HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050559.tiff Weld County Planning Department
GREELFY OFFICE
JAN Oh 2005
MEMORANDUM RECENED
' TO: Jacqueline Hatch, Planner DATE: 05-January-2005
W� Q FROM: Peter Schei, P.E., Civi neer, Public Works Department
C.
COLORADO SUBJECT: MF-1053 Prairie Ridge Estates Minor Subdivision (Final Plat)
Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed final plan materials and has the following development referral
comments.
Comments
❑ The engineer has not shown intersection sight distance triangle on the roadway plans.
o Intersection sight distance triangles at the development entrance shall be shown and dimensioned on the roadway
construction plans. All landscaping within the triangles must be less than 3''/ feet in height at maturity,and noted on
the final roadway plans.
U Although the interior roadway (Carlson Court) exceeds the County standard maximum length, Public Works finds the roadway
geometries acceptable given that an emergency access is provided at the southern terminus to CR l7.
❑ The engineer has not sealed the final plat and construction drawings.
o The applicant shall submit to Public Works stamped, signed and dated final plat drawings and roadway /
construction& grading plan drawings for review(with the final application). This is consistent with County Code:
Sec. 24-3-50,"The minor subdivision final plat submitted shall contain the original signatures and seals of all parties
required."
o Final drainage construction and erosion control plans(conforming to the drainage report)stamped,signed and dated
by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado shall be submitted with the final plan application.
❑ The Final Drainage Report for Prairie Ridge Estates, dated August 15, 2004, by Jeffrey W. Couch, P.E. (Colorado PE #16584)
with TEAM Engineering, is not acceptable. The submitted report is incomplete and seems to be missing pages, when compared
to the sketch plan report.
o The final drainage report shall be resubmitted entirety to Public Works. A final drainage report stamped,signed and
dated by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Colorado shall be submitted with the final plan application.
o The 5-year storm and 100-year storm drainage studies shall take into consideration off-site flows both entering and
leaving the development. Increased runoff due to development will require detention of the 100-year storm
developed condition while releasing the 5-year storm existing condition.
o Complete calculations must be detailed and documented for all stormwater design considerations, including
detention and/or no detention.
o The final drainage report shall include a flood hazard review documenting any FEMA defined floodways. The
engineer shall reference the specific map panel number, including date. The development site shall be located on
the copy of the FEMA map.
❑ The construction plans have no construction information regarding detention/stormwater items.
o The grading plan(s) must be amended to include dimensions and construction details for all drainage facilities,
including drainage swales, culverts and detention ponds. All drainage swales, culverts and detention ponds must be
labeled on the construction plans.
o Driveway/access culverts shall be labeled with appropriate call-outs and detailed on the construction plans.
o Outlet(s)shall be detailed and calculations verifying outflows shall be included.
o Elevations must be included for detention ponds,such as bottom elevation,top of berm,and outlet.
o Drainage facilities shall adhere to Weld County stormwater standards.
EXHIBIT
... .,...,d�,.,."w,.,,,.,,m.. .._ w. M..,._.. Page 1 of2 = 4
2005-0559 3
U The applicant must submit three (3) additional sets of final roadway, drainage, utility / construction plan drawings (stamped,
signed, and dated)to Public Works for Weld County Field Inspectors' use during construction of the subdivision.
• The applicant has not submitted Improvements Agreement According to Policy Regarding Collateral for Improvements (Private
Road Maintenance)for on-site improvements.
o The Public Works Department is providing a copy of this agreement to the applicant/engineer.
o The applicant shall submit a signed agreement to our office.
o All Public Works' items must be addressed in "Exhibit A" for the Improvements Agreement According to Policy
Regarding Collateral for Improvements(Public Road Maintenance).
o Non-transportation items must be verified by the Planning Department prior to scheduling the agreements for
acceptance by the Board of County Commissioners.
o The Board Of County Commissioners prior to recording the final plat shall approve the agreement.
U CR 84 is graveled and maintained by the County. The latest County traffic count(October 22, 2004) is shown as 117 aadt. This
development will introduce approximately 86 vehicle trips to the roadway system. The applicant will be asked to participate at
42%,which is the proportion of traffic generated by the development to the existing traffic.
o The applicant has submitted the Agreement For Improvements For WCR 84 Road Stabilization for Dust Control,
which has been reviewed by Public Works(off-site).
o Public Works is returning a completed agreement to the applicant to be signed and re-submitted to our office.
o The Public Works Department would recommend acceptance of this Agreement for Dust Mitigation.
❑ The applicant or their agents may be required to obtain permits from Weld County's Public Works Right-Of-Way Agent,Ted Eyl,
for each utility.
Recommendation
—❑ The above comments are prerequisites and shall be fulfilled prior to recording the final plat.
Any issues shall be resolved with Public Works prior to recording of the final plat:
PC:M 05 Prairie Ridge Estates Minor Subdivision(Final Plat)
Email&Original:Planner
PC by Post: Applicant JeAr )tEAM t*na i ny�
PC by Post: Engineer gwvyst,
Page 2 of 2
AGREEMENT FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR WCR 84
ROAD STABILIZATION for Dust Control
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of , in the year
2005, by and between George & Mary Carlson, developer of Prairie Ridge Estates Minor
Subdivision, hereinafter referred to as "Developer", with an address 7690 Weld County Road 84,
Weld County Colorado, and the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of
County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "County," with
offices located at 915 - 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Developer has obtained approval for a Subdivision Final Plat for 9
(nine) lots for Prairie Ridge Estates Minor Subdivision, hereinafter referred to as the
"Development," and
WHEREAS, WCR 84 from WCR 15 to WCR 17, hereinafter referred to as 'the Road",
will need ROAD STABILIZATION for dust control, in part, due to the increased traffic generated by
the Development, a distance of approximately one- mile, and
WHEREAS, WCR 84 abuts a portion of Prairie Ridge Estates Minor Subdivision, 9
(nine) of the lots will need WCR 84 for access to the Development, and
WHEREAS, Prairie Ridge Estates Minor Subdivision, requires WCR 84 and will
constitute 42 percent participation for the Road based on a current traffic count of 117 aadt, and
WHEREAS, the proportional costs of STABILIZATION for the Road attributable to the
traffic generated by the lots in the Development using the Road, is estimated to be $3,046 per lot.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained
herein, the parties hereto agree as follow:
1. TERM
A. The term of this Agreement shall be from the date first written above to
the completion of STABILIZING the Road and final accounting by County
and payment of all land development charges by the Developer for the 9
(nine) lots accessing the Road, or five years if WRC 84 is not STABILIZED.
2. OBLIGATIONS OF THE COUNTY
A. Weld County shall STABILIZE the road, within five years of the date first
written above, the Road at a current estimated cost of $62.000. The
stabilization improvements are anticipated to be for two 13 foot travel
lanes designed in accordance with generally accepted engineering
practices but the actual design shall be at the discretion of Weld County.
Page 1 of 5
r
B. Design, construction, and maintenance of this portion of Road shall be the
responsibility by the County.
C. County or Developer must STABILIZE the roads within five years of the
date first written above or forfeit all rights to land development charges,
which are the obligation of the Developer whether already in escrow or
remaining to be paid.
D. Weld County shall perform a final accounting once STABILIZATION is
complete and may collect from the escrow account (or from the developer
if the amount in the escrow is insufficient to satisfy developers obligation)
up to 42 percent of the total cost of STABILIZING WCR 84. If additional
traffic is generated prior to STABILIZING WCR 84, such that the
percentage of traffic generated by the development is less than 42 percent,
the County shall adjust the percentage charged to the developer
proportionately. Any amount which must be collected from the developer,
which is not paid within 45 days of final accounting, shall assessed
interest in the amount of 8 percent per annum.
3. OBLIGATION OF THE DEVELOPER
A. Developer agrees to pay the amount of$3,046 per each lot accessing the
Road. The actual amount shall be determined in accordance with
paragraph 2.D.
B. The Developer agrees to escrow monies as follows at the sale of the first
lot $3,046, at the sale of the second lot $3,046, at the sale of the third lot
$3,046, at the sale of the fourth lot $3,046, at the sale of the fifth lot
$3,046, at the sale of the sixth lot $3,046, at the sale of the seventh lot
$3,046, at the sale of the eighth lot $3,046, at the sale of the ninth lot
$3,046. The escrow account shall be set up according to paragraph 4
herein.
C. The Developer shall not be released from this obligation unless County
does not STABILIZE the road within the time frame set forth in paragraph
2.C. herein. In no event shall Developer's obligation under this Agreement
exceed $27,414 subject to adjustment to a higher or lower figure from the
first quarter of 2005 to the year and quarter in which the contemplated
work is being performed based on "The State Highway Bid Price index
contained in the "Quarterly Cost report" of The Engineering News-Record
as published by The McGraw-Hill Companies.
4. ESCROW AGREEMENT, the terms of which will be subject to review by the
County that provides at least the following:
Page 2 of 5
A. The cash in escrow when fully funded is $27,414.
B. The escrow agent guarantees that the escrowed funds will be disbursed
according to the terms of this agreement and will not release any portion
of the funds without prior written approval of the Weld County Board of
County Commissioners.
5. SEVERABILITY
If any term or condition of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or
unenforceable, this Agreement shall be construed and enforced without such
provision to the extent that this Agreement is then capable of execution within the
original intent of the parties hereto.
6. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY ENFORCEMENT.
It is expressly understood and agreed that the enforcement of the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, and all rights of action relating to such
enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to the undersigned parties and nothing in
this Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right of action whatsoever by any
other person not included in this Agreement. It is the express intention of the
undersigned parties receiving services of benefits under this Agreement shall be
anincidental beneficiary only.
7. MODIFICATION AND BREACH
This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding between the
parties to this Agreement and supersedes any other agreements concerning the
subject matter of this transaction, whether oral or written. No modification,
amendment, notation, renewal, or other alteration of or to this Agreement shall be
deemed valid or of any force or effect whatsoever, unless mutually agreed upon in
writing by the undersigned parties. No Breach of any term, provisions, or clause
of this Agreement shall be deemed waived or excused, unless such waiver or
consent shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have waived or
consented. Any consent by any party hereto, or waiver of, a breach by any other
party, whether express or implied, shall not constitute a consent to waiver of, or
excuse for any other different or subsequent breach.
8. NO WARRANTY.
Neither County nor Developer, by virtue of their entering into this Agreement and
upon their promises to perform the work described herein, make warranties, either
express or implied, that the improvement work and/or maintenance of these roads
meet standards other than those generally required for counties and cities of the
size and type similar to County.
mstAreirrvc_DEVELoo�TREvEw (PF. :..(Fi..2 )f_...®-�„. Page 3 of 5
r-. 9. BINDING
This agreement shall be binding on the heirs, successors, and assigns of the
parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have signed this Agreement this day
of , 2005.
BY:
Developer
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Chair,
BY: Weld County Clerk to the Board
Deputy Clerk to the Board
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
County Attorney
i •
Page 4 of 5
Cost Estimating for Offsite Improvements Agreement 5-Jan-2005 PAS
Weld County Road 84 stabilization for one-mile between CR 15&CR 17. Weld County Public Works Dept.
Two 13-foot lanes =26-feet.
one-mile estimate one-mile 42%
Material Quantity Units Cost per Unit Total Cost Percent Cost
Street Grading 2,542 ydA3 $2.60 ydA3 $6,609.20 $2,799.96
Street Base (Class 6) 2,542 ydA3 $15.00 ydA3 $38,130.00 $16,153.60
Chemical Stabilization 15,253 yd^2 $1.00 yd^2 $15,253.00 $6,461.86
(DC2000)
Engineering &Supervision Costs (fixed) $2,000.00 $2,000.00
Grand Total = 1 $61,992.201 $27,415.411 =%Total
Estimate of Quantities
r Material Length Width Depth Area Area Volume Volume Weight
feet feet feet ft^2 yd^2 ft^3 ydA3 ton
Street Grading 5,280 26 0.5 - - 68,640 2,542 -
Class 6 5,280 26 0.5 - - 68,640 2,542 -
Chemical 5,280 26 - 137,280 15,253 - - -
Proportional Share
Applicant(adtl Total (aadt) Percentage Participation
86 117 42%
Page 5 of 5
Weld County Planning Department
GREELEY OFFICE
DEC 2 2 2004
Memorand
�,ECEIVED
um
TO: Jacqueline Hatch, W.C. Planning
9
DATE: December 20, 2004
Wilge
FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Pub Ic
COLORADO Health and Environment
CASE NO.: MF-1053 NAME: Carlson Revocable Living Trust
The Department has reviewed this final plat application. The applicant proposes a 9 lot minor subdivision on
104.4 acres. The minimum proposed lot size of 10.0 acres coupled with an overall density of one septic
system per 11.6 acres does meet current Department policy.
The application states that water service will be obtained from North Weld County Water District; however no
commitment letter from North Weld County Water District was submitted with the application materials. Sewer
will be provided by individual sewage disposal systems. Because of the large lot sizes, primary and secondary
envelopes are not required on the lots.
There were no plat notes included on the Final Plat submitted with this application. The Board of County
Commissioners approved the application with the following conditions:
1. Water service shall be obtained from North Weld County Water District.
2. Sewage disposal shall be by septic systems designed in accordance with the guidelines of the
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division and the
Weld County Code(WCC)in effect at the time of construction, repair, replacement,or modification
of the system. Each septic system shall be designed for site-specific conditions, including but not
limited to maximum seasonal high groundwater, poor soils,and shallow bedrock. Additionally,all
systems must meet all setbacks as outlined in the WCC.
3. If required, the applicant shall obtain a storm water discharge permit from the Water Quality
Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Silt fences shall
be maintained on the down gradient portion of the site during all parts of the construction phase of
the project.
4. During development of the site, all land disturbances shall be conducted so that nuisance
conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions, at the request of the
Weld County Health Department, a fugitive dust control plan must be submitted.
5. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission any
development that disturbs more than 5 acres of land must incorporate all available and practical
methods that are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust
emissions.
6. If land development creates more than a 25-acre contiguous disturbance,or exceeds 6 months in
duration, the responsible party shall prepare a fugitive dust control plan, submit an air pollution
emissions notice, and apply for a permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment.
7. "Weld County's Right to Farm" as provided in Appendix 22-E of the Weld County Code shall be
placed on any recorded plat.
O:\PAM\Planning\Final Plat\MF-1053 Carlson Revoc.Trust.RTF
1
.N.1 11
Weld County Referral
November 30, 2004
IngC.
COLORADO
The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review:
Applicant Mary F. Carlson and George Case Number MF-1053
B. Carlson, Revocable Living
Trust
Please Reply By December 27, 2004 Planner Jacqueline Hatch
Project Final Plat for a 9-lot minor subdivision- Prairie Ridge Estates.
Legal Lot B of 2n°AmRE-1873; Pt NE4 of Section 8, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld
County, Colorado.
Location South of and adjacent to CR 84 and west of and adjacent to CR 17.
Parcel Number 0705 08 000051
The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you
consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may
give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be
deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions
regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Please note that new
information may be added to applications under review during the review process. If you desire to
examine or obtain this additional information, please call the Department of Planning Services.
Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) February 1, 2005
❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan
❑/We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests.
Q See attached letter.
Comments:
Signature (IV,1/CJ D Date /a A o Y
•
Agency 5(`! f 2KJS eec,e0 -
•
❖Weld County Planning Dept. +918 10th Street,Greeley, CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 ❖(970)304-6498 fax
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
BUILDING INSPECTION
O NORTH OFFICE
918 10th Street
GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
PHONE (970) 353-6100, EXT.3540
FAX (970) 304-6498
ID
SOUTHWEST OFFICE
C. 4209 CR 24.5
LONGMONT CO 80504
PHONE (720)652-4210 ext. 8730
COLORADO FAX (720)652-4211
December 21, 2004
Mary F. Carlson and George B. Carlson, Revocable Living Trust
Final Plat for a 9-lot minor subdivision-Prairie Ridge Estates.
MF-1053
1. Building permits shall be obtained prior to the construction of any building. Building permits are
required for the principle dwelling and for buildings accessory to the principle dwelling.
2. A plan review is required for each building. Two complete sets of plans are required when applying
for each permit. Each building may be required to be designed by a Colorado registered engineer.
3. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the codes adopted by Weld County at the time of
permit application. Current adopted codes include the 2003 International Building Code; 2003
International Mechanical Code; 2003 International Plumbing Code; 2003 International Fuel Gas Code;
2002 National Electrical Code and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code.
4. Each building will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnical report or an
open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be
designed by a Colorado registered engineer.
5. Fire resistance of walls and openings, construction requirements, maximum building height and
allowable areas will be reviewed at the plan review. Setback and offset distances shall be determined
by the Zoning Ordinance.
6. Building height shall be measured in accordance with the 2003 International Building Code for the
purpose of determining the maximum building size and height for various uses and types of construction
and to determine compliance with the Bulk Requirements from Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code.
Building height shall be measured in accordance with Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code in order to
determine compliance with offset and setback requirements. Offset and setback requirements are
measured to the farthest projection from the building.
Please contact me for any further information regarding this project.
Sin ely, ,
f o erCr(
9 9
Building Official
Service,Teamwork,Integrity,Quality
MEMORANDUM
To: Jacqueline Hatch
From: David Tuttle
Date: December 2, 2004
Subject: MK 1053
The letter I sent for MK-1053 in May of 2004 is below. I would assume this
is the same plan. Please refer to the recommendations listed in this letter to
see if the final plan complies.
All of the issues listed below appear to have been addressed with the exception of number
nine. If there is no body of water on the land within this development, this is a moot
issue.
To approve the street names, I will need to have addresses associated with the
names.
1. The sheriff's office requests that builders and developers designate an area by
the entrance of the sub-division in which to place a shelter for school children
awaiting the school bus. This area should also include a pull off for the school
bus which enables it to safely load and unload children out of the roadway in
the event the bus is unable to drive down the street due to road conditions.
2. Either a mail distribution within the sub-division or a central drop off location
within the sub-division should be developed so that residents do not have to
cross a county roadway to obtain their mail.
3. The name of the street and address numbers within the sub-division should be
presented to the sheriffs office for approval. This will eliminate duplication
of street names within the county.
4. A permanent sign should be placed at the entrances to the sub-division
detailing the name of the sub-division, and address. There should be a plan
developed to maintain this sign. Individual addresses also need to be clearly
visible for each residential site.
5. If the roadways within this sub-division are not maintained or adopted by the
county, individuals purchasing property in this sub-division should be notified
that the sheriffs office will have limited traffic enforcement powers.
6. A plan should be developed to maintain roadways within the sub-division
especially during inclement weather conditions for emergency vehicles.
7. The sheriffs office is very supportive of homeowner funded homeowners
associations. These associations provide a contact for the sheriffs office and
a means for maintaining common areas.
8. If there is an oil or gas well within this sub-division. This needs to be fenced
off in order to mitigate the potential for tampering. These facilities are known
to create an attractive nuisance for young people. Tampering not only creates
a significant danger to safety but also of environmental damage with extensive
mitigation and clean-up costs.
9. Any bodies of water in this subdivision should be fenced to restrict access for
safety of the residents.
The Sheriffs Office lacks the ability to absorb any additional service demand without the
resources recommended in the multi-year plan provided to the Board of County
Commissioners or as indicated by growth not considered at the time the plan was
developed. I have no other comments on this proposal.
Hello