Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20023125.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE AMENDMENT#2 TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN - MERRICK AND COMPANY WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with Amendment#2 to the Agreement for Professional Services between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Geographical Informational Systems (GIS) Division, and Merrick and Company, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said amendment, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said amendment, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Amendment#2 to Agreement for Professional Services between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Geographical Informational Systems (GIS) Division, and Merrick and Company be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said amendment. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 9th day of December, A.D., 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS /�� WELD UNTY,O C LORA O ATTEST: Lett e GI aad, it Weld County Clerk to the arcj _e , J David E. Lon Pro-Tem Deputy Clerk to the Boa M. J. Geile") V A. PPROV,EO AS TO FO EXCUSED damn H. Jerke ounty AttbTney1 tw X \lq - 47/ Robert D. Maiden Date of signature: 2002-3125 C C, / - DP0010 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 AMENDMENT NO. 2 to the AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Between Merrick & Company and Weld County, Colorado CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 1 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement for Professional Services This is an Amendment to the Agreement for Professional Services("Agreement") is made by and between Merrick& Company, a Colorado corporation("Merrick") and Weld County, Colorado ("County") signed by the County on June 17, 1998. All of the terms and conditions found in the original Agreement apply to this Amendment. The following Attachments are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement: A - Statement of Services & Project Schedule B -Schedule of Payment C - Client Responsibilities D - Documents and Deliverables Owned by Weld County IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties execute this Agreement on the date last written below. Weld County,Colorado Merrick& Company, a Colorado corporation Glenn Vaad. Chair Brian R. Raber, C.M.S. Board of County Commissio ers Signature Signature 0/0 12124rt-sr __ Title Chair Title VICE Pficst/) -2,ST Date 12/09/2002 Date II /2_S"- Attest: / pst By• Deputy Clerk to th • = Irt CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 2 of 16 Cv -bias Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 Attachment A Statement of Services & Project Schedule In accordance with the provisions of Article 1, Merrick agrees to perform the services specifically described below. Character and Extent of Services Weld County(County)hereby engages Merrick&Company(Merrick)to provide necessary mapping services for the County's digital mapping project. Merrick agrees to supply the following work and services under the conditions set forth in this agreement: A. Merrick and its subcontractors, shall provide all necessary work,material, supplies,transportation,plan, labor,and management as may be required,to accomplish aerial photography digital orthophotography for this project. B. Supplies and services to be furnished under this contract will be divided into several sub-tasks. In summary, the services include: Photogrammetric Manning 1. Placement of aerial targets on existing ground control/check points. 2. AGPS surveying for additional photo control points. 3. Black and white aerial photography products. 4. Fully Digital Analytical Aerotriangulation(FDAAT). 5. Digital orthophotography(1' pixel resolution). 6. Resampled digital orthophotography at 2',4', 8',and 16'pixel resolutions. 7. MrSID compressed imagery. C. Area of the Project-The limits of the project contain approximately nine hundred nineteen 919 square miles requiring one-foot(1')pixel resolution digital orthophotography formatted to the PLSS used in the original 1998 project. See Figure 1 for the locations of said project limits. Figure 1 L ,r, .:l WOO County CO CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 3 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 II. General Mapping and Administration Considerations A. Deliveries-All costs of deliveries shall be borne by the Merrick project team. Each delivery shall be addressed to: Ms. Judi Boeck,GIS Coordinator, Weld County GIS, 1400 North 17"'Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631. A letter and/or transmittal form, in duplicate, listing the materials being transmitted, and being properly numbered, dated,and signed, shall accompany each delivery. Delivery of all County-supplied source materials shall be made at the completion of this contract. B. Mr. Doug Jacoby will be the Merrick technical manager for this project. Mr.Brian Raber will be the Merrick contract manager for this project. Mr. Doug Jacoby will be the primary contact at Merrick for all County correspondence. Ms. Judi Boeck will be the County's primary contact. C. In the event the scope requires clarification the hierarchy of documents is as follows: 1)Amendment No. 2; 2)Miscellaneous e-mail communications/documentation; 3)Amendment No. 1;4)Contract Document; 5) Merrick's Technical Proposal; 6)the County's RFP; and, 7)County Addenda to RFP.The hierarchy applies only when there is a conflict between two(2)or more of the above-mentioned documents. D. Product Acceptance-All deliveries submitted by Merrick will be checked by the County. The County team shall notify Merrick if there are any delays in the review period. All reviews will be performed on a basis of work correctness and compliance with this contract and the technical scope of work. Merrick shall work closely with the County to develop quality control parameters/procedures for County staff. At a minimum,the data will comply with the following acceptance criteria: 1. 95%feature attribute correctness. 2. 95%features completeness. 3. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing(ASPRS)Map Standards for positional accuracy of the planimetric and topographic databases. 4. Federal Geodetic Control Committee(FGCC)and County/Merrick survey standards. 5. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing aerial photography standards. Within a thirty(30)calendar day timeframe the County team will categorize each delivery as follows: 1. ACCEPTED,that is,meeting specifications with no more than minor and/or isolated exceptions. Accepted data will conform to the minimum standards(95%) for feature attribute correctness and completeness. Accepted data is considered final,with no re-work by Merrick. 2. ACCEPTED WITH REWORK,that is,essentially the delivery conforms to specifications,but having a significant number of isolated exceptions. Client shall accept the delivery pending re-editing and corrections re-submitted to the Client. At no cost to Client,the Merrick project team shall correct and resubmit the delivery to Client within thirty(30)days. Deliverables falling within 90%to 95%will be considered under this category. The Merrick project team will complete corrections to obtain the minimum standard. 3. REJECTED,that is,the delivery fails to meet the minimum requirements and requires major improvements to comply with the pre-defined standards. At no cost to the Client team,the Merrick project team shall correct and re-submit the delivery to Client within fifteen(15)working days. CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page:4 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 Deliveries considered in this category are where data is under the 90%level. The Merrick project team will complete corrections to obtain the minimum standard. III. Photogrammetric Technical Provisions Any technical provision not clearly defined in this document may be referenced back to Attachment A("Statement of Services and Project Schedule")of the original Agreement for Professional Services. The same,or similar methods will be used in the production of digital orthophotography that were previously used during the 1998 and 2001 projects. Photo-Control Targeting 1. Prior to flying the aerial photography, Merrick will pre-mark or target a select group of existing photo control points so they will be visible on the aerial photography. These existing points were originally used during the 1998 project, as well as a portion of the 2001 project, and will be used as checkpoints for the airborne GPS (AGPS) derived photocenters. 2. Merrick will coordinate the targeting and aerial photography tasks to guarantee that the targeting is complete prior to beginning the photography mission. All targets will be inspected prior to the actual acquisition of photography to be sure the targets are in-place and in good shape. 3. When possible, Merrick will use white paint to mark the location of each control point. White vinyl material (3 ply thick)will be utilized for all those points that cannot be painted. Merrick will provide all materials. 4. The shape of the photo-control targets in the mapping area will be a "Y". The dimensions of these targets will be 12' legs, 12" wide. 5. Following the acceptance of the aerial photography by Merrick, all vinyl targets will be removed within a reasonable timeframe. Acauire New Aerial Photogranhv 1. Black and white aerial photography will be acquired to meet the accuracy requirements of the digital orthophotography. 2. Merrick will utilize Aerial Surveys International,LLC(ASI)of Watkins, CO to perform the photography mission. The camera utilized by ASI for this project will incorporate forward motion compensation(FMC). Additionally, ASI's aircraft is equipped with GPS navigation and an on-board receiver to accomplish the camera positioning for the aerotriangulation. 3. The aerial photography will conform to industry standards established by the American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing(ASPRS). 4. The following characteristics apply for the aerial photography Merrick is responsible for capturing: Negative Scale: 1"= 1,200' (1:14,400) Mapping Scale: 1" =200'(1:2,400) Flying Altitude: 7,200'AMT Forward Lap: 60% Side Lap: 30% Area per model: 749.75 acres Number of Exposures: 967 Mapping Flight Lines: 25 Mapping Flight Line Miles: 770.7 Mapping Flight Line Direction: North—South Mapping Photography Format: Stereo-model centered • CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 5 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 5. Once the film is processed, inspected and approved, each exposure shall be clearly labeled at the edge of the negative. The labeling shall include: date of photography, scale of photography,project name, flight line number and exposure number. Airborne GPS Photo-Control/Post-Processing Merrick will use Airborne GPS (AGPS) in order to control the aerial photography. The following summarizes Merrick's AGPS procedures: 1. The results from the kinematic data collection and/or data processing shall be simple coordinate values for each common epoch of data recorded by both the GPS receiver on the aircraft and base receivers stationed on the ground. 2. The photos shall be represented only by an exact time corresponding to the time that the GPS receiver recorded the electronic pulse from the camera when the photo was taken. These times shall be labeled with photo identifiers by referring to the trajectory plots and the pilot flight reports so that the line numbers match those used by the pilot and thus, ensuring easy cross referencing. At the same time test exposures and events caused by blanks shall be removed from the event list. 3. Coordinates and elevations will be generated for the perspective center for each photograph that will be used in the fully digital analytical aerotriangulation(FDAAT)process. 4. The final coordinate values will be based on the Colorado State Plane Coordinate System(SPCS),North Zone (0501), North American Datum of 1983, adjusted 1992 (NAD83/92),U.S. Survey Foot Units. Final elevation values will be relative to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). Aerial Photography Scanning I. The original aerial photography negatives will be converted to raster images using the Zeiss SCAT film scanner currently in place at Merrick 2. The input scan will vary based on the photo scale and desired output pixel resolution. The following table illustrates the relationship between scale of photography, input scan size, and output pixel resolution: Photo Scale Input Scan Input Pixel Final Pixel 1"=1,200' 14,um 0.66' 1' 3. When scanning the negatives, gray scale histograms or look-up tables (LUT's) are customized to establish the optimum"bell shaped curve". This will assure the digital ortho imagery will have a well-balanced array of grayscale values that range from 0 to 255. Fully Digital Analytical Aerotriangulation (FDAAT) The aerotriangulation process physically and mathematically ties individual exposures and associates the entire photo set with the project's horizontal and vertical datums. Sophisticated software corrects inherent systematic errors such as earth curvature, atmospheric refraction, film distortion,camera lens distortion and aircraft (flight) inconsistencies. The result of the final FDAAT solution is exterior orientations for each camera station; x,y,z location at the photo center and tip,tilt and swing of the camera at the instant the photo was captured. The exterior orientations are used to set models during the stereo-compilation phase. Merrick will perform the soft pugging, fiducial and plate mensuration on analytical, softcopy stereo-plotters in a digital environment. Digital aerotriangulation eliminates the traditional manual labor(pugging and mensuration) and many of the classical errors associated with traditional aerotriangulation. The end result is substantial cost savings for the project through automated processes. Merrick has three(3)workstations available for softcopy aerotriangulation. Leica/Helava's ORIMA (Orientation Management) software will be used to perform all phases of the triangulation process. ORIMA works with Airborne GPS data in a wide variety of formats. This allows Merrick to work with most aerial photography companies that have different aerial cameras, GPS systems and orientation capabilities. CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 6 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 Merrick uses a systematic and time-tested procedure for completing fully digital aerotriangulation: FDAAT Preparation 1. The input data for FDAAT includes the AGPS data, ground control, scanned imagery, camera calibration data. 2. Prior to this step, the aerial negatives will have been scanned at 14,um. This will ensure adequate resolution for feature definition for the aerial triangulation point correlation and digital ortho imagery. 3. Plots of the Airborne GPS data are generated to correlate each photo exposure with an AGPS event. 4. During the preparation phase, Merrick compensates for systematic error such as "drift"by creating a profile for each project. The drift parameters that impact the accuracy of the FDAAT adjustment include unresolved ambiguities, datum errors and the antenna offset. This profile allows the automatic comparison between the AGPS observations and FDAAT calculations of the photo-centers. 5. Additional project support files are generated. A batch program is executed to correlate each strip of imagery with the USGS Camera Calibration Report. Image files are minified to increase the efficiency of the triangulation adjustment. Additional project-wide parameters (calibrated fiducial coordinates, ellipsoid, antenna offset, strip Kappa, AGPS/ground control weightings, etc.)are input to a separate file. 6. The interior orientation for each image is recorded by measuring the fiducial marks on every exposure. This is automatically accomplished in a batch process. Fiducial measurements are compared to the calibrated coordinates from the Camera Calibration Report and an RMS is calculated for each exposure. The RMS results are reviewed by the aerotriangulation technician to check for compliance with a set standard of less than ten microns (<10,cun). Anomalies are investigated and resolved before proceeding to the next step. 7. After these preparation steps are verified and approved, the digital mensuration process will begin. FDAAT Mensuration 1. The ORIMA APM (Automatic Tie Point Measurement)module completes digital mensuration using auto- correlation techniques. Pattern recognition algorithms locate the exact same position on two adjoining digital images. The subsequent softcopy adjustment will use coordinates of the correlated points(x,y in the image system)to compute the actual ground coordinate values in the desired coordinate system. 2. The ORIMA software uses a pyramid structure for the imagery(minified files previously generated) of approximately five levels with the final level possessing the finest resolution. This pyramid structure is used to initially correlate coarser resolution images, and then refines the matched features in subsequent,higher resolution pyramid levels. 3. Point matching is initially completed for each strip of photography. A minimum of three (3)points is matched at classical Grueber locations in the tri-lap of each consecutive set of three images. The software automatically flags potential matching errors, or the technician can review an ASCII file of the results. Any matching errors(residuals)are also displayed graphically to the technician for review and resolution. The software provides the flexibility to re-measure points interactively, in the event that points cannot be automatically matched in a particular area. 4. The technician measures all ground control points for each strip interactively. Control points that fall in the image area of adjoining strips are automatically tied via the control point designation number in the adjustment phase. 5. Once the technician has reviewed and accepted the strip-wise matching, tie points are auto-correlated between strips. The same QC procedures used to identify and resolve strip mismatches are completed for tie points. 6. The final auto-correlated coordinates results are used as input to the FDAAT bundle adjustment. CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 7 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 FDAAT Bundle Adjustment A block adjustment is performed using Leica/Helava's ORIMA CAP-A software to calculate coordinates for tie points and determine precise exterior orientation parameters for each exposure. The exterior orientation parameters will be used for stereo model orientation and as input to the digital orthophoto process. Final OC and Aero-Triangulation Report 1. Throughout the FDAAT process Merrick is inspecting (approving and rejecting) the data before proceeding with the next step of the process. Thus,by the time the bundle adjustment is executed, only potential errors in the input control are remaining. The technician thoroughly reviews the residual and RMS results of the AGPS, ground control and terrain (matched)points to ensure that the final results will support the accuracy requirements of the project. 2. Merrick strongly encourages the use of checkpoints as an independent verification of the final bundle adjustment. 3. A comprehensive report detailing the results of the FDAAT task will be submitted to the County. The report will include, at a minimum, the following information: • A brief narrative of the aerotriangulation process. • Root Mean Square(RMS)error and residuals of the ground control points. • A discussion of any control misfits and corrective actions taken to resolve misfits. • A statement of accuracy. • A digital file of exposure locations with flight and exposure number annotated. 4. The final FDAAT coordinates will be consistent with the horizontal and vertical datums for the Weld County project (i.e., Colorado SPCS,North Zone [0501],NAD 83/92,NAVD 88,U.S. Survey Feet). 5. The final report will be inspected and signed by Merrick's Project Manager, a Certified Photogrammetrist and FDAAT Technician. Dieital Elevation Model(DEMI Data Source 1. Merrick intends on utilizing the existing DEM dataset from the 1998 and 2001 projects for the rectification of the 1"=200' scale/ 1' pixel resolution/PLSS formatted digital orthos. Dieital Orthoohoto Production The algorithms used to rectify imagery are static within the industry. Regardless of whether individual vendors use off-the-shelf or customized software and all inputs being equal,the positional accuracy characteristics of the final orthos will be essentially the same. Therefore, our focus is on image quality,production efficiencies, and customer support. The following is an overview of the process by which Merrick creates digital orthophoto images. There are five (5)main steps involved in creating a digital ortho. These include the following: 1. Integration of the existing ortho Digital Elevation Model (DEM) 2. Negative rasterization(scanning) 3. Fully differential orthometric rectification 4. Radiometric correction and image mosaicking 5. Data quality inspection and delivery Secondary processes may include: • Resampling to multiple resolutions • File compression • Integrating the imagery into Merrick's custom display and plotting extensions CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 8 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 Merrick uses Leica/Helava's latest release(4.3.1) of digital ortho processing software and high-end Dell workstations. Each step of the production process has internal validation measures, which must be approved before proceeding to the next step. The following section outlines our procedures for generating the ortho imagery. Input Validation and Setup 1. Image quality begins at the aerial photography stage. Merrick works with our aerial vendor to select the appropriate film type for the project. The aerial negatives are thoroughly reviewed by our Digital Imaging Discipline Lead for clarity, contrast, shadow detail, sunspots, and scratches 2. The project area is sub-divided into workable blocks for efficient processing(up to 50 stereo-models per block). DEM data is merged for a given block and the elevation data is graphically displayed relative to the project boundary to ensure that all areas will be correctly rectified. 3. Ultimately, orthophotos are as accurate as the rectification surface on which they are based. Rigorous quality assurance procedures provide confidence that the DEM and consequently the orthophoto meet or exceed specifications. Therefore,the DEM is evaluated using various isometric views check for any"spikes." The technician also validates that the DEM blocks overlap to ensure that there are no data gaps between blocks. 4. A Triangulated Irregular Network(TIN) is generated from the DEM. 5. Project parameters (photo scale, camera calibration data, output resolution, etc.) are input to a project file for access by the Leica/Helava software. 6. Interior orientations (fiducial measurements) are imported from stereo-compilation department to obviate the need for re-measurement and maintain consistency between the compiled data and final ortho imagery. 7. A reduced resolution data set is created by minifying(re-sampling)the scanned imagery. The reduced resolution data set will be subsequently used for the initial rectification. Image Rectification and Processing 1. Establishing or defining the ground surface and scanned negative relationship via digital orientation are the next steps in the process. Digital images are geo-referenced to the DEM surface through an interior(from the camera calibration report)and exterior orientation(from the FDAAT) of the scanned image. These orientations relate the scanned image to the camera and subsequently the camera to the ground. 2. Leica/Helava's module MO is executed to simultaneously rectify and mosaic an entire block of imagery. This process is completed on the minified data set as an initial rectification to expedite processing. Merrick will use a Cubic Convolution re-sampling method,with the ability to edge-enhance or smooth an image as needed to arrive at the best geometric and radiometric output possible in the commercial market today. 3. Seam lines are automatically generated by the software and displayed to the technician. Tone and contrast are adjusted automatically between input images during this process,with the images then feathered across a buffer zone to eliminate seam lines within the project area. 4. The ortho technician reviews the locations of the seam lines and manually modifies them to avoid height objects and to place them in monotone areas(through open field, along road centerlines, etc.). The technician also reviews the image characteristics and modifies a block-wide histogram as necessary to adjust the overall tonal balance. 5. A second and final rectification is completed on the full resolution data set using the modified parameters and edited seam lines from the initial adjustment. Tonal balancing on a block basis is again reviewed to ensure consistent imagery. Overall image quality is reviewed to ensure that the imagery is of consistent tone and contrast across the project area, and to specifically look for any breaks or processing failures within the image. Any such breaks will be cause for rejection and recreation of the affected sheets after determining the CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 9 of 16 • Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 nature of the problem. 6. The block of imagery is cut to individual delivery tiles. For this project, the tiling characteristics include: Ortho Scale Tile Size Number of Tiles Pixel Resolution File Size 1"=200' --5,280' x—5,280' 919 1' —28mb (PLSS section) 7. A visual inspection of each tile is completed for aesthetics (dust, lint, scratches, smears, building and bridge lean, etc.) 8. Bridges are corrected by rectifying them at"zero"elevation. The rectified feature is referenced and transferred to the final image file. Image Characteristics Merrick recognizes that the quality of orthophoto imagery can be subjective. Imagery that may look good to one person may not to someone else. For this reason, we work closely with our clients during the start-up and prototype processes to develop imagery that is suitable for all users. Our philosophy is that we are working as a team with our clients to achieve the desired results for their intended applications. The following outlines potential orthophoto quality issues that may arise on any given project and Merrick's solutions to these issues. Image Clarity The clarity of the image can be significantly affected by atmospheric haze and dust. Thus, aerial photography will be taken in accordance with ASPRS Standards for Aerial Photography whereby the "photography shall not be secured when the ground is obscured by haze, snow, smoke, dust, flood waters, or environmental factors that may obscure ground detail." The aerial photography is thoroughly reviewed for compliance with this standard. Brightness/Contrast Brightness and contrast can be controlled during the film processing, scanning, and orthophoto processing phases. The best way to achieve the proper brightness and contrast is through proper film selection and film processing. Although these factors can be controlled somewhat during the scanning and ortho processing phases, the extent to which they can be controlled is primarily dependent on the quality of film processing. Merrick completes a histogram analysis of the imagery prior to scanning to analyze and adjust the dynamic range of gray scale values for brightness and contrast. Brightness and contrast can also be further adjusted on a project-wide basis during the mosaicking process. We recognize that acceptable brightness and contrast of the ortho imagery is subjective and varies from client to client. In an effort to determine the optimum image quality parameters at the onset of the project, Merrick will: • Submit sample scanned images of varying contrast and brightness prior to scanning the balance of the film negatives • Review the contrast and brightness of a sample set of imagery during the prototype review meeting Shadows The extent to which shadows impact the imagery is a direct result of the time of year and time of day that the photography was flown. Longer shadows will give an overall appearance of darker imagery in heavily shadowed areas even though a histogram analysis may show that the imagery is similar. Regardless of the film type used or the time of year/day flown,you should be able to identify at least some, and preferably all, detail in shadow areas. To ensure the highest possible visibility of detail in shadows, the aerial vendor must properly expose the film and process the film according to manufacturer's specifications. Scratches Scratches can be introduced at various stages of the process. Scratching can occur when the film passes across the platen in the camera, as the film is being passed through a film processor, as the film is being used to generate CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 10 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 contact prints/diapositives, as the film is being scanned or even as the film is being rolled across a light table for review. It is difficult to completely eliminate scratches. To minimize the impact of scratching, Merrick works exclusively with aerial vendors that use the latest in camera and film processing technology. These vendors also recognize the importance of proper handling and storage of the original negatives. Whenever film is being reviewed on a light table, the technician wears white gloves and the table is thoroughly cleaned. Scratches are "paint-brushed" out during the orthophoto image QC check. The heaviest concentration is placed on scratches that fall on planimetric features, although any scratch that is unsightly is fixed. The extent to which scratches are fixed is a subject discussed at the kickoff and prototype review meetings. Artifacts Artifacts (lint, dust, etc.)can be introduced any time the film is being rolled out for any purpose. Although vendors and their subcontractors usually take great care to avoid scratches and artifacts, it is nearly impossible to eliminate them altogether. Artifacts that are unsightly or that fall on critical features are "paint-brushed"out during the orthophoto image QC check. Mosaicking Mosaicking is completed as a standard process to minimize the effect of inherent tonal variations from photo to photo. Our ortho technicians will review and modify seam lines so that they are placed in areas of consistent tonal balance and between buildings or bridges. A dynamic range adjustment is completed across the entire block of images to provide a tonally balanced product. The mosiacking parameters can be carried from block to block to ensure the entire project area has consistent tonal qualities. Radial Displacement(Buildings) Due to the radial properties of the aerial camera,buildings will "lean"outward from the center of each exposure. The extent to which a building leans is a function of the height of the building and the distance from the nadir of the photo. This can be very detrimental to ortho imagery since the leaning buildings will obscure otherwise visible features. Radial Displacement(Bridges and Overpasses) In the case of bridges and multi-level overpasses,the orientation of the bridge in relation to the principle point of the photograph plays a large part in the output appearance of that bridge. If the bridge is oriented close to the photo center,very little modification, if any, may be required for that bridge. If the bridge is located to the edge of the photo center, a marked degree of modification can occur to that structure, such as warping,ribboning, melting, etc. Merrick will make every attempt to rectify bridges and overpasses using portions of the imagery that are closest to the center of each exposure, thus minimizing the lean of these features. Positional Accuracy The best way to internally validate that the final ortho products meet the required accuracy standard is by measuring control points on the final ortho photos and comparing the values with the survey control coordinates. Planimetry is overlaid with the image data as well to check specifically for correct fit,placement, and completeness of the data prior to final formatting and delivery. Final Dieital Ortho Formattine 1. Final image quality and geometric fit is reviewed before translation to the client-specific file format. Once translation has occurred, the translated images are displayed to ensure no errors have occurred in translation. The images are then written to the specified media for delivery to the client, and are backed up with all related project data to assure data recovery for future operations. 2. For this project, we anticipate that all imagery will be output as Continuous Tone, TIFF Class G format files with a World File. Dieital Orthophotolraphy Resampling CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 11 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 1. The I' pixel imagery developed for the County will be resampled to pixel resolutions of 2',4', 8' and 16'. MrSID Image Compression Following image acceptance, Merrick will compress the data using MrSID compression software developed by LizardTech. Merrick is a business partner with Lizard Tech and has the in-house capabilities to provide this service. Merrick would work closely with the County to establish the most appropriate compression ratio(s). Typical compression of panchromatic imagery is 20:1 and offers a much more manageable dataset conducive to LAN and/or Internet transfers and applications. IV. Deliverable Products The following outlines the deliverable products produced by Merrick. Merrick understands that all of the products listed below are the property of Weld County. Aerial Photography Products 1. One (1) set of 1"=1,200' scale black and white(B&W) film negatives. 2. One(1) set of B&W contact prints of said aerial photography. 3. One (1) set of flight line/control diagrams for each scale of aerial photography(copies of USGS quad maps). Fully Digital Analytical Aerotrianeulation /FDAATI Products 1. FDAAT report and computation results for said aerial photography(hard and soft copy). 2. ASCII file of the existing ground control/checkpoints and AGPS photocenters used in the FAAT task. 3. USGS Camera Calibration Report. Digital Orthophoto Products 1. One (I) set of CD-ROM's containing nine hundred nineteen(919)PLSS formatted tiles of 1"=200' scale/ one-foot(1')pixel resolution B&W digital orthophotography in TIFF format. 2. One (1) set of the aforementioned B&W digital orthophotography resampled to pixel resolutions of 2',4', 8' and 16' in TIFF format. 3. MrSID compressed imagery of the aforementioned 1' pixel resolution B&W digital orthophotography. V. Project Schedule The following outlines the production schedule for the aforementioned Statement of Services specified for Weld County: Manning Task Start Finish 1. Recon, Recover, and Place Aerial Targets 2/17/03 2/28/03 2. 1"=1,200 Scale Black and White(B&W)Aerial Photography w/AGPS 3/3/03 3/28/03 3. Production of 1"=1,200' Scale B&W Contact Prints 3/31/03 4/18/03 4. B&W Film Negative Scanning 4/21/03 5/16/03 5. Fully Digital Analytical Aerotriangulation(FDAAT) 5/19/03 6/27/03 6. Prototype Project 6/30/03 7/11/03 7. Prototype Project Review(County) 7/14/03 7/18/03 CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 12 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 8. Prototype Project Review Meeting at Merrick 7/18/03 9. B&W Digital Orthophotography Rectification/Processing(1' pixels) 7/21/03 11/7/03 10. B&W Digital Orthophotography Delivery 8/29/03 11. B&W Digital Orthophotography Delivery 10/3/03 12. B&W Digital Orthophotography Delivery 11/7/03 13. County review and Acceptance 9/1/03 12/5/03 14. MrSID Imagery Compression and Delivery 12/8/03 12/19/03 CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 13 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 Attachment B Schedule of Payment The following outlines the compensation due Merrick&Company for the work described in Attachment A: Task Description Contract Amount 1. Project Initiation/Planning $ 1,842.00 2. 1"=1,200' Scale B&W Aerial Photography w/AGPS $ 35,535.00 3. Aerial Photography Lab $ 4,974.00 4. Recon Control/Aerial Targets/AGPS Support $ 18,596.00 5. Fully Digital Analytical Aerotriangulation (FDAAT) $ 29,663.00 6. Digital Elevation Model (DEM)Preparation $ 5,634.00 7. Film Negative Scanning $ 16,776.00 8. Digital Orthophotography Rectification $ 62,974.00 9. MrSID Compression $ 2,562.00 10. Project Management $ 5,492.00 11. Project Controls/Administration $ 1.930.00 TOTAL $ 185,978.00 Merrick will invoice Weld County on a monthly basis based on a percent complete of each of the aforementioned tasks. CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 14 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 Attachment C Additional County Responsibilities The following lists the information and responsibilities required of the County. Project Start-up Information 1. Identification of project boundaries for the project area. 2. Provide the corrected/adjusted PLSS coverage(s) for the project area. Countywide Project Production 1. Provide Merrick with timely review, feedback and acceptance of project deliverables. CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 15 of 16 Contract No. 50-013137, Amendment No. 2 Attachment D Documents and Deliverables Owned by Weld County Merrick understands that all of the products listed below are the property of Weld County. Data Provided to Merrick 1. Corrected/adjusted PLSS coverage. 2. Any and all source documents provided Aerial Photography Products 1. One (1) set of 1"=1,200' scale black and white (B&W) film negatives. 2. One (I) set of B&W contact prints of said aerial photography. 3. One (1) set of flight line/control diagrams for each scale of aerial photography (copies of USGS quad maps). Fully Digital Analytical Aerotriangulation /FDAATi Products 1. FDAAT report and computation results for said aerial photography(hard and soft copy). 2. ASCII file of the existing ground control/checkpoints and AGPS photocenters used in the FDAAT task. 3. USGS Camera Calibration Report. Digital Orthonhoto Products 1. One(1) set of CD-ROM's containing nine hundred nineteen (919)PLSS formatted tiles of 1"=200' scale/ one-foot(1')pixel resolution B&W digital orthophotography in TIFF format. 2. One(1) set of the aforementioned B&W digital orthophotography resampled to pixel resolutions of 2',4', 8' and 16' in TIFF format. 3. MrSID compressed imagery of the aforementioned 1' pixel resolution B&W digital orthophotography. CONTRACT AMENDMENT#2.doc Revision: 1 Date: 10/30/02 Page: 16 of 16 Hello