The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20051693.tiff MELVIN DIMIITEf, P.C. ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW Weld County Planning Department 640 BANK ONE PLAZA GREELEY OFFICE GREELEY, CO 80631 FEB 2 3 2005 (670) 362-2081 FAX(070) 352-9172 RECEIVED February 21,2005 Department of Planning Services 918-10`h Street Greeley, CO 80631 Attention: Sheri Lockman, County Planner Re: Case No. USR-1501 Project: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit for a business permitted as a use by right or an accessory use in the Industrial Zone District(Railroad car r-� loading area for recyclable materials from Anderson's Salvage Yard) in the A (Agricultural)Zone District Dear Ms. Lockman: This letter shall serve to advise you that I represent the following: 1. Five M Farm Co. C/o John P. Watson 20295 WCR 66 Greeley,CO 80631 2. Mike and Paul Hungenberg c/o Hungenberg Investments,LLC 976 N. Balsam Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 3. Duane and Dorothy Zabka 617-6`s Street Greeley, CO 80631 4. Tom and Diana Troudt 31383 WCR 41 Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT 2005-1693 I February 21,2005 Page 2 It is necessary to clearly indicate that each of the above named parties were listed as property owners having surface estate within 500 feet of the property being considered,namely,the 9.084 acre tract owned by the Union Pacific Railroad Company,which is the subject matter of the above described Application for Site Specific Development Plan and Use By Special Review(USR). Secondly,it is necessary to clearly indicate to the Planning Staff of the Weld County Department of Planning Services,the members of the Weld County Planning Commission and the members of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado that all of the above described named parties adamantly and actively oppose the granting of the Application in Case No. USR-1501 filed by the Union Pacific Railroad Company. It is necessary at the outset to indicate that my clients have numerous objections based upon many factors as the basis for opposing the granting of the Application. Prior to the hearing of April 5, �.� 2005 before the Weld County Department of Planning Services,I will provide additional information and documentation to support the basis of their objections. At this particular time, I will simply indicate that the following items, along with others, constitute factors of objection affecting the above described property owners as a basis for denying the Application submitted by the Union Pacific Railroad Company: 1. Increased and undesirable traffic patterns and problems at the site and occurring to traffic moving into and out of the development site. 2. Noise factors affecting not only the objectors but the entire neighborhood involved. 3. Diminution of market value of property owned by the objectors. 4. Creation of a junkyard in the midst of the neighborhood in an A-Agricultural Zone. 5. Safety and health factors. 6. Railroad regulatory matters. 7. Other objectionable items. February 21, 2005 Page 3 This letter shall further serve to advise you that it is my intention, as well as my clients' intentions, to appear at the hearing scheduled before the Weld County Planning Commission on April 5, 2005. Very truly yours, MELVIN DINNER MD/as Cc: John P. Watson Mike and Paul Hungenberg Dewey and Dorothy Zabka Tom and Diana Troudt r February 28, 2005 Weld County Plarning Department C,;EELEY OFFICE MAR 1 4 2005 To: Weld County Planning Department & RECEIVED Weld County Commissioners I, Ed Monson, currently own property within 500' of a Site Review Permit (Case #USR- 1501) involving the Union Pacific Railroad and Andersen's Sales & Salvage. I own 24 acres directly south of the property owned by Hungenberg Investments, LLC in the SE '/ 29-6-65, as well as 160 acres in the SW '/4 of 20-6-65, approximately one-half mile north of the case property. I am also the previous owner of the property now owned by Hungenberg Investments, LLC. While I owned the property we leased a parcel of land adjacent to the case property from the Union Pacific Railroad. I leased this property for approximately 30 years from the UPR and this acreage was a vital part of our produce operation, as it is the only access to the rear(north) of the building. All employees parking was located there along with the only access for employees to enter the building. All of the carrot culls and rejects are loaded on this side of the property with a hydraulic dump bin. Approximately 20 trucks must go in and out daily to remove these carrots. All of the electrical panels and supply are mounted on the rear of the building. Also, we paid for a rail siding to be placed on the property in order to ship produce with, when needed. All of this is vital to running a produce operation out of the building operated by Hungenberg Produce. They need the acreage they lease from UPR to run their operation efficiently. Therefore, I would ask that the Planning Department and Commissioners deny the UPR request to receive a special review permit to create a recyclable material loading area for Andersen's Sales & Salvage. This is an Ag Zone District and needs to remain that way. Surely there is a more suitable location for Andersen's to pursue their loading operations, than within Weld County's finest farm land. Respectfully, 4:1ti Ed Monson Owner Monson Bros. Produce Zabka jarma 617 6TH STREET GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 970-352-0015 Weld Coun.y P,a, aing Department G '" `Y O EICE March 15 , 2005 MAR 1 5 2005 To: Weld County Planning Department Weld County Commissioners a ® Sheri Lockman - County Planner '� a. To Whom It May Concern: We are writing this letter to oppose the request for a "Special Permit Review" submitted by the Union Pacific Railroad (UPR) and Andersen' s Sales and Salvage (Case #USR-1501) . Our reasons for requesting denial are based on the following: 1) The noise associated with the loading and unloading of scrap steel will be heard for miles. The peace and quiet of the country will no longer be peaceful and quiet . We are early risers and we retire early at night , so we do not need the constant noise day and night . 2) There will be a lot of dust from the loading and unloading of scrap metal . Dust from the trucks as they enter and exit the property will need to be dealt with also. 3) The traffic will be doubled and that will make the roads unsafe . There will be more traffic if this is approved. The Weld County roads are only two lane roads without a shoulder; not made to handle that much traffic without safety being compromised. 4) Because of the noise , dust and traffic safety problems , we feel that the value of all the surrounding properties will decrease . The future resale value of our land and home will have a negative impact . We feel that this location is not good for our neighborhood and it will have a very negative impact on Hungenberg Produce , which is valuable to our agricultural community . We ask that you please deny this "Special Use Review" permit . Surely there would be a more suitable location for Andersen' s Salvage to locate to meet their business need, without being a negative impact on our agricultural community. Respectfully , alhj j- y De abka Dorot ka +CO 4,4' HUNGENBFRG • \ 16 PRODUCE INC weld cou, ty / • 976 N. Balsam Avenue Gnt<1 �Al l0 a 0 _ . Greeley, Colorado 80631 11,14R -"eat ��r Ph. (970)356-6616 w �' Fax(970)356-0730 ' K " �U5 March 11, 2005 �9 To: Weld County Planning Department Weld County Commissioners Sheri Lockman — County Planner To Whom It May Concern: We are writing this letter to adamantly oppose the request for a "Special Permit Review" submitted by the Union Pacific Railroad (UPR) and Andersen's Sales and Salvage (Case #USR-1501). Our reasons for requesting denial are based on the following: 1) Most importantly, this plan will have a tremendous negative impact on our business, Hungenberg Produce (HP). Enclosed is a map of the proposed plan which shows our warehouse packaging facility in relation to the proposed project. As you can see, the proposed site comes Within 2 ft. of our warehouse. The entire distance from railroad track to our building is only 100 ft. in width, which isn't very much for a project of this magnitude. We currently have a lease with the UPR for the 4 % acres south of the railroad track. Monson Bros., the previous owners of our facility, had leased this 4 %z acres from the UPR for nearly 30 years. Over the years, this leased parcel has become a vital part of running a produce business from this location. We employ 150 workers at this site and the entire employee parking is located on this leased property. The only secured employee entrance into our facility is accessed from this parcel. Relocating our employee parking to the south side of our building would create a safety problem with the semi-truck traffic into our loading docks. Also located on the north side of our facility is a large (20 ft. by 20 ft.) bin dump, which we use to load cull carrots onto 20 to 40 trucks per day for disposal. The proposed project would restrict our access to this bin dump. Our electrical supply and transformers are also located on the north side of our facility. The previous owners of our building paid for the installation of the existing rail spur on the north of our facility. This spur was an important selling point when we purchased the property in 2003. There just does not appear to be enough area within this 4 'h acres of ground south of the rail spur for Andersen's to do what they propose to do without negatively impacting our business. They want to erect a building only 20 ft. from our building and 40 ft. from the rail spur. This will negatively impede the traffic flow through this area. The scrap iron dumping and storage area is located only 40 ft. north of our facility, directly across from our carrot unloading and wash-out area. We are extremely concerned about environmental issues concerning"junk steel" piled 50 ft. from our food processing plant, especially since we produce a "ready to eat" product (baby carrots) and fall under all the guidelines of the FDA, Safeway and Walmart Food Safety rules and regulations, including NAACP and GMP issues. In summary, this narrow (90 ft. wide) sliver of land adjacent to our building has become a vital part of our produce business, and in no way is an acceptable location for a scrap-steel loading business. 2) We would be greatly concerned about the increased traffic patterns, not only directly behind our building, but also on county roads 41 and 39 '/z coming north toward our building, as well as O Street between Rd 41 and Highway 85. 3) We have a problem with the noise factor associated with loading and unloading scrap steel. Every truck that dumps is going to make a huge noise as steel is unloaded, and every time the scrap steel is loaded onto railcars there will be a constant noise. Each drop of steel from a magnet-type loading device onto a railcar will create a tremendous amount of noise. 4) We feel there would be a negative impact to the entire neighborhood in having the piles of scrap steel even located in the area. We are greatly concerned about locating a "mini junk area" within this agricultural neighborhood. 5) Because of the above mentioned issues, we feel the values of all surrounding properties will actually decrease. It just can't be good for our property values to have a junk scrap metal piling and loading operation located in this area. Future resale values of our land, homes and businesses (including our neighbors) will be negatively impacted. 6) In summary, we understand Andersen's need for a railroad loading area for scrap steel, but this just isn't the right location. This location just doesn't physically have enough area and has too great of a negative impact on our business, as well as the entire surrounding agricultural neighborhood. We ask that you please deny this Special Use Review permit. Surely there would be a more suitable location for Andersen's Salvage to locate in order to meet their business needs. Respectfully, Paul Hungenberg Michael Hungenberg / Sec/Treas President Hungenberg Produce, Inc. Hungenberg Produce, Inc. r 1dr IF II=PPM _,....ciT),..,.....,, , ___ _ . ... yA . .. I a a� i. A 1� �,� ._.._. 1� ! S� ;-.4:„:4.,; ,. *,, , . ,,,,, • I i . .. :: ,.4 y 4:1;41'••:).'. d WWW w 1 iii i 2C fA } f %� I .1 . 1' r' r ,,1 Y • X18 . , lir > Sty ihC ' 6 sL "Q Jbp u y 1 . JS %j.a is ' a „ "r: FIVE M FARM CO. 20295 WCR 66 Greeley Colorado 80631 (970)352-9383 March 24, 2005 To: Weld County Planning Department Weld County Commissioners Sheri Lockman— County Planner To Whom It May Concern: I have lived all my life in the north Greeley area, known as Pleasant Valley by many old-timers. I am a property owner of land that is within 500' of the area in Case No. USR-1501 proposing to become a salvage yard. This use would be very detrimental to our property and all other homes in the Agricultural Zone District. Our faun is now titled as Five M Farm Company. It has been owned by the Watson family and its heirs for over 100 years. The farm is designated as a Centennial Farm through a program started back in the 1980's by the Colorado Historical Society to recognize farms owned by the same family for 100 years or more. Our main farm house (picture enclosed) was designated as a historical site due to its age. I realize your dilemma in this type of land use change. In fact, I served on the Weld County Planning Commission for 12 years when it was first organized. One must consider the comprehensive plan when considering land use changes. In this case, there is a drastic land use change affecting all urban property owners and the potential devaluation of their property. The most pertinent factor that must be considered is the serious change of land use from agriculture to industrial. The area surrounding the proposed site for this use change has many residential country homes, of which pictures are enclosed. All arc within one mile of the proposed site. This will seriously reduce property values for future sale possibilities. When I took the enclosed pictures of 14 neighboring properties,the owners stated they were adamantly opposed to the land use change from agriculture to the proposed salvage yard. I have personally known the Hungenberg family all my adult life and the excellent produce business they are operating. They raise their products from seed to finished carrots,cabbage and onions on land that they own in the immediate area. The family is now being operated by the third generation, Mike and Paul Hungenberg. A son may also be coming into the business, making it four generations. In summary, I hope you will consider recommending denial of the special permit review submitted by Union Pacific Railroad(UPR)and Anderson Salvage (Case#USR-150 1). Respectfully submitted, FIVE M FARM COMPANY, INC. _ Lip �s2� John P. Watson President y.sr�"�-�- W... ... ..•• ,A r • fi` ra p ,r � ` '' '•f ISz it k. , 1 , Vfr ..� i a 7 !' q 'tittk . '‘'.."? ..-c.I..., -1-,.. (v.- li II v ,r�1te�v, Pv I Y +V '.`.a. ri -•-.P"' sl".` _ •-- .a�..C..' Weld County Planning Department GREElFY CEEICE Thomas and Diana Troudt MAR 2 2005 31383 Weld County Road 41 Greeley, CO 80631 RECEIVED (970) 356-3022 Monday, March 21, 2005 Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Weld County Department of Planning Services, This letter is in regards to the proposed land development, Part of the E2 of section 29, T6N, R65 W, of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado which is adjacent to our property 31383 WCR 41. We would like it to be known that we passionately object to the proposed use for this land. There are many issues in which this would personally affect our lives and the surrounding community. These issues include property value, safety for community children, environmental noise, environmental pollution, and damage to wildlife habitat. We purchased this property less than two years ago. At this time, our property and all the surrounding area were zoned agriculture. We have since this time, made improvements to this property and added a house that we now reside in. At the time of the closing on this property, our house and land appraised for 425,000 dollars. We feel that adding a salvage yard within 500 feet of our residence would dramatically reduce the market value of our home and also the property that our home sits on. Previous evaluations the surrounding site were performed prior to the construction of our home. As such, a complete and thorough study to determine the negative impacts of the salvage yard on the property values for the entire area should be performed prior to any discussion taking place towards re-zoning our agricultural area into an industrial use area. Another concern is the safety for community children if a salvage yard was built in the proposed area. The area currently has a stream, trees, and wildlife that the children in the area explore and enjoy. By adding a salvage yard to this area, it will not only take this away from the kids, but it could endanger their safety. The potentially hazardous materials that this area (i.e. battery acid, oil, gas, antifreeze, lead, mercury, etc) and the heavy machinery, railroad cars, and other industrial traffic are not compatible with a residential area operating in the close proximity of children. All of these risks are directly related to introducing an unsafe industrial salvage yard that could all endanger the safety of our children and the people living in the community. Environmental pollution will be of great concern for our family and our surrounding neighborhood with this proposed project. The proposed salvage yard will most assuredly negatively effect the environmental conditions around the site. Many of the families in the area depend upon well water for every day living and household necessities. The potential contamination of any of the wells in the area would have very negative and dramatic impacts on the lives of the people living in the neighborhood. The potential for not being unable to use our wells due to this contamination would be an unacceptable result of the salvage yard location in this area. Other environmental impacts from this proposed salvage yard would be a reduction in the quality of life for our family and our neighbors. The salvage yard would be extremely unsightly and would be very noisy. The transporting of crushed automobiles in our neighborhood would be extremely bothersome as it would be an eye sore, it would destroy part of our view of the mountains, and would generate unacceptable levels of noise pollution for the surrounding families living in the area. The industrial nature of this operation simply does not allow for or accommodate the quality of life that we desired when we purchased this property, and built the home of our dreams on that land. Our quality of live will also be reduced by the increased traffic to our neighborhood. The increased traffic to and from the unsightly salvage yard will definitely place a higher burden on roads into the facility and on surrounding roads. The infrastructure that is currently in place will not adequately support significantly increased amounts of traffic and the heavy loads that trucks will be continuously using the roads. The roads will need to maintained and rebuilt more frequently. A traffic use study of the increased traffic should be preformed before any action is taken on the salvage yard. Additionally, the increased traffic poses a direct threat to the safety of the children in the neighborhood, as well to the surrounding intersections of highway 85. We are very concerned that the heavy trucks that will inevitably use the road will be dangerous to our children as the large industrial trucks that will use the road may not be able to avoid an accident that could potentially have seriously negative consequences. The additional traffic on the intersections around Highway 85 are also a concern, as Weld county already has too many accidents on this road and the additional hazardous industrial trucks using these roads will most assuredly cause additional danger and accidents in this already overused highway. We have contacted the Colorado Division of Wildlife and there are multiple concerns that were raised with this project. The potential negative impact of the salvage yard on surrounding wildlife is worrisome. There are multiple species of animals that could successfully live in this area, but the salvage yard would completely destroy any opportunity for successful wildlife living in the area. Specific concerns were raised around the potential endangered species of the Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse habitat, the bald eagle habitat, and the owls that reside on this property. Additionally, other amphibians, such as endangered toads and frogs, could also reside in the wetlands areas that could completely eliminate any chance of these fragile animals living in this area. Foxes and bats also live in the area, and these could also potentially be endangered species. We strongly feel that a complete evaluation should be preformed of the negative impacts to the wildlife in the area, and to determine the negative impacts to wildlife and to determine if there endangered species living in the area that need to be protected prior to any action being taken on this project. We strongly object to the development of this project on this property for the reasons discussed above. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns at the contact information on page of this letter. Sincerely, Thomas Troudt Diana Troudt CC: Melvin Dinner, Esq. Sheri Lockman, Department of Planning Services r-. • E Hislr AGREED TO COME UR HWY US 85 TO 0 STREET GO EAST TO 39 1/2i';;f NOT USING CR 41 NOISE FACTOR WORKING HOURS DUST 8 TO 5 : 00 P.M. MONDAY THRU FRIDAY PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATIO 41f 1 F THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY IN III.E NO. USR-1501 ire The undersigned Petitioners who are landf ers in the neighborhood and area nearby the proposed railroad spur and railroad car loading for recyclable materials from Anderson Salvage Yard in the A-Agricultural Zone District: Y Name 111 Ifr Address ,� SS 5 Noel'415i 19 t/t G.' I� 42 4 4ifh.>4'1 T .. .AA/ ' ? .5® r Al i .vim - 1 4_ // /f✓" /121 z� '.(' gim.,S //,,,/��.� ,,e) 5 c/S // . /S/ 4-o'e- _ 7 ->l Al Av Alc , LjO �, / . Gn77 r/�CLNO 1Lc'r-t C __h, '� C 7 CL('_�' 4I l..✓1- - f t r b_.) :.5L- mot- P41 C) 7 (3 Lv--c 1\� E i 'h,3 rXf.�-,v/-' ( '", cK r :37.6-4/7 (.4), c �4? `1"h.';, 4- �, reLitt tCIA "i 2 3 r LLOc t. El 16 It 9 ,u_, ,1 .c-y),_-4 tiA 41 /(-)99`T Cc1CR iov GCC.Pctic. 0 NOISE FACTOR WORKING HOURS DUST 8 : 00 AM TO 2 P.M. - AGREED TO COME UP HWY 85 TO 0 MONDAY THRU FRIDAY STREET TO 39 1/2 NOT USING CR 41 PETITION OPPOSING APPLICATION OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY IN CASE NO. USR-1501 The undersigned Petitioners who are landowners in the neighborhood and area nearby the proposed railroad spur and railroad car loading area for recyclable materials from Anderson Salvage Yard in the A-Agricultural Zone District: Name Address /9Sa-3 W-6% o g_s-'0 S /VcE ae zeiz t, , /z 9ep 6 'c/ -/ x u (1' r �, RESIDENCES LOCATED WITHIN 1 MILE OF THE ANDERSON SALVAGE SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA I V ll� r /( �R��T� �� / it .) � �.{ IS R7N4 yi,p�'�� r 'yHa / \� J ?iyp 1 � , -L-0 � f . Y�/F F {. r . �. �,'r TIMMM BmIRTIMITIImrmlrIMW 711.7! �q ; pirtilli ft a ... --- -ant. s. :41 : fY ~u. —,�, � .:-:;:11.4- ` II ',. �� f At . �i�al "' ti...r_ r ...�a...�—. s. .. 3 xy7,-r ,,,r�.^(55Nnn'. A > P xJ r. {R} /y yam, . t , '?0 r JI{t� ;5 � �C y yy z5i+i� i la r 4'y ,4;t 1 /+ • • • , 491404 ] v q %Q1t • I y „fir I f: P � r 4 . i . i., .... bi.,,,„.....,. 1 1 p . drag A ..., Iu . ii , .„ 5,44., ,, , . ., , ...- -. _... .,.., i . ,pra {Y ` .�1 �, vC4t —^ill r fir. f f".1i �_ 1 - k S�_ _� S ft a w ... wx -i ` Jar ` a� �. L s ;..✓ $ �r, • ed PT i pi 1 u� l ` . a � t r• I - R we — IS_ I r ..A.I s.•rsS.#-"v -'t "k+a. -yam;-}a 'A--;;,-c"*.' .., . . • , lii\ • X g Ise- a 9 or + - .sosio..' c byyka t:q tVi,h}.er ...':'& r # • c,: � 7 ‘ F �h _, t at ''':.� f 'M � • =:j i It / ,4} a .a n.. n ' t r••• '.''".a d F ° 4 41441"*Pre0411*t«.d.4 >d k }rte,:, . y t A, Fakr+ tkil '.X 4 ,,q, qy -. . '5. q .. I.E f gas! _. . {. -- 7.7-w a: r 3 44 IIII • ,. 4,7 I r_f ,rte`- ,I {1, ,:r 1 a 11 ikilt, .‘ .__.,._ .• de . . ' r .7.." WI.); • , . _ , __ -.--•,.. . .,,� �fir. .. .• Ilili oMi '`:�•, ,it ' , ,,[s r .alb i, ; . A-,.*,.. ,...,:. f.v., � .. „ r p --� _ .. is �. ::,Z�^G.r•.:c ,.... l r �l:' ; ® i i f� k • ,L. :. {. • . . ' }1 .14 tir t 1- .` - =- •• : 1 _ - `4 i_ 1 ,•.. II 11 � _. 1 '.• - - 1 I- Y iaiii1ij 1 y • p lry ,• Obis( E assns t J�l l 3W" WA$$AgtY DBiD—TLu4 \\ Pfu[:ou uud B[ Iun,r Co.f;Wu[•l �rrl / -ry \I .i_:.)��/ "Moot is Deed, Made this— j ru ----------between day of_ •16did r -in the year of our Lord one thousand . p p nehrandred and eidie. _— _ ____ of the County of %es',4 — and state of Colorado, of the �— _— / u ti first part,and __._______ _.- • -- Z-Lg ,. /r°n cif c, /L...f,..t; fp— is .i. c,. r rw"t ,,,L ..e Lei. • -- ..z ./ VE-4 ,i jet--c ._..� 101gs p of the second Part: r that the auid part 40.of the first part,for and in consideration of the sum of -- .L-..d..d_ -L >,.f <;3260'-,7.. - i to the said part e°-of the first part in hand paid by the said PCLL✓and acknowled ed,h part/ a p the second prom,—grheant, receipt sell,lwf Ivey and confessed and g ats,�=granted,bargained,sold and conveyed,and by these presents do—yrnnt,bargain, convey and evraJZrvru unto the said party—of the second pan,aAmetu situate,lying and being L�ry'�'°and assigns forever.al the following drsLmibed lot__-or parcel—of land, ya gin the County of /- ,1� !ff��a I f and State of Cohnrodo, to-wit•__ __ '�, 1 l 1✓° v ...4 f..a..l.;r,&.A"Lll_i teak dr?./-"„a °4,,/.-,.,6....,az? 9:';/'.__ oA. '.`_:3 f" iu.:,} ' WvJ ii._s j d. r :<./ 74..,-../....z ALr.Ur.. Z,;-e. 4 / rt of uA z— o,,sfi /, : I- / t � .,Z ".,..4,, ./r.2e e f p „&. /'>.;,Ci�.I+.,er i.r„!e Is z a �,( JJ d 7 L�1 f N� r, ., e. �set. A.<.�a... �e2.—./2:-... � d ,' it.,ac,.m_r (I�_.k ud '.. ,4a.. ^_ mow. ei e:i� C, 2,.. 6..,.w ,G 61q/' .... dfy 1,21.--, .7 Isacu.Zc,� ✓ seµ ea s≤/-F 1. (Y me es Gl , .4e-e.:-.....1. ,�"J 4 l- � ate.. (lc� df� :.E �� ..e4,,. ,,. rmeie, —e 4 I .. ,2, 4en—r„ ., L y; i ',/...4era..#/... s _ z3 �d 1 � - Y'-r..<YZ .tGr 4 �"` r ..-L J�t�� u L4 �, disuse. fig/,<... - 5,-;ar R..tree.�r3� E,. .,{26> e //�� )) r•�... .�t�,� :f tau'.E..a�L.:e. mad __-- it;m4;,:',/ el-el ise Fla 1.11met10 togegptr with alt and singular the tiered t ,t d appurtenancesel r t 1 - r ea ersiore and reversions,r enen net and remainders,rents,issues i in anywise and the demand whatsoever of the said part < the and profits ee thereof.and,dal to r f abo's bare ne interest,dais and i,ereditaove t5 and¢, of lure[amt either law or Natty of,in and the above bargained )p¢vdeanrrnes- premises,with the to have and to hold the said premises above bargained mrut described, with the a, second part I-6-d• ry.' _..heirs and assigns /t t 1 c,, unto the said pwrLY y forever and the surdJ/ ,/ .__-. - part•v _ ustr atom,d - a/the find µmG,jar �, r:;., d —covenant grant,bargain and agree to and with the heirs, ercea mad nsstgns,that at the time of the caseating aeul delivery caul ii ie-pail.,---.11 elan emend amt,pr m.�s above theirs f theca _ - and plants-.,_u_y ,. pleal deed of the alright, power anti _. .s of trod,sure,perfect,absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in law,in fee simple,and ha K_em:,l right,full /au fal authority to grant,bargain,sell and convey the sane,in manner maI D pad car from all former and other grants,bargains,sales,liens,taxes, ees y ye and 1 fences 1 and that same free w t thec Oti Nn raw, hnfeuu/rind _.....nature soeuerr — and the above bargained premises, n the quiet and m d:able/rossessioa 0/'Eli scud p„,,_, of the second parf,sladuchtm /,_^,,and assigns,g p against shat all and every person or persona!dry/i claiming or to dmAm the adao a Cr any parr[ thereof, the said par[eaheat the first part shall and rri/J, 7p;,;(tR„4NT.HND F0ItR Pd'/r:DEFEND. in Witness Whereof,The said parted—of the first part has"r c_Jcereernto set—rk'..,:, first above written. — hand':mad seal_..-the day and year Signet Sealed and Delerened in Presence or L ��?- ,�1 t/tundr("a LX�._ 1LY __N;J __._..__-CS G ...._._."tom. [jEXHYJ IBC I . r imi , , i v. ‘,5 w La I ..s.c,) Cr, I ILI 1. re © v c Z F o4 \ O n r *� d NI LO 9 O I. fir pano.fddv am )oyppog IpAauap r. 771n0iof IlpuuaAY lonuap 1 'NCI f 3 X3 CNtl W sO4 Ol Stl 03IIOtlddtl OBI41 f .. ../'74 ajn0 j ''1l7��JJJ►►►... �J a fi// 1HSIM v �5 0 �'�ON llafv `1N3W33HDV J AHvawop OVOWIIVf DI,alovd NOINfI ,� n it!' Chief`tnr4ne •,� n urc rF,'� BW. wslflstt Du D—rh'am West Piloting sue Stationery Co.,Colorado Sprigs'.Wu. M.,M./ NO.1554 22. thisDeed, Made this_ r' ` ± day of— F Qom"" — in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and- lc r'r'i'�—/�l^- ,between �Q�/ o __-__".." ---....SI/Lcc, "J:d0_, !y4•�"''�76. 1 2-Sde ›(-rr.G.'t^G4/ of the County of-r--/-Z--0, and') State of Colorado, o the first part,and ) 6//�' O`L<7C 242:£R Q, .,.,, .47__e.e.e,74.2 a-0— .L�2' CeL/Fr:rV-.. ferg/' • • • f^ e ` ,of the second part: f b f • n r ,tnessethi that the said part,Gfe4f the first part,for and in consideration of the sum of _c(�f-"-C-:¢ .e..z.:F-ZtC.a DOLLARS, to the Raid part><rdof the first part in hand paid by the said part.z-.f,_of the second part,the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged,haf't4ranted,bargained,sold and con eyed,and`a hesee presents do— grant,bargain,sell,convey and confirm unto the said part Ac of the second part-0X! .- - tire and assigns forever,all the following described l000tt- or o� parcel.—af land. situate,lyshnd being g— the County o f J -- and State f Co Dorado.to-wit JL. E&t 2' K.,S iii s <^2fig( '✓)grey✓d a0-1� _04%(6') `r rtj �jc-t;�6�d aiermecicc 174. tr-df^2.-e"X'"' �_...� t.z _Gf1/2/it2/.cl Yt!FL.e",14 -race .�e2T+-l-14...712-4,-•--;, . r��« r u :.o -�4 .u-4,,,,z.-K.74. f ve 6;2-.44.....44.0 od-4Z ../(—:,1.7,74,,,,"7/ UFl4..e4 Siee/t s.( dd‹,,..i. 2./ceeCWi il/p... ,-7 .e./ a+:Y.,,,,,t_-::vc_o-e L4"F/{/: ,---,-re ,--e,,,e-.c2.o-,/- .tk �Gc�_owv_Vie E.r <i.---,--s4.>«. _�7,.9 r _-,-Z-"::! S'an7',. dd e-e-tr,2d fe /..r a 20 ea C.Y.c%a.7.---t--•r-v ' �-1:.1.4" :7;a:--el" �/ xr* 221Y-Yr —f- cc.emu o sir/ .G a/F/ ‘<.+�!_c.G.,i f�.C.Gko.F . -' ,ems,...47 cl-.� .-,-Se-i� �fJ-Lfu�co`r. err'G4R^N^a trlf/�o-yzu /:: z...e LG/ ✓i s' d//iCe/ - - yin"-ri/-4-Er•-.7: -�C>/:,<Z 7`-— J[„u�i-P<.te-GIvE//7 - .-Wi F • //L., 02-•-•:• LG.r��FGw`.( C!/�i-J"'t/�C ' , ) .IZGz e�iG �.Fi" O-t-L ^^f/ ,p (/ ��,,rr ,, `71:)„.<4.a-L�e�,e-ate-/!F� Cam-.-Q£Rr / 7/2,7,714.-: G'-4l./J-t2s .... /;�._ d,-^alf2r-vr, .emu-e�z .c y1<1 _ E/ _ a-'L‘u ?,P'¢Ki„•K /2 ..)--t- }1. -z:. rzAZ:4-G'zz,--,i 6-i.^--0,--L-r-ei,c*-C' ""r•c£.J.? .-2!l2 -.2---g c;7.--,-,--e./Q?,--2.2.7-s.,-y�lr-i ae4ea-e.c�_ S./ G-L.'f?i..u----s ct-C(Z.-42 7.1 psFlcr car /:k% - r.crCl• ‘7.2.4,6-°- s12a-.-e. 247 fiL£-vuL r?�-o ne-erf/de^- I 2elr Gi rd, „_,....e. ec.,f_ jZe G2* /irtit,. ---c7„!--F, /icctZ4'te./,Ne.. --e.r ,.•_24 '/n-.;,..,, yFa-7.c0 t/ ....-„/1...,c/ G z z c r-z c ua-.rr,E 7 '. a! I„.4- a..,J ,- -e Jr' ter- j els<r<.e" ! i609. .. ZZ l .lI ...l etc-v'xv -29e Cage On with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto a ging,or in anywise appertaining,and the reversion and reversions,remainder and remainders,rents,issues and profits thereof;and all the estate,right.title,interest,claim and demand whatsoever of the said part.E4nf the first part,either in law or equity,of in and to the above bargained premises,with the hereditaments and appurtenances. Co bane and to Sold the said premises above bargained and described,with the appurtenances,unto the said➢art.s� of the second part,-uRR 't°js�ir and forever. And a said r- - �/ parleii4of the first part,fortittkeil <'i ...... vheirs, executors'/ and administrators.do—covenant,grant,bargain and agree to and with the said part_ .—of the second part,sY?�i•r-'arecrrsnared assigns,that at the time of the mewling and delivery of these presente_�r-ty- well seized of the premises above conveyed., as of good,sure,perfect,absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in law,in fee simple,and ha,flfood right,full power and lawful authority to grant,bargain,sell and convey the same,in manner and form aforesaid,and that the same are flee and clear from all former and other grants,bargain,sales,liens,taxes,assessments and ineumbranoes of whatever kind—r-,—nature sower, —,•-- and the above bargained premises,in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said part,.r6-_ of the second partiSrland assign,against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whde cr any part thereof the said part.Al_of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND POWER DEFEND. 7n Witness Whereof,The said part fat of the first part hadi-hereuntoset—./?+A:et hanthSand Beals.the day and year first above written. / Y/ Signed.Sealed and Delivered in Presence of •-./F�t'< '.� � ��,,� I L rrr��]]] s. n- IgiR Y Y f ` I rn ti � Htzi "11 6 y ik fJ ..k Q E...?, s l'` ....a., v a o ,i I rcr W vrta y� cj 46 Ig i ‘j Cc< 0 c,,,:, i * E t g'� N I 1 = !:`,.., '1 (1) fr:HV 1 5• ...i WI LO96V B! i panoaddn amp �aNa0 la aB aua6 T" i .10fIlauuoY/niauaq l r•••, AO NOI1f1O3X3 OM1LY Wtl0! 018V 03AOtlddtl T 1051 ye ✓7 ' 900 / G (;T oN JIOfV '1N3W338DV �''ryI IIIIy,NIIII'I',fII InI'II ANVdWO3 QVON'lltl8 O7dlovd NOV I"IIIII NYWaN�NI. IPI J INiN�IJlglllnos�sl'ill ,ut; ... A....:. ..... ..... ..-_ -.___.----- ---`---- . K ,, _ o00 . / wuauxi nisi-xs. lett unv wa e a eunm co rw�••sn nn. n - , i'cblr "".,C 7r,-A.rL U S Deed ,trade n.r�-._2 „f 77(cu --., 41 a year f ca y one thousand nd 712sal midreda d 2ZL�"//cL� between �Jf" G1I�GG/c. /- �sd �/ G rL� ltik� (`l..G�iacLu.� //PZCI� Y(.LULL zGP�,�-c _ _ ,I 1 _ ___.. • of the County of—!r/! ^ r ,c c i r, zls Yr'/, r.mat— / rLa,7 r[✓Z, . // / / rG and State Colorado, of the P part, GGfLG_rl_N��/ qa ... a �C2"!Ct! (t s_ f 9 li I. 9 _. Nab f" , i ' ,of the second lava: Witnessetb, that the said part.146,1the first part,for i in consideration of the situ, of --. .n 1101,1/1 RS, f.ssi ear-Err to the said pre t S✓�f the first mart in hand paid by the said L parrof the second part,the l t iirltereuf is l:reby confined and acknowledged,hatEringranted,b.rg n/e�1 sold du veyed,and by these presents do— 1 bargain,sell, )and f' -unto I the scold part —of the second t f FLe'1c+cet hd l assigns forever,all the highflying finer/bed�d�rIeev- pmc t l tacit. situate l yen and being in the(amity of_ ri- i State of L o uda to wit C<cs n, ,4e/lit.r' r.!l.rlvr df.k/sl mada4SAye i-�FrSa.!!..an er ,kf r,j * .r.�_`K f✓71. )/Xe419 e-21ra�/r+vl6 2 6 Ppuy, rg/anr/.r flys okr 4. .•n?F .Cssuc.e"a rYwuurL s.illI •uGmes.,mykarl✓ ..e?ris.E.t JET_ /f_.ra{4/*F/e^s/4u: awwr��:trr-z.sit4ay'!(s,4r-r.rhs�?/'�m<G(,veserr+M.ae.iwswL,s..tv Yw.l,,),47A7Y< ':t.. . G,� `., ..,',.,crv..>' _, .,'.`�::'✓, rz+l�r!,'l�.foi .✓oaf <c.� — -77/..S 6.4. .�� ivr , a'e „x w jar jaa.( 'ez z//y .'s 7 .cu 2,..� s/ (4),',,,,,:a6- I /..',, ,,141r, _ 2 ./-dv fitkerr ouQ,44'6f�py{ Gjr.rg ,,,, v1 s�i%eyiT44s .,'$r /14e4e /.e°.v�✓------, -- za_-lk . ,/ 'z>r0,)� -{./-, r n r i�t..a,/M . . ✓Az ✓ '! - d l r/ : cvnr z O / ud s Pz'cm Leu'htdW.6.u-GR7/�i✓<_ ,triJ.*l-C/s V,f, i Sore. d./�GiL Gd.,,C ��u- . au r�r� .rluL......t,rT r L.e..Y).4 no... .u.«.X ' nt�<s-zL✓z t F� / gat, ,.^✓r y.r m.� N .y i ' '3 ✓ .. �. urn � >• _•. ' sfwut.er.:. �.t��u�s2✓��nf•.Ldo zS,fo,✓.s .T� lc+r FT ( z,r �t •✓s •_!. d I-yro y U V f" 7- s,' ,o,.,,-aL e771-41/.to .,+.e�L_'.wc �.ems fa .T�i� err's'�a `J • J/ aI L ,! }f/ </`L 0.30 alZ674V a.v r /! .. L F�w rz�ur-11�c� let -f� - J J ✓ / ,/,,./2,..„/nenY_/ c ti'GL ...t " {yam _ 'a f et r �. .rn t .tie his edit to Min /n �'e,, t coot r It,together with ersialt,and d t7 ] nmmemm rut -- (''t. st1e l 3 0,t, >7tttl�interest,claim reversion anal reversions,remainder] d remainder/ to I in'rtyt thereof;and 11 the lute, r: demand Ishatsoeirer of the said part-4//,‘f the flat part, either in law or !-ty of,in.nod ta the obore 1 r e iant premises.will,U„ ieereditaovenk and appurtenances Co awe and to Sold the said premises above bargained and described, with the app to y ot the vu,j pia t!2—of to, cos 1 0� 11 �/ �/ I second partreAd "'ed 2Ihe cod assigns forever dad the aiel,i4k , s9.kl/ .,,,e ., 4, C((_�,,.//:.. .._ {/Csvy✓ G �ru tr ✓. , ...f /it'a-Si_r_C/l t __ _. <r __ _ _part 41of the first part,for,-/g i' ✓ x C-- r z ,.heirs, executors and adnunistrat s d verw.nt,grant,bargain and agree to and with the said pnrt.¢J f the second part ro assigns,that at the time of eta ensealin a and delivery of these presents—/etI z±4,-,-well seized f the so onuses above y ed, as of good,care,perfect,absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in taiv, in fee simple,and ha ' good,right full power and - lawful authority to grant,bargain,sell and convey the same,i n manner and form aforesaid.and th-et the same are free and dray front all former and other grants,bargains,sales,liens,taxes,assessments and incmmbranees of whatever kind,— nature sotee,, r' ✓['£d-£ ^a>-Y s-Pit..e u .. <r.[wTyve T _�Rl t �rT < iXe.1.. . . •z fO�l ✓c7/a4 4LYrf�asea //7 ./.& C G / 7YRT _ e end t! above 1 premises, lice y l id peaceable l f the I part�i of the second part la« 4'i�. d assigns,alienist all and y person,or persons lawfully claiming or to claim.n the o.hole e,- i, any part thereof,the said P if lof the first purl&hull and will P.dllIt I KT AXIS bOll r P h DEFEND. 7n Witness Whereof,The said pr rte f the first part ha/eta—hereunto set—i4-4-e hands/a seat-tl e gs,y t year first above critters. =4�� via`/ r Y G Signed, Sealed and Delivered in presence Of j /pf 1 '" �tI'p /.lj� K¢ ,{��-Loo,.-t, 1N, O.. .✓a- tl R-Q LO /.. U f� // �C pl LLL(41AeV1L /� /Q '• C.e+ eaZ, �iv.'/a'i�7�.^7FiN2c�V.LLL/.,.. : /k✓x u f✓l,i,I,, T. -. gy.. I IN 6,S.., t ;f ') : c •j ;. `► f, C \s J! f 1 w • A • o - A‘,. i A II 1 I' Ii qI. ? II I, I. i a I t1Ih ; OL ir Z IT Al 1 n.c-c-z2.4 i''' 6N / \ iii cp " 1.."1 4:4 i I\ l' 4 ) 4 ° iUIIH y e a 'y( WI co 9 6 OB[ y pe00AddA aptyap/a!/ag!nano {/) �Y io,/lawog y lvaaua°L'i'COI3X3 eilf 161610.4 01 SW 03AOtlddtl a 461,n 7 �Jl7i/ JAI S T ci! ON lianv `1N3W338DV A I,pI1 I11�InI' N IpIIII�IUII IpI1 i F ANVdNO;) a'O212lY8 OI4IOtld NOIN 11 NN 11 MNI II, INN didfl8ISI Exhibit 6D is four oversized sheets - Site Plan - Noise Exhibit - Landscape/Screening Plan (2 sheets) Please see original file Hello