The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20022105.tiff RESOLUTION RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 2002, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO - DENY PETITIONER'S APPEAL AND AFFIRM ASSESSOR'S VALUE PETITION OF: CLEAN ENERGY LLC 5081 S FLORENCE DR ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111-3613 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: ACCOUNT#: R1417302 PARCEL#: 070931300020 - ETN PT S2 31-7-65 (SUGAR MILL ANNEX#2)ETN 14076 PT S2 31 7 65 (SUGAR MILL ANNEX#2) BEG SE COR SEC N88D20'W 1665' TO TRUE POB N24DW 510' N29D45'W 400' N03D45'W 200' N22D45'E 130' N12D31'W 942.28' TO S LN 4TH ST EXTENDED TH S89D58'W 1100.78' TO A WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, convened as the Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the assessment and valuation of real and personal property within Weld County, fixed and made by the County Assessor for the year 2002, and WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due Notice of Determination thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s), and WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal of the County Assessor's valuation for the year 2002, claiming that the property described in such petition was assessed too high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and WHEREAS, said petitioner being represented by Richard Thomas, and WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances and is now fully informed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, acting as the Weld County Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property, after review by the Weld County Assessor. Such evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law. The assessment and valuation of the Weld County Assessor shall be, and hereby is, affirmed as follows: ACTUAL VALUE AS DETERMINED BY ASSESSOR Land $ 65,710 Improvements OR Personal Property 0 TOTAL $ 65,710 2002-2105 AS0052 RE: BOE - CLEAN ENERGY LLC Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options; however, said appeal must be filed within 30 days of the denial: 1. Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA). Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits, or any other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced at the Court of Appeals. (Section 39-8-108(10), CRS) Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the CBOE to: Board of Assessment Appeals 1313 Sherman Street, Room 315 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-866-5880 OR 2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District Court of the county wherein your property is located. New testimony, exhibits or any other evidence may be introduced at the District Court hearing. For filing requirements, please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court. Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals for a review of the record. (Section 39-8-108(1), CRS) OR 3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal your current valuation ends. (Section 39-8-108.5, CRS) Selecting the Arbitrator: In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the CBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE select an arbitrator from the official list of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the county in which the property is located will make the selection. 2002-2105 AS0052 RE: BOE - CLEAN ENERGY LLC Page 3 Arbitration Hearing Procedure: Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority to issue subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall be determined by him. The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing. Such decision is final and not subject to review. Fees and Expenses: The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and expenses cannot exceed $150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses, not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 1st day of August, A.D., 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS W LD COUN Y, COLORADO ATTEST: IL4/ .flucc Bt ty Clerk to the Board : :+m avid E. Lon• (< to theBoard . J. Gene " f TO FORM: 41,142044411•644 "42 ,, QQ 44 � J ke q(�\1 Ass' ant Co ty Attorney Robert D. Masden Date of signature: es-c‘,- cc)._ 2002-2105 AS0052 / a NOTICE OF DENIAL OFFICE OF H I 7th AVE. GIt LEI COUNTY1400 ASSESSOR ETN PT S2 31-7-65 (SUGAR MILL 80631 PHONE(970)353-3845,EXT.3aso ANNEX #2) ETN 14076 PT S2 31 7 65 MILL ANNEX #2) BEG SE COR SEC WILD (SUGAR C. 5'W 200DWN22DD45NE9D130 'WN20 ' W 1665' O12D31NWUE P942 . 28 ' COLORADO OWNER: CLEAN ENERGY LLC CLEAN ENERGY LLC LOG 706 5081 S FLORENCE DR PARCEL 07093130002 ACCOUNT R1417302 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111-3613 YEAR 2002 ..: t .. .dc...-. o..of h d !h f(u N� ... .�..0 u. ., uppr.,�. ..,uN,. u� .... ... .0 u...Cy4 .. u� u.. .....u,..0 nu u... -... u. your property should be included in thefollowing category(ies): Commercial property is valued by considering the cost, market, and income approaches . If your concern is the amount of your property tax,local taxing authorities(county,city,fire protection,and other special districts)hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information,giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest,and has determined the valuation(s)assigned to your property. The reasons for this determination of value are as follows: This value is well within guidelines for raw land much less property that already has utilities on site . We are currently valued at $1, 742 . 00 per acre for land adjacent to Eaton and other developed land at much higher values . PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE OF VALUE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW' AFTER REVIEW COMMERCIAL 65710 65710 TOTALS $ $ 65710 S 6710 APPEAL DEADLINES: REAL PROPERTY-JULY 15, PERSONAL PROPERTY-JULY 22. If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration,39-8- 106(I)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on tiling your appeal. By: Stanley F. Sessions 06/21/2002 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE 15-DPT-AR Form PR-207-87/99 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THE ASSESSOR'S DECISION The County Board of Equalization will sit to hear appeals beginning July 1 and continuing through August 5 for real property(land and buildings) and personal property (furnishings, machinery, and equipment) 39-8-104 and 39-8- 107(2), C.R.S. APPEAL PROCEDURES: If you choose to appeal the Assessor's decision, mail or deliver one copy of this completed form to the County Board of Equalization. To preserve your right to appeal, your appeal must be POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED ON OR BEFORE JULY 15 FOR REAL PROPERTY, AND JULY 22 FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970)356-4000 Ext. 4225 NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: You will be notified of the time and place set for the hearing of your appeal. COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION'S DETERMINATION: The County Board of Equalization must make a decision on your appeal and mail you a determination within five business days of that decision. The County Board must conclude its hearings and render decisions by August 5. TAXPAYER RIGHTS FOR FURTHER APPEALS: If you are not satisfied with the County Board of Equalization's decision you must file within thirty days of the County Board of Equalization's written decision with ONE of the following: Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA): Contact the BAA at 1313 Sherman, Room 315, Denver, Colorado 80203, (303)866-5880. An appeal form, rules and guidelines can be obtained on-line at www.dola.colorado.gov\baa. District Court: 9th Avenue and 9th Street, P.O. Box C Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970) 356-4000, Ext. 4520 Arbitration: WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970) 356-4000, Ext. 4225 If you do not receive a determination from the County Board of Equalization, you must file an appeal with the Board Gf.iaowaimiGit nJ JL.,aio Ly .JLNiUuiU i i L. TO PRESERVE YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS, YOU MUST PROVE YOU HAVE FILED A TIMELY APPEAL; THEREFORE, WE RECOMMEND ALL CORRESPONDENCE BE MAILED WITH PROOF OF MAILING. PETITION TO THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION In the space below, please explain why you disagree with the Assessor's valuation. IN ACCORDANCE WITH 39- 8-106, C.R.S., IF YOUR APPEAL INVOLVES REAL PROPERTY, YOU MUST STATE YOUR OPINION OF VALUE IN TERMS OF A SPECIFIC DOLLAR AMOUNT. Attach additional doc ments as necessary. ,vri1.5—C /177-467/4/En/'7> -- Tint 1/444-cg / 6v/ftfdti/ -- C�l�"�I�� wit/ ,��j LLB' 441:-?•;17-7,K-7<-Y i�>,aor� /4 zatz- 'c�1f,Nniu�ur �Neiii�uNeK / EATON SUGAR FACTORY PROPERTY TAX APPEAL The attached letters represent clean-up bids on the asbestos inside of the Eaton Sugar Factory. In addition to this cost of approximately $1,100,000 is the expense of removal of salvage from the property and cleaning up the land and filling coal pits and restoration of the land to utilize for development. Approximately 20 acres of the property are covered with the spent lime from the sugar process and cannot be utilized unless the lime is removed to grade (approximately 300,000 tons). The land under the factory of approximately 10 acres is unusable until the deteriorated and environmentally impacted sugar factory buildings are removed. These buildings are filled with salvage piping and equipment and constitute an added expense, especially since it can only be dealt with after environmental remediation of the buildings and contents. The remaining 8 acres are covered with concrete coal pits and water settling ponds and cannot be used for development until extensive land filling and leveling is done. Due to these unique circumstances I am unable to rent any of the property identified under this tax parcel and the total value of the property is a negative value unless a user could be found to buy this property for a value exceeding these costs. Sincerely, Clean En LLC� /�/ By � t/- e= -ten chard F. Thomas, manager HAZARDOUS WASTE TECHNOLOGY INC. 2802 N. PROSPECT COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80907 719-329-0008 /fax: 719-329-0985 February 2, 2001 Dick Thomas 5081 South Florence Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Re: Western Sugar Mill Dear Sir, Hazardous Waste Technology Inc. would like to thank you for the opportunity to view the Western Sugar Mill in Longmont. Terry Garner with Environmental Site Assessment was conducting an asbestos survey of the plant during our visit to assess the content of asbestos and the extent of disturbance. If possible HWT would like to have a copy of that report in order to properly evaluate and propose a Cost for clean-up for the property. Based on our site inspection, the level of contamination and given the condition of the buildings, our estimate for the abatement would be approximately $ 1,250,000.00. Hazardous Waste Technology has been in the abatement industry for over 15 years and has the experience in abatement of large scale projects of this nature. We have received numerous letters from business owners, Government officials, and been requested by the EPA for environmental cleanup projects. We look forward to hearing from you and welcome any questions you may have concerning this or other projects you may have. iRes ectfully Submitted, ( Y 24-1--4...) Gene Meek Vice President HWT hill . C i ; - : :7n FP: " BL -HUE ; HOD F : _, H: . FA5E . 001 I� ;CN*fl j w1:IAT1 1, INC ENVInONMENTAl 6ERVICE$ November 11, 1994 Richard Thomas Owner Thomas Real Estate Company 5081 South Florence Drive Englewood, CO 80111 Dear Richard: This letter is in response to your request to update the asbestos abatement figures for your Western Sugar facility and they are as follows: ► T . costs associated with the general cleanup of the facility amount to a total of cne hundred ten thousand five hundred and 96o dollars ($110,500.00). The costs associated with the remediation of the Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) required prior to the demolition of the facility which Includes the Boiler room (not including the demolition) amount to a total of one million one hundred fourteen thousand and 96o dollars ($1,114,000.00). After you have had an opportunity to review this matter, should you have any comments, questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call me personally. early, Sch ue ociates, Inc. Jo Scha P dent /GAM annallaginalltirala 6960 South 13th street • P.O. Box 285 15403 East 17th Avenue "E" Oak Creek, wisteria, 53164 Aurora, Colorado 80011 (414) 768.7240 • Fax (414) 164-2088 (303) 367.0702 • Fax (303) 387.1308 ` WI �� ;. ' 4 _�_j - 1 ! 1 �. 1 ' ""tee.,---..,.f �. dTr/s° J 1 i-4 i a + 1 _ �n ..�.. up ► I1 �t. - ( .. f�� _ *� ._ 4`3x5 ff4 Dii . „ i. , ..�_ .. ! • - of' .y &.ir-re:-...t. r ' 47' L_ tria.# - - :. ,wr 4ip ,_, M ler L .:. .� .1ia 1" p » n * 411% .„._•••- . LI Pi if : :.air .. Y 'I• I 1 ,,` 51 le vat {` �. fI : 4.: . TJL ,, t dl rt, Vitt' i . , , .) . A f.... ,, t . � „rfS der t, l ` fi } y, I .y l :1 R., a a'y ., S1 � . 4 .', •#• 1 , T I ' \ v 1. c, Lill. . _ .-..,;:-. a - .— .g. fors'_ie.: . in ill —' I t uj, )..,. 1 (. * 1"" III �N , \ III y� f _ ., imp � �14 .# '1:7-. ^r 3 r• t 1 \ I CLERK TO THE BOARD PHONE (970) 356-4000 EXT 4217 FAX: (303) 352-0242 WEBSITE: wwwnweldflLus 915 10TH STREET ' P.O. BOX 758 CGREELEY, COLORADO 80632 O COLORADO July 18, 2002 CLEAN ENERGY LLC 5081 S FLORENCE DR ENGLEWOOD CO 80111-3613 Parcel No.: 070931300020 Account No.: R1417302 Dear Petitioner(s): The Weld County Board of Equalization has set a date of August 1, 2002, at or about the hour of 11:30 AM, to hold a hearing on your valuation for assessment. This hearing will be held at the Weld County Centennial Center, First Floor Hearing Room, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado. You have a right to attend this hearing and present evidence in support of your petition. The Weld County Assessor or his designee will be present. The Board will make its decision on the basis of the record made at the aforementioned hearing, as well as your petition, so it would be in your interest to have a representative present. If you plan to be represented by an agent or an attorney at your hearing, priorto the hearing you shall provide,in writing to the Clerk to the Board's Office, an authorization for the agent or attorney to represent you. If you do not choose to attend this hearing,a decision will still be made by the Board by the close of business on August 5,2002, and mailed to you on or before August 12, 2002. Because of the volume of cases before the Board of Equalization, all cases shall be limited to 15 minutes. Also due to volume, cases cannot be rescheduled. It is imperative that you provide evidence to support your position. This may include evidence that similar homes in your area are valued less than yours or you are being assessed on improvements you do not have. Please note: The fact that your valuation has increased cannot be your sole basis of appeal. Without documented evidence as indicated above,the Board will have no choice but to deny your appeal. At least two (2) working days prior to your hearing the Assessor will have available, at your request, the data supporting his valuation of your property. CLEAN ENERGY LLC - R1417302 Page 2 Please advise me if you decide not to keep your appointment as scheduled. If you need any additional information, please call me at your convenience. Very truly yours, BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ��LI�IZ� Donald D. Warden, Clerk to the Board BY: �// Carol A. Harding, Deputy cc: Stanley Sessions, Assessor F1 NI o '\ � cn un. R' LON O Crum iwo- CD M r. •a>roo (� , et N 2 J�l/l ( ` I k(`J\ M M N l ' O Q D V l.i�1 r,' .74:::s' _•M o?�O J� v v \ O N \ i O � a I \Mr vn, uicsi i.,4tti-1 s WELD COUNTY STANLEY F. SESSIONS COUNTY ASSESSOR MICHAEL SAMPSON, CHIEF APPRAISER APPRAISAL REPORT OF VACANT LAND FOR County Board of Equalization CLEAN ENERGY LLC PETITIONER VS. WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE RESPONDENT Parcel Number: 0709-31-3-00-020 Schedule Number: R1417302 Log Number: 4 Date: Thursday Aug. 4th Time: 11:30 am Board: OBOE PREPARED BY MICHAEL SAMPSON /?;? C'tC" 90/6 i t9e - D Da ASSESSOR'S OFFICE CHIEF APPRAISER ASSESSOR VALUE $ 65,710.00 CBOE_VacLand_010995 Page 1 Property Location I ,• s siF,�tik} w� r +F � <y � � f � 14:4$5,,,'' l�r r k, f 1 I A hl � v C/5 I e p4l�yf ,,P--.[ • 1 r 11, 1 'c , 1y4y"i.�', Y 'c y�t' ,yr 9, ✓' 1.Ilieri,tom ai i ��^ � � '1 7 P i I - 1 ,G' , (c) 1,,9 Pt : r e i h . is �)e y _.!.-'T ttt SI.1 lj}��r flt a14:1'' N � � k l '•Vy �F q .. 'Ftv 't; ?S,.(47,4.:244 r 4 r1¶ ~, ( f? J sN h /w ti .. �'i t a'••. �,� tf` ,,Y'I. ;y,,t„A ., 1 1 ,"y''.1t` '`"�r.,4 r :` .' �`'k s. 1 K. �,C z; 'u1 T,✓ Brdq'' � oi} � -4.;";;`1,*: 1 Ti 1 '� 1 is t! S - 1 ‘,7,0:", 5 '� rt It 1 4 1_ , 1 ,ir, ', - �y '� asap h v r r ^k '•�" ��f-iii, w r µa 3 fi I s f 1 a ' ' l• 'Its +r ci`" /5 C .r? lra ar< 715::; � r ;f (. .. I a • ^1 VI � �'1i • er ,,_ .., �r:,, i,Y. r,,at„,,,-.7:,,112.91,1251i `tJk', I' I le t r, "Pc} A.'. +11 s1 ': tl�•,�,�r»c ''ti(t �1 tkqq eN 1 4 1 1-^ 7 Y x44' T .,. .. i -. • k - Fit 744,*'YYt )12, , I.. I " 1> /j I„ r S� t, - 5,41 * 5 L �,re gam) rlir�l d ) t .. r It� U r ti ,:''.O, a1 �c+ � �,. A Portion of: LEGEND 05N62W221 Op QDtATAARC TON LINT TCM erexm Num=A 05N62W222 D�SECTIONLAT6 — „ ®rtATTL BLOCN 05N� GmT�� >� 43,muffing? 05N , ROW/ARROW .: , 'i4 PARCEL MIRAN GE LIKE ROW/AArOW/DTTCR ❑ �CDOrU00•AT'AACOANAAf N b3 N"y� . � AOWn)R® rDAAm®R BOUNDARY • �j — ROW DISCLAIMER wedcouM.TheGISataaseend k Thb product has been it4edt c solely bat Internal we any ey end mnpb erleu usnnotbe and b t a or Mu SLY •Sr dl deb prods product le Rdledbmno charge Fil � --'R� Nit yhe HEWN aeyrrtlmd lotea Prmb of win woe lnlaab aN dose 9 `3,�,r C�we. �aa, Nit in . UND.----.ICUMS..wudwttabnd RODUCT Y'Md1•DFORF 500 1000 Feet D SiG l.w. l Fins1NDEN NO CIRcumETANcE 8l41LL TFIE PRODUCT eE USED FR FINAL 0 EITHER EXPRESSED OR O.WLwau: IED A9 TJ 7516 COMPLETENESS.ACCURACY R GUARANTEES. CcelEcnaINCO SS°S SUCH RRECT,PUIWCISE .OR se INCOMPLETE R MIS F/ O INFRANTONN CONTAINED.ARISING M THEREIN. No pat INCO Pmtlud m.Y smiled,reproduced Pr banemited In enytame any mwn . Noev ,M the udhr0.but not Imited m,ebdmdq mech.rlal,palcm0Ying. Print D.tr:1Le 30 July 2002,12:13 PM .cererInp•a e1'•nYv k rm.tlm reblevel Mbm or airy nortePPrMdPurposa without the express ANEW eaneeM d WSM Comb. LAND VALUE Sales utilized to establish the 2002 value in the subject neighborhood must be from the period of one and one-half years immediately prior to July 1 , 2000. A period of 5 years immediately prior to July 1 , 2000 shall be utilized to determine the level of value if adequate data is not available from such one and one-half year period to adequately determine the level of value for a class of property. The Weld County Assessor has an established ongoing Sales Confirmation and Validation Program for property transactions used in developing value. SS It is necessary to analyze the size and shape of comparable sold properties to apply uniform methods of valuation. The units of comparison used to value land in Weld County are square feet, acres, units or buildable sites. The subject property is valued on a square foot & Acre method and several potential comparable sites were found that represent the development potential of the subject in the future, as either residential or commercial. Additionally it should be noted that the subject parcel actually sold in the base period to the current owner and he subsequently sold off a portion of the entire parcel just this past year to another party for aprox. 80% of his initial investment. The remaining value that the Assessors' office currently shows on the subject parcel is the difference between what he paid in the base period and the transferred amount on the sale discussed above . Parcel Number Sale Date Sale Price Land Size Per Acre r Comparable 1 070931300001 6/29/1909 $365,000 74.71 ac $4886 //.2 Comparable 2 080306000035 8/05/1999 $864,100 94.37 ac $9156 2/ 1, Comparable 3 070712314000 6/15/2000 $65,000 17.75 ac $3662 y¢ MARKET APPROACH SUMMARY Real property for the tax year 2002 must be valued utilizing the level of value for the period of one and one-half years immediately prior to July 1, 2000. A period of five years immediately prior to July 1 , 2000 shall be utilized to determine the level of value if adequate data is not available from such one and one-half year period to adequately determine the level of value for a class of property. Said level of value shall be adjusted to the final day of the data-gathering period. Changes occurring between base years are not to be accounted for until the following level of value is implemented, other than additions, change in use, detrimental acts of nature, damage due to fire, etc., creation of a condominium, new regulations restricting or increasing the use of the land, or a combination thereof{39-1-104(11)(b)(I), CRS}. The subject property has been classified as Commercial/Industrial Vacant Land for assessment purposes. Commercial property value is determined by appropriate consideration of all the approaches to Value {39-1-103(5)(a), CRS}. The Assessor has considered the Market Approach to Value for the subject parcel as the most appropriate for this hearing. The Highest and Best use of the subject parcel is for development purposes and it is valued as such presently. None of the actual structures on the plant site are even valued on this property, due in some part to the contamination issues raised by the owners and in part because we chose to hold off on the CBOE VacLand_010998 Page 2 buildings for valuation until we could appraise them more completely in the next appraisal cycle. We feel that the values as shown currently for the subject land is below market, as evidenced by the comparables INDICATED MARKET VALUE $ 65,710.00 SUMMARY 1. The Assessors staff strongly feel that the market sales shown and those discussed clearly indicate that the value for the subject is not only fair but quite likely low for the appraisal period indicated. Further the staff feels that the lack of any value placed upon the structures already more than addresses the issues of buildings contamination raised by the owners. The overall value of only .04 cents per square foot or $1742 per acre are well within the market that we have shown here today. It is true that the land under the worst buildings is unusable until the structure issues are resolved, however the remaining land is under valued also and the overall result is still a lower value that the market represents. The fact that some of the remaining land needs dirt work is also already addressed with the very low value per square foot currently placed on the subject. In the future we will reappraise the subject and segregate the old plant site from the more marketable portions of the property, but this will result in a considerably higher value overall than we currently carry on the entire subject parcel. We ask that the board find for the assessors values and deny the request of the property owners for value reduction ,based on the evidence shown here today. 1$trl yv t &{^F jiT �, �ctr sti��a� k m 2 k S� gptt,# % s5+°d{'i'1, 5? ''3c rx-'� "fi'8!1 ?k"'.�ar4 as Sx t!}r do k '"fir gni -Thft �nY n rt in' j9 � p CBOE_Vacland 010998 Page 3 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR Account#: R0930386 PROPERTY PROFILE Parcel#: 070931300001 (Comparable 1 MH Seq#: MH Space: o Appr Year: 2003 Levy: 97.69 #of Bldgs: 0 Active On: Tax Dist: 0230 Map#: 1233 LEA: InactiveOn: 20000301001 Assign To: JLS Initials: LKM Acct Type: Last Updated: 03/01/2000 New Growth: 0 Owner's Name and Address: Property Address: 3.'FATLCELS —DO I 4.. 60 C. SMITH C1-{ARLES G - 01O 1O.45 - 011 SE1.2.l. 36656 BRIAN AVE -conk J - 14 11 WINDSOR CO 80550 ". .t..oS.krtrD t 14 •-t1 — ot v 4 $Vo Business/Complex: \ v Sales Summary \---c4.4. ¶os J TV C'aw" s Sale Date Sale Price Deed Type Reception # Book Page# Grantor 06/29/1999 $365,000 WD 2704477 KAMM WILLIAM J & SHARON A Legal Description ETN 14077 PT S2 31 7 65 (KAMM DANNEX#1)BEG ON 1/4 SEC LN RUNNING ON&S30'S OF CEN OF GW RR&6TE 0S19D18'E 585.2'W590' N534.6.UN87D27'E 397'TO BEG(6.17A) __.._ J Land Valuation Summary Unit of Number Of Value Per Assmt *Assessed Land Type Ag Code Abst Code Measure Units Unit Actual Value Percent Value Agricultural A III 4117 Acres 4.73 $386.92 $1,830.13 0.29 $530.74 Agricultural B II 4117 Acres 1.27 $551.38 $700.25 0.29 $203.07 Land Subtotal: 6 $2,530.38 $730.00 Full Market Values $0.00 $0.00 Buildings Valuation Summary Total Property Value $2,530 $730 *Approximate Assessed Value • Thursday, July 25, 2002 Page 1 of 2 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR PROPERTY PROFILE Account#: R8071900 •• Parcel #: 080306000035 (Comparable 2 MH Seq rt: MH Space: , Appr Year: 2003 Levy: 98.104 #of Bldgs: 0 Active On: 01/02/2002 8: Tax Dist: 0245 Map #: 1244 LEA: InactiveOn: 20010802000 Assign To: JLS Initials: JSW Acct Type: Agricultural Last Updated: 01/02/2002 8: New Growth: 0 Owner's Name and Address: Property Address: RENFROE JACK P (1/3 INT) & Street: jI City: WELD 6180 W 10 ST GREELEY CO 80634 ca14I-t-, 1. 6D l 9 4.3i A C 4 c. 1.SL BRUNNER ROBERT J (1/3 INT) LAd A 'Vac' \MAP\o W 0.0 'E, Sr, RENFROE SCOTT W (1/3 INT) & Business/Complex: Sales Summary Sale Date Sale Price Deed Type Reception # Book Page# Grantor 08/05/1999 $864,100 WD 2714860 HAYTHORN BROS Legal Description ETN PT NW4 6-6-65(HAYTHORN ANNEX)OBEG NW COR 51D31'E 270.12'TO TPOB❑S89D48'E 420.19'N1D31'W 270.12'OS89D48'E 37.95'51031'E 140.06'CISE19D48'E 348.71'NOD11'E 140' D589D48'E 250.87'SOD11'W 90.61'❑S89D48'E.165.85'S1D15'E 14.64'OSOD10'W 309.40'TH ALG ARC OF CURVE OTO NE RADIUS=1221'CHORD=S21D44'E 0548.3'539D40'E 309.60'542012'E 027.9'540057'E 247.5'TH ALG ARC OF DCURVE TO SW RADIUS=3745' DCHORD=528D59'E 1472.85'N89D39'W 0510'N9D33'W 639.53'N89D39'W 400'050020'W 630'N89D39'W 1431.92'0N1 D31'W 2378.2' TO TPOB(1.64R)DSITUS:WELD L Land Valuation Summary Unit of Number Of Value Per gssmt *Assessed Land Type Ag Code Abst Code Measure Units Unit Actual Value Percent Value Agricultural B II 4117 Acres 10 $478.54 $4,785.40 0.29 $1,387.77 Agricultural A III 4117 Acres 4.5 $317.23 $1,427.54 0.29 $413.99 Agricultural A I 4117 Acres 79.87 $548.31 $43,793.52 0.29 $12,700.12 Land Subtotal: 94.37 $50,006.46 $14,500.00 Full Market Values $0.00 $0.00 Buildings Valuation Summary Thursday, July 25, 2002 Page 1 of 3 WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR PROPERTY PROFILE Account#: R8406800 Parcel#: 070712314000 (Comparable 3) MU Seq#: MH Space: Appr Year: 2002 Levy: 83.552 #of Bldgs: 0 Active On: Tax Dist: 0931 Map#: 1228 LEA: InactiveOn: 20010727000 Assign To: PAN Initials: KRD Acct Type: Agricultural Last Updated: 07/27/2001 New Growth: 0 Owner's Name and Address: Property Address: JENSENNVESTMENT GROUP LLC Street: City: AULT 1001-A E HARMONY RD#515 FORT COLLINS CO 80525 L 5,(rte / l • 1 SAC. S 4 344'- Business/Complex: \_,f a a t 02 QkQV 11.1.0 ULU. Sales Summary Sale Date Sale Price Deed Type Reception # Book Page# Grantor 06/15/2000 $65,000 WD 2776248 HANSEN RIC Legal Description ALT HMLD PARCEL 2 HANSEN MINOR OLAND DEVELOPMENT(HANSEN ANNEX)OSITUS:AULT Land Valuation Summary Unit of Number Of Value Per pssmt *Assessed Land Type Ag Code Abst Code Measure Units Unit Actual Value Percent Value Agricultural A VII 4147 Acres 17.75 $10.99 $195.07 0.29 $56.57 Land Subtotal: 17.75 $195.07 $60.00 Full Market Values $0.00 $0.00 Buildings Valuation Summary Total Property Value $195 $60 *Approximate Assessed Value Thursday, July 25, 2002 Page 1 of 2 7 9 I 10 11 12 7 • 9 • 10 • II 12 1, 7 a • t• •. •• • • • •• .. .• i • i • 106 I I I— ---1 --- — — — — -- +.__ — — -{ I . . . ,— • le 17 1 is 10 14 13 la I 17 le is 14 13 18 17 II 10 14 13 II 17 la 1s 14 13 1 18 i7 . ii II 14 13 1e la 24 is r 1 21)22. 23 44 1• .4 ) ••• 1.f 2 24 11 r 4 ,..„:01:I.:9 24 If 2 Mt 54 if . 102 3o x i T 37 21 I n p ,; I n r - -- - T "-I.-s 2 . 27 2i 31 2f 2e _ n 1 26 2$ 3 33.. .20 . 27 .28 2s 30 100 1 - '; . _k -- _ _Li, ion Map-7,- --3 - L 31 32 33 I 34 3s 30 31 ',i 34 35 39 31 32 33 34 3s 36 1 32 J3 341 3• 35 3/ 32 33 41 3a 31 98 t:,..7N. I � � e s 4 1 3 2 t 9 51 • 3 12 I e e 1 ` 3 2 i'. 0 , 5 4 3 1 a 1 a : 0 '141 3', 2 1 f e 96 --7 f -.1 1-T -HT 1— --� — — L —�— T _ , to T ,t 12 • 10 11 12 7 e 9 10 N I 12 7 I ■ Lf_1 10 11 ,4',. 7. • i 10 1j ,',12 , 7. 6 . I . 7 94x •I.. .. .I... . I J I I— — F:.. f ' .._,:.:�.. !' l9 17 IS 116 14 113 1e 117 IS 1 14 1 13 IS 117 1 16 1 IS 14'•.I •,1! : 17 IS 1s 1 14 13 10 17 14 !s 114 1S.• la Sf 1 iJ CJ pc. I 24 If e� �,y I 24 19 r • I 123 , 59• V ,..ii, Ali, 24 if �1. z'^ ,L.x_ I' 7 r 24 19`✓Y�, B ! y 30 x x 27 u 23 30 20 2e 2'. ••e 25 30 i 29 28 27 2e 2s 30 x z+ �1a. a �]0� x ae 27 I is It,31 32 33 I •� 3, 351 31 32 33 I 34 ii I 3. 31 I 32 C33 I 34 3s 31 32 34.. 36 39 31 32 3334 33 r ]e. 31x.• 86 9 5 4 I 4 2 1 5 s 31 3 II ,_ 4 1 3 2 l . I s 4 2 f 1 • $ 4 J 21—, e 84 —I— — 82 7 A I f l to 1 11 12 7 5 9 10 1,, ,:- 7 III 9 10 II 12 7 6 9 10 11 12 7 9 9 10 1/ 12 7 la l'' 1 is /4ell If.Land , to 17 to 15 14 1 13 II 17 15 15 14 13 la 17 le 1a /4 13 la ao{— -I- y��.2m Salo 3 l' L2'.1 ! - 0: 1 I 1 r 41-'" kilt- 78h3o 1,1 1. 24 19 21 • L21 Safe:.1.. 24 I9 2 ' 23 24 1a 1�t�;II 2• •9 '!� J0 x n VatV� 1 29 x 30 x 12e 27 x6I u 30 n I 28 27 1 26 .41•1•30 76 tj ■ 36 J• 31 1 32 33 v'� 34 37 ]0 ]t 3Y7� li S{ 36 133 3/ ]2 i33 34 1 3a I Jf �II'� g 41 ` 3 2 I 1 a 514 3 2 1 6 s 4 12 1 9 72 — ♦ f l_ 7 to s 7 a �9 10 y� and,. 10 11 �12 7 I I 0 I to I 1• 12 7 • W 1 II 12 7 70 ,R. — _�; ,_.q 13 IS 17 Ie is 14 ��'r.e �� la 17 1 16 I u 1 14 1 13 17 1aLo Is 1 14 13 I la .inn�n• ///////�{//�*•,-��to t;...A 1` t. i rill 'WM •�1 k ril•CMati1a I at i t -I :' '22 .I.1 to l - •. 1fI 1f - iJIL►T r. :� � �I. � � 1 x 27 A ss x x 27 x 2s >o 64 L� +e 4 3f 1 3s 31 1 ; rk j ' J. ,ii II J4-1 3a 1 3� 31 32 21 34 37 34 31 62 • 6 z X 11 ,i. j m fir�5u� ?��3 !b�,,�� J 1��. :� ti{mow TI I • s 4 3 2 1 9 4 f �1t e-a5 eta s� I ��''►►IIIl, - 7]. !�� I 60 F�i ■� F �"wq y�,{?.Xw';: (,,,,,f{( b�t � E1 ,,,,a/A20,,�; 1. ^411 1 12 7 s • to It is 7 58 7 I a # YF 4 .,i 4 r ,:�agrg P+ 1 L,_•IL-1 1€� �`�cc�.`��L �� oprj, , -o is 1 S 7 le:•r 'c�: , 13r 1 it • 11e 1 {�{ :�7S•e"-.2.,. "0214"'',"1-,.--,2,, I�,/!lja �PA• ".. to 17 la 1s 14 13 to 56 ,-: ;=�.ioi as •� A- d ' /� ?241 �..• r t!, .�ilE E F WEga:i 1 T 1f !�1g= ,o r :rir+,�, 123)- . 1. 4� $ ?In) p 23 24 1f 54 f 5Cxilr e.i �.r. In 0114.F1" .gr �d , �+�1 `�..' Et ft,e� 1- JO 29 27 26 23 ....19. 25 •j!, 25 27 - 27 2• 25 30 52 M �.—..fan — r.f r _A. •• , 31 �� 411'1 st —•` 3Q s ° • , • .•1 33 I 34 1 3! 35 31 32 i 33 \\ b 31 St I 1695 1'1raft w�+�' �r NIT .�:, ' 2 r.- 'I s I 4 1 . :.1 4 I a 1 a l e I s 3 t a 6+ �..I ua T 10 11 6 I 9 9•,'i. . . & 1 9 10 It 12 7 6 • 10 it \ 7 7 if••r 01.1 FIT , 1 d F"':, e -4 ' g 17 1 I . .1'•w•• •1. 1{ I 1s 14 13 to 17 19 10 14 1• II 19 i� 6;7.j y.. n� p, .I, '5 • Agin II �I 1,•t.�73 J' 24 u 121 P j:A 24 19 ir �1 21 �... -i J n 30 1 30 f t- M I zy zaF 2s 30 f9 T>� 27 Lx 1 2s 30 23 ( to , 37 n 2s 30 x to 27 x 2s 30 �4 1 I_ __.I - -1- H —Je 31 1-3•t �� , 3e 311 J3 I 34 1 3s J9 3f 32 y3 L._ _ 5 31 32 133 J4 3s Je 31 32 33 34 3s 36 31 I a s ri )2 1 L s • 1 3 I t I t 9 S 4 3 2 t • s 7� 3 7 I 6 e ♦ 3 2 1!� II 12 7 a 11 13 a l9 111 0T 11 12 7 e f to- 11 I--i 7 e� s 10 11 12 7 a 9 10 II 12 IIII 7 13 F� I? Ia IS 4 13 a 17 1a m=, I • la r 17 IS is 14 /3 Ie 17 la 15 x 13 I to 24 �1 �' / :- 7 F 22 33 24 I9 ='` a4 If > !�✓ 7f ' 24 WI 0 � 1 t 7 24 I tf oti.(1, ..: Alb I... '-^//— — `, 2S x 27 x P `29 2• 27 20 2s I 30 29 20 27 x 2s 30 x 21 V 25 25 30 39 26 27 26 to 30 1� 32 3J s< l 3 32 s �y/—>s x I 3:--- - : � A >t 3132as 34J13S 3♦s4 S 13 2 1 2 1 9 a 43 a 1 • e 4 3 BO ti e 9 IC It ld 9 I l0 it 12 } 7 I 5 9 10 11 12 7 a f 10 11 12 7 ff 10 if 12 L7 'sr� _ — 4 i I I I 1 / • SUBJECT PHOTOS EXTERIOR :Jl {jFY iL.rr r i5+ Fly 4 Fir i + �. lid+ �+ r t 11 aT '�. .e �, v F'' Q ti 3 4,j' _ .,4 t. r Y •7 s x'-2, �'1 J.'";gam i r i 1 - '4,...' h )Y 1! 1:4- N � Iy 1 Y 4 �) �4 .m, >' "�'Y z 1ei+p t �r; t44':,,,,t:474.4,,,,Y44.;'," r r s �c'4 ' tFq i Y 4 ll fl ,{ ) , ��{ 4("••�5' t MAR r w ' 1 • F ': 7 r "11 ' ;;yy1/4 ak iX' �' :� i %tncyk f q�' n i t ifYx7? ,443,4 n 4 r it,✓;ty4.4/, a tom' J ;IV,' $sn •:.G 4 n 'A 'b`b4111��/11111iP�R'°u•YM.+.�..++yi.l "' !'_ ..v ' ' 1 v s. 1 .. IX, A ''' { rl s . p,lg s , T yr ' A .,„ .) e . .,,._ ,5 r �E9' d ff}}qh �� " t r ( 1 r� a 1 � y Y.- � r« c � p,/ tjq 'r1 : s;7�' : 4 *aasC tks+$:• r �� 'i `F � ci\ r 111 N( a l';' � `F-„(t "- j `n4 4 Y� '^Y 4{k;lid i,ii'' 0 ,\F IA A_ \� � • SUBJECT PHOTOS EXTERIOR M :' fib' xr�n •ti ti:-4 -- .-• •t•sy— T.' ..., - o` r F 4 k se+ t ,, onitrwailisrim- '!. :.t _ x i _ r t. � N e „ P . i ;. �" 114 a rx 'n ` ,fit •1 of _ .'V ! t' pie, SUBJECT PHOTOS EXTERIOR , _ ._ f b - 04,?;,,,.-!.f₹ ry E t r, 5: fin... P�4: rTb 1 4CeE1:W� is-:,.,; +�1 v if �� r ' !a i t , ,n 1r ' girt F :/r r, ir yj if _ 8 K.Y j L RYA. N Y d / L- f 1 a 4g t : ;iiø ro �% , " �.� \, W.'.". t AyY" ,µ►. xM ^ A ti. .:`,.4.4:,-r.4."1:.'-':-;.,'",s.: ' 4 b t. #p. 24- t r s. 5 .s.-• �•ire -�..,p 4 .;4i-t-' .'-` , ?rte ., �,,. - . r. �l., SUBJECT PHOTOS EXTERIOR - .�. 9f iS4 } —:,_;1-1 • . N p 1 l'1 "�y s ,, !. 'r' S'+i� �' `� ' r •L % ? '• i -at } 4 + , }a 1 e. ti` • t'4"er tx"x`-Oj r r. 1 - r r:: • SUBJECT PHOTOS EXTERIOR } 1 VyY � W, ate" Y d4 —at. r i y.s.sr r" : ,¢' y and y, .' <' .A_':` . T ,'zul4 x •A... _ y wY-k4.�•'Ys �� fp Jr,: .. SUBJECT PHOTOS EXTERIOR I t ; M A a� tir • a �� V { T, s y r ^i� 4 T {'fir. '/� - _n• — 4% r. S 1 • y � fr ty r � \II yn 4 _ ?frA �'.�..:. CT; , ti's` .may + �� 114 'max }yep- ry �! �.. ,�. ., t •' i . � . ' P kF a ��en ♦` 3 b., i a r� F w 1 -nsf Hello