The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20022839.tiff BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CER T 1F1CA.TE THE LAST DAY TO POST THE SIGN IS: \\ THE SIGN SHALL BE POSTED ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM A PUB ICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY BEING CONSIDERED FOR A SPECIAL REVIEW IS NOT ADJACENT TO A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES SHALL POST ONE SIGN IN THE MOST PROMINENT PLACE ON THE PROPERTY AND POST A SECOND SIGN AT THE POINT AT WHICH THE DRIVEWAY (ACCESS DRIVE) INTERSECTS A PUBLICLY MAINTAINED ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. -I HERESY CERTIFY UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY THAT THE SIGN,WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S HEARING FOR USR- 115. THE SIGN WAS POSTED BY: \\ \\ �6 IJ R-0 b-'• 4-S J NAME OF PERSON POSTING SIGN f Si -NATURE FOR PERSON POSTING SIGN STATE OF COLORADO) )ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) • 19 c�� -SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO ME THIS DAY OF q* A oRY P145, PATRICIA IL ) .141K%/j i SULLIVAN _� NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: I 0 THIS FORM SHALL SE PLACED IN THE E APPROPRIATE FILE FOR THE ABOVE CASE. eDU�-o.8 3(.1 11 EXHIBIT E thse. 1395 31 32 33 Ca It jp. - .. : ice W.C.R. 98 i f. i N '1/4 BASIN 5 4 as7W 6q mL 6 I i a -- ... - _ W.C.R. 96 in E - 3 i 9 • a li 6q.mL Ci 3 �_ 4 1oA0 loo X - SCALE: 1' . 2000• ! +i �� W.C.R. 94 i Future 100- u Peak Tx A(VS es•140 .O • imq.ml. --A- 0.07110 r CONVEYANCE*15(10'WIDE CONCRETE CRAWL) Antelope v� - CONVEYANCE#16 Rea 4 18 16 BASIN flk 91 - r �ni�c it C VANCE N21 OW PVC PIPE) r"_.‘ HIGHLAND C VANCE#22(Noce) 7' DAIRY C VEYANCE#n DAM ' Future 10D-yeer CUM pat •eo m ,hr Sa eal o-• aw 0.011!6 eq.mt W.C.R. 92 oNyerANce x19(Noce Ie I CONVEYANCE#20 CONVEYANCE#I: OR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, LLC HIGHLAND DAIRY /13/02 G NAOrIMIAGWVMJAftM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS - ENGINP �� - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS / 1 EXHIBIT FUTURE DRAINAGE LAYOUT 2 F- use 139S- • / nu Highland Dairy-Future Drainage Li Weighted Slopes r Weighted Slope= ([L151024 + L2520.24 252.24 +...+ L„5„0.24] / [L1 + L2+...+ L„)4.17 Weighted Slope-Basin#1 Pt# Length DownHill Elev UpHill Elev Change Elev S„ Adjusted S. S„°"4 L*S„u.24 1 1,182.04 5.102 00 5,110.00 8.00 0.00677 0.00677 0.30152 356.40 2 1,397.27 5,110.00 5,120.00 10.00 0.00716 0.00716 0.30559 426.99 3 781.17 5,120.00 5,130.00 10.00 0.01280 0.01280 0.35135 274.46 3,360.48 feet Scalculated = 0.00807 1,057.85 0.6365 miles (Length of Basin) 0.2731 miles (Dist to Centroid) Weighted Slope- Basin#2 Pt# Length DownHill Elev UpHill Elev Change Elev S„ Adjusted S„ S„u 24 L*S„a24 1 260.37 5,068.00 5,070.00 2.00 0.00768 0.00768 0.31082 80.93 2 2,333.56 5,070.00 5,080.00 10.00 0.00429 0.00429 0.27019 630.51 3 1,199.26 5,080.00 5,090.00 10.00 0.00834 0.00834 0.31700 380.17 4 1,291.88 5,090.00 5,100.00 10.00 0.00774 0.00774 0.31139 402.28 5 225.99 5,100.00 5,102.00 2.00 0.00885 0.00885 0.32156 72.67 5,311.06 feet Scalculated = 0.00615 1,566.56 1.0059 miles (Length of Basin) 0.5561 miles (Dist to Centroid) Weighted Slope- Basin#3 Pt# Length DownHill Elev UpHill Elev Change Elev S„ Adjusted S„ S„0i4 L*S„a24 1 347.41 5,041.50 5,044.00 2.50 0.00720 0.00720 0.30599 106.30 2 858.20 5,044.00 5,049.00 5.00 0.00583 0.00583 0.29087 249.62 3 760.10 5,049.00 5,051.50 2.50 0.00329 0.00329 0.25357 192.74 4 1,063.25 5,051.50 5,056.00 4.50 0.00423 0.00423 0.26939 286.43 5 772.21 5,056.00 5,059.50 3.50 0.00453 0.00453 0.27385 211.47 6 1,434.82 5,059.50 5,068.00 8.50 0.00592 0.00592 0.29203 419.01 5,235.99 feet Scalculated = 0.00494 1,465.57 0.9917 miles (Length of Basin) 0.4967 miles (Dist to Centroid) Weighted Slope- Basin#4 Pt# Length DownHill Elev UpHill Elev Change Elev S„ Adjusted S, S„024 L*S„UL4 1 207.26 5,022.00 5,023.50 1.50 0.00724 0.00724 0.30641 63.51 2 173.40 5,023.50 5,024.50 1.00 0.00577 0.00577 0.29015 50.31 3 246.18 5,024.50 5,026.00 1.50 0.00609 0.00609 0.29401 72.38 4 429.91 5,026.00 5,028.50 2.50 0.00582 0.00582 0.29073 124.99 5 660.68 5,028.50 5,032.00 3.50 0.00530 0.00530 0.28430 187.83 6 406.68 5,032.00 5,036.00 4.00 0.00984 0.00984 0.32982 134.13 7 380.56 5,036.00 5,038.50 2.50 0.00657 0.00657 0.29937 113.93 8 522.06 5,038.50 5,040.50 2.00 0.00383 0.00383 0.26302 137.31 9 162.76 5,040.50 5,041.50 1.00 0.00614 0.00614 0.29460 47.95 3,189.49 feet Scalculated = 0.00592 932.34 0.6041 miles (Length of Basin) 0.3230 miles (Dist to Centroid) AgPro Environmental Services, LLC 1 of 4 Eric W. Dunker, P.E. •• Highland Dairy-Future Drainage Weighted Slopes Weighted Slope- Basin#5 Pt# Length DownHill Elev UpHill Elev Change Elev S, Adjusted S„ S„"`4 L*SnU19 1 723.23 5,018.00 5,023.00 5.00 0.00691 0.00691 0.30306 219.18 2 932.78 5,023.00 5,028.00 5.00 0.00536 0.00536 0.28511 265.94 1,656.01 feet Scaicuiated = 0.00598 485.12 0.3136 miles (Length of Basin) 0.1422 miles (Dist to Centroid) Weighted Slope- Basin#6 Pt# Length DownHill Elev UpHill Elev Change Elev S„ Adjusted Sn Snu.z4 L.Snu.J4 1 664.30 91.17 97.94 6.77 0.01019 0.01019 0.33264 220.97 L 664.30 feet Scalwiated = 0.01015 220.97 0.1258 miles (Length of Basin) 0.0524 miles (Dist to Centroid) Weighted Slope-Basin#7 Pt# Length DownHill Elev UpHill Elev Change Elev S„ Adjusted Sn S„°`4 L*Sn0.19 1 210.00 82.96 84.55 1.59 0.00757 0.00757 0.30974 65.05 2 294.47 84.55 84.83 0.28 0.00095 0.00095 0.18826 55.44 3 193.18 84.83 85.53 0.70 0.00362 0.00362 0.25953 50.14 697.65 feet Scalculated = 0.00282 170.62 0.1321 miles (Length of Basin) 0.1151 miles (Dist to Centroid) Weighted Slope-Basin#8 Pt# Length DownHill Elev UpHill Elev Change Elev S„ Adjusted Sn Sn°"4 L"SnUL4 1 444.16 84.26 89.48 5.22 0.01175 0.01175 0.34422 152.89 2 695.74 89.48 92.45 2.97 0.00427 0.00427 0.2.6994 187.81 3 924.05 92.45 94.27 1.82 0.00197 0.00197 0.22421 207.18 4 485.92 94.27 98.25 3.98 0.00819 0.00819 0.31564 153.38 5 460.55 5,017.00 5,020.00 3.00 _ 0.00651 0.00651 0.29876 137.59 6 1,856.54 5,020.00 5,030.00 _ 10.00 0.00539 0.00539 0.28544 529.93 7 1,372.47 5,030.00 5,038.00 8.00 0.00583 0.00583 0.29090 399.25 6,239.43 feet Scalculated = 0.00520 1,768.02 1.1817 miles (Length of Basin) 0.6625 miles (Dist to Centroid) AgPro Environmental Services, LLC 2 of 4 Eric W. Dunker, P.E. Highland Dairy- Future Drainage Impervious r Basin #1 Impervious Percentage Basin#2 Impervious Percentage Decimal Decimal Land Use Acres Impervious A* PI Land Use Acres Impervious A* PI Ag Land 97.37 0.02 1.95 Ag Land 363.16 0.02 7.26 Dirt Roads 1.71 0.40 0.68 Dirt Roads 1.75 0.40 0.70 Buildings 0.10 0.90 0.09 Buildings 0.15 0.90 0.14 Paved Areas - 1.00 - Paved Areas - 1.00 - Totals 99.18 acres 2.72 Totals 365.06 acres 8.10 0.1550 mil 0.5704 mil Weighted Impervious Percentage = 2.74% Weighted Impervious Percentage = 2.22% Basin#3 Impervious Percentage Basin#4 Impervious Percentage Decimal Decimal Land Use Acres Impervious A* PI Land Use Acres Impervious A* PI Ag Land 459.94 0.02 9.20 Ag Land 156.74 0.02 3.13 Dirt Roads 3.88 0.40 1.55 Dirt Roads 1.09 0.40 0.43 Buildings 0.15 0.90 0.14 Buildings 0.15 0.90 0.14 Paved Areas - 1.00 - Paved Areas - 1.00 - Totals 463.97 acres 10.89 Totals 157.98 acres 3.70 0.7250 mi2 0.2468 mi2 Weighted Impervious Percentage = 2.35% Weighted Impervious Percentage = 2.35% Basin#5 Impervious Percentage Basin#6 Impervious Percentage Decimal Decimal Land Use Acres Impervious A*PI Land Use Acres Impervious A* PI Ag Land 50.54 0.02 1.01 Ag Land 10.15 0.02 0.20 Dirt Roads - 0.40 - Dirt Roads - 0.40 - Buildings - 0.90 - Buildings 13.08 0.90 11.77 Paved Areas - 1.00 - Paved Areas - 1.00 - Totals 50.54 acres 1.01 Totals 23.23 acres 11.97 0.0790 mi2 0.0363 mi2 Weighted Impervious Percentage = 2.00% Weighted Impervious Percentage= 51.54% Basin #7 Impervious Percentage Basin#8 Impervious Percentage Decimal Decimal Land Use Acres Impervious A* PI Land Use Acres Impervious A* PI Ag Land 10.0000 0.02 0.20 Ag Land 87.63 0.02 1.75 Dirt Roads - 0.40 - Dirt Roads 1.63 0.40 0.65 Buildings - 0.90 - Buildings 0.10 0.90 0.09 Paved Areas - 1.00 - Paved Areas - 1.00 - Totals 10.00 acres 0.20 Totals 89.36 acres 2.49 , .. 0.0156 mi2 0.1396 mil Weighted Impervious Percentage = 2.00% Weighted Impervious Percentage = 2.79% AgPro Environmental Services, LLC 3 of 4 Eric W. Dunker, P.E. • Highland Dairy-Future Drainage CUHP Input Data Basin Basin Distance Weighted Percent Depression Storage Infiltration Horton's Basin Area Length to Basin Impervious min (inches) Hydrologic Rates(in/hr) Decay No. g 4( ) Soil Group (mitesz) (miles) Centroid Slope (%) - Pervious Impervious Initial Final Coeffecient 1 0.1550 0.6365 0.2731 0.0081 2.74% N/A 0.4 0.1 B 4.5 0.6 0.0018 .-- 2 0.5704 1.0059 0.5561 0.0062 2.22% N/A 0.4 0.1 8 4.5 0.6 0.0018 3 0.7250 0.9917 0.4967 0.0049 2.35% N/A 0.4 0.1 B 4.5 0.6 0.0018 4 0.2468 0.6041 0.3230 0.0059 2.35% N/A 0.4 0.1 B 4.5 0.6 0.0018 5 0.0790 0.3136 0.1422 0.0060 2.00% 19.2 0.4 0.1 B 4.5 0.6 0.0018 6 0.0363 0.12581 0.0524 0.010154 51.54% 17.1 0.4 0.05 B 4.5 0.6 0.0018 7 0.01563 0.13213 0.1151 0.002816 2.00% 15.2 0.4 0.1 B 4.5 0.6 0.0018 8 0.13963 1.18171 0.6625 0.005203 2.79% 44.7 0.4 0.1 70%B.30%C 3.45* 0.53* 0.0018 'Weighted Infil.Rates based on 70%of area Soil Group C and 30%Soil Group B-from Table RO-7 UDFCD Drainage Criterial Manual Vol. 1 A AgPro Environmental Services, LLC 4 of 4 Eric W. Dunker, P.E. ' Highland Dairy-Future Drainage CUHP Input 11.12.2002 2Highland Dairy Future Drainage 1100-year 100 2.78 70 1 1 5. 1 1Basin #1 .155. 6365.2731 2 .74 . 0081 .4 .1 4 .5.0018 . 6 70 1 1 5.2 2Basin #2 .57041.006.5561 2.22.0062 .4 .1 4 .5.0018 .6 70 1 1 5.3 3Bisin #3 .725. 9917.4967 2 .35. 0049 .4 .1 4.5.0018 . 6 70 1 1 5. 4 48asin #4 .2468.6041 .323 2.35.0059 .4 .1 4 .5.0018 .6 71 1 1 5.5 5Basin #5 .079.3136.1422 2. .006 19.2 .4 .1 4.5.0018 . 6 71 1 1 5. 6 6Basin #6 .0363.1258.052451.54 .0102 17 . 1 .4 .05 4.5.0018 . 6 71 1 1 5.7 7Basi.n #7 .0156.1321 .1151 2 . .0028 15.2 . 4 .1 4 .5.0018 . 6 71 1 1 5.8 8Basin #8 .13961 . 182.6625 2 .79.0052 44 .7 .4 .1 3.45.0018 .53 E AgPro Environmental Services,LLC I of 1 Eric W. Dunker,P.E. • Highland Dairy—Future Drainage CUHP Output 11.12.2002 1 U.D.F.C.D. CUHP RUNOFF ANALYSIS EXECUTED ON DATE 11/12/2002 AT TIME 15: 32 CUHPF/PC RELEASE 2A ( 32-HIT VER) SEPTEMBER 10, 1998 PRINT OPTION NUMBER SELECTED FOR THIS BASIN IS 7 Highland Dairy Future Drainage BASIN ID: 1 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #1 AREA LENGTH OF BASIN DIST TO CENTROID IMPERV. AREA SLOPE UNIT DURATION (SQMI) (MI) (MI) (PCT) (FT/FT) (MTN) 0.16 0.64 0.27 2.74 0.0081 5. 00 COEFFICIENT COEFFICIENT (REFLECTING TIME TO PEAK) (RELATED TO PEAK RATE OF RUNnFF) 0.153 0.248 THIS BASIN USES TRADITIONAL DRAINAGE PRACTICES FRACTION OF PERVIOUS FRACTION OF IMPERVIOUS AREA RECEIVING AREA DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS DRAINAGE TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM ( DEFAULT ) ( DEFAULT ) R= 0.06 D= 0.05 CALCULATED UNIT HYDROGRAPH TIME TO PEAK PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF UNIT HYDROGRAPH PEAK VOLUME OF RUNOFF (MIN) (CFC/SQMI) (CFS) (AF) 15.08 756.90 117.32 8.27 WIDTH AT 50 = 40. MIN. WIDTH AT 75 = 21. MIN. K50 =0.23 K75 =0.31 RAINFALL LOSSES INPUT W/ BASIN DATA MAX. PERVIOUS RET. =0.40 IN. MAX. IMPERVIOUS RET. =0.10 IN. INFILTRATION = 4.50 IN./HR. DECAY = 0.00180/SECOND FNINFL = 0.60 1N./HR. TIME UNIT TIME UNIT TIME UNIT HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH I 0. 0. 50. 53. 100. 18. I 5. 45. 55. 48. 105. 16. I 10. 100. 60. 43. 110. 14 . I 15. 117. 65. 38. 115. 13. 20. 108. 70. 34. 120. 12. 25. 91. 75. 31. 125. 10. 30. 87. 80. 28. 130. 9. 35. 78. 85. 25. 135. 8. 40. 69. 90. 22. 140. 7. 45. 60. 95. 20. 145. 0. 1 BASIN ID: 1 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #1 **** STORM NO. = 1 **** DATE OR RETURN PERIOD = 100-year INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH (MIN. ) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) (MIN. ) (IN) PRECIP (CGS) 0. 0.00 0.000 0. 95. 0.03 0.000 68. 5. 0.03 0.300 0. 100. 0.03 0.000 60. "� 10. 0.08 0.000 0. 105. 0.03 0.000 54. 15. 0.13 0.000 0. 110. 0.03 0.000 48. AgPro Environmental Services,LLC'. 1 of 12 Eric W. Dunker.P.E. ' Highland Dairy--Future Drainage CUHP Output 11.12.2002 20. 0.22 0.000 0. 115. 0.03 0.000 43. I `"-* 25. 0.39 0.051 2. 120. 0.03 0.000 39. I 30. 0.69 0.629 34. 125. 0.00 0.000 35. I 35. 0.39 0.331 84. 130. 0.00 0.000 31. I 40. 0.22 0. 168 120. 135. 0.00 0.000 22. I 45. 0.17 0.120 133. 140. 0.00 0.000 25. I 50. 0. 14 0.088 133. 145. 0.00 0.000 29. I 55. 0. 11 0.061 133. 150. 0.00 0.000 20. I 60. 0.11 0.062 129. 155. 0.00 0.000 18. I 65. 0.11 0.062 123. 160. 0.00 0.000 16. I 70. 0.06 0. 007 115. 165. 0.00 0.000 14 . I 75. 0.06 0.007 105. 170. 0.00 0.000 9. I 80. 0.03 0.000 94. 175. 0.00 0.000 5. I 85. 0.03 0.000 84. 180. 0.00 0.000 4 . I 90. 0.03 0.000 76. 185. 0.00 0.000 3. I * LESS ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME ** INCLUDES ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME RELEASE FLOW TOTAL PRECIP. = 3.21 (1-HOUR RAIN = 2.78) EXCESS PRECIP. = 1.587 INCHES VOLUME OF EXCESS PRECIP = 13.12 ACRE-FEET PEAK Q = 133. CFS TIME OF PEAK = 45. MIN. INFILT.= 4.50 IN/HR DECAY =0.00180 FNINF = 0.60 IN/HP MAX.PERV.RET.=0.40 IN. MAX.IMP.RET.=0.10 IN. 1 U.D.F.C.D. CUHP RUNOFF ANALYSIS EXECUTED ON DATE 11/12/2002 AT TIME 15: 32 CUHPF/PC RELEASE 2A (32-BIT VER) SEPTEMBER 10, 1998 PRINT OPTION NUMBER SELECTED FOR THIS BASIN IS 7 ..."-- Highland Dairy Future Drainage BASIN ID: 2 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #2 AREA LENGTH OF BASIN DIST TO CENTROID IMPERV. AREA SLOPE UNIT DURATION (SQMI) (MI) (MI) (PCT) (FT/FT) (MINI 0.57 1.01 0.56 2.22 0.0062 5.00 COEFFICIENT COEFFICIENT (REFLECTING TIME TO PEAK) (RELATED TO PEAK PATE OF RUNOFF) 0. 155 0.305 THIS BASIN USES TRADITIONAL DRAINAGE PRACTICES FRACTION OF PERVIOUS FRACTION OF IMPERVIOUS AREA RECEIVING AREA DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS DRAINAGE TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM ( DEFAULT ) ( DEFAULT ) R= 0.06 D= 0.04 CALCULATED UNIT HYDROGRAPH TIME TO PEAK PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF UNIT HYDROGRAPH PEAK VOLUME OF RUNOFF (MIN) (CFS/SQMI) (CFS) (AF) 26.30 49:'.47 280.90 30.42 WIDTH AT 50 = 61. MIN. WIDTH AT 75 = 32. MIN. K50 =0.26 F75 ,=0.35 RAINFALL LOSSES INPUT W/ BASIN DATA MAX. PERVIOUS RET. =0.40 IN. MAX. IMPERVIOUS RET. =0.10 1N. AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 2 of 12 Eric W.Dunker, P.E. Highland Dairy—Future Drainage CUHP Output 11.12.2002 INFILTRATION = 4.50 IN./HR. DECAY = 0.00180/SECOND FNINFL - 0.60 IN./UP. .^ TIME UNIT TIME UNIT TIME UNIT HYDROGRAPH I HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH 0. 0. I 90. 105. 180. 25. 5. 46. I 95. 97. 185. 23. 10. 131. I 100. 89. 190. 21. 15. 209. 105. 82. 195. 20. 20. 261. I 110. 76. 200. 18. 25. 280. 115. 70. 205. 17. 30. 276. I 120. 65. 210. 15. 35. 257. I 125. 60. 215. 14 . 40. 234. I 130. 55. 220. 13. 45. 215. I 135. 51. 225. 12. 50. 202. I 140. 47. 230. 11. 55. 187. I 145. 44. 235. 10. 60. 173. 150. 40. 240. 10. 65. 159. 155. 37. 245. 9. 70. 145. I 160. 34. 250. 8. 75. 133. 165. 32. 255. 8. 80. 123. 170. 29. 260. 0. 85. 113. 175. 27. 0. 0. 1 BASIN ID: 2 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #2 **** STORM NO. = 1 *** * DATE OR RETURN PERIOD = 100-year INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH (MIN.) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) (MIN.) (IN) PRECIP (CPS) 0. 0.00 0.000 0. 155. 0.00 0.000 101. 5. 0.03 0.000 0. 160. 0.00 0.000 93. 10. 0.08 0.000 0. 165. 0.00 0.000 86. 15. 0.13 0.000 0. 170. 0.00 0.000 80. 20. 0.22 0.000 0. 175. 0.00 0.000 73. 25. 0.39 0.048 2. 180. 0.00 0.000 68. 30. 0.69 0.629 35. 185. 0.00 0.000 63. 35. 0.39 0. 330 108. 190. 0.00 0.000 58. 40. 0.22 0.168 195. 195. 0.00 0.000 53. 45. 0.17 0. 120 274. 200. 0.00 0.000 49. 50. 0.14 0.088 331. 205. 0.00 0.000 46. 55. 0.11 0.061 362. 210. 0.00 0.000 42. 60. 0..11 0.062 372. 215. 0.00 0.000 39. 65. 0.11 0. 062 369. 220. 0.00 0.000 36. 70. 0.06 0.006 360. 225. 0.00 0.000 33. 75. 0.06 0.007 348. 230. 0.00 0.000 31. 80. 0.03 0.000 332. 235. 0.00 0.000 28. 85. 0.03 0.000 312. 240. 0.00 0.000 26. 90. 0.03 0.000 289. 245. 0.00 0.000 24. 95. 0.03 0.000 266. 250. 0.00 0.000 22. 100. 0.03 0.000 245. 255. 0.00 0.000 21. 105. 0.03 0.000 225. 260. 0.00 0.000 19. 110. 0.03 0.000 208. 265. 0.00 0.000 18. 115. 0.03 0.000 192. 270. 0.00 0.000 16. 120. 0.03 0.000 177. 275. 0.00 0.000 15. 125. 0.00 0.000 163. 280. 0.00 0.000 13. 130. 0.00 0.000 150. 285. 0.00 0.000 u. 135. 0.00 0.000 139. 290. 0.00 0.000 5. 140. 0.00 0.000 128. 295. 0.00 0.000 4. 145. 0.00 0.000 118. 300. 0.00 0.000 ,_. 150. 0.00 0.000 109. 305. 0.00 0.000 2. "•••••* * LESS ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 3 of 12 Eric W.Dunker,P.E. • Highland Dairy—Future Drainage CUHP Output 11.12.2002 ** INCLUDES ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME RELEASE FLOW TOTAL PRECIP. = 3.21 (1-HOUR RAIN = 2.78) EXCESS PRECIP. = 1.581 INCHES VOLUME OF EXCESS PRECIP = 48.11 ACRE-FEET PEAR Q = 372. CFS TIME OF PEAK = 60. MIN. INFILT.= 4 .50 IN/HP DECAY =0.00180 FNINF = 0.60 IN/HR MAX.PERV.RET.=0.40 IN. MAX.IMP.RET.=0.10 IN. 1 U.D.F.C.D. CUHP RUNOFF ANALYSIS EXECUTED ON DATE 11/12/2002 AT TIME 15:32 CUHPF/PC RELEASE 2A (32-BIT VER) SEPTEMBER 10, 1998 PRINT OPTION NUMBER SELECTED FOR THIS BASIN IS 7 Highland Dairy Future Drainage BASIN ID: 3 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #3 AREA LENGTH OF BASIN DIST TO CENTROID IMPERV. AREA SLOPE UNIT DURATION (SQMI) (MI) (MI) (PCT) (FT/FT) (MIN) 0.73 0.99 0.50 2.35 0.0049 5.00 COEFFICIENT COEFFICIENT (REFLECTING TIME TO PEAK) (RELATED TO PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF) 0. 154 0.315 THIS BASIN USES TRADITIONAL DRAINAGE PRACTICES FRACTION OF PERVIOUS FRACTION OF IMPERVIOUS AREA RECEIVING AREA DIRECTLY CONNECTED `" IMPERVIOUS DRAINAGE TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM ( DEFAULT ) ( DEFAULT ) R= 0.06 D= 0.05 CALCULATED UNIT HYDROGRAPH TIME TO PEAK PEAK PATE OF RUNOFF UNIT HYDROGRAPH PEAK VOLUME OF RUNOFF (MIN) (CF /SQMI) (CFS) (AF) 26.12 512.84 371.81 38.67 WIDTH AT 50 = 58. MIN. WIDTH AT 75 = 30. MIN. K50 =0.27 K75 =0.36 RAINFALL LOSSES INPUT W/ BASIN DATA MAX. PERVIOUS RET. =0.40 IN. MAX. IMPERVIOUS RET. =0.10 IN. INFILTRATION = 4.50 IN./HR. DECAY = 0.00180/SECOND FNINFL = 0.60 IN./HR. TIME UNIT TIME UNIT TIME UNIT HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH I 0. 0. 90. 130. 180. 29. I 5. 62. I 95. 120. 185. 26. 10. 175. I 100. 110. 190. 24. I 15. 278. I 105. 101. 195. 22. ( 20. 347. I 110. 93. 200. 20. 25. 371. I 115. 86. 205. 19. I 30. 364. I 120. 79. 210. 17. I 35. 338. 125. 72. 215. 16. I 40. 306. I 130. 67. 220. 15. I 45. 280. I 135. 61. 225. 13. I 50. 261. I 140. 56. 230. 12. I 55. 241. I 145. 52. 235. 11. I 60. 221. I 150. 47. 240. 10. I AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 4 of 12 Eric W.Dunker,P.E. Highland Dairy—Future Drainage CUHP Output 11.12.2002 65. 202. I 155. 44. I 245. 10. I � 70. 183. I ] 60. 40. I 250. 9. I 75. 168. I 165. 37. I 255. 8. I 80. 154. I 170. 34. I 260. 7. I 85. 142. I 175. 31. I 265. 0. I 1 BASIN ID: 3 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #3 **** STORM NO. = 1 **** DATE OR RETURN PERIOD = 100-year INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH (MIN. ) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) (MIN.) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) 0. 0.00 0.000 0. 155. 0.00 0.000 123. 5. 0.03 0.000 0. 160. 0.00 0.000 113. 10. 0.08 0.000 0. 165. 0.00 0.000 104 . 15. 0. 13 0.000 0. 170. 0.00 0.000 95. 20. 0.22 0.000 0. 175. 0.00 0.000 88. 25. 0.39 0.049 3. 180. 0.00 0.000 81. 30. 0.69 0.629 47. 185. 0.00 0.000 74. 35. 0.39 0.330 144. 190. 0.00 0.000 68. 40. 0.22 0.168 260. 195. 0.00 0.000 63. 45. 0.17 0.120 365. 200. 0.00 0.000 58. 50. 0.14 0.008 439. 205. 0.00 0.000 53. 55. 0.11 0.061 479. 210. 0.00 0.000 49. 60. 0.11 0.062 491. 215. 0.00 0.000 45. 65. 0.11 0.062 486. 220. 0.00 0.000 41. 70. 0.06 0.006 473. 225. 0.00 0.000 38. 75. 0.06 0.007 456. 230. 0.00 0.000 35. 80. 0.03 0.000 432. 235. 0.00 0.000 32. 85. 0.03 0.000 403. 240. 0.00 0.000 29. 90. 0.03 0.000 372. 245. 0.00 0.000 27. 95. 0.03 0.000 341. 250. 0.00 0.000 25. 100. 0.03 0.300 312. 255. 0.00 0.000 23. 105. 0.03 0.000 286. 260. 0.00 0.000 21. 110. 0.03 0.000 263. 265. 0.00 0.000 19. 115. 0.03 0.000 241. 270. 0.00 0.000 18. 120. 0.03 0.000 222. 275. 0.00 0.000 16. 125. 0.00 0.000 204. 280. 0.00 0.000 15. 130. 0.00 0.000 187. 285. 0.00 0.000 13. 135. 0.00 0.000 172. 290. 0.00 0.000 8. 140. 0.00 0.000 158. 295. 0.00 0.000 5. 145. 0.00 0.000 145. 300. 0.00 0.000 4. 150. 0.00 0.000 133. 305. 0.00 0.000 2. * LESS ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME ** INCLUDES ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME RELEASE FLOW TOTAL PRECIP. = 3.21 (1-HOUR RAIN = 2.78) EXCESS PRECIP. = 1.583 INCHES VOLUME OF EXCESS PRECIP = 61.20 ACRE-FEET PEAK Q = 491. CFS TIME OF PEAK = 60. MIN. INFILT.= 4 .50 IN/HB DECAY =0.00180 FNINF = 0.60 IN/HR MAX.PERV.RET.=0. 40 IN. MAX.IMP.RET.=0.10 IN. 1 U.D.F.C.D. CUHP RUNOFF ANALYSIS EXECUTED ON DATE 11/12/2002 AT TIME 15:32 CUHPF/PC RELEASE 2A (32-BIT VER) SEPTEMBER 10, 1998 PRINT OPTION NUMBER SELECTED FOR THIS BASIN IS 7 Highland Dairy Future Drainage AgPro Environmental Services,LLC S of 12 Eric W. Dunker. P.E. • Highland Dairy—Future Drainage CUHP Output 11.12/002 BASIN ID: 4 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin M4 AREA LENGTH OF BASIN DIST TO CENTROID IMPERV. AREA SLOPE UNIT DURATION (SQMI) (MI) (MI) (PCT) (FT/FT) (MI?]) 0.25 0.60 0.32 2.35 0.0059 5.00 COEFFICIENT COEFFICIENT (REFLECTING TIME TO PEAK) (RELATED TO PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF) 0. 154 0.268 THIS BASIN USES TRADITIONAL DRAINAGE PRACTICES FRACTION OF PERVIOUS FRACTION OF IMPERVIOUS AREA RECEIVING AREA DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS DRAINAGE TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM ( DEFAULT ) ( DEFAULT ) R= 0.06 D= 0.05 CALCULATED UNIT HYDROGRAPH TIME TO PEAK PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF UNIT HYDROGRAPH PEAK VOLUME OF RUNOFF (MIN) (CFS/SQMI) (CFS) (AF) 16.98 711.51 175.60 13. 16 WIDTH AT 50 = 42. MIN. WIDTH AT 75 = 22. MIN. K50 =0.24 K75 =0.33 RAINFALL LOSSES INPUT W/ BASIN DATA MAX. PERVIOUS RET. =0.40 IN. MAX. IMPERVIOUS RET. =0.10 IN. INFILTRATION = 4.50 IN./HR. DECAY = 0.00180/SECOND FNINFL = 0.60 IN./HP. TIME UNIT TIME UNIT TIME UNIT HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH 0. 0. 60. 69. 120. 19. 5. 57. 65. 62. 125. 17. 10. 135. I 70. 56. 130. 15. 15. 173. I 75. 50. 135. 13. 20. 171. I 80. 45. 140. 12. 25. 150. 85. 40. 145. 11. 30. 133. 90. 36. 150. 10. 35. 123. I 95. 32. 155. 9. 40. 111. I 100. 29. 160. 8. 45. 98. I 105. 26. 165. U. 50. 86. 110. 23. 0. 0. 55. 77. I 115. 21. 0. 0. 1 BASIN ID: 4 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin M4 **** STORM NO. = 1 ***" DATE OR RETURN PERIOD = 100-year INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH (MIN.) (IN) PRRCIP (CFS) (MIN.) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) 0. 0.00 0.000 0. 105. 0.03 0.000 87. 5. 0.03 0.000 0. 110. 0.03 0.000 78. 10. 0.08 0.000 0. 115. 0.03 0.000 70. 15. 0.13 0.000 0. 120. 0.03 0.000 63. 20. 0.22 0.000 0. 125. 0.00 0.000 56. 25. 0.39 0.049 3. 130. 0.00 0.000 50. 30. 0.69 0.629 42. 135. 0.00 0.000 45. 35. 0.39 0.330 112. 140. 0.00 0.000 40. '� 40. 0.22 0.168 171. 145. 0.00 0.000 36. 45. 0.17 0.120 201. 150. 0.00 0.000 33. AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 6 of 12 Eric W. Dunker,P.E. Highland Dairy-Future Drainage CUHP Output 1112.2002 50. 0.14 0.088 207. 155. 0.00 0.000 29. 55. 0.11 0.061. 204. 160. 0.00 0.000 26. 60. 0.11 0.062 200. 165. 0.00 0.000 23. 65. 0. 11 0.062 193. 170. 0.00 0.000 21. 70. 0.06 0.006 182. 175. 0.00 0.000 19. 75. 0.06 0. 007 167. 180. 0.00 0.000 17. 80. 0.03 0.000 151. 185. 0.00 0.000 15. 85. 0.03 0.000 135. 190. 0.00 0.000 9. 90. 0.03 0.000 121. 195. 0.00 0.000 6. 95. 0.03 0.000 109. 200. 0.00 0.000 4. 100. 0.03 0.000 97. 205. 0.00 0.000 3. * LESS ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME ** INCLUDES ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME RELEASE FLOW TOTAL PRECIP. = 3.21 (1-HOUR RAIN = 2.78) EXCESS PRECIP. = 1.583 INCHES VOLUME OF EXCESS PRECIP = 20.83 ACRE-FEET PEAK Q = 207. CFS TIME OF PEAK = 50. MIN. INFILT.= 4.50 IN/HR DECAY =0.00180 FNINF = 0.60 IN/HR MAX.PERV.RET.=0.40 IN. MAX.IMP.RET.=0.10 IN. 1 U.D.F.C.D. CUHP RUNOFF ANALYSIS EXECUTED ON DATE 11/12/2002 AT TIME 15:32 CUHPF/PC RELEASE 2A (32-BIT VER) SEPTEMBER 10, 1998 PRINT OPTION NUMBER SELECTED FOR THIS BASIN IS 7 Highland Dairy Future Drainage BASIN ID: 5 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #5 AREA LENGTH OF BASIN DIST TO CENTROID IMPERV. AREA SLOPE UNIT DURATION (SQMI) (MI) (MI) (PCT) (FT/ET) (MIN) 0.08 0.31 0.14 2.00 0.0060 5.00 COEFFICIENT COEFFICIENT (REFLECTING TIME TO PEAK) (RELATED TO PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF) 0.156 0.228 THIS BASIN USES TRADITIONAL DRAINAGE PRACTICES FRACTION OF PERVIOUS FRACTION OF IMPERVIOUS AREA RECEIVING AREA DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS DRAINAGE TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM ( DEFAULT ) ( DEFAULT ) R= 0.06 D= 0.04 CALCULATED UNIT HYDROGRAPH TIME TO PEAK TIME OF CONCENTRATION PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF UNIT HYDROGRAPH PEAK VOLUME OF RUNOFF (MIN) (MIN) (CFS/SQMI) (CFS) (AF) 7.50 19.20 1752.06 138.41 4.21 *** NOTE : THE TIME TO PEAK IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE TIME OF CONCENTRATION PROVIDED BY THE USER, REPLACING THE ONE COMPUTED BY CUHPF (TP= 9.66) WIDTH AT 50 = 17. MIN. WIDTH AT 75 = 9. MIN. K50 =0.26 K75 =0.36 RAINFALL LOSSES INPUT W/ BASIN DATA MAX. PERVIOUS RET. =0.40 IN. MAX. IMPERVIOUS RET. =0.10 IN. INFILTRATION = 4.50 IN./HR. DECAY = 0.00180/SECOND FNINFL = 0.60 IN./HR. .•••'-‘ AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 7 of 12 Eric W.Dunker,P.E. Highland Dairy—Future Drainage CUHP Output 11.12.2002 TIME UNIT TIME UNIT TIME UNIT HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH 0. 0. 25. 53. 50. 14. 5. 118. 30. 41. 55. 11. 10. 126. 35. 32. 60. 8. 15. 95. 40. 24 . 65. 0. 20. 70. 45. 19. 0. 0. 1 BASIN ID: 5 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #5 **** STORM NO. = 1 **** DATE OR RETURN PERIOD = 100-year INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH (MIN. ) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) (MIN.) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) 0. 0.00 0.000 0. I 60. 0.11 0.061 75. 5. 0.03 0.000 0. I 65. 0.11 0.062 67. 10. 0.08 0.000 0. 70. 0.06 0.006 54. 15. 0.13 0.000 0. 75. 0.06 0.006 42. 20. 0.22 0.000 0. I 80. 0.03 0.000 32. 25. 0.39 0.047 6. I 85. 0.03 0.000 24. 30. 0.69 0.629 80. I 90. 0.03 0.000 15. 35. 0.39 0.330 123. I 95. 0.03 0.000 9. 40. 0.22 0.168 125. 100. 0.03 0.000 6. 45. 0.17 0.120 113. 105. 0.03 0.000 4. 50. 0.14 0.088 100. I 110. 0.03 0.000 2. 55. 0.11 0.061 86. I 115. 0.03 0.000 1. * LESS ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME ** INCLUDES ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME RELEASE FLOW i". TOTAL PRECIP. _ 3.21 (1-HOUR RAIN = 2.78) EXCESS PRECIP. = 1.579 INCHES VOLUME OF EXCESS PRECIP = 6.65 ACRE-FEET PEAK Q = 125. CFS TIME OF PEAK = 40. MIN. INFILT.= 4 .50 IN/HP. DECAY =0.00180 FNINF = 0.60 IN/HR MAX.PERV.RET.=0.40 IN. MAX.IMP.RET.=0.10 IN. RATIONAL FORMULA C -- 0.49 I = 5.6 INCHES/HOUR A = 50.6 ACRES Q = 138. CFS 1 U.D.F.C.D. CUHP RUNOFF ANALYSIS EXECUTED ON DATE 11/12/2002 AT TIME 15:32 CUHPF/PC RELEASE 2A (32-BIT VER) SEPTEMBER 10, 1998 PRINT OPTION NUMBER SELECTED FOR THIS BASIN IS 7 Highland Dairy Future Drainage BASIN ID: 6 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #6 AREA LENGTH OF BASIN DTST TO CENTROID IMPERV. AREA SLOPE UNIT DURATION (SQMI) (MI) (MI) (PCT) (FT/FT) (MIN) 0.04 0.13 0.05 51.54 0.0102 5.00 COEFFICIENT COEFFICIENT (REFLECTING TIME TO PEAK) (RELATED TO PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF) 0.087 0.387 n THIS BASIN USES TRADITIONAL DRAINAGE PRACTICES AgPro Environmental Services, LLC 8 of 12 Eric W. Dunker,P.E. Highland Dairy—Future Drainage CUHP Output 1112/002 FRACTION OF PERVIOUS FRACTION OF IMPERVIOUS �. AREA RECEIVING AREA DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS DRAINAGE TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM ( DEFAULT ) ( DEFAULT ) R= 0.23 D= 0.86 CALCULATED UNIT HYDROGRAPH TIME TO PEAK TIME OF CONCENTRATION PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF UNIT HYDROGRAPH PEAK VOLUME OF RUNOFF (MIN) (MIN) (CFS/SQMI) (CFS) (AF) 7.86 17.10 2774.35 100.71 1.94 *** NOTE : THE TIME TO PEAK IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE TIME OF CONCENTRATION PROVIDED BY THE USER, REPLACING THE ONE COMPUTED BY CUHPF (TP= 3.92) WIDTH AT 50 = 11. MIN. WIDTH AT 75 = 6. MIN. K50 =0.35 K75 =0.45 RAINFALL LOSSES INPUT W/ BASIN DATA MAX. PERVIOUS RET. =0.40 IN. MAX. IMPERVIOUS RET. =0.05 IN. INFILTRATION = 4.50 IN./HR. DECAY = 0.00180/SECOND FNINFL = 0.60 IN./HR. TIME UNIT I TIME UNIT I TIME UNIT I HYDROGRAPH I HYDROGRAPH I HYDROGRAPH I 0. 0. I 15. 50. I 30. 14. I 5. 69. I 20. 32. I 35. 9. I 10. 88. I 25. 21. I 40. 0. I 1 BASIN ID: 6 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #6 **** STORM NO. = 1 **** DATE OR RETURN PERIOD = 100-yeas INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH (MIN. ) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) (MIN. ) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) 0. 0.00 0.000 0. 65. 0.11 0.084 29. 5. 0.03 0.000 0. 70. 0.06 0.030 22. 10. 0.08 0.026 2. 75. 0.06 0.030 16. 15. 0.13 0.054 6. 80. 0.03 0.014 12. 20. 0.22 0.093 12. 85. 0.03 0.014 8. 25. 0.39 0.231 28. 90. 0.03 0.014 6. 30. 0.69 0.645 71. 95. 0.03 0.014 5. 35. 0.39 0.350 97. 100. 0.03 0.014 4. 40. 0.22 0. 190 86. 105. 0.03 0.014 4. 45. 0.17 0.142 71. 110. 0.03 0.014 4. 50. 0.14 0.110 58. 115. 0.03 0.014 4. 55. 0.11 0.084 47. 120. 0.03 0.014 4. 60. 0.11 0.084 38. 125. 0.00 0.000 3. * LESS ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME ** INCLUDES ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME RELEASE FLOW TOTAL PRECIP. = 3.21 (1-HOUR RAIN = 2.78) EXCESS PRECIP. = 2.282 INCHES VOLUME OF EXCESS FOECIP = 4.42 ACRE-FEET PEAK Q = 97. CFS TIME OF PEAK = 35. MIN. INFILT.= 4 .50 IN/HR DECAY =0.00180 FNINF = 0.60 IN/HR MAX.PERV.RET.=0.40 IN. MAX.IMP.RET.=0.05 IN. RATIONAL FORMULA C = 0.71 I = 5.9 INCHES/HOUR A = 23.2 ACRES Q = 97. CFS AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 9 of 12 Eric W. Dunker, P.E. Highland Dairy—Future Drainage CUHP Output 11.12.2002 1 U.D.F.C.D. CUHP RUNOFF ANALYSIS EXECUTED ON DATE 11/12/2002 AT TIME 15:32 CUHPF/PC RELEASE 2A (32-BIT VER) SEPTEMBER 10, 1998 PRINT OPTION NUMBER SELECTED FOR THIS BASIN IS 7 Highland Dairy Future Drainage BASIN ID: 7 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #7 AREA LENGTH OF BASIN DIST TO CENTROID IMPERV. AREA SLOPE UNIT DURATION (SQMI) (MI) (MI) (PCT) (FT/FT) (MIN) 0.02 0.13 0.12 2.00 0.0028 5.00 COEFFICIENT COEFFICIENT (REFLECTING TIME TO PEAK) (RELATED TO PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF) 0.156 0.179 THIS BASIN USES TRADITIONAL DRAINAGE PRACTICES FRACTION OF PERVIOUS FRACTION OF IMPERVIOUS AREA RECEIVING AREA DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS DRAINAGE TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM ( DEFAULT ) ( DEFAULT ) R= 0.06 D= 0.04 CALCULATED UNIT HYDROGRAPH TIME TO PEAK TIME OF CONCENTRATION PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF UNIT HYDROGRAPH PEAK VOLUME OF RUNOFF (MIN) (MIN) (CFS/SQMI) (CFS) (AF) 7.50 15.20 1373.64 21.43 0.83 *** NOTE : THE TIME TO PEAK IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE TIME OF CONCENTRATION PROVIDED BY THE USER, REPLACING THE ONE COMPUTED BY CUHPF (TP= 7.63) WIDTH AT 50 = 22. MIN. WIDTH AT 75 = 11. MIN. K50 =0.21 K75 =0.28 RAINFALL LOSSES INPUT W/ BASIN DATA MAX. PERVIOUS RET. =0.40 IN. MAX. IMPERVIOUS RET. =0.10 IN. INFILTRATION = 4 .50 IN. /HR. DECAY = 0.00180/SECOND FNINFL = 0.60 IN./HR. TIME UNIT TIME UNIT TIME UNIT I HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH I 0. 0. I 25. 11. 50. 9. I 5. 18. 30. 10. 55. 8. I 10. 20. 35. 10. 60. 8. I 15. 15. 40. 9. 65. 8. I 20. 14. I 45. 9. 70. 0. I 1 BASIN ID: 7 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #7 **** STORM NO. = 1 **** DATE OR RETURN PERIOD = 100-year INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH (MIN. ) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) (MIN. ) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) 0. 0.00 0.000 0. 60. 0.11 0.061 17. 5. 0.03 0.000 0. 65. 0.11 0.062 17. 10. 0.08 0.000 0. 70. 0.06 0.006 16. 15. 0.13 0.000 0. 75. 0.06 0.006 15. 20. 0.22 0.000 0. 80. 0.03 0.000 14. 25. 0.39 0.047 1. 85. 0.03 0.000 14. AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 10 of 12 Eric W. Dunker,P.E. Highland Dairy—Future Drainage CUHP Output 11.12.2002 30. 0.69 0. 629 12. I 90. 0.03 0.000 13. I r. 35. 0.39 0. 330 19. 95. 0.03 0.000 8. I 40. 0.22 0.168 20. I 100. 0.03 0.000 5. I 45. 0.17 0.120 20. I 105. 0.03 0.000 3. I 50. 0.14 0.088 18. I 110. 0.03 0.000 2. I 55. 0.11 0.061 17. 115. 0.03 0.000 2. I * LESS ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME ** INCLUDES ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME RELEASE FLOW TOTAL PRECIP. _ 3.21 (1-HOUR RAIN = 2.78) EXCESS PRECIP. = 1.579 INCHES VOLUME OF EXCESS PRECIP = 1.31 ACRE-FEET PEAK Q = 20. CFS TIME OF PEAK = 40. MIN. INFILT.= 4.50 IN/HR DECAY =0.00180 FNINF = 0.60 IN/HR MAX.PERV.RET.=0.40 IN. MAX.IMP.RET.=0.10 IN. RATIONAL FORMULA C = 0.49 T - 6.3 INCHES/HOUR A = 10.0 ACRES Q == 31. CFS 1 U.D.F.C.D. CUHP RUNOFF ANALYSIS EXECUTED ON DATE 11/12/2002 AT TIME 15:32 CUHPF/PC RELEASE 2A (32-BIT VER) SEPTEMBER 10, 1998 PRINT OPTION NUMBER SELECTED FOR THIS BASIN IS 7 Highland Dairy Future Drainage BASIN ID: 8 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #8 AREA LENGTH OF BASIN DIST TO CENTROID IMPERV. AREA SLOPE UNIT DURATION (SQMI) (MI) (MI) (PCT) (FT/FT) (MIN) 0.14 1.18 0.66 2.79 0.0052 5.00 COEFFICIENT COEFFICIENT (REFLECTING TIME TO PEAK) (RELATED TO PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF) 0. 153 0.244 THIS BASIN USES TRADITIONAL DRAINAGE PRACTICES FRACTION OF PERVIOUS FRACTION OF IMPERVIOUS AREA RECEIVING AREA DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS DRAINAGE TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM ( DEFAULT ) ( DEFAULT ) R= 0.06 D= 0.06 CALCULATED UNIT HYDROGRAPH TIME TO PEAK TIME OF CONCENTRATION PEAK RATE OF RUNOFF UNIT HYDROGRAPH PEAK VOLUME OF RUNOFF (MIN) (MIN) (CFS/SQMI) (CFS) (AF) 10.80 44 .70 1127.97 157.46 7.45 *** NOTE : THE TIME TO PEAK IS CALCULATED BASED ON THE TIME OF CONCENTRATION PROVIDED BY THE USER, REPLACING THE ONE COMPUTED BY CUHPF (TP= 31.28) WIDTH AT 50 = 27. MIN. WIDTH AT 75 = 14. MIN. K50 =0.24 K75 =0.33 RAINFALL LOSSES INPUT W/ BASIN DATA n MAX. PERVIOUS RET. =0.40 IN. MAX. IMPERVIOUS RET. =0.10 IN. INFILTRATION = 3.45 IN./HR. DECAY = 0.00180/SECOND FNINFL = 0.53 IN./HR. AgPro Environmental Services,LLC II of 12 Eric W.Dunker,P.E. Highland Dairy—Future Drainage CUHP Output 11.12.2002 '"'.. TIME UNIT I TIME UNIT TIME UNIT HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH HYDROGRAPH 0. 0. I 40. 58. 80. 15. 5. 95. I 45. 49. 85. 13. 10. 157. I 50. 41. 90. 11. 15. 140. I 55. 35. 95. 9. 20. 118. 60. 29. 100. 8. 25. 100. I 65. 25. 105. 0. 30. 82. I 70. 21. 0. 0. 35. 69. I 75. 18. 0. 0. 1 BASIN ID: 8 -- BASIN COMMENT: Basin #8 **** STORM NO. = 1 **** DATE OR RETURN PERIOD = 100-year INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** INCREMENT TOTAL* STORM** TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH TIME RAINFALL EXCESS HYDROGRAPH (MIN. ) (IN) PRECIP (CFS) (MIN.) (IN) PRECIP (CPS) 0. 0.00 0.000 0. 80. 0.03 0.000 86. 5. 0.03 0.000 0. 85. 0.03 0.000 72. 10. 0.08 0.000 0. 90. 0.03 0.000 61. 15. 0.13 0.000 0. 95. 0.03 0.000 51. 20. 0.22 0.000 0. 100. 0.03 0.000 43. 25. 0.39 0.102 10. 105. 0.03 0.000 36. 30. 0.69 0.639 77. 110. 0.03 0.000 31. 35. 0.39 0.339 146. 115. 0.03 0.000 26. 40. 0.22 0.175 171. 120. 0.03 0.000 22. 45. 0.17 0.127 173. 125. 0.00 0.000 18. 50. 0.14 0.094 166. 130. 0.00 0.000 11. 55. 0.11 0.067 153. 135. 0.00 0.000 7. n 60. 0.11 0.068 140. 140. 0.00 0.000 5. 65. 0.11 0.068 130. 145. 0.00 0.000 3. 70. 0.06 0.012 116. 150. 0.00 0.000 2. 75. 0.06 0.012 100. 155. 0.00 0.000 1. * LESS ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME ** INCLUDES ANY WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME RELEASE FLOW TOTAL PRECIP. = 3.21 (1-HOUR RAIN = 2.78) EXCESS PRECIP. = 1.707 INCHES VOLUME OF EXCESS PRECIP = 12.71 ACRE-FEET PEAK Q = 173. CFS TIME OF PEAK = 45. MIN. INFILT.= 3.45 IN/HR DECAY =0.00180 FNINF = 0.53 IN/HR MAX.PERV.RET.=0.40 IN. MAX.IMP.RET.=0.10 IN. RATIONAL FORMULA C = 0.53 I = 3.4 INCHES/HOUR A = 89.3 ACRES Q = 161. CFS AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 12 of 12 Eric W.Dunker,P.E. Highland Dairy—Future Drainage SWM Input 11.12.2002 2 1 1 2 3 4 WATERSHED 1 Highland Dairy Future Drainage 60 1 0 5.0 1 1 12 2 13 3 14 4 15 5 16 6 21 7 18 8 18 0 12 13 1 100. 5311. 0.00615 100 . 100. 0.2 4 . 0 13 14 1 100. 5236. 0.00494 100. 100. 0.2 4 . 0 14 15 1 20. 3189. 0.00592 100 . 100. 0.2 4 . 0 15 16 1 10. 625. 0.0033 0.001 0.001 0.02 4 . 0 16 22 1 1. 2717 . 0.0035 12 . 12. 0.044 4 . 0 17 19 1 1. 1663. 0.004 12 . 12. 0.044 4 . 0 18 19 1 50. 365. 0.004 100. 100. 0.2 4 . 0 19 20 3 1 . 0.004 12 . 12 . 0. 044 4 . 0 20 0 1 1. 147. 0.004 12. 12. 0.044 4 . 0 21 22 2 1 .5 1200. 0.0025 0.0125 1.5 0 22 17 3 1. 1 . 0.004 12 . 12. 0.044 4 . 7 14 15 16 21 22 19 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 14 15 16 21 22 19 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENDPROGRAM r^'" AgPro Environmental Services, LLC I of I Erie W. Dunker,P.E. Highland Dairy—Future Drainage SWM Output 11.12.2002 URBAN DRAINAGE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT MODEL - 32 BIT VERSION 1996 i"6 REVISED BY UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT DENVER *** ENTRY MADE TO RUNOFF MGDEL *** Highland Dairy Future Drainage ONUMBER OF TIME STEPS 60 0INTEGRATION TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES) , 5.00 25.0 PERCENT OF IMPERVIOUS AREA HAS ZERO DETENTION DEPTH 1 Highland Dairy Future Drainage HYDROGRAPHS FROM CUHPF MODEL ARE LISTED FOR THE FOLLOWING 8 SUBCATCHMENTS TIME(HR/MIN) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 5. 0. 0. O. 0. 0. 0. O. O. o lo. 0. 0. O. 0. 0. 2. 0. 0. 0 15. 0. O. 0. 0. 0. 6. 0. 0. 0 20. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 12. 0. 0. 0 25. 2. 3. 3. 6. 28. 1 . 10. 0 30. 34. 35. 47. 42. 80. 71. 12. 77. 0 35. 84. 108. 144. 112. 123. 97. 19. 146. 0 40. 120. 195. 260. 171. 125. 86. 20. 171. i^ 0 45. 133. 274 . 365. 201. 113. 71. 20. 173. 0 50. 133. 3+1. 439. 207. 100. 58. 18. 166. 0 55. 133. 362. 479. 204. 86. 47. 17. 153. 1 0. 129. 232. 491 . 200. 75. 38. 17. 140. 1 5. 123. 369. 486. 193. 67. 29. 17. 130. 1 10. 115. 30. 473. 182. 54. 22. 16. 116. 1 15. 105. 341]. 456. 167. 42. 16. 15. 100. 1 20. 94. 332. 432. 151. 32. 12. 14. 86. 1 25. 84. 312. 403. 135. 24. 8. 14. 72. 1 30. 76. 299. 372. 121. 15. 6. 13. Cl. 1 35. 68. 266. 341. 109. 9. 5. 6. 51. 1 40. 60. 245. 312. 97. 6. 4. .5. 43. 1 45. 54. 225. 286. 87. 4. 4. 36. 1 50. 48. 208. 263. 78. 2. 4. 31. 1 55. 43. 192. 241. 70. 1. 4. 26. 2 0. 39. 177. 222. 63. 0. 4 . 0. 22. 2 5. 35. 163. 204. 56. 0. 3. 0. 18. 2 10. 31. 150. 187. 50. 0. 2. 0. 11. 2 15. 26. 139. 172. 45. 0. 0. 0. 7. 2 20. 25. 128. 158. 40. 0. 0. 0. 5. 2 25. 23. 118. 145. 36. 0. 0. 0. 3. 2 30. 20. 7.09. 133. 33. 0. 0. 0. 2. 2 35. 18. 10i. 123. 29. 0. 0. 0. 1. 2 40. 16. 9]. 113. 26. 0. 0. O. 0. 2 45. 14. 86. 104. 23. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2 50. 9. ?0. 95. 21. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2 55. 5. 7?. 88. 19. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3 0. 4. 68. 81. 17. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3 5. 3. 63. 74. 15. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3 10. 2. 68. 9. 0. 0. O. 0. ,^.... 3 15. 0. _ .. 63. 6. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3 20. 0. 49. 58. 4. 0. 0. 0. O. 3 25. 0. 46. 53. 3. 0. 0. 9. 0. AgPro Environmental Services,LLC I of 5 Eric W.Dunker,P.E. • Highland Dairy-Future Drainage SWM Output 11.12.2002 3 30. 0. 42. 49. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0-5 3 35. 0. 39. 45. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3 40. 0. 36. 41. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 3 45. 0. 33. 38. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3 50. 0. 31 . 35. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 3 55. 0. 38. 32. 0. 0. 0. U. 0. 4 0. 0. 26. 29. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4 5. 0. 24. 27. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4 10. 0. 22. 25. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4 15. 0. 21. 23. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4 20. 0. 19. 21. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4 25. 0. 18. 19. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4 30. 0. 16. 18. 0. 0. 0. O. 0. 4 35. 0. 15. 16. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4 40. 0. 13. 15. 0. 0. 0. 0, 0. 4 45. 0. 8. 13. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4 50. 0. 5. 8. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 4 55. 0. 4. 5. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 5 0. 0. 2 4. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 Highland Dairy Future Drainage WIDTH INVERT SIDE SLOPES OVERBANK/SURCHARGE GUTTER GUTTER NDP NP OR DIAM LENGTH SLOPE HORIZ TO VERT MANNING DEPTH JK NO. CONNECTION (FT) (FT) (FT/FT) L R N (FT) 12 13 0 1 CHANNEL 100.0 5311. .0061 100.0 100.0 .200 4.00 0 13 14 0 1 cHANNEL 100.0 5236. .0049 100.0 100.0 .200 4.00 0 14 15 0 1 CHANNEL 20.0 3189. .0059 100.0 100.0 ..10 4.00 0 r 15 16 0 1 r'HAi4NFL 10.0 625. .0033 .0 .0 .n'!! 1.00 0 16 22 0 1 CHANNEL 1.0 2717. .003E 12.0 12.1 .n14 4.00 0 17 19 0 1 CHANNEL 1.0 1663. .0040 12.0 12.0 .0)4 4.00 0 18 19 0 1 CHANNEL 50.0 365. .0040 100.0 100.n . 04 4.00 0 19 20 0 3 .0 1. .0040 12.0 12.0 .(bl.i 4.00 0 20 0 0 1 CHANNEL 1.0 147. .0040 12.0 12.0 .014 4.00 0 21 22 0 2 PIPE 1.5 1200. .0025 .0 .0 .01 1.50 0 22 17 0 3 1.0 1. .0040 12.0 12.0 .P11 4.00 0 OTOTAL NUMBER OF GUTTERS/PIPES, 11 1 Highland Dairy Future Drainage ARRANGEMENT OF SUBCATCHMENTS AND GUTTERS/PIPES GUTTER TRIBUTARY GUTYEI./PIPE: TRIBUTARY _UBA0EA D.A. (AC) 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99.2 13 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 464.3 14 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 3 0 0 0 0 0 n n 0 928.3 15 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1086.2 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1136.8 17 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1160.0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 B n 0 0 0 0 0 0 99.3 19 17 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 1259.3 20 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 1259.3 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.2 22 16 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 n n 0 n O 0 1160.0 AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 2 of 5 Eric W. Dunker, P.E. Highland Dairy- Future Drainage SWM Output 11.12.2002 0HYDROGRAPHS WILL BE STORED FOR THE FOLLOWING 7 POINTS "--. 14 15 16 21 22 19 20 1 Highland Dairy Future Drainage HYDROGRAPHS ARE LISTED FOR THE FOLLOWING 7 CONVEYANCE ELEMENTS THE UPPER NUMBER IS DISCHARGE IN CFS THE LOWER NUMBER TS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CASES: ( ) DENOTES DEPTH ABOVE INVERT IN FEET (5) DENOTES L',T9)RAGE IN AC-FT FOR DETENTION DAM. DISCHARGE INCLUDES SPILLWAY OUTFLOW. (I) DENOTES GUTTER INFLOW IN CFS FROM SPECIFIED INFLOW HYDROGRAPH (D) DENOTES D1,^,CHARGE IN CFS DIVERTED FROM THIS GUTTER (0) DENOTES STORAGE IN AC-FT FOR SURCHARGED GUTTER TIME(HR/MIN) 14 15 16 21 22 19 20 O 5. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. O. O. .0( 1 .0 ( ) .0 ( ) .O ( ) .O( 1 .0 ( ) .'0( O 10. 0. O. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. .0( 1 .0 ( ) .0 ( ) .2 ( ) .0 ( 1 .0 ( ) .O ( 0 15. O. 0. 0. 2. 2. 0. 0. .0 ( ) .0( ) .0( ) .7 ( ) .0 ( ) .0 ( ) .1 ( O 20. 0. 0. 0. 6. 9. 1. o. .0( ) .0( ) .0 ( ) .0(0) .0( ) .0( ) ._' ( 0 25. 0. 0. 0. 6. 3. 2. 1. .0 ( ) .1 ( ) .1 ( ) .1 (0) .O( ) .O( ) .3 ( 0 30. 0. 20. 6. 6. 15. 12. . .1 ( ) .7 ( ) .7 ( ) .4 (0) .0 ( ) .0 ( ) r- 0 35. 2. 90. 32. 6. 34. 47. 36. .3( 1 1.8 ( ) 1.3 ( ) 1.0(0) .0( ) .0( 1 _ . ( 0 40. 7. 165. 82. 6. 91. 107. 95. .5( ) 2.7( ) 1.8( ) 1.6(0) .0( 1 .0( ) 1.9 ( 0 45. 18. 211 . 141. 6. 143. 177. 166. .7 ( ) .2 ( ) 2.3( ) 2.1 (0) .0( ) .0 ( ) 2.4 ( O 50. 33. 237. 196. 6. 205. 248. 238. .9( ) 3.4 ( ) 2.6( ) 2.5(0) .0( ) .0( 1 2.7 ( 0 55. 54. 25.1 . 239. 6. 242. 312. 304. 1.1( ) 1.6( ) 2.8 ( ) 2.8 (0) .0( ) .0( ) 3.0( 1 0. 77. 2'2. 272. 6. 282. 363. 358. 1.2 ( ) 1.8 ( ) 2.9( ) 3.0(0) .0 ( ) .0 ( 1 3. ?( 1 5. 101. 290. 298. 6. 301. 402. 398. 1.4 ( ) 4.0 ( ) 3.0( ) 3.2(0) .0( ) .0 ( ) . . 3 ( 1 10. 125. .'11. 716. 6. 325. 428. 416. 1.5( ) .1 (0) 3.1 ( ) 3.4 (0) .0( ) .0 ( ) 3.4 ( 1 15. 149. 291. 323. 6. 326. 442. 441. 1.6( ) .2 (0) 3.1 ( ) 3.5(0) .0( ) .0 ( ) 3.4 ( 1 20. 171. 29] . 325. 6. 334. 444. 441 . 1.7 ( ) .4 (0) 3.1 ( ) 3.5(0) .0( ) .0( ) 3.4 ( 1 25. 191. 291. 323. 6. 325. 438. 439. 1.8 ( ) .6(O) 3.1 ( ) 3.5(0) .0( 1 .0( ) _ . dl 1 30. 209. 291. 319. 6. 328. 427. 428. 1.8 ( ) .9(0) 3.1 ( ) 3.5(0) .0( ) .0( ) 3. 1 ( 1 35. 224. 291. 314. 6. 316. 413. 414. 1.9( ) 1 .2 (0) 3.1 ( ) 3.5(0) .0( ) .0( 1 3. t( 1 40. 237. 291 . 309. 6. 318. 397. .399. 1.9( ) 1.5(0) 3.1 ( ) 3.5(0) .0( 1 .0( ) ++ ( 1 45. 248. 291. 304. 6. 307. 382. 381 . 2.0 ( ) 1.8(0) 3.0( ) 3.5(0) .0( ) .0( 1 .- ' 1 50. 257. 291. 301. 6. 310. 369. 370. 2.0 ( ) 2.1 (0) 3.0 ( ) 3.5(0) .0( 1 .0( ) ,..' i AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 3 of 5 Eric W.Dunker,P.E. • Highland Dairy—Future Drainage SWM Output 11.12.2002 1 55. 263. 291 . 298. 6. 301. 357. 958. 2.0( ) 2.3(01 3.0( ) 3.5(0) .0( 1 .0 ( ) 3.2 ( ) 2 0. 268. 291 . 296. 6. 305. 347. 348. 2.0 ( ) 2.6(0) 3.0( ) 3.5(0) .0( ) .0 ( ) .. ) ( ) 2 5. 272. 291. . 294. 6. 297. 338. 339. 2.0 ( ) 2.9(0) 3.0 ( ) 3.5(0) .0( ) .O ( 1 3. ) 1 ) 2 10. 274 . 291 . 293. 6. 303. 331. 332. 2.0 ( ) 3.1 (0) 3.0 ( ) 3.5(0) .01 1 .0( ) 3. 1 ( ) 2 15. 276. 221 . 293. 6. 295. 324 . 325. 2.0 ( 1 x' . 4 (0) 3.0 ( ) 3.4 (0) .0 ( 1 .0 ( ) 3.') 1 ) 2 20. 276. 291 . 292. 6. 301. 318. 319. 2.0( 1 3.6 (0) 3.0( ) 3.4 (0) .0 ( I .01 1 3.0 ( ) 2 25. 275. 291 . 292. 6. 294. 314 . 311 . 2.0 ( ) 3.7 (0) 3.0( ) 3.3(0) .0 ( ) .0( ) 3.0( 1 2 30. 274 . 291 . 291. 6. 301. 310. 311. 2.0 ( ) 3.810) 3.0 ( ) 3.3 (0) .01 1 .0( ) 3.P( ) 2 35. 271. 29.1 . 291. 6. 294. 308. 389. 2.0( ) 3.9(0) 3.0 ( ) 3.3(0) .0( 1 .0 ( ) "2.8 ( ) 2 40. 269. 291. 291. 6. 300. 305. 306. 2.0 ( ) 4.0(0) 3.0( ) 3.2(0) .0( 1 .0 ( ) 3.0 ( ) 2 45. 266. 291. 291. 6. 293. 304 . 304 . 2.0 ( ) 4 .0(0) 3.0( ) 3.2 (0) .0( ) .0( ) 3.2 ( ) 2 50. 262. 291 . 291. 6. 300. 302. 31!2. 2.0 ( ) 3.9(0) 3.0 ( ) 3.1(0) .0 ( ) .0( ) 3.'i( ) 2 55. 258. 291. 291. 6. 293. 301. 301 . 2.0 ( ) 3.9(0) 3.0( ) 3.1 (0) .0( ) .0 ( ) 3.9 ( 1 3 0. 254. 291. 291. 6. 300. 300. 300. 2.0( ) 3.7 (0) 3.0 ( ) 3.1 (0) .0 ( ) .0( ) 3.2( ) 3 5. 250. 291. 291. 6. 293. 300. 300. 2.0 ( ) 3.6(0) 3.0 ( ) 3.0(0) .0 ( ) .0( ) _.',s! ) 3 10. 245. 291. 291. 6. 300. 299. 299. ....--• 2.0 ( ) 3.4 (0) 3.0( ) 3.0(0) .0( ) .0( ) 3.0( ) 3 15. 240. 291. 291. 6. 293. 299. 299. 1.9( ) 3.1(0) 3.0( ) 2.9(0) .0( ) .0( ) 2.9( ) 3 20. 235. 291. 291. 6. 300. 299. 299. 1.9( ) .'.8 (O) 3.0( ) 2.9(0) .0( 1 .0( ) 2.13( ) 3 25. 231. 291. 291. 6. 293. 298. 298. 1.9( ) 2.4 (0) 3.0( ) 2.9(0) .0 ( ) .0( 1 2.91 1 3 30. 226. 291. 291. 6. 300. 298. 298. 1.9( ) 2.0(0) 3.0( ) 2.8(0) .0 ( ) .0( ) 2. ( ) 3 35. 221. 291. 291. 6. 293. 298. 229. 1.9( ) 1 .5(0) 3.0( ) 2.8 (0) .0( ) .0( 1 2.9( ) 3 40. 216. 291. 291. 6. 300. 296. 299, 1.9( ) 1 .0(0) 3.0( ) 2.7 (0) .0 ( 1 .0( ) 2.2( 3 45. 211. 291. 291. 6. 293. 298. _, _ . 1.8 ( ) .5(0) 3.0( ) 2.7(0) .0( ) .0( ) 2. 2( ) 3 50. 206. 269. 287. 6. 297. 297. 297. 1.8 ( ) 3.R ( ) 3.0( ) 2.7 (0) .0( ) .0( ) 2.3( 1 3 55. 201. 170. 267. 6. 269. 290. 291. 1.8 ( ) 2.6( ) 2.9( ) 2.6(0) .0( ) .0( ) 2. 1( ) 4 0. 196. 206. 243. 6. 253. 276. 278. 1.8 ( ) 3.1 ( ) 2.8 ( ) 2.6(0) .0( ) .0( ) 2. ( ) 4 5. 191. 189. 229. 6. 232. 260. 262. 1.8 ( ) 2.9( ) 2.7 ( ) 2.5(0) .0( ) .0( ) ...2 ( ) 4 10. 187. 189. 217. 6. 226. 245. 247. 1.8 ( ) 2.9( ) 2.7 ( ) 2.5(0) .0( ) .0( ) _..1 ( ) 4 15. 182. 183. 207. 6. 210. 232. 234. 1.7 ( ) 2.9( 1 2.6( ) 2.4 (0) .0( ) .0( ) 2.7( ) 4 20. 178. 179. 199. 6. 209. 221. 223. 1.7 ( ) 2.9( ) 2.6( ) 2.4 (0) .0( ) .0( ) 2.6( ) 4 25. 173. 174. 193. 6. 195. 212. 214. r. 1.7 ( ) 2.9( ) 2.6( ) 2.4 (0) .0( ) .0( 1 2.6( ) AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 4 of 5 Eric W.Dunker,P.E. Highland Dairy—Future Drainage SWM Output 11.12.2002 4 30. 169. 170. 187. 6. 196. 205. 206. '--, 1.7 ( ) 2.7 ( ) 2.5( ) 2.3(O) .0( ) .0( ) :'. (: ( ) 4 35. 165. 166. 181. 6. 183. 198. 199. 1.7 ( ) 2.7( ) 2.5( ) 2.3(O) .0( ) .0( 1 _. 5( 1 4 40. 161. 162. 176. 6. 185. 192. 192. 1.7 ( ) 2.6( ) 2.5 ( ) 2.2 (O) .0( I .0( ) x.. 5 ( ) 4 45. 157. 157. 171. 6. 174. 186. 187. 1.6( ) 2. 6( ) 2.4 ( ) 2.2(O) .0( ) .0( ) 2. 5( ) 4 50. 152. 153. 167. 6. 176. 181. 182. 1.6( ) 2.5( ) 2.4 ( ) 2.2(O) .0( ) .0( ) 2.4 ( ) 4 55. 148. 149. 162. 6. 165. 176. 177. 1.6( ) 2.5( ) 2.4 ( ) 2.1 (O) .0( ) .0( ) 2. 4 ( ) 5 0. 144 . 145. 158. 6. 167. 172. 172. 1.6( ) 2.4 ( ) 2.4 ( ) 2.1(O) .0( ) .0( ) 2.4 ) ) 1 Highland Dairy Future Drainage *** PEAK FLOWS, STAGES AND STORAGES OF GUTTERS AND DETENTION DAMS *** CONVEYANCE PEAK STAGE STORAGE TIME ELEMENT (CFS) (FT) (AC-FT) (HR/MIN) 12 25. .5 2 20. 13 117. 1.2 2 40. 14 276. 2.0 2 20. 15 291. 4 .0 4.0 2 45. 21 6. 1 .5 3.5 1 30. 16 325. 3. 1 1 20. 22 334. (DIRECT FLOW) 1 20. i"', 18 161. 1.7 1 0. 17 325. .i.0 1 30. 19 444. (DIRECT FLOW) 1 20. 20 444. 3.4 1 20. 100-year peak flow after diversion s--. AgPro Environmental Services,LLC 5 of 5 Eric W. Dunker,P.E. 31 32 33 ^ • /�/ h. i �- �- _ AW.C.R. 98 j' /% ,7 f 5 4 • ` / / t /% • o 1000 Do %� � •-•-,' // / //' / 2 � . SCALE: 1- = 2000' s-�:'• //+'- f1 •1 W.C.R. 96 A. %/ OFFSITE %� DRAINAGE 4 d j j BASIN AREA:%7-% 3 a -, 1 �/ 1.716 sq.mi. Li V /, ,ii,, j / / `-'"• C ? r�/, W.C.R. 94 + t / ` 7 7 / Ow (602 crs) for Mon Y / ./ '� ��/ �Afr � Dig Basin Area . .//,.(1/7/47:1;V 4 /' Y // / SECONDARY // /� OFFSITE DRAINAGE /'/ I A / / BASIN AREA 0 08 \ � sI.mi. ' l Jv / 3\ / �•l 1O rr ' / 1.7.c � o«Ov cis) rot SecoAntelope I _ Basin Areary Drainage Res. _ ,k / Basin Area•i vl. �� mac^ / ;' % 16 ` \. n K7// /HIGHLAND/ F` (74, DAR /j NATURAL DRAINAGE G/. ...)\ •„• % RE-flWtED AROUND DAIRY AS 1 V A• 1/ A( //// SHOWN ON DETAIL V DRAWING 4/;/ � / i / S,i i EXHIBIT i� \. E i W.C.R. 92 2/ //. !/;�j t \ L1^SQ *INS i\ i T AgPro Environmental Services, LLC HIGHLAND DAIRY 5/31/o2 *NIT Na Environmental Consultants — Engineers — Architects — Planners OFF SITE DRAINAGE BASIN MAP 1 KRUG, SOBEL &RITTER, LLC ATTORNEYS AT LAW MARYBETH SOBEL' KIM L.RITTER2 STEVEN L.MURRAY' JOHN J.ROBERTS MOLLY SOMMERVILLE KAREN OSTRANDER-KRUG Of Counsel LISA M.BAIN Of Counsel November 12, 2002 1700 Broadway, Suite 508 Denver,Colorado 80290 Telephone: 303-831-8450 Facsimile: 303-831-8482 Via Hand Delivery E-mail: law(aikrug-sobel.com Members of the Board of County Members of the Weld County Commissioners of Weld County Planning Commission 915 Tenth Street 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Greeley, Colorado 80631 NOTICE OF MINERAL INTERESTS OWNED BY ANADARKO LAND CORP. AND ANADARKO E&P COMPANY LP AND OBJECTION Re: Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review/ Highland Dairy, LLC Township 8 North, Range 65 West Section 17: SW4; W2W2SE4 Weld County, Colorado Ladies and Gentlemen: This law firm represents Anadarko Land Corp. ("Anadarko Land"), formerly known as RME Land Corp. and Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation, and Anadarko E&P Company LP ("Anadarko E&P"), formerly known as RME Petroleum Company and Union Pacific Resources Company (together the "Anadarko entities"), with respect to the application that has been filed with Weld County by Highland Dairy,LLC("Applicant") for approval of a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review for property located in the SW4 and W2W2SE4 of Section 17, Township 8 North, Range 65 West ("Property"). Anadarko Land and Anadarko E&P together own all of the minerals that underlie the Property. 'Also admitted in Wyoming 3 Also admitted in Montana IX H I D I T 'Also admitted in the District of Columbia and Illinois US2.#1315 November 12, 2002 Members of the Board of County Commissioners Members of the Planning Commission Page 2 The Anadarko entities wish to give notice to the County of the mineral interests they own under the Property and make the County aware that any subsequent approval by the County of a Use by Special Review and Site Specific Development Plan and subsequent construction on the ground may interfere with the development of the oil and gas under the Property. The Anadarko entities object to the approval by the County of the Application unless and until an agreement on surface use is reached between the Anadarko entities and the Applicant. The following are comments in support of this Notice and Objection: 1. The Mineral Resources Owned by Anadarko Land Corp. Anadarko Land owns all of the minerals except for the oil and gas that underlie the Property as well as a reversionary interest in the oil and gas. Please find enclosed the pertinent portion of the Coal Resources and Development Map of Colorado prepared by the Colorado Geological Survey. The map identifies the coal resources that underlie the Property. 2. The Oil and Gas Resources Owned by Anadarko E&P Company LP. Anadarko E&P owns all of the oil and gas that underlies the Property. Union Pacific Resources Company(predecessor to Anadarko E&P) entered into an exploration agreement with United States Exploration,Inc.("UXP")that allows UXP to earn certain oil and gas leasehold rights in the Property. 3. There is Clear Statutory Authority and Direction for the County to Take Into Account the Rights of Mineral Interest Owners. The State of Colorado recognizes the important rights of mineral owners and lessees in C.R.S. § 30-28-133(10) which requires that notices of hearings of subdivision plat applications be given to mineral owners and lessees in counties. More important,subsection (10) states and acknowledges that both the mineral estate and the surface estate are interests in land and that the two interests are "separate and distinct." The subsection specifically directs county planning commissions to recognize that the owners of subsurface mineral interests and their lessees have "the same rights and privileges as surface owners." Further, C.R.S. § 24-65.5-101 et seq. requires that applicants for development approvals give notice to mineral estate owners of hearings to be held before local November 12, 2002 Members of the Board of County Commissioners Members of the Planning Commission Page 3 jurisdictions for applications for development and further requires that the developer certify that he has given the required notice as a condition to the approval of the application by the local jurisdiction. 4. Government Action Which Allows Surface Development in a Manner Which Precludes Mineral Development May Impair the Vested Property and Contractual Rights of the Mineral Interest Owner. Colorado case law continues to provide that the mineral owner owns the dominant estate and has the right of reasonable access to and use of the surface estate to extract minerals.1 Actions by a government entity which may have the effect of reversing this basic tenet of Colorado property law and thereby deprive the mineral interest owner of its vested property and contractual rights may be violative of federal and state constitutional provisions. Union Pacific Railroad Company("Railroad") gave a deed to George Oliver dated July 20, 1905 and recorded in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office on October 9, 1905 in Book 233,Page 10 in which it reserved all of the minerals. The Railroad granted the minerals to Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation(predecessor to Anadarko Land)by quitclaim deed dated April 1, 1971 and recorded on April 14, 1971 in Book 644,Reception No. 1565712. Applicant had record notice at the time it acquired its interests in the Property that the minerals were severed from the surface estate and that it received less than the entire interest in the Property. 5. An Action by the County to Approve the Application May Amount to a Regulatory Taking within the Meaning of the State and United States Constitutions for which the County Could Be Required to Pay the Anadarko Entities Fair Compensation. Action by the County to approve an application for surface development may constitute a regulatory taking, especially where the operator is deprived of all economically viable use of land or his investment-backed expectations to develop his property.2 ISee Frankfort Oil Company v. Abrams,413 P.2d 190(Colo. 1966). Note also, Gerrity Oil&Gas Corporation v. Magness 946 P.2d 913 (Colo. 1977),which discusses in a footnote on page 927 the principle that the owners of both estates must exercise their rights in a manner consistent with one another. 2See for example Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council 505 U.S. 1003, 112 S.Ct.2886, 120 r"� L.Ed.2d 798(1992). November 12, 2002 Members of the Board of County Commissioners Members of the Planning Commission Page 4 The United States Claims Court and the Federal Circuit Courts have awarded compensation or affirmed decisions to award compensation to energy and mining companies based upon claims by'the companies that their mineral properties had been taken by the government without just compensation because of government regulations which disallowed the development by the companies of their mineral rights.3 6. The Anadarko Entities Have Entered into Many Agreements with Developers With Respect to the Disposition of the Minerals at the Time that the Developer Proposes to Develop the Surface Estate, and the Public Interest is Served by the Parties Entering into Such an Agreement. The Anadarko entities have extensive mineral interests throughout Colorado where the surface estate and the mineral estate have been severed. The Anadarko entities have worked with many parties who wish to develop the surface estate in order to assure the compatible development of the surface and the minerals or to effect some other disposition of the minerals. The Anadarko entities wish to work with the Applicant in the same manner that they have worked with other developers and, toward that end, the Anadariko entities have initiated discussions with the developer. The Anadarko entities,however,object to the Application until such time as they reach an agreement with the Applicant and request that the County make any approval of the Application conditioned upon an agreement between the Applicant and the Anadarko entities with respect to their oil and gas interests. Very truly yours, KRUG, SOBEL &RITTER,LLC Molly Sommerville MS/sa Enclosures cc: Dan Casper Donna Powers, Esq. Don Ballard Chuck Traxler Shirley Kovar/for United States Exploration, Inc. Thomas Haren/for Highland Dairy, LLC 3See for example Whitney Benefits, Inc. v.United States 18 CI.Ct. 394(1989),corrected, 20 C1.Ct.324(1990),affd. 926 F.2d 1169(Fed.Cir.),cert. denied 112 S.Ct.406(1991); United Nuclear Corporation v.United States 17 C1.Ct. 768, affd., 912 F.2d 1432(1990). - COLORADO G .. I Map Series :s;f • EXPLANATION aLIGNITE WITH LESS THAN 150 FT. (46 M.) OF OVERBURDEN • LIGNITE WITH 150 FT. (46 M.) TO 1,000 FT (305 M.) OF OVERBURDEN SUBBITUMINOUS OR BITUMINOUS COAL WITH LESS THAN 150 FT. (46 M.) OF OVERBURDEN wai ?1] SUBBITUMINOUS OR BITUMINOUS COAL WITH 150 FT. (46 M. ) TO 3,000 FT. (910 M. ) OF OVERBURDEN BITUMINOUS COAL WITH MORE THAN 3,000 FT. (910 M.) OF OVERBURDEN ANTHRACITE AND SEMIANTHRACITE AREA OF PAST OR PRESENT COKING-COAL PRODUCTION DENVER REGION COAL-BEARING REGION 42.47 ESTIMATED ORIGINAL IN-PLACE RESOURCES TO 6,000 FT. IN BILLI (1820 M, ) , 42.36 ESTIMATED REMAINING IN-PLACE RESOURCES TO 6,000 FT. (1820 M. ) , IN BILLIONS OF TONS, AS OF 1/1/77 SOMERSET MINES AND PRELIMINARY 1977 PRODUCTION IN MILLION TONS 0.95 (FOR MINES THAT PRODUCED > 0.25 MILLION TONS IN 1977) • UNDERGROUND MINE (LICENSED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1977) fl O ABANDONED UNDERGROUND MINE *Xi SURFACE MINE (LICENSED AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1977) 1� ::A ABANDONED SURFACE MINE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND MINE `•y Buckeye' J 11 Lrvernbre CO T Owl Cann U O J e CC Wbvefly s �� a I Well agtpn Foudre Park i E R L 'lac ,1 t . ,. Nit \ ace Laporte I t.p' � •Mt E-' � .,, Cotner ' n�ia Purcell ti -nggs6a ` r\-"•55 ��` o s For Coll1 1!' E 4"�V _ `ayyr Y vet- Brag +w S tr - rc6STQn' n I I E It Lookout Mtn - . K •6 ' J I Harm Y \ 3 iaeaw ..elpivr. . t�: Mil a Min Tn iy Corner a ^'� ji- `Sµ,! i �•�..�" •' Storm Mas wlle ^ R amp, WIr.sor •� € ia Mtn naI .P Barnes le 1 as Bracewell �- n ,cis �• .r _ _ Drake I _. — N _ r aye wartor / LZ.L+.' J p. —Li_ f w-ev.•r�. DO r IILw' el: di vans �r 102 6 Jlymcvs ker8m, 1 - �� - t€rt 1� -' : / _ miner .rain Parrorama �] Car-i non — /) Tea. 8We Mtn �� Op(anion _l a• �,nson Berth t oil DPadrelr - -. Ilcrest .. M J Cn I n?. ,v . I� ..W Walk ...�I ark „....... Mead c lyon6. ( I laalor a!I.Y6�ne • Cr. r_e tongmo see, Fairview robe / Oa� i_et ',alley 'Peak •Mtn cto b-nesio Nrwar . i11! PC:r 0 N¢eR,,,s, SON,3OU i E 9..lee Hal - f safe ry� taw, .I .1�.Cn .Lvr. . •osp ws�e er ter 1 1 DER D �� — t. G n . • h„n '-88e r 1 s r`+oa ♦ .�....i� o T `, I� � r 1! w ner he q, 62 i-z S �•�•,,, � .3A• .� �I l FLaD 5a 53 — agnoha ISNYkl27iv5 e e .��/!/!/ Mersr al'";�:,�..�:.V � e, e Crescent Lprr:ate �ltake tit ,P,.r s , Br omfiee a 9Hen k , M ,�s, ntw • A y/ A N I m... i•'^'. I� ► �d./' .•✓ ----•Q,r I ,�'"'' ' Y'cal " •• Y 1S17:Edi 3.•-.... Ott -��i �- tim ePr ei par• N `` . � _ ..• �j .: r: •, ::1,• / , / I N „age u R I Imedaie\ 1 • e ��♦ • �•�. .•.• •'�.r. �/a e 'K,r•.>f `T `e) • ely• p - �'///, . I// e• rinsed f n te5 ' H Iar �� • !• :•••••• �s �-i I ran ,n wns Il, etbn "y, !.•:::v"; .e- rt r r .I. rm A 1 ero �.v . ..-_. . 1::::::•••;:•:•:••••••::.:.. . .. ;rJl• _ { a^�x�9rc+r+ytze.3 m m H a ( JJ i-1, 7.n j J' . is'e ) , ' �.. i 41 ,Crr I r 4 ' jr 1 a { p. @ g' 2 kn it's sfi r 4'k4 'Ar 4 j n r 5* v x� .a ,p . t.„ ,....'.� � * r1,;;;.,...-,:-.,-,z4 3 S� 4 Yh Hello