The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20050168 LAW OFFICES JOHN S.HOUTCHENS HOUTCHENS HOUTCHENS AI GREENFIELD, LLC E.H.HOUTCHENS KIM HOUTCHENS 522 ,SUITE 270 1175. 1191 DALLAS D IELD ,COLORADO 50651-4045 HOUTCHENS BRANDON S.HOUTCHENS RISLET 0170)151-SIPS 1111.1004 DENVER (101)571-005[ FAX (170)150-0111 RODGER I.HOUTCHENS W WWW.HOVTCM{NS.COM ISM - 1151 SEAN J.LACEFIELD S.ROBERT HOYTCXtNS 1517-1151 C.DANIEL January 7, 2005 1117-11.5 Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado Attention: Mr. Donald Warden, Clerk to the Board 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: 2ndAm USR-894 Dear Mr. Warden: I am writing to you in your capacity as the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County on behalf of my client Kauffman Land & Development ("KL&D"). KL&D owns an approximately 5 acre parcel of property located north of and adjacent to WCR 22, and west of and adjacent to WCR 19. Land uses for the property are pursuant to the 2ndAmUSR-894, approved on September 10, 1997. KL&D is a wholly owned subsidiary of K.P. Kauffman Company, Inc. ("KPK"). KPK's management desires to use a helicopter to aid it in the closer management of its scattered oil and gas production, transmission, and storage facilities. KPK's wells and pipelines in Weld County are spread across 6 townships and comprise approximately 750 wells and 600 miles of pipelines. In addition, KPK wants to equip a helicopter with a new boreal laser to check gas pipelines in and around Weld County for leaks. In conjunction with the use of the helicopter, KPK wishes to place a permanent helipad on the subject property. KPK believes that placement of the helipad will not constitute a major change to the 2ndAmUSR-894 requiring any formal amendment thereto. In that regard, I wrote to the Weld County Planning Department on December 6, 2004. Enclosed you will find a copy of my letter and copies of the attachments which were sent to the Weld County Planning Department. As you can see, my request was that planning staff determine that placement of the helipad did not constitute a major change to the existing approved use for the property pursuant to Weld County Zoning Ordinance 23-2-280. I requested that planning staff file my letter and enclosures in the USR file in question. On December 20, 2004 I received a response from the Planning Department in the form of a letter dated December 17, 2004 authored by Jacqueline Hatch, Planner I. A copy of Ms. Hatch's letter is enclosed for your reference. i 0 Ivy 7 /��✓t��e.rv�C.e!e..l—,� - _ l ,X Li 2005-0168 Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado Attention: Mr. Donald Warden, Clerk to the Board 1/7/2005 Page 2 of 3 Ms. Hatch's letter advised that planning staff determined that the request to incorporate a helicopter landing facility at the property in question does not comply with the original approval, and that placement of the helipad would require an amendment to the existing USR. With that background in mind, by this letter I make the following requests and advisements on behalf of KPK: 1. Based upon my review of the zoning provisions of the Weld County Code, it is not clear to me what the procedure is for KPK to appeal the decision of planning staff set forth in their December 17, 2004 letter. I believe that KPK should be entitled to appeal the planning staffs initial decision in this matter directly to the Board of County Commissioners and respectfully make that request at this time. Please advise me at your earliest convenience whether I need to take any further action beyond the request contained in this letter to appeal the planning staffs decision to the Board of County Commissioners. 2. As you can see from looking at the Planning Department's December 17, 2004 letter to me, there is no rationale set forth for planning staffs decision that the request to place the helipad does not comply with the uses allowed in the existing USR. Specifically, I cannot tell whether planning staff relied on an interpretation of Chapter 23 of the Zoning Ordinance, or whether they simply relied on the USR permit, in reaching their conclusion. Please provide me with a written response clarifying the basis for planning staff's decision in this matter. As I stated above, I believe that my client has the right and ability to directly appeal planning staff s decision to the Board of County Commissioners. However, in order to protect my client's interests, in the event planning staff relied on an interpretation of Chapter 23 of the Zoning Ordinance in making the decision set forth in their December 17, 2004 letter, please consider this letter an appeal of planning staffs decision pursuant to Section 23-6-20 of the Zoning Ordinances. Regarding the application requirements set forth in subsection A. of Section 23-6- 20, I cannot at this time provide you with a citation of the section of Chapter 23 which is the subject of the disagreement because I have not yet been provided with any information regarding whether planning staff relied on an interpretation of any section of Chapter 23 in reaching their conclusion. The grounds for the appeal are that planning staff has improperly denied the request contained in my December 6, 2004 letter through an abuse of their discretion, acted in excess of their jurisdiction and authority, and has otherwise acted improperly and without a proper legal Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado Attention: Mr. Donald Warden, Clerk to the Board I/7/2005 Page 3 of 3 basis under all applicable zoning ordinances, statutes, or law in denying the request contained in my December 6, 2004 letter. The reasons held by KPK for their request that the Planning Department determine that the helipad does not constitute a major change to the existing approved use for the property are as contained in my December 6, 2004 letter and enclosures, copies of which are enclosed. If you have any questions, or need any other documents or input from me or from my client, please do not hesitate to give me a call. Thank you for your prompt consideration of this matter. I will look forward to hearing from you in the near future. Very truly yours, Houtchens, Houtchens & Greenfield, LLC Kim Robert Houtchens KRH/bes Enclosures cc w/out ends.: Weld County Department of Planning Services Lee D. Morrison, Assistant Weld County Attorney K.P. Kauffman Company, Inc. Attention: Gordon Allott, Jr. a ficiai :gip 4--ttA, LAW OFFICES BARNARD HOUTCHENS HOUTCHENS HOUTCHENS & GREENFIELD, LLC E.H.MOUTCHENS RETIRED 822 SEVENTH STREET, SUITE 270 1878- 1942 JOHN B. HOUTCHENS GREELEY,COLORADO 80631-4045 RODGER I. HOUTCHENS KIM ROBERT MOUTCHENS GREELEY (970)353-9195 1921 - 1988 METRO DENVER (303)571-0052 DALLAS D.GREENFIELD ' FAX (970)353-0151 S. ROBERT HOUTCHENS BRANDON B. HOUTCHENS 1917- 1989 JERRY C. DANIEL WARREN W.SCHAEFFER 1927- 1998 December 6, 2004 Weld County Planning Department Attention: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Kauffman Land and Development 2ndAmUSR-894 Dear Ms. Daniels-Mika: I am writing you on behalf of my client, Kauffman Land and Development ("KL&D -) regarding an approximately 5 acre parcel of property the Company owns which is located north of and adjacent to WCR 22, and west of and adjacent to WCR 19. Land uses for the property are pursuant to the 2ndAmUSR-894, approved on September 10, 1997. KL&D is a wholly owned subsidiary of K.P. Kauffman Company, Inc. ("KPK"). KPK owns and operates approximately 1,000 oil and gas wells in Colorado. approximately 750 of which are located between Denver and Greeley. At the property in question KPK has an oil and gas support and service operation. The structures on the property are comprised of an office building, a contractor's shop for vehicle and equipment maintenance, an additional shop building, a septic system, and gas storage tanks which store gasoline used by company vehicles. KPK's management desires to use a helicopter to aid it in the closer management of its scattered oil and gas production, transmission, and storage facilities. In addition, KPK wants to utilize a helicopter in conjunction with a new boreal laser to check gas pipelines in and around Weld County for leaks. The laser is a new technology that is used worldwide, but is not currently used in the United States. KPK wishes to place a permanent helipad on the subject property, and believes that such use will not constitute a substantial change to the 2ndAmUSR-894 requiring any formal amendment thereto. In support of KPK's position I provide you with the following facts and documents: • The helipad itself is a 25 foot by 25 foot square steel pad that sits on the ground but is not permanently affixed thereto. Attached as Exhibit A is a plot plan depicting the parcel, presently existing improvements, and 36 feet from the west property line you will see a square with an "H" drawn in which shows the location Weld County Planning Department Attention: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director 12/6/2004 Page 2 of 4 of the helipad. Attached as Exhibit B are photographs of the helipad. • KPK has made application to the Federal Aviation Administration, which has very stringent safety regulations before approving the location and use of a helipad. I am attaching as Exhibit C the advisory circular from the FAA regarding the requirements for establishment of a helipad. KPK made their initial application to the FAA on October 15, 2004 for approval of the helipad on their property. and the initial indications are that the FAA is satisfied with the application and will approve it. • The helicopter that will be utilizing the helipad is a 206B Jet Bell Ranger helicopter. Attached as Exhibit D is a "Noise Footprint" for this helicopter. You will note that 70 db's of noise is produced at about 50 feet during landing. The west edge of the helipad is 35 feet from the west property line. I understand that pursuant to Weld County Zoning Ordinance 25-12-102, the noise level should not exceed 70 db's as measured 25 feet from the property line. Adding 25 feet to the 35 foot distance from the west edge of the helipad to the west property line results in a total distance of 60 feet from the helipad. At that distance, the noise level produced will be less than 70 db's and therefore in compliance with the zoning ordinance. The attached "Noise Footprint" also shows that beyond 60 feet from the helicopter the db's of noise produced decrease substantially. The maximum noise level produced by the helicopter during touchdown will last only approximately 10 seconds, and during takeoff will last only approximately 15 seconds. • The lighting on the helipad will be as depicted on the attached Exhibit A. There will be lights on the northeast and southwest sides of the pad. Both of these lights will face down on the pad. • Fuel will be stored at the site for the helicopter. This is not any material change to the existing use of the property, as gas is already stored on the site for use by KPK ground vehicles. • The anticipated number of takeoffs and landings from the helipad will average about 2 per day, with an anticipated maximum number of 5. It is anticipated that Weld County Planning Department Attention: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director 12/6/2004 Page 3 of 4 the helicopter flights will reduce some ground vehicle trips. • The helicopter will not be based at the location of the helipad. It will be based at Centennial Airport, and any major mechanical or maintenance work will be performed on the helicopter there. • KPK desires to use the helicopter to aid it in the closer management of its diverse oil and gas producing assets in and around Weld County. This will include equipping the helicopter with a new boreal laser to check KPK's pipelines for leaks, and probably the pipelines of other producers in Weld County. There are approximately 16,000 oil and gas wells located in Weld County. The purpose of the use of the boreal laser is to identify gas leaks before environmental damage or loss of property or life occurs. KPK has made an initial test run of the boreal laser and it appears that it will function quite nicely for its intended purpose of the environmental detection of oil and gas leaks in this area,just as it has in other parts of the world. You should also be aware that the KPK helicopter is part of Angel Flight, and will be used to move patients requiring quick transport between hospitals. In summary, KPK's proposed placement and use of the helipad within the 5 acre site in question does not constitute a major change to the existing approved use of an oil and gas support and service operation and contractor's shop for vehicle and equipment maintenance pursuant to Weld County Zoning Ordinance 23-2-280. The use of the helipad and helicopter is consistent with Agricultural Goal and Policy 5 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan which states the extraction of mineral and oil and gas resources should preserve or minimize the impact on prime agricultural land. The helipad and use of the helicopter will not cause any additional off-site impacts beyond those occurring with the existing use of the property, and the helicopter's use of the boreal laser to search for oil and gas leaks serves a broader public safety purpose. Safety issues pertaining to the helipad will be addressed and regulated through the stringent FAA approval and operation criteria. My request is that you file this information with the other pertinent documents regarding the USR in question. Weld County Planning Department Attention: Monica Daniels-Mika, Director 12/6/2004 Page 4 of 4 I would appreciate it if you would advise me of the Planning Department's position regarding this matter at your earliest convenience. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need any further information. Very truly yours, Houtchens. Houtchens & Greenfield, LLC 14tie ea Kim Robert outchens KRH/bes Enclosures cc w/out ends.: Lee D. Morrison, Assistant Weld County Attorney K.P. Kauffman Company, Inc. Attention: Gordon Allott, Jr. EXHIBIT 10-11-20A 3:83PM FROM P.2 • WELD cQUNIY Ron) 19 ) ,Dpi, -,\41 I / I. NB9'4o45 W\>N455.00 25.00..,._.. -N w. \ iCI \\;\ \ « D� 2Si <: sq, a`� \ y FENCE!FM rl .R E,k \ f SS.% ��L�v A90�}Y1 !A �T 0 E ` , " EUILDE " ` I oo Doi ii 14 - ,` „ — V L4c rn / • IM (iY CALS'— e_ t a..3 t l J —_ lltrlCnt _ o r^— z° 'a 99 _ 1Rp.1E0 Ot�RMM \ Oo♦♦ n, 'o �. 1CLCRHONE�\ N� \. ,. III r 4. \... -oE .\.A % 1 oVERHHE `,i 11 ..__ [[LECIDIc '^tvm\"FYI \ (IVRICAL) �xx 11enp \ I \ ,..a 040r E U1LIET P TAW J)r $ A91�`E1��`Rnyru v01^ l) I F., fEon LOT a I irACAI) s �'g. „..- -` 183404 E - 22200 /- ,4/`]%+/f6Tmc \ V A 1.6"-- 11-.lAIIAL J-L� q :CPT* P I IfACCESS 1 /_�____ _ b \ • 8g 'r A, a A _ AI 1 F�{ O C t (GRAVEL) T I i p A�` ��' .T� ---..__.. ----——--- —. . ._— I :-1.........n 239100 1 g I $69'd0'45 E . 'R A WELD COUNTY ROAD 22 • "GREELEY NATIONAL BANK TRUSTEE" PLOT PLAN W • E • 1ION.LEDEN0: ' THE V.3.pEPARTMENT 0E AORICVUVR s SOIL , , PHIBITL/ Kodak HTML Email Page 2 of 4 4 tJ_ � d v ` ‘,2,1-17 �:r .; ». gym. � a ��-� r o n ! ham'2 , .as - �tZ s; • 12/6/2004 Kodak HTML Email rage s 014 ex's 2,-3-i,, " ,a J., 4 4 i �' d e@ 44.1 S rt t 6 f i',,m"`l ,Af i -4 '4r e, - t i r w' u� "t r y iyiii�• '# t 4 "� f A k 3n iA 4 t t y� ' "«�s ae k• .;'“b,`,44:7,1,4, y k".tjhA�� . '' a a� , fi�.?1. c�I 9a r .pr t,3 i,A �*� z x�a #� '.',:.}.;1-'7=,t a + ' "e 8 .Y �'.....ix� .. <e wky aa.. � S tLY � v. 4 "G M^k4x •;lyw.� y y� et,. qsitrV • r .L t't y �f ,a¢'Ss . .a9ti, 12/6/2004 Kodak HTML Email Page 4 of 4 ai • 1 .Fly .• '' a¢advitiott N,,, - 7, 4.1.,4?,,.,,,.,i_-- . : _ .,,,,,... _... ; m*6,, - '4,_,.,..,44, . c,-4:70; � ' 4'— kik f'. YY(( ',Ii .(•-• a • .{4.. C t ...4i,/,' -' . ,;-401,.. .4',..,„f,...„ y'4. 4 --it'+,1}1^1 `xr: I _ II `•�{-� ,......s. '"' .�w.. �` ,: ' :o r5?.sf.;4,..-.e., ms ' .: 1 �/� ,/f� ` How to save a picture ■ odakEasYSh.� 0 S:' npi Ii: t .:!. . ._ =.il(I _.:I 'cr •.:d'.. ::na.:IF a: J' C I !'1A•_ l:': • . .. aii 1 if=:1 .''I- ,r.11.1.2 . . D..1:•ii:::.;•r..' O'ganlZe, ()rl.li ai:.J sh:•l.? •,.'01:: I:Ia i ph::t' Gick here to get the software M Share Moments. Share Life:" {'r,pyrk4ht F•?stman Y•:•:t 1.k Cornpan\• ::r.t:5 12/6/2004 EXHIBIT 0 Advisory U.S. Department Circular of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Subject: HELIPORT DESIGN Date: 1/20/94 AC No: 150/5390-2A Initiated by:AAS-110 Change: 1. PURPOSE. This Advisory Circular(AC)provides (4) Moving High Value Assets. High-value or recommendations and standards for heliport and time-sensitive cargo, such as canceled checks, and helistop design initiated after the date of this AC. people, including the President of the United States, frequently travel on helicopters because this mode of 2. CANCELLATION. AC 150/5390-2, Heliport transportation is fast and flexible. Companies use Design,dated January 4, 1988,is canceled. helicopters as an invaluable part of an in-house transportation system to connect the office with various 3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The modern plants,job sites,and the local airport. Utility companies helicopter is one of the most versatile transportation use helicopters to construct and inspect high-voltage vehicles known to man. The helicopters ability to electrical lines and to monitor underground gas operate from minimal real estate has given it the transmission lines. Newspapers and radio/TV stations capability of providing a wide variety of important use helicopters for on-site news gathering, taking services to any community which integrates the photos, and airborne reporting of rush hour traffic helicopter into its local transportation system. conditions. a. Service. In addition to their service in the b. Facilities. The most effective way for a transportation of people, helicopters have proven to be community to realize the benefits of helicopter services useful to their communities in the following ways: is by developing or permitting the development of places where helicopters can land and takeoff. While (1) Disaster Relief. Natural disasters often heliports can be large and elaborate, most are not. In result in the breakdown of ground transportation many situations,a wind sock on a grass area with clear systems. Helicopters are able both to bring in response approaches is sufficient to provide an effective and safe teams and supplies and to evacuate injured people heliport. This minimal facility may be adequate as a during the critical period before and while ground private use heliport,and may even suffice as the initial transportation is being restored phase in the development of a public use heliport capable of serving the general aviation segment of the (2) Air Ambulance Services. For an injured or helicopter community. critically ill person, time is life. Only helicopters can provide high speed point-to-point transportation without c. Planning. While the heliport itself may be being constrained by the limitations of the ground simple, the planning and organization required to infrastructure. properly put one into place can be intimidating. To help make the process easier, the Federal Aviation (3) Police Departments. Many municipalities Administration has published this AC 150/5390-2A, consider their police department helicopters vital force Heliport Design. While the AC is a technical document multipliers in carrying out search and rescue,chase,and intended to help engineers,architects,and city planners surveillance. design, locate, and build the most effective heliport, it can be used by anyone considering the construction of a heliport. AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 d. Location. The optimum location for a heliport is in close proximity to the desired origination and/or (4) Transport heliports are developed to provide destination of the potential users. Industrial, the community with a full range of vertical flight commercial,and business operations in urban locations services including scheduled service by air carriers are demand generators for helicopter services, yet in (airlines) using helicopters. When the heliport serves many cases compete for the limited ground space any scheduled or unscheduled passenger operation of available. A site permitting the aeronautical and an air carrier that is conducted with an aircraft having commercial usage to be shared is a viable alternative to a seating capacity of more than 30 passengers, the non-aeronautical use alone. Heliport sites may be heliport is required to be certificated by the FAA in adjacent to a river or a lake,a railroad,a freeway,or a accordance with Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) highway, all of which offer the potential for multi- Part 139, Certification and Operations: Land Airports functional land usage. These locations also have the Serving Certain Air Carriers. In any event,a transport advantage of relatively unobstructed airspace which heliport would also accommodate corporate users and can be further protected from unwanted encroachment local air taxi Operators. This broad spectrum of by properly enacted zoning. As vertical lift activities frequently requires a more extensive air-side transportation becomes more and more prevalent, and land-side infrastructure with the potential requirements for scheduled "airline type" passenger capability to operate in instrument meteorological services will necessitate the development of an conditions. Not withstanding these requirements, a instrument procedure to permit "all-weather" service. community's investment in a heliport may be This requirement may materialize at a few substantially less than the investment required for an metropolitan heliports. airport providing comparable services. Design standards relevant to developing a transport heliport e. AC Organization. The AC is structured to are found in chapter 4. provide communities and or persons intending to develop a heliport, or become involved in regulating (5) Hospital heliports are treated as special helicopter facilities, with general guidance on heliport cases of private use facilities providing a unique public requirements. The AC is organized to minimize the service. They are normally located in close proximity amount of material that the reader is obligated to digest to the hospital emergency room or a medical facility. in order to have an understanding of heliport design Design standards relevant to developing a hospital based on the functional role the heliport is intended to heliport are found in chapter 5. perform. (6) When there is a significant number of (1) A heliport proponent should be familiar helicopter operations on an airport, it may be prudent with the terminology used in this specialized field. to consider developing separate facilities specifically Chapter 1 defines pertinent terms used in the industry for helicopter use. Chapter 6 addresses helicopter and identifies actions common to developing a facilities on airports. heliport. (7) Currently, when the weather is poor, (2) Private use heliports are usually owned by helicopters tend to use an airport with an instrument an individual or corporation who can control heliport landing procedure. Good planning suggests usage. Generally, a private use heliport is used by a municipalities should plan for the eventual single pilot or a small number of pilots who are development of instrument approaches .to their familiar with the heliport and any physical or heliports. Recommendations to be considered in operational limitations. For this reason, private use contemplating future instrument operations at a heliports can be designed to more flexible standards. heliport are found in chapters 7 and 8. Design recommendations relevant to developing a private use heliport are found in chapter 2. (8) Chapter 9 addresses heliport gradients and pavement design issues. (3) Public use general aviation heliports are normally publicly owned although they can be (9) The appendices provide helicopter privately owned. As public use facilities, they can be dimensional data, dimensional recommendations for used by any qualified pilot. Therefore, the heliport markings, and addresses of aviation recommended dimensions and clearances are more organizations. demanding than for private use heliports. Design standards relevant to developing a public use general aviation heliport are found in chapter 3. ii 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A 4. APPLICATION. The recommendations and standards in this AC are for planning and designing civil heliports. These reconunbndations and standards are predicated on average conditions,thus may require adaptation to meet the specific conditions of a particular site. To the extent that it is feasible and practical to do so, these standards should be used in planning and designing improvements to an existing heliport when significant expansion or reconstruction is undertaken. Conformity with these standards is prerequisite to Federal grant-in-aid assistance. The recommendation and standards in this AC are not intended to govern either helicopter or heliport operations or be used to design an instrument approach procedure. LEONARD E.MUDD Director,Office of Aimput Safety and Standards iii • 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A CONTENTS Paragraph Page - CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1. GENERAL 1 2. BASIS 1 3. EXPLANATION OF TERMS - 1 4 . NOTICE OF HELIPORT DEVELOPMENT - 2 5. MEDICAL EMERGENCY SITES - 3 6. EMERGENCY EVACUATION FACILITIES - 3 7 . NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 4 8. FAA STUDY OF EXISTING OBJECTS - 4 9. FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 5 10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS - 5 11. STATE ROLE 5 12. LOCAL ROLE 5 CHAPTER 2. PRIVATE USE HELIPORTS 13. GENERAL 13 14. FINAL APPROACH AND TAKEOFF AREA (FATO) 13 15. SAFETY AREA 13 16. TOUCHDOWN AND LIFT-OFF AREA (TLOF) 13 17. APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACE 14 18. HELICOPTER PARKING 14 19. HELIPORT MARKERS AND MARKINGS 14 20. HELIPORT LIGHTING 14 21. WIND DIRECTION INDICATOR 15 22. HELIPORT SAFETY AND SECURITY 15 CHAPTER 3. PUBLIC USE GENERAL AVIATION HELIPORTS 23. GENERAL 27 24 . FINAL APPROACH AND TAKEOFF AREA (FATO) 27 25. SAFETY AREA 27 26. TOUCHDOWN AND LIFT-OFF AREA (TLOF) 27 27. APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACE 28 28. PROTECTION ZONE 28 29. TAXI ROUTES AND TAXIWAYS 28 30. HELICOPTER PARKING 28 31. HELIPORT MARKERS AND MARKINGS 29 32. HELIPORT LIGHTING • 29 33. WIND DIRECTION INDICATOR - 30 34. VISUAL GLIDE PATH INDICATORS 30 35. TERMINAL FACILITIES 31 36. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS 31 37. ZONING AND COMPATIBLE LAND USE 31 CHAPTER 4 . TRANSPORT HELIPORTS 38. GENERAL 49 39. FINAL APPROACH AND TAKEOFF AREA (FATO) - 49 40. SAFETY AREA • 49 41. TOUCHDOWN AND LIFT-OFF AREA (TLOF) - 49 42. APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACE - 49 43. PROTECTION ZONE 50 44. TAXI ROUTES AND TAXIWAYS 50 v AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 45. HELICOPTER PARKING 50 46. HELIPORT MARKERS AND MARKINGS 51 47 . HELIPORT LIGHTING - 51 48. WIND DIRECTION INDICATOR - 52 49. VISUAL GLIDE PATH INDICATORS 52 50. TERMINAL FACILITIES 52 51. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS 52 52 . ZONING AND COMPATIBLE LAND USE 53 CHAPTER 5. HOSPITAL HELIPORTS 53. GENERAL 69 54. FINAL APPROACH AND TAKEOFF AREA (FATO) • 69 55. SAFETY AREA • 69 56. TOUCHDOWN AND LIFT-OFF AREA (TLOF) - - 69 57. ROOF TOP HELIPORTS • 69 58. APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACE 70 59. HELICOPTER PARKING 70 60. HELIPORT MARKERS AND MARKINGS - 70 61. HELIPORT LIGHTING 70 62. WIND DIRECTION INDICATOR - 71 63. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGERS (MRI) 71 CHAPTER 6. HELICOPTER FACILITIES ON AIRPORTS 64. GENERAL 81 65. TAKEOFF AND LANDING SURFACES 81 66. SURFACE MOVEMENT 81 CHAPTER 7. NON-PRECISION INSTRUMENT OPERATIONS 68. GENERAL 85 69. IMPROVED LIGHTING SYSTEM 85 70. OBSTACLE EVALUATION SURFACES 85 CHAPTER 8. PRECISION APPROACH OPERATIONS 71. GENERAL 89 72 . FINAL APPROACH REFERENCE AREA (FARA) 89 73. LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS - 89 74 . OBSTACLE EVALUATION SURFACES - 89 CHAPTER 9. HELIPORT GRADIENTS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN 75. GENERAL 95 76. GRADIENTS - 95 77. DESIGN LOADS • 95 78. PAVEMENT DESIGN AND SOIL STABILIZATION 95 APPENDIX 1. HELICOPTER DATA (3 pages) APPENDIX 2. MARKING DIMENSIONS 1. PUBLIC USE HELIPORT 1 2. HOSPITAL HELIPORT - 2 3. OTHER - 3 APPENDIX 3. AVIATION ORGANIZATIONS (7 pages) vi 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Figure Page 1-1. Example of required notice 6 1-2. Example of a heliport location map - 7 1-3. Example of a heliport layout sketch 8 1-4. Emergency evacuation facility 9 1-5. Off site development requiring notice 10 1-6. Obstruction identification surfaces for visual operations . 11 2-1. Essential features of a private use heliport 16 2-2. A large private use heliport 17 2-3. FATO/TLOF relationship - 18 2-4. Elevated TLOF and safety net - 19 2-5. Helicopter parking 20 2-6- In-ground and raised markers - 21 2-7. Marking paved heliports 22 2-8. A closed heliport 23 2-9. Lighting a private use heliport - 24 2-10. Lighting an elevated private use heliport 25 3-1. Essential features of a general aviation heliport 33 3-2. FATo length increase for elevation - 34 3-3. A lengthened FATO with two TLOFs 35 3-4 . Raised TLOF with a safety net 36 3-5. Protection zone 37 3-6. Taxi route and taxiway markings 38 3-7 . Parking apron design 39 3-8. Heliport with markers and markings - 40 3-9. Heliport with surface markings - 41 3-10. Marking a closed heliport - 42 3-11. Lighting system for night operations 43 3-12. Visual glide path indicator siting and clearance criteria. 44 3-13. Recommended area for wire marking and/or lighting 45 3-14. Caution sign 46 3-15. Apron parking position clearances - 47 4-1. A typical transport heliport - 54 4-2. FATO extending over water 55 4-3. FATO length 56 4-4. A FATO with two TLOFs - 57 4-5. Protection zone 58 4-6. Taxi route taxiway relationship - 59 4-7. A transport heliport apron 60 4-8. Heliport markers and markings - 61 4-9. Heliport surface markings 62 4-10. Marking a closed heliport 63 4-11. Lighting system for night operations 64 4-12. Visual glide path indicator siting and clearance criteria. 65 4-13. Recommended area for wire marking and/or lighting 66 4-14 . Caution sign - 67 4-15. Apron parking position clearances 68 5-1. A basic hospital heliport - 72 5-2. A roof top hospital heliport - 73 5-3. Elevated TLOF and safety net - 74 5-4 . Hospital heliport markings 75 5-5. A closed hospital heliport - 76 5-6. Hospital heliport lighting - 77 5-7. Raised platform lighting - 78 vii AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 5-8. Recommended area for wire marking and/or lighting 79 6-1. Apron TOLF 83 6-2. Large and cylindrical markers for helicopter air taxiing and hover taxiing at airport's 84 7-1 . Heliport instrument lighting system (HILS) • 86 7-2. Obstacle evaluation surfaces 87 8-1 . FARA/FATO relationship 91 8-2. HALS lighting system 92 8-3. FAA Demonstration Heliport • 93 8-4. Obstacle evaluation surfaces 94 9-1. Heliport grades and shoulder - 97 9-2. Helicopter landing gear loading 98 Al-1. Helicopter dimensions 1 A2-1. Standard heliport H marking - 1 A2-2. Hospital heliport marking - 2 A2-3. Other markings 4 viii 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1. GENERAL This chapter defines terms used in this \a. Approach/Takeoff Path. The flight track Advisory Circular (AC), and addresses matters of a helicopters follow when landing at or taking off from a general nature relating to heliport development. heliport. 2. BASIS. This AC implements the objective set forth b. Design Helicopter. A generic rotorcraft which in Section 103 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 as reflects the maximum weight, overall length, rotor amended. That states,in part: diameter, etc. of all helicopters expected to operate at the heliport. "In the exercise and performance of his power and duties under this Act, the Secretary of Transportation c. Emergency Evacuation Facility. A clear area shall consider the following, among other things, as on a roof of a tall building, that is not intended to being in the public interest: function as a heliport,yet is capable of accommodating helicopters engaged in fire fighting and/or emergency (a) The regulation of air commerce in such manner evacuation operations. as to best promote its development and safety and fulfill the requirements of defense; d. Final Approach and Takeoff Area (FATO). A defined area over which the final phase of the approach (b) The promotion, encouragement, and to a hover, or a landing, is completed and from which development of civil aeronautics; the takeoff is initiated. This area was called the"takeoff and landing area"in previous publications. (c) The control of the use of the navigable airspace of the United States and the regulation of both civil and e. Final Approach Reference Area (FARA). A military operations in such airspace in the interest of the 150 foot (45 m)wide by at least 150 foot (45 m) long safety and efficiency of both." obstacle-free area with its center aligned on the final approach course. It is located at the end of a precision This AC recognizes that FAR Part 77,Objects Affecting instrument FATO. Navigable Airspace, establishes standards for determining obstructions to navigable airspace and f. Hazard to Air Navigation. Any object having a provides for aeronautical studies of such obstructions to substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient use determine their effect on the safe and efficient use of of the navigable airspace by aircraft or upon the airspace. These standards apply to the effect of operation of an air navigation facility. construction proposals upon a heliport available for public use or a planned or proposed heliport that will be NOTE: Obstructions to air navigation are presumed to available for public use. The heliport primary surface be hazards to air navigation until an FAA study described in FAR Part 77 coincides in size and shape determines otherwise. with the designated takeoff and landing area, i.e., the FATO. The heliport approach and transitional surfaces g. Heliport. The area of land, water, or structure described in FAR Part 77 are depicted in figure 1-6. used or intended to be used for the landing and takeoff Public agencies are encouraged to enact zoning of helicopters, together with appurtenant buildings and ordinances to prevent man-made features from facilities. penetrating these surfaces. h. Heliport Elevation. The elevation,expressed as 3. EXPLANATION OF TERMS. The the distance above mean sea level, of the highest point Pilot/Controller Glossary of the Airman's Information in the FATO or the FARA. Manual (MM) defines terms used in the Air Traffic Control system such as instrument flight rules (IFR), i. Heliport Imaginary Surfaces. The imaginary and visual flight rules (VFR). Copies of the MM are planes, centered about the FATO and the available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. approach/takeoff path, that identify the objects to be Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. - evaluated to determine whether the objects should be Other terms used in this publication follow: removed, lowered, and/or marked and lighted--or the approach/takeoff path realigned. 1 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 j. Heliport Reference Point(HRP). The geographic (2) Transport Heliport. A heliport intended to position of the heliport expressed as the latitude and accommodate air carrier operators providing scheduled longitude at: ` or unscheduled service with large helicopters. (1) The center of the FATO, or the centroid of r. Safety Area. A defined area on a heliport multiple FATOs, for heliports having visual and non- surrounding the FATO which is free of objects, other precision instrument approach procedures;or than those required for air navigation purposes, and intended to reduce the risk of damage to helicopters (2) The center of the FARA when the heliport accidentally diverging from the FATO. has a precision instrument procedure. s. Taxi Route. An obstruction free corridor in k. Helistop. A minimally developed helicopter which helicopters hover taxi above the surface at facility for boarding and discharging passengers or airspeeds less than approximately 20 knots. cargo. The heliport--helistop relationship is comparable to a bus terminal--bus stop relationship with respect to t. Taxiway. A defined path established for the the extent of services provided or expected. ground taxi of helicopters from one part of a heliport to another. NOTE: The heliport design recommendations and standards in this AC are equally applicable to helistops. u. Touchdown and Liftoff Area(TLOF). A load bearing, generally paved area,normally centered in the L Hospital Heliport. A heliport limited to serving FATO,on which the helicopter lands or takes off. The helicopters engaged in air ambulance, or other hospital TLOF is frequently called a helipad or helideck. This related functions. area was called the"FATO"in previous publications. m. Medical Emergency Site. An unprepared site 4. NOTICE OF HELIPORT DEVELOPMENT. at or near the scene of an accident or similar medical Except as noted in subparagraph b, FAR Part 157, emergency on which a helicopter may land to pick up a Notice of Construction, Alteration, Activation, and patient in order to provide emergency medical transport. Deactivation of Airports,requires any person proposing to construct,activate,or deactivate a heliport to provide NOTE: A designated helicopter landing area located at the FAA advance notice of their intent. Notice is also a hospital or medical facility is a heliport and not a required when an existing heliport changes the medical emergency site. size/number of FATOs; adds, deletes, or modifies an approach or departure route; or changes its status from n. Obstruction. Any object, including a parked private use to public use or public use to private use. helicopter,exceeding the obstruction standards specified States and local governments may have notice by FAR Part 77,Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace, requirements that parallel the Federal requirement. Subpart C,Obstruction Standards. Heliport proponents are urged to contact their appropriate state and local governmental offices or o. Private Use Heliport. A heliport developed for transportation departments for their requirements. the exclusive use of the owner and persons authorized by the owner. a. Notification Procedures. Notification is accomplished by forwarding a completed FAA Form p. Protection Zone. An area off the end of the 7480-1 (figure 1-1), a location map (figure 1-2),and a FATO and under the approach/takeoff path to enhance layout sketch (figure 1-3) to the appropriate FAA the protection of people and property on the ground. Regional Airports Office. Airspace submissions should be made at least 90 days prior to construction, q. Public Use Heliport. A heliport available for alteration,or date of changed use begins. Addresses for use by the general public without a requirement for FAA Regional Airports Offices are on the Form. It is prior approval of the owner or operator. recommended that a 7.5 Minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)Quadrangle Map be used for the location map. (1) General Aviation Heliport. A heliport The sketch should show the heliport layout,all proposed intended to accommodate individuals,corporations,and approach (departure) routes, buildings, trees, fences, helicopter air taxi operators. Scheduled passenger power lines,etc. services may be available. 2 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A NOTE: (1) In an emergency involving essential public d. Notice Benefits. In order for the FAA to study the service,public health,public safety, or when the delay impact of off-site construction (Refer to paragraph 7) arising from the 90 day advdnce notice requirement upon a heliport available for public use, it is essential would result in an unreasonable hardship, a proponent that the heliport's latitude and longitude,elevation,and may provide notice to the appropriate FAA Airport the direction and type of approach and departure be on District/Field Office or Regional Office by telephone or record with the FAA. other expeditious means as soon as practicable in lieu of submitting FAA Form 7480-1. However, the 5. MEDICAL EMERGENCY SITES. Medical proponent shall provide full notice, through submission emergency sites are clear and level areas at or near the of FAA Form 7480-1, when otherwise requested or scene of an accident or incident that have been selected required by the FAA. or designated by the local emergency response team as the place where the helicopter air ambulance is directed (2) The latitude and longitude of the proposed to land in order to transport an injured person to a heliport should be stated in North American Datum of hospital. 1983 (NAD-83)coordinates. 1f another datum series is used, that fact should be noted in the submission. a. Notice. Because of their transitory nature, medical emergency sites are not heliports and b. Notice Exemptions. Paragraph 157.1, submission of FAA Form 7480-1 is not required. Applicability, of FAR Part 157 exempts heliports Proponents of predesignated emergency landing sites meeting the conditions under (1), (2), and (3) below should coordinate their emergency plan with the local from the requirement to submit notice. However,these airport traffic control tower(ATCT). This coordination exemptions do not negate a notice or formal approval is especially important if a site(s) may be used under requirement prescribed by state law or local ordinance. conditions of low visibility and/or use of the site(s) would require ATC clearance. (1) Any heliport subject to conditions of a Federal agreement that requires an approved current b. Marking/Lighting. Depending upon the level layout plan to be on file with the FAA. of training of the local accident or emergency response teams and agreements worked out with the local air (2) A heliport at which flight operations will be ambulance operators, medical emergency landing sites conducted under visual flight rules (VFR)and which is may be identified with flags,markers,lights,flares,etc. used or intended to be used for a period of less than 30 consecutive days with no more than 10 operations per c. Landing Discretion. All landings at a medical day. emergency site are made at the pilot's discretion after weighing the urgency for air transport against the (3) The intermittent use of a site that is not an performance capability of the helicopter, his or her established airport, which is used or intended to be piloting ability and experience, and the limitations used for less than one year and at which flight and/or constraints of the site. operations will be conducted only under VFR For the purpose of this part, "intermittent use of a site"means: 6. EMERGENCY EVACUATION FACILITIES. (1)the site is used or is intended to be used for no more To facilitate fife fighting or emergency evacuation than 3 days in any one week; and (2) no more than 10 operations, local building codes may require structures operations will be conducted in any one day at that over a specified height to provide a clear area on the site." roof capable of accommodating a helicopter. Since the cleared area is not intended to function as a heliport, NOTE: For the purposes of applying the FAR Part 157 there is no requirement to submit an FAA Form 7480-1. exemption criteria cited in(2) and(3)above, a landing As in the case of medical emergency sites, proponents and associated takeoff is considered to be one operation. of emergency evacuation facilities should advise the local ATCT of the facility. The landing surface should c. FAA Action. The FAA evaluates the proposed be developed to the local fire department requirements heliport for its impact upon the safe and efficient use of based on the size and weight of the helicopter(s) navigable airspace; for its impact upon the operation of expected to engage in fire or rescue operations. The air navigation facilities; and for its effect on the safety following markings are recommended to identify the of persons and property on the ground. The proponent limits of the landing area and to alert the pilot to any is advised of the FAA findings. weight limitation. Markings should be in a color(red or orange is suggested)that provides the greatest possible contrast to the roof coloration. 3 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 a. Edge Marking. A 12 inch (30 cm) wide line navigable airspace. The FAA does not have authority to defines the limits of the intended landing surface. It is approve or disapprove the construction of a proposed recommended that the edge marking provide'at least 10 structure that would be a possible hazard to air feet(3 m)of clearance to any object that could be struck navigation, but FAA's recommendations on the subject by a helicopter's main or tail rotor. are not easily dismissed by project sponsors because of potential liability. b. Weight Limitation. Any limitation on allowable weight should be placed in the center of the (1) An FAA marking-and-lighting circle as viewed from the preferred direction of recommendation may be incorporated into a approach. Weight limitations should be stated in units determination of no hazard and, if included, is of 1,000 pound as illustrated in figure 1-4. To assure considered to be a condition to that determination. early recognition of a weight limit it is suggested that the numeral(s) be a minimum of 3 feet (0.9 m) in (2) The FAA also provides copies of height. A bar may be placed under the number to determinations to state and local aviation agencies and minimize the possibility of being misread_ airport authorities. 7. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. (3) When the study involves a proposal for FAR Part 77 requires the FAA be notified of certain which a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposed construction or alteration of a structure or construction permit is required,then the FAA provides object It also specifies standards for determining the FCC with a copy of the determination. obstructions to air navigation and provides for FAA aeronautical studies of obstructions to determine their 8. FAA STUDY OF EXISTING OBJECTS. effect on the safe and efficient use of airspace. Existing objects that are obstructions to air navigation are presumed to be hazards until an FAA study a. Notice. Proposed construction or alteration of determines otherwise. structures or objects in the vicinity of a public use heliport requiring notice to the FAA include those a. FAA Study. Aeronautical studies of existing which are: objects are conducted when deemed necessary by the FAA to determine the physical and electromagnetic (1) more than 200 feet AGL or effect on the use of navigable airspace and air navigational facilities. Aeronautical studies of existing (2) less than 200 feet AGL and; objects may be initiated as a result of information received or a situation observed. • (a) are located within 5,000 feet(1 500 m)of a public use or military heliport and penetrate a 25:1 b. Mitigating Adverse Effects. The adverse effect sloping surface originating at the heliport as illustrated of an object presumed or determined to be a hazard to in figure 1-5,or air navigation may be mitigated by: (b) the FAA requests notice. (1) Removing the object,if practical; b. FAA Aeronautical Study. Information on the (2) Marking and/or lighting the object,provided FAA's role in conducting an aeronautical study of off an FAA aeronautical study has determined_that the heliport construction is found in AC 70/7460-2, object would not be a hazard to air navigation if it were Proposed Construction or Alteration of Objects That marked and lighted; May Affect the Navigable Airspace. The FAA also may choose to study a proposed structure that the FAA (3) Realigning the approach/takeoff path to believes may pose a hazard to navigation. In most avoid the object or cases,wires and their supporting structures fall into this discretionary category of structures less than 200 feet (4) Modification of operations. AGL. c. Determination. The FAA summarizes the findings of an aeronautical study in a determination of hazard or no hazard that is issued to the sponsor. An FAA determination discusses the aeronautical impact of the proposed construction or alteration on the use of 4 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A 9. FEDERAL ASSISTANCE. The FAA administers may be taken in selecting a site to minimize the effects a grant program that provides financial assistance to of turbulence. eligible sponsors to develop 'a public use heliport. Information on Federal-aid program eligibility (1) Ground Level Heliports. Helicopter requirements is available in FAA Regional and District operations from sites immediately adjacent to buildings, Airports Offices. Addresses of Regional offices are trees, etc. are subjected to air turbulence effects caused listed in Appendix 3. AC 150/5000-3,Address List for by such features. Therefore, locate the landing and Regional Airports Divisions and Airports District/Field takeoff area as far from nearby buildings, trees, or Offices,lists all addresses. significant terrain features as the site permits. 10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS The (2) Elevated Heliports. Elevating heliports 6 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 requires an feet (1.8 m) or more above the level of the roof will environmental assessment be made prior to undertaking generally minimize the turbulent effect of air flowing certain Federal actions relating to heliport development. over the roof edge. While elevating the platform helps Actions which may require an environmental reduce or eliminate the air turbulence effects, a safety assessment are normally associated with Federal grants net/shelf may be required. or heliport layout plan approvals leading to the construction of a new heliport or significant expansion 11. STATE ROLE. Many state departments of of an existing heliport. transportation, aeronautical commissions, or similar authorities, require prior approval, and in some a. Assessment Items. An environmental instances a license, for the establishment and operation assessment must address noise, land usage, water and of a heliport. Several states administer a financial air quality, socio-economic issues, and viable assistance program similar to the Federal program and alternatives to the proposed development, etc. It must are staffed to provide technical advice. Heliport also describe the action taken to ensure public proponents are encouraged to contact their respective involvement and citizen participation in the planning state aeronautics commissions or departments for process. An opportunity for a public hearing may be particulars on licensing and assistance programs. required for a federally funded development of, or Appendix 3 lists addresses for state aviation offices. significant improvement to,an existing heliport. 12. LOCAL ROLE. Some communities have enacted b. Guidance. FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport zoning laws, building codes, fire regulations, etc. that Environmental Handbook, and Order 1050.1, Policies can impact heliport establishment and operation. Some and Procedures for Considering Environmental have or are in the process of developing codes or Impacts, provide guidance on environmental ordinances regulating environmental issues such as assessments. State and local governments should be noise and air pollution. A few localities have enacted contacted directly as they may also require an specific rules governing the establishment of a heliport. environmental report. The procedures in AC 150/5020- Therefore, heliport proponents are encouraged to make 1, Noise Control and Compatibility Planning for early contact with officials or agencies representing the Airports,describe a means of assessing the noise impact local zoning board, the fire, police, or sheriffs for airports which can be used in conjunction with the department,and the elected person(s)who represent the Heliport Noise Model (HNM) for assessing noise area where the heliport is to be located. impact. The HNM is available from the FAA Office of Environment and Energy. Proponents of non-federally assisted heliports are encouraged to work closely with local governmental authorities concerning environmental issues. c. Turbulence. Air flowing around and over buildings, stands of trees, terrain irregularities,etc. can create turbulence which may affect helicopter operations. A report, Evaluating Wind Flow Around Buildings on Heliport Placement.addresses winds effect on helicopter operations. A copy of the report (Accession number is AD-Al 53512) is available from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. The following actions 5 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 NOTICE OF LANDING AREA PROPOSAL perDIO •• ti.—. a. err deme'w..e.o.O.nv7esasrw +ra.S da0.4..Sint. .e.arnl.rk.a, INC.SHd.Gl.Sint.1.0 00CM .3_ WW2 Ceepary 3CC Luke SLr.rt q Oaol'aUnwary wrrr areestredrr•a*lees Pr are. alexanar La, rii giria 230x13 sr lel ortop4 errrle aanew eV le rtes e.enrol _ _ .._. .... u-1 C ram a asla.U es es aaltineneenee of C meet fl OeeelsFfere ra O'WW1 A rc. o•lrglar 0.efaege Err. q Hared ❑bniewegete CI Afars sSPrcern A-Lebo*.erla+a-1 MIN _ r-- _..-._„.. I arviocaq G.Sat 2.Caalyie(Perpdr Lira d Aware 3.Da1o•SOrscran F+re farerdria, Virginia atet applicable eaa.yaed Cat'Li.lee, r tear.. 1 Heli Alex M+ 36- 46'46 ' 77•Laws.�10 ' r 10 inn 1.5 I.Ferper Ttrrlr F{,es a triage Alien"0eerne Orr O Orrtnelee bolas to Ptak elrRW nrIo' Tse7teearn raL0eaa•e.r C twee ark crop Oc•_-'J3 . .ems'ga Q Fre let MlWclr..ilieo y, fl.. Ar AJAaaYe 0.Lawn anus APE W30 C'1.1$ fnPnea C.OrrLaairl Ors Err Mar eryaa law Pt An e7 N.7 PS P.m ERR 1. Llgroat Maintl Ma..Iq$3h ai. i!1iiei1b0mn ::.•..x..00 _ ..__ filatLVal l,:e'pyY 1M6 3.5 r P Mw ' Andrew" Il'3 i 2 10 _ __ _ .. bensoninigeor Seminal a` In Fri F T °,moue rlenb r fff 4 ICwc, M.*Karts ltd,Ek l I Dear_ co w anvil Nor etc Tree refFlTC1nf! 1DC• is 2C0 L i.a A7>PLOP;r Pr 5:: x 50 orFEIr t.00etrntare .. t' J lira S'Li I % IC 3/306 Fr T:M' Y IAW '-vole l�4 TTya,rprSe..rdlgL alc'. Concrete i a e' era ' Mir 1 1 r 1 elvior.'d'4 Oa f: Crier of Peronk4d laic T Tesrplc 200 r 0„ bit"0.3 -Edge t Leman 7irection . %weir ly M[-nice i4nrrtFnntr (15n St o-e I.lakrdgeAa lisWr rAetalt Mtelerl P7.� Line 75 1 S 0,05. Anal _i_ Ora, 40• ••• '- Cffic9 E+.1d1119^- {120 3ek 0,1 4a imam ...Pm I w.t w Syr wrrlwi 0 2 ep.wr rr+ll 0 5 , OS Q Sir CsSafve Mors nor o I EE IS rag IFES Fa fin rome Sere Idr.aLYtlO. Sri Ala ayb Prep i'1 r. .. p*rr T,a-rm salary 5211 M 0.9 r - emir 20 E 5g .TdEersor.-3ous tom Scb WT 0.0 lower ,-, IMPS etSekt E Lee S[7. E O.H4 aP e.r Carran Se5 - I 0.94 1rixp FR PinelsFielb Nsleis rC $tnn.r.11 7.ctwa Sch WEL 0.9 OM d Tar Tier Vas Typo tree Sirlrup Ireton Sigl Stb in 0.7 t:Mea.a..1 alpesmouse R.sidarces (ALL directive ) 0-3 Qrr Ie.nanr C Er Fervid Dare Q WA lb so. Ct-- Ciimwasrte"any s t KRTSIC*T10M 14.-Orarct+rr ae Ore.aSelletharmak Oa iv M In LtC.era.Scer¢,r.�e}WM.6•4•45., lAne S.We r. ran*Showthan r +.. � R Jrr. . .w ige'M(b gel:'• � "" tatl.aFyea O'rrr'T Or Me 11 1. 1193 hpopE ei No(h-ern inner Pao 2:32-262-270 FAA Fern}Ni-1 n.C,Erma Free ter Fib 1-1. Example of required Mwtice 6 co n w N FRUCHT AVENUE _ _.—;-- —'— -- ~� AUTO PARKING CITY PROPERTY • L" J OFFICE �1 4 141, Ct'W PROPERTY . FUTURF. PAVED APRON a y a IN-ORQUND FATO EDGE MARKERS LEAD•IN LIGHTS APPROACH/TAKEOFF PATH �y:d APPROACH/TAKEOFF PATH _ROC _ - -_ PAQPRRR'TINE -- - _- - 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A I JF� /l _. ____,_ fril / 7 - WEIGHT nirrTAi76N ., ' �: /41,000 Powld Units} N %rr; : 'i ROOF SUItwAcz Slant) RE ! + 1 FREE OF LOOSE GRAVEL CI !'� ' l RED/ORANGE PAINTED CIRCLE l; _ t� ++ f / SLIGHTLY RAISED�_ y r • PLATFORM zit.. ---- _SAUFfigA 4,E_LIEOPIRE LOWING''aim at i"bh 'y -e a l Jf • //w1rmc1m1cAroa / r _ �' it f I. 4q f :if: h II iodyi I +rr,/ .r t 1 � rlA + Figure 1-4. Emergency evacnninn facility 9 a n N Q -7j_ N . i ^� _� l i I F / te.•1e. ^-�t : .� 1 _ - �, ,/Y - ��` � r I It. —. t "-' .rte �,r It Q)Building is tan than 700 Net(60 rn) in height ''^s,_-'�4 - ,• __ I but tap will penetrate the 25:1 surface. �"�� __y Notice is required by MAR 77,18(a)(9)(iii)l • I.ANDLen AAD F4KPO F AREA _ Q i. 1. PRIMACY 9t'N1'ALIE ;; g. © Antenna is over 200 feet OM m) in h■ighR F.170 _ h :\ r) [Natio,required by FAR 77.18(0)(1).1 ,, :'' : y;; Antenna lass than 200 feet (OQ m) in height , which penetrates the 26:1 surface. I 1 ri Piloting required by FAR 77.18(e)(2)Gii).1 I ( Caaitruotton crane penetrates 25:1 surface. [Notice is tequired by FAR 77.13(a)(2Xti11.] V Building tar than 2x0 Net (60 u.) in height dose not penetrate 2b:1•aurfera!- %nice is not required. cJ Balding I.more than 0,000 feet from heliport. [Natioe is required ir building 'nlldd be 200 feat WO re) er more In height.? N O b A 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A ., • f�Is'�? i lid I 1 III 1 ,_ -;;;,-_,-.-;(0,. :.•--f. % -. .Sa;OF,.. „f•'1-'••••— , •Pasta Saar.lratQ • ISOMETRIC VIEW *mummy su rAcr 7C0�i3 r.7 S>K X VA1CABt,E iM111N um 1.5 tl'dEAi',,J..ta...IdGr71: Icrt Ilsssf4ioa1fLaetl. .2 i. t— T illr lisifi t Apneach Srfacs!81aps 11:15 Mils--; ILFpc+t heini5q.1 BmU1r(.lope it1) l I .hi-7717m i 1 I arar fl NO — - . � ' IjJ14tI111 ! •i, 1 * • -1,sv(.e■( w 6.1) 1361 IV 7]l PLAN •IEW Fistoe I- AGnfction idemiBr tiaa11rf res fo%risral opfxaIi iz 11 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A CHAPTER 2.PRIVATE USE HELIPORTS , 13. GENERAL. Helicopters are routinely used for The FATO and the safety area should be free of objects public services such as news gathering,traffic reports, such as other helicopters, buildings, fences, parapets, and law enforcement. Numerous firms transport oil etc.,which could be struck by the main or tail rotor,or field workers from their on-shore heliports to offshore be hit by the skids of a helicopter while landing or oil platforms saving hours of transit time over ship- taking-off based transportation systems. Companies have found the helicopter to be an efficient and effective way to 16. TOUCHDOWN AND LIFT-OFF AREA transport people and products between headquarters (FLOP). When the entire FATO is not load bearing,a offices and suburban manufacturing plants, to remote paved or an aggregate-turf TLOF is recommended. or inaccessible field/mine sites,as well as a convenient shuttle to/from the local airport. To save time and a. Location. When a TLOF is provided, it is avoid the congestion on streets and highways, an normally centered within the FATO. For irregularly increasing numbers of helicopter owners are finding shaped or oversized FATOs,the center of the paved or the helicopter to be a convenient way of commuting aggregate-turf TLOF should be located at least 3/4 of between their homes and their places of business. the design helicopter's overall length in from the With this diverse usage, private use heliports can vary FATO boundaries. Figure 2-3 illustrates the considerably in both size and complexity. This chapter recommended FATO/TLOF relationship. To the contains recommendations for designing a heliport extent practical,the TLOF of a roof top heliport should intended to be used as a private use facility. Figure 2-1 be elevated above the level of any obstacle in the identifies the essential features of a private use heliport FATO. while figure 2-2 depicts an extremely large private use heliport. b. Size. The least dimension of a TLOF should be a minimum of 1.5 times the length or width of the 14. FINAL APPROACH AND TAKEOFF AREA undercarriage of the design helicopter, whichever is (FATO). A private use heliport should have an greater. identifiable, object free area (FATO) available for helicopter landings and takeoffs. c. Surface Characteristics. If a surface more durable than aggregate-turf is needed,Portland Cement a. Location. A FATO may be at ground or water Concrete (PCC) pavement is suggested An asphaltic level,or at pier or roof top level. Objects or structures surface is "less desirable" for heliports as it may rut should be outside the FATO to permit at least one clear under the wheels or skids of a parked helicopter, a approach/takeoff path aligned with the prevailing possible factor in some roll-over incidents. Pavements winds. Figure 2-1 illustrates this recommendation. should have a broomed or other roughened finish that Heliport located on raised platforms, piers and docks, provides a skid resistant surface for helicopters and or buildings may have outer portions of the FATO non-slippery footing for persons. Pavements should be extend beyond the platform, pier, dock, or building designed to support 1.5 times the maximum takeoff edge as illustrated in figure 2-4. weight of the design helicopter. Roof top heliport TLOFs may be constructed of wood,metal,or concrete. b. Size. A FATO may have any shape provided that its least dimension, i.e., length, width, or d. Elevated TLOFs. Roof top heliport TLOFs diameter, is not less than 1.5 times the overall length may be constructed of wood, metal, or concrete. of the design helicopter. Elevator penthouses, cooling towers, exhaust/fresh air vents, and other raised features impact roof top c. Gradients. When a TLOF is not provided, the helicopter operations. To the extent practical, the FATO should be graded to provide a smooth surface. TLOF of a roof top heliport should be elevated above To assure drainage, a 0.5 to 2 percent gradient is the level of any obstacle in the FATO. Other objects or suggested for any part of a FATO surface on which a structures should be outside the FATO to permit at helicopter is expected to land least one clear approach/takeoff path aligned with the prevailing winds. Figure 2-4 illustrates this 15. SAFETY AREA. A safety area surrounds the recommendation. Elevated platforms should be FATO. Its recommended width is 1/3 rotor diameter designed to support 1.5 times the maximum takeoff of the design helicopter,but not less than 10 feet(3 m). weight of the design helicopter. When the TLOF is on a platform elevated more than 30 inches 13 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 (75 cm)above its surroundings,a 5 foot(1.5 m)wide that will not catch helicopter skids or create barriers to safety net or shelf should be provided. The safety net helicopter maneuvering. If raised markers are used, or shelf should have a load carrying capability of 25 they should be located at the outer edge of the safety pounds per square foot(122 Kg per sq.m). The net or area and no more than 8 inches (20 cm) in height. shelf, as illustrated in figure 2-4, should not project Markers are placed at the corners,and as needed along more than 2 inches (5 cm) above the level of the the edges of the FATO. Figure 2-6 illustrates different TLOF. A report, Structural Design Guidelines for types of in-ground and raised markers. Heliports, (Report Number AD-A148967) is available from the National Technical Information Service, (2) Paved Surfaces. A 12 inch (30 cm) wide Springfield,VA 22161. dashed line, as illustrated in figures 2-5 and 2-7, defines the limits of the FATO when the entire surface e. Gradients. To assure drainage,TLOF gradients is paved. A 12 inch(30 cm)wide solid line is used to should range between 0.5 to 2.0 percent. define the limits of a TLOF. While white is the color most commonly used, any color which provides good 17. APPROACHJTAKEOFF SURFACE. contrast to the background,may be used. a. Approach/Takeoff Path. A private use heliport b. Identification Marking. A distinctive must have at least one approach/takeoff path. This marking, such as the company logo, serves to identify path,to the extent practical,should be aligned with the the facility as a private use heliport. The identification dominate winds. Additional approach/takeoff paths marking should be placed at the preferred touchdown are recommended. Approach/takeoff paths may curve location,be as large as practical and be oriented to be to avoid objects and/or noise sensitive areas and utilize legible from the preferred direction of approach. The the airspace above public lands, e.g., freeways, rivers, marking should be at least 10 feet(3 m)in height. The etc. capital H illustrated in Appendix 2 may be used in lieu of a logo. b. Approach/Takeoff Surface. An approach/ takeoff surface is centered on each approach/takeoff c. Weight Limitations. Surfaces which are path and should conform to the dimensions of the FAR limited in weight-carrying ability should be marked Part 77 heliport approach surface. Figure 1-6 with a number, in thousands of pounds. The marking illustrates the FAR Part 77 approach surface which should be large enough to be legible from the should be free of object penetrations. approaching helicopter. The number is located to the right and below the heliport symbol as viewed from the 18. HELICOPTER PARKING. A separate preferred directions of approach. helicopter parking area is not required unless the heliport must accommodate more than one helicopter d. Closed Heliport. All markings on a at a time. Parked helicopters should not penetrate an permanently closed heliport should be obliterated. approach/takeoff surface or be parked within the safety When obliteration is impractical,a yellow X should be area. While parking areas need not be paved,figure 2- placed over the markings. The X marking, as 2 depicts a large private use heliport with a number of illustrated in figure 2-8, must be large enough to paved parking pads. Figure 2-5 illustrates a simple ensure pilot recognition from 1/4 mile(400 m). parking apron with details of recessed eyes/loops permitting helicopters to be tied down. e. Parking Apron. If a parking apron is provided, it is recommended that it be designed and marked 19. HELIPORT MARKERS AND MARKINGS. utilizing the guidance in paragraphs 30 and 31. Markers and/or surface markings are suggested to identify the facility as a heliport, the perimeters of the 20. HELIPORT LIGHTING. When night FATO and/or TLOF, and, if needed, the operational operations are intended and ambient lighting is limitations on weight. Lines used as surface markings inadequate,it is recommended that the perimeter of the may be paint or preformed material. FATO or TLOF (but not both)be defined with yellow lights. Alternatively, floodlights may be used to a. Perimeter Markings. In-ground or surface illuminate the heliport's FATO or TLOF surfaces. markings may be used to define either, or both, the Figures 2-9 and 2-10 illustrate the recommended FATO and TLOF. perimeter lighting systems. (1) Unpaved Surfaces. The perimeter of a turf FATO should be identified with in-ground markers 14 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A a. Perimeter Lights. At least 3 uniformly spaced 21. WIND DIRECTION INDICATOR. A private lights are recommended per side of a square or use heliport must have at least one wind indicator. A rectangular FATO or TLOF with a light located at wind sock is the preferred indicator as it shows both each corner. A minimum of eight lights are needed to the direction and magnitude of the wind. The wind define a circular FATO or TLOF. The interval sock should be placed where it provides a true between lights should not exceed 25 feet(7.5 m). indication of surface wind and is clear of the safety area and any approach/takeoff surface. The wind sock (1) FATOs. Flush lights may be located on,or may be internally or externally lighted for night within I foot(30 cm)of,the FATO edge. Raised light operations, or, alternatively be located in an fixtures,modified to be no more than 8 inches(20 cm) illuminated area. in height, should be located 10 feet(3 m)out from the edge of the FATO. 22. HELIPORT SAFETY AND SECURITY. (2) TLOFs. Flush lights may be located on,or a. Safety. Provisions should be made to prevent within 1 foot(30 cm)of,the TLOF edge. Raised light any spilled fuel from collecting in a confined location fixtures,modified to be no more than 8 inches(20 cm) and/or contaminating a waterway. National Fire in height, may be located 10 feet (3 m) out from the Protection Association pamphlets provide guidance on TLOF edge and should not penetrate a horizontal plane fuel handling and storage. at the TLOFs elevation by more than 2 inches(5 cm). b. Security. The operational areas of a heliport (3) Raised TLOFs. Flush lights should be need to be kept free of people, animals, and vehicles. within I foot (30 cm) of the edge of a raised TLOF. The method to be used to control access depends upon Raised fixtures should be within 1 foot(30 cm)of the the heliport location and type of potential intruder. in TLOF edge and should not project more than 2 inches urban areas, a curb will normally keep vehicles from (5 cm) above the TOLF as illustration in figure 2-10. entering while in rural areas cattle guards or fences In snow areas, it is suggested that the lights be placed will prevent the entry of animals. Generally, people along the outer edge of the safety net or shelf. will not enter a fenced area. In all cases where a fence is used, it should be as low as possible and at the b. Floodlights. When floodlighting is used, care greatest possible distance from the safety area and not should be taken to place floodlights clear of the safety penetrate any approach/takeoff surface. A visible area and the approach/takeoff surface(s). Floodlights reminder such as a sign, a low trimmed hedge, or should be aimed down so as not to interfere with pilot flower bed may suffice to alert people to the heliport vision and provide a minimum of 3 foot candles presence where access to the heliport owners property (32 lux) of illumination over the FATO or TLOF is already controlled. surfaces. To eliminate the need for tall poles, floodlights may be mounted on adjacent buildings. Floodlights which might interfere with pilot vision during takeoff and landings must be capable of being turned off during landings and takeoffs. 15 2 Fa it a ra 1 _ \ f1T""�T �r. APPRC>i RFAC KBCP! dd r, rrt •�.CI IC) !bgi ^b L CLEAkt?llLA NnINGITA KW ne AREA / sth,R ''r ' IT• AM) OPTIONAL rAiv CORNEAMARIPRe -. r , a RCCOHn F' Stn--�mgld Prafeend) '3 A?h1WACHA'nHearr svkxAca ~ �' re, � r . r'^ (OPTIONAL] .. �• -- WEND i f��, '. �• f r L ,r,ai:.,.. rJ.,-,---"-- g" •- .)irts14 y��.I N,•r .; J � ejs.• 1\, Y 31 li„ • a i et.a +x 5 .� •' ..ay rR«a ...- \ /. 1 • •1 N O b a N O b a MY In41.• ioncart,,,ty.-'p1 N.., I. '" . . ... :hie.: ,6111::1% , EATO ` N ~_ Y� X ^�_-u a Ste^ _mss -mss t:. 5 e. r- ►-�1ti�. 9 - . MDIVIDVAL PARKING PA )firs 9 n N 0 N W Q N 9 1.1-, T w f � /AB ` TLOF In. •N FATO /I/1 / FATO PROTECTION ZONE RECOMMENDED FATO/TIEOF MINIMUM DIMENSIONS Rased On The Design Helicopter A--FINAL APPROACH AND TAKEOFF AREA (FATO) 1.6 a OVERALL LENGTII R--TOUCHDOWN AND LIFT-OFF AREA (TLOF) 1.5 x UNDF.RCARR1AGE LENGTH OR WIDTH NORMALLY CENTERED IN THE FATO C--SAFETY AREA 0-33 x ROTCR DIAMETER NOT LESS THAN l.i) I'EDT (S m) N b A N O b A r" +. '" ' LIMITS ... / -FATO - -- w ii- . • / A i • / 'n441 i Y. ,i, I Mfr / : :a .:.• -ar / tir 6 FOOT(1.6 m)SAFETY NRTIEHRLF . WHEN'FLOE 16 RAtRED MORE i. I 0 THAN' 30'INCHES(73 cro) i; / 'FLOP ! S / _ '- ` a SAFETY AREA +.. r - a 1/9 ROTOR EA ro) it/ 1 ...Or ' I / i I /!N. + ��( I WIND SOj' cRJc / '(S?) 1/14/ . 4. 4 o 0 w b O N 0 1 n Q APPRCAC;H. CAKROFF SURFACE ta — L a I I 1 PAVED 4),:t PAVED TAXEWAY CE:NTERIJNE , I I PAMJ PARKING LIGHTED i APRON 0 WIND • SOCK f I I L I u o _ �r �Y SAFETY AREA \I 1 a _... ��N\ APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACElli ' ' APRON PAVEMENT Z J 1 5 s yr I I RI CESSED••T[E DOWNS o i A ON a J ile\ I_A fy ++ 15:V. +a tj ;. ABOVE GROUND MARKERS - ' •}41 F.; z� - ... ._. . (Low Pane., Embzdded Rocky) .•-' I1.1" 1J. ._... _ - [18 Feet (8 m) froze FATO Edge) ABOVE GROUND MARKERS Wt ND GC1( 0��' APn{O.%CHITAKFf)FFSURFACK F (ValBoerd►, Half Barrels) _•�„_�.-- [10 !leaf (8 e} PAIN) Edge)PAIN) Y_ j, `� FATO WITHOUT A TLOF �= p�h N. ••.. _ NATURALADOVE GROUND MARKERS _ _ (Low Hod})o,FWwcr lied) [10 Feet 13 &from PA'1't} }Axel IN-GROUND MARKERS (Cohere* Stone,timbers) (On FATO Edge] • n U O w N NJ AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 r e1 J SSk _ r r irl 1 r•w s Sig � lgi r I e ( i - _�'/ Ili , i ~ f1 r I Of / \ I a F: i n r yr• W≥ ':i ' <I--. % r tt ' 4a O2 , re L ; z �� u— kE I e As r 3 F �Q �v r. a pi "f11(3.4 I 1 r Cz w. O / Fr, cn I.4 F� VI :l f Q • '1 e� ! ct . cIc F , 44 P 2 . I r--7 a i Af` i 1 GR ' — F k" \� F4 ff 8 I F fl� phi: VL w� I p r y`, Pal I , w ~. I S . sot / r,W .s. \-c b Z . N. Mitre 2-7, Mukkig paved heliports 22 N O VD a Seid 11 ititii. Il--. .'‘‘.t. /pi .. • W r PI 11.21 WIND SOCK REMOVED .__ YELLOW 'X' OBLITERATES -- IDENT[FICnTIOK MARKING CORNER MARKJERS REMOVED • 0 La L. 0 N 4 W > a n in 0 LA w t'') � LIGHTED WIND SUCK lc. ' . .. #4,,, ,,fi.• Siffl&r1.1,4. caa __. -- -- Q-• ,. 0MNI-DIRECTIONAL LIGHTS FLUSIIIN-PAVEMENTTIGH'PA - . - ; C 0WNER4IUS0 gT AVF.n TLUF FIAISH ELL•'CTRU•LUMINESCL•'N'f PANEL LIGHTS r yl yJ ]N.GR0CXT)rrsucen MAAK}:R$ r1.r.11STMT]`Ic TI1S Th\Nat OY IdciITiriO SYSrrMZ Avntiour. • O a 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A M a �I M I f : l x~ f ` - I I ,— fit I n JAr '�� top ; `~ � r 'al 1 �, E� I l�� ' I i •I I t� kJ I: °� w ` o •`` F —�`� f I Y� LJr4fI, I 3 ti _ -. 4 �! .:.,. � ` �� f I}ins I -c z—j p--'- !' a� i eii*- ' - H Z4 6 x� faE „ �zc3 ^ x1 @� 1 •I O F K r Et- c: E c `s C w < H 4<�C y�x.- Pe lin ≤a x C p., tm.F p--«- 33xx leap Cm Figure 2-10.. Lighting an elevated private use heliport 25 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A CHAPTER 3. PUBLIC USE GENERAL AVIATION HELIPORTS 23. GENERAL. A public use heliport is a heliport c. Gradients. The FATO should be graded to remove available for use by the general public without a surface irregularities and assure drainage. The requirement for prior approval of the owner or operator. recommended gradients for the FATO range from a A public use general aviation heliport accommodates minimum of 0.5 percent to a maximum of 5.0 percent. helicopters used by individuals, corporations, and FATO grades should not exceed 2 percent in any area helicopter air taxi services. Scheduled passenger where a helicopter is expected to land. services may be available if sufficient demand exists. The property needed for a public use general aviation 25. SAFETY AREA. A safety area equal to 1/3 the heliport depends upon the volume and type of users and rotor diameter of the design helicopter,but not less than the scope of amenities, including automobile parking, 20 feet (6 m) in width, surrounds the FATO. The provided. Property requirements for helicopter FATO and the safety area must be free and clear of operators and for passenger amenities frequently objects such as parked helicopters,buildings, fences, or exceeds that required for"air side"purposes. While the objects which could be struck by the main or tail rotor, typical public use general aviation heliport is also or catch the skids, of an arriving or departing publicly owned, public ownership is not a requirement helicopter. for the public use designation. Public agencies and persons proposing to develop a general aviation heliport 26. TOUCHDOWN AND LIFT-OFF AREA are encouraged to select a heliport site that has the (TLOF). When the entire FATO is load bearing, an potential for future expansion. This chapter contains identifiable TLOF may not be required. A TLOF may standards and recommendations for designing a public have any shape. TLOFs are paved or other hard use general aviation heliport. Figure 3-1 illustrates the surfaces normally centered in the FATO. For essential features of a public use general aviation irregularly shaped or oversized FATOs, the center of a heliport. TLOF is located at least 3/4 of the design helicopter's overall length in from the FATO boundaries. An NOTE: To the extent that it is feasible to do so. elongated FATO may have an elongated TLOF or existing public use heliports should be brought into contain more than one TLOF as illustrated in figure 3-3. conformity with the standards and recommendations in this AC at such time as major expansion or re- a. Size. The recommended minimum dimension of construction is undertaken. the TLOF should not be less than the rotor diameter of the design helicopter. 24. FINAL APPROACH AND TAKEOFF AREA (FATO). A public use general aviation heliport must b. Surface Characteristics. A Portland Cement have at least one FATO. The FATO may contain one or Concrete (PCC) surface is recommended for ground more touchdown lift-off areas--locations within its level heliports. An asphaltic surface is "less desirable" borders at which arriving helicopters terminate their for heliports as it may rut under the wheels or skids of a approach in a hover or a landing, and from which parked helicopter, a possible factor in some roll-over departing helicopters takeoff. incidents. Pavements should have a broomed or other roughened finish that provides a skid resistant surface a. Location. The FATO of a general aviation for helicopters and non-slippery footing for persons. heliport may be at ground or water level, or at rooftop Pavements should be designed to support 1.5 times the level. maximum takeoff weight of the design helicopter. b. Size. The least dimension (length, width, or c. Elevated TLOFs. Elevated heliport TLOFs may diameter)of the FATO shall not be less than 1.5 times be constructed of wood, metal, or concrete. The TLOF the overall length of the design helicopter. For heliports should be designed to support 1.5 times the maximum at elevations of 1,000 feet(300 m)or more above mean takeoff weight of the design helicopter. When the sea level, elongation by the amount determined from TLOF is on a platform elevated more than 30 inches(75 figure 3-2 is recommended. The elongation should be cm)above its surroundings,a 5 foot(1.5 m)wide safety in the direction of takeoff. net or shelf should be provided in lieu of a railing. The safety net or shelf should have a load carrying capability of at least 25 pounds per square foot(122 Kg per sq.m). The net or shelf,as illustrated in figure 3-4,should not project more than 2 inches(5 cm) above the level of the TLOF. 27 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 (2) Taxiways. The width of a paved taxiway should be d. Gradients. To assure drainage,,the TLOF designed to provide at least twice the undercarriage should have a minimum gradient of 0.5 percept and a width of the design helicopter. maximum gradient of 2.0 percent To insure TLOF drainage, gradients of rapid runoff shoulders should b. Clearances. Taxi routes and taxiways should be range between 2.0 and 5.0 percent designed to provide 20 feet(6 m) of rotor tip clearance to objects and parked helicopters for hover taxiing, and 27. APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACE. 10 feet(3 m)of clearance for ground taxiing. a. Approach/Takeoff Path. A public use general c. Surfaces. Unpaved portions of taxi routes aviation heliport should have more than one should have a turf cover, or be treated in some manner, approach/takeoff path. One of these paths should be to prevent dirt and debris from being raised by a taxiing oriented to align with the direction of the predominant helicopter's rotor wash. Taxiways may have an wind. Approach/takeoff paths may curve to avoid asphaltic, portland cement, or other stabilized surface. objects and/or noise sensitive areas and utilize the Taxiway pavements should be capable of sustaining the airspace above public lands e.g.freeways,rivers,etc. maximum gross weight of the design helicopter under all weather conditions. b. Approach/Takeoff Surface. An approach/takeoff surface is centered on each d. Gradients. Taxiway longitudinal gradients approach/takeoff path and conforms to the dimensions should not exceed 2.0 percent. Transverse gradients of the FAR Part 77 heliport approach surface. Figure 1- should not be less than 0.5 percent nor greater than 2.0 6 illustrates the FAR Part 77 heliport approach and percent. transitional surfaces which must be free of hazards to air navigation. Paragraph 8 provides guidance on how 30. HELICOPTER PARKING. A public use general to identify and mitigate hazards to air navigation. aviation heliport, unless designed as a helistop, should have an area designated for parking helicopters. The 28. PROTECTION ZONE. The protection zone is size of the area or apron depends upon the number of the property under lying the approach/takeoff surface helicopters to be accommodated. Parking positions out to where the surface is 35 feet (10.5 m) above the should be designed to accommodate the range of heliport elevation as illustrated in figure 3-5. The helicopter sizes expected at the facility. Individual heliport proponent should own or control this property. parking pads may be used in lieu of an apron. The control should include the ability to clear incompatible objects and to preclude activities that a. Size. Parking position size is dependent upon contribute to the congregation of people. the helicopter size and the intended paths in maneuvering in and out of the parking position. There 29. TAXI ROUTES AND TAXIWAYS. A taxi route should be at least 1/3 rotor,but not less than 10 feet(3 is both an object free right-of-way connecting the FATO m), of clearance between skid equipped helicopters and to a parking area/apron,and a maneuvering aisle on the at least 10 feet (3 m) for wheel equipped helicopters to parking area/apron. Taxiways are paved surfaces, another helicopter or object. Clearances are measured normally centered in a taxi route, used by wheel from any part of a helicopter with the helicopter on the equipped helicopters in ground maneuvering. The intended path. Tail rotor clearance may become the relationship between taxi routes and paved taxiways is critical clearance when the helicopter turns 30 degree or illustrated in figures 3-6 and 3-7. more within a parking position. Figure 3-7 illustrates apron design concepts and figure 3-15 illustrates a. Widths. parking position clearances. (1) Taxi Routes. The width of a taxi route is b. Parking Pads. The least dimension of a parking determined by adding the clearance specified in 'b" pad should be a minimum of 1.5 times the below to the maximum rotor diameter of the helicopter undercarriage length or width of the design helicopter. that will hover or ground taxi. c. Fueling. AC 150/5230-4, Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling, and Dispensing on Airports, contains guidance on fueling services. Systems for storing and dispensing fuel must conform to federal,state,and local requirements for petroleum handling facilities. Guidance is found in AC 150/5230-4, Aircraft Fuel 28 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Storage, Handling, and Dispensing on Airports, and It Identification Marking. An in-ground H marking appropriate National Fire Protection Association will identify the heliport as a public use facility as well (NFPA) publications. Fueling ,locations should be as mark the intended landing position within the FATO. designed and marked to minimize the potential for The letter H is illustrated in figures 3-7 and 3-8. The H helicopters to collide with the dispensing equipment. is oriented on the axis of the dominate approach/takeoff The area should be lighted if night fueling operations path. A bar may be placed under the H when it is are contemplated. necessary to distinguish the preferred approach direction. Appendix 2 contains dimension d. Additional Apron. Additional area may be recommendations. required adjacent to hangars used by private helicopter owners and for hangars and other structures used by c. Taxi Route and Taxiway Markings. Taxi route fixed base operators. edges are defined with yellow-blue-yellow raised markers that are not more than 8 inches (20 cm) in e. Tie Downs. Recessed tie downs may be installed height nor less than 4 inches (10 cm) in diameter. to accommodate extended or overnight parking of based Taxiway centerline and edges are marked with yellow or transient helicopters. Guidance on recessed tie lines. The centerline is a continuous 6 inch (15 cm) downs recommended for extended or overnight parking wide yellow line. The edges are defined with two is found in AC 20-35,Tiedown Sense. continuous 6 inch (15 cm) wide yellow lines spaced 6 inches (15 cm) apart. Figure 3-6 illustrates taxiway 31. HELIPORT MARKERS AND MARKINGS. centerline and edge markings. Markers and/or surface markings identify the facility as a heliport, the perimeter of the FATO and TLOF, any d. Apron Markings. In addition to the taxiway taxi route, taxiway, and/or parking positions. Surface and parking position markings, the yellow (double) markings may be paint or preformed material. Heliport taxiway edge lines continue around the apron to define FATOs and TLOFs are defined with in-ground markers the apron edge. Figures 3-7 and 3-15 illustrate apron and/or surface white lines. Taxi routes are defined with markings. raised edge markers. Taxiways and aprons are defined with yellow lines/markings. Lines/markings may be e. Parking Position Markings. The yellow outlined with a 6 inch (15 cm) wide stripe of a taxiway centerline continues into the individual parking contrasting color to enhance conspicuity. positions to define the centerline of the parking. positions. A parking position is further identified by a a. Perimeter Markings. The perimeter of the 12 inch(30 cm)wide yellow line defining a circle. The FATO and/or TLOF should be defined with markers diameter of the circle is equal to the rotor diameter of and/or lines. Figure 3-8 illustrates a heliport with in- the largest helicopter the position is designed to ground markers and surface markings while figure 3-9 accommodate. illustrates a heliport with surface markings. f. Closed Heliport All markings of a permanently (1) Unpaved FATOs. The perimeter of an closed heliport, FATO, or TLOF should be obliterated. unpaved FATO is defined with in-ground markers, If it is impractical to obliterate markings,a yellow X,as approximately I foot by 5 foot(30 cm by 1.5 m),located illustrated in figure 3-10, should be placed over the H. at the corners and along the FATO edges. The yellow X must be large enough to ensure early pilot recognition that the heliport is closed. (2) Paved FATOs. A 1 foot (30 cm) wide dashed white line defines the FATO perimeter. The 32. HELIPORT LIGHTING. For night operations, segments and separation between segments should be the FATO or TLOF,but not both,and taxiways (or taxi even. The corners must be defined and the edge routes) need to be lighted. Yellow lights define the segments should be approximately 5 feet (1.5 m) in limits of the FATO or TLOF. Flush green lights define length. taxiway centerlines. Blue omni-directional lights or reflectors define taxi route edges. Figure 3-11 illustrates (3) TLOFs. A continuous 12 inch(30 cm)wide these lighting systems. AC 150/5340-19, Taxiway solid white line defines the perimeter of a paved or hard Centerline Lighting System, AC 150/5340-24, Runway surfaced TLOF. A continuous 12 inch (30 cm) in- and Taxiway Edge Lighting System,and AC 150/5345- ground marking defines the perimeter of a load-bearing 46, Specification for Runway and Taxiway Light aggregate-turf TLOF. Fixtures, contain technical guidance on lighting equipment and installation details. 29 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 a. Perimeter Lights. A minimum of 4 flush or raised Markers, may be used in lieu of the L-852A or L-852B light fixtures is recommended per side of a square or lighting fixtures. rectangular FATO or TLOF. A light is located at each corner with additional lights uniformly spaced between b. Heliport Identification Beacon. A heliport the corner lights with a maximum interval of 25 feet identification beacon is recommended to aid pilots in (7.5 m) between lights. An even number of lights, at locating the heliport when its location cannot be readily least eight, uniformly spaced with a maximum interval identified by a prominent lighted landmark. The of 25 feet(7.5 m)between lights is required to define a beacon, flashing white/green/yellow at the rate of 30 to circular FATO or TLOF. Flush lights may be located 45 flashes per minute, should be located on or close to on the TLOF edge or within 1 foot(30 cm)of the TLOF the heliport. Guidance on heliport beacons is found in edge. Raised light fixtures,modified to be no more than AC 150/5345-12, Specification for Airport and Heliport 8 inches(20 cm)in height, should be located 10 feet(3 Beacon. m)out from the TLOF edge and should not penetrate a horizontal plane at the TLOF's elevation by more than 2 e. Floodlights. Floodlights may be used to inches (5 cm). When non-flush lights are used on a illuminate the apron. To eliminate the need for tall raised TLOF,they should be positioned as illustrated in poles, these floodlights may be mounted on adjacent figure 3-11. In snow areas, it is recommended that buildings. Care should be taken, however, to place these lights be placed along the outer edge of the safety floodlights clear of the safety area, the approach/takeoff net/shelf to minimize the chances of being damaged by surface(s), and the heliport transitional surfaces. snow removal operations. Floodlights should be aimed down and provide a minimum of 3 foot candles (32 lux) of illumination on b. Landing Direction Lights. Landing direction the apron surface. Floodlights which might interfere lights are a configuration of five L-861 lights with with pilot vision during takeoff and landings must be omni- directional yellow lenses. The lights are spaced capable of being turned off during landings and at 15 foot (4.5 m) intervals beginning at the line of takeoffs. perimeter lights and extend outward in the direction of the preferred approach/takeoff path as illustrated in 33. WIND DIRECTION INDICATOR A wind sock figure 3-11. Landing direction lights are an optional conforming to AC 150/5345-27, Specification for Wind feature to be installed when it is necessary to provide Cone Assemblies,is recommended to show the direction directional guidance. and magnitude of the wind. Wind socks must be lighted for night operations. The wind sock should be placed c. Taxi Route and Taxiway Lighting. where it provides a true indication of surface wind and is clear of the safety area, the approach/takeoff (1) Taxi Routes. The edges of a taxi route,that surface(s), and the heliport transitional surfaces. The does not contain a paved taxiway, are defined with blue wind sock should provide the best possible color lenses on raised lighting fixtures or reflectors modified contrast to its background. When the heliport is large to be no more than 8 inches (20 cm) tall. Taxi route or located among buildings, wind direction and speed lights or reflectors are placed at intervals of 50 feet(15 may differ significantly from one part of the heliport to m) on straight sections and 25 feet (7.5 m) on curved another and multiple wind socks may be necessary. sections. A minimum of four lights are needed to define a curve. Blue retro-reflector Type II markers epared at 34. VISUAL GLIDE PATH INDICATORS. A visual 50 foot (15 m) intervals may be used to identify the glide path indicator, such as Heliport Approach Path edges of a taxi route. Indicator (HAPI), Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VAST), or Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAM), (2) Taxiways. Taxiway centerlines are defined provides pilots with visual course and descent cues. The with flush L-852A bi-directional or L-852B uni- lowest on course visual signal must provide a minimum directional green lights. The lights are spaced at 50 feet of 1 degree of clearance over any object in the approach (15 m)intervals on straight sections and at 25 feet(7.5 path that lies within 10 degrees of the approach course m)intervals on curved sections with a minimum of four centerline. The optimum location of a visual glide path lights needed to define the curve. Green retro-reflective indicator is on the extended centerline of the approach markers meeting requirements for Type 11 markers in path at a distance that brings the helicopter to a hover 3 AC 150/5345-39, FAA Specification L-853, Runway to 8 feet(0.9 to 2.5 m)above the TLOF center. Figure and Taxiway Centerline Retro-reflective 3-12 illustrates visual glide path indicator clearance criteria. AC 150/5345-28, Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) Systems, and AC 150/5345-52, Generic 30 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Visual Glideslope Indicators(GVGI),provide additional d. Equipment/Object Marking. Heliport information. maintenance and servicing equipment, as well as other objects used in the air side operational areas, should be 35. TERMINAL FACILITIES. The heliport terminal made conspicuous with reflective tape, paint, or other requires curb side access for passengers using private markings. Particular attention should be given to autos, taxicabs, and public transit vehicles. Public marking objects that are hard to see in marginal waiting areas need the usual amenities and a counter for visibility such as at night,in mist,or in fog. rental car services may be desirable. Passenger auto parking areas should accommodate current e. Passenger Walkways. Passenger movement in requirements and have the capability of being expanded operational areas should be restricted to marked to meet future requirements. Readily available public walkways. Figure 3-15 illustrates one marking scheme. transportation may reduce the requirement for Apron pavements should be designed so that spilled fuel employees and service personnel auto parking spaces. does not drain onto passenger walkways or toward The heliport terminal building or sheltered waiting area parked helicopters. Two separated access points are should be attractive and functional. AC 150/5360-9, required for elevated TLOFs. Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities at Non-Hub Locations, contains guidance on designing f. Communications and Weather. A UNICOM terminal facilities. radio may be used to provide arriving helicopters with heliport and traffic advisory information but may not be 36. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS. The following used to control air traffic. The Federal Communications safety related features should be provided on an as Commission(FCC) should be contacted for information needed basis. on UNICOM licensing. An AWOS measures and automatically broadcasts current weather conditions at a. Wire Marking And Lighting. Unmarked the heliport site. When an AWOS is installed,it should electric and telephone wires in the heliports immediate be located at least 100 feet (30 m) and not more than area may be difficult to see. It is recommended that, 700 feet(215 m)from the edge of the TLOF. Guidance where practical, wires located within 500 feet (150 m) on AWOS systems is found in AC 150/5220-16, of the FATO, as well as those within 1/2 mile (1 km) Automated Weather Observing Systems (AWOS) for that are beneath and up to 100 feet(30 m)to the side of Non-Federal Applications. an approach/takeoff path be marked to make them more conspicuous. Figure 3-13, illustrates the area of g. Winter Operations. Swirling snow raised by a concern. Guidance on marking and lighting objects is landing helicopter's rotor wash can cause the pilot to contained in AC 70/7460-1, Obstruction Marking and lose sight of the intended landing point. Swirling snow Lighting. on takeoff can hide objects which need to be avoided. At least the TLOF, and as much of the FATO and the b. Security. Ground level general aviation safety area as practical, should be kept free of snow. heliports may require their operational areas to be Guidance on winter operations is found in AC fenced to prevent the inadvertent or unauthorized entry 150/5200-30,Airport Winter Safety and Operations. of persons or vehicles. Fences should be as low as possible and located as far as possible from the FATO. 37. ZONING AND COMPATIBLE LAND USE. Fences should not penetrate any approach/ takeoff or Where state statutes permit, the sponsor of a public use transitional surface. Access to airside areas should be general aviation heliport is encouraged to promote the through controlled and locked gates or doors displaying adoption of zoning measures to ensure that the heliport a cautionary sign similar to that illustrated in figure will continue to be available for public use as well as to 3-14. protect the community's investment in the facility. c. Rescue and Fire Fighting Services. Rescue and a. Zoning to Limit Building/Object Heights. fire fighting service requirements vary. Public use General guidance on drafting an ordinance which would utility heliports should meet (NFPA) Pamphlet 418, limit building and object heights is contained in AC Standards for Heliports, and (NFPA) Pamphlet 403, 150/5190-4, A Model Zoning Ordinance to Limit Aircraft Rescue Services,criteria. A fire hose cabinet or Height of Objects Around Airports. The ordinance extinguisher should be provided at each access gate and should substitute the heliport surfaces for the airport each fueling location. Fire hose cabinets, fire surfaces in the model ordinance. extinguishers, and other fire fighting equipment at elevated TLOFs should be located adjacent to,but below the level of the TLOF. 31 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A b. Zoning for Compatible Land Use. A zoning ordinance may be enacted, or an existinpc ordinance modified, to control the use of property within the heliports approach/takeoff path environment. The ordinance should restrict activities to those which are compatible with helicopter operations. • 32 I N O_11 J/ A _._ .t. k -. .. f!.!, _ APPROACH/TAKEOFF SuRFACE e wpm s Cx_, - -- - — • —__:„.---..C - a - •• —.� ..� .__ � J �� FATO ~ T . . APPROACH:TAREOFr SURFACEDdrif ' - _ y- • 1N.0R0UNn MAkxERS tr , .. ' - '- • - ' SAFETY AREA ' '` F1Fl.1CCJPTPR PAIUONC AREA • 2- n 0 W cg N W W a AA .,., E. 300 90 re.: o m I I 1 I 1 EXAMPLE: 80 FEET IS ADDED TO THE BASIC FATO LENGTH 5 POP A SITE ELEVATION OF 3,200 FEET. - e N _ x i PI .a 30 . d 100 ' ' C fri F H 2 o o A 0 . L I j 1 i ! . . . i i I I I r 0 Q p 1 2 a 4 b 6 .,4 SITE ELFNATIUN (1,000 FEET) 0 a N D \ \\. v •I I.•�)N FOR TAKEOFF 1K 5 d 'I'LOP " � OPPOSITR D1REctION- -..\ TA7CE-0Fr DIRECTION. --C-3. FATQ -4 r. �> u \ \kb. IFImimi.". N a E 1. RECOMMENDED FATO,PFLOF RELATIONSHIPS FOR A GENERAL AVIATION HELIPORT M C A-•FATO WIDTH t. 1.6 x OVERALL LENGTH . ff B--NATO LENGTH i 1$x OVERALL LENGTH PLUS ADDITION FROM FIGURE 3-2 C••TLOF LENGTH AND/OR WIDTH ' 1.0 x ROTOR DIAMETER D--DISTANCE FROM FATO EDGE TO CENTER OF TLOF 0.75 x OVERALL LENGTH F--SAFETY AREA 0.3,E ROTOR DIAMETER MINIMUM OF 20 FEET (6 m) a F--RECOMMENDED MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN n TU.-Ur EDGES DEVELOPED FOR o OPPOSITE DIRECTION OPERATIONS 1M X ROTOR DIAMETER Q w a 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A 71(� i------ - --- ----- —_ r ri. ! 4:7 4— •-- air,--...' ....,..,__„"t. F—T-urAnTS %r M1i � __-•- • ! Ijr. _ • .' '9' ems - - •_� 1 ``"/ 4 Final LIGHTS • �t tft f ' C .- _-= J mit I, ,_ "'�� • RAISED TIDY ' _ ., -s 4 , . ,. , - SF •17.6raJS.tf'E7YlvE7'16HEIl- r 'I7 _ �y �� . � �� z� :lid 't 4 I c.uwnxee .Ar,c an t l ` — WINDSOCK r r ''ca �� i t- r y Tyr ' _iH� 1 I I` ll + �1 ;1 Ewe 3-4. Raised' OF with a safety net 36 N a b 2:1 TRANSITIONAL $i7RFACF, SA!`ETY A� , Cii I Q PROTRCTIS7N ZONE AP PROAC H!TAKEO F F SURFACE I • I I La N 2:1 TRANSITIONAL SURFACE no FEET (85.3m) ___..j, OX LEVEL (3-FLOT)NTI 8 GK Op ttEopa.V_ 4;� -- -. _._.._ � FU � SURFACE 8,1 5LOFE �C}AGl��'rAPF 4:1 TRANSIT;ONAI.S1IRFACF. j _ may,, -f� 9f FEET tl0,b m) 4S' •.:�;{ ' FAT0 -=r I-0.- PRATECTTU? 2ONR .--'rt a n 8 0 N w a J AC 150/5390-2A (/20/94 • t'ry y ROTOR DIAMETER 20 FEET(8 2A .m) _ -II ROUTE WIDTH = ROTOR y _�' • MA-METER+2:REQ Q CLEARANCE ;itB INCII (40�...j HAIR ;it • TAXI KO UTE EDGE MARKERS 2 INCH (5 au-WIDE DAIL'DS YI LOWAtTAJE-YELUOW TAXI ROUTE WITHOUT A PAVED TAXIWAY • __l �-~.r- ~ter-•J �LJ aT&1T7' ADSOR INA.d 7AII0.AT 9IIL7fI1 EQTIAL 7'O-' � LL7R I:EIADEIlG1AaAG�WIDTH YL 04 W'-^rt.`GSM TAMWAY .J CnnISH rt Wan 10FEET ,I e) i1- TAXI Win wT01I. ROTOR DIAMETER-2:REVD CLEARANCE ..� . -r R TAXI ROUTE WITH PAVED TAXIWAY Fi2lue 34. Taxi mute sod tniwiy mrtings 38 1/20/94 AC I50/5390-2A 1.4 . .1 RkS~— (. i : -c` l }_ � eI1 4 I If Is 1 f 1 FF + j I II II I1 “att I rk" Fp - i I !1 f l 1 “ I � nW � �� r Cott t 4 - i ! 1 K$ Ii I z5K � ,! 1 1 DZ... ra` t r ova f-A tVs 222 5 Y.`]. i --S. P _ f _ _., — — - — — —/ 77/ .4 r f 1 ' 4 r. • ,. fr_te_ __,‘;1_ I S a= 1 A i j+ i II Z.. II d ' a . . i 22 , tlf s- i + ivic xE -R f Fine-43-7_ pule apma design 39 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 l li APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACE i 1 - J - ----- -- 1 ' iR.t]RGix111 i II:-GkOIIK0 PASO I CORNERED£MARKERS I _ �� 'p. .�MAEPER r a PAINTER mat E6{]Elt(,{RIiING TAX]ROUTE MARKER I I I I 1i k HELIPORT if"t,1ARKIN0 ! I T6 MINO U%RE; ('�J i f L!fI r I 4 WIND SOCK I I Ll 444 1 I -J i I I I I J SAFETY AREA �1 APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACE � Fims 34. Haapon with marker aad markings 40 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A ,\ I APPROACIIITAXEOFF SURFACE i I DASHED FATO LOUNAME:0 I i 1 S 0 C"'EDGE MARKING I r M.I TLC"' Ig TAY]ROUTE MAP.HER I U ' i l i EIES.]]'ORT'}3-HLI TArrx'AYun C lLLrE r 1 I I TAXIWAY EDGE HARKIXC lil ambit 9GCIL i L - i I I—_-- - - - -- ._<. _ ,I I r I SAFETY AREA I ::: : I I Figure 3-9- klclipmr w11Y surface markings' 41 a N 9 n V, 3, W ti II Q .. WIND SOCK RIZIOYED to -=r--- _ FAINTED 1f MARKSNCI L'Il iS'ED O[7'I _ __:- - WITH A.YELLOW'X." MARKN0 '' FATO 6IJoE MARKERS REMOI/F.E N O b a i 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A is / \ �� E a � 4\ § U I F- § 5 § n§� \ /[ 4 a 0 CIE ; § I( 4i |§ S2 . §| 3 ` '11 iti §\ rt §% , . -� . §- FL i , 1. § re a • ; \ ] Et h. \ /• • : 1 ° a • • • . \:)-. . /v \ • � 2 /: \ ' \ \ § k 9 22 42 ; _ ( § le i) . a { / . // § • ) % \ _ /� � L. . . •§ 7 , ! 64v ( _ : / § 3 Si � \ w k \ . \ . � � — , § — \ i �] §2 =lit_ bi Figure AL Lighting system for night operation 43 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 RRNtl SOCK �4 : :� :h' �y --'� --_ite �1 ; ! •Ct7 GliSF CEN7I_...... '!'/_►CLEARANCE tl UDE ,-"'t�I ,. .: ' PLANE GLl11P. - ` l0' h'• . . PATH L '-' _� JTY i L�IDICATOR CRITICA.L • r b0. TAt.�--- ovisg ur41T °341-12-11--",�g ,1N� 1'M]NDlum CLEARANCE �ygcTACG Cie- I 8 c tinCa �— p� ORIECT. b �c1—� Ydi a —J -- 1+VARIA Bi.F.-•^1 • Figure 1-12. Visual glide path indicator siwg and clearance criteria 44 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A 1/ 'I , f 1 ! 1 ekbil 1, , y f po f I ' 100 FEET(30m) :� WIND SOCK II : 1 - - I 5 I r ' APPROACH/TAKEOFFSURFACE LT 1;t--� �- �. ' �. �Y - - f - r l , ( i '100 FEET BO m] .i k ill• I rWriail i1 POLE LINE$HOIJLD -L__. .— - BE MARKED7LIC HIED • r 1,1 .c • ii OBSTRUCTION :I. _, 6 1 LIGHTS 0>` ki N W :S./ ; BUILDING I" ' , I Ts l 11 o . + c 1A V VIEW 1~ — L. CliffAltEOFFStt3tACF_, • APFI• — kin- - . --- SEE [I4 SET —.:-I d 1 �. IIEco1a11ENn THAT 5.0 YZJEES k OBJECTS PROFILE VIEW t • i/TI{ISAREA ALSO SE 1(ARB:EDMONTED Or tq4' 1�1 SI- 64 • ) „.." i20 FEET(Sm) 316 • -500 FEET(1150 m)- ti 1---- INSET NOT TO$GALE Figure 3-13. Racammnded area far wire narking milk,:lithtiag 45 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 ERT AROUND THE HELICOPTER • Sr APPROACH AND LEAVE THE HELL( )PTE R 1N A CROUCHED 34ASNF.R WHEN ROTORS ARE TURNING ALWAYS AVOID THIS BLIND AREA AS f�THE HELICOPTER PILOT CANT SEE YOU I _ THE PILOT CAN'T SEE YOU HERE EITHER DON'T EVEN GET CLOSE TO THE TAIL ROTOR 1 Rpm 3-14. Caution sip 46 0 o I "n- A M ILLUSTRATION PRESUMES THE ,04 9 1•IELICOP'I'ER ROTATES ABOUT a. v THE MAST IN ORDER TO EXIT o THE PARKING POSITION' q0 i p CLEARANCE LINO EA6F:D ON ARC OF TAIL ROTOR - �l � e. , 'Id CLEARANCE ARCS OF r -• •. ..• •x + CLEARANCE ARCS OF a,� D A M:MTPOSITION3 di'. P',.. ARC MINERATNE nY TAIL ROTOR.,.0 ^`` ADJACENT P031'ISONS �` MAYOVRRLAP t/ 1� 1 to '�`;MAY ETCR�P ! ? �1 \ i ` . \\ r t ! f \{ 1 ll fA (\ : � I //RADIUS Ov}Rnl.r.l,FNfF�r .1,^g Rfi'I't"IR OIApt {N' { r ' / { f ls 1i 1 ^e 1 'r PAR [NG CIR.CLR F1 x R TOR nIA41CTElu ,I PARKING CIRCLE Il x ROTA a U[AMRT ,RT �R IR ` J 14 P H 1 ZF. 1/ IIIr : v ,. . :r 1 1 1 Arc l / • _fie �/ RF.F,IONFQLNUiDCL]CARA)`CF Jf i AKIn EQIJ(PPDD 9E1JCOPTRRS 0 !f J '' :., III RCFPOR RUT ,�^'� �+ . NOT LESS EQTI IINLICBCCf3ni: a +"w 1 •�ti W1lL�EL k:QUll'PRU HLLICOPTT.R5 N. J titl'['LL"S4 THAN LD PERT[;i m:; w • a *.F7 E RRT1NdIIIMPf]t •-FiRR F!YK'1_N[s111SHF.1F" a�— —..... .-. .—.._eOSIG1' . -.. —.—_ C{.ATE WARN:Nl381C.Y -.--r M..4fr+. FEN FIAT! WARNING SIGN C9] O w N a 9 J 1/20/94 AC 15W5390-2A CHAPTER 4. TRANSPORT HELIPORTS 38. GENERAL. A transport-heliport is available for be in the direction of takeoff. Figure 4-3 depicts use by the general public without a requirement for recommended FATO lengths. prior approval of the owner or operator and is intended to accommodate air carrier operators providing c. Gradients. The turf portions of a FATO should scheduled service with large helicopters. When the be graded to remove surface irregularities and assure heliport is served by helicopters carrying more than 30 drainage. Longitudinal gradients should match those of passengers,the heliport operator is required to have an the paved touchdown and liftoff surface (TLOF). To FAA certificate issued under FAR Part 139, insure drainage, a shoulder with gradients ranging Certification and Operations: Land Airports Serving between 2 and 5 percent should exist along the TLOF Certain Air Carriers. Because of the need for all- edge. weather operating capability,public agencies planning a transport heliport are encouraged to select a site capable 40. SAFETY AREA. A safety area not less than 30 of accommodating precision instrument operations. foot (9 m) in width surrounds the FATO. The FATO This chapter contains standards and recommendations and the safety area must be free and clear of objects such for designing a transport heliport. Figure 4-1 illustrates as parked helicopters, buildings, fences, etc. which the essential features of a transport heliport. could be struck by the main or tail rotor, or catch the skids,of an arriving or departing helicopter. NOTE: If operations by tilt rotor aircraft are contemplated, criteria in AC 150/5390-3, Vertiport 41. TOUCHDOWN AND LIFT-OFF AREA Design is applicable. (TLOF). TLOFs are rectangular paved surfaces centered on the major axis of the FATO. For irregularly 39. FINAL APPROACH AND TAKEOFF AREA shaped or oversized FATOs, the center of the TLOF is (FATO). A transport heliport must have a FATO located at least the rotor diameter of the design which may contain one or more touchdown liftoff areas- helicopter in from the FATO boundaries. Figure 4-4 - locations within the FATO at which arriving illustrates this FATO/TLOF relationship. helicopters terminate the approach and from which departing helicopters takeoff. a. Size. The minimum dimension of a the TLOF shall not be less than the rotor diameter of the design a. Location. The FATO of a transport heliport is helicopter or 50 feet(15 m). normally at ground level but may be developed with the TLOF located on a pier, or when carefully planned, on b. Surface Characteristics. A Portland Cement the roof of a building. Figure 4-2 depicts a FATO Concrete (PCC) surface is recommended for ground extending over water. level heliports. An asphaltic surface is less desirable" for heliports as it may rut under the wheels or skids of a b. Size. FATOs are normally rectangles with the parked helicopter, a possible factor in some roll-over long axis aligned with the prevailing wind. FATO incidents. Pavements should have a broomed or other width is based on the rotor diameter of the design roughened finish that provides a skid resistant surface helicopter. FATO length is based on the elevation of for helicopters and non-slippery footing for persons. the heliport site above mean sea level. Pavements should be designed to support 1.5 times the maximum takeoff weight of the design helicopter. (1) FATO Width. The minimum width of a FATO should be at least 2 rotor diameters of the design c. Gradients. To assure drainage, the TLOF helicopter. A recommended FATO width of 100 feet should have a maximum longitudinal gradient of 0.5 (30 m) will accommodate the majority of large percent and a transverse gradient between 0.5 and 2.0 helicopters in the current fleet. percent. 42. APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACE. (2) FATO Length. The minimum a. Approach/Takeoff Path. A transport heliport recommended FATO length is 200 feet (60 m). For should have more than one approach/takeoff path. A heliports at elevations of 1,000 feet (300 m) or more path should be oriented to align with the direction of the above mean sea level, an elongated FATO as determined from figure 4-3 is recommended. The elongation should 49 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 predominant wind during visual conditions and, to the c. Surfaces. Unpaved portions of taxi routes should extent practicable, an other with the prevailing winds have a turf cover, or be treated in some manner, to during instrument conditions. Visual approkh/takeoff prevent dirt and debris from being raised by a taxiing paths may curve to avoid objects, noise sensitive areas, helicopter's rotor wash. Taxiways may have an and/or utilize the airspace above public lands e.g. asphaltic, Portland cement, or other stabilized surface. freeways,rivers,etc. Taxiway pavements should be capable of sustaining the maximum gross weight of the design helicopter under b. Approach/Takeoff Surface. An approach/ all weather conditions. takeoff surface is centered on each approach/takeoff path. The visual approach/takeoff surface conforms to d. Gradients. Taxiway longitudinal gradients the dimensions of the FAR Part 77 heliport approach should not exceed 2.0 percent. Transverse gradients surface. Figure 1-6 illustrates the heliport approach and should not be less than 0.5 percent nor greater than 2.0 transitional surfaces which must be free of hazards to percent air navigation. Paragraph 8 provides guidance on how to identify and mitigate hazards to air navigation. The 45. HELICOPTER PARKING. A transport heliport approach/takeoff surface centered on the path aligned should have a paved apron for parking helicopters. The with the prevailing winds during instrument conditions size of the apron depends upon the number of should comply with the obstacle evaluation surfaces helicopters to be accommodated. Separate aprons may criteria cited in chapters 7 and 8. be established for specific functions such as passenger boarding, maintenance, and parking of based and 43. PROTECTION ZONE. The protection zone is transient helicopters. Parking positions should be the property under lying the approach/takeoff surface designed to accommodate the range of helicopter sizes out to where the surface is 35 feet (10.5 m) above the expected at the facility. heliport elevation as illustrated in figure 4-5. The heliport proponent should own or control this property. a. Size. Parking position size is dependent upon The control should include the ability to clear the helicopter size and the intended paths in incompatible objects and to preclude activities that maneuvering in and out of the parking position. There contribute to the congregation of people. should be at least 1/3 rotor,but not less than 10 feet(3 m), of clearance between skid equipped helicopters and 44. TAXI ROUTES AND TAXIWAYS. A taxi route at least 10 feet (3 m) for wheel equipped helicopters to is both an object free right-of-way connecting the FATO another helicopter or object. Clearances are measured to a parking area/apron,and a maneuvering aisle on the from any part of a helicopter with the helicopter on the parking area/apron. Taxiways are paved surfaces, intended path. Tail rotor clearance may become the normally centered in a taxi route,used by helicopters in critical clearance when the helicopter turns 30 degree or ground maneuvering. The relationship between taxi more within a parking position. Figure 4-7 illustrates routes and paved taxiways is illustrated in figure 4-6. this design principle. a. Widths. b. Fueling. AC 150/5230-4,Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling, and Dispensing on Airports, contains (1) Taxi Routes. The width of a taxi route is guidance on fueling services. Systems for storing and determined by adding the clearance specified in "b" dispensing fuel must conform to federal,state,and local below to the maximum rotor diameter of the helicopter requirements for petroleum handling facilities. that will hover or ground taxi. Guidance is found in AC 150/5230-4, Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling, and Dispensing on Airports, and (2) Taxiways. The width of paved taxiway appropriate National Fire Protection Association should be at least twice the undercarriage width of the (NFPA) publications. Fueling locations should be design helicopter. designed and marked to minimize the potential for helicopters to collide with the dispensing equipment. b. Clearances. Taxi routes and taxiways should The area should be lighted if night fueling operations provide the design helicopter with 20 feet(6 m)of rotor are contemplated. tip clearance for hover taxiing and 10 feet (3 m) clearance for ground taxiing. c. Additional Apron. Additional area may be required adjacent to hangars used by private helicopter owners and for hangars and other structures used by fixed base operators. 50 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A d. Tie Downs. Recessed tie downs may be installed to accommodate extended or Lover night parking of based markers that are not more than 8 inches (20 cm) in or transient helicopters. Guidance on recessed tie height nor less than 4 inches (10 cm) in diameter. downs recommended for extended or overnight parking Taxiway centerlines and edges are marked with lines. is found in AC 20-35,Tiedown Sense. The centerline is a continuous 6 inch (15 cm) wide yellow line. The edges are defined with two continuous 46. HELIPORT MARKERS AND MARKINGS. 6 inch (15 cm) wide yellow lines spaced 6 inches (15 Markers and/or surface markings identify the facility as cm) apart Figure 4-6 illustrates taxi route and taxiway a heliport, the perimeter of the FATO and TLOF, any centerline and edge markings. taxi route, taxiway, and/or parking positions. Surface markings/lines may be paint or preformed material. e. Apron Markings. In addition to the taxiway Heliport FATOs and TLOFs are defined with in-ground and parking position markings, the yellow (double) markers and/or white lines. Taxi routes are defined taxiway edge lines continue around the apron to define with raised edge markers. Taxiways and aprons are the apron edge. Figure 4-7 illustrates apron markings. defined with yellow lines/markings. Lines/markings may be outlined with a 6 inch(15 cm) wide stripe of a 1. Parking Position Markings. The yellow contrasting color to enhance conspicuity. taxiway centerline continues into the individual parking positions to define the centerline of the parking a. Perimeter Markings. The perimeter of the positions. A parking position is further identified by a FATO and/or TLOF should be defined with markers 12 inch(30 cm)wide yellow line defining a circle. The and/or lines. Figure 4-8 illustrates a heliport with in- diameter of the circle is equal to the rotor diameter of ground markers and surface markings while figure 4-9 the largest helicopter the position is designed to illustrates a heliport with surface markings. accommodate. The spacing between circles,and a circle and an object depends upon how much the helicopter (1) Unpaved FATOs. The perimeter of an must turn to exit the position. Refer to paragraph 45.a. unpaved FATO is defined with in-ground markers, approximately I foot by 5 foot(30 cm by 1.5 m)located 47. HELIPORT LIGHTING. For night operations, at the corners and along the FATO edges. the TLOF and taxiways (or taxi routes) need to be lighted. Yellow lights define the limits of the TLOF. (2) Paved FATOs. A I foot (30 cm) wide Green lights define taxi route and taxiway centerlines. dashed white line defines the FATO perimeter. The Alternatively,blue lights may be used to define taxiway segments and separation between segments should be and taxi mute edges. Figure 4-11 illustrates these even. The corners must be defined and the edge lighting systems. AC 150/5340-19,Taxiway Centerline segments should be approximately 5 feet (1.5 m) in Lighting System, AC 150/5340-24, Runway and length. Taxiway Edge Lighting System, and AC 150/5345-46, Specification for Runway and Taxiway Light Fixtures, (3) TLOFs. A continuous 12 inch(30 cm)wide contain technical guidance on lighting equipment and solid white line defines the perimeter of a paved or a installation details. hard surfaced TLOF. a. Perimeter Lights. A minimum of 5 lights are b. Identification Marking. Transport heliports are recommended per side or end of the TLOF. A light is identified by the white capital letter H centered on the located at each corner with additional lights uniformly TLOF as illustrated in figures 4-8 and 4-9. The H is spaced between the corner lights with a maximum oriented on the axis of the dominate approach/takeoff interval of 25 feet (7.5 m)between lights. Flush lights path. Appendix 2 contains dimension may be located on,or within 1 foot(3 cm)of,the TLOF recommendations. edge. Raised light fixtures,modified to be no more than 8 inches(20 cm)in height,may be located 10 feet(3 m) c. Closed Heliport. All markings of a permanently out from the TLOF edge and should not penetrate a closed heliport, FATO, or TLOF should be obliterated. horizontal plane at the TLOFs elevation by more than 2 If it is impracticable to obliterate markings,a yellow X, inches(5 cm). as illustrated in figure 4-10, should be placed over the H. The yellow X must be large enough to ensure early b. Landing Direction Lights. An optional feature, pilot recognition that the heliport is closed. landing direction lights,is a configuration of five L-861 lights fitted with omni-directional yellow lenses. The d. Taxi Routes and Taxiway Markings. Taxi lights are spaced at 15 foot(4.5 m) intervals beginning mute edges are defined with yellow-blue-yellow raised at the line of perimeter lights and extending 51 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 outward in the direction of the preferred path at a distance that brings the helicopter to a hover 3 approach/takeoff path as illustrated in figure 4-11. to 8 foot (0.9 to 2.5 m) above the TLOF. Figure 4-12 illustrates visual glide path indicator clearance criteria. c. Taxiways. Taxiway centerlines are de£med with AC 150/5345-28, Precision Approach Path Indicator flush bi-directional or unidirectional green lights. (PAM) Systems, and AC 150/5345-52, Generic Visual Alternatively, taxiway edges may be marked with blue Glideslope Indicators (GVGI), provide additional taxiway edge lights. Lights are spaced at 50 feet(15 m) information. intervals on straight sections and at 25 feet (7.5 m) intervals on curved sections with a minimum of four 50. TERMINAL FACILITIES. The heliport terminal lights needed to define the curve. Green retro-reflective requires curb side access for passengers using private markers meeting requirements for Type 11 markers in autos, taxicabs, and public transit vehicles. Public AC 150/5345-39, FAA Specification L-853, Runway waiting areas need the usual amenities and a counter for and Taxiway Centerline Retro-reflective Markers, may rental car services may be desirable. Passenger auto be used in lieu of the centerline lighting fixtures. Blue parking areas should accommodate current retro- reflective markers may be used in lieu of edge requirements and have the capability of being expanded lights. to meet future requirements. Readily available public transportation may reduce the requirement for d. Heliport Identification Beacon. A heliport employees and service personnel auto parking spaces. identification beacon is recommended to aid in locating The heliport terminal building or sheltered waiting area the heliport The beacon,flashing white/green/yellow at should be attractive and functional. AC 150/5360-9, the rate of 30 to 45 flashes per minute,should be located Planning and Design of Airport Terminal Facilities at on or close to the heliport. Guidance on heliport Non-Hub Locations, contains guidance on designing beacons is found in AC 150/5345-12, Specification for terminal facilities. Airport and Heliport Beacon. 51. SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS. The following e. Floodlights. Floodlights may be used to safety related features should be provided on an as illuminate the apron area. Care should be taken to place needed basis. floodlights clear of the safety area,the approach/takeoff surface(s), and the heliport transitional surfaces and not a. Wire Marking And Lighting. Unmarked interfere with pilot vision. electric and telephone wires in the heliports immediate area may be difficult to see. It is recommended that, 48. WIND DIRECTION INDICATOR. A wind sock where practical, wires located within 500 feet (150 m) conforming to AC 150/5345-27, Specification for Wind of the FATO, as well as those within 1/2 mile (1 km) Cone Assemblies,is recommended to show the direction that are beneath and up to 100 feet(30 m)to the side of and magnitude of the wind. Wind socks must be lighted an approach/takeoff path be marked to make them more for night operations. The wind sock should be placed conspicuous. Figure 4-13, illustrates the area of where it provides a true indication of surface wind and concern. Guidance on marking and lighting objects is is clear of the safety area, the approach/takeoff contained in AC 70/7460-1, Obstruction Marking and surface(s), and the heliport transitional surfaces. The Lighting. wind sock should provide the best possible color contrast to its background. When the heliport is large b. Security. Ground level heliports may require or located among buildings, wind direction and speed their operational areas to be fenced to prevent the may differ significantly from one part of the heliport to inadvertent or unauthorized entry of persons or vehicles. another and multiple wind socks may be necessary. Fences should be as low as possible and located as far as possible from the FATO. Fences should not penetrate 49. VISUAL GLIDE PATH INDICATORS. A visual any approach/takeoff or transitional surface. Access to glide path indicator, such as Heliport Approach Path air side areas should be through controlled and locked Indicator (HAP1), Visual Approach Slope indicator gates or doors. Gates and doors should display a (VAST), or Precision Approach Path indicator (PAPI), cautionary sign similar to that illustrated in figure 4-14. provides pilots with visual course and descent cues. The lowest on course visual signal must provide a minimum c. Rescue and Fire Fighting Services. Rescue and of 1 degree of clearance over any object in the approach fire fighting service requirements vary. Public use path that lies within 10 degrees of the approach course utility heliports should meet (NFPA) Pamphlet 418, centerline. The optimum location of a visual glide path Standards for Heliports, or (NFPA) Pamphlet 403, indicator is on the extended centerline of the approach Aircraft Rescue Services,criteria. A fie hose cabinet or 52 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A extinguisher should be provided at each access gate and g. Winter Operations. Swirling snow raised by a each fueling location. landing helicopter's rotor wash can cause the pilot to loose sight of the intended landing point. Swirling d. Equipment/Object Marking. Heliport snow on takeoff can hide objects which need to be maintenance and servicing equipment as well as other avoided. The FATO and the safety area should be kept objects used in airside operational areas should be made free of snow. Guidance on winter operations is found in conspicuous with reflective tape, paint, or other AC 150/5200-30,Airport Winter Safety and Operations. markings. Particular attention should be given to marking objects that are hard to see in marginal 52. ZONING AND COMPATIBLE LAND USE. visibility such as at night,in mist,or fog. Where state statutes permit,a transport heliport sponsor is encouraged to develop and adopt the following zoning e. Passenger Walkways. Passenger movement in measures to ensure that the heliport will continue to be operational areas should be restricted to marked available for public use as well as to protect the walkways. Figure 4-15 illustrates one marking scheme. community's investment in the facility. Apron pavements should be designed so that spilled fuel does not drain onto passenger walkways or toward a. Zoning to Limit Building/Object Heights. parked helicopters. General guidance on drafting an ordinance which would limit building and object heights is contained in AC f. Communication and Weather Information. A 150/5190-4, A Model Zoning Ordinance to Limit UNICOM radio may be used to provide arriving Height of Objects Around Airports. The locally helicopters with heliport and traffic advisory developed ordinance should substitute the heliport information but may not be used to control air traffic. surfaces for the airport surfaces described in model The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ordinance. should be contacted for information on UNICOM licensing. An AWOS measures and automatically b. Zoning for Compatible Land Use. A zoning broadcasts current weather conditions at the heliport ordinance may be enacted, or an existing ordinance site. When an AWOS is installed, it should be located modified, to control die use of property within the at least 100 feet(30 m)and not more than 700 feet(215 heliports approach/takeoff path environment. The m) from the edge of the TLOF. Locate the AWOS to ordinance should restrict activities to those which are avoid heliport surfaces subject to rotor wash from compatible with helicopter operations. helicopter operations. Guidance on AWOS systems is found in AC 150/5220-16, Automated Weather Observing Systems (AWOS) for Non- Federal Applications. 53 a y C U t., W O N 1. �7 '711 a ��Alan _�,y�GL"- �..i _may .. tizczonj P APPROACH,/ m� 'n''14� TAKEOFF SLRFAOA �-"� r' .+r � _ ..� PANFttN6 AP&ON ��,� „ LIo=n Tiny snr.K c 1 R TAN C]1.AR TTor ---74.7.: .•1, I.:• . . IN•ORpUND PA'R7 WANER t 1 AND MGT.MAnteft4 c _• t T. I- 1 nzuroIIT ittsgmURSLNT minim srerebt • • • ' • •r APPROACIPTAI{EOFF SURFACE N O zai a S aPO i TI . tflnn_ Gagnale2lEgrallelaffel- _- _.�_rr�-4 ONSROREPARKINGAPRON I �---1 - o ~~ • "�� I �� i ' I I ;` � 1 `�PIKR AJttu'AY`-''-�� /�. II` 'ri;SAFETY AREA t•' t J , ��' EXTENDS BEYOND PIER �'r- y ---• FATO r .. f ,----d---41 � ~F1AFE7PARFA ---4- rd _� EXTENDS BEYONDP1ER." -�:"IlprQ� _ �r `- • U, 0 LA w c O N n 0 w 500 , r' ,WO - EXAMPLE: A HELIPORT SITE AT 3,600 FEET MSL WOULD HAVE A RECOMMENDLU FATO LENGTH OF 290 FEET. 400 ! - I 120 I .. _ • ,. . . ., . . w td 500 i I 90 M oal • E4 200 1 1 l . '' 60 w f I .-I- --4_..k... ; • fif Q a ; . I I I i ! I + ; . I I ; ; ; I . i 9 -a l 1 t 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Et,FVATTON (1,000 FEET) N O b a 1 A X54` D-�', - F �1/4\'.. 1�1 � D , I 1 `' ,• •,•'.TL07 i"OR TA MOTTO::\\\\\\H‘ A —TWF C �- O?NAM DI I`L rION :" 1 • \ TAKE-OFFDIRECI'ION ‘` • T1.. FATQ -- , 'y\ \ ‘Sfer" "-Cil••-ls\1 E SAFETY AREA I M RECOMMEEDET) FATO/TLOF RELATIONSHIPS I 'a. FOR A TRANSPORT HELIPORT I 0 A•-FATO WIDTH. 2 x ROTOR DIAMETERS. . S 100 FEET (30 m) RECOMMENDED MINIMUM. S 8--FATO LENGTH. OBTAIN FROM FIGURE 4-3. C--TLOF LENGTH AND/OR WIDTH. i ROTOR DIAMETER. 50 FEET (15 m) RECOMMENDED MINIMUM WIDTH. LENGTHENED TT.OF ENCOURAGED. D--DISTANCE FROM PATO ENT)/EDGE TO TLOF CENTRR. 1 ROTOR DIAMETER • 50 FEET (15 m) RECOMMENDED MINIMUM. E--SAFETY AREA. n 30 FEET (Hm) RECOMMENNED MINIMUM WIDTH. F--MINIMUM DIS'iANOE BETWEEN SEPAI1ATE TLOF EDGES I c FOR OPPOSITE DIRECTION OPERATIONS. 1 ROTOR DIAMETER RECOMMENDED. c N J AC 15W5390-2A I/20/94 IN t%.= E V1 c- 0 O 65 1 Li•4 t b. d 0 I P I le Z N 2 C k 4 O C - ICa. C2 3 F 6 4. fIw x 0. I a. ,r e 1 N mi t 1 C l I IR v a iI .2 ic .__c_... A j — j o , r c O f i i r u rr iI I r ] z N I iIg sk i r p 1 N I e I I Id I , I I I I I I r 1 i I I I 1..— _—__ I --- — -- I 1 Z q Figxr 4-5. Psoax.tion zone 58 0 a 1 f 1.9- TAX]WAY W[UTH k:QUA[.T(] - - - ., _ 2 x UNDL+H CARRIAGE WIDTH YrI W CEN1'R12i1NE .4TR[PI �,i0P,F,2' f3 no P — _ Yk LI UIY IIUUBI,F.LINt1 F. R 9CRIPkB ^4Q�"$ tOr�l M , I , At 8 INCH (20 um)HIGH TAXI �+--_eof•'ERT (3 rn]S4 '„Hew e ,. 0 . ROUTE EDGE MARKERS WITH '.1. tP S iG t� i INCE (6 cm) WIDP RAN0S { ,tp- ta rOF YSLLUW-BLUE•YELLGW 1 / SO i NOTE: CONSIDER ALL HELICOPTERS TO UROUNU TAXI WITH A PAVED TAXIWAY HAVING A MARKED AND LIGHTED CENTERLINE RAISED TAXI ROUTE EDGE MARKERS ARE OPTIONAL WHEN BOTH THE TAXIWAY CENTERLINE AND mats ARE MARKED a n a 0 u• w o Ill N a AC 150/5390-2A + } ° { / . it , \ , \ ' + , . . \ ' / I /' I > �\ \ / / LL, ~ ] . ...../ / 7\ ; ^} / Z Eji. % 1 r.. J - | . 1 / ' \r. 7 % � 1 |\ 2 l • _ ' - f \ ' . , : c \ � K : /` \ . + l - \ ? / -Z r\ - \\ / � f ! i \ \ - ( ia / }. b ; . . \ t )kf � ! ) § • . m - i | r a Q kk ; | (E kl C 1 FQE Vi \ott / §§{ �) C o * \f§ o■ §f( A @ % ° , Firat 4-7. A_port It-Lipari apt-CC 60 N O A fi.l PL Ii VI y 31 c 7° _ �+�� yam-•., ' GIyLIPORT iP MARKIH ___ ,~� I 1� AP9FlOA CIIiThStEI?FF EiliM1RAS:� �•�'" - • "'6,,1/4 fN-G ROUNB FATC? iv,CORN81t.ISM:F;MAIIICE RS fl .. 9 C 0 O N 9 a rn C N C Q H W r•Y. ;i �I i1 i• fTVA.C 411.: C-76-1----.7---7 � iiii J1(' • M� � n.-� � ' : J : +� 1Y til�T,7t 1�� I P --Clutch r j�.lf �tlti ..ytta:A E+' � :1•++tiy PARlG N4 TOWTION MARKINsiti — — _._ • - 71D'+Tl..Marla' r : =�- 'BE TSQ_UME 4.79i watacivAv G 5 _ t WINf1AC.:K • - 3 S ��` y�~'` - + YF.1,lF7'N '1'•ixT�1Y[:F:fITF:liL1NF i 54'HiTi:'tl" YT.LWW'1'A%1�'AY t:L GE LANE WHITE T6 OF CAC E I.1\L'--� ti ` tin t • O VD A 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A 1 . I n C ACi, r.. i , i i '. t � fr2 .: -mot '� •• ► t 1 . ..y w t. :1 7,' '► A1 k x I / A f 1 1 `` G VA SVI �' ILI t 1 , / RI: Z v r a, /titort ., t t• illti. i t i 4 t 1 t I) Figur 4-10. Marinag a cloud heliport 63 a ON a O Q w N --- 4)--..�+,�'S[T•a'�I.i: iA•. •.lc.:. .i+',lis:i. .}�»,wu,.,.ilF.:,V1, ,1 1�,._ IIGHTLD WIND FOCI( J 1 ',Amu:co DIRK!.TI0N LIMIT. y3 ' r . !OPTIONAL FEATURE VhR 01-tER�TION _ ION I. n / OMDTI-DTAF.CTiONAL TLU! EDGE LICiire ; • o CUttEN IN•PAVE.MENT l ,�• TAKTWAY CENTERLINE LIGHTS • O b A N O 0 A 17 l WIND 5OCR p----r-7 � r 1 i�,--r r 1) F� is ossTAct,F: ° ' mil T -. i t —I :[cc}j 'F CENTRRL]NE • ,r., C:LEARANCF. It. (I IJI OE PATH I - - _,_.� lift iiN�, �qj {f)pl) .Mr {j 3F— /,- e` i ,� CRITICAL, PLANE ± 1 'I I, di. : _-- OBJECT I �pottsc 9SGNnL . . . _ _.• . . -_ . . a. nr ON t' M[N0 UM �.•1,F::1Ravrt: [AWLtt uttS r - . �_ _ -� _ _ - - -O1iii+l,(_LF. CS.FAR_ANLR REPF.Itli.NCF LINE. :oaintcr 2:14 i..F VAIt1ABLE-.4 n 0 In w O Q N AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 E ± 7- I-, A13" •••• .1 e. — — — — --- A— . — — _ `� Icy FEETi3S:n1 I— . I Or I :/.. t4 APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACE. "�'� - '140?[ET ;30 m) i 1 r :� 7 !'+aj f c I r POLE LINE SHOULD ; — I. BE MARKED/LIGHTED If DAsTR£•CT1D1 r / LIGHTS ON µ.! F i t • i ///' BUILDING . o I. t 1 p ` RECXk6L END THAT r r r WIRES& OBJECTS i I .44 ' THIS AREA ALSn AF : p. '. MARKED:LIGHTE.D C-42.-"" PLAN VIEW . a� a 2,5:1 -a k a, :T_.,J (7d nl la.-999 FEE?Clio n')—, I INSET NOT TO SCALE yCaf 4CE _ PROFILE VIEW spz nor gg,ae 4-13. Reaors)aoded arra for wire mattlam and/or lighnng 66 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A DE ALERT • AROUND THE HELICOPTER f I � a `l-1� APPROACH AND LEAVE THE HELICOPTER IN A CRLY ICH ED MANNER WHEN ROTORS ARE TURNING ALWAYS AVOID THIS BLIND AREA AS THE HELICOPTER PILOT CAN'T SEE YO4.__J-L=40.\\ THE PILOT CAN'T&E YOU HERE EITHERDON'T EVEN GET CLOSE TO THE. • TAIL ROTOR i Figure 4-14. Cation lir 67 Go n e O, V. U 7. I1.LUST101'10N PRFSI AIVS THE a o I1F;I.IC'.QPTEl! ROTATES ABOUT el p V THE MAST IN 0RDEK TO EXIT a `I'IIE PARKING POSITION a cm `Y . CLEARANCE. LINE ISASISI]ON ARC OP TAIL.inv.)R o _t re ~ CLEARANCE ARCS or w .- ( st -- w. - w. Ct.RA RANGE ARCS (II' ,a All1A p0Nl'PCk117IUN3 ,,.". '. AK:f;t(NBItAI'►'Cl PY TAIL It4:'1"U1c_. \ A11,1 AC ENT Pe 1 fl')145.1 MAY OVPIHSiAI' t' 'F r I' ' . 61.1Y lPh:Irr.A1'o • E 1 ! , Ai �. ' J .. - RADIUS VEICA LI, LBNUTli-:f2 Ronne rn 1 PAR INC]CIRCLE,Cl .tiftl'C.R• LTI.11•IE '8IC p I'.ATtkINCI O111C'LY.r] x RU'TUR 1llAMI.:TERI I g I I ' • el ) 1 $nrixel. i ai V .. ) �. ill% .r ill.+` i '1 '�"'�— RE;COMHRNORII c1.PARANL'l.5: , '-ca _..se l i +'„wr �. .SR IU YWUIIVED ISELICUI,'•EiLS / ` U ~ +-.. NOT Lr-SR THAN HI FEET :0 m] iS +- • '• . z' W]IESI.ECSI1rPPRT] 1I1c.I.ICLIPTEIO• ' n l NOT LESS iMAN 10 FCET:8 iul a �'� f flKE E7ITIAC:UL7IIP.R •-PIRC RKTINRUIRI[C:R I'1;Nf1e • GATE WAKNINf)S]GTN (MAT!. War.N:Nr 'tom rile!: N O b A • • 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A CHAPTER 5. HOSPITAL HELIPORTS 53. GENERAL. Helicopters have proven to be an 56. TOUCHDOWN AND LIFT-OFF AREA effective means of transporting injured persons from (TLOF). A paved TLOF is not required. When a the scene of an accident to a hospital, and in paved or other hard surfaced TLOF is provided, it is transferring patients in critical need of specialized normally centered in the FATO. Irregularly shaped or services to another hospital having that capability. A oversized FATOs should have the center of the TLOF fully functional hospital heliport may be as simple as a located at least 3/4 of the design helicopter's overall cleared area on the lawn together with a wind indicator length in from the FATO boundaries. Hard surface (wind sock)and a clear approach/takeoff path. To the TLOFs are recommended to provide an all-weather extent feasible, the approach/takeoff path should be wearing surface for the helicopter and a firm working aligned with the dominate winds. This chapter surface for hospital personnel and the wheeled contains recommendations for hospitals to use in equipment used in moving patients. designing a heliport to accommodate air ambulance operations and emergency medical service personnel a. Size. The recommended minimum dimension and equipment. Figure 5-1 illustrates the essential of the TLOF is 40 feet(12 m). features of a hospital heliport. b. Surface Characteristics. Paved TLOF 54. FINAL APPROACH AND TAKEOFF AREA surfaces should have a roughened finish that will (FATO). A hospital heliport must have at least one provide a skid resistant surface for helicopters and non- FATO. slippery footing for hospital personnel. The TLOF should be constructed to support the 1.5 times the a. Location. The FATO may be at ground or roof weight of the design helicopter. top level. Objects or structures should be outside of the FATO to permit at least one clear approach/ takeoff c. Gradients. The recommended gradients for a path aligned with the prevailing winds. To avoid or TLOF range from a minimum of 0.5 percent to a minimize the need for additional ground transport,the maximum of 2.0 percent. FATO should be located to have ready access to the hospital's emergency room. Portions of the FATO of 57. ROOF TOP HELIPORTS. Roof top heliport rooftop heliports may extend into the clear airspace TLOFs may be constructed of wood,metal,or concrete. beyond the buildings edge. Elevator penthouses, cooling towers, exhaust/fresh air vents, and other raised features impact roof top b. Size. The recommended minimum dimension helicopter operations. To the extent practical, the of a hospital FATO is 1.5 times the overall length of TLOF of a roof top heliport should be elevated above the design helicopter. the level of any obstacle in the FATO. Other objects or structures should be outside the FATO to permit at c. Gradients. Gradients may range from 0.5 least one clear approach/takeoff path aligned with the percent to 2.0 percent for any area on which the prevailing winds. Figure 5-2 illustrates this helicopter is expected to land. Drainage should be recommendation. Elevated platforms should be directed away from hospital buildings and areas designed to support 1.5 times the maximum takeoff occupied by people. weight of the design helicopter. When the TLOF is on a platform elevated more than 30.inches(75 cm)above 55. SAFETY AREA. A safety area having a width its surroundings, a 5 foot (1.5 m) wide safety net or equal to 1/3 the rotor diameter of the design helicopter, shelf should be provided. The safety net or shelf but not less than 10 feet(3 m), surrounds the FATO. should have a load carrying capability of 25 pounds per The FATO and the safety area should be free and clear square foot (122 Kg per sq. m). The net or shelf, as of objects such as light poles, buildings, trees, and illustrated in figure 5-3,should not project more than 2 parked autos which could be struck by the helicopter's inches (5 m) above the level of the TLOF. A report, main or tail rotor,or catch the skids,of an arriving or Structural Design Guidelines for Heliports, (Report departing helicopter. Number AD-A148967) is available from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. 69 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 58. APPROACH/TAKEOFF SURFACE. segments should be approximately 5 feet (1.5 m) in length. A 12 inch(30 cm)wide white line defines the a. Approach/Takeoff Path. A hospital heliport perimeter of a TLOF. These lines are illustrated in must have a at least one approach/takeoff path. This figure 5-4. path,to the extent practical,should be aligned with the dominate winds. Two approach/takeoff paths,oriented b. Identification Marking. A hospital heliport is to be 90 to 180 degrees apart,will minimize the times identified by a red capital letter H centered on a white when the helicopter would have to land or takeoff with cross. The recommended maximum dimensions of the a crosswind or tailwind. Approach/takeoff paths may cross is 30 feet(9 m)by 30 feet(9 m) as illustrated in curve to avoid objects and/or noise sensitive areas and figure 5-4 and more filly described in appendix 2. The utilize the airspace above public lands e.g. freeways, red H is centered in the cross with the H oriented to rivers,etc. align with the preferred direction of approach. To enhance the cross symbol conspicuity in areas subject b. Approach/Takeoff Surface. An approach/ to snow,the pavement between the cross and the white takeoff surface is centered on each approach/takeoff TLOF perimeter line may be solid red. path and should conform to the dimensions of the FAR Part 77 heliport approach surface. Figure 1-6 c. Closed Heliport. All markings of a illustrates the heliport approach surface which should permanently closed hospital heliport should be be free of object penetrations. obliterated. If obliteration is impractical, a yellow X, as illustrated in figure 5-5, should be placed over the c. Approach Protection. It is recommended that existing markings. The X must be large enough to as much of the approach/takeoff surface as ensure early pilot recognition. circumstances permit overlay hospital property. 61. HELIPORT LIGHTING. Because ambient 59. HELICOPTER PARKING. A separate lighting is usually inadequate,the landing area and the helicopter parking area is required at heliports that will wind indicator (sock) should be lighted for night accommodate more than one helicopter at a time. operations. Helicopter parking areas should not lie under an approach/takeoff surface. a. Perimeter Lights. At least 3 uniformly spaced lights are recommended per side of a square or 60. HELIPORT MARKERS AND MARKINGS. rectangular FATO or TLOF with a light located at Markers and/or surface markings are recommended to each corner. A minimum of eight lights are needed to define the perimeters of the FATO and TLOF surfaces define a circular FATO or TLOF. The interval and to identify the facility as a hospital heliport. between lights should not exceed 25 feet(7.5 m). Surface markings may be paint or preformed material. (1) FATOs. Flush lights may be located on,or a. Perimeter Markings. The perimeter of the within I foot(30 cm)of,the FATO edge. Raised light FATO and/or the TLOF should be defined with in- fixtures,modified to be no more than 8 inches(20 cm) ground markers and/or surface markings. When the in height,should be located 10 feet(3 m)out from the TLOF edges are obvious, such as a paved TLOF in a edge of the FATO. turf FATO,perimeter markings may not be required. (2) TLOFs. Flush lights may be located on,or (1) Unpaved Surfaces. The perimeter of an within 1 foot(30 cm)of,the TLOF edge. Raised light turf FATO should be identified with in-ground markers fixtures,modified to be no more than 8 inches(20 cm) that will not catch helicopter skids or create barriers to in height, may be located 10 feet (3 m) out from the helicopter maneuvering. If raised markers are used, TLOF edge and should not penetrate a horizontal plane they should be located at the outer edges of the safety at the TLOF's elevation by more than 2 inches(5 cm). area and be no more than 8 inches(20 cm)in height. Figure 5-6 illustrates hospital heliport lighting. Markers are placed at the corners and as needed along the edges of the FATO. Figure 5-4 illustrates different (3) Raked TLOFs. Flush lights may be placed types of in-ground and raised markers. within 1 foot (30 cm) of the edge of a raised TLOF. Raised fixtures are illustrated in figure 5-7. In snow (2) Paved Surfaces. A 12 inch (30 cm) wide areas,it is suggested that the lights be placed along the dashed white line defines the FATO perimeter. The outer edge of the safety net or shelf. segments and separation between segments should be even. The corners must be defined and the edge 70 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A b. Floodlights. Floodlights may be used to illuminate 62. WIND DIRECTION INDICATOR. A hospital the heliport. To eliminate the need for tall poles,these heliport must have at least one wind indicator. A wind floodlights may be mounted off an adjacent building. sock is the preferred indicator as it shows both the Care should be taken, however, to place floodlights direction and magnitude of the wind. The wind sock clear of the safety area,the approach/takeoff surface(s), should be placed where it provides a true indication of and the heliport transitional surfaces. Floodlights surface wind and clear of the safety area and the should be aimed down and provide a minimum of 3 approach/takeoff surface(s). The wind sock may be foot candles (32 lux) of illumination over the heliport internally or externally lighted for night operations,or, surface. Floodlights which might interfere with pilot alternatively be located in an illuminated area. vision during takeoff and landings must be capable of being turned off during landings and takeoffs. 63. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGERS(MRl). Hospital equipment,such as an MRI used in diagnostic c. Heliport Beacon. A beacon may not be work,can create a strong magnetic field which will necessary when the location of the hospital can be cause temporary aberrations in the helicopter's readily determined by the lighting on a prominent magnetic compass and may interfere with other building or landmark near the heliport. When a navigational systems. Heliport proponents should be beacon is provided, it should be located on the highest alert to the location of any Magnetic Resonance point on the roof of the hospital. Beacons should Imagers(MRl)with respect to the heliports location. conform to AC 150/5345-12, Specification for Airport A warning sign alerting pilots to the presence of an and Heliport Beacon. MRI is recommended. Verbal warning that the MRI is operating should be given in radio contacts with an d. Wire Marking. Where practical, it is approaching EMS helicopter. recommended that unshielded electric and telephone wires located within 500 feet(150 m)of the FATO,as well as those within 1/2 mile (1 km) that are beneath and up to 100 feet (30 m) to the side of an approach/takeoff path be marked to make them more conspicuous. Figure 5-8, illustrates the area that should be considered for marking and/or lighting. Guidance on marking and lighting objects is contained in AC 70/7460-1,Obstruction Marking and Lighting. 71 a n J N 0 O w w N a Irim cil a liPpril✓..il I L , CLEAR APPROACH/ .111:, WIND rNDVCA•IVR TAI{COFF SURPACE ``-:.• - \- ' - 1 1...,.;.II �1- - -....... -at..az..t, .. .i • CLEAII ARIIA (NATO) f :'..«nu At 4.a- = -_ ..n. • • - IN-AROUND CORNER!.EO . ,--.,-). ' MARKT:WI ARE ENCOURAGE!)• MLA:. ^.% - N • b a 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A a: rI r — .:' �_ J- S_FATO LIMITS ill: I / 441.: - 47 r- MOP' LIVIT:R; q : ir.,� `l d _/ f I • O / REAHONA WHITE CROSS' 7 it 1 ' f ` ! AOcF1TriC.lt.�RK.r_aG ismil ,/ `�-� a/ AN' IY —.z. . 6 w qi 11 SAFETY AREA / t /i 6. ii fir° " '!"...f.; IP •F� I!. ;RRRIll I. I A Fierce 5-2. A roof top hospital heliport 73 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 �.. / • r� s. • • ' ' / it/ . • s:. .- „,:?;:f-,- . .FE75 NEi`SIl. .� �. .. . ... . > ', e RAMP :].s.:. i GLT9'F.R ! • aiRL79 NET5tiEL G,w,,...� turn NC:Mar REttital Sf i CAUTION HELICOPTER LANDING ARE/ L . .. _ . . MORE THAN.%SWIMS(TB ems: AL7NORILED PERSONNEL ONLY . [itFirm S-3. Elevated MOP sad safety on 74 • 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Y: x let =.:L- s1 r . \' .L f ^1 J }1� -.-;,11 't-::.%%•. z 'f s 'i i I rt♦. ./ �� •C I t Ii- - y • / V . 1 1 'c. ^J �� 1 . " ,!j 7o1 . - x ,� : : ..: He .,...... 1!1 t ;Ilk,: 2 IL__ •, , I , . - 4 _A ` I.c, &�z �,z, r, ILz l 1IkktS n 1�.i ,1 i t- z � ,f. X _ n > r• >1 I I!V ,r f , t :- ..-t _t.. U; .z��+ 1 .9 W. C _ "C�i S ,, \ cs ctel `s z F 7.aiiI I. LC.T ,� 101 i/ Y� x n t a n� SSF 'az' e� _1R �� F Mi Mi3e I 5 r Fqure 5-4. Hospital heliport markings 75 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 • Jam' : l3 z< 21.I C'-i 7. J • i, l`• '4 - ` • • / A YELLOW"X'SHOULD ;crri!"/ ' BE PAINTED OVER THE "H' + 'F • . Wit EN REMOVAL OR OBLITERATION !C OF THE HELIPORT MARKING IS `<- i IMPRACTICAL • Figure 5-5- A closed Yoapica1 heliport 76 N O a a IT . 1 [,IGtI'L'LD WIND SUCK�- (al OMNIDIRECTIONAL EDGE LIGHTS --- PLACED 10 FEET(3 m) OUT Tr. ` ? FROM A PAVED TLWF EDGE er IC (b)FLUSH LI4HT9 or(el PANEL LIGHTS -•�;'" '. LOCATED 1 FOOT (90 crn) IN FROM • ..r THE EDGE OF PAVED T1.02 A COMPOSITE ILLUSTRATING THE DIFFERENT LIGHTING SYSTEMS AVAILABLE (a) RAISED OMNI-DIRECTIONAL LIGHTS (b) FLUSH IN-PAVEMENT LIGHTS (c) FLAT ELECTRO•LUMINESGBNT PANEL LIGHTS 9 C 7, 0 v, w b P V> AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 r IN STALL OMNI-D I RECT IONAL g ,-�' LIGHTS OFF PLATFORM EDGF. ' - - 1 ft 111 :f,d `.r �� "�- - HOSPITA�KING- F . /lJf ` ; rs e a : .. ' • y / / -f • FLUSH LX-PAV'EMF,N1 LIGHTS - LIX3 �•`�? _. - - l r CAUTION'RIFLTCOP I R LA?mina AREA 4VTIICRIZEU PERSWI'Nei.ONLY r— 5 FEET-0.4 — OPTIONAL LOCATION OF �•.cFLUSH LIGHTING OMNI-DIRECTIONAL LIGHT 1 ---7--';..... ....4., C1 S m) 1 FIXTURES IN SNOW AREAS I- I - IRECTONAL LIGHT MOUNTED I OFF MOP EDGE MORE THAN 30 INCHES (75 cm) a EDGE LIGHTING DETAILS Ron 5-7. Kauai platbn Ilgbtiug 78 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A ''-:� 1 4o�`r ' y - 140 FEET 30 m: K7SD SOCI( •, -i I —---- y } 1 :- ,_: ,9PPROACH."TAK}:•OFF 5UR}'A('F. T--- • I: p� !104 FEET [30 mi t ' POLE LIKE SHOULD. r 'i — — BE MAREEP'LIGHTED I =I -,I , ! ! '- -.OBSTRUCTION I / LIGHTS ON C. 1 / BumLD!s° eV izi JJ`1 f/ p n . i ' F PLAN VIEW `'-- L 1-------- CA{�OkY•sully :F-1 ,_-- kpPRot.C}J r _J��1_i__-- f'e— ----- SBEINSET ,QEr RECOMMEND THAT PROFILE YEW 4F yv . 1 WIRES&O&IFC'7 S ��O THIS AREA ALSO BE Z .r ' , . . MARKEDILIGHTED ' T44 / $6:1 tit ¢ -- `t 20 FEET(S n) 316 FEET . 'IL [92 ml - 500 FEET(1F0 nil-+1 I— INSET NOT TO SCALE --- Figure 5-8. Reconm nded an for wire fucking ndfor lighting 79 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A CHAPTER 6. HELICOPTER FACILITIES ON AIRPORTS 64. GENERAL. Helicopters are able to operate on d. Marking and Lighting. The marking and most airports without unduly interfering with airplane lighting systems of chapters 3 and 4 also apply to traffic. Separate facilities and approach/takeoff airport helicopter facilities. When the FATO or TLOF procedures may be necessary when the volume of is located on an existing paved area, such as an apron airplane and/or helicopter traffic impacts operations. or taxiway traversed by airplanes, all markings and At airports with inter-connecting passenger traffic, the lighting fixtures defining the FATO and TLOF, and terminal apron should provide gates for helicopter taxi route centerlines or limits should be flush with the boardings. Persons who use a helicopter to go to an pavement as illustrated in figure 6-1. airport generally require convenient access to the airport terminal and services provided airplane 66. SURFACE MOVEMENT. Helicopter taxiways passengers. The airport layout plan (ALP) should be and taxi lanes should conform to the criteria of chapter amended or revised to identify the location of the 3 or 4. Paved taxiways permit wheel equipped exclusive use helicopter facilities, approach/takeoff helicopters to ground maneuver. When taxi distances paths, and helicopter taxi routes. This chapter are great,both wheel and skid equipped helicopters can addresses design considerations for providing separate be expected to hover or air taxi. helicopter facilities on airports. a. Hover Taxiing. The cylindrical markers 65. TAKEOFF AND LANDING SURFACES. The illustrated in figure 6-2 are recommended to define the area(s) developed/designated for helicopter landings edges of a route for helicopters hover taxiing. Hover and takeoffs may be located anywhere on the airport. taxi routes should meet the appropriate clearance The takeoff/landing area should provide for ready requirements and be located to minimize interaction access to the airport terminal or to the helicopter users with airplane operations. The cylindrical markers origin or destination. displaying 3 equal width bands of yellow-blue-yellow define hover taxi route edges. Markers are placed at a. FATOs/TLOFs. FATO/TLOF dimensions and intervals not in excess of 100 feet (30 m) on straight clearances in chapters 3 and 4 also apply to facilities sections and 50 feet(15 m)on curved sections. being developed on an airport for helicopter usage. b. Mr Taxiing. Air taxiing at elevations b. Approach/Takeoff Paths. Each FATO/TLOF approximately 100 feet (30 m) above the surface is must have at least one approach/takeoff path meeting preferred when helicopters must traverse long the criteria in chapters 3 and 4. To the extent distances. The large markers illustrated in figure 6-2 practical, helicopter approach/takeoff paths should be may be used to define the centerline when air taxiing independent of approaches to active runways. 100 feet(30 m)above ground level and should avoid or minimize interaction with airplane operations. c. Spacing Criteria. The recommended distance Markers are placed at intervals not in excess of 200 between the centerline of an approach to a runway and feet(60 m)on straight sections and 100 feet(30 m)on the centerline of an approach to a FATO for curved sections. simultaneous same direction VFR operations is provided in table 6-1. Table 6-1. Distance between FATO center to runway centerline Small Helicopter Medium Helicopter Heavy Helicopter 6,000 lbs or less 12,000 lbs or less over 12,000 lbs Small Airplane 300 feet 500 feet 700 feet 12,500 lbs or less 90 m 150 m 210 m Large Airplane 500 feet 500 feet 700 feet 12,000 lbs to 300,000 lbs 150m 150 m 210 m Heavy Airplane 700 feet 700 feet 700 feet Over 300,000 lbs 210 m 210 m 210 m 81 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 c. Parking Positions. Helicopter parking positions should be located as close to the intended destination or origination of the passengers as conditions permit. Clearances should conform with the apron design and marking criteria of chapters 3 or 4. Locate parking positions to minimize helicopter rotor wash from upsetting parked airplanes. d. Passenger Walkways. Passenger movement in operational areas should be restricted to marked walkways. Figure 4-15 illustrates one marking scheme. Apron pavements should be designed so that spilled fuel does not drain onto passenger walkways or toward parked helicopters. 67. PASSENGER SERVICES. Unless screening was carried out at the helicopter passengers departure location, Federal Aviation Regulations require that a screening area and/or screening be provided before passengers enter the airport's secured areas. Multiple helicopter parking positions and/or locations may be needed in the terminal area to service helicopter passenger and/or cargo inter-line connecting needs. • 82 N O a A _•"_.tea . .�_ _. - ,osPtc-S_—_ - —. ..-_-- - tea- ^C.-----.y i1:�u N = YLUSI I L[Gn% -.mimosa, - -- - -- - - vav wmN!n n ��. sAr a CA U770 _ 'w e7.f�� yf`l1�• 49NIiiVG LsO% 4114:4A -_ C-A • n U' 0 u, w 9 OC N W a AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 6 FEET •18n)N1:IC MUM — - 1 IT r--- l If 4 FEET t0.a re) YELLOW GREEN YELLOW i 3 FEET kt1 nn1 I IH IT 5 , YELLOWGREEN-YOW LARGE MARKER FOR t k AIR TAXIING CENTERLINE 4 IN arts d0 mo 1E mans(30 enc, i B B I VCHFS[20 cm) . l I yi j YELLOW-BLUE-YELLOW CYLINDRICAL MARKER FOR HOVER TAXI R.OTJTE EDGE Fibare 6-2. Late and cylindrical raters for helicopter an tailing and hover tauing a airyorla 84 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A CHAPTER 7. NON-PRECISION INSTRUMENT OPERATIONS 68. GENERAL. A non-precision approach procedure 70. OBSTACLE EVALUATION SURFACES The permits helicopter operations to continue during following surfaces are evaluated for object penetrations periods of reduced visibility. The procedure is based when the improved lighting system is provided for on signals providing bearing and distance information. lower minimums. Figure 7-2 illustrates these surfaces. The signals are broadcast from navigational aids such as a Very High Frequency Omni-range (VOR) a. Approach Surface. The approach surface is a transmitter located at some distance from the heliport. trapezoidally shaped plane starting at the end and The non-precision procedure is established in elevation of the FATO. The surface is wider than the accordance with Order 8260.3, United States Standard recommended FATO. It begins at a width of 500 feet for Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). To (150 m) and flares outward to a width of 5,000 feet(1 achieve lower minimums,the following criteria for the 500 m) in a horizontal distance of 10,000 feet (3 000 improved lighting system and increased airspace is m). The surface slopes upward at a ratio of 20:1 recommended. This chapter addresses issues which (horizontal to vertical). heliport owners should consider before requesting the development of a non-precision approach procedure. b. Transitional Surfaces. Transitional surfaces extend outward and upward from the edges of the 69. IMPROVED LIGHTING SYSTEM. The FATO and the non-precision approach. Transitional enhanced perimeter lighting system and the Heliport surfaces slope upward at a ratio of 4:1 (horizontal to Instrument Lighting System (HITS), illustrated in vertical). figure 7-1,are recommended. (1) FATO transitional surfaces terminate in a a. Perimeter Light Enhancement. An additional horizontal distance of 350 feet(105 m) measured from light is inserted between each light in the front and the edges of the FATO. rear row of perimeter lights to enhance the definition of the TLOF. (2) Approach/takeoff transitional surfaces terminate in a horizontal distance of 600 feet (180 m) b. HILS Lights. Three unidirectional PAR 56, measured from the centerline of the approach/takeoff 200 watt aimed lights (edge bars) extending the right surface. and left line of perimeter lights fore and aft and the front and rear line of perimeter lights right and left. c. Missed Approach Surfaces. All instrument •procedures require a missed approach procedure. The (1) Edge Bars. Edge bar lights are spaced at surfaces for a missed approach procedure may continue 50 foot(12.5 m)intervals,measured from the front and in the direction of the approach or incorporate a turn. rear row of perimeter lights. Missed approach surfaces are complex and need to be discussed with an FAA airspace procedures specialist (2) Wing Bars. Wing bar lights are spaced at early in the effort. 15 foot (4.5 m) intervals, measured from the line of perimeter edge(side)lights. NOTE: Non precision instrument approach procedures utilizing Loran C and/or Global c. Optional Lights. An optional feature is a line Positioning System (GPS)signals are being evaluated. of 7 white flush lights spaced at 5 foot(1.5 m)intervals The imaginary surfaces to be evaluated for penetrating installed in the TLOF pavement. The lights are objects may der from the imaginary surfaces aligned on the centerline of the approach course to described herein. provide close in directional guidance and improve TLOF surface defmition. 85 co n n L1 0 ,% • • cn w a rz ATT 4 Al. - -T _ . l • 1Z. GVOL3BAR a '' 1--,-i:;I I b;Lc TL&n Ie a n a o--121 9 4 CI '' llppii . . -__pi. ... Y- ` —+a -- - ry nom. . �`_. r.... .._.-..� .� 2 OD root[1L.5mi HYACINU I 50 FOOT 112.5 ml S1'ACINIi II o o I • L I • ADD(TIoNAT.nMNI UlltECTInf Al T.T:TIT a 1 I inLONAL I:(iEI t".3 • .9 fcCi a.5:11i 5rA c7Nrr I • ' (__..�i IV g ` j ` • I _.. e.. 1 a .' 1 a Co O O O 1 In 1 <1 , 4 — __ .. J t.I NOTE: THE DF.PH:'Itn RILS INSTALLATION III APPROYLCATE TO A MINIMALLY SIZEn IIELIPORT LOCATED AT AN ELEVATLON OF 1,000 FEET OR 1.F.:;S ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL, •N O 'C A I 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A ___lam ESP r:Jt:: n1O14 ___-- I $ -r .7 L_ Y0:1. APPR0ACAVTAKLDFFSURFACF. - w 0 .ri -a — - woo FE13T 43 000 no �r1 lC�la ------; r - FF 14:aFCAI:Hl1'RRYITF SURFACE,. / `•A y`r:' �lv FATO 1 j_ i mac___- .� T[eTi�s� _ _ aril El` a)___ BRUIT 7.2. Obstacle ovn*Rian surfaces 87 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A CHAPTER 8. PRECISION APPROACH OPERATIONS 71. GENERAL. A precision instrument approach 74. OBSTACLE EVALUATION SURFACES. The procedure is necessary to provide the operational operational minimums, determined by the FAA in capability desired by many executive and corporate establishing a helicopter precision approach procedure, users. Such a procedure is established in accordance depend upon the extent that objects or structures with Order 8260.3, United States Standard for penetrate the surfaces described below and depicted in Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS), and is figure 8-4. The FAA needs to know the location and essential to assure the all-weather reliability needed for elevations of objects that penetrate the described a helicopter air carrier to be successful in offering surfaces to advise the heliport owner as to the lowest scheduled service. This chapter describes the larger practical approach angle and prospective operational ground area (FATO) associated with precision minimums. The heliport owner must then judge instrument operations and describes the imaginary whether the operational benefits of the lower approach aerial surfaces which are evaluated for the impact of angles justify the costs to remove, lower, or mark and object penetrations. Heliport owners desiring a light objects and structures impacting the procedure. precision instrument approach procedure are urged to initiate early contact with the appropriate FAA a. Approach Surface. A precision approach Regional Office. surface is a trapezoidally shaped plane beginning at the near edge of the instrument FATO. The trapezoid 72. FINAL APPROACH REFERENCE AREA extending outward for 25,000 feet (7 500 m) in the (FARA). A certified helicopter precision approach direction of the approach has an initial width of 1,000 procedure terminates in the helicopter coming to a feet(300 m)and flares to a width of 6,000 feet(I 800 hover or touching down within a 150 foot(45 m)wide m) at the far end. The vertical slope ratio of 34:1 by at least 150 feet(45 m) long FARA. The FARA is (horizontal to vertical) depicted in figure 8-4 is located at the far end of a 300 foot wide by 1,225 foot required for a 3-degree glide slope approach angle. A long (90 m by 373 m) FATO required for a precision vertical slope ratio of 22.7:1 is required for a 4.5 instrument procedure. Figure 8-1 illustrates the degree glide slope approach angle. A vertical slope FARA/FATO relationship. ratio of 17:1 is required for a 6 degree glide slope approach angle. The glide slope approach angle can 73. LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS. The following vary in increments of 1/10 degree from 3 degrees up to lighting systems are necessary for a helicopter 6 degrees with corresponding adjustments to the precision instrument approach procedure with the vertical slope ratio and landing minimums. lowest minimums. b. Transitional Surfaces. A precision instrument a. HALS. The HALS installation, depicted in approach has transitional surfaces associated with the figure 8-2, is a distinctive approach lighting instrument FATO and the certified approach surface. configuration designed to prevent it from being mistaken for an airport runway approach lighting (1) FATO. Inner transitional surfaces abut system. each side, and when there is no back approach, the non- approach end of an instrument FATO. b. Enhanced Perimeter Lighting System. The Transitional surfaces are 350 feet (105 m) wide and enhanced perimeter lighting system, as described in slope upward at right angles to the centerline of the chapter 8, strengthens the conspicuity of the front and instrument FATO at a ratio of 7:1 (horizontal to back line of perimeter edge lights. vertical). c. HILS. The HILS system, described in chapter (2) Approach Surface. Transitional surfaces 8, uses PAR-56 lights to extend the line of edge lights abut each edge of the precision approach trapezoid. fore and aft and right and left. The surface is 600 feet(180 m)wide at the FATO end and flares to a width of 1,500 feet (450 m) at the far NOTE: Figure 8-3 depicts the HLLS and HALS end of the approach trapezoid. Transitional surfaces precision instrument approach lighting system slope upward at right angles to the centerline of the installation at the FAA's Demonstration Heliport, approach course at a ratio of 7:1 (horizontal to Atlantic City, New Jersey. The FAA is continuing its vertical). study of configurations for precision instrument approach lighting systems. 89 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 c. Missed Approach Surfaces. The ability to support low landing minima, even when the approach trapezoid is void of penetrations, may be controlled by objects in the missed approach segment of the procedure. While figure 8-4 illustrates the initial portion of a missed approach surface,missed approach requirements are complex requiring specific technical advise outside the scope of this AC. 90 N O ^ .. .. • pRrcrsjo rvs'rt --� 7a ` FARA (11:1 ni 200 FF7LT tw no rF'r -130 FEET(45m) j,22. 0 .� a - �_ NOTE.! 'ICE ILLUSTRATED FAR -PATO RELATIONSHIP IS APPROPRIATE FOR A HELIPORT AT AN ELEVATION UP TO J,OOA FEET ABOVE MBAN S}1A LEVLL G 0 w `'0 a N 9 G U W t t a o PRECISION INSTRUMENT F.4Tn •L _ J: ; HELIPORT APPROACH LIGHT SYSTBSI (HALE; 1U LIGHT BARS rke, 104 FOOT (30 ml SPACING NOTE: THE HALS LIGHTING SYSTEM ILLUSTRATED IS APPROPk1Arrp:FOR A HELIPORT AT AN ELEVATION CP IX) 1.000 FEET ABOYM M KAN SI:A LEVEL • C b A 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A hi v ,1 r+?w S ! , a s w L. .3-5.-i-..:, p Itip: gt: '.- • m 3c ft it k „ h i, R o .. L •y� ky, k • > i 'A 2div^'•.f-,''';':_•:g.<,::' T Ff R �'t��. ' s G A -4H 4 • �t ..•?-.-.:•. SFGx , ,, • • ti <:;�.rc c ..•. i .. YL-S ..twit 93 A • 'D iv n , `-' H b- O n w VD r.,'v.n'rnl..I .,•1.I 1. • O • 21 70• r'-- N'4gtl `\�. _ __ ---- '..— — I.16.%.,.. r ` Tf I • Ir Z�. �C8 `�r--- -1I---- 11— 7. q•p,,riNt'F1U�nl.rV1tF,t:'L r- y -- -- - - x400 FEET __�- -1-'`r - - -�._ iE+- _. - _ 1� II I p _-_._�_.._�__1,000FEFEE -'--_ gnnu Ftlt:1' - -_ Ak'PiLUAI'11 j07tFACF :AS L11'.ti' AS 111 . ---a _' \• DECISION llh:1UJ1'I'I UI{I 11_ • .1 :7U0 n.. 6LPJ FEET(t-� m1 1_ ;1 I _---. JNn Sl�l''k I:1E0 FP.F.^T+ - _ __- fy __- �l / mis m1 I �_ L Uo Fl.CI' U TA1;T 1450 m) (' 3,a 1 ..—_ . - 25A00 FP_F.T i7 000 rrl- -- . _______H I'• --1 ,mrrrT(anc ml T'Da mm7) — J.2n FKrT ran mi - ma .1:- nC NOTE: THE 11.141IHTRA7"ED VARAi11'A'IM) \\ 7;1�uti`sl',IeN,I.':um'nce '!na'"''`I • RELATIONSHIP IS APPROPRIATE FC]R }_ a,�•r rem A tIELIPORT AT AN ELEVATION 1JP'TO ,11, - 1 .�:Im....t 1,000 ll'EET MEAN SEA 1.EVPI. N- �_ y mnM 1N:41N.ML'fF.ATf] 4DC nit y{CrGT A / 71 TINNSITIuN.,I.rill IYM.I. lh:l In:r ue Ili; i O r7 a 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A CHAPTER 9. HELIPORT GRADIENTS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN 75. GENERAL. This chapter provides guidance on wheel equipped helicopter, or through the aft contact the designing heliport pavements, including design areas(See figure 9-2)of a skid equipped helicopter. loads, and addresses soil stabilization as a method of treating non-paved operational surfaces. c. Rotor Loading. Rotor (down wash) loadings are approximately equal to the weight of the helicopter 76. GRADIENTS. Operational surfaces such as the distributed uniformly over the disk area of the rotor. FATO, TLOF, parking apron, taxi route, and taxiway Tests have established that rotor(down wash)loadings should present a reasonably smooth, uniformly graded are generally less than the loadings specified in surface. building codes for snow, rain, or wind loadings typically used in structural design calculations. a. Soft Surfaces. The "soft"unpaved surfaces of a heliport should be graded to be free of surface 78. PAVEMENT DESIGN AND SOIL irregularities and be designed to provide positive STABILIZATION. Pavements distribute the drainage. Longitudinal and transverse gradients of soft helicopters weight over a larger area of the subsurface surfaces may range between a minimum of 2.0 to a as well as providing a water impervious, skid resistant maximum of 5.0 percent. A maximum gradient of 2.0 wearing surface. Paving TLOFs,taxiways and parking percent should be established for any soft surface on aprons is encouraged to improve their load carrying which the helicopter is expected to land. ability, to minimize the erosive effects of rotor wash, and to facilitate surface runoff. Stabilizing unpaved b. Hard Surfaces. The "hard" surfaces of a portions of the FATO and taxi routes subjected to rotor heliport, whether paved or of metal or wood plank wash is also encouraged. Guidance on pavement construction, should be designed to present a smooth design and on stabilizing soils is contained in AC surface and provide positive drainage. Longitudinal 150/5320-6, Airport Pavement Design and Evaluation, and transverse gradients of hard surfaces may range and AC 150/5370-10, Standards for Specifying between a minimum of 0.5 to a maximum of 2.0 Construction of Airports. percent. Paved surfaces should be designed with a shoulder as illustrated in figure 9-1 to ensure that a. Pavements. In most instances, a 6 inch (15 water is carried away from the pavement. cm) thick Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavement is capable of supporting operations by helicopters 77. DESIGN LOADS. Heliport "hard" load bearing weighing up to 20,000 pounds (9 216 kg). Thicker surfaces should be designed and constructed to support pavements are generally not required unless heavier the weight of the design helicopter. Helicopter weights helicopters are expected, or the quality of the are listed in Appendix 1. Loads are applied through subsurface soil is questionable. PCC pavement is the contact area of the tires for wheel equipped recommended for all heliport surfaces used by skid helicopters or the contact area of the skid for skid equipped helicopters. equipped helicopters. Helicopter landing gear contact area configurations are illustrated in Figure 9-2. b. Stabilizing Soils. Different methods of soil stabilization may be used to meet different site a. Static Loadings. For design purposes, the requirements. design static load is equal to the helicopter's maximum takeoff weight applied through the total contact area of (1) Turf. A dense well-drained turf is the least the wheels or skids. intrusive and most cost effective way to develop a usable landing surface capable of supporting the b. Dynamic Loadings. A dynamic load of 1/5 weight of many of the helicopters used by private and second or less duration may occur during a hard corporate operators. Climatic and soil conditions landing. For design purposes, dynamic loadings may dictate the appropriate grass species to use at the site to be assumed at 150 percent of the takeoff weight of the provide protection against rotor induced erosion. design helicopter. When specific loading data is not available, assume 75 percent of the weight of the (2) Aggregate-Turf. The load carrying design helicopter to be applied equally through the capability of poor soils may be improved by mixing main landing gears of a selected granular materials such as crushed stone, pit- run gravel,coarse sand,oyster shell,etc. into the upper 12 inches(30 cm)of the soil. The ratio of aggregate to 95 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 soil must be sufficient to improve the stability of the soil yet retain the soils ability to support grass. c. Formed Masonry Shapes. Precast masonry shapes vary in size and shape from a brick paver to an open block. Pavers can be laid on a prepared bed to present a solid surface. Precast blocks can be embedded in the soil with grass growing in the natural openings. Architectural catalogs identify different masonry shapes that are commercially available for this purpose. d. Pierced Metal Panels. Perforated metal panels, that allow grass to grow through the openings, can be laid on the ground to provide a hard surface for helicopter operations. Engineering catalogs identify commercially available panels. 96 t--- I.) W O O a c wJ�.�—J--`— — —ter la 0.6% TO2%ORADL" F • 1.61NC1[ES f# cm1 y 1! �,-'' -` r-.• �, Its PAVCMNNi '''' sir p_p , - h7 SCa ORADE 2`k Tt7 51. GRADE CI M n It a a R 1. i w i La A C 11-PAYFM �-"iNT_ <.: --}^- 5=' GRAbn . V 7�� z •m cc nRADL ' \-----...._ Leh _,• TURF STABILIZATION ILECOMMENDF.n ?'„r 4 0 La w O N J Y AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 r S _. 11rI _ n A L BI2 312 TYPICAL SINGLE WHELL CONFIGURATION .rr B AaA A is L ..- . --.. r Br4 &4 TYPICAL DUAL WLIEI:L CCIPIFIGUBATION B = Gf0$SWti'EIGHT 13,1 = GROSS WEIGHDGEAR'SKIT1 $a = GROSS WEIGHT/TIRE K= WHEEL SASE/SKID LENGTH L = TREAD TYPICAL SKID CONFIGURATION Figure 9-2. Hellopin la:Aim nu loading 98 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Appendix 1 APPENDIX 1. HELICOPTER DATA This appendix contains selected helicopter data needed The published information has been verified by the by a heliport designer. The data represent the most various helicopter manufacturers and is current as of critical weight, dimensional, or other data entry for the date of publication. If more specific data is needed that helicopter model recognizing that specific versions the specific helicopter manufacturer should be of the model may weigh less, be smaller in some contacted. Appendix X lists manufacturers' addresses. feature,carry fewer passengers,etc. A Manufacturer and helicopter model. I Tail rotor ground clearance in feet. B Maximum takeoff weight in pounds. J Gear pattern. C Overall length in feet. (Rotors at their maximum K Undercarriage length in feet. (Strut to strut.) extension.) L Undercarriage width in feet. (The distance D Overall height in feet. (Usually at tail rotor.) between tire or skid centers.) E Rotor diameter in feet/no.of blades M Number and type of engines. F Rotor plane clearance in feet. N Number of crew and passengers. G Distance rotor hub to tail in feet. O Standard fuel capacity in gallons. H Tail rotor diameter(in feet). No Blades. �. C: -- --"_ e 1 Al.. I 1 n F' 3 V �� i 1 .s L on %-e-- .. . C 1.'- E • E....---E—1 4 1' t --- , - —z D A I I. .,__.,,,,,__,._____,+„_,, , , --'d�'. �r ;,a-L y Fes---ati---- Figure A'.-1. Helicopter aireneieos 1 N 'O as i R [7 11 ly j lc r(' FI J 1 J K ' S, M N [t 'IR.1 17Aafnm Main Rohr Tail NaIr Nu mtwr o Z M, ltarturlr 'Moan (Mr all 1344, natal Risher MI ow rllnund UedunmgY . Enna rtad' 994.1411 ^ o =r1011-. W.I6ll IAn i jitkihl N. II" rid,.... Afl Ind-jNn.I11441e cty4nn- -..'I�'lx SnPi1It.. - - w[di1_ 1),_. eL-, ?Amite Inu n1 4 wpol rnn r IMee'Nnl 1i! Merl 11.4.91191 (hnll feel pee' „ sokha i['wlldnh .__ _ 1 T IA4 7 315 IAnl /� 4] _!-Z..... 37q 10.! b A3,30 3.2 . ...lilt—. _s•:?..� ?A.. .. ._ _.- .___. I'2 1S 110 M1.1 31,315 to ]2 3W7 WA is 10 OA d4 • 4 131 _ 9.1 :_l__ ,MSI __ M.IK ., 4 le 1.0 Pr I A 17 S71'1 15 2 . 111.144 61—•—_r . •• 171 9il J:1 -_ 2173 it III Hl lianxl t1 ._.mn IS OM .. . _ i l! 1,9't0 b 11 1511 .. e4 i T1 Frtr'Mn in 73 4164 1.1_ 4 4_. , ....lT 1h4 1J U 11. 350A914NEtun 411 „tral..- 41 11 1451 Id.5 ._. 15 _ i 4.142 23 1111__ ._.-47 TI 1:.1__.._.IM I41 12 75S 1.4.!35.4 4,6111 13 II :1[413 1617 55 4,12 1.1 .kW - Si -_—!1 _.-_. 1:1 _..-_1.' .....141 • , ' lit; Inl 13 Ws) Wurlq bills - N 12 H,4 11.7 .? _ IhnoI,m ' m 73 7 1 4 1.1 _— ..._... 14 M!TJ.oliain 2 $111a 11 I 1 b1,4 11 4 .I ['control 7.4 n 119 f1` 1 1 Hu) le: 13 i4n.ie5 5.774 w IQ 114 111 71 442 AI I Aid 41 01 _'r IA's. 111 _.... .__�.-..--._ I ._. _... ._.._2 lAlm. . .—'IAI l6 II1C 117 .,, ,.- 7315 13 11 314 I 11 S d4.T 4l ,Lii 42 1l. 2-1„. ._ 11 ..._. _._.. ... . — .— _ 1 171 AIICilJS1'A y-_„-„ I ,-- --1. .. - .—_. 19 n 109 33517 45 , 11 1714 10 ' "1 47/• 23 — 114 11 ....1.7 1ti7 i44 21 I ___ • -—.- ... 441111 NM1.1-34 MIJCJ:]MI Fa - ( 33 47 L9S0 41 10, . M2 , 15 25 312 _ ,L5 d.J it is LP_ 1511 ki 21 205 •__ 9100 71 _.__.IS 1W II 11-- 312 19 IlW 1?1 ! ad 1.1 Ikl4 _—:15 24. NF3d9ao1.Yanrer 4,450 41 Ill .1'teg ').5 75 5107 1.5 Aid Q4 _ T 255 :a (Igo 34 13 1Af2 11.4 34 1.1(2 4.1 ale 1:1 t7 I 2T l&I4 71, 26 214 I 7711 nl 14 IV? 11 57 9.7!! 11 Aid 111 _ IV :'r 244i 4.' rf 7,10 1,0131 1'! 41,2 77. V. _-- FaR^, 12.2 -• _ Y.1 ---2 r [ '1' 2R 412 31.900 57 15 464 1114 65R 2.3 nwi 19 13 ::1' JA I1 110 30 BRAYII-VA1AY14134 —_ i.. —__ - il ��' _-__-. _ 1,42 1.P Ih1 �I Jl H." a,4T/ 1 n 7 An 4 ' I7 4.7,4 4 •kW - . 32 3111d(1?75 1,5M _...H A 29A 6 Iv ..... 4.1.4 -- . 33 ._ .—_._.__ 33 lel ... 20,000 l! 17 10.3 15 39 5W3 149 , a ?I9 LY - 'I — 1971 35.1 ..._. 1 . ..-. • - 16.41 36 NO dR5M M 19 414 35 SI NL7 Ill • - -.._23.9 1 -111 _21 _ .- A 11.11.1 S7 7f9 Ja,4U e4 Al vy4 11 f^ Tk.! • • 5!, - I, 7-1'-_I--3.15:10 + 1 1Yb s 38 _19 F.1111JU1Al11tti __- --'w' '-' N .10 F21.17Jt 1 16500 75 ?I_,—_,11:5 ..._215 14 13.1,4 31 • . . 227 144 3r. :ay, Jac 0 N A n t I I3 i tt [. N N 1 t; , I _ ..- 2 i K J I. `61 N [ 0 Z-0- SOnber a t 16.6.6,4 I Main 11<Ior '1110 Nakr.._ 2 Ma...la.1nee 7.1...0 C)..r all I IT..ieiat IL i.....4 u.04. Dilnlakr Qr.Nn.)Ilri tinden... r I:nilnd— Clt.„ 34na1l { N"" weW701 -4glh phl I FO.Dlaan t:ki C anra Afl aN 9AItb6n r»Cle. r• l'}TM town ilia iliaFry 19.wn6•« Sr.a d tlMl1d51 tl'etq (Pnn (IAvb%al !I'.ee7 1,r»q ,Yn4Nw1 11..! 1 II'v cl ICnn . .,,-, N...dVu. I i glob... 3 _._..__. .... .. ..... ...... _L.___. . 6 IihVYHQM ._ 1 I ...-_._ .__....-.-. _ .i..__.... .. . 7 1N66-7i I' 2608 ST '1 I 117 ql 11 I J7.4 3.1 .kiJ .11 P,1 11• 50'1 10 A{ INU •1[511 i.... OT In .L^2 0t * 21 ?..3 skid n] ' . L_ 1.15 - 0. 9 10 4.4wal ..� . .. _.. t . . 1 l I K MNC '� —.• �- 14 a,4m AI 11 lC!': � 10.7 ^1 N.\ NA IS! 113 I�T 1 t24 --- -. _ .. - .._ ...._ __ . . .... _.... .. • ._. .. 13 max lPC( I.l..11f77:Cii AS I • • _ . .. II 300536550 11411 12 a 213 1 1 aP 403 Ail1.5 51 I-T IA. Is l .12.N0301. ],350 R 1 L A•S It I IT 91H'Ak skid I 11 03 1-1 AI • pl l6 affix 8y11a1 7,600 is 1': W) 1T NO1 4d 73 71 21_ - t7 1�7 _.I I .._�_ TAR�_...3 __.._.. . 18 ?TASFOC!. 1 _.. • 19 rn.'.9101 14.660 61.7 13.3 xl,�Art . . 16043 : _ _ 3 r a ]1I 2U .� ._— .—_...-- -....._.__ i .__.... fl aoti F9D4 -_.. _ ._ _.. ... -. 32 K.72 1370 _ n 1 9 241 4I . 14_ :.ti^. l 1 .Aia 1.: .__41 __5 P , 1RI __ _ 20 23 XJIAam. 2400 3* -.. II _ 317 103 32 ♦21'1 and G• 22 L r Jit 11 - •2d ... .... ..___ .... ... _-_.• I 2.$ ZOOE4sgN HtLL6k I. — -_—.. . . M - �ld R11.t106 3-500 tx ' IP q1 s} :1 ,_ 0.02 1- ltd _ 79 2: _ 1:r_ 71[0_ _ _ .. 27 034-03 ... _ 3.100 4 IL' - .363 101 23 664 4 Skid ..• _A.: _ .S I-P IR2 36 .- ft [f.HWr17}A .]Q 263 1¢76 T . 5 ':ILT .0 b 3 47 LL:,A 15 47 1.P 1X1 II16 1920 2000 11 9 27,4 IN ' 14 ...P I 21 1 tad 211 03 t 1' ICI_ is 3113!1 3.400 31 10 I 27,1 11 al I 13 1.32 I 33 and 05 1.7 161 M-,,, 33 34 S l trr]RSce _— .. _ __ _. —_I 35 21.9 13tQ011 d6 IS 549 11.1 ; 3X 95,9 i hl. 1X! _ 17 7.-l' :414 _✓1J _- -' _ ...__--. a ^.6 5-41 .__. 217.300 73 19 r7N3 i7 I 42 _ 10210 I 43 - 215 It 31 'Ws aC5__ -S T:1•44 ant 42000 19 la '11M Iab S3 1401 . 9f. i7 I'I'I -r-I 94 - s 21' ,V _._.... _ .. --...._. -� .n.s I 311 3137 __ a0,1S11 5410 70 'PO I n of SON i 95 ' z i I_ _ .47 Jab 'NfA A1.-au.,.A 1;000 IS • 14 3444 2_4 ' 11U4 . 0> - '_0 a4 T tr )aII . !oJ F6 11,7011 5) _.15 urt 1 l0 41 ..-t.49 65 let--- V._ _. -� —' 7211: 1 la: 9 I al _ I -- ,_.. .... —_ r---- ._,._... __ . _. .-•72 wl'SYL3NU -.._ ‘° 7211 12102 29 • 16 4rt its ii 109 a 191 1�1 t 51 1 -n..tip:—' e'. 4 _ a La 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Appendix 2 APPENDIX 2. MARKING DIMENSIONS 1. PUBLIC USE HELIPORT. The letter H, the TLOF length, 1.2 times the TLOF width,or 60 feet illustrated in figure A2-1, identifies a facility as a (18 m). The recommended width is 0.66 times the H's public use heliport. The H is centered in the TLOF or height. Width of vertical lines should be 0.07 times the intended landing position of an unpaved FATO and the H's height and width of the horizontal lines should aligned with the preferred direction of approach. The be 0.14 times the H's height. When a black border is recommended height of the H is the lesser of 0.8 times provided,it should be 0.02 times the H's height. -4-- - -O.66A- • • I � • 0.07 A • • • ->- T--a_02 A P I ; • • 0.14 A ;I LETTER HUGE IT (A) rs THE LESSER OF; 50 FEET (18 n) 0,8 TLOF LENGTH -t_ 1.2 TLOF WIDTH'. Figure A2-E. Standard belipon H marking AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 Appendix 2 2. HOSPITAL HELIPORT. The cross marking located in the center of the square, is the height of the identifying a hospital heliport is illustrated in figure center square with a width that is 0.66 the height of the A2-2. It is a configuration of 4 squares abutting on a center square. The width of vertical lines should be 0.1 center square. The recommended height and width of times the H's height and the width of the horizontal the cross is 0.8 times the TLOF's least dimension but lines should be 0.2 times the H's height. The cross not more than 30 feet(9 m). The red capital letter H, may have a red border 7, "' 0 R ?:4'H' HEIGHT — is m r C W 1'10 'A' ITCIGHT Lt _ c . o zw " d H z 0CROSS HEIGIIT 4' - 1 I wHCe ~r Jo r•�rl 1 rrrrllr 0 'L J �tTt c W,try O Ortiz Hcca cc 6 't i THE CROSS HEIGHT AND WI 11TH IS - ---0.8 TIMES THE TLCF'5 LEAST ULI4ENSTON RUT NOT MORE THAN 30 FEET (9 ma Figure A2.2_ Hospital heliport malting 2 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Appendix 2 3. OTHER. A letter/numeral within a circle may be the position is capable of accommodating. This may be placed on/adjacent to the line at entry points to identify indicated by placing the position letter/number above a parking position. When all positions are not able to the number of the design rotor diameter at each entry accommodate the design helicopter,each position must point to the position. Figure A2-3 illustrates the be marked to indicate the largest rotor diameter that recommended marking. PARRINCI CIRCLE EAR LING CIRCLE t ; I1 BOTORM4M£CHRI ,1 ROTOR DIAMETER: l ARC OF TA II ROTOR CLEARANCE ARC • ARC Or TAIL ROTOR, • - jII CLEARANCE ARC ANION TAXIWAY API-NIN TAXIWAY CENTERLINE B /40 LETrERNUNEER IDE.N TIM It WREN ALL POSITIONS SAME SIZE • GATE LETFE&NUMIBER IDENTIFIER OVER ROTOR ROTOR ALL POSITIONS NOT SAME siZE D 1 Finn A2-3. Olhcr inn-kings 3 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Appendix 3 APPENDIX 3. AVIATION ORGANIZATIONS STATE AVIATION OFFICES ALABAMA COLORADO Alabama Department Of Aeronautics Division of Aeronautics • 770 Washington Avenue,Suite 544 Colorado Department of Transportation Montgomery,AL 36130 6848 South Revere Parkway,Suite 3-101 Telephone 205-242-4972 Englewood,CO 80112-6703 FAX 205-240-3274 Telephone 303-397-3045 FAX 303-397-3042 ALASKA Department of Transportation& CONNECTICUT Public Facilities Bureau of Aviation and Ports P.O. Box 196900 Connecticut Department of Transportation Anchorage,AK 99519-6900 24 Wolcott Hill Road Telephone 907-266-1465 P.O. Drawer A FAX 907-243-1512 Wethersfield,CT 06129-0801 Telephone 203-566-3076 ARIZONA FAX 203-566-4904 Division of Aeronautics Arizona Department of Transportation DELAWARE 2612 South 46th Street Aeronautics Administration Phoenix,AZ 85034 Delaware Transportation Authority Telephone 602-255-7691 Department of Transportation FAX 602-255-7037 P.O.Box 778 Dover,DE 19903 ARKANSAS Telephone 302-739-3264 Department of Aeronautics FAX 302-739-5711 Regional Airport Terminal Building No. 1 Airport Drive FLORIDA Little Rock,AR 72202 Aviation Office Telephone 501-376-6781 Florida Department of Transportation FAX 501-378-0820 605 Suwannee Street Mail Stop 46 CALIFORNIA Tallahassee,FL 32399-0450 Division of Aeronautics Telephone 904-488-8444 California Department of Transportation FAX 904-487-3403 1130 K Street,4th Floor P.O.Box 942873 GEORGIA Sacramento,CA 94273-0001 Georgia Department of Transportation Telephone 916-322-9965 Office of Intermodal Programs . FAX 916-327-9093 276 Memorial Drive,SW Atlanta,GA 30303-3743 Telephone 404-651-9201 FAX 404-651-5209 1 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 Appendix 2 HAWAII KENTUCKY Airports Division Office of Aeronautics Hawaii Department of Transportation Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Honolulu International Airport 421 Ann Street Honolulu,HI 96819-1898 Frankfort,KY 40622 Telephone 808-836-6542 Telephone 502-564-4480 FAX 808-836-6441 FAX 502-564-7953 IDAHO LOUISIANA Bureau of Aeronautics Aviation Division Idaho Department of Transportation Department of Transportation&Development 3483 Rickenbacker Street P.O.Box 94245 P.O. Box 7129 Baton Rouge,LA 70804-9245 Boise,ID 83705 Telephone 504-379-1242 Telephone 208-334-8786 FAX 504-379-1394 FAX 208-334-8789 MAINE ILLINOIS Air Transportation Division Division of Aeronautics Maine Department of Transportation Department of Transportation State House Station#16 Capital Airport-One Langhorne Bond Dr. Augusta,ME 04333 Springfield,IL 62707-8415 Telephone 207-289-3186 Telephone 217-785-8544 FAX 207-289-2805 FAX 217-785-4533 MARYLAND INDIANA Maryland Aviation Administration Division of Aeronautics Maryland Department of Transportation Indiana Department of Transportation P.O.Box 8766 143 West Market Street,Suite 300 Baltimore/Washington Intl.Airport Indianapolis,IN 46204 MD 21240 Telephone 317-232-1496 Telephone 410-859-7100 FAX 317-232-1499 FAX 410-850-4729 IOWA MASSACHUSETTS Office of Aeronautics Massachusetts Aeronautics Commission Air and Transit Division 10 Park Plaza,Room 6620 Iowa Department of Transportation Boston,MA 02116-3966 International Airport Telephone 617-973-7350 Des Moines,IA 50321 FAX 617-973-7351 Telephone 515-287-3315 FAX 515-287-7731 MICHIGAN Bureau of Aeronautics KANSAS Department of Transportation Division of Aviation 2nd Floor,Terminal Building Kansas Department of Transportation Capital City Airport Docking State Office Building Lansing,MI 48906 915 SW Harrison Telephone 517-373-1834 Topeka,KS 66612-1568 FAX 517-886-0366 Telephone 913-296-2553 FAX 913-296-7927 2 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Appendix 3 MINNESOTA NEW JERSEY Aeronautics Office Office of Aviation Minnesota Department of Transportation New Jersey Department of Transportation Transportation Building,Room 417 1035 Parkway Avenue CN 610 395 John Ireland Boulevard Trenton,NJ 08625 St.Paul,MN 55155 Telephone 609-530-2900 Telephone 612-296-8202 FAX 609-530-5719 FAX 612-297-5643 NEW MEXICO MISSISSIPPI Aviation Division Mississippi Aeronautics Bureau State Highway and Transportation Department Department of Economic&Community Development P.O. Box 1149 100 Airport Drive Santa Fe,NM 87504-1149 Jackson,MS 39208 Telephone 505-827-0332 Telephone 601-354-6970 FAX 505-827-0431 FAX 601-354-6969 NEW YORK MISSOURI Aviation Division Department of Highways&Transportation New York State Department of Transportation Aviation Section 1220 Washington Avenue P.O. Box 270 Albany,NY 12232 Jefferson City,MO 65102 Telephone 518-457-2821 Telephone 314-751-2589 FAX 518-457-9779 FAX 314-751-6555 NORTH CAROLINA MONTANA Division of Aviation Aeronautics Division North Carolina Department of Transportation Department of Transportation P.O.Box 25201 P.O. Box 5178 Raleigh,NC 27611 Helena,MT 59604 Telephone 919-840-0112 Telephone 406-444-2506 FAX 919-840-0645 FAX 406-444-2519 NORTH DAKOTA NEBRASKA North Dakota Aeronautics Commission Nebraska Department of Aeronautics 2301 University Drive P.O.Box 82088 Box 5020 Lincoln,NB 68501 Bismarck,ND 58502 Telephone 402-471-2371 Telephone 701-224-2748 FAX 402-471-2906 FAX 701-224-2780 NEVADA OHIO Nevada Department of Transportation Ohio Department of Transportation 1263 South Stewart Street Division of Aviation Carson City,NV 89712 2829 West Dublin-Granville Road Telephone 702-687-5440 Columbus,OH 43235 FAX 702-687-4846 Telephone 614-793-5040 FAX 614 761-9609 NEW HAMPSHIRE Division of Aeronautics OKLAHOMA New Hampshire Department of Transportation Oklahoma Aeronautics Commission Municipal Airports 65 Airport Road Department of Transportation Building Concord,NH 03302-5298 200 N.E.21st Street,B-7 Ist Floor Telephone 603-271-2551 Oklahoma City OK 73105 FAX 603-271-1689 Telephone 405-521-2377 FAX 405-521-2524 3 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 Appendix 2 OREGON TENNESSEE Division of Aeronautics Office of Aeronautics Oregon Department of Transportation Tennessee Department of Transportation 3040-25th Street,S.E. PD.Box 17326 Salem,OR 97310 Nashville,TN 37217 Telephone 503-378-4880 Telephone 615-741-3208 FAX 503-373-1688 FAX 615-741-4959 PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS Bureau of Aviation Texas Department of Transportation Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics 208 Airport Drive P.O.Box 12607 Harrisburg International Airport Austin,TX 78711-2607 Middletown,PA 17057 Telephone 512-476-9262 Telephone 717-948-3915 FAX 512-479-0294 FAX 717-948-3527 UTAH PUERTO RICO Aeronautical Operations Division Puerto Rico Ports Authority Utah Department of Transportation P.O.Box 362829 135 North 2400 West San Juan,PR 00936-2829 Salt Lake City,UT 84116 Telephone 809-723-2260 Telephone 801-533-5057 FAX 809-722-7867 FAX 801-533-6048 RHODE ISLAND VERMONT Rhode Island Department of Transportation Agency of Transportation Department of Airports 133 State Street Theodore Francis Green State Airport Montpelier,VT 05633 Warwick,RI 02886 Telephone 802-828-2093 Telephone 401-737-4000 FAX 802-828-2829 FAX 401-732-4953 VIRGINIA SOUTH CAROLINA Department of Aviation South Carolina Aeronautics Commission 4508 S. Laburnum Avenue P.O. Box 280068 Richmond,VA 23231-2422 Columbia,SC 29228-0068 Telephone 804-786-1364 Telephone 803-822-5400 FAX 804-786-3690 FAX 803-822-8002 WASHINGTON SOUTH DAKOTA Division of Aeronautics Office of Aeronautics Washington Department of Transportation 700 Broadway Avenue East 8600 Perimeter Road-Boeing Field Pierre,SD 57501-2586 Seattle, WA 98108-3885 Telephone 605-773-3574 Telephone 206-764-4131 FAX 605-773-3921 FAX 206-764-4001 4 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Appendix 3 WEST VIRGINIA WYOMING Department of Transportation Wyoming Department of Transportation Building 5,Room A-109 5300 Bishop Boulevard West Virginia State Capital P.O.box 1708 Charleston,WV 25305 Cheyenne,WY 82002-9019 Telephone 304-348-0444 Telephone 307-777-4480 FAX 304-348-4076 FAX 307-637-7352 WISCONSIN Bureau of Aeronautics Division of Transportation Assistance Wisconsin Department of Transportation P.O. Box 7914 Madison, WI 53707-7914 Telephone 608-266-3351 FAX 608-267-6748 5 AC 150/5390-2A 1/20/94 Appendix 2 Aviation Organization/Associations AIRPORT CONSULTANTS COUNCIL HELICOPTER SAFETY ADVISORY CONFERENCE 421 King Street,Suite 220 c/o Exxon USA-Offshore Division Alexandria,VA 22314 P.O.Box 60626 Telephone 703-683-5900 New Orleans,LA 70160 FAX 703-549-4749 Telephone 504-561-4314 FAX 504-5614808 AMERICAN HELICOPTER SOCIETY 217 N. Washington St. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AVIATION Alexandria,VA 22314 OFFICIALS Telephone 703-684-6777 Metro Plaza One-Suite 505 FAX 703-739-9279 8401 Colesville Road Silver Spring,MD 20910 ASSOCIATION OF MR MEDICAL SERVICES Telephone 301-588-0587 35 S. Raymond Avenue, Suite 205 FAX 301-588-1288 Pasadena,CA 91105 Telephone 818-793-1232 NATIONAL BUSINESS AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION FAX 818-793-1039 1200 18th Street,Northwest,Suite 200 Washington,D.C.20036 HELICOPTER ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL Telephone 202-783-9000 1619 Duke Street FAX 202-331-8364 Alexandria,VA 22314-3406 Telephone 703 683-4646 NATIONAL EMS PILOTS ASSOCIATION FAX 703-6834745 35 South Raymond Avenue,No.205 Pasadena,CA 91105 Telephone 818-577-7600 FAX 818-793-1039 6 1/20/94 AC 150/5390-2A Appendix 3 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIRPORTS DIVISION OFFICES ALASKAN REGION CENTRAL REGION Alaskan Regional Office IA,KS,MO,NE AK Central Regional Office Airports Division,AAL-600 Airports Division,ACE-600 222 West 7th Avenue,Box 14 601 East 12th Street Anchorage,AK 99513 Kansas City,MO 64106 Telephone 907-271-5438 Telephone 816-426-4698 FAX 907-271-2851 FAX 816-426-3265 NEW ENGLAND REGION SOUTHWEST REGION CT,MA,ME,NH,RI,VT AR,LA,NM,OK,TX New England Regional Office Southwest Regional Office Airports Division,ANE-600 Airports Division,ASW-600 12 New England Executive Park 2061 Meacham Boulevard Burlington,MA 01803-5299 Fort Worth,Texas 76173-4298 Telephone 617-238-7044 Telephone 817-222-5600 FAX 617-238-7608 FAX 817-22-5984 EASTERN REGION NORTHWEST MOUNTAIN REGION DC,DE,MD,NJ,NY,PA,VA, WV CO,ID,MT,OR, UT,WA,WY Eastern Regional Office Northwest Regional Office Airports Division,AEA-600 Airports Division,ANM-600 JFK International Airport 1601 Lind Avenue SW,Suite 540 Fitzgerald Federal Building Renton,Washington 98055-4056 Jamaica,NY 11430 Telephone 206-227-2600 Telephone 718-553-1239 FAX 206-227-1600 FAX 718-995-9219 WESTERN-PACIFIC REGION SOUTHERN REGION AZ,CA,HI,NV,GU AL,FL,GA,KY,NC,SC,TN,PR,VI Western-Pacific Regional Office Southern Regional Office Airports Division,AWP-600 Airports Division,ASO-600 15000 Aviation Boulevard 1701 Columbia Avenue Hawthorne,CA 920261 College Park,Georgia 30337 Telephone 310-297-1240 Telephone 404-305-6700 FAX 310-297-0490 FAX 404-305-6730 GREAT LAKES REGION IL,IN,MI,MN,ND,OH,SD, WI Great Lakes Regional Office Airports Division,AGL-600 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines,IL 60018 Telephone 708-294-7272 FAX 708-294-7036 7 EXHIBIT D o CP sell Helicopter , A Textron Company ❑ a n ❑ Noise Footprint - '.- coco 1 m a , 3 co A N J T �. LOCATION i E I CITY 1 -A CENTER LANDING PATH 46..,,__T T a 6 URBAN thIA SHOPPING CENTER tillA (4 6 t0 m 13 (2 1110 437631 I 0 m /E m URBAN o 1+.. DISTANCE FROM LANDING, 1000 FT$0 FT HOVER RESIDENEIAI N 6:1 ~�' All 10 Ft S ro i MVH ^0tat••• b 5 IU 1S 210 ❑ SECONDS APPROACH ANC LANDING PROFILE ?S<'. F1 0 a EXHIBIT D • RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SECOND AMENDED SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT#894 FOR AN EXISTING OIL AND GAS SUPPORT AND SERVICE OPERATION - KAUFFMAN LAND AND DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing on the 10th day of September, 1997, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board for the purpose of hearing the application of Kauffman Land and Development, 1675 Broadway, Suite 1970, Denver, Colorado 80202, for a Site Specific Development Plan and Second Amended Special Review Permit#894 for an existing oil and gas support and service operation on the following described real estate, to-wit: Lot A of Recorded Exemption 1921, and being part of the SE% of Section 9, Township 2 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado WHEREAS, said applicant was represented by Molly Sommerville, Attorney, at said hearing, and WHEREAS, Section 24.4.2 of the Weld.County Zoning Ordinance provides standards for review of said Special Review Permit, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present, studied the request of the applicant and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission and all of the exhibits and evidence presented in this matter and, having been fully informed, finds that this request shall be approved for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Board of County Commissioners that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.4.2 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: A. Section 24.4.2.1 --This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, as amended. The proposal is for a two-acre increase of an existing oil and gas support and service operation and 971989 PL0624 SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT#894 :KAUFFMAN LAND AND DEVELOPMENT PAGE 2 contractor's shop for vehicle and equipment maintenance relating to those activities, as well as the construction of an addition to the existing shop building, the construction of an additional shop building, and the construction of a permanent office to replace the existing mobile home. The proposed addition is to provide additional space for existing operations, not to increase the intensity of the activity or to add supplemental activities. This is consistent with Agricultural Goal and Policy 5 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan which states the extraction of mineral and oil and gas resources should preserve or minimize the impact on prime agricultural land. The proposed additional two acres are dryland, sandy soils which are not prime farm ground and are not currently in production. The proposal is also consistent with UGB.Goal 2 which states that urban development shall be concentrated in or adjacent to existing municipalities. This proposal is located within the Town of Firestone's Urban Growth Boundary. B. Section 24.4.2.2-- This proposal is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural) Zone District. The Agricultural Zone District is intended to provide areas to conduct agricultural activities without the interference of other, incompatible land uses. The Agricultural Zone District is also intended to provide areas for the conduct of Uses by Special Review which have been determined to be more intense or to have a potentially greater impact than Uses Allowed by Right. This proposal is consistent with Section 31.4.1 Mineral Resource Development facilities including oil and gas support and service in the A (Agricultural) Zone District of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. C. Section 24.4.2.3 -- The proposal is consistent with Section 24.4.2.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, and will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. The surrounding properties are zoned agricultural and include the following uses: open range land to the north and south, an existing turkey facility to the east, and one residence approximately '/e mile to the west. Conditions of Approval and Development Standards ensure that the proposed uses will remain compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. D. Section 24.4.2.4 -- The proposed uses will be compatible with future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the A (Agricultural) Zone District and with the future development as projected by the Comprehensive Plan or Master Plan of affected municipalities. The site is located within the Town of Firestone's Urban Growth Boundary and the 971989 PL0624 SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT#894 - KAUFFMAN LAND AND DEVELOPMENT PAGE 3 Tri-Area IGA boundary. Although the Town of Firestone is requesting that the applicant execute an annexation agreement pursuant to Section 4.3(b) of the IGA, the Weld County Board of Commissioners indicated during the review of USR-1151, dated July 30, 1997, that Section 4.3(b) is not intended to apply to applications for the expansion of an existing use. It is staffs opinion that the concerns received from the Town of Firestone and the Weld County Health and Public Works Departments will be addressed by the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards placed upon this application. E. Section 24.4.2.5--The proposal is located within the Town of Firestone's Urban Growth Boundary area as delineated in the IGA. The site is not located within any other Overlay District areas identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County. F. Section 24.4.2.6-- The site is not classified as prime agricultural land. The proposed additional two acres are dryland, sandy soils and are currently not in production. G. Section 24.4.2.7--The Design Standards (Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended), Operation Standards (Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended), Conditions of Approval, and Development Standards ensure that there are adequate provisions for the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and county. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the application of Kauffman Land and Development for a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit #894 for an existing oil and gas support and service operation on the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, granted subject to the following conditions: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review Plat prior to recording the plat. The completed plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 30 days of approval by the Weld County Board of Commissioners. 971989 PL0624 SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT#894 :KAUFFMAN LAND AND DEVELOPMENT PAGE 4 2. The amended Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording the plat the applicant shall address the following conditions: A. The oil tank which is currently being utilized as a sign at the corner of the site is considered a structure as defined in Section 10 S of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. The applicant shall submit evidence to the Department of Planning Services that this structure has either been removed or has been made to comply with requirements set forth in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, including required zoning setbacks, offsets, and Section 42, Sign regulations, as well as meeting requirements set forth in the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. B. The applicant shall submit a screening plan to the Department of Planning Services for approval. The plan shall be in accordance with Section 24.5.1.10 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, and include a specific implementation schedule. C. The applicant shall submit a parking plan to the Department of Planning Services for review and approval by the Public Works Department. The plan shall conform to Section 41 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended, and include a specific implementation schedule. The plat shall be amended to include the approved parking plan. D. The applicant shall submit a storm water drainage study and plan to the Weld County Public Works Department for approval. The plan shall conform to Section 10.12 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance and include a specific implementation schedule. The applicant shall submit evidence of approval by the Public Works Department to the Department of Planning Services. E. The applicant shall submit evidence to the Department of Planning Services that the cross culvert which flows under the existing access is cleared of all sand and debris restricting storm-water run-off. F. The applicant shall submit a wastewater discharge plan to the Weld County Health Department for approval. G. If applicable, an Air Pollution Emission Notice (A.P.E.N.) and Emissions Permit application must be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Division, 971989 PL0624 SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT#894 =KAUFFMAN LAND AND DEVELOPMENT PAGE 5 Colorado Department of Health, for emissions of criteria, hazardous or odorous air pollutants. Sources of such emissions include, but are not limited to, the following: sandblasting operations, mining, spray paint booths, dry cleaners, haul road traffic, composting, boilers, and incinerators. H. The plat shall indicate an additional ten (10) feet of right-of-way reservation for future expansion of Weld county Road 19 for a total of forty (40) feet from the centerline of Weld County Road 19. 4. Access shall be limited to the existing access on Weld County Road 22. No additional accesses will be granted. 5. If and when the applicant proceeds with the construction of a permanent office to replace the existing mobile home, applicant shall have thirty (30) days from the Certificate of Occupancy date to remove existing mobile home. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 10th day of September, A.D., 1997. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD C UNTY, COLDO ATTEST: i� l �!1 ;rl�; � eorge E. Baxter, Chair Weld County Clerk : l'� _y (///// %//r{� ;; nstance L. Harbe ro-Tem B P a\mow._. , ate. 0-.uty Clerk to th � !M N ' ` , Dale K. Hall APPROV S TO F M: EXCUSED Barbara J. Kirkmeyer y A i ) ty Attorne /1 4k �// ),,it ;52 W. H. Webster 971989 PL0624 • SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS KAUFFMAN LAND AND DEVELOPMENT USR#894 1. The Amendment to a Site Specific Development Plan and Special Use Permit is for an oil and gas support and service operation and contractor's shop for vehicle and equipment maintenance relating to those activities in the A (Agricultural) zone district, as indicated in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right to the same extent available for a new site specific Development Plan pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended effective upon the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 3. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 5. All waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. 6. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 7. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the light industrial limit of 70 db(A), as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 8. The applicant shall provide and maintain adequate toilet facilities for employees and the public. 9. The septic system for the proposed office is required to be designed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal Regulations. The septic system for the shop addition is required to be reviewed by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. 10. Storage of materials, derelict vehicles and equipment shall be visually screened from all adjacent properties and road rights-of-way. 11. If and when applicant proceeds with the construction of a permanent office to replace the existing mobile home, applicant shall have thirty (30) days from the Certificate of Occupancy date to remove existing mobile home. 971989 PL0624 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - KAUFFMAN LAND AND DEVELOPMENT (USR #894) PAGE 2 12. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 13. A spillage retention berm shall be required around the fuel tanks. The volume retained by the spillage berm should be greater than the volume of the largest tank inside the berm. 14. All pesticides, fertilizer and other potentially hazardous chemicals must be stored and handled in a safe manner. Reference Section 25-8-205.5 of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act and Rules and Regulations thereof. 15. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. 16. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as amended. 17. Personnel from the Weld County Health Department and Weld County Department of Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County regulations. 18. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing standards and all applicable Weld County regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 19. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 971989 PL0624 Hello