HomeMy WebLinkAbout20020606.tiff Weld County Planning Department
GREELEY OFFICE
JAN 2 5 2002
Department of Planning Services
1555 N. 17th Avenue RECEIVED
Greeley, CO 80631
Date: 1-19-02
RE: Case Number USR 1368
TO: Lauren Light, Planner
As an adjacent landowner, I am concerned about the proposed dog kennel (to include training,
boarding, special events, and two dwelling units). As agriculturally zoned("A") Zone district
property, the proposed"dog kennel" use seems inconsistent and incongruous with surrounding
land use. Having a kennel (and other intended uses)will detract from the surrounding
landowner's property enjoyment and value for the following reasons:
1. Noise—kennels are noisy operations. i.e. barking dogs, etc. —thus detracting from
enjoyment and reducing the value of surrounding land owners property.
2. Houses—as zoned agricultural, my understanding that county rules prohibit two home
on the proposed property.
3. Increased traffic—as an agricultural producer increased automobile traffic contributes to
the difficulties of operating and moving agricultural machinery.
4. Special events—what does this imply? If it means more traffic, people, noise, and
parking—I am not in favor of such use of the property.
For these reasons, I am opposed to the proposed use.
Sinc J
Tom Goding
970-223-2510
2002-0606
II I
EXHIBIT
' ,
Matthies Properties, LLP
337 South 127h Street Weld County Planning Department
Omaha, NE 68154-2309 GREELEY OFFICE
FEB 1 9 2002
February 12, 2002
Attn: Lauran Light, Planner RECEIVED
Department of Planning Services
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Case Number USR_1368
As an adjacent landowner, we are concerned about the proposed dog kennel(to include
training, boarding, special events, and two dwelling units). As agriculturally zoned("A")
Zone district property, the proposed "dog kennel" use seems inconsistent with
surrounding land uses. A kennel (and the other intended uses) will detract from the
surrounding landowner's enjoyment of and value of the property for the following
reasons:
1. Noise - kennels are noisy operations. i.e. barking dogs, etc. - thus detracting from
enjoyment and reducing the value of surrounding landowner's property.
2. Houses - as zoned agricultural, it is our understanding that county rules prohibit
two homes on the proposed property.
3. Increased traffic - because we depend on an agricultural producer, we are
concerned that increased automobile traffic would contribute to the difficulties of
operating and moving agricultural machinery.
4. Special events- what does this imply?Does this mean more traffic, people, noise,
and parking.
5. Set back from WCR 43 and WCR 78 - these area,set forth in subject case.
For these reasons, I am opposed to the proposed use.
• ce ely,
Ma hies Properties, LLP
Fred J. Matthies
Managing Partner
Telephone: 402-334-1833
Hello