Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20020634.tiff HEARING CERTIFICATION DOCKET NO. 2002-15 RE: SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT#1365 FOR AN EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING NON-CONFORMING USE (A DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT WITH AN EXISTING CONVENIENCE STORE - LA TIENDITA) IN THE A (AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT -JOSE AND BENERANDA MARQUEZ A public hearing was conducted on March 13, 2002, at 10:00 a.m., with the following present: Commissioner Glenn Vaad, Chair Commissioner David D. Long, Pro-Tem Commissioner M. J. Geile Commissioner William H. Jerke Commissioner Robert D. Masden Also present: Acting Clerk to the Board, Esther Gesick Assistant County Attorney, Lee Morrison Planning Department representative, Chris Gathman Health Department representative, Trevor Jiricek Public Works representative, Don Carroll The following business was transacted: I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated March 1, 2002, and duly published March 6, 2002, in the Tri-Town Farmer and Miner and the Greeley Tribune, a public hearing was conducted to consider the request of Jose and Beneranda Marquez for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit#1365 for expansion of an existing non-conforming use (a drive-in restaurant with an existing convenience store - La Tiendita) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Lee Morrison, Assistant County Attorney, made this a matter of record. Chris Gathman, Department of Planning Services, presented a brief summary of the proposal and entered the favorable recommendation of the Planning Commission into the record as written. Mr. Gathman gave a brief description of the location of the site, and stated nine referral agencies reviewed this proposal. He stated the applicant originally proposed 11 diagonal parking spaces; however, only five of the spaces can serve this site without blocking existing driveways. He further stated the Planning Commission added a Development Standard to require a minimum of five parking spaces, one of which must meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Mr. Gathman stated the property is within the three-mile referral area for the City of Greeley; however, the proposal does not comply with the City's 2020 Comprehensive Plan, and there are landscaping issues that need to be addressed. He stated the comments from the City of Greeley have been addressed in the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards, and he submitted a memorandum, marked Exhibit F, requesting the addition of Development Standard #16 regarding signage for this use. In response to Chair Vaad, Mr. Gathman indicated the location of the five spaces that do not block existing accesses. Responding to Commissioner Jerke, Mr. Gathman stated the applicant also owns the residence with the affected driveways, so it will be their option to not use the driveways so customers ccan park there. He also explained the applicants propose to use an existing kitchen in the store to prepare the food. Commissioner Geile reviewed the various deeds for this property and Mr. Gathman stated property transactions can be explained by the applicant. In response to 2002-0634 C' . /3L /7/ ?id PL1587 HEARING CERTIFICATION - JOSE AND BENERANDA MARQUEZ (USR#1365) PAGE 2 Commissioner Masden, Mr. Gathman concurred the language proposed in his memorandum is already addressed in Development Standard #12, therefore, the addition is not necessary. Responding to Commissioner Geile, Mr. Gathman stated Condition #2.A.1.e.2 is necessary because the Weld County Code does require the applicant to include the names of the adjacent property owners on the plat plan. He further stated Condition of Approval #2.C only requires the applicant to attempt to address the requirements or concerns of the city, not absolutely comply with them. Commissioner Geile commented this permit is under Weld County's jurisdiction and there is no Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Greeley, therefore, he does not feel the applicant should be required to comply with the City's requests. Mr. Gathman stated the concerns of the City of Greeley are referred to under reason of approval #2.d and Condition #2.C. Commissioner Geile commented he does not like the implication that the applicants must comply with Greeley's requirements, and he requested the last two sentences of reason of approval #2.d and Condition #2.C. be deleted. Commissioner Jerke referred to Condition of Approval #2.A.1.d and stated although this site is surrounded with residential uses, it is technically within the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Therefore, he does not feel the applicant should be required to provide the information regarding soil classifications and the location of all the other residences within a one-half-mile radius because that is very burdensome to the applicant. Mr. Gathman expressed no concern with eliminating these requirements. Commissioner Jerke also expressed concern with Condition #2.A.1.e.6 because he feels showing topography on this plot plan would also be burdensome for the applicant. Commissioner Jerke commented if the applicant owns the residence next to the business,they should have the option of blocking their own driveways, if they are the only ones affected. Mr. Gathman concurred; however, he expressed concern with the situation if the residence is sold. Mr. Morrison stated the residence is not part of this Use by Special Review Permit, so the business and the residence could be owned by two different parties in the future. Chair Vaad concurred and stated he is not agreeable with dropping the five parking space requirement. Don Carroll, Department of Public Works, stated he agrees with planning and added Development Standard #12 requires a minimum of four parking spaces with one ADA space. Beneranda Marquez, applicant, explained they want to open an existing kitchen in the store, and the customers will park and come in to pick up their order, and there will be no drive-up. Ms. Marquez expressed concern with providing restroom facilities for the public because they will not be allowed to stay at the facility. She stated her family can use her personal residence. Mr. Jiricek stated the Health regulations do not require restrooms where the public is not staying, so that requirement could be amended. Mr. Gathman stated Development Standard#13 can be amended to delete the words "and the public." Responding to Commissioner Jerke, Ms. Marquez stated a 16-square-foot sign will be adequate, and Mr. Gathman stated that signage will be in addition to the existing store sign. In response to Commissioner Geile, Ms. Marquez stated she has provided the Department of Planning Services with a copy of the purchase agreement, and she clarified the residence at 1517 North 25th Avenue was purchased on January 8,2000. She further stated there is also a lease on the store with the option to purchase. In response to Commissioner Jerke, Mr. Morrison stated the children inherited the home from Isabel Garcia upon her death, and then they deeded it back to their father, Alvin Garcia, and all further transactions have been with him. No public testimony was offered concerning this matter. In response to Chair Vaad, Ms. Marquez stated she has reviewed and agrees with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards and the discussed amendments. 2002-0634 PL1587 HEARING CERTIFICATION - JOSE AND BENERANDA MARQUEZ (USR#1365) PAGE 3 Commissioner Long moved to approve the request of Jose and Beneranda Marquez for a Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit #1365 for an expansion of an existing non-conforming use(a drive-in restaurant with an existing convenience store-La Tiendita) in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, based on the recommendations of the Planning staff and the Planning Commission,with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards as entered into the record. His motion also included deleting the last two sentences of reason of approval #2.d, in addition to Conditions#2.A.d.1 and #2.A.d.2, Condition #2.A.1.e.6, Condition 2.C, deleting the words "and the public" from Development Standard #13, and renumbering or relettering as appropriate. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Jerke,and it carried unanimously. There being no further discussion, the hearing was completed at 10:30 a.m. This Certification was approved on the 18th day of March 2002. APPROVED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ✓ COUNTY/COLORADO ATTEST: ALmA' !` A �; %' \ GI Vaad, Chair Weld County Clerk to th < ,�"�. 21- U J186l t b3 t: j CC d f}David E. ng, Pro-Te BY: Deputy Clerk to the B� (7� i1/ ;al/ M. J. Geile TAPE #2002-10 EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL illiam H. Jerke DOCKET#2002-15 Robert D. Masden 2002-0634 PL1587 EXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET Case USR#1365 - JOSE AND BENERANDA MARQUEZ Exhibit Submitted By Exhibit Description A. Planning Staff Inventory of Item Submitted B. Planning Commission Resolution of Recommendation C. Planning Commission Summary of Hearing (Minutes 02/05/2002) D. Clerk to the Board Notice of Hearing E. Planning Staff Photo of sign posted on site F. Planning Staff Memorandum re: Addition (03/20/2002) G. H. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. Hello