The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20053106.tiff • October 5, 2005 LAND O ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates PUD Dear Chris: The following report provides a summary of the applicant's resolutions to referral agency and Weld County staff comments from the PUD Change of Zone review process. Responses below correspond with the draft Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners provided by the Clerk to the Board. We have attached a copy of the resolution for your reference. The resolution reads as follows: The Change of Zone from (A) Agricultural to PUD for 833 single-family lots with R-1 (Low Density Residential) uses along with 70.08 Acres of open space in the Mixed Use Development Overlay District is conditional upon the following: 1. Prior to scheduling Board of County Commissioners hearing: A. The applicant shall submit an agreomont with tho proportios minorai ownors/leasohold interests stipulating that oil and-gas-activities havo boen adequately incorporated into the design-of the sito or provide written and/or graphic evidence that an adequate attempt has boon made to mitigate the concerns of tho mineral owners/leasehold interests. (Dopartmont of Planning Sorvices) B. The applicant shall submit a revised building envelope diagram and maximum building footprint for each proposed lot type. 2 Prior to recording the Change of Zone plat: A. All proposed street names shall be submitted to the Mountain View Fire Protection District and the Longmont Post Office for review. Response: The applicant has contacted the Mountain View Fire Protection District and the Longmont post office and provided them with a list of street names. The Applicant was directed by both agencies to go through the Weld County Building Department for final street name approval. The applicant has contacted Linn Dodge with the Weld County Building Department and provided her with a list of street names for approval. Please see Exhibit 'A' containing the response letter from Land Architects and updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan addressing this specific concern. 2005-3106 1 land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 8012• www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 B. Location of proposed mail boxes shall be reviewed by the Post Office. Evidence of Post Office approval shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services. Response: The applicant has provided locations of mailbox clusters on the Change of Zone Plat that have been approved by the Longmont Post Office. Please see Exhibit 'A' containing the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan addressing this specific concern. C. The Change of Zone plat shall meet all requirements of Section 27-9-20 of the Weld County Code. Response: The applicant has met all of the Change of Zone Plat Map Requirements as defined in Section 27-9-20 of the Weld County Code. Please see Exhibit 'A' containing the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan addressing this specific concern. D. The applicant shall submit a proposed estimate for time of construction of the PUD. Response: The applicant has provided a construction schedule from Tetra Tech RMC. Please see Exhibit 'B' containing the response letter from Tetra Tech RMC and attachments addressing this specific concern. E. The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of the City of Longmont, as stated in their referral dated May 13, 2005. Written evidence of such shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. Response: The applicant contacted Froda Greenburg and Dan Wolford with the City of Longmont Department of Community Development and Open Space and Trails Department via faxed letter on February 2, 2005 and via phone on October 5, 2005 to clarify their referral comment requesting a 300' buffer on the east side of the Liberty gulch for preservation of potential wildlife corridors. Please see Exhibit 'C' containing a response letter from Land Architects, project correspondence, and the referral letter dated May 13,2005 addressing this specific concern. F. The applicant shall address the concerns of the Weld County Sheriff's office, as stated in a memo dated May 6, 2005 and incorporate remedies for these concerns. Written evidence of a solution shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. Response: The applicant has addressed the concerns of the Weld County Sheriff's Office regarding the location of bus stops, location of mailboxes, neighborhood signage, roadway maintenance, fencing for oil and gas operations, street name approval, and capacity to provide law enforcement as requested in their referral response letter dated May 6, 2005. Please see Exhibit `D' containing the response letter from Land Architects and Weld County Sheriff's Office referral response letter. Also refer to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A', showing the addition of items requested in the Weld County Sherds Office referral response letter. ER final COZ res nse 10-14-05.doc G. The applicant shall attempt to address the requirements/concerns of the Longmont Soil Conservation District as stated in their referral dated May 6, 2005. Written evidence of such shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. Response: The applicant has addressed the concerns of the Longmont Conservation District regarding the mitigation of noxious weeds and conservation practices as requested in their referral response letter dated May 6, 2005. Please see Exhibit `E'containing the response letter from Land Architects and Longmont Conservation District referral letter. H. The applicant shall attempt to address the requirements/concerns of the Colorado Division of Wildlife as stated in their referral dated May 15, 2005. Written evidence of such shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. Response: The applicant has addressed the concerns of the Colorado Division of Wildlife regarding the mitigation of noxious weeds, the impacts of surrounding wildlife and hunting on the neighborhood, and native planting next to Liberty Gulch as requested in their referral response letter dated May 15, 2005. Please see Exhibit 'F'containing the response letter from Land Architects and Colorado Division of Wildlife referral letter. The applicant shall provide written evidence from the Colorado Geological Survey that their issues/concerns with groundwater/drainage and future basement construction as stated in their referral dated May 16, 2005 have been addressed and basements can be constructed on the lots located within the high groundwater areas or a plat note shall indicate which lots should not have basements. Response: The applicant has addressed the concerns of the Colorado Geological Survey regarding ground water drainage and basement construction as requested in their referral response letter dated May 16, 2005. Please see Exhibit `G'containing the response letter from Tetra Tech RMC. J. The applicant has proposed trees to line the interior roadways. It is unclear if these trees are to be in the individual lots or the road right-of-way. If they are intended to be in the individual lots the covenants need to ensure that their placement does not interfere with utility easements. Utility easements are addressed in section 24-7-60 of the Weld County Code. Response: The applicant has discussed the placement of street trees with Peter Schei, Weld County Public Works, and has determined that the optimal location for the street trees is within the individual lots approximately eight (8)feet behind the sidewalk, outside of the front yard gas easement. Refer to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'A', showing the street trees in the new location. R fin I CCZ re nse 10-14-05.doc f 2. In accordance with Weld County Code Ordinance 2005-7 approved June 1, 2005, should the plat not be recorded within the required thirty (30) days from the date of the Board of County Commissioners hearing a $50.00 recording continuance charge shall be added for each additional 3 month period. Response: The applicant acknowledges this condition. 3. The plat shall be amended to include the following: A. The proposed locations of the oil and gas drilling envelopes (if no agreement is reached) and the existing oil and gas facilities on site, including all easements associated with these facilities. Response: The applicant is working with Kerr McGee to finalize easements and drilling envelopes. Draft agreements and maps locating drilling envelopes have been provided for review. Drilling envelopes and easements will be added to the Change of Zone Plat once they are finalized. Please see Exhibit 'H' containing the response letter from Tetra Tech RMC and attached exhibits. B. Weld County's Right to Farm note as delineated in Appendix 22-E of the Weld County Code. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'A'. C. A bike lane adjacent to the outside through lanes must be added to roadway cross-section (Section A). The bike lane should be six-feet in width. Response: The change has been made to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. D. A typical alley cross-section shall be indicated. Response: Alley product has been removed entirely from the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'A'. E. A typical 80-foot Collector roadway cross-section shall be indicated. The typical roadway section of the interior roadway shall be shown as two 12-foot paved lanes with 8-foot paved parking lanes on the change of zone plat (the traffic impact study shall classify interior roadways of the development). The MUD shall require curb, gutter and sidewalk. Response: The change has been made to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. F. Building envelopes with overhang areas noted shall be indicated. Response: A building envelope diagram has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. G. County Road 7 is classified by the Weld County 1-25 Parallel Arterial Study as a major arterial road which required 140-feet of right-of-way. If the right-of-way cannot be verified, it shall be dedicated on the final plat. Response: The applicant acknowledges this condition. submittaMDLER final COZ res nse 10-14-05.tloc i1 S H. County Road 28 is classified by the Weld County I-25 Parallel Arterial Study as a major arterial road and required 140-feet of right-of-way. If the right-of-way cannot be verified, it shall be dedicated on the final plat. Response: The applicant acknowledges this condition. County Road 26Y2 is classified as a 1 lane major arterial 2-lane urban collector road and requires a 80-foot right-of-way. Response: The applicant acknowledges this condition. J. The wellhead setback radius'as indicated on the plat shall be amended from 300 feet to 200 feet. Response: The change has been made to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. K. The Change of Zone plat map shall be submitted to the Department of Planning Services' for recording within Sixty (60) days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. With the Change of Zone plat map, the applicant shall submit a digital file of all drawings associated with the Change of Zone application. Acceptable CAD formats are .dwg, .dxf, and .dgn (Microstation); acceptable GIS formats are .shp (Shape Files), Arclnfo Coverages and Arclnfo Export files format type is .e00. The preferred format for Images is .tif(Group 4) ... (Group 6 is not acceptable). (Department of Planning Services) Response: The applicant acknowledges this condition. 4. The Change of Zone is conditional upon the following and that each shall be placed on the Change of Zone plat as notes prior to recording: Response: The following notes A-CC have been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. A. The site specific development plan is for a PUD change of zone from (A) Agricultural to PUD with (R-1) Low Density Residential and continuing Oil and Gas Production Uses in the Mixed Use Development Overlay District as indicated in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject and governed by the Conditions of Approval stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. The (R-1) Low Density Residential lots shall comply with all (R-1) requirements with the exception of minimum lot size, oil and gas setbacks, building offsets, animal units and/or associated kennel facilities and carports and/or parking areas. Adler Estates PUD shall be allowed their proposed signage concept that is in excess of the allowable signage area per Code (23-4-80). Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Conditions of Approval may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'A'. B. Adler Estates PUD shall obtain water from Long's Peak Water District. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. LER final COZ res nse 10.14-05.doc C. Adler Estates PUD shall obtain sewer service from St.Vrain Sanitation District. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. D. A stormwater discharge permit is required for a development /redevelopment /construction site where a contiguous or non-contiguous land disturbance is greater than or equal one acre in area. Contact the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment at www.cdphe.state.co.us/wa/PermitsUnit for more information. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. E. If land development creates more than a 25 acre contiguous disturbance, or exceeds six (6) months in duration, the responsible party shall prepare a fugitive dust control plan, submit an Air Pollution Emissions Notice (A.P.E.N.), and apply for a permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. F. During the development of the site, all land disturbances shall be conducted so that nuisance conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions, at the request of the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment, a Fugitive Dust Control Plan must be submitted. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'Ai G. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, any development that disturbs more than five acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods which are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. H. The pedestrian school crossing at the intersection of County Road 7 and County 26.5 to the Future St. Vrain School Site shall bo signalized have pedestrian crossing signage with flashing caution lights and school zone signage approaching the intersection. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. Permanent restroom and hand washing facilities shall be provided within easy access of the public gathering areas. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. J. Building permits shall be obtained prior to any construction. A separate permit will be required for each structure. Permits are required for structures such as bus shelters or entrance gates. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. e io-14-O5.doc ` `-• K. A plan review is required for each building for which a building permit is required. Plans shall include a floor plan. Residential building plans may be required to bear the wet stamp of a Colorado registered architect or engineer. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. L. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the codes adopted by Weld County at the time of permit application. Current adopted codes include the 2003 International Residential Code; 2003 International Building Code; 2003 International Mechanical Code; 2003 International Plumbing Code; 2002 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'A'. M. Each residential building will require an engineered foundation based on a site- specific geotechnical report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. N. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 2003 International Building Code for the purpose of determining the maximum building size and height for various uses and types of construction and to determine compliance with the Bulk Requirements from Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. Building height shall be measured in accordanco with Chapter 23 of tho Weld County Code in order to dotermino compliance with offset and setback requirements. Offset and setbacks are measured per the PUD criteria. An Improvement Lot Certificate (ILC) will be required for each building showing the building height as measured according to Chapter 23 of the Weld County Codo, ac well as the offset and setback distances to property lines per the approved PUD setback standards. The ILC, bearing the stamp of a Colorado registered engineer or the certification of a Colorado registered surveyor, will be required prior to the frame inspection. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. O. All signs including entrance signs shall require building permits. Signs shall adhere to Section 26-2-90 and Section 23-4-100 of the Weld County Code, and variances approved with the PUD. These requirements shall apply to all temporary and permanent signs. With each Filing, The applicant shall follow the approved Sign Plan. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. P. Effective January 1, 2003, Building Permits issued on the proposed lots will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the County Road Impact Program Area. (Ordinance 2002-11) Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. Q. Short term improvements in the form of additional lanes on the north and south legs of the intersection of County Road 7 and State Highway 66, as identified in the Traffic Impact Study—Adler Esates —Weld County, Colorado dated May 17, 2004 and supplemental report dated July 9, 2005 Traffic Impact Study are to be installed, and paving of County Road 7 from County Road 28 to State Highway 66 is to be completed to allow the roadways listed to function at an acceptable level of service. These improvements are to be completed concurrent with Phase I of the project, and that no certificates of occupancy are to be issued for the project until all of these improvements identified are completed. Response: The short-term improvements are under design and will be constructed with Filing One of the project. A traffic study completed July 9, 2005 has further defined the actual improvements necessary for construction. Please see Exhibit 'I' containing the response letter from Tetra Tech RMC and attached exhibits. R. Installation of utilities shall comply with Section 24-9-10 of the Weld County Code. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. S. The property owner shall be responsible for complying with the Performance Standards of Chapter 27, Article II, of the Weld County Code. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. T. The property owner shall be responsible for complying with Chapter 27, Article VIII, of the Weld County Code. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. U. The property owner shall be responsible for complying with the criteria of Chapter 26 of the Weld County Code. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'A'. V. Personnel from the Weld County Government shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'A'. W. The property owner shall be responsible for maintaining compliance with Section 26-2-100 of the Weld County Code. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. 0-140 . oc X. No development activity shall commence on the property, nor shall any building permits be issued on the property until the final plan as been approved and recorded. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit A'. Y. All landscaping within the site distance triangles must be less than 31/2 feet in height at maturity. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'A'. Z. A Home Owner's Association shall be established prior to the sale of any lot. Membership in the Association is mandatory for each parcel owner. The Association is responsible for liability insurance, taxes and maintenance of open space, private utilities and other facilities. Open space restrictions are permanent. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit Ai. AA. The property owner shall allow any mineral owner or lessee the right of ingress or egress for the purpose or exploration development, completion, re-completion, re-entry, production and maintenance operations associated with existing or future operations located on these lands. Installation of utilities shall comply with Section 24-9-10 of the Weld County Code. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'B'. BB. Adler Estates PUD shall comply with Section 27-8-50 Weld County Code, as follows: Failure to submit a Planned Unit Development Final Plan - If a PUD Final Plan application is not submitted within three (3) years of the date of the approval of the PUD Zone District, the Board of County Commissioners shall require the landowner to appear before it and present evidence substantiating that the PUD project has not been abandoned and that applicant possesses the willingness and ability to continue with the submittal of the PUD Final Plan. The Board may extend the date for the submittal of the PUD Final Plan application and shall annually require the applicant to demonstrate that the PUD has not been abandoned. If the Board determines that conditions or statements made supporting the original approval of the PUD Zone District have changed or that the landowner cannot implement the PUD Final Plan, the Board of County Commissioners may, at a public hearing revoke the PUD Zone District and order the recorded PUD Zone District reverted to the original Zone District. Response: The note has been added to the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'B'. With this summary of responses we believe that all of the conditions have been satisfied. Please let us lmow if you feel otherwise. If you have any further comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 303-734-1777. Sincerely, LAND ARCHITECTS, INC. Joshua L. Rowland, R.L.A. Director of Planning and Design ,4 LAND 0 ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international • Exhibit 'A ' S • .•. .. .... ... ..., • .u n.1;• ; d •Z Comments.doc land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd„ Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 t. -4 LAND MI ARCHITECTS October 5,2005 perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates PUD Dear Chris: The Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners contained an Approval Recommendation for the Adler Estates Project, PZ-1071 based upon compliance with Chapter 27 requirements with conditions. These conditions are listed on pages 11-16 of the draft resolution by the Clerk to the Board. We would like to provide you with the information that we believe resolves the following condition: 1.A Prior to recording the Change of Zone Plat: All proposed street names shall be submitted to the Mountain View Fire Protection District. Resolution: The updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plans, revised Oct. 5, 2005 is attached for your reference. The applicant has contacted the Mountain View Fire Protection District and the Longmont post office and provided them with a list of street names. The Applicant was directed by both agencies to go through the Weld County Building Department for final street name approval. The applicant has contacted Linn Dodge with the Weld County Building Department and provided her with a list of street names for approval. Please see the updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan addressing this specific concern. With this response we believe that this condition has been satisfied. Please let us know if you feel otherwise. If you have any further comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 303-734-1777. Sincerely, LAND Joshua . Ro d,R.L.A. Director of Planning and Design land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 CHANGE OF ZONE MAP NORHOC 1,4 CORNER MC NOST COMER 33. .M SM n. NORM,,.CORNER 4C L,)LI.RYA.6144 W MO 2'AC CAP MO ADLER ESTATES V 6606'R01Y WYAd S a �' RP 2'MOW P1RS 22017 INNS ° �, D.R. NORTON-MELODY SERIES ns "rows'',2•70."5 N80'O7'SYE 1067.12' xs6rz4�zY.w' -' - _.__= -=;P--........---•.....,--._•==... •r•- w..n: IEAIL0EPII0N j (^ ' • �MPOITION Of THE SOUTHEAST DORM Of SECTION v,TIMNYP 3 403470 RANGEu WEST Cf ML PRYIOPAL NERCO,MONTY Of CO.STAR Of[CO CO.BONG YORE P4MCULMILY I '2' Dxxm AS FOLLOWS: C. j j 1 Mti [OMMISC 1 AT ME SWIIEAST CDC Of SECTION v WEN TE DST OCCALAR2R CORNERa e SECTION v REARS NORM&vale MST 2641.44 FEET TIM'£µp10 THE EAST LONE OF ME yg OUTCAST OWRIW OF SLCIIW SS NORTH TEl)30'WEST 41203 FEET TO NE MN!Of BEd WC: 1` I *Ca".PRSIIMIF t _ TICK£WNW SAO NOR 41 PSOUTHair 4714'44" o nt 2110.0 BEET:THENCE l35 NORTH BAGS'OJ-YEST 10 ( I 5y1,, 074.20 FEET;flea NORTH 41 0.•n•MST 627 m FEET 12.05 t2RM 25'Srir MST S A POET: • ! { B1$r6 THENCE NORTH 622327•WEST 31 d FEET;THENCE NORM ':r MST 1CBss FTC TO A PONT (' [R TE NORM LINE OF NE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF MOON v THENCE MONO SW CM LINE f I NORM NSW Io'O'EAST 100303 FEET TO 114 DST pE 70116106 EARNER:THENCE ALONG THE EAST •1 H L, UIE T TE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTON 33 07TH OTTO20'UST 223010 FEET ro TE PORE Of BEGWOO. T� I G t cowmen 60551 arts ORE OR LESS. ^ —I 11 0.!S PAQCE1 2 NE110EHRPFn RKbW1Y 1 • PARCEL 2 F. §^ ME 7 EASTERLY TTIC d�N sswo LEON, `SECTION 33. N RANGE 66 ma( F COLORADO,NONE TORE y 1892/C1e6 l jj w `(N PE1m1ua,M.9LINBm M P0. 69871782 eon R METING ZONE:A $ _ MD S CT AT 23 0045 S UT OWNER p OTSECTION .9 MIENS ME NORTH pI EAST E Of OF S MD SECTION v BEARS SWIM B33 ROT x]70.86 IF£!: 0.06MENGE 10 TIE FASTT LINE Of TIE I NPm0ST aOATER 1 SECTS'S v SOUTH NE EAST TR5e 06 FEET TO ME EAST ONE-COMET CORER Of SW STEM 3l:THENCE ALONG ME SOUTH UEN or ME NORTHEAST QUARTER Of SODOM 1\ \ a 33 TIfY£SWIM BRION'NT ST 12RJ.09 FEET:THENCE LEA.MINi SOO SONAR LENS NORTH 0724'50' WEST\ II 1 I MENYSORO fir TO A ALONG SNO NORTH UNE NORTH 67T3'E EAST 1267.12 ON NE NORTH LISE Cf FEE 10 NE A�ORMR\ST CORNER Of OF SECTION 33; E) SECTION v MO ME PONT Of 864444040. 4 \\ A CC CM 120.003 ARSES.a OR LESS. R I II A APoR ON C TIC MUIIIRSST pW(IO OF SECTION M 104694W 3 NORTH.POE BB MOT OF ME I! 51114 POEMS.YOROW,COUNTY OF WELD.STAR Of CMCD0.BONG OM PMIICUM6Y I NERGENNEDERMAURE S.meal TµLEY 20400.u41xET : cannon AS rpUOM2 11 H0NNW AT NE SNTNaST CORNER OF SECTION 24,NEC ME WEST 0E"O0RR0 CORNER OF -' OCTOPI 34 BEMS MUM OO10050-NEST 2651.44 FEET;THENCE ALONG THE WEST UNE OF THE II'; SO TO T 0540100 OF EFCTNN S4 XtliM 031644 SOT 3651.44 FEET ro SAID REST 0E12LWMER - Ij DOT 154 wJx�T IIDCE LEAVING CO M 10744E 300(10 004155•DST�A 0�THRICE51• i ( SOUTH 211Ea•EAST 737.00 FEET 10 A PONE ON THE SCUM LNE OF THE SWIINST WARIER OF �' •II • SFCIYN 34;NOCE ALONG S W SOUTH LINE NORM er54'48'MST 2160.03 FEET TO TE SOUTHWEST .I 0 IN eO COINER OF SECTION 34 ANO TIE PONT OF 6NMNMC. /. II EARS 1 6..466 / f' MC 314TH,RYA.NM W COMFIT 1/4 CORER• COMMUTE 111.1 oz ACRES.ROM CO 169 II i MO Y COOT AURA OP SEC N.T]1.NM.6TH FY 1 1 0.E BMW ROY WRFC r AL LY AY DP scut: t' -30D' YGAN E8®08rrAR j i 0.S MC INJ PS 7735.2000 • 1 568.10'0014 1867A8' 44]8'07'20'0 1766.68' Amy S SE ISIS SANE swWN SIN NEE O SOLE CON ITACPm FEE op (MME)01NQBm a 1043 • RR 1Y LOC ATED NE A'M.g1LTRLL'ZONE DISTRICT LEO IS ALSO 410600 10 PROVO 4 _ _ 1 11g1903.03! 1 � "-'`Y FOR THE CONDUCT a amu USES Y nYNr.ACCESSORY USES MO um n mEcw.REC. 1 . — 0311051144E OGNANEI• (w«TwE) W 1 I/4 INNER \ - xc v.rW.qtY.4TH PUN • II 8011Np�NF LEE NIO •• ....•••• 2W TEAR EID]O P1.W WPM O PeOW NAM TYPED OR PRIMED MYE no 2'ALLY CAP BELOW ROAD D1m442 i I PARCEL'1 ,PLS • , I ♦ sEc1M UHE YS OF maAmt 1 \ V -__ YWFR INE )- R6382ACA91 P: 57111*earl I V S— — SAMMY C LE OF )E COMET W • Fia6`}6'Sa2 'A \ IN - - SIMI WEAR LINE ER L ME FYE406C CGNICAEON WAS 7cKNOMm EO BEFORE YE MIS_O4,OF 30� :.Ps I __ G4 WE - NY CORYSOI PS E' _.—,. _ -.- `<. P e !.'t _ - - UWEIO ELECTRIC YHE Mnes wIWO NO YR 1 \ • _ I— PARCEL 9 _f __ _. .— `E"O.LEE �, ..R1 1 T� — -- - - • EAypENO OMITY REPLRC . - - 111.1682 ACRES .- _ 1 \\\1 11 E70elerlat Sr 8YNa�a1EtA "Ed.2 I CgEEFN'AECFMPII0YA.B/liE8BA811B110FNA1N1889Mf�'N7W81M11YEIEIIBC ' . .•�a 1 \ ^ TINS PLAT IS ACCEPTED NO APPOSED T'ME RPMIYFNT Of PLANNING MINCES FOR 51.10. id n 3 N82'25'7r14 -1., V �'' I e 181.60 t',.. \\ ! t — d'.d Movm4 Mpv1r P DEPARTMENT OF PLANNIQ yINv[c • R .4 `6 9IAR OF LOpYm ) ' U. (Q TE OLLOYC PARCELS TO EE REUSED COMITY OF Wm r. S \ N. I" ' P'Wpt I-EbE TL'0' NE FMEO0Oi CERTIFICATION INS ACTON.NCNO TERME YE MIS DAY OF 20� RLWST PROPERTY 0. �-//%. j wee.z-MC'NO' Y WTHYSSON 625440 54 \ (] 154 • PMORI-51144E AO' OTICW NMO MC YK. \�WA ! IOC TEPu02c • Mai 0 \ � •.\ \� I 4 • . 1 NIS PLAT IS I 0F APPEALNE THE BCCBOARDCONCSI NWS Of VELD \ -! W[ MEPW0100 WNF'�n FLAT RCNED 2005 NOT rnrsnTlm E rc A-mm omIA21001.STATE of cp4Rwo.•�_- -.•-•\ 54714'4419 I I �X '1 271.07' I \ 0. WITNESS WY HAND AND TIE CORPORATE SEAL OF MOO COUNTY TNY_�AY OF�,AO, • \ - \ ; 3 _- j 367AK 00 OF N 5000TY COWISSIOEY5 �, I MELD cower CLERK TOTE EOM 0 I \ ' SECS 2 CORNER I /so 34.TO N INNE OH PY B/: J444' DOM CLERK OF THE BOLO. SOIN'462 x649.7] FPO 3"COOT PLO IBC TAW CM • --.-44]00 b Y 2128.0.21400 CMSYIBDC0UAYRWD81 Y 'Dimmer comet MINIM GR FICMe 2 same cOYET MC 33.EW,R6ER.6TH w S SEC 33.TIM ROE OM PIAFO r COOT NON CAP O MSC 0.3'BODY TOY SURE/CE 1. A RE051OI2 PROF-MOM CO 00440101 N TIE STAR OF nS 6403.1907 COLORADO CO HERBY TERM,MO ME SE6EY RDPESmIT we THIS PLAT WAS ICE LINER an iPE 5NL RRad'1N M0 CMECOO,I R EI ER CFMIRM THAT TIE SVMY MO THIS PLAT COMPLY WIN ML MPUCYIE RULES.REGULATIONS NO LAWS OF TIE STAR Of°MO ACO.STATE BONG Of ®p 441 aMIMTON FOR MDSSOM DONO 1S MD PROFSSYWL LAN 9MEKTS,Alt moat F RFLpO (WE .- TETRA TECH RMC M' amen Nl� © 10 SU7µ,vMa S.YISET WMY tll'.'e ONhAN : a2Almm TARE SURVEYOR DATE ANN /��4 00.0068.o67 ADLER ESTATES V{AL1 LAND MARCHITECTS VICINITY MAP Ems; it. E ' -€ vBTspectiVB I balance .,P.:. �. `" ADLER ESTATES �' ` � ' I. ' I " PRELIMINARY SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANSt. ii WELD COUNTY, C0L0RAD0 ".... F ; I \ � II MELODY HOMES, INC. ;' A DELAWARE CORPORATION 7 II D/8/A D.R.HORTON-MELODY SERIES `� . ( _ / , N 11O31 SHERIDAN BLVD.SUITE A 7 • .�� ' ' `� APPLICANT/CLIENT WESTMINSTER,CO 8OO2O -- 1. Tit'9$ '� A DEAAWARE CORPORATIONAT PHONE)(303)48&1891 I 11n OIB/AU.RHORTON- ...rM" 'A MELODY SERIES FM:(303)438-Ten )— P-�G/ 1 -,i�.,.,. 111)BPPRNNAf �� al e / l { I ~ 1101E ENIGN BLVD. L ��( if `h ./ wEEow 90 R w® ZONING CLASSIFICATION AND LAND USE DESIGNATION PLAT NOTES) ��. g �._.-.Y Tow 90340101 i; dm,d® ToiP1SITE ACREAGE.LSoo.BBA S I fYY `E, \ ti1 ,CONSULTANT TOTALINOmCREAGE)AG181MACFES NE DIRECT.PROPOSED 201411a NDYABI 1. THE SITESPKJFIC DEVELOPMENT RAN IS FORA PLO CHANGE OF ZONE FROM W It ALL EWE NOUMEA)ENTRANCE BRIE SHALIEOURE BUILDING PERMS.SIGNS NOLL V' ] AGRICULTURAL TO PAID.MTH(Ell LOWE DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTIAL NO CONTINUING OLND MERE TO SECTION MOM ANO SECTION 214106 THE WELD COUNTY CODE.THESE �A ESTATE AND CONTINUING qL&GAS PRODUCTION USES IN THE MED USE DEVELOPMENT GAS PRODUCTION USES IN THE BREED ONE DEVELOPMENT q£NAY DISTRICT AS IIEOMIELENTS/CM/I LL.TO ALL TFAE'ORAROAM PERTINENT SONS.WITHEACH .J �1 rS »11_ — — TETRA TECHSYNC OVERLAY DISRWT.) INDICATED N THE APPLICATION INTERIMS ON FEE w TIE L@NOLENT 6 flAMf0 RING THE APPLIGV?9WL FOLLOW THE APPROVED SIGH NIM(DEPARTENT 6 1aO18.N IF STREET SERVICES NO REJECTND GOVERNED BY THE COMMONS 6 APPROVAL STATED BUILDING INSPECTOR CEPNEIEENT OF EANYY SERVICES) ELITEON.1F )LOWmemLOIDe 303OOSNNI • NESWNAND LALL KR LCOMPL WITH COUNTY REGULATIONS.RSWJWEM TIE(ISWITH TTHE EXCEPTION Ruffle 3034124282 • MINNE TIALLOT MEMOTS SHALL GYPSY WITH ML BUILDING REQUIREMENTS E UNITS SMOTOR 6 17.EFFECTIVE ADHERE E1. DEFEESSUEDES PERMITSSTRUCTURE ISSUED THE NT PROPOSED IMP CTLO S WILL REPROGRAM Far 30050511 MIMMWDDT S�.LA NO GAS SEIBAO(S.BMLDIAC OFFSETS. AREAS. ADLER ESTATES AREA.TD TO ACNERE TO DE FEE STRICTURE 61XE CIMYEdDNPACT PROGRAM THE OF COMPLETION(ESTIMATED) PLO SFATERREMEL FFDIIRS NO REMED CARPORTS MOTOR PMT1HATIFA6XCESS OFTATSS AREA.IOIOENRf 20AllIDEPARTMEM6PAMMGSERVI ES) PLOWABLE ALLOWEDONAGER IT-OR PELPOOEDNGWRE CONCEPT TINr191N EXCESS OF THE CONSULTANTS JANUARY.AOB MEOW INFRASTRUCTURE IWTN ATCN COMMONS SNNYDEARFA PER CO6 OMARSONFO NONCOMIUNICE OF TIE PERMIT BY It SHORT TERM OFTIE NIFMS N TIE FORM 6Y 7 L LANES STATE THE NORTH NO COMMONS Wx BE REASON FORfEVoCAT1616TE PETNTBYTIE ISOUTH LEGS OF TIE WINMELTDN OF COUNTY ROAD 7 NO STATECOIMMTO.AS SEPTEMBER.AM 55014 MOCELHONE GRFIE%E8 BOARD OF GENIALCONISSOEL4 IDENTIFIED N THE 1TINAC!BRACT STUDYSTY-ALTER BE INSTALLED, , WI/TV.S0C Can NOVEMBER 200 BEGIN ION COSWULTOX-FEND WEMTFDYMrn 7 FROM TFTICNPACYRODYME TO BE NBTNLFa AND PAVESTO BE 611E CIVIL ENGINEER COMPLETION N IN MONDE- 2. VIL SECTION TI OF THIS PLAN MAY CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY MNT OF PLUN/T TO MME COUNTY RIWT FROM THE LIMY FLINT TO STATE NOWAY BBBTOBE SERVICE TETRA TECH I RMC APlal ZOO WL 21800FTIENEIDOXMY COLE.RFPARIVEM6FLNIEOSEW/N£5) TSEIMPRDE OVRDNTS NaO BE TO FUNCTION AT N110EEPTFSIE LEVEL OFIOFTHE Mg,SDEI" J NOVEMBERS 202 BEGNHOME wIBIRUCIMNI-FBINGTNOTHESE IMPGKJEMSN TO NS COWISTEO CONCURRENT WITH PHASE COMPLETION N)ETRLCRS- 3. ADLER ESTATES PLO SHALL OBTAIN WATER FROM LEO'S PM(WATER PSNBCT. PROJECT.NO THAT NO CERTIFICATES 6 OCCUPANCY Na TO BE ISSUED FOR THE NOVEMBER DEPARTMENT OF PARC HEALTHMO EMMOMENH PROJECT UNTIL ALL OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS IDENTIFIED Na COMPLETED(TOWN OF OCTOBER 200 BEGN HOME CONSTRUCTION.FLING TREE 4. ADLER ESTATES MID SHELL OSTEN SEWER SERVICE FROM ST.VENN SANITATION MEW) I- O COMPLETION N HIMONT*-EMNOR 200 DETECT.DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC IEALTI AM ENVIRONMENT) It INSTALLATION OF MITRES SIMLL CCMRY WITH SECTON 24040 OF THE W3DGIMY (DEPARTMENT 6 PLANTING SERVICES) JANUARY,2010 BEGIN HIOBE CONSTRUCTOR.FILING FOUR S A STRTANNTER DSOARGE PERMIT IS TI FORA DEVELOPMENT REOEVEIDREMT -�`ry(� TyS COMPLETION IN U MONTHS-M 1 G 2011 HSTROG TON SITE WERE A CONTIPJS OR HONCONTDISTURBANCEO DISTURBANCE E 2a TIE PROPERTY OPERTY OWNER WITH R SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TE PB R IOAME BY W GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE(11ADIE IN AREA. OF M ARTICLEA.CONTACTTEWATER QUALITY STANDARDSCHEWER T 2E E. E WELD COUNTY CODE(DEPAR TMENT RUNG FIVE CONTROL pDIVISION6 TECOMPLETIONCOLORADO 0EPAR11EM 6 RUMS FEALTIES) PNMNOSER OS) O D FEBRUARY.201 BEGNIKYE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION INN MONTHS-MAY 2D12 ENDRESENT ATw.s*N.NWamisY4F.tW n FORAMS SICREATL (DEPARTMENT OF PINTO HEALTH NO NNBDMBII) 21.THE PROPERTY owER SHALL BE NFcwtE F FOR COISLYNR WITH OUTER n. ARTICLE W,6THE WELD=MY w6,(6PNOlEM6RNEEG eWINCES) ///LLL O 1,, B. IF L OEY66MENT CREATES MORE THAN ADACRE M CONTOMUS IMRN CR LAND EXCEEDS SR R MONTHS N TIE SHALLOJRATCN. RESPONSIBLE PARTY SHALL PREPARE TIE SHALL W T CRITERIA 2L PROPERTY OWNER L BE RFaor F FOR COMPLYING M E CRITERIA OF In i 0 Z WELDI%IUNTYS RIGHT TO FARM STATEMENT FUGITIVE MAST CONTROL PLVL DSMTNHMPILLNO N M MISSIONS NOTICE R£(MEAL). CIM➢T286 TIE COUNTY WED. LMTY COLE.(DEPARTMENT OF P1N AGSNlV1'ESL ■ ■ Z WELD COUNTY IS RE OF TIE MOST PRODUCTIVE AGRICULTURAL COUNTIES N THE LIMED AND APPLY FORA PERMIT FROM THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PSITC IEALTIND ` O STATES.Remora FIFTH IN TOTAL MVNET VALUE OF AGRICULTURAGRICULTURAPRODUCTSSOL L PRODUCTS D TIE ENVIRONMENT.(DEPARTMENT OF MW AND MALT, D ENNROMMT) EL PERSONNEL FROM THE WELD COUNTY GOVERMENT SHALL BE GRATER SS OEM JrL- T�1 RURAL AREAS WD COUNTY MAY BE OPEN AM SPACOIS.BUT T Na INTENSIVELYEYINTENSIVELYNT Y THE PROPERTY ATM/RFAUN TAEENSUREF IN CHEER TO ENSURE DE ACINTES CANNED 'V USED FOR AGRICULTURE PERSONS MOVING INTO A RURAL AREA MUST TELIG1@NO T. OUTER DEVELOPMENT OF TIE SITE.ALL LAND TYSMBAME NALL BE COMUCTEO SO OUT ON THE PROPERTY COMPLY WITH TE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STATED IEIEFI ACCEPT TIEREME OAWNAGNS.IINCLUDINGCONTRACTSCONTRACTSMMM WITH LOSNG T NUISANCE GRA THAT MANTES Na MT CREATED.F DUST EMISSIONS CREATE 2: N N O ALL APPOCAE YIELD COUNTY PEGMATS.DEPARTMENT PLANING ESE■EVEN Z LL AGWCLLTNAL PRACTICES NADA LOWER LEVEL OF SERNAFS TWIN MAN ALCM PATH CONDITIONS.AT THE REQUEST 6 THE WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC IEALTI SERVICES) TIE DAWMCOI COME THE NCEONES WM2I ATTRACT URBAN DWELLERS 101HMATE AM ENVPONBENT.A FUGMVE DST CONTROL PLAN MST BE SUBMITTED.D ARTIENT E E / O O AREAS) R TO RRALA :OPEN NEM EPACIWNESS WfOF M IFE,LAO( CITY EENO OF PSLC TENT,AM ENVIRONMENT) 24.THE PROPERTY OVER SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAMANIG GEAMN6 WITH SHEET INDEX 1-1..i CONGESTION.NO TIE RM.ATMOSPHERE NO WAY OF LEE WTWTNEIGIBORIG BECTON M;-1006 TE WELD COUNTY COOS DEPARTMENT OF PASEC SERVICES). FRAME.THOSE FEATURES WHICH ATTRACT ASNI ONELLIERS TO WAIL WELD COUNTY B IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IEGUTON86 TIE COLORADO AARQUVETY=ORM 0 0 NWAOgN2Gx BE GORE FOREVER. COMMISSION ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT DISTURBS MORE THAN FIVE ACRES 6 LINO MST 25,M DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMMENCE ON THE PROPERTY.MM SHALL NIT INCORPORATE ALL AVAILABLE AM PRACTICAL METHODS SEECNAFE TEO LLNPROPERTYEOLOGICALLY BDG PERMITS BE ISSUED ON TIE PROPERTY TIE FINAL P NM I L AN BEEN SHEET TIRE SCALE V AGRICULTURAL USERS OF TE LAND ROAD NOT BE EXPECTED TO OMNOE THEIR FEASIBLE EwKMCAILr REASONABLE IN CEDERTOMM BW66 2E DUST APPROVED AND RECORDED.(CFPMT2Exr6PAMlM aE1NYF8) 0 Q 2LCNOEETABLNIEO AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES TO ADCOA ATE TIE NIIESON 6 D PARTIENL 6 PUBLIC HEALTH NO ElmROMINNT Q URBAN USERS INTO A RURAL AREAWELL-RUWELL-RUNAGRICULTURAL ACONITES TALL GREATE N.M GPM LAMS WITH ONss TE SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANO ;MIST BE LESS T FEET N COZ1 CHANGE OF ZONE PLAT 1'=300-0' J OFF-SITE GRACIE INCLUDING MICE FROM TRACTORS MD EMIPERT;SLOW-MOP L THE PEDESTRIAN SCHOOL.CROSSING AT THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD 7 AND HOORAY MATURITY.D@MTEiT OF PLANING SERVOS) FNM VENQES ON PALL ROE DIET FROM MICR PNI4.FELDW E MMGTNO COUNTY ROAD 2E5 TO TE FLAMBE ST.BRAN Y]WLSITE SHALL BE MGNAll2E . Q GRAVEL ROADS(ODOR FROM ANwl CONFINEMENT,STAGE AM IMMURE SMOKE FILM ST.AMME OWNERS ASS TIOaelwLBE ESTEEMED PRONTO TE SALE 6NnLm. 1 COVER SHEET N.T.S. \ > 0 0004 NAVElS;PUSS AND 10BOMTOEB:HUNTING NO TRAPPER ACTIVITIES MOOED 10.PFSIMIFNT RES-ROOM NO HAMMERING FMLITES SHALL BE POVI[® T N IS W TRIM EASY MEMBERSHIP TE ASSOQATONICA P .TORY FOR EACH PAIN OMER TIE SPORTS.LEGAL HMEHG OF NUISANCE VIEWER AND THE USE OF PESTICIDES NC ACCESS OF PDUC GATESNIF AREAS.DEPMTENT OF PUBLIC HHLTI ND ASSOCIADON IS RESPONSIOLE FOR MESHY INSURANCE.TAXES NO MJNTEMME OF , FERRIERS IN THE FIELDS.VOLUME THE USE OF AERIAL SPRAYING.EIOES NO - ENVIRONMENT) OPEN SPACE,PRIVATE MITES NO OTHER FNYTIEL OPEN®NR RESTRICTIONS Na 2 SHEET INDEX KEY 1'=300'-01 ISSUE RECORD RESERVOIRS CANNOT MARY BE MOVED'CUT OF TIE VARY OF 1E8LFMl4 11.BUILDING PERMITS SHALL BE CETNNFD MICR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ASFPNATE PERMANENT.DEPNSIMEM6PLVlfG SERVICES) Ds. pEVEL6MUVTWIHOUT.TOF AM FRO DREAMER THE FFFICEM[HJVFRY6VNMIOXTOFMDa PEERTWILL BE ROWED FOR EACH SMOTNE PERMIT ME REQUIRED FOR ELTEPROPERTY WISER MALL ALLOW ANY MINERAL OMER OR LESSEE TE FIGHT CF W' NEON IS ESSENTIAL TO FMMINLCHES.L PROPERTY OWNERS AND RESIDENTS CANNOT STRUCTURES SUG AS BUS SHELTERS OR ENTRANCE GATES.(DEPARTMENT OF SWAM INGRESS OR EGRESS FORTE PURPOSE OR ESRORATN DEVELOPMENT,CMRETOL 3 SITE PLAN 1'=100100 R"y'a PEE WATER FROM ED RIO/ON DITCHES.TER. OTTERdS STaOTFESWASBTHEY INSPECTION) RECOPLETON.R-ENTRY.PR:IXCION AM MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED HAVE NI ADUDEATED ROT TO'ME WATE0. 4 WITH EXISTING O R FUTURE OPERATIONS LOCATED ON TIE DAMS.I SALATd6 SITE I'=100'-0' SECTION 354.5402,SEARq CAS. TE THATCE F TIE LTWALaPNAT10NMWLMreE 12 A LL/ REVIEW IS REWIRED FOR EACH BUILDING FORWNN A WILDINGPFAYTE URNIES SALLw1Rr WITH SECTION M3106 TE WELD COUNTY CCM. 5 SITE PLAN 1'=100'-0' FOUND TO BEA PUBLICLO PRIVATEMISANCECTEAGRRTLTDW.OPERATION ALLEGED REWIRED.TO PLANS HEN.TE NCWCEA FLOOR PAIN. REGISTEREDA NG ECT MAY BE (DEPARTMENT OF PINNING SERVICES) roBEA NLIBNRGE EMPLOYS MSTWSORPRACTCFSTINrARE CLNLOMYaR REQUIRED BEAR THE WET SPAM OF A COLORADO 1EGISTEREDAMNER OR 6 SITE PLAN 1'=100'-0' REASONABLY ASSOCIATED WITIADRCATALLL PRODUCTION. ENGNEER(EPARTET OF SUNDAE NBPFLTION Et ADLER ESTATES SP PALL COMPLY WTI SECTQ122ie0 WLDPMENT ELMY CODE AS 12.BUILDINGS SHALL CONFORM TO TIE REQUIREMENTS OF TIE DOLES ADOPTED BY WELD APPLICATION ISIS NOTro WATTTED PI WTTEC TREE UNT (3)O YEARS TIE DATE OF TIE WELD 7 SITE PLAN 1'=100'-0' WELD COUNTYTIESTARBAIAMNRE,A60VERFDUITdS EE'THOUSAND ECH)SO.YIE MIIGN ONMY AT TIE TEE OF PEWIT APPLICATION.CURRENT ADOPTED CODES*CLYDE TE APPROVAL OF TIE PLO ENE DETECT.THE BOND OF COUNTY GIN6&OIERSSHILL 9OfNACEnE8ATE6CEUYAREIWITI MORE THAN OUTSIDE THREEEOf ASA108EVEH RE NTEDNATIOHAL RESIDENTIAL MCC AO INTERNATIONAL BALDER COTE 203 REGIME TM LANDOWNER APPEAL BEFORE TiAND PRESENT EVIDENCE HNDREDC,2MMLES OF STATE AND COUNTY ROADS OUTSIDE OF MMR.NTEB TE 8 COMMUNITY PARK PLANS 1'=40'-0' PROJECT! 0122 SHEER MAGNITUDE 6 11.6 AREA TO BE SERVED STRETCHES AVNABIE PATROLS LWV INTERNATIONAL RICAL CODE:20]NIEOF INTERNATIONAL PLUMING CODE SJE SUBSTANTIATING THAT THE PIDPROJECT IW NOT BEEN ABANDONED NOTHAT TE EKOR6M Ti BVEDax aEHMNBEaro GMPAMSILYELAY 6N MTRIXS6TE NATONAL ELECRICAL CODE MO CHAPMAN 6 TE W:ID GQUmm CODE.DEPMIMET APPJWT P SSESSE TE BOARD A ND MIRY rowMME WITH TEAMATTAL 9 COMMUNITY PARK PLANS 1'=40'-0' DAN .LR COUNTY.AM TIE DISTANCES MICR MIST BE TRAVELED MAY 6uYALNE TECTTO 6BIAAMIISPEGION OF TIE ILO FINAL PLR.TIE BOARD TAW EMEND THE DATE FOE TIE SISMITN6TE DRAWN W REBroYPROII .MONO LAW EHQRECPIA,SMEMNRCIEIR,FIRE.FIRE roISTO PLO FINAL PUN APPLICATION NO MALL ANNUALLY REWIRE THE HONOTTO 10 COMMUNITY PARK PLANS 1'=40'-0' DEOon a USUALLY PROVIDED BY VOlYTFFRBWa MUST LEAVE IC MATTER HOW FNMJFBro 14.EACH RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WILL NOMBRE MPNOCFPFDFDIIAATION BASED ON A DEMONSTRATE THAT TIE PJD HAS NOT BEEN MAM6ED.IF TIE BONO DETERMINES RE9POMroEEP%ENNIDE COUNTYTHE IGRAVEL WOOFSDADe.MMATTEa1ONaFTFNT ROAD SITE-SAECEC GEOEORHGI REPORT ORAN OPEN HOLE INSPECTION PERFORMED BY A TAT CONDITIONS OR STATEMENTS MADE SUPPORTING DE CRONE APPROVAL OF TIE SHOWRE UMRPRON6 TE SATE ONO OF SURFACE EONVTSO FRMAPAVED ROAD. COLORADO REGISTERED ENGINEER_ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS MAU.BE DESIGNED BY PD ZONE OSTRCT HAVE OMNGED OR THAT TIEAIDOWIER CANNOT IMREIENT TIE 11 COMMUNITY PARK PLANS 1'=40'-0' SHOW REMOVAL PNORIIES EE-AXTMTIGADBFMM WBOVNON9.NE6TELONFB! COLORADO REGISTERED ENGNEER DEPMMENT OF EUROPE ISPELIIO) PLO FETAL PLAN,TE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSTHE IONERS MAY,ATA PRLC HEARING SHEET INFO. PRIORITY FOR RBLICR ES OR PAY BE TE PIVATEPEEWILLLOT BE OF TE REVOKE THE TIE OR OSm lE GIST 0Ea RECORDED PwzOM DISTRICT 12 COMMUNITY PARK PLANS 1'=40'-0' ICIEQWERS.SERVICES N RURAL TEAS NMWYwES WILL NOT EOJNNENLro tB euWNC.1EGHr MALL BE MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZOO NIERMTOH4 REVERIEDronEOWCi1NLLmM DISTRICT.DEPMMENT6PAXNXI:MBIVICE6) MUNICIPAL SERVICES.RURAL DWELLERS MET,BY MIESST',BE MOE SEAL NL HEBULIGHT FOR VARIOUS ON LEEES TYE PURPOSE PES CONSTRUCTION NC TO 5D.WELD COUNTY,EMT TO FARM.AS ON THE PAT.SHALL BE RECOGNIZED DEMESNES THE MAXIMUM BOSOM MEMO 13 COMMUNITY PARK PLANS 1'=40'-0' COVER TM"U'I°A"°WFElERB COMPLIANCE MTH TE WAX REQUIREMENTS FROM OAPTERM O THE WELD CO TMEs 14 COMMUNITY PARK PLANS 1'=40'-0' CODE BUILDING EIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED N ACCORDANCE WTI°WEER 23 MINE SHEET PEOPLE ARE REPOSED 10 DIffERENT WARDS UNTIE COL//1Y TI/WI WIN.LSENI OR WELD COUNTY CODE N ORDER TO DETERMINE COMILIM E WITH ND SETBACKLA OFFSET BACK 31.THE COTTER T AMER ESTATES SITE S SHALLOW GROUNDWATER NO BASEMENTS SUBURBAN SETTING.FARM EQUIPMENT AM OLiELDEWRNEM,RODS NO NEOIIPEVENTB OFFSET MO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS APE IEAMIL®FROM TIE Na NOT RECOMMENDED BYTE GEOTEONECAL MNEATTAT10H PREMED BY TETRAGON15 STREET SECTIONS 1'=10'-0' IRWATION DIMES,EUFCTOGL POWER FOR NMPe NC CENTER PIVOT TTCAE. TARTEST PROJECTION FROM TIE BUILDING.M D ILC PROVEIENT LOT CERTIFICATE) N TI E A NOTED R3ERSVL LETTER DATED MAY It A TI E BY COLORADO GEOLOGIC WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH HIGH SPEED TOMO,SAND ARAB PNCTIRE VIES,TEFNTOML RANI DOGS AND ACCORDING TO 23 orUIi1REWELD COMITY LENG SHOWING DO ABUILDING EUMM TTIE ENO ' 16 BUILDING SETBACK EXHIBIT AS NOTED SHEET M1� UVES106AM OPEN BURNING PRESENT REAL THREATS.GNWOLUNG DEONION SETBACK DISTANCES TO PROPERTY LEES.A ILG BEARING THE STRAP OF A COLORADO THEFAREBERMPOIINNT,Nm ONLY FOLTMAONSIBL BUT NBOnEPM1EC1(M6 REGISTERED ENGINEER OR 114E CERTIFICATION OF A wlOUG REGISTERED MNNNLR 17 BUILDING SETBACK EXHIBK NOTED 1 of 17 TE FARMERS UVES000.PARENTS Na RESPONSIBLE FOR TIER CHILDREN MELEE REQUIRED PRIOR TONE ERNE INSPECTION(DEPARTMENT CIF BUILDING INSPECTION MD EAM ES TWOS) V1 3� DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY F LI H •�• _ 1 — % - ADLER ESTATES E • RE ,...,....--\\.:2--..-&-.-..---__. ,� 7,.: .L Phase s ;�pz 1"� aim c>!, II emu.. AwE�wE T i 1.l f ^� +,,,� 7V��//C��®��I x , % IrG� r1� ��1 + , .�,, ,� l NOTE:1 ? d � m„�r . . 1" } tw rwMin.ANrewulsm�r �an,� , ♦� 1 1NE ww MuvnxDs ! ii roaDlrwT�'� '� "'. �� J � �� III4 PREWNNNtY LdlOlilIXl4 CF ROl1YAY. .�xl M•,s,.1 s t a ' 1♦� ucmu ADxD Dweauwwv�naN roBER1 I LLAY 'IA �/_ IIE CFPMiMFNFF Pl1&1L 1, ■ •'!1 �/, 131]l Aar 1m•1 I� num1�\I1 i;'�® _►� f 3W Phase I■• 97 • ��•.r^ �A�A �I I Lie u� ecrex,L •a�.+l IMII 1 1 �r ' �� I__, 1•( ` m�F�N10.Ytl 113Px1wl 1 +nmw� m mex APPLICANT/CLIENT Lill / 1 k. `ZV Z:'Y� -� �T to 5W FwIIY DMtl.1 aIx 1wl 10.mAv� m A'LM MELODY HOMES,INC ��I I / Y� ✓fi 331 �� 9Yy�Fn�D.r�.efrsxu0 i.m� m twx AOELAWAFtECOIiPOflATKKI �II 3) � .— �� VI3 �� IqL l P*MW*Y 1].Aib� °iB/A MELODY$OE/UES li .• - G 4' ■ m A-_ A � �,, A awFtiralra..um em+A� 1m lax ++ml mm Q �). i a41FIl fi#.may,. ad 1•r, I;CAVAN'Y �1 ' �7Ui� \\� � 10 �iYi"` aF£� q ��I®I -�1 �_ �� I � 111 Ili �f - SE Phase rne�muen+m+ N® nrr'1 I ! Z . J \ �� ADPF_MiE Squib xaPmn z Fa msasxm 'I� tL�'• •+ � � 9 IE99®i �� Mid; rl� w�� CHr..r .s11` �� ' mq.Fla*Dm.11mxl00) ssA� tm mmc r coNsu�TANr 1 3_ Fn,Y 1 /w'-\ �_...- � i •� 11'! sips F.r.Yom.a lID•x+or1 1nnr� 04 Cin ))F „f�/ ..v1�i t""� raiaii00 ®in ai II 1yIi.R'Ar- `` [ E'�VC;'' M\;vl, "`�• wV�Fm.lr D.m.elwx++vl 1+.mw� s 1¢ te�oos suNB s�rxiCt til _ qA`S p,a r'� ■ ■ 10® �� II aft�� ({([- �1 (1��VA ow sPA• rWmawn xs,m.. Flo�mmmam „y„il ` RIICI�I'I,GIO^a� 1 1� ,# ��x a / 9E Flux iml•bitFw ftt.ta•b� m tm% F¢]@6ESm5Y lingo , �� moo- 1 ��\\ ��)\1� 3. G .r IIOI �� I I I acid rr �1„�{�u:f, �� ,: -"+�,,/ �� [� (I libel �� I� me�j COMMUNITY SUMMARY 5 i a � �I�IiII 1\t%1� 1►�Ir II��VI= �D. .alra xaPmn J ,', d3°%,�� ,►11�r�� ! I I'='J �.;� ;��w rhn/i_ .L�►�il� '" _"n.'_"Rz,� w" x n: LLI _i// ff - s Mi9b F�nilyD F Pow_ __ sings Fasy DNW.C(Tx110) mmAo� 1m +mx O �� t_1� p awrYmms 1047 Arm �1. ^� ✓�� R fl rw �n �� !!^• f w.�w�m�w..er+l mmb.. I- �.�� \� ,� Rasa vv., TB IM i .01 �^ 7 �� ao /O 1�5� i7� 111 Ij\ �� ,` .® ®la to Sa : lid ' r I Tom ra.luwlo.+� 'arm. w 3s Dulxc l Ill le'^14\ 1� �,I/�/GAy/E,�uw �I �,� %11 � ��, W Z A e X11 0�1 :, -- I e'. =s .� tu�14� ;•m r �■oAv�v� ,I�ill' ♦�� 7� I� E� �� / / H N 1. \�ilq xe `` �[�fJM�1 nt 1� I�, �_1&t$ ��a1�e}₹g rs� Z �.L \i, - \ \� � a4, i1F-I�Ir�IS:Sp,ili�lal�ra l�l I F}-1 l�I\\ ,S s --t i /F W O 0 i �� ''n.v .g yiIl'1111w vA A � 1 W �p a. 1 tills. V �t� � e3 111► !!.AV Au? If �1��1,� �1�� \ 0--I. diDc ail1\\C Rea1rr.7��►s, l � �1�.�74 AL 'd_� tNcJ� r.14( mSSUERECORD tilME ` 8: fix!+ +�.� 1 n 7- ��Y3�'3 d� �.%� ' wmenr- ]D '%, I IIk� * r e P r �� S A �? `401 1�� Tt�� '� 1 Y PROMO, OrZt ITE PLAN 1 �'Y,ts� I �i t Z / sX= �s...:� [ _ "�'L1 I 1 �� / EET5 �\ Y 'add!!! ,Id III1�� / A �'� A� _ ,\ caeca .u1 SHEET INFO. SHEET INDEX KEY SHEET INDEX PLAN 0 300 °°° 9°°im_ri iiFILING PLAN 0 80D 1800 2400 SHEET ruMmn Graphic scale: 1••=3OO• NORTH Graphic stela: 1.=eoo• NORTH 2 of 17 H WCPA MEDIAN i 14 r CONCRETE TRML MATERIALS LEGEND U; If LANDSCAPE BUFFER i 'CONC.TRAIL wPAN AND BERME -•-'- PROPERTY UNE • SHADE STRUCTURE .y E W REQUIRED EY WATA STANDARDS) r ' OF WAYH ii r CRUSHER ME RWL ENLARGEMENT'A' PRIVACY PENCE TRASH RECEPTACLE � r SNE � --- BENCH - - N� _ _ _ _— - -' CONCRETE TRAIL PICNIC TABLE ^�i n _ �^ �`�` � ' x '/ UTILITY EASEMENT LOT PLAY -J v.ww..wEai _ -. C# S G -- - --- --- -�� _1BS-----s- -. i rSJ CRUSHER FINE TRAIL -- --- --irmi, n in .h`�V'-•" 4 Rte' �L�. X \ O STRUCTURE \\ � ` w a''Yaaa aw — ► {a �� '� `� � � m CROSSWALK WITH SWINGS B— , \ \' 't i�' _ ....:::: :.:::::::.?::::;;..6,01176�1i1 t,. — ~ 1�\� uulniuu PRIVACY FENCE !III r c. LANDSCAPE BERM \„\\\\\,\\, t �� V I�� V rru: - ., � � Z. "__"_.- OPEN RAIL FENCE '} i %E2 • •• FE • 4¢i t . 7.— y _ -- - '�maim flp r .F' �� ': a ti•. uENr e .,` i PLANT LEGEND�•�L ��f oren:, SYMBOL TYPE OF PIANi PLANT SPECIES SELECTIONNORRERN ED OAK'IiIOLONOONPWIETREEIr �� Ifl GLENtEVEN IlDENWESawn li� .. iiyri1 I:I • Jlil ee O O A 1 !) A UNOERSlO� ACERGRISEUM GWPINV NY1IN APERBARK MAPLE at . •• In s. _,. O e % ® tt 19 Ni;1 � MAUISNXPReIG SNOW\ . e ® 9`—I ...'lil/,� / ....N � \-. � \ LaNO Swrir.mOBN \ 1 c I [ x " 16 _ E. !:' O / amaewe,HuxeERrr RED BARBERRY ;� \\\\„\L'�, `ii I. e ilel Irw. g\ o DECIDUOUS •ATROR1RiREA• `� n„j i ` �'i\ O e O O[O�p9 O O O iii O i1 SHRUBS wNaxwAGusoLMM aREarlrvIAPE Hour 03-015.095. '5,v 5V VAS e: II • a 1i ,�7�' ,,, \ O aaysarw,MNus,VAR DWARF nAsenemmN L` „,4 ! i aF 3 — 131 a VIII Ili3 O v i �`\\,\\.:1 \ii , si _ 11 S e •• A� b'1\\ 0� .� , ' O EVERGREEN AWl PHEl8A MEDIA eNo�aMoax cOM'i °°RTZE tJUN Et t NA 3 e 'I'I e A • 7 SHRUBS PRUERAN COAPAcrCO $11\- \VAoi3�.i i ,t+pR Ria fi Ia �"�yi �r�...i�'Ce _ '�:'TT`\�� A:1 �': Nuxuunww MOUNTAIN LAUREL tj �..„ IA :,0 O t I� a O O e ,b` � qy. � � s°Dlms w Q I \ t \\A! ..� rill) �' " - Aft) i rHTrvE "\ \\ tikt 0 ; \ai la.r)----.°1 }� III, �:. p H .I, \�\\ 7 \ a W._ O a e 5 7 s � v �( ��\\ �`� 4 \Y\`Qu� O 7� ,,i .O �Sa.•i �: . ,: �� a �. I rmxua:iE TRw is ' I I LMOerAPE BEiERw H O S �' �S4� I` It '' r G �, ¢1 O .O [ .�S `1e��e� II SeawunvLwmG J J -1 + Y \ ! �� O . � A. IXwil,sL�TBR r 1 Y O � PwPAcr FBA O .t l� E4' Is:/!_i� t e;. a I'i •a ,' II I�' w 1 i tha t 1 I_ lO l �0 � �; ' EN R�EM O � �. i II 1 P"r""caNCETE ' U Z Iq I T, 41 it\ vv Se k ° i e " e e - �i. O 1 flitfl*di 'I ` \� k �. a �a eJ�e6. ',I o e�o o a o �� e _ ill WOWS #0% I— r O. \ JulD (UNRRMATFD) LL Z LL Ai \ \ \ �a �_, ela riggo �� I rE O II , i y` i a T ir'� fi%v l0 a 07/O o e� O O d� 4 e ( wosuPE PIANwO 1di i I 4 \ , , dam. vie r`-'' Blbr - .. O • P �' ��jll.a Eesrsaue aeemN ow �l/fI//ti 1�a, `\‘ �8"tf ° - f+ a O lit U r r - ,• / ash, - ,� = PaE- T. a�.� it J C� i ..�, ,' u� . ® �IIM 31.1° t/;:,t5;,,,-V II. uwrweEMEuw Q J Q 'Ii y H\ ashZ' ' gip'- 5-4,t Say •�a'n -. eli. I;y KEEN.,- . ,' ! II aoswewceNnPNS > C�\AA A�., N �1-•� 4 y kra p -"- ` 4tt vo e� a O Pe ': e e O O •41, iL O m O ovi 1.�r.m"fw fi ,i LxnsaeEw�mxe \ , �, WILT VAS, lI, a r.etN�ii¢ .` . . \t i I , , ISSUE CORD \i\\\l 'i x11‘,5* - O O o e e p e e e 7 t to' 0 c, p I� r_ uses_T ' frTM+ Been Ia e. \VIAVv k a,xr .;,, _, �.0 l i \ \ \ O e0 t \i � r 'Y ?4� 0V1i v .. S I>. NP e \ l I;ir. NarE �\ ., � a� t ►' A Nn PARµ18NGFRMLM SKETCHED ON � \ Y.1P 0' ' 0 h ( TIEPUNauNw.Sero Nw al i� 1 0` w p O O PREUMwunmalmw aPRiYnwAr. , :, • L i renLURaAOCOnFwwav1axmSE t‘..,....,,,\\ k'1 i }` . fir, .I ' n r/. I Prill_ ; Erne OPSArnrvnaFv,as fl\N - S , 'Y < • y4 'e,• �� i�11 O ,e �Y► 0 1 OAj d N' , NgrvElu.aewTEolPROJECT. 03122 AR \4I I �< t '�.. r It, 0 44 .. ill'', OR,.nt LE, I 1 `�:. I ti. N -� �C.`:'. •....' :. l ill : '/ O Q' n a<aon AA I' {! :�F: u^' 'WS aFtoe l« a :Ill I.. I� e1 /_e a®� I f4 of\, ia��if I e0igE il l tia i SHEET INFO. SEE SHEEt1I ,. F. , -€�r`T.�(an\wp,--�'Ql� ,' I_ ril 1pis®�irnI. \,IO i ,'� � .:r2 P, IU.• I/ I': �. ... 9K:. '°�° �1. 'a,1' o -� , , . v . `R°L d, Via. SITE PLAN PLAN ENLARGEMENT ° 100 200 300 fl �� SHEET NNam Graphic Scale: t'- TOO' NORTH 3 of 17 Z a_.t .t,a.... .: e _ q MATERIALS LEGEND V f,e � tw Itl � ta 1 f6 0 / / , =maw ., ,7 I; I -:-.EX-,..ea-� - l � / h 1. �• PROPERTY LINE SHADE STRUCTURE e5t �c9,.ts` i i i Ol; O O r F' t •• ii 5 ETa 1 _ ( O !�.:::.: ;: D E-S 3 RIGHT OF WAY • TRASH RECEPTACLE ■ R .C �„ aroma �}, a = .r I�i H. Fall kBENCH Li! •wirtIllaingI PICNIC TABLE I J\ CRUSHERFINE TRA L O TOT LOT PLAY STRUCTURE �. \\ 0. %� ': aWewFn 1 �� „�„a,p,. _ % / A Ilk. MIA j �i �L IIIIIIIIIIIIIII CROSSWN.K WITH SWINGS €�� I l k 1 • / �_ ® YS`J.. O.. O O S O a O O al O O O�\\� O O O O I° > , 4 I, ___ PRIVACY FENCE V LANDSCAPE BERM L— t\e •try LI 1I O O O ! �� 11►�sit � ° ° .• (I i, OPECRAILFENCE �_ �� OI PRECAST CONCRETE FENCE , I , . .- �'.i J � i...n 'v.y 'Y J �'.:-.'� •Y �.. ' APPLICNfi�Cl1E1R ,. .77�[[�$! I °1 , ;a A' I . � ' r 4,,; vst„ i 4 ?, e I I PLANT LEGEND , ( I t ? ) �- 4 a•f� Y+. y +.•er l[ k^ II ° ° MELODY HOMES,INC i 1 i k rf y. 3 ,. 1 • J . / ( �`S .<a ''s ` !s',D Fes`R h °, I SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLANT SPECIES SELECTION A DELAWARE CORPORATION r O / �{ 1 # ,z . a i '.� fi .4''v 3•. t �u,.� ° �`' q�. D/BIA DR.HamaN- ' °I / \� /l� /° >t:J'� l 1 y , j x , >r` . .'" � •Y 1.y I ._ A �I {S •'4_ O DECIDUOUS WERMJS XACE - NORTHER RED WK MELODY BERIES OPEtl �� ••11��`` F S ;� �� ° I..'�flt� ^ S_.\,�F k� 'r ¢•1''J'' t) I + H 4 'u9•,.I I I - C{� tI:I ' CANOPY TREE sump. 'Y/ PP MTAMIS X ADFRPCUA LONDON WANE TREE Itmt MlWDAN KIND.ME,},,! J / ' ! C it Y TBM CORDATA'ILFMEVEN cLENLEVFNIRUCE r ,...„%, �, / a 0/°� ° \ SI B ♦t • r-A'. r i •'v,y}1, '� ,/� - 1 ® EVERGREEN RCFJ RJSTANB COLORADO SPR{M,E R"�m �� / I ° aY Tati > i1 J '�''' Y .1 { TREE PNUSAWB+ATA FNRAL PBE / i , ' 'I r / ° \ • �' J' k .4 I i ! - PNIa POrIpEROSA PONDEROSA ,, ! i' !!! / l } t,-5• O CONSULTANT I ((( /@� / / •/ .'i t } F ' �" ^T;r vw , r.� I � l ® am annNus cumLrrwwPLE HOPAPERBARK RNBEAM.ve TETRA TECH(w+D a r' O I /° ia4 a I" ». < .3 :59, a-0' °P n�E ,aoosaureerera �l f / ° I l�j I �� f M < j. �� J .iF} 4. ° ill LMLUB['SPRING SNOW SAaNG SNOW CRABAPPLE MPIE Is f f (F _ / ;� , O � >< Rr •c mar 7E + y< ,k,5F-S d +< i I �- BERBER STMA9ERGI RED BARBERRY LOHGMONI.COIOem ff �I �� i �� .Y fi`^'T'Y.r�.e. •, F {' �v�. ',�/ A / II F O DECIDUOUS 'ATImPIRUIiEA• PIv�mTrz� > r ,a' 4 r 1' �.• r F a' .tom a- O 0 O ° 0 t I ra wasemm to ' 1 f "' C \ Y L X t N- J \ I SHRUBS MANOLNMAMnnv OREGON GRAPE HOLLY ) 3r Ifl o! `I° fr ,fk C_ 2 a1~ '!.,;>: • ry▪ r^�•r5 i �`r', ••,OPEN ILLL I, .` OWYS0THPERUS SAO VAS DWARF RARBTBMSI fit! " ( 11 (a^ RT'' �%O I� .* Yr f'• S':k,g .i "s' 5. K ,0"` S3 O�;4,R� O E�nar�� .yiuMum ex�ilE cw� va�w•r vPlrrOOR�.unrEn / 5fk Itt I (1 �O Vto .1- n Ik fr 1I'S:+Z^-,i ,a /� 7 � t. slmJes scrtgnr,HncwPAcr I//vim J /� a It 1, , tp. OA ', d, }stn • ` i", ri• 't. �yt& Rre I Allni �S �I� wAtrM urRUMMGurrtuwDunaJ/ II7 } III \ 0li o\ 'O `4 ,Pc.�. .41 `'• ,j,` x .:!�r";�. --�I ` L` `� � 9 �I Q slnlTtRF W (( t1 V \\•,\ I i� A q 5 r.e• Y r'. .`4 i`'Y "• ,t 1��_ -,. .a I' "` L / O \ \ Qr . ., . 0 mtQ a n`9EN.= Rcctol 1t� , I Q NATNEPRARIE 1 O a HH C _ ��, 1 „0\ v ✓ an KEW s e Kafs c.i 1v ,° 00 Yips c6SE®a'+HNnva�'Sa+ 1 i./, O, • C�� 'R6ya�. ��__..-f :C I y _ fon. � -a., ! I tI, , , CO r; 1°1 \\I'll\t' \Ili' 'Zit/ , ,k1 ii..:^ SiGkanZWPWEISTRWIffyrS8WASJ \311.:`$ °` \ \'°� . j , t O� lJ��— _ 0'. �Od -� ',mtll 'Z;.};:: Inky MI>E meals BENDY.) _ O C® O 0 r! ® ORPSIENTAL TREE! U) "•O - 7 I� Fr':c Z LL 1 � 1. tv , @t,�; � �I \ �. s ( /0/O . O O � O 0 L00 �� N � Nj LL ° ' lino Miii Imo•' ►°Bay 0 a ", ,, :.AA \ O it OEN a ��.:sll att vVA � � O 0 O a wZ ` 2-3 y0 A ‘..14,0 O ( i /' If5 yIAW , A�_ b �l A ° 17Nil � •r ei �I- �� vunmrAPE MEDIAN ISSUE RECORD sar� - Bet IME2001\\,\\ ' I 1 , �� tt " T1S, O��\° O A " 0 ' � 1 °I �� r - weMewA o \\l'`"\ \ t iv y,;, •w \\C PP \r0 % O Q+® r'9 �4 0 V—� O O l --j r�`I� 10:' .mxoc,E,wx 1\\\k,\\\\� I J '� -- ly�� isik1� F \> I �' ,j d lrA�"{ mPi t 1t ;; ♦ \ \J d -.4.........„-. ___--..... .4, {(-7,-,V 0th,w'ee - °--cd,\ 0 ' A NOTE: ' I I IAt' I ` V.� 0 A /� 1 (' �Q y® A , p REPWIOMMMOBTO MwuaIEmEO al Nara NM 1 c v a o. \ a . �� ` t 1 ! '� e�l O Oi O \ 1 1 1 1 Y I � Pr�uaram'aronbxsvr roNND.wr. eNemms LAI u \� \\"� O O _ ACIwLrow mrRwwTwNro BE DPRent a :f Maa %Islat �§ APPROVED rent BEPPIRIMNT OF RRRIC i } V to NN:::: i"�� -. V q O E a I/ t�.�V �' , r .��t0 0� 1 11 i � � a II( �( 1 ® 0 V t1,, tI 0 7 4 .;.� / \ r� T �� 0\ IR. aIIi l H I�� . 4 � ' ` tt...?t:, t.. J 1i1,, A + . . :: SITE PLAN PLAN ENLARGEMENT G IDD 2W DDD a SHEET NUMBER Graphic Scale: 1'= 100' NORTH 4of17 LAI LE. N MATERIALS LEGEND U Ell --- PROPERTY LINE • SHADE STRUCTURE B B RIGHT OF WAY • RTRASH RECEPTACLE OS-I !• �3 '`-r` \'\9� :"'•` ..� t r u' al ——— UTILITY EASEMENT - BENCH I C _ -'A CONCRETE TRNL O PICNIC TABLE • /F iiD� . t/ O E O , . , a • O O TOT LOT PLAY II ,� �/ F�,it, t` 'vtaw DM , y 4 O'/ CRUSHER FINE TRAIL STRUCTURE ��: ��in 1 t..''I`` I ' am.` v la -.i '-';'-':.,,, •..-...-• IIIIIIIIIIIIIII CROSSWALK WITH SWINGS �� '1�'• # •••,...,, ,4„,, �. , a I ,Lis. .2311 o ' ,II E • ____ EEF $. _ _ acE Iii � \ "" G. al �►�b . I 10 ' ) •, lII I)I! A , . / a 4 AwlxwNccOENr .�� id a ^� I I ,i o - yg �� PLANT LEGEND MELODY HOES.NC �,, �� 1 ?` �I ice �� Q I �� t' 'I'M �]` y ..' SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLANT SPECIES SELECTION •DELAWARE CORPORATION f Ado IIL I l i 411 � :'F I rte. "- ole�e O.reHOmoN- COSMO '\ ` '1 $ �� ( i ) 11 _ � \ O DECIDUOUS OUERCUS meta ACERFOUA NCRRERN RED OAK MELODY sexes } • + +\ 1\:\,..31_04.1740) \ l0 OBE ' � la / \ CI �� } yfNur O CANOPY TREE c ANUS xrx vF.Mli t�EN r+ vE uLONDON w .E „o,wE1 SNIERIOANaVD. ITEA N �• , .y�. • ( Irk - e.E Ex PLEA wxENs ca omlDo srRucE \ � ��1 �� Ft �t\ � �� I O .:f If11H3 �� ( �I � : f Oi r ��" Po x rorNE ,� rte.�o...,o. I \\ Iii e/ ; I f7 �1 ! 1.. I OBI. p_ OWMMENTAL S�RfAL4ElIM PMEHSMKWWE CONSULTANT V A \ IIJM1 , I'� i f' ry V: 1' t ' r 1 ® uroexsram cruawus�•oa Nur� ,v.Enxu� :w rErnA rEp�,mAc \� ii . , AA I*. � /�f/, e ',\ l�" I I�l I �� I \ try ,®nswee,>: E: ` .- �� — lag�� \� p ' I III ' .IDjOj®/ I O O wwa�aru�c aNar arux3 aiwvvuau aure,r /419.:,41, �lj �" .tq 9 IhYI J �!A O O O 1 a, .�,._ i ,&.. - BERBERS.11111NBERGII RED BARBERRY LaNGMONT,m MEo, i. 1( 1�� , , ., -\ ` M p' - fit. • li BERME MNiONNADUIFODUM OREGON GR PE HOLLY Net mYl3dilt L ��• =>t-0T ATIDII I ✓'l IL Ir O DECIW0118 'ATROPlIW1EX Fv:>mNsmv j , f �`� � I _ CIRYSOONLINS.VAR DWARF RAIMNBRUSH �, y� '�. . jZ`C�O I IL O (6 51! .ARIPERVS SAMNA IIRONM00R BRa.DMOOR JUNIPER J HR' ,:;: ` I ( {1 f d ' QIMMaTNN O EVERGREEN JUNPERI9xMEDM COMPACT PFIi�RxNPER w � _ l��l �� - 7. LAUREL • ipµ( f f zf i' 1 ; I is f~\ E \\ `6En r,-•qr~-..„,ear ( , 1 �� eIlir •a SOOIms J , I jI iI Q(` ''• `.SD ''1 r`�- i�ii±i.,.. ` I1I :. O xATNE muaE I. 0 4.14 ri IT 0 :7*..-T. .J.e. AT, lest ' .. i'l'illril IS . -,skso g,1,•ti -twee '"\\NN,N,,,,N, , \ '' ' -; , ,- .:::r..:i..!.%.*". ..::.:::::.::. ke t‘..,..../ ��`\ � ., 1::x;::5 r a � :?� II�_: O o .� . s III O W �� +� t '»: �:� :. y,, ,� 1111 U �tVA � O. / O1.: O ' O Z '` `S \ \ v , } to �'ii i �, O J '' I \1k\,\\ f\\ "� - 7,O / mi.ISSUE RECORD VI \�` 6una c i�. /�, ! _ussI Y10O\1O ,' A A\��1� S ^+``. ''-� ��`(' { 1 L wwe,� Uuat'� � ' i � , I III 11\If?VA A Ls s 4 +t"w1 ti joi:I �'• Z��\�t O� I� .t�` I , Act, Z ".i O • r I) I ,, A \•\ omOrt AA � \ �V . ''''\ V l 'V• NaJECTt m,a r AEI\ `O 1 �., ._, 4 .I,� of . — cflEour \] { l • I ,� ^I ,( I ( t i /1 Ly 3i}!q y"� , ?:,'.-:1,-,:•.,:, U S' -� SHEET INFO. I •` \ ` t l�if ItisS 9 i�13 � I ..1::i:-,-...1.!;, `Lf. . --7*,. -7 .J' ,*�` Y . ._�ti.,�� ,t �L` II .‘: `:..:, ` '. SITE PLAN PLAN ENLARGEMENT 0 00 2°° '°° SW RIMFIi 5 of 17 Graphic Scale: 1'- Too• NORTH PARLIELARIFALL NOTE 1N PNLWIIMIES TO WfETE ON //.l E THE n,NORAvawicro T ]CLI-`I, iIII'I CROSSING CROSSWALK STRIPING avx Rre nut APPRUAL OVEAD D DEPARTMENT r MATERIALS LEGEND U Er .•CONCRETE RAL LANSCAPE.FFERW pygmy/ma PROPERTY SHADE STRUCTURE -,---,7-_• � � q��® — _\ ' ti t _ eEiwr-� ��!!'!!�I_��EwsaExr lissome- ..„...C.- _.__ RIGHT OF WAYS • TRASH_• BENCH RECEPTACLE ileI @tea a.-�A __a � -.. - --- CONCRETE TRAIL PICNIC TABLE 1-r'.� • - " r illdEaao;•:' r iii :: .� [ f r'�,., amxo.remvL CRUSHER FINE TRAILOTOTLSTRUCTUREY _t9 If... :::...::.. Ndtia4..::.� WITH SWINGS ra. 4: . .. :::::.:.:. : :: � IIIIII,IIIIIIII CROSSWALK Lie BF_RM !I-1 I 8 -y ..; .-ve O �eO O 1\Ore �Or ' .�—�,. OPEN RAIL FENCEDSCAPE ,-,.1::::::1 1 S • �� / mown \ \-:Ii*: � �- - e . �... _. ° `r PRECAST CONCRETE FENCE �� j �� oltooee ISHO4411141111100)/� �o APPL CANT CL ENT a �� ° PLANT LEGEND MELOOY HOMES.INC O SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLANT SPECIES SELECTION w DELAWARE CORPORATION :,. II e ° I o/R/A 08MORTON- 1 O // • �� O y � �O Q �' 5 O DECIDUOUS rmEE �auExcus wlBRA nrouA NORTHERN m�`EE ,+mELOOY o.x.w. ,��0, As IP / 4;LOX) 9�i vi v �O P nwcoxoArAnErAEVEFr o�uEVExuIOEN wREA \ 11O i. e O O O, o t , . L EVERCREFT PRannPUNOEE caoRAoosPRucE COMM TREE MRCS APoSTATA FOXTAL PINE Fix 900-1.xrw TREE O /� .wP..ORaE I� ` O. 91 ® PROS PONOFAQRA PONDEROSA FINE CONSULTANT 1 O( o • O O O O ��O O IO a, ;0 O O O O raMENTA ArFa arsauA PAPERRA KNAPE TETRA EON/RNc ![. O e (e O e O tit Piwwcv FEr� ® aw INusIMAMS x sPw SNOW > iDlowrnAMERICAN `�wrne 1900 a SUNSETE T STREET ° �°� �° O S9gp IO \Ar �aPEM\ FEN>: eEnmas iNl.oFx<aI xEo w+eENxr �axcwxcm.Sn1 �.. }...•• ° ° Z �� °� ' \v \ a SHRUBS 118 'ATROPLIUIER �Qm�.` ::> :: •O °O /�� O e 1 O . �� -i '.an,.IERnEsNRuss .wYSOTHA NUS, A aECONORAPENOur• ' .� arhsoTluKuls.vua owAIS RAERRBRURN OeO ; ` \ auNPEnua sARNu,eRu nEaar EROAOMOORARIE4R O70/0 / e ':lir /ate• (.8 ?� JUNIPERUS_PRTZERANA COMPACT PFRffit JUNIPER 14 �O 1 ;Ili: `�",�4I. e \ IwulA unPauA walNruN uuREEv' °. o o E' �\ A»oP�aR.. �I �RF �j,� Qt li o�.e ° I � �+� . o .,.mil --\____,N. I N„ P O t t ,.. Ho s3 ent �:.... �f;$ ` ° ` ::r.: O' a ��o e� g ale ie e, ,,, i . Ili k rm. ° o �� . . ,t...tailor . (n o `�t. 4 Miss . I I f w . a OMS-9&iiii ILINIA - C.,t1,..-''' -i.,, ,_ Z u_ \ I . ? ISI MILIIma--- 0, la . ,S,:.::.1%. 4_,..1.:Jr•ae.‘ *WA \-46111 srl \ W op O i 0 i Aelp, arilirt. le ,.- irsersAl'A"'lAi.1 zraslaik.,‘'� 1 OIhimm I Wale a `o IO 1 O O�� _it k1 f' w Q .;+ (I� OJv+OZIIJ LOTippri � �r Jr.,- �'qc�-p,lyE-'Me es s4e4 �� - 1$ raini� e e 9.4 e 8 -, �� a;:s , s,.. ISSUE RECORD . �v��ecA.w� iN.� .rb it ilj � p Y � ' swumnerd �,_ �m solo ot . friar ' ' S Hi j6 t 3:;:": I legfri lillitinnr, Ar" -rdelee ' . ael 4 id1, Orr r �I ° O cm! ( 2 y FFiObfn e,'R7��' e O e\ o.:1:1! . _ J1 t + , !ISI EM ii,' s . r-. 3 - �, tirli- : I DESIGN NCTA mew O O �gaT$\ O• - awnsw.14 II � JUI 1 E "�` �igkr J SHEET INFO. (` s !ill..}� i: . I I •, 'v � 0 ' 7" S SEE SHEET�„„,� 4 lI�` �.,_ \ BL.. ' ° SITE PLAN PLAN ENLARGEMENT 0 10O 200 '°D fla , ,a Graphic Scale: 1"=100' NORTH 6 of 17 VI € Ili fa MATERIALS LEGEND U I ;r --- PROPERTY LINE • SHADE STRUCTURE Ryl RIGHT OF WAY • TRASH RECEPTACLE 11' � C UTILITY EASEMENT - BENCH * CONCRETE TRAIL 0 PICNIC TABLE Li _J r CRUSHER FINE TRAIL O TOT LOT PLAY g y' STRUCTURE 3_7 111111111111111 CROSSWALK WITH SWINGS Al J -.--�- PRIVACY FENCE V LANDSCAPE BERM t_, OPEN RAIL FENCE ' fl .- PRECAST CONCRETE FENCE PLANT LEGEND APP`S CDE T MELODY HOMES,'KG SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLANT SPECIES SELECTION A DELAWARE CORPORATION O Di BELD.R EKES - DECIDUOUS nRP^Ue X AcE NORTHERN RED OAN B/A D.RDEPES CANOPY TREE RATANUS ACEAFOLM LONDON RAIVE TREE ttat SHERGN MW. TLIA CORDATA SLENLEVEMM GLENLEVEN LEN au ER. WEsrMNSITE CO® ® EVERGREIII PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPRUCE Taw W3461831 TREE PRLIS ANSTATA FOXTAL PINE Fat 303-00.7624 RHOS PONSEROSA PONDEROSA PINE CONSULTANT ® ORNAMENTAL ACER GREELM PAPEREAI(MARE LUGEJTBTORY CPINUS r. PUNA AAEHGIN HORNBEAM TETRA TECH/SI Pn NOTE: TREE MALUS x EPPING SNOW SPIVS SION CRABAPPLE IRE S.SsJJNSEFSWEET ,M PAIULLB ARTERIL®9ETC ED ON LOHGMIM.CO E0501 TIE RAN[Raman TO INDICATE BERBER'S TNUNBERGI RED BARBEFPY PIv7oa.a 8EE PELIMNMM'CONDITIONS OF NDWPAY. 0 sinsDECIDUOUS 'ATItCPLA AaEA' Fix]¢/MyAPA ALTIWL RIM COIEXMLATIDNTo BE SIRUBS MMIONM AOUFOJIIM OREGON GRAPE ICILY APPROVED BY OE OEPARRENT O PRIG CHtYSOOMMNUS,VAR DWARF RABINTERUR1 WORKS. I,} � • i �''' J - 'l i JUNIPERUS SABINA ERADMOOR BRWDMOORTZERAR V 0 EVERGREEN JUHPERUS X MEDIA COMPACT PFRZERMIPER �' 1:::••.....— =' 3 -sp. a 4 i1 :� • O p '. _$8 } PRUES PFITZCAIPACT IMAMERANAC LTawuIN LAUREL 1 II t PRA .. .. ,� n3 • L „ 0 r f._. SW/TLEF J • J Q I.` Mm • I _I •• • I` K ` o I% ' n NATIVE PPAFE OO u_t II LV ti • Ir ! • O� : sEEsHEEre �. �Aà . AEI le \ . � s" 6�I °� L I -- o m •I Bk'; 321s.+a • 1, { p \o c\ \ oa �.o 0 o��!I[1ej �` ( (f) O W III i \ —Liit# : � — '\ O°� III O PRY • rs � �� I • i1 �. r � n X11 T.. + ° ••• • • LLIFG.RrRRE w l• t�" .1 i• n"AM.M W Q •k • 6•r �1�11 , p\�\ •Oscam T T •OPEN ' Rwa \N f V Y�Isi +•A l'\ `MT) � ' II (! ISSUE RECORD 1I 1 I ]I��I.1,4j1 it LIt�A �\0 BOCK ° I „'m" 412300101alal q t i \�iLl,i I -R'At_ EEII' 9 eV 1 ' �,e� I i \11 L9 O O [ I ' O O I YO11 • A i e • al a ' o a PROJECT* 03122 1�.\ P 1 .J '� I ,• SHEET INFO. F CRUSHER FOE IPAI WmrAPE IIFFBI I �---• n ` Y COMMIETPA. W BERMO NO MMIpO CCIBMERRIETRIL shwa EASEMENTSITE PLAN PLAN ENLARGEMENT ° 100 2°° '°° IWEET MASER rinu Wg Graphic Seale: 1-=1OO• NORTH 7 of 17 (I) MATERIALS LEGEND PLANT LEGEND �eEI, 10 SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLANT SPECIES SELECTION -- PROPERTY LINE • SHADE STRUCTURE 1 I r OMICPYIIH WFlnajsx*CE NDRTMERN PW1E OW --- RIGHT OF WAY TRASH RECEPTACLE CAMPY TREE TUTANUBxACEnsaEV LONDON PLANE'FREE / iii , 1.E O TW CORLATA YiENIEVEN GLENLEVEN UICEN /� UTILITY EASEMENT - BENCH • I 4 •® EVERGREENPLEA Ns COLORADO away �. . ,� S Dag I � 2-_____....// CONCRETE TRAIL C PICNIC TABLE T� PN�'GOATA FOETAILPPE - � - �P II PrxlSPaOEROBA PONDEROSA ME ' CRUSHER FINE TRAIL O TOT LOT PLAY ORNAMENTAL AeERGRMEueI PAPERwaMAnE y'� 11 STRUCTURE 'U UPCERSTmV CAIFwLR rums elANA AMERICAN HORNBEAM 111111IIIIIIIII CROSSWALK WITH SWINGS T� MALUSx9RiWWG SNOW SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE ,ry, t 4 4 j LANDSCAPE BERM BERLE=THUNSERGB RED BARBERRY 0t �/^ -J B ----- PRIVACY FENCE 0 DECIDUOUS ATROAFUREA • •�� _ 'If�t �= rails SHRUBS ',AMNIAAp1FCEAw OREGON GRAPE MOLLY • _ 4.---N-4.---4.---N--14-- ' OPEN R K+ AIL FENCE CH YSORMUS.VAR DWARF EM RABBITI.BM _ #e •.F f PRECAST CONCRETE FENCE 0 EVERGREE x N NNNFHeILsx MEDIA COMPACT rFRaLRWt:RJRSONS - ' -.-- I g-z SHRUBS PFIrZERANAcawACr 4. KNMLA LATIF0.M MOUNTAIN LAWS. 1d ni SOo/TURF ELEVATION - (HADDONSTONE E550) o a 18 24 APPLIOANT/CUENT rn NATIVE PRME rrill..1 MELODY HONES,INC A DELAWARE CORPORATION Graphic Scala: T'=S•-O^ D/B/AD.RHORTON- . MELOOY SERIES IIOII a1ERWI FL'A MITEA manna one= .....AJM1a1 Floc 3034.36M4 I' 1002 CONSULTANT 494e NOTE TETRA TECH/RAC HOT: 140 PAIWIE ReluL IS wETPID CH ` 1mfARNPA w RE PLAN CamMosm cer _ �� ,��-= LowL°Ia.r.'"'Emeaa, RAN ORAWa Ge ro raATE PREWM'HACOMMONS OF ROPOWAY. A0111 PREU 'MIT COMMONS OF RUAO ,a la.lOBwr. _.�:- APPROVEDMITE OEr OF PUBLIC / mRam .o n / mmmar Pew 303-772-6232 Fax 3oseeseess l E APProLm BYTIE°WHOM/IMF/MAKWORM ._ __ -„W,.7 WORKS IA WELD LOUT!!PAPALLIM ARTERIAL — /— CO w H�EA HE STRIPING MOM AM EDG.GR P, F AN eM . . . �� ' N` "E • O� ARFEAWBEMINB CONC. • •e it w.� •b , - :.\ //, 4 • �' • ( J -.trews SmeIRT: l o ooa . la, 1/f �e - - .�. - \ O t A•.' i.• •Ye�. �// O .L"E'R""N°H°af . - r�'- ° A!oFaro I IIIP IAfi 4� - �v -. . \ �� '1r�e '-• �: VL<, o . aiaeBRiB1REE(MPA /i 1A1� a e •^' r i VN .- - 'LAxmrAPE ' I I Z • efl Af •= A rs s•heds.b•Rml-'� ��w��/�Q\C�oo �eo �r—_TRIO `.•1 . •. C'7,►i, Wn �`�� ,\ CROSSWALK �� t 1� .BERrawp �� 'wr' O • • w_:• w,�°o„�°� IhP •••• _ ' PMWCFEIA£� ''t'. i�1,. \ OO�\` • y '� • � I . �(a' I Lei Z LL STAMPED ASPHALT PAVING PRIVACY FENCE ��o '� �`N �� WEwnmxogEfW LFENERm. ��}«� �� w .-•.- ` p �I' i'� vA ,►' ` ' F gyp, . . . :--'..I ::.::: I J V Uw' e i r OZ ,In�lPrt wl `�I��lf.fir` .* aauw. . .'. X19. .• J E}ERG ERN, R P.) �• • •C C) n t :,;e . : > _. •: w = PYeexE PRSGBT.. ENE !.r CASTCQK ee aYK6"AEObE�B�M . 1-Ulm.) 1 ISSUE RECORD WALE •,•:` <� NdmAwp ' ° has Esc .0231:2001 �r f/ �JVEi`�s� ,PAIL \� \. • 6,*lX;'' - man _1Eat�s \� pel ,�,� ! / I • I A�� EVERGREEN , �� IL A�,Mp+\ Yt t . ooe o° .a �` l • TIRE GYP) •L �,lP�•L •I %%a \ `l °Fgoo a o.q.y`/ \- B - -1re£(m.l ` - 6:ei <a • T. I o ao. J \\IT � � / IA •1. . . . . Tp I-• tAi I �. I 11 PLANTING EEO ' P �\ !1j! ' / FENCE t.♦. - Ilr;.' PROJECT! NEAR navCONC \ _ tan AA YR BRAWN w I / . y..•�I• Le .'1 '•\ \ \.,• / SHEET INFO. .:•. ' !' COMMUNITY PARK PLANS PLAN ENLARGEMENT'A' D rar4D 'D / 0 PLAN ENLARGEMENT'B' D 40 7 110 21 SHEET MAABE0. Graphic Scale: 1"—40' NORTH Graphic Scale: 1'=40• NORTH 8 of 17 PLANT LEGEND - MATERIALS LEGEND • SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLANT SPECIES SELECTION a --- PROPERTY UNE • SHADE STRUCTURE DECIDUOUS OUER US MW NORTHERN RED OM I F x --- RIGHT OF WAY TRASH RECEPTACLE O CANOPY TREE PIATAMEEACFRFCW LONDON PLANE TREE 1 /e • I II ——— UTILITY EASEMENT BENCH EVERGREFD flume CO SPRUCE ♦ I� i7rj q �i TREE PEWS ARISTATA FOETAL PIPE R CONCRETE TRAIL O PICNIC TABLE ® j/ , x L•' PNUS PONDEROSA PONDEROSA PINE CRUSHER FINE TRAIL O TOT LOT PLAY ® ORNAMENTAL y�LREUM PAPERER( •\ J STRUCTURE DgHceeipb OuwwuBCAIIQNWw AMERICAN HORNBEAM •\� �: — Milani' CROSSWALK CROSSWALK WITH SWINGS TREE MALUS•'SPIEE SNOW SPRNGSNOW CRABAPPLE • R • • • !.i• d LANDSCAPE BERM BERBERIS'MUNGER=I RED BARBERRY +—< �J3 ij' -- PRIVACY FENCE o DECIDUOUS •ATROPUIVRFA• La SHRUBS MAHONE AQUEOUS.. OREGON GRAPE HOLLY o—..--.^- OPEN RAIL FENCE C)MVSGRULn4B.VAR. DWARF RABBRSRUSH ANN 1 IPERUB SABNA BIEMpgaT BROM:NOMMEN:ER —. PRECAST CONCRETE FENCE O EVERGREEN ANPERUSX MEDIA COMPACTPFamERJWNIPER I SHRUBS PFITo=RARA COMPACT jr N• k I li KALMw LARFQA MOUNTAIN LAUREL ELEVATION - HADDONSTONE E555 MILENIUM OBELISK a a 18 24 APP CA A E T nPRONE PRAIRE MELCOY HOMES,INC A DELAWARE CORRT RCH Graphic Scale:1"a 8'-O" O/B IA D.0.IHQiTON- MELODY SERIES IIMI SHEAIDAN ELM SUITE A WTSIMNHoaA w® •N Fe]eYA]Nal • • O r f I ! II NOTE , MOIL ` • I' I n • ` J — CONSULTANT y� I \ . III INePARALLaMhiE1eLLaSIE1GEpeN P giw'w m,aTa.eL ,HEToenw ! �� \ / i ) I I irErwrwewxcerowrw>E Wa wawa TO TE I j 1A. I• �� PREIPLN[KAMM IOXECICAM Y. TEIiw TECH/RMC \ I ; I��l \ %RELIQARY ROAwRA. I �LANGTrAPE 81FF£R 1Ma4M6ETaTREET i ALTAI mac CONFi:uRADON TO BE ACR1LL Wi1W 9@NiGE -I- my 8111E t{ PRIVACY MICE , II HAVANA APPROVED BYDE IMMINENT OF PUBLIC \ AP'PROVE BY THE DEP . a- ! LONGMONT,CO 01W1 \ 1 PNv FPrE .) IiB� Pim<Bam�z (\/%RE ASTCONDEIE �• ' •.�I I (I '.l. - I I •. F' F¢305dpSmY• \ 11 a \/ '•. ''Ell : . 1 \ 1 III I FENCEi } { './' l I \I 1 '.'a .. LY.I ) PEEWIT CONCRETE I LANDSCAPE B1L , 1 , FEN�PA,E.mP.) l ; �/'� 1 I RIAING AND Pwmc� ►��1 * / t' 'I • ! ('. _ EVERGREEN TREE W I `++ O • BUFFER • • • I W \\ `i I I Li\\ L __ I MIPEIeEcxNP AMenrALTREEO I { � .1• I� �• • EYEAGREENTREE 1 �Ev Ia` •`(Tm J1\ •'r f 11'rP;(. aAr`� �� EDUARD• o6e T°«�e�� I Ili�,uDEE I ,00°I • .�• f1YP) E�eT �a,A1��r�\ - I 4wa SPl 1N�°wI ♦ l I A :Coe A• I a0• � 1��'°°♦ o oe°°' \ RM��g��YTS��°.♦ 4�eS, / ��. RF Rw.) 1 AyYlylYp?PLANTEDMFDWI 1 'L FJ' 4 I EINEET(TYP.) I � N \TM °"1fv a •sue eea ! VCONcETE aNAxR 1 wIn°P.I,9Z'1atIlY.4i.�YLeI r 4oe NY�) \_f - �1 ol l Ioo000 r � Q Z EWwc I ` � .- 1 _� I\ R pFLVA I _ < > U t9!®IE • ec ooAoe°oeooeo�� ( J L y�� //�` I �a�Ls ��II TURF -'1 I A Ypee(°o. l<OONY Y�V ` \ J I A o00 .,oho o / I �eb I ` I/ 11 °,er°4° leB i j O O CI MO v EN ��•o a oa I l • II �000 Ta ISSUE RECORD t \ (.3 \ O I Ir J �muP®� i �� •. o Roe°6 1 _ I ° .—. a. �• _ _ _ _ - Les MIA 92-3�II ! EVERIaEEN • °! > .B® / V I / Nf�,� � •� qeo° I MAMA ]EGFID@. I nEERrv.l • ro. _° - ! 1. - P r ��• !I • I 0e4�A \, I `\ io? I •q'W - ( I l 1�•�. .C .'r _ '4":'• 1j�ii�•• I I °aoR '� I N GMMETEIwuc \ ayb loN • rl•• ••fc 1•• LANDSCAPE BBUBUFFER\InccrrilwEEITYP N ♦ I /1 • < weEPm ie,PINGING I I wxLTNEm Few �� Lo • ( I I • • • • • • t•• • r •* ••r .• I ! eBf cam 1 ♦ l • •• J• ^••+A°NR •'C� aaII:IL JA < y \ Y (lRa1NON B) n DRAW uM �\ � c I il .1 . t � 1 e.. . • . . aEc� w I i \. •• t • \ • Y •• ••`.• 4 II NHI. . . ii `. •., SHEET INFO.NAME 'I �\ 1um0. `� } . _R. . : .'3 COMMUNITY • PARK PLANS PLAN ENLARGEMENT'C' D a n p PLAN ENLARGEMENT'D1 D w Bo �o rr Si RUINER Graphic Seale: T"a 40' NORTH Graphic Seale: 111 a 40' NORTH 9.of PLANT LEGEND MATERIALS LEGEND N IF SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLANT SPECIES SELECTION --- PROPERTY LANE • SHADE STRUCTURE H I MY RUBRAu! —. Q DECIDUOUS MAMMAS XACE NORTHERN _.._ RIGHT OF WAY • TRASH RECEPTACLE • —E GWOPYTREE PurANus xpcEaIFOIM LONDON PLANE TREE �p TAM COROATAGLENLEVEN GIF.rLEVENLINEN ——— UTILITY EASEMENT -• BENCH •IB ' Try�� PUNGENS MwAwnTATA COLORADOSPRUCE FocrpL CONCRETE TRAIL D PICNIC TABLE x R PINGS PPNUEROS CRUSHER FINE TRAIL O TOT LOT PLAY (J l ® RXRNMIENTAL ACER CER GREEUM PAPFABAIBI MAPLESTRUCTURE 7 RRaERsrartr CMIPMUS CMaNIwa ANEMIA HORNBEAM TREE LMLUS A SPRING MOW SPRNG SNOW CRABAPPLE 'MINIM lll CROSSWALK WITH SWINGS �P } G DECIDUOUS •A RPET'R. RED BAR _'— PRIVACY FENCE (7 LANDSCAPE BERM 3_ .1 SHRUBS AMMONAAOUFQBM OREGON GRAPE Hare aPvsonAHRus,vAR DWARF aABNiew®a ""^'""- OPEN RAIL FENCE — 3 JUNIPERIIS SABINA BRCACMOOR BROADMOO RJUJPER ^ PRECAST CONCRETE FENCE - lit 0 EVERGREEN ARNPERUS X MEDIA COMPACT PFR®t JUNIPER SHRUBS WnRERANA COMPACT IAL AIM IATFW MO O UNTAN LAUREL L rl SOD/TURF APPLICANT/CLIENT l'•••• 'ACME PRAPE • a Q)J LJ J LV LU IB/A HOMES,BC '� A DELAWARE CORPORATION \ DIBUA O.znoRroN- LELmYSERES \, • . 11031 LIMN SLIM C NC EIE VA LA iW eVO a• I El NDRIIMIM — \ Ft .4STMt "•"� • I•I I I I'i i 111111II ! viral j /� `� \��\ TRAIL r' CONSULTANT TRA TECH/RMC / \\ ) AIM FENCE V. 1 III 11 ll llll��i 1 I .� . e.. 1®ss sm� le DO 0 : \ ( l _ IJ a -El " ' 1 HililI( i weawmisiNrr: OPEN RMLs£xE IryP._ L mme�Mx' \EVEcxt�•) 4 4� '1 1 J , , i I I 1 I I I\ l 1 1 i x o,PFnawF DrP.I • • rmmsevea OPEN_FENFE II 1 1 i VJ F'WXCTRAL \ _' . • • • 1 I tg I I I11W1,.vRAlnq ( rs ` /' XAtrgmYw.«• LIJ J •. InIIII 11111 1. >PEO, GTPJ a � ' . IA 1 �[ 11111j, • ;f, i ' ? �B.J ;I. // • � ,yA� LIE 11 I I i i IIliliIIII /i/ iI F• _ It' 1 I I I I I 17 I H I ( a. _ •� I, I I !IIIIIIIII lcill I I ( . g m .� �:.�A 1 . nRP • I 14 P II INOITE!i I l 1' i I I ( O . �. I • l Hs O D BaMHO l.Z �'� I 1 i I W -•w I .t6 . �•; � i J Co S MNNG � a`•I:- X110 1p �+ �, i I ` l - ., �"'"'".`.•mom IP I . • �r�f a } ! t 1 "°re . .M ,—_l �8 ye rorinr HI l+�eJ ' I Z .. ,„ •�. DHNM NTAL - € �l,z. . . • , , .• IY11 AM.mBMEy'{ �► 1 �`.�T• • �I c/ . Li_ N j� ( `\ i/ U O wGRanE ••, - L it o a•mNOEreTwLGYP) WrnlA'� �LCx I U W �_� � STREET EE o �. Pi 7. mal.ETa -: \ Z O � � W llI 1 rl a11I .'.'.' �. . �� roPaPAn, , mama U I' ( r . y �a �k• at I ISSUE 6VMIAR _ .'.�� '1.I.:" e I 11 �( I :i�� J.tl, ._y O - / Pa ��'s'� Pe s`�� 9�: L �, "�'� Yi.. ' \ A RN�inw ,�'. `o TURF• r 11t I . • • * - - * * • - * * * * .''s`� I .. _ .. .� » 0 ,y��. . . .... \ 'J�a�►�` �' 11 11 • � i r! `a . !O•• I a�E e.. ''�FENCE TRAIL \ \ \` •MTRE • • � 'II 1 -NATNp Ril�• •F� PROJECT. 0311 I •�'•- ."&' 4A 1 •.LUMRIY�•1�. 'I'.,. ' .,tl1`, \ OtaICN u i. • . . l • 1. •�"// CRAMP UM MLFFHtf R 'h�•••••. I ."."•".'•"•". - ' / _.--• SHEET INFO. / �..:� / I i'. \• • " " • •" & E"aE9E` COMMUNITY PARK PLANS lirPLAN ENLARGEMENT'E' G B° "° PLAN ENLARGEMENT'F' 0 w ro p "EET"AIR'omm=Graphic Scale: 1"-40' NORTH Graphic Scaler 1"-4O' NORTH 10 of 17 - ;! �__ �,.y� MATERIALS LEGEND r—1 f a A -- a :r� I. OPEN Fat FENCE RYF) --.- PROPERTY UNE 1 SHADE STRUCTURE [V' FY ��, I� . 4 —..— RIGHT OF WAY TRASH RECEPTACLE �'! 6 E `-��•�� -� f/� , ` pwrvauADYP.) —'—/— UTILITY EASEMENT - BENCH li•il�I ifpa -� \ `. J a1Mi \T-, FLAWED ISLAND �1 CONCRETE TRAIL 0 PICNIC TABLE =j ! 04,E -OD r ° QeO, VI 1 /o°n°>≥ ooec °°a �. p •- WALK .) r CRUSHER FINE TRAIL O STRUCTURTOT LOT E r E �R° - 4-7 ° Ii1.. WITH SWINGS < i SUFFER �I!• �� o r,: IIIIIIIIIIIIIII CROSSWALK I}} 6�4i I` • I� oo ado oa e_ o�V ~\ /\, i +--_- PRIVACY FENCE d LANDSCAPE BERM 13—■S \ kith r �� 1/f � \ EVSPcr�eITrEE ttrr OPEN RAIL FENCE Yl ` �, ��/' P pw seww •� R�� / PRECAST CONCRETE FENCE d�s�.a� tea �►si�� u Pte• ^ � /�1` �.��i''�► `fir:\ L'bffEEW ARP.> 1E abI l "m�� • cfi. \ E«°Ha. PLANT LEGEND ° • APPL GNTCUENT ` aI07�-R .`� SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLAIT SPECIES SELECTION RiIEENaEN`61(IYPI ( aa/ pp�® O D IP oo MELODY PIGGIES.INC . I � •�y° P'jl WRDUGMIRaRFGATE a:4b • DECIDUOUS WFJGUS PURIM NORTHERN RED OAK A DELAWARE CONPCMT- y` \y P te• 0 6°?r < °-° I B® °�,OOp° ' \O `�� O GV1CYYTREE RATANUS X ACERigH LONDON PANE 1REE DI MELODR HCRTON • •'•\.'.' A I°°I ooa oCJ '.• LcxEI6W `�o°e<'- -�°000000'� TIM LORMTA 5YFNAEYEN OAENIEVENLMFN NomsnNmw lava oso__ S• ERES •••• ••F•-• • \. I °1 I sLxrlPa o \o^, �'— EVEAf,tEEN PgEA PAASTATAGENS COLORADO SPRUCE rresDwNsmtEMCEoosom \ y Y 10 ® TREE PINUSARISTATA FOJITALPNE \5tl ``• \ i • 00 0°a o 0l v4Pp/�07��3 P /e0. MIRPNCCSiI@i PEWS PONDEROSA PONDEROSA PINE 'D Plow 3054.0.1101 {•' pl,� °01 loot aaaa. V - /o !� ORNAMENTAL ACERfJLSEUM PAPEASAKKMAPLE F IL1 �V TLRY °° eo Sao,' ® LRCERSTORY CARPINUS CARa.INWN AMERICAN HORNBEAM CONSULTANT 000Eoo. >1 .� ooV Ipa°o �o / yep°°ose.°000� TIDE MALUSUS PRNG 8N SPRINOSNOMCRAeAPPLE TETRA TECII/RISC . • a°o Qeo ' 0.uod °oo° o°a; a TNINBERW RED BARBERRY Hon x SUNSET STREET ' • \C� ••\ . • %\ \ o 's SA"°S ST o� a•e°°; oe o DECIDtnm •ATRDn1wIaA• Lac oNT.COSLflI l \ wrArE�E M1LLX• • QI eo1 a �oy <v Leo SHRUBS MMIONMAOUF0.MA OREGON GRAPE ICILY Ply...303472452.2 r:3 �)1 L0.9e° amsanMLINUB.VAR DWARF RMINTBRUSN F6m 3 r� :� �1� . a • )oy s1��• • Y ' EYERSEEISINS ANwERGIBBABwIRO.DMDOR BRGADMDORAN,PER \ .'V • -�/ ?r' • �A "i/ PLANING O EVERGREEN .RnffnusxM®M COMPACTPFlrmuuxree . \,.\.,......,,,.......\.‘... .' t .. . `o • .•I..* Via Eton '.�� I.iAP "was urEG � MwrrtAIN LAUREL Uli e.�, „° KAMM.�- E„§Ncr�N"EA: .i ... • ni EGO/TURF • • •\�. •r'�ll a1i►h�/ / r. NATIVE PRAFBE Q ".. . .• •< i. \ . 1 a 9�®d� �i di R LLLC m P m �I 1\ eL- ii O D . '. '.�.'. ate . �,. r— ;� • � 'eo TURF mP3• vR.: V/ 0 Z •wBEra«r,D POW. •- -1�- `:. ° ° NY�wA GYP.) VERGREEN - III ' . 11• (4 ,�4• e `1 TIEE GYP.) _ I O Z Um FmNNE e TRAIL : ' : : ..... I�� ` J C7 r 1 _ �.I I .f • • ul, ! S • \•• 1� .. eNa ,ISc3UE RECORD • Sam. =HER •'31 III' .W. Ps •• • • • • O.. - O •' va v• II � • ITS ° III:• • Ian • q • \ O 4:11 ,..- II.11 Uhl •�� i Mat 05122 AR t • .1111.-1 . .� • T•• • • • QIy I �,-'.' -'-'' 1.'.'; DRAWS LAR i :=Q J aEaon an • - �_ _____ aL , \ [I, STREET SHEET INFO. <�•• TREE '-1 \ 1 li I,I COMMUNITY PARK PLANS PLAN ENLARGEMENT'G' D b is l a NEST wean Graphic Scala: 1"a 4O• NORTH 11 of 17 MATERIALS LEGEND [-I-I;' !0 ---- PROPERTY LINE • SHADE STRUCTURE V- f e j -E --- RIGHT OF WAY TRASH RECEPTACLE I E '/—— UTILITY EASEMENT - BENCH I" I' ; Y CONCRETE TRAIL 0 PICNIC TABLE u' 3 O TOT LOT PLAY i r CRUSHER FINE TRAIL STRUCTURE _ IlgililIM', CROSSWALK WITH SWINGS pp`J II +-+- PRIVACY FENCE cl LANDSCAPE BERM [�i 1 j -8—..- OPEN RAIL FENCE !I II PRECAST CONCRETE FENCE 1 12 PLANT LEGEND APPLICANT/CLIENT SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLANT SPECIES SELECTION MELODY HOLES.INC A DELAWARE CORPORATION O DECIDUOUS OLERCUS RUBRA NORTHERN MOON( 0/B/ADRHORTON- CNICPYTREE PLATMUS%ACERIFOW LONDON RAKE TREE MELODY SERFS TCORM [YSHEMIN TA ENLEVEM GIENLEVEN LRCEN 0031 BLVD. W ® EVERGREEN PICEA PUNGENS COLCRADOSPMIOE SORSA WEBIINIMERW® TREE PEIUSARIBTATA FOI(TAL ME POW mtctmt Fu 9WYlm1 1,1 • i / / I Iy `� \ i I PNIffi PONDEROSA PONDEROSA PPE Y+ ( V A i 1 I , e CONSULTANT t I I p ® ORNAMENTAL A[Ea GRMEW vIPERIMIr(MAPIE I // ! �, w•�Te9 UNDERSTORY CAIRINUS CAROII ANA AMERICA!HORNBEAM � �.,� SUITE 1-F I d I i i ! ' t �� ° Tam uuUBAamwDsxoM evRlNc SNOW CRABAPPLE TETRA IEOH/wnc 1/ l/i, 1 I t t r r n°aa- BERBtlSTM1NBERGII RED BARBERRY tmoaasiRHT I I l ; / ,�of I O DECIDUOUS 'ATROPUPURFA' LPler mmsaxONGMONT,CO t / • H �� SHRUBS MAMMA AOUFOLUI OREGON GRAPE HOLLY Fc smlmem0 //KJ1 , IPER / t} H I, i� HI 1 � �Ye.+ ono+ °.� aaraDnwwus.vrw. DWARF RrsenawsH r.. WALK ) / Ihi, /1 1 T I GOLDEN ANN i I O EVERGREDI UNPEAVB I(ILEOM CCMMPA RPFI ZERMIF t ,------- Gann.DAWN / I \� F CONCRETE WWI ), \I ;, tit: { I I• � SHRUGS Iwu TIFouARZERANA COMPACT MOUNTMNLUREL •• _ I m 1 r_ _ r.._.j SOD/TURF LU J _--�• bM MO F-, NATIVE RME �l�Tv rpgNii1 P® O E- STREET TREE .7 1 T c Ii t" Dwulenu -.: --I I I PAP - - ✓ I L�P� I• Mean RAU( 1 EDGING GYP.) i `I. G I' • ≥p• °r•i•!I 'q / is• f .4. NOTE: COSUFFER t ��(�� j ./ . , ... . .7. q �I, . 1cPAwuaAR(esAL Isaa1a®ON O WI NC Mp PLANING ; ` . I j B �a MLR /I r •• - ty .•.r! yn PmAiwmRa DRAWINGS TO wawr. V' �J,f •n• • '�, , t ' \ 1` , I _ ! .'.T',;.}� E. +t% I ACTUAL MAO CONAGUMTION TO SE APPRw®eroF DEFAmNertOFPIa¢ I U Z i_.i.,. 7N.: � •••` t I /'� 1 1.� gi ft '- Ia • .41 . w EYENNiBl TRED(IYP)• I 'Ar' O Z Um •<�:. . . . -. • 1 .Alm• ��00 • :':•••: 'I • ' i�•,! O it♦. r i i I i • I. K • f ' I O LIJ ., ''••.' furl, I ' . ,.� . . ....t•. .j • • , ' i I U . • • • • • • esao • t .. .•. u t I F •• •• •••••` ' • ��II(STUMM • • • j.. ISSUE RECORD •I.a ••••••�• • • .! /i.• •r ' I®.' ....• • • j Irar<•w�°aritm'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. • . - .1 .• a . ••WCRUSERNrcTwRTYPT:'''''''' e , - •_ l • , • • , • -' • :• ah. •. Jr T • VI ••• •.�iY. �•.•• . '. . .'.. . • • . ' . . . . .'.' e� .' • • I ( PROJECT Ram DESIGN r . . • : ..... . . �,: : :-:-:•.;sir �. . . . -: .-:.'': : :.:.. ... nMNa AR .. .....'%�: .. ail `. �. . . ; a an \''.''•'',' , •- i SHEET INFO. . . . . r. . . . . . .tl..0 •••••••-•••••••••••••• •• . . . • •••••• .•• •.'.l-... '.'. •:•. COMMUNITY PARK PLANS 0 40 p PLAN ENLARGEMENT'I' rD ilLNII rrF WISER Graphic Scala: r—4O' NORTH 12 of 17 L ,__ T� MATERIALS LEGEND SHADE STRUCTURE F .. � --- RIGHT OF WAV • TRASH RECEPTACLE A \ _ j ——— UTILITY EASEMENT - BENCH y '�� i CONCRETE TRAIL I7 PICNIC TABLE V' 11 • SHADE tM'I \ \ Oa CRUSHER FINE TRAIL O TOT LOT PLAY }I OPEN FENCE 0W.) \� STRUCTURE �J9is• . \ ' BOWING MUUMUU CROSSWALK WITH SWINGS \ NAME ,-/ • • LANDSCAPE BERM i \i •• s�•�s��-�+r;.. y� 11nYnne, I\ PRIVACY FENCE -; . . ! II .`'.. ,.1 •• ' . r� b , ! t' t�. .:. OPEN RAIL FENCE '• . - m. ° 0p \ PRECAST CONCRETE FENCE -`� swim .• •`` •• P �Ra�' aHABE Ry*y o - 7I� \\\` • APPLICANT/CLIENT o•'e O MELODY HOSES.MC MUMPS ' PLANT LEGEND A DELAWARE CORPORATXN RIES j • `�°�q°° � o o 000°e°o°°wed ° •, ' ` _ SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLANT SPECIES SELECTION DIME COV SE ••••• �1 oaEHPNL FENfE , DECIDUOUS WERCUS INSM NORTHERN RE)MR „m,axewuAx BLVD. �t ' C'1.' I O CANCPY TREE RATANUS X ACEHFOLM LCNDDH PLANE TREE WESTMINSTER.LOOM I�" TLA CORDATA VIEWEVEN CLENLEVEN MOEN X11 . � I oq' ✓wy. ` .'. .• - LuroecwE 6,IRliR Time 303.4118-303.4118-11131, , 7 I o'� :T 4 \ �� WBERLWm ANp PIIHINO EVERGREEN PICEA PUNGENS COLORADO SPaAi , fs , 1 • ® O 30943.9730943.970430943.9704 TEE PNUSARSTATA FOXTALPNE CONSULTANT PNIa MN„EPtiCA PONDEROSA PRE • 't EYERD/EEN TREE (\/�, TETRA TECH/RMC { - ORNAMENTAL AGER OIJIBEl1M PAPERBARNMAPLE .,' , (OPDJPUV• • w l V I ® IJNOERST Rr C. ,a,s CAROLINIAN,. AMERICAN HORNBEAM ,9006 SUU STREET s 3C0472490112 . M �_ `•••• TREE MAWS x'SPRN)AREG SNOW' SPRING SNOW CRASAP4IE LoNsmoNT.Go NeN OPEN PAL PEKE • \'b` ��` 5 BERBER'S TERGB RED SMBERmY Fos 3 S B�• bj . - 0 DECOIflJS •ATROPOPUEA• . SHRUBS MAHONA AWFCIUM OREGON GRAPE HOLLY 20BBBU FETBRLI(RVPA : . ..l ( GNYSODMMMIS.VAR. DWARF RABINIBRUSH y '•: '•.•.-• I JUNNEAUS SABNA 9U]AUMOOR BROADMOOR JNJPER C/ W EVERGREEN JINPFR xAEDN COMPACTPFTTIERJUNPEIiCo •\ g` 'o:. •",.(." - 1 SHRUBS MERMANA CAMPACC LATa5GPE BLFF81 / �` .,•,T CDNGEJE' :• <r .•..`'.,�...;' .",,'.: .,`..'.' .�'. � •',.�.:"; `. '..::..,.".:. ., \• - Iw.MM,uTFaLLA MouNTAN LAURELLLI J w PLANIwGABD1YN° ��• YMLX wENRgNO " •� •'• FCONLIETE SDD/TU6 Q � ��'' a+mrtaEre '.•.• .AIWA - WiLSRYP.I I ,- 1 NAME PRA1T� a F • PIAMNT: 1 1 NNa Ve�. f It co . .iii, • • --, : PLAN ENLARGEMENT'I' CO O CO Nw ii: 'Meth.. . .uwrv. • FmNC1E9E YlN1( ` D 40 BD 1mLu a\ :•/: ►� TURF •'' .' •.\\\ NORTH Graphic Scale: T's 4O• �/ I- O /. LLeDO �, WOO ,�� . . • • • • W .�' � ` J iJ -. . `. ... . • ..'1-.' '.'• MA CHUNE W •J,:�IC.• �. '... .. '• .' ',.I LE'HEET14 •y°e .. _ ..lT� ISSUE RECORD Oq°/ J C�_._..� •. t'yr/ . . �`1 / . PROJECTS. 03122 MO. AR •I•.- . .• •. • • . - • DRAM IJM /� CHEME........................ ........ ................- : •:':' • • • '• •. SHEET INFO. \' j�A tit r��,)' ' t ,/ ' COMMUNITY . .. ��.'.-. . . . :: ' / PARK PLANS N I I: O MATERIALS LEGEND Uf f.! • �`+p \• - SHADE STRUCTURE y' l \\ I --- PROPERTY LINE • \ �' ,•,• . . _ I - - RIGHT OF WAY TRASH RECEPTACLE E I 1 Y v •_ S' , !� A 'I 1' --- UTILITY EASEMENT - BENCH V � '�"i°`"""' .Otiose CONCRETE TRAIL O PICNIC TABLE cik O 0YNN lel ;yiI ll CROSSWALK_Y � PRIVACY FENCE !I% OPEN RAIL FENCE ! �. \• '� �� PRECAST CONCRETE FENCE i••'�'..'.::. .` .'.'.'.'. APPLICMJi/CLIENT �.: • , ' �� ` . . :.�� ' PLANT LEGEND ADEUWAflE ON S _� I. iii!!• : � " SYMBOL TYPE OF PLANT PLANT SPECIES SELECTION D/B/ADaNaxrON- V P a`IUp�' . . te1. MELODYSERES ` q'�":I`� .' ' 1r •• � C, 1 '•••'•• DECSJU01J8 aERaD3181BBA NORTHERN RED OAK nmt SHEMIN BLVD SEEP H.,' 1 �� i �+�1. Ip �•• CANOPY TREE PUTANUBJIACERPOIN LONDON PLANE TREE tWs1ML�lER LO® 4'i� ,�• .��•• '. ' ET 13 O TLN CORDATA YRENILYEN COLORADO LHOQN x��m t FeC rA:,'�9�00�� ea t& _ %;, �. Cia;IE � �, ® EVERGREEN P�cFA PUNf£Ns FOCAL PINE 0. ,� ` TREE PNLIBAWSTATA FOMAL PNE CONSULTANT AleRMC �• '• • (, PPM PONDEROSA PONDEROSA PINE TETRA F O 1�1�1� • :. � ••♦' '• �` ® ORNAMENTAL AfERGPoSCAR PAPERBARX MAPLE tvooaN aET>a •-• •• UNDERSIORY f:ANPMU3 CAROIJFlNANA AMERICAN HORNBEAM SUNE T 1..71:14111�4 ^va'o°, �I��I� ,,�.'.•.• . :�-. ,,,� 1REE MALl19 sPRSB SxOA• 8PRe1G SNOW CRABAPPIE LaNGMOM•m mml A ee • Vg, SHRUBS Ope J • ��_ aWNCPpE .AJor'nN%a.Y` oy BERBERIS1NwE:N Rm BARBERRr Phew VgSOOSS ,� AM a.�I��. YNIN �� ,-••-••• ;• '�I ild➢ ' ' ' O DECIDUOUS 'ATNOARIYEA' -per _ YNgNNA0UF0.EB1 OREGON GRAPE HOLLY ,/ � � �� /_ *�` :• '• /Q� ',. - CIYRY8p11NLNUB.VAR DWARF RABBRBRUEN � I. GMVFJ W6IACWRP RdO "��i�� ,J`l`.••. •. gip. . '.:,'/' aPEn ML� JUNFERUS S.ABINA BROADMOOf BRWDMOOR JUNIPER XIMil JJ y �A �, •J,- '1� IENfE 0 EVE GREEN JImPERusxLR_DN COMPACT PFIrgRJUNPER 1 ��i '�w7.K��w ► ��®�® 'it•'•'•'.' �-^7 uuM�iAu caPAcr MOUNTAIN LAUREL 1 1 1 Q I� - ,lr 4- . I { S00/TURF L.L1 O •7äì' T+«- e' r•'• INTNE PRMRE03 N. � O PLAN ENLARGEMENTI' in r. •'''�'. � � ' '' niNrW'1 I4 NORTH nr � NwatsE+,a� .�.-.�.�:�:•• Ai'�p •s: '•'L �Ai \�•••••�•�•••'• •'•'-'.'.' J �.. Graphic Scala: t'=40' — LL Z i . W ` N:orAxGJJrR. ' : ,. O J ° OF / I/ ❑ W = c► s O \ O /// ISSUE RECORD LE_ l.M ON. DEMME . biliall° O • • NAmE NNNMAR/ O - �eRxWaP1EWMn O PLANTING SEC PROJECT* mta `oPEx 0.VLFFINLE O GESIGMAWR AR CwNN UM cNE ¢¢ AR O ei O O O -- O O „ SHEET INFO. COMMUNITY CHINDOK , C PARK PLANS \ , ' - \- -' C NEEINAIDI 14 of 17 :.-E Cad if um wnev uaa .wtw vN It E.a 1NN11ERV 0.0,W uti wa wa IMNEae w.x a • ¢ z m .ov ! ¢ ¢ m n W • I�fi • tvt 1�¢ I1 #I !•*:' ..''''r.. ! ii Foam 'as i ^" ^^ tI st.71 APPLICANT/CLIENT MELODY HOMES.IC A DELAWARE Cp8ORATION D/B/A D.RHdRON- MELODY SERFS SECTION A- 140'ARTERIAL R.O.W. 11031 SHERIDAN BLVD. SUITE A WESTMINSTER.W® Phan. ]ulYaiW Fa 301435-783. CONSULTANT TETRA TECH/RAC Itt A SUNSET SWEET Rat TO l RAW. SMIE Ii m' SDd 1 2 LIE COLLECTOR LOIGWIT.CO M0, Plv¢NA-7724282Fa']O96SBL flFBYEIIINLRO.W. v a 5 crone Foams new. ',wawa name wham* Nava nave E.t.a.,Marl m • F W Q ` ti , a Q a P ,----Lnt (.O o W SECTION B -60' LOCAL STREET R.O.W. SECTION C- 80' URBAN 2 LANE COLLECTOR 0� � � U �/ Z Nu_ III 0 W JUG 0Oa AESIDBII14 RAW RES1DBIi4LL0.0.W.• rW W " • a n ato IV a .wiN wu ems_ In RMEMMM r v ef manumit a rwa wax mrwn•nw ISSUE RECORD Les= YNtffi leeL.W ]4 j4 PROJECT* WM M• •- DEM'. AR DRAW. UM t J IPi Mgt Q weaaa AR 1 SHEET INFO. TYPICAL STREET SECTION D -40' R.O.W. LOCAL ONE WAY STREET a VILLAGE GREEN SECTION E - LOCAL STREET ROUNDABOUT ° ° Z° '° SECTIONS MEFF MATER Graphic Scala: 1->< 10' 15 of 17 CI)! B [..4Lot Setback Matrix Setback Notes(cont.): i to U: fr Setback"Si,See Setba notes below for definit �,7 lons and allowable encroachments. �-!i j Lot Type Front Back Side 3.Items allowed In the setback area include the following; n la a a.front-yard sidewalks ~ Front-load 20' 20' 7.5' x r b.back-yard patio/decks (not to exceed 15 ft.extension from back foundation wall) Ue�/// 11i C.back-yard air concktioning units �� -T # Setback Notes: 1.Setbacks are dimensioned from the outside face of the foundation wall and/or front porch slab. 4.Items specifically excluded from side-yard setback area B- a include the following; ! 2.The setback area includes a 2.5 ft.wide zone,adjacent to the foundation wall and/or front porch Nab, a.side-yard concrete sidewalks and stoops AA�jj allowing for encroachment of the following architectural elements; b.side-yard air conditioning units ray ii e.eaves IQQ7711 b.bay and box windows C.room projections and cant levers APPLICANT/CLIENT d.foundation counterforts Bulk Requirements s.brick ledge Minimum Lot SizeNELkxwllalES.INmilte-5,500 sq C A DELAWARE CORPORATION Maximum Building Height-30f.(measured per the 2003 IBCARC guidelines) D/a/ADRHORION- MELODY SERES Maximum Lot Coverage-50% HOW EMPJOAN ME MATE* WESTMINSTER memo •521*mwenm h F Fc]m•16Aw CONSULTANT TETRA TECH/RNC SUNSET STREET 55' x 100' Lot 65' x 105' Lot 75' x 110' Lot "�a " LDMaeCM.COMM ,03� Fa]0.iMbMN Melody 5000 Series/Model 1665 Melody 6000 Series/Model 2959 Melody 7000 Series/Model 3806 W.'MICAS=WIDTH W'4 TYPICAL LOT N9111 T'PRYM1 LOT WHIN CO 13r „E�m.r F. mvrkmweem rr eDErATIONWALLlkro wmunF.wcur ;F rr FONDAR NWALL '° g Q id' FOUNDAMONWLxro i711 II �l t FaaMTI0NwN1 Fa1xMTpNWN1 ; FDUMATIDN WALL a leer RawYARDARCOND CNNO ill I ar r sr r ESN, uarALLaw®waEIeACRAREA `A'L ri I laxl a 1 sm. v e e to-z--�epzg27T . I Ql�IIIITIIIT1l1I�1/ ' REAR-WADER� %IIO�l/1I111IIlOI/ 1 CO/J Jr„,, Rsw-rWounmNDrroeaiD y^ urR FiLwrFnwasracrzARl� O 1 PAnO� wrtuLavEDw BEieAC6ARFw ---,�16 W •■ I LJJ 'a Z 1 0,0/e 1170or 1- 40••• I 1 / ,- ---- gA'neo . __I I Y aan'oe,r no R�EwDNffl'w°m°A9E,wV<NARFA/ I I� • • d I E - -I__�• I ��// IV g1 I 1 1 LL Z li g II J. O � / I I % , I I fA f ! I OW = � ,/ � - a ]I / i, /A + ISSUE RECORD 1 Or reil ern_ ��, .II +� 1 , 1 I 4 l so. •f J1l /�//,r �� . W I �/ IXi1VEWAY IL u / / v 1 pRNEWAY ,/ r-TM- /77 ZStr//I7t*/6 14 Lac' I I a SDa-YAFm SETBACK TO 'd I gg i L-_ ' PROJECT* rota Id ZONE FOR ALLOWABLE - -..- I d I 71-:W'9'S S. 77� A%A raft mvsN JkA > re tacceeemn SIDE-YARD r 1 DRAM um 1 FRONT-yARDHo m gq DRIVEWAY gaC Fu an a T ALDaffi1N8E1MI.RAIaA---f ..•:_.... y el w umfin 6tn 2 2r zone FCRALLOWABLE . - a8 ?r ZOXEFaINLQYABLE liRla maws ; e1Oi6WIMelIB SIDE-YARD-FSETBACK > •-ON ealeir i mover-vAM SIDEWALK 1B" SHEET INFO. srmssew SIDEWALK 1,---..—A- - Am. �'Lar"'glif — — ALLOWED IN SETBACK AREA m,Eraser BUILDING - , STREET SIDEWALK — — _4gl — — SETBACK EXHIBIT STREET SIDEWALK S WMASER STREET 16 of 17 Emli MA Cui VI H nal_I■■ III■■III= III■■an m III .i �.■. ;■■r :ll _c ■■I =_■_ p_It i it .1.::: min 3 9 -• ••"- - d m.0 :t �-- _,�. -.m nnirC �m - 6-i l oo t •..m Si .u. ..E :. N0 I e m n.1� L 1 iii== ri _= 9 001. nnn nt n....I!:: til El-r.! I , tile Na ■■e_— 1 L.....I -i I I=1= - uui. �I■■■; e ■�Lu��l ■� � _Op e.,?■■I•�. _ 0� ■■ •..�i�i�?�,: . I'��'mt.....®l0000le -• '�_ .��■� �� 1.■....E a Nley3iei;�!e!s��•aa:fill no „e..� .EL-al nue9� ■IN ,.. —eI 1E �.!.I...:..• , IIIIIIIIIIII �_ =�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII -4� � ■I� �Illllllllhlllllllll�IIIIIIIha a - .. - APPUCANT)CUENT _ .•^ „..... - Mar HOMES,INC A OEUWA O HORT N- Mclody 7000 Series - 75' x 110' Lot 1mEeTOR DIB/ASERIES 9W1E. The residential street elevation shown above incorporates an assortment of models currently available for .° "'113-43"=1 the specified lot size. Duplicate models will not be placed directly adjacent to one another. CONSULTANT TETRA TECH/RING 1.16 SUMEISTREET •' SUM 1F .. .�. .... .. .. +- LOMGMONT W=I - t .. Row sO TM=Far MIIMINII eilliglialSI' :::'.�_°° ni,�—.1_11-11—. �nu�nnl el::: L. Cm_____ t_..n°n1Ic=1S•.. =E °dEIIM_RRRR. .� W o s -a ,...,---�i m1"Sinn m c i n. 11�� m_°I=11=�PB�1 '� = P� .nom ems a e ¢ EJ-esirr `- ^� i N o'm uuu uuu ii. 7.o.--e EIO°L—man e r i� s - �,=mm— :_. . " ll'l11l��l � :Is—�—his— =e�.e _i _ Ee in mw�—Ill n1 r3 3 001 a Ill n.a 1 DL J.1 === Fri oo- a 11�1111�111�l: ` i. I I IRE Mel al n:In= I 1 O cn ._.�.v . _— =-. 9� I m 1 I IS DO;Ill- ��- 1n n. P =man®� X11 le a 111.. �� CO----I2 _— _LIU! IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I PE---=wa' i UULU I_ i i` 911.°. ...I.III�O t--' —===- v- w 5 O N Melody 6000 Series - 65' x 105' Lot �lu ce o W The residential street elevation shown above incorporates an assortment of models currently available for J 0 Vr the specified lot size. Duplicate models will not be placed directly adjacent to one another. O 0 Z Q UJ UJU ISSUE RECORD ]OWLS Inia YI�I.....1�_I nil.I..—I�—..1 `, IREIB ®s•_ ...MI =11 �: .II�1 oi•:,�iii�+ .a� ut 1 w S.- II ,.tee m �_ e, - opIlld Sr e NM INN 0o : In I Min i l9 alp�� -- I - u- 1. mint i..-'III.III.1111.111. . r1wEcTR Win a iII-IIIIII uuuull- 'rr illlllllllllllllllllll 00=-�:=--gm� •1• pp ,- an.,, '1,•' AA L .= 112 ni.. 9— ) c1Eo� AA e. •� �� ME _ FIM-- "MINYw-..»:. Mn2 IMEIESISIa c SHEET INFO. BUILDING SETBACK Melody 5000 Series - 55' x 100' Lot EXHIBIT The residential street elevation shown above incorporates an assortment of models currently available for the specified lot size. Duplicate models will not be placed directly adjacent to one another. 1 7 of 1 7 LAND M ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international Exhibit ' B ' • - •. . .. .... .•. ,,,. ••a OZ submifaMDLER final COZ Comments.doc land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 fj ] TETRATECH RMC October 5, 2005 Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates PUD Dear Chris: The Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissions contained an Approval Recommendation for the Adler Estates Project,PZ-1071 based upon compliance with Chapter 27 requirements with conditions. These conditions are listed on pages 9 13 of the resolution. We would like to provide you with the information that we believe resolves the following condition: Prior to recording the Change of Zone Plat I Z.D The applicant shall submit a proposed estimate for time of construction of the PUD. (Department of Planning Services) Resolution: The proposed estimate for the time of construction for this project is as follows: January,2006 Begin infrastructure installation September, 2006 Begin model home complexes November, 2006 Begin home construction—Filing One Completion in 16 months—April 2008 November,2007 Begin home construction—Filing Two Completion in 12 months—November 2008 October, 2008 Begin home construction—Filing Three Completion in 16 months—March 2010 January,2010 Begin home construction—Filing Four Completion in 14 months—March 2011 February,2011 Begin home construction—Filing Five Completion in 15 months—May 2012 With this response,we believe that this condition has been satisfied. Please let us know if you feel otherwise. If you have any further comments or questions,please do not hesitate to contact us at 303-772- 5282. Sincerely, Tetra Tech RMC (,, aitaik Catherine A. Leslie,P.E. Project Manager 1900 5.Sunset Street,Suite 1-F Longmont,CO 80501 Tel:303.772.5282 Fax 303.665.6959 www.ttrmc.com LAND 0 ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international • • Exhibit C ' land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 5. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 October 5, 2005 LAND O ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates PUD Dear Chris: The Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners contained an Approval Recommendation for the Adler Estates Project, PZ-1071 based upon compliance with Chapter 27 requirements with conditions. These conditions are listed on pages 11-16 of the draft resolution by the Clerk to the Board. We would like to provide you with the information that we believe resolves the following condition: 1.E Prior to recording the Change of Zone Plat: The applicant shall attempt to address the concerns of the City of Longmont, as stated in their referral dated May 13, 2005. Written evidence of such shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. Resolution: A copy of the May 13, 2005 referral is attached for your reference. 1. The City of Longmont requests a 300' buffer on the east side of the Liberty gulch for preservation of potential wildlife corridors. The applicant contacted Froda Greenburg and Dan Wolford with the City of Longmont Department of Community Development and Open Space and Trails Department via faxed letter on February 2, 2005 and via phone on October 5, 2005 to clarify their referral comment requesting a 300' buffer on the east side of the Liberty gulch for preservation of potential wildlife corridors. The applicant was informed by the City of Longmont staff that their open space code will be revised in the future to require specific setbacks from identified wildlife corridors; however there are no requirements in the current City Code requiring specific setbacks. The referral response from the Colorado Division of Wildlife, dated September 23, 2004, states... "The parcel is currently agricultural land and cannot be considered as critical habitat for any wildlife species". The applicant recognizes the request from the City of Longmont and has provided setbacks from the Liberty Gulch ranging from 100 to 500 feet. The project site is not located within the City of Longmont/Weld County IGA boundary or Area of Influence. land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 1,0/05/05 17:22 FAX 19r v14 • MRY.13.2005 1:04PM N0.450 P.1 • Weld County Referral • PLANNING DIVIStC,, April 21, 2005 C APR 1y This s. • COLORADO R v • • The Weld Counts/Department of Planning-Services has reoclved the following item for review: Applicant Melody Homes-DR Horton Case Number PI-1071 Please Reply By INFORNIIII Renner *IS ' • Project ' Application for change of zone from A(Agriculture)for PhD.for 833 single family residential lots along with an elementary school site and 70.08 acrea of open space Legs1 Pt SW4 end Pt. SE4 of Section 33 and part of the SW4 of Section 34,T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado, • Location South of and adjacent to CR 28 and east and west of and adjacent to DR 7. Parcel Number 1207 33 000024. 1207 33 000030, 1207 34000025 The appllcatien is submitted to you finreviewand recommendation. Any comments or recomin andadon you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation, Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have enyfurther questions regarding the application, please cap the Planner associated with the request. Please hots that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process. if you desire to examine or obtain this additional information,please call the Department of Planning Soviets. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(If applicable) June 21,2005 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that N does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan O We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. CI See attached letter. • Comments:' . ou CO‘.t1-517TY5 t .sfleq Ste.C..hrl 5Yt[.t- JA_Zoi A 1-ta.311-li L.M.T4t AFF't= cc .1nC,n fart h" V-Fr.rAT4S crig-ac Signature > Ot+ Date • y((3O Agency C. tr* • 4C Lai _ ' II 4-Weld County Rennin Dept +018 104 Street,Greeley,co.Bawl 4(970)3534100 ext3540 41070)354-5455 fax ; •UUT-Ub-LUUb THU lib: lb fin SUUTHWLST WHLU YLHNNINU I'M NU. IZU bbi 4211 r. u • xr,ca.eun4 ii:17RM N0.@58 p.l DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DIVELOPMWNT Lair PUBUC WORKS DIVISION 40e THIRD AV&4US • LONGMONT.00 00501 - 503.661.9504 • FAD 903-651.809e Cif II DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPME "LOB tfry PLANNING & PUBLIC WORKS DIVISIONS CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX I LONGMONT'CO 80501 (303}651.6330/(303)451-8304 FAX(303)451-8696 l • FAX COVER SHEET TO: hh'/�/ e , COMPANY: Waki �,Qy{ y F jiy FAX N: 9'10 3o+ /(044,2' FROM: (P,h ,r _ DATE; Minh„ NOTES: Mat Id- ILL he:4f I Oh WWZr Sat rinIA • • TOTAL A Or PAGES 3 OIUGINALICOTY TO FOLLOW; A / CONFlDENTIANTY NOTICE THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR TDB USE Of TIIE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY 10 WIIIEll Ti'IS AI:DREMflhl AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRMLIXIUD, CONPIPENTUL AND EXRAIPT PRUM taw • UNDER APPUC AIRE LAW. IP TIM READER OP THIS M66SAOE IS NOT TIM IN1'EIMD RI CIPICNT. OR 1 ilf:. • . EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONEIDLE PDX DEUVERINU 1I IF MESSAGE SOI.EV 10'HIS INTENDS')RGCIPR_'N I.YOU ' ARE HEREBY NOT'EnED MAT ANY UBSEMINATION,DISIRIDUIION OR CDI:YiNO or THIS COMMUNK'A1ION IS .- STRICTLY-J!RDIIIDITED.--1F OU-NAPE-RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN P.RRIIRr PLEASE_N( .In- 115- IMMEDIATELY aY TELEPIKINE AND RETURN TIM ORIUINAL MESSAGE TO US AT T111 ADOvE ADDRESS VIA 111I! U.S,NATAL SERVICE, THANK YOU. - With this response we believe that this condition has been satisfied. Please let us know if you feel otherwise. If you have any further comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 303-734-1777. Sincerely, Joshua L. Rowl. . :,R.L.A. Director of Planning and Design • ... ,. . _ ._..... . . ... ,.,c. n. . ,: .i , 1405... r, cc : •0CT-U6-2011b THU U8:18 AN SOUTHWEST WELD PLANNING EHA NU. ('N bbd 9211 • x.,-.ca.6y,7a e=r'rarl N0.050 P.2 • - 1 ,i DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Civic Center Complex/LO • (303)651-8330/Fax M(303)6514696n 88501 E-mad: lomptiontp/armtreilet lownontca.ue Web sloe: i>ttp://www.ci.lan ontoo_us • September 22,2004 Weld Comity Afl Planning Department Monica1555 N 17o Avame Greeley,CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates PUD Sketch Plan • Dear Monica, Thank you Sr seat s the Adler Estates PUD Sketch Plan to the City of Longmont for our review and comment. The applicant proposes to build approximately 800 homes on 300 Bans located north of Weld County Road 26,south of Weld County Road 28,both east and west of Weld County Road 7. The Mixed Use Development(MUD)area was recently expanded to include an addal 188 of the 300 acres lying west of Weld County Road 7. The property is within the St.Vrain Valley Planning Area and is adjacent to land included in the Coordinated Planning Agreement. Given it's proximity to Longroont,a development of this as will have a significant impact on the City of Longmont unless Weld County provides a tbU range of urban services for residents in the MUD area. The following policies and ehategiee of the Longmont Area Comprehensive Plan (LACP)relate to this area and the proposed development as follows, Strategy E-2.1(b) Cooperate with other jurisdictions to develop programs for preserving arem of environmental sie,such as stream scenic views and highways,wildlife habitat,and wetlands. The western boundary of this property is a natural seep/drainage corridor through this area,and according to residents in this area,provides a movement corridor for local wildlife. A mini um= buffer of 300 feet on the eastern side of Liberty Gulch would assist in protecting that corridor. Policy T-2.2 Marsala a traffic system that encourages the use of arterial streets for crosstown and regional waffle,that encourages the use of primary and neighborhood collector streets to thermal traffic from the neighborhoods to arterial streets that discourages the use of OCT-06-2005 THU 08:16 All SOUTHWEST WELD PLANNING FAX NU. (20 652 4[11 r. di • ocr.ca.cue., a;irmin rc.ose P.3 local streets for through traffic, and that provides efficient regional travel connections to other jurisdictions and activity centers is the region. This proposed development places a significant traffic generator(-8,000 trips per day)away from most of the supporting roadway infrastructure. Although a 4-lane Major Arterial is planned to provide north/south access in the figure,such a roadway with connections to SH-66 and SH- 119 may be needed at the time of development to handle projected vehicle load. The traffic study submitted to the County will help identify the roadway needs fbr the development. Strategy 0-1.2(c) Plan areas in advance of development so that the City can identify the levels of service that both the City and other entities need to provide to accommodate the development. Policy 0-1.4 Ensure that urban-level development within the St.Wain Valley Planning Area is directed toward the City of Longmont in accordance with the goals and policies of the Longmont Area Comprehensive Plan or with adopted intergovernmental agreements. The proposed development is clearly urban in character and will require urban level services. While water and wastewater services will be provided by independent service providers, residents of this development are likely to look to Longmont to provide other services end oPportu nitiea such as parks and recreation,library,and neighborhood shopping. Thank you for the opportunity to review this POD Sketch Plan appilrMinp Should you have any questions about this se0r sal response,please feel free to call me et(303)651-5735 et e-mail ate at jennifer.hotfinanneci,longr ,cars. Sincerely, Planner xc: Phil DelVecchio,Community Development Director Brad Schol,Planning Director Don Semler,Director,Pails and Open Space David Andrews,Melody Homes File:#2051-33a1 ))04% WGffar9: 303 7-744,611 clan Spree. c 4rat(5 W,Ic) FAX LAND Z ARCHITECTS DATE: February 2, 2005 PROJECT: Adler Estates PROJECT #: 03122 TO: Jennifer Hoffmann PHONE: 303-651-8330 City of Longmont FAX: 303-651-8696 Dept. of Community Development PHONE: CC: FAX: FROM: Josh Rowland PHONE: 303-734-1777x30 Land Architects, Inc. FAX: 303-734-1778 SUBJECT: Response to PUD Sketch Plan Referral Comments # OF PAGES: 4 ATTACHMENT(S) Jennifer, I am contacting you on behalf of the applicant of the Adler Estates PUD Sketch Plan application with Weld County. This fax is intended to address your referral comments to the PUD Sketch Plan es. submittal, dated September 22, 2004. Following this cover letter is a portion of our response letter to Weld County's Department of Planning Services that explains how we have addressed your Sketch Plan comments. I will follow up with a phone call to discuss; ultimately I am looking for you to provide written acknowledgement, for record with the County, that your concerns are being addressed. I look forward to discussing these matters with you in greater detail. Thanks, Josh Rowland Associate/Project Director Land Architects, Inc. r land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S.Ridgeline Blvd.#130, Highlands Ranch,CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone(303) 734.1777 • fax(303) 734.1778 O P � (4. Comment: The applicant shall submit written evidence that indicates the Colorado Division of Wildlife's concerns have been addressed, including their it., ) concern pertaining to the Liberty Gulch area. A Response: The Colorado Division of Wildlife stated in their referral letter that, 'L "The parcel is currently agricultural and cannot be considered as critical habitat 1 for any wildlife species." CDOW concerns of mitigating noxious weeds will be addressed during the construction phase when the entire site will be graded and properly re-established with appropriate landscape materials. The HOA will be V provided with a noxious weed mitigation plan for long-term care of the development. The recommendation by CDOW to re-vegetate the Liberty Gulch area has been addressed as shown in the Preliminary Site Improvement plans. 5. Comment: The applicant shall submit written evidence that indicates the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment concerns have been addressed, including lack of letters from St. Vrain Sanitation District and Longs Peak Water District indicating intent to provide services. Response: The applicant has provided, with the Change of Zone submittal, formal service agreements with the St. Vrain Sanitation District and Longs Peak Water District. '0*--N 6. Comment: The applicant shall submit written evidence that indicates the City of Longmont, Department of Community Development's concerns have been addressed, including compliance with the Longmont Area Comprehensive Plan. Response: The City of Longmont, Department of Community Development La requested that the applicant address the following concerns relating to guidelines of the Longmont Area Comprehensive Plan; • Strategy E-2.1(b) Cooperate with other jurisdictions to develop programs for preserving areas of environmental significance, such as stream corridors, scenic views and highways, wildlife habitat, and wetlands. 1/4.45 j The Preliminary Site Improvement Plans show native re-vegetation along the open space areas adjacent to Liberty Gulch to preserve the environmental characteristics of the corridor. The open space areas along the Liberty Gulch corridor maintain development setbacks that range from 100 feet to 500 feet. • Policy T-2.2 Maintain a traffic system that encourages the use of arterial streets for cross-town and regional traffic, that encourages the use of primary and neighborhood collector streets to channel traffic from the neighborhoods to arterial streets, that discourages the use of local streets for through traffic, and that provides efficient regional travel connections to other jurisdictions and activity centers in the region. • . r• The Preliminary Site Improvement Plans shows on-site roadway improvements for the WC I-25 Parallel Arterial Roadway and WCR 26.5. Off-site roadway improvements that will be addressed in the development phasing, as both a part of this and other developments, will include connections of the WC I-25 Parallel Arterial Roadway to CO Hwy 119 and CO Hwy 66 and WCR 26 to WCR 5.5. The proposed system of roadways will address the concerns of the City of Longmont, Department of Community Development as they relate to capacity for traffic generated by the development. • Strategy G-1.2(c) Plan areas in advance of development so that the City can identify the levels of service that both the City and other entities need to provide to accommodate the development. • Policy G-1.4 Ensure that urban level development within the St. Vrain Valley Planning Area is directed toward the City of Longmont in accordance with the goals and policies of the Longmont Area Comprehensive Plan or with adopted intergovernmental agreements. The primary concern of the City of Longmont, Department of Community Development, as they relate to the aforementioned policies, is the development's impact on Longmont services such as parks and recreation, library, and neighborhood shopping. Adler Estates will provide over 70 acres of developed parks and open space for use by its residents to include sports fields and courts, roller hockey rink, swimming pool, playgrounds and over five miles of trails. The Weld County Library District is planning a new branch location along the CO Hwy 119 corridor near I-25 that will help to mitigate the impact of future residents of the development on the Longmont Library District. New commercial districts are forming along the CO Hwy 66 and 119 corridors in Weld County that will serve this development in the future. Until such services are in place, the City of Longmont will benefit from sales tax revenues from Weld County residents that are not a burden on the City's infrastructure. 7. Comment: The Weld County Department of Building Inspection in their referral dated September 8, 2004, stated their concerns specific to foundations and bulk requirements. The applicant shall indicate in future applications how the concerns of the Weld County Department of Building Inspection will be addressed. Response: The applicant will construct foundations as directed by the Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation. Bulk requirements of the residential architecture, as they relate to minimum side-yard setbacks, will provide a minimum 5' clear zone and an additional 2 '/z' zone to include any appurtenances • (i.e. counter forts, eaves, a/c units, etc.) providing a minimum 7 '/2' building setback from the property line. Many residential product models provide more the the 7 '/2' minimum setback. r^ MEMO LAND ARCHITECTS n To: Monica Daniels-Mika, Planning Director Phone: (970) 353-6100 Weld County Planning Dept. Fax: (970) 304-6498 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Date: 2/ /04 Project: Adler Estates Project #: 03122 Subject: Longmont, Department of Community Development-PUD Sketch Plan Referral Comment/Referral Agency Authorization Sent by: Jennifer Hoffmann, c/o Josh Rowland, Land Architects Monica, I have discussed my referral comments regarding the Adler Estates PUD Sketch Plan application with Josh Rowland (Land Architects, Inc.), the applicant's representative. (check one) r _ ...my referral comments have been addressed satisfactorily, and I approve of the applicant proceeding with the Weld County, PUD Change of Zone application. ...my referral comments have not been addressed satisfactorily, for the following reason. Signed: Jennifer Hoffman, Longmont Dept. of Community Development Date This letter will be included as a part of the Adler Estates, PUD Change of Zone application. Please sign and fax back to me at 303-734-1778. This is a requirement by the Weld County, Department of Planning Services. Thanks, j. Joshua Rowland Senior Project Designer/Team Leader land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S.Ridgeline Blvd.#130, Highlands Ranch CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone(303) 734.1777 • fax(303)734.1778 LAND 0 ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international Exhibit ` D ' .� r ....-MA -I- - •.rt1COZ submittallADLER final COZ Comments.doc land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 October 5, 2005 LAND rM ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates MUD Dear Chris: The Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners contained an Approval Recommendation for the Adler Estates Project, PZ-1071 based upon compliance with Chapter 27 requirements with conditions. These conditions are listed on pages 11-16 of the draft resolution by the Clerk to the Board. We would like to provide you with the information that we believe resolves the following condition: 1.F Prior to recording the Change of Zone Plat: The applicant shall address the concerns of the Weld County Sheriff's Office, as stated in a memo dated May 6, 2005 and incorporate remedies for these concerns. Written evidence of a solution shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. Resolution: A copy of the May 6, 2005 referral letter is attached for your reference. We have addressed their comments as follows: 1. The Sheriff's Office requests that builders and developers designate an area by the entrance of the subdivision to place a shelter for school children awaiting a school bus. The Change of Zone Plat provides two (2) bus shelter locations centrally located in the development at the intersection of CR7 and CR 26.5 for the future use by school buses and future regional bus service. The St. Vrain Valley School District has indicated that, based on the size of Adler Estates, there would be multiple pick-up points throughout the neighborhood. In this situation, the school buses would utilize on-street parking areas for loading zones and children would use the local street sidewalks to stage loading and unloading. 2. Either mail distribution within the sub-division or a central drop-off location within the subdivision should be developed so that residents do not have to cross a county road to obtain their mail. The updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit `B', provides locations for mailbox clusters along land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd, Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 local streets. Mailbox clusters are allocated such that residents will not have to access a county road to retrieve their mail. 3. A permanent sign should be placed at the entrance to the subdivision detailing the name of the subdivision, address, and graphical presentation of the roadways within the subdivision, and a plan developed to maintain the sign. The updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit `B', provides three (3) locations for the orientation signage described by the sheriff's department at each major entry along CR 7. 4. If roadways within this subdivision are not maintained or adopted by the county, individuals purchasing property in this subdivision should be should be notified that there will be limited traffic enforcement powers. Adler Estates will not have private streets or restricted access to any areas. 5. A plan should be developed to maintained maintain roadways within the subdivision, especially during inclement weather conditions for emergency vehicles. The county has accepted responsibility of all maintenance on streets within the Adler Estates. 6. The Sheriff's Office is very supportive of homeowner's associations as a means of maintaining common areas. All common areas and landscape buffer areas that are a part of Adler Estates shall be maintained by an HOA. The applicant intends to finalize the formation of the HOA prior to Final Plat approval. 7. Oil and gas production facilities within the subdivision should be fenced off in order to mitigate the potential for tampering. The updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'B', provides security fencing locations around all oil and gas production facilities. 8. The names of all streets within the subdivision should be presented to the Sheriffs Office for approval to eliminate duplication of street names within the county. The updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit 'B', provides final street names that have been approved by the Sheriff's Office, the Longmont Post Office, and the Weld County Building Department. 9. The Sheriff's Office lacks the ability to absorb any additional service demand without additional resources. The Southwest Weld County Law Enforcement Authority was approved by the BOCC on September 21,2005 and has an election scheduled for November 1, 2005. The LEA was created in conjunction with the Adler Estates PUD to provide the Sheriff's Department with additional funding to serve new urbanized areas of the county. With this response we believe that this condition has been satisfied. Please let us know if you feel otherwise. If you have any further comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 303-734-1777. Sincerely, L C J\snua L. Ro d, R.L.A. Director of Planning and Design 1,0/05/05 17:23 FAd trust • Weld County Sheriffs • Office • • Memo • • T131 Chris Gathman Front Ken Poncelow • Data: May 6,2005 • • Rea PZ-1071 - • The Sheriffs Office recommends theldlowing improvements for this housing sub-division: 1. The Sheriffs Office requests that builders and developers designate an area by the entrance of • the sub-division in which to place a shelter for school children awaiting the school bus. This area should also include a pull off for the school bus which enables it to safely load and unload • children out of the roadway. • • 2. Either mail distribution within the sub-division or a central drop off location within the sub-division • should be developed so that residents do not have to cross a county road to obtain their mail. 3. A permanent sign should be placed at the entrance to the subdivision detailing the name of the sub-division,address,and a graphical presentation of the roadways within the subdivision. • There should be a plan developed to maintain this sign. -4. If the roadways within this sub-division are not maintained or adopted by the county, individuals purchasing property in this sub-division should be notified that the Sheriffs Office will have limited traffic enforcement powers. 5. A plan should be developed to maintain roadways within the sub-division especially-during inclementweather conditions for emergency vehicles. 6. The Sheriffs Office is very supportive of homeowner funded homeowner's associations. These associations provide a contact for the Sheriffs Office and a means of maintaining common • areas. • 7. If there are oil or gas production facilities within this sub-division,they need to be fenced off in ' order to mitigate the potential for tampering. These fealties are known to create an attractive nuisance for young people. Tampering not only creates a significant danger to safety but also of environmental damage with extensive mitigation and clean-up costs. 8. The names of all streets within the sub-division should be presented to the Sheriffs Office for approval. This will eliminate duplication of street names within the county: The Sheriff's Office lacks the ability to absorb any additional service demand without the resources recommended in the multi-year plan provided to the Weld County Board of County Commissioners or as indicated by growth not considered at the time the plan was developed. I have no other comments on this proposal. • 1 a • LAND 0 ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international • • Exhibit 'E ' • • • P:\2003\03122-MEL-Adler Property\Letters\Report\COZ submittal\ADLER final COZ Comments.doc land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 October 5,2005 LAND M ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates PUD Dear Chris: The Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners contained an Approval Recommendation for the Adler Estates Project, PZ-1071 based upon compliance with Chapter 27 requirements with conditions. These conditions are listed on pages 11-16 of the draft resolution by the Clerk to the Board. We would like to provide you with the information that we believe resolves the following condition: 1.G Prior to recording the Change of Zone Plat: The applicant shall attempt to address the requirements/concerns of the Longmont Soil Conservation District as stated in their referral dated May 6, 2005. Written evidence of such shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. Resolution: A copy of the May 6, 2005 referral is attached for your reference. We have addressed their comments as follows: 1. The district has concerns about the 70 acres of open space and how it will be maintained for weed control and conservation practices. The applicant will submit an HOA Landscape Installation &Maintenance Guidelines manual to the County for review with the Final Plat. The manual will direct the HOA on the long-term care of the open space areas and will specifically address noxious weed control measures and other conservation measures relating to irrigation controls, low-water plant selection, and soil preparation. land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 With this response we believe that this condition has been satisfied. Please let us know if you feel otherwise. If you have any further comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 303-734-1777. Sincerely, LAID Joshua L. Row , R.L.A. Director of Planning and Design 10/05/05 17:27 FAA _._-- - - WILD �_' 16 a Weld County Referral Weld County Planning Department April 21 , 2005 • GREELEY OFFICE III MAY 1 2 2005 rst-rog.q COLORADO. RECEIVED 27- The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: , Applicant Melody Homes-DR Horton Case Number PZ-1071 • Please Reply By May 19,2005 Planner Chris Gathman • Project Application for a change of zone from A(Agriculture)for PUD for 833 single family residential lots along with an elementary school site and 70.08 acres of open space Legal - Pt SW4 and Pt.SE4 of Section 33 and Part of the SW4 ofSection 34,T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location . . South of and adjacent-to CR 28 and east and west of and adjacent to C R 7. Parcel Number 1207 33 000024, 1207 33 000030, 1207 34 000025 , The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation, Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any-response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions • regarding the applidation, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new information may be added to applications under review during the review process.- If you desire to examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) • June 21,2005 • 24/V ,have reviewed the request and find that It does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan e have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. O See attached letter. Comments: - i%rit t •3ir•c! xri,< '1 r v 4R e • ('tp.-.. /yfl � etcetc...,etc..., ..i/ ,c.:-Z e.t4Zef 4- ryrn. f+,-c/ `4; - i, rr-r o// <n�T^!•�, ate./ `atrenst, ,.(.at..[?r..s,. .Signature I.Lz ar , - Date ' ,X., /G -05. . ' Agency A 0 -74-,1J (Ai) *Weld County Planning Dept. 4918.10s Street,Greeley,CO.60631 4(970)353-6100 exL3540 4(970)304.6498 fax • LAND 0 ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international • • Exhibit 'F ' • • • • n -MEL-Adler Pro•- etterslRe•ort\COZ subrrtittal\ADLER final COZ Comments.doc land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 October 5, 2005 LAND O ARCHITECTS perspective I balance a subsidiary of land architects international Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates PUD Dear Chris: The Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners contained an Approval Recommendation for the Adler Estates Project, PZ-1071 based upon compliance with Chapter 27 requirements with conditions. These conditions are listed on pages 11-16 of the draft resolution by the Clerk to the Board. We would like to provide you with the information that we believe resolves the following condition: 1.H Prior to recording the Change of Zone Plat: The applicant shall attempt to address the requirements/concerns of the Colorado Division of Wildlife as stated in their referral dated May 15, 2005. Written evidence of such shall be provided to the Department of Planning Services. Resolution: A copy of the May 15, 2005 referral is attached for your reference. We have addressed their comments as follows: 1. Upon disturbance of any areas, noxious weeds should be monitored and controlled. The applicant will submit an HOA Landscape Installation & Maintenance Guidelines manual to the County for review with the Final Plat. The manual will direct the HOA on the long-term care of the open space areas and will specifically address noxious weed control measures both during and after construction. 2. CDOW warns that homeowner and HOA landscaping may be damaged by wildlife. Damages incurred will not be eligible for reimbursement by CDOW. The applicant acknowledges this condition. 3. CDOW requests that the Liberty Gulch area be maintained as an open corridor and improved and enhanced with native vegetation. Adler Estates provides trail/open space buffers planted with native grasses and plantings along Liberty land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste- 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 Gulch. The updated Change of Zone Plat/Preliminary Site Improvement Plan, Exhibit `B',provides detail regarding the treatment of open space areas. 4. CDOW requests that homeowners be warned of the presence of native predators and seasonal hunting activities on surrounding properties. The applicant will submit the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions for the HOA to the County for review with the Final Plat. The CC&Rs will cover the information requested by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. With this response we believe that this condition has been satisfied. Please let us know if you feel otherwise. If you have any further comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at 303-734-1777. Sincerely, L CHITE• ., Jo ua L. Row and, R.L.A. Director of Planning and Design 10.1405.tloc .1.41,.1.41,w w rat i i AI + ___ _ -- -_ ------ _ Mesa STATE OF COLORADO - Np$.!t_ BIN Owens,Governor. ti • O T�_D' DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE �► AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER SOF Bruce McCloskey,Director For IArldlijr • - Den Broadway Weid Caanly an 16in For People TelephonColorado(�)297-1192 GREELEy OFFICEpa am May 15,zoos MAY h 9 20/5 *old County Planning RECEIVED Chris Gathman 918 10th Street Greeley,CO 80631 Subject:Melody Homes-DR Horton,case number PZ-I 071 Dear Chris: The Colorado Division of Wildlife has checked and reviewed the subject property and proposed development as to potential impacts on wildlife. The parcel is currently agriculhiral land and generally cannot be considered as critical habitat for any wildlife species. According to the Colorado Division of Wildlife Natural Diversity Information Source Map for Weld County,the area provides winter range for bald eagles,foraging areas and winter range and winter concentration area for ducks and geese,and is within the overall range for pheasant and mule.deer and white-tailed deer. Coyote,fox,raccoon, skunk,songbirds,other raptors and herptofauna may also occur in this area. • Upon disturbance of any areas,noxious weeds should be moni ral and controlled. Homeowners should also be aware that planting'trees,shrubs and other herbaceous plants may attract wildlife. Subsequently,ornamental landscaping may be damaged by wildlife. Homeowners will need to be responsible for damages incurred and will not be eligible for any reimbursement by the Colorado Division of Wildlife. The Liberty Gulch area should be • maintained as an open corridor and improved and enhanced with native vegetation. Homeowners should be made aware of the presence of native predators. Pats should not be allowed to roam free. ' All domesticated livestock and farm animals should be secured with wildlife proof fencing appropriate for the species being raised. Pets as well may negatively interact with wildlife even on the home-sites and homeowners will be responsible for handling these problems. Homeowners should secure pet and animal feeds,trash containers,and charcoal/gas grills. Nets should have current shots. All control of nuisance wildlife will be the homeowner's responsibility with the possible exception of bears and mountain lions. Homeowners should also be aware that hunting may be an ongoing fall and winter activity on lands surrounding the development Shooting will occur normally in the early mornings until dark on these areas. The sounds of gunfire may be somewhat distracting,yet should be noted to the potential owners and developer. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES,Russell Georoe,Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION,Jeffrey Crawford,Chair•Torn Burke,Vice Chair•Ken Tones. Sec-Mary Members,Robert Bray•Rick •Robert Shoemaker Ex Officio Members,Russel George end Don Amend w/ua/Ya 1(:Ji l'M __ ___ %JUJU • Thank you for your consideration of these comments. If you have any questions regarding these comments,please contact District Wild4ife Manager Suzanne Kloster at 303-485-0593. Sincerely, /1/.11 '.. e fa Scott Hoover ' Northeast Regional Manager Cc: Suzanne Kloster • • • • • • • • • LAND rM ARCHITECTS perspective balance a subsidiary of land architects international Exhibit ' G ' P:\2003\03122-MEL-Adler Property\Letters\Report\COZ submittal\ADLER final COZ Comments.doc land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 • ( . lb TETRA TECH RMC October 5, 2005 Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates PUD Dear Chris: The Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissions contained an Approval Recommendation for the Adler Estates Project,PZ -1071 based upon compliance with Chapter 27 requirements with conditions. These conditions are listed on pages 9— 13 of the resolution. II-IUQ We would like to provide you with the information that we believe resolves the following condition: Prior to recording the Change of Zone Plat I i-I The applicant shall provide written evidence from the Colorado Geological Survey that their issues/concerns with groundwater/drainage and future basement construction as stated in their referral dated May 16, 2005 have been addressed and basements can be constructed on the lots located within the high groundwater areas or a plat note shall indicate which lots should not have basements. (Colorado Geological Survey). Resolution: A copy of the May 16,2005 referral is attached for your reference. We have addressed their comments as follows: I. Subsurface/soils. Site specific borings will be conducted for each foundation site to correctly determine the type of soil. This will be done at the time of design for the individual residence. 1900 S.Sunset Street.Suite I-F.Longmont,CO 80501 Tel 303 7725282 Fax 303.665.6959 www.ttrmccom I El TETRA TECH RMC Chris Gathman October 5, 2005 Page 2 2. Groundwater/drainage. The geotechnical recommended against basement construction in a portion of the property due to shallow groundwater. However, subsequently,this recommendation was revised that basement construction would be allowed with the addition of an underdrain system was installed. This is per the attached letter from Terracon. Since then,we have had email correspondence(dated September 7th and 12th)in which Andy Gleason, Geologist from Colorado Geological Survey, indicated that he was not opposed to the underdrain system as long as he is provided with a more detailed design plan. The timing of this design plan will be in conjunction with the final construction plan, at which time he will review it and provide an additional letter. 3. Slope Stability. It indicated that the setbacks from slopes were adequate to avoid potential slope failure. With this response,we believe that this condition has been satisfied. Please let us know if you feel otherwise. If you have any further comments or questions,please do not hesitate to contact us at 303-772-5282. Sincerely, TETRA TECH RMC, INC. ofrimte,, a Catherine A. Leslie, P.E. Project Manager Attachments H:\0068_067 Adler Property\Weld County Comment Responses\Resolution of 2!-Colorado Geological Survey.doc . • COLORADO GEOLOGICAL WRVSit iW E TATS OF COLORADO Division of Minerals&Geology } ) C." Department of Natural Resources • 1313 Sherman Street,Room 715 % Denver,Colorado 80203 m 5-4--oc Phone(303)866-2611 FAX(303)866-2461 • DEPARTMENT OF May 16, 2005 Legal: SENES33, T3N, R68W NATURAL RESOURCES Chris Gathman Weld County planning Departmer►t Sill Owens Weld County Department of Planning Services CREELEY.OFFICE Governor 918 10th Street MAY 3 1 Z005 Ru«q George Greeley, CO 80631Executive " rve Director RECEIVED Ronald W_Cottony Re: Adler Estates PUD Division Director ws CGS Review No. WE-05-0049 Vincent G�ogisct Dear Mr. Gathman; In response to your request and in accordance with Senate Bill 35 (1972), I reviewed the change of zone submittal. The site consists of approximately 300 acres and the proposed subdivision would include 833 residential lots with 75.89 acres of open space and an elementary school site. Included in the review package were a PUD Change of Zone Specific Guide and Preliminary Site Improvement Plans by Land Architects (2-25-05), a Supplemental Geotechnical • Investigation by Terracon (12-14-04), a letter and map regarding the Groundwater Management/Soil Treatment of the Adler Property by Terracon (1-17-05) and a Preliminary Drainage Report by Tetra Tech RMC (1-19-05). The change of zone submittal included adjustments to the layout of the subdivision that took my comments from the CGS letter dated September 13, 2004 into consideration. 1. Subsurface/soils. The Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation by Terracon included analysis from 15 test borings. The swell/consolidation tests indicate that much of the soils found on the property may be able to support conventional spread footing foundations. Some soils do show moderate swell and consolidation potential and will require some type of mitigation as outlined by the Terracon report. Terracon recommends that site-specific borings be conducted for individual foundation sites to determine the type of foundation necessary to mitigate potentially swelling or consolidating soils. 2. Groundwater/Drainage. Groundwater was found at depths of 2 to 13 feet throughout the property. Terracon recommends aaainst basement construction in the center of the property due to shallow groundwater. This should be in the plat notes and be a condition of plat approval. The site- specific subsurface investigations should note depth to groundwater and make recommendations for subsurface construction. Adler Estates PUD, CGS Review No. WE-05-0049, page 2/2. Terracon recommends that the soft sediment in the bottom of the 2 ponds located in the south part of the property be removed prior to filling in the ponds. I would also recommend that the ponds be filled with structural fill designed to support the bearing weight of the proposed structures. A qualified geotechnical engineer should oversee the construction of the pond fill. 3. Slope stability. The site plan includes changes to the layout that avoid the steep slopes outlined in section 6 (Slope stability) of my previous letter. The setbacks from steep slopes appear to be adequate to avoid potential slope failure. The Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation by Terracon and the Preliminary Drainage Report by Tetra Tech RMC have adequately addressed my concerns regarding the geologic hazards for this subdivision, provided that all recommendations in the reports and in this letter are compiled with. If you have any further questions or concerns, please contact me at (303) 866-3350, or andy.oleason(offstate.co.us. Sincerely, A4. iteo,- Andy Gleason Geologist • Colorado Geological Survey / lierracon Consulting Engineers&Scientists January 17, 2005 Terracon Consultants,Inc. 1242 Br-ennead Place Longmont,Colorado 80501 Jennifer Augustine Phone 303.7763921 D.R. Horton, Melody Series Fax 303.776.4041 11031 Sheridan Blvd www.terracon.com Westminster, CO 80020 Re: Proposed Residential Subdivision Adler Property Groundwater Management/Soil Treatment - Weld County, Colorado Terracon Project 22045248 Based on our supplemental geotechnical investigation dated December 14, 2004, moderately swelling bedrock was not detected on the above-referenced site within a depth of 10 feet of the ground surface. Therefore, this study indicates that the majority of this site is suitable for residences constructed on conventional type foundation systems. Some areas may exist on this property where moderately expansive bedrock is at higher levels. It is planned to drill each individual lot prior to construction. At that time it will be determined if caisson type construction or over-excavation and stabilization is required for any of the residences. If moderately expansive bedrock is encountered within the influence of the foundations, either drilled pier foundation systems or over-excavation and replacement of expansive materials will be recommended. If soft low bearing soils are encountered at or near planned foundation levels, over-excavation and replacement with washed gravel or structural fill will be recommended. We do recommend that all soft sediment which exists in the bottom of the 2 ponds on the site be removed prior to filling in the ponds. It is our understanding that an interceptor drain system is proposed on this site along the north side of the property and that an underdrain system will be constructed within the subdivision to draw down the existing water table. The cut/fill map by Tetra Tech RMC indicates that fill will be placed in the areas of shallow groundwater. It is our understanding that final grades will provide a minimum of 1 to 3 feet clearance between the groundwater table and the bottom of foundations. Perimeter drains are planned around all basements. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Sincerely, n , • S .- ,. . TERR4CON i ele?L'I r 1 i k trn % � a .: . O , O Edward J. Paas, P.E. ' ` �e'ee ,tieik"w�`/ ''aftVileett,Vc Delivering Success for Clients and Employees Since 1965 More Than 60 Offices Nationwide . • Page 1 of 2 Cathy Leslie From: Becky Eustice Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 10:32 AM To: Cathy Leslie Subject: FW:Adler Estates, Weld County From: Gleason, Andy [maiito:Andy.Gleason@state.co.us] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 9:14 AM To: Becky Eustice Subject: RE: Adler Estates, Weld County Ms. Eustice, This is in response to your letter regarding the construction of basements in shallow groundwater areas of Adler Estates. Due to the clayey nature of the soil and the underlying bedrock, the underdrain system may have the tendency to drain slowly. Other underdrain systems in claystone in the Denver Basin have had poor performance issues which resulted in flooded basements. I am not opposed to the underdrain system, but I would like to see a more detailed plan regarding the type of underdrain system that is to be utilized for the Adler Estates property before I write a letter to the Weld County planning department. If these details will not be available until the final plat stage, then I am willing to address these concerns at that stage. Please contact me with any further questions or concerns. Andy Gleason Colorado Geological Survey 1313 Sherman St, Room 715 Denver, CO.80203 303-866-3350 andy.gleason@state.co.us -----Original Message----- From: Becky Eustice [mailto:Becky.Eustice@ttrmc.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:59 AM To: Gleason, Andy Cc: Linda Sweetman-King; Paas, Ed J.; Josh Rowland; Cathy Leslie Subject:Adler Estates, Weld County Hello, I am one of the engineers working on the Adler Estates project located in Weld County(CGS Review No. WE-05-0011). I called and left a message last week about meeting to discuss Weld County comments (see below). Hopefully, this email can provide additional information that will be useful to you in determining if a meeting is required. Weld County Staff made the following statement as a result of their review and your referral letter. The Colorado Geological Survey, in their referral letter dated May 16, 2005 indicated concerns with groundwater/drainage on the site(referring to a supplemental Geotechnical Investigation by Terracon(12- 14-04), and a letter and map regarding the Groundwater Management/Soil Treatment of the Adler Property by Terracon(1-17-05). Their referral states, "Groundwater was found at depths of 2 to 13 feet throughout 10/5/2005 J Page 2 of 2 the property. Terracon recommends against basement construction in the center of the property due to shallow groundwater. This should be on the plat notes and be a condition of plat approval. The site specific subsurface investigations should note depth to groundwater and make recommendations for subsurface construction." This is addressed through the attached conditions of approval. And, The applicant shall provide written evidence from the Colorado Geological Survey that their issues/concerns with groundwater/drainage and future basement construction as stated in their referral dated May 16, 2005 have been addressed and basements can be constructed on the lots located within the high groundwater areas or a plat note shall indicate which lots should not have basements. (Colorado Geological Survey) We have discussed these issues with Terracon and determined a plan for the abatement of the groundwater issues(interceptor underdrain along northwestern boundary, underdrain throughout the site and over excavation as necessary). Please refer to the attached pdf of the signed and stamped letter from the Geotechnical Engineer. As indicated in the italicized portion above, County staff are requiring a letter from you. Is the attached letter sufficient to allay your concerns or should we meet to discuss the issues further? Please email or call if you have additional questions. Thank you for your assistance. Becky Eustice, MSCE Project Manager Tetra Tech RMC, Inc. 1900 S. Sunset Street,Suite 1-F Longmont, Colorado 80501 Tel 303.772.5282 Fax 303.665.6959 The information contained within this email is intended for the addressed recipients only.Any other use of this information is prohibited. 10/5/2005 LAND MI ARCHITECTS perspective [ balance a subsidiary of land architects international • Exhibit ' H ' • P:12003\03122-MEL-Adler Property\Letters\Report\COZ submittaMDLER final COZ Comments.doc land planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchltects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 r TETRA TECH RMC October 5, 2005 Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates PUD Dear Chris: The Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissions contained an Approval Recommendation for the Adler Estates Project,PZ-1071 based upon compliance with Chapter 27 requirements with conditions. These conditions are listed on pages 9— 13 of the resolution. We would like to provide you with the information that we believe resolves the following condition: 4. The plat shall be amended to include the following: A. The proposed locations of the oil and gas drilling envelopes (if no agreement is reached) and the existing oil and gas facilities on site, including all easements associated with these facilities. (Department of Planning Services) Resolution: We are working with KMG to provide the correct easements per the attached exhibits that they are reviewing in conjunction with the final agreements. Once the easements are approved, they will be noted on the Change of Zone plat(of which a draft is attached with the exhibits as they are at this time.) 1900 S.Sunset Street,Suite I-F,Longmont,CO 80501 Tel 303 7715282 Fax 303-665.6959 www.ttrmccom , Chris Gathman TETRA TECH RMC October 5,2005 Page 2 With this response, we believe that this condition has been satisfied. Please let us know if you feel otherwise. If you have any further comments or questions,please do not hesitate to contact us at 303-772-5282. Sincerely, TETRA TECH RMC, INC. Cr:4A (V .. Catherine A. Leslie, P.E. Project Manager Attachments H:\0068_067 Adler Property\Weld County Comment Responses\Resolution of 4A-Oil-Gas Facilities.doc I , CHANGE OF ZONE MAP 7.41.,'.,,...=w r ° .n. 74.4.'.41.4=..� 41.4:F •Vre �.- ADLER ESTATES " "w ti MwY`' ' SERIES . 't R"'•. ~�� {.11Yjjj ON MELODY 1 6 1 ¢'.+lt. , astaireersii i. i¢•4:.`•.'-,- ,,,i'�"r. unto, i '1'-' .. dr....ae n M WNW,CM..=TM N..rt W..•n.w.1 t...l a �, ••.� -.. .."/"/7`- A''�f.' Z,7",.,..:2:41:1=1;1"..."7.4.4.74=1,:'-'.w 4.re.,a iw..., ;;. ..,,: II:: , '� 1 . !k r """' i;;.+.ND,. 4"..4,1:.7,-,..,,,:: . . !+�,m'w"°�r.on ro be�'"r Mt Yam.M•.+ r.o.mi, m Mee.a m+.e.w"a°i..r�r nw°'Pirw�.uu or/. •,!I .r: ^ ...,�,yr.fl .oa.et ro�r .D. yr p to w.ran V I ./ i s T.ff/ f •..1Tct'3,. v..wo r' 4fCm 1 e4. re.74'lrr R .i%'LI..j r'� �� ,\.• i •� "�. _Le0Nn1� p.vW WI YY.w wn noct�"irfM�f0 �I •, ,,., of•f:i ., ,.'" • a w KftbacerA wean :',/ I --... UyAgs {. ^.,k.• $.;;,..'ti•, Y6ffi1y4* ..:....e.s.:s r ........... r...w"u MM..nMw.I.nr.Si e101 K..so.W-0.010.OM.Of :�=t1M7M A ;.. '� OMI Woos WM wo.nrr.m...01 a.4 .w v.. .. ....'.I 0101 ....I _ '`ti.s iv.'r'f o . r..�•.n .:",4tuo�:e b..w:n X�r�'''.1`11% '.mow w %.--.r.,—a1 sierM aK,ueer"" is •1 nardel COMM 4' ��imom m VMS.m ` ■ _ 0 44 I I?II KS*41(144,41.41 V.WOO'vW•en.fa e.AEnI '''''''.."'"."1444.24 r♦.Y u.b.uOl 44,".."4,4. ra.O."."1440.4.1 ic4.....pp a • I 4044•4001 4I:04.1•1".'"."74•441.`�..•w,a'"a.eon a•w.n,m';.,:".044144741417.4"."..4l.. .0 aC-0 '11 m..`p MT ,...,4n w.....r.,..D K mono •or,•.M.H MIMS arra MO amo.UK lam eve...DM Mae Fi woos To w'no-trM.nee n4r r.a w Imo, VT ~01 01 .{4 Our.a • w MVO b.vw 1.,ms nt r'.e eve .' ar•a.aR.fn i nor•••am 4~ �.w'/gym""..,.. ea....�,,.iw.w...:w nw 1 r , / r•••' /6w" u.c,,••xd PACIVIIVIVe6 mlmGl! c•-•'\ __ S!1'1�'011M 1167.0f * �rr.20 usu. 7 mn' . nitA Wi iw e. m e rot'..` al..a...e r met MOncomp M"". �rr \� ' I �O.—.^.—. 0101.MmteeO,rca + wrno,w_afe wirer.TO v'1.V.-4 I V - :0101.... I na M.Rm. -nor w Mood,M. —Woo ern....r ..M \ PARCEL 1 «.� u[ 0101 or 04.0400 I ( Watts MAT -..... ...............r.. V[ Wu&a.,n COMM MAIL A •`..........- .«. •-•Arc.. 0101. M nrcwr D.r.br w r.s.tp RI*.....g_...W a •A , i eg W lK w�.er ♦ le. �.�. •--a[r.nr 4ffMt lK awe.la MOO W Km -- Wen 0.l.LAI PARCEL 8 n.ne., Wen Iw►.i — 11 • •• 111.10!.AIMS y y AMNIA KM wnurtaan+wtnnEoe�.enar ROM EMU•�aA+n.mtrcnet e .._�...�.-._AA, A, NI COO111A 1O1lA ..n.".rD"ye..e...e r...Down..a wr omen re.n... J. 3 sl. • l • i .4.e.Meyer. a IDrn n..a e....e I —ai7sr+f v+ sir a� + J^ ' ` f% , t l,, 0101. ..m.S.w..0101 a...a.oe I t.(M .r....W.M1\ .........is\.� 1. A 1F • risen 1.N.T.• Yrltl IN ea al 0101` „Y.t [ 1 17 . II rer.7• -------..- •� 1 mmrxn OPNI.IlEY7MlO]VOOTOOIIRYC01AMO411! f ---' bIT1r'H1 myLIJ v Mri me OM ma mar...ratlinsmerww.Is n.< .anon.. ow r.q a Mama iE �-_` ♦ • :• \ • i^0101+o 0101 0101 row.0101 .mi cwn�ua .r•a.. 231.6+ \ 411.• rra ssaa�a ` } Kytewn 4W w...0..0 \\� wlD of.MrANIp>r^ . k4tRrtr4 i11i�' -� y.,�,_ U ` .. ▪ a.u \k...40"j'rm...',.../PM...'"'',..1.745,...se Tw6�iIf11,1C w.n , _m n. r..▪r e�.ow w.."�.D44".'"'". 44...":".L ..a w,w.sr non D r "' Mara. a '�,w.n:7.w"'"c...n"'°'r r...`mw. �:w M.r..' ;'Yl mr...,ro t4.+ .....$ ".:ear= r de in •� TETRA TECH RMC I — --_ -.w..� C r., � ..er.a, ,a,.1,1.nf cozi I • / —-----—,—,.---a air awe.sr I 1 ._. i %" t— I i ! 1 . . ,",. i I I i r I e . •� it' i \-, ! ' ?EJk. :Ir . s KI f 4 9 .. .. I Al ,..<Jr / 'c : 1 I I d ii lI:IFr y r at _ � � � IIIIIIIIil1' II I I ..-..i:. _ _ -- -:- rte;� _---- =,� - `:-_ -'- ' di II, iy- I I irn ��s� iii iit�►� �Q :� ■ I lift r ►d_ ® !11 _ z. s - i : . J i i" 1 Hill !�� 1 < ! i a I ___,— ——————__—LE----- I i di ADLER ESTATES � . EASEMENT EXHIBIT l '=f. up'm? • EXHIBIT A A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO /- - , EAST 1 4 CORNER SiC T3N, R&M PM 'iI i 'r,FND " COOT ALUM CAP I 0.6' ELOW ROAD SURFACE J„i ;O 8442. 1997 ,":111::: I: ; r ws,. ,.-.3 J ©G 2.4 AC Ur i:I'� (� 9 \PROPOSED LOCATION „1; 400'x400' �r 'I/ ` 1' 1 111; \ r WEST 323.00' R=315.00' ° :ii: L.j 4 in DELTA=52'09'52' i i I (D \ b o CH-N45'4719"W 1�r'; 1 N \\ m CL=276.99' 'I 'fi7----G cnv ..4.. L=286.79' /v",1 •' ' �n IPROPOSED ACCESS ROAD IF. — - a r_ AND WHEN, PROPOSED OIL & / a fSIw ° 17 ,-• CAS OPERATIONS AREA IS / // , H to Y l� UTIU2ED / // �'z R 1.,- R=435.00' r, /6 ' EAST 323.00' , DELTA=28'49'35" 1 r / 7 / CH=S3407'il'E �/ / / t ./wo1r PROPOSED R=255.00' \ CL=216.55' /�j '�3 ' OIL do CAS DELTA=50'10'41" L=218.86' a j OCh° 3 OPERATIONS CH=N44'47'44"W \ Icy,, �- GAS LINE 1 AREA CL=241.70' S� `'!• �' TO REMAIN §: L=249.60' ��i �� // / R=615.00' C . DELTA=1733'03" F / CH=N4715'27'W Y R=465.00' ' DELTA=28'49'35' 7 �1 CL=134.45' N = L=134.72' !II P CH=534-07'11"E / ! / i \ Z C1=231.49' / i / '45 R=485.00' !�, V DELTA=22'34'37" L=233.95' // / t / i R=585.00' CH=S4T 16'13"E :1r 5 / /j DELTA=1233'03' CL=189.88' �. i C / CH=N42 75'27"W t \hSe. 1=791.71' 1!11 ..... C =127.89' N�3, / // :128.15' `T? r' i / w`�` J �,a R=155.00' W n ISO // / R=515.00' \•3 DELTA=7728'48' ' V/% DELTA=22 34'37 s 7 \g. CH-N19 49'081M ' / / CH=54716'13'E \ \,,. CL=193.99' r 1 I SCALE: 1* / / / CL=201.62' R=125.00 t L=209.60' / L=202.93' li DELTA=7T28.48 Ile i 1 - / CH=N19'49'08'W •, 1 e' / CL=156.45' , /4''\ ,‘,/,,•`� .. L=169.04' oo � TRUE P01N6 s WEIR COUNTY RO _ y- _ ` - - N89'1 1'47"E 5289.16' $ 32 35 N83E N00-48'13'W i 41.44' 1 & I f SOUTHEAST CORNER ' S SOUTHWEST CORNER SEC 33, 7'3N. R68W, 6TH PM S SEC 33. T3N, R68W, 6TH PM FND 3' COOT ALUM CAP NO DESC 0.5' BELOW ROAD SURFACE i PLS 18482. 1997 R n e g TETRA TECH RMC o' 1900 S.SUNSET ST.,SUITE 1-F,LONGMONT,CO 80631 o' TEL 808.77252 METRO 80S.995 8288 FAX 305.015181/50 & THIS EXHIBIT DOES NOT REPRESENT 08/08/05 BKT I AINTENDED TOTEDEPICTT TTHE ATTACOHED s DESCRIPTION JOB# 80-0068.067.01 • EXHIBIT B - A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO ,1 f III " ' : 1; 2671 j•7;'9n 1 6, i i EAST 1/4 CORNER ::,: SEC 33, TJN, R68W, 6R1 PM `tp(TER 1/4 CORNER ,;' i FND 3' CDOT ALUM CAP SEC 341 1314, R68W, 6TH PM 'I'' ' 0.6' BELOW ROAD SURFACE I FND 2 ALUM CAP ' '' ' PLS 18482. 1997 I I PLS 7735. 2000 !I , 'I0 I I • III I„I I'' ( I J:: I I EAST l',- # I I 83.85' I re ' • - S3731'57'E O I I "j 157.51' CC Iu n S II II � ' ' I I rn _ ] (0 i� ( w SS27•07451,/ n F. by ,., If1 b 177.52' • .r+ 0 O 0 n I I Z 510'51'57V g 9 u I WEST 33.98' E. j I� i I 84.19' S43'39'44'11/3 ' I I 9.32' 77. 5 I" I S t i r. I DETAIL OF OPERATIONS AREA 5 O3 I:' ; _--= _--.:-_•.-:...... PARCEL I3• N od NO STRUCTUR$$ TRUE POINT f `v Ili : OF BEGININC EV I r ` 4839621 SO n PROPOSED ' a ` 1 1 i ; r OIL k GAS El I,, ' , Y inr21.45' ! OPERATIONS W AREA N00'19'30'W_ I:' LC) N89'40'302'r as.u. --- }o 3 80.00' 1 ' t H Ali 1,I�� I� , �- ;— — (SB34�030TiV 785.14' =r-2: —""'"---, — 5 • m �r r.''1* -min-- __ -/ ;I'1 per• I '�' C % • / / I I'' . =�II 123.28' ..I i1 EAST 323.007 i ill 50' PROPOSED j ' =I= ACCESS EASEMENT I ; I : 3 s . •I ✓' a * q r 8 2I 8 ii OUTHEAST CORNER o SEC 33, T314. R68W, 6TH PM 0 is »o 300FND 3' COOT ALUM CAP MlitMml n 0.5' BELOW ROAD SURFACE PLS 18482. 1997 scALE, 1"= 300' i 8 I n g • � TETRA TECH R IC ii 900 S.SUNSET ST.,�1.F,L ONGIMONT.CO 80601 , TEL 300.772.8462 METRO 000.686.4293 FAX SOLON2195o , ATHISM E DOES NOT REPRESENT 08/08/05 BKT r A ONUMENUMENTEp SURVEY. R IS ONLY tDESCRIPTION DEPICT THE ATTACHED JaB# 80-0068.067.01 EXHIBIT C A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO I,• III iIr I IIri f I PI F II r 1. N89'�7i 0' t3.92,2r,�,r i l ! N89'07'20'E 1756.66'1 t . i ......>>....... !III r EAST 1/4 CORNER i !! ! SEC 33, T3N, R68W, 6TH PM I CENTER 1/4 CORNER IIr! ! FND 3'COOT ALUM CAP I I SEC 34, 73N, R68W, 6TH PM {!I 0.6' BELOWROAD SURFACE r FND 2 ALUM CAP III I I PLS 18482, 1997 11'I PLS 7735, 2000 I 11 II !III ! -.4. PROPERTY UNE I" I I ! 1 Fill 1 j r111 u) o III I (.4 I i i yI 1 I !I t 3 I o i IS 1 I I O ' I O I i I I{ M I tIr 6 a I III' I O pf , II 1 O y II ! Z • , iI �! cOl Iii I i I P III r 5 IllI P ' I � ' IIIr r pQ Q Ii°' I I F III I I 1 cc .f.: Y III I }} 1 O III I I T— I v I`I g op t r l Z i i ,I TRUE Pow !Ir I ;'�o_ _ _ =`� PARCEL 3SI of �ECIMNc E p,,111; I U \\ NO s;�ucru� (�I; {I , \\ ` N88'55'45'E (NI;I{I i 9 \\ 4839621 SQf E7 17.00' i I rI i N\ 1 1 ' 102 A E" oro4'ts-E W III s-.....,, I� _ t 1� 657 7• 20.00' III I \ ` =w = Tj N79'38.13'E �I ri? t 13 65 :≥ sars5.451N CU " 15.38' !It I I 'ti jV'/ ` I I: — — — G — — — 20.33' I IIIo / ;I 1 § I I L_ JIJ 1 q it, I g IIIt ! Ii �l ttl l I r g !!; ! iI "I r I '! I I tsl! �i i I� ! I I ! al. p L I w SOUTHEAST CORNER ti SEC 33. T3N, R68W, 6TH PM q F'NO 3' COOT ALUM CAP 8 PLS 18462.BELOW 1ROAD SURFACE TETRA TECH RMC 1900 S.SUNSET ST.,surf 1-F,UOWGFAOFlr,Co 80601 e o 75 Ise AO _ TEL 9.7725282 METRO 305866.826.7 FAX 306.696.0969 & ATNMONUMEIS NTED SURVEY. IIT DOES NOT TPSEON YENT 1 " I 08/08/05 BKT Y DESCRIPTION DEPICT THE ATTACHED SCALE: r" A 300. JOB# 8O-0O68.Q67.Oi • EXHIBIT D A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO NORTHEAST CORNER SEC 33, T3N. Row6TH PM NORTH 1/4 CORNER FNO 2' ALUM CAP SEC 33. T3N. R68W, 6TH PM PLS 22097 FNO 2'ALUM CAP BELOW ROAD SURFACE PLS 20673, 1996 WELD COUNTY ROAD 28 - tt S89'03 55 2670.9 j 4i. - - Sevro3'55 W--1 esxi z- _ / 41 Ii / '/ rlrl l; / j �I ! r /V / ,l rjj'I a 1' /// t 1A I r /// ,I�r i I/ // I • .II /// ii I II iv j�j , III // / p�yl . to lb // / int III // -' lOrl I i r. /g/ 1, i O i. / // + a o • I,' / // 'lI i� r,r C o r / r I I' �' / NI _ ` 4 G �, /// al ' r uJ r :II // / Z ' Y. I U i1 /// III III '/ I s tO / / iIll ' j `l` / /. / , 4. rj , III / // I . rr Y C III / ,',. I, a N O 1 r /// 11 /� ifs — — — G — — — — — — _� — G i TRUE I i �/ • t: t - OF BE � i- / • .� ` 89'35'10- /323.00' I `' \ 1 1Q I r E T. R ; ' z A,CO r Q II,I' ;t :!rt:.COLRO IIIiii SED OIL & GAS ;I S OPERATIONS AREA I 'I ( III r IS EAST 1/4 CORNER `II ;I SEC 33, T3N, R68W, 6TH PM I 3 FNO 3' CDOT ALUM CAP gi 0.6' BELOW ROAD SURFACE u ' tr PLS 18482, 1997 l' " rr o ,:r h 8 -� TETRATECH RMC [Mb) tsoo S.SUNSET ST.,SUITE 1-F.LONGMONr.CO sow a n 15a llo TEL 508.772.5282 METRO 300.885.8283 FAX 303.886.6969 8 THIS EXHIBIT DOES NOT REPRESENT limilIMMMI. 4 INTENDED TO DEPICT THE ATTACHED SCALE 1" = 300' {)8 08/05 BKT SURVEY. DESCRIPTION roe# 80-0068.fl67.09 lbTETRA TECH RMC EXHIBIT A A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 33 WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 BEARS NORTH 89°11'47" EAST 5289.16 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 89°11'47" EAST 377.99 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE NORTH 00°48'13" WEST 41.44 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 18°55'16" EAST 97.74 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 155.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77°28'48" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 19°49'08" WEST 193.99 FEET) , A DISTANCE OF 209.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58°33'32" WEST 212.39 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 485.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°34'37" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 45°16'13" EAST 189.88 FEET) , A DISTANCE OF 191.11 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 615.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°33'03" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 42°15'27" WEST 134.45 FEET) , A DISTANCE OF 134.72 FEET; THENCE NORTH 48°31'58" WEST 261.81 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 435.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°49'35" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 34°07'11" EAST 216.55 FEET) , A DISTANCE OF 218.86 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 315.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 51°51'42" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 45°38'14" WEST 276.99 FEET) , A DISTANCE OF 286.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87.15 FEET; THENCE WEST 323.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 323.00 FEET; THENCE EAST 323.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 204.11 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 50°32'22" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 44°58'34" WEST 241.70 FEET), A DISTANCE OF 249.60 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 465.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°49'35" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 34°07'11" EAST 231.49 FEET) , A DISTANCE OF 233.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48°31'58" EAST 261.81 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 585.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°33'03" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 42°15'27" WEST 127.89 FEET) , A DISTANCE OF 128.15 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 515.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°34'37" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 45°16'13" EAST 201.62 FEET) , A DISTANCE OF 202.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°33'32" EAST 212.39 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 125.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 77°28'48" AND A CHORD WHICH BEARS NORTH 19°49'08" WEST 156.45 FEET) , A DISTANCE OF 169.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18°55'16" WEST 109.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 86°55'53" EAST 32.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 3.490 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 11006$_067 ADLFRW°g\Fismxna\GASEASEMBdT FJnllerr LEGAL DFSCRRTIONS.doc 1900 S.Sunset Street.Suite 14 Longmont.CO 80501 Page I of 3 Tel:303.7725282 Fax:303.6654959 10/42005 wwwartnc.com TETRA TECH RMC EXHIBIT B A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE EAST ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 33 WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 BEARS NORTH 00°19'30" WEST 2651.44 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00°19'30" WEST 1370.83 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89°40'30" EAST 785.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 106.85 FEET; THENCE EAST 323.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 323.00 FEET; THENCE WEST 323.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 136.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°40'30" WEST 785.44 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" EAST 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79°38'13" EAST 657.27 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°19'30" WEST 80.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 3.838 ACRES MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT C A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE EAST ONE-QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 33 WHENCE THE CENTER ONE- QUARTER CORNER LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 BEARS NORTH 89°07'55" EAST 2670.95 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 89°07'55" EAST 1756.66 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 01°04'15" EAST 1271.12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH O1°04'15" EAST 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°55'45" WEST 15.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 79°38'13" WEST 659.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'00" EAST 20.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79°38'13" EAST 657.27 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°55'45" EAST 17.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 0.31 ACRES MORE OR LESS. R\a06S061 ADERW"Y s1, nsGAS'EASEMENT EDBBJT LEGAL DESCR@TLONS.doc 19005.Sunset Street,Suite 1-F Longmont,C080501 80501 Page 2a3 d 3 Td:303.772.52821=ax:303.6654959 10/42005wwwurimc.com TETRA TECH RMC EXHIBITD A PORTION OF T.AND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 33 WHENCE THE NORTH ONE-QUARTER CORNER LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 BEARS SOUTH 89°03'55" WEST 2670.95 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION. THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 89°03'55" WEST 1884.11 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 00°56'05" EAST 1425.46 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINING; THENCE NORTH 89°35'10" EAST 323.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'50" EAST 323.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°35'10" WEST 323.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°24'50" WEST 323.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 2.395 ACRES MORE OR LESS. DATE: PETER A.BRYANT,COLORADO PLS NO.20673 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF TETRA TECH RMC RWa6r_O67 ADLFAWE\Fisem is\GAS\EASEMENT Sm®rt LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS.doc 1900 S.Sunset Street Suite 1-F Longmont CO 80501 Page 3 of 3 Tot 303.7725282 Fax:303.665.6959 10/4/2005 www.ttnnC.tom WELD COUNTY ROAD 28 , gig 'Pe" F [ [ # ‘ I li I • •N , , ,, ,fr„i , i, 4 _ _TA 40. ACCESS Oft ABM.M.OOY. I .. ._ -.... F � s ��4 zu 1 pirl I � ; 6 .: '., I tl 9 _...... '....._ _( ` YMYI. TON O N vAIMIIIP .3/44 az T \ , iii I ea ip, -, or ' i , n i Air II Y y- �,,► i nr 1 O il i ill, � ; �■ ■ I �■■■ ii B • • • EXHIBIT A A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO NORTHEAST CORNER SEC 33, T3N. R68W, 6TH PM NORTH 1/4 CORNER FND 2'ALUM CAP SEC 33, T3N, R68W, 6TH PM PLS 22097 FND 2' ALUM CAP TRUE PONT OF BEG6VING BELOW ROu1D SURFACE PLS 20673, 1896 SO0'24'50'E WELD COUNTY ROAD NB9 03'55'E 13.10' - S89'03'55"YY 2670.95' �3•os' �9s3' E 13 .4 :',/,.* ,r ;; '1 as• p /6y1i1i �' r 589'03'551N 1329.09' O� s1 �°' II, o \ '.if ill' 41 ID EASEMENT y \ g 't S i I I I I}I TO BE AS.\ 7:,..4,"' 5� `i a I i I ili TO r¢,xr s I`Ir• //// '/ 6yT \POD c0 I 0tl 1 il: . I I; / 4 ,i; , i, Q' 4 / '/ II I; 2 Ip ,It ,- // -4-, i , �; v I I al, t rn �'� 7// oI I Ii, s ' ,7/ Nfg ,(f a � ; :I Di I I / % I {.1. I /• JI Ili' , i 5 1 ,G / / // N " r ,I , ' W C , , // I I '1 1 N ,I I C I 1= / I g ii < it /// N89'30'09'E I' • , m = I I a o /// 100.00' I :ij j tf/ �� 589 30'09'W I . sla I \ '.� ; :� 730.00' .i I ;1 ; N410.935'W I \•`.�--�-4; 68...,...B24'50-E 500'24'50"E •,. ' '/ N470935 el •-•. ----5-4; ` / 68.65' 30.00' ' :' 79.41' I I I I I \ , I, 4 116.a2' . �� \ I , , \;\ :II: 500'41'5519! i \ t i 108.89' l I , I k 148'22'22Vi I :i , ;I I s 35.50' !,I. ;III : j EAST 1/4 CORNER :it; 'I SEC 33. T3N, R68W. 6TH PM OD r, ii FND 3' COOT ALUM CAP ii 0.6' BELOW ROAD SURFACE 'I?' ' 8 PLS 18482, 1997 'i;; I 4.4 TETRA TECH RMC illb 1900 S.SUNSET ST..SuXTE 1-F,LONGMONT,CO 90601 I o os 'so MO TEL 300.772.5282 METRO 303.666.8268 FAX 800.666.6959 a ANIMONUMEINTEOS T DOES SURVEY. R IS ONLNOT Y 08/08/05 BKT 'r INTENDED TO DEPICT THE ATTACHED SCALE: t' = app DESCRIPTION JOB# 80-0068.067.01 EXHIBIT B A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO NORTH 1/4 CORNER SEC 33. T3N. R68W. 6TH PM NORTHEAST CORNER Mr ALUM CAP SEC 33. T3N. R68W. 6TH PM ' BELOW ROAD SURFACE PLS 20673, 1996 FND 2' ALUM CAP WELD COUNTY ROAD 28PLS 22097 N89'03'551 63.05' �- / o'i illi / ; ;,I ;I I 111 . / ' i Ili / / 11 ; rl / / t C V1 ;I ////S0ff24'50'£I i i �I I.// 13.10' �, /�/ it I ;i / r/ 'ii 'I i / N 'V/ : i ' i // / li`• I /, / II a V 1 // ' • • I 1 II AY v iI g I: 9�1� II i F`, r , I Ili / ;I'i; II . s II" /// I p. IN .e ',I I I 1 II'I i, i m I III y, / ,1 ' ;I 37 I` 1'I /, 50' TYP EASEMENT TO BE VACATED it ; g C [ I /7#.0 A PORTION OF RECEPTION / XXXXX ,• I .I v 'i' ' fI o ;i /// s.l s to a , Ii 'Ii :3. 1;% . '-.."56%. OA trEl \ J , , I i i%4. N47-01'5 �\ ;II+ I 53.9 ' iir \\ O \ + ; e i,,, \ \ I � $ 11'•!� \ ! i d ,I I iv, L{ ih i 0 EAST 1/4 CORNER I I i SEC 33. T3N, R68W, 6TH PM { -{. �" FND 3' COOT ALUM CAP ' a 0.6' BELOW ROAD SURFACE "li i PLS 18482, 1997 ;;I; 0 0 I TETRA TECH RMC 2 ilb o , m ,,, 1900 8.SUNSET ST.,SUITE 1-F,LONGMONT,CO 80501 E TEL 308.7725282 METRO 900.686.82!9 FAX SOIL 965.8959 x THIS EXHIBIT DOES NOT REPRESENT Q8/08/05 BKT WA MONUMENTED SURVEY. R IS ONLY SCALE, 1'- JO0' DESCRIPTION DEPICT THE ATTACHED JOB# $0-0068.077.01 EXHIBIT C A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO NORTH 1/4 CORNER SEC 33, T3N, R68W, 6TH PM ' MD 2' ALUM CAP NORTHEAST CORNER 1/ BELOW ROAD SURFACE SEC 33, 1311. R68W, 6Th PM Pty 20673, 1996 FND 2' ALUM CAP COUNTY ROAD 28 PLS 22097 _ -4 N23y US'bJ't 2670.93' ,C, _1 / I'll- , 4j-- I r'' , I ,, / v I ;i i i !! - ,rr /// I ;I,, ;I, i / e :i �/ , 'I','�I ta r Fa I. r't '4/ , I a I , I '' m y i {{{{��RRtt i S C I :I: ,/ tilr 'I ...,•i' co al ,,- % • I / R p 0 '', soo-za'so-E / // 30.00' V C ;l c = o //', N89'30.09"E , ,I. --tier _- - tl9T2B:292 H5o21' _ '— - -569:]532 ,59g,57_1o7.zo' 1,! I N o, /,'—� _ =�'-S67'2e'28W'93J:sT — — �e6'*5'az'n„'ss9-o3—= �,-Lf or'o % Z. . 7/44'91--i 107.74' ,t , I // 30• TYP EASMEM TO BE VACATED I i _ N'11 FI A PORTION OF RECEPTION / XXXX i'I':Fi v.� tut \ 0\ I ' o , : 8 N58'22'22'W I .I \\ a 35.50. i IIi , yr i it 3 I1, ; u EAST 1/4 CORNER Ia _ SEC 33. 73N, R68W, 5TH PM _ if ' MD r COOT ALUM CAP 0.6• BELOW ROAD SURFACE tip' ' PLS 18482. 1997 ii!' S (. TETRA TECH RMC SO s t , TEL soam.vmIETRosoxe.6283 FAXaw.fi85s9s9 8 AHIS EXHIBIT DOES NOT MONUMENTED SURVEY. IT ISEONLY SLUE: 1' 300 SENT 08�08�05 BKT g INTENDED'TO DESCRIPTION DEPICT THE ATTACHED JOB# 80-0068.067.01 • TETRA TECH RMC LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: EXHIBIT A A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 33 WHENCE THE NORTH ONE-QUARTER CORNER LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 BEARS SOUTH 89°03'55" WEST 2670.95 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'50" EAST 13.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49°45'47" WEST 465.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°40'27" EAST 362.77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'50" EAST 709.98 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°30'09" EAST 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'50" EAST 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°30'09" WEST 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°24'50" WEST 727.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°40'27" WEST 644.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°03'55" WEST 1329.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'50" EAST 1261.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47°09'35" EAST 63.14 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'50" EAST 68.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°09'35" WEST 79.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°41'55" WEST 108.89 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58°22'22" WEST 35.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°41'55" EAST 118.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°09'35" WEST 10.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°24'50" WEST .1332.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°03'55" EAST 1399.49 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°40'27" WEST 267.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49°45'47" EAST 409.99 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID NORTH ONE-QUARTER CORNER LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 89°03'55" EAST 63.05 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 4.916 ACRES MORE OR LESS. x:10066_067 ADLERVInllEasernemeGAS1GAS EXHIBIT LEGAL DESCRflONS.doc 19005.Sunset St reet,:Suite 1-F Longmont.CO 80501 Page I of 2 Tel:303.7723282 Fax 303.665.6959 9/222005 �,N.h, e COm rs* TETRA TECH RMC EXHIBIT B A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 33 WHENCE THE EAST ONE-QUARTER CORNER LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 BEARS NORTH 00°24'50" WEST 2659.16 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00°24'50" EAST 13.10 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 49°45'47" WEST 1981.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64°54'11" WEST 384.51 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°09'35" WEST 53.95 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°54'11" EAST 398.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49°45'47" EAST 1934.24 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 33; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 89°03'55" EAST 63.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 2.706 ACRES MORE OR LESS. EXHIBIT C A PORTION OF LAND IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 33 WHENCE THE EAST ONE-QUARTER CORNER LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 BEARS NORTH 00°24'50" WEST 2659.16 FEET, SAID LINE FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00°24'50" EAST 1276.53 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00°24'50" EAST 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'30'09" WEST 107.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°15'42" WEST 599.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°28'20" EAST 839.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 51°29'20" WEST 278.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63°57'12" WEST 182.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58°22'22" WEST 35.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 63°57'12" EAST 197.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51°29'20" EAST 284.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87°28'20" EAST 850.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°15'42" EAST 599.57 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°30'09" EAST 107.20 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINS 1.393 ACRES MORE OR LESS. DATE: PETER A.BRYANT,COLORADO PLS NO.20673 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF TETRA TECH RMC RA006t_061 ADLERYIn1E..mmtGAS\GAS EXHIBIT LEGAL DESCRITnONS.doc 1900 5.Sunset Street.Suite 1-F Longmont,Co 80501 Page 2 oft Tel:303.772.5282 Fax:303.665.6959 9/22/2005 wvevettrmc.com Y LAND M ARCHITECTS perspective I balance o subsidiary of lond architects international Exhibit ' I ' P:\2003\03122-MEL-Adler Property/Letters\Report\COZ submittal1ADLER final COZ Comments.doc and planning • urban design • landscape architecture • park planning 9137 S. Ridgeline Blvd., Ste. 130, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129 www.landarchitects.net phone (303) 734-1777 • fax (303) 734.1778 ' mrt TETRA TECH RMC October 5, 2005 Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 918 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Adler Estates PUD Dear Chris: The Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissions contained an Approval Recommendation for the Adler Estates Project, PZ-1071 based upon compliance with Chapter 27 requirements with conditions. These conditions are listed on pages 9— 13 of the resolution. We would like to provide you with the information that we believe resolves the following condition: 4. The plat shall be amended to include the following: R. Short term improvements in the form of additional lanes on the north and south legs of the intersection of County Road 7 and State Highway 66, as identified in the Traffic Impact Study—Adler Estates—Weld County, Colorado dated May 17, 2004 Traffic Study are to be installed, and paving of County Road 7 from County Road 28 to State Highway 66 is to be completed to allow the roadways listed to function at an acceptable level of service. These improvements are to be completed concurrent with Phase 1 of the project, and that no certificates of occupancy are to be issued for the project until all of these improvements identified are completed. (Town of Mead) Resolution: The short term improvements are under design and will be constructed during Filing 1 of the project. A traffic study, which was completed on July 9, 2005, has further defined the actual improvements necessary for constructed. This study is attached, for your information, and will be provided to the Town of Mead for their use during plan review 1900 S.Sunset Street,Suite I-F,Longmont,CO 80501 Tel 303.772.5282 Fax 303.665.6959 www.ttrmc.com 4. TETRA TECH RMC Chris Cabman October 5,2005 Page 2 and approval. We have also had discussions with the Town Engineer—Mike Brake who is fully involved in the design of the improvements. With this response, we believe that this condition has been satisfied. Please let us know if you feel otherwise. If you have any further comments or questions,please do not hesitate to contact us at 303-772-5282. Sincerely, TETRA/� TECH RMC, INC../ '� lam% '•--.N Q /dam^' Catherine A. Leslie,P.E. Project Manager Attachments H:\0068_067 Adler Property\Weld County Comment Responses\Resolution of 4R-Short Tenn Improvements.doc A Tel: 303-792-2450 P.O.Box 260027 EUGENE G. COPPOLA P.E. Fax: 303-792-5990 Littleton,CO 80163-0027 July 9, 2005 Cathy Leslie TetraTech RMC 1900 S. Sunset #1-F Longmont, CO 80501 RE: Improvements Associated with Development West of 1-25, East of CR 51/2,South of SH 66,and North of SH 119 Dear Cathy: I have reviewed the expected development activity in the above area over the next five years. This includes the Adler, Centex, Kitely, and High School developments. The review focused on the years 2006 through 2010 and operating conditions at the SH 66-CR 7, SH 119—CR 5Y2 and the future SH 119—CR 7 intersections. Development activity was estimated for each year and an evaluation of operating conditions at year end was undertaken to identify any needed intersection improvements. Activity as- sumed for each development is stated below. Development 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Adler 30 D.U. 144 D.U. 144 D.U. 144 D.U. 144 D.U. Centex 56 D.U. 84 D.U. 84 D.U. 84 D.U. 84 D.U. Kitely 0 84 D.U. 84 D.U. 84 D.U. 84 D.U. High School 0 0 Open Open Open Centex Retail 0 0 0 0 192,500 S.F. Traffic for each development was extracted from that development's traffic impact study (TIS)and adjusted to reflect the indicated development level. In the case of the Centex de- velopment, it was assumed that CR 5'%would be built south of SH 66 to serve the residen- tial area. Consequently, this development will impact the SH 66—CR 7 intersection by add- ing traffic to SH 66 and not CR 7. The Centex retail area will use both CR 7 and SH 66. While the project's traffic study assumes a right-in, right-out access to SH 66, it was modified to a % access given the spacing between CR 7 and CR 5'/z and the benefit to the SH 66— CR 7 intersection. Other development related traffic was simply extracted from the TIS and applied to the area street system. Through traffic on both SH 66 and SH 119 was increased at a rate of 3.4% per year to ac- count for regional traffic growth. Anticipated peak hour traffic for each year from 2006—2010 (inclusive) is shown on Figures 1 —5. The high school was assumed to open with the full complement of students. Concur- rent with the high school CR 7 is assumed built to SH 119. Typically, the methodology used in this study involved increasing through traffic at the SH 119—CR 5'/2 and SH 66—CR 7 intersections to represent years 2006 through 2010. De- velopment traffic was loaded onto the existing street system in 2006 and 2007. In 2008, with the extension of CR 7 to SH 119, development traffic was transferred from CR 5/s to CR 7 and new development traffic was added accordingly. In 2008 and later,the SH 119— CR 5'% intersection is no longer impacted by site traffic and therefore, the intersection was dropped from the investigation. Capacity analyses were conducted for both morning and afternoon peak hours at each im- pacted intersection. Intersection level of service(LOS)of'D' or better is considered accept- able at signalized intersections with the individual traffic movements allowed to operate at LOS `E' or better. At stop sign controlled intersections with arterial streets, level of service E/F was considered acceptable for critical traffic movements. This is normal in an urban en- vironment during peak hours. If needed to meet CDOT(Colorado Department of Transpor- tation) standards or achieve acceptable operations, auxiliary lanes were added. Resultant levels of service and needed improvements(if any) are indicated below for traffic conditions at the end of each year. 2006 Movement/ Level of Service Intersection Control Direction AM Pk Hr. PM Pk Hr. Improvements SH 66—CR 7 Signal EB A B None WB C C NB C C SB C C All B C CR 5%—SH 119 Stop EB LT B B None SB LT E E SB RT C B _ 2007 Movement/ Level of Service Intersection Control Direction AM Pk Hr. PM Pk Hr. Improvements SH66-CR7 Signal EB B B None WB B C NB C C SB C C All B C CR 5'/r-SH 119 Stop EB LT B B None SB LT E E SB RT C C 2008 Movement/ Level of Service Intersection Control Direction AM Pk Hr. PM Pk Hr. Improvements SH 66—CR 7 Signal EB B B NB&SB Right tum Lanes WB C C NB C C SB C C All C C CR 7 SH 119 Stop EB LT C C None SB LT F F SB RT C C Signal EB A B Traffic signal WB C C NB C C All B C I 2009 Movement/ Level of Service Intersection Control Direction AM Pk Hr. PM Pk Hr. Improvements SH 66—CR 7 Signal EB C C None WB C C NB D C SB C C All C C CR 7—SH 119 ' Signal EB A A None WB C B SB C C All 1 C B 2010 Movement/ Level of Service Intersection Control Direction AM Pk Hr. PM Pk Hr. Improvements SH 66-CR 7 Signal EB D D EB RT Lane WB C D NB D D SB D D All D D CR7—SH 119 Signal EB A A None WB C B SB C C All B B Capacity worksheets are attached. As indicated, acceptable conditions can be maintained at critical intersections with the fol- lowing improvements. Intersection Year Improvement SH 66—CR 7 2008 Northbound & southbound right-turn lanes SH 119— CR 7 2008 Traffic signal installation, if warranted SH 66—CR 7 2010 Eastbound right turn lane In summary, it is concluded that the anticipated development levels can be accommodated as long as the indicated improvements are available concurrent with demand. I trust this letter meets your current needs. Please give me a call if you need any further as- sistance. Regards, o°V�t G 5r�EAGE?�26,-.3 s1E, 41 ::;' • 9 • r. EugeneGCopla, E. i • NAB •• Q, ,f,N CO-d 1n 0 N L IC 10/15 LO 4- 620/730 tc5/10 SH 66 25/1101 t i' 670/705 —► i1 ,n o 5/5 o N K U N r N re U O 1r1 111 M O O 25/45 4— 1525/1225 SH 119 45/95 1 925/1595 —► LEGEND: AM/PM Peak Hour NOTE: Rounded to nearest 5 vehicles. Figure 1 2006 TOTAL TRAFFIC u, Coo X10/15 1- 655/785 1 20/60 SH 66 25/110 -p , 720/750 —Do 0 CO to 15/30 "' 0 "' coin ti U N LL U O NO o � o �n 40/85 I- 1575/1265 SH 119 55/120 -� 955/1650 —► LEGEND: AM/PM Peak Hour NOTE: Rounded to nearest 5 vehicles. Figure 2 2007 TOTAL TRAFFIC 2 U, ") m o N N .n �- 10/15 4- 680/835 a 4, c 35/105 SH 66 25/110 -ill1 770/790 —► o o 90/45 C° v m 0) CD m n eel U r U, K U U, rn o NC 0 ire <t? rCOIC 30/90 �- 25/35 a) L 4--- 1630/1325 4— 1750/50/1385 SH 119 45/90 -p 160/200 1135/1825 -► 1015/1655 —P LEGEND: AM/PM Peak Hour NOTE: Rounded to nearest 5 vehicles. Figure 3 2008 TOTAL TRAFFIC " o Nr C•1 CN 10/15 T T T 4-- 710/885 1 c 50/155 SH 66 25/110 - - t 820/830 --* Lo to o 100/70 — rcov T T N () 0 u7 T lC) t6O in so ti O O T T L 25/35 ) Sit-- 40/130 c 4- 1860/1470 r 4-- 1710/1390 SH 119 45/90 - 170/215 1190/1980 -* 1060/1795 ---9 LEGEND: AM/PM Peak Hour NOTE: Rounded to nearest 5 vehicles. I. Figure 4 2009 TOTAL TRAFFIC . too � o CV CO k- 10/15 r r 4- 800/1135 A) 1 c r 100/300 SH 66 25/110 1 ILI t 1> 960/985 -► 0 0 0 110/95 co r 00 `o IA0 o co `0 co o r N e. 54 N () h re o 00 co O O O IA N u o CD 0 tie '4 rr 4— 25/35 4c it- 55/175 4- 1765/1435 C 4- 1935/1530 SH 119 45/90 -s 175/245 1 1230/2070 -► 1095/1855 —► LEGEND: AM/PM Peak Hour NOTE: Rounded to nearest 5 vehicles. [ Figure 5 2010 TOTAL TRAFFIC Full Report Page I of 3 FULL REPORT I it' i1_r i,Yyi1 . ... _ . .- _. 4.....,..a z .>saw...::,..1-r s�€1. .. z .s,- ., k ., .. . wt , -�«LF� Analyst GC Intersection 66-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/ 2005 Jurisdiction Time Period PM Analysis Year 6:)07 08 09 10 Grade= 0 0 1 0 H Grade= 0 Shaw North Arrow = T -- . — I //� o = R 'in, � ) = L = 7 R Grade= 0 i ma = LT t Grade= 0 'ler = LIR o f o ad wa 2 s { SB LT { TH { RT LT TH RT 1 LT TH RT LT { TH { RT Volume(vph) 25 1 670 5 5 620 10 15 10 10 15 1 5 1125 % Heavy veh 2 12 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 10d0 10.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) PIP P PP P PIP P P PIP Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 { 12.0 { 2.0 { { Ext. eff. green 2.0 20 12.0 20 20 { I 2.0 { { Arrival type 3 4 { { 3 4 3 1 1_ 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 I 1 3.0 3.0 I 3.0 I 13.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 { o { o o { 0 o o I 0 Lane Width 12.0 120 120 1120 12.0 1120 I I Parking(Y or N) N I N N N NI IN NI I N Parking/hr 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I Bus stops/hr 0 I O I 0 0 I 10 1 1 10 I 1 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 1 EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 1 06 1 07 08 Timing G = 12.0 G = 50.0 G G = G = 28.0 G= G = G = Y= 0 Y = 5 Y= Y= {Y= 5 Y= Y= {Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 1 {Cycle Length C = 100.0 Full Report ;Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET M. :,,, ,..�..:,.i_..... c,�� ......_... ..... s,.,sxt..�v�,... :!,»,�.�: .w,b� ..w, a+. ' v" .ms.' ' ,ws...�ar_ `' Project Description rv'4a EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 25 670 5 5 620 10 5 10 10 15 5 125 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow Rate 28 744 6 6 689 11 6 11 11 17 6 139 Lane Group L TR L TR LTR LTR Adj.flow rate 28 750 6 700 28 162 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 — 0.008 0.000 — 0.016 0.214 — 0393 0.105 — 0.858 .. _ :::: i "..,.,,_�. ,-. � �. . . u..�......`k..'...«osaaa v ..3 k ,., ,. .:`k.:.t Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 tW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp • 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 10.950 1.000 - 0.381 1.000 - 0.950 - 0.975 - Secondary fLT 0.184 — — — -- fRT — 0.999 — 0.998 — 0.947 — 0.884 fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — L 1.000 — fRpb — 1.000 -- 1.000 -- 1.000 -- 1.000 Adj. satflow 1770 1861 709 1858 1675 1606 Sec. adj. satflow 343 — — — — Full Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Project Description q .tea;.�..:.fy6�y5rr; .r ..}Fr "'tea R 3 }. �+ '} •.�'^+'E,gY `N lty.'i 5 i...t t" 4 '? Ca„Q4� �h� ==�(.+N7� j �'1`� � i N 1 t.Y -. 7l- :a� R,�"f.�F,�.:{.4n't' .t r � •. n, .+_ .�..� n t EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR LTR 1 I LTR 1 Adj. flow rate 28 750 6 700 1 28 1 I 162 I I Satflow rate 11770 11861 I 1 709 11858 I 11675 I 1606 1 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _ 2.0 1 Green ratio 0.62 0.62 0.50 0.50 0.28 0.28 Lane group cap. 384 1154 355 929 1 469 450 v/c ratio 0.07 0.65 1 10.02 0.75 1 I 10.06 10.36 Flow ratio 0.40 0.01 0.38 10.02 0.10 Crit. lane group N Y N N N Y Sum flow ratios 0.50 Lost time/cycle 10.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.56 - Lane. p' a`9'a "' EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR LTR LTR Adj. flow rate 28 750 6 700 28 162 Lane group cap. 384 1154 355 929 469 450 v/c ratio 0.07 0.65 0.02 0.75 0.06 0.36 Green ratio 0.62 0.62 0.50 0.50 0.28 0.28 Unif. delay dl 11.1 12.1 12.6 20.1 26.4 28.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 0.4 2.8 0.1 5.6 0.2 2.2 PF factor 1.000 0.525 1.000 0.767 1.000 1.000 Control delay 11.5 9.2 12.7 21.0 26.6 31.1 Lane group LOS B A B C C C Apprch. delay 9.3 20.9 26.6 31.1 Approach LOS A C C C Intersec. delay 16.6 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Full Report Page I of 3 FULL REPORT eal",c _ as si f:.: ..� �. �' ,, '. w � . ,".�-,.t 3 ,;7.tH.:4₹`h ,,. z. ,. ‘.. **:: ,:. . G". ..ti,.4'',.r"w ;.tea Analyst GC Intersection 66-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/8/28� Jurisdiction Time Period AM Analysis Year C)07 08 09 10 lny" '%'s • a ��s3 '�p9+�i� � r.a ,.1v� . x�. ,,.'., . E ,.�: . > . .„ .vs.'�y w. , r ., � ••��` �4 i ��.��:xsti sr Grade= 0 0 1 0 I. /H1 • Grade= 0 iii L:II, Shaw North Mar TI = T • f19! 1 ~) o 1 �!> /� �s>ua•� f - T R Grade= 0 = LT UR i t .n_ - -I---I- fl Grade= 0 "Yr = LTR 0 1 0 EB I WB NB..>.. I SB I LT TH I RT LT I TH RT LT I TH I RT I LT I TH I RT I Volume(vph) 1 110 705 5 10 1 730 15 5 5 1 10 110 15 1 75 To Heavy veh 2 2 2 2 12 2 2 2 12 12 2 12 PHF 0.90 L0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 10.90 0.90 10.90 Actuated (P/A) IPJPPPPPPPIPPPIP Startup lost time 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 I I 2.0 Ext.eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 I 120 I I Arrival type 3 4 13 4 13 I I 13 I I Unit Extension 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 I 13.0 1 IL 1 3.0 I Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 10 I 0 0 Iola I O 0 I ( 0 Lane Width 1120 1120 120 120 I 120 I ( I12.0 1 1 Parking(Y or N) NI NN NINI 1 NIN I I N Parking/hr I I I I I I I I I I Bus stops/hr 10 10 I 10 10 I 1 0 I I 10 I I Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 I EB Only EW Perm 03 I 04 NS Perm 06 I 07 I 08 Timing G = 120 G= 50.0 G = G = G = 28.0 G = I G = G= — Y = 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= IY = 5 IY= I Y= Y= Duration of Analysis(hrs) = 0.25 (Cycle Length C = 100.0 Fuht Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET ..�#cy"M`t.6,-.. ll ,'-N.. N•'Sr.'• >rir. .-' �.V 1Y: 5NS S ...Y t ;den �> afi� a ., -�` �� .� ,< — . r . _ . ._. : . -- .--_,.. , Project Description VCo xri ' #us me EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 110 705 5 10 730 15 5 5 10 10 5 75 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow Rate 122 783 6 11 811 17 6 6 11 11 6 83 Lane Group L TR L TR LTR LTR Adj. flow rate 122 789 11 828 23 100 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 - 0.008 0.000 -- 0.021 0.261 - 0.478 0.110 - 0.830 Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 0.358 1.000 - 0.949 -- 0.978 - Secondary fLT 0.080 -- -- — — fRT — 0.999 — 0.997 — 0.935 — 0.888 ] fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 -- 1.000 — fRpb -- 1.000 -- 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 Adj. satflow 1770 1861 666 1857 1653 1617 Sec. adj. satflow 149 — — — -- Full Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Project Description 99 EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR LTR LTR Adj.flow rate 122 789 11 828 23 100 I I Satflow rate 1770 1861 666 1857 1653 1617 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.62 0.62 0.50 0.50 0.28 0.28 Lane group cap. 287 1154 333 929 463 453 v/c ratio 0.43 0.68 - 0.03 0.89 0.05 0.22 Flow ratio I 0.42 0.02 0.45 0.01 0.06 I Crit. lane group N N N Y I I N Y Sum flow ratios 0.58 Lost time/cycle 15.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.68 EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR LTR LTR Adj.flow rate 122 789 11 828 23 100 Lane group cap. 287 1154 333 929 463 453 v/c ratio 0.43 0.68 0.03 0.89 0.05 0.22 Green ratio 0.62 0.62 0.50 0.50 J 0.28 0.28 Unif. delay d1 17.2 12.5 12.7 22.5 26.3 27.6 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 4.6 3.3 0.2 12.6 0.2 1.1 PF factor 1.000 0.525 -1.000 0.767 1.000 i 1.000 Control delay 21.8 9.9 12.9 29.9 26.5 28.7 Lane group LOS C A B C C C Apprch. delay 11.5 29.7 26.5 28.7 Approach LOS B C C C Intersec_ delay 20.7 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright*2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Two-WayfStop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY MOMMO q"019 ++•, Analyst GC Intersection 119 -CR 5.5 Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Date Performed 7/8/2004 Analysis Year 007 08 09 10 Analysis Time Period AM EM Project Description East/West Street: SH 119 North/South Street: CR 5 1/2 Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 @;it '-',71:111`.:71..- ie., _ Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 L 1 I 6 T R L I T R Volume (veh/h) 1 95 1595 0 0 I 1225 45 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _I 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate(veh/h) 95 1595 0 0 1225 45 Proportion of heavy 0 0 vehicles, PHv - Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes I 1 j 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L j T ( _1 T I R Upstream Signal 0 I I 0 I Minor Street I Northbound I Southbound Movement 7 I 8 9 I 10 I 11 12 L I T R I L _I T R Volume(veh/h) I 0 I 0 0 I 35 1 0 I 50 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 0 0 j 35 I 0 I 50 Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 vehicles, PHv Percent grade (%) I 0 0 Flared approach I N I N Storage I 0 I 0 I RT Channelized? I 0 I 0 Lanes I 0 0 0 1 I 0 ( 1 Configuration I I I L I ( R Co"tair"o 9. 4. Approach EB WB I Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 I 4 { 7 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 12 Lane Configuration L I I I L I R Volume, v (vph) 95 I I I 35 1 I 50 Capacity, cm (vph) 554 131 441 v/c ratio 0.17 I 0.27 I 0.11 Queue length (95%) 0.61 I 1.01 0.38 Control Delay(s/veh) 12.8 42.2 14.2 LOS B J I E I B Approach delay(s/veh) — — 25.7 Approach LOS I - - I D HCS2000TM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4,I d Full Report Page 1 of 3 FULL REPORT t i1 Analyst GC Intersection 66-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/8/2005 Jurisdiction Time Period TI PM Ana is Year 09 1 0 l�� a3xs . ,... ��. ., .;�C� ._ 0 1 0 Grade= 0ED _1.1 + Grade= 0 _ = T f� l ■f 1 ija�P MI u� ? y\ 5 p r J ° i1��Ntuf i 1itel, = T R f nit/ Y Grade= 0 1 = LT ‘_Iy = L R n� IInia■sa nfl Grade= 0 VIA" = LIR ° / 0 LT I TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT I LT TH I RT Volume(vph) 25 1720 15 20 655 10 30 10 50 115 5 125 % Heavy veh 12 2 12 12 2 2 2 12 2 2 2 2 PI-IF 10.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) IP P P PIP P P P PIP PIP Startup lost time 20 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 I Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 20 2.0 I I Arrival type 13 4 1 3 4 3 I I 13 1 1 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 I 12.0 1 I 120 Parking(Y or N) N I N N I N N N N I N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 I 0 1 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 1 EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 1 07 1 08 G = 10.0 G = 520 G = G = G = 28.0 G = IG= IG = Timing Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= IY= IY= Duration of Analysis(hrs)= 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 1 Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET ,s, -1.,_ . _ :::',4.5 Project Description t 1,4 BB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 25 720 15 20 655 10 30 10 50 15 5 125 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0_90 Adj. Flow Rate 28 800 117 22 728 11 33 11 56 17 6 139 Lane Group L TR L TR LTR LTR Adj. flow rate 28 817 22 739 _ 100 162 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 -- 0.021 0.000 -- 0.015 0.330 - 0.560 0.105 - 0.858 Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ' fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 0.324 1.000 - 0.873 - 0.969 - Secondary fLT 0.179 — — — — fRT — 0.997 — 0.998 — 0.924 — 0.884 fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 — fRpb -- 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 Adj. satflow 1770 1857 603 1859 1503 1595 Sec. adj. satflow 333 -- — — — Full Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET b a 'yam Project Description EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR 1 I LTR I I LTR I I Adj.flow rate 28 817 22 739 I I 100 I 1 162 I 1 Satflow rate 11770 11857 603 11859 I I 1503 1 I 11595 1 1 Lost time 12.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.62 0.62 1 0.52 0.52 0.28 0.28 Lane group cap. 350 1151 314 967 J 421 447 v/c ratio 0.08 0.71 0.07 0.76 0.24 0.36 Flow ratio 0.44 0.04 0.40 0.07 0.10 1 Crit. lane group N Y I N N 1 N Y I Sum flow ratios . 0.54 Lost time/cycle 10.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.60 c'V A^*' t '§ti- f, s s i -LaW +.s E".. , c:1 IC 1 3 -: : "&t'�-.'`av' e6 D°e,�.waa i x•,' '� ₹,.vA° `�hn'��'7` , L -, °r �E�-., .} >, :. ¢ , . . .` , _...r .. _.: EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR LTR LTR Adj.flow rate 28 817 22 739 100 162 Lane group cap. 350 1151 314 967 421 447 v/c ratio 0.08 0.71 0.07 0.76 0.24 0.36 Green ratio 0.62 0.62 0.52 0.52 0.28 0.28 Unif. delay d1 11.4 12.9 12.0 19.1 27.8 28.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 0.4 a7 0.4 5.7 1.3 23 PF factor 1.000 0.525 1.000 0.735 1.000 1.000 Control delay 11.8 10.5 12.4 19.8 29.1 31.1 Lane group LOS B B B B C C Apprch. delay 10.5 19.6 29.1 31.1 Approach LOS B B C C Intersec. delay 17.0 Intersection LOS B Hcs200aTM Copyright©2000 University ofFloride,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d HCS2000 Full Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET �p jrat ®iaZ 0 'x,.z i3r"4 s= ,.ti > - ,:`^ aa...:: r .ter,..�. _ .� .....,.. , w.� axc . ' x , .n e . #^ Project Description e y . r ,.. k i ry k. r x . ,-z �" s z, x ti:'�,r s,,,+:. , y, ,.A...^ :-::: EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR LTR LTR Adj.flow • 67 889 67 L 105 1 Satflow 535 11857 11550 1 1 1623 1 , I 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.62 0.62 0.52 0.52 0.28 0.28 Lane group cap. 251 1148 278 966 1 434 454 v/c ratio 0.49 0.75 0.24 0.92 0.15 0.23 Flow ratio 0.47 0.13 0.48 0.04 0.06 Crit. lane group N N N Y N I Y Sum flow ratios 0.61 Lost time/cycle 15.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.72 ;r:, �e'$Is a$:Y ; sp�&ti oa :u "fa ��as �n-; a�� a. a,+5 e,..,. ,_,�„-,e,,..,,__,� EB WB NB SB EB WB NB Lane group L TR L TR LTR LTR Adj.flow rate 122 866 67 889 67 105 Lane group cap. 251 1148 278 966 434 454 v/c ratio 0.49 0.75 0.24 0.92 0.15 0.23 Green ratio 0.62 0.62 0.52 0.52 0.28 0.28 Unif. delay dl 19.0 13.6 13.2 22.1 27.1 27.7 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 6.6 4.6 2.0 15.1 0.8 1.2 PF factor 1.000 0.525 1.000 0.735 1.000 1.000 Control delay 25.6 11.7 15.2 31.4 27.8 28.9 Lane group LOS C B B C C C Apprch. delay 13.4 30.2 27.8 28.9 Approach LOS B C C C Intersec. delay 22.3 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id HC52000 Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst GC Intersection 119-CR 5.5 Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Date Performed 7/8/2004 Analysis Year 06C)08 08 09 10 Analysis Time Period g9 PM Project Description EastMest Street: SH 119 INorth/South Street: CR 5 1/2 Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 9,°-I lii ra`-- 4' -:4- ,&d;f^4° *.i'.zli `-ip t4 �w ,.. _ ,:t: _ -^` ..h r., ,.:�' '�`,o- ...'Y fa a, ...._ . Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement I 1 I 2 3 4 I 5 6 I I Volume(veh/h) I 55 955 0 0 I 1475 I 40 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate(veh/h) 55 I 955 0 0 1475 40 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 — -- 0 — — Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? 0 I I I 0 Lanes I 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration I L T T I R Upstream Signal I 0 0 Minor Street Northbound I Southbound I Movement 7 I 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 L T R L T i R Volume(veh/h) I 0 0 0 I 85 0 100 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate(veh/h) 0 0 0 85 0 100 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade(%) I 0 0 Flared approach I N I N I Storage I 0 0 RT Channelized? I 0 0 Lanes I 0 0 0 1 0 I 1 Configuration I I I L I R us— u _, , s.�..es:,f..«uL.a..- .,,._.:..Iv....... _m�.....��....-v......... ._..._..ws.".�..S,..' Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 9 10 11 I 12 Lane Configuration L I L R Volume, v(vph) 55 I I 85 I 100 Capacity, cm (vph) 447 161 365 v/c ratio 0.12 I 0.53 0.27 Queue length(95%) 0.42 2.63 1.10 Control Delay(s/veh) 14.2 I 50.0 18.5 LOS B I E I C Approach delay(s/veh) — — I 33.0 Approach LOS - - I D HCS2000TM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Full Report Page 1 of 3 FULL REPORT Analyst GC Intersection 66-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/8/2_g0j5 Jurisdiction Time Period AM(I'IIA1 Analysis Year 0. 0.8 09 10 0 I 0 Grade= 0 ED uuac• ifiU UU IUU�YC74/iI Grade= 0 111 i = T 1 R■UK11h ■��fl ° rir = R Ifi!_1 1 .ii` . �UI � = L TR Grade= 0 .0 n - = LT ® 1�i ■■ ' `. I = LR q iT: Ii Grade= 0 +ttjs = L T R 0 1 o T FP . e. e 9?.1 9£7..1.:: ----....,_—_____rY8. .. ss2:w. cv.--. —w£aeoS}--..w.w.__ . —_..._...—.Jlumn,,.sd.w...mY;'S.,— w�.c:s+��_ .......� �B ...,..a.. r.t"p EB I mLT TI-I I RT I LT I TTHB RT I LT TNHB I RT LT TH I RT I Volume (vph) 110 750 30 . 160 785 15 20 5 135 10 10 175 1 % Heavy veh 1 2 12 2 12 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 12 12 PHF 0.90 10.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 10.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 10.90 Actuated (P/A) P IP , P P P P PIP P P PIP Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 I Ext. eff. green 12.0 2.0 I 20 2.0 2.0 I I 2.0 Arrival type 1 3 4 3 4 I 3 I 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 I 3.0 3.0 1 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 Lane Width 120 112.0 120 12.0 120 120 Parking(Y or N) N 1 N N I N N N N II N Parking/hrI ( Bus stops/hr 1 0 10 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 10 1 I Ped timing 12 12 3.2 3.2 1 EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 L 07 08 G = 10.0 G = 520 G = G = G = 28.0 G = IG = G = Timing Y = 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= I Y= I Y= Duration of Analysis(hrs)= 0.25 Cycle Length C= 100.0 1 Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET dIr ° , ,._ ......w. .r ,a..,a: _:.W�...ayd„-a....-..r.,.3._v>*,ati—w.t ,.3>,;-'.as:.`a___ a.• .i.�.»..ava..s'u:#'. 'w:a_i,..t`r�" t—xaSi2,.w'�+,- Project Description � 'lly� �'y^eW'�V a4tu� S� ��SN a _ .e._ . .._. � . . ... EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 110 750 30 60 785 15 20 5 35 10 10 75 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow Rate 122 833 33 67 872 17 22 6 39 11 11 83 Lane Group L TR L TR LTR LTR Adj.flow rate 122 866 67 889 67 105 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 — 0.038 0.000 — 0.019 0.328 — 0.582 0.105 — 0.790 . . el'kiln- k4r)a. '.aa .. . ' s .a:'q , . ea..ust . a.q Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 L 1900 Num. of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 10 0 1 0 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fg t000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 0.287 1.000 - 0.903 - 0.976 - Secondary fLT 0.077 — -- _ — — fRT — 0.994 — 0.997 — 0.921 — 0.893 fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 -- 1.000 — fRpb — 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 Adj. satflow 1770 1852 535 1857 1550 1623 Sec. adj. satflow 143 — — — Two-Way-Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 3 .,. t... .. .. :,ewe s w .. ,Ec�.m-tawcaed. ,iz- /_wa e . k"., -,`*._ . ,,, , ;"ti:. Analyst GC Intersection 119- CR 5.5 Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Date Performed 7/8/2QQ4 Analysis Year 060080910 Analysis Time Period AM Project Description East/West Street: SH 119 INorth/South Street: CR 5 1/2 Intersection Orientation: East-West (Study Period (hrs): 0.25 °{--Thc'oTh c0!'s9;,..11 I-s.'1::Uri+m sF'nh�9"�a�s--r s: ,.. � r t . * .,, - r[m Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 IL Volume(veh/h) I 120 I T R I L T R I I 1650 0 I 0 I 1265 I 85 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate(veh/h) 120 1650 0 0 I 1265 I 85 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 — — 0 — — Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes I 1 2 0 0 i 2 1 Configuration L T I T I R Upstream Signal I 0 I 0 I I Minor Street Northbound I Southbound I Movement 7 8 I 9 10 I 11 I 12 I L T R L I T I R Volume(veh/h) I 0 I 0 0 60 I 0 I 70 I Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate(veh/h) 0 0 0 60 I 0 70 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach I N N Storage 0 0 I RT Channelized? 0 Lanes I 0 0 0 1 I 0 I 1 1 Configuration I L I I R I e'r, a2 y . 3u :.«f� � gat Approach EB I WB Northbound I Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 Lane Configuration L I I L I I R I Volume, v(vph) 120 I ( 60 I 70 I Capacity, em (vph) 516 154 428 v/c ratio 0.23 I 0.39 I 0.16 Queue length(95%) 0.89 1.68 0.58 Control Delay(s/veh) 14.1 42.6 15.0 LOS B I E I C Approach delay(s/veh) — — I 27.7 Approach LOS - - I D HCS2000TM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id Full Report Page 1 of 3 FULL REPORT ye'°+-e'i-1ma e?€ ,Ci ..:...»a.W.. _.».w_.. w -.11.-.. .1": 9 aca-. ate R . . _,.....s,_.,,...... _—........s,..s Analyst GC Intersection 66-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 72005 Jurisdiction Time Period PM Analysis Year 06 07909 10 7d.ETS' _ • _,�N�s$ r�� , m:�u,:„c�.-C�-,�< , .-r..'�x '�. ,, e m.. ,.,v.'g i<� . . . ., Grade= 0 1 1 0 G) �ilitl�flitifiii 1lsifHt!! , i nt Grade= 0 riinuau 9roriYatlrMav 1 = T 1 • 4fli n flUt o (' = R i I .r iAl��t� •%a1 I ��■1�� i! ) = L = T R Grade= 0 . : y = LT t l a. = LR IntlIllf Grade= 0 . _ L 7 R 0 1 1 } EB WB V NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT I LT 1 TH 1 RT LT 1 TH I RT Volume(vph) 1 25 770 90 35 680 10 90 65 95 15 1 125 1125 % Heavy veh 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 Actuated (P/A) PPPPIPPPPPPIPP Startup lost time 1 2.0 20 1 2.0 1 20 I I 2.0 20 2.0 1 20 Ext. eff. green 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 1 Arrival type 1 3 4 3 4 I 3 3 1 3 3 - Unit Extension 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 I 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 Lane Width 120 1120 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1120 Parking(Y or N) N NN NNI INN 1 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Ped timing 12 12 12 3.2 EB Only EW Perm 03 1 04 NS Perm 06 07 I_ 08 G = 10.0 G = 520 G = IG= G = 28.0 G = G = I_ G = Timing Y= 0 Y= 5 Y = IY= IY= 5 (Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs)= 0.25 I (Cycle Length C = 100.0 Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET e Project Description EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 25 770 90 35 680 10 90 65 95 15 125 125 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow Rate 28 856 100 39 756 11 100 72 106 17 139 139 Lane Group L TR L TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 28 956 39 767 172 106 156 139 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 — 0.105 0.000 — 0.014 0.581 — 0.000 0.109 -- 0.000 Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fl-IV 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 0.214 1.000 - 0.602 - 0.961 Secondary fLT 0.157 — — — — fRT — 0.984 — 0.998 — 1.000 0.850 — 1.000 0.850 fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 — fRpb 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 Adj. satflow 1770 1834 399 1859 1122 1583 1790 1583 Sec. adj. satflow 1292 Full Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Project Description _ y 'h'-..c,.�..ny.�.....�. _._. �._... ._..A..r, ..:_......,..w..W ,..,_.........,.��..,. .......<.,..._ .. ..,.,°..e......-.a..t5. .".�£.a<a' .,+;4, bFr+.w,�.`� EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR I L I TR I LT RI LT IR Adj.flow rate 128 956 1 39 1767 I 1 172 1 106 1 1 156 1 139 Satflow rate 11770 1834 1 1399 1859 1122 11583 11790 1583 Lost time a0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.62 0.62 0.52 0.52 0.28 0.28 0:28 0.28 Lane group cap. 329 1137 1207 967 314 443 501 443 v/c ratio 0.09 0.84 0.19 0.79 0.55 0.24 0.31 0.31 Flow ratio 0.52 0.10 0.41 0.15 10.07 0.09 0.09 Crit. lane group N Y N N Y N N N Sum flow ratios 0.67 Lost time/cycle 10.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.75 < ro, g ... .._ 4-/='ca5d".4';-:(77.1;:Ti AS Z rJxi Irit) �46m '`Y'�.t;,la X a'-ri.atP-ri:s �'� , , ..; .r. . ... . ?s $. x.a,u i,.n ,.° EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR LT R LT R Adj. flow rate 28 956 39 767 172 106 156 139 Lane group cap. 329 1137 207 967 314 443 501 443 v/c ratio 0.09 0.84 0.19 0.79 a55 0.24 0.31 0.31 Green ratio 0.62 0.62 0.52 0.52 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 Unit delay dl 12.1 15.1 12.8 19.6 30.6 27.8 28.4 28.4 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 10.50 Increm. delay d2 0.5 7.6 20 6.7 6.7 1.3 1.6 1.8 PF factor 1.000 0.525 t000 0.735 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 12.6 15.5 14.8 21.1 37.3 29.1 30.0 30.3 Lane group LOS B B B C D C C C Apprch. delay 15.4 20.8 34.2 30.1 Approach LOS B C C C Intersec. delay 21.3 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.I d Full Report Page 1 of 3 FULL REPORT Analyst GC Intersection 66-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/8/2 5 Jurisdiction Time Period Alv Analysis Year 06 07®09 10 s..reeu _.,. a eS�'ai.dw�z.� '. .m ...n,,._.....tv.,:..o.;,....:_...::....,m.Y...:...e.�„�....._....W..».....E_.�,.._.,,...,W. .,va�:.z».W,._........:,....,.. .,"si Grade= 0 0 titaliiF�t��! i 1•liIN!!! ; Grade= 0 I!!■i!!!■!!t Show With Anew •rt.�a.�s�� y I( = T In s nul 0 !!! =i It i I !!!1 I R ■�' !� C!111 u.i ltl iii } = L 0 i5■iii ' lir .� .......� = T R Grade= 0 � • = LT N!!!!!y! lif�l/ wyr = L R III r Grade= 0 ger = LIR o t ......w ... EB WB NB I SB I LT I TH RT LT TH RT I LT I TH I RT I LT I TH I RT I Volume(vph) 1110 790 45 105 835 15 160 1 40 165 10 135 175 1 cro Heavy veh 2 2 12 2 2 2 2 12 12 2 12 12 PHF 0.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 (0.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 10.90 Actuated (P/A) P PIP P P P PIP PIP PIP Startup lost time 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 1 2.0 I 2.0 12.0 Ext.eff. green 12.0 2.0 20 2.0 I 2.0 2.0 I 12.0 12.0 Arrival type 3 14 I 3 4 3 3 3 13 Unit Extension 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 13.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Lane Width 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 112.0 (12.0 Parking(Y or N) N N N N I N I N N I N I Parking/hr I I I Bus stops/hr 0 10 I 0 0 10 ( 0 0 10 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 12 I EB Only EW Perm I 03 04 NS Perm 06 I 07 08 G = 10.0 G = 55.0 G = G= G = 25.0 G = I G = G = Timing Y = 0 Y= 5 Y = Y = Y= 5 Y= IY= Y = I Duration of Analysis (hrs)=0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 I Page 2 of 3 Full Report y. p4-ry VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET I®8 i � n isr,_c a . m v .,.rv:32`s'9 Project Description ailt aC'- ;ti t;a.e�" e _ M.,.,._...—.,,......._...:...3..a......»..w.:. s .�..,..,....�..: .. ...,..._.._,.......ae..� u - ,,.*'.x^ EB W NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 110 790 45 105 835 15 60 40 65 10 35 75 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow Rate 122 878 50 117 928 17 67 44 72 11 39 83 Lane Group L TR L TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 122 928 117 945 111 72 50 83 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 - 0.054 0.000 - 0.018 0.604 - 0.000 0.220 - 0.000 are Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 0.281 1.000 - 0.803 - 0.942 I - Secondary fLT 0.073 — — — — fRT — 0.992 — 0.997 — 1.000 0.850 1.000 0.850 fLpb 1.000 t000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 — fRpb — 1.000 — 1.000 — t000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 Adj. satflow 1770 1848 524 1858 1496 1583 1756 1583 Sec. adj. satflow 135 — — — — Full Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Genera_ fY�yI*y . .� _ _ ________ _ _-_ _ _ __ � _ _. _ _ _. _.._ Project Description EB WB NB SB Lane group 1 L TR 1 I L TR I 1 LT I R 1 1 LT R Adj.flow rate 1 122 928 I 1 117 945 I 1 111 1 72 1 1 50 83 Sattlow rate 1770 11848 524 11858 I 11496 11583 11756 1583 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.65 0.65 1 0.55 0.55 _I 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Lane group cap. 251 11201 288 1022 374 396 439 396 _ v/c ratio 0.49 0.77 0.41 0.92 0.30 0.18 0.11 0.21 Flow ratio ,0.50 0.22 0.51 I t 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.05 Crit. lane group 1 N N N Y 1 1 Y N N N Sum flow ratios 0.65 Lost time/cycle 15.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.77 EB I WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 122 928 117 945 111 72 50 83 Lane group cap. 251 1201 288 1022 374 396 439 396 v/c ratio 0.49 0.77 0.41 0.92 0.30 0.18 0.11 0.21 Green ratio 0.65 0.65 0.55 0.55 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Unif. delay dl 19.2 12.3 13.0 20.6 30.4 29.5 28.9 29.7 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 lncrem. delay d2 6.6 4.9 4.2 15.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 1.2 PF factor 1.000 0.438 11.000 0.681 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 25.8 10.3 17.2 29.0 32.4 30.5 29.5 30.9 l Lane group LOS C B B C C C C C Apprch. delay 12.1 27.7 31.6 30.4 Approach LOS B C C C Intersec. delay 21.4 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright O 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 4=Y g[ JSf ale " 1.. .. � e ,. .._,. ...,,..'.._._.v nt. :: �:__u..,.�w .....3" Analyst GC Intersection 119-CR 7 Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Date Performed 78/2004 Analysis Year er910 Analysis Time Period IA PM Project Description East/West Street: SH 119 North/South Street: CR 7 I Intersection Orientation: East-West Study Period (hrs): 0.25 I ' .. °1t 9# 4-wr�5 s y'r.e;5@.L4'ca i. 1 `...C , . .. ... .v ,,m .., . ,. .c.:S.,. za,.+n's'a1: , Major Street I Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 i 2 3 4 I 5 6 L I T R L I T R j Volume (veh/h) 160 I 1015 0 0 1630 30 Peak-hour factor, PHF I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I Hourly Flow Rate(veh/h) 160 1015 0 I 0 1630 ( 30 Proportion of heavy 0 — 0 vehicles, PHv Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I 0 I I 0 Lanes I 1 2 0 0 2 ( 1 Configuration I L L T T I R Upstream Signal I I 0 0 Minor Street L Northbound I Southbound Movement I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 12 L T R I L I T R Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 I 80 0 I 145 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 0 I 0 0 I 80 I 0 I 145 I Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 vehicles, PHv Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach I I N I N ' Storage I I 0 I I 0 RT Channelized? I 0 I 0 I Lanes 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 I Configuration I I I L I R I Approach I EB WB I Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 I 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L I L R I Volume, v (vph) 160 I I I 80 145 Capacity, cm(vph) 393 117 325 v/c ratio 0.41 0.68 0.45 I Queue length(95%) 1.93 I 3.63 2.20 Control Delay(sNeh) 20.3 85.2 24.7 LOS C F C Approach delay (s/veh) — — I 46.2 Approach LOS - - I E HCS2000TM Copyright C 2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Two-Way'Stop Control Page 1 of I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY , �� ; t l.<€ r:','v- fl , n. _ w v. Analyst GC Intersection 119-CR 7 Agency/Co. Jurisdiction Date Performed 7/8/2004 Analysis Year (309 10 Analysis Time Period_ AM&A Project Description East/West Street: SH 119 North/South Street: CR 7 Intersection Orientation: East-West h Study Period (hrs): 0.25 I t '0 h 88 .. _"' A9A2c9\ 4 ( 6 vs - d x4 . � ,�3. - t ✓ 6 � S 2i'.-`. .W a..,.. y .F^cx.,: n.�'�s.'�si..filvxll Major Street I Eastbound I Westbound Movement I 1 2 3 I 4 j 5 6 I L I T R P L ( T I R Volume (veh/h) 200 I 1655 0 I 0 I 1325 I 90 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) I 200 1655 0 0 i 1325 I 90 Proportion of heavy 0 — 0 — — vehicles, PEiv — Median type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized? I I 0 I 0 Lanes 1 j 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration I L T I T R Upstream Signal I I 0 I I j 0 Minor Street I Northbound Southbound Movement I 7 J 8 I 9 10 I 11 12 L I T R L I T I R I Volume (veh/h) 0 0 0 55 0 95 Peak-hour factor,PHF 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate(veh/h) I 0 I 0 0 55 0 I 95 Proportion of heavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 vehicles, PH, Percent grade(%) 0 0 Flared approach I N I N I I Storage I I 0 0 I I RT Channelized? I 0 0 I Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration I L I R ^ fI "#9y 1,:', ii':','"=:-_-'Y.-,,--,',,P.,, •s-5---1,-,,d . , a . , m.. r Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound I Movement 1 I 4 7 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 12 Lane Configuration L I I L I R Volume, v(vph) 200 I 55 I 95 Capacity, cm(vph) 488 112 409 v/c ratio 0.41 0.49 I 0.23 Queue length (95%) 1.97 221 0.89 Control Delay(s/veh) 17.4 1 I 64.8 16.4 LOS C I I I I F I C Approach delay(s/veh) — — I 34.2 Approach LOS — — I D ncs2notind Copyright®2003 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id Full Report Page 1 of 3 FULL REPORT a-0-i ft...., .. _ �._,_.. .�c,. ,�._..> _ ..,._._._ , ' .L •..., r2..,...,...._.._. ..�,..,.,.�„ .:z ....,.�:..,t j Analyst GC Intersection 119-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7 (2005 Jurisdiction Time Period lllKgl%}PM Analysis Year @09 10 i ; P a "` - � ,.¢ �'�+ �� e+'.L,'' �6.`. .� ., �., ,s;i..,.. w, .v .. ' �.�,n_.,•ns; s,-,.-?. .4 ;rx- . ,=ro+s c,. .:. Grade= 0 1 0 1 f■■� iiii Grade= 0 '■®■■■■■/ Show Wirth Mow a_a 1 = T //%1■!r�■/ ■■N■■ ■�- ■/ ■tt/�\■■� = R 2 \.■■■■� ■ ' ■� 2 it) = L /■■mma t■1�■■■1 o /■■m■/ ■■■■■■■1 Grade= 0 nnn■■ = L T • Ht®■■■■■ice ` = L R q■■■■ua■m �HH■■ I Grade= 'r = L 7 R 0 0 0 EB WB NB I SB LT I TH I RT I LT I TH RT LT I TH I RT I LT I TH I RT I Volume(vph) 1 160 1015 I I 1630 30 ( 180 1 145 %Heavy veh I O 0 I I 0 0 I 10 1 0 PHF 0.90 0.95 I 0.95 10.90 I 0.95 0.95 Actuated(P/A) P P P I P I P P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 I 12.0 1 2.0 Ext. eff. green 12M 20 2.0 2.0 I 12.0 I 20 Arrival type 1 3 4 4 3 13 I 13 Unit Extension 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 I 3.0 I 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume I 0 0 0 0 0 35 Lane Width 1120 120 1 12.0 12.0 I 12.0 12.0 Parking(Y or N) N I N N N N N I N N Parking/hr . Bus stops/hr 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 I 10 0 1 Ped timing 3.2 a2 3.2 1 EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 1 08 1 G = 18.0 G = 52.0 G = G = G = 25.0 G = G = G = Timing Y = 0 Y = 0 Y= Y= Y = 5 Y = Y= Y = Duration of Analysis(hrs) = 0.25 (Cycle Length C = 100.0 I Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET 6. 1 u Project Description .o um .3 ,i = en ,:, __ . _ _ .. EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 160 1015 1630 30 80 145 PHF 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow Rate 178 1068" 1716 33 84 116 Lane Group L T T R L R Adj. flow rate 178 1068 1716 33 84 116 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 -- 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 - -- Sa uy7: , ' Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 - - 0.950 -- Secondary fLT 0.077 -- - - __ f RT — 1.000 - 1.000 0.850 - - 0.850 fLpb 1.000 .1.000 -- j 1.000 - - 1.000 - fRpb — 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - - 1.000 Adj. satflow 1805 3610 3610 1615 1805 1615 Sec. adj. satflow 146 - - - - Full Report Page 3 Of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET ::, f Project Description .-- o _ EB WB NB SB Lane group L T 1 1 T R L ' R Adj. flow rate 1 178 1068 1 11716 133 1 84 116 Satflow rate 11805 13610 1 13610 11615 11805 I 11615 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.52 0.25 0.25 Lane group cap. 401 2527 1877 840 451 1 1 404 v/c ratio 0.44 0.42 0.91 0.04 1 0.19 10.29 Flow ratio 1 0.30 0.48 0.02 1 0.05 0.07 Crit. lane group N N Y N J N 1 N f N 1 Y Sum flow ratios 0.65 Lost time/cycle 5.00 Critical v/c ratio I 0.68 EB WB NB SB Lane group L T T R L R Adj. flow rate 178 1068 1716 33 84 J 116 Lane group cap. 401 2527 1877 840 451 404 v/c ratio 0.44 0.42 0.91 0.04 0.19 0.29 Green ratio 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.52 0.25 0.25 Unit. delay dl 20.5 6.4 22.0 11.8 29.5 30.3 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 3.5 0.5 8.4 0.1 l 0.9 I 1.8 PF factor 1.000 0.256 0.735 1.000 1.000 [1.000 Control delay 24.0 2.2 24.5 11.8 30.4 32.1 Lane group LOS C A C B C C Apprch. delay 5.3 24.3 31.4 Approach LOS A C J C Intersec. delay 17.3 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Full Report Page 1 of 3 sry FULL REPORT I _ :'-i4rn ej yQr�ql [C aks s_ ....�..e ..: ..... . .... .= , ..:. ', ii=:, .;,- ...... ....�,,... . �,.3...,..v..�.�.. <..:„- -'.'" Analyst GC Intersection 119-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/8/2 Jurisdiction Time Period AM to Analysis Year 08 09 10 K. trier.-41r4.' ti.y ' - vr„ .w ._...,.,....� ....„ _ .. .,......._. . . . a w ..._ _ , x, *mod Grade= 0 1 0 1 Grade= 0 1��■ I Show North Arrow T = T / _�� It� d]♦)♦� r r tip t I . \ = R Y }J 2 2 = L 0 ��tinutiti ntl♦tit� 0 tar = 7 R Grade= 0 —I— mt.,. = L7 N . . fins I y = L R n i ' timi�1 Grade= = LIR o o 0 "srffsitfr-ta `a 2'Piii ....i_ ice,_____ .._x. . ._ _ __.__._� ._....,_.,...J..,... _._ ......._.._.....�,. .,� EB WB �NB -SB —1 LT TH I RT LT I TH RT LT I TH RT I LT TH I RT Volume(vph) 1200 1655 11325 90 I 55 L95 % Heavy veh 10 0 0 0 I I 0 10 PHF 10.90 10.95 I 0.95 0.90 I I 0.95 a95 Actuated (P/A) I P IP I I P I P I P P Startup lost time 12.o 12.0 2.0 20 I 20 2.0 Ext. eff. green 12.0 2.0 20 20 20 I 2.0 Arrival type 13 4 I 4 3 3 I 3 Unit Extension 13.0 1 3.0 I 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume I I I 0 0 0 0 I I 0 1 25 Lane Width 12.0 112.0 I 120 12.0 I i 112.0 I 1120 I Parking(Y or N) N I I N N N N I N I N I I N Parking/hr I I I Bus stops/hr 0 0 10 i 0 I 1 0 I 10 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 I EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 G = 18.0 G = 42.0 G = G = G = 35.0 G = G = G= Timing Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= I Y= Y= 5 Y= I Y= IV= Duration of Analysis (hrs)= 0.25 I 'Cycle Length C = 100.0 1 • Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET - : a e R t s e .,.......gii !ii_...... vM: m'gq:. i,_, ..............>.2E]' „r.ag..Ee..a: ,.... .,_..vldr3.,as iO Project Description EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 200 1655 1325 90 55 95 PHF 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 L • 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow Rate 222 1742 1395 100 I 58 74 Lane Group L T T R L R Adj.flow rate 222 1742 1395 100 58 74 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.000 — — T -. a1 ¢iiiii.:.. e2 n y vc-YW- y„ .,e gi Y-ta >f.A.,., d 1.., g Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1bb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 - - 0.950 - Secondary fLT 0.095 — — — — fRT — 1.000 — 1.000 0.850 — — 0.850 fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — — 1.000 — fRpb — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — — 1.000 Adj. satflow 1805 3610 3610 1615 1805 1615 Sec. adj. satflow 181 — — — — Full Report Page 3 013 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Y , Project Description g4- i ... tti5t: ' -h rt,.» �_...., t.nK3 .._ ss,..., ��a't ds C� . � . . r. u ,., „=-x .,a K""....,..-.: s'T...c:,,,„> EB WB NB SB Lane group L T T I R I L I R Adj.flow rate 222 1742 1395 1 100 158 174 Satflow rate 11805 13610 I I 3610 11615 I (1805 I (1615 I Lost time 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.60 0.60 0.42 0.42 0.35 0.35 Lane group cap. 401 2166 1516 678 I 632 565 v/c ratio 0.55 0.80 0.92 10.15 0.09 0.13 Flow ratio 0.48 0.39 0.06 0.03 0.05 Crit. lane group N N I Y N N IN NY Sum flow ratios 0.56 Lost time/cycle 5.00 Critical v/c ratio I 0.58• r •z x;9. $,:m d'ai sT ""A:..l'.`.:r. w. a'Erd3xa.L1` n' ti_'fi'„ r. ( ,'t'asXa X§iaj5 �...•i •• s:r: a.'' tyea' EB WB NB SB Lane group L T T R L R Adj.flow rate 222 1742 1395 100 58 74 Lane group cap. 401 2166 1516 678 632 565 v/c ratio 0.55 0.80 0.92 0.15 0.09 0.13 Green ratio 0.60 0.60 0.42 0.42 0.35 0.35 Unif. delay dl 20.8 15.5 27.4 17.9 21.8 22.1 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 5.4 3.3 10.6 0.5 0.3 0.5 PF factor 1.000 0.575 0.872 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 26.3 12.2 34.5 18.4 22.1 22.6 Lane group LOS C B C B C C Apprch. delay 13.8 33.4 22.4 Approach LOS B C C Intersec. delay 22.3 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.I d Full Report Page 1 of 3 I FULL REPORT Analyst GC Intersection 66-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7(;005 Jurisdiction Time Period PM Analysis Year 06 07 08 0�10 Grade= 0 1 1 0 fiffi ■■111v11♦■ + 1■� . ■■ Grade= 0 1■■�■; . I Stag North Arrow Vi T 1 n■ ■� ■■■II 0 -—i ! I r . R 1 �■ ■ 1 i t , 1 wr1 �■■1 . ■It i■■i■ ; ! = L ° . 1 = T R rt Grade= 0 = LT ; , ..yr /■ < < ■1■I ■ ; �■ ' Grade= 0 V-4,..-.• - LIR 0 1 1 EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT I TH I RT LT TH RT ! Volume (vph) 1 25 820 100 50 710 10 1115 65 140 15 125 125 I % Heavy veh E 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 PHF 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 Actuated (P/A) P P P P P j P P P P P P I P Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ( 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 _ 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 1 4 3 4 1 13 3 I 3 13 Unit Extension 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 I 3.0 3.0 13.0 I 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking (Y or N) N NN _ NNI NN i N Parking/hr I I I I Bus stops/hr 0 0 I 0 0 I f 0 0 I 0 10 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 I EB Only r EW Perm WB Only 1 04 NS Perm I 06 I 07 08 G = 10.0 G = 46.0 G = 7.0 I G = G = 27.0 I G = G = G = Timing Y = 0 Y = 0 Y = 5 1Y= Y= 5 Y = Y = ! Y = Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 _ Cycle Length C = 100.0 1 Fu11 Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET Project Description EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 25 820 100 50 710 10 115 65 140 15 125 125 PI-IF 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow Rate 28 863 111 56 747 11 128 72 156 17 139 139 Lane Group L TR L TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 28 974 56 758 200 156 156 139 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 - 0.114 0.000 - 0.015 0.640 - 0.000 0.109 - 0.000 Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 t000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 L000 - 0.561 - 0.958 - Secondary fLT 0.146 — 0.087 — — — fRT — 0.983 — 0.998 — t000 0.850 — 1.000 0.850 fLpb 1.000 t000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 — fRpb -- 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 Adj. satflow 1770 1831 1770 1859 1045 1583 1784 1583 Sec. adj. satflow 273 — 162 — — — Page 3 of 3 Full Report } CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Project Description EB WB NB SB Lane group I L TR L TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 128 974 I 56 758 200 156 156 1139 Satflow rate 11770 1831 11770 1859 1 1045 1583 1784 11583 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.56 0.56 0.53 0.53 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Lane group cap. 303 1025 199 985 282 427 482 427 v/c ratio 0.09 0.95 0.28 0.77 0.71 0.37 1 0.32 0.33 Flow ratio 0.53 1 I 0.19 0.10 0.09 0.09 Grit. lane group N NI IN IN 1 1 N N N I N Sum flow ratios 0.00 Lost time/cycle 0.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.00 EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 28 974 56 758 200 156 156 139 Lane group cap. 303 1025 199 985 282 427 - 482 427 v/c ratio 0.09 0.95 0.28 0.77 0.71 0.37 0.32 0.33 Green ratio 0.56 0.56 a53 0.53 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Unif. delay dl 14.0 20.7 36.2 18.7 33.0 29.6 29.2 29.2 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 0.6 18.4 3.5 5.8 14.1 2.4 1.8 2.0 PF factor 1.000 0.662 1.000 0.718 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 14.6 32.1 39.7 19.2 47.0 32.0 31.0 31.2 Lane group LOS B C D B D C C C Apprch. delay 31.6 20.6 40.4 31.1 Approach LOS C C D C lntersec. delay 29.2 Intersection LOS C 'HCS2000iM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.W • Futt Report Page 1 of 3 FULL REPORT w ....,. .. ... .... .... . ��'. �='+ Analyst GC Intersection 66-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 2/1/2N Jurisdiction Time Period Analysis Year 06 07 08 3 10 Grade= 0 1 0 liC3E1 ) /u!u!luA1 Grade= 0 il♦�� , 5tior[goMlimw r = T I fnua.I Bt®Rfl ° = R I ° , r 1try. = T R •Grade= 0 1 = LT l��l•� t .ry. = L �-4-+-�, �� Grade= 0 414. = L R 0 1 1 � ��°+ i-�'4an aka a`y=5 }e. &.>_„'{' .. r ,.. ., e _. ,....,.:,. e. ".fie ,. ,"y�•�' EB WB NB I SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH ( RT LT ( TH ( RT Volume(vph) 1110 1830 70 155 885 15 75 45 1 90 10 40 175 cro Heavy veh ( 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ( 2 PHF 10.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 Actuated (P/A) IP P P P P ( P P ( P P P PIP Startup lost time 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ( ( 2.0 2.0 2.0 ( 2.0 Ext. eff. green ( 20 2.0 2.0 20 ( 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 Arrival type 3 4 3 4 13 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 I 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 0 0 Lane Width 1120 112.0 120 12.0 1 12.0 120 120 120 Parking(Y or N) I N I N N IN NI N N I N 1 Parking/hr I I Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 I Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 I EB Only EW Perm WB Only 04 NS Perm 06 I 07 I 08 G = 10.0 G = 47.0 G = 10.0 G = G = 23.0 G = G = (G = Timing Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= I Y= 5 Y= Y = (Y = Duration of Analysis(hrs)= 0.25 ( (Cycle Length C = 100.0 ( • Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET st."d''qq 1 e7 4a .0 ,..,,:____. ,., :...._ .s...,. •e,._...s `.'b_. ... .yw..,....s_.. ...................a.. .2 .....a........_:u ti.-.. .. .—. Project Description �y® is ;rrz,ii,A"t3 z+. s ,,:r_e4.> . .,, , a ., .. .rv.........rv� ,. . ..... .,m.rvr_ , ,..c.. .-. .. EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 110 830 70 155 885 15 75 45 90 10 140 75 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 (0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow Rate 122 922 78 172 983 17 83 50 100 11 44 83 Lane Group L TR L TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 122 1000 172 1000 133 100 55 83 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 - 0.078 0.000 - 0.017 0.624 - 0.000 0.200 -- 0.000 ^l ".. ,iil +.* ;: f....)..(.. . w . .. ., w . A a fa:.. . . -. .. v . x +P t:'. w .ry. . .. - . - Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.781 - 0.942 - Secondary fLT 0.085 - 0.085 - -- - fRT — 0.988 -- 0.997 — 1.000 0.850 — 1.000 0.850 fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 -- 1.000 fRpb — 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 Adj. satflow 1770 1841 1770 1858 1455 1583 1755 1583 Sec. adj. satflow 159 — 159 — — — Full Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET 0e . ... . . _. . ... - . Project Description D Ei EB WB NB SB Lane group I L TR 1 I L TR 1 LT I R I LT 1 R Adj. flow rate 1122 1000 1172 11000 1 133 1 100 1 1 55 1 83 I Satflow rate 11770 1841 11770 1858 11455 1583 1755 1583 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.23 0.23 0.23 '0.23 Lane group cap. 252 1049 252 1059 335 364 404 364 v/c ratio 0.48 0.95 10.68 0.94 0.40 0.27 0.14 0.23 Fiow ratio 0.54 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.05 Crit. lane group I N N N I N I N N N 1 N Sum flow ratios 1 0.00 Lost time/cycle 0.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.00 EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 122 1000 172 1000 133 100 55 83 Lane group cap. 252 1049 252 1059 335 364 404 364 v/c ratio 0.48 0.95 0.68 0.94 0.40 0.27 0.14 0.23 Green ratio 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 Unif. delay dl 19.8 20.2 39.4 20.0 32.6 31.6 30.6 31.3 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 lncrem. delay d2 6.5 18.6 14.0 17.1 j 3.5 1.9 0.7 1.5 PF factor 1.000 0.642 1.000 0.642 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 26.3 31.6 53.4 30.0 36.1 33.5 31.3 32.7 Lane group LOS C C D C D C C C Apprch. delay 31.0 33.4 35.0 1 32.2 Approach LOS C C C C I intersec. delay 32.5 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright©2000 University.of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.I d Full Report Page 1 of 3 FULL REPORT g Y ..;'._'`—.---11—m :._....,.,r,..._ ..,.,......,�... ....� .........._w,.m Rj-, ' :--.' °,�^.....,...w .a.�.,,,,., �..>,.,m.,..., ._... Analyst GC Intersection 119-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7 005 Jurisdiction Time Period �PM Analysis Year 08O10 10 Grade= 0 1 0 1 �fifilt I •ifafl lfi��<tll I Grade= 0 lnnun + Show Nat Mar = T 1Nu�v, 1 rev = R 2 I 2 igN L o nul u o = TR Grade= 0 ®#H��V1 = LT . uum e nuu y = LR unnuti\tl Grade= • = LIR 0 0 0 BB WB NB SB LT I TN RT LT TH ( RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Volume(vph) 170 11060 1710 40 120 1 175 % Heavy veh 1 0 ( 0 0 0 ( ( 0 0 PHF 10.90 10.95 ( 0.95 0.90 1 0.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) ( P ( P ( p p ( I P P Startup lost time 2.0 1 20 I 2.0 2.0 ( I 2.0 2.0 Ext.eff.green 2.0 1 2.0 ( 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 ( 4 4 3 ( I 1 3 ( 3 - Unit Extension 10 13.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume ( 0 0 0 ( 0 0 ( 45 Lane Width 120 1120 12.0 112.0 1 112.0 112.0_ Parking(Y or N) 1 N 1 INN N 1 N N 1 N 1 N Parking/hr I Bus stops/hr 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 10 Ped timing 3.2 12 3.2 1 EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 1 06 1 07 08 G = 18.0 G = 52.0 G= G = G = 25.0 (G = G = G = Timing Y = 0 Y= 0 Y= Y= Y= 5 (Y= Y = Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs)= 0.25 (Cycle Length C= 100.0 Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET . w__... .._._ . ... ; .. ,:,.. . a „,,.h,u:;&.tc,.a.vrv:i.;..< ._.._.— .- .. .auct 7.Ev'4'tM:4 Project Description EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 170 1060 1710 40 120 175 PHF 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow Rate 189 1116 1800 44 126 137 Lane Group L T T R L R Adj.flow rate 189 1116 1800 44 126 137 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.000 — — Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Mt 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 -- -- 0.950 - Secondary fLT 0.077 -- — — — fRT — 1.000 — 1.000 0.850 — — 0.850 _ fLpb 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 — — 1.000 — fRpb — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 -- — 1.000 Adj. satflow 1805 3610 3610 1615 1805 1615 Sec. adj. satflow 146 -- — I — Full Report Page 3 df 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Project Description EB WB NB SB Lane group L T T R I L R Adj.flow rate 189 1116 1800 44 I 126 137 Satflow rate 1805 13610 13610 1615 I 1805 I 11615 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.52 0.25 0.25 Lane group cap. 401 2527 1877 840 451 _404 v/c ratio 0.47 0.44 0.96 0.05 0.28 0.34 Flow ratio 0.31 0.50 0.03 0.07 0.08 Crit. lane group N N Y N N 1 N N Y Sum flow ratios 0.69 Lost time/cycle I 5.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.72 EB WB NB SB Lane group L T T R L R Adj. flow rate 189 1116 1800 44 126 137 t Lane group cap. 401 2527 1877 840 451 404 v/c ratio 0.47 0.44 0.96 0.05 0.28 _ 0.34 Green ratio 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.52 0.25 0.25 Unif. delay d1 21.8 6.5 23.0 11.8 30.2 30.7 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 3.9 0.6 13.1 0.1 1.5 2.3 PF factor 1.000 0.256 0.735 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 25.7 2.2 30.0 12.0 31.8 33.0 Lane group LOS C A ' C B C i C Apprch. delay 5.6 29.6 32.4 Approach LOS A C C intersec. delay j 20.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida,Ail Rights Reserved Version 4.Id Full Ripart Page 1 of 3 FULL REPORT ��r91"S ti;e C Ify fl .,,-_xc..__.r wL.ss .8-.,.[„ .n s...� a,..�_...,...a...�._ .m—..,es.. xS Analyst GC Intersection 119-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/8/2�D04^A5 Jurisdiction Time Period AM&J Analysis Year 08 0 10 e ^<7a (q6tG id 3e� s a=� ._ . ..._ a. _., r sm ...�- ,. a ss Grade= 0 1 0 1 ■■■■,■■Hi Grade= 0 i■■■N■■■■i ShowNor9nMw I■■ I i i■®i = T I u nut I I■■ ■I = R 2 /■CSZ■I I■■�■I I■■■■■■I ■■■■■■ 0 I■■■■■■I ■■®■■� 0 ■■ i ■■tt Grade= 0 Hi�■ ‘fl = L T u iii Y = LR Niii�■�/ Grade= = L T R 0 0 0 c ? f�f"°ra EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT I TH RT I LT TH I RT Volume(vph) 1215 1795 I 1309 1 130 1 75 115 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 PHF 0.90 0.95 10.95 0.90 I 0.95 I 10.95 Actuated (P/A) P P P P P P Startup lost time 20 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 13 4 14 3 I 3 13 - Unit Extension 13.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume I I 0 0 0 0 0 30 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 Parking(Y or N) N N N I N N N I N I IN Parking/hr I L Bus stops/hr 0 10 10 0 _O 0 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 I EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 G = 18.0 G= 52.0 G= G= G = 25.0 G = G = G = Timing Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs)= 0.25 'Cycle Length C = 100.0 • Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET c-"^ -i a ® d v,5d. v,ase,.,..v s._.x,..x...x._..._xi._, , .,».._ , .Ma4 _..._.,. _____ hmm,.. _5. _-k.. .zk Project Description 'ga £eL"4litt°la L?-1'..i)11:1:111.. —_—_ ._,,..._.. .c . ....._v.__...,.i..a.......,. ,....__ .__,___,..,,...,_..z.s._..._..... ., �. .v._.. ....a.. ..... L:I—Si az EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 215 1795 1309 130 75 115 PHF 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow Rate 239 1889 1378 144 79 89 Lane Group L T T R L R Adj.flow rate 239 1889 1378 144 79 89 Pro�p. LT or LT or RT 0.000 -- 0.000 0.000 - 0.000 - - •r9@ =Yw��'-�s Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb t000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 - - 0.950 - Secondary fLT 0.095 — — — — fRT — 1.000 — 1.000 0.850 — — 0.850 fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — — 1.000 — fRpb — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — — 1.000 Adj. satflow 1805 3610 3610 1615 1805 1615 Sec. adj. satflow 181 — — — — Full Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Project Description EB WB NB SB Lane group L T I IT IR L I I R Adj.flow rate 239 1889 I 1378 1144 17g 89 Satflow rate 11805 3610 1 I 3610 11615 I 11805 I 11615 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.52 0.25 0.25 Lane group cap. 419 2527 1877 840 451 404 v/c ratio 0.57 0.75 0.73 0.17 10.18 0.22 Flow ratio 0.52 0.38 0.09 0.04 [ 0.06 Crit. lane group N Y N N N N N Y Sum flow ratios 0.58 Lost time/cycle 5.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.61 EB WB NB SB Lane group L T T R L R Adj.flow rate 239 1889 1378 144 79 89 Lane group cap. 419 2527 1877 840 451 404 v/c ratio 0.57 0.75 0.73 0.17 0.18 0.22 Green ratio 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.52 0.25 a25 Unit delay dl 18.2 9.4 18.6 12.6 19.4 29.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 H 10.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 5.5 2.1 2.6 0.4 I 0.8 1.3 PF factor 1.000 0.256 0.735 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 23.8 4.5 16.3 13.1 30.3 31.0 Lane group LOS C A B B C C Apprch. delay 6.6 16.0 30.7 Approach LOS A B C Intersec. delay 11.4 Intersection LOS B HCS2000T M Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id • Full Report Pagi 1 cif 3 ULL REPORT Syr.. . ..>: .. F,� -..., ::-7, :1- a. Analyst GC Intersection 119-7 Agency or Co. Area Type Al!other areas Date Performed 72005 Jurisdiction Time Period PM Analysis Year 08 090 i 1 0 1 Grade= 0 ■■■IFH■■R■ ■■■�1u■■■■�i I■r ' ■■ ' ��■�■■ t Grade= 0 1■■■ ' ■■ Show North Arrow uara�ar.�� 1 = T r = R 1 2 s ��■ �! s = L + , 1111 rt Grade= 0 , ■1�� t = LT ! p1r■N�■ t v = L R " ■ Grade= v = L 1 R 0 0 0 .y�fe `bi .ab ti ..� . .. ..... ........ .. ...� .Y5'...''.:'.'(,''r'. - avaS_':. �O�iJt)7�';'�q I� "r" I1 �� 'k�::i�+r '".�:... :.• .... =r'> r x t • t�:, r �;.-_�".�il„ '�• nor EB IN- I NB I SB 1 LT TH I RT LT TH I RT I LT TH RT LT TH I RT I Volume(vph) 1175 1095 1765 155 I 155 1195 % Heavy veh 0 0 i 0 10 I I I 0 10 PHF 0.90 0.95 I 10.95 0.90 I 0.95 10.95 Actuated (P/A) I P P I P P I P I I P Startup lost time 12.0 2.0 I 2.0 2.0 I I 2.0 I 12.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 ] 12.0 2.0 I _ 2.0 I 2.0 Arrival type 3 4 1 1 4 3 I I 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 I 3.0 3.0 I I 3.0 I 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 10 0 0 10 I _I 0 150 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 ' I 12.0 12.0 I 12.0 _112.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N N N 1 I N I{ Parking/hr I I I Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 I Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 1 06 07 08 G = 15.0 G = 55.0 G = G = G = 25.0 G = G = G = Timing Y = Y = 0 Y= 0 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y = Y= } Duration of Analysis (hrs) = 0.25 1 Cycle Length C = 100.0 I • Furl Retloit Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET Project Description EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 175 1095 1765 55 155 195 PHF 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow Rate 194 1153 1858 61 163 153 t Lane Group L T T R L R Adj. flow rate 194 1153 1858 61 163 153 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 -- 0.000 — -- Sa ra e : F a '. ;"!;''';''.':::::t.:"..=:,11,.:,' Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fl-IV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU fi.00 10.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 - - 0.950 - • Secondary fLT 0.073 — — — — fRT — 1.000 — 1.000 0.850 — — 0.850 fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 -- — 1.000 — fRpb -- 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — — 1.000 Adj. satflow 1805 3610 3610 1615 1805 1615 , Sec. adj. satflow 138 — — . — — Full Report Page 3 elf 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Project Description EB WB NB SB Lane group L T I T R I I 163 Adj.flow rate 194 1153 1858 61 1153 Satflow rate 1805 3610 3610 1615 I I 11805 11615 Lost time 20 20 2.0 20 2.0 20 Green ratio 0.70 0.70 - 0.55 0.55 0.25 0.25 Lane group cap. 347 2527 1986 888 451 404 v/c ratio 0.56 0.46 0.94 0.07 0.36 0.38 Flow ratio 0.32 0.51 0.04 0.09 0.09 Crit. lane group N N Y NI IN N N I Y Sum flow ratios 0.72 Lost time/cycle 5.00 Critical v/c ratio I 0.75 EB WB NB SB Lane group L T T R L R Adj.flow rate 194 1153 1858 61 163 153 Lane group cap. 347 2527 1986 888 451 404 v/c ratio 0.56 0.46 0.94 0.07 0.36 0.38 Green ratio 0.70 0.70 0.55 0.55 0.25 0.25 Unif. delay dl 24.9 6.6 20.9 10.5 30.9 31.1 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 6.4 0.6 9.8 0.1 2.2 2.7 PF factor 1.000 0.256 0.681 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 31.2 23 24.0 10.7 33.2 33.8 Lane group LOS C A C B C C Apprch.delay 6.5 23.6 33.4 Approach LOS A C C Intersec. delay 18.0 Intersection LOS B HCS2000T'M Copyright Cl 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.I d Full Rlepvtt Page 1 of 3 I FULL REPORT Analyst GC Intersection 66-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 78/2005 Jurisdiction Time Period LAID PM Analysis Year 06 07 08 09O Grade= 0 I I 0 Iu.sH./- mu •• �� ' Grade= 0 Show North Maw Rii�fifi ru•��®r•r•s� nNi�tt6 I = T =i , = R USIUI iuni } ' ' .a . �, = 7R Grade= 0 1 �■'� � = LT �■. t� ` = LR a -• ■I/1fi1 Grade= 0 A LTR 0 I I � <<{.dxJ4#/i@(-L�ifa lf ay.^ $�@a T w��uxvsssarssnt�..wy....«.ew.a cva.._ ..�_ m.....:.�...u.. .. 1� EB WB NB SBV LT f TH 1 RT LT 1 TH RT LT 1 TH RT LT I TH I RT Volume(vph) 1 25 960 110 1100 1 800 10 150 85 200 15 130 125 cro Heavy veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 a90 Actuated (P/A) P PIP P P P PIP PIP PIP Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 f 2.0 Ext. eff. green 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 ( 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Arrival type 3 4 1 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 . Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 1 0 25 0 0 10 40 0 1 20 Lane Width 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 120 - .0 1120 112.0 120 Parking(Y or N) N N N NN I INN 1 N Parking/hr I I I I Bus stops/hr 1 0 0 0 0 I o Polo 0 10 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 EB Only 1 EW Perm WB Only 04 NB Only I NS Perm 07 1 08 Timing G = 7.0 G = 45.0 G = 10.0 G = G = 13.0 G = 15.0 G = G = Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= 1Y= 0 Y = 5 Y = Y= Duration of Analysis (hrs)= 0.25 Cycle Length C= 100.0 1 Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET ,-7.-, ,. 1°j �i$ }„qty xr . * s"- � cIH- y "°9!$'4 '.x..v"i.Y.m..N�.6kv.L.a!a'i�L�cu.ru.s..du.�umr a..nv....Ve. u+.a uw,:n... a..,,..v.a wcv.ew �e1c..a�Ms✓ Project y Description .v-11j B..7kS a3° JD a-,!..,,-C �,.a,m......,.._...., ....._ ..,,___.. ....,___. __,...._. .�. w ._....n..v...L...._,. ...._..,_______..,.: ,+ EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 25 960 110 100 800 10 150 85 200 15 130 125 PHF 0.90 0.95 a90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow Rate 28 1011 94 105 842 11 167 94 178 17 144 117 Lane Group LTRL TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 28 1011 94 105 853 261 178 161 117 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 — 0.013 0.640 — 0.000 0.106 — 0.000 Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV a980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.969 - 0.945 - Secondary fLT 0.095 — 0.087 — 0.219 — — fRT — 1.000 0.850 — 0.998 — 1.000 0.850 — 1.000 0.850 fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 — fRpb — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 Adj. satflow 1770 1863 1583 1770 1859 1805 1583 1760 1583 Sec. adj. satfiow 177 I — 162 I — I 407 — — Fu31 Ra$pott Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET r 3 Project Description ti g EB WB NB SB Lane group L T I R L TR I I LT I R I LT I R Adj.flow rate 28 1011 94 105 853 I 1 261 1178 161 1 117 Sallow rate 11770 11863 1583 1770 11859 I I 11805 11583 1 1760 11583 I Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 20 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 I Green ratio 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.56 0.56 0.29 0.44 0.16 0.28 Lane group cap. 222 987 839 252 1041 314 697 282 443 v/c ratio 0.13 1.02 all 0.42 0.82 0.83 0.26 0.57 0.26 Flow ratio 0.53 0.06 all 0.09 0.07 Grit. lane group NNNNN N N N N Sum flow ratios 0.00 Lost time/cycle 0.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.00 I } �wp±i-` :'}�1• z..Thro17: -m.S .,s.3-��{Ii..a9.a`7.�L�a:1''..in °mot:. . - . , .... _........ .^c „' .` r s.r' . EB WB NB SB Lane group LT R L TR LT R LT R Adj. flow rate 28 1011 94 105 853 261 1 178 161 117 Lane group cap. 222 987 839 252 1041 314 697 282 443 v/c ratio 0.13 1.02 0.11 0.42 0.82 0.83 0.26 0.57 0.26 Green ratio 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.56 0.56 0.29 0.44 0.16 0.28 Unif. delay d1 16.8 23.5 11.7 39.2 17.9 33.2 17.7 38.8 28.0 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 1.2 35.0 0.3 5.0 7.2 21.9 0.9 8.1 1.5 PF factor 1.000 0.718 1.000 1.000 0.662 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 17.9 51.8 120 44.2 19.1 55.1 18.5 47.0 29.4 Lane group LOS BDBDB E B D C . Apprch. delay 47.7 21.8 40.3 39.6 Approach LOS D C D D Intersec. delay 36.9 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright©2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Full Report Fagg 1 of 3 FULL REPORT Analyst GC Intersection 66-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/8/2L, Jurisdiction Time Period AM p., Analysis Year 06 07 08 09 O0 t- _ e eC3 prix, - s-d < m. 4e^., • . .a. Grade= 0 I I 0 l�tiiltitiltit: 1 mils.r i I i �t i • Grade= 0 Show North Mow = T 1 . o r = R ' = T R Y Grade= 0 = LT t` �• ySR IY = LR NB��H1 Grade= 0 "Ir = L 3 R o > p �E Ve`!'s' '' `'=9`d,.3.^ ev?.,...?iz..... .«. ,ss` w-... ._......,,_..._..,....,...,___'"` .. ...a._.a...�......,...,....w... ,..........�.._.vim.. . _�::.;.:.,._�._. ,.c Eli WB NB SB LT TH _ RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT I TH RT Volume (vph) 110 985 95 300 1135 15 180 80 160 10 1 40 75 % Heavy veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 10.90 0.95 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 Actuated (P/A) I P PP PP P P PIP P PIP Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 20 Ext. eff.green 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Arrival type 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 I 25 0 0 0 140 0 20 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 1120 12.0 1120 112.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N N NI IN Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1_ 0 0 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 I 3.2 1 EB Only EW Perm WB Only 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 G = 7.0 G = 45.0 G= 16.0 G = G = 13.0 G = 9.0 G = G = Timing Y = 0 Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y = Y = Duration of Analysis (hrs)= 0.25 1 Cycle Length C = 100.0 Full l&port Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET Project Description c , 1 t u+' — - ,' i,.z-�':_v ,"}ci. st+ *a nc..:" M. ._�.a.,'>-.. y .. ,-.�. .-L .ss ,.. •,e-tiF xas, .sasaaty.pro . ..«.e`.xss>i�,.Z`'.N' EB WB NB SB LT TH -RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 110 985 95 300 1135 15 180 80 160 10 40 75 PHF 0.90 0.95 0.90 0.95 a95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow Rate 122 1037 78 316 1195 17 200 89 133 11 44 61 Lane Group L T R L TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 122 1037 78 316 1212 289 133 55 61 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 - 0.014 0.692 - 0.000 0.200 - 0.000 Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 0.980 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.967 - 0.882 - Secondary fLT 0.089 - 0.087 - 0.376 - - fRT — 1.000 0.850 — 0.998 — 1.000 0.850 — 1.000 0.850 fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 — fRpb — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 Adj. satflow 1770 1863 1583 1770 1859 1800 1583 1643 1583 Sec. adj. satflow 166 — 162 — 700 — — Full Report ?ag?'3 df 3 w:.i� .S„} �y CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET 4.:-.- 3xH r&,L'id-fxcc.-1=a4 E.uuYv�,...v.L.:.. ...vim......it ra<.. ..cc_.t........•. .u....ticr'Si,. ....... -n,..v... w.xi.. • e1 ,! .. .. r Project Description'51-' � ts.�., ��' ._... ;`s ._.... t ;.�.z,..d..........:,..,_....a...__.cv..r....-..:...�_a.,,.� ,s,...,.,-t'C;E a �� , ,, aca EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR 1 LT I R LT IR Adj.flow rate 122 1037 78 316 1212 1289 1133 55 61 Satflow rate 11770 11863 1583 1770 11859 11800 11583 I 11643 1583 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 20 20 20 20 Green ratio 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.62 0.62 0.23 0.44 0.10 0.22 Lane group cap. 217 987 1 839 358 1153 315 697 164 348 v/c ratio 0.56 1.05 0.09 0.88 1.05 0.92 0.19 0.34 0.18 Flow ratio 0.53 0.05 0.08 0.03 0.04 Crit. lane group NNNNN N N N N Sum flow ratios 0.00 Lost time/cycle 0.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.00 ,:i8 "Wm49al at,, C.+-:','..zy.:R,,1, ;. b7s,p7, Ik e '...*� at'74--2-4:.; AT:-CE'" ,il;',1n. . . .. I. c, . r #t EB WB NB SB Lane group CTRL TR LT R LT R Adj.flow rate 122 1037 78 316 1212 289 133 55 61 Lane group cap. 217 987 839 358 1153 315 697 164 L348 v/c ratio 0.56 1.05 0.09 0.88 1.05 0.92 0.19 0.34 10.18 Green ratio 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.62 0.62 0.23 0.44 0.10 0.22 Unif. delay dl 20.9 23.5 11.6 38.8 19.0 37.6 17.1 41.9 31.6 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 10.1 42.9 0.2 25.5 41.0 33.4 0.6 5.4 1.1 PF factor 1.000 0.718 1.000 1.000 0.525 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 31.0 59.8 11.8 64.3 51.0 71.0 17.7 47.3 32.7 Lane group LOS CEBED E B D C Apprch. delay 53.9 53.7 54.2 39.7 Approach LOS D D D D Intersec. delay 53.4 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id Fd11 kftp4rt Page 1 of 3 r FULL REPORT aerii. a Analyst GC Intersection 119-7 Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/8/2Q5 Jurisdiction Time Period AM AnalysisAnalysis Year 08 09 10 Grade= 0 1 0 1 iRR , RU , I Grade= 0 1�1♦ ' ' Shalt North Moir T 11I�r71l 1 = i 2 2 , , ° % , %, �s� ° = T R Grade= 0 , . i RU = T • t i = L i ■ Grade= = L 1 R 0 0 0 \y EB , WI NB 1 SB LT TH RT I LT TH I RT LT TH I RT LT 1 TH I RT Volume (vph) 245 1855 1435 175 _ 155 1130 Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 PHF 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 I 0.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) P P P P I I P P Startup lost time 12.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 I 2.0 1 2.0 Ext. eff. green 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 I I 2.0 2.0 I Arrival type 3 4 4 3 I 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 I 3.0 1 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 1 0 135 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking (Y or N) N N I N N N N N N Parking/hr I I I I Bus stops/hr 0 10 10 10 10 I 10 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 I G = 18.0 G = 52.0 G = G = G = 25.0 G = G = G = I Timing Y = 0 Y = 0 Y = Y = � Y = 5 Y = Y = Y = I Duration of Analysis (hrs)= 0.25 Cycle Length C = 100.0 I Full Report Pag''2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION PLOW RATE WORKSHEET .rs , � -: i'� .... .. ...frig ?fi '4 • . ;�' .-. -r ?4.>i.: - .. ., -- .. Project Description EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 245 1855 1435 175 155 130 , PHF 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow Rate 272 1953 1511 194 163 100 Lane Group L T T R L R Adj. flow rate 272 1953 1511 194 163 100 Prop. LT or RT 0.000 — 0.000 0.000 -- 0.000 — -- Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fg 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - 1.000 - - 0.950 - , Secondary fLT 0.077 — — — -- fRT -- 1.000 -- 1.000 0.850 -- -- 0.850 fLpb 1.000 1.000 — 1.000 — — 1.000 — , fRpb — 1.000 — 1.000 1.000 — — 1.000 Adj. satflow 1805 3610 3610 1615 1805 1615 Sec. adj. sattlow 146 — — Full Report Page 3 of 3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Project Description f- RG}, Id...i4'I.LLVY.(aIwMY...x ,.... W,.e 1ltvtn ..avrcvv..._vw_., .emu,.. , w......n..ot i#.in. ...?'�rc..u..cal F L e EB WB NB SB Lane group L T I I T R I I R Adj.flow rate 272 1953 I I 1511 194 I I 163 I 100 Satflow rate 1805 3610 3610 1615 I I 1805 I 1615 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.52 0.25 0.25 Lane group cap. 401 2527 1877 840 451 404 v/c ratio 0.68 0.77 0.81 0.23 0.36 0.25 Flow ratio 0.54 0.42 0.12 0.09 0.06 Crit. lane group N N I Y I N N I Y N N Sum flow ratios 0.66 Lost time/cycle 5.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.69 EB WB NB SB Lane group L T T R L R Adj.flow rate 272 1953 1511 194 163 100 Lane group cap. 401 2527 1877 840 451 404 v/c ratio 0.68 0.77 0.81 0.23 0.36 a25 Green ratio 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.52 0.25 0.25 Unif. delay d1 25.2 9.8 19.8 1.11 30.9 30.0 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 8.9 2.4 .18 0.6 2.2 1.5 PF factor 1.000 0.256 0.735 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 34.1 4.9 18.4 13.7 3.12 31.4 Lane group LOS C A B B C C Apprch. delay 8.4 17.8 32.5 Approach LOS A B C Intersec. delay 13.8 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Hello