HomeMy WebLinkAbout20053488.tiff MEMORANDUM
. TO: Clerk to the Board 11/8/05
COLORADO FROM: Chris Gathman - Planner II L. .
SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval for USR-1527 (Waste Management)
Conditions of approval prior to scheduling the Board of County Commissioners have been
satisfied for case # USR-1527 (Waste Management).
EXHIBIT
SERVICE,TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY,QUALITY /r,,/
2005-3488 �� �
Page 1 of 1
Esther Gesick
From: Chris Gathman
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:53 PM
To: Esther Gesick
Subject: FW: Landscape Cross Sections for Waste Management- USR-1527
Attachments: 7660 XS LOCATION.pdf; 7660 XS.pdf
Esther,
Here are exhibits from the applicant for USR-1527(Waste Management).
Chris
From: Wertz, Chip [mailto:cbwertz@wm.com]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 5:18 PM
To: Chris Gathman
Cc: Leroy Whipkey(E-mail); Bret A. Icenogle (E-mail); Cort Nickel (E-mail); DeWaard, Dan; Hurt, Rick; Smith,
Jim
Subject: FW: Landscape Cross Sections for Waste Management- USR-1527
Dear Chris,
Attached are plans showing location of landscape berm cross sections as well as typical cross sections through
the landscaping berms on the west and north sides of the project. These plans are being submitted as requested
in Condition 2 of items to be completed prior to scheduling a Board of County Commissioners hearing. The *.pdf
files may be printed on either 8.5"x11" or 11"x17" paper. Please let me know if you would also like to have 24"x
36"copies of the cross section plans.
Condition 1 of items to be completed prior to scheduling a Board of County Commissioners hearing consisted of a
request to have CDOT review and comment on the traffic study completed for the project. The traffic study was
completed and submitted to CDOT and the Weld County Department of Planning Services earlier this week. My
understanding is that Gloria Hice-Idler of CDOT expects to have her review completed with comments and or
recommendations to the Department of Planning Services by end of day Monday October 31, 2005.
Should you have any questions regarding the landscape berm cross sections, traffic study or need any additonal
information in order to set the date for the Board of County Commissioners hearing, please contact me at either
303-914-1438 or 303-944-7521.
Sincerely,
WM Chip Wertz
Manager of Construction
Waste Management - Colorado Landfills
8310 S. Valley Hwy, Suite 200
Englewood, CO 80112
Phone: 303-914-1438 Fax: 303-914-1588
11/10/2005
COUNTY ROAD 25
inc 1! I =
PI NSNOR P
i
ii
9 jI
2
I
J R<il
( p Y a I
I
aY❑❑
I Wg I MRmaPM R
I 11
to ... DI _ - _
Ii
y
s a
gg R
F i E - II �, III
Fi i I I., A
0
I
ll
11 5 .
a J R
01-J 1H5 335 '3N1H)lYll
IIo
pia
!a
li
WASTE RANAGERENT CE NORTHERN CCLCRA00 m. a-mn-m mom n ex PROGRESS PRINT
OPFRARORS FAOUTY we MN n u NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONDAM ROlhbrrg,TbnIbunni&Winsor,Inc.
E CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS oammxo amo-cn mx n we ant MX !BMW Nmsm, Pmhssbal r?odos rs&CommYnts
rancwna Glenda
I / I
iii
�nsm Nom
lip
wan
IR
Im..m
I I
I I I
al
f9A
SI
R-
WASTE MANAGEMENT(.f NGAMERM CClgUDO GRESS PRPI
�FAATg15 FAgOtt no-co rmPRO macnxsrnurna. fbQlbG7'g,7limbur O&Wmsa,IOC.
LANDSCAPE CROSS SECTIONS .m .,00-so omens o® 4lo-.lmolo�l rwnim.:rna cm.unao-
MEMORANDUM
op co co
• TO: Chip Wertz, Waste Management
LO Leroy Whipkey, Landmark Construction Services, Inc ,
o co Chris Gathman, Weld County Planning Department c
oDepartment
Co Peter Schei, Weld County Engineering
o Gloria Hice-Idler, CDOT ;;. s
O (3) - 4] 3=0
• x FROM: Matt Delich - � '
a j�/
LL DATE: October 20, 2005 r
o SUBJECT: Waste Management of Northern Colorado operations facility'"`
traffic impact study (File: 0557ME01)
w O
> N
cTi 6
O co This memorandum is a traffic impact study (TIS) for the
l 6 proposed Waste Management of Northern Colorado operations facility,
a rn located in the northeast quadrant of the SH14/WCR25 intersection, in
= Weld County. The site location is shown in Figure 1. The proposed
w operations facility is essentially a consolidation of Waste
i7 = Management vehicles to/from Greeley and Fort Collins to company owned
c‘: a property adjacent to the North Weld Sanitary Landfill site. The year
N2008 was chosen for the short range analysis. The long range
analysis year is assumed to be 2025. Primary access is intended at
the existing SH14/Landfill Access (WCR25) intersection. There are no
capital improvement projects on any of the roads in the vicinity of
the Waste Management operations facility. The State Highway Access
Code (2002) is used for determining the required lengths for
auxiliary lanes and tapers at the SH14/Landfill Access intersection.
Figure 2 shows recent peak hour traffic counts at the
SH14/Landfill Access intersection. Raw traffic data is provided in
Appendix A. Figure 3 shows the existing geometry, including
auxiliary lane lengths and tapers, at the SH14/Landfill Access
intersection. These auxiliary lanes were measured in the field using
W a "wheel" measuring device and rounded to the nearest five feet.
a• ,R Waste Management constructed these auxiliary lanes in 1991, in
' i accordance with CDOT specifications prior to opening the North Weld
w Landfill in February 1992. It is likely that the posted speed on
I Z SH14 was 55 mph in 1991. Using the volumes shown in Figure 2, the
c) z key intersections operate as indicated in Table 1. Calculation forms
are provided in Appendix B. During traffic counting, the number of
J lL
Z trucks (heavy vehicles) using the Landfill Access was also counted.
W o The heavy vehicle percentage for each movement, as well as a heavy
o F vehicle factor of 11% for SH14, was used in the analyses. As can be
m seen in Table 1, the SH14/Landfill Access intersection currently
7 05 operates acceptably. State Highway 14 is categorized as a RA highway
a in this area. The posted speed on SH14 is 65 mph. This road is
considered to be in good condition. There are no known deficient
1— structures in the area. Land uses in the area are agriculture, open,
W 'o or residential.
= U
I"' a Table 2 shows the existing trip generation and future trip
generation at the site. Having all Waste Management trucks based at
the landfill site will reduce the number of entering trucks in the
morning peak hour and the number of exiting trucks in the afternoon
peak hour. These eliminated truck trips will become passenger car type
vehicle trips. For analysis purposes, it was assumed that the Waste
Management truck activity would double and the contractor (non-Waste
Management) truck activity would remain constant in the future.
The trip distribution for the Waste Management operations facility
was based upon the existing counts, travel patterns in the area, and
consideration of trip productions in Northern Colorado. The existing
roadways in the area also play a role in developing trip distribution. The
trip distribution for Waste Management operations facility is shown in
Figure 4. Figure 5 shows the assignment of the peak hour site generated
traffic.
Short range (2008) and long range (2025) traffic forecasts were
obtained by factoring the counted peak hour through traffic on SH14 by
factors obtained from the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT)
Highway Traffic Statistics for SH14. The 20-year factor for this segment
of SH14 is 1.26. This factor results in a growth rate of 1.25% per year
compounded annually. Figures 6 and 7 show the respective short range
(2008) and long range (2025) total traffic at the SH14/Landfill Access
intersection.
Using the volumes shown in Figures 6 and 7, the SH14/Landfill Access
intersection will operate as indicated in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.
Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C and D, respectively. The
levels of service at the key intersections are similar to that shown with
the existing traffic.
Figure 8 shows the required geometry, including auxiliary lane
lengths and tapers, at the SH14/Landfill Access intersection. The storage
requirement for the eastbound left-turn lane used three passenger car
equivalents for each truck in the traffic forecast. A taper ratio at 25:1
for a 12 foot lane results in a bay taper of 300 feet. A comparison of
Figure 3 and Figure 8 indicates that all lanes, except for the westbound
right-turn deceleration lane, are substandard. The westbound right-turn
deceleration lane is 130 feet longer than required. The westbound right-
turn acceleration lane is 115 feet short of the required length. The
eastbound left-turn acceleration lane is 180 feet short of the required
length. The eastbound left-turn deceleration/storage lane is 60 feet short
of the required length. These differences are not significant enough to
compromise the safety at this intersection.
It is concluded that the proposed Waste Management of Northern
Colorado operations facility will have minimal impact on the area roads.
The required auxiliary lanes currently exist at the SH14/Landfill Access
intersection. The SH14/Landfill Access will operate acceptably.
S
N
N
Proposed Waste
8 Management of
Northern Colorado
1) /Operations Facility
Weld County Rd 84
cn
O �
North Weld
Sanitary
c) Landfill
.-. State Highway 14
SCALE: 1"=3000'
SITE LOCATION Figure 1
N
Co
8
C
J
O O
�J 12/4
! -•••---219/161
25/16 SH14
123/248 -N►
AM/PM
RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2
N
U)
U)
8
J
570'deceleration lane plus 360'taper
935'acceleration lane plus 330'taper
1105'acceleration lane plus 95'taper SH14
580'deceleration lane plus 205'taper
- Denotes Lane
EXISTING GEOMETRY Figure 3
TABLE 1
Current Peak Hour Operation
L�eNnef of §erlrio�`
SB LT B B
SH14/Landfill Access SB RT B B
(stop sign) SB APPROACH B B
EB LT A A
r
TABLE 2
Current and Future Trip Generation for the North Weld Sanitary Landfill
V.hWash} stn 1 , 4
y� u C7ut
Current Facility
Truck 22 Total 21 Total 8 Total 10 Total
11 Waste Management 11 Waste Management 4 Waste Management 4 Waste Management
Car 15 Total 10 Total 12 Total 10 Total
Facility with Waste Management Based Trucks plus Increase
Truck 11 Total 33 Total 12 Total 6 Total
0 Waste Management 22 Waste Management 8 Waste Management 0 Waste Management
Car 37 Total 10 Total 12 Total 18 Total
N
AIL
41
J / \
Site
58% \ / _ 42%
74% \ / 26%
SH14
Cars
Trucks
TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4
a
N
N
Ul
G)
8
U
C
(6
J
V O
O M
M
f 19/8
29/16 SH14
-- AM/PM
SITE GENERATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 5
S
N
U)
J
wT
I19/8
---227/167
29/16 SH14
128/257 i
r
AM/PM
SHORT RANGE (2008) TOTAL Figure 6
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
AS
N
U)
!/1
N
J
V O
M
i 19/8
f-280/0/206
29/16 SH14
157/317 -►
AM/PM
LONG RANGE (2025) TOTAL Figure 7
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
TABLE 3
Short Range(2008) Total Peak Hour Operation
Inter ion M .,; M1r8j o4'Serlrirhe;
SB LT B B
SH14/Landfill Access SB RT B A
(stop sign) SB APPROACH B B
EB LT A A
TABLE 4
Long Range (2025) Total Peak Hour Operation
Mersectlon Mnf of
SB LT B B
SH14/Landfill Access SB RT B A
(stop sign) SB APPROACH B B
EB LT A A
S
N
N
(W)
U
V
co
J1
800'deceleration lane including taper at 25:1 Apri La1/4 1380'acceleration lane including taper at 25:1
13� 80'acceleration lane including taper at 25:1 SH14
845'deceleration/storage lane including taper at 25:1
- Denotes Lane
REQUIRED GEOMETRY Figure 8
APPENDIX A
f
1 MATTHEY \FPELICH, P.E. 1
2272 GLEN HAVEN DRIVE
LOVELAND,CO 80538
Phone: (970)669-2061
TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS
Date: 7.12.05 Observer: Joe
Day: Tuesday City: Weld County
R-right turnIntersection: SH141Landfill
S=straight
L= left turn _
Time Northbound: Southbound: Landfill Total Eastbound: SH14 Westbound: SH14 Total Total
Begins C S R Total L S R f Total north/south L S R Total LSR Total eastiwest All
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 30 _ 45 0 45 75 75 M1
7:30 0 2 7 9 9 6 38 44 52 6 58 102 111
7:45 0 4 3 7 7 7 24 31 56 3 59 90 97
j 8:00 0 3 4 7 7 6 26 32 51 2 53 85 92
C' 8:15 0 2 6 8 8 6 35 41 60 1 61 102 110
8:30 0 2 5 7 7 5 28 33 49 2 51 84 91
7:30-8:30 0 0 0 0 11 0 20 31 31 25 123 0 148 0 219 12 231 379 410
PHF n/a 0.86 0.84 0.95
.
Heavy Vehickes 6 15 _16 I [ 6
4:15 0 0 4 4 4 3 41 44 19 2 21 65 69
4:30 0 3 6 9 9 4 53 57 43 2 45 102 111
4:45 0 0 2 2 2 5 48 53 45 0 45 98 100
5:00 0 2 5 7 7 3 71 74 36 1 37 111 118
5:15 0 3 0 3 3 7 66 • 73 37 2 39 112 115
5:30 0 5 3 8 8 1 63 64 43 1 44 108 116
4:45-5:45 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 20 20 16 248 0 264 0 161 4 165 429 449
PHF n!a 0.63 0.89 0.92
-
eavy VehIc ea H _ 2 8 7 1
APPENDIX B
3
3: SH14 & Landfill Access
recent AM 10/14/2005
4— 4.-
Movement EBL EST WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations t + r ►)
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 25 123 219 12 11 20
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86
Hourly flow rate (vph) 29 145 231 13 13 23
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised
Median storage veh) 1
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 243 434 231
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 231
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 204
vCu, unblocked vol 243 434 231
tC, single (s) 4.7 7.0 7.0
tC, 2 stage (s) 5.9
tF (s) 2.8 4.0 4.0
p0 queue free% 97 98 96
cM capacity (veh/h) 1033 536 657
Direction, Lane# EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 29 145 231 13 13 23
Volume Left 29 0 0 0 13 0
Volume Right 0 0 0 13 0 23
cSH 1033 1700 1700 1700 536 657
Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.09 0.14 0.01 0.02 0.04
Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 2 3
Control Delay (s) 8.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.9 10.7
Lane LOS A B B
Approach Delay (s) 1.5 0.0 11.1
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.4
Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.2% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
r
Synchro 6 Light Report
Matthew J. Delich , P. E.
Page 1
A
•
3: SH14 & Landfill Access
recent PM 10/14/2005
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations 'it P
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 16 248 161 4 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86
Hourly flow rate (vph) 19 292 169 4 12 12
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised
Median storage veh) 1
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 174 499 169
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 169
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 329
vCu, unblocked vol 174 499 169
tC, single (s) 4.5 6.6 7.0
tC, 2 stage (s) 5.6
tF (s) 2.6 3.7 4.0
p0 queue free % 98 98 98
cM capacity (veh/h) 1185 558 707
Direction, Lane# EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 19 292 169 4 12 12
Volume Left 19 0 0 0 12 0
Volume Right 0 0 0 4 0 12
cSH 1185 1700 1700 1700 558 707
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.17 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 2 1
Control Delay (s) 8.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.6 10.2
Lane LOS A B B
Approach Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 10.9
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Synchro 6 Light Report
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Page 1
r_
APPENDIX C
6'
•
3: SH14 & Landfill Access
short total AM 10/17/2005
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations ♦ 11 •1 P
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 29 128 227 19 13 30
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86
Hourly flow rate (vph) 34 151 239 20 15 35
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised
Median storage veh) 1
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 259 458 239
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 239
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 219
vCu, unblocked vol 259 458 239
tC, single (s) 4.4 7.1 7.0
tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1
IF (s) 2.5 4.1 4.0
p0 queue free% 97 97 95
r- cM capacity (veh/h) 1169 505 641
Direction, Lane# EB 1 E6 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 34 151 239 20 15 35
Volume Left 34 0 0 0 15 0
Volume Right 0 0 0 20 0 35
cSH 1169 1700 1700 1700 505 641
Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.09 0.14 0.01 0.03 0.05
Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 2 4
Control Delay (s) 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 10.9
Lane LOS A B B
Approach Delay (s) 1.5 0.0 11.4
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.6% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Synchro 6 Light Report
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Page 1
t
•
3: SH14 & Landfill Access
short total PM 10/17/2005
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations f f P '1 P
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 16 257 167 8 10 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86
Hourly flow rate (vph) 19 302 176 8 12 16
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (Ws)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised
Median storage veh) 1
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 184 516 176
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 176
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 340
vCu, unblocked vol 184 516 176
tC, single (s) 4.7 6.6 6.5
tC, 2 stage (s) 5.6
tF (s) 2.7 3.7 3.6
p0 queue free% 98 98 98
cM capacity(veh/h) 1123 549 802
Direction, Lane# EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 19 302 176 8 12 16
Volume Left 19 0 0 0 12 0
Volume Right 0 0 0 8 0 16
cSH 1123 1700 1700 1700 549 802
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.18 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 2 2
Control Delay (s) 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 9.6
Lane LOS A B A
Approach Delay(s) 0.5 0.0 10.5
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.8
Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.5% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Synchro 6 Light Report
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Page 1
APPENDIX D
R
3: SH14 & Landfill Access
long total AM 10/17/2005
l t \. J
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations ►( t f r r
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 29 157 280 19 13 30
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86
Hourly flow rate (vph) 34 185 295 20 15 35
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised
Median storage veh) 1
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 315 548 295
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 295
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 253
vCu, unblocked vol 315 548 295
tC, single (s) 4.4 7.1 7.0
tC, 2 stage (s) 6.1
tF (s) 2.5 4.1 4.0
p0 queue free% 97 97 94
.� cM capacity (veh/h) 1112 465 593
Direction, Lane# EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 34 185 295 20 15 35
Volume Left 34 0 0 0 15 0
Volume Right 0 0 0 20 0 35
cSH 1112 1700 1700 1700 465 593
Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.11 0.17 0.01 0.03 0.06
Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 3 5
Control Delay(s) 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 11.5
Lane LOS A in 1-1
in
Approach Delay (s) 1.3 0.0 11.9
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 1.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.4% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Synchro 6 Light Report
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Page 1
t0
3: SH14 & Landfill Access
long total PM 10/17/2005
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations It ? ir ) P
Sign Control Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 16 317 206 8 10 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.86 0.86
Hourly flow rate (vph) 19 373 217 8 12 16
Pedestrians
Lane Width (ft)
Walking Speed (ft/s)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type Raised
Median storage veh) 1
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 225 627 217
vC1, stage 1 conf vol 217
vC2, stage 2 conf vol 411
vCu, unblocked vol 225 627 217
tC, single (s) 4.7 6.6 6.5
tC,2 stage (s) 5.6
tF (s) 2.7 3.7 3.6
p0 queue free % 98 98 98
cM capacity(veh/h) 1081 498 760
Direction, Lane# EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 SB 2
Volume Total 19 373 217 8 12 16
Volume Left 19 0 0 0 12 0
Volume Right 0 0 0 8 0 16
cSH 1081 1700 1700 1700 498 760
Volume to Capacity 0.02 0.22 0.13 0.00 0.02 0.02
Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 2 2
Control Delay (s) 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.4 9.8
Lane LOS A B A
Approach Delay (s) 0.4 0.0 10.9
Approach LOS B
Intersection Summary
Average Delay 0.7
Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.7% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min) 15
Synchro 6 Light Report
Matthew J. Delich , P. E. Page 1
1/
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING
CERTIFICATE
THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS December 11, 2005. THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED
ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT
ADJACENT TO A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT
OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON
THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY
(ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICALLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
I, , HEREBY CERTIFY UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN WAS POSTED
ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST TEN DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
HEARING FOR USR-1527 IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE DISTRICT.
Chris Gathman
Name of Person Posting Sign
StALQ
Signature of Person Posting Sign
STATE OF COLORADO
) ss.
COUNTY OF WELD2(4
The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me this 6 day of Ci?tr J1 , 2005.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Pm .‘0-11-et/e?
Nctary Public BFT►+Agy :t
cni SWAIN
Nom •..
My Commission Expires: `�, 14L� y` "' ...... •
may. � -�Q,
r `
ky — - rao. _•_ d
K I ,
V i , NOTICE 4 V.I. ,
,. ams I. PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNIN
- 1 . - 0 '� -• -: THIS PROPERTY WILL BE HELD AT:
, 20 M
NAME L .4.
REQUEST .. . .
tr
CASE NO. . . ACRFS ,/ , '
FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL ' E'� F�3''
WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF , -
PLANNING SERVICES AI
_ (9701353-6100 ext 3510 � 't ' I-li t€V�GI
dh \S"
•
clii
. 12 / 09 / 2005
:, n'. ;,
\I44},\ MEM0RANDUM
• TO: Board of County Commissioners
COLORADO FROM: Chris Gathman - Planner II C7 4
SUBJECT: Recommended Revisions to USR-1527
Planning Staff recommends the following revisions to USR-1527:
Insert as development standard # 24 and renumber: "Effective August 1, 2005 building permits
issued on the site will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the Capital Expansion Impact
fee and the Stormwater/drainage impact fee. (Ordinance 2005-8 Section 5-8-40)"
Insert as development standard #25 and renumber: "Effective January 1, 2003, Building
Permits issued on the proposed lots will be required to adhere to the fee structure of the Weld
County Road Impact Program. (Ordinance 2002-11)"
7w
SERVICE.TEAMWORK INTEGRITY,QUALITY
Hello