HomeMy WebLinkAbout20022632.tiff Weld County P! 7ning department
SEP 0 4 2002
7:"7*%
N.Y..,fir ,j `fi t•V
September, 3, 2002
Sheri Lockman
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 N. l7''' Ave.
Greeley, CO 80631
Subject: PZ-61 3, Cattail Creek Group, LLC
Dear Mrs. Lockman,
I am writing to express my objection to the new development proposed by the Cattail
Creek Group. The Department of Planning Services is under the impression that this
development would fit into,or be compatible with the surrounding area. (Section 27-6-
120.6.c.) This is not true! Every home within a mile in every direction (much more in
three directions) is on at least five acres of land. The proposed development would be on
one acre lots. I am wondering why the county has a 35 acre rule that is so easily
bypassed!
If the Planning Commission approves this development, it will be imperative that Road
70 be paved and the road through the development be paved. Weld County Road 31 is a
very heavily traveled road and the addition of a development close to it will cause that
much more traffic. There should also be provision of a place for a school bus to pull off
of Road 70 to pick up the children from this development.
Thank you for your attention to my concerns.
Sincerely,
Nancy Kurtz (Mrs. Dwaine)
33693 WCR 31
Greeley, CO 80632
2002-2632
EX ff
5
Weld County Planning Den,rtrnent
September 5,2002 SFP 10 2002
Sheri Lockman WC1/4... Cr 1 V CU
Weld County Dept. of Planning Services
1555 N 17th Ave.
Greeley,Co 80631
Subject:PZ 613, Cattail Creel Group,L.L.C.
Dear Ms.Lockman:
We are writing to convey our disapproval in the matter of the new"cluster"of homes proposed by
the Cattail Creek Group. The tract of land in question for development lies directly across our property line
to the east along County Rd. 70.
Our objections will be clearly stated in the body of this letter. The subject matter is in response to
the topics discussed in the Land Use Application Summary Sheet for P.U.D. Change of Zone dated August
20,2002.
To begin:
In reference to:
2.A(1)Section 11-1-190.D.2.b,P.U.D.Policy 4.2 Cattail Creek has allocated 20 Shares of Woods Lake
Mutual water to irrigate the 30 acres of open space to the east of the purposed units.
The 20 shares are not a guaranteed delivery of water.Without shares of a supporting ditch
company, such as the Larimer-Weld Ditch Co.,(which fills Woods Lake Reservoir)this open space may
only receive 50%or less of its allotment in a dry year.Also without supporting shares the property would
only receive seepage and run off.
2.A(2)Section 22-3-50.B.1,P. Goal 2 "States North Weld County Water District will be used for potable
water&fire protection.
North Weld County Water District is already on water restriction. I spoke with a NWCWD
representative today and they stated currently they are OK,however another year of this type of drought
and they would be in the same position as other water companies. .Where is the water coming from? If it is
the Colorado Big Thompson,North Poudre,and or any other water source it is only good if there is water
in it.The forecast is predicating that it will be several years before we can fully re-coop the losses that we
have experienced the past few years. We do not need 8 or 9 more homes maintain at the present.
In the event that this is approved,the Applicant must provide a fire hydrant due to the closeness of
our homes. With the type of wind that we experienced in this area it is not uncommon to have 40 to 65 mile
per hour wind.Combined with the dryness&wind,many homes could be lost within a few hours.
2.B Section 27-2-20 Access standards,applicant proposes internal gravel roadway.
We support the decision of the Weld County Dept. of Public works to pave the internal roadway.
Furthermore, if the zoning changes from Agricultural to PUD,then concrete curb and gutter should also be
installed.
2.C Section 27-6-120.6.C Compatible
Planning Services seems to be under the impression that this cluster development would be
compatible with the surrounding area.Not So! Our agricultural farm community has several acreage's in
the two(2)digits,and many more that are in the three-(3)digits. Many of these are less than 'A mile from
the purposed development and more just a mile or two(2)further. In this immediate area five(5)acre is the
smallest. This is prime farmland that has been farmed probably longer than you or I have lived. It has a
perfectly fine concrete ditch that delivers water to the acreage,and produces a good crop yield.
The density of 8 to 9, 1-acre lots is not suitable for the area.This is a farming community not mini sub-
division.
2.D Section 27-6-120.6.d Water Supply&Sewer disposal.
Ground water can be reached at three(3)feet in this area. We find this very difficult to believe that
8 to 9 septic systems at such close proximately could be a benefit for the area.Where will the seepage flow,
into the open space? Several people who have lived in this area for many years' state,In a wet spring water
has been V2 way up the purposed development. This brings up environmental issues,Coal Bank creek is
right below the development site and seepage of the septic system has the potential to pollute the creek.
This represents a health issue.After the review of objection, if the Planning Commission approves this,
then it is imperative that the Applicant be required to tap into The City of Greely's sewer system.
2.E Section 27-6-120.6E States streets,highways to property are adequate.
If this development is approved, it will be crucial that County Rd. 70 is paved from County RD.31 to
County Rd.29 due to traffic and road conditions that Weld County can barley maintain with the current
flow of traffic. There should also be a requirement for County Rd. 70 for a designated off the road access
for School buses.
There are other issues that we have,when we signed a contract January 2000 to purchased farm land from
John A. Shepardson,Jr. who is the Register Agent of the Cattail Creek Group,LLC that was recorded with
the Colorado Secretary of State on November 01/2001.
We agreed to purchased this land because we were told that the surrounding land would remain"farmed
land,and that it would be at least ten years( 10)before anything else could be exempted from this farm
land. Had we wanted neighbors right out side our back door,we would have remained in our former
neighborhood.
We ask that you please do not approve this request to change the zoning to PUD from Agricultural.Thank
you for the time and consideration to our request.
Sincerely,
�1 De
/he ehtt
Mic ael&De ra Pa <i
Mr. Joseph A. Hoff
Mrs. Elaine D. Hoff
34251 WCR 31
Greeley, CO 80631
September 6, 2002
Department of Planning Services
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Planning Commission,
We are writing this letter to voice our objections related to the following zoning request:
Request from Cattail Creek Group, LLC to change the zone from Agricultural to
PUD for a parcel located north of and adjacent to WCR 70 and approximately 800
feet east of WCR 29. (Case number PZ-613)
We object to this zoning change for the following reasons:
• The proposed development of 8 one acre lots would not be compatible with the
existing development of the surrounding areas (Section 27-6-120.6.c) The homes
in the surrounding one mile radius are located on lots of approximately 5 to 20
acres,with some being on 65 acres, and most have open, cultivated farm land
between them.
• The proposed development does not comply with the City of Greeley's
comprehensive plan(Section 27-6-120.6.c)
• There is not an adequate water supply available(Section 27-6-120.6.d)
Household water is provided by North Weld County Water District. Because of
the current drought, beginning in November, 2002,NWCWD will deliver 30%of
one acre foot per share. That amount is inadequate to establish newly planted
lawns,trees and shrubs. The result is likely to be a barren patch of dirt in what
has been irrigated,productive farm land. A letter from Mr. George DuBard to
Ms. Sheri Lockman dated June 25, 2002 states that the common open space will
have 20 shares of Woods Lake Mutual water. He states that each share produces
between 1.5 and 2.5 acre feet per year. This is a gross exaggeration. In a good
year, with an abundant water supply, each share would produce a maximum of 1.9
acre feet each year. During the current drought conditions, each share is
producing .60 of one acre foot per share. Again,that amount is inadequate to
establish newly planted grass. There is also a question of how that water will be
delivered to the open space, as the concrete ditch is above the planned lots,
requiring the water to flow through the houses and yards into the planned open
space.
• The sewage disposal system is inadequate(Section 27-6-120.6.d) The water table
near the creek is at 3 feet, which is where the leech beds would need to be. In the
case of heavy rains, when the creek floods up into the planned open space area,
the sewage would run into the creek.
• The proposed development would not be considered an urban subdivision.
However, because there are 8 planned lots, the property owners adjacent to this
land would be unable to develop their land in the future, as it would then be
considered an urban subdivision, requiring city curb, gutter, water and sewer
services.
• There is a great deal of traffic on WCR 31 now, and while we realize a traffic
study was done, it seems unreasonable to knowingly increase the traffic on an
already dangerous road.
We feel that this proposed development would benefit the Cattail Creek Group only, at
the considerable detriment of the existing land and home owners in the immediate, and
outlying areas. We urge you to deny this request for a zoning change. Thank you for
your time and attention.
Sincerely,
Joseph A. Hoff
�C•u.,2 /Zip irii'/
Elaine D. Hoff
r
Mr. Joseph A. Hoff
Mrs. Elaine D. Hoff
34251 WCR 31
Greeley, CO 80631
September 9, 2002
Department of Planning Services
1555 N. 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Dear Planning Commission,
This letter is in reference to the following zoning request case:
Request from Cattail Creek Group, LLC to change the zone from Agricultural to
PUD for a parcel located north of and adjacent to WCR 70 and approximately 800
feet east of WCR 29. (Case number PZ-613)
We have voiced our strong objections to this request in a separate letter. However, in the
event that the request is approved,we respectfully request the following contingencies be
met:
• The access to the lots be served by paved roadways,to include both WCR 70
from WCR 31 to WCR 29, and the internal roadway. (Section 27-2-20)
• An adequate area be provided for the school bus to pull off WCR 70 so that
children may safely board the bus. If this area is within the internal roadway,
there must be adequate room for the bus to turn around without having to back up.
(Section 27-6-120.6.e)
• Sufficient landscaping be completed immediately to provide a buffer of trees
around the property. This landscaping should consist of enough mature trees (5 to
6 feet tall when planted)to shield our view of this development.
• Documentation be provided regarding the available water for irrigation of the
open space, as well as the landscaping in each lot, and for method of delivery of
that water.
Thank you for your time and attention.
Sincerely,
(5 -- I u /(a>fr
Joseph A. off Elaine D. Hoff
8
PETITION
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY HEREBY REQUEST THAT
THE BOARD OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE REQUESTED CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION #PZ-613 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.c THE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES. SECTION
22-2-60 PRESERVATION OF PRIME FARMLAND. THIS APPLICATION MAKES NO
ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE SOME VERY PRIME FARMLAND. SECTION 27-6-120.6.d
THE AREA HAS POOR WATER SERVICE ALREADY AND HIGH GROUNDWATER
THAT FEEDS EAST TO A SMALL CREEK WHICH COULD BE AFFECTED BY
EFFLUENT FROM SEPTIC SYSTEMS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.e THE ACCESS TO THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS ON WCR 70 AND THE INTERSECTION AT WCR 70 AND
WCR 31 IS VERY DANGEROUS AND NOT CONSIDERED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS
AGREEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THESE ISSUES AND DENY THE APPLICATION.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE#
1rrce-e. r XI* sv s-i wck 3/ greater fTvW ySy•3743
2. 3y,1S) (A./cR3) ,P7-�et.4.) $O0) L/5y-3113
3 n4CJ'77l. atiR /`4'5'.3 lv ; fa 63/ 3.5d-.(o 8b'
4.K/-e_e! 1 a ca.ed 34/oa4 uJa e G 80 31 3/4531--2 a 5�s
s. iy t� 33g3s 14/6 31 4%63( ✓ (-7473
g /A; � l
6 adsc tw teaalej 3 5/oaV we,C.a 9 0ba/ 1sV-,7,02 Vs
7. ; , ` \ Lt t 2-.7) ,{�i i \.Os• �� � � `t�4c , �� r �cn ,ice,'
r
8. 5 79.7 Rd 29 clreCiati, ne ,gc(3i 3s6-/;
9. :(7dlt.: ._g•Vel-34, tvc2 33 4 8043/ 9/3-A.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
September 5, 2002
Bill Gerke; Mike Geile; Glenn Vaad; David Long; Rob Masden; Mike Miller
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
CASE NUMBER: PZ-613, Cattail Creek Group, LLC
Public Hearing, Tuesday, September 17th, 2002 at 1:30 pm
Dear Planning Board:
We live at 34024 WCR 29 and know that this is an area of high agricultural use and this is
certainly not home site area. We are on North Weld Water and by the time the water reaches our
home the pressure is very limited. We have wonderful neighbors and we all know when to water
to make everyone have enough water to get by. We have been contacted by the manager of
Cattail Creek Group, LLC and he stated that there will be an eight inch water line installed and
that there are plenty of water taps. We request to see this in writing.
We have been notified by your department of the above mentioned hearing and we have
concerns and requests that we do not approve of the Change of Zone for the following reasons:
Section 27-2-20, Access standards—The internal roads be curb, cutter and paved, with the entry
way large enough for school buses to exit off WCR 70 for the safety of children. The school
buses should not be aloud to turn north onto WCR 31 as it is a blind corner. The entire WCR 70
must be paved from WCR 31 to WCR 29 because it is heavily traveled at this time, even though
a traffic count was done stating only 41 vehicles traveled in that area, which is not true. The
traffic will not only use WCR 31 but also WCR 29. The stop sign at WCR 29 is very unsafe
because of not being visible all directions and high speed vehicles on WCR 29.
Section 27-6-120.6c—Cattail Creek Group is making the board feel this development would be
compatible or fit into the exiting area. I would recommend that all the board explore the area
because this is not true because there are no subdivisions or one acre home site in miles.
Section 27-6-120.6.d-It would be very difficult to install sewage disposal system because of the
water table sometimes being only down three feet. With the slope of the ground we would say it
would be very unsafe with the flow going towards Coal Creek Ditch and the homeowner's down
stream would have unsafe water and it would create health hazards. We don't know where City
of Greeley comes into the picture but the only way to handle sewage would to tap on to their line
—which might be several miles away.
Section 27-6-120.6.g— We would have an interest in the minerals located under the property
since we do have a share, we would want this to be protected.
Page Two
We have a very big concern to fire protection and rates. We would request that fire hydrants be
put along WCR70 and WCR 31 to protect the neighborhood.
The 30 + acres of open space behind the homes would be very unsafe for children as in years
past that ditch has a very high flow of water and we won't have dry years forever.
We would appreciate you taking the time consider our concerns.
Sincerely,
QC' >,'-c-[,c.a.l.,6
William A. "Bill" Perusek
34024 WCR 29
Greeley, CO 80631 O
Barbara c "Barb" Perusek
34024 WCR 29
Greeley, CO 80631
September 8, 2002
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: Cattail Creek Group, LLC PZ-613
Attn: Planning Commission
Rob Masen, Mike Miller, Mike Geile, Bill Gerke, David Long, Glenn Vaad
Dear Board:
I live at 14099 WCR 70 and received a letter of a Public Hearing to be held 09/17/2002, at 1:30
p.m. regarding the case number listed above.
I have great concern for safety on WCR 70 with it being a gravel road and know that if this
develop takes place the traffic is going to flow both ways to WCR 31 and WCR 29. It would be
my request that the road would have to be paved the complete one mile.
Under Section 27-2-20, Access standards it would have to be paved throughout the complete
subdivision to be developed and wide open spaces and pull over for school buses. The entry
must be decorated with high standards of entrance decor, trees and shrubs and maintained year
round.
I have great concern for water usage in the area and North Weld Water would be requested to
furnish writing that the main water line will be made larger and that water taps are available and
that no water would be taken away from any of our homes that are already established.
Also, I feel that is a flood area and in my years of living out here I have seen that water level way
up the open space area. This concerns me for sewage and would be a great health hazard.
I feel this is not a subdivision that should be developed because of the low area where it is
planned for. Also, the costly homes that would be built by the Cattail Creek Group, LLC are
certainly not compatible for this area as we all much larger acreages.
Hoping you will take these matters into consideration .
Sincerely,
MjCil
Michael N. Erbes
14099 WCR 70
Eaton, CO 80615
September 12, 2002
r
Weld County Planning Commission
155 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Board of County Commissioners
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Case Number PZ-613, Cattail Group, LLC
Gentlemen:
I am writing this letter in objection of the proposed Cattail Creek Group. It is my great
hope that as a member of a"planning group" for Weld County it would be in your best
interest to try and maintain the quality of life for its residents. These attempts to urbanize
areas of the"country" cause many, many problems. The majority of residents in this area
own acreages of a considerable amount with quality housing and out-buildings. Most of
us have experienced living outside the city limits for all of our lives and are very used to
the lifestyle that accompanies it. The proposed development would greatly diminish all
the features of"living in the country" as well as the surrounding property values.
Another big concern is, of course, the safety conditions of the roads. Traffic has already
greatly increased to dangerous levels on County Road 31, Hwy. 392, and County Road
74. With additional housing in this area you would inundate and create even greater
difficulties on Roads 70, and 72. We have unfortunately witnessed many casualties on
these roads because they have become so heavily traveled.
With the addition of this proposed development it would also stress the Eaton Fire
Department and its ability to protect the surrounding community. This also brings to
light another problem, which is the water supply. In this period of time when we are
experiencing a drought it should be our civic duty not to put any more of a drain on our
water sources than we currently have. If this development were to go through the water
pressure that we currently have would be affected as well as the ability to use the
irrigation systems that are currently in place. In order for us to maintain the health, safety,
and welfare of our community it is essential that you not allow these types of
developments to win our county.
It is my hope that you will see this development for what it is, and that is that it is only
going to be beneficial to the developer; who obviously has no care of concern for our
community/county and is looking solely at making the all too important profit at
everyone else's expense.
Please do not approve this request and compromise our beautiful county!
Sincerely,
J Millett
33835 WCR 31
eley, CO 6
tt
338 5 WCR 31
Greeley, CO 80631
r
r
September 10, 2002
Weld County Planning Commission
155 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Board of County Commissioners
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80651
RE: Case Number PZ-613, Cattail Group, LLC
Gentlemen:
First I would like to state that I have been actively involved in real estate sales for the past 25
years, specializing in the sale of all types of property in the rural sector. I strongly believe in the
rights of land owners to utilize the benefits of property ownership to its fullest potential.
However, I also believe in the rights of landowners protecting their interest from those who pose
adversity by exceeding certain boundaries while achieving that potential.
I have tried to consider any benefits to the neighborhood that the proposed zoning change would
allow and there are none. Therefore, we strongly urge that you deny this request based on the
following negative impacts this proposal would have on the neighborhood and surrounding
property owners.
Section 27-6-120.6e of the County Code states that the street or highway facility providing access
to the property are adequate. When we purchased and moved to our property 17 years ago
County Road 31 was known as "that road to Bruces Bar", and was primarily local traffic. It is
now a major arterial road providing access to and from the county landfill as well as much of the
transit from Greeley to and from Eaton, Severance, Timnath and Fort Collins, etc.. Traffic on
County Road 31 intersecting Highway 392, O Street and County Road 74 are sites of many
traffic accidents and numerous fatalities each year. The intersection of Road 31 and Road 70, the
intersection where much of the increased traffic will enter onto Road 31 is poor due to low
visibility. I fear for the health, safety and welfare of the present and future residents of the
county as well as the additional burden placed on fire and medical staff responding to the
additional traffic collisions and fatalities in this already problem area.
.
The property consists of prime farmland and when Johnny Miller farmed this property it
produced top yield of all crops including vegetable crop such as lettuce, onions and potatoes.
As stated in Section 27-6-120.6c of the Weld County Code, the use shall be compatible with the
existing or future development of the surrounding area by the existing zoning, which is "A"
Agriculture. The proposed equestrian P.U.D. is not functional as a legitimate horse facility but
instead is just a vehicle used to skirt the zoning requirements to accomplish the sale of a row of
one acre tracts which are not compatible with the surrounding area. The neighborhood instead
consists of mostly agricultural uses consisting of improved parcels ranging from 5 to 160 acres or
larger. Most of these properties are improved with modern good quality improvements. Clearly
this type of housing does not fit the neighborhood and will diminish surrounding property values
as well as the quality of life that has been enjoyed there. The proposal does not comply with the
policies and intent of the City of Greeley Comprehensive Plan and Resolution 7, 1985. Also, the
City of Greeley has cited other conditions that should be part of the proposal.
I have further concerns regarding compliance with Section 27-6-120.6d of the Weld County
Code as to adequate availability of domestic water and the impact this will have on existing
users. Water pressure in the area is already a problem. Further concerns are for the impact this
number of septic systems will have on a shallow water table with live water flowing in a stream
"Coal Bank Creek"just below these systems.
Discussions with neighboring property owners have caused me to have some credibility concerns
with the developers. It seems odd that the planning staff has a picture of this posting for the
proposed change of zoning. However, not one person in the neighborhood has ever seen a sign
posted. I have never seen a copy of the Frederick Farmer and Miner publication. Have those
people never heard of the North Weld Herald and Windsor Beacon? I have heard that one
adjoining neighbor who purchased property from one of the principals had several
misrepresentations in that sale including assurance that there would not be further development
of this land for at least 10 years. Also, when the developer approached neighbors to present their
proposal, if the neighbor was not in agreement they become confrontational. I do not wish to see
the quality of life in this neighborhood be diminished by a party who takes everything they can
and returns nothing beneficial to the surrounding property owners and then moves on.
Once again I strongly urge you to deny this request. Thank You.
Sincerely,
R._Intl . C,1. a `kati
Patrick L. McNear
Claire E. McNear
September 10, 2002
Weld County Department of Planning Services
1555 North 17th Avenue
Greeley, CO 80631
Board of County Commissioners
915 10th Street
Greeley, CO 80651
Re: Case Number PZ-613, Cattail Creek Group, LLC
Attention: Sheri Lockman, Bill Gerke, Mike Geile, Glenn Vaad
David Long, Rob Madsen and Mike Miller
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to object to the eight lot PUD proposed by Cattail Creek Group. The objections listed
henceforth will be in response to the Land Use Application Sheet PUD Change of Zone reasons
for approval as well as other related issues which site reasonable objections and state why this
"development"should hereby be DENIED.
Please refer to:
Section 27-2-20 Access Standards
The internal road should be paved with curb and gutter so as to eliminates dust pollution. The
entry should be wide enough to accommodate a school bus so as not to impede the flow of traffic
on County Road 70 and more importantly for the safety of the children riding the bus. To further
reduce dust pollution on County Road 70, as this development will easily double the volume of
traffic, the mile from County Road 29 to County Road 31 should be paved the entire length. Also
for the safety of the children, the school bus should not be allowed to turn North onto County
Road 31, as this is a blind corner and traffic moves well in excess of the posted 55 mph speed
limit.
Section 27-6-120.6.c
The Cattail Creek development is completely incompatible with the surrounding agricultural area.
This area is very much an agricultural community and has been for the past twelve years that I
have lived here. There are no one acre lots in the area, let alone one acre lots in a row house
configuration. Not to mention that the ground slated for this development is part of a productive
farm as it has been for many years. Also, this proposal does not comply with the policies and
intent of the City of Greeley Comprehensive Plan and Resolution and the City of Greeley has
cited other conditions that should be part of the proposal. To allow this development to proceed
is inconceivable.
Section 27-6-120.6.d
There is a concern that if this development is approved, that the delivery of an adequate amount
of water from the North Weld County Water District will be difficult if the current system is utilized.
Water pressure is already low to non-existent at times. Enlargement of the system would seem
to be necessary if this type of subdivision is allowed.
Also an issue of concem is the high water table in close proximity to the sewage disposal
systems proposed for this development as well as the lay of the land which slopes toward the
creek. The high water table combined with the natural grade of the land sloping toward the creek
seem to create a very real potential for contamination of the creek. This should be deemed an
issue the will compromise the health, safety and welfare of the people, not only in the area, but
downstream as well.
Section 22-2-190.D.2.b
As a former Secretary/Treasurer for the Wood Lake Mutual Water& Irrigation Company, I have a
fair understanding of how the system functions. The twenty shares allocated from the Wood Lake
Mutual Water& Irrigation Company are not a guarantee of delivery to the open space. Without
additional shares of a ditch company that can carry water to the Wood Lake system (for example
—Larimer and Weld)the only water available to the Cattail Creek development would be seep
water. In a drought, like we are experiencing now, there may be little to no seep water available
to be delivered to the development for the open space. In a normal to wet year, the amount of
water available to be delivered will still rely only on the seep water, which will change some,
however, it will never be adequate to irrigate the 34 acres. With consideration to the fact that
there will not be enough irrigation water to properly establish a crop, nor to sustain it, what can
the adjacent properties and surrounding neighbors expect to see in the open space? Undesirable
plants, which usually include noxious varieties, will be certain to invade the open space without
adequate irrigation and maintenance. This will create a nuisance for adjacent property owners
who wish to control weeds on their property as well as create a fire hazard not only for the
development, but for surrounding properties as well. The other issue at hand is the delivery of 20
shares of seep water to the property. It becomes increasingly difficult and cumbersome for the
ditch rider and the farmers under the system to divide the water into smaller and smaller
increments for delivery to such small parcels.
Section 22-3-50.B.1
If this development is allowed to proceed, adequate fire hydrant protection must be provided due
to the close proximity of the homes, not only to each other, but to the surrounding properties.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are no obvious benefits from this development to the
surrounding landowners. It does not lit" into the agricultural community and will only serve to
diminish property values in the area as well as the quality of life that has been enjoyed there.
The negative impact will far outweigh any implied benefit represented by a developer who only
has an interest in taking what he can while returning nothing beneficial to the neighborhood.
I would ask, that for the above mentions reasons, that you hereby deny the request for a change
of zoning from agricultural to PUD_ Thank you for your time to review these concerns and to
consider this request.
Respectfully,
Vicki Mill
Department of Planning Services
The Petition attached is in reference to Case #PZ-613, Cattail Creek Group, LLC,
Change of Zone Application.
The Petition is a request for the Board of the Weld County Planning Commissioners to
deny the request to change this agricultural land to a PUD.
The signatures on the attached Petition form a total of 90 signatures at the present time.
As you can see, the immediate and surrounding community is against this change.
We appreciate your time in reviewing our request and will trust that you will honor the
request for the safety, health and welfare or our community.
PETITION
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY HEREBY REQUEST THAT
THE BOARD OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE REQUESTED CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION #PZ-613 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.c THE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES. SECTION
22-2-60 PRESERVATION OF PRIME FARMLAND. THIS APPLICATION MAKES NO
ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE SOME VERY PRIME FARMLAND. SECTION 27-6-120.6.d
THE AREA HAS POOR WATER SERVICE ALREADY AND HIGH GROUNDWATER
THAT FEEDS EAST TO A SMALL CREEK WHICH COULD BE AFFECTED BY
EFFLUENT FROM SEPTIC SYSTEMS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.e THE ACCESS TO THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS ON WCR 70 AND THE INTERSECTION AT WCR 70 AND
WCR 31 IS VERY DANGEROUS AND NOT CONSIDERED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS
AGREEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THESE ISSUES AND DENY THE APPLICATION.
AME ADDRESS PHONE#
1. � . 34451 w c2 3I Cinws,,, ('v . 21-6i- 30S
2. c E. ki 344'79_ KiC,I2 3/ ( ree (9 9S -a4ss
3. <-SPULHALY P7/ip O Mil?) (JC 3/ CPe 5'/
4. / JJ WV weed 7/ a_(f 4/ 4.521-30-t
7-
5. /✓t ,<,., l't99/ cacti Gr�uC}, 3tY�.
6. , C -- ASS/D we l2 3 / Eft, CIO /ice/ /0
7.1 \f Q o tut ,3/ F4044 efi
8.fie/Yet-4i/ CLCZ/i 364K C'afri,g3
9.% (dm S 354413 WCR 3t Ea;1-o3/4, co y5 11-goof
if 2422ph,t /23/s 4�e,y' moon- de. 41h .2,,Z
e<86- V2. 77
1172-C-tn PAA -e- / o't 31 i c R?z ��a.�a-1— 0e4 &o6/rr
12. 31Y-5:3Y Z�F R 33 jIti -L� & r.
13. G', _...,. l 5754 weR 70 C & -31
14a-15-75M_ W Gc70 Grob j-° OCGT1
PETITION
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY HEREBY REQUEST THAT
THE BOARD OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE REQUESTED CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION #PZ-613 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.c THE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES. SECTION
22-2-60 PRESERVATION OF PRIME FARMLAND. THIS APPLICATION MAKES NO
ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE SOME VERY PRIME FARMLAND. SECTION 27-6-120.6.d
THE AREA HAS POOR WATER SERVICE ALREADY AND HIGH GROUNDWATER
THAT FEEDS EAST TO A SMALL CREEK WHICH COULD BE AFFECTED BY
EFFLUENT FROM SEPTIC SYSTEMS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.e THE ACCESS TO THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS ON WCR 70 AND THE INTERSECTION AT WCR 70 AND
WCR 31 IS VERY DANGEROUS AND NOT CONSIDERED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS
AGREEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THESE ISSUES AND DENY THE APPLICATION.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE#
1. (j c L' t to 04943 wci2_ acj szI l — _ziOcc
2. (V\.,cc.S ILf3'? coc2 70 y 5y- 156 2
3. tit&&' 't /13-79/ 4/(t/ 7C.' 45L 15(4,3--
9 4. f---- c„ V 3S�� 1,1C'R- 2-7 '363 -"LOSS
o-4-- 5 ,,J c_ft. 1
s. -, �V 3 -��� -7 45'Ka ya9
6. C`la ric191 A. . Li g LCs-K _ IS--.k
7. and /?0,- /- srn-rn Nay /9- g S IL -" l2ScY
/� /
8. . I� �l fc 4c47-. !3 SCl/ (4.,41? )l! Vs-9- i,Nr3•9. mow,.. .4;-\\i‘n.,..e-3-__ 1 . 'i t w �f& -70 4 5 q- 110 3
10.7 Hcz< X /4 7r 4r,36-6-7, 7-f-
11.
`/
ex on / 4[377 IlCc7n :) ^ % 1Q
12. J dr, I327/ /JOCK 707 qS11/3072
1 AA 7 & 30�9
14. /�.ctrou �2/7l t V l,�CTha y\a-G 1t`l1
PETITION
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY HEREBY REQUEST THAT
THE BOARD OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE REQUESTED CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION #PZ-613 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.c THE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES. SECTION
22-2-60 PRESERVATION OF PRIME FARMLAND. THIS APPLICATION MAKES NO
ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE SOME VERY PRIME FARMLAND. SECTION 27-6-120.6.d
THE AREA HAS POOR WATER SERVICE ALREADY AND HIGH GROUNDWATER
THAT FEEDS EAST TO A SMALL CREEK WHICH COULD BE AFFECTED BY
EFFLUENT FROM SEPTIC SYSTEMS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.e THE ACCESS TO THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS ON WCR 70 AND THE INTERSECTION AT WCR 70 AND
WCR 31 IS VERY DANGEROUS AND NOT CONSIDERED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS
AGREEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THESE ISSUES AND DENY THE APPLICATION.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE #
t3y (40)- kkke 1 '/ & c0 4Sy -37y3
2,/(7 /3 yV z WL.,/? 7Y <,%h . 5'sY-37Y3
3. King, 1ocasn fs Wc2 z7 Ems, C'_a, 23k0
4.r -iar IrAtoiu& i 3l`t 3 Wry 7Z r rzl i Cn, e4s4-7213 I
5 Lcz-A / 39 Y/ ter je '72 / „ � 013-4/3946
6.12/9,cxi/ T 67 /gri S Cott :mt,zt- zcce
7cJ1✓ t � - / rest 7 14-16C- 77- 61r`7o 6) 4,5et ?FS,
8. 13 'St lock 7ja 4w ( 9 . '16
C U ,L /5-22-71- `z �'� C,
9. / //1 - — 59/f ( aV4„,,, ,% 7a4Ali 7/7"3-7!3'
� 9 c- .,1 /szvo' ct'o�'- !a.
1 trl G' . ecucC �:�C c� 3r - l_aZcadG_ - 'i `// l� ?LiC±e Lee n . //11-C713
11. Cat f / 3W6 ux,e 701 44 &, 95r 3-4:7
12. S.A.. no 4d9_ ui33�c•% .)c.,e r 6-nee y Co 9s5' 3 7
B44 4,3 �i ". �coy — i3G 7 a C T-e-t_11€-,,ti z 2 -9w7
14. �1t3 1-/
5 '/eii, 3�ssG Wc> -q Cie /7 q' -_2.3/9
Sc S316 C
/� �.� - S� A,n. /6 6v-c.c./kJ- z 3 - 63 6y
/ 7 -7/0 paw„ t ib /,v -2142 51-1. I/& r_0�y; nd 3W- 51122-
PETITION
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY HEREBY REQUEST THAT
THE BOARD OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE REQUESTED CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION #PZ-613 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.c THE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES. SECTION
22-2-60 PRESERVATION OF PRIME FARMLAND. THIS APPLICATION MAKES NO
ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE SOME VERY PRIME FARMLAND. SECTION 27-6-120.6.d
THE AREA HAS POOR WATER SERVICE ALREADY AND HIGH GROUNDWATER
THAT FEEDS EAST TO A SMALL CREEK WHICH COULD BE AFFECTED BY
EFFLUENT FROM SEPTIC SYSTEMS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.e THE ACCESS TO THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS ON WCR 70 AND THE INTERSECTION AT WCR 70 AND
WCR 31 IS VERY DANGEROUS AND NOT CONSIDERED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS
AGREEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THESE ISSUES AND DENY THE APPLICATION.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE #
1. eb,,, /5ffos, WC2 20 owe fey, Co&x3/ 3sa-C 4 yo
Ct-2. fly i��0� u!aa 70 cvfauit CO Ltcr k 2352 -5(.0�a
/S7iV l✓o4' 20 Gree/e Co 8QGs3/ c-&1-5/243
4. f742ntt /1 6 44t /S?SY cvCIR ?6 Z e4, CA- 10131 3s3- Y9o3
5. d o� t 1
/ 5'/ toeGZ-7b ��h , C;a �b3/ 37/-sac
6. 1 V (2, gi
I,►.,er/Jjr-in 7,s,/ 6alr ;/I9A.%/4 epic 7O613-4alb
7. 7ar,e (. CQ/ ') £25 G,ACh Aue L II (101 &Dgc®
8. 14200 WCR 70 Grecley Cole t;GC3 (
/�� On, .,44 ) i� wee r° Co yea, 1
10. a l4 200 Lc}cQ Q tlitaha CO eoc ? /
11, p . act .3L/b6o I,UC� .3 r ,ro v 6,/
12. t 35 3't W c iz `1 2nee taxi Cu goon
13.
14.
PETITION
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY HEREBY REQUEST THAT
THE BOARD OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE REQUESTED CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION #PZ-613 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.c THE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES. SECTION
22-2-60 PRESERVATION OF PRIME FARMLAND. THIS APPLICATION MAKES NO
ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE SOME VERY PRIME FARMLAND. SECTION 27-6-120.6.d
THE AREA HAS POOR WATER SERVICE ALREADY AND HIGH GROUNDWATER
THAT FEEDS EAST TO A SMALL CREEK WHICH COULD BE AFFECTED BY
EFFLUENT FROM SEPTIC SYSTEMS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.e THE ACCESS TO THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS ON WCR 70 AND THE INTERSECTION AT WCR 70 AND
WCR 31 IS VERY DANGEROUS AND NOT CONSIDERED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS
AGREEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THESE ISSUES AND DENY THE APPLICATION.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE#
1. 72,041/ o� £363 (-Oat -3 351 -4044
ee,g2_ 3 67,,�i��iC� r/�� �,�
3. Co Q E 3, 5 we./2_ ,N Greek (Q 001031 Tri-3
4. t RXg � !Q ?( (.5-reeky CoD �7,
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
PETITION
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY HEREBY REQUEST THAT
THE BOARD OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE REQUESTED CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION #PZ-613 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.c THE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES. SECTION
22-2-60 PRESERVATION OF PRIME FARMLAND. THIS APPLICATION MAKES NO
ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE SOME VERY PRIME FARMLAND. SECTION 27-6-120.6.d
THE AREA HAS POOR WATER SERVICE ALREADY AND HIGH GROUNDWATER
THAT FEEDS EAST TO A SMALL CREEK WHICH COULD BE AFFECTED BY
EFFLUENT FROM SEPTIC SYSTEMS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.e THE ACCESS TO THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS ON WCR 70 AND THE INTERSECTION AT WCR 70 AND
WCR 31 IS VERY DANGEROUS AND NOT CONSIDERED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS
AGREEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THESE ISSUES AND DENY THE APPLICATION.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE#
1.7 J /? r70? / ,t t/ 5/4 353- 7D≤≤
2. t MD `1Z LCeMe &i/1, -7055
3. 6-1-L/CL- t14ve(f 6(4 ClJ CST -Sr/ c/4t
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
�v
PETITION
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY HEREBY REQUEST THAT
THE BOARD OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE REQUESTED CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION #PZ-613 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.c THE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES. SECTION
22-2-60 PRESERVATION OF PRIME FARMLAND. THIS APPLICATION MAKES NO
ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE SOME VERY PRIME FARMLAND. SECTION 27-6-120.6.d
THE AREA HAS POOR WATER SERVICE ALREADY AND HIGH GROUNDWATER
THAT FEEDS EAST TO A SMALL CREEK WHICH COULD BE AFFECTED BY
EFFLUENT FROM SEPTIC SYSTEMS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.e THE ACCESS TO THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS ON WCR 70 AND THE INTERSECTION AT WCR 70 AND
WCR 31 IS VERY DANGEROUS AND NOT CONSIDERED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS
AGREEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THESE ISSUES AND DENY THE APPLICATION.
NAME t ADDRESS PHONE#
1. °y� Y ie1LePa2:: ea /CIO0 i W C R -in 41 S4 -4013
2. t s.,...<c.J /11 • .,. / 4697 WC /Zi : 7, &`( 1 -,meaty
1 jiA
p
4. 0CUlAA_ FOL.210 r i67(9V-7 &dr,p 1.Z-z_ 7 -2224 is. ,„ i /46 ,P7 G✓C/e / L t 1 7 Z z-/z.y
6. 9r-tett f/0 s 73 GdcIC ! z Z 6l2- ZYp(
7 _
•
2 89 -24/1
) ^
8. ✓✓ 7.e}e r 3P1\ SW Hine 1 3Stc,- agnti
34 Soo t!/eA.f' 3 /"4, G,6 - 5/
Io. ? / , iii/2 /1 A04 G 'ie -ZS.2 -50/7
11. 19' 122C rOalC..,s.a (f- W ..dsor r.o 4)(2-f(O
12. Cann_ C3Co1-Iowwe,ocA C4 W11O(4Sorco in.%- 13oa.
13. OGeA Te--E-e-r Fri ( a. E l7S+ 6�eef' SS ≥-Sa19
14. qc.0.,c, 1, Ld j.ISVI. \\Ak.k \.c1Ca Uf Rib, Ui f 256--(s $cA-
,0
PETITION
WE THE UNDERSIGNED RESIDENTS OF WELD COUNTY HEREBY REQUEST THAT
THE BOARD OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE REQUESTED CHANGE OF ZONE
APPLICATION #PZ-613 FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.c THE
SUBDIVISION IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING LAND USES. SECTION
22-2-60 PRESERVATION OF PRIME FARMLAND. THIS APPLICATION MAKES NO
ATTEMPT TO PRESERVE SOME VERY PRIME FARMLAND. SECTION 27-6-120.6.d
THE AREA HAS POOR WATER SERVICE ALREADY AND HIGH GROUNDWATER
THAT FEEDS EAST TO A SMALL CREEK WHICH COULD BE AFFECTED BY
EFFLUENT FROM SEPTIC SYSTEMS. SECTION 27-6-120.6.e THE ACCESS TO THE
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS ON WCR 70 AND THE INTERSECTION AT WCR 70 AND
WCR 31 IS VERY DANGEROUS AND NOT CONSIDERED IN THE IMPROVEMENTS
AGREEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THESE ISSUES AND DENY THE APPLICATION.
NAME ADDRESS PHONE #
1. tktc. 1cP C"T1gt4 cxcb ft-) gin - ���1
2. . 5O5 3st CI`[CC -
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Weld Count; 0 0, _hunt
C^
SFP 1 3 2002
September 10, 200
15374 Weld County Road 70
Greeley, CO 80631
Mike Geile, Bill Gerke, Sheri Lockman, David Long, Rob
Madson, Mike Miller, Glenn Vaad
Weld County Planning Commission
P.O. Box 758
Greeley, Co. 80632
Subject: PZ 613, Cattail Creek Group, L.L.C.
Dear Planning Board;
It has just been brought to my attention that a request to build
a "Cluster Development" on Road 70 between Roads 29 and 31
is before you at the September 17th meeting. I live on Road 70
between Roads 31 and 33 and have lived here for 25 years. I am
writing to let you know I strongly disapprove of this plan.
The first question to be asked is "Why?" I do not believe there
is a need for homes in Weld County in the price range that has
been proposed.
Second, the area proposed is not suitable for homes, in my
mind. This is a low lying area where, in wet years (and they will
come) this is often flooded. The land here has been profitably
and continuously farmed for as long as this area has been
settled. There is no logical reason to change this.
Third, I understand the homes are to be on septic systems.
Would not these systems seep into Coal Bank Creek, just below
the development, and cause pollution? The water table in this
area is usually quite high, especially during the irrigation
season. Nine septic systems in such a small area does not seem
like a sensible idea.
Fourth, If these properties are to receive a share(s) of the ditch
water, this hardly seems practical. The available ditch water
should not be diverted from agricultural use to household use.
The opportunity of these owners to irrigate lawns would be hard
to regulate fairly.
Fifth, The problem of more families in a small area would
require arrangements to be made of school bus services, fire and
police protection, and delivering adequate water to each home
while maintaining water pressure.
Please give these concerns serious consideration. All growth is
not positive for our county. Thank you for the effort and
thought you give this matter.
Sincerely,
r ,5.4! ,t X72---
Sonia Burron
356-9694
r
Weld Co °nt
�-. September 12, 2002
Weld County Dept. of Planning Services& Weld County Sc.' 16 2002
1555 N 17th Ave.
Greeley, Co. 80631 a y
Subject: PZ 613, Cattail Creek Group, L.L.C.
Dear Sir or Madam:
We are Mike and Brenda Nelson. We live within a mile of this proposed
subdivision. Mike has lived within a mile of this site his entire life, 20 years of that time
he spent farming. We would like to state our disapproval in the proposal of this building
site for new homes.
We would like to point out that the open areas in this subdivision are dependant
on imaginary shares of Wood Lake Water. This lake is nothing without water from
Lorimer Weld irrigation so where will this water really come from? We also do not
understand how a county interested in preserving prime agricultural farm ground
would have the best part of this whole section under houses.
The main entry to this area, Road 70, at the intersection of Road 31 is already a
very dangerous intersection. If this project does somehow go through we hope you are
looking into a four way stop to help prevent the inevitable accidents.
It is our hope that you seriously consider not approving the proposed Cattail
Creek Group, L.L.C. subdivision.
Sincerely,
/hik,
Mike and,Brenda Nelson
SHERI Lockman - PZ-613WCR70agreerr9t.wpd Page 1
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1111 H STREET
P.O.BOX 758
GREELEY,COLORADO 80632
WEBSITE: WWW.CO.WELD.CO.US
PHONE (970)356-4000,EXT. 3750
FAX: (970)304-6497
September 13,2002
Matthew J. Delich,P.E.
2272 Glen Haven Drive
Loveland,CO 80538
Re:PZ-613 Cattail Creek,WCR 70 Road Improvements Agreement
Dear Matt:
This is in response to your memorandum of August 28,2002,and to document our telephone conversation of
September 10,2002.
/"` I agree with your methodology in determining 27%to be the cost allocation for the Cattail Creek development.
Roadway stabilization consisting of additional aggregate base course treated with chemical additives is an
appropriate roadway improvement given the level of traffic anticipated at the build out of Cattail Creek. The
cost for material and placement for one mile is approximately$50,000.
Your cost share contemplated stabilizing 0.8 of a mile from the Cattail Creek access east to WCR 31. Because
we anticipate Cattail Creek will generate 40%of its trips west to WCR 29,and because the County would
stabilize the entire mile,the cost share should include the entire mile. Therefore,the cost share for the
development would be($50,000 X 27%)$13,500. It is my understanding you agree.
This proposal meets the roadway improvements agreement requirement for the change of zone hearing. The
final agreement to be submitted to the Board of Weld County Commissioners for approval will be required with
the final plat application materials.
Sincerely,
Drew Scheltinga P. E.
Engineering Division Manager
PC:John Shepherdson,Cattail Creed Group LLC
Todd Hodges/Ann Johnson,Todd Hodges Design
Sheri Lockman,Planning
File PZ-613
EXITh3fr
M:\W PF ILES\DRE WPlanning\PZ-613 W CR70agrcement.wpd /
r
Cattail Creek
Planned Unit Development
Change of Zone
Presentation to:
Weld County Planning Commission
September 17, 2002
Todd Hodges Design, LLC
r
Vicinity Map
1411 Oap. f • r 7r,
Tr
, s J /
r
\J C
W .
i Si)
tie,
1
View to the North
•
.,,. ::
•
•
t
.fry , ..... •
III: be4 1 ,
ty Ia IIryII
•
•
re"
View to the West
•
f u r,�,,ni,flitf;ilf;,hP;i'I
fft 7f f�I111�Il nll �.z
•
•
If fI,fi
s• '. C
•
•
r
View to the South
ii ii ��il�l I
t �• - 4...Yyk w.'.
v �`M
View to the East
Ili�i iIIIfII��I)���i I iii,'
(
4+x
.e ..... ... .revuybm.ia J.v.v-+m. .........w s.
3
View to the East
Across Building Envelope
,
5 "'1 , 4 hP ' 40,1 , % . '"
r
Site Plan
r -, „.,:„....„,„,....,,,....„.,..,"
.," i , _._
I ,. , _
, 1
, .,
,„ , _, _ . _ ,..,.......
..i., ,'., r
, i ti�ii ,I ,,,..i ,e r. � ` x E'lE5ia
,_
4
r
Code Compliance
Benefits to the County
• Common Open Space Requirement
• Creative Approach to Land Development
• Upgrading Public Water Supply Line
• Appropriate location for Non-Urban Scale
Development
• Right to Farm
• Incorporation of Referral Responses
Thank you .
Todd Hodges Design , LLC
5
Hello