HomeMy WebLinkAbout20020038.tiff WINDSOR
��. Town of Windsor
30I Walnut Street • Windsor, Colorado 80550 • 970-686-7476 • Fax: 970-686-7180
COLO
ANNEXATION IMPACT REPORT
EASTBROOK ANNEXATIONS#1 AND #2 AND MASTER PLAN
The parcels proposed for annexation contain approximately 126.4 acres located north of
and adjacent to State Highway 392; west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 21, being
more particularly described as part of the SE '/4 of Section 15, Township 6 North, Range 67
West of the 6'h P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
1) Please see the enclosed Vicinity and Land Use Plan Maps.
2) The application materials did not include a draft or final pre-annexation agreement.
3) Municipal services will be provided as follows:
➢ Water—The Town of Windsor will provide potable water service to the proposed
development. It is also anticipated that discussions with the developer to provide
a non-potable irrigation system will take place in order to reduce the amount of
potable water required.
> Sewage Disposal — The Town of Windsor will provide sanitary sewer service to
the proposed development.
➢ Drainage Facilities— Drainage infrastructure per the Town's requirements is to be
constructed by the developer at the developer's expense.
> Fire Protection —Windsor-Severance Fire Protection District
➢ Police Protection—Town of Windsor Police Department
> School — Windsor-Severance School District (enclosed please find an Impact
Statement from the School District)
4) Installation and financing of infrastructure extensions, as well as any applicable
reimbursements for previously oversized infrastructure to serve the subject property,
shall be the responsibility of the developer
5) Enclosed please find a list identifying all existing districts within the area to be
annexed. _ . ,.
6) Enclosed please find an Impact Statement from the Windsor-Severance School
District.
All development proposals are required to comply with the Town of Windsor
Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and applicable Corridor Plans.
2 I j, 101
Scott Ballstadt, AICP, Senior Planner Date
annex impact report
2002-0038
//..)."O,4PC' PL O\00-n cet) Pw, em , So (IL"
cou CO __ co u___ --
"� I SP I'z
1
1'3 Si ;�9 F., 3
LCR 6s wrp Pn _ S , WCR 8Q r I VICR E'J_
LCR 14 m i
® -ca i i:-.I
IC 42,Irl
O I 1
3
rc
0
ter)
' WCR J. WCR JE L_ I wfo -a -- �—
-1 . .. CR J
1 t. _ Pq
1
LCR 40 .r,1.W R J *_
TOWN I. $ 1 $2 0`pY
41,
J rc [ TOWN OF I
_ WCr.4,' SEVERANCE
3
�CR
� marl 'v > { j --
R }. 1 LCR 3 �.� f�A! k 2 ✓ 3 f ` 1
a�
I �' K— • r
. 41 ;. Ji 2
c, -•' WCR JOB —___-1WCR JO �..��� �_� x N i i ,". p .44 .. SUBJECT ,�
54
'rA3/4, v PROPERTY ` i
�? } ` e1IGrCf �)Fa ez - .I y
7I'LCR 30
i a o Sys' i►wp NET 4.
g
ill,.: w R - 3 S `+` —
•
A? P x ,� P ORE o
CRY OF ?` ' 1 I I A
OVEL ND
45
„ SF" i]. WCR 60 y�2. c g mV?yea,'. U� 34 BU5.
!
al
c .,, ,.y = pr
�'� ` y'ss't' �-0 d an
cm of an
'1 � r •
rc 3 r ,�t.c�_Pt-y a GREELEY 3. I
u5 34 r LP _
'3' — sy}•y A.,A ry 0 so l r
Le
R y 3 3 __ 3I Scab iDAM
17 J
pNK1MipN6 ED Li0NIndoFid I= Other Pubic/Semi Pubic IWKnuTpN6
O Very Low Desity Single Fancy Residenld Hoary Industrial ® Lakes,Rivers.filches LAND USE PLAN MAP
LANISED DUtlEP
D Single Family Residential ®Residential Mixed Use .. Community lndence Mee
—Mdifaniy Nadeau! 5 PSApen s,O space&FboPl®s Growl Malegement Meg BoLmdery Comprehensive Plan
—Central !Mid id p Community Sepaalor C) Mlaid Entryways
—Neighborhood A General Cammereid ®&hods Town of Windsor,Colorado
'NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Windsor Planning Commission will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on Wednesday,
January 16, 2002 and the Windsor Board of Trustees will hold a PUBLIC HEARING on
Monday, January 28, 2002 at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of Town Hall, 301 Walnut
Street, Windsor, Colorado to receive public comments on an annexation to the Town of
Windsor of approximately 122.9 acres known as the Eastbrook First and Second
Annexation located north of and adjacent to State Highway 392 and west of and adjacent
to Weld County Road 21 in the Town of Windsor.
Interested citizens are invited to attend and be heard.
Catherine M.Kennedy
Town Clerk
Published in the Windsor Beacon December 20 and 27, 2001 and January 3 and 10, 2002
NOTE TO BEACON: LEGAL NOTICE
CONTACT: Peggy Tremelling
Planning Technician -Town of Windsor
686-7476
DELIVERED TO THE WINDSOR BEACON
DATE: 12-17-01
•
TOWN OF WINDSOR
RESOLUTION NO.2001 - 79
BEING A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT AND ESTABLISHING
THE TOWN OF WINDSOR'S INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN
AS THE EASTBROOK FIRST ANNEXATION AND A DETERMINATION OF SUBSTANTIAL
COMPLIANCE WITH THE MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION ACT OF 1965
WHEREAS, a petition has been filed by Andrew L. Farago and Becky A. Farago to annex to the
Town certain real property known as the Eastbrook First Annexation, more particularly described
within the petition which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS,pursuant to the Municipal Act of 1965,the Town is required to establish a date,time
and place for a public hearing on said annexation; and
WHEREAS, the Town is further required to determine that the petition for annexation is in
substantial compliance with the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND AND RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR,COLORADO,AS FOLLOWS:
1. The petition for annexation has been signed by more than 50 percent of the land owners in
the proposed annexation, said land owners owning more than 50 percent of the land in the
area to be annexed.
2. At least 1/6 of the boundaries of the proposed annexation are contiguous to the boundaries
of the Town of Windsor, pursuant to Section 31-12-104(l)(a), Colorado Revised Statutes.
as amended.
3. A community interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of
Windsor.
4. A public hearing shall be held by the Windsor Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, January 16, 2002 and by the Windsor Board of Trustees at 7:00 p.m. on
Monday, January 28, 2002 at the Windsor Town Hall, 301 Walnut Street, Windsor,
Colorado.
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 10th
day of December,2001.
TOWN OF WINDSOR, COLORADO
By: 44:6-,-1,t.MA/4,
/Mayor
A';OFW.,y
/' CORPORAT
AI !EST:
SEAL le T
wn Clerk 9 CoCoQ•P
TOWN OF WINDSOR
RESOLUTION NO.2001 - 80
BEING A RESOLUTION MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT AND ESTABLISHING
THE TOWN OF WINDSOR'S INTENT TO ANNEX CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY KNOWN
AS THE EASTBROOK SECOND ANNEXATION AND A DETERMINATION OF
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION ACT OF 1965
WHEREAS, a petition has been filed by Andrew L. Farago and Becky A. Farago to annex to the
Town certain real property known as the Eastbrook Second Annexation, more particularly described
within the petition which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS,pursuant to the Municipal Act of 1965,the Town is required to establish a date,time
and place for a public hearing on said annexation; and
WHEREAS, the Town is further required to determine that the petition for annexation is in
substantial compliance with the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND AND RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR,COLORADO,AS FOLLOWS:
I. The petition for annexation has been signed by more than 50 percent of the land owners in
the proposed annexation, said land owners owning more than 50 percent of the land in the
area to be annexed.
2. At least 1/6 of the boundaries of the proposed annexation are contiguous to the boundaries
of the Town of Windsor, pursuant to Section 31-12-104(1)(a), Colorado Revised Statutes
as amended.
3. A community interest exists between the area proposed to be annexed and the Town of
Windsor.
4. A public hearing shall be held by the Windsor Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. on
Wednesday, January 16, 2002 and by the Windsor Board of Trustees at 7:00 p.m. on
Monday, January 28, 2002 at the Windsor Town Hall, 301 Walnut Street, Windsor,
Colorado.
Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the foregoing Resolution was adopted this 10th
thy of December,2001.
TOWN OF WINDSOR,COLORADO
By: G n 11/1((
or
a� ..... OS,
64/.
ATT . ® ® ®
'• L SEA
sT. oo r'
9�OF COuO�PTown;11:4---4+ -�,s
R67W Wp ;1.11 JJ, -
- � i, ' i, Bmoe .. K
I / P. o '— i i
1 • N / p \ 0—~� `\
., � , : —
•'•PREELEY -.._. 1 v :W
P
N.r7f751
j
\ 4600 SITE/ 1 465 �,\
4.,,,,,;,-,,,),. 1,r a yt 4 Cr' V �'
`Pr Lake OD • -
n.JA �I f ` 771 I / —�—�) � c
v
I I in i �.�—��/
B I a ; �1 /.•- I I 1r ' Ri.n eel•/ SH 392 4790
1 \ I 838:1 766. ..• -7 - e ` . A
- --
r N. I P
` \ 4794 \ ��. e hi< \N\\ _n
:• • Windsor _ . S �'` �� "6° )• �.
• c it a A. -
1 il21 22 2 cc4 c 23 p 1 we ,,
$ Q4p0 /p1' `M10 / `
Er C a 'M
a - a�A/ j \I ,�'; 4765 CDr�eS .
4
Sewage Deposal BM • 2 I - T+'\� I /
'Plant 4774 r 4766 s 9 k.; .a.41 •
Ip 4 - I,
r1
il
y f` •
28 * .z 7 1�/ . - A .__.WHITNEY _
160
O
2000 1000 0 2000
tiniiMESI
SCALE IN FEET
EXHIBIT A
oaw, Ivpvolrip, ' Applegate
Job Ho: 01-102 ANDY FARAGO t Group,Iwa.
Drown: CPS
EASTBROOK ANNEXATION gym°""`�raj
� end Willa
Dew I Derma,
,C IZp34-2728 200 Nal noeCO00530 N0
Mocked MJL Umw.2-6611 E9 070)461-98PA 18
e.: wkeaay Yap WIG VICINITY MAP a"(M3�b➢Sa F.(970l�1177
Scab: I••2000• mi: 9a9...Wobkk AplrptGmy®
EASTBROOK ANNEXATIONS 1 AND 2
Statement of Community Need For Proposed Annexation and Zoning
Project Description
The property comprising the Eastbrook Annexations 1 and 2 are located in the quarter section
immediately north of State Highway 392 (SH 392) and immediately west of Weld County Road
21 (WCR 21), adjacent to the eastern boundary of the Town of Windsor. The property is
described more particularly as a portion of the east half of Section 15, Township 6 North, Range
67 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado (see Exhibit A).
The area to be annexed includes approximately 126 acres, of which 3.5 acres are road right-of-
way. Through this annexation, 2,540 feet of WCR 21 will be incorporated into the Town of
Windsor. Due to the shape of the parcel, a series annexation is required, to be carried out in two
steps (Annexation 1 and Annexation 2).
The existing land use on Lot B, which comprises the majority of the property (117.9 acres), is
agricultural, and the Subdivision Exemption lot (5.0 acres) is the site of one single-family
residence and related outbuildings and structures. The property is bisected from the southwest to
northeast by a single-track branch of the Great Western Railway (the "rail line"), and is further
bisected from northwest to east central, along an irregular route, by the Union Colony #2 Canal
(the "canal").
In conjunction with the proposed annexation, the zoning is anticipated to change from Weld
County Agricultural to the Town of Windsor's Residential Mixed Use (RMU).
The existing land use pattern for the area surrounding the property consists of agricultural to the
north and east, single-family residential and commercial to the west (Winter Farm Annexation
and Windsor Industrial Park Annexation, respectively) and single-family residential to the south.
Project Concept
The applicant's objective for this development is to provide the Town of Windsor with a variety
of attractive housing and a commercial/industrial area that enhances the economic viability of
the Town. The proposed RMU zoning provides for a compatible mix of single-family (attached
and detached) and multi-family residential dwellings, as well as commercial and light industrial
land uses in a planned community environment.
Single-family homes are proposed in the area north of the Great Western railroad right-of-way,
removed from the hustle of SH 392. The lots in this area will range in size from 6,000 s.f. to
approximately 0.75 acres. The lots along the western boundary of the proposed development
will be comparable in size to those in the adjacent portion of the Winter Farm development,
ensuring compatibility between the two subdivisions.
A mixture of single-family attached and multi-family residential is proposed for the area south of
the rail line and the canal. The multi-family residential will include duplexes, town homes and
Eastbrook Annexations I and 2 Page 1 of 6
Statement of Community Need 11/9/2001
"� ' 3 �`u 11'
R67W �Bnoe ` , ;
3/ o , • I
/ I r�\ to l ' l
_ +a3W M1 1 -
I ,,,1 '�\ CV ', o '` -C.
/\ ' \i
GREELEY a' • .`\ S O 47 ;
1.
� 4600 1 I '..' 485
an \ =isi SITE 14 ' ° ~`
a.,/,
r Lake a::
°u; �I moo ._�
d. la r
8 1 SH 392 4790
, -„� 4766'. 'l i''' 0 —"� -
T6N; o o ,—
J ..
amr"" tack Off\ 6M y o.., ••
`�
�]✓f\a -_ 4794 0 --.s� f� 44 •
...,.,
- �"
a a>so-
W Windsor ���
0
! 21 0o-
22 23 well,
22 Oo�OP 400 leu _'1
h.
N
10 1 '., `I 4765 Co
e \ Ov
Sewage Disposal - a y I �$• \ \
B
'Plant M_<4774 �� 14766 0 ':\
4764
II
1 I
gg
u., r y ` � ..-.. llI \_i . 4757
28 \ { •
_ r• te__ 27 27 i. _ •
i€ .. . ,......,.N .._.
._. .J!.. _ wmg EY
alb
2
2000 1000 0 2000
iiirlIMMII
SCALE IN FEET
EXHIBIT A
Dote 11/01/°' r 5 Applegate
Job No: 01-102 ANDY FARAGO
Daown EPS Group,Inc.
Design- EASTBROOK ANNEXATION t antultanla
orland Minerals anti
Woo
checked MDL 149)Woe 120th Me...Sac.100 Na Hoeing IX Au.10
Davin,(It Wn]4-znx I.wtln,a.CO 8151
File: Vicinity Nop DWG VICINITY MAP (3nuuus1I 1970)461.9x84
Fr(3011457.2754 lax 19701911-1177
Scale: 1"-1000' —thfewlei er Pas Wraoc.4xxiPisan,m
apartments and will serve as a buffer between the single-family residential to the north and the
commercial area to the south. These units are situated closer to the intersection of WCR 21 and
SH 392 to facilitate access for residents or the area and to minimize unnecessary travel through
the single-family residential area.
Parks and open space are also significant components of this development, strategically located
to provide residents with convenient areas for outdoor recreation and to buffer the development
from less compatible adjacent land uses. Major open space/park areas are located adjacent to
WCR 21 and adjacent to the Windsor Industrial Park. The locations of these open spaces will
also provide the development with attractive landscaped entrances.
Provision is made for a pedestrian/bicycle path along the north side of the Union Colony Canal,
as well as along the west side of the Law Ditch lateral. These trails will help to connect the areas
within the Eastbrook development, as well as connect the development as a whole with the
surrounding neighborhoods such as Winter Farm and other areas of Windsor to the west and
south. Children from the development will also be able to use these paths to walk to the
elementary school located in the Winter Farm subdivision.
Commercial and light industrial uses are proposed within the southern portion of the
development, along the SH 392 corridor, in accordance with the amended boundaries of the
Cooperative Planning Area (CPA) and the Commercial Corridor Area (CCA), as set out in the
IGA between the Town of Windsor and the Town of Severance. This area will be visible and
easily accessible from both SH 392 and WCR 21, and will serve as a potential employment base
for the residents of the development, as well as strengthening the economic base of the
community.
Development Phasing and Schedule
It is anticipated that this development will proceed in approximately four phases, commencing
with the multi-family and single-family attached homes in the east portion of the site north of the
commercial/industrial area. The detached single-family homes north of the rail line will
comprise Phases 2 and 3, likely being developed in progression from west to east, as an
extension of the Town growth that will happen in the Winter Farm subdivision. Phase 4 of the
Eastbrook development will consist of the commercial/ industrial area fronting on SH 392.
It is anticipated that build-out of this development will occur over a 5-10 year period, subject to
market conditions.
Site Soils and Groundwater
A subsurface investigation of the site was conducted by Earth Engineering Consultants, Inc. in
May/June of 2000, in connection with a previously contemplated development. In the course of
the investigation, seven augered borings were advanced to depths ranging from 10.5 feet to 48.5
feet. The soils underlying the site consist typically of six inches of topsoil, underlain by stiff to
very stiff brown lean clays, clayey sands and sandy clays; underlain by cleaner granular soils
with some cobbles. Two of the borings were advanced to bedrock, which was encountered at
depths of 27 and 47 feet, respectively. Groundwater was encountered in the borings at depths
ranging from 4 feet to 11 feet below grade.
Eastbrook Annexations I and 2 Page 2 of 6
Statement of Community Need 11/9/2001
Based on the findings of the investigation the geotechnical consultant recommended that
conventional shallow footings and foundations be used for lightly loaded structures (which
would include residential dwellings) and that deeper foundations may be necessary for more
heavily loaded structures (possibly some of the commercial buildings). Little if any swell
potential was indicated by laboratory testing of collected soil samples, although a caution was
included regarding the need for good positive drainage under roads and exterior slabs to limit the
possibility of frost heaving.
The elevated water table condition observed during the investigation led to a recommendation
that no basements be constructed at the site. It should be noted, however, that the investigation
was conducted during the growing season, when the area was being regularly irrigated. It is
possible that the shallow depth to water was actually localized evidence of an artificially
mounded water table due to that irrigation. A further investigation of the groundwater condition
will be conducted, now that the growing season is complete and irrigation has been suspended.
If this subsequent investigation indicates that the water table has subsided, normal residential
development, including basements, can proceed. If the water table is shown to be naturally high,
in the absence of irrigation, then it is reasonable to conclude that groundwater will be a concern,
and further consideration will be given to either developing engineering solutions to mitigate the
problem or foregoing the prospect of having basements in some or all of the houses. Mitigation
options might include raising the grade of various lots as part of the overlot grading plan or
installation of a subdrain system to locally lower the groundwater table.
Site Access
Access to the site will be from the existing WCR 21 and SH 392, as well as through the Winter
Farm development. WCR 21, which abuts the eastern boundary of the site, is currently a 2-lane
paved road with no shoulders, situated within a 60-foot right-of-way. SH 392, runs east-west
along the southern boundary of the site. This is also a 2-lane paved road, but with arterial status.
SH 392 is constructed within a 140-foot right-of-way. Access through the Winter Farm
subdivision will be along a collector road in a 60-foot right-of-way.
Municipal Services
Municipal services for the Eastbrook Annexation will be provided by the following agencies:
• Water Town of Windsor
• Sewer Town of Windsor
• Electricity Xcel Energy (formerly Public Service Company)
• Telephone Qwest Communications (formerly US West)
• Fire Windsor-Severance Fire Protection District
• Police Windsor Police Department/Weld County Sheriff's Department
Potable Water
There is a 14-inch diameter trunk main, comprising a portion of the Town distribution grid,
located along WCR 19, west of the Winter Farm development and approximately one-half mile
west of the project site. Proposed water works infrastructure improvements within the Winter
Eastbrook Annexations I and 2 Page 3 of 6
Statement of Community Need 11/9/2001
Farm development will extend to the west boundary of the Eastbrook subdivision, at the access
point north of the railway right-of-way. This will provide one point of supply for water works
improvements within the Eastbrook development. In addition to the distribution mains within
the Eastbrook development, it is anticipated that a new water main will be constructed along a
portion of WCR 21, to link the northern and southern portions of the development, and a further
trunk main will be constructed westward along SH 392 to WCR 19 to complete a loop of the
water supply network in the area.
Sanitary Sewer
The Town is preparing to construct a 27-inch diameter sanitary sewer interceptor that will serve
the Winter Farm development and also be available to serve the proposed Eastbrook subdivision
and other developments in the eastern portion of the Town. The new sewer interceptor is
referred to as the East Side Sewer Interceptor (ESSI). Sewer infrastructure improvements within
the Winter Farm development will be extended to the west boundary of the Eastbrook property,
along with the water works infrastructure described in the section above. It appears that the
proposed Winter Farm improvements will be sufficiently located and sized to serve the portion
of the proposed Eastbrook development north of the rail line. Due to site topography, however,
it will likely be necessary to construct a new sewer trunk main, westward along SH 392 from the
southern access to the site to the ESSI, in order to serve the southern portion of the Eastbrook
development. Both the sewer and the water trunk mains along SH 392 will require crossings of
the rail line. Such crossings are not expected to be technically challenging, but will require
coordination with and approval of both the railroad company and CDOT.
Drainage and Storm Water Management
The general topography in the vicinity of the site is such that storm runoff flows toward the site
primarily from the north and northeast. Runoff that originates within the site from incident
rainfall, migrates overland and is either intercepted by the Union Colony #2 Canal and conveyed
off-site to the southeast; funneled toward a standpipe drain just north of the rail line at the west
property line, and conveyed off-site to the south from there; or intercepted by the roadside ditch
along SH 392 and conveyed away from the property in a southerly direction by the existing
surface drainage network. Runoff from the area immediately north of the site and west of WCR
21 enters the site as overland flow and is either diverted to the southwest by the railway
embankment or directly intercepted by the Union Colony #2 Canal. Runoff from the area to the
northeast of the site is intercepted and concentrated by the extension of the railway embankment
and/or the John Law Ditch and conveyed toward the site.
Management of runoff that originates within the site will not present any significant challenges.
Flows will be conveyed, via a combination of roads, surface channels and underground pipe
systems, to one of several on-site detention facilities. Discharge from these detention facilities
will be controlled such that the rate of release does not exceed historic rates. Discharge from
areas north of the Union Colony Canal will be piped under the canal, as the Irrigation Company
will not accept storm discharge into their system. Other than this requirement to eliminate direct
discharge to the canal, the existing downstream drainage network is expected to be adequate to
accept and convey controlled-release storm flows.
Similarly, management of storm runoff that enters the site from the tributary area directly north
Eastbrook Annexations 1 and 2 Page 4 of 6
Statement of Community Need 11/9/2001
of the site should not present a major concern to development. This upstream tributary area is
relatively small (less than ''A section) and the drainage from this area should be quite readily
collected and either conveyed through or diverted around the site.
Management of drainage from the area to the northeast of the site will be a more significant
challenge. Storm water that flows toward the site in the John Law Ditch commingles with flow
moving eastward in the Union Colony Canal, which does not have capacity to carry the
cumulative flow. Thus, the flow backs up in both channels and spills out over the banks onto the
surrounding land. Some of the flow will be conveyed through and beyond the southeast portion
of the Eastbrook property in the existing Consolidated Law lateral, but that facility is relatively
small and has limited capacity. Furthermore, the culvert crossing of SH 392 at the southern
boundary of the property constricts the capacity that is available in the lateral.
A storm water management master plan is currently being developed for the Windsor area, to
identify drainage impacts from uncontrolled runoff and address ways of mitigating such impacts.
At this time, the study is incomplete and no formal conclusions or recommendations are
available. Preliminary comments received through informal communications with the
consultants performing the study indicate that options will be considered to direct storm runoff
from northeast of the Eastbrook property along the east side of WCR 21. However, if
development of the property proceeds prior to implementation of the master plan, it may be
necessary to make provision in the Eastbrook development plan for conveyance of storm runoff
through the site. Such provisions may include an upstream crossing of WCR 21 and a
downstream crossing of SH 392, as well as a drainage easement along the Consolidated Law
lateral. Alternately, it may be possible to negotiate agreements with the property owner to the
east of WCR 21 and/or the Town and the County to allow creation of drainage facilities within
the rights-of-way for WCR 21 and SH 392, minimizing impacts to the developable land. A
drainage plan for the development will be negotiated with the Town as an integral component of
the approval process for the development.
Electric Power
Electric power distribution facilities currently extend along SH 392, on the south side of the
road, and along WCR 21 on the east side of the road. Both lines are conventional overhead
installations, and appear to provide three-phase power, suitable for a development such as that
proposed. There will likely be a need to install additional transformer capacity at take-off points
to the proposed development. The distribution works within the development will be located
underground, however, because the existing pole lines are on the opposite side of the road from
the development site, it is expected that it will not be necessary to relocate the existing power
supply infrastructure underground.
There is also a major overhead primary power line traversing the property on large steel
transmission towers within the railway easement. This line is not suitable as a source of power
to the development, but will remain as is, within the existing easements established to
accommodate the facility.
Telephone
Telephone infrastructure is located underground along SH 392, adjacent to the north right-of-
Eastbrook Annexations I and 2 Page 5 of 6
Statement of Community Need 11/9/2001
way line, in combination with fiber optics lines, and on the pole line along WCR 21. As with the
existing power distribution infrastructure, the existing telephone facilities are expected to be
adequate, with minor upgrades, to serve the proposed development. The telephone infrastructure
within the development will be installed underground, similar to the power distribution
improvements.
School District Impact
A referral was sent to the Weld County School District RE-J regarding this annexation and the
proposed land uses. Attached, as Exhibit B, is a copy of the School District's response,
calculation of number of students and related information.
Intergovernmental Agreement
During initial discussions with the Town of Windsor, it was revealed that a portion of the Farago
property fell within an area covered by an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) between the
Town of Windsor and the Town of Severance, and that the nature of the proposed development
(particularly the southern extent of the residential portion of the proposed development) was in
conflict with the land-use requirements of the IGA. In order for the development to proceed,
amendment of the IGA would have to be approved by both communities, prior to consideration
of any application for annexation or rezoning of the property by the Town of Windsor.
An application for an amendment was submitted to the Boards of both towns in April 2001 and
approved by the Town of Windsor and the Town of Severance on June 4, 2001 and August 4,
2001, respectively.
Summary
This annexation will provide the Town of Windsor with an attractive mixed-use community
consisting of single-family and multi-family residences and commercial and light industrial
development. As a result of this variety of land uses, the proposed development will better
accommodate and serve the needs of a wider spectrum of the population in the Windsor area.
Other benefits of this annexation include: provision of a wide selection of housing types to
accommodate a broad spectrum of the area population; enhancement of the economic viability of
the Town by positioning commercial and light industrial uses along the SH 392 corridor, and
within reasonable proximity of residential areas; limited need for upgrades to trunk
infrastructure; and provision for a trail system promoting neighborhood cohesion.
Eastbrook Annexations I and 2 Page 6 of 6
Statement of Community Need 11/9/2001
Oct 26 01 04: 32p Weld County RE 4Windsor 970-886-5280 p. l
EXHIBIT B
EDUCATION FOR LIFE
W NDSOR Brian L Lessman
Superintendent of Schools
October 25,2001
Molly Orkild-Larson
Applegate Group,Inc.
1499 West 120th Avenue,Suite 200
Denver,Colorado 80234-2728
Via:Fax Transmission((303)452-2759)
No original to follow unless requested
Impact Statement-Fargo Property
As submitted,this property is expected to generate approximately 200 students to the Windsor School
District(100/elementary and 100/secondary). Currently the District is at capacity in all levels with the
exception of middle level students,needing modular units to meet the needs of the District. The District
has a ballot question before voters in November of 2001 which asks for additions or new schools at the
secondary and elementary levels.
Given this location,the students from this property would likely attend a future elementary school located
in a neighboring Winter Farm property. The Winter property will have a land dedication for an elementary
school site. In the short term,these students would be bussed to other schools in the district As such,the
District would request cash-in-lieu of land dedication for this property. As currently outlined,cash in lieu
fees are$1,214.57 for each single-family residence for a sub-total of$255,059.70 and$278.21 for each
multi-family unit or$19,474.70 for a total of$274,534.40. This cash-in-lieu will help mitigate future land
needs for the school district.
The capital impact to the district and ultimately the taxpayers for these facilities is estimated to be as
follows:
One hundred students at elementary level=.22 elementary buildings @$9,900,000 per building or a
capital impact of$2,178,000. One hundred students at the secondary level= .083 buildings @$25,000,000
per building or a capital impact of$2,075,000 for a total capital impact of$4,253,000.
There will be some short-term impact on student transportation services until a school may be built near
this location. This can be mitigated if student growth in this area combined with Winter Farm is sufficient
to generate a school site at this location. If build-out is slowed or does not generate sufficient students for a
school site,the impact on bussing is much greater. If only a 50%build-out occurred in these locations,the
cost for transportation would likely be two school busses or about$190,000 in capital cost.
The current bond election will place the District near its debt ceilings according to Colorado statutes.
Additional annexations and development with residential only,place a burden on the District with regard to
being able to create new debt for schools. The cities of Greeley and Severance also place a burden on the
District with new developments. The Windsor School District has more than 7,000 lots with potential for
build-out from these three cities or towns. The commercial portion of this development will be helpful in
helping to deal with the need for increased assessed value given the huge future potential residential
impact. However,developers have indicated that this will follow the residential development. It would be
most he ful to the dish t to accelerate the commercial development to mitigate assessed value concerns.
Brian L. essman
WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-4
1070 Main Street • P.O. Box 609 • Windsor, CO 80550 • (970) 686-7411 • Fax (970) 686-5280
t
ANNEXATION PETITION
(I, We) the landowner(s) of more than 50% of the territory, excluding public streets and alleys,
described as ... legal description _.. containing 49.6acres more or less, allege the following to be
true and correct:
The perimeter of the proposed annexation has a distance of 7 990 feet, of which 1440 feet
are contiguous to the existing TOWN limits of the TOWN OF WINDSOR. A minimum of 1/6 of the
perimeter of the proposed annexation is contiguous to the TOWN OF WINDSOR
We further allege:
1. It is desirable and necessary that said territory be annexed to the TOWN OF WINDSOR.
2. A community of interest exists between the said territory and the TOWN OF WINDSOR
3. Said territory is urban or will be urbanized in the near future.
4. Said territory is integrated or capable of being integrated with the TOWN OF WINDSOR.
5. No land held in identical ownership is divided into separate parcels unless the owner of
said tract has consented in writing or joins in this Petition.
6. No land held in identical ownership comprises 20 acres and together with improvements
had an assessed valuation in excess of$200,000.00 in the year preceding the filing of this
Petition_
7. No proceedings for annexation of the territory have been commenced for annexation to
another municipality.
8. The signers hereof comprise the landowners of more than 50%of the territory proposed to
be annexed exclusive of streets and alleys, and are in fact owners of 100% of the
hereinafter described property.
Therefore, the undersigned hereby request that the TOWN OF WINDSOR approve the
annexation of the area described above and do herewith pay the required fees.
In addition to the annexation, the undersigned request the zoning of RMU for the above
described property.
Date OwwnersQQSignature Mailing Address teiAic 11- CI-(71 C0 )171 a -14.160 , 9T it pay uasnr (!) $Cssr
FAST BROOK ANNEXATION NO. TWQ
A parcel of land being a port of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4) of Section Fifteen (15) and a port of the Southwest
Quarter (SW1/4) of Section Fourteen (14). Township Six North (T.6N.), Range Sixiy—seven West (R.67W.), Sixth
Principal Meridian (6th P.M.), County of Weld, State of Colorado and being more particularly described as follows:
COMMENCING at the East Quarter (E1/4) Corner of said Section 15 and assuming the East line of the Southeast
Quarter of said Section 15 as bearing South 00'03'21" East, being o Grid Bearing of the Colorado State Plane
Coordinate System, North Zone, North American Datum 1983/92, with all other bearings contained herein relative
thereto:
THENCE North 89'55'39" East a distance of 30.00 feet to the East Right—of—Way (ROW) of Weld County Road (WCR)
#21;
THENCE South 00'03'21" East along said East line a distance of 142.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE continuing South 00'03'21" East along said East line a distance of 2402.06 feet;
THENCE South 8911'16" West a distance of 60.01 feet to the West ROW of said WCR /21;
THENCE North 00'03'21" West along said West ROW a distance of 409.63 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot B,
Recorded Exemption NO. 0807-15-4—RE2371 as recorded in Weld County Records under Reception No. 2681026;
THENCE along said Lot B the following eleven courses and distances:
THENCE South 88'58'21" West a distance of 848.75 feet;
THENCE South 32'51'26" West a distance of 224.00 feet;
THENCE South 16'51'42" West a distance of 230.87 feet;
THENCE South 8911'16" West a distance of 556.98 feet;
THENCE North 04'52'24" West a distance of 247.59 feet;
THENCE North 47'46'03" East a distance of 123.48 feet;
THENCE North 29'07'15" East a distance of 56.74 feet;
THENCE North 16'08'41" East a distance of 92.44 feet
THENCE North 29'43'17" East a distance of 430.82 feet;
THENCE North 32'31'14" East a distance of 608.86 feet;
THENCE North 38'41'41' West a distance of 217.93 feet to the South ROW of Great Western Railway Company,
THENCE North 5118'48" East along said South ROW a distance of 1439.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said Farago Annexation No. Two contains 49.574 acres more or less (±).
ANNEXATION PETITION
(I, We) the landowner(s) of more than 50% of the territory, excluding public streets and alleys,
described as ... legal description ... containing 76.8 acres more or less, allege the following to be
true and correct:
The perimeter of the proposed annexation has a distance of 10.343 feet, of which 2121 feet
are contiguous to the existing TOWN limits of the TOWN OF WINDSOR. A minimum of 1/6 of the
perimeter of the proposed annexation is contiguous to the TOWN OF WINDSOR.
We further allege:
1. It is desirable and necessary that said territory be annexed to the TOWN OF WINDSOR.
2. A community of interest exists between the said territory and the TOWN OF WINDSOR.
3. Said territory is urban or will be urbanized in the near future.
4. Said territory is integrated or capable of being integrated with the TOWN OF WINDSOR.
5. No land held in identical ownership is divided into separate parcels unless the owner of
said tract has consented in writing or joins in this Petition.
6. No land held in identical ownership comprises 20 acres and together with improvements
had an assessed valuation in excess of$200,000.00 in the year preceding the filing of this
Petition.
7. No proceedings for annexation of the territory have been commenced for annexation to
another municipality.
8. The signers hereof comprise the landowners of more than 50% of the territory proposed to
be annexed exclusive of streets and alleys, and are in fact owners of 100% of the
hereinafter described property.
Therefore, the undersigned hereby request that the TOWN OF WINDSOR approve the
annexation of the area described above and do herewith pay the required fees.
In addition to the annexation, the undersigned request the zoning of RIC for the above
described property.
Date Owners Signature Mailing Address
((/of%J �?!/�tea^ ?Art— ? /11139)- t,-,n.ofo,2 v n63-SO
/1-4-01 vole&_ ( ja,1(felt 957/F{rr:y 34),te?r,l4snr,
FAST BROOK ANNEXATION NO. ONF
A parcel of land being a port of the East Half (E1/2) of Section Fifteen (15) and a part of the West Half (W1/2) of
Section Fourteen (14), Township Six North (T.6N.), Range Sixty—seven West (R.67W.), Sixth Principal Meridian (6th
P.M.), County of Weld, State of Colorado and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the East Quarter (E1/4) Corner of said Section 15 and assuming the East line of the Southeast
Quarter of said Section 15 as bearing South 00'03'21" East, being a Grid Bearing of the Colorado State Plane
Coordinate System, North Zone, North American Datum 1983/92, with all other bearings contained herein relative
thereto:
THENCE North 89'56'39" East a distance of 30.00 feet to the East Right—of—Way (ROW) of Weld County Road (WCR)
#21;
THENCE South 00'03'21" East along said East ROW a distance of 142.18 feet to the South ROW of Great Western
Railway Company,
THENCE South 5118'48" West along said South ROW a distance of 2584.27 feet to a point on the West line of Lot
A Recorded Exemption No. 0807-15-4—RE2371 as recorded in Weld County Records under Reception No. 2681026;
THENCE along said Lot A the following five courses and distances;
THENCE South 54'23'31" East a distance of 320.34 feet;
THENCE South 03'48'09" West a distance of 187.28 feet;
THENCE South 36'50'55" West a distance of 64.05 feet;
THENCE. North 89'57'40" East a distance of 94.16 feet;
THENCE South 00'43'51" East a distance of 386.45 feet to the North ROW of Colorado State Highway #392;
THENCE South 89'11'16" West along said North ROW a distance of 32.64 feet to a point on the East line of Lot B,
Recorded Exemption No. 0807-15-4—RE261;
THENCE along said Lot B the following seven courses and distances:
THENCE North 02'40'55" Eost a distance of 224.47 feet;
THENCE North 73'12'08" West a distance of 51.32 feet;
THENCE North 53'19'29" West a distance of 20.98 feet;
THENCE North 28'40'39" West a distance of 20.36 feet;
THENCE South 89'04'23" West a distance of 397.22 feet
THENCE North 01.'01'37" West o distance of 393.64 feet to said South ROW of said Great Western Railway Company,
said point being on the South line of Lot B of said Recorded Exemption No. 0807-15-4—RE2371;
THENCE along said Lot B the following six courses and distances:
THENCE South 51'18'48" along said South ROW a distance of 549.21 feet to the East line of the Southeast Quarter
of the Southwest Quarter (SE1/4—SWI/4) of said Section 15;
THENCE North 00'01'24" West a distance of 899.74 feet to the Center South Sixteenth Corner (CS1/16) of said
Section 15;
THENCE continuing North 00'01'24" West along the Eost line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter
(NE1/4-5W1/4) of said Section 15 a distance of 1317.59 feet to the Center Quarter (C1/4) Corner of said Section
15;
THENCE North 00'01'21" West along the East line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 15 a distance of 11.38
feet;
THENCE North 89'24'02 East a distance of 1305.14 feet;
THENCE South 00'04'16" West a distance of 5.83 feet to the Center East Sixteenth (CE1/16) Corner;
THENCE North 89'09'44' East along the North line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NE1/4—SE1/4)
of said Section 15 a distance of 1305.14 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said Farago Annexation No. One contains 76.782 acres more or less (t).
TOWN OF WINDSOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT
301 Walnut Street
Windsor, Colorado 80550
Phone: 970/686-7476 Fax: 970/686-7180 Project No.
LAND USE APPLICATION FORM
Land use applications shall include all items listed in the application submittal checklist and the
Town of Windsor Planning Procedures Manual. The Town of Windsor Planning Department
reserves the right to refuse to accept incomplete submittals. Please see the Town's Planning
Procedures Manual for submittal requirements.
APPLICATION TYPE: STATUS:
x ANNEXATION Preliminary
x MASTER PLAN Corrections to Staff Comments
x REZONING Final
MINOR SUBDIVISION Fast track (original submittal)
MAJOR SUBDIVISION Fast track (resubmittal with
SITE PLAN corrections)
ADMINISTRATIVE SITE PLAN
Qualified Commercial or Industrial
(Fast Track) SITE PLAN
PROJECT NAME: Eastbrook Annexation 1 & 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEI; of section 15. T6N. R67W
PROPERTY ADDRESS (if available): 9511 State Highway 392
PROPERTY OWNER:
Name: Andreii L Farago & Becky A. Farago
Address:9511 State Highway 392 Windsor, CO 80550
Primary Phone #: 970-669-8600 Secondary Phone #:970-231-4488
Fax#: 970-669-9518 E-Mail:
OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE:
Name: Molly Orkild-Larson
Address: 1499 West 120th Avenue, Suite 200 Denver, CO 80234
Primary Phone#:303-452-6611 Secondary Phone #: 720-339-8248
Fax #: 303-452-2759 E-Mail:moliyiarson@applegategroup.com
All correspondence will only be sent to the owner's authorized representative. It is the
sole responsibility of the representative to redistribute correspondence to the owner and
other applicable parties, i.e. engineers, architects, surveyors, attorneys, consultants, etc.
I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans
submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
7 n
Signature: Owner or Owner's thorized Repregentati e* Date
*Proof of owner's authorization is required with submittal if signed by Owner's Authorized Representative.
Project No.
FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Application fee: $ Application checked by:
Ap. received date: Date application checked: complete 1 rejected
GENERAL APPLICATION OVERVIEW
EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural
PROPOSED ZONING: EMU
TOTAL ACREAGE 122. 1
TOTAL # OF PROPOSED LOTS: SFA 19, SFD 166
AVERAGE LOT SIZE: +_`8000 square feet
MINIMUM LOT SIZE: SFA 4500 SF. SIT 6000 SF
TOTAL # OF PROPOSED PHASES:
ACREAGE PER PHASE: Ph1: 14.51, Ph2:29.20, Ph30.79 ,
rl,a• iy el
LOTS PER PHASE: Ph1:20, Ph2:80, Ph3:86
PARKLAND (sq. ft. & acreages): 619,423 SF, 14.2 AC _
PARKLAND (public or private) Private
IRRIGATION WATER (potable or non-potable) Non-notable
UTILITIES TO BE PROVIDED BY:
WATER: Town of Windsor
SEWER: Town of Windsor
GAS: Xcel Energy
ELECTRIC: xcel Energy
PHONE: Qwest Communications
IF THIS IS A FINAL APPLICATION, SUBMIT TOTALS OF THE FOLLOWING IN
LINEAR FEET (use separate sheets if necessary):
PUBLIC STREETS (break down by classification/width): n/a
PRIVATE STREETS (break down by classification/width):
TOTAL STREETS (break down by classification/width):
WATER LINES (break down by line sizes):
SEWER LINES(break down by line sizes):
CURB:
GUTTER:
SIDEWALK:
OPEN SPACE (not to include detention areas) in sq ft & acres:
TRAIL EASEMENTS (break down by width):
> Developed trail (break down by width, depth & material):
> Undeveloped trail (break down by width, depth & material):
FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Applicable Corridor Plan:
Metropolitan District:
PROCEDURAL GUIDE-ANNEXATION
Weld County Planning Dept.
Weld Co. School District RE-4 1555 N. 17th Ave.
1020 Main Street Greeley, CO 80631
Windsor, CO 80550
Windsor/Severance Library District Weld County Attorney
720 3`d Street PO Box 728
Windsor, CO 80550 Greeley, CO 80632
North Weld County Water District Water Valley Metropolitan District
33247 Hwy. 85 305 Teal Court
Lucerne, CO 80646 Windsor, CO 80550
Northern Colorado Water Weld County Engineering Dept.
Conservancy District P.O. Box 758
1250 North Wilson Greeley, CO 80631
Loveland, CO 80537
West Greeley Soil
Conservation District
4302 W. 9th St. Rd.
Greeley, CO 80634
Windsor/Severance Fire
Protection District
728 Main Street
Windsor, CO 80550
Weld County Commissioners
PO Box 728
Greeley, CO 80634
Hello