Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20020112.tiff WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-8 Fort Lupton Public Schools 301 Reynolds Street 303-857-3219 Fax Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-3200 Weld County Planning Dept. November 16, 2001 Lauren Light ray19 1��� Weld County Planning Department 1555 N. 17th Avenue RECEIVED Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Weld County Referral Guy Jensen Change of Zone from A (Agriculture) to E (Estate) Case Number Z-566 Thank you for referring the Guy Jensen Change of Zone from A (Agriculture) to E (Estate) to the School District. Based upon expected student generation ,"- rates from what appears to be the possibility of 4 new single family units on 20 acres, the four (4) new homes, at build out, would generate approximately 3 new students to be accommodated within district. Bus transportation would likely be provided. It is understood that approval of the proposed zoning change does not yet add residential units to enrollment potential. However, certain school issues should be considered at this important juncture, including school site planning, transportation access and facility capacity. The current facilities that would serve this development are Twombly Primary, Butler Elementary, Fort Lupton Middle School and Fort Lupton High School. Capacities and enrollments of these schools are: Seats Student Enrollment Available School (Grades Served) Capacity (10/1/01) (Short) Twombly Primary (K-2) 530 540 (10) Butler Elementary (3-4) 420 409 11 Fort Lupton Middle School (5-8) 890 804 86 Fort Lupton High School (9-12) 770 744 26 The District is on record as not opposing growth so long as the growth is planned and is manageable from a student enrollment standpoint. This development could impact all levels of schools. In addition, even without this project, completion of other previously approved developments would generate more students than can be accommodated by the existing schools. /-. As the volume of developments increases with no alleviation of the existing capacity conditions, the ability to provide the same quality education for these new students becomes increasingly difficult. Weld County School District Re-8 requests the cooperation and participation of the develo EXHIBIT provide cash in-lieu of land dedication fee, (currently $939) , to add A COMMUNITY WHICH BELIEVES EDUCATION IS 1 /1 2002-0112 2 need for future school sites. Further, the District requests that the County assist with monitoring residential growth working and consider facility capacity impacts upon the schools in determining whether a new project should be approved. We appreciate your cooperation and the opportunity to comment upon the issues of interest to both the County and the School District. We ask that the building permit not be issued until the applicant demonstrates that the cash in-lieu of land dedication fee has been paid, or that arrangements have been made with the School District. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at (303) 857-3200. Sincerely, Edward J. Meier Director of Business Affairs and Auxiliary Services Weld County Planning Dept. 0 s 200\ Kits te-01-; :, RECEIVED Weld County Referral October 31, 2001 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Guy Jensen Case Number Z-566 Please Reply By November 21, 2001 Planner Lauren Light Project Change of Zone from A (Agricultural)to E (Estate). Legal Lot B of RE-2303; Pt. of the E2 of Section 35, T2N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location West of and adjacent to WCR 23; north of and adjacent to WCR 14 1/2. Parcel Number 1311 35 000065 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 18, 2001 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: Please note correct parcel number is 1311 350.00 086. Signature Jeanne Evans 1.0..) Date November 7. 2001 Agency Assessor +Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax EXHIBIT /d i(r0 Weld County Referral 1111 D C October 1,=Z001kif r NOV� 2001 COLORADOWELD CC-n,'NM _ The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Guy Jensen Case Number Z-566 Please Reply By November 21, 2001 Planner Lauren Light s = 4 Project Change of Zone from A (Agricultural)to E (Estate). Legal Lot B of RE-2303; Pt. of the E2 of Section 35, T2N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location West of and adjacent to WCR 23; north of and adjacent to WCR 14 1/2. Parcel Number 1311 35 000065 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 18, 2001 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: • Signature k Date III cri Agency h� lr c_ \A—CD u AC s +.•Weld County Planning Dept. +1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 -9(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970)304-6498 fax EXHIBIT I 'j f • n MEMORANDUM fat TO: Lauren Light, Planning DATE: November 30, 2001 Wilpe FROM: Drew Scheltinga, P. E., Engineering Manager SUBJECT: Z-566 Blue Sky Estates Minor Subdivision 1� COLORADO We:d Ccwity Planning Dspt. =r •, COMMENTS: RECEIVED External Roadways: WCR 23 is designated as a collector in the Weld County Comprehensive Transportation Plan and requires a minimum 80-foot right-of-way. The rezoning plat submitted includes dedication of an additional 10 feet which adequately addresses right-of-way needs. The applicant has requested the existing access to Lot 1 remain in use as long as the parcel continues in agricultural production. This is acceptable but a clarification is needed. When residential development occurs on Lots 2, 3,or 4 the agricultural production of the parcel will be effected. The existing access to Lot 1 should be closed and a new internal access constructed when any new building permits are issued on Lots 2, 3, or 4. Internal Roadways: Roads within minor subdivisions do not require paving. The minimum gravel roadway width is 26'. The width shown on the rezoning plat on the cross section is 20'. Prior to recording the rezoning plat, the roadway width dimension must be increased to 26'. Prior to recording of the final plat, roadway construction plans must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department. Stop signs and road name signs will be required. Landscaping in the intersection sight distance triangles must be less than 3.5' high at maturity. Storm Water: A drainage report has been submitted and is acceptable. It calls for detention of storm water at the southeast corner of the property and then release under WCR 14.5 into Little Dry Creek. Plans for the construction of the detention pond and outlet structures must be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department prior to recording the final plat. Recommendation: Approval Page 2 Z-566 11-30-01 Development Conditions: 1. Requirements for the relocation of the access to Lot 1 shall be included in the development standards for the final plat. 2. Width of the roadway shall be increased on the rezoning plat to 26'. 3. Roadway and drainage construction plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Public Works Department prior to recording the final plat. PC: Z-566 M:\WPFILES\DREMPlanning\z-566.wpd MEMORANDUM MORANDUM WID C TO: Lauren Light, WC Planning DATE: December 3, 2001 COLORADO FROM: Pam Smith, W.C. Department of Public Health and Environment CASE NO.: Z-566 NAME: Guy Jensen/Big Sky Estates The Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment has reviewed this proposal. The proposed development is for 4 lots,with a minimum lot size of 3.94 acres. The overall density of one septic system per 5 acres meets current Department policy. The application has satisfied Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code in regard to water service. Water is to be provided by the Central Weld County Water District. Tap agreements from Central Weld County Water District were provided in the application materials. The application has satisfied Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code in regard to sewer service. Sewer will be provided by individual sewage disposal systems. As discussed above,the overall density meets the current Department policy. The Department recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Water service shall be obtained from the Central Weld County Water District 2. A Weld County Septic Permit is required for each proposed septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System Regulations. Each septic system shall be designed for site-specific conditions, including but not limited to maximum seasonal high groundwater, poor soils, and shallow bedrock. 3. The applicant shall obtain a storm water discharge permit from the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment, if required. Silt fences shall be maintained on the down gradient portion of the site during all parts of the construction phase of the project. 4. During development of the site, all land disturbance shall be conducted so that nuisance conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions, at the request of the Weld County Health Department, a fugitive dust control plan must be submitted. 5. In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission any development that disturbs more than 5 acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods which are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. 6. "Weld County's Right to Farm"shall be placed on any recorded plat. O:\PAM\Planning\chzone\z566.rtf EXHIBIT /y RECEiVED \Inv " 5 /IV + 0. Kiti 4;Nts Weld County Referral IIiDc October 31, 2001 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Guy Jensen Case Number Z-566 Please Reply By November 21, 2001 Planner f Lauren Light I Project Change of Zone from A (Agricultural)to E (Estate). I Legal Lot B of RE-2303; Pt. of the E2 of Section 35, T2N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location West of and adjacent to WCR 23; north of and adjacent to WCR 14 1/2. `I Parcel Number 1311 35 000065 M The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) December 18, 2001 O We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: Signature _— Fg-,zr-- Date lZ In_ /O I Agency G YY O r rpm- f Ldp.-r04 3Weld County Planning Dept. 4-1555 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 4x(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4-(970)304-6498 fax EXHIBIT I Ar of RT (�pl (tip of fort !Lupton a°*36 THE"PROUD'TO BE"CITY LA CIt1DAD"ORGULLOSA DF,\ER" "9{OKORI NO"MACHI P.O. Box 148 County of Weld COLORADO 130 S.McKinley Avenue (303) 857-6694 Fort Lupton-tEo}orado 80621 Fax (303) 857-0351 Performance,Integrity,Teamwork '•e CU County Pt- Accountability and Service rining Dept. December 3, 2001 AEC 2:,01 Weld County Department of Planning AEC El V E D Attention: Lauren Light 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Subject: Z-566 Referral Response Dear Ms. Light: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed change of zone for Lot B of RE-2303. The Fort Lupton Planning Commission reviewed this request at their November 13, 2001 meeting and has the following comments: 1. Please ensure that this subdivision mitigates its own impacts by contributing a proportionate share toward public services such as schools, fire protection, roads and other public services and infrastructure. 2. The Commission does not have a concern about this subdivision in particular; however, if this type of development were approved consistently in the areas surrounding the city, there would be significant impacts to our municipal infrastructure and services. 3. Please ensure that this development proposal meets the requirements of the intergovernmental agreement between the City and County regarding Section 3.2 - Development Outside Urban Growth Area. Since the subdivision is not a typical cluster subdivision, this proposal may not meet the definition of "Non-Urban Development" as defined in Section 2.2. The Planning Commission minutes are attached for background information. Please do not hesitate to call our office at 303.875.6694 if you have further questions. Sincerely, Brian Grubb, AICP City Planner FORT Die °� a4 '°' Citp Dt fort Lupton r-. 18 i !;er 36 cot on h a tanning (orr1rr1SS5ion Performance,Integrity,Teamwork, Accountability and Service Eugene Reynolds—Co-Chairperson Steven Mitchell—Co-Chairperson Tracey Reynolds Donald Young Sandy Neb Shawn McCutchan(Alternate) Mayor Phil Jensen—Ex-Officio Council member David Norcross—Ex-Officio MINUTES November 13, 2001 1. CALL TO ORDER: 7:01 P.M. 2. ROLL CALL Gene Reynolds Present Tracey Reynolds Absent Steve Mitchell Present Sandy Neb Present Donald Young Present Shawn McCutchan Absent EX-OFFICIO Mayor Phil Jensen Present Council member David Norcross Present STAFF Brian Grubb Present 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA: Gene Reynolds motioned to approve and Donald Young seconded the motion. Passed on voice vote. 4. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Gene Reynolds motioned to approve and Donald Young seconded the motion. Passed on voice vote. 5. WELD COUNTY REFERRALS - A) Weld County Case #Z-566, Change of Zone The applicant, Guy Jensen of 6706 WCR 23 Fort Lupton, Colorado, is requesting approval of a Change of Zone for a 20-acre parcel located north of and adjacent to WCR 14 ''A and West of and adjacent to WCR 23. The existing zoning is A (Agricultural). The applicant is proposing to change the zone to E (Estate). This case is outside of the City of Fort Lupton's urban growth area but is in the City's referral area. It is governed by the IGA and the proposal is to change the zone from agricultural to estate. Mr. Grubb's main concern is whether or not the proposal will comply with section 2.2 and 3.2 of the City's IGA. Section 3.2 says to the extent legally possible the County will disapprove proposals for urban development; areas of the municipal referral area outside the urban growth area, in reviewing the proposal in non-urban development in such area the County will apply its comprehensive plan. This situation is covered in the first sentence of this section. Does this meet the definition of non-urban development, which is Section 2.2? According to the definition, non-urban development is land use or Planning Commission Minutes November 13, 2001 Page 2 capable of being used for agricultural production and including developments which combine clustered residential uses and agricultural uses in a manner that agricultural lands are suitable for farming and ranching operations in the next 40 years. This is not one of Weld County's clustered developments and this is why Mr. Grubb is raising this issue. In this situation the applicant is starting with a 20-acre tract and it isn't being clustered in any manner. The land is being divided into equal lots with no agricultural land being left over. The lots will between 4-5 acres each. Lot 1 and Lot A could possibly be sub- divided further in the future. Central Weld Water will be used and they will be on septic systems. Mr. Grubb's recommendation is that the Planning Commission express no difficulties with this proposal in and of itself but recommends that the applicant contribute their proportionate share to the RE-8 school district and Fire District, also that if there are a number of these approved around the City Limits that it could impact the transportation system and the schools. IGA section 3.2 also needs to be looked at. MOTION: By Gene Reynolds to check box #3 (See attached letter) with staff recommendations that the applicant contribute proportionate funds to the RE-8 School District and to the local Fire District and also that the IGA section 3.2 be looked at, seconded by Sandy Neb. Passed on a voice vote. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None 7. ACTION ITEMS: None 8. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A) Modifications to Appel Farms Final Plat: Discussed the minor adjustments that are being proposed on this subdivision. The east 1/3 of the project is what is being changed. This change would give a good access to a signalized intersection. The development would be allowed one full movement access and that could be Rolland Ave. to the east until such time Purman is built. At that time Rolland Ave. will be emergency only. CDOT wants Purman to be the full movement access road. The Hwy Department is recommending a 146 buffer for noise purposes. The developer already has plans for the buffer. New plat maps need to be distributed to Council and Staff. SIA will need to be adjusted by Brian Grubb. Steve Mitchell discussed the new design of the Safeway project with the Planning Commission Board. B) Field Trip Follow-up: The Board said that it gave them a new visual prospective on what they like and dislike. C) Results of Visual Preference Survey: Brian reviewed these results with the Board. Discussion. ADJOURNMENT Hello