_L`<NA''t ~ r'rl I1� �V Iro' .' .'6�.j1fli C / r"X !"d 6�F"b ,yt '*` L" ‘,14,„,„,'{ �( ,, a�ii v ,, a i .,1, -.A i4. X1,1 t m k /!,,, ,. z„ , i - w 1.?' .4 * , ;Jp / ,' ya, (ile•fe:-..,..,,..,5,:,,\Ltzt.i ii-q44 �y » , o .'Yap N:a'w xJ Y F`!? ` / '',. .4,5L 4:4, ! _ k 1 � �ri i.A) ,y��ri� V� ro 'a l � T � x y, /y$Co ..r �4 r 'k n r �,, / f 3 [ AA F 1 a e �,iOUyNTYYI ,O/Jp./NNq i •F, 6 qX :Vr" r y +,:- a.rx":a',;3r 1 sf t I •( L r f „Lk ;N -,,,I leas 0 7 ©ootsuBt WX ®B IIt®®T 0 ilt©- Im ,33, 17th street o,te 7,0 . Eemer. cubrodo 90203 3 (303) 293-8107 w"- WATER AND SEWER MASTER PLAN 0630000 1 0 .o oar 10... FIGURE 2-2 r•600 o FUTURE WATER SYSTEM oar Eo�- 5 YEAR PROJECTION DEC 2003 ��- TOWN OF CILCREST a 1 Cti ac } x ry 2' B n .44 t mM R 1 l �i k:•/".47,4)4(‘ , T y h-�, _ 'a > m n i t o '',‘-% k Is�ts.✓ r I j 5 s I k w?y' ° �"3Q4i� 1 °,; ti a�81 Lyy" � Q 111 4k" � x, 1^`t� O C� d � P ' $ A r' �, ` Z�•ss'� ,ua s r,° 1 EXIST ;$.. 1� 9i as a� f c, <®1 142 _ ca4 FOURTEENT J STS r '1.4 4 '..4',, i ,. , — '! 4..1''�• ,vf , } is r j !1 te r(AlarL, ER's *t , -!.� ET 3.1w tr z •. t� y{ e �•• N U ! 6xNI B jL , �j v 3 A 10 'b i aa� t u li=eAD 40 wr '-�_- `` v ;,y �n., r,.. . ai ,� r _ x iN / •L., _ � J . jr'SA �; �"� I I �s dti e ,,' F $ i ' I 4P ° M Ptah � Y �' x I �� a �i ,� r ' . w_j, i. -6. . .1 —C '+ter ' ' 9 I� �- >� :�i rd ��y.� P a s k�Fi ' s,r' tl ! Y.,, ! RY QA. � t= ql'. r t - �a eey t�� a #c F�' � 1 � �� ' t 4f:44,44 , f t+ V —t i g LEGEND p,�, QQ Cr W 04�@ OPE�hg@ffs WuC�, v — — — — URBAN GROWTH AREA BOUNDARY aai inn street . su¢e io . oio aao 80202 ( 3) zs3aia� :11DH WATER AND SEWER MASTER PLAN osw.000� —c EXISTING/PROPOSED CWCWD WATERLINE FIGURE z-3 ° o� M FUTURE WATER SYSTEM PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION MAIN (12" MIN) ULTIMATE PROJECTION oocc zoo3 v TOWN OF CILCREST i a Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 2—Water System _ 2.5 FUTURE WATER SYSTEM COSTS The costs for the future water system infrastructure are provided in Table 2-3. These costs are for ultimate build-out. Other than operation and maintenance, the Town should not have any capital expenditures related to growth in the 5-year projection. Any developers should fund these required improvements. For the ultimate water system, most of the improvements should be funded by development. Only items that benefit the existing residences should be paid for by the Town. For example, this would include the upsizing of some of the waterlines in existing areas. But the major infrastructure projects should be brought on-line as needed and not paid for by the Town. The costs for these major projects are included in the Master Plan to provide the magnitude of costs associated with growth. Table 2-3: Future Ultimate Water System Costs Description ' Estimated Costs Elevated Water Storage Tank $1,300,000 Town Distribution System $3,324,500 Master Meter connections $200,000 CWCWD Distribution Waterlines $822,500 Pump Station improvements $150,000 Total Water System Cost: $5,797,000 Notes: _ 1. All estimates are in 2003 dollars. 2. All estimates include a 20% contingency, and engineering and construction management. 3. Detailed estimates for each item are provided in the Appendix. Page 13 r rg consulting engineers, inc. Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 3—Sewer System SECTION 3: SEWER SYSTEM 3.1 EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM The Town's existing sewer system consists of a collection network with gravity sewers and force mains, two lift stations, and a wastewater treatment plant (see Figure 3-1). Most of the facilities were constructed before the 1970s and haven't been improved dramatically except for routine maintenance. 3.1.1 Existing Collection System The Town's existing collection system includes 8" sanitary sewers, two lift stations, and 4" and 10" force mains to the Wastewater Treatment Plant. Most of the sewer lines are shallow and will be undersized for future growth. 3.1.2 Existing Lift Stations There are two wastewater lift stations: the12t Street Lift Station and the Elm Street Lift Station. The 12th Street lift station was put in service in the 1970's and was upgraded in 1981. It is located at the Twelfth Street and County Road 31 intersection. It pumps wastewater from the north part of the Town starting from Eleventh Street to the Wastewater Treatment Plant, and serves approximately 100 homes. The Lift Station is equipped with one primary and one standby submersible sewage pump. The total wet well volume of lift station is 140 gallons. The existing pumping capacity is 120 gpm at 20 feet of head. The Elm Street lift station was put in service in the 1980's. It is located at Elm Street and Eighth Street. It pumps wastewater from the south part of the Town starting at Eleventh Street to the Wastewater Treatment Plant, and serves approximately 239 homes. The Lift Station is equipped with one primary and one standby pump. The existing pumping capacity is 100 gpm at 20 feet of head. The Elm Street lift station's equipment was previously used at the 12th Street Lift Station. 3.1.3 Existing Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) The WWTP is located at the northeast part of the Town between County Road No. 42 and Railroad Street. The initial construction of the WWTP was in the 1970's. The WWTP was expanded in 1980, and its current maximum capacity is 0.19 MG per day. The WWTP consists of a headworks (bar screen), two aerated ponds, and a settling pond. The WWTP also has an effluent pump station which sends treated effluent through an 8" force main three miles west to the Platte River. The effluent pump station has two pumps with a capacity of 150 gpm at 53'TDH. The WWTP's discharge is regulated by the Town's 1998 Discharge Permit, which is valid until 2004. The following are the parameters for the WWTP: Page 14 r rg consulting engineers, inc. Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 3—Sewer System Table 3-1: WWTP Effluent Limits _ Parameter Limit Flow (MGD) 0.196 (30 day average) 5-day B.O.D. (mg/I) 30/45 (7 day avg./daily max.) Total Suspended Solids (mg/I) 75/110 (30 day avg./7 day avg.) Fecal Coliform Bacteria #1100 ml 6,000/12,000 (30 day avg.R day avg.) _ Total Residual Chlorine (mg/I) 0.5 (daily max.) pH 6.5—9.0 (daily max.) Oil and Grease (mg/I) 10 (daily max.) Page 15 r rg consulting engineers, inc. r . ,.t O .i. y }r x rat"giff', N � An y��{. FQ RTEENTH ST. (WELD OUNTY }, 1 . 4 ' M ,: -- _- $ j F is t„,',4.; G.. xi b. 4J i� • f ;q r '" %THIRTEEN ST... ,• , s.*r .xr�xr g.4 _ ? C. ,.i: A -•'- s ,, TVJI hF H ' _ Ta 1yCti " ■1 , Wye}. ✓' .7'r� o ,-�, at/ d ar 4 E�EVENT �` a1 c Ci f ® i+ en-':;'TThai' i ,,..,..re,,,:. J`r rin1F ? �'i M �' prr ~ , kM , ,�,A. s, $, y �� '^I , 'n l` IN 4 '/. m. ��i n 3 CI a mow. ■I TL ! — Cl" I L I A NTH STS'. u; , %t t ?■ �� f s �i ..`Tyy��, rte- 1 _ / I 4, A g — (t -tdj.. 51''x.. r: { T x d/ $nA3ty yra „ p �1 a 1 . 7 ' vf� 4£ . } - “Iiii1 s ..• MAI ST Tr e= ,y' �; a, rr ;� a s :, t @ �. ,'T a C f aP L4 7 ak 4 F .. G 9 .• if $ 1 3�IXTH } i ' '+f ,e ,1 r /r/ r�y'�y m ,+ v- k I4 \'‘' ',: t' , ra + - e4 "'444p ;71/4t,,,- fir" n. � '•x"': — J r "� �t` �' a`— �a 1 ,, ,� ,,,Z• / l �' ;14'4y `' j N 4g k / , ,4:1"1,./& f.�,'Y *4 .!•��1 1 '{ ^ir}tii x}. d �t .� ,t.* 11! ". . µq " 'ten it,xY r§t 4dis L. v ur7' I* u '7 `“ i ' t t e ,roitir(, ,� . ,x •vb,/ •, • _1'�Yr ./A `. ,.fi•♦ t�, ' A o.14 %a.. x ers s _ V }1-✓� ,S", .z �✓��f�i' F 4 -t ls�YfuSm .-4rx p 'dia .� ,f it—R r - 4,14,,,j44:1 �F t'� d �' �% - , ,� ��d � � ., � y .. i ./ j VQ x ) kt& i )S T. a „ 0 �p1 s,�. L e ., aI ,•t J, 4Ul ea Gf0 p N ,� r 1,,, V Gd p Vol °RjB W llr° ®Mcl° r®. (aNG, �� NOTE: 3 331 17th street soae no a.o.sc mloraao 00204 (JOJ) 193-8101 ALL SEWER LINES ARE 8" UNLESS "' WATER AND SEWER MASTER PLAN os Ale 000a, g OTHERWISE INDICATED M "" FIGURE 3-1 �a ,•,o VD o�*.m" EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM oat zom ,..- CA ac TOWN OF ClLCREST Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 3—Sewer System 3.2 POTENTIAL PROBLEMS With expected growth, the existing sewer system facilities will require expansion. However, portions of the existing collection system can handle some additional flows. The lift stations are already near capacity and wastewater from new developments should be directed away from them. The WWTP has capacity remaining, but ultimately will need to be much larger to serve the expected growth. 3.2.1 WWTP Capacity After 91 future SFEs are added, the treatment facility would be at 80% of capacity. At that time, a 201 Facility Plan for upgrading the facility is required by the State and the design of an expansion should follow. Once 180 future SFEs are built, the WWTP will be at 95% of capacity, and the State requires the construction of the WWTP expansion or a new larger facility. 3.2.2 Lift Station Capacity Peak wastewater flows from future development will exceed both lift stations' discharge capacities. For example, the proposed County Meadows subdivision's peak flows would result in a total inflow rate of 327 gpm. This rate is over three times the capacity of the 12th Street Lift Station. 3.2.3 Collection System Capacity Overall the Town's existing collection system will not be adequate for future growth. The Town's population will increase by more than 10 times and all components of the collection system will have to grow. A main interceptor should be constructed along a natural basin to promote gravity flow. Force mains will be required where new lift stations are constructed. 3.3 SEWER SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA The future system components were based on certain design criteria. When considering future developments, the same criteria should be used when evaluating and designing sewer system components. The sewer system criteria are as follows: Table 3-2: Sewer System Design Criteria Criteria„ .. Value ,t,,.. : Average Day Flow per SFE 280 gallons per day Peak Flow Formula (maximum 5.0) 3.79"Q-0.168 (Q in cfs) Minimum Pipe Velocity 2.0 feet per second Maximum Pipe Percent Full 80% Inflow and Infiltration Rate (I/I) 55 gallons per gross acre 3.4 FUTURE SEWER SYSTEM In order to accommodate future growth, the Town will have to improve every major component of their wastewater system. As growth occurs and sewer flow travels through the existing Page 17 r rg consulting engineers, inc. Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 3—Sewer System system, it will exceed the capacity of the facilities and pipelines. The WWTP and lift stations' capacity will need to be increased, and new collection pipelines will need to be installed. The future 5-year and ultimate sewer systems can be seen in Figures 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4. 3.4:1 Future Wastewater Treatment Plant The existing WWTP site is planned to be rezoned for commercial development due to its prime location at Highway 85 and south of County Road 42. The new WWTP will need to be located _ in one of two locations. The first site is west of Town near County Road 42 and east of Highway 60. Site 1 is advantageous because any treated effluent must be pumped west to the Platte River, so locating the facility to the west will reduce the effluent pumping requirements. One major problem with Site 1 is that the majority of the raw sewage will have to be pumped a long — distance to the WWTP. However, pumping may be needed regardless of the new WWTP location. A second site has been selected for consideration. It is located to the northwest of the existing WWTP, near Highway 85 and north of County Road 42. Site 2's possible advantage is that it may allow for almost all the Town's ultimate raw sewage to flow to the WWTP via gravity. However, this is not certain, and should be evaluated in depth as a part of the 201 Facility Plan. 3.4.1.1 5-year Projection The 5-year growth projection will not exceed the capacity of the existing WWTP. After approximately 91 more SFEs, a 201 Facility Plan is required, however, only 52 SFEs are — expected in the next five years. 3.4.1.2 Ultimate Projection — After the next five years, a 201 Facility Plan and eventually a new larger WWTP is needed. At the time of the 201 Facility Plan, a site for the WWTP should be selected. The ultimate capacity of the WWTP is estimated to be 1.2 million gallons per day (MGD). The facility should be constructed so that is can be expanded in intervals until its final capacity is reached. 3.4.2 Future Lift Stations While lift stations are an on-going maintenance item, because of the topography of the Town's service area it is unlikely that lift stations can be eliminated in the future. The Elm Street lift — station may have to remain in service in the future even if future wastewater flows are diverted away from it. Raw sewage will need to be pumped to either WWTP site. A major lift station replacing the 12'h Street lift station will be needed regardless of which WWTP is selected. The Twelfth Street location is an ideal location because the Town's topography generally slopes downhill from the southwest to the northeast. There is a small ridge near County Road 29 that will prevent wastewater from the west of the ridge to flow east to Town. As a result, if WWTP Site 2 is selected a future lift station is needed in this western area to pump flows east to the system. However, if Site 1 is selected, it is likely that a lift station in the area will still be needed. Page 18 r rg consulting engineers, inc. Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 3—Sewer System 3.4.2.1 5-year Projection The 52 new SFEs in the 5-year projection are expected to occur in and around the proposed County Meadows development. The wastewater in this area flows to the 12th Street lift station which is already near capacity. This lift station will require improvements, including pumps with a higher discharge rate. Any improvements to this lift station should account for any flows beyond the next 52 SFEs. 3.4.2.2 Ultimate Projection Ultimately, the 12th Street lift station should be replaced with a larger facility capable of being expanded to accommodate almost all of the Town's wastewater. This new lift station will pump to one of the proposed WWTP sites. The peak flow to this lift station is approximately 4,000 gpm. The County Road 42 the lift station that serves the west side of Town will also be needed to pump flows to a future sewer outfall or interceptor. 3.4.3 Future Collection System The existing collection system is not capable of conveying the ultimate wastewater flows. Rather than improving all the existing lines, it may be more cost effective to route future wastewater through the existing system in a future major interceptor. The interceptor's alignment would start in the southwest part of Town, and carry flows to the northeast to the expanded 12"' Street lift station. 3.4.3.1 5-year Projection The 52 new SFEs expected in the 5-year projection will not necessitate improvements to the existing collection system. 3.4.3.2 Ultimate Projection _ The major interceptor will ultimately extend to the southwest portion of the service area, near Railroad Street and County Road 40. Along with the interceptor, several outfalls will be needed to serve all the new developments. The interceptor will most likely discharge into the expanded 12th Street lift station. Page 19 r rg consulting engineers, inc. .`y**-, •v"fir ai3AxP "'k .-` a J1. s ' by„ $54e�hi / - '. ; _ ciSY ftlii4 F hr e . — OURTEENTH ST (WELD,OUNTY t ' . 42 - c k , , Y,£r yam. - O0��L • T' cf'k r^19� � 1 ! 1 11,, , _t f L ,- ll_^w' m , y�t A it "lie DOWS PWASE 1 ,` t 1 ^, - W L { 4 YF N l�', l xi l. tin, MF .. ` r ' * -to fE INTO EXIST. , ! p.- -44.4',' '4- -- it i F `o - -- 4' ,4 c r r AI w IRTEEN ST ' e I ." I �� 1. '/:44 1 W f - .„,l k Z - .uT. - d �• 1 f 4 r A : 'Avr z. f r. 5'ei 7"` 4s Ci• F 7�iJ46" I�.sa'' it -1*,' d( s. 4 .41C 1-."' m � � ys 4.t If`S�+n'i � 71' vjr � i . . +��{ y Job' I Ir '� " y..,. "--`, ..It 5 f �ifrL f : �` 1;4,- r,_, ,�, try sp' ' ffirt'. 1-A '1 y $ A4t" t t ,} ,CI 1 1 m l ,,roi J� ! .^ '�+ a IhL 'I� CY rd '^c Y G. A* - I A) 7_, G.1 1. ' .l r ] «. 1 31. E. — j :; r..] J, i 1s ESS a R t, A. > f.'IE A' /47=4;4,- 4 : i 77`i.��stt ' �0�yy� . MAIN-ST T a i k t ' !% 4 ` r fl 4 +'h ._ ' " ,ki1/4 i ' ITHSTa ^xK F- 11 eft - tir 5 (�{ 4A /V-r♦� / . *.` - t �M r'h ° j f it •1 ,tru. I^ f ,L ! • c M. r 'i' s,t�t {F .,•M1 't x•• [ i n� , S iii Y d} M Pi' • �.Y �i � ' :Yf C en � j ti . r -X ' a./.., Jibt,I{t4 veL4 Y ey.. I�® �° • .IR.a Y %i,44� i. 11 =`p^4 �' J i �i a 5 ' r s`^ � it �, � .,'...‘„,,,,-4 s x � �5, ctS r t �- s' F 141,,,z,4-1;-,,y #° �L°' t 1 m^ + a�' ' 3 ` ,L1,-'41( art i � , 11 Si w(" t' 1-r;- h,. ; S3 �' ^ 1 ill,' s4 3 -,•,:('''1, ),�it"h ',i,,(,114., k •W �'a _ •/ ;!.�w �j7 �'�t, � 4E � k.f;.sr �� X>y N uj @00 W4llf401t1� 0n 1�1®® O lie ^0 331 t]tn street suite ]I0 eenoc- coiarodo BJzoz a NOTE: 03) z9J-s,m o ALL SEWER LINES ARE 8" UNLESS , WATER AND SEWER MASTER PLAN ��. , ^o OTHERWISE INDICATED o. m" FIGURE 3-2 :sue. • o FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM tO o�.ro m 5 YEAR PROJECTION occ 2003 ac TOWN OF�GILCREST scup.. 1 .. ‘ ,„„,,,. ..i .,,,„„„ .,.; lir r„ , Ti " i T, rl, 1k'x 1 t.x yy t11 J tr 4 al'"; ii a .t 'ew 'x qq( j f° r -4,* '1' _ 5 411 /11 yam, Pe ? . -V/aft =.,J v ;ie k— }— t _ _s,;.,_ • -'"J`I F r a s µ iP* 9 Y ♦r ..c,44": + �K ✓ . �,. . _ �d f8 i ` RCEP �pY� �.... P R .1 ;4:-.. .,:,m w� ,�" 'r \\C-2.412:1:141X31 ' j. Ip f < i PRI ✓F s �,} ' ,� �` I f="^ ¢� a w' 6 f _7 / th+r•ax �I' }'a Mi } � I/ti ;I I la" r� ±c12 ; o a '` a irk: rrXT � ' „atet o eias h . q „Art-7 x � { / '''',11.•.4.,. �` ` (a„ G ;non � � •„' ". y' I + /f' 1U d itP r ' �la..,...1,,,, ,:j`OAD 40 Y ' �' rte,.. F', ft fi >p 3- z pro ; ms's i �' R 1T a 4f Y 1 f'• ^ �� t.: (r t 11L �b • 'fib t �,B "a' $ rlV I.• • f ,-,./f, JI ...+ to t'U -4Y' �� ¼ ::; i *y a4 yr2 r7' awy.. /. Io. P LEGEND � �n ( o e}�0°Il00T�° 0�6a �'a• URBAN GROWTH AREA BOUNDARY 1331 17th street • 7g . e<,;<. <clnroeo 80202 (aw) zsaelm cn " WATER AND SEWER MASTER PLAN ;c.");°°13 PROPOSED SEWER INTERCEPTORor" FIGURE3-3 Ilk - FUTURESANITARYSEWERSYSTEM• PROPOSED FORCE MAIN °LimULTIMATEPROJECTION (WWTPSITE #1JacTOWN OF GILCRESTI d 1 pm / t 9- +`dK w ae ;47:n.. of 9t a zx.r $ y ', rl ;A.y "1" t s 'cRt qR - e r > e., s z; . a`. 'V � Y a +i� �' — � - t_ �3 z. 4 i 1 Y O _ I f `{�r I C • i �''. f 1 _. F6 RCEPf .: s , I �I{y' 5 d y q -Y I _ r.,` FJ 1 L VVV M ® ;i yFOR°, 7sWFerS'�'-�C ) d Fy-r- 9, �I ! _ d V, lt �< ,, t 41•:--tom r,f Rf y' w .0 4 a r.. .1. �! 1"i •y.-'''t I ' mto �▪ I cW. . ' "�i�y `7 4 .r� . y:1 D. _fig', . '..6-F'▪ L"4J. J . u / ZF 1 ` . 'A .4* y l r • F�• Mr .,,�.y? .4 +.° s ! �sxfrw. "e'fa ! fti r Pt sa,' r yx . • 'EEj .'?v" wr m`�c g� "s�Y, 1 S.e at�3,,. s f • „+r {rf ' 43P. ,� -)=.:::;.- W yi Sr } 3 c 11 s r i ..' a laAD 40 2 ' fi s o,. $i �� '/ r,^' . _ t s I see "J x ,! :a y�y y x j , t'4 ' Q:` � , I I .. 4 ' F t n r -+ Ir tr l i' +r '''‘;"•;.;-;•;•;:.; r+ r F• t .J6L {r �, t #«' .1 u ; re":, CIS .,,,iti � r', r ,� J/, rI p -Y- v4 .�� 't ti A Y . ..) . t I!( � ^reiA+ i a: �1 e " � � 4 ,I . C cR ai 3 G ,N{{paw y � N i r�' /J'"(�}� r y't L'-. V d 3 Y ,....r s a LL LEGEND TO O0W�M0 in j O��OOP40 run ^� 1331 nth street . sue )10 . Eenver, Colorado e02 0 2 — — — — URBAN GROWTH AREA BOUNDARY 03) 293-810) -cm� : _i.1""IDL1: WATER ANDSEWERMASTERPLAN 73'0001 �� — PROPOSED SEWER INTERCEPTORIX FIGURE 3-4 C FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM w,E kt LTIMATE PROJECTION (WWTP SITE #2�DEC, 2003 ti- PROPOSED FORCE MAIN a ° TOWN OF CILCREST ; Town of Gilcrest 2003 Water and Sewer Master Plan Section 3—Sewer System 3.5 FUTURE SEWER SYSTEM COSTS The costs for the future sewer system infrastructure are provided in Table 3-3. These costs are for ultimate build-out. Other than operation and maintenance, the Town should not have any capital expenditures related to growth in the 5-year projection. Any developers should fund the required improvements. For the ultimate sewer system, most of the improvements should be funded by development. Only items that benefit the existing residences should be paid for by the Town. For example, this would include the re-alignment or lowering of sewer lines. But the major infrastructure projects should be brought on-line as needed and not paid for by the Town. The costs for these major projects are included in the Master Plan to provide the magnitude of costs associated with growth. Table 3-3: Future Ultimate Sewer System Costs (WWTP Site 1) _ Description ; Estimated,;Costs , WWTP $8,000,000 Interceptor $1,969,000 12th Street lift station expansion $562,000 Elm Street lift station improvements $50,000 County Road 42 lift station $389,000 Force Mains $739,000 Total Sewer System Costs $11,709,000 Table 3-4: Future Ultimate Sewer System Costs (WWTP Site 2) Description . Estimated Costs WWTP $8,000,000 Interceptor $1,969,000 12th Street lift station expansion $562,000 Elm Street lift station improvements $50,000 County Road 42 lift station $389,000 Force Mains $565,000 Total Sewer System Costs $11,535,000 Notes: _ 1. All estimates are in 2003 dollars. 2. All estimates include a 20% contingency, and engineering and construction management. 3. Detailed estimates for each item are provided in the Appendix. Page 23 r rg consulting engineers, inc. Town of Gi!crest Water and Sewer Master Plan Appendix APPENDIX • Table 1-1: Ultimate Growth Projections Table 1-2: Growth Projections Summary • Table 2-1: Water Demand Types Table 2-2: Future Water Demands Table 2-3: Fire Flow Storage • Table 3-1: Projected Wastewater Production 44, tXry{ Table 3-2: Proposed Interceptor Capacities £$ ; • Table 4-1: Estimated Ultimate Distribution Main Costs, ,f}, " Table 4-2: Estimated CWCWD Waterline Costs ;9,'Q, •. Table 4-3: Estimated 1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank Cost • Table 5-1: Estimated Interceptor Cost (A-1 to A 2) Table 5-2:5-2: Estimated Interceptor Cost (C-1 to A" ) v `$ Table 5-3: Estimated Interceptor Cost (A-2 to Lift Static f t dk�^ Table 5-4: Estimated Interceptor Cost (B 1 to Lift St}a'tida) _ Table 5-5: Estimated Interceptor Coat (A-1 to Lift Station) Table 5-6: Estimated Sanitary SewerForce"Main (WWTP"S e 1) Table 5-7: Estimated Sanitary Sewer Force Main (WWTP Site 2) _ Table 5-8: Estimated Sanitary Sewer Force Ma�f( P Site) Table 5-9: Estimated.County Road 42 Lit Station Cost ; Table 5-10: Estimated 12th Street Lift Station Cost • Table 6-1: Summary of Proposed'Water and Sewer Improvements (WWTP Site 1) Table 6-2: Summary of Proposed Water and Sewer Improvements (WWTP Site 2) • Existing Water System Cybernet Model 1 c� u� F , R:O630\OWi\WartA2003 Gilaest WSS Master Plan Appendix.doc RG Consulting Engineers, Inc 12/11/03 at 8:29 AM - TOWN OF GILCREST Water and Sewer Master Plan Growth Projections JN: 630.0001 Date: December 2003 Calc'd by: DLT Table 1-1: Ultimate Growth Projections (Urban Growth Boundary) a �z� 1 Agriculture/Large Lot 1251 0.2 250 2 Low Density Residential 260 1.0 260 3 Medium Density Residential 350 6.0 2100 4 High Density Residential 111 13.5 1499 5 Commercial 22 2.0 44 6 Downtown mixed com/res 12 2.0 24 7 Industrial 135 1.0 135 8 Park 16 1.5 24 9 School/Civic 56 1.0 56 Total 2213 4,392 Notes: 1. Planning Areas and Unit Densities were established in the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update by Modus Management, except for Areas 5 through 9. - 2. The Unit Density for"High Density"was 18 per acre (according to Modus) but was multiplied by 0.75 because the area is multi-family. Table 1-2: Growth Projections Summary : . 1 Existing 339 2 5-Year 391 3 Ultimate 4,392 Note: - 1. The 5-year projection was based on the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update by Modus Management. 2003 Gilcrest Master Plan.xls Page 1 of 1 Growth 12/11/03 at 8:45 AM — TOWN OF GILCREST Water and Sewer Master Plan _ Projected Water Demands JN: 630.0001 Date: December 2003 Calc'd by: CAO Table 2-1: Water Demand t �b₹ 9$i- ��"{��r� �u�•..ot 9 �£RiSa'2�' _�._ I t..J�a^� _.v _ 1 Average Day 450 0.31 2 Maximum Day 1,000 0.69 3 Peak Hour 2,500 1.74 4 Fire Flow n/a 3,500 Note- 1. The Fire Flow is for a commercial building and is assumed to have a two hour duration. Table 2-2: Future Water Demand rns 4r9,1,ip 4 d wth ' ' _ 1 Existing 339 152,550 339,000 235 589 2 5-Year 391 175,950 391,000 272 679 3 Ultimate 4,392 1,976,265 4,391,700 3,050 7,624 Note. Estimated fire flow storage (commercial): 420,000 gallons Table 2-3: Fire Flow Storage I k tb .1,;(3p) tiro, 1 Existing 339,000 759,000 2 5-Year 391,000 811,000 3 Ultimate 4,391,700 4,811,700 — Note. 1. Potable water storage is normally calculated as the sum of Max Day and Fire Flow, however, it would be impractical to provide this amount of storage in an elevated tank. Therefore, only 1 million gallons of elevated storage will be provided. Water Demand 2003 Gilcrest Master Plan.xls Page 1 of 1 12/11/03 at 8:45 AM TOWN OF GILCREST Water and Sewer Master Plan Projected Wastewater Production JN: 630.0001 Date: December 2003 Calc'd by: CAO Average wastewater per SFE: 280 gallons per day Table 3-1: Projected Wastewater Production 3 T :7141,7ASIO, — r _ 9 3 fy ls��i..�3A�E }. .° {,g�y,#9 k9 ` AJ wJ 1� F,» i4._..I iu �. �ox..x... f 3 .�......._.... 14. \ 1 Existing 339 94,920 5.00 474,600 330 2 5-Year 391 109,480 5.00 547,400 380 3 Ultimate 4,392 1,229,676 3.41 4,190,793 2,910 Note. 1. Peak flow was estimated by applying a factor of 3.797F°18° not to exceed 5. F is measured in CFS. R:\0630\0001\Excel\2003 Gilcrest Master Plan.xls Page 1 of 1 %NW Production TOWN OF GILCREST Water and Sewer Master Plan Proposed Interceptor Ultimate Capacities JN: 630.0001 Date: December 2003 Calc'd by: CAO Table 3-2: Proposed Interceptor Capacities )[;_ I `, 1 ro v f 6 ) ' a -.�a s eyc 9 & e a �� u ��4 If��.�.t h .4�' 1 Interceptor A from 664 664 129 604 628 0.23% 15 41% A-1 to A-2 2 Interceptor C from 72 72 14 70 84 0.60% 12 16% C-1 to A-2 3 Interceptor A from 1,098 1,834 357 1,407 1,445 0.36% 21 35% A-2 to Lift Station 4 Interceptor D from 2,320 2,320 451 1,711 1,728 0.29% 21 41% D-1 to Lift Station 5 Interceptor B from 238 238 46 231 255 0.42% 12 30% B-1 to Lift Station Notes. 1. SFEs were estimated from Future Land Use Map provided by Modus Management. 2. The average flow per SFE is assumed to be 280 gallons per day (0.194 gallons per minute). _ 3. Peak flow was estimated by applying a factor of 3.797F°168 not to exceed 5. F is measured in CFS. 4. Infiltration is assumed to be 55 gallons per acre per day. 5. Approx. slopes were estimated from ground surface elevations shown on USGS 7.5 minute topo map revised in 1969. 6. Flow capacities were estimated using Manning's equation with a roughness coefficient of 0.010. R:\0630\0001\Excel\2003 Gilcrest Master Plan.xls Page 1 of 1 Sewer-Calcs 12/11/03 at 8:45 AM TOWN OF GILCREST Water and Sewer Master Plan Proposed Ultimate Water Improvements JN: 630.0001 Date: December 2003 Calc'd by: CAO Table 4-1: Estimated Ultimate Distribution Main na t Improvement? Costs p rr� -. �� 't n,.:... Fir"7.Tp j,: . A 1 F&I 12" DIP Pipeline 41,000 If $ 45 $ 1,845,000 2 Remove/Replace Asphalt 20,500 sy $ 25 $ 512,500 3 Reseeding 10 ac $ 2,000 $ 20,000 4 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 20,000 $ 20,000 5 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Subtotal Construction Items $ 2,517,500 Contingency(20%) $ 504,000 Engineering and CM(12%) $ 303,000 Total Project Cost $ 3,324,500 Table 4-2: Estimated CWCWD Waterline Cost 1 F&I 14" DIP Pipeline 9,000 If $ 50 $ 450,000 2 Remove/Replace Asphalt 4,500 sy $ 25 $ 112,500 3 Reseeding 5 ac $ 2,000 $ 10,000 4 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 20,000 $ 20,000 5 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Subtotal Construction Items $ 622,500 Contingency(20%) $ 125,000 Engineering and CM(12%) $ 75,000 Total Project Cost $ 822,500 Table 4-3: Estimated 1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank Cost 1 1 MG Composite Elevated Water Tank 1 Is $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Contingency(20%) $ 200,000 Engineering and CM(10%) $ 100,000 Total Project Cost $ 1,300,000 2003 Gilcrest Master Plan.xls Page 1 of 1 Ultimate-Water 12111/03 at 8:45 AM TOWN OF GILCREST Water and Sewer Master Plan Proposed Ultimate Sewer System Improvements — JN: 630.0001 Date: December 2003 Calc'd by: CAO Table 5-1: Estimated Interceptor Cost(A-1 to A-2) -1 {, :.,,_c. z _ nw kg:—. „i' °_—7--i27-7727. _ <i °ii.- ® 1 15' PVC Sewer Line 10,000 If $ 35 $ 350,000 2 Manholes 25 ea $ 2,000 $ 50,000 _ 3 Remove/Replace Asphalt 5,000 sy $ 25 $ 125,000 4 Reseeding 3 ac $ 2,000 $ 6,000 5 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 20,000 $ 20,000 6 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 28,000 $ 28,000 Subtotal Construction Items $ 579,000 Contingency(20%) $ 116,000 — Engineering and CM(12%) $ 70,000 Total Project Cost $ 765,000 Table 5-2: Estimated Interceptor Cost(C-1 to A-2) .:11.711.1i.:— ----;g4-747171,07 77, m e I-7 f q 7:'!:Il'.,MS r* :7::, I. ' '.. 1 12" PVC Sewer Line 4,200 If $ 30 $ 126,000 2 Manholes 11 ea $ 2,000 $ 22,000 3 Reseeding 2 ac $ 2,000 $ 4,000 4 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 5 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 9,000 $ 9,000 Subtotal Construction Items $ 171,000 y Contingency(20%) $ 35,000 Engineering and CM(12%) $ 21,000 Total Project Cost $ 227,000 Table 5-3: Estimated Interceptor Cost(A-2 to Lift Station) M ' :1v . _ 1?,.1:415I.I. 1:1:1a ' 1rA...i„1.1.1-02;.___, . s. :::-_.. I .ti.! „i _ ..-5.,-.),..1{.}-imo,. 1 21" PVC Sewer Line 2,300 If $ 40 $ 92,000 2 Manholes 6 ea $ 2,000 $ 12,000 3 Remove/Replace Asphalt 2,300 sy $ 25 $ 57,500 4 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 5,000 $ 5,000 5 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 9,000 $ 9,000 Subtotal Construction Items $ 175,500 Contingency(20%) $ 36,000 Engineering and CM(12%) $ 22,000 Total Project Cost $ 233,500 2003 Gilcrest Master Plan.xls Page 1 of 3 Ultimate-Sewer - 12/11/03 at 8:45 AM - Table 5-4: Estimated Interceptor Cost(B-1 to Lift Station) 1 12" PVC Sewer 5700 If $ 30 $ 171,000 2 Manholes 20 ea $ 2,000 $ 40,000 3 Remove/Replace Asphalt 2000 sy $ 25 $ 50,000 4 Reseeding 3 ac $ 2,000 $ 6,000 — 5 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 6 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 14,000 $ 14,000 Subtotal Construction Items $ 291,000 Contingency(20%) $ 59,000 Engineering and CM(12%) $ 35,000 Total Project Cost $ 385,000 Table 5-5: Estimated Interceptor Cost(D-1 to Lift Station) iii,,. ' !a 6e la' !::____,.../. Ill W clla.. 4t `' 1 21" PVC Sewer Line 3500 If $ 40 $ 140,000 2 Manholes 10 ea $ 2,000 $ 20,000 — 3 Remove/Replace Asphalt 3,500 sy $ 25 $ 87,500 4 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 5 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 13,000 $ 13,000 — Subtotal Construction Items $ 270,500 Contingency(20%) $ 55,000 Engineering and CM(12%) $ 33,000 — Total Project Cost $ 358,500 — Table 5-6: Estimated Sanitary Sewer Force Main Cost(WWTP Site#1) ' t :.t. '.,-D _t °� 8 b. ; -II y '9, § 4.?. o ii 444i'�... a..s 1,,_.:_l_` -. ...._." Via' .._.,,.� .1�....,._::_ _ .._..,,. 1 12" PVC Sewer Line 11,100 If $ 45 $ 500,000 2 Reseeding 6 ac $ 2,000 $ 12,000 3 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 20,000 $ 20,000 4 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 27,000 $ 27,000 — Subtotal Construction Items $ 559,000 Contingency(20%) $ 112,000 Engineering and CM(12%) $ 68,000 "" Total Project Cost $ 739,000 2003 Gilcrest Master Plan.xls Page 2 of 3 Ultimate-Sewer — 12/11/03 at 8:45 AM Table 5-7: Estimated Sanitary Sewer Force Main Cost(WWTP g Site#2) — .e i,1'..r o a :�s-1-5;-----,*:!_--.' l..1. .a"'.,:'. ;° ' b t 7 `:. �..7' { °,.$.:4- a:R I ,SilrbM1.1 1 12" PVC Sewer Line 3300 If $ 45 $ 149,000 2 Reseeding 2 ac $ 2,000 $ 4,000 — 3 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 4 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 9,000 $ 9,000 Subtotal Construction Items $ 172,000 " Contingency(20%) $ 35,000 Engineering and CM(12%) $ 21,000 Total Project Cost $ 228,000 Table 5-8: Estimated Sanitary Sewer Force Main Cost(WWTP Site#2)- 1 7.2:,...1:1'77:-7.7.17n7-12 PVC Sewer Line 4,000 If $ 45 $ 180,000 2 Reseeding 1 ac $ 2,000 $ 2,000 3 Remove/Replace Asphalt 2,000 sy $ 25 $ 50,000 4 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 5 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 13,000 $ 13,000 — Subtotal Construction Items $ 255,000 Contingency(20%) $ 51,000 Engineering and CM(12%) $ 31,000 — Total Project Cost $ 337,000 l 2003 Gilcrest Master Plan.xls Page 3 of 3 Ultimate-Sewer 12/11/03 at 8:45 AM TOWN OF GILCREST Water and Sewer Master Plan _ Preliminary Lift Station Costs JN: 630.0001 Date: December 2003 Calc'd by: CAO Table 5-9: Estimated County Road 42 Lift Station Cost 1 Site work 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 _ 2 Building 200 sf $ 50 $ 10,000 3 Wet Well 1 Is $ 30,000 $ 30,000 4 Pumps 2 ea $ 30,000 $ 60,000 5 Interior piping 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 6 Landscaping 1 Is $ 5,000 $ 5,000 7 Reseeding 1 ac $ 2,000 $ 2,000 8 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 5,000 $ 5,000 9 SCADA 1 Is $ 15,000 $ 15,000 10 Electrical work 1 Is $ 30,000 $ 30,000 11 Generator and ATS 1 Is $ 70,000 $ 70,000 12 HVAC 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 13 New electrical transformer 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 14 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 14,000 $ 14,000 — Subtotal Construction Items $ 281,000 Contingency(20%) $ 57,000 Engineering, Permitting, and CM(18%) $ 51,000 — Total Project Cost $ 389,000 Table 5-10: Estimated 12th Street Lift Station Cost .e'24- S ' 1 ;� ti:-L.. 9 1-It° _ 1 Site work 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 2 Building 300 sf $ 50 $ 15,000 3 Wet Well 1 Is $ 64,000 $ 64,000 4 Pumps 3 ea $ 30,000 $ 90,000 5 Interior piping 1 Is $ 20,000 $ 20,000 6 Landscaping 1 Is $ 5,000 $ 5,000 7 Reseeding 1 ac $ 2,000 $ 2,000 8 Erosion Control 1 Is $ 5,000 $ 5,000 9 SCADA 1 Is $ 15,000 $ 15,000 10 Electrical work 1 Is $ 70,000 $ 70,000 11 Generator and ATS 1 Is $ 70,000 $ 70,000 12 HVAC 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 13 New electrical transformer 1 Is $ 10,000 $ 10,000 14 Mobilization (5%) 1 Is $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Subtotal Construction items $ 406,000 Contingency(20%) $ 82,000 Engineering, Permitting, and CM(18%) $ 74,000 Total Project Cost $ 562,000 2003 Gilcrest Master Plan.xls Page 1 of 1 Lift Station 12/11/03 at 9:42 AM TOWN OF GILCREST Water and Sewer Master Plan Estimated Cost Summary JN: 630.0001 Date: December 2003 Calc'd by: CAO _ Table 6-1: Summary of Proposed Water and Sewer Improvements(WWTP Site#1) ' ta fl^art; t F Water Distribution Mains $ 3,324,500 CWCWD Waterline $ 822,500 Master Meters $ 200,000 Storage $ 1,300,000 Booster Stations $ 150,000 Subtotal $ 5,797,000 Wastewater Interceptors $ 1,969,000 Force Mains $ 739,000 - 12th Street Lift Station $ 562,000 CR 42 Lift Station $ 389,000 Elm Street Lift Station $ 50,000 — WWTP $ 8,000,000 Subtotal $ 11,709,000 _ Total Cost $ 17,506,000 Table 6-2: Summary of Proposed Water and Sewer Improvements (WWTP Site#2) >' ' •''' Cr_ Water - Distribution Mains $ 3,324,500 CWCWD Waterline $ 822,500 Master Meters $ 200,000 Storage $ 1,300,000 Booster Stations $ 150,000 Subtotal $ 5,797,000 Wastewater Interceptors $ 1,969,000 Force Mains $ 565,000 — 12th Street Lift Station $ 562,000 CR 42 Lift Station $ 389,000 Elm Street Lift Station $ 50,000 — VWVfP $ 8,000,000 Subtotal $ 11,535,000 Total Cost $ 17,332,000 2003 Gilcrest Master Plan.xls Page 1 of 1 Summary Scenario: Max Day w/ Fire Steady State Analysis Junction Report Node Elevation Demand Demand Demand Calculated Calculated Pressure Label (ft) Type (gpm) Pattern Demand Hydraulic (psi) (gpm) Grade - (ft) J-31 4,745.00 Demand 612.26 Fixed 1,530.65 1,879.16 -1,239.28 J-30 4,747.50 Demand 3.72 Fixed 9.29 4,743.07 -1.92 - J-32 4,748.50 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,747.01 -0.65 J-29 4,747.60 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,747.01 -0.25 J-28 4,749.00 Demand 3.16 Fixed 7.90 4,801.29 22.61 J-34 4,749.00 Demand 1.11 Fixed 2.78 4,802.70 23.22 - J-33 4,749.00 Demand 1.11 Fixed 2.78 4,802.71 23.22 J-36 4,750.00 Demand 0.74 Fixed 1.84 4,833.81 36.24 J-43 4,753.00 Demand 1.30 Fixed 3.26 4,837.95 36.73 - J-44 4,753.00 Demand 1.30 Fixed 3.26 4,837.98 36.75 J-40 4,752.00 Demand 3.16 Fixed 7.90 4,837.66 37.04 J-37 4,751.00 Demand 1.47 Fixed 3.68 4,836.93 37.16 J-41 4,752.00 Demand 3.16 Fixed 7.90 4,838.06 37.21 - J-35 4,750.00 Demand 2.61 Fixed 6.51 4,836.08 37.22 J-38 4,751.00 Demand 0.74 Fixed 1.84 4,837.24 37.29 J-42 4,751.00 Demand 0.74 Fixed 1.84 4,838.39 37.79 - J-6 4,754.00 Demand 2.61 Fixed 6.53 4,846.92 40.18 J-5 4,749.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,843.61 40.91 J-39 4,745.50 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,842.91 42.12 J-25 4,753.90 Demand 2.97 Fixed 7.42 4,852.31 42.56 - J-27 4,748.50 Demand 3.16 Fixed 7.90 4,848.00 43.03 J-10 4,744.50 Demand 8.71 Fixed 21.77 4,849.64 45.47 J-7 4,743.00 Demand 2.61 Fixed 6.51 4,848.64 45.68 J-8 4,742.50 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,849.62 46.32 - J-24 4,744.00 Demand 3.72 Fixed 9.29 4,851.41 46.45 J-9 4,742.00 Demand 6.49 Fixed 16.23 4,849.67 46.56 J-4 4,747.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,855.09 46.74 - J-23 4,743.00 Demand 1.30 Fixed 3.26 4,851.40 46.88 J-22 4,742.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,850.79 47.04 J-21 4,742.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,850.80 47.05 J-14 4,740.50 Demand 6.49 Fixed 16.23 4,849.63 47.19 - J-15 4,740.50 Demand 6.49 Fixed 16.23 4,849.64 47.20 J-12 4,740.40 Demand 1.48 Fixed 3.70 4,849.64 47.24 J-11 4,740.30 Demand 1.48 Fixed 3.71 4,849.64 47.28 - J-13 4,740.00 Demand 6.49 Fixed 16.23 4,849.63 47.41 J-45 4,740.50 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,850.31 47.48 J-16 4,740.00 Demand 5.45 Fixed 13.62 4,850.18 47.65 J-26 4,748.00 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,858.26 47.68 _ J-17 4,739.50 Demand 4.08 Fixed 10.20 4,850.31 47.92 J-46 4,739.00 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,850.31 48.13 J-18 4,739.00 Demand 3.72 Fixed 9.29 4,850.34 48.15 - J-19 4,738.50 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,850.33 48.36 J-20 4,738.00 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,850.33 48.58 Title:Gilcrest Project Engineer.Ricardo Goncalves - s:\162.0016\dwg\cybernet\gilcrest_exist.wcd RG Consulting Engineers, Inc. Cybernet v3.1 [071] 11/24/03 10:19:57 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Max Day wl Fire Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Link Length in Material Rough Cur.0/C (gp Start End HL m) HGL HGL (ft) (ft/s) Status y(ft) (in) (Calc) (Calc) - (ft) (ft) P-6 500.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 139.89 4,855.09 4,843.61 11.48 3.57 Open P-37 410.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 448.04 4,855.09 4,852.31 2.77 2.86 Open P-7 348.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -252.56 4,843.61 4,846.92 3.31 2.87 Open - P-8 347.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -177.87 4,846.92 4,848.64 1.72 2.02 Open P-35 643.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -81.21 4,846.92 4,852.31 5.40 2.07 Open P-9 362.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -127.89 4,848.64 4,849.62 0.98 1.45 Open P-30 643.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -56.49 4,848.64 4,851.40 2.76 1.44 Open P-10 280.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -30.90 4,849.62 4,849.67 0.05 0.35 Open P-29 652.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -102.54 4,849.62 4,850.79 1.17 1.16 Open P-11 359.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 21.32 4,849.67 4,849.64 0.04 0.24 Open - P-21 601.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -68.46 4,849.67 4,850.18 0.51 0.78 Open P-14 455.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 2.36 4,849.64 4,849.64 0.00 0.03 Open P-13 881.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 2.81 4,849.64 4,849.64 .98e-3 0.03 Open -- P-17 293,00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -7.86 4,849.64 4,849.64 .44e-2 0.09 Open P-15 547.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -1.34 4,849.64 4,849.64 .98e-3 0.02 Open P-19 194.00 6 Ductile iron 100.0 Open -16.23 4,849.63 4,849.64 0.01 0.18 Open P-18 194.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 16.23 4,849.64 4,849.63 0.01 0.18 Open - P-20 906.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -56.55 4,849.64 4,850.18 0.54 0.64 Open P-22 833.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -26.60 4,850.18 4,850.31 0.12 0.30 Open P-23 149.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -34.50 4,850.31 4,850.34 0.04 0.39 Open - P-66 714.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -2.30 4,850.31 4,850.31 .98e-3 0.03 Open P-24 96.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 20.88 4,850.34 4,850.33 0.01 0.24 Open P-26 592.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -64.68 4,850.34 4,850.80 0.45 0.73 Open P-25 118.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 4.65 4,850.33 4,850.33 .49e-3 0.05 Open P-27 634.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 6.59 4,850.80 4,850.79 0.01 0.07 Open P-28 286.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 112.04 4,850.79 4,850.18 0.60 1.27 Open P-33 356.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -213.54 4,850.79 4,851.40 0.61 1.36 Open - P-31 492.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -3.11 4,851.40 4,851.41 0.01 0.08 Open P-34 345.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -270.18 4,851.40 4,852.31 0.92 1.72 Open P-32 584.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 76.82 4,851.41 4,850.80 0.61 0.87 Open P-36 653.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 89.22 4,852.31 4,851.41 0.91 1.01 Open P-39 279.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 593.48 4,858.26 4,855.09 3.17 3.79 Open P40 235.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 1,228.21 4,858.26 4,848.00 10.27 7.84 Open P-41 836.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 657.84 4,848.00 4,801.29 46.70 7.46 Open - P42 338.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 1,164.15 4,801.29 4,747.01 54.28 13.21 Open P47 267.00 6 Ductile Iron 120.0 Open -220.84 4,801.29 4,802.71 1.41 2.51 Open P49 385.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -293.37 4,801.29 4,836.08 34.78 7.49 Open P43 25.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 1,153.05 4,747.01 4,743.07 3.94 13.08 Open - P46 794.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 5.55 4,747.01 4,747.01 0.01 0.06 Open P44 1,492.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 1,530.65 4,743.07 1,879.16 863.90 39.08 Open P45 667.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -386.89 4,743.07 4,843.61 100.54 9.88 Open - P48 1,328.00 6 Ductile Iron 120.0 Open 2.78 4,802.71 4,802.70 .24e-2 0.03 Open P-50 657.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 146.14 4,836.08 4,833.81 2.27 1.66 Open P-55 509.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -304.35 4,836.08 4,842.91 6.83 3.45 Open P-51 556.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 226.39 4,833.81 4,802.71 31.10 5.78 Open - P-52 365.00 4 PVC 100.0 Open -82.09 4,833.81 4,836.93 3.13 2.10 Open P-53 673.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -49.08 4,836.93 4,837.24 0.31 0.56 Open P-58 378.00 4 PVC 100.0 Open -36.70 4,836.93 4,837.66 0.73 0.94 Open P-54 357.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 141.68 4,837.24 4,836.08 1.16 1.61 Open P-56 494.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -562.46 4,842.91 4,848.00 5.09 3.59 Open P-60 472.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 253.46 4,842.91 4,838.39 4.52 2.88Op n Engineer:Ricardo Goncalves We:1,0016\1 Project Cybemet v3.1 [071) s:\162.0016\dwg\cybemengilcrest_exist.wcd RG Consulting Engineers,Inc. 11/24/03 10:20:13 AM ©Haestad Methods,Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 2 Scenario: Max Day w/ Fire Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Link Length D Material Rough Cur. Q Start End HL Velocity O/C (ft) (in) O/C (gpm) HGL HGL (ft) (ft/s) Status (Cale) (Cale) (ft) (ft) P-59 536.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -21.85 4,837.66 4,838.06 0.40 0.56 Open P-63 357.00 4 PVC 100.0 Open -22.75 4,837.66 4,837.95 0.28 0.58 Open P-62 517.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -59.02 4,838.06 4,838.39 0.33 0.67 Open P-61 200.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 192.60 4,838.39 4,837.24 1.15 2.19 Open P-64 255.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -26.01 4,837.95 4,837.98 0.04 0.30 Open P-65 431.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -29.26 4,837.98 4,838.06 0.08 0.33 Open P-67 231.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -6.94 4,850.31 4,850.31 .29e-2 0.08 Open P-68 713.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -11.59 4,850.31 4,850.33 0.02 0.13 Open P-69 122.00 6 Ductile Iron 130.0 Open 1,826.33 4,886.00 4,858.26 27.74 20.72 Open Title:Gilcrest Project Engineer. Ricardo Goncalves s:\162.0016\dwg\cybemet\gilcrestexist.wcd RG Consulting Engineers, Inc. Cybemet v3.1 [071] 11/24/03 10:20:13 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203)755-1666 Page 2 of 2 4irale WS V-19 _ Y _ r Al r OJC OOI -46 FAA qp rN Y 411V. 2p f-86 _ (1:7 10 W IL'I {01V. 681V8 SL)w Y Y AN r9/. 6o.s IS w -72s PO V 41.1174.1W r6/�O IV. P-29 r_ us ay. )VV. 6'r o: )s r r p9R r 1Ry 1122e' J Z']r6M1 ".. rife \liar WOIV. `.{mow g�]He prvrv. , HI Fin V. f ]6 u ran vs r., raw P-.6 'IYp• ills -{ills 'P r� -ner ran as r . v. P-.t WI I ' .]-26 v )Y w !1 rye -u 'ifilr - r T.4 VV. z> r r 51 P-i9 13.0 IN t,.IL. A IV. Y g p -]9 II{rV. •�' poi . IN r ar r r -60 52 -S•ry. Ilt IN 1y 15M1 r Y .2 so y6B {: P-58 IV. �,r,Y, -41 r r v. At 65 a"" Y EXISTING MODEL -44 5413 r v Scenario: Max Day - Steady State Analysis Junction Report Node Elevation Demand Demand Demand Calculated Calculated Pressure Label (ft) Type (gpm) Pattern Demand Hydraulic (psi) (gpm) Grade - (ft) J-6 4,754.00 Demand 2.61 Fixed 6.51 4,883.87 56.16 J-25 4,753.90 Demand 2.97 Fixed 7.42 4,884.01 56.27 - J-43 4,753.00 Demand 1.30 Fixed 3.26 4,884.45 56.84 J-44 4,753.00 Demand 1.30 Fixed 3.26 4,884.45 56.84 J-40 4,752.00 Demand 3.16 Fixed 7.90 4,884.45 57.28 J-41 4,752.00 Demand 3.16 Fixed 7.90 4,884.46 57.28 J-37 4,751.00 Demand 1.47 Fixed 3.68 4,884.46 57.71 J-38 4,751.00 Demand 0.74 Fixed 1.84 4,884.48 57.72 J-42 4,751.00 Demand 0.74 Fixed 1.84 4,884.49 5733 - J-36 4,750.00 Demand 0.74 Fixed 1.84 4,884.46 58.15 J-35 4,750.00 Demand • 2.61 Fixed 6.51 4,884.48 58.15 J-5 4,749.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,883.94 58.35 J-34 4,749.00 Demand 1.11 Fixed 2.78 4,884.33 58.52 - J-28 4,749.00 Demand 3.16 Fixed 7.90 4,884.33 58.52 J-33 4,749.00 Demand 1.11 Fixed 2.78 4,884.33 58.52 J-32 4,748.50 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,884.08 58.63 J-27 4,748.50 Demand 3.16 Fixed 7.90 4,884.70 58.90 - J-29 4,747.60 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,884.09 59.02 J-30 4,747.50 Demand 3.72 Fixed 9.29 4,884.08 59.06 J-26 4,748.00 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,884.85 59.18 - J-31 4,745.00 Demand 12.26 Fixed 30.65 4,882.01 59.25 J-4 4,747.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,884.45 59.44 J-10 4,744.50 Demand 8.71 Fixed 21.77 4,883.39 60.06 J-39 4,745.50 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,884.59 60.15 - J-24 4,744.00 Demand 3.72 Fixed 9.29 4,883.83 60.47 J-7 4,743.00 Demand 2.61 Fixed 6.51 4,883.77 60.88 J-23 4,743.00 Demand 1.30 Fixed 3.26 4,883.85 60.91 - J-8 4,742.50 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,883.67 61.05 J-9 4,742.00 Demand 6.49 Fixed 16.23 4,883.53 61.20 J-21 4,742.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,883.71 61.28 J-22 4,742.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 5.55 4,883.72 61.28 - J-14 4,740.50 Demand 6.49 Fixed 16.23 4,883.33 61.77 J-15 4,740.50 Demand 6.49 Fixed 16.23 4,883.35 61.77 J-12 4,740.40 Demand 1.48 Fixed 3.70 4,883.37 61.83 - J-45 4,740.50 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,883.54 61.85 J-11 4,740.30 Demand 1.48 Fixed 3.71 4,883.36 61.87 J-13 4,740.00 Demand 6.49 Fixed 16.23 4,883.33 61.98 J-16 4,740.00 Demand 5.45 Fixed 13.62 4,883.54 62.07 _ J-17 4,739.50 Demand 4.08 Fixed 10.20 4,883.54 62.29 J-46 4,739.00 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,883.54 62.50 J-18 4,739.00 Demand 3.72 Fixed 9.29 4,883.55 62.51 - J-19 4,738.50 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,883.54 62.72 J-20 4,738.00 Demand 1.86 Fixed 4.65 4,883.54 62.94 Title:Gilcrest Project Engineer.Ricardo Goncalves - s:\162.0016\dwg\cybemet\gilcrest_exist.wcd RG Consulting Engineers,Inc. Cybernet v3.1 [071] 11/24/03 10:11:30 AM ®Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Max Day Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Link Length D Material Rough Cur. Q Start End HL Velocity O/C (ft) (in) O/C (gpm) HGL HGL (ft) (ft/s) Status (Calc) (Calc) (ft) (ft) P-6 500.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 25.98 4,884.45 4,883.94 0.51 0.66 Open P-37 410.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 163.97 4,884.45 4,884.01 0.43 1.05 Open P-7 348.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 31.50 4,883.94 4,883.87 0.07 0.36 Open P-8 347.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 36.62 4,883.87 4,883.77 0.09 0.42 Open P-35 643.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -11.63 4,883.87 4,884.01 0.15 0.30 Open P-9 362.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 38.15 4,883.77 4,883.67 0.10 0.43 Open P-30 643.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -8.05 4,883.77 4,883.85 0.08 0.21 Open P-10 280.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 51.48 4,883.67 4,883.53 0.14 0.58 Open P-29 652.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -18.88 4,883.67 4,883.72 0.05 0.21 Open P-11 359.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 45.08 4,883.53 4,883.39 0.14 0.51 Open P-21 601.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -9.84 4,883.53 4,883.54 0.01 0.11 Open P-14 455.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 12.22 4,883.39 4,883.37 0.02 0.14 Open P-13 881.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -11.08 4,883.36 4,883.39 0.03 0.13 Open - P-17 293.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 15.89 4,883.36 4,883.35 0.02 0.18 Open P-15 547.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 8.52 4,883.37 4,883.36 0.01 0.10 Open P-19 194.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -16.23 4,883.33 4,883.35 0.01 0.18 Open P-18 194.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 16.23 4,883.35 4,883.33 0.01 0.18 Open P-20 906.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -32.81 4,883.35 4,883.54 0.20 0.37 Open P-22 833.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 1.48 4,883.54 4,883.54 49e-3 0.02 Open P-23 149.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -12.97 4,883.54 4,883.55 0.01 0.15 Open - P-66 714.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 4.25 4,883.54 4,883.54 39e-2 0.05 Open P-24 96.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open '14.33 4,883.55 4,883.54 49e-2 0.16 Open P-26 592.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -36.59 4,883.55 4,883.71 0.16 0.42 Open P-25 118.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 4.65 4,883.54 4,883.54 49e-3 0.05 Open ._., P-27 634.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -9.62 4,883.71 4,883.72 0.01 0.11 Open P-28 286.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 57.75 4,883.72 4,883.54 0.18 0.66 Open P-33 356.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -91.80 4,883.72 4,883.85 0.13 0.59 Open - P-31 492.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 4.21 4,883.85 4,883.83 0.02 0.11 Open P-34 345.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -107.31 4,883.85 4,884.01 0.17 0.68 Open P-32 584.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 32.52 4,883.83 4,883.71 0.13 0.37 Open P-36 653.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 37.61 4,884.01 4,883.83 0.18 0.43 Open P-39 279.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 195.50 4,884.85 4,884.45 0.41 1.25 Open P40 235.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 126.18 4,884.85 4,884.70 0.15 0.81 Open P41 836.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 48.22 4,884.70 4,884.33 0.37 0.55 Open - P-42 338.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 62.13 4,884.33 4,884.09 0.24 0.70 Open P-47 267.00 6 Ductile Iron 120.0 Open -6.19 4,884.33 4,884.33 .2e-2 0.07 Open P-49 385.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -15.62 4,884.33 4,884.48 0.15 0.40 Open _ P-43 25.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 51.02 4,884.09 4,884.08 0.01 0.58 Open P46 794.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 5.55 4,884.09 4,884.08 0.01 0.06 Open P-44 1,492.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 30.65 4,884.08 4,882.01 2.06 0.78 Open P-45 667.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 11.08 4,884.08 4,883.94 0.14 0.28 Open P48 1,328.00 6 Ductile Iron 120.0 Open 2.78 4,884.33 4,884.33 24e-2 0.03 Open P-50 657.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 11.57 4,884.48 4,884.46 0.02 0.13 Open P-55 509.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -32.73 4,884.48 4,884.59 0.11 0.37 Open P-51 556.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 11.74 4,884.46 4,884.33 0.13 0.30 Open P-52 365.00 4 PVC 100.0 Open -2.02 4,884.46 4,884.46 29e-2 0.05 Open P-53 673.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -10.46 4,884.46 4,884.48 0.02 0.12 Open P-58 378.00 4 PVC 100.0 Open 4.76 4,884.46 4,884.45 0.02 0.12 Open P-54 357.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 0.97 4,884.48 4,884.48 49e-3 0.01 Open P-56 494.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -70.06 4,884.59 4,884.70 0.11 0.45 Open P-60 472.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 32.68 4,884.59 4,884.49 0.10 0.37 Open I itie:Gilcrest Project hngineer.Ricardo Goncalves s:\162.0016\dwg\cybernet\gilcrest_exist.wcd RG Consulting Engineers,Inc. Cybernet v3.1 [071] 11/24/03 10:05:05 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 2 Scenario: Max Day Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Link Length D Material Rough Cur. (ft/s) Status Q Start End HL SGLVelocity /C (ft) (in) (g (Calc) (Calc) (ft) (ft) P-59 536.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -2.49 4,884.45 4,884.46 0.01 0.06 Open P-63 357.00 4 PVC 100.0 Open -0.65 4,884.45 4,884.45 49e-3 0.02 Open P-62 517.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -17.56 4,884.46 4,884.49 0.04 0.20 Open P-61 200.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 13.28 4,884.49 4,884.48 0.01 0.15 Open P-64 255.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -3.91 4,884.45 4,884.45 98e-3 0.04 Open P-65 431.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -7.17 4,884.45 4,884.46 0.01 0.08 Open P-67 231.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -0.39 4,883.54 4,883.54 0.00 0.44e-2 Open P-68 713.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -5.04 4,883.54 4,883.54 49e-2 0.06 Open P-69 122.00 6 Ductile Iron 130.0 Open 326.33 4,886.00 4,884.85 1.15 3.70 Open Title:Gilcrest Project Engineer.Ricardo Goncalves s:\162.0016\dwg\cybernet\gilcrest_exist.wcd RG Consulting Engineers,Inc. Cybemet v3.1 [071] 11/24/03 10:05:05 AM ©Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA (203)755-1666 Page 2 of 2 • M rN P Y N M V {II YI M �v. a {'O-, Y YaM 41 pre or ri3v. c 1,0 :fifes N 494 �1_JI IN LM!M MA 00 w 1.111714 Ihilt4 w mrPIN J 61]14210 J-l9_]Y.M y r u191Mr Y Y W 1441145 Fin P-2r rN rN _ y 2 I-21 W IN w M91Yh w 1111 IN w Y Y 9 _33 ]h/0 IV. --]2 4-44 1•11 rN8-4 w 1 N . 00 ]6 BIN IN -]b W IN 1y3 w N M w P-06 2 ie0 rN VJ IN IN. V VW w V�.5 p 5 •rN 'ants - RI Li?Vs • M WI MY -BIN T Ws B MO I P OT M .S M V -4BrN zr M r i.vw r, P_41 r SHIN 9M IN F]Wu 494 -39 / • N •• - •• N w r P-52 �1IIIN �IN N V IWO 44 -58 LISP text N Jr M � r _6] 111 IN 1N EXISTING MODEL -44 4444 - LMM Y Scenario: Peak Hour — Steady State Analysis Junction Report Node Elevation Demand Demand Demand Calculated Calculated Pressure Label (ft) Type (gpm) Pattern Demand Hydraulic (psi) (gpm) Grade - (ft) J-31 4,745.00 Demand 12.26 Fixed 73.56 4,865.86 52.26 J-6 4,754.00 Demand 2.61 Fixed 15.64 4,875.22 52.42 _ J-25 4,753.90 Demand 2.97 Fixed 17.81 4,875.97 52.79 J-43 4,753.00 Demand 1.30 Fixed 7.82 4,878.16 54.13 J-44 4,753.00 Demand 1.30 Fixed 7.82 4,878.17 54.13 J-40 4,752.00 Demand 3.16 Fixed 18.97 4,878.16 54.56 J-41 4,752.00 Demand 3.16 Fixed 18.97 4,878.20 54.57 J-5 4,749.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 13.33 4,875.58 54.74 J-37 4,751.00 Demand 1.47 Fixed 8.84 4,878.25 55.03 _ J-38 4,751.00 Demand 0.74 Fixed 4.42 4,878.34 55.06 J-42 4,751.00 Demand 0.74 Fixed 4.42 4,878.38 55.08 J-32 4,748.50 Demand 2.22 Fixed 13.33 4,876.32 55.27 J-36 4,750.00 Demand 0.74 Fixed 4.42 4,878.23 55.45 - J-10 4,744.50 Demand 8.71 Fixed 52.26 4,872,81 55.49 J-35 4,750.00 Demand 2.61 Fixed 15.64 4,878.34 55.50 J-34 4,749.00 Demand 1.11 Fixed 6.66 4,877.56 55.59 J-28 4,749.00 Demand 3.16 Fixed 18.97 4,877.56 55.59 - J-33 4,749.00 Demand 1.11 Fixed 6.66 4,877.57 55.60 J-29 4,747.60 Demand 2.22 Fixed 13.33 4,876.35 55.68 J-30 4,747.50 Demand 3.72 Fixed 22.30 4,876.29 55.69 - J-27 4,748.50 Demand 3.16 Fixed 18.97 4,879.44 56.62 J-24 4,744.00 Demand 3.72 Fixed 22.30 4,875.05 56.67 J-4 4,747.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 13.33 4,878.15 56.72 J-9 4,742.00 Demand 6.49 Fixed 38.96 4,873.52 56.87 _ J-8 4,742.50 Demand 2.22 Fixed 13.33 4,874.23 56.96 J-7 4,743.00 Demand 2.61 Fixed 15.64 4,874.76 56.98 J-14 4,740.50 Demand 6.49 Fixed 38.96 4,872.54 57.10 - J-15 4,740.50 Demand 6.49 Fixed 38.96 4,872.59 57.12 J-23 4,743.00 Demand 1.30 Fixed 7.82 4,875.13 57.14 J-26 4,748.00 Demand 1.86 Fixed 11.15 4,880.21 57.17 J-12 4,740.40 Demand 1.48 Fixed 8.88 4,872.73 57.22 - J-11 4,740.30 Demand 1.48 Fixed 8.91 4,872.68 57.25 J-21 4,742.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 13.33 4,874.42 57.26 J-22 4,742.00 Demand 2.22 Fixed 13.33 4,874.49 57.29 - J-13 4,740.00 Demand 6.49 Fixed 38.96 4,872.54 57.31 J-45 4,740.50 Demand 1.86 Fixed 11.15 4,873.57 57.54 J-39 4,745.50 Demand 1.86 Fixed 11.15 4,878.89 57.68 J-16 4,740.00 Demand 5.45 Fixed 32.68 4,873.59 57.77 _ J-17 4,739.50 Demand 4.08 Fixed 24.48 4,873.59 57.98 J-46 4,739.00 Demand 1.86 Fixed 11.15 4,873.57 58.19 J-18 4,739.00 Demand 3.72 Fixed 22.30 4,873.62 58.21 - J-19 4,738.50 Demand 1.86 Fixed 11.15 4,873.60 58.42 J-20 4,738.00 Demand 1.86 Fixed 11.15 4,873.59 58.63 Title:Gilcrest Project Engineer Ricardo GondaIves s:\162.0016\dwg\cybernetlgilcrest_exist.wcd RG Consulting Engineers,Inc. Cybernet v3.1 [071] 11/24/03 10:12:30 AM ®Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Scenario: Peak Hour — Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Link Length D Material Rough Cur. Q Start End HL Velocity O/C (ft) (in) O/C (gpm) Ha HGL (ft) (ft/s) Status (Calc) (Calc) (ft) (ft) — P-6 500.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 62.35 4,878.15 4,875.58 2.57 1.59 Open P-37 410.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 393.53 4,878.15 4,875.97 2.18 2.51 Open P-7 348.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 75.61 4,875.58 4,875.22 0.36 0.86 Open — P-8 347.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 87.89 4,875.22 4,874.76 0.47 1.00 Open P-35 643.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -27.92 4,875.22 4,875.97 0.75 0.71 Open P-9 362.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 91.57 4,874.76 4,874.23 0.53 1.04 Open — P-30 643.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -19.32 4,874.76 4,875.13 0.38 0.49 Open P-10 280.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 123.54 4,874.23 4,873.52 0.71 1.40 Open P-29 652.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -45.30 4,874.23 4,874.49 0.26 0.51 Open P-11 359.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 108.19 4,873.52 4,872.81 0.71 1.23 Open P-21 601.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -23.61 4,873.52 4,873.59 0.07 0.27 Open P-14 455.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 29.33 4,872.81 4,872.73 0.08 0.33 Open P-13 881.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -26.60 4,872.68 4,872.81 0.13 0.30 Open — P-17 293.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 38.14 4,872.68 4,872.59 0.08 0.43 Open P-15 547.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 20.45 4,872.73 4,872.68 0.05 0.23 Open P-19 194.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -38.96 4,872.54 4,872.59 0.06 0.44 Open P-18 194.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 38.96 4,872.59 4,872.54 0.06 0.44 Open — P-20 906.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -78.74 4,872.59 4,873.59 1.00 0.89 Open P-22 833.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 3.56 4,873.59 4,873.59 29e-2 0.04 Open P-23 149.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -31.13 4,873.59 4,873.62 0.03 0.35 Open - P-66 714.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 10.21 4,873.59 4,873.57 0.02 0.12 Open P-24 96.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 34.39 4,873.62 4,873.60 0.02 0.39 Open P-26 592.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -87.82 4,873.62 4,874.42 0.80 1.00 Open P-25 118.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 11.15 4,873.60 4,873.59 39e-2 0.13 Open - P-27 634.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -23.09 4,874.42 4,874.49 0.07 0.26 Open P-28 286.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 138.59 4,874.49 4,873.59 0.90 1.57 Open P-33 356.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open I -220.31 4,874.49 4,875.13 0.65 1.41 Open — P-31 492.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 10.10 4,875.13 4,875.05 0.09 0.26 Open P-34 345.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -257.55 4,875.13 4,875.97 0.84 1.64 Open P-32 584.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 78.05 4,875.05 4,874.42 0.63 0.89 Open P-36 653.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 90.25 4,875.97 4,875.05 0.92 1.02 Open — P-39 279.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 469.21 4,880.21 4,878.15 2.05 2.99 Open P40 235.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 302.83 4,880.21 4,879.44 0.77 1.93 Open P41 836.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 115.73 4,879.44 4,877.56 1.88 1.31 Open P42 338.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 149.10 4,877.56 4,876.35 1.21 1.69 Open _ P47 267.00 6 Ductile Iron 120.0 Open -14.85 4,877.56 4,877.57 0.01 0.17 Open P49 385.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -37.49 4,877.56 4,878.34 0.77 0.96 Open P43 25.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 122.44 4,876.35 4,876.29 0.06 1.39 Open - P46 794.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 13.33 4,876.35 4,876.32 0.03 0.15 Open P44 1,492.00 4 Ductile Iron '100.0 Open 73.56 4,876.29 4,865.86 10.43 1.88 Open P45 667.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 26.58 4,876.29 4,875.58 0.71 0.68 Open — P.48 1,328.00 6 Ductile Iron 120.0 Open 6.66 4,877.57 4,877.56 0.01 0.08 Open P-50 657.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 27.78 4,878.34 4,878.23 0.10 0.32 Open P-55 509.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -78.55 4,878.34 4,878.89 0.56 0.89 Open P-51 556.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 28.18 4,878.23 4,877.57 0.66 0.72 Open P-52 365.00 4 PVC 100.0 Open 4.82 4,878.23 4,878.25 0.02 0.12 Open P-53 673.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -25.09 4,878.25 4,878.34 0.09 0.28 Open P-58 378.00 4 PVC 100.0 Open 11.43 4,878.25 4,878.16 0.08 0.29 Open — P-54 357.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 2.36 4,878.34 4,878.34 98e-3 0.03 Open P-56 494.00 8 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -168.13 4,878.89 4,879.44 0.54 1.07 Open P-60 472.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 78.43 4,878.89 4,878.38 0.52 0.89 Open Project tngineer.Ricardo Gonsalves I:tie:— .i crest Cybernet v3.1 [071 11/24/03 10:12:10 AMnet©Haestad I ConsultingEngineers, Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury,CT 06708 USA (203)755-1666 Page 1 of 2 Scenario: Peak Hour Steady State Analysis Pipe Report Link Length D Material Rough Cur. Q Start End HL Velocity O/C (ft) (in) O/C (gpm) HGL HGL (ft) (ft/s) Status (Calc) (Calc) (ft) (ft) P-59 536.00 4 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -5.97 4,878.16 4,878.20 0.04 0.15 Open P-63 357.00 4 PVC 100.0 Open -1.57 4,878.16 4,878.16 .2e-2 0.04 Open _ P-62 517.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -42.14 4,878.20 4,878.38 0.18 0.48 Open P-61 200.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open 31.87 4,878.38 4,878.34 0.04 0.36 Open P-64 255.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -9.39 4,878.16 4,878.17 0.01 0.11 Open P-65 431.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -17.20 4,878.17 4,878.20 0.03 0.20 Open P-67 231.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -0.94 4,873.57 4,873.57 0.00 0.01 Open P-68 713.00 6 Ductile Iron 100.0 Open -12.09 4,873.57 4,873.60 0.02 0.14 Open P-69 122.00 6 Ductile Iron 130.0 Open 783.19 4,886.00 4,880.21 5.79 8.89 Open Title:Gilcrest Project Engineer: Ricardo Goncalves s:\162.0016\dwg\cybernet\gilcrest_exist.wcd RG Consulting Engineers,Inc. Cybemet v3.1 [071] 11/24/03 10:12:10 AM ®Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203)755-1666 Page 2 of 2 1+ P-19 aN an Y P-1 - P6 _1] N A ratw -u v is v` r nn r v. Sn PV6 P-66 N Y �66Hn 19n -31 111V6 se sun/ / P- 5114311.0 9 Y Y 1 Y ]/11 JI '3 Y 'Vdl]IVs P_n 01V6 and a Y rue .-. r Y]� aw P -33 tr. rin -32 rye -44 IV. P-3 -z: �. P-34 61V. IW -36 LIB IV. _ F v Y P-.6- 3) I9n IV6 L-3 rV. Br V` 58.01,41 P-4 er I.I. 9P. M 3V - Sy .. 419 firs -.2 5111 P 9 RI?.n 40 A IV. r 9 -51 rr. si -56 rY. rya 4 r �� 39 A 1 IV. Y M Y Y _52 P-54 v. Y6 rt..IN r tee • -seIVf -6as M21N LIt s.1 p M id • .1 -65 .-6]rV. .a vu. EXISTING MODEL «- 590161 Y GI. oor� Ra citing ®Ingo�eerr� dna \ denver • durango • grand junction • trinidad t August 25, 2004 in 4! r`; " SEPp 1 �y,� Mr. Bruce T. Barker L w "� Weld County Attorney Ar arrn c sua F� P.O. Box 758 maw$" ice 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Coordinated Planning Agreement Weld County and the Town of Gilcrest RGCE Job No. 162.0029 Dear Mr. Barker: Enclosed please find two copies of the signed Coordinated Planning Agreement between Weld County and the Town of Gilcrest. Attached to each agreement is a map showing the proposed Urban Growth Area. The Urban Growth Area was established as part of the update to the Gilcrest Comprehensive Plan that was adopted by the Board of Trustees earlier this year. The boundaries were determined based on major transportation routes that could have impacts on the Town. These boundaries are: WCR 44 on the north, SH 60 on the west, WCR 38 on the south, and one-half mile east of US 85 on the east. By designating this area as a Future Planning Area in the Comprehensive Plan, this guides the Town in decision-making so that the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan can be achieved. Please let me know if you need anything else to move this forward for consideration by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. Sincerely, RGQ�CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. RG oL1. /J! rrn 101/4471) Babette Morrow, AICP Senior Planner cc: Monika Mike-Daniels, Weld County Planning Linda Chosa, Gilcrest Town Clerk 1331 17th street• suite 710• denver, colorado 80202 • (303) 293-8107 fax (303) 293-8106 R:t0162',0029\Bruce Barker letter.doc Hello