Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20020002.tiff • BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Cristie Nicklas that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: Case Number: USR-1362 Planner: Lauren Light Applicant: Theodore Schrage 0866 State Highway 60 Loveland, CO 80537 Request: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a Single Family Dwelling Unit, Other than Those Permitted under Chapter 23, Article III, Division 1, Section 23-3-20.A, in the A(Agricultural)Zone District. Legal Description: Lot B of RE-2509; Pt. of the NE4 of Section 6, Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Location: South of and adjacent to State Highway 60; west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3 be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 23-2- 260 of the Weld County Code. 2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission staff that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 23-2-220 of the Weld County Code as follows: a. Section 23-2-220.A.1 --The proposed use is consistent with Chapter 22 and any other applicable code provisions or ordinances in effect. A. Goal 1 states, "Preserve prime farmland for agricultural purposes which foster the economic health and continuance of agriculture". The U.S.D.A. soils maps indicate that the soils on this property are designated "Prime". The applicant has indicated the balance of the land will stay in agricultural use when the new home is constructed. However, the property is only 45 acres in size and the Home Supply Irrigation Ditch traverses the property which reduces the ability to farm the parcel. b. Section 23-2-220.A.2 --The proposed use is consistent with the intent of the A (Agricultural)Zone District. Chapter 23,Article III, Division 1, Sections 23-3-20.A and 23- 3-40. L of the Weld County Code provide for a Single Family Dwelling Unit, Other than Those Permitted under Chapter 23, Article III, Division 1, Section 23-3-20.A, in the A (Agricultural)Zone District, subject to a Use by Special Review Permit. There is currently one home located on the property which is occupied by the applicant. The applicant's stated purpose for the Use by Special Review is to provide a building site so a new home can be constructed which is wheel chair accessible. c. Section 23-2-220.A.3 --The uses which will be permitted will be compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. The surrounding properties are predominantly rural residential in use. Conditions of Approval and Development Standards are proposed to ensure that the applicant's proposed use will remain compatible with the existing surrounding land uses. A rural agricultural residence is compatible with the surrounding property uses. ti EXHIBIT 2002-0002 US2t3ba RESOLUTION, USR-1362 Theodore Schrage Page 2 d. Section 23-2-220.A.4 --The uses which will be permitted will be compatible with future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning and with the future development as projected by Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code and any other applicable code provisions or ordinances in effect, or the adopted Master Plans of affected municipalities. The site is located within the three-mile referral boundary areas of the Town of Berthoud and Larimer County. Neither entity indicated a conflict with the proposed Use by Special Review. A rural agricultural residence is in keeping with the potential future surrounding property uses. e. Section 23-2-220.A.5 --The site does not lie within any Overlay Districts. f. Section 23-2-220.A.6 --The applicant has demonstrated a diligent effort to conserve prime agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. The U.S.D.A. soils maps indicate that the soils on this property are designated "Prime" land. The applicant has indicated the balance of the land will stay in agricultural use when the new home is constructed. g. Section 23-2-220.A.7 --The Design Standards (Section 23-2-240, Weld County Code), Operation Standards (Section 23-2-250, Weld County Code), Conditions of Approval, and Development Standards ensure that there are adequate provisions for the protection of health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and County. This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commissions recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review Permit shall be adopted and placed on the Special Review Plat prior to recording. The completed plat shall be delivered to the Weld County Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 30 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. (Department of Planning Services) 2. Prior to recording the plat: a. The plat shall be amended to delineate the following: 1) Adherence to Section 23-2-260.D of the Weld County Code which pertains to the Special Review Permit Plan Map. (Department of Planning Services) 2) Weld County Road 3 is designated on the Weld County Transportation Plan Map as a local gravel road, which requires 60 feet of right-of-way at full build out. There is presently 60 feet of right-of-way. A total of 30 feet from the centerline of Weld County Road 3 shall be delineated right-of-way on the plat. This road is maintained by Weld County. (Department of Public Works) 3) All approved accesses shall be clearly shown on the plat. Shared access with the adjacent property owner on Weld County Road 3 shall be indicated. The applicant shall submit to the Weld County Department of Planning Services a recorded copy of any agreement signed by all of the owners of the property RESOLUTION, USR-1362 Theodore Schrage Page 3 crossed by the access. The access shall be for ingress and egress and shall be referenced on the plat by the Weld County Clerk and Recorders reception number. (Department of Public Works) b. The existing residence shall use the existing residential access point as no additional accesses shall be granted. (Colorado Department of Transportation) c. The applicant shall attempt to address the requirements (concerns) of the Berthoud Fire Protection District, as stated in the referral response received 11/13/01. Evidence of such shall be submitted in writing to the Weld County Department of Planning Services. (Department of Planning Services) d. The applicant shall provide written evidence to the Weld County Department of Planning Services that Section 23-2-260.8.13 of the Weld County Code has been addressed. This section refers to ditch owner agreements. (Department of Planning Services) e. The applicant shall provide the Weld County Department of Planning Services with a certificate from the Weld County Treasurer showing no delinquent taxes exist for the subject parcel. (Department of Planning Services) 3. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. (Department of Planning Services) Motion seconded by Stephan Mokray. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Michael Miller Bryant Gimlin Cristie Nickles Cathy Clamp Stephan Mokray John Folsom Lous Llerena The Chair declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioner's for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Voneen Macklin, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on December 4, 2001. Dated the 4th of December, 2001. Voneen Macklin Secretary SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Theodore Schrage USR-1362 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Use Permit is for a Single Family Dwelling Unit, Other than Those Permitted under Chapter 23, Article III, Division 1, Section 23-3-20.A, in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, as indicated in the application materials on file and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. (Department of Planning Services) 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 23-8-10 of the Weld County Code. (Department of Planning Services) 3. All liquid and solid wastes (as defined in the Solid Wastes Disposal Sites and Facilities Act, 30-20-100.5, C.R.S.) shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. (Department of Public Health and Environment) 4. Waste materials shall be handled, stored, and disposed in a manner that controls fugitive dust, blowing debris, and other potential nuisance conditions. (Department of Public Health and Environment) 5. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. (Department of Public Health and Environment) 6. This facility shall adhere to the maximum permissible noise levels allowed in the Residential Zone as delineated in 25-12-103 C.R.S., as amended. (Department of Public Health and Environment) 7. The facility shall utilize the existing public water supply ( Little Thompson Water District). (Department of Public Health and Environment) 8. Access to the new home shall be via Weld County Road 3 and shall be shared with the adjacent property located to the south. (Department of Public Works) 9. Further subdivision of this parcel will require the vacation of USR-1362. (Department of Planning Services) 10. All proposed or existing structures will or do meet the minimum setback and offset requirements for the zone district in which the property is located. Pursuant to the definition of setback in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, the required setback is measured from the future right-of-way line. (Department of Planning Services) 11. Any future structures or uses on site must obtain the appropriate zoning and building permits. (Department of Planning Services) 12. Should noxious weeds exist on the property or become established as a result of the proposed development the applicant/landowner shall be responsible for controlling the noxious weeds, pursuant to Chapter 15, Articles I and II of the Weld County Code.(Department of Public Works) 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of Section 23-2-240, Weld County Code. 14. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 23-2-250, Weld County Code. 15. Personnel from the Weld County Departments of Public Health and Environment,Public Works and Planning Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time in order to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated herein and all applicable Weld County regulations. RESOLUTION, USR-1362 Theodore Schrage Page 2 16. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing standards and all applicable Weld County regulations. Substantial changes from the plans or Development Standards as shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 17. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. r ,---- the City of Longmont and the Town of Frederick. Mr. Morrison stated that it would apply due to the fact that the area is still included in the formula and the roads are included. As long as it lies within the defined area it will apply to the Impact Fee Ordinance. Sheri Lockman stated that in the past they had placed the condition on if they were in the area. The project will come before the review board so if it is not applicable they will not have to pay. Cristie Nicklas asked Don Carroll about the access. Mr. Carroll stated that the accesses are existing. The residential access is off WCR 7 while the two additional access the outbuildings. They are legitimate accesses. Ruth Traupe,the applicant, provided a brief summary with regard to the need for the property. They have an existing business and need the addition space for storage. The existing buildings were one of the benefit to the property. John Folsom asked about the number of vehicle trips and if there would be a need in the future to have that increases. Mrs. Traupe stated she would like to have more trips if it was possible. The trips are stated as what they do now. Cristie Nicklas asked if they were to live on the property as a primary residence. Ms. Traupe stated at the present time they are not. They will have someone live there. Ms. Nicklas asked if that would be a problem with the USR. Sheri Lockman stated that they need to change the request from a home business. Ms. Lockman suggested that the request be changed to"A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a Use allowed by Right in the C-2 Commercial Zone District(storage building for commercial uses, i.e. trophy parts) in the (A)Agricultural Zone District." Michael Miller asked if it would be sufficient if they read that into the record or would they need to change the application. Mr. Morrison stated it was advertised as a home business and described as a storage building for trophy pars. The description should be reflected in the resolution. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. Cristie Nicklas moved that Case USR-1359, along with the change to Development Standard #4A to one delivery truck three times a week, #46 to one UPS truck five times a week, and the change to the request, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recommendation of approval. Stephan Mokray seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. John Folsom,yes;Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller,yes;Bryant Gimlin,yes; Cathy Clamp,yes;Cristie Nicklas, yes; Luis Llerena, yes. Motion carried unanimously. Case Number: USR-1362 Planner: Lauren Light Applicant: Theodore Schrage 0866 State Highway 60 Loveland, CO 80537 Request: A Site Specific Development Plan and a Special Review Permit for a Single Family Dwelling Unit, Other than Those Permitted under Chapter 23,Article III, Division 1, Section 23-3-20.A, in the A(Agricultural)Zone District. Legal Description: Lot B of RE-2509; Pt. of the NE4 of Section 6, Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Location: South of and adjacent to State Highway 60; west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 3 [4. EXHIBIT C USe f34 Lauren Light, Department of Planning Services presented Case USR-1362, reading the recommendation and comments into the record. The Department of Planning Services is recommending approval of the application along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards. Theodore H. Schrage, provided some additional information with regard to the medical need for the application. Ms. Clamp asked about the other house. Mr. Schrage stated that he will probably rent it. Mr. Folsom asked about the agreement for access with the neighbors. Mr. Schrage stated that they have already agreed to this. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. No one wished to speak. Cristie Nicklas moved that Case USR-1362,be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commissions recommendation of approval. Stephan Mokray seconded the motion. The Chair asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. John Folsom,yes;Stephan Mokray,yes; Michael Miller,yes;Bryant Gimlin,yes;Cathy Clamp,yes;Cristie Nicklas, yes; Luis Llerena, yes. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 2:00p.m. Respectfully submitted vax- Voneen Macklin Secretary Hello