The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20020700.tiff Weld County Planning Dept. STATE a COLORADO r OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINES/ 2 9 601 of co>i Division of Water Resources e�OA.\ Department of Natural Resourceyp�J p) F `� 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818Fl�E e E i V E D Denver,Colorado 80203 Phone(303)866-3581 FAX(303)866-3589 Bill Owens www.water.state.co.us Governor Greg E.Walther Executive Director November 27, 2001 Hal D.Simpson,PE. State Engineer Ms. Carla Angeli Weld County Planning Dept. 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case Number Z-568 Summit at Mountain View Sections 5, T1N, R68W, 6th PM Water Division 1, Water District 5 Dear Ms. Angell: Pursuant to the State Engineer's August 7, 1995 memorandum to county planning directors this office is no longer providing comments on land use actions that do not involve a subdivision as defined in Section 30-28-101(10)(a), C.R.S. This referral does not appear to qualify as a "subdivision." Returned herewith are the materials submitted to this office in the above referenced matter. If you have any questions in this matter, please contact this office at 303/866-3581 . Sincerely, (Acov.4. William C. McIntyre Water Resource Engineer Enclosures cc: Richard Stenzel, Division Engineer WCM:MountainViewrtn.doc EXHIBIT 2002-0700 1 / - STATE OF COLORADO OF THE STATE ENGINEER ,ision of Water Resources /sti° Department of Natural Resources iN`' o\ 1313 Sherman Street, Room 818 )' `h Denver,Colorado 80203 Weld County Planning Dept. -/876 Phone:(303)866-3581 FAX:(303)866-3589 • Bill Owens http://water.state.co.us/default.htm June 28, 2001 WL 0 6 2001 Governor Greg E.WaicherRECEIVED Executive Director Hal D.Simpson, B.S. Mr. Robert Anderson State Engineer Weld County Planning Dept. 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Case Number S-596, Summit at rvtuurltain View Section 5, T1N, R68W, 6th PM Water Division 1, Water District 5 Dear Mr. Anderson: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to subdivide a 28.9-acre parcel into 7 single-family residential lots. The proposed water source is the Left Hand Water District (District). Paragraph E of the summary memo from the applicant to your office dated May 24, 2001 claimed to have attached a letter from the District pre- approving the water taps for six (instead of seven) new lots, however, our package of information contained no such letter. The application also did not include a Water Supply Information Summary. The District's normal mode of operation is to charge fees for the water supply on a per tap basis payable prior to activation of the tap. Based on current records on file in this office, the District currently has an adequate uncommitted water supply to provide the water associated with this project. Pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(II), C.R.S., the State Engineer offers the opinion that on the condition the Left Hand Water District is, in fact, committed to supply the subdivision with water, the proposed water supply can be provided without causing material injury to existing water rights and expects the supply will be adequate. Should you have any questions, please contact Scott Cuthbertson of this office. Sincerely, • S°< Kenneth W. Knox Assistant State Engineer c: Richard Stenzel, Division Engineer - Water Supply Branch District File File KWK/scc:Summit at Mountain View.doc Nov-29-01 11 :05A Colorado Geo . Survey__ . 303 gg94 2174 P - 01• • • Post-ItsFax Note 7671 Date %%12AIolIvaogesi 1 ro C.AVVLA AN6ELt From 1-ILL GAaLSoN Co./Dept, Co. rte.` Phone u Phone a 303. act 4.. 2A-73 (0,....e7".a..*****%‘af Fax a Fax I Nos'010 I,kr ;1Sr Weld County Referral WIlD November 19, 2001 C. COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant David Dalglish Case Number Z-568 Please Reply By December 3, 2001 Planner Carla Angeli Project PUD Change of Zone for Summit at Mountain View. Legal Lot B of RE-2196, part of the E2 of Section 5, T1 N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location 1/4 mile south of Hwy 52 on WCR 5; west on Mountain View Street; north on Fir Avenue (West of Carmacar Ranchette Subdivision). Parcel Number 1467 05 100020 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 15, 2001 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: ?LEASE SEE G[Srs LETTER, DATED 5ULY 2 2OO1 FoR OuR CoMMENT5 or4 SUMMIT ATMoUNTAIN VIEW ►?UD SK-Etc-H PLI'�N WELD Co. CASE No. 5 - 54 b . Signature SID Ui Date t11 I o l Agency UYt tDL00.-"D0 &E.DLo6IGAL SvtLvcY 4-Weld County Planning Dept. 01555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO.80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304-6498 fax STATE OF COLORADO COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Division of Minerals and Geology 1313 Department m nf Nreet Resources m715 1313 Sherman Street, Room 715fratiPlire Denver,Colorado 80203 1 Phone:(303)866-2611 FAX:(303)866-2461 Weld Count DEPARTMENT OF July 2, 2001 y Planning Dept, NATURAL ' � 0g 0 RESOURCES Robert Anderson lv Q Bill Owens Governor Weld County Planning Department R ♦+ Greg F.Watcher 1555 N. 17th Avenue ' ` L c E' E D Executive Director Greeley, CO 80631 Michael B.Long Division Director Subject: Review of Summit at Mountain View PUD Sketch Plan Vicki Cowan State Geologist Case No. S-596.Weld County,CO; CGS Unique No. WE-01-0072 and Director Dear Mr. Anderson: Colorado Geological Survey has completed its site visit and review of the above-referenced project. I visited the site on June 28, 2001. I understand the developer plans to subdivide this 28.59-acre parcel into 7 residential lots of 3 to 3.5 acres with 4.75 acres of open space. Individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS) are planned. I reviewed the Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Terracon, dated March 20, 2001. The report evaluates potential site development constraints and makes general construction and septic system recommendations. While I concur with the recommendations in the report, I have several comments: 1. Lignite Lignite lenses were observed in claystone samples collected from two of the borings. Lignite and its associated gases are flammable,and therefore potentially very hazardous. If basements are founded in lignite-bearing formations,gases can seep into the living space and create a health hazard. The depth and thickness of lignite-containing units should be identified and overexcavated during grading. 2. Oil and Gas Well(s). An oil/gas well is located on proposed lot 6. A setback of 150 feet from all wells,tanks and production facilities will need to be incorporated into the building envelope. The surrounding neighborhood should be evaluated, using the proposed final density of homes at build-out,to determine if it meets the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission's definition of a high-density area. The oil/gas well(s), pump(s), processing facilities and tank • batteries would then need to be fenced and locked,with warning signs posted to protect residents from hazards associated with the machinery and potentially tainted soils. Prospective residents should be advised and a plat note should be included informing buyers that the oil/gas well pumps and related equipment may be loud, may pose a visual nuisance, and will require ongoing servicing and maintenance. Potential buyers of this lot should be made aware that access must be provided to the operator of the well(s). 3. Groundwater Groundwater was observed at depths of 11 to 16 feet in three of the borings drilled by Terracon. Since groundwater levels tend to rise seasonally and perched water can form as a result of landscape irrigation and increased runoff, foundation drains will be necessary G:\Carlson\Weld Summit at Mountain View.doc 07/03/01,11:18 AM Robert Anderson Page 2 of 2 July 2, 2001 Groundwater,continued around all basement areas. I agree with the drain system recommendations presented on page 9 of Terracon's report. 4. Foundation and ISDS Design The site soils exhibit varying strengths, water contents, relative densities and percolation rates. Laboratory testing indicates that the soils possess low to moderate collapse/settlement potential, and the underlying bedrock is low to moderately expansive. Given the variability in soil thickness and soil and bedrock engineering properties, I agree with Terracon's statement(page 1)that"a design level geotechnical exploration will be required on each building site in order to provide specific design and construction recommendations for foundations, floor slabs and septic systems." Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have questions or need clarification of issues identified during our review,please call me at(303) 894-2173, or e-mail jill.carlson@state.co.us. Sincerely, � VUU Jill Carlson,C.E.G. Engineering Geologist G:\Carlson\Weld Summit at Mountain View.doc 07/03/01,1118 AM • Welt, County Planning Dept. 2001 • RECEIVED Weld County Referral November 19, 2001 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant David Dalglish Case Number Z-568 Please Reply By December 3, 2001 Planner Carla Angell Project PUD Change of Zone for Summit at Mountain View. Legal Lot B of RE-2196, part of the E2 of Section 5, Ti N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location 1/4 mile south of Hwy 52 on WCR 5; west on Mountain View Street; north on Fir Avenue (West of Carmacar Ranchette Subdivision). Parcel Number 1467 05 100020 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 15, 2001 O We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. - Comments: Signature Date Agency {a :' ' VrE:, rvC GY (^11 . . :‘Weld County Planning Dept. C.1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley. CO. 80631 •:.(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax • • apUNrq�N MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT a Administrative Office: 9119 County Line Road • Longmont, CO 80501 E , e (303) 772-0710• FAX (303) 651-7702 Weld Ccunty Planning Dept. VIEW November 27, 2001 RECEIVED Ms. Carla Angeli Weld County Planning Department 1555 North 17'h Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms. Angeli: I have reviewed the submitted material pertaining to the change in zoning for the Summit at Mountain View PUD/David Dalglish, located ''A mile south of Highway 52 and west of Mountain View Street (Case Number Z-568). The Fire District does not object to the request for Change in Zoning provided the development meets the requirements of the Fire District. All applicable codes as they pertain to water supply, fire hydrant locations, fire department access, and street designs must be met. We appreciate being involved in the planning process. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 772-0710. Sincerely, c occ5 LuAnn Penfold Fire Marshal LMP/lp cc: project file file rrr r.23.01 Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 EXHIBIT 9119 Cnty Line Rd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs (7/ 80501 80504 Mead,CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie,CO 80516 riiWeld County Referral November 19, 2001 C. COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant David Dalglish Case Number Z-568 Please Reply By December 3, 2001 Planner Carla Angeli Project PUD Change of Zone for Summit at Mountain View. Legal Lot B of RE-2196, part of the E2 of Section 5, Ti N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location 1/4 mile south of Hwy 52 on WCR 5; west on Mountain View Street; north on Fir Avenue (West of Carmacar Ranchette Subdivision). Parcel Number 1467 05 100020 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 15, 2001 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ fie have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: Signature Date at, 2„ Uz, Lac / Agency 14-4-1 &,, TT.. p t 1thvrvo +Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO. 80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax Q DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING INSPECTION Weld County Administrative Offices 1555 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631 WEBSITE: www.co.weld.co.us Phone (970) 353-6100, Ext. 3540 111kFax(970) 304-6498 COLORADO December 12, 2001 David Dalglish PUD Change of Zone for Summit at Mountain View Z-568 1. Building permits shall be obtained prior to any construction. A separate permit will be required for each structure. Structures shall be separated from each other in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 5 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. 2. A plan review will be required for each building. Two complete sets of plans are required i—. when applying for the permit. 3. Buildings shall conform to the requirements of the 1997 UBC, 1998 IMC, 1997 IPC, 1999 NEC and Chapter 29 of the Weld County Code. 4. Each building will require an engineered foundation based on a site-specific geotechnical report or an open hole inspection performed by a Colorado registered engineer. Engineered foundations shall be designed by a Colorado registered engineer. Please contact me for any further information regarding this project. Sincerely, Jeff Reif Building Official EXHIBIT /S.Service,Teamwork, Integrity,Quality ✓ Memorandum TO: Carla Angell, W.C. Planning 9 CDATE: December 12, 2001 • FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Publi COLORADO Health and Environment \ CASE NO.: Z-568 NAME: David Dalglish The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this proposal. The applicant proposes a 7 lot PUD on 28.6 acres. The minimum lot size is 3.2 acres with an overall density of one septic system per 4.1 acres does meet current Department policy. The application has satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regard to water service. Water will be provided by Left Hand Water District and sewer will be provided by individual sewage disposal systems. A letter of agreement from Left Hand Water District was provided in the application materials. The application has satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regard to sewer service. Sewer is proposed to be provided by individual sewage disposal systems. Preliminary percolation data included in the sketch plan application indicates the area in the vicinity of Lot 5 will require an engineered system due to unsuitable percolation rates. The preliminary data indicates that the other sites will be suitable for conventional septic systems. The Department recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Water service shall be obtained from the Left Hand Water District. 2. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for each proposed septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations. Each septic system shall be designed for site-specific conditions, including but not limited to maximum seasonal high groundwater, poor soils, and shallow bedrock. 3. Stormwater from and/or through the equestrian center must be contained on the equestrian center lot. Management of manure and stormwater must comply with Best Management Practices (BMP=s) in the Confined Animal Feeding Operations Control Regulations. 4. The applicant shall obtain a storm water discharge permit from the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment, if required. Silt fences shall be maintained on the down gradient portion of the site during all parts of the construction phase of the project. 5. During development of the site, all land disturbances shall be conducted so that nuisance conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions,at the request of the Weld County Health Department, a fugitive dust control plan must be submitted. 6. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission any development that disturbs more than 5 acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods which are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. 7. If land development creates more than a 25-acre contiguous disturbance, or exceeds 6 months in duration, the responsible party shall prepare a fugitive dust control plan,submit an air pollution emissions notice, and apply for a permit from the Colorado Department of Public m Health and Environment. _ aa X8. "Weld County's Right to Farm"as provided in the Weld County Code shall be placed on any W recorded plat. 0:1PAM\PLANNING\CHZONE\Z568.RTF a3A13D32! Rez)«d2 ZOO, 9 83 gig 3 ° Memorandum +uaw}ieda0 Sul t is I\ TO: Carla Angeli, W.C. Planning Ink DATE: February 5, 2002 \ FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Public Th COLORADO Health and Environment y CASE NO.: Z-568 NAME: David Dalglish The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this proposal. The applicant proposes a 7 lot PUD on 28.6 acres. The minimum lot size is 3.2 acres with an overall density of one septic system per 4.1 acres does meet current Department policy. The application has satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regard to water service. Water will be provided by Left Hand Water District and sewer will be provided by individual sewage disposal systems. A letter of agreement from Left Hand Water District was provided in the application materials. The application has satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regard to sewer service. Sewer is proposed to be provided by individual sewage disposal systems. Preliminary percolation data included in the sketch plan application indicates the area in the vicinity of Lot 5 will require an engineered system due to unsuitable percolation rates. The preliminary data indicates that the other sites will be suitable for conventional septic systems. The Department recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Water service shall be obtained from the Left Hand Water District. 2. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for each proposed septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations. Each septic system shall be designed for site-specific conditions,including but not limited to maximum seasonal high groundwater, poor soils, and shallow bedrock. 3. The applicant shall obtain a storm water discharge permit from the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment, if required. Silt fences shall be maintained on the down gradient portion of the site during all parts of the construction phase of the project. 4. During development of the site, all land disturbances shall be conducted so that nuisance conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions,at the request of the Weld County Health Department, a fugitive dust control plan must be submitted. 5. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission any development that disturbs more than 5 acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods that are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. 6. If land development creates more than a 25-acre contiguous disturbance, or exceeds 6 months in duration, the responsible party shall prepare a fugitive dust control plan,submit an air pollution emissions notice, and apply for a permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. '� 7. "Weld County's Right to Farm"as provided in the Weld County Code shall be placed on any recorded plat. O:\PAM\PLANNING\CHZONE\Z568.RTF • Weld County planni g Department t �� JAN 3 0 2002 riis RECEIVED Weld County Referral ' Novemberlfgf-2Q0,— e NOV 2 2 2001 COLORADO Pt16Li j f:n t:;q Darr The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant David Dalglish Case Number Z-568 Please Reply By December 3, 2001 Planner Carla Angeli Project PUD Change of Zone for Summit at Mountain View. Legal Lot B of RE-2196, part of the E2 of Section 5, Ti N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location 1/4 mile south of Hwy 52 on WCR 5; west on Mountain View Street; north on Fir Avenue (West of Carmacar Ranchette Subdivision). Parcel Number 1467 05 100020 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 15, 2001 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ee attached letter. Comments: n N Signature , •, , ).i• Date I2ci(G Z Agency C Woe LS +Weld County Planning Dept. .•1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO.80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)304-6498 fax Weld County Planning Department ' t GREELEY OFFICE r et I\ M zo Z DUM TO: Carla Angeli, Planning DATE: January 29, 2002 COLORADO FROM: Drew Scheltinga, P. E., Engineering Division Manager SUBJECT: Z-568; Summit at Mountain View Qf,. The Public Works Department has reviewed this Change of Zone application. Comments made during this phase of the subdivision review process may not be all-inclusive, as other concerns or issues may arise during the remaining application processes. COMMENTS: Roadways: The Summit at Mountain View development will be accessed through Carmacar Ranchettes. All the streets in Carmacar are unpaved. Weld County Public Works has received numerous complaints about road conditions and dust for many years from the residents of Carmacar. When the Peaks at Mountain View (a five lot development south of and adjacent to the Summit at Mountain View) was approved by the Board of Weld County Commissioners, a Road Maintenance and Improvements Agreement was required. It made the applicant responsible for providing dust suppression chemicals during the time the development is under construction. A copy of the Agreement is attached. The applicant for the Summit at Mountain View should be required to do the same. All PUD roadways require paving. A letter dated October 10, 2001, by John Myers, P.E., requests an exception to the requirement. As stated above, current residents of the area complain about dust and road surface conditions. At their request, I have worked with residents of Carmacar and the Peaks at Mountain View in an effort to form an improvement district to pave their roads. The initial effort was not successful; however, I am certain it is only a matter of time until a district is formed because the majority of residents are not satisfied with the level of service a gravel road provides. This portion of the County is rapidly growing with residential development being the major influence that is determining the character of the area. The request to wave the paving requirement should be denied and Summit Way should be paved. The Typical Street Section shown on the Change of Zone Plat is acceptable. The paving cross section and a road construction plan can be submitted at the final plat stage. r Page 1 EXHIBIT 1 / 9 - • vv_.-. „ ; Depertmera FIr,F .,,,,a 3 0 2002 Page 2 RECEIVED Z-568 1-29-02 In the Road Improvements agreement, the applicant should be required to participate in a Carmacar improvement district to pave Fir Avenue and Mountain View Street between Summit Way and WCR 5, which would provide a paved access to Summit Way. The amount of participation should be based on the traffic generated by the Summit at Mountain View proportionally with the background traffic on Mountain View Street. All landscaping in the intersection sight triangles must be less than 3.5 feet above the road level at maturity. The right-of-way for Summit Way is shown correctly and should be dedicated to Weld County on the final plat. Storm Water: A drainage report was submitted by Foothills Engineering, dated October 12, 2001. The basic drainage concept is acceptable; however, more detailed information will be required at the final plat submittal. That information entails delineating offsite and onsite basins with specific historic and proposed runoff data for each, routing to the detention pond, detention pond construction detailing including dimensioning of the outlet structures, and routing of detention pond discharge to existing drainage features. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. A Road Maintenance and Improvements Agreement be submitted that addresses dust control and participation in a Carmacar improvement district for paving. 2. Summit Way shall be paved in accordance with PUD requirements. 3. Final roadway plans and drainage report to be submitted at final plat application. pc: Z-568 M:\WPFILES W\Planning\z-568.wpd SUMMIT AT MOUNTAIN VIEW - Z-568 Developer: David Dahlglish PT E2 5-1-68 ZONED PUD/ESTATE NOT IN FLOOD PLAIN (0960D) IS IN RIF AREA LEFT HAND WATER DISTRICT INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS UNITED POWER KN COMPANY 7 LOTS Lot 1 5515 Summit Way Lot 2 5525 Summit Way Lot 3 5535 Summit Way Lot 4 5545 Summit Way Lot 5 5540 Summit Way Lot 6 5530 Summit Way Lot 7 5520 Summit Way Weld County Planning Department GREELEY OFFICE FEB 0 7 2002 RECE ' EXHIBIT ,�� CE Weld County Planning Department GR ELEY JAN 2 9 2002 Interoffice Memo RECEIVED To: Carla Angeli,Department of Planning \ o co"o ,y From: Ken Poncelow fco ='-% Date: January 21, 2002 Subject: Z568, Applicant- David Dalglish This proposal specifically indicates that the access road and the road within the subdivision will remain private. If the road remains private, everyone should be informed that the Sheriffs Office has significant limitations regarding traffic enforcement on private roads in the event speeding or other use which may not conform to traffic laws on public roads. Private roads are require specific provisions for maintenance, particularly from heavy snowfall and/or drifting, which is not described in this proposal. All individual addresses must be prominently displayed at the individual residence's access to aid emergency responders particularly during the hours of darkness. The Sheriffs Office is very supportive of homeowner's associations that require annual fees in order to maintain, develop, and enforce covenants. We are better able to address neighborhood issues that may develop with an existing neighborhood governing body. There is no mention of this issue in this proposal. There is an oil well and tank battery within this development. These need to be fenced off in order to mitigate the potential for tampering. These facilities are known to create an attractive nuisance for young people. Tampering not only creates significant danger to the safety but also environmental damage with extensive litigation and clean-up costs. No lighting is shown on the street named Summit Way. The Sheriffs Office requests that lighting be brought up to county standards so that the road be well lit. The Sheriffs Office lacks the ability to absorb any additional service demand without the resources recommended in the multi-year plan provided to the Board of County Commissioners or as indicated by growth not considered at the time the plan was developed. I have no other comments on this proposal. EXHIBIT IT Weld County Planning Dept, St. VYa V Valley School District January 9,2002 RECEIVED Carla Angeli Weld County Planning Department 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Recommendation to opposes Summit at Mountain View Change of Zone{Lot B of RE-2196,situate in the East'A of Section 5,Ti N, R68Wj Dear Trudy: Thank you for referring Summit at Mountain View Change of Zone to the School District. The District has reviewed the development proposal in terms of future student impacts and available school capacity and has the following RECOMMENDATION: the District is OPPOSED to the approval of this application due to this development's impact on already overcrowded school facilities. The Board of Education has established a district-wide policy of opposing new developments that add to the student enrollment of schools projected to be at or above 125% of their capacity. This particular application, which is currently located in the Erie Elementary and Erie Middle/Senior High feeder, will add 6 new single- family dwelling units with a potential impact of 4 additional students in this feeder. The District opposes this development because, as indicated in the chart below, Erie Elementary and Erie Middle/Senior High schools will exceed 125% of their capacity with the addition of students from this development. The District may reconsider this opposition should the developer wish to discuss how the development can be better timed to coincide with the District's construction of new facilities, or if other mitigation measures can be taken to accommodate this development's contribution of new students in light of school capacity shortfalls. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY BENCHMARK Building Oct 01 Stdnts. Enrollment w, New Proj. Stint= w/proposed Capacity Capacity Enrollment Impact Development Capacity 2005 development 2005 Elementary 528 501 2 503 95% 1199 1201 227% Middle/Senior 618 573 2 575 93% 1229 1231 199% Total 1146 4 2428 2432 The recommendation of the District noted above applies to the attendance boundaries current as of the date of this letter. Residential growth and new school facilities could affect the projects attendance area in the future. As of this time, there are no anticipated boundary changes or facility expansions that would warrant a change in the current attendance areas. Should the County decide to recommend approval of this development proposal, the School District's cash-in- lieu and/or land dedication requirement would still need to be satisfied. This requirement involves the dedication of land with the adjacent infrastructure or payment of an equivalent cash-in-lieu fee based on the student yield of the development. . Although cash-in-lieu fees are insufficient to help provide for construction of schools and resolving capacity shortages, it does assist in the purchase of land for future school sites. Since this property is not a likely future school site, the fee would be assessed per the attached chart. Also, transportation would most likely be provided for this site. Please let me know of any further questions. Sincerely, Glen,AICP Planning Specialist GS:jkr EXHIBIT ST.VRAIN VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING DEPARTMENT.395 SOUTH PRATT PARKWAY,LONe CO 80501.SCOTT TOILLION, MANAGER.PHONE 303-682-7229. FAX 303-682-7344. 1Pat) 3 Zi w c - > o.•••••••.••••••• zLI Q a Zd M O 2 I— Q F- 5 N -, co c D I o `� a v v a d o 0 o o 0 = c O O O O Zero co to to to to O c O m C . o o a aco •c o o o o 0 • C O t.) C a Q c m d �� H O 1 a N a 0 3 N = ` o in a d eu& a = ° .— o co N t a �v c o as N d — , in o o Z •co a ti r' ca LL N co C.) 'ap at M r CO� N. O QO) N '0 r- O N O O a M a N m cwt co co cfl _� Cl) _ >, E �. > o E U.to _I _ ui aa) C C.) m a a a) c_ E --a_ am o m N W Z H cn Q w N t O )( C> W Carla Angeli - Re Water agreement Z-568 Page 1 From: LEE Morrison To: Carla Angeli Date: 2/1/02 3:27PM Subject: Re: Water agreement Z-568 Sorry for the delay, I was not connecting Daglish to this case. The tap agreement #2082 is satisfactory Lee D. Morrison Assistant Weld County Attorney 915 10th St., PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80634 (970)356-4000 x 4395 FAX 352 0242 >>> Carla Angeli 2/1/02 1:47 PM >>> Dear Lee, Last week I contacted you about the water agreement for Z-568 (Summit at Mountain View PUD). The hearing is scheduled for March 5 and I am intersted in receiving your comments. If you could let me know when to expect a response I would really appreciate it. If you need another copy or additional information please let me know. Thank you for your help with this matter. Carla Angeli Planning r EXHIBIT lad Hello