The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20020758.tiff Todd Hodges Design, LLC Use by Special Review SE '/4 OF THE SW 1/4 01 -01-66 Prepared for: Robert Oman Select Materials PO Box 280 Ft Lupton, Colorado 80621 Prepared by: Todd Hodges Design, LLC 2412 Denby Court Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 Submitted: November 28, 2001 pwuert I lo 2412 Denby Court • Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 • (970) 207-0272 • fax: (561)828-8059 email: toddhodgesdesign(t earthlinknet 2002-0758 ' Todd Hodges Design, LLC Table of Contents I . Authorization Letter 2. Application Sheet 3. Questionnaire 4. Dust Control Plan 5. Road Access Sheet G. F.E.M.A. Map 7. Soils Report 8. Water Information 9. Septic Information 10. Deed I I . Certificate of Conveyance 12. Treasurer Certificate 13. Ditch Letter 14. Affidavit $ List of Mineral Owners of Record 15. Affidavit $ List of Surrounding Property Owners I G. Vicinity Map (attached) ,.-. 17. Site Plan (attached) 2412 Denby Ct • Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 • (970) 207-0272 •fax (561) 828-8059 email: toddhodgesdesign(ilearthlink.net DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1555 N. 17th Avenue,Greeley,CO 80631 Phone(970)353-6100, Ext.3540, Fax(970)304-6498 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Application Fee Paid Receipt# Date Recording Fee Paid Receipt# Date Application Reviewed by: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Please print or type,except for necessary signature) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: SE IA SW V.S 1-T 1N-R 66 W PARCEL NUMBER: 1471011000035 (12 digit number-found on Tax I.D. Information or obtained at the Assessor's Office. Section 1 ,T 01 N,R 66 W-Total Acreage 39.26 Zone District AG Overlay Zone none Property Address(if available) 17269 WCR 12 Ft Lupton,Co 80621 Proposed Use Manufacturing soil products. residence for one employee.cattle grazing 10-15 head max,continuing sand mining SURFACE FEE(PROPERTY OWNERS)OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT Name: Robert D Oman Address: PO Box 280 City/State/Zip:Ft Lupton,Co 80621 HomeTetephone:(303)880-8136BusinessTelephone:(303)637-0178 Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Home Telephone: Business Telephone APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT(if different than above) Name: TODD HODGES DESIGN. LLC c/o: Todd Hodges Address: 2412 Denby Court City/State/Zip: Fort Collins,Colorado 80526 Home Telephone: NA Business Telephone: (970)207-0272 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES USE ONLY Case Floodplain: O Yes O No Geologic Hazard: O Yes O No I hereby state that all statements and plans submitted with the applica' are true and cgrrecttp the best of my knowledge. Rev: 1-27-97 Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent 1 BUSINESS EMERGENCY INFORMATION: Justness Name: Select Materials Phone: (303)637-0178 Address: PO Box 280.Ft. Lupton.CO 80621 Business Owner: Robert D.Oman Phone: (303)880-8136 Home Address: City: Ft.Lupton.CO 80621 List three persons in the order to be called in the event of an emergency: NAME TITLE ADDRESS PHONE Robert D Oman Owner 14510 WCR 6 (303)880-8136 Ellen S Oman Wife 14510 WCR 6 (303)637-0309 Arlyn Ford Employee (303)857-1492 Business Hours: 7:30 am to 6:00 pm Days: Monday through Saturday Type of Alarm: None Burglar Holdup Fire Silent Audible Name and address of alarm company: Location of Safe: r***********************************************************************v+e*****o**e»Rr**********t*teMe***************** MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION: Number of entry/exit doors in this building: 2 Location(s): one on each end of the buildings Is alcohol stored in budding? no Location(s): Are drugs stored in building? no Location(s): Are weapons stored in building? no Location(s): The following programs are offered as a public service of the Weld County Sheriffs Office. Please indicate the programs of interest. Physical security check Crime Prevention Presentation UTILITY SHUT OFF LOCATIONS: Main electrical: on pole with yard light Gas shut off: none Exterior water shutoff: on pole with yard light r Interior water shutoff: on pole with yard light 6 Select Materials C/o: Robert Oman PO Box 280 17269 WCR 12 Fort Lupton,Colorado 80621 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that I, Robert Oman, hereby authorize Mr. Todd Hodges of Todd Hodges Design, LLC, to represent me in my endeavor to subdivide my property located in the SE 'A, SW 'A 1-1-66 west of the 6a'P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. ect Materials c/o: Robert Oman r Use by Special Review Questionnaire Select Materials Robert Oman 1. Explain, in detail, the proposed use of the property. The proposed use of this property is to manufacture soil products, build an office, shed and a residence for an employee, and pasture 10-15 head of cattle. The proposal involves trucking soil amendment materials onto the site, mixing them with the on-site sand and trucking this upgraded soil material off-site. The applicant proposes to build an office, shed and a residence for an employee. The agricultural portion of the land will be utilized to pasture cattle. The site will be maintained and managed by the applicant and the plan is to operate the wholesale soil manufacturing business that will serve properties in the surrounding area and Front Range for landscaping material needs. The site has an existing Special Use Permit for Open Pit Mining (Extraction of sand and soil). The applicant will continue operating the sand mining operation (SUP-460). The sand and soil mining on this site has been in operation since the Special Use Permit was originally approved in 1981 for approximately 10 acres. The permit was amended and approved by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners in June of 1993 to increase the acreage to approximately 38.3 acres. The applicant purchased this property in 2000 and has continued to mine the sand and transport it off-site. This property owner has complied with all Development Standards set forth in the AM SUP-460 Special Use Permit. Uses allowed within this existing permit include trucking sand off-site utilizing WCR 12, WCR 35 onto Highway 52. 2. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 22. This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Code, Chapter 22. Section 22-2-60.E A. Goal 5 states - "The extraction of mineral and oil and gas resources should preserve or minimize the impact of prime agricultural land. " The subject site is classified as "Other" on the Farmland map recognized in the Department of Planning Services. Therefore,prime farmland is not being removed from production. Further, Section 22-5- 80.D states, "Minimize hazardous conditions related to mining activities and the mining site. " Conditions of Approval and Development Standards shall be adhered to, minimizing negative impacts. Sec 22-2-60.A.Goal 1 - "Preserve prime farmland for agricultural purposes which foster the economic health and continuance of agriculture." The subject parcel is approximately 39.26 acres in size. This proposal is also consistent with the Weld County Code by taking advantage of the existing sites' location and attributes to provide a service to the surrounding citizens of Weld County and the Front Range. This proposal is consistent with efficient and orderly use of the property by expanding the site for additional uses. This proposal will remain in harmony with the existing uses of the surrounding properties. 3. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 23 and the zone district in which it is located. This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Code, Chapter 23. Sec 23-3-40.B.8 Use By Special Review as "Agriculture Service Establishments primarily engaged in performing agricultural, animal husbandry or horticultural services on a fee or contract basis, including:fertilizer storage, mixing, blending and sales". This proposal is also consistent with the Weld County Code and the agricultural zone district by not taking any "prime" farmland out of production. The site is non-irrigated and is located close enough to the population base it will serve while maintaining an adequate distance from urban developments. 4. What type of uses surrounds the site? Explain how the proposed use is consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses. Surrounding land uses are primarily agriculture and some residential. Other types of uses that surround the site include larger farms with residential structures, Boss Compost to the west and Buffalo Ridge Estates to the south. The site is presently zoned agricultural. The existing and proposed use of the site is consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses. The sand mining operation has been in operation and is consistent with the proposed uses. The site will be managed similar to any good farming/animal operation in Weld County. A letter has been sent to the ditch company to let them know about the proposed uses for the site. A copy of the letter is included in the application packet. 5. Describe, in detail, the following: a. How many people will use this site? A total of approximately 16 people will use this site, on an average. The applicant has two employees presently and would like one of those employees to live on-site for safety and security reasons. As the operation grows, the applicant would like to reserve the right to have four employees at djerent times of the week. The drivers of the trucks will use this site to drop off or pick up material but won't be on-site for the majority of the day. Traffic to the site will remain at a minimum due to the nature of the business, this being a wholesale business, not retail business. b. How many employees are proposed to be employed at this site? At this time there are two employees but in the future, the applicant may have up to four employees. The existing permit allows for three employees. c. What are the hours of operation? The hours of operation will be during daylight hours. 7:30 am. - 6:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday; Closed Sunday d. What type and how many structures will be erected (built) on this site? The site has no existing structures at this time. The applicant proposes to build an office, a shed and a residence that will be associated with this USR operation. This proposal does not preclude the ability to add any use by right structures in the future. These structures are delineated on the plat. The existing permit states the applicant has plans to build a residence. The applicant will have a communication tower, less than 70 feet, on site that is a use by right in the agricultural zone district sited in Section 23-3-20.U e. What type and how many animals, if any,will be on this site? An average of 10-15 cows may be on the site at any one time, however this does not preclude the animal units by right in the agricultural zone district. f. What kind (type, size,weight) of vehicles will access this site and how often? In the past, the sand mining operation has generated approximately 20 round trips for the tractor-trailers and 10 round trips for the tandem dump trucks, depending on the time of the year. This is a seasonal business. This number will �-. increase to approximately 24 round trip for the tractor-trailers and 12 round trips for the tandem dump trucks once this Use by Special Review Permit is approved. There is an existing historical access off of WCR 12 which is presently being used WCR 12 dead-ends at this site. The applicant recently graded applied gravel and a dust suppressant to WCR 12. Only one other residence uses WCR 12 going east off of WCR 35. WCR 35 dead ends south of Highway 52 at Buffalo Ridge Estates so there is limited traffic. The applicant's representative has been in contact with CDOT. A Traffic Impact Study is in process and will be submitted to the Department of Planning Services prior the Planning Commission hearing. This study is above and beyond requirements outlined in the County Code and in Department procedural guides. In 1993-94 the average loads trucked off-site were approximately 2500 loads. In 2001, the applicant trucks approximately 720 loads off-site per month at the highest peak of the year. The applicant desires to create an attractive entrance to the site and extend WCR 12 and create a new access onto the site. The number of vehicles accessing the site will be minimal due to the limited number of clients, do to the fact that this is a wholesale site. Trucks will stay within the legal weight limits. There will be a truck scale on-site. The applicant uses a dust suppressant on WCR 12 and will continue to do so. A water truck will help control dust on site. The dust plan is included in this application packet. The following is a list of the vehicles that will be on-site. 1-5 semi tractors trailers (depending on the season) 2- tandem dump trucks 2-front-end loaders 2-soil processors I-road grader 1-water truck(to control dust) 1-dozer 1-yard hostler 2-trailers 2-trucks I-excavator(during construction) g. Who will provide fire protection to the site? This proposal is located within the Fort Lupton Fire District. The applicant will work with the Fire Department. The applicant has discussed this project with the Fire District h. What is the water source on the property? (Both domestic and irrigation) A private well (permit number 054673-F) shall provide commercial and domestic water. There is no irrigation water associated with this site. A copy of the permit is included within this packet. i. What is the sewage disposal system on the property? (Existing and proposed) The proposed sewage disposal system shall be an individual septic system. Included within the packet is a copy of the septic application for the shed and office (permit #SP0100014). A Colorado professional engineer will design the septic system for the shed and office. An additional permit will be obtained from the Weld County Department of Public Health &Environment for the residence. j. If storage or warehousing is proposed,what type of items will be stored? Some of the equipment will be stored in the shed as well as bagged soil amendments. 6. Explain the proposed landscaping for the site. The landscaping shall be separately submitted as a landscape plan map as part of the application submittal. This site has existing vegetation located on the property, which the applicant will maintain. Please see site plan for the location of the existing and proposed landscaping on this site. Landscaping may be limited due to the high sodium content of the well water. Existing trees shall be preserved and/or relocated on the site. 7. Explain any proposed reclamation procedures when termination of the Use by Special Review activity occurs. The property owner and/or operator of this operation shall be responsible for the reclamation of the site as described in the mining permit#M-1980-205 and SUP-460 permit. 8. Explain how the storm water drainage will be handled on the site. Storm water runoff will be handled in a manner so the water will be contained on site. Any water that comes in contact with any of the soil material will be collected in the storm water detention pond in the southwest corner of the site and will not leave the property. There will not be any impact to the groundwater. A future detention pond is delineated on the plat. 9. Explain how long it will take to construct this site and when construction and landscaping is scheduled to begin. The applicant will begin constructing the office and shed as soon as the Use by Special Review application is approved. The residence will be constructed shortly after approval. 10. Explain where storage and/or stockpile of wastes will occur on this site. r Waste will be stored in trash containers and removed from the site once a week by a professional refuge company. The applicant shall remove, handle and stockpile sand and soil materials in a manner that will prevent nuisance conditions. Stockpile locations are delineated on the plat. There shall be no stockpiling of wastes on this property, which will cause damage to adjacent properties. r Robert Oman Select Materials November 2001 PARTICULATE EMISSIONS CONTROL PLAN FOR MINING AND PROCESSING ACTIVITES THE FOLLOWING PARTICULATE EMISSIONS CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE USED FOR COMPLIANCE PURPOSES ON THE ACTIVITIES COVERED BY THIS PERMIT, AS REQUIRED BY THE AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION REGULATION NO.1, SECTION III.D.1.b. THIS SOURCE IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING EMISSION GUIDELINES: a. Mining and Processing Activities—Visible emissions not to exceed 20%, no off-property transport of visible emissions. b. Haul Roads—No off-property transport of visible emissions shall apply to on-site haul roads, the nuisance guidelines shall apply to off-site haul roads. c. Haul Trucks— No off-property transport of visible emissions except that when operating off the property of the owner or operator, the applicable guidelines shall be no off-vehicle transport of visible emissions. Control Measures 1. Adequate soil moisture must be maintained in topsoil and overburden to control emissions during removal. Watering shall be implemented if necessary. 2. Topsoil and overburden stockpiles shall be compacted and revegetated within one year. 3. Emissions from material handling (i.e. removal, loading, and hauling) shall be controlled by watering at all times unless natural moisture is sufficient to control emissions. 4. Vehicle speed on unpaved roads and disturbed areas shall not exceed a maximum of 20 m.p.h. Speed limit signs shall be posted. 5. Vehicle speed on haul roads and service roads shall be restricted to 20 miles per hour. Speed limit signs shall be posted. 6. Unpaved haul roads shall be watered as often as needed to control fugitive particulate emissions such that the above guidelines are met. 7. Reclamation works and sequential extraction of material shall be initiated to keep the total disturbed areas at any one time to a minimum. 8. Material stockpiles shall be watered as necessary to control fugitive particulate emissions. Aggregate materials shall be sprayed with water during material loading into the storage bins of stockpiles. 9. Plant entryway and truck service roads shall be graveled. Watering shall be implemented if emissions guidelines above are not met. woad File# RE: Other Case No. APPENDIX B WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS INFORMATION SHEET Weld County Public Works Department Date: 1111 H Street,P.O. Box 758, Greeley,CO 80632 Phone: (970)356-4000,Ext.3750 Fax: (970)304-6497 1. Applicant Name Select Materials/Robert Oman Phone (303) 637-0178 Address pc Box 7X0 City Fort I.nptnn State Co Zip R0621 2. Address or location of access 17269 WCR 12 Section 01 Township 01 Range 66 Subdivision NA Block Lot Weld County Road # 12 Side of Road North Distance from nearest intersection approx. 1/4 mile 3. Is there an existing access to the property? Yes X No #of accesses 1 historical access 4. Proposed Use: N Permanent kl Residential/Agricultural ❑ Industrial ❑ Temporary ❑ Subdivision ® Commercial ❑ Other SUP kkkk}kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk 5. Site Sketchy Legend for Access Description: S AG = Agricultural Hwy 52 4 4 %gm„ RES = Residential - ft O&G= Oil&Gas .t—O.R. - Ditch Road WC 36 -' FT e..access SITE 7 WCR 12 kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk;kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk OFFICE USE ONLY: Road ADT Date Accidents Date Road ADT Date Accidents Date Drainage Requirement Culvert Size Length Special Conditions kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk ❑ Installation authorized ❑ Information Insufficient °Theviewed By: Title: 8 r^ h. Todd Hodges Design, LLC December 27,2001 Mr. Chris Gathman,AICP Weld County Planning Department 1555 North 17"'Avenue Greeley Colorado 80631 RE: Select Materials/Robert Oman—Existing State permits and USR application Dear Mr. Gathman: This letter is in response to our discussions with you and Mr. Ogle concerning the existing mining and reclamation plan with the State of Colorado for the Select Materials site. I spoke with Allan Sorenson at the Division of Minerals&Geology and he stated that a Technical Review would be required to incorporate any changes to the site, associated with the mining permit. Upon approval of the USR, a technical review will be submitted to the Division of Minerals and Geology for their review. This process takes up to 30 days. A description of any proposed changes related to the site will be included in this review. The applicant requests that the Planning Commission hearing date be set and the Use by Special Review application be reviewed and approved prior to requiring the submittal of a technical review packet to the Division of Minerals and Geology for their review. If you have any questions, I may be reached at 581-8985. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. S.i7e7,17 ?U-C_ Sheble McConnellogue Todd Hodges Design,LLC Cc: Todd Hodges,Robert Oman Pc: project file r 2412 Denby Court • Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 • (970) 207-0272 • fax: (561)828-8059 email: toddhodgesdesign@earthlink.net - t Todd Hodges Design, LLC November 27, 2001 Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation, Inc. 80 S 27th Ave Brighton, CO 80601 RE: Select Materials USR SE 'A SW ''A 01-01-66 To Whom It May Concern: I sent a letter to you dated November 20, 2001 for Select Materials. In the letter I indicated the existing Special Use Permit was SUP-260 but in fact the existing permit is SUP-460. If you have any concerns or input, please call me at(970)207-0272. Ihanext,cysar&ii Todd Hodges U Todd Hodges Design,LLC 2412 Denby Court • Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 • (970) 207-0272 •fax:(561)828-8059 email: toddhodgesdesigncejearthlink.net . Toad Hodges Design, LLC November 20, 2001 Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation,Inc. 80 S 27th Ave Brighton, CO 80601 To Whom It May Concern: I represent Robert Oman with Select Materials. We are in the process of applying for a Use by Special Review with the Weld County Department of Planning Services for a permit to manufacture soil products. This site is located at the SE 'A, SW ''A Section 1, Township 1 North, Range 66 West. Robert Oman presently has an existing permit to mine sand from this site. The existing SUP-260 development standard number two protects the ditch on this property and it states: No excavation or processing of minerals shall be permitted nearer than 10 feet to the boundary of adjacent property, easement or irrigation ditch or right-of- way, nor nearer than 125 feet to any existing residence, unless by written_agreement to the owner or owners of such adjacent property consent to a lesser distance and the Planning Commission approves such lesser distance. The additional permit to manufacture soil projects should not impact the existing ditch. If you have any questions or comments,please call me at (970) 207-0272. Thank y Todd Hodges, L Todd Hodges Design,LLC Cc: Robert Oman, property owner r'^ 2412 !)enter Court • Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 • (970) 207-0272 • fa :(561)828-8059 email: dxWhodgesdesign(a earNdink.net Report Date: 11/15/2001 01:45PM WELD COUNTY TREASURER Page: 1 STATEMENT OF TAXES DUE SCHEDULE NO: R6091486 /'-' ASSESSED TO: OMAN ROBERT D P O BOX 280 FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 15028-A SE4SW4 1 1 66 EXC UPRR RES (1SHT) PARCEL: 147101000035 SITUS ADD: TAX YEAR CHARGE TAX AMOUNT INTEREST FEES PAID TOTAL DUE 2000 TAX 28.72 0.00 0.00 28.72 0.00 TOTAL TAXES 0.00 GRAND TOTAL DUE GOOD THROUGH 11/15/2001 0.00 ORIGINAL TAX BILLING FOR 2000 TAX DISTRICT 0820- Authority Mill Levy Amount Values Actual Assessed WELD COUNTY 22.038 8.82 AGRICULTURAL L 1,393 400 SCHOOL DIST RE8 34.001 13.59 CCW WATER 1.117 0.45 TOTAL 1,393 400 FORT LUPTON FIRE 5.045 2.02 AIMS JUNIOR COL 6.351 2.54 WELD LIBRARY 3.249 1.30 71.801 28.72 - TAXES FOR 2000 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY AND MOBILE HOMES-AUGUST 1, REAL PROPERTY-AUGUST 1. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIERS CHECK. P.O. Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 (970)353-3845 ext.3290 WELD COUNTY TREASURER Pursuant to the Weld County Subdiv,uion Ordinance, the attached Statement(s) of Taxes Due, issued by the Weld County Treasurer, are evidence that, as of this date, all property taxes, special assessments and prior taxes liens currently due and payable connected with the parcel(s) identified therein have been paid in full. Signed cJ e Date4/140 �5/ .9'OI High Plains Engineering 735 Denver Avenue • Fort Lupton CO 80621 Phone 303-857-9280 • Fax 303-857-9238 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AND FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Prepared For. Select Materials P.O. Box 280 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Job Site Located At: 17269 WCR 12 Fort Lupton, Co Weld County November 8, 2000 JOB # 00-0535 O Rse, • s 12330 : ; Cecil R. Crowe, PE any`. §42330 Pas 4 PURPOSE: This report reflects a soil and foundation investigation from soil borings to determine the subsurface soil identification, and to determine the physical characteristics of the soil for a suitable foundation design. The foundation is to support a single-family home. LOCATION AND SITE CONDITIONS: This report represents the results of the data obtained during the subsoil investigation for the proposed steel building at 17269 WCR 12, Fort Lupton, CO. The site is presently a vacant lot. The site is reasonably level with slopes of 0.5% to the South. The lot appears to be well drained with no erosion evident. SUBSOIL CONDITIONS: Two, four inch diameter holes were drilled to a depth of fifteen feet at the building site on October 23, 2000, as shown on the attached site map. Samples of the soil were taken at two-foot intervals. These samples were analyzed in the field and laboratory to determine the characteristics of the soil for identification and foundation design. In general, the soil profiles in test holes #1 & #2 indicate Sandy Silt (SM) material to a depth of 9 feet, then Sandy Clay (SC) to a depth of 12 feet. Clay with Medium Plasticity (CL) exists from 12 feet to 15 feet. The Standard Penetration Test similar to ASTM D1586 showed 7 blows for 12-inch penetration, at a depth of 4 feet and 8 blows for a 12-inch penetration at a depth of 9 feet. The shrink/swell test indicated a shrink of 1.9% at a depth of 4 feet, and 1.6% shrink potential at a depth of 9 feet. The soils in this report were classified using the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) procedures. All loose and disturbed soil shall be removed before placing of the concrete for the foundation. The bottom of the foundation shall be a minimum of three feet below final grade for frost protection and below any organic material. r 'FOUNDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: The Sandy Silt (SM) material has a bearing strength of 1000 psf and an equivalent liquid pressure of 55 psf. We recommend the use of a spread footing reinforced to equalize soil pressures, due to the low shrink-swell potential of the analyzed soils. The following comments are additional recommendations for the foundation construction. SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION: 1. Where slabs-on-grade are chosen and the owners are willing to accept the risks associated with slab movement, the following recommendations should be followed: a.) Slabs should be constructed to be "free floating." The slabs should be isolated from all structural components and utilities which penetrate the slab. Isolation may be achieved with 1/2 inch isolation material or by sleeving. b.) Eliminate under slab plumbing where feasible. Where such plumbing is unavoidable, it should be pressure tested during construction to minimize leaks, which would result in wetting of the sub soils. c.) Place the slab directly on the undisturbed natural soils, or well compacted fill soil. Do not place a gravel layer under the concrete slab, unless specified by the foundation engineer. Slabs should be reinforced with wire mesh or fibermesh to help control crack separation. d.) To avoid settlement and distortion of exterior slabs due to improper compaction, we recommend that concrete slabs should be doweled to the foundation wall. The slab should be reinforced as necessary for the span involved. 2. Provide frequent scoring of the slabs to provide joints for controlled cracking of the slab. Control joints should placed to provide approximate slab areas of 150 square feet. The depth of sawed control joints should be 'A of the slab thickness. /01 taN A minimum void or clear space of 1'/ inches should be provided at or near the bottom of all non-bearing partitions. In finished room areas, all drywall and paneling should be stopped approximately 1'/z inches above the top of the slab. This will allow some space for upward movement of the slab before pressures are applied to the wall and upper levels of the structure. The builder should provide a 'A inch space at the bottom of all doorjambs to allow for limited movement of the floor slab. The owner is hereby notified that it is their responsibility to maintain these void spaces. 4. Proper drainage away from the foundation walls should be provided. A minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet out from the building is recommended. Roof downspouts and sill cocks should discharge into long concrete splash blocks (5 feet long) or into metal gutter extensions to deposit runoff water beyond the limits of the backfill soil near the foundation walls. The foundation and retaining walls should be well cured, damp proofed, and well braced prior to backfilling. 5. Steel reinforcement will be required in the footings and foundation wall. This will give the walls beam strength to span or bridge over any loose or soft pockets of soil not found in our exploratory holes or that may develop during construction. This should also help prevent any differential movement of the foundation system. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: In any soil investigation, it is necessary to assume that the subsurface soil conditions do not vary greatly from the conditions encountered in the field and laboratory testing. The accompanying design is presented using best professional judgment based on the limits of the extent of testing commissioned by the client. Our experience has been that at times, soil conditions do change and variations do occur. These may become first apparent at the time of excavation for the foundation system. If soils conditions are encountered which appear different from the test borings as presented in this report, it is recommended that this office be called to inspect the open excavation prior to placing the footings. This inspection is not part of the report. 1 3 BL0WC0UNTS TI12 - .7 4 SANDY SILT(SM) 5 6 r9"- 7 8 K0WC0UNTS 8/12 - 9 1 o SANDY CLAY (Sc) 11 12 13 CLAY WITH MEDIUM PLASTICITY (CL) ------ 14 15 SOIL PROFILE ,..� SOIL TESTING SUMMARY 10% rte. 8 % - - - - - 6 % - - - - - - z O Q 4 % - - - - -- - - 1- a J cnO 2 % ` - _ z O O 0 - ctj Wn'f L------""'1- z 2 �' AOOEO - w a w-4 % _ _ _ . a- -6 % - 8% - 10% -12% 100 500 1000 2000 3000 10000 LOAD (PSF) HOLE# DEPTH LL P.L P.I %SWELL %CONSOLIDATION REMARKS l 9 ' Nl'M-R.i snc — mot a /�if SANDY) s c-r 2 7 � /vow — 46% e % PSF 5nri )ccAY p HIGH PLAINS JOB NO.00-0535 ENGINEERING SWELL/CONSOUDATION TEST RESULTS FT 735 DEN VEC0 80s21 PROPERTY AT: 170269 WAR /a DATE: /I - $ •O'-' PHONE:303-857-9280 Fa A7— L. t Perot') ro � Cc DRAWN: FAX 303.857-9238 Waal COMtJTyl CHECKED: ? 5 #'. SELECT MATERIALS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY WELD COUNTY, COLORADO NOVEMBER 2001 Prepared for: Select Materials. P.O. Box 280 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. Ppn Rep. 2272 Glen Haven Drive Qa "` �¢ Loveland, CO 80538 6/1,./S %' Phone: 970-669-2061 w FAX: C970-669-5034 • ',;'fit, • �� EXHIBITGvAe + TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 1 II. Existing and Proposed Conditions 3 Proposed Uses 3 —' Site Access and Existing Roads 3 Existing Traffic 3 Existing Operation 3 III. Trip Generation 7 IV. Trip Distribution 8 V. Traffic Forecasts 10 Trip Assignment 10 Background Traffic 10 Total Traffic 10 VI. Transportation Impacts 14 Signal Warrants 14 Geometrics 14 Operation 14 — ^ IV. Recommendations 17 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Current Peak Hour Operation 6 2. Trip Generation 7 3. Short Range (2003) Background Peak Hour Operation 16 4. Short Range (2003) Total Peak Hour Operation 16 - LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Site Location 2 2. Site Plan 4 3. Recent Daily and Peak Hour Traffic 5 4. Trip Distribution 9 5. Site Generated Peak Hour Traffic 11 6. Short Range (2003) Background Daily and Peak Hour Traffic 12 7. Short Range (2003) Total Daily and Peak Hour Traffic 13 8. Short Range (2003) Geometry 15 — ^ APPENDIX _ A Recent Daily and Peak Hour Traffic B Current Peak Hour Operation/Level of Service Description C Short Range Background Traffic Operation D Short Range Total Traffic Operation I. INTRODUCTION This traffic impact analysis (TIS) for the Select Materials facility development addresses the capacity, geometric, and traffic control requirements related to the proposed development. The Select Materials site is located south of SH52, and east of WCR35 in Weld County, Colorado. The location of the Select Materials site is shown in Figure 1. This study conforms to a typical traffic impact study format. The study involved the collection of data, a review of previous developments and studies in the area, trip generation, trip distribution, trip assignment, and the operation analyses of the key intersections in the area. The operations analyses were performed for the existing conditions and the short range future (2003) . The scope of this study was discussed with the owner's representative (Robert Oman) , project planner (Todd Hodges Design) , Weld County Public Works (Drew Scheltinga) , and CDOT (Gloria Hice- Idler) . 1 Q O 0 N 85 - o O O q FORT LUPTON SH52 _ _ T WCR12 f O o Select Materials ' II LL a� a O z i I I I 1 I SCALE: 1"=4000' _ SITE LOCATION Figure 1 2 II. EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS Proposed Uses The land for this development is currently vacant. Figure 2 shows the site plan for Select Materials. The existing road system in the area of the proposed development consists of SH52, WCR35, and WCR12. Land uses near Select Materials are vacant, agricultural, and residential. Select Materials is proposed as a soil processing facility. As analyzed in this TIS, it will consist of an office, storage shed, residence for an employee, grazing of 10-15 head of cattle, and the manufacturing of soil products. A short range future year (2003) reflects full build-out of the development. Given the nature of the development, a long range (2020) analysis was not requested or performed. Site Access and Existing Roads The site plan shows access to the site via WCR12 to the east of WCR35. SH52 is categorized as an RA highway near to this site. The posted speed on SH52 in this area is 55 mph. WCR35 is a paved rural county road that primarily serves residential uses south of WCR12. WCR12 is a gravel rural county road serving residential uses to the west and this site plus one existing residence. Existing Traffic Current daily and peak hour traffic counts at the SH52/WCR35 intersection are shown in Figure 3. Daily and peak hour traffic data was collected in November 2001. Raw traffic counts are provided in Appendix A. Existing Operation _ Using the volumes shown in Figure 3, the peak hour operation at the SH52/WCR35 intersection is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix B. The intersection was analyzed using the unsignalized intersection techniques from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. As shown in Table 1, the SH52/WCR35 intersection is currently operating at acceptable levels of service. Acceptable operation is defined as level of service (LOS) D or better. A description of level of service for unsignalized and signalized intersections is also provided in Appendix B. 3 _ a N NO SCALE - SH52 CM cc 2°°6 44)f ate it.*)E, I — r l_-f I 1� ,01 �! IO . \c;.---'--. .-'' 1 _ w watRAMG my •19 • v ,- LSf!~ WCR12 a n R r boss ff u�a roe 3 lit Anal — W ips me=IA 12 2740 le 4 MIIVII •t I MT • was 4n m vi s . SITE PLAN Figure 2 4 N -�176/157 2326 /(---2/2 2301 109/162 — 3/9 n N N - N N I O 0 N Daily — -No AM/PM RECENT DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 5 TABLE 1 Current Peak Hour Operation �evei'of Service ; SH52/WCR35 NB LT/RT B B (stop sign) WB LT A A — 6 III. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation is important in considering the impact of a development on the existing and proposed street system. Trip Generation, 6th Edition, ITE is customarily used to forecast trips that would be generated by a given development. However, this type of use is not listed in that document. Therefore, the owner was interviewed in order to determine the expected daily traffic. Truck traffic and external customer traffic occurs randomly during a given day. In order to be conservative, it was assumed 20 percent of the daily traffic would occur during each peak hour of the road. This is reflected in Table 2. A trip is defined as a one way vehicle movement from origin to destination. TABLE 2 Trip Generation l r A111 I1$$atc Hour P OI iMaak F#*ur ?�,►'� Ito_ " Employees(one on-site,three off-site) Employees I 17 I 3 I 0 I 0 I 3 Trucks Dumps(20%in peak hours) 48 5 5 5 5 Tractor-Trailer 24 2 2 2 2 External Customers Dumps(All in peak hours) 4 1 1 1 1 Tractor-Trailer 2 0 0 1 1 Total 95 11 8 9 12 7 IV. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Trip distribution for Select Materials was based on existing/future travel patterns, land uses in the area, consideration of trip attractions/productions in the area, and techniques in the State Highway Access Code (1998) . The existing roadways in the area also play a role in developing the trip distribution. The trip distribution for the residential and commercial land uses are shown in Figure 4. This trip distribution is in accordance with the State Highway Access Code, 1998 . Given the trip generation, the trip distribution has very little impact on the operation of the subject intersection. B N 60% 40% - SH52 — u-) re re 0 _ TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 4 9 V. TRAFFIC FORECASTS Trip Assignment The trip assignment is how the generated and distributed trips are expected to be loaded on the roadway network. The site generated trip assignment is shown in Figure 5. Background Traffic Background traffic was determined for the short range future year and is shown in Figure 6. The background traffic was developed using the traffic counts shown in Figure 3. Counted traffic on WCR35 was not changed, since there were no known development proposals for land south of SR52. When/if development occurs, this should be analyzed in subsequent traffic impact studies. CDOT traffic forecasts were used to develop the background traffic. This source indicates that the 20 year factor is 1.4 or a 1.75 percent per year increase. This growth factor was discussed with CDOT. Total Traffic The site generated traffic was combined with the background traffic to determine the total forecasted traffic for the study area. Short range total peak hour traffic is illustrated in Figure 7. 10 N 4/4 - 7/6- ...Si re SH52 inNT 0 9/12 y-NOM — � WCR12 O _ z U + AM/PM SITE GENERATED - PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 5 11 - N _- -182/163 2410 2/2 2385 113/168 — sH52 - 3/9 N N O NCOr 1/2 ocher' NOM — ) + \ NOM —11 t WCR12 _ 2/0 NOM —�- NOMm z z — o O N O co r Daily AM/PM SHORT RANGE (2003) BACKGROUND Figure 6 - DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 12 N ' 182/163 6/6 2439 2413 113/168-► l SH52 10/15 C° N 1 (O N CO H N N o -En- o 10/14 I " NOM J j NOM 105 2/0 1 t WCR12 NOM -- e. NOM m z up z 81 0 a co r Daily cc AM/PM SHORT RANGE (2003) TOTAL Figure 7 - DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 13 VI. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS Signal warrant, geometric, and operational analyses of the key intersections were conducted using the short range traffic forecasts shown in Figures 6 and 7. Signal Warrants Using the short range (2003) total peak hour traffic forecasts, it is expected that traffic signals will not be warranted at the SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections. Geometrics The geometry at the key intersections was evaluated using the State Highway Access Code (1998) as the reference document. Currently, no auxiliary lanes at the SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections exist. According to the State Highway Access Code, no auxiliary lanes will be required at the key intersections. Short range geometry is shown in Figure 8. The vehicle types are listed in the trip generation table (Table 2) . It is expected that on an average weekday there would be 17 passenger car/pick-up truck trip ends, 52 single-unit dump truck trip ends, and 26 tractor-trailer truck trip ends. Based upon observation during traffic — counting, the radii at the SH52/WCR35 intersection are adequate to accommodate a combination (tractor-trailer) vehicle type. Likewise, at the WCR35/WCR12 intersection, there is an adequate radius on the east leg to accommodate a combination vehicle type. WCR12 is a gravel road. As indicated on Figure 7, the daily traffic on the east leg is projected to be 105 vehicles. This is substantially below the paving threshold of 200 vehicles per day. Therefore, paving of the east leg of WCR12 will not be required. Operation Table 3 shows the short range background morning and afternoon peak hour operation at the SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections. Calculation forms for these analyses are provided in Appendix C. The SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections operate at acceptable levels of service for both the morning and afternoon peak hours. Table 4 shows the short range total peak hour operation at the SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix D. The SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections will operate acceptably. 14 N SH52 _ WCR12 (41.- �-- - Denotes Lane U SHORT RANGE (2003) GEOMETRY Figure 8 15 - TABLE 3 Short Range (2003) Background Peak Hour Operation Lewrel4f Service Intersection 'Rov'RoyalismAM PM SH52/WCR35 NB LT/RT B B (stop sign) WB LT A A EB LT/T/RT A A WCR35/WCR12 WB LT/T/RT A A (stop sign) NB LT A A SB LT A A TABLE 4 Short Range(2003)Total Peak Hour Operation SH52/WCR35 NB LT/RT B B (stop sign) WB LT A A EB LT/T/RT A A WCR35/WCR12 WB LT/T/RT A A (stop sign) NB LT A A SB LT A A 16 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS This study assessed the transportation impacts associated with Select Materials facility development, located south of SH52, east of WCR35 in Weld County, Colorado. At full development, Select Materials is expected to generate 95 trip ends on an average weekday, 19 morning peak hour trip ends, and 21 afternoon peak hour trip ends. The potential impacts of the proposed project were evaluated at the SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections. Currently, the SH52/WCR35 intersection operates acceptably with the existing control and geometry. In the short range total future, it is expected that signals will not be warranted at the SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections using the peak hour signal warrant. In the short range future with background traffic, the SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections will operate acceptably with the existing traffic control. In the short range future with development of Select Materials, the SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections will operate acceptably with stop sign control. The geometric recommendations are shown in Figure 8, for the short range future. Auxiliary lanes will not be required at the key intersections. The intersection radii at the SH52/WCR35 and WCR35/WCR12 intersections are adequate to accommodate the design vehicle. Based upon the traffic forecasts, it will not be necessary to pave the east leg of WCR12 . — 17 _ APPENDIX A • -ac e_ Runt. Counts,2.G 4 •.,s Fort Cocoon .621 star -e: 10, ,2501,' Other Phone (303) 641-0445 Fax (303) 559-9191 File I.D. 4;CR355G:152 L211-21B LN2-0014 Pace : 1 B_4 Mon. 1 Combined Toes. _�binad Tirn - J/23 f • e * 6 4 0 16 12:30 *• 1 l i • 5 i * 6 2 4 9 - - 3 ' 4 3 • r 0 _ r - 1 - :p _ a ( - I * 8 1 14 0 01:30 r r 0 I * 4 f,1:55 - 4 11 0 1 I0 51:00 * 1 I r _ Ir 6 S J 9 - 02: • 10 r 4 4 I 4 14 0 0 5 0 1 - 6 +- 0 2 i0 _ - 02:45 * 4 * 1 r * 5 0 r 1 3 I 1 3 03:00 - 6 I - 10 0 _ 02:15 * 9 I * 4 1 r 13 1 16 03:30 - 2 1 - 3 * 0 ? r 0 3 ! 0 6 03:45 ' 2 4 6 0 6 I 0 8 9 04:00 ' 1 4 I :1 0 9 1 0 11 04:15 * 8 1 * 5 ! ' 13 2 I 3 4 24:35 * - * - 1n - i 1 4 i 11 05:00 4 * - a 11 3 2 4 I 3 5 05:15 • 3 I ' 5 I ` 8 I 6 1 8 05:30 a 1 ' 6 2 4 1 f 7 1 ; 6 05:45 * 1 I * 3 I . 4 6 I 1 I 17 06:00 1 I * i * a 4 1. 1 I 1 06:15 * 2 I r 4 1 * 6 4 1 I 4 1 4 06:30 ' 1 I * 2 1 - 3 5 I 1 06:45 * 2 1 * 4 : * 1 3 I I 4 6 07:00 * 11 2 1 4 4 5 0 1 3 1 I ' 07:15 3 1 ' 4 I * 3 1 1 1 0 1 4 1 07:30 - 1 1 * 0 * 1 i 2 4 5 02:45 * 1 1 ' 1 4 2 3 0 I Cr 0 I 3 0 06:00 * 2 I 0 2 3 0 1 1 5 1 08:15 * 0 I 1 * 1 0 0 I 6 0 1 8 0 08:30 - 0 I 0 - 0 s ? 5 1 IL '. 08:45 * 0 ! 4 3 r 3 0 1 i 0 1 1 09:00 * 0 * * 2 0 1 i 6 7 1 00:15 * 0 1 * 1 I 1 1 1 I 0 2 1 1 3 05:30 • 0 I - 0 I * 0 3 0 1 i 1 6 1 09:45 * 1 I " l I ` 2 7 0 I 2 3 1 9 3 �� 10:00 ` 0 1' ' 0 ] 3 10:15 • 1I 1 I 2 2 Cl 2 0 I 4 0 10:30 * Cl 0 1 * 0 3 1 ! 10:45 * : I 01 I ' 1 Cl 1 1 1 11:00 * I ' 0 I * 0 7 1 I 4 0 I 13 1 1]:15 I 0 I * 0 3 0 1 4 0 1 7 0 11:30 ' I 4 0 1 r 0 5 0 I 0 0 f 0 0 11:45 I * 0 1 * 0 6 0 I 5 0 ! 11 0 Totals 0 021 0 139 0 259 109 98 55 118 164 216 Day Totals 460 139 259 207 173 380 k Total .OP. 46.3% .0% 53.6% 28.6% 25.7% i4.A8 31.0% r . Peaks 01:30 12:30 01:00 11:00 12:00 08:15 03:15 11:00 03:15 Volume 26 26 46 21 23 34 41 P.H.F. .65 .65 .71 .75 .52 .62 .43 ., .64 :9ea_i.er Rocky I lc 434.ain C9*:-..s, 447. 119E Cherry Cot., Other Choi_ (303) 641-04 " tai 357-9191 Filo 1._. ..'0 1 1t 1402-60 q..Ned. 12:00 . _ _ 12:30 �. . , . , ._ ( 4 . . , * _ . - 0 - _ _ - . 0 c - 4 4I . 32:30 0 0 - - - 02:45 - • 00:360 0 - 0 _ _ 03:19 00 - 4 4 3:30 0 - 0 4 * ' i . :45 0 0 * - • 4I « 0 4i . . - 04:30 0 0 ! 0 - . 04:45 3 * 0 * * ' I * 1 * 05:00 :: 1 * - I . 05:15 0 1 0 * 4 I * 4 05:3n * 1 05: 2 0 2 • 4 * * 00:00 8 * 0 a - 4 - . * . 06:15 0 ' 5 * 4 . 4 00 * 0 - - .* 4 _ 03:45 .. 45 2 - 0 4 4 4 . - 07:00 .4 1 - . 4 4 * _ - 03:15 5 * * - 4 4 * 2 07:30 * 5 . 7* 9 4 4 i 4 * 1 4 07:45 3 4 -i « _ : * 4 . 03:rn 2 * * *- 1 7 * _ . I 08:15 7 4 14 * * 1 * 6 08:3_0 3 . 2 4 . * 4 * 4 * 05:45 1 I7 * 1 8 * * I ' 09:00 * 1 4 i 6 * • ' * * * 09:15 1 1 3 * * 4 4 * 09:30 1 0 * I 4 * 4 * 09:15 3 11 * * * I • r., l0: 4 , 0 * * I * * 10:15 4 I 4 4I 8 * _ « 10:30 0 * 5 6 4 1 11 - * - i * k - 10:45 12 6 * 1e 4 4 1 4 4 ' * 11:00 1 ' I 0 * 16 * * I * . ' 11:i5 - i 10 . * * * 4 - 11: 90 4 4 1 3 * ] * 6 4 11:45 3 k I 7 10 T. [n; 1-L15 0 87 0 10 0.______ _—__. 0 .__ Day Totals 116 67 203 0 0 0 % Total 57.1% .0% 42.8% .0% 6 4 * * Peaks 10:30 10:30 10:30 :'olmne 30 25 55 0-P.e. .62 .ie .76 Rocky Mountain Counts, _lCherry - "04 — - - F , `6621 - Exher Phone 130') 641-0445 Fax (303) 857-9191 File 1.0. : S852WW47R3E. _Street name :SH 52 WEST OF PLR dS 6i-V19 1.82- E9 2a9—.e — Beg - Mon. Combined Tues. 1 2 C6x483r,ed TinA 1082- A.M. ?.?'. P..M. 3 F-F!. n m 23 .. :• •?. 7 . 0/ 77_:00 — 34 37 ? 1 33 ; c !: I i E4 .. - - - 42 6 30 12:30 ' 30 I 62 a 49 38 1 t 8: * 19 4 3` 3 * 6l 3 38 64 _ * - '0 - 32 66 — '6. U1:13 37 ! ! - 64 1 27 * 4'0 __ 40 I 3 45 - 55 40 1 32 1 - -r; 02:30 - 41 I 34 75 30 02:45 47 I ' 30 I * 97 32 1 10 — 03:08 ' - - 39 . 0 39 4 04 03:16 * 4 9`, 4 54 39 . 5 93 03:30 * 63 ' 57 I - 125 4 65 3 I 7 106 03:15 * 35 i 43 - 78 3' 01:00 - 42 I * 40 1 ' 82 2 49 I 4:i 1 97 04::5 - 43 : * 47 90 7 41 i 6 51 13 96 • 04:30 - 1 ' 37 I ' 8 4 45 ! 77 100 6 93 `_5 04:45 * 43 I * 41 I * 84 2 64 I 9 36 I li 100 -.:00 ' 38 I ' 61 1 ' 99 6 46 65 I 12 111 05:15 ' 38 I 52 I ' 90 42 I 8 46 I 20 03 05:30 I - 49 I * 36 30 44 I 15 I 44 95 ern00:45 * 46 I 39 I ' 85 26 26 I 13 39 I 33 65 06:00 ' 36 I 31 I 67 30 42 I 27 1 I 57 833 06:15 ' 34 I * 26 I * 60 41 26 I 23 35 I 61 61 06:30 ' 17 I ' 39 : * 55 47 12 I 45 28 I 92 40 06:45 ' 32 I 26 I 38 44 24 I 41 26 I 88 50 07:00 ' 19 I 25 I 44 31 21. I 40 32 I 7l 53 — 07:15 ' 10 I ' 11 I 21 38 19 ! 49 29 I 87 43 07:30 13 ! 20 I 33 62 10 I 34 20 30 07:45 ' 10 I 17 I 61 12 I 48 14 i 109 08:00 9 I * 15 I ?4 11 : 32 10 74 26 1 00:50 ' 9 I ' 13 I 17 36 7 49 18 95 25 06:30 ' 9 v I - 22 55 16 41 9 96 .. 2.. 08:45 ' 7 I * 21 ) 28 3 38 13 41 11 7') 24 09:00 ' 14 * 23 35 13 3R 7 20 09:15 * 8 I ' 6 I ' 14 26 11 32 8 5{I 19 09:30 ' 14 I * 16 ! 4 30 37 31 34 13 I 31 44 09:45 * 5 I * 12 I ' 17 25 9 40 19 27 7' — .rn,10:15 * * 7 I ' 16 4 39 4_ I 36 17 I 66 22 10:15 ' 5 I ' 4 I ' 9 32 4 I 34 7 I 66 11 10:30 ' 11 ' 7 I * 18 16 3 I 34 4 I 60 7 10:45 ' 9 * 4 I ' 13 37 6 I 35 3 I 72 11:00 - 7 * 4 ' 9 26 4 I 39 1 I 55 11:30 * 4 * 2 I6 5 0 I 34 I 6 — 11:30 ' 4 ' 2 1 6 41 4S n l 30 I 1 I 71 1 11:45 * 9 2 I * 11 43 1 I 40 83 3 0 1248 0 1321 Totals1040 13 b .69 1307 993 1327 2041 2634 Day Totals 1248 1321 2569 2355 2320 4675 Total .0% 40.5% .0% 51.4% 22.46 27.9E 21.2% 28.3% ▪ Peaks 02:45 04:45 02:95 07:15 04:00 06:30 03:45 07:15 04:15 Velmre 209 203 404 203 213 178 203 366 407 P.N.F. .76 .83 .00 .81 .83 .90 .86 .0:1 .91 — _. , — 3na_a £ 062 10, 2/2.7 Other Phone (303) 641-0445 Fax (303) 559-9191 File 1.0. . S552P1Ci435 Street name SH 52 1€ST OF ACR 25 N1-WE1 1242= 68 Falco Peaks 2Wed. 2 124 Combined r. Com bined ed _ 12:00 -.. 2 1 _ a a a r 12.30 0 * I 0 a * + , I . 0 3 - + 01 , * ' 1 * a :00 _ * - ' 02 0 3 + _ * I * 02;30 0 _ * 7 i . a . , 02:45 3 0 I 3 - * * 1 + 1 * * am 03:05 1 - - I * _ * _ 03:15 1 • 1 * * 'a I - I • 03:30 0 • ! - * _ 03:45 6 1 I 7 * * * . * * 04:00 3 2 5 *' ' 04:15 3 * ' * — am 04 _0 11 4 * I 14 2 , + ' • 1 « 04:45 4 * I 8 , * + 1 a * 05:00 * 1 9 . I 13 — 9 ° 4k ' :15 11 i 6 I 17 « * . + * 05:30 23 i4 37 - ,. . « mm 05:45 23 ' I 13 9 ! 36 * . I a a a . 06:00 35 £6 I 6i 4 * I a « 06:15 23 I 32 4 l 55 * I * ' * * 06:30 46 41 . 1 87 - « - . a * 06:45 47 * I 38 85 ' * * * 07:00 40 39 * I 85 * • I • 4 ' • 07:15 21 34 * * ' * + I 4 * 07:50 79 51 i 130 ' 4 • 1 ' 07:45 49 * I 53 I 102 ' * * 1 * ' 08:00 37 - I 40 * I 8S , * . 08:15 31 * I 57 * I 82 * * * ' 1 + 08:30 37 21 7 58 * 4 * * I ' mm 08:45 37 * I 34 71 * + * + 1 09:00 48 ` I 37 ' 85 * * * * I + * 09:15 65 ' 1 23 * 88 * + a 1 * + n9:30 32 4 31 ' 63 - . 4 1 * _ 09:45 35 a I 39 • 74 * * « • ` I * * — „ea.. 70:00 35 ' ' 42 * 77 - ' * * - 10:15 36 ' I 23 ' 64 * * ` • I * • 10:30 32 * I 34 a 66 , . k * ' a 10:45 45 46 91 * * * i 11:00 20 * I 26 a I 54 ' a * I • * 1 . * 11:15 35 ' 1 40 * I 75 * * * I + * I ' ▪ 11:30 34 25 1 59 * + ' I * 1 4 11:45 27 * I 44 * I 71 a _—....- _. * _.I *__._ I * Totals 1048 0 960 0 2008 0 0 0 0 0 0 n Day Totals 1048 960 2000 0 0 0 4 Total 52.1% .0% 47.8% .0% * * ' * am Peaks 07:30 07:30 07:30 Volume 196 209 405 P.H.F. .62 .91 .77 et a Fo Q CD 1� OOD A m co ti c- COD 2 n C 3 .i1. a-- 01 CO O O! In OQ� t� N N N of !"� M F a CO in CO 0- ICI •V' N A N. A CD 0- CO m N FJ- Ypf t'7 O M OfCO CO 0 R IR z z 4, X co •IF co O n x y — v K o b C ars a CO LO CO CND m CO CO R M m A A A A m Ir' J r 0 0 r .o r N r O O r r 0 N Z . 7 .m= 0 40 pp {� U 1:1V n ~ n N ea rt. aO+ M h V M W w m s y - LIJ V_ l d> co 0 T d O 2 ? O O N O trJ {7 CO O N CO .-- OP .T W m / m V e W M N N m ca an S. A C�'J VO' m 4 0,3 cm cm — I^ W> V 10 MI w J 0 --4O O —lx Z � CO _ — Lai ��a/� J W m y, J 4-N O a C O a n n M N — N V' CD e- C4I O N N .- t� N 2 o O L a- C7 O Q A 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C a b a b b a a CO 7 ~ r I- al W iii ce b O C7 0 C L— CO p b = 4.mr r a J co O n n CO O O �"I N r N f W 0 e- {4!. O N N o- A CL' H o 0 U _ 3 'p ix O r r O r N N O N O O O O N C J 2 w O O O 7- J co N r r r CO N r r 0 04 N r n ^ ..a t E a O o M -•-• .co it m c in g n g n g yp is. n 0 n a n c3 vj LL rn E '� M v o e+i r an v CO r 0 Z '= co a 1"- m A A A w O W - D- a! O of 6 iA iA M d 11 n n m g 4 _ .� APPENDIX B w .-. 11CS2000: Unsigna ed Intersections Release 4 .1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael P-"oncy/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. e Performed: 11/28/01 _Analysis Time Period: gem pm Intersection: 52/WCR35 Jurisdiction: Weld County Units: U. S. Customary —Analysis Year: CD short bkgrd total Project ID: 0192 East/West Street: SH52 North/South Street: WCR35 --Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 109 3 2 176 --Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 121 3 2 195 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- _Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT _Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 — L T R I L T R volume 7 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 —Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage — Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 - Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service --Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR I -v (vph) 2 9 C(m) (vph) 1463 716 v/c 0.00 0.01 __ 95% queue length 0.00 0.04 Control Delay 7.5 10.1 LOS A B Approach Delay 10.1 _Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich —Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsigna ed Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael A.aency/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. e Performed: 11/28/01 _Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: SH WCR35 Jurisdiction: Weld County Units: U. S. Customary —Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd total Project ID: 0192 East/West Street: SH52 North/South Street: WCR35 —Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound — Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 162 9 2 157 --Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 180 10 2 174 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided --RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R \, ume 5 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 _Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage ._Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 —Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service —Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 LR I —v (vph) 2 7 C(m) (vph) 1384 686 v/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 Control Delay 7.6 10.3 LOS A B Approach Delay 10.3 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich —Matthew J. Delich, P.E. UN SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level-of-Service Average Total Delay _ sec/vch A < 10 - — — - > 10and < 15 C > 15 and<25 D >25 and<35 35 E >35 and<<50 — F >50 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level-of-Service Average Total Delay sec/veh — B > 10 and <20 — C >20and<35 D > 35and<55 E >55 and<80 l > 80 APPENDIX C - HCS2000: Unsigna'ed Intersections Release 4.1a '� TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael &acncy/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. .e Performed: 11/28/01 __ Analysis Time Period: a pm Intersection: 52/WCR35 Jurisdiction: Weld County Units: U. S. Customary _Analysis Year: recent 41114:11, total Project ID: 0192 East/West Street: SH52 North/South Street: WCR35 —- Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound — Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 113 3 2 182 -- Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 125 3 2 202 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided - RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R . _sume 7 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 _ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage _. Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 —Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service —Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 LR I —v (vph) 2 9 C(m) (vph) 1458 707 v/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.04 - Control Delay 7.5 10.2 LOS A B Approach Delay 10.2 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich _Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: UnsignagThed Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael a+cency/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. :e Performed: 11/28 01 —. Analysis Time Period: a p Intersection: SH5 /WCR35 Jurisdiction: Weld County Units: U. S. Customary — Analysis Year: recent short .kgrd total Project ID: 0192 East/West Street: SH52 North/South Street: WCR35 — Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 168 9 2 163 - Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 186 10 2 181 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- Median Type Undivided - RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT _ Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R ) L T R ..,lume 5 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 —. Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage —. Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 -- Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service "' Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR I - v (vph) 2 7 C(m) (vph) 1377 675 v/c 0.00 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.03 Control Delay 7.6 10.4 LOS A B Approach Delay 10.4 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich - Matthew J. Delich, P.E. - HCS2000: Unsigna'r'ed Intersections Release 4.1a " TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Aaency/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. e Performed: 11/28/01 __Analysis Time Period: am pm Intersection: CR35/WCR12 Jurisdiction: Weld County Units: U. S. Customary • Analysis Year: recent short, bkgrd total Project ID: 0192 East/West Street: WCR12 North/South Street: WCR35 —Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound — Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 2 1 1 1 1 1 —Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 1 1 1 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided —RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R b__ume 1 6 1 2 3 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 _Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 6 1 2 3 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage _Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service —Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR --v (vph) 2 1 8 5 :(m) (vph) 1620 1620 918 925 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.02 `'ontrol Delay 7.2 7.2 9.0 8.9 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.0 8.9 Approach LOS A A - HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsigna ed Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Po....cncy/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. e Performed: 11/28/01 —Analysis Time Period: am) Intersection: WCR 5/WCR12 Jurisdiction: Weld County Units: U. S. Customary —Analysis Year: recent short#bkgr• total Project ID: 0192 East/West Street: WCR12 North/South Street: WCR35 — Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound — Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 0 1 1 1 1 2 _ Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 1 1 1 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided _ RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR __ Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 - „� L T R I L T R Volume 1 5 1 1 8 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 — Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 5 1 1 8 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (8) 0 0 Median Storage — Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 -- Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service —" Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 0 1 7 11 C(m) (vph) 1619 1620 926 928 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 _ 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 Control Delay 7.2 7.2 8.9 8.9 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 8.9 8.9 —. Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich — Matthew J. Delich, P.E. APPENDIX D - HC52000: Unsigna. ed Intersections Release 4.1a �, TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael A+ency/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. e Performed: 1/28/01 Analysis Time Period:`am pm Intersection: 52/WCR35 Jurisdiction: Weld County Units: U. S. Customary _Analysis Year: recent (hor)bkgrd Project ID: 0192 East/West Street: SH52 North/South Street: WCR35 —Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound — Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 113 10 6 182 --Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 125 11 6 202 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided --RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 11„wume 12 6 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 ...Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage _Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 —Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service —Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR I —v (vph) 6 19 C(m) (vph) 1448 716 v/c 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.08 _ Control Delay 7.5 10.2 LOS A B Approach Delay 10.2 _Approach LOS B HC52000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich _Matthew J. Delich, P.E. - HCS2000: Unsignal'ed Intersections Release 4 .1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael Amency/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. e Performed: 11/2 /01 • Analysis Time Period: am) Intersection: SH52/WCR35 Jurisdiction: Weld County Units: U. S. Customary —Analysis Year: recent short bkgrd(cota) Project ID: 0192 East/West Street: SH52 North/South Street: WCR35 —Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound — Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 168 15 6 163 --Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 186 16 6 161 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided .—RT Channelized? Lanes 1 0 0 1 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 1,..sume 12 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 _Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage _Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 —Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service —Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I LR I ""v (vph) 6 20 C(m) (vph) 1370 679 v/c 0.00 0.03 95% queue length 0.01 0.09 • Control Delay 7.6 10.5 LOS A B Approach Delay 10.5 Approach LOS B HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich .Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsigna�-ed Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael A..ency/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. e Performed: 11/28/01 _Analysis Time Period: Cpm Intersection: R35/WCR12 Jurisdiction: Weld County Units: U. S. Customary _Analysis Year: recent shor bkgr. total Project ID: 0192 East/West Street: WCR12 North/South Street: WCR35 —Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound — Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 2 1 1 1 1 10 --Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 1 1 1 1 11 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided --RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 1v ume 1 6 1 13 3 0 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 _Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 6 1 14 3 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage _Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 —Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service —Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR —v (vph) 2 1 8 17 C(m) (vph) 1607 1620 908 968 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.05 'Control Delay 7.2 7.2 9.0 8.8 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.0 8.8 _Approach LOS A A HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich _Matthew J. Delich, P.E. HCS2000: Unsigni- zed Intersections Release 4.1a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: Michael JI-•ency/Co. : Matthew J. Delich, P.E. .e Performed: 11/2:/01 —. Analysis Time Period: a pm Intersection: WCR /WCR12 Jurisdiction: Weld County Units: U. S. Customary - - Analysis Year: recent shor bkgrd total Project ID: 0192 East/West Street: WCR12 North/South Street: WCR35 — Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs) : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound — Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 0 1 1 1 1 14 — Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 1 1 1 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Median Type Undivided _ RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR — Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 .., L T R I L T R volume 1 5 1 11 8 2 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 v.- Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1 5 1 12 8 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 2 2 2 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage — Flared Approach: Exists? No No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 "' Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service -- Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 17 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LTR LTR I LTR I LTR v (vph) 0 1 7 22 C(m) (vph) 1602 1620 913 957 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 — 95% queue length 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.07 Control Delay 7.2 7.2 9.0 8.9 LOS A A A A Approach Delay 9.0 8.9 __ Approach LOS A A - HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1a Matthew J. Delich — Matthew J. Delich, P.E. Hello