HomeMy WebLinkAbout20050444.tiff INVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
Applicant Gilcrest IGA Case Number
Submitted or Prepared
Prior to At
Hearing Hearing
1 Staff Comments X
Department of Planning Services Maps and Field Check Forms
Legal Notifications
2 Application X
• Maps
Property Owners
Utilities
3 Referral List X
Referrals with comments
Weld County Department of Public Works, referral received 10/29/2004 X
4 Surrounding Property Owners-Letters
Letter from Jack McClellan X
5 Planning Commission Resolution
I hereby certify that the 4 items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the
scheduled Planning Commissioners hearing.
;1J' �n-r�tf27Gc.er,�
Sheri Lockman ❖ Planner II
2005-0444
MEMORANDUM
TO: Weld County Planning Commission DATE: November 19, 2004
WIDc FROM: Sheri Lockman, Planner II
COLORADO SUBJECT: Intergovernmental Agreement for Gilcrest and Weld County
Since 1994, Weld County has been working with communities in establishing Intergovernmental
Agreements. For your consideration, the Town of Gilcrest and Weld County agreement has been
prepared. It is the Department of Planning Services recommendation that the above mentioned
Intergovernmental Agreement meets the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as follows:
1. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 1 states that Weld County will encourage and assist each
municipality in establishing an intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement. Further,
UGB.Policy 1 states, 'Weld County recognizes that municipalities can and should plan their
own futures in terms of the nature and rate of growth".
Comprehensive Plan UGB.Policy 1.1. The County recognizes that municipalities can and
should plan their own future in terms of the nature and rate of growth. The Town of Gilcrest
stated they are able to provide urban services in the proposed UGB area, and as such, are
modifying their capital improvement plans to be consistent with the proposed boundary.
Comprehensive Plan UGB.Policy 1.2. Revise intergovernmental agreements as required by
changing conditions. Due to the growth in the area, and the need to pro-actively plan services,
Gilcrest is requesting adoption of the proposed UGB.
Comprehensive Plan UGB.Policy 1.3. The County encourages each municipality to plan its
future in coordination with individual landowners in unincorporated Weld County. The
individual landowners of property within the urban growth boundaries shall be notified of any
negotiations and consideration of intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreements. On
October 18, 2004, a community meeting was held in Gilcrest. All effected property owners
were notified by mail.
The Town of Gilcrest has worked with Weld County in establishing this proposed Intergovernmental
Agreement. Through this agreement, the Town of Gilcrest has indicated their interest in planning
for responsible growth. The Department of Planning Services sent out notification to all property
owners in the influence area. This IGA serves as a direct outcome of a commitment to conserve
natural and managed resources while directing growth and enhancing economic development
through efficient use of infrastructure.
2. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal 2 suggests concentrating urban development in or adjacent
to existing municipalities, an approved intergovernmental agreement, the 1-25 Mixed Use
Development area, urban growth boundary areas, urban development nodes, or where urban
infrastructure is currently available or reasonably obtainable. UGB.Policy 2.1 indicates Land
use development proposals within an urban growth boundary area will be determined
according to the procedure set forth in Chapters 22 and 23 of this Code.
ala
The Town of Gilcrest has delineated their Urban Growth Boundary on the attached map. Through
this Intergovernmental Agreement, the Town of Gilcrest has specified the future growth of their
community. Further, it is noted that Weld County recognizes that it is appropriate for its m
municipalities to plan for growth at their current boundaries and in the surrounding areas. X
..paw `
3. Comprehensive Plan UGB.Goal3 states that the County and municipalities should coordinate
land use planning in urban growth boundary areas, including development policies and
standards,zoning,street and highway construction,open space,public infrastructure and other
matters affecting efficient development.
Through this Intergovernmental Agreement with the Town of Gilcrest, the County recognizes that
an intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement is by far the best tool for coordinating
development for municipal/county interface. It is further noted that the County Commissioners
imparted the following criteria to guide the municipalities in developing their urban growth
boundaries. These guidelines are the impetus for many communities in establishing an
Intergovernmental Agreement with Weld County (Section 22-2-100).
Efficient and orderly land development and the conservation of agricultural land suggest that urban-
type development take place in or adjacent to existing municipalities or where adequate
infrastructure is currently available or reasonably obtainable. Urban development adjacent to
municipalities is appropriate if urban services can be extended to serve the area.
The intergovernmental urban growth boundary agreement is a tool for coordinating development
at the municipality/County interface. The individual landowners of property within the urban growth
boundaries shall be notified of any negotiations and consideration of intergovernmental urban
growth boundary agreements. In the spring of 1994, believing that each community should direct
its growth, the Board of County Commissioners began contacting each municipality to establish
their own tailor-made growth areas. The Board of County Commissioners imparted three (3)
criteria to guide the municipalities:
1. Growth should pay for itself in terms of initial costs, and in the long range, through
good design and functional efficiency.
2. Annexation patterns should directly correlate with municipal service areas.
3. When a municipality and the County enter into an urban growth boundary
agreement, the County agrees to consider the municipality's vision for future
development in the area. Likewise, the municipality agrees to limit its expansion to
the defined areas where it plans to provide municipal services. It is understood that
urban growth is an ongoing process and urban growth boundary agreements will
be subject to revision as needed.
The purpose of this Intergovernmental Agreement between the Town of Gilcrest and Weld County
is to establish procedures and standards pursuant to which the parties will move toward greater
coordination in the exercise of their land use and related regulatory powers within unincorporated
areas surrounding each municipality. The Town of Gilcrest exercises governmental authority over
the same matter within its boundaries; including annexations. The premise for this
Intergovernmental Agreement is similar to the agreement for the fourteen previous agreements this
board has approved. Customized modifications include the following:
It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services staff and at the direction of the County
Attorney that this Intergovernmental Agreement be forwarded to the Planning Commission with
favorable recommendation.
This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the
applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities.
•
FIELD CHECK inspection date: 11/18/2004
CASE NUMBER: USR-1197
APPLICANT: Hunt Feedyard, David Hunt
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NW4 33-4-66
LOCATION: South of and adjacent to County Road 40 and east of and adjacent to
County Road 29
Zoning Land Use
N A (Agricultural) N Agricultural / Residential
E A (Agricultural) E Agricultural / Residential
S A (Agricultural) S Agricultural / Residential
W A (Agricultural) W Agricultural / Residential
COMMENTS: Cindy Etcheverry from Weld County Department of Public
Health and Environment and I met with David Hunt to tour the
feed lot. Mr. Hunt showed us what has been done on the site
to ensure drainage is adequate. In 1999 Mr. Hunt was asked
to address drainage then call the Health Department for a final
approval. He was also asked to update the plat to show feed
storage. It appeared the drainage had been addressed
although the Health Department was not contacted. Ms.
Etcheverry has agreed to review the drainage documents and
contact the State Health Department to verify compliance.
Mr. Hunt agreed to update the plat and submit a landscape
plan for review in that the landscaping was not installed as
proposed.
i/ fr./WI G' 6z
Sheri Lockman , Planner II
•
.;;•.,..„,,k7.., -:.;,!-;:-.4:;:):::;;,-.49.1,647,44:43:4•;�je,,,,:r•-•.--$'
'g„'+fi' t -: y -
1
•
•
•
[
_ 3P� .ypp 4{ X36.v
Y
I .' "-„*x �' i�" aka.
y: • w.+ '�. <[4:41-7i:..4,-:',,:;:.
x. -7.„— , g' r
s xa 9
.vi .;1 • � '% ' r
e
it gi £ 'i ' r,..,://, 1. r 4,1,..";44:-.:"1--
�y h $ x
z 'qy of ! } t r.
d v ,*".,P- x ' a t '!C 3, f < e ,mss,.!` < , .r '1: F+
- +'LC L 64. .r<y�yr4 .:7" ijr .- r y�t ji * �
-Sx $ Yj s" i err, ,S'1.� XA�Ag F 4 }z h ° '`.ti f. a .3 : ',, fi 3
'zd /// s Y .B • 4K
J a -17—„/,',-:,,,,'
x
tl 5"
1 'r
,..,70,.- " v' £
r , 4 �u f Y v' ,d
• fi
✓
Y 4
° ra
pi." � Yrc f 5.- d'� •� iIm'.
3TY > mcv...„."4-..744,-.4:4,74,7.71E;00-71.::i;',.
wMw.. •-n3n .Lk .eY" �f ..
4 t
P °: i �� x�4 $ a Fw.xk'A
�� V `5 qq 3 ( 'x`i S,1-",w ' t ',5. maEM T
�tfl t
* a ' 4ss.�, ''..]:,-,‘;''''4'-11-' _ Sys ..+.,
a ^Sr ,f P§ T cixTY' ', g4'9�a s�
•
om i A 'f L � &q�, 4 t
�. cam' 4
yy N � �
Vfik l'Eg S:i i t
fL�� `t 4
. r; �, } a2
tot
§,. 1 N °ear
fl '
'm, ,. . �.i
4
i c) 1w.a i
1rII
1-I SR-12 .8
7
USR-1 ;185 • " ' 7
Machire' -epair
nl i-'
__I
7 „„Lr
o
I 1,..„.,L,
.s„, r„,,,,„„
...,,,_ 27
..., , 7
I
US -866 �„, , /to_
Oil nd Gas
upport i l\
il USR-1197 1�I
10M h- :d
... . i i. eedlot� 'n r �-N
w of n t. 209/ ,,
,..a
Hou • _ •• •
11 [.._.J._
\ v
-\\ r: c i
L
• 4.1
i�n N. ��`}
?l.. •• •
Mi1+1) hew^. r7 lit 1011
FIELD CHECK inspection date: efri
CASE NUMBER: USR-1185
APPLICANT: Dana and DeeAnn Patten
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. NW4 SW4 21-4-66
Zoning Land Use
N A (Agricultural) N (1 e�.t�kc�, Anittil
E A (Agricultural) E d
S A (Agricultural) S
W A (Agricultural) W
COMMENTS: � w-gJf me".ta:LAI . /^
fr
lr 7/1
L a �, -
arru, (at da,n m / 7,
a/3 3O
kd
Sheri Lockman , Planner II
•+ e'^ y�.:dt,cy ...:€rWn FH^ q r+cgr. tr r nr
" !i7 •'5' ' "'",t@',�sy"3', ,f s
•
Y ✓t+ .ww..a+.,L.rp 'x
"" #x° '.5rY tit,pl r M 34,p,f 1' fir } '"ro'b+ ro " :,Mm.:...�.xxstu ...wG 53.. BLS x^u^`f..Pr8 f' t
•
tj on c. ' ati
y» ' y
% " r .2 Mkt sip:
" A / r
�
n ➢ Y^`^+ ✓,.I 'ti iNvrvurrP.MY
( }T —;:— H�wyy / # 1 l.i{ }(rt 1L \,4•'
a ' '• 14S 1.-r.-* 1}p*n* 5 -..—'N•-• i ,�a+R p /lF:..#' • c,c1NM•VYK.M. ,.l£.
•
it
' �.uw... :� ; rip' 6✓ �yt .. ��
^ - 3' i '' a3YA N. t ia-` Ltd.' .4-''::.i- ..,n.-WS*.k"i'e«: ` t.rtt*".".._,",:d. 'R' , •+"£-
/
N` K ,ry • 7 k ! �.
* qy j t ± ;r I tt t d
4 �}' '� • Si• f A y t Y t $ i• tFF 4 i i t i
t zj P t i.£ '. r t 2
f frfr
o
•- $ *4;7,9, el I• .I t; 44
` k i' ; 9 C
$ • {g�� yy ₹ r cl,o f i .#
.* Y �f
i 3 3 • Pi e r
{ } 4 d
✓ " x i 4 3 , r s 'r ; i r i, I i, r A• 9 ; y '7,
er T • b . .9 t' t r z f 77 d -• + ,
r x 9 g I t ° e I z { t L $F ; i 3�
. (C. ' -; 11 ' ' '' r 7 . .: " il k ' r , ,. .H, ,. i .1 ,: :
, , , ,d ys: Q y .start O'•• }, • w9 XXX { N t ; F• , # ' t , § t y•r • anfli
' x0 • 4 1 ' i£ a E.
€ R # > 4 Y . °I
.„ ,its.. .„,i .
} • • d ,iiiii, .
,, _........... ..
,... • , . .. .... .... ii 9- '�f£( 8' - +,i '�ry �Ni,:»S . .` [ rigtW:_f u�, ,f,'�3',
FIELD CHECK inspection date: i/#1/
CASE NUMBER: USR-1268
APPLICANT: Glen Fritzler
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt. NE4 22-4-66
Zoning Land Use
N A (Agricultural) N La .enth.co_0. /Qe9JL:rlatalbed
E A (Agricultural) E ThAru, / ()TA Ablthleinef,
S A (Agricultural) S N J / Cl h ;ruia_tha j)
W A (Agricultural) W a9AA ±(.1
COMMENTS: /LA My' /utL b � ` /I/5e
1
-0wnd au 3Ike ern C
�i az 7, tutt
CCIAL
/16(11) (AC
1L: 4.)ziffkv-
-- �
Sheri Lockman , Planner II
yI { any; a„ I i 1 t o,•,,a+$,ya
ffi � + ,,, ,
•t i .i�4 - ¢
lRt+u.wxvi .: rt {r r _.. p t ) ' ,�� Xo ,,I r � {� .ts
its a :g - II,,,;';', { Y 'e " e'3`$'; ,i °at. •� � �Iitis S' t 4 ., 'iT k` -t S,t.l u,•
fe! •m.•i' `.n '`r 4 i h 1 �2g1,,` ry � ��• 's L
“ K{i r8 t ' s� � fin'' . c ( ., ;�' +:.,7,
+ A ' x a t.a q> o • x ;•3 i - s ',- { f : . • ° *rs.a M� Jy �S „ ..
/44- "� , yi S b « as x —1—,tv . �`..3 +r, + 4 s
^. # yy If'''. .. x21'3 }yj£ : 'va-..- t&7 ' K '.k t'y,.+k. y"S�.s'.
Yt
jj
q� av
gg i �
! S 4 ?
f`
to * ¢ ) tri #£ a t x ¢. „.
t :i i,Y' • lP^
k 4 NN
i n •• g € t
r .I I' Yr xuau
1 .$
, , J7 / 0! ! *./7-1/
• •
'' `eR4 taw J•_f'
, .4444
..
.
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
1555 N. 17'"AVENUE
II
GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
0:st I
IWEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us
CE-mail PHONEs(970) FAX53-6100
(970)304-6498
COLORADO
April 20, 2004
Ed Fritzler
Glen Fritzler
15630 Highway 256
LaSalle, Colorado 80645
Subject: Use by Special Review 1268
Required Inspections and Permits prior to operation in any calendar year
Legal: Part of the N2 of the NE4 of Section 22, T4N, R66W of the 6'h P.M., Weld
County, Colorado
Location: The parcel is located west of and adjacent to U.S. Highway 85, south of and
adjacent to State Highway 256 in unincorporated Weld County.
Dear Messrs. Fritzler:
It has been brought to the attention of the Department of Planning Services that
correspondence has not been received for the non-permitted electrical sign that was placed on
the property per the August 25, 2003 letter, Ogle to Fritzler. Staff requests immediate attention
to this issue, specific to requiring the applicant to submit a building and electrical permit and
pay the appropriate fees associated with this fixture.
Further, staff will require the applicant to demonstrate compliance with all building and electrical
codes in any calendar year for all proposed electrical fixtures, wiring and conduit placed on site.
Issues that shall be addressed will include proper electrical service wiring, metering, and
installation of all electrical appliances. Further the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with
all building code requirements for any structure, temporary or permanently placed on site.
Given that this facility is a commercial operation, the applicant is further required to address the
Americans with Disabilities Act or provide evidence that a reasonable accommodation has been
provided for compliance with this Federally mandated act.
At issue is the concern for the health, safety and welfare of all participants coming to the
property, including both visitors and participants in all on-site activities.
The applicant shall address these concerns immediately and provide the appropriate
documentation for all required permits, including the address of the Stop Work Order provided
by this office.
Please contact the Department of Planning Services and Building Inspection a minimum of
thirty days prior to the scheduled date of operation of the Corn Maze and all associated
activities, including the sale of produce. This request is intended to establish that all Building
and Electrical issues, including construction and placement of all fixtures and structures are
appropriately constructed and placed and approved by this office for the health, safety and
welfare of all users of this facility.
Finally, any and all proposed expansion of the permit (USR-1268) shall be submitted in writing
to this office for review and comment prior to commencing development of any type on this
property.
Should you have any questions or need further information, I may be reached at the above
address, telephone number or e-mail address.
Sincerely,
Kim Ogle
Planning Manager
Enclosure
ec: Commissioner Geile
M.Mika,Director of Planning
File: USR 1268
Building Permit File
shOz,
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
1555 N. 17`"AVENUE
IDWEBSITE:
GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
www.co.weld.co.us
CE-mail PHONEs(970)3FAX 0 O)304-6498
COLORADO
August 25, 2003
Ed Fritzler
Glen Fritzler
15630 Highway 256
LaSalle, Colorado 80645
Subject: Resolution by the Board of Adjustment(BOA-1007)concerning a Variance for more
than one sign, the size of the signs, and setbacks for the signs, in the Agricultural
Zone District.
Legal Description: Part of the N2 of the NE4 of Section 22, T4N, R66W of the 6`" P.M., Weld County,
Colorado
Location: The parcel is located west of and adjacent to U.S. Highway 85, south of and
adjacent to State Highway 256 in unincorporated Weld County.
Dear Messrs. Fritzler:
The Department of Planning Services has reviewed the USE-1268 and the BOA-1007 case files for
compliance with the Weld County Code. The property in question, that operates the Corn Maze in the
autumn of each year is in compliance with the development standards. The property is not in compliance
with the permitted signs as addressed in the Board of Adjustment resolution of August 23, 2001. The
resolution is as follows:
The Board of Adjustment has determined that the submitted materials are in compliance
with the application requirements of Section 23-6-40.A of the Weld County Code and
recommends that this request be approved for the following reasons:
Based upon the submitted application materials and other relevant information regarding
this request, the Board of Adjustment's recommendation for approval is conditional upon
the following:
1. All construction shall comply with the requirements of the Weld County Building
Inspection Department.
2. This variance is only for a second sign of 160 square feet in the Agricultural Zone
District. All other criteria for signs in the Agricultural Zone District must be met for
the proposed sign.
3. Approve to grant a variance for the required setbacks for the temporary(6 month
per calendar year) produce sign,which is not to exceed 50 square feet.
4. Approve and grant a variance for the setbacks for the temporary(6 month per
calendar year)flashing arrow sign, with the stipulation that the applicant obtain
the necessary building and electrical permits. The sign is not to exceed 20
square feet and cannot be within 500 feet of the intersection.
5. Approve the temporary(6 month per calendar year) produce bulletin board sign,
not to exceed 50 square feet, with the necessary building permit.
6. Approve the temporary(6 month per calendar year) banner sign; that it be no
larger than 160 square feet, and that it should comply with the 20 foot required
setbacks, and also to grant a variance exceeding the number of signs normally
allowed.
The newly constructed sign placed on site without a building and electrical permit and not addressed
through either the USR approval or the BOA approval is in violation of the Weld County Code. It is the
understanding of this office that there has been discussion with Code Compliance to remove the flashing
arrow sign, herein identified as item #4.
The Department of Planning Services will support this request with the following caveats. The flashing
arrow sign will be removed and not utilized at any time. The sign constructed without the proper permits
will be permitted with payment of the appropriate fees, Inspected and Finaled through the Department of
Building Inspection. The sign shall be illuminated with white lights, shall not show any movement and will
be operational for a period of six months or less of any calendar year.
To facilitate this request, this office requests a letter from you stating your course of action. Should you
elect to adhere to the staff requirement, a letter stating this shall be submitted to this office. No fees
associated with the Department of Planning Services will be imposed.
Should you have any questions or need further information, I may be reached at the above address,
telephone number or e-mail address. Bethany Salzman, code Compliance official is also available at the
same number.
Sincerely,
Kim Ogle
Planning Manager
File:USR-1268
BOA-1007
FIELD CHECK inspection date: /WO3
CASE NUMBER: USR-866
APPLICANT: Windsor Gas Processing
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt NE4 NW4 32-4-66
Zoning Land Use
N A (Agricultural) N
E A (Agricultural) E
S A (Agricultural) S
W A (Agricultural) W
COMMENTS: ✓A .AWL, argil rk /Ot
lite U S Q l on_ /003
U�Z -� 1
47A
Sheri Lockman , Planner II
'}PW'
.. S "Yl n� C F S ribaSp S. } t . :sl y -,:xYa,;, a vca
• . ` :- x s M r `Ysf^i"iXb t 'iR*ax i }'w
,mfa" mn 3 d 1-`9+1 r ^CT,y.. Rrr t "✓,{ ,v -,:s.,..•,,,,,.
s} w tcx S�wiw .w.s'ti�'7 M 1'k k ''S
.. .. .. . > - •taw s r t -�s<tie� �^ t#^3ar zj.r. m+�+Y3�;rR..•.4 � ltd,,,-;::::,...,,,,,,;":2,.,:i,,;.7„.,#
fir„ f w. y 4" �a a
•�.sxtta+k �rMwY►W> .- 2r :YM f
wa° �R" uezmn r .xsr'+o-ry { ^fi
Y .Y +:c,
t s 1 ,
• attatza' •Irrr`A'7�wr #1, ;rt 'xrarx„ r „tt°s^-'<.
.* ''s&"4},;77*"ea`�e*f' Viarar_nA i pSf lip` F t.,.y"£ ,s3 ,1, ",tail' • .
A �.m • .,¢� r
k uwj� .mm+W.A 'i.. Ww '!_, MN411}II hT if St 1 t ` '6 .+'
bFF $M Ae'S
j,> `.aK .
•
'�a2A .i °wks*i Yp i•
r+"..,+R^'•..«✓ „�" .b'° t :
, "'""t « w.axG3 $ +G"pgy ax A YM
. k. w�wWQgs a.,t - blt 's ..�•. t
* -tw u.,.ss m ywarrwNA sx .J ,a � ,-_.
r ,4p* a.F*yyp,�pTMo , Tn .�f
ell* IDj `.1,,
....y-..
rx.w..'$hw•.iF�.+=w.m.—�'�'vra I� Rw'? YM`t .'" +Y'.s�,+e+:« �w.„a...« E* ,J i... },I
• .. :• ,,-.-. . try* ...2.-".,::.':',X4: 1 i:,:- IIII"."-",. :
,.
ft Y - n. IY' i r
3 .vex
:ittt 9n��t , t.. gyp. a,, y:.. . .
p%
F ' aft . 5s₹. " - .
•
w 4 S• :t �v jf
4�x.+
K
•
•
•
FIELD CHECK inspection date: //NO 4/
CASE NUMBER: USR-1209
APPLICANT: Jim and Judy Reynolds
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Pt NE4 32-4-66
Zoning Land Use
I
N A (Agricultural) N
E A (Agricultural) E
S A (Agricultural) S
W A (Agricultural) W
COMMENTS: J /at� (99/2w,,a_ 11/4€ ,(/Y6
xthytein
Sheri Lockman , Planner II
1
` _ a e „3 ,r" _ ra n 4 � :e ,`� ` :'" x i 4 •I''...
't.,%,..,...-4..,:.,-424.i. .” rp h4 .�. ppss�f.. `� 1 p a, g it
y v.•v•,:-...,,..e.--,1...!:q. f S T,$ 343.„Y ! % yc1,, q F+'Y ..�3 M A y, d
k a„ a ,Iwy a ' r 'S�gp ,S } ₹
x a ,:: '''' . d r « x`4't 57 � fEs t fi yKt 3 ¢� J ,4 yyce .fief �i#r
.r▪ 1 - � � ce?rJ • °$"i 3,.a 8 " 19; b3At ₹ C ,eaCs4
h,¢y"' Ti ''' o y.ix✓k -'4i'wz ^a Ld x •
�`i" ,u .: z¢yy°�`vrS ipt:, ,° a 5 `:' ° a≥ � f ,. } ' F t "• " s yg f.",
` + :yes" r r r't*t k,..�137,q„„; ° > to '°^ r i ,' r'; i ,. ',1.-V12 ! 5 ;
} �� .'j�RutMr^+S].d:ir :f.fic�, ..j 4-.E.:9 h - d .
fi r• o.r y 1„ y, t,„ {} y.• ,� �t IA;
v. s w~� -'xq 'r. ,yn• r. ' r . '� .F 3� Iv, r • d "41 9 dx
..,:.:Le,r i': s ' ,,Wry. shS ^' 4.�„'•:‘,.-,a4::.4;474.:4';;4
:4 t t , ; � a ?irt v.., f %..
C ✓ K r c'x+•t-a wi w"vti"ac�'4fr o+ , L' yy N 'F .., �. e
.: we a Po e"F^3s.s°• °, .a5''.. '"r r ,�' { 'v.a x ,�,Yrt" '3r. K f.; , }t .
e 3v 1. sy a n.,_ r ',.‘1,-'':3,i),..333.
x s� ?,•34,33,333 �e �' a 't 3 b•,^}, .1' .anr 4t � w` ,�,. .?r ' s„ ^t L,'1 'x,~:•
• ik I �' { ti�, St77/7:7'17,s.rr: }• 'S �• aax'' S 'grn ,A'j*..ritt %- t(afi"•; �.. '�" -4r- ,} ' i{n !.i.' ',it
,,^?• r ., wr» a a ^%' `"''d,� '` `�i"` q +s�",`�-,d .w "' s. L-4.1
°*'. ...;;_.,33 t 3 }6 i 4 s ' 7 y
r trkq .: • i .x i 9T'' +k„sj F 4,'•dy' r C:i f,y� it d sc...., ro 1 c* y t' g l." cC # p
ts
s a ' § ,� 11��'i a.,a,,.' i ; : Iy �1y"..'T m'fi �'1 ii: tkg,, ,a' D S• w' a' v v'; 'y"% t. - ;. --y'
�'st"I ,: r • r d.t^ k::: n,., b,ik.a P= • j .m4 lNzj4"--, .:
:f�t ' r,....11O4°,, ' 14;m1.;;
y- ! �' 7 3 t'.t
t. >< .sra„z a Fx. < r w *�erl* ter; �; '3T+o- ,r r t". rgg
a',re t-. `, x' :.4st:+'rl''d"d .: r} ,pfri 7: S .y'.�v°} ' R:s'' F F} '
ce s '56Ati ₹ * r 1 e Y <x ,t. s R T .,aDii N.^ ' Ta t$ L`�f lei,
,4,. ,"x r • > .,'',-,r:,,,* / r $py,Po ".s+' V ar"#;F�r +r4 @P '' 5 in* i jy�{ '` }. ',,
ki
.?G : ti d? Lti 4 , ' i pr t s"i- ¢y �, • • i 1 • X'` ;L.
NiFlgs M.2, x. zt,p,'..: �. r °^tF! s t ,€
u;` ' „�" ,a�w ;Tiers:
3 +,. r+r*m :' a'$'`yxt,":1-
'r c r * .�.
n c '" F ,, ' vim ,. _ f q . r sa ` A,
.µ's }• `• -+ w .4Ni',:rt ; aaa***
a�: b� !�''r fi.x yR ' x.rt s ¢�s,>n r 'Po tit .+ E r
's;JS 4• Fa ii�. nr t o d.' k q '
a€ 2 v y▪ t„4. i .ym,' tx a?' ° n�. ` y a a•a & °`y5`rd": z b*P �t' WLa ���` 4 3334g,
3d y �' k`.. b` G 'f, .. '
IJ; ,y § d:?..3.r;' )3 f?:;.'F dY 'i A `' ''...w.. air' - ti
S
. ' ..,:jam a "t Lr 1: rjI>
k� :"}�"
•
r K'
lit
ry � i>y
' {K`%�'_ +y 4 a rill:-
Lett�i • '
F
':.;,v ETC S y, `' �s,.@" s > a, y ...w.S r „.:
..in. t ;I'm ,.. _..
;At
y g
,�wR •
r. R^ wxbnit..'1";
✓! S ...`:4**,'err,c "'tom
Hello