The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20050474.tiff Pris City&County of Denver JOHN W.HICKENLOOPER Mayor January 28, 2005 Weld County Commissioners Weld County PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Dear Sir or Madame: Enclosed are reports for the 4th Quarter of 2004 (October 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004) and the 2004 Annual Report (January 1, 2004 to December 31 , 2004) from the Denver International Airport Noise Office. If you have any questions regarding these reports, or if I can be of further assistance, please contact me at (303) 342-2360. Sincerely, Andrea C. Christensen Denver International Airport Aviation Noise Analyst DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Department of Aviation Airport Office Building 8500 Pena Boulevard Denver,Colorado 80249 303.342.2200 www.FlyDenver.com atai- D4 2005-0474 a. MN aa'tor 2004 Noise Report(October 1,2004—Decanirer 31,2004) Oir Forth addition to monitoring noise levels, the LardtlseZor�k� system calculates Noise Exposure --- r Quarter Nova Performance Standards. (NEPS) at f:. 101 grid points in Adams County (see Urban growth and During the Fourth map on page 3 for NEPS locations). development in the areas surrounding Quarter of 2004, there was one DEN, particularly non-compatible potential Class II violation, which The DEN ANOMS system monitors residential and other noise-sensitive occurred at NEPS grid point (E,-1) in noise levels at 27 permanent and 4 land uses, is of utmost concern to the Area 3. This NEPS grid point was also portable noise monitoring terminals. City and County of Denver. The Noise the single potential Class II violation for These terminals are located throughout Office has developed noise contours the Fourth Quarter of 2003. the Denver metro area (see map on surrounding the airport, inside which page 3 for RMT locations). certain types of land uses are not There was no potential noise recommended. The 65 Ldn noise contour violation for this quarter. The The system also records the contour (average decibel level with a 65 L d, contour for the Fourth Quarter movement of all aircraft in the vicinity of 10 decibel penalty applied to nighttime 2004 was slightly longer to the north DEN by utilizing FAA air traffic control operations)is a line inside which, under and west, slightly shorter to the south, radar data. This makes it possible to Federal guidelines, no residential and much shorter to the east compared match actual flights with noise events. development should occur. to the Fourth Quarter of 2003. In addition, the ANOMS system records weather information from three The operational 65 Ldn noise A total of 267 noise complaints were remote stations, which include a contour for the airport, as created by received during the quarter. This RACAL recording device to record ARTSMAP, is included in this report. represented a 60% reduction from the pilot/controller radio transmissions. However, for DEN, the 60 Ldn noise 667 complaints received during the contour is used for compatible land use Fourth Quarter of 2003. The city with p planning by the surrounding ARTSAA the highest number of complaints was jurisdictions, in accordance with Elizabeth with 68. The total number of — -- guidelines promulgated by the Denver households registering at least one ARTSMAP is a _ Regional Council of Govemments and complaint during the period was 50 specially designed the Denver/Adams County compared to the 62 households who noise modeling program that Intergovernmental Agreement. complained during the same quarter automatically creates noise contours. Additional mapping for DEN that last year. 66% of all complaints came ARTSMAP is designed to create includes the applicable noise contours from 10 households. contours from actual radar flight tracks is available upon request. that our office receives from the FAA Total aircraft operations at Denver ARTS system which is sent via International Airport increased 5% modem, eliminating the need for compared to the Fourth Quarter 2003. manual data manipulation. The ARTSMAP software is installed on a DENVER INTERNATIONAL computer in the Noise Abatement AIRPORT DEN Ab ortNoeeaMOparadon Office. The program analyzes, views, Pa s reports, and stores the data. Currently,ARTSMAP is used at several major airports nationally. It allows the The DEN Airport DEN Noise Abatement Office to Noise and Operations ° ' 4, perform noise data analysis, generate Monitoring System ..y daily automated noise contours, (ANOMS) is a state-of- willi receive detailed runway utilization, and the-ad computer airline fleet mix identification. system designed to enable the City and County of Denver to monitor aircraft noise in the vicinity of the airport. In 1/31/2005 5:30PM 1 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 4T"QUARTER 2004 NOISE REPORT(OCTOBER 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) , impact of noise on the environs of an Questions/comments DWI liaise airport. Noise abatement measures Wane Potty ,M .. include aircraft operating procedures and use or disuse of certain runways or We have tried to make it easier for flight tracks. These operating you to contact the Noise Abatement The purpose of the DEN Noise procedures are controlled by the FAA. Office. If you have any questions or Complaint Hotline is to provide an comments, please feel free to contact opportunity for individuals to express their A-Weighted Sound Level (dBA): A us by using any of the methods listed concerns regarding noise generated by type of sound level measurement below. aircraft operating at DEN. Citizens are which reduces the effect of very high asked to teat fret trace, ackk'ess and and very I0w fret emotes kt order to the date arxf title of the* on the mimic the response of the tuna, ear. ( -- hotline. CorTrts are downloaded daily Nearly ail asCratt sold level by our Noise Analysts and then Maas€r€erttent le cOrtducted using A- ® r' ui thaustani hie the ANOMS system, wei rfktg. where specaf can be e I. matched to indwiduaf tracks. ft is F rwa nt Corttfrtrxstrs Sound Level ' essential for all information to be entered (Leg): A measurement of the average DEN Noise Co mputer correctly in order for the system to be sound energy experienced over a effective. We have five methods for period of time. This average sound Phone: (303)342-2000 registering complaints;they include calling level is expressed in decibels, and the Hotline at (303) 342-2380, or toll free includes a notation of the period of Fax: (303)342-2366 1-800-417-2988, they may be faxed to time, which it covers (such as Leq (24) (303) 342-2366, or sent to our email for an average of the sound level over Email: Noise.Office(a7dladenver.net address Noise.Ofice(a diadenver.net, or by a 24-hour period). Website: www.flvdenver.com using our new online form on our website Day Night Level (Ldn): Also referred Click on on Airport Business and http://flvdenver.com/biz/noise/complain.aso to as DNL. Similar to a Leq then click on Noise just click on the Complaint tab to get to measurement, but is conducted over at Management. the online form. least a 24-hour time span and includes a 10dB nighttime penalty. For an Ldn Mailing Address: Profanity will not be tolerated, and will calculation, all noise that occurs at result in the complaint not being night (defined as 10:00 pm to 7:00 am) Denver International Airport registered. My attempt to deliberately is artificially increased for the public's Noise Office tie-up or abuse the Hotline may result in increased sensitivity to noise during 8500 Pena Boulevard police action. Phone harassment is a these hours. Airport Office Building,6 Floor, state criminal offense and can carry a jail Denver,CO 80249 sentence and/or fine. Threats involving Noise Contour: A line surrounding an Noise Complaint Hotline: aircraft and/or the airport are a very airport that encloses a geographic serious matter and are a federal criminal region, which is exposed to a particular (303)342-2380 offense. To make a threat,even jokingly, Ldn level. These contour lines are will result in a notification to the Denver nested in such a way that contours Toll Free 1-800-417-2988 Police Department and may involve an closer to the airport generally surround FBI investigation. areas that experience higher noise levels than contours farther out. �' GlrsyotT7eens Annual Ldn contours are used to deter-nth whether certain types of Sound_ A rapid varaftn in zoning or land uses are compatible with '"r u ay pressure, wtticft particular annual Ldn noise levels. 65 e cAS perceived by the ear and Ldn is considered by many federal Er brain as sound. agencies fa be the level at which residenfa land use becomes Noises Generally considered to be any wicompa#rte. .w sound,which is deemed urxlesxat�by .. •. an individual. Remote Monitoring Terminal (RMT): Consists of a noise Decibel: Sound is measured by its level analyzer, a weatherproof ' ': a; pressure or energy in terms of decibels. microphone, a system i �- The decibel scale is logarithmic; when controller, a power supply, and J the decibel level increases by 6 dB, the a dedicated telephone line to DENVER INTERNATIONAL measured sound is twice as loud. download noise data to the AIRPORT Noise Abatement: A measure or ANOMS system, all mounted action that minimizes the amount or in a weatherproof cabinet. 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 2 e X m_ o cm O .63 CB AREA 1 L m .. c Cn' .N —____— 0 C8 D8-- E8 F8 �Q� xi I i zm C6 D8 Ee 8 * J m AREA 2 P Z O D, E� * C.4 10 1A !N ® F3 H3 D ® € 0 e 112 * m ° C%L.'v �_ IGA 65 DNL CONTOUR(BLUE) N -net et s N m AT O C1 07 t7 \ ,- .2 -_ 20 is 1 11111+ p 11►_ p11I O O o A8 . 1w C8 D8 ES \ --,/, - I.1 7J A4 IllY/ffy(I'CI a Q C �`, Legend N3 1., --... ul y CJ O* Q •� 1n Y , r A3 _ ANflOM m ', n A2 B2 C2 02 O BRIGHTON I. m 1AREA 3 AlI E' _ COMMERCE CITY M CO DENVER ////�� CO A3 B3 C3 '�, g N) ` NORTHGLENN .,\ A2 BI C2 O E2 F2 \ ^ N Howaan MueMmIMI,p 3X55 N t - A8 B8 CO DO E8 * 1^ Miss 9 _' C_1 V_ 1 BS 0 1 2 3 `.:y 5y WMlw/ . se:enes wuxma w• weasvaw.l[aa uu w DEN NOISE REPORT 4T"QUARTER DEN NOISE REPORT(OCTOBER 1,2004—DECEMBER 31,2004) 4Quarter 2004-DEN 65 Lrdrl Contour ••.•4 .1., _ 4-4 0; .-;.,-.-7 4 '-7-..E. :1 IOW Age'= .c.,;,i :... ' :± .-, — . \is+..'- . ....: • 5; ,.E 152nd ,... et _ .. E ,:Ave .. , g $ e 2 D Ct E 144th Ave • ,p 4< <,l $ E o r.. c 1pr�f a = b Z - E 128th Ave r. 12 E QIh Are ..:..� r i \II �: ,�.. � ,,,r .E 120th Ave IGA 65 Ldn Contour (/Green t t42th Are 1 I 1 E 1120 Ire _- .. . I • E 104th Ave ' E IOM ww E 96th Are reFp ( i % �. A► 4404 65 Ldn Contour (Red) 1 E DI Irr E 881A Are + :ti.. E fill Ire E7 E72ndkw .1 z z _ . trT E64th Ave , -IJ1 :E. 56th Ave rri . 5' . .'4• I D . MA- be, P E 48th Are Front r— o Range y -- \ Airport A 2 r rn I I e N E ZGO� Ave 70 I I i - S+►Iil1 Rd t 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 4 ' DEN NOISE REPORT e"QUARTER DEN NOISE REPORT(OCTOBER 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 41%Quarter 2004-Derwed!Adams Canty IGA NEPS Valdes Area 2 Area 1 4th Quarter 2004 4"'Quarter 2004 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Leq(24) Leg(24) Leq Points Leq(24) Leg(24) Leg A,1 38.6 35.9 -22 C,4 44.2 35.8 -84 A,2 37.6 36.4 -1.2 C,5 36.7 34.0 -2.7 A,3 42.3 37.3 '-5.0 C,6 36.0 33.0 -3.0 A,4 45.3 38.2 -7.1 D,4 41.1 35.3 -5.8 A,5 43.9 38.8 `-5.1 D,5 34.2 34.3 0.0 A,6 37.5 38.7 1.2 D,6 36.0 33.6 -2.4 A,7 37.7 392 15 D,7 41.4 A,8 36.5 38.4 1.9'- E,4 38.3 36.0 -23 A,9 36.3 36.1 42 E,5 34.8 35.9 --'1.1 A,10 37.6 34.7 -2.9 E,6 36.7 35.2 -1.5 Al 392 34.4 !-4.8 E,7 41.4 34.9 "45 A,12 41.2 339 -7.3 F,2 51.7 40.5 -11.2 B,2 39.5 36.9 -2.6 F,3 43.7 37.9 -5.8 8,4 42.5 38.8 -3.7 F,5 37.3 36.0 -1.3 8,5 43.1 39.6 4.8 F,6 38.5 36.1 -2.4 8,6 39.0 39.4 0.4 F,7 42.1 36.3 5.8 6,7 39.0 40.0 : 1.0 G,2 51.2 41.0 -10.2 8,8 38.0 38.6 - -'-0.8 G,3 42.1 37.7 -4.4 6,9 38.3 36.4 -1.9 G,4 40.2 35.7 -4.5 6,10 39.0 35.4 -';3.6. H,2 50.1 41.7 - -8.4 8,11 40.4 35.4 -5.0 H,3 46.0 37.8 42 8,12 42.6 349 -7.7 H,4 46.1 36.0 -10.1 C,2 41.0 37.4 `- 3.8 C,3 43.3 38.2 "41 Area 3 C,4 43.5 394 ' -4.1 4th Quarter 2004 C,5 43.4 40.3 ''3.1 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 43.3 40.3 -:'3.0 Points Leq(24) Leg(24) Leg C,7 43.3 40.7 -28 A,-1 38.9 32.4 45 C,8 42.6 38.8 .54.8 A,0 39.6 32.8 4.8 C,9 42.2 36.7 -5.5 Al 43.2 33.7 -4 3 C,10 41.6 36.6 40 A,2 45.7 35.2 -10.5 C,11 42.5 366 !-:5.9 A,3 45.6 36.5 -9.1 C,12 44.3 35.9 - -8.4 B,-1 37.9 32.4 55 D,2 41.7 37.8 -:.3,g::. 8,0 39.2 32.4 4.8 0,3 46.2 38.7 `-7.5 6,1 42.6 33.2 .....-9.4 D,4 48.4 40.0 -&4 8,2 45.8 34.6 -11.2 D,5 48.2 41.3 '4.9 8,3 45.7 36.3 -9.4 D,6 46.2 41.3 ' -4.9 C,-1 36.7 33.0 -3.7 D,7 44.2 41.5 S-=2.7 C,0 37.1 32.9 -4.2 D,8 43.7 38.9 '.,, -4.8 C,1 39.5 33.5 - -6.0'. D,9 43.1 377 4.4' C2 448 34/ -10.1' D,10 449 38.0 --6.9 C,3 46.5 36.5 ' ''-10.0 D,11 44.5 377 :'44.8 D,-1 326 33.6 ,'.1.0 D,12 45.1 36.7 ,;x`4.4 D,0 33.3 33.9 --0.6 E,1 42.4 37.8 "-4.6 D,1 37.3 34.1 '- 32: E,2 42.2 38.4 - i'3.8 D,2 43.0 34.8 I.8:2 E,3 46.7 39.3 H:7A: E,-1 31.4 33.7 2.3 E,4 51.2 40.9 -10.3` E,0 33.1 33.5 0.4 E,5 51.0 42.6 ?4.4 E,1 36.2 34.1 -2.1 E,6 44.6 42.6 ` "-2.0 E,2 40.6 35.4 -52 E,9 43.1 39.2 3.9 F,1 36.5 33.3 -32 E,10 43.1 39.2 - ' 4.0 F,2 39.4 35.3 -4.1 E,11 46.1 38.2 `-. =7.9 G,1 42.5 34.2 -8.3 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 5 DEN NOISE REPORT e QUARTER DEN NOISE REPORT(OCTOBER 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) . 4'r Quarter 2004-DEN Complaint Statistics Number of Complaints 4q03 4q04 City City Households Max# Total number of noise complaints 667 267 Total Total number of hotline callers/households 62/62 50/50 Arvada 0 0 0 Max#of complaints by an individuaVhousehold 243/243 52/52 Aurora 65 9 19 Bailey 0 0 0 Bennett 2 1 2 Boulder 9 2 7 Breakdown by time of day 4q03 % 404 % Brighton 6 4 3 Day Hours(7:00 am—9:59 pm) 554 83 241 90 Broomfield 0 0 0 Night Hours(10:00 pm—6:59 am) 113 17 26 10 Castle Rock 0 0 0 All Hours 667 100 267 100 Commerce City 14 5 7 Conifer 0 0 0 Denver 3 3 1 Breakdown By Month Elizabeth 68 4 52 1q04 2q04 3804 4404 Englewood 0 0 0 January 171 April 216 July 473 October 133 Estes Park 0 0 0 February 83 May 435 August 314 November 93 Evergreen 9 1 9 March 268 June 382 September 250 December 41 Federal Heights 0 0 0 Fort Total 522 1,033 1,037 267 Collins 0 0 Fort ton Lupton 0 0 0 Franktown 0 0 0 Golden 0 0 0 Monthly Complaints 2003 vs. 2004 Henderson 0 0 0 Highlands Ranch 0 0 0 +2003 Hudson 1 1 1 Kiowa —II-2004 1000 913 Lafayette 0 0 0 Lakewood 14 1 14 800 Larkspur 0 0 0 600 74 Littleton 0 0 0 Lochbuie 0 0 0 355 435 382 73 Lonetree 0 0 0 400 268 341 27 Louisville 0 0 0 238 382412 312 200 70 Louviers 0 0 0 314 1 242 216 250 g Lyons 0 0 0 0 83 3 - 41 Morrison 0 0 0 c a m n >. c 5 m o. y > u Nederland 0 0 0 o LA- 2 Q 2 - Q' 0 O 2 0 Northglenn 0 0 0 Parker 21 5 15 Pine 0 0 0 Sedalia 0 0 0 Superior 0 0 0 Total Operations (1) Thornton 22 8 15 Watkins 2 2 1 O2003 Westminster 31 4 20 60000 ❑2004 . Wheatridge 0 0 0 Windsor 0 0 0 50000 Total 267 50 166 'This colunn further breaks down the household category by depicting 40000 the highest number of complaints from an individual household. 30000 Top 10 Complainants vs. All Others 20000 33% 19% 10000 a' 7% 0 3% others 7% C Al 4 al 2 a g -s -) a y O z O 4% 6% 4% 6% 5% 6% (1) Total Operations includes Air Carrier,General Aviation, Military,and Air Taxi. Source: Federal Aviation Administration 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 6 ' DEN NOISE REPORT 4'"QUARTER DEN NOISE REPORT(OCTOBER 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 4.1 Omuta 2004-DEN Runway Utilization 16R ARR 16L 13.5% APR DEP 08 �sy.�/� DEP ARR 26 DEP ARR !:� 0.1% 28.0% 0.0% 5.6% 0.3% 30.5% D.0P 17R1 __ 17L ARR 4.6% j ARR DEP, I 0.1% 6.2% 16.2% 18.8% DEP DEP DEP 3.4% 0.0% 1.1% ARR ARR 2.7% /34L\ 34R\ DEP SM__ 0.2% 27.6% DEP --- ARR DEP ine DEP ARR ARR __ 9% ,:0� 4.4% 0.0% 241% 0.5%'07 PI25 / \, 11ARR /35L\ 1j 135Rs Day Arrivals (700am-959pm) ■7 Day Departures (700am-959pm) •7 ■6 ■8 35R 7 8 0 a 34R 35L 35R 7 o EL 34L 35L 12% \ 5%� 0% 16L/o D.6R 17% 1% 0% 0% 8 a ER 29 ■17L28% \ / 29% •m 0 •RR ° 16L •'RR 34R •25 26 0 ■25 1% 16R 026 0% 0% 34L 026 .17L 14% ■34L 25 ' 16R •34L 0% 26 25 17R 0% ■34R 26%1 oR 17L 0%■34R 6% 1% - ❑35L l8/0 3/o I 0 35 4% ■35R �' ■35R Night Arrivals (1000pm-659am) ■7 I Night Departures (1000pm-659am) •7 ■8 ■8 35R 7 8 r 7 8 16L 035L a34L 27% 3%1 0% 0% ❑.R 27% I /L 3% / 0% 20% r 0% 0 5R 0% 16L •17LL 16R •nL 44% ■17R 6%0% ■17R34R ■25 ■25 0% 9% 0 26 16R 026 17L •34L 34L 4% ■34L 26 4% ■34R 1% 26 17R M 34 1% 25 17R 17L ° 25 37% 0% 20% 1% 035E 0% 1% 0 35 0 35R I ■35R 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 7 DEN 2004 Annual Noise Report(January 1,2004-December 31,2004) hair noise in the vicinity of the airport. In IN Amami ROIPOrt addition to monitoring noise levels, the Laral � system calculates Noise Exposure ;, > Performance Standards. (NEPS) at Urban growth and ' There were two 101 grid points in Adams County (see development in the areas surrounding potential Class II violations during map on page 3 for NEPS locations). DEN, particularly non-compatible 2004. This was an improvement from residential and other noise-sensitive the three potential violations registered The DEN ANOMS system monitors land uses, is of utmost concern to the in 2003. One exceedance was located noise levels at 27 permanent and 4 City and County of Denver. The Noise in NEPS Area 2, with the other located portable noise monitoring terminals. Office has developed noise contours in Area 3. These terminals are located throughout surrounding the airport, inside which the Denver metro area (see map on certain types of land uses are not The 65 Ldn contour decreased in page 3 for RMT locations). recommended. The 65 Ldn noise overall size very slightly, particularly to contour (average decibel level with a the east, south, and west. A small The system also records the 10 decibel penalty applied to nighttime portion of the contour on the west side movement of all aircraft in the vicinity of operations)is a line inside which, under of the airport extended beyond the IGA DEN by utilizing FM air traffic control Federal guidelines, no residential baseline contour, but was completely radar data. This makes it possible to development should occur. contained within the boundary of the match actual flights with noise events. City and County of Denver. In addition, the ANOMS system The operational 65 Ldn noise records weather information from three contour for the airport, as created by Noise complaints for 2004 remote stations, which include a ARTSMAP, is included in this report. decreased by 35% as compared to RACAL recording device to record However, for DEN, the 60 Ldn noise 2003. There were 2,859 complaints pilot/controller radio transmissions. contour is used for compatible land use registered during 2004, versus 4,394 planning by the surrounding during the previous year. The number jurisdictions, in accordance with of households which registered at least guidelines promulgated by the Denver AFtTSPAAP one complaint during the year Regional Council of Govemments and increased slightly, from 191 in 2003 to -- — the Denver/Adams County 209 in 2004. The 10 households which ARTSMAP is a _ _ Intergovernmental Agreement. registered the highest numbers of specially designed Additional mapping for DEN that complaints per household accounted noise modeling program that includes the applicable noise contours for just under half (49%) of all automatically creates noise contours. is available upon request. complaints received. ARTSMAP is designed to create contours from actual radar flight tracks Total aircraft operations at Denver that our office receives from the FAA International Airport for 2004 increased ARTS system which is sent via 11.1% compared to 2003. modem, eliminating the need for manual data manipulation. The Sac- ARTSMAP software is installed on a DEN Airport Noise and operadons computer in the Noise Abatement DENVER INTERNATIONAL Office. The program analyzes, views, AIRPORT Meeitorkig System reports, and stores the data. Currently,ARTSMAP is used at several The DEN Airport major airports nationally. It allows the Noise and Operations ° 1> -" DEN Noise Abatement Office to Monitoring System ti " ' 4 perform noise data analysis, generate (ANOMS) is a state-of- nifie z-"b' daily automated noise contours, the-art computer receive detailed runway utilization, and system designed to enable the City and airline fleet mix identification. County of Denver to monitor aircraft 1/31/2005 5:30PM 1 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) impact of noise on the environs of an QuesDolls/Garments DEN Noise airport. Noise abatement measures Hotline Polley include aircraft operating procedures and use or disuse of certain runways or We have tried to make it easier for flight tracks. These operating you to contact the Noise Abatement The purpose of the DEN Noise procedures are controlled by the FAA. Office. If you have any questions or Complaint Hotline is to provide an comments, please feel free to contact opportunity for individuals to express their A-Weighted Sound Level (dBA): A us by using any of the methods listed concerns regarding noise generated by type of sound level measurement below. aircraft operating at DEN. Citizens are which reduces the effect of very high asked to leave their name, address and and very low frequencies in order to , the date and time of their complaint on the mimic the response of the human ear. - — hotline. Complaints are downloaded daily Nearly all aircraft sound level by our Noise Analysts and then measurement is conducted using A- transcribed into the ANOMS system, weighting. where specific complaints can be •� matched to individual fli ht tracks. It is Equivalent Continuous Sound Level 9 JLeq): A measurement of the average DEN Noise Abatement Office Computer Room essential for all information to be entered sound energy experienced over a correctly in order for the system to be period of time. This average sound effective. We have five methods for Phone: (303)342-2000 registering complaints;they include calling level is expressed in decibels, and the Hotline at (303) 342-2380, or toll free includes a notation of the period of Fax: (303)342-2366 1-800-417-2988, they may be faxed to time, which it covers (such as Leq (24) (303) 342-2366, or sent to our email for an average of the sound level over Email: Noise.Office(cldiadenver.net a 24-hour period). address Noise.Olfice diadenver.net, or by Website: www.flydenver.com using our new online form on our website Day Night Level (Ldn): Also referred Click on http://flvdenver.com/biz/noise/comolain.aso to as DNL. Similar to a Leq Airport Business and then click on Noise just click on the Complaint tab to get to measurement, but is conducted over at Management. the online form. least a 24-hour time span and includes a 10dB nighttime penalty. For an Ldn Mailing Address: Profanity will not be tolerated, and will calculation, all noise that occurs at result in the complaint not being night (defined as 10:00 pm to 7:00 am) Denver International Airport registered. Any attempt to deliberately is artificially increased for the public's Noise Office tie-up or abuse the Hotline may result in 8500 Pena Boulevard increased sensitivity to noise during m police action. Phone harassment is a these hours. Denvrt,CO e Building,6 Floor De state criminal offense and can carry a jail Denver CO 80249 sentence and/or fine. Threats involving Noise Contour: A line surrounding an Noise Complaint Hotline: aircraft and/or the airport are a very airport that encloses a geographic serious matter and are a federal criminal region, which is exposed to a particular (303)342-2380 offense. To make a threat, even jokingly, Ldn level. These contour lines are will result in a notification to the Denver nested in such a way that contours Toll Free 1-800-417-2988 Police Department and may involve an closer to the airport generally surround FBI investigation. areas that experience higher noise levels than contours farther out. -- -4, Glossary of Annual Ldn contours are used to ex , determine whether certain types of - Sound: A rapid variation in zoning or land uses are compatible with ,;.-2,- air pressure, which is particular annual Ldn noise levels. 65 0 0:61"4"perceived by the ear and Ldn is considered by many federal —" brain as sound. agencies to be the level at which a residential land use becomes Noise: Generally considered to be any •incompatible. � wk sound,which is deemed undesirable by .. .. an individual. Remote Monitoring Terminal JRMT): Consists of a noise Decibel: Sound is measured by its level analyzer, a weatherproof pressure or energy in terms of decibels. microphone, a system _ The decibel scale is logarithmic; when controller, a power supply, and the decibel level increases by 6 dB, the a dedicated telephone line to DENVER INTERNATIONAL measured sound is twice as loud. download noise data to the AIRPORT Noise Abatement: A measure or ANOMS system, all mounted action that minimizes the amount or in a weatherproof cabinet. 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 2 Oa m NI = CR O 0 W AREA 1 p P \� w O m cra II o p Ef FY ��'°\ - /�� XI i ,^ w QC/ '�!��??JJ CO D6 O F6 * rAREA 2 r m m a V a & ® ®1O O, a 'tJ 'a°DF3 03 HI ® ©. C7 _ ® ® ® V 02 HA • * Z o . IGA'65 DNL CONTOUR(BLUE) zr ��99 (� I r Z m 1 AF O � O •*i ____ A m O*o D yk f�'�� -a , 2 G1. A2 O O Dr ti .■ • a . g ® \ %me 73 AF HF .CO DS E6 t A mss®p 0 `C. -Sm _ Legend m 0.I t'ie' r - . ,, AURORA Cil c. MROKTON ` n AZ �C2 OZ E2 _. A a Al El AREA 3 I COMMERCE CRY 03 A to to A3 53 C2 DENVER y, c a ` AT '-' ROR9Rcteuu H2 C2 O E2 F2 ^^ TIORNTON N Al H1 C, D1 Et F1 01 \--__ * Rove MwNbrlry sMt A W V O*I: , ® VT\_J p m' MIM ranted rrrane w torero.Ana II DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) +. DEN 2004 Annual January 1, 2004 - December 31, 2004 Please note: Does NOT include the impact of extraordinary weather to the NEPS values. 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 4 • DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 2004 Annual-DEN 65 Uhl Contour i u .. ,1,, c•. ... ' , :,..N3 oQ, J E 160th Ave • . CC jr 16 • CC t,43 ---...\\E..1152nd Ave Cr E 144th Are e• J 3 u u j O L O 0. E 136th Ave \'�lr o z c tvr r • B ' A ' / z E o• h ar b E 128th Ave s . E 120th Ave , .E 120th Ave /. ' Ir_. I!i[ 1121h Ave 1 I IGA 65 Ldn Contour (Green) E lath Ave ! I , .....-‘,_---_________r>. E 96th Ave tt i•' ;.._��,,�— -. 1 r.. v+It � r r 2004 65 Ldn Contour (Red) ' E g"' "'" E 118th Ave ° O. 8 E canii—j-E — • 724 Ahe , i (72nd Are ` s • I z z li Ft:4th Are t "' 71j `• 1: 561h Ave m .-\-J) 4~ / I ; (aril., toE 48th Ave Front _._ �-- O Range -s —z-- - Airport 2 rm i l e N E 26th Ave li t 70 _ r t i Smith R 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 5 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004—DECEMBER 31,2004) 2004-DenvedAdants County IGA NEPS Values Area 2 Area 1 2004 Annual 2004 Annual Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Leq(24) Leg(24) Leg Points Leg(24) Leq(24) Lett A,1 38.6 36.6 r4 t;-2.0 C,4 44.2 36.3 ,•7.9 A,2 37.6 37.1 at ,' ^4.0 C,5 36.7 34.2 •,444 4.5 A,3 42.3 37.7 ,,w,m ' C,6 36.0 33.1 F' t)-^'3.9' A,4 45.3 38.5 t>r.1`'' '; 43 D,4 41.1 35.7 ',.;-.4.4' A,5 43.9 39.3 ' [ '^b4. D,5 34.2 34.4 7;4`;;K:102. A,6 37.5 39.3 Y 000' D,6 36.0 33.7 'tom='�23.: A,7 37.7 39.7 iM CO•` D,7 41.4 34.3 'x Kral l- A,8 36.5 38.8 2.3 E,4 38.3 36.4 14%.14:A9- A,9 36.3 36.6 ` ,f g. n 0.3;: E,5 34.8 36.2 ;','A.''`xsT'1U' m0 37.6 35.3 YIV 3,3 E,6 36.7 35.5 s (<x,,-12';! A,11 39.2 35.0 I142 E,7 41.4 35.1 axe+43} A,12 41.2 345 'i� u 7 F,2 51.7 41.4 v: 3'- B,2 39.5 37.5 $ `1'4' F,3 43.7 38.6 i", #S,1. B,4 42.5 39.0 '.. ,**:434 F,5 37.3 36.3 ::1.434-044- B,5 43.1 40.0 x`-31" F,6 38.5 36.4 q z-'-2:1' B,6 39.0 40.0 , "15 F,7 42.1 36.6 .�r"a 6,7 39.0 40.5 e4 . '.ri"1.5 G,2 51.2 42.0 , -t3 B,8 38.0 38.9 4Af,, d1,9 G,3 42.1 38.6 : ,'x'3.5 6,9 38.3 36.6 J' G,4 40.2 36.3 44$.''' * 6,10 39.0 35.9 1 "..3.1' H,2 50.1 43.0 v+p x,:3 .-1.1 6,11 40.4 359 ' 11.3 46.0 38.9 x' £-1.2 8,12 42.6 35.4 %.11„Z.` H,4 46.1 36.6 2{ ` C,2 41.0 38.1 . '4, C,3 43.3 38.8 �, .� Area 3 C,4 43.5 39 6 14 K P, • 2004 Annual C,5 43.4 409 �'� Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 43.3 40.9 ` •`-` Points Leg(24) Leq(24) Leq C,7 43.3 41.2 :: 1^ A,-1 38.9 33.1 W.c.6$ C,8 42.6 390 ✓7 ' A,0 39.6 33.4 nom'":. C,9 42.2 37.0 c s`. Al 43.2 34.1 .(-1:11;t44,..,...44 C,10 41.6 37.0 u1"' ' A,2 45.7 35.6 6 .fir t- d C,11 42.5 37.1 c' : - A,3 45.6 36.9 ' a it 1k C,12 44.3 36.4 ro ' 8,-1 37.9 33.1 '� D,2 41.7 387 o: 6,0 39.2 33.1 A D,3 46.2 39.5 =art 8,1 42.6 33.8 iv1W** D,4 48.4 40.4 s!At 6,2 45.8 35.1 �gxi . 41448, D,5 48.2 41.9 p., `,,, 6,3 45.7 36.9 D,6 46.2 41 9 " C,-1 36/ 33.5 ' , y 1' D,7 44.2 419 , rn C,0 37.1 33.6 ' 3 "_ . D,8 43.7 39.1 fi. •'� C,1 39.5 34.1 yyi, D,9 43.1 38.0 . C,2 44.8 35.2 t'' T. Alt D,10 44.9 38.4 C,3 46.5 37.0 D,11 44.5 381 D,-1 32.6 34.1 S ` 1 tI4D,12 45.1 37.1 ' r,' D,0 33.3 34.1 �,;0S E,1 42.4 38.4 gItrl.; ' 1' D,1 37.3 34.5 uaf E,2 42.2 39.1 E. D,2 43.0 35.4 '"`„ "4'7.6! kitE,3 46.7 403 €'1`+'", E,-1 31.4 34.2 2.8 E,4 51.2 41.3 49+ E,0 33.1 34.0 €„x X9.9; E,5 51.0 43.2 7.9 E,1 36.2 34.5 '''1,',''',..01..4..V E,6 44.6 43.2 -.1„3`: E,2 40.6 35.7 ' r `1 ^+f 9. E,9 43.1 39.6 e,, , ;,3.5a F,1 36.5 34.1 -. sf.l =3.4` E,10 43.1 39.5 : it,r: F,2 39.4 36.0 ms., et.4. - E,11 46.1 38.6 4., 7.5'.. G,1 42.5 34.8 _=kT 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 6 ' DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 2004—DBI4 Complaint Statistics Number of Complaints 2003 2004 City City Households Max# Total number of noise complaints 4,394 2,859 Total Total number of hotline callers/households 191/191 209/209 Arvada 1 1 1 Max#of complaints by an individuaVhousehold 1,151/1,151 279/279 Aurora 540 24 152 Bailey 1 1 1 Bennett 6 2 4 Boulder 115 5 49 Breakdown by time of day 2003 % 2004 % Brighton 226 21 67 Day Hours(7:00 am—9:59 pm) 3,647 83 2,515 87 Broomfield 1 1 1 Night Hours(10:00 pm—6:59 am) 747 17 344 13 Castle Rock 1 1 1 All Hours 4,394 100 2,859 100 Commerce City 258 19 112 Conifer 0 0 0 Breakdown By Month Denver 53 27 6 Elizabeth 495 8 279 1q04 2q04 3q04 4904 Englewood 0 0 0 January 171 April 216 July 473 October 133 Estes Park 0 0 0 February 83 May 435 August 314 November 93 Evergreen 151 2 87 March 268 June 382 September 250 December 41 Federal Heights 0 0 0 Fort Collins 28 1 28 Total 522 1,033 1,037 267 Fort Lupton 1 1 1 Franktown 0 0 0 Golden 4 2 2 Monthly Complaints 2003 vs. 2004 Henderson 14 6 5 Highlands Ranch 1 1 1 2003 Hudson 8 5 3 —1-2004 Kiowa 0 0 0 1000 913 Lafayette 0 0 0 Lakewood 120 3 116 800 Larkspur 0 0 0 600 -. 574 Littleton 1 1 1 435 384 ' 3 Lochbuie 0 0 0 400 355 _ �t Lonetree 0 0 0 412 341 27 312 238 268 382 Louisville 0 0 0 ' 200 70 314 Louviers 1 1 1 1 242 216 250 g Lyons 0 0 0 0 83 3 1♦ 41 Morrison 0 0 0 as ti 2 < E n ' R Cl O 0 0 Northglenn 16 5 7 Parker 161 16 98 Pine 0 0 0 Sedalia 0 0 0 Total Operations (1) Superior 0 0 0 Thornton 473 44 226 Watkins 27 3 24 ❑2003 r Westminster 151 6 124 60000 - 0 200 Wheatridge 1 1 1 Windsor 0 0 0 50000 - _ Total 2,859 209 1,402 _ — : *This column further breaks dovm the household category by depicting 40000 -Ti the highest number of complaints from an individual household. 30000 - it i. tit Top 10 Complainants vs.All Others 20000 - l` - 10% 1 ° 10000 - .y 8/0 5% i 0 r r ,i f r q r S r 9 r I 51% others v� 5% N N al acts > J 7 d Q > d 4% U. 2 'C g —a C to 0 2 0 ` 4% 3% 4% (1) Total Operations includes Air Carrier, General Aviation, 3% 3% Military,and Air Taxi. Source: Federal Aviation Administration 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 7 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) - 2004 Runway Utthzation - 16R ARR 16L 12.9% ARR I DEP I , I DEP „ I ARR I Os Z6 EP ARR 0.0% }28.1%^•lam'^0.0%(. ,6.1% 0.4% 28.8% V DEP 17R 0.1% 171 ARR 5.0% ARR , DEP 0.2% 7.3% 15.8% 17.4% DEP DEP DEP , -11_. _1Th- 5.4% 01% 1.5% ARR ARR P✓ 2.6% 34L\ /34R\ DEP 0.2% 27.1%1 DEP ARR DEP DEP „J ARR ARR 5.2% 0.0% 22.5% "-I 0.3% 25 1ARR 35L 35R Day Arrivals (700am -959pm) M7 Day Departures (700am-959pm) '7 ❑EL 34R 7 8 35L 35R 7 0 a S 35R 6% 0% 16L DER 0% B DER 55L 13% 27% [29% ■17L 3 % ■17L ■17R 816L IN 17R 34R 16R ■250% •25 2% ;. 13% 026 26026 34L •34L 0% ■34L 0% 625 17L •34R 24% 17% 0 ■34R 6% 6/o 0% 17R 0% D 35L D 35L 4% •35R ■35R Night Arrivals (1000pm-659am) •' Night •Departures (1000pm-659am) 28 35L 35R ■8 7 35R 0 a 29% 4% 0°/n 8 0 a 35L ° 7 8 0% DER 26% 2/0 0% 32% DER 34L 16L ■17L 0% 39% Ill TIR 16L ■17R 34R 0% •25 34R 16R •25 8% 0% 6% 026 16R D 26 34L o ■34L ■34L 0%1% 28% 17L ■34R 26 25 17L •34R 25 26 2% 1% 0% 17R 1% 035E 1% 0% 035E 20% •35R ■35R 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 8 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) First Quarter 2004 January 1, 2004 — March 31, 2004 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 9 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 1d Quarter 2004-65 Lthi Contour t iwm Ave ti W la li K .45 °b E 152nd Ave c g c x E 144th Ave \ it: Y N Y c n die g € I E M681 1 1 A 1 i r E o o Z U c4ger 0. 4 E 128th Ave E 120th Ave I \ I , ,E 120th Ave E 112th Ave 1 r--I -1 IGA 65 Ldn Contour (Green) E It2F Ave • E 104th Ave _ E 104th ?we e (9-""\----- -17-7-- > E 96th Ave 1:1 1g04 65 Ldn Contour (Red) E Me I g 1 1 d z s E Ave 1 1 E red Ave z E 64th Ave E 56th Ave 11 \L i 1 4 / I Y i: +et M > E 48th Ave Front 9NI 1 Range —_ Airport 2 rvni le N 1 1 E 26th Are 70 sinahmi 1 0 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 10 ' DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 1st Quarter 2004-Denver/Adams County IGA NEPS Values Area 2 Area 1 1°Quarter 2004 1°Quarter 2004 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Gild IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Len(24) Leg(24) Leg Points Leq(24) Leq(24) Leq A,1 38.6 37.0 u1,„-1.6 C,4 44.2 36.1 . -8.1.. A,2 37.6 37.3 {<4 `;p , C,5 36.7 34.0 A,3 42.3 379 7 a -`-,,,, C,6 36.0 32.8 ` -at- A,4 45.3 38.5 *Set D,4 41.1 35.3 `-. 43.8'- A,5 43.9 39.3 lit.4440 D,5 34.2 34.3 'z i's.-.` _ 0.1'. A,6 37.5 39.2 ,?- ': 1.7 D,6 36.0 33.5 is. ;` '_ A,7 37.7 39.4 a "., ; '11 D,7 41.4 34.0 ' -4.4- A,8 36.5 38 5 '14.,'"t244.0." E,4 383 36.4 .,!`'. ...1.9% A,9 36.3 36.3 @. 0.0 E,5 34.8 36.3 '1.5 A,10 37.6 35.1 ti,X4, -23 E,6 36.7 35.5 i z -13' t� „A,11 39.2 34.6 x4.6 E,7 41.4 35.1 S,15t ^8.4> A,12 41.2 34.0 sr %i t-7kf, F,2 51.7 40.6 ` ='1u 1'"- 4- 8,2 39.5 37.7 A,> .-.-15 F,3 43.7 38.3 .'` ':.4-'-','.164 6,4 42.5 39.0 k4 --(F` ,: F,5 373 36.5 'l':r:.t"-D.B'' 8,5 43.1 40.1 ` `1.-1-471:c F,6 38.5 36.7 ` .15 8,6 39.0 39.9 •Y;°04; F,7 42.1 36.9 „ ! -j8�2� 4P: : '-98 6,7 39.0 40.2 44 13' G,2 51.2 41.4 ', At 8,8 38.0 38.7 ' ' '0.7` G,3 42.1 38.3 Cs . € 31l 6,9 38.3 36.5 a=1.6'- G,4 40.2 36.2 . ,-4.0 8,10 39.0 35.9 xis ,`•1`32 H,2 50.1 42.3 ~'30444413° 8,11 40.4 35.6 8.,a Ati4s. H,3 46.0 38.6 at,"IiiPfSa, 6,12 42.6 35.1 144•..2.4,1%.46Y4.8, '�`H,4 46.1 36.3 1 �1s) -9.6 !� C,2 41.0 38.3 i '' « 'Ott ' C,3 43.3 38.9 :. t. Area 3 C,4 43.5 397 " 'r1likix 1° Quarter 2004 C,5 43.4 410 a .' '- e Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 43.3 40.6 i.+ R''7,' Points Leg(24) L.eq(24) Leq C,7 43.3 40.8 kg Da- A,-1 38.9 33.2 -51 C,8 42.6 38.8 '.edi 8 A,0 39.6 33.7 „ -6 9 C,9 42.2 37.0 .1, A,1 43.2 34.5 ±,C,41:1,41-41.7. 1'� _ liti C,10 41.6 37.0 °l�'W?',t, 6.E-;4.11,' A,2 45.7 36.3 _..:4.."t,14.- C,11 42.5 37.0 s C`:-- {: A,3 45.6 37.9 "`1?'S e k1'h7 C,12 44.3 36.2 ,,',4'', = 1 8,-1 37.9 32.9 ti s, x:.z-6:¢1 D,2 41.7 389 3' �y,_"+' r 8,0 39.2 33.1 a41g= 0,3 46.2 39.5 ,„1,`s.y' , 8,1 42.6 33.9 a, , *411.- D,4 48.4 40.3 'a `Y',= .. 6,2 45.8 35.8 4-' ;;-1d,O... 0,5 48.2 4Z0 . —g� -62: 6,3 45.7 37.8 3`3+s7,0$.�-15, D,6 46.2 41.6 ., r.� c,-.1 36.7 33.3 r.. .t4 0,7 44.2 415 1 'E' .1,, C,0 37.1 33.5 44it tx 0,8 43.7 38.8 ),-11k C,1 39.5 34.2 .. _s r�. .4i, D,9 43.1 379 evr >"' C,2 44.8 35.9 ', D,10 44.9 383 ?' 4.5 C,3 46.5 37.8 .. '- 88 0,11 44.5 38.0 i. . ' y: £ 0,-1 32.6 33.8 £ 'ass 0,12 45.1 36.9 4j+�" ck, ar i D,0 33.3 34.0 gb)Zft"'` c : E,1 42.4 38.9 SP,FM. D,1 37.3 34.4 oso9.1,44,-, E,2 42.2 39 2 « 0,2 43.0 36.1 '�rM" E,3 46.7 400 4.Wei,,.°4,• +; .. E,-1 31.4 34.0 2.6 E,4 51.2 41 0 � E,0 33.1 33.8 t ` ' ' E,5 51.0 43.3 )a, < 4,t4 E,1 36.2 34.3 4.(97 E,6 44.6 42.8 *Ate.,I ii, E,2 40.6 36.1 tilt' -44: E,9 43.1 393 C14, ,:, ;-$:4. F,1 36.5 33.9 i1r7 E,10 43.1 39.3 ' .`', ;'-3,8:x. F,2 39.4 36.1 .s f ;.3,3 E,11 46.1 38.5 .":':,E 7:61 G,1 42.5 34.9 "' "''44 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 11 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) la Quarter 2004-Runway Uhl Lion 16R ARR 16L 133% ARR I , DEP DEP „ I ARR_li ! ^. -rl DEP ARR �$ 0.1% DEP DEP 5.7% 26 0.6% 3131.2% --- “- DEP 17R 17L I6.RR 7% ARR DEP 0.2% 6.4% 15.3% 20.0% 5- DEP DEP DEP __0__`� J}- 5.5% 0.0% 1.0% ARR ARR 2.8% 34h 34R DEP __CL. 0.1% 24.9% DEP (---., ARR DEP in DEP ARR ARR _31._ 10.4% U7 6.5% 0.0% 21.4% 0.1% 25 ARR /351\ 35R Day Arrivals (700am-959pm) 17 Day Departures (700am-959pm) 17 ■8 ■8 35R 7 o TL 34R 35L 35R 7 0 fL 8 35L 11% 7% 0% DER 16% 1% 0% 0% 8 016R 25% I 16L •nL 34L 27% •17L 34L ' 30% ■17R 7% ■17R ■25 16L 0% ' 26 0% ■25 4: 16R 026 0% 026 34R I 14% ■34L 25 16R ■34L 1% 26 25 17R 17L 134R 22% 'oR 17L 1% ■34R 206% 0% 6% 0% 0 35L 6% ❑35L 135R ■35R Night Arrivals (1000pm-659am) 1 Night Departures (1000pm-659am) •8 16 35R 7 8 0 EL 35L 1% 7 34L o 16L 23% 2% % 016 35R 0% 0R 29% 0% 32% 0 15R 0% 16L ■nL ■17L 46% ■17R 16L ■17R 34R •25 34R 0% 1 2 0% 026 8% 16R 026 134E 34L 0% •34L 26 16R 134R 1% 26 25 17R 17L •34R 25 2% 0 17R 3% 035E 0% 1% 26% 2% 035L 0% 24% 0% ®35R ■35R 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 12 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) Second Quarter 2004 April 1, 2004 — June 30, 2004 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 13 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 24 Quarter 2004-65 Ld1 Contour E 160th Are • .F.,,, e7 la V. T., re 43 E 152nd Ave re e v E 144th Are Y tr 2 CP ER. Are t ,� 8 z E g Z . c 1vdp. d I = • •� Z U A E 12&h 1 I I �� . E 120 Ave r,, ,E 120th Ave 1121h Ave ICA 65 t do Contour (croon) E Itze he �1 ... 15> ..........jr 96th Are � "'V�1 ,r � ^ �, i, 65 �.dn Contour (Rod) E 9Be Ps. E t o Ave - O I*$ i E E eee he E NO Nik L 8 I z l S C i E 72d he 1 IZ z E 64th km 56th Ave 14. ( _\...A �� D 1 AEe An r v E 48th Ave Front -I V Range —� = Airport ow E 26th Are _ 70 2 rrni I e 14 i 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 14 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 2"d(quarter 2004-Denver/Adams County IGA NEPS Vaktes Area 2 Area 1 2"Quarter 2004 2"Quarter 2004 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Leq(24) Leq(24) Leo Points Leq(24) Leg(24) Leo A,1 38.6 36.5 „",5S`-2,1''. C,4 44.2 ,..,. A,2 37.6 37.2 '"Y�,�1.�.Y�i{'. C,5 36.7 34.3 ' L',;.;:;,3A A,3 42.3 38.1 ,.0 i.tr4. . C,6 36.0 33.1 .p'...Ti X3.0::, A,4 45.3 38.7 ^t .,`; ':6�6` D,4 41.1 35.9 '^2:-52 A,5 43.9 39.5 x1„9C.4..4'>7 0,5 34.2 34.4 f' .L%'t 02 A,6 37.5 39.4 ,;t .", '1..9 D,6 36.0 33.7 3` A,7 37.7 39.8 2.1 0,7 41.4 34.4 ,e'=7.6.. A,8 36.5 38.9 2.4 E,4 38.3 36.7 4:ii'it*:air A,9 36.3 36.6 8:.,..,./C 0.3'' E,5 34.8 36,2 wa"1 i14 A,10 37.6 35.4 4;1);4i-,12.21,, E,6 36.7 35.2 .("-1(SS A,11 39.2 35.2 ( X7.4.0 E,7 41.4 35.0 ".::47,044,44 A,12 41.2 34.9 I 46,31`. F,2 51.7 42.1 ' '��'� q' � sd3.6` 8,2 39.5 37.7 Esc•'12'r;, F,3 43.7 39.2 „tf..N:.a444.. 6,4 42.5 39.3 '7 ": F,5 37.3 36.2 `i ,e`11 B,5 43.1 40.3 ' PP. - F,6 38.5 36.1 `'s+"vats `— B,6 39.0 40.1 t s .kr 1.1. F,7 42.1 36.2 :3.) 3 fa$ 6,7 39.0 40.6 7 �` 1 S` G,2 51.2 42.7 a �t 4.5 6,8 38.0 39.0 ;(18n,r- iF `"+.+1.0`- G,3 42.1 39.6 a h. �' B,9 38.3 36.7 ' `-1'.6 G,4 40.2 37.0 1r ',3.3' 6,10 39.0 36.0 ",'-ator, H,2 50.1 44.1 "' -to 8,11 40.4 35.9 11,3 46.0 40.2 P.e.'.5.8 6,12 42.6 35.6 `, : 5?-7`.W, H,4 46.1 37.4 Cik '-tom[ C,2 41.0 38.5 ` ' ')!46s' : f C,3 43.3 39.2 « Area 3 C,4 43.5 39,9 1 ,47 , 2" Quarter 2004 C,5 43.4 411 ) '."...l Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 43.3 41.1 i t d .d,`€ Points Leq(24) Leo(24) Leg C,7 43.3 41.3 s "t ' ` !'t A,-1 38.9 33.8 --5.1: C,8 42.6 39.2 #.ie A,0 39.6 34.1 .. ,x'$6': C,9 42.2 37.2 . f.' Al 43.2 34.5 Fl 1 ,47 • C,10 41.6 370 ��., 1•,; A,2 45.7 35.5 yy':'0;612 C,11 42.5 37.1 !.'14-4,a, -,. l A,3 45.6 36.6 ,,',.0,10,-.41.404, C,12 44.3 364 4..+' -7i9 8;1 37.9 33.8 ,o.tr4.1- D,2 41.7 39.2 t,, ;" ." B4O 39.2 33.8 ' D,3 46.2 40.0 ° ,+k B,1 42.6 34.2 7 D,4 48.4 406 t `"t-1'.. , 8,2 45.8 34.9 ,xx?4 T"g 0,5 48.2 42.2 +ivt 6,3 45.7 36.3 "a 14141- D,6 46.2 42.2 r �,: C,-1 36.7 34.2ti° ': D,7 44.2 42.1 , 1;g :0"'x' '' C,0 37.1 34.2 t -44' 0,8 43.7 393 '(�'` �` C,1 39.5 34.5 ' Z / 40 D,9 43.1 380 dx"i1,, 5"- C,2 44.8 35.2 mi1"' �4`?,A�a �t 0,10 44.9 38 2 a _) C,3 46.5 36.5 . ` '.- 0,11 44.5 38.0 ' x 0,-1 32.6 34.6 ''.rJk '2 5 0,12 45.1 372 ", 's :Vh :- 0,0 33.3 34.5 tig ztA E,1 42.4 38.5 ` ' D,1 37.3 34.7 c�` "" E,2 42.2 39.5 4 D,2 43.0 35.2 ? : ='t6.. E,3 46.7 41.0 t # e.1. E,-1 31.4 34.7 3.3 E,4 51.2 417 1111144 E,0 33.1 34.4 s. r t 1.3 E,5 51.0 43.4 t . r 't7�' E,1 36.2 34.5 ;114',W441.;„ E,6 44.6 434 nut, foe'"„,Y.+ E,2 40.6 35.3 "0 E,9 43.1 39.5 1. ...0,14Z:,: F,1 36.5 347 i e,a -: 16 MO 43.1 392 tn:0; F,2 39.4 35.4 nla X4:0'4 E,11 46.1 385 « "4 `'�',-7.7 G,1 42.5 35.0 ° ".;-75'. 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 15 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 7 Quarter ter 2004-D O Runway UtWaation 16R ARR 16L 11.4% j Os O..R DEP I , ( 0.0P I ARR C. 0.EP �R� 0.0% 25.4%^I,�" 0.0%!�'^8.2% DEP4% AzIRR I DEP 17R 0.1% 17L 13 32 .2% ! ARR DEP 0.5% 9.4% 18.1% 13.7% ---47r DEP DEP DEP _{M_. St 7.4% 0.1% 3.6% ARR ARR 2.5% 34L 34R DEP -2_ 0.4% 26.0% DEP ------s ARR DEP DEP ARR ARR _II_ 5.2% 0.0% 22.6% 0.4% 25 1ARR 35L ;A Day Arrivals (700am-959pm) •a• Day Departures (700am-959pm) ••8 7 8 DEL 34R 35L 35R 7 DEL 35R 6% 0% 16L DER 19% 1% 0% 0% 8 013R 17/7%0 24% •m 25% •17L 35L 16R ■17R 16L 16L •17R 12% 10% 0% ■25 26% 026 026 17L 26 16R 34R •34L ■34L 0% 0% 25 17R 17L 0% 4% 34L/ 25 17R ■34R 24% 13% 8% ■34R 26 0% 0% 2% 035L 035L 9% •35R ■35R Night Arrivals (1000pm-659am) •' Night Departures (1000pm-659am) ;8 ■8 35R _ 7 DEL 35R DEL 8% 1% 08% 16L o ER 35L 3% 7 8 0 ER 25% 0% 35� 34% ■m 32% •9L 16R ■17R 16L •17R 4% ■25 34R 1% ■25 34L 026 10% 16R 026 0% 17L •34L 34L 0% •34L 34R / 17R 2% •34R 1% 26 25 17R 17L ■34R 0% 0% 26 05 14% 035L 0% 1% 24% 3% 0 35 2% •35R ■35R 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 16 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) • Third Quarter 2004 July 1, 2004 - September 30, 2004 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 17 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 3ie 43uarter 2004-DEN 65 Lein Contour E 160th Ave v M 1140 E 152nd Ave it c c Et '0 2 E 144th Are \ u : c Y t i t o ,e 2r E136thArewi I v ty 8 Z E b z [ISO M a 1 z E 128th Ave 1 E 120th Are l 1 I E 120th kie E 112th Ave E II —� IGA 65 Ldn Contour (Green) E 11201 he r___E 104th Ave --'\_„---'Y-- 1 �_ l .........„ E 60101 Ire E 96th Ave N r g 1:,) � I 3q0465 Ldn Contour (Red) E 9301 Ate E 98th Ave - + 8 E Elam he g 2 l 'ale Z 5 End Are ,,, Iti I \ z z I i TEL64th Ave ` I ` ` j7 I E 56th Ave m L—J 46h be a 4` E 48th Aare Front a Range ,____ I _L Airport E 26th Ave 10 2 rrni le N Srnkh 1d 1 — i I i N-- 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 18 • - DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004—DECEMBER 31,2004) r Quarter 2004-Denver/Adams County IGA NEPS Values Area 2 Area 1 3"'Quarter 2004 3n°Quarter 2004 Grid IGA Annual Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points Leq(24) Leg Points Leq(24) Leq(24) Leq A,1 38.6 36.9 .�?s'Las . C,4 44.2 36.7 -,.. :;,t.-1:5 A,2 37.6 37.3 I3 s"7. �' C,5 36.7 34.6 i ,. `4 A,3 42.3 373 C.6 36.0 33.7 `.041% - A,4 45.3 38.5 ,, - -. D,4 41.1 36.0 . & A,5 43.9 395 .,3"'h` D,5 34.2 34.7 44.. 95 A.6 37.5 39.7 2.2 D,6 36.0 34.2 7. °: A.7 37.7 40.4 2.7 D,7 41.4 34.8 ?; A,8 36.5 39.6 3.1 E,4 38.3 36.5 4tt , A,9 36.3 37.4 TIMM E,5 34.8 36.4 A,10 37.6 35.8 ,kikfiggj771 E,6 36.7 35.7 ' I+ A,11 39.2 355 s to "17 E,7 41.4 35.4 ' 4 A,12 41.2 35.1 r '3 F.2 51.7 42.3 6,2 39.5 37.7 freirtri2.1 F,3 43.7 38.9 4 6,4 42.5 391 ,LF*11=i F,5 373 36.4 4 6,5 43.1 40.3 1...{:"T",12,1,47.71 F,6 38.5 36.6 3 ,. B,6 39.0 40.5 kw ' F,7 42.1 36.6 i` . B,7 39.0 41.1 F,TiNtry. G,2 51.2 42.9 In M . 8,8 38.0 395 ` ;..a$: G,3 42.1 38.6 6,9 38.3 369 -.".;714;(1:irp G,4 40.2 36.3 4 ; 6,10 39.0 36.3 .. :.:7.4:.:7121H,2 50.1 43.8 B,11 40.4 365 x ,;; H,3 46.0 39.0 8,12 42.6 36.1 tLITL:ilia 11,4 46.1 36.9 4 C,2 41.0 38.3 `"" 7 C,3 43.3 39.1 -(1-L11, Area 3 C,4 43.5 39.8 k."4.5` 3s Quarter 2004 . ^v C,5 43.4 41.1 �, � s",;�, 17 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 43.3 41.5 &,s airy: Points Leq(24) Leq(24) Leq „7';'7,77''':111 C,7 43.3 41.9A,-1 38.9 32.9 C,8 42.6 394 ,.,.a<.,_,.w x A,0 39.6 33.2 .. ' -, 4", C 9 42.2 37.3 - ` A,1 43.2 33.8 - + , C,10 41.6 37.5 r.,,.._ A.2 45.7 35.1 ' , C,11 42.5 37.8 14p A,3 45.6 36.2 ;k: C,12 44.3 37.1 °,{s B,-1 37.9 33.0 ,(1"4, .-';":-.` D,2 41.7 38.8r 7.-7:9 8,0 39.2 33.0 ti . ' s D,3 46.2 36.7 [s d : 8.1 42.6 33.6 -',4:4-4)., - e x , D,4 48.4 40 7 1,4,7,1-22,11,A 6,2 45.8 34.9 � y D,5 48.2 422 „ ® B,3 45.7 36.6 D,6 46.2 42.6 '.. �, 7',._„ C,-1 36.7 33.5 „ D,7 44.2 42.7 ` ' C4 C`13 C,0 37.1 D,8 43.7 394 ;-,'... C,1 39.5 34.1 x11.'': 3 '.,-, D,9 43.1 38.3 i =,1 1 y C,2 44.8 35.0 ' ,ier �u. „'. D,10 44.9 39.1 € i C,3 46.5 36.7 ..32.6 ; D,11 44.5 38.8 I „� "'� D,-1 �'� D,12 45.1 377 s r" + D,0 33.3 34.5 ro" `- E,1 42.4 38.2 r,C 0.1 37.3 .irtort. E,2 42.2 39.2 E., 3.1., a°, D,2 43.0 35.4 . 4. -." E,3 46.7 40.6 , . E,-1 31.4 34.5 3.1 E,4 51.2 41.7 1 + + ;n E,0 33.1 E,5 51.0 43.5 ,-;./73E.1 36.2 35.1 , Er -"3 t i.,,a("' . E,6 44.6 43.9 E ,4i .fit -' E,2 40.6 „ • 34.4 � E,9 43.1 40.2 F,1 36.5 - E,10 43.1 403 L.7.72, 1 F,2 39.4 36.6 '°Mir". te,b E,11 46.1 39.3 tiatati8,1 42.5 35.0 :.;.. 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 19 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 7 Quarter 2004-DEN Runway nway UtEtttion 16R ARR 16L 13.4% C- --4„ l ARR f DEP DEP „ I ARR p ARR UB 0.0% ,}30.9% 0.1%(,-I,5.0% 26 0.5% 28.0% Ii 17R 17L I;R �RR DEP 0.2% 7.7% 14.0% 16.5% DEP DEP DEP ,Sz __IL 5.4% 0.1% 0.7% ARR MR 2.5% 34L 34R DEP ` J M_ 0.3% 29.8% DEP -'---, ARR I „ DEP DEP „ I ARR ARR _St_ 07 I 2.4% 4.8% 0.1% 22.1% 0.2% 251ARR [3:-‘L\ 35R Day Arrivals (700am-959pm) •8 Day Departures (700am-959pm) 27• 7 8 0 8L 34R 35L 35R 7 0 ZL *8% . 35R 6L 0ER 15% 1% 0% 0% 0ER 17L34L ■nL 30 ■nR16R ■25 26 ■25 l3% 026 % 026 125516R ■34L ■34R23% 16% 1uL 0o/R 035E 6% 035L 5% ■35R ■35R Night Arrivals (1000pm-659am) • Night Departures (1000pm-659am) ;8 35R ■6 35L ° 2% 7 8 0 EL 35L 35R 0 EL 34L 30% 0% 0% 16L 0 ER 23% 2% 0'/0 6 0 ER 31/0 •17L 0% ■17L 34R 40% 16R a17R ■nR 34R 13% ■25 344% ■25 0% 026 1 °L 16L 026 ■34L 0% ■34L 26 25 ■34R 2517L �34R R 1% 26 17R 17L 0% 035E 1% 0% 17R 2% ❑35L 0% 27% 2% 0 21% ■35R 0 35R 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 20 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) Fourth Quarter 2004 October 1, 2004 — December 31, 2004 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 21 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004—DECEMBER 31,2004) e Quarter 2004-DIN 65 Id n Contour E 160th ANC' . q .- V ..1 Pt I E 152nd'Ave rt ix ` - E144MAve 1 ' ,4 8 !, g, o to �e 3 R a a r X E . 8 Z-, c Z o E 12001 Ave E 110th Ave -; : t .E 120th Ave l _ [ . _ Ave I IGA 65 Ldn Contour (Green) -. _._. �_ + I . _ E 112U M E tO4th Me • ,: .. E KM M E 96th Ave >a- r-i 4g04 65 Ldn Contour (Red) E anal M E eft Ave iT' 'O ' ± ' n lee E 8 _ p a ibd_ - • E 64th Ave -, ,f t• Ave 59 t . _a4. t D A E 4841 Ave Front. . . Q Range _ —T _ Airport z nni le N E 146! Ave _. — 70 r_ i - - Sn* Re - o - 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 22 ' DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) 4"Quarter 2004-DenverlAdams County IGA NEPS Values Area 2 Area 1 4'"Quarter 2004 4`"Quarter 2004 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference Points L-• (24 Leg(24) Lea Points Lea(24) Leg(24) Lea A,1 38.6 359 7.:77,7„:1111,7711I CA 44.2 35.8 . s . ' A,2 37.6 364 ' it'h- C,5 36.7 34.0 1 A,3 42.3 37.3 F ''_ a -`3 CM 36.0 33.0 z K A,4 45.3 38.2 + ,c,.S.1".., D,4 41.1 35.3 .714(2'hr t A,5 43.9 38.8 D,5 34.2 A,6 37.5 38.7 } '.7, .^a D,6 36.0 33.6 ` € k A,7 37.7 39.2 t. 1^ D,7 41.4 34.1 _ AS 36.5 38.4 ... I E,4 38.3 36.0 `• ' +z ` A,9 36.3 36.1 + • . 't. E,5 34.8 35.9 . kr A,10 37.6 34.7 '17.7'J3 E,6 36.7 35.2 A,11 39.2 34.4 fi.;„'„yp ;ik 3 ``74" E,7 41A 34.9 ';- - A,12 41.2 339 e F,2 51.7s� � 8,2 39.5 36.9 77,71 F,3 43.7 37.9 . 4„4 " '' 8,4 42.5 388 ` F,5 37.3 36.0 `("b ''*+: 8,5 43.1 39.6 L77:121.:11 F,6 38.5 36.1 p@^'�3 B,6 39.0 39.4 r .. + zt F,7 42.1 36.3 s�. 8 7 39.0 40 0 ' G,2 51.2 41.0 'k Ii 8,8 38.0 38 6 G,3 42.1 37.7 i i- *1 8,9 383 36.4 7:.: 1 G,4 40.2 8,10 39.0 35 4 ' ;;z 14,2 50.1 41.7 z 0-'1.;, � B 11 40.4 35.4 J ^" H,3 46.0 37.8 a ; 8,12 42.6 34.9 ,,;,.911, 11,4 46.1 C,2 41.0 37 4 9 t C,3 43.3 38.2 �,.� Area 3 C,4 43.5 39.4 _ , 6 4'"Quarter 2004 C,5 43.4 40.3 I',% „ , .,,,„;,i,3 Grid IGA Annual Calculated Difference C,6 43.3 40 3 t Points Leg(24) Leg(24) Le• C,7 43.3 40.7 r: 'i A.d 38.9 32.4 • fi ,-77!..431;t CM 42.6 38.8 r '0, A,0 39.6 32.84,m,,"s C,9 42.2 36.7 } ,U A,1 43.2 33.7 r� � C,10 41.6 36.6 (, _a A,2 45.7 35.2 „. i ,4; C,11 42.5 36 6 F __E A,3 45.6TM `�+.'. 's C,12 44.3 35.9 I • •� i 8,-1 37.9 D,2 41.7 37 8 i +� 8,0 39.2 32.4 _ D,3 46.2 38.7 8,1 42.6 33.2 D,4 48.4 40.0 re.1 8,2 45.8 34.6 r , t M a D,5 48.2 41.3 L w 8,3 45/ 36.3 ze t", ,,, D,6 46.2 41.3 '• C,-1 36/ 33.0 -4; D,7 44.2 41.5 C,0 37.1 32.9 f!' t " D,8 43.7 38.9 ' C,1 39.5 33.5 x ra •, D 9 43.1 37/ c C,2 44.8 34.7 ,, -t,,,t: X D,10 44.9 38.0 q C,3 46.5 36.5 D,11 44.5 37.7 ' D,-1 32.6 33.6 ', Ai . D,12 45.1 36 7 r D,0 33.3 33.9 E,1 42.4 37 8 ( �- .� D,1 37.3 34.1 E,2 42.2 38.4 i ;2 0,2 43.0 E,3 46.7 39.3 F ,7:-....:1 E,-1 31.4 33.7 2.3 E,4 51.2 40 9 (' c";x EM 33.1 33.5 °"' ` E,1 E,5 51.0 42 6 '`I ., .,,,, 36.2 34.1 r i_.i1' E,6 44.6 42.6 , 'I E,2 40.6 35.4 "' E,9 43.1 39.2 ru r} F,1 36.5 33.3 ?'a 1,$. E,10 43.1 392 cl F,2 39.4 35.3 '_ '., E,11 46.1 382 1,, t ,y, J G,1 42.51 34.2 r ' 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 23 DEN NOISE REPORT DEN 2004 ANNUAL NOISE REPORT(JANUARY 1,2004-DECEMBER 31,2004) . 4t Quarter 2004-DEN RIa1IWaly UNZEItiOll 16R ARR 16L 13.5% ARR DEP I I DEP ARR DEP �R r 0.1% 28.0%^,' " 0.0% 5.6% 26 0.3% 30.5% \lit DEP 0.0% \._I R 4.6% 01 RR DEP 0.1% 6.2% 16.2% 18.8% 7 D`EP DEP DEP - 1_ __S _ 3.4% 9C 0.0% 1.1% ARR ARR 2.7% 34L 34R DEP -fi- 0.2% 27.6% DEP ! ARR DEP DEP ARR ARR J 9 �� 4.4% 0.0% 24.1% 0.5% 25 11.9%ARR )35L 35R Day Arrivals (700am -959pm) ■7 Day Departures (700am-959pm) '7 ■8 ■a 35R 7 8 o EL 34R 35L 35R 7 0 EL 35L 12% 5%� 0% 16L O ER 17% 1% r 0% 0% 8 o ER 28% 29% •17L 34L 29% ■17L ■17R6% 1 ■17R 34R ■25 26 0 ■25 1% 16R 026 0% 0% 026 34L 14% ■34L 25 16R II34L 0% 26 28 17°L ■34R 26% 17R 17L 0% S 34 6% 1% 17R •0% D35L 18% 3% ❑35L 4% ■35R M 35 Night Arrivals (1000pm-659am) '7 Night Departures (1000pm-659am) •8 ■8 35L 35R 7 8 O EL 35R 7 8 16L o 18L 0 34L 27% 3/0 0% 0% O ER 35L 1% 0% 20% 0% O W 0% 16L 27% 18 17L'17L 27% 44% ■nR ■nR 0% O /R 125 9R 125 026 17L 026 16R 34L 4% ■34L ■34L 26 4/0 ■34R 1% 26 17R ■34R 1% 25 17R 17L 25 37% 035E 0% o 0 35 0% 20% 1% 1/o ■35R ■35R 1/31/2005 5:30 PM 24 Hello