The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About810483.tiff O• TO T : - s DATE February 17, 1981 Proposed Comprehensive Revision of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance and Map Weld County • !, by Bob Ehrlich that the folio:,in.g resolution be introduced for ;accc_E by the held County Planning Co--i` c �on: FE it Res: veC by the I:eld County Fiannr. in_ E:-.T ssici, That the January 14, 1981 Draft Zoning Ordinance and the Proposed Revisions to the January 14, 1981 Draft Zoning Ordinance and the revisions to the Draft Zoning Ordinance proposed by the Department of Planning Services Staff at the February 3, 1981 and February 17, 1981 Public Hearings and the zoning districts shown on Zoning Map A parts 1 and 2, and the revisions to those zone districts shown on Zoning Map D. be reco „ended {favorably) f(XXXXXXXlE X) to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: The proposed amendments and map redistricting comply with Sections 82.2.2 .1 , 82.2.2.2 and 82 .2.2.3 of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. The existing zoning resolution is in need of revision, the proposed revision is consistent with the future goals and needs of the County as set out in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, and the proposed revision is consistent with the overall intent of the Weld County Zoning Resolution for the following reasons : 1 . The existing Weld County Zoning Resolution is vague in its structure, organization, and word definitions. 2. Individual amendments to the text of the Weld County Zoning Resolution have created an inefficient document. Continued on Page two Notion seconded by Bette Kountz Vote: For Passage Bob Ehrlich Against Passage i er a e Don Billings Bob Halleran Jerry Kiefer___ Bette Kountz __Jack._Nolman — — Fred Otis The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be for...arded with the file of this case to the Board of County Comissioners for further proceedines. 810483 RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS February 17, 1981 Page 2 3. This revision reflects recent changes in state legislation and court actions dealing with zoning. 4. This revision reflects changes in the techniques of administration of zoning ordinances. 5. The increased population growth and expansion of urban areas in Weld County require an updated ordinance in order to allow the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners to more accurately assess the impact of proposed land use changes. 6. The proposed revision implements the policies of the Weld County Com- prehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states "if the Comprehensive Plan is to be realized, zoning decisions must reflect the major objective of the Plan - the enhancement of agriculture and sound, orderly, urban development. If zoning is to help implement the policies of the Comp- rehensive Plan, the Weld County Zoning Resolution itself should be revised with the objective of the plan in mind." This revision is intended to implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan by allowing, for example, more agriculturally related uses in the agricultural district; and, making the urban zone districts more compatible with city zone districts, which will allow for a more orderly urban expansion. 7. The proposed revision is intended to: reduce application time re- quirements; list more clearly the information required for application; and list more clearly the determinations the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners must make in order to approve or deny an amendment or permit application. AJ:jkm 2-27-81 . _ ,.- IF : c. : ; , ^, C = COPY Jeanene Moore , Recordinc Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County , Colorado , adopted on February 17, 1981 and re- corded in Book No . VII of the proceedincs of the said Planning. Commission . Dated the 25 th. day of February 1 9 81 S e c r�r�y2�o � / f � f�- �� • Date : Febl_ 3, 1961 CASE NUMBER: - - NAME : Weld County Planning Commission REQUEST: Comprehensive revision of the text and redistricting of the map of the Weld County Zoning Resolution LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The unincor'orated areas of Weld County outside the boundaries of Weld County towns and cities. LOCATION: THE DEPARTMENT OF PL 1 ING SERVICES STAFF RECOMIIEIDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE approved FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : The proposed amendments and map redristricting comply with Sections 82.2.2.1, 82.2.2.2 and 82.2.2.3 of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. The existing zoning resolution is in need of revision, the proposed revision is consistent with the future goals and needs of the County as set out in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, and the proposed revision is consistent with the overall intent of the Weld County Zoning Resolution for the following reasons: 1. The existing Weld County Zoning Resolution is vague in its structure, organization, and word definitions. 2. Individual a endments to the text of the Weld County Zoning Resolution have created an inefficient document. 3. This revision reflects recent changes in state legislation and court actions dealing with zoning. 4. This revision reflects changes in the techniques of administration of zoning ordinances. 5. The increased population growth and expansion of urban areas in Weld County require an updated ordinance in order to allow the Planning Com- mission and Board of County Commissioners to more accurately assess the impact of proposed land use changes. - 6. The proposed revision implements the policies of the Weld County Com prehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states "if the Comprehensive Plan is to be realized, zoning decisions must reflect the major objective of the Plan - the enhancement of agriculture and sound, orderly, urban development. If zoning is to help implement the policies of the Compre- hensive Plan, the Weld County Zoning Resolution itself should be revised with the objective of the plan in mind." This revision is intended to implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan by allowing, for example, more agriculturally related uses in the Agricultural District; imposing fewer permit recuireents in the agricultrual district; and, making the contatibl_e with city zone districts, which will C Weld County Planning Commission . February 3,-1981 - Page 2 7. The proposed revision is intended to: reduce application time re- quirements; list more clearly the information required for application; and list more clearly the determinations the Planning Commission and the Board of County CorTtssioners must make in order to approve or deny an amendment or permit application. AJ:rg 2/3/81 • • • 1 ATENDANCE R E C O R • D_ TIME : DOCKETig-'/-`�"` APPLICANT : 1,{) TIME � � ��/ DATE : REQUEST : JD ADDRESS ,4; ' i�s ✓� L f ✓ r ! j•• J :� 7 c/k`j I ) J J )( r i < i. �`� hi-e°-/C / c r /C ( ' (2. l2 `( .• . A 1,1) L `7C' r 1 , L .. /( (A- ) C„ (i I-1 j )L4c L 1, / r y V �� c c� , ,`� /1 �Jt:`L�i f N'0,, ri -1 !�� 1 /7 Aft L C t- f�72 K + e."—x— • .. y/ / . /l}'1 _ i. A.1 ..:icy• 1 ` t,•/C) a}. �a Li / i.,1::"Y1.4‘1..1 • • • 1 - - l APPLICANT : WELD COUNTY ZOT "NG ORDINANCE & MAP TIME.: 2:1' P.M. DOCKET#81-9. DATE : APRIL 8, 1981 REQUEST : NAME ADDRESS 3f_ _ /jJfl \\ , w,CV Q r :i J (- eo rn .)IiU Gticu/12/ 71:./7z or C-1,AH Chi cz l�u�,' h, I j ? AP i7`77 2E?-(-R P\Ut- 4k"7 1 - -In , "OC c& GHEE Ceti Co 'C:0%_:3( 6 :1 _730 1 . r Srt 'F± L&IQ v j 0\0±9 \-\-\ (;:,&., n_ -15-15 ?octRick St- / C-i - <ov\ cz,c-k I -- 4 01, A7 , t�"d Y /S 73 ¶ 7774 /4Ze ETXu-nif;k-z 2 / / 0,`f- v �;x �,.:r--.47-' 1 f I . i NOTICE DOCKET #81-9 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, the Board of County Commissioners will conduct a public hearing in its chambers on the First Floor of the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado at the date and time specified: DATE: April 8, 1981 TIME: 2 : 00 P.M. Said hearing will be for the purpose of considering the PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE REVISION OF THE WELD COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP. All persons in any manner interested are requested to attend the hearing and may be heard. The text of the proposed zoning ordinance is available for public nspection in the Office of the Clerk to the Board of County Commissioners, third floor, Weld County Centennial Center, __5 10th street, Greeley, Colorado, and may be viewed Monday _=_ o --da;, from 3 : 00 L.m. to : 00 P .M. TEE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO TEE BOARD BY: Keitha White , Deputy DATED: March 2 , 19°1 PUBLISHED: March 5 , 19°1 `9 and March 26 , 12 \f _ / t-J'a°q-, .e.e R,1-I. .. c AGRICULTURE COUNCIL OF WELD COUNTY "Progress Through Unity" The_Weld County Agricultural Council has had a contin- uing research and dialogue on the proposed new zoning ordin- ance. We have several concerns and problems with thezoning ordinance and zoning in Weld County. We believe that NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION N recent actions of the Board of County Commissioners signal F COLLECTIVE O BARGAINING a change of direction away from preservin g p g prime agricultural land in Weld County. We look at the siting of the Hewlett- Rocky Mountain Packard plant west of Greeley, the move to make a major air- maFanners Union u port out of the Greeley Airport, all the zoning changes in the proposed new ordinance, and zoning changes that can lead WELD COUNTY Cowbelles to new towns and away from the concept of basing growth W.t.F,E, on the existing towns in the county. We watch Greeley and Dairyettes see they get anything they want in this county even if the WELD COUNTY answer is no the first time. We read statements in the press LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION by the mayor that they are going to grow northward. If this WELD COUNTY happens throw out the comprehensive plan its worthless. How- TAXPAYERS' ASSOCIATION ever, in all this process we see nothing to allow a land- >' "'`'iiit, owner more freedom to take advantage of the growth in the «' x, front range. Instead we have a county regulation allowing mr J ?cm,s� splits only on 160 acres of dryland and 80 acres of irrigated land. To preserve prime ag lands this is backwards. It should A.A,M, be 80 acres of dryland and 160 acres irrigated land. le feel that so far as this question is concerned either we should preserve prime ag land and work to see that growth, whether residences, industry, commercial or any other be directed away from the prime farm land, or if not, say we are going to accomodate growth and allow it to go where it wants to go, go back to State Law and allow 40 acre split offs and ease up- on requests for exemptions. The county now has ill maps of allthe counties in ated acres, zoning by land classification should present nobig problem. As late as last fall we re- commended to the county that we not try to compete with the Fort Collins-Loveland airport to construct annother major facility at the Greeley Airport. The large costs involved and the obviou s end results of losses of large acreages of prime farm land were our concerns. We were assured this was county policy. At that time we felt the county ' was trying to 'follow the comprehensive plan. Now we can only conclude this isn't true. Besides the difficulties we have on basic concepts involved we also have a number of specific problems with the plan. In setting up R, '_, R 2, R 3, R 4, and R 5 zones we believe you are opening up the county to urbanization. In sett- ing up these zones we think it will be simple to incorporate start annexing and bingo you have new towns. We do not believe there is any way this can be denied if they can meet water and sewage requirements. Once established they can annex new lands and they are out ofeffective control. The recent app- lication for the development near Longmont show how this can happen. In this case as it will in others, immediate costs willcome up for policing, fire prot- ection, schools, roads, utilities etc. All the established areas will have to pay these new costs. If new growth is limited to existing towns citizens at least have the opportunity to vote for officials making growth policies. If R zones are allowed they should be limited to areas in the county that are not Prime ag lands. The same holds true for industrial and commercial zones. From reading the ordinance they can go anywhere as long as they meet the basic re- quirements. In the case of the C 4 highway zone there is no provision to stop a continuous strip area from developing. As wide open as Larimer County has been they are trying to prevent this between Loveland and Fort Collins. We believe this to be a major flaw in this ordinance. In the A zone it is not clear whether the intent is to require build- ing permits for buildings other than reidences. We feel the inforcement section of the State Law 30-28-206 on county p lanning and zoning clearly exempts any building pe. ...tts for livestock facilities ant_ all other farm build- c ings!residences, We recommend notices of set back requirements and of sewage and electrical permits be sent out with the county assessment or tax notices to all county landowners and no furthur attempt be made to require building permits. The public utilities want to be able to build by the review p rocess. We strongley oppose this. When a major facility is sited this is only the first step. Delivery systems both in and out of a facility need to be considered. Again if we are to preserve prime ag land these locations need the full permit process to assure everyone a chance to [resent their views. A situation that is not addressed in the present ordinance exists in re- spect to a landowner retiring and wishing to sell off the farm and retire where he presently lives. This has proved impossible in the past. To comp ound the injustice a new buyer has only to declare the buildings surplus and of no use to him and he is allowed to split them off and sell them. We in the Ag Council feel this is backwards. A landowner wishing to retire on his farm should be allowed to do so and a buyer in buying land should not be allowed to sp lit off the buildings. His is always a matter of choice as as to whether to buy or not to buy. The sections dealing with junk classifications have not been changed in spite of protests about them. At the present price of ag products most of us can not afford anything else to farm with. We recommend that this be eleminated so that no urban inspector who does not understand farming can hazzle land own- ers about used equipment, fencing, lumber and scrap iron. One of the first reactions we have encountered from anyone reading this zoning ordinance is the repetition and unnecessary wordage used. From the start of definitions that are completely superflous to th@ repetition over and over of set backs, heights, notices etc. We feel this ordinance should be sent back for rewriting and simplification. The council feels this only adds to costs, creates confusion and furthurs public distaste for bureaucracy and re- gulations. We can see no useful purpose in Ft and think it only gives protect- ion for an overzealous f /loyee to hide behind and furthi. s legal interpretations and fees. Most of us felt that we were voting against this type of government at the last election. We would urge each commissioner to take a few hours time (and you will need it) and read this document and then to ask yourselves if all necessary regulations couldn't be written in about twenty pages. In conclusion I want to make clear that the Council does not either favor or oppose growth. We have both opinions in the membership. We do oppose having to pay new growths way. With the tight budget situation and the road conditions in the county we oppose building new oil roads, higher utility costs because of growtl, higher law enforcement costs, school costs, and airport costs. We would urge a cost accounting be done before this ordinance is adopted. We suggest this be outside of the present legal and planning staffs. We think ' a priority system of what will be funded when should be established and followed. When new growth projects arise funding be'done only as money becomes available. We also recommend that we either steer a course that will preserve prime ag lands or else abandoned the verbage. If this is abandoned then agriculture should be allowed the privilege of sharing in the financial gains of a growth economy. Agricultural Council of Weld County yiRNS 1' 6 A cnZi� � poration : 'r APR 7' 19R� , Richard's Lake Road 47 ;ollins, Colorado 80524 aR€Ecr. 4R2-1509 2 April 1981 {{: 7 J Mr. Alan Jost ' Weld County Planning Department °'7 _Weld County Court House K'*' Greeley, CO 80631 RE: 18 acres south of EAd Platteville ' "e,''' Dear Alan, Mtv I appreciated your time Monday the 23rd, and hope `fir you are feeling better. }, `. Even though it is possible I will annex subject property to the moan of Platteville and it is possible the rr current zoning would not be proper for eventual development, I .. wish to co on record with the county commissioners of my objection to being placed in your proposed C-1 category. F,µ My objection is mainly based on the fact the proposed C-1 zoning severely reduces development potential from what I now have with current zoning. And, I have beena diligently seeking interested Parties to utilize the land a_ accordingly. Please see to it the commissioners are aware of this objection. Yours ttn ly,� ///`�/�_- Walter E. Stearns WES:ss if (.:_ fP Gibe League of Women Voters ( GRUL.ZY - WELn COUNTY February 3, 1981 j TESTIMONY BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: WELD COUNTY DRAFT ZONING ' ORDINANCE DATED JANUARY 14, 1981 The League of Women Voters of Greeley-Weld County would like to thank you for this opportunity to comment on the Weld County Draft Zoning Ordinance dated January 14, 1981. One of our basic principles is that government depends on the active participation of its citizens. We appreciate the efforts of the Weld County Planning Department to keep us advised of progress in the preparation and adoption of this document. The League supports the philosophy implied by the Draft Zoning Ordinance. We'believe that local governments should control use of private land through development of comprehensive plans. We consider zoning and subdivision regu- lations to be appropriate tools for implementing these plans. The League would like to applaud your efforts to continually update and review these documents. In particular, the League of Women Voters supports your intent that "Agri- • culture in Weld County is considered a valuable resource, which must be protect- ed from adverse impact. . . ." We believe that the preservation of agriculture and prime agricultural land is crucial to the economy and character of Weld County. Both prime agricultural land and the water to make it productive should be pre- served for economic, social, health, land planning and aesthetic purposes. The League also supports a policy of developing within and contiguous to existing incorporated areas. The League believes that units of government need to cooperate in land use decisions, particularly planning jurisdiction and development standards. We also favor comprehensive land use planning that anticipates changes in popula- tion, facilities, and uses of natural resources. We therefore support your efforts to cooperate with municipalities in insuring orderly development in their future growth rings. Adoption of compatible zoning districts, require- ments that new development meet the performance standards of the municipalities into which they will eventually be annexed, and the requirement that residen- tial dwelling units be connected to and served by a public water system and a public sewerage system will contribute to orderly growth. The League of Women Voters believes that local governmental bodies should identify and regulate large scale private developments such as industrial or commercial areas which may have substantial impact upon the physical, social and economic environment. Therefore, we support your attempts to regulate commercial and industrial growth in the county by the C and I zoning districts. We appreciate and support your attempts to insure quality development and min- imize adverse impacts on neighbors through requirements for screening of park- ing and loading areas, landscaping, and sign regulations. The League believes that governments should identify and regulate areas of critical concern such as natural hazard lands, where development could en- danger life and property. We therefore support strict standards for develop- ment in Flood Hazard Overlay Districts and Geological Hazard Overlay Districts. — f p 9P6 as i C__ a <enose pxopexL * ' . ensicivity to thc= on " t District uper At development the same in nma he urge a acopre—dated re dated the Hazard Overly , , andr a hazard that aea p the zoning ordinances Se ' '>` ,�ntation of public h��^+stfu ly balance tee urge the idle { orfully balance private rights with ovE 11 consideration of the 2 and welfare. k1u safety, _ mpa r` +7 growth pressures. _n co c ' ! trz m ndous g we bnlie+Ytthat Weld County is experiencingCa-2 draft zoning ordinance, f a! the are reseat zoning g ordinances lose p effort to :mprvve coordination and eifecTivuuas��gaih ,, y growth. ti'anky you making a great ns development, and gro c end in the areas of land on-ding art. governor of Women Cr,cers to participate n this d �g Sough the League on_' 1:' for allowing keep us infozaecl as the Zoning Ordinance progresses Please continue to �,nn. ,, the various stages of review awl fj ¢ a, Fyn #, P„" Kathy Ley `. President irk, � at ,J.° �;TJ T. '<lam e "_damn =i r, lsc Vice ?resi+:end J i th Avenue Court " 22.S0 Creel.ey, Colorado 8C> w'. i+ / n n It .fit Sharon canbl::n t, Laud Use Clz r cl t. • • 4 �_.ZPAF,T'J,ck' Orrt SC,riVlL_J PHONE (3031356-4000 EXT.404 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 ( ;�� March 5, 1981 COLORADO L. M. Abrahamson Facilities, KCD Eastman Kodak Company Windsor, Colorado 80550 Re: Letter of February 20, 1981 Dear Mr. Abrahamson: This office has reviewed your above referenced letter and does concur with your interpretation of accessory and other uses in the 1-1 District. The 1-1 District is intended for those industrial activities whose operation is housed within enclosed structures. Certain ancillary functions, such as parking, are required to be screened from adjacent properties or public rights-of-way. The requirement of Kodak' s operation to be flexible for power supply alter- nativesmay require backup or primary power to be supplied by coal powered generation on the site. It is the opinion of the Department of Planning Services that the on site power supply is incidental and accessory to the principle industrial use. As an accessory use it should be screened, but is not restricted to an enclosed structure. The distillation tower (part of future expansion) would be considered a building by definition. Because it is considered a building, and the dis— tilling process occurs within the confines of the tower, it would be in compliance with the I-1 District requirements. I hope this has addressed your concerns regarding future activities on the KCD property. If you have further questions please feel free to contact me. ter) truly your S Thomas E. Bonn Zoning Administrator TER:rjg EI HOdak%int/ r February 20 , 1981 Mr. T. Honn Weld County Planning & Zoning Dept. Greeley, CO. 80631 Dear Mr. Honn , This letter will confirm Kodak ' s understanding regarding the application to our facility of the proposed Weld County Zoning Ordinance which was approved by the Weld County Plan- ning Commission on February 17 , 1981 and will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners at a later date. The Kodak Colorado Division plant as it presently exists meets all the requirements of the I-1 District. Although we have no present plans for it, future development at the plant could include a coal fired boiler , and the resulting coal piles needed to operate the boiler would be considered accessory to the main purpose of the plant , which is to manufacture photographic products . Even such an addi- tion would not require future zoning change since the plant would still fall within the definition of the I-1 District. Similarly , should future development result in the installa- tion of a distilling tower , the distilling process would take place within the tower and this would fall within the requirements of the I-1 District also. If our understanding of the ordinance as it pertains to the examples described is correct, please respond in writing that you concur. !" /_ �GCCs L. M. Abrahamson Facilities , KCD ,/0232 )5>j R Ffa °c] � i 0 FCEIV D a t.77k'E': E !C EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY • WINDSOR. COLORADO 80550 • 303 686-7611 / . , _ I ill • i January 6, 1981 Weld County Planning Commission 9th Avenue and 10th Street • Centennial Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 The undersigned, the Elmer H. Jones and Alice V. Jones are owners r I of twenty acres of land located in the South Range Northwest 65 VestQuart Township S North, of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, zoned wn indusoah and agricultural of the 6th P.M. This land is presently in the amount of approximately ten acres each. A portion of the agricultural land is occupied by the stream bed of the Cache La Poudre River leaving approximately seven acres of agricultural land. In order to provide that the entire parcel owned by us be zoned in a t his parcel be zoned C-3 consistent manner, it i its uestsisebeing made rquested aintaccordance with the Weld County entirety. This req Draft Zoning Ordinance dated June 6, 1980. Your favorable recommendation concerning this request will be appreciated. 6i . fi Elmer H. Jres // Alice V. Jones / /p^.STANSFIELD(1903-ICT9) RICHARD W.BRYAN5,P.C. /// KELLY, STANSFIELD & O'DONNELL - WILLIAM E SK EWES HA fltS J.KELLY ATTORNEYS AT LAW JAMES R.McCOTTER,P.C. /ANT O'DONNELL * TIMOTHY J. FLANAGAN pp6ERT S.OAST,JR. SUrE 900.550 15TH STREET JAMES K.TARPEY rLETCHER THOMAS p ONALD D.C/W ELT1.P C. DENVER, COLORADO 80202 HARRY A.K. WI MESS ROBERT E THOMPSON 003) 825-353-0 IMOTH K.WIG HTMAN FRED L.WITSELL.P C. TIMOTHY FOX January 23 , 1981 `COUNSEL TO THE river 'Z5272829 JAN 1261 ro Mr. Allen Jost , Planner : RECEIVED Weld County , Colorado M It Minty a ct 915 10th Street 'r Manly!, Cammisima Greeley, Colorado 80631 S Sy/ Dear Allen: � del Zl\V I I would like to express my appreciation for the time you spent with us yesterday afternoon reviewing the proposed Weld County Zoning Ordinance. I am sure you have spent many hours preparing the current draft, and we appreciate your willingness to hear our concerns at this stage of the process . Just to recap our conversation, some of the con- cerns are as' follows : ( a) That the structures involved in Utility Ser- vice Facilities, principally poles and pipelines , will have the opportunity, regardless of what district they ' re in, to justify a deviation from the bulk requirements of the particular district. An examination of the bulk require- ments , design and performance standards in various districts indicates that they are not particularly applicable to poles , underground pipelines and some other utility facil- ities. (b) An opportunity for the Company to place in an appropriate district a service center which essentially would be a garage for our service trucks and a warehouse for the material necessary for those trucks to service the gas and electric utility facilities within the general areas . It was suggested that such facilities may qualify as a "Contractor ' s Shop" under the ordinance (page 10-4) . I would suggest that the definition of Contractor' s Shop be . expanded to make clear this intent , perhaps by adding language like , " . . . and the storage and servicing of equipment and . materials. (c) It may be wise in situations where the appli- cant is required to prepare a list of surface and mineral owners to indicate as of what date that list should be cur- rent. Mr. Allen Jost, Planner - 2 January 23 , 1981 (d) The reference in 21. 6 . 2 to " facts presented at the public hearing" would indicate that the ordinance should be clear that the entire or official file may be presented at the public hearing and would constitute the facts upon which the• County Commissioners can rely in their - decision. The composition of such a file and the method of introducing it could be clarified. (e) It could be clarified in Sections 21. 7. 3. 4.2 and 21. 7 . 3. 4 . 3 that the requirement is not for a certificate of approval but merely for a form in which such certificate can later be placed. (f) In the design standards for use by special review, and particularly 24. 5. 1. 7 , a phrase could be added that would allow the authority granting a special review permit to deviate in certain respects from the set- back and offset requirements in situations where an appli- cant could establish that such deviation was appropriate. (g) 24 . 5. 1. 11 should indicate that, as an alternative, the applicant could demonstrate that the design of the use of the land is such that productive soil will not be des- troyed and that agriculture pursuits can continue even after the pipeline or electric line was installed, thus minimizing any loss of productive soil. (h) Sections 24 . 7 . 2. 8 and 24 . 7 . 5. 3 - as we discussed, it is often a problem with a utility acquiring fee ownership land prior to the receipt of a special use permit. The better procedure is to get the County ' s permit first before negotiating with the landowners. It should be possible for an entity with eminent domain powers to apply for a permit even though it may have no property interest in the lands at the time of application. (i) Section 25. 2 - it should be clear that, if an applicant follows the procedures under Section 25 , they do not also have to follow the procedures under Section 24 . - (j ) Section 25. 8 - it should be clear what the words "these regulations" refer to. Is the reference to Section 25 or to the entire ordinance? (k) 31. 1 - as we discussed, the true intend of an agriculture district is primarily for agrigultural uses , but it is clearly also intended for those uses listed as uses • Mr. Allen Jost, Planner - 3 January 23, 1981 for special review, when appropriate and authorized. The intent language should reflect this situation. This same concern could be expressed with the intent language in- troducing other districts. (1) There were a couple of districts wherein Utility Service Facilities have not been provided for. I believe you made notes to indicate which ones were involved. (m) The question was raised as to whether under 61. 1 an applicant or landowner dissatisfied with the deci- sion of the Board of County Commissionrs could interpret this language as allowing him to appeal to the Board of Ad- justment. At our meeting, I offered to attempt to devise some language to take care of situations wherein uses provided for under the old ordinance could be continued where the lands were rezoned to a more restrictive district under the new ordinance. I have attached a proposed paragraph for your consideration. My thinking is that the procedure should work by definition rather than by any special review permit to be "automatically" issued. If this language is used , I believe Section 76 can be stricken. I would be glad to discuss this procedure with you at your convenience if you care to give me a call. Your truly, KELLY, STANSFIELD & O' DONNELL By C'✓Ci FW/al Enc. cc. David Kent Howard, Supervisor Land Use - NEMD Headquarters Building Public Service Company of Colorado Denver , Colorado (-� ..• 3C-� �`� // January 6, 1981 Weld County Planning Commission 9th Avenue and 10th Street Centennial Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 The undersigned, Elmer H. Jones and Alice V. Jones are the owners of twenty acres of land located in the South 1/2 of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. This land is presently zoned industrial and agricultural in the amount of approximately ten acres each. A portion of the agricultural land is occupied by the stream bed of the Cache La Poudre River leaving approximately seven acres of agricultural land. In order to provide that the entire parcel owned by us be zoned in a consistent manner, it is requested that this parcel be zoned C-3 in its entirety. This request is being made in accordance with the Weld County Draft Zoning Ordinance dated June 6, 1980. Your favorable recommendation concerning this request will be appreciated. Elmer H. Jones' a oes Alice V. Jones • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE 1303) 3564000 EXT.404 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 6 if SIPS, • -74- 40 • COLORADO October 21, 1980 Mr. Ernest Ryand Ryandsdesign Ltd. 15169 Nancy Avenue Ft. Lupton, CO 80621 Pear Mr. Ryand: Thank you for your telephone rail and your interest in the Weld County DRAFT Zoning Ordinance. I have enclosed a copy of the preliminary DRAFT of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance along with a letter explain- ing the process. Since this DRAFT was first circulated for public Trent last June 1980, the Department of Planning Services, after consultation with the Weld Planning Cormission, organizations, and interested individuals, has made numerous changes to text of the enclosed, preliminary DRAFT Zoning Ordinance. One of these changes, which was made quite recently, deals directly with your question regarding the number of ANIMAL UNITS allowed per acre in the "A" Agrinlltural District. If you look on page 85 of the enclosed DRAFT, I have inserted these changes. As indicated there, we now propose to allay by right a maximum number of 4 ANIMAL UNITS per acre or portion thereof in the A District. Please refer to page 6 for the definition of an ANIMAL UNIT. I have marked these pages with a pink tab for your convenience. As I stated above, there have been numerous changes to the enclosed DRAFT Zoning Ordinance. Of course, I have not been able to note all than in your enclosed copy. A revised DRAFT Zoning Ordinance will be printed in the near future, and will be available for inspection. This forthcxning DRAFT, will probably be the version which will be the subject of the official adoption procedure by a Planning Cannission Public Hear- ing and a Pnard of County Commissioners Public Hearing. These public hearings will be scheduled sometime in 1981. Dates have not been set yet. I have placed you on our special mailing list, and will notify you of the progress on the Weld County Draft Zoning Ordinance, so that you may par- ticipate in the pica tss if you so desire. We would value any consents Mr. Ernest Flyand =" Cctnh r 21, 1980 Page 2 you might have on this proposed DRAFT Zoning Ordinance. If you have any other concerns or questions please do not hesitate to telephone or write to the Weld County Departnent of Planning Servirec. Again, I thank you for your interest. Respectfully, Forger L. Houston Planner PLaVdt Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF TRANS°ORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADN S kTIOH .O. AN, I t ROCKY MOUNTAIN REGION • 10453 WI ISM AVENUE AUROE.t COEOEADO E0010 O OCT 8 1980 Mr. Neil H. Keddington Airport Manager Weld County Municipal Airport P. O. Box 727 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Dear Mr. Keddington: We have reviewed the draft of Part 51 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The ordinance is in accordance with our model height zoning ordinance. We have not reviewed the land use zoning ordinance related to areas ad- jacent to the airport but would like to review that section of the Weld County ordinance as it is updated. Thank you for the opportunity to review this ordinance. Sincerely, ,0.\121315,6�j treie �� 1§.( OCT1980 N Cecil C. Wagner n. RECEIVED Airport Planning Officer p R; Planning Applications Section cs bilhah ^' Airports Division c^ Plan*tol ti issloi l c1g0162pi :319 E ( _,. Gibe League of Women Polers GREELEY — Witc COUNTY September 22, 1980 Allen Jost Weld County Planning Department 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Jost, The League of Women Voters of Greeley-Weld County would like to thank you for inviting us to comment on the Weld County Draft Zoning Ordinance dated June 6, 1980. One of our basic principles is that government depends on the active participation of its citizens, and we feel privileged that you have included our organization in the preparation of the Zoning Ordinance. The League supports the philosophy implied by the Draft Zoning Ordinance. We believe that local governments should control use of private land through develop- ment of comprehensive plans. We consider zoning and subdivision regulations to be appropriate tools for implementing these plans. The League would like to applaud your efforts to continually update and review these documents. In particular, the League of Women Voters of Greeley-Weld County supports your intent that "Agriculture in Weld County is considered a valuable resource, which must be protected from adverse impact. . . ." We believe that the preservation of agriculture and prime agricultural land is crucial to the economy and character of Weld County. Both prime agricultural land and the water to make it productive should be preserved for economic, social, health, land planning and aesthetic purposes. The League believes that units of government need to cooperate in land use decisions, particularly planning jurisdiction and development standards. " We also favor comprehensive land use planning that anticipates changes in population, facil- ities, and uses of natural resources. We therefore support your efforts to cooper- ate with municipalities in insuring orderly development in their future growth rings. Examples are the Transition District in the June 1980 draft and the Overlay Zone now being developed by your department. In particular, we agree that new development should meet the performance standards of the municipalities into which they will eventually be annexed (e. g. , streets, curb and gutter, and sidewalks. ) We also sup- port the requirement that residential dwelling units be connected to and served by a public water system and a public sewerage system. These provisions should avoid the added expense of upgrading at the time of annexation. They also help the property owner to establish the real cost of developing a land parcel at the outset. We have one concern in considering the sign regulations proposed for the Transi- tion District. If such land converts to a use with more restrictive sign regulations, is it possible that less restrictive signs allowed in the Transition District would already be in place? Would such signs be allowed to remain as a non-conforming use? The League of Women Voters of Greeley-Weld County believes that local govern- mental bodies should identify and regulate large scale private developments such as industrial or commercial areas which may have substantial impact upon the physical, social and economic environment. Therefore, we support your attempts to regulate commercial and industrial growth in the county by the C and I zoning districts. We appreciate and support your attempts to insure quality development through require- ments for screening of parking and loading areas, landscaping, and sign regulations. The League believes that governments should identify and regulate areas of critical concern such as natural hazard lands, where development could endanger life and property. We therefore support strict standards for development in Flood Hazard Overlay Districts and Geological Hazard Overlay Districts. At the same time we urge a continuing sensitivity to those whose property development in a hazard area pre-dated the Hazard Overlay District designation or standards. We urge that the implementation of the zoning ordinances carefully balance private rights with overall consideration of the public health, safety, and welfare. Weld County is experiencing tremendous growth pressures. In comparing the present zoning ordinances with the draft zoning ordinance, we believe that you are making a great effort to improve coordination and effectiveness of local government in the areas of land use, development, and growth. Thank you again for asking the League of Women Voters to participate in this ongoing effort. Please keep us in- formed as the Zoning Ordinance progresses through the various stages of review and adoption. Sincerely, . zrni 6- Sharon Camblin Land Use Chair 3733 West 6th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 yortdelanl Jane Adams 1st Vice President Kathy Ley President ic . /yo .. / ,50? . 2O �, ED Meld tatlwet P. paaan Yield Comity School District Greeley 811 Fifteenth Street • Greeley, Colorado 80631 • 303/352-1543 William A. Mitchell, Ed.D., Superintendent September 1 9 2456 /3ti .P- 207, SEP SEP 1980 ;, RECEIVED NJ SN VA Wan -O Mann1 6/)2213001 Mr. Allen Jost H Weld County Planning Officer eleue61' i Centennial Center , 915 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr . Jost : At the August 27, 1980 regular meeting of the Board of Education , the following motion was unanimously approved. I recommend that the Board of Education direct the administration, on behalf of the Board, to contact the planning offices and governing bodies of the City and Cowity and express our major concern in the following manner. We urge that the City and County require developers of subdivisions and/or PUD filings to provide adequate wallaoays (sidewalks) to insure pedestrian safety and that streets approved in said filings be developed at proper widths, with acceptable clearance, and appropriate turning radiuses to allow for the movement of School District and/or City buses through those" areas. It is extremely important to the District , its patrons , and children that proper safety provisions be made for pedestrians and mass-transit vehicles so that we can insure the efficient movement of students to and from school . We ask that you accept this statement of concern and keep it in mind with all present and future requests for new housing areas . Thank you for your consideration in this matter. We look forward to a long and productive cooperative effort . Sincerely , William A. Mit hell Superintendent of Schools WAM: vb __- - _- . _r:- OF . . P' ONE t303: 356400 EC cc L10T!-• s-Et; GREE LE Y,COLORADO 80631 August 19, 1980 • COLORADO Mr. J. Norman Brost 13557 Weld County Road 88 Pierce, Colorado 80650 Dear Mr. Brown: Thank you for taking the time to provide us with written comments and con- cerns about the proposed Zoning Ordinance. It is much easier to respond to specific issues when they are provided in written form. I will address each of your questions as they appear in your letter. The first issue you raised was that the meetings that are being conducted now should not be final meetings. It is not the County's intent to reach any final decision during these public meetings. The purpose of the three meetings (July 8, in Briggsdale, July 15, in Greeley, and July 21, in Fort Lupton) is to present the proposed Zoning Ordinance to the public and to hear comments concerning the proposal. Aftertbe public meetings are finished the Planning Commission, my staff and Thom Rounds (Consultant to the County) will review all of the comments and concerns. Our intent is to incorporate as many changes as possible before the Ordinance is adopted. Once the re- visions have been made we will begin the formal public hearing process. This will occur first before the Planning Commission, which will make a recommenda- tion to the Board of County Commissioners. These public hearings are presently proposed to be completed before the end of 1980. Following are your specific questions along with my response: 1. "Is the proposal's intent to replace the present Comprehensive Plan with one that allows wide open development and negates the preserva- tion of prime agricultural lands?" The Weld County Comprehensive Plan and the proposed Zoning Ordinance are two different documents which have different purposes. Planning in general, and our Comprehensive Plan specifically, is intended to guide development decision making. For example, as you mentioned, preservation of prime agricultural lands is one of the principle goals in the County Plan. Supporting policies then state that when develop- ment occurs, it should be directed to the municipalities existing in the County. Zoning regulations are the way planning policies are put into effect. Plans are not regulations, but zoning rules are. Other Mr. 3. Norman _ro-.. August 19, 19SO Page 2 examples of regulations that are designed to support Planning Policies are the Building Code and the Subdivision Regulations. Zoning Regulations are laws which affect how property is used, what can be done and how, as well as how large lots must be. We are proposing new Zoning Regulations not a new plan. The pro- posed Zoning Ordinance is meant to replace the current Zoning Resolution which was first adopted in 1961. The new regulations were written specifically with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan in mind. Therefore, the Plan should be better implemented by using the new Zoning Regulations.. Again, I will emphasize that ' the current proposal does not affect the polciies set forth in the Plan. The Plan policies will remain the same. 2. and 3. "Will R Zones be kept out of prime agricultural lands?" "Will I and C Zones be kept out of prime agricultural lands?" As I mentioned above, the Weld County Comprehensive Plan is still in effect. The proposed Zoning Ordinance does not affect the policy to direct growth towards existing municipalities. There will be no change it.. the Plan policies regarding the location of such uses un- der the current proposal. 4. "Under a plan allowing all the various zones will the County have any say about where these developments go if developers meet other requirements?" Decisions affecting the location of development will be handled in the same manner that they have been in the past. Under the proposed ordinance, the County will examine the proposed rezoning in terms of compliance with the Plan and compatibility with the neighborhood, as it has done in the past, prior to making any zoning decisions. Moreover, you will find that the proposed zoning district classifications are, in many respects, similar to the classifications used in the current Zoning Resolution. 5. "What purpose can a T Zone have other than legalizing leapfrog developments all over the County around existing towns?" The purpose of the proposed T District is to encourage the orderly transition of agricultural uses to urban uses where the urban uses have been planned to occur. T District Zoning may only be located within an area that is included in a town' s comprehensive plan. The T District designation is not automatic, the classification must be applied for as would any other zone change. We designed the T District to encourage towns to prepare comprehensive plans and to encourage agricultural interests to locate major facilities (such as feed lots or dairies) in areas that are meant to be main- tained in an agricultural state. Finally, since the beginning of our public meetings which were designed to obtain input on the pro- posal, a great deal of discussion has occurred concerning the Transi- Mr. 3. Norman Brown rucust 19, 1980 . Page 3 tion Zone. Many have perceived a number of problems which could be created by establishing such a Zone. As a result the staff • and the Planning Commission are of the opinion that the Transi- tion District should be dropped from the ordinance and another approach be sought for solving the concerns which the Transition Zone was designed to address. 6. "Can repairs and maintenance be done on existing structures under this plan without the red tape of permits?" To the extent that the repair and maintenance activities are af- fected by zoning, yes. Legal uses and structures, as well as non- conforming structures may be repaired or maintained so long as the activity does not expand the use. However, I believe your question related more specifically to the regulations contained in the Build- ing Code. The proposed Zoning Ordinance does not change the Building Code requirements. 7 - 9. "What has been the cost of preparing the plan ?" "T,nat will be the cost to implement it?" "How many additional County Employees will be required and at what salary scales?" The cost or preparing the Zoning Ordinance which is now proposed was approximately $48,000.00 over a two to two .and one-half year period. Of this amount $11,531.00 came directly from County Funds and $36,500.00 was provided by the State of Colorado, Department of Local Affairs, through the House Bill 1041 Program. The House Bill 1041 monies were specifically appropriated by the Legislature for the development of regulations such as those which are proposed. We feel that the Zoning Ordinance, as it now stands, can provide substantial benefits and savings, well above the actual cost of the project. If one considers the amount of money that is expended yearly in the preparation of applications and the amount spent in application fees on an annual basis, one soon recognizes the need for a carefully drafted ordinance which sets out straightforward procedures that remove as much confusion from the process as possible. We feel that the proposed ordinance simplifies and clarifies many of the procedures which have been used in rezoning processes over the past years. As a result there must be a simpler process for people to go through and should result in savings to individual ap- plicants because they will not have to go back and continue to create new information every time another question comes up in the hearing process. As far as the County's cost for implementing this Ordinance, we do not feel the proposed ordinance will increase costs of imple- mentation over the present ordinance. In fact, the proposed ordinance will likely reduce the overall costs of administration, Ems= Mr. J. Norman Brown August 19, 1980' Page 4 since the procedures are much more clearly defined and reduce the possibility of confusion and mistakes in the application processes. Finally, we do not anticipate that any additional county employees will be needed in order to administer the proposed ordinance. In fact, since the procedures set forth in the ordinance are more straightforward and clear, the or- dinance could in the long run reduce the need for expansion of staff to handle applications which otherwise could not have been handled as effectively under the existing ordinance. 10. "What effect will the recent Supreme Court decision allowing local governments to designate open space areas have on this plan and Weld County?" We are not aware of the case you mention, but will research tile implications on Weld County if you will provide us with the necessary references on the case. As you are aware, after your examination of the Regulations concerning the A District, we have made only minor changes from that which is found in the current ordinance, The A District is essentially as it was after the Agricultut?Connci1 s:,:.z Y:e'-' rh..b'old_rn,,ntv_in_.1973_.,in.. evise. that_ portion of the Zoning Resolution. However, we have proposed changes that: (1.) permit agricultural business establishements as uses by special re- view; and (2.) that relax the requirements for special review permits for feeding and dairy operations, I hope that this provides you with the information you need. If not, please don' t hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Gary Z. Fortner, Director Department of Planning Services GZF:TWR:rjg • 2.11 [I No. Date July 18, 1980 File To: Planning Commission From: Ken McWilliams, City Planner 721 Subject: Review of the Weld County Draft Zoning Ordinance The Planning staff has reviewed the Weld County Draft Zoning Ordinance and offers the following comments: 1) The staff supports the concept of a Transition District as outlined in the intent statement in the draft resolution (copy in attached packet ) . The basic concept is to provide for orderly and timely transition from agricultural to urban uses in the future growth areas around towns . Further , the concept is to discourage intensive agricultural uses which would conflict with future urbanization in the area . The staff is concerned that the proposed method of implementation will not accomplish the stated intent . As proposed , the Transition District will be a zone which a landowner can petition for from the County . The staff feels that in order for the con- cept to be implemented effectively the County needs to initiate and establish the Transition District coincident with the City ' s comprehensive planning area. The staff feels the currently proposed implementation mechanism will be ineffective and may be misleading . Further , the staff feels that the uses permitted within the district are not consistent with the concept of discouraging intensive agricultural and related uses which would conflict with future urban growth in the area. 2 ) The R-2 (Medium Density Residential ) District permits the development of two to six units per lot . This R-2 District is more intensive than the City ' s Two Family District and as such may not provide a good buffer and transition from single family to multi family residential development . 3 ) The draft resolution makes no provision for an Office District comparable to the City 's C-i District , which provides a good transition from residential to more intensive commercial uses or a good buffer along heavily used roads. Planning Commission July 18 , 1980 Page 2 4) The draft resolution would permit parking and loading areas to be improved with gravel and not require asphalt or concrete. The staff is concerned with potential air pollution problems which may result from this development standard . Also the City can anticipate problems in the future associated with upgrad- ing these areas to City standards after they are annexed to the City. 5) The staff is concerned that the definition of "Home Occupation" as specified in the draft resolution may be too broad and may permit uses inconsistent with surrounding uses. In particular, the staff is concerned with this potential problem in residen- tial areas around the City . The staff ' s principal concern with the definition is that it permits the home occupation to be conducted in accessory structures and is not restricted to the dwelling unit itself . The concern is that there is potential of allowing uses such as vehicle repair and body work as home occupations in residential areas . 6) Overall the staff feels that the districts outlined in the draft resolution are much more consistent with the City of Greeley' s zoning districts . 7 ) The staff recommends that the Commission request input from the County with regards to the zoning of lands in the City ' s Comprehensive Planning Area after adoption of the new Zoning Resolution . .,t, s L ' A �.;. s----- --^u'•r ...u�:ran�,�. ,-'-^w�-,♦ _�xay.� _.. 1 r- "may'"` ' - '_I �,m}'�"{' f' s'-�-'�.v. .:�i J1L:E �0r� �-�'-a i� y¢.YS.L t��Ya ...� �1,r fr��,.wr * .1471;. - _ z.c -a4 / _� �� ' ': a.,y,Ky�,u F- x ¢- Y ' -`fi".- +-.•—_____ - - --WS .r-; .. 'Tic ✓ %;s' s zits �.a�;;� .r _ — __�s.. _ _...sue _ ` s '4�x'^'c ''+�,�Ud g ,Y �*__ 14C 6' _ ►' =i Ain fi • ce- ...f E£1 +` « c..• .. r sr 1I. GREELEY CIVIC CENTER GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 PHONE (303, 353-6123 July 9 , 1980 Chuck Carlson , Chairman Weld County Planning Commission 915 Tenth Street . Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Carlson : The Greeley Planning Commission will be unable to complete its review of the Weld County Draft Zoning Ordinance prior to the public meeting scheduled for July 15, 1980 . The Commission anticipates completing its review at the next regularly scheduled meeting on June 22 , 1980 and intends to forward written comments subsequent to that meeting. The Commission apologizes for this delay and respectfully requests consideration of its comments after the July 15 public meeting . Sincerely, ohn Dietz , Chair an Greeley Planning Commission JD : KM: ka -,G 11� 3 js 'c� F l CO CO co �' doo,I`yd`47, re,O O "A CO.MMUNITY OF PROGRESS" .oF co i c- --,-(e----7:- o COLORADO STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS *4:4 ' n ` DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS * 78T6 July 3, 1980 DOH FILE 42100 Gary Z. Fortner, Director Department of Planning Services Weld County Courthouse 915 10th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Gary, Enclosed is a copy of the comments by the District 4 Materials Section of the Colorado State Department of Highways, after their reviewing of the Weld County Draft Zoning Ordinance dated June 6, 1980. We hope you will view these comments in the constructive manner which they are intended, and that you will give them careful consideration when formulating your final draft of the zoning ordinance. Thank you for the opportunity to review this draft, and if you have any questions on the comments please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, DWIGHT M. BOWER DISTRICT ENGINEER • (Cennerta Leo O' Connor District Materials Engineer LO:rd cc: D. M. Bower File (2) P.O. BOX 850 GREELEY, CO 80632 (303) 353-1232 • REVIEW OF WELD COUNTY DRAFT ZONING ORDINANCE DATED 6-6-80 GENERAL COM«NTS: 1. Would it be possible to obtain permits faster on smaller types of pits similar to the size covered by the Mined Land Reclamation Boards limited impact permits? Some possible ways of achieving this are as follows: A. Eliminate one of the public hearings by allowing the Planning Commission to approve these pits or have the Commissioners act on it without Planning Commission review. B. Allow the notice to be published in a newspaper with a general circulation within the area of interest instead of one specific designated newspaper. This would allow the use of daily newspapers which could save as much as a weeks time lag between the time the notice was ready to print and the time it is published. C. Check with the MIned Land Reclamation Board to see which outside agencies they utilize in reviewing permit applications. If you are both requesting review from the same agency it is a duplication of effort and can create a delay in your review of applications if you are waiting for an outside agency response. 2. Are the requirements listed under Application For a Use by Special Review (24.7) in addition to the requirements listed under Open Mining (45) or will the requirements under Open Mining suffice for gravel and borrow pits? 3. We request that you chanoe your requirements that call for a certified boundary survey of the property (45.1.1, 45 .2.2.1, and 45.2.3.1) . In many rural areas of the county the expense of locating or establishing section corners , which are necessary for a certified boundary survey is very excessive. Since the application is not for taking title to the property, the primary reason for the map and boundary location is to provide others with information as to the location of our pits. It seems that if the map and description of the area was simply tied to existing fences, roads, etc. it would provide sufficient information as to the location of the pit. In addition it would be much simpler for someone trying to locate the proposed site, or check on an existing one , if they could use existing physical features rather than / . obtaining a survey crew to locate a section corner and run a line into the pit. 4. 45.1.7.4 requires a listing of county roads and bridges to be utilized when hauling from the mine. We can not supply this information with any measure of certainty since the contractor for our projects could haul legally on any road he desires. 5. 45.1.7.8 requesting information concerning reclamation; We are not sure of reclamation until it is approved by the Mined Land Reclamation Board. 6. 45.2.2.5 requests a timetable for phases of the operation. This information could not be normally furnished with any degree of accuracy. The inability to accurately predict supply demands, and in our case the availability of money, rate of deterioration of roads, sanding material required due to bad weather, etc. makes such timetables virtually useless. 7. 45.2.2.8 and 45.2.3.8 call for certificates on the map. We submit that all of the certificates should be removed from the map for the following reasons: A. Surveying Certificate - previously discussed. B. Certificate of Responsibility - There is no need for this. We submit a signed application to conduct a mining operation. If approved, you grant us permission to conduct a mining operation subject to certain conditions contained in the permit. We can either conduct our mining under these . conditions or refuse the conditions and not mine the area. By simply conducting the mining operation we- are showing that we accept the conditions. C. Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners Certificate - It would seem that a permit where we are granted permission to mine , subject to certain specified conditions, containing the commissioners signature as • evidence of their approval, should be sufficient certification. D. Recorders Certificate - We do not understand the reasoning for requiring the recording of maps or permits. Therefore , it is difficult to state objections to the reasoning. However, listed below are a few of the reasons why we feel it is not necessary: 1. The mining is done only in areas where the zoning permits mining. . ....._ 6 CC- 2. The land is not required as a surety for granting the permit. 3. The permit itself imposes no restrictions in transfer of ownership of the property. 4. If the person applying for the permit does not own the land, you require proof that he has the owners permission to mine, and in any event, the mere act of recording the information does not alert the landowner. 5. If for some reason you should revoke the permit it would in no way directly affect the ownership of the land. 6. The recording creates unnecessary expense for the person obtaining the permit and for the landowner. 7. If someone should wish to view the permit it would be much easier to come to your office and see it where they could have questions answered. 8. 45.4.8 states "where topsoil is removed sufficient arable soil shall be set aside . . .". Sufficient is an ambiguous word - this requirement should be dropped as it is covered in the Mined Land Reclamation Board permit. 9. Section 45.5 - Reclamation Standards - It was our understanding that reclamation of mined areas was the responsibility of the Mined Land Reclamation Board, therefore , this section, and references to reclamation in the previous sections should be dropped. 10. We propose that the county accept a copy of the application and maps for mining submitted to the Mined Land Reclamation Board in lieu of requiring a separate county application. If you have objections to portions of the proposal they can be modified and submitted to the Mined Land Reclamation Board. Dnce the county has approved the mining operation they could issue a permit approving the operation as outlined in the application. I AGRILULTURE COUNCIL OF WELCJ COUNTY "Progress Through Unity" June 29, 1980 Mr. Gary Z. Fortner Director Weld County Dept. Of Planning 915 16th St Greeley, Colo. NATIONAL Dear Sir: FARMERS ORGANIZATION We The Council at its June meeting would like to submit F.tb,ieUnc OBnecAmING a comment on the new zoning revisions and ask some questions of clarification. Our comment is that any time zoning hearings on changes to the A zone are held they should never be in the busy Ag season, June thru September. This can cause many people who would like eRocky Fannon Uni nln to participate to be unable to do so. We feel no decision should be made at this time from these hearings. Questions are: WELD COUNTY Cowbelles 1. Is the proposals intent to replace the present comprehensive plan with one that allows wide open W.I .F.E. development and negates the preservation of prime agricultural lands? 2. Will R zones be kept out of prime ag lands? WELD CUNTY LIVESTOCK AS ASSOCIATION 3 . Will I & C zones be kept out of prime ag lands? L Under a plan allowing all the various zones will WELD COUNTY the county have any say about where these F`,¢rie develop- TAXPAYERS' ASSOCIATION ments go if developers meet other requirements? 5. What purpose can a T zone have other than legalizing ...A. leap frog development all over the county aroung existing . ' towns? rd s 1. \ .-4:--- ( 6. Can reoairs and maintenance be done on existing .�1��-'. structures under this plan withiut the red tape of oermi ts? 7. What has7been the cost of preparing the plan? 8. 'rnet will be the cost to implement it? 9. How many additional county e ployees will be re- A.A. :. cuired and at what salary scales? � �-1--.. 10. What effect will the recent supreme court decision ,1,39 allowing local governments to designate open space areas ,.I '4' .S have on this p' an and Weld County? 61 - JUL isao RECEIVED cn� Wd7County ,�, Sincerely q'nciet tcatista ..N J' N.918.1 li Cii ' -' --._ Jorman own 2D -� , CGA) ANdc 504 .veld County / / 3a Draft Zoning Ordinance .9 � �• `T June 1 , 1980 DRAFT COMMENTS ) 9� by g Public Service Company of Colorado and Home Light and Power Company • • 1 . Definitions, Page 9, Electric Transmission Lines Should read: The system, including lines and support structures , used to transmit electric energy in amounts above 69KV. • If it is intended by the County to include electric transmission lines as a Use by Special Revia++Lkpscertain zone districts , this threshold modifica- tion would exclude 69KVrelectric lines which are generally accepted by industry as distribution voltaces, and would also bring the definition in line with the one included in the proposed Meld County Public Utility Plan. At this time, we and other utilities are operating "informally" under the provisions and requirements of the proposed Public Utility Plan. If this practice is to continue, or if the County plans to eventually adopt the pro- posed Public Utility Plan, it would be impractical and a duplication of effort to require both a public utilitlys major facilities permit and a special use permit in the various zone districts . We would recommend that major facilities of a public utility be treated in the proposed zoning ordinance as follows : A. The definitions found in the proposed Public Utility Plan for Major Facilities of a Public Utility should be included in the proposed Zoning Ordinance, include ing Electric Transmission Lines , Substations and Power Plants. B. Language should be added to the Use by Special Review category in the Agriculture , Transition , Commercial and industrial zones to read. Major Facilities of a Public Utility subject to the provisions and require- ments contained in the Public Utility Plan. This will also avoid the necessity of rezoning in each instance . 2. Definitions , Page 24, Utility Service Facility We would like to request that this definition be reworded to include: Public Utility mains , lines , substations , gas regulator stations , and accessory buildings where no public office, repair, or storage racilities are operates or maintained. Buildings to house and protect electric control facilities and gas regulating and metering facilities are an essential part of those facili- ties . r - 3. Zone Districts We notice that there is much inconsistency with regard to the treat- ment of all* public utility facilities, both major and minor, in the various zone districts. -"Public utility mains , lines, etc. , are a Use by Right in the A, T, and C-2 zones , are a Use by Special Review in the R-1 , R-2, R-3, and R-4 zones , and are not even mentioned in the other commercial and industrial zones We strongly ure_e that facilities for the distribution of electricity and natural cas, as defined above, be made a Use by Right in all zone districts. The county will have ample opportunity to review the need for and availability of electric and gas facilities during the normal review of major and minor subdivisions , applications for building permits , and zoning changes and variances. 4. Geological Hazard Overlay District Development Permit In the Draft Zoninc Ordinance, this permit is required for 'Major Facilities of a Public utility" which are not defined anywhere in the draft. We feel that it is unnecessary to obtain a separate permit when geological hazards can be addressed in the normal review of those facili- ties . Ac' it j90 COLORADO STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS VtH *o DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS } 7876 f April 23, 1960 DOH FILE 42100 Gary Fortner `d Director of Planning am Weld County Courthouse /�' APa 12.80 915 10th Street /59 G1,\/ Greeley, Colorado 80631 '4' RE Ceuod V— Weld s�� tr i,��iei Coen; Dear Gary, /O . At our recent meeting concerning special use permit . application fees, you stated that the county was in the process of revising their procedures for granting special use permits for the mining of sand, gravel, and borrow material. As you also invited any comments or suggestions that we might have, we are submitting the following items for your consideration: 1. Would it be possible to obtain permits faster on smaller type pits similar to the size covered by the Mined Land Reclamation Boards limited impact permits? Some of the possible ways of achieving this are as follows: A. Eliminate one of the public hearings by allowing the Planning Commission to approve these pits or have the Commissioners act on it without Planning Commission review. Of course this would only be possible in areas where no zoning changes are required. B. Allow the notice to be published in a newspaper with a general circulation within the area of interest instead of one specific designated newspaper. This would allow the use of daily newspapers which could save as much as a weeks tine lag between the time the notice was ready to print and the time it is published. C. Reduce publication time to 2 notices, one week apart similar to the requirements of the Mined Land Reclamation Board. D. Check with the Mined Land Reclamation Board to see which outside agencies they utilize in reviewing permit applications. If you are both requesting review from the same agenc it creates double work and can create P.O. BOX 950 GREELEY, CO 80632 (303) 353-1232 DOH FILE 42100 Gary Fortner April 23, 1980 Page Two a delay in your review of applications if you are waiting for an outside agency response. 2. We request that you change your requirement which calls for a certified boundary survey of the property. In many rural areas of the county the expense of locating or establishing section corners which are necessary for a certified boundary survey is very excessive. Since we are • not taking title to the property, the primary reason for the map and boundary location is to provide others with information as to the location of our pits. It seems to us that if the map and description of the area was simply tied to existing fences, roads, etc. it would provide sufficient information as to the location of the pit. In addition it would be much simpler for someone trying to locate the proposed site, or check on an existing one, if they could use existing physical features rather than obtaining a survey crew to locate the section corner and run a line into the pit. 3. Maps A. We would like to see the requirements for certification of the maps by a registered land surveyor or professional engineer dropped. As we previously mentioned the amount of field work and surveying required to locate all physical features within one-half a mile of the pit operation accurately enough for the map to be certified is cost prohibitive. B. For the vicinity map, we would like to have it specified that a copy of a U.S.G.S. map would be acceptable. You have allowed us to do this for our last few applications and it has apparently been sufficient. C. We have the following suggestions for the extraction plan map : 1. Drop the certification requirement for the boundary Cz- DOH FILE 42100 Gary Fortner April 25, 1980 Page Three survey for reasons previously mentioned. 2. The requirement which requests time required for each phase is nearly impossible to furnish. The inability to accurately predict supply demands, and in our case the availability of money, rate of deterioration of roads, sanding material required due to bad weather, etc. makes such timetables virtually useless. 3. The stockpile areas, parking areas, and circulation routes will normally change as the deposit is depleted in one area and the excavation is moved to another portion of the pit; Therefore, it is difficult to specifically locate the area of these activities. 4. Certificates - We submit that all of the certificates should be removed from the map .for the following reasons: a. Surveying certificate - previously discussed. b. Certificate of responsibility - There is no need for this. You are granting us permission to conduct a mining operation subject to conditions contained in the permit. We can either. conduct our mining under those conditions or refuse the conditions and not mine the area. By simply conducting the mining operation we are showing that we accept the conditions. c. Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners Certificate - It would seem that a permit where we are granted permission to mine subject to certain specified conditions, containing the commissioners signature as evidence of their approval, should be sufficient certification. d. Recorders certificate - We do not understand the reasoning for requiring the recording of maps or permits. Therefore , it is difficult to state objections tc the reasoning. However, listed below DOH FILE 42100 Gary Fortner April 23, 1980 Page Four - are a few reasons why we feel it is not necessary: 1) The mining is only done in areas where the zoning permits mining. 2) You are not requiring the land as surety for granting the permit. 3) The permit itself imposes no restrictions in transfer of ownership of the property. 4) If the person applying for the permit does not own the land, you require proof that he has the owners permission to mine. And in any event, the mere act of recording the information does not alert the landowner. 5) If for some reason you should revoke the permit it would in nc way directly affect the ownership of the land. 6) The recordinc creates unnecessary expense for the person obtaining the permit and for the landowner. 7) If someone should wish to view the permit it would be much easier to come to your office and see it where they could have questions answered. 4. From your previous statements we assume you are deleting the. reclamation portion of your requirements; so we will make no comments on that section. Thank you for granting us this opportunity to express our views. In addition, would you please notify us when you conduct your public hearinc to consider the proposed changes so we might add our input. Very truly yours, DWIGHT M. BOWER DISTRICT ENGINEER Joe A. Intermil ✓; Jr. JAI:rd Ma erials Reconnaissance Engineer cc: D. M. Bower Chairman of the Board of Weld County Commissioners Chairman of the held County Planning Commission Weld County Fneireer Weld County Zoning Acninistrator - File '1 WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, DO HEREBY PHTITION WELD COUNTY, THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONERS, TO GRANT THE RESIDENTS OF ARISTOCRAT RANCHETTES AN EXTENSION OF SIX MONTHS BEFORE REACHING FINAL DECISIONS CONCERNING PROPOSED NEW ZONING CHANGES AFFECTING RANCHETTE RESIDENTS. WITHIN FIVE CALENDAR MONTHS FROM THIS PETITION, THE. WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WILL RECEIVE A WRITTEN REPORT CONTAINING ALL NECESSARY DEMOGRAPHIC SUPPORT INFORMATION AS WELL AS FINAL MAJORITY RECOMMENDATIONS AS WELL AS MINORITY RECOMMENDATIONS TO ASSIST THE COMMISSIONERS IN ARRIVING AT A DEMOCRATIC ZONING DETERMINATION REGARDING THE PROBLEMS OF ARISTOCRATIC RANCHETTES. 2 ,C -I( 744,.s fi 2rc_4 y�^ ) 7rf-s /e ter tc- , aLed, �? gyp 7as-s- i/�h6,�ne/s eac,„,-, AS ? 7I ' jam- �. PLC Y Z. /21c IQ e /tea �a�y C_ ay.' �r ism-c 7 �� a . gy. fr rzy A.�,C.�� 9220 -, 4/ Vim. * c,l.lLk,cL, i �� 9I i-1 DUI 1 `" KL-- ,- --e a-.5... lido [cei c',��,�t r 15?9 ,„4, ,,),/e. a:/L./6 i C '2 79 S / t,-d., r /. .,a, _- , �-iciv /5 /4o Ceti /L(Ci.11 a A - / S-/' X115 cam, ---- 7l/„14 V"C, i -tt �// rAsedaesc� /S .-9_.3 zo - -LGcl.{.�//, /i Illvy C SC_ n /S� c/c� .�`'recce! GtK._ __,,, /six(7Fiaro_d A.,,, --(3 2,_ /s „5--cf i 0,,,,, _ „_e_ l I / 5e--7 7 9 Las b ti,e. 9 .4A ern `.ALL 15479 L .gym i5 A v c- ItiiLier: cue-r 6",-(----,- / L:74-77 7 [ore' i )//deui (Lzac0it IJC9 /� caAnAi A - l 7�5 `�-1a/ z _C c ,,..4 ,7,„) 2 .,_ . , T2) , , \ \ 7-Acc_t+ .1- cj`a'� - 2. --\S AS _ -\-k,:c k r14-., At. 75d `r {-/--(44,-/,?` t Y57_ ?o )7 C�vr�.cc, Acciet 5 5 `l S v-+.-- /5375-5- MAI Bud ' -c)-(4z /5-5() 9/--g1)2"--5- y �� Qom �, � �— SS *12.064 �� '4:1Z,. iL 7 C2 d G4a< , , i . Lti , )/ � Y-� y49i� 7✓a2� ' . 857 2101 1l' 3/ , ' ' P, / 'e' 1-' . .1,/s siet-ea- ils.4% C.. roi -- Ce:�arsae,oti _Hires Aug. 16, 1981 Affidavit of publication STATE OF COLORADO ) )s COUNTY OF WELD ) James P. Noel being duly sworn, says that he/she is publisher of the Platte Valley VOICE, a weekly newspaper published and printed in Kersey in said County and State; that said newspaper has a general circulation in said County and has been continuously and unin- terruptedly published therein, during a period of at least NOTICE . fifty-two consecutive weeks , ETNo.st-8 NO prior to the first publication of �s h *r §•;'thil the annexed notice; that said Milcn . '.Its' newspaper is a newspaper with- , the in the meaning of the act of the 10 i ' v` 1 4,�p , Via General Assembly of the State date• tc` of Colorado, entitled "An Act to DA regulate the printing of legal said h ',: notices and advertisements," of sf° and amendments thereto; that COPAPA•r'. O the notice of which the annexed THE •...ZIPNINGt Ft- ,, i '^ is a printed copy taken from AU '{ '" "•�'''' interested said newspaper, was published are ,,, , the my in said newspaper, and in the me } a� Y' regular and entire issue of The .t "GDed z ordlnaricrt: r is every number thereof, once a inapectto+i to fire s- along'there tk3pr, . ty week for one successive Centered,* eet5`tah skeet, Greeley,i,:G`ol and may-be weeks; that said notice was so viewed Monday t ugh Friday,from published in said newspaper 8:00 A.M. to�0 TH proper and not in any supple- THEEsoaaDOF ment thereof, and that the first ''W-COUNTY COMMISSIONERS publication of said notice as it7 o N a aforesaid, was on the —1-9-t — OARD DA ty day of —_Larch 1981 981 In try " _ 1931 t9, n Yale 404E, Kersey, Co i, and the last on the day of , 19--. -- le Xeld._ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27th day of � ��— 19-- 8- . .......L. cyyl-L_ Notary ' ublic Fly Commission Expires 2/15/82 i Pawl frown and Csmnlrr.Nk WS Mar(h26..1981 z W'p �g Y $'J' Wt WZ< E ~� . !ii ,vr1i yii E� (� L' t F R. C7 r '5a. "'U0y i i I 21X wit itd5 a`tsam,LppzoeHII!% • 'g.g. m 17.r, 1 $re2 ellrA 6 r . vi Ic73 ' 'SAmye lilt.* 1... _Q�X+, 1 EU •o s c�.�Oa F q,+', n FW .Y !s4 ,a t1"> i 1_ 1 m 2 S'd E d o yee $ T Ok'10 'r m e ° yc 3co t m CUG 63ja�F o.9UU3c Sc'< FOOL) RI O I; T C co C O i0 i0 j 0 0 p C N p = o a) U�' '00 O 0 O a J O C U O N 0) rn O) .O 0) N d N O) J C L to r' l9 0_ c L H Ern M m .' 3 5 ° a o d 0 0 y a ` %1 E 0 p (� w .. N at - c c • 7�` cHfU < 9H Q 0N9vLO W yU = L Z C0 co .C v C ° tr.,.. a CL 0` f -C 0 0 C d 15, T C `� N N C YO E N.‘‹ N r '0 UO 3 1° atl � aa m yoiz � ? `° V� C `o r p E co.- a) m m s y�� y > '3 O 3 > r O _ a L tl) ▪ « U O a3 h co N U N � O) 0 C c a a C J m CO N U >-, -F_ d J m 05 n ° j Q ° @ L ° �'\ p Cl. .. t - T o6 T c ` p T C .T.. 0) l6 H C a U U p O) O ° F- N � (0 ° C (7),_ a V V ' I) ° 3 v ° a a) °A3 = ._ a S c. a r, ° c 3 m m U c°) F c°i c{‘ 1- $ rn q g LLw88zmoor {{ ,hL 9`► 3N'Oz }li �14i pWfllm<qL t- g & '^ S m maYW$.p' J^ g W A 11 N �0> I It (.212Swwaw= in Yr N (.< mmW O !jlflltj1 WU0IthI .012 1₹ 1 8•3 m WEN ilillft". 1:81152) .2.18 53 _ _ ct » tP i, . . ° `c' . -`O. y5 o.00. c Z3 c ° a ° r t o a o c ° c t s nU i v c' `- = >, ° c a `c a '= c m 0° ? .c 3 v ES , y n c _ _ = .- _ c y E _ _ r. - m i o > a. 6 y T _ y m m 2 E m 9 '- 9 i 9 cc - - C 'l. N y 5 4: -. E ..5 _ u J V' m G ',I. N g G _ ° 4. C OWC c s m s a E ° ` o L c ° 'c 3 m a t ° G _. T , O A. _ m i- ❑_ ._ a - c - c G c _ '¢ - _, .0 3 C. O G O j' O. S - c in � C •ai 9 t L L .P. d „.j V - m G = % t m .q 4 y 3 v ,y Y >i n 6 e t L a O ., E. 5 C C i C Y- id G G4 t c 0 Cs O L b G C�� a Q��^ 1 S a h( r Ya 9 4 r _ 3 C u s _ c C L C E r m _ C G ' �- c O O L U L . L y O m E t a u C C O C $ v-— C F c O. O _ F c vc 03c C c.- C 9 G C m y m y G L . c < c c y 4 o � { \\1 d C > E s. o �� n c .E c `c - c .= - - c E c n ❑ o m N `- m ° \\]\°� s z L E _ Kr� e� J t - N t T G O . :J >. L y a ' G C t a. eu c `9O 3 " c ac' v y _ T G_ - G _ G y C_ C. J _ - F - _ - C C L, r, t < 'l - Ri I - _ - _ a - _ 3 _ - m _ f - _ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION LONGMONT DAILY TIMES-CALL State of Colorado ) ss County of Boulder ) I, Dennis„.E.,...H.arry do ' - 'I"' waxy solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES-CALL is a NOTICED,SERERYOI*EN,tne duct s eeC lore will Caqucta daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in NR My abel�wden ntelQnaeley,Col the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, oracle touWN rapecNNd: DATE: ItI x1 • and which has general circulation therein and in parts of Boulder TIAIE ►.M. Said bestial will he for the putpooe of and Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously coneld.r4n:me PROPOSED COM- -'tl$ INANCE and uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months ANp Mir ORDOUNCE next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice AN y manner interested are rem nd the Wine and may of advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the Mg' Aini p,tga+d ,alma Or- United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions able Re peak inspection in ineO Mme Clerk t0qy ReardOf of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and county nan.rGeNtad' ppr,Weld County DR CeftSat E-!em that said newspaper is a daily newspaper qualified for publishing Street, ,Colorado and may be duly viewed Y through Friday, from legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws & A W P.Ax EOUNTYCOMMPSstONERRF{ of the State of Colorado; that copies of each number of said 01E D COUNTY,COLORADO newspaper, in which said notice or advertisement was published, EVORiA R Y ANN NEUERSTEIN CONIINILERK AND RECORDER were transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the subscribers - CLERK TO TNESOARD By: K,altha While, Dap'uty DATED:Waxen 2,1911 of said newspaper, according to the accustomed mode of business Published InM Dailyrch 21,iiimesCall,LonR- in this office. moat,Colo.,_._ That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire editions of said daily newspaper once each week on the same day of each week for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated March 21 , 19 81 and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated March 21 19 81 In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of Marc 19 81 atr.,q C C Business Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this 21st day of March 19 81 My Commission Expires --L'cir-e-t `+-l02 '©j 19// Notar.Public FEE $ 9.64 1-1300-02 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NONCg tit MPS- t a. STATE OF COLORADO 1 Campo Ceeilleilessen aria }reshot.if• PIS ss. Thar a( COUNTY OF WELD I ,91S 10th _ Skeet, Greeley, SI tlr 4M asl time . 1, J140L`. ._JLL�2C tit(., of said County of DAT13, III g,19g1 ._ Weld, being dilly sworn, say that I am office manager TATS ] A Said heesY{ A. be Nr0te d. of SIVE ORDINANCE .. COUMIT THE WINDSOR BEACON, INC. ZONING MAIN All persons is any meager interested.are a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in requested to attend the oaring and may be said County and State, published in the town of he ext of the '`mdng ordinance is WINDSOR, in said County and State; and that the available for pa lic. pectM!in the Office of notice, of which the annexed is a true copy, has beei the Clerk to the d of. County Commissioners, third Weld County Centennial Center,915 I `Street,Greeley, published in said weekly for ........ ........ successive Colorado, and may be -viewed Monday weeks, that the notice was published in the regular through Friday.from g:99„A to M. 3:00 ARD OF and entire issue of every number of the papere during COMET t SION6RS the period and time of publication, and in the news- WELDCOURPY COLORADO paper proper and not in a supplement, and that the BY,MARYA�NN IEUERSTEIN first publication of said notice was in said paper bear- COUNTYAND MIST°THE HOAARD rug the date of the BY,Yi161S WhIM,apety MRkffA t' day of �II/l<1 Iv l-� ._. ., A.D., 19 and the last publication bearing the date of the G. �' day of A t f11ic H A.D. 19 .i and that the said "WINDSOR BEACON" has been published continuously and uninterruptedly for the period of 52 consecutive weeks, in said County and State, prior to the date of first publication of said notice, and the same is a newspaper within the mean- ing of an Act to regulate printing of legal notices and advertisements, approved May 18, 1931, and all I,rior ,,9s so far as in force. / J. OFFICE MANAGER Subscribed and swo to before me this - day of x t✓/f/ , 19 ,—. „ NOTARY PUBLIC My conunission expires -.....may.,',. !I � //./9 t'�5 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF COLORADO ss. County of Weld, Charleen Rudd of said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am an advertising derk of THE GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE, and THE GREELEY REPUBLICAN that the same is a daily newspaper of general circulation and printed and published in the City of Greeley, in said county and state; that the notice or advertisement, of which the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said daily newspaper for consecutive (days) (weeks); that the notice was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said newspaper during the period and time of publication of said notice, and in the newspaper proper and not in a supplement thereof; that the first publication of said ,... d notice was contained in the issue of said newspaper .:•�d ', bearing date M MW M IM CMmbrt M lee lewd et COMt� tt,. _Weld mMn sixth ce:Lt: rte[m�r f tN'pelev'". In MYo MtNni cl IWO Perwm. day of April A.D. 19 81 U P r It1.AtlNNi ims'M and Um P.rgtn are rerrveetw4atnnp ana and the last publication thereof; in the issue of said SR 1;46SO KNOWNMet the Mell end newspaper bearing date the maps N tserNmse or WI WNW Canty PIpeR11P1I mtY Mexemit IN1MeNen WCn, oM'$Oin we WildCounty GRtr,Ma CMMt,eltl rMlt" Strepl,Tl,Iry p��OK ,CaN.eo. day of April A.D. 19$7-._, ' D RPIMrMel that said The Greeley Daily Tribune and The Greeley -- . QRCsloteeoeoelr ET NO*Hp Republican, has been published continuously and DATE:2StU INI TIME: a uninterruptedly during the period of at least six REQUEST:audit.use Permit—.Fuel ANGAL slSltt . months next prior to the first issue thereof contained LEOL Ns I PT ION:M.SWIA SWVr M ahn' ?ewAsnlee Norm,Raw u said notice or advertisement above referred to; that said Westi COMMISSIONERS WELD newspaper has been admitted to the United States WELDCo NTµV;COLORADO mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the COUNTY CURS ANO RECORDER Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof; and R4 that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. April 6, 1981 . Total charge $ 11 .31 .I n hCA._.l LQJ la. Advertising Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this 6th of _ A ri A.D. 19 81 My c mi ion expires My Co•'Mission -r p c s Feb 28, 19R` Notary Public AM-Iiim VIT OP PUBLICATION FARMER AND MINER County of Weld ) ss State of Colorado ) NOTICE DOCKET No.569 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,the Board of County Commleelonen will conduct a public hearing in Ne''Mamban en the Flat Floor of the Weld County Centen- I, Ann7.5.. ....Harry do +Ialceepwr;9ulE paclNM: nSNeee,BdeNy,coi- solemnly swear that THE FARMER AND MINER is a weekly DATE:AWOL tell TIME:2:00 P.M. newspaper which is published in the County of Weld, State of ' hearing will dering thee ROPOSED COM- Colorado, purpose of I Colorado, and which has general circulation therein; that said PREHENSIVE REVISION OF THE newspaper has been published continuously and uniterruptedly in WELD COUNTY ZONINOORDINANCE WD CP. AU perwpIn any manner Interested are said County of Weld for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive re to toat«wmemantw and Mer weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice TIN text-of the proposed zoning or- dinance is available for public Inapecilen or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the in tee Office of ne Clerk to the soarOw County CommIssioners,third floor.Weld United Sates mails as second-class matter under the provisions county Centennial center. 91S nth -Strew,CMa,'Colorade,.a,af may Se of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereto, and that viewed Monday through Friday. from COD A.M.to 5:00-P.M. said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for pub- THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS lishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of WELD COUNTY.COLORADO BY:MARY ANN PEUERSTE IN the laws of the State of Colorado. COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD p That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published DATED:March 2,1981 Published White,Deputy Published in the Farmer end Miner. March 96,1981 in the regular and entire editions of said daily newspaper once each week on the same day of each week for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated March 26 , 19...81.., and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper meted 1`1d.r. 19....81. tek- Business Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this 26th day of March , 19 81.. my 7Imission Expires Aug. 1983 My Commission Expires otary Public -. FEE $ 9.92 3-1300-02 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION THE JOHNSTOWN BREEZE STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF WELD ) I, Clyde Briggs, do solemnly swear that I _ am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze; --=r- that the same is a weekly newspaper - printed, in whole or in part, and published in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, N.. cE i, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published In continuously and uninterruptedly in said Carat* County of Weld for a period of more than as fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the DAN'S:: first publication of the annexed legal notice TD.[Es I. or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as Said ao • second-class matter under the provisions of the of March 3, , amendmentsAct thereof, and 1879 us that said bilib All n6. or newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly tn: qualified for publishing legal notices and &Sad _"' advertisements within the meaning of the tea laws of the State of Colorado. bur ' That the annexed legal notice or advertise- ii. stoor, ment was published in the regular and w tar, entire issue of every number of said weekly ow- am awed newspaper for the period of ..2 consecu- r° tive insertions; and that the first e:oo 11NTY publication of said notice was in the issue,of said newspaper dated/114..*:.S 4- T A.D. 19�., .s P and that the last publication of said notice ANN was in the issue of said newspaper dated €lr26 A.D. 19 CI awn �A' i%In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand this ...Z.4r... day of ..01'-•- , Bt,KelthaWhIte,D°PuIr A.D. 19 i. DATED: March E 081 PUBLISHED:100116.1.981 and ,. �J p �i Marc M,N flw N-to Johnstown p f ✓ „j BrossPublisher Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the County of Weld,State of Colorado thisu?.6.tiiCday of )a2c.J..i LL-A.D. 1.9.4.-.1... Notary Public. My commission expires //` /- 12— ) SfLi"•"T YPATE OF COLORADO ) the:Board sr�f" ' )� s COUNTY OF WELD ) r$T B x `� being S a xr + duly sworn, says that he/she is pub- tq lisher of the KEENE VALLFY SUN, a weekly newspaper published and '4th °`°'j^'"*& .x .) rr•.''.. printed in Keenesburg in said County and State; that said newspaper has r "6,a4Sith "t.14 Abe a general circulation in said County , `"°"' „ ()- and has been continuously and un- interruptedly published therein, dur- pVpA 'nx 9 i )i k hag a pericd of at least fifty-two 4, 4;consecutive weeks prior to the first publication of the annexed notice; that said newspaper is a newspaper within the meaning of the act of the the Z($!Mtf +°`=. • , General Assembly of the State of 'j'h teh of too- Colorado, entitled "An Act to regu- 'Pre1 !<On- late the printing of legal notices and 8 � � LOT advertisements," and amendments the ,of thereto; that the notice of which the $ fey annexed is a printed copy taken from eN said newspaper, was published in said t 915 newspaper, and in the regular and entire issue of every number thereof, and throth' WADI once a week for t013;911 pal. l" i. . week,(; that said notice was so pub- COUNTY COMBO lisped in said newspaper proper and M111$ j not in any supplement thereof, and WELD COUNTY,COLODADO that the first publication of said no- BY' I tice es aforesaid, was on the 1CO day of . ))�'`�� , 19Cr BY: Keithresinilte.!)eput DATED: March,2. 1221 - and the last on the day of Published.tiLtheiCeoni Sun March 26, I9$1s° 19 - Subscribed and sworn to before me /J this ' day of ../) ) °l 19 My Qommissicn Expires Eebruary_7,, 19a ✓ `/ ° PROOF OF PUBLICATION The North Weld Herald Eaton, Colorado 80615 STATE OF COLORADO, ) ss. County of Weld I,.yLA L )1.1tC- L�fJ.:.k-��, , do solemnly swear that I am Cat tat i)• of THE NORTH WELD HERALD; that the same is a weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; and that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Weld for a period of more than fifty-two con- secutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper No cm' NO.81.9 has been admitted to the United States mails as second• N9TICE 15' MEImOCKET gr. GIVEN. the Board 01. Countymissioners wig class matter under the provision of the Act of March 3, 1879 conductapublicheginIts chambers or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a on the First floor the Centennial st floor , 915 Weld th County weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal Greeley,Colorado at the date and time specified: • notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws DATE:April 8, 198) of the State of C,OlOrad O. TIME: 2:00:P.M. Said hearing will be for the purpose of considering the PROPOSED COMPRE HENSIVE REVISION OF THE.WELD That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE AND MAP. published in the regular and entire issue of every number of All persons in any manner interested said weekly newspaper for the period of C-nc. G 1 are re may be a h a to d.ear attend the hearing anc d. consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said The text of the proposed zoning ordinance. is available for .public notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated inspectionintheofficeofthe Cle.ktothe Board of County Commissioners, third f'1(t, '' k- u1CP A.D., 19 5'i , floor, Weld County tentepnlal CentFr, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, and and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue may be viewed Monday through Friday, of said publication dated 1Tw,-ACiti. ,a/e A.D., 19 <zr/ , from 8.00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m: THE BOARD OF.COUNTY MMISSIONERS In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand this WELD COUNOTY,COLORADO ,Q-7Ot. da .-( BY:-MARY>ANN FEUERSTE IN y Of 71aie I^- A.D., 19 1L . COUNTY CLERK AND RECORMER AND CLERK TO, HE,AOAtcD BV: Ke't s �!c2 IMO ( �,L DATED March 2, 11��BBV1 • bury Published in the N1th.Weld Herald March 26, 1981. J Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in / 0 13 and for the County of Weld, State of Colorado, this 0?77Z day of fikiebe c r A.D., 19 . Notary Public My commission expires bd. 19; 1982 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO, County of Morgan. ss. Fern H. Spencer , being of lawful age and first duly sworn on his oath, states that he is the Circulation Mgr. of The Fort Morgan Times; that The Fort Morgan Times is a daily rewspaper of general circulation and printed and published in the City of Fort Morgan in the County of Morgan, State of Colorado; that said daily newspaper has been published in said Morgan County, Colorado, uninterruptedly and continuously during the period of at NOTICE, least twelve months next prior to the first issue thereof N, -.9 , ,,., , .q Co ly Not M containing the annexed • m Ms Docket No. $1-9 c ,� : o2t6e f th6'. ty o . Centel:Wel Cen* 4 'era!e ' ,Omelet'Colorado at the dueling e i., St -fit�Y� ��y•�� l f� � �� . that said daily newspaper is a daily newspaper and Mxp qualified for that purpose within the meaning of the Act af('" ac• lh t runner 'alk'tektep1,ve of the General Assembly of the State of Colorado, ap- ss toattena ring Sybeheted proved March 30, 1923, and entitled, "An Act to amend fed of O .,Ordinate antitan a for pubd peclldi tl0x an Act entitled 'An Act concerning legal notices, adver- Medi to the Board Votaty, Rail* ird tisements and publications and the fees of printers and floor, weld Copt pentti i c,„,,,,,„..$1 I4th publishers thereof, and to repeal all acts and parts of street Greeley, redo; and a be" mowed acts in conflict with the provisions of this act,' " being Monday through Dom WCOMtoa: MRS Section 1 to 10 inclusive pages 404 to 409 inclusive of ' wECDCOIIIINN Chapter 139 (pertaining to legal notices and advertise- i`Ilf11'Mc7A.E AAHI� N meats) of the Session Laws of the State of Colorado for NDCI.E • m , BO 1923, as amended by Chapter 113, Session Laws 1931; VDATED:Maret l - that the annexed Not_in-e ___----___ One Publication March 2t,tsar ,s was published in the regular daily and entire issue of said daily newspaper on Saturday of each successive for a period of 1_ insertions; wegt- that the first publication of said Notice was in the regular daily issue of said daily newspaper dated --_Marco h_ast is-$1 and the last publication thereof was in the daily issue of said newspaper dated March 21st , 1981. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th 4day of 'rc ._- , 1981. i STATE OF COLORADO, � . County of Morgan ss. Subscribed and sworn to before me, __ Robert Ii._,S pent er a Notary Public in and for the County and State afore- said by ---_Fern.-.-H. Spencer this 27thday of,1 March , A.D. 1981. My commission expires February 11tht. 19$5 ------�.—C -,.�!!�-_. Not Y Public Affidavit of Publication on he FPO n t caycy my STATE OF COLORADO con } cwry r 1 t t Ume ' 'Colorado 0 tto'ppH MO ffmo ss. DATa;:XpF'u�`aNH •'' County of Weld, TIME?I:00P is aua nWMO KMbOw dp opuYrp000 of EHEM Is NN FROPDOEO. 7 P E RENENNVE xI3NIN OF TYKE' WELD Cp UNT( ZONING GRDi. Paula A. Barton of NANCE AgaMygr I, on rlAll Moro0f*PF m' ffer aw Mooring a said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am moo 10 *Ovoso ,:onMp oral- et an advertising derk of TtN n MoAXl000l NWkNA NM*lam come cpmn Mka 5Mtn THE GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE, and CWeld ountyMoot c `o F'pIOM inn b• THE GREELEY REPUBLICAN Mona Mm+ax loon Foy.from °°°, cOUp"+t" that the same is a daily newspaper of general E"P44. TNEoOARDOF WM.COLO ADO circulation and printed and published in the City of W••••Y It CDLOAAOO R :MARY. pNEeE Ism Greeley, in said county and state; that the notice or advertisement, of which the annexed is a true copy, has been published in said daily newspaper for consecutive (days) (weeks); that the notice was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said newspaper during the period and time of publication of said notice, and in the newspaper proper and not in a supplement thereof; that the first publication of said notice was contained in the issue of said newspaper bearing date Twenty-fifth day of March A.D. 19 81 and the last publication thereof; in the issue of said newspaper bearing date the Twenty—fifth day of March A.D. 19 81 that said The Greeley Daily Tribune and The Greeley Republican, has been published continuously and uninterruptedly during the period of at least six months next prior to the first issue thereof contained said notice or advertisement above referred to;that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof; and that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. March 25, 1981 Total charge; $10.44 ( IL ( Advertising Clerk L Subscribed a sworn to before me this itii D 25th day of March A.D. 19 81 My co missi e es My `° .mi^..ion oxpire Feb 23, 1982 Notary Public PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF COLORADO, 155. COUNTY OF n dams H. Harrison Cochran do solemnly swear that I am the Publisher of The Brighton Blade that the same is a weekly newspaper published in me City 0, Brighton County of AdamslTdl' , sip a.:; M nR O ' y 41 State of Colorado and has a general circulation CC 6 Patent Alin in, therein,that said newspaper has been published Ayr. la5 continuously and uninterruptedly in said x ROD ,,ft OIYO 1" con ItltR tct County of Adams AND MAP, • E Ay 'M 71y ,• Wc for a period of more than 52 weeks prior to the ' first publication of the annexed notice,that said WAWA Itataaj newspaper is entered in the post office at I,i1M County r l o h t o n Ong$'' MMtlt(�yyx(k'ot ARM W 6 M'pp tl R00 01 Colorado, as second class mail matter and that W. the said newspaper is a newspaper within the M meaning of the act of the Gen l Assembly 9 of 2r, D� q the State of Colorado,approved March 30,1923, 8,:91x. p�pyty and entitled"Legal Notices and Advertisements' r DATED: p,}yea • and other acts relating to the printing and Publalhe1Icnon March2 glade publishing of legal notices and advertismenis: - - -. _-_ that the annexed notice was published in the regular and entire issues of said newspaper, once each week, on the same day of each week for the period of 1 consecutive insertions: that the first publication of said newspaper dated larch 25 , 81 19....and the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated Akomitax. 9 Signature and Title Subscribed and sworn to before me,a Notary 25th Public this day of arch 981 Notary Public } Ovremhxsioo expires Mat di 3, F!' Proof of Publication THE STATE OF WYOMING, SS �� . 1 r i . COUNTY OF LARAMIE, `� • 1d Q'ry TIMOTHY T. CONNER, being first • i duly sworn according to law, deposes and iw _ ; Weld ., says as follows: That he is one of the pub- T 915 +P Ushers of the PINE BLUFFS POST, a news- paper of general circulation published once et* { - - every week on Thursday at Pine Bluffs, in 1. 14 Laramie County, State of Wyoming; and ter ferie that the attached notice was regularly pub- p 4 s y the P1�O- lished and circulated in the regular issues of said paper, and not in any supplement CO tT J • I1 is 1 - thereof, on the following dates: �� s •,� , AU mailer g tend the p lit t- Thursday,} a%_LtJJ__/9 _Igo / w tt the The of the' ptapwed Thursday, aodag• 1a p' or public in of Thursday, thee "ioard-of ty C _ oor. eld County lr"enter, 015 Thursday, 10th Coicdo, and Monday Thursday, t p,f°°18fD0 5,15.to r BOARD Thursday, TIMO Y T. CONNER, Publisher. ER AND't - BOARD B t '•" hite.Deputy ....nw a ii:.. ..•t Subscribed and sworn to before me, by the aforesaid Timothy T. Conner, person- ally known to me to be a publisher of the PINE BLUFFS POST, this NM day of_)4OlA�C 1 />7.Atilt9, rads rly Commission expires Ju 21, 1983 [SEAL] DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (303)356-4000 EXT.404 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 C. COLORADO January 5, 1981 Dear Publisher: Please insert the enclosed legal notice in your newspaper during the week of January 12-16, 1981 for one (1 ) publication ONLY. Please use small type, as in all legal notices. You may send a statement to our office for payment. Please include an affidavit of publication along with your statement. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely yours , K Sandra K. Hunter SKH/cb / /7/2/ 5 CO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 3, 1981 in the First Floor Hearing Room, Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to the Board of County Com- missioners to adopt a comprehensive revision of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. The proposed revision includes changes to the text of the Weld County Zoning Resolution, its adoption as an ordinance, and changes to the Official Weld County Zoning Map. The proposed zoning regulations pertain only to land within the boundaries of Weld County, Colorado and outside the corporate limits of Weld County municipalities. If adopted, the text of the Weld County Zoning Ordiance will include the following general sections: Introductory Information; Definitions; Procedures and Permits; Zone Districts; Supplementary District Regulations; Overlay Districts; Board of Adjustment; Nonconforming Lots, Uses, and Structures; and Enforcement. If adopted, the map accompanying the text of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance will contain five (5) general zone district categories. These five (5) general zone district categories are: "A" Agricultural, "C" Com- mercial, "I" Industrial, "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development and "R" Resi- dential. The "R" Residential District includes the R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5 Zone Districts. The "I" Industrial District includes the I-1, I-2 and I-3 Zone Districts. The "C" Commercial District includes the C-1, C-2, C-3, and C-4 Zone Districts. The "A" Agricultural District includes only the "A" Agricultural Zone District classification. The "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District includes only the "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District classification. These districts, in some cases, will differ from the zone district classifications on the existing Official Weld County Zoning Map. Provisions for assigning new zone district classifications are included in the text of the proposed zoning ordinance and are referred to as Redistrict- ing Policies. Notice of Public Hearing Page 2 Copies of the proposed regulations and accompanying maps are avail- able for public inspection in the Office of the Department of Planning Services, Room 342, Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. SH:rg 1/14/80 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE 1303)356-4000 EXT.404 915 10TH STREET GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 COLORADO January 5 , 1981 Dear Publisher: Please insert the enclosed legal- notice in your newspaper during the week of January 12-16, 1981 for one (1 ) publication ONLY. Please use small type, as in all legal notices . You may send a statement to our office for payment. Please include an affidavit of publication along with your statement. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely yours, Ci'a.cd,, K ' 1te Sandra K. Hunter SKH/cb c //sr cc Alga)sP4e&ES 1- A LE64L "ye ricE /4ND /'726.5_5 R-LE/f,SG O1d PA•9A1 .0A16 con 'V,'Ss/o /91.A 4/ /-/6ARm o,c/ C4.34,8/1/1 y o3 / t ri/ 0 "1 i 27/E P7.->ADs 60 WEL-O CoLI ✓r --/ 2-aftd' -'c- ore 'J14 Uc.E. (kth Weld Herald P. O. Box 945 Town 8 Country News Eaton, CO 80615 Weld County News P. O. Box 1421 Greeley, CO 80632 Frederick Farmer and Miner Box 158 Longmont Times-Call Frederick, CO 80530 715 4th Avenue Longmont, CO 80501 Fort Lupton Press Greeley Booster 4] ` Denver Avenue 728 9th Street Ft . Lupton, CO 80621 Greeley, CO 80631 _bhnstown Breeze .Soknstown, CO 80534 Keene Valley Sun Keenesburg, CO 80643 Platteville Herald/ LaSalle Leader Platteville, CO 80651 Windsor Beacon Box 639 Windsor, CO 80550 Greeley Tribune 714 8th Street Greeley, CO 80631 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO, ) , )ss. COUNTY OF WELD. ) 1 7 i. wr- Lon,^n a. J- n , 7 being duly sworn, deposes and says - _: 1. That he is the Owner and Publisher of The Greeley Booster 3l . C weekly newspaper printed and published do, in the City of Greelea !Intl 4,, .,-,County of Weld and State of Colorado, which has been admitted z000sneinsd a •Fe. to the United States Mails as second class matter under Act of to tta-"tax • �' Weld .. -fy Congress, of March 3, 1879. to tha- 2. That the said The Greeley Booster is printed and published as an. {vY': and ctint; at regular intervals, one time each week, on Friday, and that it 'Offidu a W has a general circulation in the County of Weld, and elsewhere. .'Thh! tall 3. That the said The Greeley Booster was established and has County, Colorado .and of outside been printed and published in said county uninterruptedly and to limits of Weld continuously during a period of at least fifty-two consecutive weeks If Countym Zoning Cr textm. a Weld County next prior to the first issue thereof containing said -- Inchtdde Vhe hdorina- mral Idn'ht_ce^� cn Pub]is Her ?'1no. sections;Intmductodo ns;Definitions;P ocedures -- -- and Permits; ZoneDist eDistricts;; a copy of which is hereunto attached. tghag ie .Districts -"""_ Noncontormirii 4. l the said The Greeley Booster is ia weekly hole or erin ofen,ira Stsuctu es; annd of general circulation, and is printed and published in whole or in 1 ms-R the p E 1tn a 1eu4 tat um W ac- part in the said I\lona# 0-Weld which-as-id tiers inv tw, prdm ey in Yt -si T rict categories. 'Z p to Zone- ve _ (61 generalsops ict� esita- is required by law to be published, a copy of which is hereto at- yelp are: A" - "Pigswill-WO Lached. Dew l meat l "ilRut' 5. That the said The Greeley Booster is a weekly newspaper Development all Residential within the meaning of "An Act Concerning Legal Notices, Adver- Mnnal. the rsui1.�Rial Llsements and Publications and Fees of Printers and Publishers R-8, includes and RAI Zone eta.*e.Meta. Thereof and to Repeal all Acts and Parts of Acts in Conflict with The 1` Induet�ria Dis the Provisions of this Act," being Chapter 139 of the Session Laws Districts. 1'1Af!.2 Cal 14 Zane of Colorado cY 1923 as amended by Chapter 113 of the Session and s of the isAs ral Laws of Colorado of 1931, and later amended by Chapters 155 tc Atcgat xpgoa - -I oAin�vrt¢ul A.�. F dri �ral Soee 156 of the Session Laws of Colorado of 1935. District.'k s lom The P D.i"pe'tspnea Unifncludes 6. That the said annexed — �JnB DoW ., � ca- DDee tdaae i C'ntic Public Heflin',rim% y CMO. Some . was published in the regular and entire edition of The Greeley Booster, a duly qualified weekly newspaper for that purpose with- cesn.t ,LOn la. in the terms and meanings of the above named Acts. Z dtsW mpi ash. '}' ens... 7. That the said annexed — tM - to No+ice ,ar Plhl1c Her"^inr' ° tint is a full,true, and correct copy of the original which was regularly rata mql' published in each of the regular and entire issues of said news- vi.�ad�osf �* paver, a legally qualified paper for that purpose, once each week, tlon in r et5-Testit anisadgf on the same day of each week, for successive weeks vt as, Roam - Wit, by NI,.- insertions and that the first publication thereof le ,add'` was in the issue dated and 1981 In P+ DPI Published 7anua. J^,nu rfe o The Greeter Booster 9 that,or last publics n s in t e dated e -�'� --Y Subscrib and sworn to befocp me this a eis : 1 ,L[ey i ; „' 'ua r 3. of 1 .-J.. -: _-, . .. S :flea GRE .LLt.. GuWiiAi - • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION County of Weld ? NanetePftluktt SWUNG The Weld Caumy-Minnr ltannin get3, Yon wilt ue star. µCUC 3,Wel in S S: • an Floor conduct *s R mY State of Colorado ) Pint`"°` `""'°°°Ci cmfe Colt Cants, he net skew.Dearing•Coo Male.The POPolamm Milo a15w o to ) o Coady yr6Inmmoi*ts to the board of CaaMy farnroosts?{ b e e a Dennis E. HarryWO chain p10 their Of I, do solemnly swear that I ant'the Me sow friar sane Riffilution,its A5, iliffibillikat sae nen anemia.retainer . The the Farmer and Miner, •a weekly news ae Official Weld County canal Mffi yM proposed toning revelation pertain �� paper printed and published in the Town of Frederick, only to lend wilaln Ms boundaries al in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and having wow et mItsColo ed.of sowed a net cemerrb Jnumicipellties. of Weld aunty One Weld aunty a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has ra'lineOrdin the will Malone fo "'- been continuously and uninterruptedly published In from genera p ai ki Phis rrewand said county fifty-two weekspis Parrnfu'un°°allu r air Y prior to the first blica Board atrl of A ffi iiertp> DRMaing tion of the annexed notice, and that said newspaper Is Lots,Oa,uKSws rEnforce- Merit. • newspaper within the meaning of the act of the f dopted,let map accompanying the text of Mt Assembly of the State of Colorado, approved on wilt Weld County R`ar Or- General co iSIgenerator* ve (SI March 30, 1923, being Chapter 1939, Session Laws of district zoned~mfi°°+ca Iw These aam."A" Aorkullural,"C"Commercial."I"fm 1923„45 amended by Chapter 113 of the Session Laws dustrlat 1P.u.o." Manned. Unit of 1931; and as further amended b Cha K 155 of "R"Residnttia Diawmrla°"°°"rmasnn»�e a- Y Pr 1,R-t.R-3,RJ and R4 Zane Dietrich the Session Laws of 1935; that the annexed notice was The"-I"Industrial Zone oe District tRRrne Me co 1-2 mad 1-3 includes I C"C" Ublished in the regular Commercial DistricteDietrich "A" p and entire issue of every y ric sow c-1 tore oimida The•Ae AA" Agri District includes only the number of said weekly newspaper for • period of an cast n- reel Zone District 1 angles The "P.U.D." Planned consecutive issues, and that the first pub- Unit Dawfepmont Dimly Includes only the"Palle"Planned unit Development District s,willkeno.These districts,in lication of said notice was in the issue of said news. some cams,will differ from the zone district cle fkRan ason1M C faistingOf- ficial Weld mMy Zona;Map.'Pron. raper dated ....... January .15.., 19 $1...., and the .`uopmetnaime,oalIr w lottenwditstct referred Radarioting Policies.ere COMes of the proposed regulations and last publication was in the issue of said newspaper acc rep maps an available for Iwpk I n the Office a the dated January 15 81 DepartmentCantonal Planning13 Tenes,th Street, ..y , 19 �,Mle,Colorr�M,tls "..,n.w.e In the Frederick Farmer and In witness whereof, I have set my hand this 15th day of ...... January J/ 19 81 Business Mgr. Rxlxlmtoex Subscribed and sworn before me this ..1.5.th day of January 19 81 F' tY ` is"p E� '(1/G-r otary Public 's ;,is Pnr My commission expires /9 4-1300-2 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF COLORADO, 1 ss. County of Weld, 1. r/,4 we- 7 47//755a / _. ... .. , of -^r ' .k+ said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say tha' p i am pubusher of / a t n 'k" Q4a 4-4/�a, I l e f le.r.L: (d ' t "'earo-�k ,kr `arrassnr 4 t that the same !s a weekly newspaper at genera, rat n, % tom' LT: �. ,. $ .. .y. �'ttfMeR. ee,K" L s.. � 'AFT circulatt and d„4, and published in me t _, , ` .,x, ,��. ce_ry¢e r Tnth`.. town c� SJ. y" IIIwM:` ':.YJNtaOe' -- - ---_ .N tlt► tt►tlevllle in said county and state; h� ih� nchce cr rover � " "g" ,,..>3,ecf+}A!sNe-4 � �°a - 'k ,a F�tfYs��11�i. hsemenL of whicF. the annexed is a true ropy. ��,: �4A .- .i�Clu 1 s tk.: -.- y,�1pi, has been published in said weekly newspaper Si... 'v' " e n � aha V +F s _ . . _.. for ( consecutive .a� kx"m weeks that the notice was published in the 4-1-m ,� y, r s regular and entire issue of every number of,said e"" newspaper during :he period and time of publ:- ` carton of said notice aria In the newspaper proper and not in a supple,pent thereof; runt toe .ate„ first publication of said notice .h-as contained in °• '' the issue of said newspaper bearing date th- and the last puLtino,sn toe:( f in ths ._:sue o: alim wi said newspaper beahng date, the IS dcy of : ;k. 7 n, - 19 ii; that the said g 6 tpy � t K, Mb z -......6,...e �!.a.a e rte__. ,., .tette has been published conttn'.:cusly and uninterrapt c -teat a Ike -rk.'. e edly during the period of at least fifty-tws con- ".. pleletl;t/iD"-""°e secutive weeks next prior to the first issue thereof It rafts 4,± containing said notice or advertisement abovw •tt' '_ ' referred to: and 'hat said newspaper was at the time of each of the publications of said nonce b4str District includesZone duly qualified for that purpose within the mean 7.R-tantl R 5 Zone "se" ridusirial Die- mg of an act, entitled, "An Act Concerning beg-! fit= me-1-1, 1-2 and 14 Notices, Advertisements and Publications, anti yMN ,404, Tee "C' Commer- the Fees of Printers and Publishers thereof, and ' 3'$ bias yhe-An to Repeal all Arts and Parts of Acts in Conflict with the Provisions of this Act." approved April 7. ,v ss,, 1921, and all amendments thereof, and parncc Y t�. r d a. larly as amended by an act approved, March 30. 1923, and an act approved May 18, 1931. 7L ez t,?e Publisher - Subsc ed and sworn to before me this /12 _ /�n*'). 15 o � day c. A.D.. 197/ J .,„?2,54(h..- d a Ply commission expires //— -.P.A Notary Public ! `N. C/ 9 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO 1 } ss. COUNTY OF WELD J wadi s. 1, J.(nig Size-ri Lc- of said County of wurtt:aodocr a public at3,gg,p p.m Weld, being; they sworn, say that I am office manager Tandy,Pehroary 3,1481 in the Ilse Hoer of anew Rom,Centanoial Center,915 Tenth Street,GroSy,Colorado. tie. THE WINDSOR BEACON, INC. Men le te consider a for the Board of Cantylve Ceendal'of N to d Query. a weekly newspaper having a general circulation in Zak g . .� prepped revision County and State, published in the town of lads.. .. ,, 'rtlr test of the WeldWINDSOR, in said County and State: and that the County MMIWrOil tlrtlr nsr notice, of which the annexed is a true copy, has beer_ mdWw,r3 thelese to the Omdd Weld Calory Twaing Hap. The paper cad aaNng hradationa porter n eab to led the published in said weekly for a successive C•arb Wal.fwW end ; weeks, that the notice was published in the regular eitelde diedie .awes, of WOilli h'" and entire issue of every number of the papere during U adopted, the text of the Weld County• the period and time of publication, and in the news- Zoning Ordinance will include the following paper proper and not in a supplement, and that the general sections; Introducey Information; (u-st publication of said notice was in said paper bear- Definitions; Procedure.sad Its; Zone mg the date of the Districts;Supplementary District Regulation; Overlay Districts; React of Adjustment; / wand Enforcement n�If�don_Nonconforming Uses, and Structures; _/5-.._ day of __.a kJ.4//-fedi, A.D., 19.. of the Weld Colo t,the P�ilangg accompanying will w and the last contain five (51 general zone district publication bearing the date of the categon'es. These five (5) general zone )_ diet categories are: ••A" Agricultural /, s.!/g PtJL .. �i I "C•Commercial, "I"Industrial,"P,U.D." _ /7 day of .._ 4 r'—`{' A.D., 19 J L.. Planned Unit Development and R•• and that the said "WINDSOR BEACON" has been Residential. The R" ReddentW District published continuously and uninterruptedly for the includes the R-1,R•2,W,R-4 and R-5 Zone period of 52 consecutive weeks, in said County and Districts.The"I"Industrial District include the 1.67.2 andZone 14 Zone Districts.The"C" State, prior to the date of first publication of said Commercial District includes the CI, C-2, notice, and the same is a newspaper within the mean- C-3 and C-4 Zone Districts. The "A" trig of an Act to regulate printing of legal notices Agricultural District include only the "A" and advertisements, approved May 18, 1931, and all Agricultural Zone District classification.n The ,rior arts so far .is in force. PP U.D.••Planned Unit Development District includes only the "P.U,D." Pinned Unit Development District classIleation. These L71 A-�J districts, In some cases,will differ from the et - C/ c- -f1-C lone district claeificadons on the existing OFFICE MANAGER Official Weld County Zoning Map.Provisions for assigning new zone district classifications the Included in the text of the proposed - zoning ordinance and are referred toas Redistricting Policies. Copies of the proposed regulations and 9 Zi accompanying maps are available for public Subscribed and sworn to before me this day inspection in the Office of the Department of. Planning Services, Room 342, Centennial Canter,915 Tents ereeley Celerado. p',7 Tens, A „•_Al iii of ...... t�tiC- :G , 19,, iaA ... ,,,A2i.. r.C >tcc:=:ra4-y.: jC. frf3- / NOTARY PUBLIC • -,.B 1(.1,', '?, My commission expires ..._k4-ac..._...T ! . ' rECEIVED ,,,,,,,,i 'r.auiUy ssiga r Page 19 Towaaad tauuuy NEWS January L .19151 ";4 1211 °t111.011fli H n 124;ii !icisir; aiiii g rllL"« 4g11rii'- L °a1JJ tg Os� i £ 4� ' 2gy,N 65E p p g � y Y Eg0 d S ,- la., 121 -li, v , iA _ . tri p4 Y3 c`NOLLS °�g OKE [ J gE r' ° p l 1.611 I L LEl.�b p5¢ dg2 ,� 1 ESo. z ; 2.2P.Y E ° - 4 "E sS aR _..i .01 0. EE° 30 ≥2 °8$ dY ° 3005 3 e .. Eo a°a1caa 1 .61taEl;t Yfiu F c. Ems_ o „ E _4J_ t °x +l o EEai 55 ~30=g4eu ,-g _eu@ss E. a __N.l. 9iE-t, nv „3-uu 'g. ,'.lac . .7..... .uoad3 ° Y , N 1 W ,( 4 ''I oT coT � � om7m � a � y c m>.,. o d v, m : O a y O a) _ o t , v y n i° m O O y 0' -° c° ? D ° m o f E rn yr a -- a v a' y a' a r,. v of CO as 3 O. a 0w0 w O m y g o o p a a E_''G_ Z U a o d a Q a' n d a' Q ,� 7,J a2 a' do y - a) a; 'moo �_ .- 013E . 3 - m e = .°o a L� c c w d as a' 3 n — a' O W ry J EA N L Z co I y Y ;. i > o w o _ '‘ c w 3 d o v U c a' a m m o '- c O O Uo o f as ai m L `m N rn Z y C o .— "at r 7��\ U — O O. v' L 7,5OT) O' = t O. �' \ C W v •1C —o > Y m ! f - iP1 o as y y ° te a O `a L m O, 13 a' t J F V . 3 O X -�v Q d O c p H U c O 7F, J . v i a' O O J+ (On\ ] F' C a' C U Affidavit of publication STATE OF COLORADO ) )s COUNTY OF WELD ) James P . Noel NQTICE OF PUB G , being The Weld - mission w, ea- r- ng a a: duly sworn, says that he/she is ��1 le 1 _ ire r.: publisher of the Platte Valley VOICE, a weekly newspaper TerMO eta to published and printed in Kersey St ` - the in said County and State; that Bo - to said newspaper has a general m o t e circulation in said County and es ha.s been continuously and unin- to t linty terruptedly published therein, z■�` as during a period of at least 4H - Map fifty-two consecutive weeks TN - Ions prior to the first publication of the the annexed notice; that said oundrde alt mra- do and outside the ' limits newspaper is a newspaper with- of Weld muffle) in the meaning of the act of the a weld General Assembly of the State cf ilrsec of Colorado, entitled "An Act to ti ion; regulate the printing of legal Defitat Per- notices and advertisements," DIsmite;, ry and amendments thereto; that ter Non- the notice of which the annexed cont Strut" is a printed copy taken from tuf s, ' - g said newspaper, was published the to t. yInc in said newspaper, and in the Ordlna ' (5) regular and entire issue of general tare oriel. ri every number thereof, once a Tit fns(5) I " Those five are:^ a I,"C" Commercial "I'?hdu$10 d, . U.D.' Planned Unit: i*nd "R" week for one successive Resident I. �`" " R14demml weeks; that said notice was so District l cludae Si P-i,R•2, R-3, in said newspaper R-4 and R-S �Islid - e"I" published1-2ted 1- ' littitte 1C, proper and not in any supple- t-2 tad to Wafdcts. "C" ment thereof, and that the first Contented*WO lad a C-1, publication of said notice as C-2,443Gil Zone e:The A" A .The only nit) .. Zone aforesaid, was on the 13th— — District jolt, MO" Planned let includes oar day of ---ems:--, 1981, Unit DOWSPOMP fiC.. tient Than dielficilt fn wgl'ddM heft ,the ct c1aeP4tetpae=W;mir 5- and the last on the --- day of cieetWeW Provident ipt e district clalisflidlttbaa turfed 19— in the text of ng ordinance see II re Redistricting Policies , �y >� Copies of the,pan purposed 'aeons end accompb in maps. avail- able for public:in In the Office of the.Depart of nning Services, Room sot; tennlal Subscribed and sworn to before Center, 915 Tenth Street,, nee*, Colorado. {n,,'-, Published In the' Pt Valley me this Z--,14- day of 1-11-1 y. VOICE, Kersey,Colorado,Thersday, January 15, 1981. 97. 2_0J4116:,_ 4-4##—__ l.7, •V- 'Lli it' pi ll/AI 44-StO z ,:_ C�+' ' 72 U � - Weld ( t E „..:a„..:aQ vlanni,7r p,,, -— 'yi'd J NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEAR ,,t t The Weld County Commission will conduct a sibile hearing at 3:00 pt.m. on STATE OF COLORADO ) February 3, 1981 in the ss. Floor Hearing Room, Ce OOUNTY OF WELD ) Center, 915 Tenth.Street,' co 9 icy,Colorado.The; ur hearing is to er a /`' 72 u- c..4.1„, , being mendation to the Board of B oen- duly sworn, says that gm is pub- ty Commissioners to a 6 Esher of the KEENE VAI.T.FY SUN, comprehensive revision the a weekly newspaper published and Weld County Zoning Reso printed In Keenesburg in said County The proposed revision in and State; that said newspaper has changes to the text of the old a general circulation in said County County Zoning Resolutio and has been continuously and un- adoption as an ordinance,*interruptedly published therein, dur- changes to the Official Weld ing a perk d of at least fifty-two County Zoning i.lv,o,� consecutive weeks prior to the first posed oning regulations taro publication of the annexed notice; said newspaper is a newspaper only to land within the bow- that � within the meaning of the act of the dories of Weld County, to limits General Assembly of the State of and outside the corporate Ihrdts Colorado, entitled "An Act to regu- of Weld County municipalities. late the printing of legal notices and If adopted, the text oa$d'= advertisements," and amendments Weld County Zoning Ordinance thereto; that the notice of which the will include the following general annexed is a printed copy taken from Sections: Introductory In said newspaper, was published in said tion;Definitions;Promed' newspa per, and in the regular and Permits; Zone Districts; Su entire issue of every number thereof, mentary District Regula Overlay Districts; Board of once a week for II swecnsisoe justment; Nonconforming Lpttsei weekas that said notice was so pub- Uses, and Structures; and am: lished m said newspaper proper and forcemeat. - 1 not in any supplement thereof, and If adopted, the`"ma ti twee- that the first publication of said no- ponying the text it the Woad County Zoning Ordinance 4rill, tice a foresaid, was on the - contain five (5) general zone-ds.`- ‘ trict categories. These five (5). day of - , 19C? general zone district categories are: "A" Agricultural, "C" Com- and the last on the day of mercial, "I" Industrial, "P.U,jh" Planned Unit Development ae(d 19 "R" Residential. The "R" dential District includes the Si, c?Le.lt,o:nr i0/1,7‘).a7 'R-2,R-3,R-4 antl"*p Zone Cez'' (acts.The"I"Industrial Disti includes the i-1, 1.2 and 1-3 Zane Districts. The "C" Commercial District includes the C-1,C-2,C-3 and C-4 Zone Districts. The W Subscribed and s�•, to before me AgHcultul'a1-Dletrl 1nClndea ly the"A"Agricultural Zone BB- tic trict classification. The "P.U.D." thist30 day of Planned Unit Development Dla- trict includes only the 19 P.U.D." Planned Unit Develop � ment District classification. `a " r e 1 64-c-7A ti, t f�� These districts, in some coat will differ from the distritit A"Y-laa:::iasinn Expires-fe ruarY7v-1931 classifications on the existing 0f ficial Weld County Zoning Provisions for assigning new zone district classifications are included in the text of the pro- posed zoning ordinance and are referred to as Redistricting Pol. ides. Copies of the proposed regu- ,?1i',n tS fS,, lotions and accompanying maps /,),. ., are available for public mr e $_ o �j lion in the Office of the Depart- n s n3 ment of Planning Stites,Room U� .12 �o L 342, Centennial Center, 9.15 C- - '' `_. Tenth Street,Greeley, Colorado. y Published in the Keene Valley Sun January 15, 1981. y - ' _ _ fl GriLkbci: ---�---•tom M AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION HEARING Commteilodn willty and citna .'-m ubnearIn��rg�a�yag T THE JOHNSTOWN BREEZE First Floor Hearin r TenN STATE OF COLORADO ) Centennial Center, E ) SS Street, G ese eleye. Cheelo{rldo is E COUNTY OF WELD ) consider a.recommemte- z I, Clyde Briggs, do solemnly swear that I the Boarrd° aof tou tc'oLp�iprehen-. T sive revision ofpthe walmCewynty N- am publisher of The Johnstown Breeze; Zoningp eRvl Resolution. Vicludehsdr°' ; that the same is a weekly newspaper to the text of the ,„;„� printed, in whole or in part, and published zoning ordinance,Resolution, in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, as the Official weld &intang and has a general circulation therein; that Map. The proDo regulations pertain g said newspaper has been published within the bounds of aide County, Caauaih°ntatedoa'wia continuously and uninterruptedly in said the count mnntetpanate . County of Weld for a period of more than nadvoCoralea metext theweta fifty-two consecutive weeks prior to the countyth o ceneerraal. first publication of the annexed legal notice include theilow1p� secb°ne: miroauctory?a' adu a or advertisement; that said newspaper has lion;Permits, and Ieme tta• been admitted to the United States mails as supplementary DUe bons; overlay DSm Inv second-class matter under the provisions of of LAts, ses,a td sttueseea; an the Act of March 3, 1879, or any Enforcement, the tu"ap ac• amendments thereof, and that said It ado c text afore Weld comp?� n will newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly %Iap qualified for publishing legal notices and do $)F3 ca ) e district cote ultcate advertisements within the meaning of the l criesgenerale .:"A' et dust s°c" eomt�rcfat "ea dash{ laws of the State of Colorado. rtal. "P ASP. isa. Reei- That the annexed legal notice or advertise- Developmerpt an dentiai- The R Reeiaentlal ment was published in the regular and District Includes t1M R-lgC'te. Te n i's"inau trial Diatrut entire issue of every number of;aid weekly includes the 13,14 and l-sane newspaper for the period of consecu- Diatricte.The c• commercial tive insertions; and that the first District Includes the G•1,C-2,GS and c-e zone DDIe te.The de publication of said notice was in the issue of Agricultural is gngel e only the A A °u� said newspaper dated4.'1..!S A.D. 19,V., District pleas ned ton. The and that the last publication of said notice P.U.D. Planned Unit Development District includes was in the issue of said newspaper dated Develt oal1men initr�cc'Thinned A.D. 19 bon, Ttneee metncte, In soma In witness whereof I have hereunto set passe,wnl eirrer from the son, district classifications °a wag; my hand this 2y day of .Tan existing Official Weld County ZoningMap. ProV1stene for A.D. 19.Q.1 assigaing8 neweriticlyatrilnt elestext boor the text of the pr spree eSa IC o ygy ordinance and are Redietrleting Panel,e' -5� Copies of the proposes remape . .... .. hone and accompanying p Publisher are available for pubtic inepe - tlon in the Orrice t the Department Ro m 842, Centennla1 i y Coloeaa enth Street„Sri e- Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Published 1n the Johnstown Notary Public in and for th County of Broeee Jan.. ltrl We tate of Colorado, this-k-rr• day of F��: A.D. 19.: .l... „ ./1 Notary Public. y / , ,,y, l SAP )\ My commission expires k , O%./V cs c' P/a,sky Fp V �� coa, ,ion Nil/ 4751 Pi L.' i 4`"V AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION LONGMONT DAILY TIMES-CALL State of Colorado ) County of Boulder ) ss 1, Dennis Ht...H,arry do solemnly swear that the LONGMONT DAILY TIMES-CALL is a POTicEoiriatcH!ARINO The Weld Ceei4t Planning Commis daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part, and published in slots v ll,condudt bn<hearitasn:00 p'.rrl on oo,, I.4 . ydry L let Centennial the City of Longmont, County of Boulder, State of Colorado, Cent ,pit R e .Greeley, Center.9 u treed.hearing. sot and which hasgeneral circulation therein and in parts of Boulder consider The ecommenr the to is rd o County y recommendation t the opera and Weld Counties; that said newspaper has been continuously of revision visonera to e Weld a comprehensive of Me o* County 2p�Rqt_fbrang b Tote xNE and uninterruptedly published for a period of more than six months theiWeld County'honing sReesp�n text its next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice adoption as en drliinence,and changes to of advertisement, that said newspaper has been admitted to the The proposed zal oni grenulatio�ep rten only to land within the boundaries of United States mails as second-class matter under the provisions Weld County,Cold'rado end outside the farporate limits of, weld County of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and munl<Ipenne:. r that said newspaper is a daily newspaper qualified for publishing Zoninnggpamnthe llieWI Itext the r Weld County duly ow mg general sectioonsl.ntr�oducttoryl In legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws tormatldwoondttinin Procedures and Permits;ZoneDitcts;Supplementary of the State of Colorado; that copies of each number of said District Ripulatlaite;Overlay Districts; newspaper, in which said notice or advertisement was Board toof aAnd s,NonconformingEorce published, Lou.Uses and atrudurn:and Enforce m were transmitted by mail or carrier to each of the subscribers if adopted,.the map accompanying the text of the Weld County Zoning Or of said newspaper, according to the accustomed mode of business dlnance wilt contain five(51general time district cetegoel . These five R1 in this office. general mnrau' catepot'ies an:"A"1 Agricultural,"C”Commercial, •I" In t That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was tlevelop •t a "R" aside lame g published Development and"R"Residential. I.R b R S,R C�aR0R�5 Zone Districts. in the regular and entire editions of said daily newspaper MHde@(atk Tee".I••-fndntltNnOkvic:m<Idde°tin I I,12 and 1 3 Dish cts.The••C" Commercial ClisiSt Includes MSG 1,C 2.C 3 and C 4 Zone Districts. The"A" MOROIMMODMItte000MOOMDOWtAk for the period of 1 AgriculturallcDII llinclu es only the classification. P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District includes only consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice tv trc't alasauid n.Thitleseddittrricts in some cases• will differ from the zone q district<Ieui�fi<*rffunson the existing Of January 12 al Weld CoJh Y Zoning Mep..Provi was in the issue of said newspaper dated dons for assigning new zone district classifications antloclYMOth hie text of the proposed ordinance and are referred 19 81 , and that the last publication of said notice was in mCoopiesoftheMhtdon.aregwatensand accompanying Math are available for public inspection:In.the Office of the O partment of Plahning Services.Room the issue of said newspaper dated January 12 19 81 34t,Centennial Canter,915?resin Street. enteral In the d.•, Published In the Drily Times Cell,Long 12th Mont.Colo Jenuary12.INS' In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand this L bb -- - day of Janaary 19 81 Bu ss Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this 12th day of January 19 81 My Commission Expires.2.-4r4-0 / e7.-6, " -'--t4Notary'Public!.... c FEE $ 17.63 1-1300-02 2s c. /,lif g. V .c S' >`f.o 3 • C � 31°w ems. Mill:"O 2>mY mds«m. e e a e at in x 4. V. EgSg".eye ..9 ko rg'� o R. �' °�. Ec 3Sa oe"G4t su ri t i 'JAN. 4 t 'trills - i tt li d rc . 3u u 3ItligItt6z 3= _• as il 5 = ' ''n a .'. m 3 ° c w ` .4 g ; -63.1 fra c R G \ c . _. c ' � a « 0 gym! .. :d ,0 3 U E q - s c ¢ s u t u m m e - ` L `o c u n — i s m c c - t .C .C. ` a :o m J N _C O 0 ., w G t EA L a E 0 ` o c L 2... r. . O ° 3 4' N t --, 0 c �" \` Z p 7„.7 n J L O ' J 1 L t r t •U L _ CJ J 27 a 6 " O c 1 .- c_ t _ J 6 C ` q t y _ `_ 3 ._ A V O c L t G G ,c 6 L in Q } ,0„ G O O n ., c G L L V i.J. '` O ? 1 L s ; a x l .. C L n d C q ; Y m C O T • . ��l b .a y _ c c c ,G ° a ;. 3 u d 3 a ' a—. ° L - i O - V c G Lz n 3 r .0 L n�.4 C d C' J 6 `� t 40 . -= . . r ' . G .T„ •° 3 m c v c - a., c `G . G 'y^ e r" C `\� 5 c \r� ` CYi O G 0 - U L M t m V n . c c m "i c ° C a A c s � Pa m c Q t - W U n .. i cu -4 Ul C t Y C G 9 - S C �1 \ C L 0 C Xi c' p c .c c Y G. =0 L . o Q Z G� 650 . 1 0 > _ F Fi c c' cE m e `c - t c c :c m c = E v c a, '//�`].� e, c E U I:, q O - _ L _ - .2 a n o m r ` `-' IT c I ¢ I u ` yyJ - L6L t O , G L G L L J >' O �C $ G_ C •v. t Affidavit of Publication STATE OF COLORADO ss. County of Weld, I Paula A. Barton of said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that I am an advertising derk of W' THE GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE, and THE GREELEY REPUBLICAN E cra., k^mum k that the same is a daily newspaper of general of totio 4))."‘an* circulation and printed and published in the City of Mall'' i the TOW camr xmM,nmamw,,,;r Greeley, in said county and state; that the notice or , advertisement, of which the annexed is a true copy, has tbeen published in said daily newspaper for consecutive tot (days) (weeks); that the notice was published in the w regular and entire issue of every number of said newspaper during the period and time of publication of twit✓ said notice, and in the newspaper proper and not in a Ia supplement thereof; that the first publication of said � notice was contained in the issue of said newspaper + t bearing date Fourteenth . day of January A.D. 1981 -qt and the last publication thereof; in the issue of said : newspaper bearing date the m0Rossa u►, maw,sit r 'iir yRx . r. it. Fourteenth The 1' on day of January A.D. 1911 9.Z V , 4lnc.mmrre that said The Greeley Daily Tribune and The Greeley Republican, has been published continuously and ” 4 r uninterruptedly during the period of at least six vanes '` months next prior to the first issue thereof contained '"f" 'd'mmiitwamr q.,.* said notice or advertisement above referred to; that said men Ognatt>tIOlith:04)t s. "weLk oaMtNm newspaper has been admitted to the United States st.aware NMI a mails as second-class matter under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof; and old ..r "' 'a M that said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified ►Nk�4 ,- ir,,. for publishing legal notices and advertisements within wrno�dMyd. w, the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. wwrrnorl ''Isis January 14, 1981 Total charge: $19.14 C lia,. . CI �y 0. - �..)Thc`v. cr. 7li"---- „� in t 1 ..cr. Advertising Clerk c- ` Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th January 81 nv alssiu da of A.D. 19 dlunoj RIj� b My mmi on expire acs Feb 28, 1982 3 Ala '!� !3Nye �� Notary Public v Y1�4 9, yl � NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a 3:00 public hearing at 1MOW p.m. on Tuesday, February 3 , 1981 in the First Floor Hearing Room, Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. The purpose of the hearing is to consider a recommendation to the Board of County Com- missioners to adopt a comprehensive revision of the Weld County Zoning Resolution. The proposed revision includes changes to the text of the Weld County Zoning Resolution, its adoption as an ordinance, and changes to the Official Weld County Zoning Map. The proposed zoning regulations pertain only to land within the boundaries of Weld County, Colorado and outside the corporate limits of Weld County municipalities . If adopted, the text of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance will include the following general sections: Introductory Information; Definitions; Procedures and Permits; Zone Dis- tricts; Supplementary District Regulations; Overlay Districts ; Board of Adjustment; Nonconforming Lots , Uses, and Structures; and Enforcement. If adopted, the map accompanying the text of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance will contain five (5) general zone district categories . These five (5) general zone district categories are: "A" Agricultural, "C" Commercial, "I" Industrial, "P .U.D. " Planned Unit Development and "R" Residential. The "R" Residential District includes the R-1, R-2 , R-3, R-4 and R-5 Zone Districts . The "I" Industrial District includes the 1-1, 1-2 and 1-3 Zone Districts. The "C" Commercial District includes the C-1, C-2, C-3 and C-4 Zone Districts. The "A" Agricultural District includes only the "A" Agricultural Zone District classification. The "P.U.D. " Planned Unit Development District includes only the "P .U.D. " Planned Unit Development District classification. These dis- tricts, in some cases , will differ from the zone district classifications on the existing Official Weld County Zoning Map. Provisions for assigning new zone district classifications Notice of Public Hearing Page 2 are included in the text of the proposed zoning ordinance and are referred to as Redistricting Policies . Copies of the proposed regulations and accompanying maps are available for public inspection in the Office of ^ the Department of Planning Services, Room 342 , Centennial Center, 915 Tenth Street, Greeley, Colorado. NOTICE OF PUBLIC ."MEETING The Weld County Planning Commission will conduct a public meeting at 7 : 30 p .m. on March 13 , 1979 in the County Commissioners Hearing Room, first floor of the Weld County Centennial Center , 915 10th Street , Greeley, Colorado. The Weld County Department of Planning Services staff , as directed by the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners , are in the process of revising the Weld County Zoning Resolution . The purpose of this public meeting is to explain the project and establish mechanisms for coordination and feedback with anyone who desires to take part in the development of the new Zoning Resolution for the County. All interested people are encouraged to attend. For further details on this meeting or the overall project , please contact Thom Rounds at 356-4000, Extension 403 . To be published in the Johnstown Breeze Publication Date : March 8 , 1979 Y Hello