HomeMy WebLinkAbout20053800.tiff � cki
® EarthTech 5575 DTC Parkway P 303.694.6660
Suite 200 F 303 694 4410
Englewood,CO 80111-3016 www.earthtech.com
ATyco International Ltd Company
October 14, 2005
Mr. Douglas Ikenberry, P.E. Weld
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Cou1nty Ilan
•
Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division CREELEy ingOpp �pa�me
HMWMD-SWIM-B2 °CT CF nt
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South 1 8 200
Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 C
eE
Ms. Cindi Etcheverry
Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Re: Buffalo Ridge Landfill
First Semi-Annual 2005 Groundwater Sampling Report
Project No. 84158.0701
Dear Mr. Ikenberry and Ms. Etcheverry:
Enclosed is the First Semi-Annual 2005 Groundwater Sampling Report for the Buffalo Ridge
Landfill (BRLF). This report was prepared on behalf of Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. by
Earth Tech,Inc.(Earth Tech). Severn Trent Laboratories,Inc.,Denver performed the analyses. Also
enclosed is a 3.5-inch disk, which contains the analytical results for the first semi-annual 2005
sampling event as requested by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
(CDPHE).
This report represents the seventh semi-annual monitoring event for the BRLF groundwater
monitoring network since monitoring was temporarily suspended following the fourth quarter 1998
sampling event. This is also the sixth event since the commencement of landfilling operations,and
the sixth event subject to statistical evaluation to satisfy detection monitoring requirements. The
statistical evaluation was conducted as outlined in the Statistical Methods for Ground-Water
Monitoring at Buffalo Ridge Landfill,prepared by Robert D.Gibbons,Ph.D.(March 2003). This is
the second event since the submittal of the Alternative Source Demonstration (ASD) dated
December 3, 2004 (Earth Tech 2004).
Statistical analyses were performed using intra-well comparisons. Intra-well Combined Shewart-
CUSUM Control Charts were prepared for wells MW01 through MW11, which monitor
groundwater upgradient and downgradient of Phases 1 and 2 of the landfill. The enclosed results of
the statistical analysis are displayed in tabular and graphical format. In accordance with the
approved statistical methods and the ASD letter from CDPHE dated January 5,2005,the background
period for most control charts has been updated on schedule to include data through June 2004.
Cumulative Sum(CUSUM)is calculated starting at the end of the background period. In accordance
with the ASD letter, this background update was applied to all wells and constituents with the
exception of chloride in MW04 and sodium in MW06. The original background window remains in
2oo538cO
EarthTech
A two International Ltd.Company
Mr. Douglas Ikenberry
Ms. Cindi Etcheverry
October 14, 2005
Page 2
place for these two constituents. Although there is no regulatory requirement to perform statistical
analysis on upgradient wells,intra-well statistical comparisons have been performed for information
purposes only.
VERIFIED EXCEEDANCES FROM THE SECOND 2004 EVENT
The constituents chloride in MW04 and sodium in MW06 had a continued CUSUM exceedance with
detections below the control limits. These statistically significant increases(SSIs)for CUSUM first
appeared with the second 2003 sampling event and were addressed in the December 3, 2004 ASD
report. The constituent sulfate in MW06 had an initial detection and CUSUM exceedance during the
second 2004 event that was verified during the first 2005 event. The following provides findings for
these constituents.
Chloride and Sodium
During the first semi-annual 2005 groundwater sampling event,monitoring wells MW04 and MW06
continue to show a CUSUM SSI for chloride and sodium,respectively. However,the actual detected
concentrations of chloride for MW04 and sodium for MW06 continue below the control limits(no
detected concentration has ever exceeded the control limit). The following table summarizes the
constituents, control limits, and detections for MW04 and MW06.
Control Limit Detections
Well Gradient Date Constituent (mg/L) (mg/L)
MW04 Down 5/26/05 Chloride 229.10 200
11/04/04 200
7/7/04 210
12/31/03 200
MW06 Down 5/26/05 Sodium 167.33 150
11/04/04 160
7/7/04 150
12/31/03 140
mg/L-milligrams per liter
BRLF submitted an ASD that showed that these two SSIs are the result of a source other than the
landfill. In accordance with the ASD letter from CDPHE,the original background period continued
to be applied to MW04 for chloride and MW06 for sodium during this event.
It is anticipated that the CUSUM for chloride in MW04 and for sodium in MW06 will continue to
exceed the control limits under the original background period since the original background does
not include the recently observed variability. Since the detections for chloride in MW04 and sodium
in MW06 have never exceeded the control limits and in accordance with the conclusions of the ASD,
EarthTech
A two International Ltd.Company
Mr. Douglas Ikenberry
Ms. Cindi Etcheverry
October 14, 2005
Page 3
it is recommended that the statistical background window be updated for these two wells for the next
semi-annual event to allow for the proper incorporation of recently observed variability.
Sulfate
During the second 2004 semi-annual detection monitoring event,sulfate was detected at 180 mg/L in
MW06, relative to a control limit of 169.78 mg/L. This constituent was subject to verification
sampling as part of the first 2005 sampling event. The following table summarizes initial statistical
exceedances from the second 2004 event and the results of verification sampling performed during
the first 2005 event.
Initial Exceedances Exceedances Verified
Second 2004 Event First 2005 Event Statistical
Well Gradient CUSUM Detection CUSUM Detection Exceedance
MW06 Down Sulfate Sulfate Yes Yes Yes
During the first 2005 semi-annual detection monitoring event, sulfate was again detected above its
control limit of 169.78 mg/L, at a concentration of 180 mg/L. It should be noted that sulfate has
never been detected in any of the leachate samples from the BRLF. Leachate sampling and
analytical testing have been performed five times since the site commenced accepting waste in 2002.
As a result of the sulfate detection at MW06, and in accordance with Colorado Regulations
Pertaining to Solid Waste Disposal Sites and Facilities, 6 CCR 1007-2(B4)(C)(1), Earth Tech Inc.
(Earth Tech) on behalf of the Buffalo Ridge Landfill (BRLF), provided a 14-day notification of a
confirmed statistically significant increase(SSI)over background for sulfate in down gradient well
MW06. This was transmitted to CDPHE in a letter dated September 30, 2005 (Earth Tech 2005).
Based on the geochemical history of groundwater at this site (parameter detections have shown
relatively significant variability both upgradient and downgradient of the landfill, with upgradient
wells showing greater variability in some cases), the results of leachate sampling (there has never
been a detection of sulfate in any of the five leachate samples since the site commenced operations),
and the spatial differences in sulfate concentrations (upgradient wells show sulfate concentrations
more than ten times higher than this downgradient well). BRLF intends to proceed with an
alternative source demonstration in accordance with 6 CCR 1007-2(B4)(C)(3).
INITIAL EXCEEDANCE FROM THE FIRST 2005 EVENT
The following table summarizes initial statistical exceedances and the status of required verification
sampling as a result of the first 2005 monitoring event.
EarthTech
A two International Ltd Company
Mr. Douglas Ikenberry
Ms. Cindi Etcheverry
October 14,2005
Page 4
Initial Exceedances Verified Sampling
First 2005 Event Required Second 2005
Well Gradient CUSUM Detection Event
MW02 Down TOC TOC Yes
MW05 Down TOC TOC Yes
MW06 Down Alkalinity Yes
Chloride Chloride Yes
Lead Yes
TOC Yes
TOC-total organic carbon
These detections will be subject to verification sampling as part of the second 2005 semi-annual
monitoring event.
In accordance with 6 CCR 1007-2,Appendix B (84)(A)(1),BRLF is in the process of re-evaluating
the current groundwater monitoring parameter list for purposes of potentially recommending a
reduced list to CDPHE. Since the available groundwater quality data at BRLF demonstrates
relatively significant temporal and spatial variability, reducing the parameter list should diminish
statistical false positive detections and increase statistical power. A reduced parameter list was
suggested by Dr. Gibbons in the initial statistical evaluations report (March 2003).
Also enclosed with this report are the Monitoring Well Integrity Field Survey forms, completed
during this event. There were no integrity issues noted which require immediate attention. Should
you have any questions concerning this report,please call me at(303) 694-6660.
Very truly yours,
Earth Tech, Inc.
/Randy Thompson, P.E.
Environmental Engineer
cc Alan Scheere, WM
Bill Hedberg,NWLF
Kim Ogle, WCDPS (w/o enclosures)
Jack Epple, BRLF
Lou Bull, WM
Len Butler, WM
work\84158\product\brftl st05gw.doc
Hello