HomeMy WebLinkAbout20022739.tiff RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
MINUTES
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
OCTOBER 9, 2002
TAPE #2002-34
The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, met in regular session in full conformity
with the laws of the State of Colorado at the regular place of meeting in the Weld County Centennial
Center, Greeley, Colorado, October 9, 2002, at the hour of 9:00 a.m.
ROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order by the Chair and on roll call the following members were
present, constituting a quorum of the members thereof:
Commissioner Glenn Vaad, Chair
Commissioner David E. Long, Pro-Tern
Commissioner M. J. Geile
Commissioner William H. Jerke
Commissioner Robert D. Masden - EXCUSED
Also present:
County Attorney, Bruce T. Barker
Acting Clerk to the Board, Carol A. Harding
Director of Finance and Administration, Donald D. Warden
MINUTES: Commissioner Long moved to approve the minutes of the Board of County Commissioners
meeting of October 7, 2002, as printed. Commissioner Geile seconded the motion, and it carried
unanimously.
ADDITIONS TO AGENDA: There were no additions to the agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Long moved to approve the consent agenda as printed.
Commissioner Geile seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.
PROCLAMATIONS:
CELEBRATION OF FAMILIES WEEK - OCTOBER 13-19, 2002: Chair Vaad read the certificate
proclaiming October 13 through 19, 2002, as Celebration of Families Week.
PRESENTATIONS:
RECOGNITION OF SERVICES, REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS ADVISORY BOARD - THOMAS
BACKER: Chair Vaad read the certificate recognizing Thomas Backer for six months of service on the
Regional Communications Advisory Board.
RECOGNITION OF SERVICES,BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR NORTH COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER-
ROBERT HESSLER: Chair Vaad read the certificate recognizing Robert Hessler for eight months of
service on the Board of Trustees for North Colorado Medical Center.
2002-2739
BC0016
COMMISSIONER COORDINATOR REPORTS: There were no Commissioner Coordinator Reports.
PUBLIC INPUT: Mike Silverstein, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, gave a brief
presentation regarding the Greeley Area Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan. He asked the Board to
approve the Plan, which would mean the elimination of the monitoring in this area. Chair Vaad clarified
a letter of support would be appropriate at a future date, after the Board has given further thought to this
matter and after he has discussed it with the North Front Range Transportation Board.
WARRANTS: Donald Warden, Director of Finance and Administration, presented the following warrants
for approval by the Board:
All Funds $187,807.72
Commissioner Long moved to approve the warrants as presented by Mr. Warden. Commissioner Jerke
seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
BIDS:
PRESENT PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERTS BID - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: Mr.
Warden read the names of the three vendors. Frank Hempen, Jr., Director of Public Works, stated this
is for the Weld County Road 15 project between Weld County Roads 72 and 74. Mr. Warden stated said
bid will be considered for approval on October 23, 2002.
NEW BUSINESS:
CONSIDER POLLING PLACE CHANGE FOR 2002 ELECTIONS: Bruce Barker, County Attorney, stated
the Clerk and Recorder reviews precinct polling places and requests changes as appropriate.
Commissioner Jerke moved to approve the change in the polling place for Precinct#4234862224 for the
2002 Elections. Commissioner Geile seconded the motion, which carried unanimously.
CONSIDER RESOLUTION RE: CANVASS BOARD CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION FOR AUGUST 13,
2002, PRIMARY ELECTION: Mr. Barker stated the Board generally accepts the certification as received
from the Clerk and Recorder. He stated this is the certification for the August 13, 2002, Primary Election.
Commissioner Long moved to approve said Resolution. Commissioner Geile seconded the motion,which
carried unanimously.
CONSIDER TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURE OF WCR 17 BETWEEN WCRS 14 AND 16: Mr. Hempen
stated this closure is necessary in order to replace an irrigation structure. He said the closure will be
effective on October 21, 2002, and last approximately ten working days. Commissioner Geile moved to
approve said temporary road closure. The motion, which was seconded by Commissioner Long, carried
unanimously.
CONSIDER NONEXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR UPGRADE AND MAINTENANCE OF A
PORTION OF WCR 81 AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN - BARBARA PELLOUCHOUD: Don Carroll,
Department of Public Works, stated this is for access to an 80-acre parcel, and the road will run north on
Weld County Road 81 from Weld County Road 106 for one mile. Mr. Carroll stated the applicant has
supplied the appropriate documentation, the right-of-way is currently 60 feet, and all adjacent property
owners were contacted to inform them of this agreement. Commissioner Long moved to approve said
agreement and authorize the Chair to sign. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Geile, and it
carried unanimously.
Minutes, October 9, 2002 2002-2739
Page 2 BC0016
CONSIDER AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS TO CLERK AND RECORDER DATA BASE AND AUTHORIZE
CHAIR TO SIGN - CHANCERY TITLE COMPANY, LLC: Mr. Barker stated this is the standard form of
agreement for access to the Clerk and Recorder's data base. Commissioner Jerke moved to approve said
agreement and authorize the Chair to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Long, the motion carried
unanimously.
CONSIDER AGREEMENT FOR DONATION OF PROPERTY FOR POUDRE RIVER TRAIL AND
AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN - BUCKLEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY: Mr. Barker stated this agreement
is for donation of property to extend the Poudre River Trail through the Bucklen Equipment property. Chair
Vaad expressed the gratitude of the Board of County Commissioners for the cooperation that was received
from Mr. Bucklen. Responding to Commissioner Jerke, Mr. Barker stated the County is the holder of the
property because when the original agreement in 1994, between Greeley, Windsor, and the County, was
being negotiated, it was decided the property would be held by the entity through which the trail was
passing. He stated it was done to allow the entity to claim the trail as right-of-way, especially in reference
to the immunity statute. Responding to Mr.Warden, Mr. Barker stated the trail is treated as a right-of-way,
so it is transferred to the municipality with an annexation. Responding to Commissioner Jerke regarding
whether it would be best to set up some type of authority to hold these properties, Mr. Warden stated the
ownership would still reside with the jurisdiction, although they have the ability to manage the facility. Mr.
Barker indicated another reason is the maintenance issues that are involved. Commissioner Geile moved
to approve said agreement and authorize the Chair to sign. Seconded by Commissioner Long,the motion
carried unanimously.
CONSIDER DESIGNATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY PLANNING COMMITTEE AS CITIZEN CORPS
COUNCIL AND APPOINT MEMBERS: Ed Herring, Sheriffs Office of Emergency Management, stated
President Bush, through the Homeland Security Office and the Colorado Office of Planning and Security,
has requested the creation of a local Citizen Corps Council to help coordinate volunteer activities to make
our communities safer, stronger, and better prepared to respond to any emergency situation. He stated
the Colorado Emergency Planning Commission is recommending placement of this Council within the
Local Emergency Planning Committee. Mr. Herring said the Committee membership is updated simply
by sending a letter to the State. Chair Vaad requested Mr. Herring send an update, indicating
Commissioner Long is replacing Commissioner Geile. Responding to Chair Vaad, Mr. Barker stated the
second "Resolved" paragraph in the draft Resolution is not necessary. Commissioner Jerke moved to
designate the Local Emergency Planning Committee as the Citizen Corps Council. Commissioner Long
seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES: The resolutions were presented and signed as listed on the consent
agenda. No Ordinances were approved.
Let the minutes reflect that the above and foregoing actions were attested to and respectfully submitted
by the Acting Clerk to the Board.
Minutes, October 9, 2002 2002-2739
Page 3 BC0016
There being no further business, this meeting was adjourned at 9:45 a.m.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST: 6') BD/i9/ l EXCUSED DATE OF APPROVAL
77Clerk D Chet La GI Vaad, Chair_
Weld County Clerk to the
4.
`i ' 9 David E. Lo , Pro-T
BY:
Deputy Clerk to the B rd "~ ^_ , 27/' me-;-/
, ., M. J. eile , / /
William H. Jerke
EXCUSED
Robert D. Masden
Minutes, October 9, 2002 2002-2739
Page 4 BC0016
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan
for the Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area
8/14/02 Draft
INSERT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PHOTOGRAPH OF
GREELEY
Revisions to the Maintenance Plan adopted by:
The Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, ???
The North Front Range Transportation and Air Quality Planning Council,
Redesiqnation Request and Maintenance Plan originally adopted by:
The Colorado Air Quality Control Commission, September 19, 1996
Original Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan approved by:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March 10, 1999
Please note that this draft contains minor revisions to the mobile source emissions
inventories and the mobile source emission budgets. The commitment to re-implement
an I/M program in 2026 remains as projected 2030 mobile source emissions equal the
proposed 2015 and beyond emission budget. No other revisions were made.
_ $ e - . }
pF COO • e . 6 ' B: 0 6 % .F RA#last-itit air-* e
� ` s mivi ® t-, y _ ms ; i - n = g cx
'18056 .. @' ! • - c hT:/'.' sz ar :
Colorado Department 2 b® - t� e: . '
of Public Health 6 .® e g -' ', h
' �� z .
and Environment � 5xxp
ax P r t ,,,.is x
xti '
I
1. Background
The Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) approved a carbon monoxide(CO)
redesignation request and maintenance plan for the Greeley area on March 10, 1999 (64
FR 11775),which became effective on May 10, 1999. The Greeley redesignation request
and maintenance plan, which was adopted by the Colorado Air Quality Control
Commission (AQCC) on September 19, 1996, established an attainment year of 1995,
provided for the continuation of the inspection and maintenance program and the
oxygenated gasoline program in the Greeley area, and established a contingency plan in
the event a violation of the CO National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)was
measured.
Because the Greeley area had been previously classified as a"Not Classified"
nonattainment area for CO, the redesignation request and maintenance plan was
developed utilizing EPA's limited maintenance plan policy. This policy does not require
a demonstration of long-term maintenance of the CO NAAQS or the establishment of
emission budgets (to be utilized in transportation conformity determinations) as long as
existing control strategies were maintained. Because the two control strategies, 1/M and
oxygenated gasoline, are being eliminated with this revised maintenance plan, a
demonstration of long-term maintenance of the CO NAAQS through 2015 and mobile
source emissions budgets are included in this revised maintenance plan. The attainment
year is also revised to 1992.
2. Emission Inventories and Maintenance Demonstration
The emission inventories for the 1992 attainment year, 1998, 2004, 2005 and
2010 interim years, and the 2015 maintenance year are presented in Tables 1. and 2.
Mobile source emissions for the years 2020, 2025, and 2030 are also presented as
additional information (though are not intended to become incorporated into the federal
State Implementation Plan (SIP)). Each inventory accounts for the emission control
programs effective during that period. As shown in these tables, emissions for all future
years are less than emissions for the 1992 attainment year. Therefore,maintenance of the
CO NAAQS is demonstrated.
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 2
Figure 1. Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area
BT TE HWY 392
+r
J
Y
n �r
m r
e
r u
BUS BTATE ,
r
p 34
r !�
I:
cc,YNTY HWY 54
r �
r �
49TH 8
4flhl' l
46.4
enl r iiI
so Y
gun HNT e9 cA•F"
0 0.350.7 1.4 2.1 N
-Miles
Legend
s Attainment/Maintenance Area
Si,seated Eythe WCD'Medfield Santee Prapem.
Calaedo Department Of Public Heath and Enslraw ant
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 3
Table 1.
1992-2015 Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area
Carbon Monoxide Emission Inventories
Area/
Vehicle Fleet Avg. Mobile Non-Road Total
Miles Emission Rate Sources Sources Emission
Year Traveled (grams/mile) (tons/day) (tons/day) (tons/day) Strategies
Idle I/M
1992 oxy
1992 1,071,930 50.2 59.3 16.4 75.7 level
Idle UM
1998 oxy
1998 1,369,412 31.6 47.7 17.7 65.4 level
2004 1,778,877 30.1 59.0 12.0 71.0 No controls
2005 1,859,000 27.6 56.5 12.2 68.7 No controls
2010 2,147,150 20.0 47.3 13.2 60.5 No controls
2015 2,479,960 16.9 46.1 14.3 60.4 No controls
2020 2,836,535 15.0 47.0 N/A N/A No controls
2025 3,244,721 14.4 51.6 N/A N/A No controls
2030 3,747,652 14.4 59.6 N/A N/A No controls
Note: Results are reported with one decimal place precision to provide representation of smaller
source categories. This level of precision is not intended to suggest a level of accuracy.
The inventories provide emissions estimates for a weekday during the winter
CO season(November through February). The modeling domain consists is the Greeley
attainment/maintenance area, which encompasses the City of Greeley and surrounding
communities. The inventories were developed using EPA-approved emissions modeling
methods, including the MOBILE6 emissions model, and the latest transportation and
demographic data from the North Front Range Transportation and Air Quality Planning
Council (NFRTAQPC). The technical support document for this maintenance plan
contains detailed information on model assumptions and parameters for each source
category. The technical support document for this maintenance plan describes in detail
the assumptions and methodologies used for all modeling work.
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 4
Table 2.
1992-2015 Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area
Carbon Monoxide Emission Inventories
Source Category 1992 1998 2005 2010 2015
Commercial Heating 0.025 0.039 0.054 0.065 0.076
Residential Heating 0.167 0.182 0.219 0.246 0.272
Agriculture Non-road 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009 0.010
Commercial Non-road 2.536 3.166 3.920 4.607 5.259
Construction Non-road 0.828 0.816 0.693 0.711 0.759
Industrial Non-road 1.559 1.574 1.667 1.708 1.754
Commercial Lawn& Garden 0.280 0.304 0.346 0.377 0.412
Residential Lawn& Garden 0.100 0.115 0.129 0.140 0.153
Recreational Non-road 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.004
Railroad Non-road 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005
Railroad Locomotives 0.119 0.135 0.128 0.135 0.145
Residential Wood Burning 8.967 9.558 2.908 2.933 2.958
Point Sources 1.850 1.838 2.101 2.287 2.474
Subtotal 16.447 17.744 12.182 13.228 14.282
On-Road Mobile 59.3 47.7 56.5 47.3 46.1
TOTAL 75.7 65.4 68.7 60.5 60.4
Note: Results are reported with one and three decimal place precision to provide representation of
smaller source categories. This level of precision is not intended to suggest a level of accuracy.
3. Control Measures to be Removed for the Maintenance Period
As of January 1, 2004, the oxygenated gasoline program and the basic 1/M
program will not be part of the federally enforceable SIP for the Greeley
attainment/maintenance area. No emission reduction credit has been taken in the
maintenance demonstration for these or any other current State or local control programs.
The federally enforceable basic 1/M program included in the SIP for this area
through December 31, 2003 does not include on-board diagnostics (OBD)testing because
modeling demonstrates that maintenance of the NAAQS can be achieved without it. For
the period prior to January 1, 2004, maintenance is achieved with basic 1/M without OBD
testing. For the period beginning January 1, 2004, maintenance is achieved for the
remainder of the maintenance period without an I/M program.
Although the basic I/M program is being removed from the SIP by December 31,
2003, the AQCC and the Air Pollution Control Division(APCD) commit to
implementing an I/M program in the Greeley attainment/maintenance area by January 1,
2026 to help assure the conformity determination for 2030 and those thereafter(see
Section 5. below for an explanation of the conformity process).
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 5
4. Enforceable Control Measures for the Maintenance Period
• AQCC Regulation No. 11, Inspection/Maintenance, through 12/31/03
• AQCC Regulation No. 13, Oxygenated Gasoline, through 12/31/03
• Federal Motor Vehicle Emissions Control tailpipe standards and
regulations, including those for small engines and non-road mobile
sources. Credit is taken for these federal requirements,but they are part of
a federally administered program and not a state commitment of the
Colorado SIP.
• AQCC Regulation No. 3
• AQCC Regulation No. 4, Wood Stove Standards
• AQCC Regulation Number 6
• AQCC Common Provisions Rule
The Common Provisions and Regulation No. 6 delineate industrial source control
programs. The Common Provisions, and Parts A and B of Regulation No. 3, are already
included in the approved Colorado SIP. Regulation No. 6 and Part C of Regulation No. 3
implement the federal standards of performance for new stationary sources and the
federal operating permit program. The revised Greeley maintenance plan makes no
changes to these regulations.
5. Transportation Conformity and Mobile Source Carbon Monoxide Emissions
Budgets
The transportation conformity provisions of Section 176(c)(2)(A) of the CAA
require regional transportation plans and programs to show that emissions expected from
implementation of plans and programs are consistent with estimates of emissions from
motor vehicles and necessary emissions reductions contained in the applicable state
implementation plan. The establishment of mobile source emission budgets in this
maintenance plan assures that transportation plans and their resulting emissions will
conform with the emission projections and the demonstration of long-term maintenance
of the CO NAAQS documented in this maintenance plan.
The Greeley attainment/maintenance area mobile source emission budgets are 62
tons/day for 2005 through 2009, 61 tons/day for 2010 through 2014, and 60 tons/day
for 2015 and beyond. These budgets were derived by taking the difference between the
base year(1992) total emissions and the 2005, 2010, and 2015 total emissions, and then
subtracting one ton. This difference is the "safety margin", and the safety margin is
added to future year mobile sources emissions to determine the budgets.
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 6
2005-2009: 75.7-68.7 = 7.0 tons
7.0- 1 =6.0 tons(safety margin)
6.0+ 56.5 = 62.5 or 62 tons/day emissions budget
2010-2014: 75.7-60.5 = 15.2 tons
15.2— 1 = 14.2 tons (safety margin)
14.2+47.3 =61.5 or 61 tons/day emissions budget
2015 and 75.7—60.4= 15.3 tons
beyond: 15.3 — 1 = 14.3 tons (safety margin)
14.3 +46.1 =60.4 or 60 tons/day emissions budget
These budgets allow for flexibility for mobile source growth beyond projected levels for
future years. These budgets will take effect upon EPA approval, or 45 days after
submittal of the Plan,unless the budget is determined by the EPA to be inadequate,per
40 CFR 93.118(e)(1).
Typically, emission budgets are the level of mobile source emissions in future
years. For Greeley, the budgets could have been 56.5 tons per year for 2005-2009, 47.3
tons per year for 2010-2014, and 46.1 tons per year for 2015 and beyond. As stated
above,the NFRTAQPC has elected to add the margin of safety to the budgets in order to
maximize the flexibility for determining conformity in future years.
Because projections indicate that the 2015 and beyond emission budget may be
equaled or possibly exceeded by mobile source emissions in the 2030, the AQCC and the
APCD commit to re-implementing the basic I/M program in 2026. The PM program
shall include any federally required on-board diagnostic tests.
This commitment to implement an I/M program in 2026 is included in the
maintenance plan for purposes of 40 CFR Part 93.122(a)(3)(iii), which provides that
emissions reduction credit from such programs may be included in the emissions analysis
required by the federal transportation conformity rule, if the maintenance plan contains
such a written commitment. This commitment is included in the maintenance plan solely
for the purpose of authorizing such emission reduction credits for transportation
conformity determinations and shall not be construed to extend the maintenance period
beyond the year 2015.
6. Monitoring Network/Verification of Continued Attainment
The APCD will continue to operate an appropriate air quality monitoring network
in accordance with 40 CFR Part 58 to verify the continued attainment of the CO NAAQS.
If measured mobile source parameters (e.g., vehicle miles traveled, congestion, fleet mix,
etc.) change significantly over time, the APCD will perform the appropriate studies to
determine whether additional and/or re-sited monitors are necessary. Annual review of
the NAMS/SLAMS air quality surveillance system will be conducted in accordance with
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 7
40 CFR 58.20(d)to determine whether additional and/or re-sited monitors are necessary.
Annual review of the NAMS/SLAMS air quality surveillance system will be conducted
in accordance with 40 CFR 58.20(d)to determine whether the system continues to meet
the monitoring objectives presented in Appendix D of 40 CFR Part 58.
7. Contingency Plan
Section 175A(d) of the CAA requires that the maintenance plan contain
contingency provisions to assure that the State will promptly correct any violation of the
CO NAAQS which occurs in the Greeley attainment/maintenance area.
The contingency plan must ensure that the contingency measures are adopted
expeditiously once the need is triggered. The primary elements of the contingency plan
involve the tracking and triggering mechanisms to determine when contingency measures
are needed and a process for implementing appropriate control measures.
A. Tracking
The tracking plan for the Greeley area consists of continuous carbon monoxide
monitoring and analysis of CO concentrations by the APCD. The APCD will notify the
EPA, the AQCC, the NFRTAQPC and local governments of any exceedance of the CO
standard within 30 days of occurrence. The ongoing regional transportation planning
process carried out by the NFRTAQPC in coordination with the Colorado Department of
Transportation (CDOT), the APCD, the AQCC, and the EPA, will serve as another
means of tracking mobile source CO emissions into the future. Since revisions to the
regions' transportation improvement programs are prepared every two years, which must
go through a transportation conformity determination, a process is in place to periodically
review the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and mobile source emissions of CO presented in
this maintenance plan.
B. Triggering and Response
Triggering of the contingency plan does not automatically require a revision of
the SIP,nor is the area necessarily redesignated once again to nonattainment. Instead, the
State will have an appropriate time-frame to correct a violation by implementing one or
more adopted contingency measures. In the event that violations continue to occur after
contingency measures have been implemented, additional contingency measures will be
implemented until the violations are corrected.
An exceedance of the CO NAAQS (any value over 9.5 ppm) may trigger a
voluntary, local process by the NFRTAQPC and APCD to identify and evaluate potential
contingency measures. However, the only federally enforceable trigger for mandatory
implementation of contingency measures shall be a violation of the CO NAAQS.
Specifically, this would be a second value of 9.5 ppm or higher at the same monitor
during any calendar year.
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 8
The State will move forward with mandatory implementation of contingency
measures under the SIP if a violation of the CO NAAQS occurs. No more than 60 days
after being notified by the APCD that a violation occurred, the NFRTAQPC, in
conjunction with the APCD , AQCC and local governments, will initiate a subcommittee
process to begin evaluating potential contingency measures. The subcommittee will
present recommendations within 120 days of notification, and the recommended
contingency measures will be presented to the AQCC within 180 days of notification.
The AQCC will then hold a public hearing to consider the recommended
contingency measures, along with any other contingency measures the AQCC believes
may be appropriate to effectively address the violation. The necessary contingency
measures will be adopted and implemented within one year after a violation occurs.
C. List of Potential Contingency Measures
The NFRTAQPC and the APCD may choose one or more of the following
measures to recommend to the AQCC for consideration. The measures are designed to
bring the area quickly back into compliance with the CO NAAQS.
• A basic vehicle inspection and maintenance program as set forth in AQCC
Regulation No. 11,prior to modifications made as of December 19, 2002, with
the addition of any on-board diagnostics components required by federal law.
• A 2.7% oxygenated gasoline program as set forth in AQCC Regulation No. 13,
prior to modifications made as of December 19, 2002.
In addition to these potential contingency measures, the State may evaluate other
potential strategies, including but not limited to, enhanced I/M, transportation control
measures and mandatory wood burning restrictions, in order to address any future
violations in the most appropriate and effective manner possible.
8. Subsequent Maintenance Plan Revisions
It is required that a maintenance plan revision be submitted to EPA eight years
after the original redesignation request/maintenance plan is approved. The purpose of
this revision is to provide for maintenance of the NAAQS for an additional ten years
following the first ten-year period. The State of Colorado commits to submit a revised
maintenance plan eight years after redesignation to attainment, as required by the CAA
and EPA.
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 9
Attachment A
Proposed Revisions to the
"Ambient Air Quality Standards" Regulation
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 10
Classification of Nonattainment and Attainment/Maintenance Areas in Colorado'
Carbon Monoxide
Area Classification Boundary
Denver Metro Area Attainment/Maintenance See attached legal description and map.
(effective 1/14/02)
Colorado Springs Attainment/Maintenance Urban Transportation Planning Study Area as
(effective 10/25/99) defined in 1989.
See attached map.
Fort Collins Attainment/Maintenance* Fort Collins Urban Growth Area boundary as
adopted by the city of Fort Collins and the
Larimer County Commissioners and in effect
as of July 30, 1991. See attached map.
Greeley AREA Attainment/Maintenance Urban Boundaries defined in the North Front
(effective 5/10/99) Range Regional Transportation Plan, May,
1990. See attached map.
Longmont Attainment/Maintenance Begin at Highway 52 and Boulder/Weld
(effective 11/23/99) county line and go west to 95th Street/Hoover
Road to the intersection of Plateau Road,then
west on Plateau Road to the intersection of N.
75th Street, then north to the Boulder/Larimer
County line,then east along the
Boulder/Larimer County line to the
Boulder/Weld county line, then south along
the Boulder/Weld County line to Highway 52,
plus the portion of the City of Longmont east
of the Boulder/Weld County line in Weld
County. See attached map.
*The designation of asterisked areas as attainment/maintenance shall become effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of EPA approval of such designation. Until such approval, and
publication, the areas remain nonattainment for the respective pollutant.
'Nonattainment Areas
Ambient Air Quality Standards Page 3
Pagosa Springs (Modeling PMio
Area) 2012 and Beyond: 7,486 lbs./day
Steamboat Springs (Modeling PMio
Area)
2015 and Beyond: 21,773 lbs./day
Telluride (Modeling Area) PMio
2012 and Beyond: 10,001 lbs./day
Longmont Carbon Monoxide
1998 and Beyond: 27 tons/day
Colorado Springs Carbon Monoxide
2001 and Beyond: 270 tons/day
Ft. Collins Carbon Monoxide
2005 through 2009: 99 tons/day
2010 through 2014: 98 tons/day
2015 and Beyond: 94 tons/day
GREELEY AREA CARBON MONOXIDE
2005 THROUGH 2009: 62 TONS/DAY
2010 THROUGH 2014: 61 TONS/DAY
2015 AND BEYOND: 60 TONS/DAY
IV.A.2. Geographic Coverage
Unless otherwise specified, the geographic coverage of each of the area
Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets shall be the nonattainment or
attainment maintenance area as defined in the respective state
implementation plans.
IV.A.3. The Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget for PMio applies to total
primary PM10 emissions, including emissions from tailpipe exhaust,
unpaved roads (except for the Denver PM10 nonattainment area),
reentrained road dust and street sand. It does not include precursor or
secondary emissions,which,where appropriate, are covered under
separate budgets.
IV.A.4. Effective Dates
RESERVED
Ambient Air Quality Standards Page 21
Attachment B
Proposed Revisions to Regulation No. 11
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 11
Attachment C
Proposed Revisions to Regulation No. 13
Revised Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan for the
Greeley Attainment/Maintenance Area—August 14, 2002 draft 12
PROPOSED REGULATION NO. 11 LANGUAGE
Part A.1.Applicability
Under Part A.1.A. Geographic Areas of Applicability.
I.A. Geographic Areas of Applicability
This regulation shall apply to the AIR Program area as defined in Section 42-4-304(20),
C.R.S.,EXCEPT THAT,EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,2004,THE AIR PROGRAM
SHALL NOT APPLY IN THE WELD COUNTY PORTION OF THE PROGRAM
AREA.
Part A.IV. Clean Screen/Remote Emission Sensing
Under Part A.IV.A. Geographic Area of Applicability
IV.A.l.a. The Clean Screen Program shall initiate as established in Section 42-4-306(23),
C.R.S., in the Larimer and Weld County elements of the basic program area as
defined in Section 42-4-304(20),C.R.S. THIS SECTION IV.A.1.a.IS
REPEALED,EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31,2003.
IV.A.1.b. THE CLEAN SCREEN PROGRAM SHALL APPLY IN i.ARIMER
COUNTY.
IV.B.2. Vehicles registered within the program area excluding El Paso County AND,
BEGINNING JANUARY 1,2004,EXCLUDING WELD COUNTY.
IV.E. Schedule for collection of emissions inspection fees by county clerks and recorders.
IV.E.1 Beginning with motor vehicles with registration renewals coming due in
November 2002,the clerks and recorders for the counties of Larimer and Weld
shall collect an emissions inspection fee in the amount specified pursuant to
sections 42-3-135(26.5)(a)(I), C.R.S. at the time of registration of a motor vehicle
that the department of revenue has determine to have been clean screened,unless
a valid certification of emissions compliance has already been issued for the
vehicle being registered indicating that the vehicle passed the applicable
emissions test at an enhanced inspection center,inspection and readjustment
station, motor vehicle dealer test facility,or fleet inspections station.
This Section IV.E.1. shall not apply until the Colorado Department of Revenue
and the Air Pollution Control Division determine that all requisite computer
programming changes necessary for the functioning of the pay-upon-registration
system have been completed,and that the pay-upon-registration system will
function properly in such counties.
BEGINNING JANUARY 1,2004,THIS SECTION IV.E.1 SHALL NOT
APPLY IN WELD COUNTY.
PROPOSED REGULATION NO.13 LANGUAGE
Part I.Introduction and Definitions
Under Part I.D.Definitions
14. "Oxygenated Gasoline Program Area"means the Colorado Front Range counties which are
subject to this regulation that includes:Adams,Arapahoe,Boulder,Broomfield,Denver,Douglas,
Jefferson, and Lorimer counties,and that portion of Weld°County which lies within the AIR
Program Area defined in eSection 42-4-307(8),C.R.S. Effective January 1,2004,the
"Oxygenated Gasoline Program Area"means the Colorado Front Range counties which are
subject to this regulation that include:Adams,Arapahoe,Boulder,Broomfield,Denver,Douglas,
AND Jefferson.,and that portion of Weld County which lies within the AIR Program Area defined
in Section 12 1 307(8),C.R.S.
Part IL Requirements of the Oxygenated Gasoline Program
Under Part It.Requirements of the Oxygenated Gasoline Program
ILA. Control Areas
The two control areas constituting separate Oxygenated Gasoline Program control areas;will
consist of the following counties and AIR Program areas;
1. Larimer-Weld control area:Latimer County and that portion of Weld County that lies
within the AIR Program area. This Section H A.1.is repealed effective January 1,2004
and is_eplaced b y the re ,..,IJ w o below be _'- r , .
2. Effective January 1,2001,Greeley control area: that portion of Weld County that lies
within the AIR Program area.
32. Denver-Boulder control area:Adams,Arapahoe,Boulder,Broomfield,Denver,Douglas,
and Jefferson Ceounties.
TLC. Class A Fuel Requirements
l.a. Larimer-Greeley control area:at least 2.0%oxygen content by weight from November 1
through November 7,and,at least 2.7%oxygen content by weight from November 8
through the end of the Oxygenated Gasoline Control Period as defined in Section II.B.
This Section II.C.I.a.is repealed effective January 1,2004 and is replaced by the
requirements in Section II.C.1.b.below beginning January 1,2001.
Lb. Effective January 1,2001,Greeley control area: at least 2.0%oxygen content by weight
from November 1 through November 7,and,at least 2.7%oxygen by weight from
Section--ILB.
Lab. Fthe Denver-Boulder control area(beginning November 1,2002):
Greeley Area Carbon Monoxide ;' History
F ;}
Maintenance Plan Revision ry,, ■Greeley was the first Co nonattainment
9
area in Colorado to be redesignated to
�Y.
• attainment
"•' " ""`""`�""^°°°""'`^" mi —Attainment with the CO standards have
Presentation to the Board of County ; %; been monitored since 1989
Commissioners, Weld County •The State approved the redesignation
October 9, 2002 . request and long-term maintenance
plan in 1996, EPA approved in 1999
Mike Silverstein ` , —Continued all controls—basic I/M and
Colorado Air Pollution Control Division , oxygenated fuels
Geeky,81119h St
Revised Maintenance Plan
3 W { 7777 77w t Format
Plan must contain a base case and
w�u„„Mk future year emissions inventory
" •Plan must contain an emissions bud et
s 4. x 9
o s m � ' r ■Plan must contain necessary rule and
U regulation changes if strategies are to
'• . . be removed
8+s'4f4PdddP,artfRfili+e, ry;=_ ■Planmustrelyonlatesttransportation
ten•1 - rtx+art,ad Mae °5 �' modeling processes
ff;
Status of the Revised `',
Maintenance Plan
Control Strategy Outlook
■ A margin of safety exists to remove
■ Draft plan has been developed using the Fort ' p oxygenated fuels and basic I/M from the
Collins plan as a model federally enforceable plan
■ Draft plan has been approved by the ;r ■ Elimination of oxygenated fuels and I/M from
NFRTAQPC Technical Advisory Committee, the federal and and State regulations is
Town of La Salle,Greeley Air Quality and proposed for January 2004
f s' Natural Resources Commission , • Emission budgets established for 2005,2010,
• The plan has been approved by the Colorado and 2015
Air Quality Control Commission for a ii • Year 2030 estimate has been evaluated for
December public hearing impacts on conformity—reinstatement of I/M
: : }} is possible
11 v
1
I Control Strategy Outlook
a Action Plan
• ■Can I/M be retained locally as is the
r case for Fort Collins? ■Briefings to local governments in
.. s —The State could continue to run the September and October
program—shops would need to purchase ■Approval by the NFRTAQPC in
new analyzers November
—A hybrid UM program could be developed— t ', ■AQCC public hearing in December
Fort Collinss looking at options •Submittal to Legislature in January
—Greeley/Weld County could take over the
program—significant legislation and i 2003
staffing would be required ■Submittal to EPA—June 2003
is
2
Greeley Area Carbon Monoxide History
Maintenance Plan Revision a
a Greeley was the first COr nonattainment
, area in Colorado to be redesignated to
; 1 attainment
v;. ' .¢ h " &� „_ —Attainment with the Co standards have
Presentation to the Board of County been monitored since 1539
Commissioners,Weld County in The State approved the redesignation
October 9, 2002 s request and long-term maintenance
plan in 1996, EPA approved in 1999
Mike Silverstein " � —Continued all controls—basic I/M and
Colorado Air Pollution Control Division oxygenated fuels
GeSy 9,,,9h9�.PmdeflTreft•C4 Revised Maintenance Plan
a +,';' `' a , ;v ,�. Format
■Plan must contain a base case and
s iw■,;; ' future year emissions inventory
a , ■ Plan must contain an emissions budget
s 8 w s, 2;n ',I-_? ; .,.. j_� Z1 ■Plan must contain necessary rule and
t
* regulation changes if strategies are to
4. k. : ' _ ', be removed
•Plan must rely on latest transportation
ten a.+eH,aew, modeling processes
k ,
Status of the Revised
? v Maintenance Plan Control Outlook
■A margin ofStrategy safety exists to remove
■ Draft plan has been developed using the Fort E x, oxygenated fuels and basic I/M from the
,• Collins plan as a model federally enforceable plan
ge ■ Draft plan has been approved by the t� • Elimination of oxygenated fuels and I/M from
i' NFRTAQPC Technical Advisory Committee, the federal and and State regulations is
Town of La Salle,Greeley Air Quality •
and 2° proposed for January 2004
Natural Resources Commission Emission budgets established for 2005,2010,
' . . • The plan has been approved by the Colorado n and 2015
Air Quality Control Commission fora ! • Year 2030 estimate has been evaluated for
-art December public hearing ` impacts on conformity—reinstatement of I/M
is possible
1
: Control Strategy Outlook
Action Plan
•Can I/M be retained locally as is the .
case for Fort Collins? ■Briefings to local governments in
'.--"' —The State could continue to run the ,= September and October
..MT program-shops would need to purchase •Approval by the NFRTAQPC in
` "' new analyzers November
—A hybrid WM program could be developed— 0... ■AQCC public hearing in December
t Fort Collinss looking at options ' •Submittal to Legislature in January
—GreeleyNVeld County could take over the 'r v2003
'pi} ' program—significant legislation and
. staffing would be required s! ■Submittal to EPA—June 2003
2
Hello